WISC-V-Tech-Manual-Supplement.pdf

Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement: Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures and Additional Tables

PsychCorp is an imprint of Pearson Clinical Assessment. Pearson Executive Office 5601 Green Valley Drive Bloomington, MN 55437 800.627.7271 www.PearsonClinical.com Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Portions of this work were previously published. Warning: No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Pearson, the PSI logo, PsychCorp, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and WISC are trademarks, in the U.S. and/or other countries, of Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). Printed in the United States of America. Product Number: 0150015089

Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement: Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures and Additional Tables

David Wechsler WISC–V Research Directors Susan Engi Raiford, PhD James A. Holdnack, PhD

Contents

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Brief Descriptions of Other Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Vineland–II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 WIAT–III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Brown ADD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Results of Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Intellectual Disability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Correlations With the Vineland–II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Written Expression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Correlations With the WIAT–III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Correlations With the WIAT–III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Correlations With the Brown ADD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Disruptive Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Traumatic Brain Injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Autism Spectrum Disorder With Accompanying Language Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Accompanying Language Impairment . . . . . . . . . 33 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Appendix F. WISC–V Stability Coefficients, by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Appendix G. Intercorrelations of WISC–V Scores, by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Appendix H. Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3 and WIAT–III, by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 iii WISC–5 Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

List of Tables Table 1

Demographic Data for the Validity Studies With Other Measures in Special Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Table 2

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Table 3

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Table 4

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Table 5

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Table 6

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Table 7

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group . . . . . . . . . . 16

Table 8

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Table 9

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group . . . . . . . 18

Table 10

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Brown ADD for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Table 11

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the Brown ADD for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group . . . . . . . . 21

Table 12

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Disruptive Behavior Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Table 13

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Disruptive Behavior Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Table 14

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Traumatic Brain Injury Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

Table 15

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Traumatic Brain Injury Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

Table 16

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group . . . . . . . 27

Table 17

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group . . . . . . . 30

Table 18

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group . . . . . . . . . . 34

Table 19

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group . . . . . 37

Table F.1

Stability Coefficients of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores, by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

Table F.2

Stability Coefficients of Complementary Subtest and Composite Scores, by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

iv WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table G.1 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 6 . . . . . . . . 49 Table G.2 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Table G.3 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 7 . . . . . . . . 51 Table G.4 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Table G.5 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 8 . . . . . . . . 53 Table G.6 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Table G.7 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 9 . . . . . . . . 55 Table G.8 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Table G.9 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 10 . . . . . . . 57 Table G.10 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Table G.11 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 11 . . . . . . . 59 Table G.12 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Table G.13 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 12 . . . . . . . 61 Table G.14 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Table G.15 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 13 . . . . . . . 63 Table G.16 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 Table G.17 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 14 . . . . . . . 65 Table G.18 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Table G.19 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 15 . . . . . . . 67 Table G.20 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Table G.21 Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 16 . . . . . . . 69 Table G.22 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Table H.1 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3, by Age Group . . . . . . . . 72 Table H.2 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the KTEA–3, by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Table H.3 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III, by Age Group . . . . . . . 78 Table H.4 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III, by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

v WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Introduction The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC–V) is often used with other clinical instruments in evaluations of children with various clinical diagnoses. In the early stages of WISC–V development, practitioners were asked to identify special groups of children they frequently tested with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC–IV; Wechsler, 2003) and other measures they frequently used in conjunction with the WISC–IV. Based on this feedback, a number of the special group samples were administered additional measures in addition to the WISC–V during the scale’s standardization. This supplementary document provides the results of the special group studies with other measures that were collected as part of the WISC–V standardization but not reported in the WISC–V Technical and Interpretative Manual (Tech Manual). Results from these studies provide practitioners additional information about the construct and ecological validity of the WISC–V subtest, process, and composite scores. The Tech Manual provides information on the relation between intellectual and cognitive abilities as measured by the WISC–V with other tests in typically developing children. This information illustrates the cognitive skills associated with developing academic skills, psychosocial development, and behavioral regulation. However, the studies in the Tech Manual do not indicate how impairments in cognitive ability may impact functioning in other psychosocial domains. The studies reported in this supplement provide some information about the impact of cognitive deficits on aspects of academic performance, adaptive functioning, and behavioral issues in children with known neurodevelopmental disorders. Eight special group studies were targeted for validity studies using the WISC–V in conjunction with other measures, including Intellectual Disability (ID, both Mild and Moderate severity), combined Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Written Expression (SLD-R/RW), Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics (SLD-M), AttentionDeficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Disruptive Behavior (DB), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Autism Spectrum Disorder With Accompanying Language Impairments (ASD-L), and Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Accompanying Language Impairments (ASD-NL). Table 1 provides sample sizes and demographic data for the WISC–V special group studies with other measures. The mean age of each sample is reported, as well as percentages of sample representation by sex, race/ethnicity, parent education level, and geographic region. Chapter 5 of the Tech Manual describes the results of studies comparing the performance of special groups in this supplement to matched control groups from the normative sample. Appendix A of the Tech Manual lists specific inclusion criteria for each special group. When evaluating the correlation between two measures in clinical samples, it is important to consider the range and variability of scores in each clinical group. Correlations may diverge from those seen in a sample of typically developing children if the distribution of scores is different in the selected special group. For example, the correlation may be attenuated due to range restriction (e.g., WISC–V scores in the ID group do not cover full ability range).

1 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

2

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

3.2

SD

50.5

Male

1.1

9.7

60.2

2.2

Asian

Hispanic

White

Other

26.9

28.0

22.6

20.4

9–11 years

12 years

13–15 years

≥16 years

10.8

South

West

25.5

52.9

2.0

19.6

29.4

39.2

13.7

13.7

3.9

—

56.9

31.4

—

11.8

54.9

45.1

2.5

11.3

28.0

44.0

4.0

24.0

32.0

24.0

20.0

12.0

12.0

—

48.0

32.0

—

20.0

52.0

48.0

2.2

14.1

25

WIAT–III

SLD-M

13.0

58.7

8.7

19.6

34.8

45.7

17.4

2.2

—

6.5

78.3

6.5

—

8.7

63.0

37.0

2.8

11.3

46

BASC–2 PRS

ADHD

12.8

61.7

6.4

19.1

36.2

42.6

19.1

2.1

—

6.4

76.6

8.5

—

8.5

61.7

38.3

2.9

11.4

47

Brown ADD

14.3

33.3

14.3

38.1

9.5

33.3

42.9

14.3

—

9.5

47.6

—

4.8

38.1

52.4

47.6

3.6

10.6

21

BASC–2 PRS

DB

44.4

44.4

—

11.1

38.9

44.4

11.1

5.6

—

5.6

55.6

27.8

—

11.1

61.1

38.9

3.0

13.0

18

BASC–2 PRS

TBI

18.5

40.7

14.8

25.9

51.9

25.9

22.2

—

—

3.7

70.4

22.2

—

3.7

77.8

22.2

3.0

11.5

27

BASC–2 PRS

ASD-L

40.0

40.0

10.0

10.0

50.0

36.7

10.0

3.3

—

10.0

70.0

13.3

—

6.7

76.7

23.3

2.6

11.3

30

BASC–2 PRS

ASD-NL

Note. Special Group abbreviations are: ID = Intellectual Disability, SLD-R/RW = Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Written Expression, SLD-M = Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics, ADHD = Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, DB = Disruptive Behavior, TBI = Traumatic Brain Injury, ASD-L = Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment, ASD-NL = Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment. Except for sample size (N ) and age, data are reported as percentages. Total percentage may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

4.3

61.3

Northeast

23.7

Midwest

Geographic Region

2.2

≤8 years

Parent Education

26.9

African American

Race/Ethnicity

49.5

Female

Sex

12.1

51

WIAT–III

Vineland–II

93

SLD-R/RW

ID

Special Group

Demographic Data for the Validity Studies With Other Measures in Special Groups

Mean

Age

N

Table 1

Brief Descriptions of Other Measures Children in each of the identified special group samples were administered the WISC–V, as well as portions or complete versions of the following measures: the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales–Second Edition (Vineland–II; Sparrow, Cicchetti, & Balla, 2005), the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Third Edition (WIAT–III; Pearson, 2009), the parent rating scale from the Behavior Assessment System for Children–Second Edition (BASC–2 PRS; Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004), and the Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scales for Children and Adolescents (Brown ADD; Brown, 2001). The following sections provide a brief summary of each measure. Please refer to the published materials of each measure for additional information on appropriate uses, psychometric properties, and other relevant information.

Vineland–II The Vineland–II is an individually administered measure of adaptive behavior for ages birth through 90. It measures adaptive behavior in four broad domains: Communication, Daily Living Skills, Socialization, and Motor Skills. It also includes a Maladaptive Behavior Domain to measure problem behaviors. Each domain includes a number of subdomains, but not all subdomain scores are available for ages 6–16. The Vineland–II domain scores are scaled on a metric with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15; the subdomains and subscales are on a v-score metric with a mean of 15 and an SD of 3. Domain scores of 71–85 reflect adaptive skill levels that are moderately low, and scores of 70 or below are classified as low. Similarly, subdomain and subscale v-scores of 10–12 are classified as moderately low and scores of 9 or below are classified as low. The Maladaptive Behavior Index and its contributing subscales, Internalizing and Externalizing, are reverse scored; therefore, v-scores of 18–20 are classified as elevated and scores of 21–24 are classified as clinically significant. The Parent/Caregiver Rating Form of the Vineland–II was administered to the caregivers of children in the ID special group study. Due to the developmental nature of the skills measured in the Motor Skills domain and subdomains, there is little variability in performance for individuals ages 7 to 50, and scores for ages 7–16 are extrapolated from the norms for 6-year-olds.

WIAT–III The WIAT–III is an individually administered diagnostic achievement test designed for students in grades prekindergarten though 12 and adults, or ages 4:0–50:11. It includes 16 subtests designed to measure listening, speaking, reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The cognitive strengths and weaknesses of children identified as SLD-R or SLD-RW are reviewed in the Tech Manual as is the relationship between the WISC–V and WIAT–III in nonclinical children. The WIAT–III subtests and composite scores are scaled to a standard score metric with a mean of 100 and an SD of 15. The WIAT–III was administered to children in the SLD-R/RW and SLD-M special group studies.

BASC–2 PRS The BASC–2 PRS is used to rate a child’s observable behavior and to provide insight into a child’s behavior and personality, both adaptive and maladaptive. It is part of the BASC–2, a multimethod, multidimensional system for ages 2:0 to 25:11, that is used to facilitate differential diagnosis and educational classification of emotional and behavioral disorders. The primary and content scores are scaled on a metric with a mean of 50 and an SD of 10, with higher scores indicating more behavioral difficulties on most scales. Scores of 60–69 indicate “at risk” and scores of 70 or more are classified as clinically significant. Although Executive 3 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Functioning is a positive trait, higher scores on this scale indicate poorer executive functioning. For the Resiliency scale, a high score reflects positive features and low scores suggest possible problems areas. The Parent Rating Scale of the BASC–2 was administered to the caregivers of children in the ADHD, DB, TBI, ASD-L, and ASD-NL special group studies.

Brown ADD The Brown ADD is a rating scale that uses an executive functioning model to measure symptoms of attention-deficit disorders. The scale yields various cluster scores, including Activation, Focus, Effort, Emotion, Memory, and Action. The ADD Inattention Total and ADD Combined Total scores are also available. The primary and content scores are scaled on a metric with a mean of 50 and an SD of 10, with higher scores indicating more behavior difficulties on most scales. Scores of 55–59 are considered somewhat atypical. Scores of 60–69 are considered moderately atypical, and scores of 70 or more are markedly atypical and considered clinically significant. High scores on this scale indicate poor attention, and poor executive and behavioral functioning. The Parent/ Caregiver Rating Form of the Brown ADD was administered to the caregivers of children in the ADHD special group study.

Results of Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures Intellectual Disability Correlations With the Vineland–II Children identified with Intellectual Disability show global deficits in cognitive functioning and in adaptive functioning (American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2010; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Chapter 5 in the Tech Manual presents WISC–V data for the ID-Mild and -Moderate special groups and for the relations between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II. Both special groups demonstrate lower scores on all subtest, process, and composite scores than the matched control groups. However, the Mild ID group had relative cognitive strengths on the PSI, NSI, STI, and SRI, and the Moderate ID group demonstrate relative strengths on the NSI and STI. In typically developing children, there is little association between cognitive functioning and adaptive behavior. A moderate relation between working memory and written communication skills was found. Typically developing children do not show impairments in adaptive functioning, which results in a restricted range of scores. In children with ID, it is expected that range restrictions will also attenuate the correlation between WISC–V scores and adaptive functioning. The WISC–V and the Vineland–II were administered to parents or caregivers of 93 children with intellectual disability-mild or -moderate severity, aged 6–16, with a testing interval of 0–44 days and a mean testing interval of 4 days. Tables 2 and 3 present the means, SDs, and corrected correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II.

4 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

5

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

9.7 2.9 92

.20 .40 .25 .17 .25 .32 .23 .34 .36 .32 .40 .14 .15 .13 –.01 .19 .31 .31 .30 .26 .07 .32 .37 .22 .26 .37 .13

Receptive

9.7 3.1 92

.26 .41 .37 .36 .27 .38 .27 .29 .37 .32 .52 .28 .37 .08 .15 .25 .35 .36 .33 .45 .12 .29 .35 .44 .25 .44 .21

Expressive

Communication

9.5 3.0 92

.15 .36 .35 .27 .13 .25 .12 .24 .20 .25 .48 .38 .45 .20 .13 .40 .28 .22 .21 .49 .19 .25 .29 .47 .23 .31 .31

Written

10.7 3.7 92

.07 .24 .22 .21 .20 .34 .24 .23 .25 .25 .47 .34 .22 .14 .06 .30 .18 .30 .27 .45 .11 .15 .28 .33 .19 .31 .19

Personal

10.4 3.0 93

.16 .41 .26 .24 .23 .26 .16 .37 .21 .18 .31 .18 .29 .18 .06 .27 .30 .29 .30 .24 .14 .26 .34 .29 .25 .40 .14

Domestic

Daily Living Skills

9.7 3.5 90

.34 .40 .39 .38 .27 .38 .25 .24 .41 .41 .52 .44 .45 .09 .06 .28 .39 .36 .29 .53 .08 .21 .37 .48 .25 .45 .21

Community

10.1 2.9 91

.15 .21 .24 .18 .16 .28 .20 .24 .23 .31 .46 .37 .16 .09 –.08 .21 .19 .25 .26 .48 .00 .21 .30 .29 .26 .28 .14

Interpersonal Relationships

9.1 2.9 92

–.01 .32 .18 .21 .06 .46 .09 .27 .13 .17 .23 .04 .12 .02 –.04 .13 .16 .26 .17 .11 .01 .06 .25 .18 .13 .18 –.06

Play and Leisure Time

Socialization

Vineland–II Subdomain

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

Mean SD  n

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Vineland–II

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 2

11.9 3.3 90

.26 .45 .31 .16 .21 .44 .26 .32 .27 .32 .43 .21 .07 .14 .03 .24 .34 .36 .33 .33 .08 .32 .37 .23 .29 .43 .13

Coping Skills

12.7 4.2 70

.33 .22 .21 .27 .49 .53 .20 .23 .35 .18 .28 .29 .07 –.05 .07 .19 .31 .56 .23 .29 –.06 .09 .25 .18 .23 .44 .00

Fine

12.6 3.1 70

.33 .36 .49 .45 .41 .54 .33 .27 .33 .41 .53 .31 .37 .17 .16 .31 .39 .54 .35 .45 .14 .29 .39 .49 .35 .55 .25

Gross

Motor Skills

17.7 2.8 92

.03 –.18 –.07 –.21 –.16 .02 –.02 –.08 –.22 –.21 –.34 .03 –.10 –.13 –.03 –.09 –.07 –.08 –.05 –.08 –.08 –.16 –.15 –.21 –.03 –.12 –.05

Internalizing

17.0 2.6 92

–.08 –.24 –.16 .04 –.17 –.13 –.07 –.15 –.13 –.20 –.20 .04 .00 –.07 .02 –.05 –.12 –.15 –.11 .00 –.03 –.21 –.18 –.08 –.14 –.16 .01

Externalizing

Behavior

6

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

70.1 13.2 92

Mean SD  n

73.6 16.4 91

.20 .35 .31 .29 .20 .34 .22 .28 .32 .28 .44 .36 .33 .12 .06 .31 .30 .31 .30 .44 .10 .16 .33 .39 .23 .39 .21

Daily Living Skills

74.6 13.7 90

.16 .35 .24 .21 .13 .42 .23 .32 .24 .26 .42 .24 .16 .09 –.03 .24 .27 .30 .30 .37 .03 .22 .34 .27 .26 .33 .12

Socialization

86.0 20.3 70

.36 .29 .35 .37 .51 .58 .29 .26 .39 .29 .43 .34 .22 .03 .13 .25 .37 .59 .30 .40 .03 .19 .33 .35 .31 .52 .12

Motor Skills

71.3 12.9 89

.20 .36 .29 .26 .18 .39 .25 .32 .34 .29 .50 .33 .29 .17 .09 .33 .30 .32 .33 .46 .14 .26 .35 .39 .31 .39 .26

Adaptive Behavior Composite

17.9 2.6 92

.01 –.19 –.15 –.10 –.21 –.16 –.10 –.18 –.21 –.23 –.31 .01 –.03 –.09 –.02 –.11 –.09 –.21 –.15 –.06 –.07 –.16 –.22 –.14 –.11 –.19 .00

Maladaptive Behavior Index

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.24 .45 .35 .32 .28 .40 .26 .38 .40 .35 .56 .34 .39 .19 .14 .35 .37 .39 .36 .48 .17 .35 .42 .46 .34 .46 .29

Communication

Vineland–II Domain

3.3 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.6 4.2 4.3 2.9 3.0 4.1 3.3 4.4 4.7 5.7 62.9 63.8 65.1 63.5 69.2 58.8 62.7 60.1 61.0 61.3 61.6

Mean 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.1 1.9 2.6 2.2 2.6 1.8 1.9 2.3 2.0 2.9 3.0 3.6 12.3 10.8 12.2 10.7 15.9 10.0 10.7 11.6 9.5 10.0 12.7

SD 

WISC–V

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Vineland–II

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 2

n 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 92 93 93 90 92 89 84 82 93 93 93 92 89 80 82 92 87 83 92 78

7

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

9.7 2.9 92

Mean SD  n

.37 .43 .52

70.1 13.2 92

NSI STI SRI Vineland–II

Mean SD  n

10.7 3.7 92

.25 .37 .35

.09 .17 .37 .36 .25

Personal

73.6 16.4 91

.30 .40 .43

.11 .19 .37 .39 .29

74.6 13.7 90

.20 .37 .40

.06 .16 .34 .37 .30

Socialization

Vineland–II Domain

9.5 3.0 92

.39 .38 .52

.23 .24 .34 .35 .33

Written

Daily Living Skills

9.7 3.1 92

.29 .33 .40

.15 .16 .30 .34 .26

Expressive

86.0 20.3 70

.23 .39 .40

.00 .24 .38 .41 .28

Motor Skills

10.4 3.0 93

.35 .37 .49

.18 .24 .34 .36 .29

Domestic

Daily Living Skills

71.3 12.9 89

.29 .42 .48

.10 .22 .38 .41 .34

Adaptive Behavior Composite

9.7 3.5 90

.31 .41 .44

.15 .17 .35 .40 .32

Community

10.1 2.9 91

.19 .30 .34

.07 .14 .29 .30 .22

9.1 2.9 92

.12 .23 .24

.04 .10 .20 .21 .20

Play and Leisure Time

Socialization

17.9 2.6 92

–.06 –.17 –.17

.03 –.12 –.15 –.13 –.18

Maladaptive Behavior Index

Interpersonal Relationships

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.15 .27 .39 .42 .36

NSL NSQ IST DST RST

Communication

.28 .39 .42

NSI STI SRI Vineland–II

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

.08 .29 .35 .38 .33

Receptive

Communication

Vineland–II Subdomain

72.7 71.5 70.4

75.5 69.6 69.4 72.6 70.5

Mean

11.9 3.3 90

.21 .42 .49

.03 .22 .40 .42 .35

Fine

12.7 4.2 70

.09 .31 .21

–.06 .15 .30 .35 .18

14.8 13.6 9.9

21.7 16.7 16.3 15.7 14.7

SD 

WISC–V

Coping Skills

n

81 91 79

82 83 93 93 91

12.6 3.1 70

.36 .40 .56

.09 .29 .41 .39 .34

Gross

Motor Skills

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group

NSL NSQ IST DST RST

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 3

17.7 2.8 92

–.08 –.06 –.14

.01 –.11 –.05 –.05 –.10

Internalizing

17.0 2.6 92

–.08 –.17 –.24

–.01 –.14 –.16 –.15 –.16

Externalizing

Behavior

The mean WISC–V primary index scores range from 62.9 (VCI) to 69.2 (PSI). The mean FSIQ is 58.8. The Vineland–II domain means range from 70.1 (Communication) to 86.0 (Motor Skills). These scores indicate moderately low levels of adaptive behavior functioning. The overall correlation between the FSIQ and the Adaptive Behavior Composite is low, suggesting minimal relations between overall adaptive and intellectual functioning. The Adaptive Behavior Composite has low to moderate correlations with all WISC–V primary and ancillary index scores. All WISC–V index scores have low to moderate correlations with the Vineland–II subdomain and domain scales. The pattern of low correlations occurs, in part, due to range restriction. Correcting for range restriction increases the level of association between the WISC–V and Vineland–II. The VSI and GAI correlate moderately with fine, gross, and overall motor skills. The WMI and AWMI are moderately correlated with the Vineland–II expressive and written communication skills as well as with aspects of daily living skills (e.g., personal and community). The WMI is also associated with parent ratings of better interpersonal relationships and motor skills. Moderate relations are also observed between some WISC–V subtests and the Vineland–II domains and subdomains. Moderate correlations are observed with the Immediate Symbol Translation and Delayed Symbol Translation subtests. The IST is moderately related to coping skills and gross motor ability. The DST is moderately related to community, coping skills, communication, total motor ability, and overall adaptive functioning skills. This pattern of correlations indicates that memory functioning and working memory in children with ID relate to their level of adaptive functioning. Additionally, children rated as having more intact motor skills perform better on the WISC–V visual-spatial subtests.

Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Written Expression Correlations With the WIAT–III In the SLD-R and SLD-RW special group studies reported in the Tech Manual, children identified as SLD-RW demonstrate cognitive weaknesses on the VCI, FRI, WMI, AWMI, and QRI. Additionally, the SLD-RW group has weaknesses on the NSI and SRI. These results indicate difficulties with working memory, verbal knowledge and problem solving, quantitative and conceptual reasoning, automaticity of naming, and visual-verbal associative learning. For children in the matched controls, the VCI and WMI are the best predictors of overall academic functioning (with the exception of FSIQ), as measured by the WIAT–III. The VCI and the WMI are moderately to highly correlated with language, reading, and writing abilities. The QRI correlates most highly with mathematics. Based on these findings, it was expected that children showing more deficits in verbal comprehension, working memory, and naming speed would also show lower scores on correlated measures of academic performance. However, range restriction affects the relations between variables associated with reading development because there is increased likelihood that most children with reading difficulties will struggle with these skills; therefore, the results reported for this study were corrected for the variance of the normative sample. The WISC–V and the WIAT–III were administered to 51 children diagnosed with SLD-R or SLD-RW, aged 6–16, with a testing interval of 0–35 days and a mean testing interval of 10 days. Tables 4 and 5 present the means, SDs, and corrected correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III.

8 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

9

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

91.5 12.3 51

Mean SD  n

90.3 15.9 15

.18 .34 .69 .18 .16 .04 .61 .14 .49 .17 .25 .31 .21 .00 .19 .08 .36 .10 .40 .37 .09 .35 .18 .27 .26 .37 .20

ERS

86.6 13.6 51

.43 .71 .80 .51 .25 .28 .31 .28 .14 .54 .33 .23 .43 .33 .23 .27 .70 .30 .37 .39 .30 .63 .49 .48 .46 .59 .43

RC

87.6 10.6 51

.66 .58 .77 .60 .48 .47 .54 .51 .29 .56 .42 .26 .63 .40 .16 .15 .72 .55 .65 .46 .32 .80 .66 .66 .71 .77 .45

MPS

83.8 11.8 51

.55 .46 .62 .46 .32 .31 .47 .36 .20 .66 .35 .27 .61 .36 .22 .04 .62 .37 .52 .41 .32 .67 .63 .61 .57 .62 .46

SC

79.2 10.5 49

.31 .45 .57 .40 .12 .06 .14 .21 .10 .31 .37 –.01 .45 .31 –.01 –.15 .48 .11 .24 .24 .18 .48 .34 .53 .26 .38 .25

WR

91.4 17.2 40

.45 .21 .39 .34 .17 .13 .43 .34 .05 .28 .71 .04 .47 .44 .32 .16 .36 .17 .49 .52 .41 .63 .42 .71 .44 .44 .55

EC

90.0 15.5 40

.47 .17 .46 .37 .07 .07 .42 .31 .04 .33 .52 .07 .40 .25 .23 .04 .35 .08 .46 .40 .26 .50 .41 .57 .31 .40 .38

EC-GMa

78.0 11.0 49

.17 .05 .09 .12 .00 –.20 .18 .09 –.02 .03 .36 –.08 .16 .11 –.06 –.22 .12 –.13 .17 .19 .05 .23 .09 .33 .01 .16 .11

PD

90.0 10.5 51

.46 .17 .54 .39 .16 .13 .36 .37 .03 .42 .23 –.23 .27 .16 .16 .26 .38 .16 .47 –.04 .17 .45 .51 .33 .27 .44 .13

NO

87.9 11.8 51

.43 .67 .77 .64 .37 .44 .16 .33 .26 .54 .58 .24 .73 .34 .31 .36 .68 .47 .34 .55 .35 .68 .53 .78 .55 .60 .53

OE

80.9 11.5 50

.52 .54 .70 .37 .32 .15 .46 .40 .16 .48 .32 .09 .32 .39 .21 .02 .64 .27 .54 .26 .34 .69 .56 .41 .51 .65 .39

ORF

79.3 13.0 50

.42 .50 .40 .28 .29 .09 .29 .27 .03 .38 .24 –.03 .39 .13 –.14 –.06 .57 .22 .37 .13 .02 .51 .41 .41 .28 .55 .08

ORAa

83.8 10.6 50

.49 .54 .73 .37 .31 .17 .51 .39 .15 .47 .31 .13 .33 .43 .28 .07 .63 .27 .56 .29 .39 .69 .55 .42 .53 .65 .45

ORRa SP

82.4 9.2 51

.40 .33 .50 .45 .18 –.02 .21 .31 –.01 .56 .32 –.01 .31 .22 –.02 –.12 .44 .09 .36 .21 .13 .48 .53 .41 .24 .44 .19 85.6 13.7 51

.49 .19 .53 .34 .16 .08 .29 .31 .03 .42 .32 .07 .21 .40 .37 .29 .39 .13 .39 .26 .42 .53 .47 .33 .38 .43 .46

MFA

85.9 14.2 51

.45 .19 .51 .30 .17 .25 .45 .36 .00 .38 .24 –.10 .37 .32 .27 .25 .36 .25 .51 .07 .32 .51 .47 .38 .41 .46 .30

MFS

89.6 13.4 40

.48 .41 .59 .31 .23 .20 .36 .25 .19 .38 –.01 –.24 .41 .43 .31 .35 .51 .25 .37 –.21 .40 .51 .37 .29 .36 .47 .27

MFM

a

Supplemental scores.

Note. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension, ERS = Early Reading Skills, RC = Reading Comprehension, MPS = Math Problem Solving, SC = Sentence Composition, WR = Word Reading, EC = Essay Composition, EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics, PD = Pseudoword Decoding, NO = Numerical Operations, OE = Oral Expression, ORF = Oral Reading Fluency, ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy, ORR = Oral Reading Rate, SP = Spelling, MFA = Math Fluency–Addition, MFS = Math Fluency–Subtraction, MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.40 .63 .52 .56 .17 .42 .20 .33 .03 .45 .28 .07 .56 .17 .31 .57 .65 .36 .37 .22 .24 .51 .49 .54 .39 .53 .31

LC

WIAT–III Subtests

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 4

10

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

88.2 12.0 51

Mean SD  n

78.6 8.5 47

.47 .60 .72 .52 .31 .22 .43 .39 .19 .46 .48 .05 .47 .38 .15 .03 .66 .31 .53 .35 .30 .71 .53 .58 .51 .66 .40

Total Reading

78.6 9.6 49

.25 .27 .36 .28 .06 –.09 .17 .16 .04 .17 .40 –.05 .32 .24 –.03 –.20 .34 –.03 .22 .24 .14 .38 .22 .46 .13 .28 .20

Basic Reading

80.8 11.6 47

.52 .72 .83 .56 .35 .34 .43 .43 .19 .59 .45 .14 .45 .41 .31 .23 .74 .41 .55 .40 .39 .75 .62 .55 .58 .71 .49 83.4 11.3 50

.58 .46 .63 .55 .25 .13 .43 .43 .06 .64 .58 .13 .58 .42 .25 .09 .62 .22 .56 .49 .36 .73 .67 .71 .49 .63 .51

Written Expression

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.46 .71 .71 .66 .29 .48 .20 .36 .14 .54 .48 .17 .70 .27 .35 .53 .72 .45 .39 .44 .32 .65 .57 .72 .52 .62 .46

Oral Language

Reading Comprehension and Fluency

WIAT–III Composites

87.9 9.7 51

.63 .43 .73 .56 .35 .34 .49 .48 .17 .55 .36 .01 .51 .31 .18 .23 .63 .41 .61 .24 .27 .69 .64 .54 .55 .67 .32

Mathematics

86.2 13.2 50

.53 .27 .56 .37 .17 .18 .37 .33 .05 .46 .21 –.07 .34 .42 .38 .33 .47 .21 .45 .09 .43 .56 .49 .37 .41 .49 .40

Math Fluency

81.0 9.4 46

.67 .64 .80 .70 .40 .40 .48 .52 .19 .67 .54 .16 .67 .49 .36 .23 .76 .47 .64 .46 .46 .82 .71 .74 .67 .76 .56

Total Achievement 7.8 7.7 8.3 8.2 9.2 9.0 8.4 8.4 9.0 7.9 7.8 7.8 7.9 8.3 9.1 9.6 88.0 94.7 90.7 86.9 92.9 87.2 89.3 88.2 89.1 88.7 87.9

Mean

2.1 2.5 1.9 2.8 2.7 3.0 2.1 2.8 3.0 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.3 3.2 2.8 3.2 10.8 13.8 11.5 10.0 15.5 10.9 11.3 10.2 12.2 11.1 12.4

SD 

WISC–V

51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 50 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51

n

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 4

11

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. 87.6 10.6 51

.16 .35 .52 .51 .62 .31 .57 .50

MPS

79.2 10.5 49

.30 .27 .30 .39 .47 .35 .45 .50

WR

78.6 9.6 49

.41 .29 .21 .32 .40 .43 .39 .54

Basic Reading

83.8 11.8 51

.17 .19 .30 .31 .45 .22 .40 .38

SC

90.0 15.5 40

.35 .24 .23 .19 .48 .35 .30 .37

EC-GMa

78.0 11.0 49

.43 .27 .10 .22 .25 .44 .27 .48

PD

80.8 11.6 47

.25 .33 .48 .45 .53 .38 .52 .54

Reading Comprehension and Fluency

90.0 10.5 51

.00 .16 .30 .20 .37 .07 .26 .14

NO

83.4 11.3 50

.36 .33 .27 .27 .53 .41 .37 .46

Written Expression

WIAT–III Composites

91.4 17.2 40

.30 .31 .18 .11 .55 .33 .25 .29

EC

87.9 9.7 51

.08 .27 .46 .39 .55 .20 .46 .36

Mathematics

87.9 11.8 51

.21 .43 .46 .45 .61 .40 .56 .57

OE

80.9 11.5 50

.26 .38 .33 .34 .35 .39 .35 .43

ORF

86.2 13.2 50

.28 .50 .45 .42 .49 .46 .43 .50

Math Fluency

79.3 13.0 50

.20 .37 .26 .30 .25 .40 .34 .51

ORAa

82.4 9.2 51

.24 .15 .25 .28 .34 .26 .36 .39

SP

85.6 13.7 51

81.0 9.4 46

.30 .37 .53 .46 .66 .40 .57 .56

.31 .50 .28 .30 .36 .49 .28 .44

MFA

Total Achievement

83.8 10.6 50

.27 .39 .39 .39 .43 .39 .40 .45

ORRa

87.4 89.9 90.2 91.9 90.9 87.8 89.8 86.0

Mean

85.9 14.2 51

.17 .41 .43 .35 .47 .33 .39 .39

MFS

16.4 13.9 13.8 13.9 11.7 13.4 12.7 12.7

SD 

WISC–V

89.6 13.4 40

.18 .44 .60 .57 .61 .38 .58 .53

MFM

n 49 49 51 51 50 49 50 48

a

Supplemental scores.

Note. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension, ERS = Early Reading Skills, RC = Reading Comprehension, MPS = Math Problem Solving, SC = Sentence Composition, WR = Word Reading, EC = Essay Composition, EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics, PD = Pseudoword Decoding, NO = Numerical Operations, OE = Oral Expression, ORF = Oral Reading Fluency, ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy, ORR = Oral Reading Rate, SP = Spelling, MFA = Math Fluency–Addition, MFS = Math Fluency–Subtraction, MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

78.6 8.5 47

88.2 12.0 51

Total Reading

.35 .34 .45 .48 .55 .44 .55 .60

Oral Language

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

86.6 13.6 51

.19 .32 .47 .46 .53 .33 .54 .54

RC

.17 .44 .42 .34 .49 .38 .44 .47

90.3 15.9 15

91.5 12.3 51

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n

.11 .45 .05 .08 .30 .34 .16 .52

ERS

.07 .36 .30 .18 .29 .27 .25 .28

LC

WIAT–III Subtests

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 5

The WISC–V mean primary index scores for this sample are in the low average to average range. The mean WIAT–III composites are in the very low to low average range from 78.6 (Total and Basic Reading) to 88.2 (Oral Language). Correlations between the WISC–V primary index scores and WIAT–III composites reflect the relations between general and specific aspects of cognitive ability and academic performance. These correlations indicate which cognitive skills differentiate academic performance among children with known learning difficulties. In this sample, Basic Reading skills have a low correlation with most WISC–V index scores, while in the study with nonclinical children reported in the Tech Manual, Basic Reading is moderately associated with the VCI and WMI. This does not mean that these skills are not important in developing basic reading skills, but among children with basic reading impairments, these tests scores do not differentiate among children with low basic reading ability. In this sample, the VCI and FRI show the most consistent relations with academic functioning. The factors that may predict whether or not a child develops learning difficulties may not be the best predictors of academic ability within groups of children with specific learning disabilities. The WMI is moderately correlated with Total Achievement, Written Expression, Oral Language, and Reading Comprehension and Fluency. The PSI correlates most highly with the WIAT–III Total Achievement and Math Fluency composites. These results suggest that in the SLD-R/RW sample processing speed is related to performance on fluency tests but also to overall academic functioning. The WISC–V ancillary index scores correlate moderately to highly with the WIAT–III Total Achievement score. The QRI correlates highly with WIAT–III Total Achievement and correlates highly with most WIAT–III composites, with the exception of Basic Reading and Math Fluency. The GAI correlations were similar to those seen with the FSIQ, but lower. The correlations between the NVI and the WIAT–III composites are slightly lower than the correlations of the GAI and the FSIQ with the WIAT–III composites. The AWMI correlates similarly to the WMI with the WIAT–III composites, but the correlations are relatively higher with the AWMI. Among the complementary index scores, the SRI has a moderate correlation with all the WIAT–III composites, with the exception of Mathematics. The STI was most highly correlated with Total Reading and Reading Comprehension and Fluency. The NSI most highly correlates with Total Reading and Math Fluency. Overall, the relations of the WISC–V and the WIAT–III indicate that a number of cognitive skills show a moderate relation to academic functioning in children with learning difficulties in reading. The relatively high correlation of FSIQ with academic functioning indicates that cognitive weaknesses strongly relate to lower academic scores in children with specific learning disorder-reading and specific learning disorder-reading and written expression.

12 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Correlations With the WIAT–III The cognitive strengths and weaknesses of children identified with specific learning disordermathematics (SLD-M) are reviewed in the Tech Manual. Children identified as SLD-M demonstrate cognitive weaknesses on the VSI, FRI, and QRI. These results indicate difficulties with visual spatial, conceptual, and quantitative reasoning abilities. For children in the matched control, the VSI is moderately correlated with Mathematics, Oral Language, and Total Achievement composite scores from the WIAT–III. The FRI is moderately correlated with WIAT–III Mathematics and Total Achievement. The QRI is moderately correlated with all WIAT–III composites but has the highest association with the Mathematics and Total Achievement composite scores. The cognitive weaknesses associated with math difficulties are also related to math functioning in typically developing children. Based on these findings, it was expected that children showing more deficits in those cognitive domains would also show lower scores on correlated measures of academic performance. The WISC–V and the WIAT–III were administered to 25 children diagnosed with SLD-M, aged 9–16, with a testing interval of 0–62 days and a mean testing interval of 8 days. Tables 6 and 7 present the means, SDs, and corrected correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III.

13 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

14

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

94.8 14.5 25

Mean SD  n

90.7 11.6 25

.49 .65 .66 .65 .52 .52 .30 .47 .29 .55 .49 .46 .51 .23 .20 –.17 .62 .54 .50 .53 .26 .71 .60 .62 .56 .74 .41

RC

78.7 10.9 25

.22 .50 .55 .55 .45 .46 .25 .68 .32 .66 .36 .38 .64 .26 –.12 –.22 .42 .47 .59 .42 .05 .65 .78 .57 .56 .67 .22

MPS

85.7 14.0 25

.63 .48 .74 .55 .49 .35 .42 .25 .13 .69 .63 .53 .64 .47 .31 .01 .58 .42 .42 .66 .43 .72 .49 .74 .52 .68 .57

SC

94.2 14.2 25

.53 .60 .60 .57 .29 .53 .22 .28 .40 .62 .53 .53 .63 .24 .02 –.12 .60 .44 .32 .59 .13 .62 .49 .64 .46 .61 .39

WR

93.6 11.4 24

–.01 .15 .50 .06 .34 .37 .29 .15 –.02 .28 .18 .38 .25 .36 .07 .26 .10 .37 .29 .33 .23 .35 .23 .23 .42 .32 .29

EC

88.8 12.5 24

.07 .14 .50 .06 .60 .49 .45 .31 .18 .56 .52 .56 .48 .51 .26 .26 .12 .54 .50 .62 .43 .61 .48 .56 .63 .53 .54

EC-GMa

92.5 11.0 25

.31 .53 .57 .46 .54 .56 .26 .26 .28 .63 .62 .61 .74 .26 .28 .02 .48 .57 .33 .69 .33 .63 .47 .76 .53 .59 .54

PD

79.5 9.0 25

.53 .51 .57 .67 .45 .38 .30 .43 .26 .77 .57 .45 .56 .52 .07 .00 .55 .42 .46 .57 .30 .72 .66 .62 .53 .68 .45

NO

92.3 11.4 24

.62 .62 .87 .52 .54 .58 .46 .38 .42 .47 .37 .56 .35 .56 .27 .42 .65 .58 .57 .53 .46 .79 .49 .42 .69 .81 .50

OE

94.4 10.1 25

.40 .46 .37 .50 .49 .29 .20 .24 .31 .63 .71 .51 .60 .57 .29 .19 .47 .38 .28 .68 .47 .66 .46 .74 .46 .56 .60

ORF

93.3 14.5 25

.44 .47 .35 .45 .47 .36 .13 .18 .20 .66 .69 .32 .64 .11 .15 .02 .49 .42 .19 .57 .16 .55 .44 .74 .31 .49 .40

ORAa

96.4 9.1 25

.37 .43 .40 .45 .49 .26 .20 .22 .30 .56 .62 .47 .51 .54 .28 .21 .44 .37 .27 .60 .45 .62 .42 .65 .43 .52 .54

ORRa SP

91.4 14.0 25

.41 .32 .52 .42 .34 .28 .29 .11 .18 .66 .60 .32 .55 .18 .23 –.04 .38 .31 .25 .52 .24 .50 .36 .67 .31 .45 .41 82.0 14.3 25

.24 .09 .39 .23 .32 .18 .34 .10 .55 .60 .57 .35 .50 .57 .43 .09 .15 .24 .28 .52 .57 .47 .34 .62 .37 .32 .55

MFA

78.2 14.2 25

.56 .43 .63 .50 .51 .38 .38 .20 .33 .69 .69 .53 .58 .63 .37 .19 .51 .46 .36 .69 .56 .71 .46 .73 .53 .62 .65

MFS

78.7 12.0 24

.31 .31 .44 .35 .33 .39 .20 .34 .27 .57 .55 .33 .58 .49 .14 .13 .33 .38 .34 .50 .33 .56 .51 .66 .43 .47 .43

MFM

a

Supplemental scores.

Note. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension, RC = Reading Comprehension, MPS = Math Problem Solving, SC = Sentence Composition, WR = Word Reading, EC = Essay Composition, EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics, PD = Pseudoword Decoding, NO = Numerical Operations, OE = Oral Expression, ORF = Oral Reading Fluency, ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy, ORR = Oral Reading Rate, SP = Spelling, MFA = Math Fluency–Addition, MFS = Math Fluency– Subtraction, MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.77 .81 .93 .70 .71 .78 .43 .35 .54 .68 .51 .60 .35 .44 .31 .21 .83 .77 .50 .63 .43 .87 .57 .48 .72 .90 .56

LC

WIAT–III Subtests

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 6

15

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

92.5 13.9 24

Mean SD  n

90.2 10.5 25

.51 .64 .63 .61 .51 .55 .27 .34 .37 .69 .65 .59 .71 .36 .21 –.03 .62 .55 .39 .70 .33 .71 .56 .77 .56 .68 .54

Total Reading

92.7 11.3 25

.46 .61 .62 .55 .43 .58 .25 .29 .37 .66 .60 .60 .71 .27 .14 –.07 .58 .54 .35 .67 .23 .66 .51 .74 .53 .64 .49

Basic Reading

90.6 10.7 25

.54 .64 .60 .66 .54 .46 .29 .41 .33 .66 .67 .55 .63 .48 .28 .03 .64 .51 .45 .68 .43 .77 .60 .75 .57 .73 .58 88.1 11.9 24

.48 .40 .76 .46 .49 .42 .44 .20 .12 .72 .62 .53 .64 .43 .30 .07 .47 .46 .41 .65 .41 .67 .47 .73 .53 .63 .57

Written Expression

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.79 .78 .94 .66 .68 .74 .48 .38 .53 .65 .47 .63 .35 .52 .31 .34 .81 .74 .57 .63 .47 .88 .57 .47 .76 .91 .57

Oral Language

Reading Comprehension and Fluency

WIAT–III Composites

78.3 8.9 25

.38 .54 .59 .64 .48 .46 .29 .61 .31 .75 .49 .43 .63 .39 –.06 –.14 .51 .48 .57 .51 .15 .71 .78 .62 .58 .72 .33

Mathematics

78.7 12.5 24

.41 .29 .57 .37 .39 .35 .36 .20 .42 .66 .66 .43 .56 .60 .35 .14 .37 .38 .36 .62 .53 .63 .44 .72 .47 .50 .60

Math Fluency

86.0 11.1 23

.68 .72 .86 .68 .62 .67 .43 .44 .39 .78 .63 .65 .66 .49 .21 .09 .74 .67 .57 .73 .39 .86 .69 .74 .72 .85 .59

Total Achievement

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 6

8.3 8.4 8.0 8.3 7.2 7.7 7.2 6.6 8.8 6.6 8.2 8.3 8.0 7.3 8.5 10.4 91.3 86.0 82.5 89.9 88.4 83.5 80.6 89.2 81.7 84.4 87.0

Mean

2.3 3.1 2.0 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.4 3.3 3.0 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.0 2.2 2.8 3.0 13.8 12.8 15.3 13.7 12.2 12.0 13.9 11.2 13.8 12.3 14.0

SD 

WISC–V

n 25 25 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 24 25 25 25

16

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. 85.7 14.0 25

.24 .40 .38 .27 .30 .40 .35 .42

SC

93.6 11.4 24

.47 .37 .31 .29 .25 .48 .33 .45

EC

92.7 11.3 25

.43 .38 .10 .09 .26 .49 .17 .36

Basic Reading

94.2 14.2 25

.45 .34 .17 .18 .34 .48 .26 .41

WR

92.5 11.0 25

.35 .39 –.03 –.06 .11 .43 .02 .24

PD

79.5 9.0 25

.40 .37 .28 .25 .22 .46 .28 .41

NO

90.6 10.7 25

.49 .44 .17 .13 .23 .54 .20 .41

Reading Comprehension and Fluency

92.3 11.4 24

.54 .56 .53 .47 .53 .65 .55 .68

OE

88.1 11.9 24

.47 .46 .33 .26 .26 .54 .32 .47

Written Expression

WIAT–III Composites

88.8 12.5 24

.26 .29 .16 .28 .10 .34 .21 .31

EC-GMa

78.3 8.9 25

.32 .34 .16 .10 .22 .38 .18 .32

93.3 14.5 25

.25 .26 –.22 –.23 –.03 .29 –.16 .04

ORAa

Mathematics

94.4 10.1 25

.68 .58 .10 .17 .25 .72 .20 .50

ORF

78.7 12.5 24

.35 .39 .41 .34 .27 .46 .38 .46

Math Fluency

96.4 9.1 25

.67 .57 .09 .16 .24 .70 .19 .49

ORRa SP

82.0 14.3 25

.25 .30 .37 .34 .27 .33 .37 .38

MFA

78.2 14.2 25

.44 .53 .41 .33 .30 .58 .38 .53

MFS

86.0 11.1 23

.49 .52 .39 .29 .40 .60 .40 .56

Total Achievement

91.4 14.0 25

.43 .31 .08 .05 .09 .43 .09 .26

98.7 92.8 91.9 95.4 93.7 94.8 93.1 92.4

Mean

78.7 12.0 24

.44 .27 .31 .27 .21 .41 .30 .39

MFM

12.5 14.6 13.9 13.9 14.4 12.7 14.0 14.1

SD 

WISC–V

n 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

a

Supplemental scores.

Note. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension, RC = Reading Comprehension, MPS = Math Problem Solving, SC = Sentence Composition, WR = Word Reading, EC = Essay Composition, EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics, PD = Pseudoword Decoding, NO = Numerical Operations, OE = Oral Expression, ORF = Oral Reading Fluency, ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy, ORR = Oral Reading Rate, SP = Spelling, MFA = Math Fluency–Addition, MFS = Math Fluency–Subtraction, MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

90.2 10.5 25

92.5 13.9 24

Total Reading

.49 .43 .12 .10 .26 .53 .18 .40

Oral Language

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

78.7 10.9 25

.23 .26 .06 –.03 .19 .27 .10 .20

MPS

.39 .53 .50 .42 .47 .55 .51 .60

90.7 11.6 25

94.8 14.5 25

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n

.11 .16 .15 .02 .10 .18 .12 .17

RC

.19 .43 .34 .27 .32 .39 .35 .43

LC

WIAT–III Subtests

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 7

The WISC–V mean primary index scores for this sample range from low average to average. The mean WIAT–III composite scores range from 78.3 (Mathematics) to 92.7 (Basic Reading). Correlations between the WISC–V primary index scores and WIAT–III composites reflect the relations between general and specific aspects of cognitive ability and academic performance. These relations indicate which cognitive skills differentiate academic performance among children with known math difficulties. In this sample, math skills have moderate correlations with most WISC–V primary index scores. The FRI and FSIQ have the strongest association with Mathematics. Math Fluency is most highly correlated with the WMI and FSIQ. The FRI and WMI correlations are larger in this sample than those observed in the nonclinical sample reported in the Tech Manual. Overall academic functioning has moderate to high correlations with all primary index scores except the PSI; the highest correlations were with the VCI, WMI, and FSIQ. The WISC–V ancillary index scores correlate in the moderate to high range with the WIAT–III Total Achievement score. The GAI correlates with Total Achievement at nearly the same level as the FSIQ. The correlations between the NVI and the WIAT–III composites are slightly lower than the correlations of the GAI and the FSIQ with the WIAT–III composites. The QRI is moderately to highly correlated with the WIAT–III composite scores, and among all primary and ancillary index scores, it has the highest correlation with the Mathematics composite. The AWMI is highly correlated with all WIAT–III composites, with the exception of Oral Language. It is most highly correlated with Total Reading and Reading Comprehension and Fluency. Among the complementary index scores, the NSI and SRI correlate moderately with Math Fluency. There were many moderate to high correlations observed between cognitive functioning and academic performance in the SLD-M sample. Overall, the relations of the WISC–V and the WIAT–III indicate that a number of cognitive skills show a moderate to high correlation with academic functioning in children with math learning difficulties. The QRI and, to a lesser degree, the FRI are particularly important in math skills while the WMI and PSI are related to Math Fluency. The relatively high correlation of the FSIQ with academic functioning indicates that cognitive weaknesses strongly relate to lower academic scores in children with specific learning disorder-mathematics.

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children diagnosed with ADHD have behavioral symptoms that include attention and executive functioning problems (Delis, 2012) which can be evaluated with the BASC–2. Cognitively, children diagnosed with ADHD show weaknesses on the WISC–V working memory and processing speed measures. The relation between the BASC–2 and the WISC–V evaluates whether measured cognitive difficulties are related to observable behavioral problems. In the nonclinical sample reported in the Tech Manual, the BASC–2 and WISC–V were generally unrelated. Given that typically developing children do not show significant behavior problems, this finding is not unexpected. Similarly, while children with ADHD will have a higher degree of problems, range restriction may also be observed in this sample. The WISC–V and the selected scales from the BASC–2 PRS were administered to 46 children diagnosed with ADHD, aged 6–16, and their caregivers, with a testing interval of 0–14 days and a mean testing interval of 1 day. It was predicted that, in general, low inverse correlations would be present between the WISC–V and the selected BASC–2 PRS scores, except for the Resiliency scale, which would be positively correlated. Tables 8 and 9 present the means, SDs, and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and selected BASC–2 PRS scales. The correlations are not corrected because the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study. 17 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table 8 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group BASC–2 PRS Scale

WISC–V

Resiliency

Conduct Problems

Executive Functioning

Attention Problems

Mean

SD 

n

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

–.14 –.01 –.02 –.17 –.29 –.16 –.17 .06 –.02 .17 –.12 .00 .07 –.15 –.02 .06 –.08 –.23 –.05 –.06 –.11 –.18 .13 –.01 –.19 –.14 –.09

–.06 –.25 –.06 –.15 .00 –.01 .13 –.17 –.17 –.08 .07 –.13 –.17 .21 –.02 .08 –.17 –.01 –.03 .01 .12 .06 –.14 –.07 .01 –.09 .04

.03 –.14 .05 .06 .22 .04 .21 –.01 .06 –.16 .15 .06 –.14 .06 –.09 .01 –.06 .13 .11 .12 –.02 .13 –.10 –.01 .16 .08 .05

–.23 –.26 –.21 –.19 –.02 –.17 –.07 –.24 –.20 –.25 –.10 –.12 –.02 –.10 –.25 –.16 –.27 –.10 –.20 –.13 –.20 –.22 –.29 –.07 –.19 –.21 –.25

9.6 9.6 9.7 9.5 9.5 9.7 9.3 9.7 8.9 8.5 9.4 8.9 9.1 8.5 9.6 9.7 98.0 97.5 97.4 95.4 94.8 95.9 94.9 95.8 94.6 97.1 93.6

2.3 2.4 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.3 2.5 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.7 3.0 2.6 3.0 2.6 11.6 16.8 13.5 13.1 13.4 11.8 14.4 13.1 13.3 13.6 12.0

46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 45 46 45 46 45 46 46 46 46 45 45 45 46 45 46 46 44

Mean SD  n

38.6 10.1 44

57.7 9.7 46

63.9 9.9 45

66.3 5.9 46

Table 9 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group BASC–2 PRS Scale

WISC–V

Resiliency

Conduct Problems

Executive Functioning

Attention Problems

Mean

SD 

n

NSL NSQ IST DST RST

.04 –.07 –.01 –.06 .10

.08 –.01 –.04 –.07 –.01

–.09 .00 .11 .08 .09

–.06 –.13 –.33 –.32 –.31

95.0 94.1 100.1 99.3 103.0

15.2 15.9 15.3 15.4 16.8

45 45 46 46 46

NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS

–.02 .01 –.01

.05 –.01 .14

–.04 .11 .05

–.11 –.34 –.33

93.8 100.8 97.1

15.5 15.8 13.4

45 46 45

Mean SD  n

38.6 10.1 44

57.7 9.7 46

63.9 9.9 45

66.3 5.9 46

18 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

The mean WISC–V index and subtest scores are in the average range. The selected BASC–2 PRS problem behavior scores range from 38.6 (Resiliency) to 66.3 (Attention Problems). As expected, low negative correlations are present between the WISC–V and selected BASC–2 PRS scores. The correlations indicate that in a sample of children with observable attention and executive functioning difficulties, cognitive difficulties are not highly related to behavioral difficulties. For the nonclinical sample reported in the Tech Manual, the strongest association between behavior and cognition was observed between the WISC–V WMI and the BASC–2 Attention Problems scale. In the ADHD sample, the Symbol Translation subtests, the STI, and the SRI show the largest associations with Attention Problems. These results suggest that cognitive abilities share low levels of association with attention and executive function, when assessed using a parent report measure. Of the WISC–V measures, the memory tasks have the highest association with observable behavior. Children with memory problems may be rated by their parents as inattentive.

Correlations With the Brown ADD Children diagnosed with ADHD have behavioral symptoms that include attention and executive functioning problems (Delis, 2012) which can be evaluated with the Brown ADD. Cognitively, children diagnosed with ADHD show weaknesses on the WISC–V working memory and processing speed measures. The WISC–V and the Brown ADD were administered to 47 children diagnosed with ADHD, aged 6–16, and their caregivers, with a testing interval of 0–24 days and a mean testing interval of 4 days. Tables 10 and 11 present the means, SDs, and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and the Brown ADD. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study.

19 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

20

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

–.01 –.07 –.02 –.05 –.07 –.08 .08 .04 .07 .07 .10 –.07 .14 –.13 –.09 –.18

–.05 –.05 –.05 .09 .19 –.16 –.11 –.04 –.08 .07 –.01 –.13 –.03 .06 .14 –.06 –.02

–.06

66.1 7.5 47

BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI

CPI Brown ADD

Mean SD  n

Activation

67.3 5.8 47

.00

.08 –.05 –.03 .19 .14 –.13 –.01 .16 .10 .17 .08 –.05 .04 .19 .21 .09 .15

.19 .11 .12 .05 .07 .10 .07 .21 .06 .14 .12 .11 .24 –.21 .11 –.08

Focus

63.8 8.7 47

–.19

.05 .06 –.04 .00 .05 –.04 .02 –.12 –.02 –.04 –.11 –.21 –.09 –.06 .01 –.12 –.06

–.10 –.13 .06 –.21 .02 –.04 –.01 –.05 –.03 –.04 .00 –.19 .02 –.19 –.17 –.01

Effort

60.8 8.4 47

.13

.13 .19 .18 .15 .27 –.04 –.04 .10 .12 .07 .20 .02 .16 .06 .15 .14 .10

.19 –.01 .05 .03 .13 .11 .07 .04 .05 .07 .24 .12 .03 .03 .00 –.05

Emotion

65.4 10.3 47

.03

–.03 –.01 –.03 .13 –.04 .07 .16 –.07 –.07 .01 –.06 .13 –.09 .00 .04 –.04 –.06

–.11 –.03 –.01 .08 –.07 –.06 –.01 .02 –.14 .00 .00 –.03 .05 .00 .20 .13

Memory

Brown ADD Scores

65.5 7.1 30

.03

–.02 –.18 .06 .03 .07 –.02 .08 –.12 –.08 –.16 .06 –.01 –.18 –.09 .06 –.12 –.15

.00 –.24 –.12 –.09 –.06 –.08 –.12 –.12 –.14 –.03 .05 .11 .06 –.11 .10 .04

ADD Inattention Total

66.0 7.2 30

.04

–.38 –.34 –.08 .00 –.14 .29 .24 –.26 –.43 –.24 –.10 .13 –.22 –.11 –.10 –.32 –.34

–.18 –.33 –.21 –.08 –.35 –.45 –.24 –.16 –.37 –.04 –.13 –.11 –.07 .16 .08 .33

Action

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Brown ADD for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA

WISC–V Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

Table 10

66.6 7.0 47

.00

.01 .05 .01 .16 .14 –.03 .05 –.02 –.03 .06 .02 –.02 .01 .05 .14 –.02 .01

.01 –.05 .06 –.05 –.01 –.05 .05 .06 –.02 .06 .11 –.05 .12 –.06 .02 .01

ADD Combined Total Score

92.8

9.3 9.5 9.6 9.3 9.3 10.0 9.1 97.7 96.6 97.4 94.7 94.1 95.3 94.8 95.0 94.1 96.8

9.6 9.6 9.6 9.4 9.3 9.5 9.4 9.7 9.0 8.5 9.2 8.9 9.0 8.4 9.5 9.6

Mean

12.7

2.8 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.2 2.5 2.8 11.5 16.2 13.4 13.4 14.0 11.7 14.3 13.3 13.1 13.3

2.3 2.4 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.2 2.5 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.8 3.1 2.7 3.1 2.6

SD 

WISC–V

45

47 46 47 47 46 47 47 47 47 47 46 46 46 47 46 47 47

47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 46 47 46 47 46 47

n

21

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI Brown ADD Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 11

66.1 7.5 47

.22 .19 –.16 –.17 –.13 .24 –.19 .02

Activation

67.3 5.8 47

.21 .12 .07 .03 .06 .17 .04 .02

Focus

63.8 8.7 47

.25 .23 –.19 –.25 –.21 .28 –.24 .04

Effort

60.8 8.4 47

.17 .27 .00 .04 .00 .24 .00 .15

Emotion

65.4 10.3 47

.24 .28 –.12 –.11 –.07 .27 –.13 .03

Memory

Brown ADD Scores

65.5 7.1 30

.34 .34 –.07 –.10 –.13 .40 –.14 .11

ADD Inattention Total

66.0 7.2 30

.27 .17 –.19 –.27 –.14 .26 –.21 .07

Action

66.6 7.0 47

.28 .28 –.13 –.15 –.09 .31 –.15 .08

ADD Combined Total Score 93.7 93.6 100.2 99.3 102.5 93.1 100.6 96.5

Mean 16.8 16.2 15.1 15.2 16.3 16.1 15.5 13.6

SD 

WISC–V

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the Brown ADD for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group

n 46 46 47 47 47 46 47 46

The mean WISC–V subtest, process, and index scores are in the average range. The selected Brown ADD scores range from 60.8 (Emotion) to 67.3 (Focus). As expected, low negligible negative correlations are present between the WISC–V and most scales from the Brown ADD Scale Parent Rating Form. Moderate negative correlations are present between the Brown Action scale and the VSI. A moderate correlation is observed between NSI and the ADD Inattention Total score. These results suggest that, in children with ADHD, cognitive abilities share low levels of association with attention, behavior, and executive function, as assessed using a parent-report measure.

Disruptive Behavior Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children with DB exhibit behavioral symptoms that include conduct problems, and in some cases, attention and executive functioning problems, which can be evaluated with the BASC–2 (see Children With Disruptive Behavior in Chapter 5 of the Tech Manual for symptom review). For the sample reported in the Tech Manual, children with DB did not show specific cognitive weaknesses as measured by the WISC–V compared to matched controls. The WISC–V and selected scales from the BASC–2 PRS were administered to 21 children diagnosed with DB, aged 6–15, and their caregivers, with a testing interval of 0–13 days and a mean testing interval of 1 day. Tables 12 and 13 present the means, SDs, and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and selected scales of the BASC–2 PRS. It was predicted that, in general, low inverse correlations would be present between the WISC–V and the selected BASC–2 PRS scores, except for the Resiliency scale, which would be positively correlated. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study.

22 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table 12 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Disruptive Behavior Group BASC–2 PRS Scale

WISC–V

Resiliency

Conduct Problems

Executive Functioning

Attention Problems

Mean

SD 

n

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

.41 .22 .37 .31 .44 .38 .66 .45 .22 .22 .41 .19 .50 –.15 –.04 .21 .37 .44 .63 .42 –.12 .55 .40 .51 .53 .65 .17

–.36 –.28 –.34 –.41 –.13 –.33 –.44 –.16 –.07 –.02 –.12 .06 –.12 .25 –.01 .07 –.35 –.25 –.35 –.04 .13 –.28 –.11 –.13 –.21 –.40 .07

–.16 –.31 –.32 –.17 –.21 –.44 –.41 –.03 .04 .19 .11 –.04 –.02 .27 .12 –.01 –.25 –.34 –.26 .06 .23 –.15 .11 .04 –.23 –.33 .18

–.25 –.37 –.29 –.38 –.09 –.09 –.23 .03 –.12 .07 –.20 .00 –.32 .11 –.11 –.30 –.35 –.09 –.11 –.15 .00 –.20 .06 –.30 –.06 –.24 –.07

9.4 8.4 9.0 9.3 9.5 9.5 9.2 8.8 9.4 9.0 9.3 9.0 8.7 8.7 8.8 9.6 94.1 97.1 94.4 95.3 92.8 93.3 93.8 94.5 93.6 94.1 92.8

2.6 2.3 3.0 3.3 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.8 2.6 3.1 3.4 3.0 3.8 3.2 3.2 2.4 11.8 13.9 15.2 13.7 17.1 12.4 13.7 18.0 12.5 12.0 14.3

21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21

Mean SD  n

36.6 9.9 21

82.8 13.3 21

71.8 11.8 21

67.5 9.6 21

Table 13 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Disruptive Behavior Group BASC–2 PRS Scale Resiliency –.09 .39 .25 .26 .46 .26 .33 .35 36.6 9.9 21

Conduct Problems –.36 –.37 –.10 –.23 –.19 –.48 –.17 –.33 82.8 13.3 21

Executive Functioning .11 –.23 .06 –.14 –.27 –.12 –.10 –.12 71.8 11.8 21

WISC–V Attention Problems .02 –.25 .07 –.09 –.21 –.18 –.05 –.11

Mean

SD 

n

101.0 102.2 100.2 99.7 100.2 100.9 99.5 100.0

8.0 10.0 13.4 12.1 10.6 8.4 13.0 12.0

21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21

67.5 9.6 21

23 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

The mean WISC–V composite and subtest scores are in the average range. The selected BASC–2 PRS scores range from 36.6 (Resiliency) to 82.8 (Conduct Problems). The results indicate a general low negative correlation between the BASC–2 behavior problem scales (e.g., Conduct Problems, Executive Functioning, and Attention Problems) and the WISC–V composite scores. The only moderate correlations with the WISC–V composite scores were between the GAI and the NSI with the Conduct Problems scale. In contrast to these findings, there were many moderate positive correlations between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 Resiliency scale. Of these, the highest correlations are observed with the GAI (.65) and the FRI (.63). These findings suggest that in children with behavior problems, those with better general cognitive functioning and in particular, conceptual reasoning ability may be better able to overcome adversity and cope with stressful situations than those with lower cognitive ability. These results further suggest that, in children with DB, cognitive abilities share low levels of association with attention and executive function, as assessed using a parent report measure. However, children with DB that have stronger general ability and fluid reasoning skills may appear more resourceful and stress tolerant than children with lower ability.

Traumatic Brain Injury Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children with moderate to severe TBI are at risk for developing multiple neurobehavioral and cognitive symptoms, including impulsivity, and executive functioning and attention deficits (Donders, 2008), which can be evaluated with the BASC–2. For the sample reported in the Tech Manual, children with moderate to severe TBI show general cognitive difficulties and specific cognitive weaknesses on the VSI, FRI, and WMI compared to matched controls. The WISC–V and selected scales from the BASC–2 PRS were administered to 18 children having moderate to severe TBI, aged 7–15, and their caregivers, with a testing interval of 0–15 days and a mean testing interval of 1 day. Tables 14 and 15 present the means, SDs, and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and selected scales from the BASC–2 PRS. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study.

24 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table 14 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Traumatic Brain Injury Group BASC–2 PRS Scale

WISC–V

Resiliency

Conduct Problems

Executive Functioning

Attention Problems

Mean

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

–.07 .13 .08 –.18 .02 –.41 –.24 –.48 –.40 –.17 –.09 –.20 –.33 .00 –.12 –.05 .04 –.21 –.40 –.15 –.08 –.14 –.36 –.23 –.24 –.21 –.07

–.18 –.11 –.12 –.09 .50 .20 .09 .17 –.21 –.02 –.04 .02 .11 .08 .35 –.04 –.27 .39 .13 –.03 .23 –.04 .08 .04 .21 –.04 .14

–.18 .10 –.18 –.05 .39 .14 .31 .28 –.21 .00 –.08 .07 –.06 .14 .31 .25 –.06 .30 .33 –.03 .24 .18 .16 –.07 .27 .24 .15

–.44 .01 –.30 –.12 .08 –.02 –.08 .09 –.38 –.17 –.26 –.04 –.20 –.13 –.06 –.07 –.30 .00 .01 –.18 –.08 –.27 –.03 –.24 –.05 –.20 –.17

8.4 8.2 7.9 8.2 8.1 7.7 8.3 7.8 7.9 7.3 7.9 7.5 8.0 7.0 7.6 8.4 88.9 89.0 88.9 86.6 84.2 83.7 85.7 88.5 85.6 86.2 83.8

Mean SD  n

41.9 7.0 18

49.8 11.9 18

56.4 10.3 17

59.2 7.4 17

Table 15 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n

SD 

n

2.8 3.2 2.9 2.4 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.0 3.2 2.7 3.2 3.6 3.7 3.8 13.8 15.7 18.9 16.2 21.0 14.6 18.2 16.8 17.6 14.2 17.7

15 17 18 18 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 17 15 17 18 18 17 15 18 18 17 15 17

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Traumatic Brain Injury Group BASC–2 PRS Scale Resiliency –.03 –.18 –.23 –.14 –.26 –.04 –.24 –.12 41.9 7.0 18

Conduct Problems .01 –.12 .33 .29 .29 –.08 .40 .18 49.8 11.9 18

Executive Functioning –.11 .02 –.20 –.18 .04 –.07 –.08 –.14 56.4 10.3 17

WISC–V Attention Problems –.16 –.08 –.16 –.18 –.07 –.14 –.13 –.16

Mean

SD 

n

90.5 88.9 88.6 88.9 89.3 90.1 88.1 90.3

22.9 22.2 21.4 18.9 20.4 21.5 18.5 16.4

16 17 17 17 16 16 16 14

59.2 7.4 17

25 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

The mean WISC–V composite and subtest scores are in the low average range. The selected BASC–2 PRS scores range from 41.9 (Resiliency) to 59.2 (Attention Problems). As a group, children in this sample do not show a high degree of behavioral symptoms, as rated by their parent. In general, low negative correlations are present between the WISC–V and selected BASC–2 PRS scores. A few moderate correlations are observed between the two measures. However, given the large number of correlations and the small sample size, these may not be meaningful. The results suggest that among children with TBI, cognitive abilities share low levels of association with attention and executive function, as assessed with a parent rating measure. In the TBI sample, observable behavior problems may not relate to severity of cognitive difficulties.

Autism Spectrum Disorder With Accompanying Language Impairment Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children diagnosed with ASD-L have multiple behavioral and cognitive symptoms which can be evaluated with the BASC–2 (see Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Chapter 5 of the Tech Manual for symptom review). For the sample reported in the Tech Manual, children diagnosed with ASD-L show general and specific cognitive weaknesses on the VCI, WMI, PSI, and AWMI compared with matched controls. The WISC–V and the full BASC–2 PRS were administered to 27 children diagnosed with ASD-L, aged 6–16, and their caregivers, with a testing interval from 0–33 days and a mean testing interval of 4 days. Tables 16 and 17 present the means, SDs, and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and BASC–2 PRS. The BASC–2 PRS scores reported here include: Hyperactivity, Aggression, Conduct Problems, Anxiety, Depression, Somatization, Atypicality, Withdrawal, Attention Problems, Adaptability, Social Skills, Leadership, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, Anger Control, Bullying, Developmental Social Disorders, Emotional Self-Control, Executive Functioning, Negative Emotionality, Resiliency, Adaptive Skills, Behavioral Symptom Index, Externalizing Problems, and Internalizing Problems. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study.

26 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

27

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

–.14 .02 –.17 –.13 –.08 –.22 –.27 –.16 –.27 –.15 –.26 –.38

–.31 –.41 –.08 –.20 –.09 –.20 –.23 –.38 –.24 –.27 –.16 –.31 –.42 –.20 –.33

67.4 12.3 27

LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

Mean SD  n

Hyperactivity

52.4 8.3 27

.20 –.13 –.05 –.26 .34 .23 .03 .11 –.11 .20 .16 .26 .04 .21 –.02

.27 .41 .35 .21 .21 .27 –.01 .08 .16 .24 .31 –.11

Aggression

53.0 8.5 27

.09 .13 .15 .01 .07 .14 .07 –.02 .24 .09 .01 .14 –.05 .05 .15

.05 .19 .24 .08 .17 .12 .13 .00 –.03 .01 .15 –.15

Conduct Problems

53.0 13.4 27

.29 .18 .22 .20 .38 .37 .35 .26 .23 .36 .38 .41 .20 .34 .21

.35 .48 .40 .45 .28 .44 .23 .43 .23 .26 .36 .11

Anxiety

59.6 11.5 27

.24 .25 .28 .04 .28 .31 .28 .20 .35 .31 .23 .30 .20 .28 .31

.26 .36 .20 .26 .20 .43 .27 .24 .01 .18 .27 .11

Depression

53.6 11.4 27

.16 .38 .16 .05 .16 .34 .27 .13 .31 .31 .19 .23 .26 .26 .19

.09 .26 .15 .15 .29 .34 .25 .26 –.05 .07 .20 .05

Somatization

BASC–2 PRS Scale

78.9 19.1 27

–.27 .12 –.12 –.16 –.24 –.09 –.01 –.26 .07 –.13 –.17 –.31 –.07 –.11 –.08

–.31 –.08 –.35 –.13 –.16 .02 .00 –.02 –.47 –.33 –.37 –.07

Atypicality

73.7 14.5 27

–.34 –.05 –.36 –.16 –.28 –.09 –.14 –.22 –.24 –.20 –.24 –.36 –.14 –.19 –.25

–.25 –.24 –.10 –.19 –.04 –.10 –.08 –.17 –.34 –.32 –.35 .00

Withdrawal

64.9 8.8 27

–.31 –.36 .09 –.21 –.08 –.30 –.26 –.45 –.08 –.29 –.26 –.41 –.37 –.19 –.25

–.08 –.12 –.25 –.08 –.19 –.29 –.28 –.21 –.41 –.30 –.47 –.33

Attention Problems

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 16

33.5 10.5 27

.15 .17 .17 .17 .07 .00 .08 .21 .17 .11 .06 .22 .18 .06 .21

.06 .04 .03 .12 –.09 .02 .07 .10 .22 .05 .20 .13

Adaptability

35.1 10.4 27

.28 –.06 .11 .16 .27 .23 .20 .35 .01 .21 .23 .39 .21 .22 .22

.30 .16 .30 .25 .17 .17 .22 .16 .35 .31 .42 .18

Social Skills

28

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.56 .45 .47 .46 .42 .49 .41 .48 .59 .60 .69 .42 .49 .12 .20 .14 .57 .50 .48 .63 .16 .58 .56 .61 .48 .58 .44

32.3 9.6 27

Mean SD  n

Leadership

30.7 12.7 27

.15 .12 .30 .23 .39 .49 .37 .38 .44 .37 .47 .51 .42 .23 .00 .15 .13 .53 .40 .55 .06 .38 .39 .47 .56 .35 .33

Activities of Daily Living

27.2 11.3 27

.64 .53 .59 .61 .53 .44 .34 .44 .70 .69 .77 .36 .65 .18 .35 .29 .69 .54 .42 .65 .28 .66 .59 .74 .51 .65 .53

Functional Communication

65.1 8.9 27

.03 .07 .05 .04 .03 –.10 –.28 –.18 –.18 –.06 –.16 –.35 –.11 –.27 –.14 –.20 .07 –.08 –.24 –.29 –.19 –.13 –.11 –.16 –.29 –.09 –.28

Anger Control

57.8 8.3 27

–.10 .13 .04 –.03 –.03 –.13 –.22 –.16 –.20 –.03 –.07 –.32 –.13 –.18 –.21 –.13 –.02 –.15 –.21 –.24 –.19 –.14 –.10 –.13 –.34 –.13 –.23

Bullying

BASC–2 PRS Scale

75.8 12.7 27

–.31 –.24 –.32 –.25 –.23 –.25 –.23 –.24 –.57 –.43 –.52 –.29 –.43 –.19 –.16 –.27 –.31 –.29 –.25 –.47 –.14 –.34 –.34 –.50 –.34 –.28 –.32

Developmental Social Disorders

65.4 11.0 27

.03 .21 –.16 .06 .03 .09 –.09 .04 –.16 –.01 –.12 –.16 –.10 –.13 –.05 –.10 .11 .03 –.03 –.16 –.06 –.02 .03 –.10 –.14 .02 –.13

Emotional Self-Control

67.9 8.6 27

–.13 .03 –.16 –.08 –.15 –.20 –.35 –.18 –.29 –.21 –.30 –.40 –.28 –.31 –.15 –.23 –.07 –.24 –.29 –.40 –.22 –.27 –.20 –.30 –.42 –.23 –.35

Executive Functioning

63.8 8.9 27

.25 .17 .05 .09 .12 .25 –.07 .21 .13 .14 –.01 .00 .01 –.22 –.21 –.32 .19 .17 .07 .00 –.23 .07 .20 –.01 –.01 .13 –.17

Negative Emotionality

28.0 10.5 27

.12 .12 .16 .16 .10 .15 .12 .20 .38 .26 .37 .20 .30 .15 .15 .18 .16 .17 .16 .33 .12 .24 .23 .35 .29 .19 .24

Resiliency

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 16

29

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.41 .31 .41 .40 .35 .40 .35 .39 .54 .48 .61 .40 .47 .17 .21 .22 .42 .44 .40 .58 .18 .48 .45 .57 .48 .46 .42

28.7 10.8 27

Mean SD  n

Adaptive Skills

70.9 10.8 27

–.15 .03 –.15 –.06 –.05 .01 –.09 –.08 –.40 –.23 –.28 –.18 –.24 –.10 –.10 –.23 –.10 –.06 –.09 –.28 –.05 –.13 –.15 –.26 –.20 –.09 –.16

Behavioral Symptoms Index

58.5 8.5 27

.04 .22 .12 .05 .09 .02 –.11 –.06 –.11 .01 .02 –.31 –.06 –.23 .01 –.20 .10 .02 –.09 –.18 –.07 –.04 –.03 –.02 –.24 –.01 –.12

Externalizing Problems

BASC–2 PRS Composite

56.7 13.3 27

.27 .42 .29 .33 .29 .46 .28 .36 .09 .20 .32 .10 .27 .30 .25 .12 .32 .39 .34 .23 .33 .38 .31 .36 .25 .34 .27

Internalizing Problems

6.2 5.6 5.5 4.5 7.0 6.7 7.1 7.4 6.0 5.0 5.2 6.8 4.9 5.2 6.2 6.0 78.2 82.2 84.4 76.9 76.1 75.2 78.0 71.3 79.9 80.6 74.2

Mean 3.4 3.3 3.5 2.9 4.2 4.5 4.3 3.7 4.6 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.4 17.9 23.1 21.2 20.2 18.2 19.6 19.4 22.5 20.8 19.0 18.7

SD 

WISC–V

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 16

n 26 26 26 27 27 26 27 27 26 27 27 27 26 26 23 27 25 26 27 27 23 25 27 26 25 25 23

30

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.35 .26 .69 .62 .59 .33 .63 .58

30.7 12.7 27

32.3 9.6 27

Activities of Daily Living

52.4 8.3 27

–.02 .02 .11 .14 .20 –.03 .17 .17

Aggression

.53 .49 .58 .49 .62 .55 .58 .71

Leadership

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n

67.4 12.3 27

–.55 –.42 –.45 –.40 –.40 –.54 –.40 –.51

Hyperactivity

27.2 11.3 27

.67 .53 .48 .39 .53 .67 .46 .67

Functional Communication

53.0 8.5 27

–.24 .00 .16 .18 .21 –.13 .20 .06

Conduct Problems

65.1 8.9 27

–.20 –.12 –.38 –.24 –.23 –.19 –.27 –.28

Anger Control

53.0 13.4 27

.05 .14 .50 .50 .47 .05 .50 .33

Anxiety

57.8 8.3 27

–.39 –.22 –.31 –.22 –.25 –.32 –.24 –.22

Bullying

59.6 11.5 27

.05 .17 .32 .34 .27 .08 .34 .23

Depression

75.8 12.7 27

–.53 –.56 –.48 –.42 –.56 –.62 –.47 –.66

Developmental Social Disorders

65.4 11.0 27

–.31 –.24 –.20 –.21 –.18 –.33 –.17 –.25

Emotional Self-Control

78.9 19.1 27

–.40 –.46 –.17 –.20 –.29 –.52 –.20 –.42

Atypicality

BASC–2 PRS Scale

53.6 11.4 27

–.10 –.09 .19 .12 .16 –.12 .16 –.01

Somatization

BASC–2 PRS Scale

67.9 8.6 27

–.45 –.35 –.42 –.36 –.40 –.46 –.39 –.49

Executive Functioning

73.7 14.5 27

–.51 –.51 –.17 –.09 –.25 –.55 –.16 –.47

Withdrawal

63.8 8.9 27

–.21 –.17 –.21 –.14 –.17 –.26 –.16 –.26

Negative Emotionality

64.9 8.8 27

–.31 –.37 –.59 –.49 –.59 –.40 –.56 –.66

Attention Problems

28.0 10.5 27

.43 .39 .46 .35 .49 .45 .42 .57

Resiliency

33.5 10.5 27

.41 .32 .44 .32 .46 .40 .39 .50

Adaptability

35.1 10.4 27

.51 .48 .52 .42 .56 .55 .50 .66

Social Skills

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 17

31

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 17

28.7 10.8 27

.58 .49 .64 .53 .65 .58 .61 .73

Adaptive Skills

70.9 10.8 27

–.46 –.44 –.25 –.20 –.31 –.53 –.23 –.45

Behavioral Symptoms Index

58.5 8.5 27

–.39 –.22 –.15 –.10 –.07 –.34 –.09 –.19

Externalizing Problems

BASC–2 PRS Composite

56.7 13.3 27

.00 .09 .39 .37 .35 .01 .39 .22

Internalizing Problems 81.1 75.8 84.9 88.8 88.2 78.8 87.7 82.1

Mean 18.7 20.9 25.1 21.4 23.2 16.2 21.6 16.3

SD 

WISC–V

25 25 25 25 25 25 25 23

n

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group (continued)

The mean WISC–V composite and subtest scores are in the very low to low average range. The BASC–2 PRS scores range from 27.2 (Functional Communication) to 78.9 (Atypicality). Unlike other clinical and typically developing samples, the pattern of correlations in the ASD-L group ranges from low to high with positive and negative associations. The results for the BASC–2 composite scores (i.e., Adaptive Skills, Behavioral Symptom Index, Externalizing Problems, and Internalizing Problems) indicate that cognitive skills are more highly related to adaptive functioning than to negative behaviors, and that language automaticity and memory functioning are generally more related to observed behaviors than other cognitive measures (the SRI–Adaptive Skills Index correlation is .73). Among the composite behavioral symptom scales, low scores on language automaticity and memory were associated with more behavioral symptoms in general. The highest correlations occur between WISC–V and Functional Communication, Leadership, Attention Problems, and Daily Living. Functional Communication and Leadership are related to a number of cognitive processing index scores including the VCI, WMI, AWMI, NSI, and SRI. Children with deficits in verbal problem solving, auditory working memory, automaticity of language, and memory are rated by parents as having difficulty with day to day communication and have difficulty working under pressure, being creative, and getting work completed. Children with ASD-L who have deficits in language automaticity and memory are also rated as having more problems with attention, social skills and resiliency. Working memory ability is also associated with attention problems. Children with better cognitive skills on Vocabulary, Comprehension, Visual Puzzles, Figure Weights, and the Symbol Translation subtests appear more anxious than children who have lower scores on those measures. The correlations of the WISC–V with the BASC–2 content scales indicate moderate relations between WISC–V complementary measures and BASC–2 parent ratings. Specifically, low scores on language automaticity and memory functioning are related to higher scores on the Developmental Social Disorders or Executive Functioning scales. Children showing deficits in automaticity of language and memory have more observable symptoms of a developmental disorder and executive functioning deficits. These results show that in a complex disorder with both cognitive and behavioral impairments, cognitive difficulties are related to observable differences in behavior. In particular, cognitive abilities relate to adaptive behaviors such that low ability is associated with observable deficits in communication, social skills, resiliency, and leadership skills. Among the WISC–V measures, Naming Speed Literacy and the Symbol Translation subtests are most consistently related to both adaptive functioning and behavior symptoms. Language automaticity and memory deficits are more associated with attention and social skills problems, and a lack of resiliency.

32 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Accompanying Language Impairment Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children diagnosed with ASD-NL have multiple behavioral and cognitive symptoms which can be evaluated with the BASC–2 (see Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Chapter 5 of the Tech Manual for symptom review). For the sample reported in the Tech Manual, children diagnosed with ASD-NL show weaknesses on the WMI, AWMI and NSI compared with matched controls. The WISC–V and the full BASC–2 PRS were administered to 30 children diagnosed with ASD-NL, aged 7–15, and their caregivers, with a testing interval from 0–35 days and a mean testing interval of 5 days. Tables 18 and 19 present the means, SDs, and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and BASC–2 PRS. The BASC–2 PRS scores reported here include: Hyperactivity, Aggression, Conduct Problems, Anxiety, Depression, Somatization, Atypicality, Withdrawal, Attention Problems, Adaptability, Social Skills, Leadership, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, Anger Control, Bullying, Developmental Social Disorders, Emotional Self-Control, Executive Functioning, Negative Emotionality, Resiliency, Adaptive Skills, Behavioral Symptom Index, Externalizing Problems, and Internalizing Problems. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study.

33 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

34

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.29 .07 .05 .18 .06 .17 .17 –.15 .17 .07 –.06 .09

–.15 .21 .25 .26 .18 .11 –.01 .00 .24 .06 –.03 –.11 .11 .09 .15

64.7 14.3 30

LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

Mean SD  n

Hyperactivity

55.3 15.3 30

.00 .16 .21 –.03 –.07 –.03 –.11 –.15 .18 –.14 .04 –.17 –.01 –.08 .03

–.09 .02 –.04 .00 –.02 –.04 –.11 –.08 .11 .13 –.30 .07

Aggression

56.8 15.9 30

–.11 .13 .20 .12 –.01 –.10 –.12 –.08 .17 –.13 .05 –.15 –.06 –.10 .05

.04 .00 –.08 –.01 –.15 –.01 –.18 –.04 .13 .12 –.17 .04

Conduct Problems

57.0 11.0 30

–.23 .00 –.11 –.24 –.03 –.20 –.17 –.15 –.05 –.16 –.20 –.24 –.13 –.16 –.11

–.03 –.06 –.15 –.03 –.30 –.06 –.06 –.21 .05 –.16 –.20 –.04

Anxiety

61.0 14.0 30

–.27 .03 –.05 –.07 .01 –.09 –.21 –.31 –.04 –.21 –.22 –.36 –.15 –.12 –.18

–.02 –.04 –.18 –.01 –.09 –.06 –.07 –.27 .10 –.15 –.38 –.12

Depression

52.5 12.1 30

–.15 .24 .05 –.10 –.04 –.09 –.20 –.32 .14 –.13 –.27 –.21 –.13 –.13 –.08

.10 –.17 –.32 .00 –.11 –.04 –.07 –.25 –.12 –.22 –.23 –.32

Somatization

BASC–2 PRS Scale

71.4 12.2 30

–.02 .09 .02 .14 .03 –.10 –.26 –.12 .05 –.11 –.24 –.06 –.14 –.14 –.01

.07 –.02 –.02 .08 –.13 –.05 –.13 –.29 .13 –.17 –.08 –.10

Atypicality

68.5 13.7 30

.20 .04 –.11 –.26 .36 .22 .02 .04 –.06 .17 .16 .20 .07 .21 .00

.26 .27 .32 .10 .20 .20 –.02 .06 .20 .22 .13 –.08

Withdrawal

65.5 7.2 30

–.33 –.15 .01 .33 .01 –.04 –.26 .01 –.07 –.14 –.17 –.21 –.13 –.13 –.03

.06 –.01 .06 .00 –.04 –.03 –.04 –.36 .08 .02 –.07 .11

Attention Problems

38.0 8.7 30

.02 –.06 .01 .17 .15 –.04 .18 .12 –.02 .12 .11 .09 .05 .11 .04

.09 .24 .28 .14 –.07 .01 .02 .25 –.03 –.04 .16 .04

Adaptability

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 18

40.3 11.0 30

–.36 –.16 –.05 .06 –.22 –.27 –.07 –.12 –.09 –.19 –.25 –.27 –.17 –.22 –.13

–.10 –.27 –.41 –.19 –.38 –.08 –.03 –.10 –.39 –.33 –.09 –.10

Social Skills

35

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.27 .01 –.09 .13 –.08 .20 .26 –.04 –.26 –.10 –.04 .02 –.15 .15 .23 .08 .10 .05 .11 –.02 .21 .08 –.07 –.11 .12 .09 .10

37.6 8.4 30

Mean SD  n

Leadership

33.0 7.9 30

–.07 –.02 –.13 –.02 –.15 .01 –.07 .16 –.15 –.08 –.11 .08 .04 .00 –.05 –.15 –.04 –.09 .06 –.01 –.02 –.06 .03 –.03 .00 –.03 –.04

Activities of Daily Living

35.1 9.6 30

.22 .23 .18 .27 –.05 .21 .24 .07 –.15 –.13 .00 .26 –.17 –.05 –.01 –.10 .21 .07 .17 .15 –.01 .09 –.04 –.10 .15 .15 .04

Functional Communication

63.2 11.8 30

.04 .01 –.03 .02 .00 .04 –.02 –.13 .13 .11 –.24 .12 –.13 .14 .19 .05 .01 .02 –.10 –.09 .16 –.10 .00 –.20 .02 –.04 .06

Anger Control

58.3 15.0 30

–.12 –.05 –.14 –.06 –.04 –.11 –.14 –.19 .07 .04 –.39 .08 –.05 .16 .21 .06 –.14 –.08 –.19 –.20 .18 –.22 –.07 –.25 –.06 –.16 .00

Bullying

BASC–2 PRS Scale

70.4 9.8 30

.21 .23 .30 .10 .25 .11 .05 –.15 .41 .30 .08 .05 .13 .12 .01 .14 .30 .21 –.08 .07 .06 .13 .10 .14 .06 .14 .09

Developmental Social Disorders

60.8 12.8 30

.31 .15 .07 .26 .22 .22 .17 –.02 .30 .19 –.05 .10 .10 .26 .28 .05 .26 .23 .07 .02 .28 .15 .11 .04 .19 .20 .19

Emotional Self-Control

64.2 10.7 30

.22 .18 .07 .16 .10 .18 .03 –.16 .20 .17 –.10 .11 –.04 .17 .27 .09 .20 .14 –.09 .00 .22 .02 .02 –.07 .08 .07 .15

Executive Functioning

57.7 11.9 30

.20 .08 –.01 .15 .03 .12 –.02 –.09 .16 .11 –.11 .01 –.09 .06 .12 –.11 .17 .07 –.07 –.07 .08 –.01 .03 –.10 .01 .06 .03

Negative Emotionality

33.4 8.1 30

.02 .07 .07 .06 –.27 .00 –.08 .06 –.21 –.16 .12 –.02 –.04 –.01 .05 –.01 –.04 –.16 .00 .06 .03 –.04 –.07 .02 –.06 –.08 .03

Resiliency

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 18

36

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.12 .06 –.05 .10 –.22 .11 .13 .09 –.30 –.20 –.02 .09 –.20 –.04 .04 .02 .06

–.08 .13 .04 .02 .02 –.07 –.13 .05 .03 .01

34.5 7.3 30

VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS

Mean SD  n

Adaptive Skills

68.5 10.9 30

.03 –.19 –.15 .10 –.09 –.10 –.17 –.06 –.03 –.01

.14 .08 .04 .09 .00 .06 –.06 –.25 .20 .03 –.21 –.02 –.11 .13 .10 .06 .13

Behavioral Symptoms Index

60.0 15.3 30

–.01 –.09 –.09 .21 –.08 .02 –.16 .01 –.04 .08

.08 .03 –.03 .06 –.05 .04 –.05 –.10 .15 .11 –.20 .07 –.09 .18 .24 .12 .03

Externalizing Problems

BASC–2 PRS Composite

58.4 12.8 30

–.14 –.23 –.32 .02 –.19 –.28 –.33 –.16 –.16 –.15

.03 –.10 –.26 –.01 –.19 –.06 –.08 –.30 .02 –.21 –.33 –.20 –.27 .11 –.05 –.16 –.01

Internalizing Problems

100.9 100.1 98.6 93.6 87.6 96.3 100.2 92.5 95.4 99.4 88.9

10.6 9.6 10.0 8.5 9.6 10.5 9.7 9.8 9.5 10.3 8.9 8.9 8.5 7.4 8.2 9.7

Mean

15.3 17.2 15.9 17.0 17.1 18.0 18.7 17.6 17.5 17.0 17.7

3.5 2.9 3.8 3.1 3.6 3.0 2.8 3.4 3.1 3.9 3.6 3.3 3.6 3.0 3.4 3.5

SD 

WISC–V

29 30 30 30 29 28 30 30 29 29 29

29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 30

n

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 18

37

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

37.6 8.4 30

–.36 –.24 –.09 –.12 –.15 –.27 –.16 –.28

Leadership

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n

64.7 14.3 30

–.10 .06 –.01 .00 –.02 .01 –.04 –.05

Hyperactivity

33.0 7.9 30

–.09 –.02 –.04 –.04 .04 –.07 –.08 –.15

Activities of Daily Living

55.3 15.3 30

.21 .24 –.14 –.10 –.21 .26 –.17 .03

Aggression

35.1 9.6 30

–.28 –.32 .11 .13 .16 –.33 .12 –.10

Functional Communication

56.8 15.9 30

.00 .14 –.16 –.19 –.22 .11 –.24 –.14

Conduct Problems

63.2 11.8 30

–.02 .09 –.11 –.09 –.07 .06 –.13 –.07

Anger Control

57.0 11.0 30

–.41 –.25 .02 –.05 .00 –.33 –.06 –.29

Anxiety

58.3 15.0 30

.17 .24 –.18 –.16 –.22 .24 –.22 –.03

Bullying

61.0 14.0 30

–.19 –.02 –.07 –.07 –.01 –.10 –.09 –.15

Depression

70.4 9.8 30

.25 .23 .15 .17 .27 .24 .22 .28

Developmental Social Disorders

60.8 12.8 30

.14 .23 .09 .13 .05 .21 .06 .12

Emotional Self-Control

71.4 12.2 30

–.09 .00 .13 .07 .09 –.04 .10 .04

Atypicality

BASC–2 PRS Scale

52.5 12.1 30

–.30 –.18 –.14 –.25 –.16 –.25 –.24 –.33

Somatization

BASC–2 PRS Scale

64.2 10.7 30

.19 .21 .01 .07 .04 .23 .02 .12

Executive Functioning

68.5 13.7 30

.13 .00 .12 .13 .23 .03 .18 .15

Withdrawal

57.7 11.9 30

.11 .09 –.04 .02 –.11 .12 –.08 –.02

Negative Emotionality

65.5 7.2 30

.14 –.02 –.05 .03 .02 .07 .01 .06

Attention Problems

33.4 8.1 30

–.26 –.27 –.10 –.16 –.08 –.28 –.10 –.20

Resiliency

38.0 8.7 30

–.07 –.06 .03 –.05 .16 –.07 .06 .04

Adaptability

40.3 11.0 30

–.45 –.33 –.16 –.17 –.20 –.38 –.21 –.38

Social Skills

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 19

38

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Table 19

34.5 7.3 30

–.37 –.28 –.03 –.06 .01 –.33 –.07 –.25

Adaptive Skills

68.5 10.9 30

.02 .08 –.01 .00 .01 .06 –.02 .01

Behavioral Symptoms Index

60.0 15.3 30

.04 .16 –.11 –.11 –.17 .13 –.17 –.06

Externalizing Problems

BASC–2 PRS Composite

58.4 12.8 30

–.35 –.17 –.07 –.14 –.06 –.27 –.15 –.30

Internalizing Problems 93.5 90.8 101.8 102.8 104.2 91.3 103.9 97.0

Mean 14.3 16.3 17.8 18.2 17.1 14.5 19.0 16.6

SD 

WISC–V

30 30 30 30 28 30 28 28

n

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group (continued)

The mean WISC–V composite scores are in the low average to average range. The BASC–2 PRS scores range from 33.0 (Activities of Daily Living) to 71.4 (Atypicality). The results indicate low negative correlations are present between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS problem behavior scores and positive with the adaptive behavior measures. Moderate correlations are observed between the Naming Speed Literacy subtest and the BASC–2 Anxiety and Social Skills scales. A few other moderate correlations are observed between the measures. However, given the large number of correlations and the small sample size, they may not be meaningful. In general, there are no strong associations between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS in the ASD-NL group. These results suggest that for children with ASD-NL, cognitive abilities share low levels of association with behavioral symptoms and adaptive functioning, as assessed with a parent report measure. In the ASD-NL sample, observable behavior problems may not relate to severity of cognitive difficulties.

Summary Results from these correlation studies of other measures with WISC–V in special groups provide additional support for the validity and clinical utility of the WISC–V. In particular, there is strong support for the new subtests and composites. In addition, the studies illustrate that the WISC–V is correlated with academic performance in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. The studies also demonstrate that in clinical samples with a high degree of cognitive and behavioral variability, the WISC–V is associated with adaptive functioning and behavioral concerns. In particular, the new complementary measures are related to both academic and behavioral measures. The results are generally consistent with expectations based on previous research and theoretical foundations. It is expected that future investigations utilizing the WISC–V in different clinical settings and populations will provide additional evidence of the scale’s utility when used as part of a comprehensive clinical evaluation for diagnosis and intervention purposes.

39 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Appendix

WISC–V Stability Coefficients, by Age Group

40 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

F

Table F.1 Ages 6–7

Stability Coefficients of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores, by Age Group First Testing

Second Testing

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

n

r 12

Corrected r a

Standard Differenceb

SI

9.3

2.4

10.5

1.8

33

.66

.78

.57

VC

9.0

2.7

9.7

2.8

37

.78

.82

.25

IN

9.4

2.9

10.0

2.4

37

.80

.81

.23

CO

9.5

2.5

10.1

2.3

36

.68

.78

.25

BD

8.9

2.7

10.5

2.7

34

.75

.80

.59

VP

9.7

2.7

10.4

2.8

37

.78

.82

.25

MR

9.0

2.3

10.8

2.5

34

.58

.75

.75

FW

9.4

2.8

9.5

2.6

34

.79

.82

.04

PC

10.0

2.4

10.6

2.7

33

.50

.68

.23

AR

9.9

2.0

10.6

2.1

36

.62

.83

.34

DS

9.8

2.8

9.5

2.6

36

.77

.80

–.11

PS

9.5

2.7

9.6

2.7

36

.77

.81

.04

LN

9.4

2.8

9.4

3.1

33

.79

.82

.00

CD

8.9

2.7

10.4

3.5

36

.73

.78

.48

SS

9.4

2.5

11.6

3.7

36

.76

.83

.70

CA

10.1

2.5

10.9

3.0

36

.71

.80

.29

BDn

8.9

2.8

10.7

3.0

34

.77

.80

.62

BDp

9.0

2.6

10.5

2.4

35

.77

.83

.60

DSf

9.7

2.3

9.7

2.7

35

.70

.82

.00

DSb

9.8

2.7

9.5

3.1

35

.76

.81

–.10

DSs

9.4

3.1

9.5

2.6

32

.74

.72

.03

CAr

10.3

2.4

10.8

2.7

33

.69

.80

.20

CAs

9.8

2.4

10.8

3.0

36

.69

.80

.37

Subtest/Process/ Composite Score

VCI

95.2

11.4

101.0

10.7

36

.78

.87

.52

VSI

94.8

14.0

102.6

13.0

37

.82

.84

.58

FRI

95.6

14.3

100.4

12.7

37

.65

.68

.35

WMI

98.1

14.7

96.9

12.9

36

.83

.84

–.09

PSI

96.6

14.2

107.2

18.6

36

.82

.84

.64

FSIQ

93.9

12.6

101.4

12.0

35

.86

.90

.61

QRI

97.9

11.1

99.7

11.2

37

.61

.79

.16

AWMI

96.8

13.7

97.2

13.7

36

.81

.84

.03

NVI

94.4

13.2

101.5

13.4

37

.80

.85

.53

GAI

93.9

12.4

101.8

10.8

36

.80

.86

.68

CPI

96.7

14.7

102.7

15.7

35

.87

.88

.39

a

Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen, 2002; Magnusson, 1967).

b

 he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance, computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.4.

41 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table F.1 Ages 8–9

Stability Coefficients of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores, by Age Group (continued) First Testing

Second Testing

Subtest/Process/ Composite Score

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

n

r 12

Corrected r a

Standard Differenceb

SI

10.0

2.0

10.6

2.5

42

.74

.88

.27

VC

9.7

2.7

9.9

2.8

43

.89

.91

.07

IN

9.7

2.4

10.4

2.5

43

.83

.89

.29

CO

9.8

2.5

10.3

2.9

43

.78

.85

.18

BD

9.9

2.8

11.4

3.1

41

.80

.83

.51

VP

10.1

3.0

11.5

3.0

39

.73

.73

.47

MR

10.1

2.3

10.7

2.3

40

.56

.74

.26

FW

10.6

2.7

11.0

2.7

42

.83

.86

.15

PC

10.3

3.1

11.2

2.7

39

.56

.53

.31

AR

10.1

2.2

10.6

2.6

39

.66

.82

.21

DS

10.1

2.8

10.3

3.3

42

.79

.82

.07

PS

10.5

2.6

10.6

2.3

39

.56

.67

.04

LN

10.0

2.9

10.2

3.0

41

.77

.79

.07

CD

10.3

2.9

11.8

2.9

43

.78

.79

.52

SS

10.1

2.6

11.4

2.7

40

.74

.80

.49

CA

10.6

2.9

11.6

2.7

41

.82

.83

.36

BDn

9.8

3.0

11.4

3.4

42

.79

.79

.50

BDp

10.0

3.1

11.0

3.3

40

.81

.80

.31

DSf

10.1

2.6

10.3

3.0

43

.81

.86

.07

DSb

10.4

2.5

10.4

2.7

39

.73

.81

.00

DSs

9.7

3.0

10.4

3.3

39

.75

.75

.22

CAr

10.4

3.0

11.6

2.7

39

.82

.82

.42

CAs

10.6

2.5

11.6

2.6

41

.74

.82

.39

VCI

99.4

11.6

101.7

13.4

42

.92

.95

.18

VSI

101.0

15.8

108.6

15.6

43

.82

.80

.48

FRI

102.4

13.0

105.2

11.9

43

.70

.77

.22

WMI

100.5

14.1

102.7

13.1

43

.70

.73

.16

PSI

101.2

13.7

108.8

13.2

42

.77

.81

.56

FSIQ

101.5

13.2

106.2

13.5

42

.91

.93

.35

QRI

102.2

13.7

104.2

13.7

43

.81

.84

.15

AWMI

100.0

14.1

100.7

16.3

43

.84

.86

.05

NVI

101.7

14.0

108.9

12.4

43

.83

.85

.54

GAI

101.0

13.1

105.2

13.3

42

.91

.93

.32

CPI

100.6

14.6

106.7

13.8

42

.84

.85

.43

a

Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen, 2002; Magnusson, 1967).

b

 he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance, computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.4.

42 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table F.1 Ages 10–11

Stability Coefficients of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores, by Age Group (continued) First Testing

Second Testing

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

n

r 12

Corrected r a

Standard Differenceb

SI

9.7

3.0

10.3

2.7

40

.89

.89

.21

VC

9.6

3.0

9.7

3.0

39

.92

.92

.03

IN

9.9

2.6

10.2

2.5

40

.88

.91

.12

CO

9.9

3.5

9.8

3.3

37

.90

.86

–.03

BD

9.7

2.8

10.9

3.3

35

.78

.81

.39

VP

10.2

3.0

11.2

2.9

39

.83

.83

.34

MR

9.5

2.4

10.1

2.3

38

.69

.80

.26

FW

10.7

2.4

11.4

2.4

38

.73

.83

.29

PC

9.6

2.8

10.2

3.2

38

.77

.80

.20

AR

9.0

2.6

9.6

2.5

38

.80

.85

.24

DS

9.4

2.7

9.4

2.8

39

.79

.83

.00

PS

9.5

2.5

10.0

2.6

39

.75

.83

.20

LN

9.7

2.7

9.8

2.6

40

.80

.84

.04

CD

9.5

2.8

11.1

2.8

40

.78

.81

.57

SS

10.4

3.4

11.8

3.0

37

.84

.79

.44

CA

8.9

2.7

10.5

2.7

39

.80

.84

.59

BDn

10.1

2.8

11.1

3.0

36

.74

.77

.34

BDp

10.2

3.4

10.8

3.5

36

.86

.82

.17

DSf

9.9

3.1

9.9

3.3

39

.80

.79

.00

DSb

9.9

2.9

9.9

2.5

36

.62

.64

.00

DSs

9.0

2.3

9.5

2.8

39

.71

.83

.20

CAr

8.9

2.7

10.6

2.4

38

.77

.81

.67

CAs

9.2

2.7

10.3

2.8

38

.78

.82

.40

VCI

98.1

15.2

100.2

14.4

39

.93

.93

.14

VSI

99.6

15.4

106.2

15.6

39

.82

.81

.43

FRI

100.3

14.1

104.0

12.4

40

.78

.81

.28

97.1

13.6

98.6

14.1

40

.81

.84

.11

PSI

100.1

15.9

108.9

15.3

38

.79

.76

.56

FSIQ

97.7

15.5

102.9

14.4

38

.92

.91

.35

QRI

98.7

13.7

102.5

11.8

40

.84

.87

.30

AWMI

97.2

13.0

98.1

13.4

40

.84

.88

.07

NVI

98.9

15.3

105.4

14.7

39

.87

.86

.43

GAI

98.5

15.7

103.1

13.9

38

.92

.91

.31

CPI

98.6

13.9

104.6

14.5

38

.79

.82

.42

Subtest/Process/ Composite Score

WMI

a

Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen, 2002; Magnusson, 1967).

b

 he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance, computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.4.

43 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table F.1 Ages 12–13

Stability Coefficients of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores, by Age Group (continued) First Testing

Second Testing

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

n

r 12

Corrected r a

Standard Differenceb

SI

9.7

2.6

10.3

2.5

42

.88

.91

.24

VC

9.9

2.6

10.2

2.6

42

.88

.91

.12

IN

9.6

2.7

10.2

2.8

42

.84

.87

.22

CO

10.5

2.8

10.5

3.0

42

.81

.83

.00

BD

9.3

3.4

10.5

3.5

42

.84

.79

.35

VP

10.0

2.6

10.6

2.9

41

.71

.78

.22

MR

10.1

2.4

11.0

2.2

39

.66

.78

.39

FW

9.5

2.5

10.3

2.6

39

.71

.80

.31

PC

9.5

2.1

10.3

2.6

40

.59

.80

.34

AR

10.0

3.0

10.2

2.4

38

.80

.80

.07

DS

9.7

2.9

10.5

3.0

41

.79

.80

.27

PS

9.6

2.8

10.1

2.6

40

.77

.80

.19

LN

9.8

2.8

10.4

2.4

42

.77

.80

.23

CD

10.8

2.9

11.5

2.9

41

.81

.82

.24

SS

10.3

2.8

12.0

3.2

40

.62

.67

.57

CA

9.7

2.9

11.6

3.9

41

.80

.81

.55

BDn

9.6

3.3

10.5

3.5

41

.85

.82

.26

BDp

9.9

3.5

10.9

3.5

41

.88

.84

.29

DSf

9.7

2.8

10.0

2.9

40

.71

.75

.11

DSb

10.0

2.9

10.9

2.8

40

.78

.79

.32

DSs

9.4

2.4

9.9

2.9

39

.76

.85

.19

CAr

10.2

2.9

11.3

3.4

38

.79

.80

.35

CAs

9.8

3.0

10.9

3.5

41

.82

.82

.34

Subtest/Process/ Composite Score

VCI

99.0

12.8

101.4

12.7

42

.92

.94

.19

VSI

98.1

14.8

103.1

15.9

42

.88

.88

.33

FRI

98.9

11.5

105.1

13.0

42

.61

.77

.51

WMI

97.5

13.7

102.2

13.9

42

.79

.82

.34

PSI

103.6

15.4

109.7

15.6

41

.79

.78

.39

FSIQ

99.0

12.9

104.8

13.3

42

.92

.94

.44

QRI

98.1

13.9

102.7

14.3

41

.77

.80

.33

AWMI

98.6

13.1

102.5

13.5

42

.86

.89

.29

NVI

98.9

13.1

105.4

13.3

42

.89

.92

.49

GAI

98.1

13.0

103.6

13.8

42

.89

.92

.41

CPI

100.5

14.3

107.2

13.2

41

.81

.83

.49

a

Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen, 2002; Magnusson, 1967).

b

 he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance, computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.4.

44 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table F.1 Ages 14–16

Stability Coefficients of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores, by Age Group (continued) First Testing

Second Testing

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

n

r 12

Corrected r a

Standard Differenceb

SI

9.9

2.4

10.9

2.6

56

.86

.91

.40

VC

9.9

2.8

10.2

2.9

56

.92

.93

.11

IN

9.9

3.0

10.6

3.1

56

.89

.89

.23

CO

10.1

3.0

10.1

2.7

56

.80

.80

.00

BD

9.9

2.5

10.8

2.9

56

.77

.84

.33

VP

9.7

2.9

11.1

3.0

54

.81

.82

.47

MR

9.3

2.6

10.7

3.2

51

.75

.81

.48

FW

9.8

2.6

10.2

2.5

51

.72

.79

.16

PC

9.8

2.9

11.1

3.0

53

.68

.70

.44

AR

10.0

2.4

10.2

3.0

54

.80

.87

.07

DS

9.9

2.9

10.7

3.2

56

.83

.84

.26

PS

9.6

2.1

10.3

2.7

54

.70

.85

.29

LN

10.2

2.4

10.9

2.8

56

.73

.83

.27

CD

10.3

2.9

11.4

3.5

56

.85

.86

.34

SS

9.7

2.3

11.0

3.2

56

.78

.87

.47

CA

9.8

3.1

11.1

3.5

52

.82

.81

.39

BDn

9.5

2.2

10.5

3.0

54

.70

.84

.38

BDp

9.9

2.7

10.9

3.0

56

.85

.88

.35

DSf

10.1

2.7

10.8

2.9

56

.84

.87

.25

DSb

9.4

2.8

10.0

3.0

51

.68

.72

.21

DSs

9.9

2.7

10.7

2.7

51

.75

.80

.30

CAr

9.9

3.2

11.0

3.0

52

.83

.81

.35

CAs

10.0

3.1

11.0

3.5

53

.83

.82

.30

VCI

99.8

12.9

103.1

13.6

56

.94

.96

.25

VSI

99.1

13.8

105.6

14.9

56

.84

.86

.45

FRI

96.7

14.5

102.9

14.2

55

.66

.68

.43

WMI

98.9

13.4

102.8

14.4

56

.81

.85

.28

Subtest/Process/ Composite Score

PSI

99.8

12.6

106.8

17.1

56

.88

.92

.47

FSIQ

98.5

13.8

105.1

15.1

55

.91

.92

.46

QRI

99.0

13.9

102.6

15.8

55

.70

.74

.24

100.1

13.1

104.3

15.0

56

.87

.90

.30

NVI

98.1

14.1

105.6

14.7

55

.88

.89

.52

GAI

98.1

13.8

103.8

14.3

55

.90

.92

.41

CPI

99.4

13.3

105.8

16.3

56

.88

.91

.43

AWMI

a

Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen, 2002; Magnusson, 1967).

b

 he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance, computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.4.

45 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table F.2 Ages 6–7 Subtest/ Composite Score

Stability Coefficients of Complementary Subtest and Composite Scores, by Age Group First Testing

Second Testing

Mean

SD

NSL

96.5

NSQ

100.2

IST

94.3

DST

95.4

RST NSI

r 12

Corrected ra

Standard Differenceb

37

.92

.85

.21

36

.80

.79

.12

36

.86

.88

.52

37

.84

.87

.60

14.2

37

.83

.88

.50

18.9

37

.88

.81

.22

102.6

13.5

37

.85

.89

.60

102.8

15.1

37

.88

.88

.49

n

r 12

Corrected ra

Standard Differenceb

Mean

SD

20.8

100.8

20.6

15.3

102.0

15.9

14.0

101.1

12.3

13.5

103.3

12.9

96.0

12.5

102.7

97.5

18.8

101.7

STI

94.7

12.9

SRI

95.4

15.1

Ages 8–9 Subtest/ Composite Score

First Testing Mean

n

Second Testing SD

Mean

SD

NSL

99.7

13.9

104.1

14.7

39

.76

.79

.31

NSQ

103.0

14.5

102.1

14.7

43

.80

.81

–.06

IST

103.0

13.5

112.3

14.6

43

.81

.85

.66

DST

103.7

12.8

112.5

14.1

42

.79

.85

.65

RST

102.4

14.5

108.3

11.5

40

.79

.80

.45

NSI

101.2

16.0

102.7

16.5

42

.78

.75

.09

STI

102.8

14.2

112.0

14.7

43

.81

.83

.64

SRI

102.7

16.2

109.4

16.7

42

.88

.86

.41

Ages 10–11

First Testing

Second Testing

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

n

r 12

Corrected ra

Standard Differenceb

NSL

94.9

17.0

97.3

14.6

39

.86

.82

.15

NSQ

96.0

14.7

98.1

14.7

39

.85

.86

.14

IST

96.2

15.3

103.7

17.2

39

.93

.93

.46

Subtest/ Composite Score

DST

95.5

15.4

103.1

15.7

39

.89

.88

.49

RST

96.1

16.2

101.2

14.0

36

.85

.83

.34

NSI

94.7

16.1

97.9

15.1

40

.81

.78

.21

STI

96.2

15.4

103.9

17.1

40

.91

.91

.47

SRI

94.7

16.3

101.3

17.4

40

.89

.87

.39

a

Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen, 2002; Magnusson, 1967).

b

 he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance, computed using Cohen’s T (1996) Formula 10.4.

46 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Table F.2

Stability Coefficients of Complementary Subtest and Composite Scores, by Age Group (continued) First Testing

Ages 12–13 Subtest/ Composite Score

Mean

Second Testing SD

Mean

SD

n

r 12

Corrected ra

Standard Differenceb

NSL

97.8

14.9

100.8

16.3

41

.86

.86

.19

NSQ

99.0

15.9

100.0

15.7

41

.86

.84

.06

IST

98.1

14.5

105.6

15.1

42

.86

.87

.51

DST

97.7

12.9

107.3

15.3

41

.85

.89

.68

RST

99.8

14.0

103.7

16.1

38

.75

.78

.26

NSI

98.5

15.5

100.1

16.8

42

.83

.82

.10

STI

98.5

13.9

106.5

16.1

41

.82

.85

.53

SRI

98.6

14.4

104.7

16.5

41

.87

.88

.39

n

r 12

Corrected ra

Standard Differenceb

First Testing

Ages 14–16 Subtest/ Composite Score

Mean

Second Testing SD

Mean

SD

NSL

101.2

13.0

103.8

13.7

55

.90

.92

.19

NSQ

100.0

13.4

100.2

13.6

56

.78

.82

.01

IST

96.1

13.2

107.4

16.3

55

.84

.88

.76

DST

97.4

13.4

107.5

15.4

55

.83

.86

.70

RST

99.5

14.5

105.2

13.8

52

.79

.80

.40

NSI

100.8

14.0

102.2

14.6

56

.85

.87

.10

STI

96.3

15.0

106.5

16.2

55

.86

.86

.65

SRI

98.3

13.1

105.8

15.1

55

.85

.89

.53

a

Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen, 2002; Magnusson, 1967).

b

 he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance, computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.4.

47 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

Appendix

Intercorrelations of WISC–V Scores, by Age Group

48 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

G

49

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.53

.32

.77

.54

.56

.56

.78

.51

9.9 3.3

PSI

FSIQ

QRI

AWMI

NVI

GAI

CPI

Mean SD

.60

.69

.59

.61

.56

.72

.43

.57

.45

.54

.45

.52

.46

.57

.29

.47

.39

.48

.73

.74

.46

.42

.71

.35

.45

.52

.50

.67

.75

.55

.53

.67

.29

.54

.58

.88

.52

.58

.80

.79

.56

.60

.78

.37

.60

.88

.58

.52

.37

.65

.66

.38

.77

.61

.26

.37

.83

.48

.36

.53

.56

.57

.54

.50

.58

.30

.58

.51

.49

.44

.55

.51

.49

.56

.81

.56

.37

.55

.43

.37

.47

.70

.65

.62

.93

.59

.75

.34

.84

.54

.57

.57

.09

.65

.39

.60

.39

.38

.41

.29

.81

.41

.33

.27

.00

.58

.60

.56

.94

.54

.66

.31

.68

.50

.50

.53

.00

.68

.29

.49

.20

.23

.47

.88

.23

.21

.24

.23

.29

.81

.47

.58

.41

.47

.56

.89

.45

.44

.41

.35

.23

.15

.41

.19

.10

.17

.02

.02

.15

.28

.04

.06

.18

.02

.92

.93

.07

.04

.48

.72

.74

.46

.42

.71

.35

.45

.52

.88

.45

.23

.18

.43

.33

.49

.68

.71

.46

.44

.68

.38

.44

.50

.82

.42

.23

.19

.42

.41

.34

.35

.54

.28

.41

.15

.54

.28

.35

.28

.07

.08

.61

.49

.49

.77

.47

.59

.28

.75

.40

.41

.44

.06

.12

.22

.03

.03

.13

.61

.64

.57

.15

.07

.13

.82 –.01

.58 –.01

.71

.35

.68

.52

.52

.60

.22

.10

.19

.05

.03

.15

.29

.06

.08

.51

.85

.59

.59

.53

.82

.33

.52

.52

.55

.79

.85

.57

.54

.78

.37

.56

.62

.56

.56

.56

.85

.85

.56

.79

.81

.37

.57

.47

.47

.82

.64

.74

.81

.59

.71

.38

.37

.37

.85

.43

.61

.35

.40

.58

.56

.56

.77

.97

.91

.75

.74

.29

.64

.46

.66

.59

.56

.64

.59

.73

.72

.60

.25

.25

.68

.67

.63

.74

.74

.80

.88

.27

.41

.50

.65

.61

.59

.63

.47

.65

.55

.55

.61

.62

.41

.39

.42

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

9.9 10.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.2 9.9 10.0 10.0 10.2 10.0 9.9 10.0 10.0 9.8 10.2 10.1 19.8 20.0 20.3 20.2 20.0 70.1 20.2 19.9 60.5 50.1 40.1 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.2 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.8 3.3 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.2 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.2 2.8 2.8 5.4 5.3 5.1 4.8 5.2 14.4 4.5 5.9 11.8 11.1 8.3

.38

.71

.48

.48

.39

.69

.26

.38

.55

.89

.45

.01

.24

.21

.33

.55

WMI

.41

.41

.57

.08

.71

.05 –.01 –.07

.29

.18

.08

.19

.50

.49

.67

.05

.00

.82

.61

.21

.01

FRI

.49

.86

.08

.05

.52

.39

.05

.02

.48

.10

.06 –.01

.50

.83

.38

.38

.73

.90

.23

.06

.38

.50

.24

.29

.26

.09

VSI

.10

.18

.50

.48

.64

.41

.41

.05

VCI

.09

.12

.49

.23

.29

.26

.27

.01

.03 –.03

.07

.42

.44

.26

.45

.46

.55

CAs

.01

.54

.40

.15

.35

.31

.32

.03

.59

.32

.32

.40

.39

.36

CAr

.48

.41

.34

.35

.36

.31

.58

.50

.28

.51

.52

.34

.08 –.02 –.04

.40

.29

DSs

.33

.33

.55

.56

.00

.41

.28

.45

.39

.89

.99

.07

.37

.90

DSb

.25

.33

.31

.03

.32

.23

.25

.40

.42

.08

.42

.20

.23

DSf

.36

.38

.10

.36

.23

.35

.37

.22

.35

.17 .20

.41

.12

.31

.13

.49

.28

BDp

.08

.48

.23

.45 .56

BDn

.00

.27

.15

.36 .36

.04

.27

.50

.40 .18

.35

.20

.47

.25 .18

CA

.28

.41

.43 .36

SS

.19

.43

.32

.36 .74

.23

.52

.26

.55

.48 .37

CD

.44

.21

.56

.35 .35

.50

.31

.46

.31 .56

LN

.15

.55

.49 .56

.32

.63

.52

.43

PS

.46

.33

.48 .25

.55

.39

.35

.50

.37

.52

DS

.40

.35

.47

AR

.39

.23

.42 .49

.39

.36

.56

.51

PC

.29

.41

.52

.35

.56

.50

.42

FW

.46

.41

MR

.48

.38

.31

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.44

SS

.41

CD

VP

LN

BD

.53

.55

PS

.49

DS

CO

.59

AR

.60

PC

IN

FW .57

MR

.57

VP

VC

BD .57

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 6

Table G.1

50

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.49

.33

.49

.51

99.6 14.7

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

100.0 14.9

.50

.49

.33

.46

.44

.49

.36

.21

VSI

9.9 2.8

.45

.48

.24

.49

.44

.43

.17

.24

VC

100.8 14.8

.46

.46

.30

.42

.43

.45

.33

.20

FRI

10.2 2.7

.56

.50

.41

.51

.46

.46

.40

.32

IN

100.5 13.9

.63

.55

.48

.49

.53

.54

.53

.31

WMI

10.0 2.8

.46

.44

.31

.47

.40

.39

.34

.20

CO

99.9 14.8

.42

.26

.45

.24

.24

.27

.44

.35

PSI

10.0 3.0

.42

.39

.30

.37

.35

.41

.29

.23

BD

100.1 14.7

.63

.58

.46

.54

.54

.57

.44

.36

FSIQ

10.0 3.0

.46

.47

.28

.44

.43

.46

.34

.15

VP

100.5 13.0

.54

.49

.40

.44

.48

.48

.45

.25

QRI

10.1 3.2

.46

.46

.30

.44

.44

.45

.30

.22

MR

99.7 16.0

.63

.56

.46

.49

.55

.57

.48

.33

AWMI

10.2 2.7

.31

.32

.21

.27

.30

.32

.26

.11

FW

100.5 14.3

.58

.53

.43

.49

.50

.54

.45

.29

NVI

10.0 3.1

.42

.40

.30

.35

.38

.39

.30

.22

PC

100.1 14.5

.57

.56

.38

.53

.52

.54

.35

.32

GAI

10.0 3.0

.53

.46

.41

.43

.45

.43

.44

.27

AR

100.2 14.4

.62

.48

.56

.44

.46

.48

.58

.39

CPI

10.0 3.0

.61

.54

.45

.48

.53

.53

.48

.30

DS

99.8 15.2

.63

.16

.87

.17

.14

.15

.51

NSL

10.2 2.8

.42

.35

.34

.31

.33

.35

.39

.21

PS

100.0 15.2

.78

.44

.87

.40

.44

.43

NSQ

9.9 3.3

.57

.51

.42

.43

.49

.53

.42

.31

LN

99.4 15.0

.78

.96

.33

.82

.92

IST

10.0 2.9

.28

.16

.32

.14

.15

.17

.31

.26

CD

100.8 15.2

.79

.96

.33

.83

DST

10.0 2.9

.46

.30

.48

.29

.28

.30

.48

.36

SS

100.1 15.7

.77

.93

.33

RST

10.2 2.9

.08

–.01

.16

.06

–.02

–.06

.14

.15

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.45

9.9 3.3

Mean SD

DST

.46

SRI

.45

.40

STI

.26

.35

NSI

IST

.39

RST

NSQ

.37

DST

VCI

.38

IST

.32

.29

NSQ

NSL

.32

NSL

Subtest/ Composite Score

SI

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 6

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.2

199.7 26.4

.81

.35

.51

.51

NSI

10.0 3.2

.41

.39

.29

.37

.34

.40

.29

.22

BDn

300.3 43.5

.82

.84

.91

.91

STI

9.9 2.7

.41

.40

.28

.40

.35

.40

.27

.21

BDp

199.5 24.2

.73

.78

.77

.56

.29

SRI

10.0 2.8

.33

.33

.23

.29

.35

.30

.30

.11

DSf

10.0 3.0

.50

.41

.41

.36

.42

.40

.42

.28

DSb

9.8 3.2

.55

.47

.43

.44

.43

.48

.42

.33

DSs

10.2 2.8

.07

–.02

.15

.04

–.02

–.08

.12

.15

CAr

10.1 2.8

.10

.00

.18

.05

–.02

–.03

.17

.15

CAs

51

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.49

.22

.75

.55

.53

.56

.80

.42

10.1 9.6 3.0 3.2

PSI

FSIQ

QRI

AWMI

NVI

GAI

CPI

Mean SD

.38

.54

.44

.42

.42

.55

.21

.43

.46

.71

.73

.43

.43

.71

.36

.38

.51

.36

.62

.74

.40

.45

.61

.19

.41

.58

9.9 10.0 10.0 9.7 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1

.41

.69

.53

.54

.48

.69

.22

.46

.38

.87

.44

9.9 3.0

.43

.75

.77

.45

.50

.73

.26

.46

.85

.62

.47

9.9 2.9

.35

.70

.65

.40

.84

.66

.22

.36

.84

.45

.45

.55

.54

.55

.63

.85

.62

.40

.51

.49

.41

.44

.70

.56

.58

.88

.55

.71

.31

.84

.48

.47

.48

.24

.66

.38

.59

.43

.33

.44

.24

.85

.34

.31

.33

.10

.53

.58

.55

.90

.57

.65

.32

.55

.46

.42

.53

.16

.09

.71

.19

.48

.30

.27

.42

.88

.25

.19

.23

.07

.27

.22

.76

.35

.47

.30

.37

.46

.89

.32

.30

.32

.23

.41

.33

.15

.33

.27

.31

.17

.23

.33

.37

.16

.23

.30

.22

.93

.92

.13

.46

.70

.72

.45

.43

.71

.36

.38

.50

.86

.43

.23

.20

.37

.30

.41

.66

.67

.45

.45

.66

.33

.34

.48

.79

.39

.16

.12

.33

.54

.39

.40

.59

.35

.51

.30

.59

.30

.32

.35

.18

.16

.58

.45

.50

.69

.46

.56

.29

.67

.44

.38

.36

.23

.51

.48

.48

.73

.47

.59

.17

.68

.40

.42

.40

.28

.22

.23

.13

.17

.27

.31

.13

.15

.25

9.9 10.0 10.2 9.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.9 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.1 9.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.2 2.9 3.0 2.7 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.8

.29

.36

.35

.34

.34

.39

.18

.30

.29

.33

.33

.19

.03

.16

.19

.38

.85

.55

.55

.53

.79

.17

.47

.54

.47

.76

.85

.48

.51

.76

.32

.46

.63

.51

.51

.46

.86

.84

.51

.79

.82

.28

.48

.44

.44

.80

.55

.69

.77

.51

.67

.33

.43

.43

.83

.31

.54

.34

.37

.49

.56

.56

.71

.96

.90

.75

.76

.22

.58

.51

.61

.57

.51

.64

.53

.73

.71

.62

.42

.42

.68

.63

.62

.58

.58

.75

.85

.26

.38

.46

.63

.59

.57

.52

.52

.59

.53

.56

.66

.51

.45

.37

.44

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

9.9 19.8 19.7 19.8 20.0 20.0 69.9 19.9 20.3 59.3 49.6 40.0 2.9 5.6 5.3 5.1 5.1 5.5 14.0 5.0 5.4 11.9 11.2 8.6

.37

.30

.35

.20

.25

.35

.38

.20

.27

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.26

.74

.43

.45

.41

.67

.09

.36

.47

.86

.42

.13

.18

.50

.31

.50

WMI

.43

.37

.57

.24

.15

.34

.20

.16

.31

.54

.49

.72

.22

.05

.82

.48

.30

.22

FRI

.42

.90

.30

.13

.47

.37

.23

.20

.48

.24

.12

.30

.78

.38

.33

.73

.89

.16

.24

.33

.44

.30

.25

.28

.14

VSI

.19

.19

.34

.30

.71

.42

.40

.12

VCI

.19

.05

.36

.34

.37

.19

.23

.15

.20

.15

.36

.41

.22

.40

.42

.46

CAs

.16

.41

.36

.21

.43

.38

.43

.20

.42

.29

.30

.24

.23

.12

.34

CAr

.35

.23

.24

.34

.34

.06

.23

.31

.37

.34

.32

.48

.51

.21

.31

.31

DSs

.26

.36

.47

.51

.19

.36

.32

.38

.39

.91

.99

.09

.17

.91

DSb

.30

.31

.31

.20

.26

.15

.33

.45

.45

.19

.25

.24

.24

DSf

.32

.35

.29

.20

.34

.36

.38

.24

.36

.16 .39

.42

.10

.22

.12

.58

.26

BDp

.18

.22

.20

.30 .56

BDn

.18

.13

.13

.37 .26

.21

.28

.40

.17 .31

.27

.15

.34

.24 .20

CA

.17

.38

.34 .36

SS

.01

.37

.30

.37 .58

.11

.49

.24

.44

.41 .43

CD

.44

.30

.41

.33 .31

.52

.30

.41

.37 .56

LN

.23

.43

.39 .34

.37

.49

.43

.30

PS

.39

.33

.34 .42

.46

.23

.26

.47

.30

.24

DS

.35

.35

.44

AR

.35

.31

.34 .43

.25

.37

.43

.56

PC

.36

.38

.51

.46

.51

.46

.33

FW

.39

.45

MR

.39

.34

.31

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.41

SS

.42

CD

VP

LN

BD

.53

.55

PS

.50

DS

CO

.66

AR

.64

PC

IN

FW .61

MR

.61

VP

VC

BD .61

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 7

Table G.3

52

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.34

.30

.43

.42

99.5 15.2

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

99.1 14.6

.35

.36

.27

.31

.36

.34

.27

.27

VSI

9.6 3.2

.30

.34

.20

.27

.37

.33

.09

.27

VC

99.5 14.7

.31

.43

.17

.39

.42

.42

.24

.12

FRI

9.9 3.0

.45

.51

.27

.41

.51

.51

.17

.31

IN

99.8 14.6

.52

.53

.40

.46

.52

.53

.38

.35

WMI

10.0 2.9

.42

.47

.24

.44

.43

.46

.20

.24

CO

100.1 15.5

.35

.25

.33

.20

.26

.24

.29

.33

PSI

10.0 3.0

.35

.30

.30

.22

.33

.29

.25

.31

BD

99.9 14.2

.53

.53

.39

.45

.53

.51

.33

.39

FSIQ

9.7 3.1

.25

.31

.17

.30

.29

.29

.21

.16

VP

99.6 14.5

.46

.46

.37

.43

.44

.43

.37

.31

QRI

9.9 3.0

.25

.39

.10

.35

.38

.38

.19

.05

MR

100.8 15.0

.59

.52

.48

.46

.49

.53

.46

.43

AWMI

9.9 2.9

.28

.35

.18

.31

.34

.33

.21

.15

FW

99.1 14.4

.48

.49

.36

.42

.48

.47

.35

.34

NVI

9.9 2.9

.33

.27

.32

.22

.26

.28

.33

.21

PC

99.5 14.6

.45

.48

.31

.40

.50

.47

.27

.31

GAI

10.0 3.0

.48

.43

.41

.41

.41

.40

.40

.36

AR

99.9 14.9

.54

.47

.46

.39

.47

.46

.42

.43

CPI

10.2 3.0

.50

.50

.38

.46

.46

.50

.36

.31

DS

100.1 15.7

.74

.29

.89

.23

.31

.29

.58

NSL

9.8 3.0

.40

.40

.32

.31

.42

.39

.31

.28

PS

99.8 15.9

.76

.40

.89

.33

.38

.42

NSQ

10.0 3.2

.55

.45

.47

.38

.43

.46

.46

.44

LN

98.3 14.5

.78

.97

.37

.81

.93

IST

10.0 3.0

.32

.19

.31

.18

.17

.19

.25

.34

CD

100.2 14.2

.77

.95

.36

.77

DST

10.0 3.2

.31

.25

.27

.18

.29

.23

.28

.26

SS

99.2 15.1

.69

.91

.28

RST

9.9 2.9

.15

.14

.14

.15

.14

.13

.13

.18

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.46

10.1 3.0

Mean SD

DST

.45

SRI

.42

.43

STI

.20

.34

NSI

IST

.35

RST

NSQ

.45

DST

VCI

.42

IST

.33

.27

NSQ

NSL

.33

NSL

Subtest/ Composite Score

SI

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 7

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.4

201.3 28.0

.84

.36

.58

.58

NSI

10.0 3.0

.36

.31

.30

.23

.34

.30

.25

.31

BDn

297.7 41.3

.79

.80

.89

.92

STI

10.1 2.7

.39

.33

.33

.25

.36

.33

.29

.32

BDp

201.1 25.1

.65

.75

.78

.48

.44

SRI

10.2 3.0

.32

.40

.18

.40

.35

.38

.18

.15

DSf

10.0 2.8

.39

.37

.34

.31

.35

.39

.35

.25

DSb

10.1 3.0

.41

.42

.32

.40

.38

.41

.31

.27

DSs

9.8 2.8

.11

.09

.12

.10

.08

.08

.11

.15

CAr

9.9 2.9

.18

.18

.16

.16

.18

.16

.16

.19

CAs

53

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.41

.41

.63 .57

.76

.79 .38

.71

.65

.47

.41

.48

.50

.34

.37

.50

.61

.65

.64

.63

.85

.69

.37

.72

.56

.58

.90

.59

.70

.33

.85

.68

.50

.65

.50

.45

.52

.25

.86

.45

.60

.54

.57

.89

.55

.62

.35

.62

.51

.41

.48

.69

.29

.50

.33

.25

.49

.87

.27

.28

.24

.22

.16

.71

.35

.44

.32

.28

.44

.87

.31

.30

.30

.30

.21

.15

.05

.09

.03

.03

.08

.23

.02

.07

.04

.02

.92

.40

.69

.71

.35

.44

.66

.31

.35

.49

.87

.44

.07

.38

.63

.66

.32

.41

.60

.29

.32

.44

.82

.39

.09

.43

.36

.31

.56

.39

.44

.15

.55

.35

.18

.30

.13

.57

.42

.47

.70

.45

.54

.27

.65

.41

.31

.35

.07

.00

.02

.20

.03 .60

.10

.50 –.01

.52

.74 –.06

.49 –.02

.60

.31

.67 –.03

.47 –.01

.38

.44 –.01

.03

.03 –.03 –.04

.16

.12

.14

.11

.10

.15

.21

.06

.15

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.44

.71

.74

.52

.87

.68

.32

.61

.54

.37

.45

.11

.01

.25

.52

.88

.67

.53

.63

.83

.30

.54

.47

.76

.83

.44

.53

.73

.31

.56

.87

.85

.59

.82

.86

.82

.62

.72

.82

.61

.81

.37

.54

.38

.31

.77

.96

.92

.74

.80 .63

.56

.79

.75

.64 .74

.61

.78

.89 .61

9.9 10.2 10.1 9.9 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.0 10.0 9.8 10.1 10.1 10.0 20.2 20.3 20.2 20.1 20.2 70.6 20.2 20.1 60.6 50.5 40.3 2.9 3.1 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.9 5.5 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.0 14.6 5.1 5.2 12.4 11.5 8.4

.48

.56

.72

.42

.52

.76

.17

.35

.58

.39

.47

.02

.00

.28

.53

Mean SD

.47

.70

.50

.36

.47

.61

.39

.44

.42

.49

.59

.08

.93

.00

.72

.48

.33

CPI

.83

.60

.45

.46

.67

.24

.54

.84

.43

.39

.02

.18

.30

.24

.33

.77

.58

GAI

.64

.42

.37

.55

.31

.43

.85

.42

.50

.19

.16

.24

.03

.45

.58

.58

NVI

.53

.54

.68

.26

.36

.54

.56

.54

.56

.20

.09

.62

.45

.56

AWMI

.60

.78

.33

.47

.49

.88

.52

.39

.27

.16

.08

.56

.08

QRI

.75

.74

.38

FSIQ

.26

.45

.43

.88

.46

.15

.76

.51

.10 .33

.29

.27

PSI

.51

.54

.41

.61

.10

.51

.37

.15 –.04 –.04 –.01 –.07

.26

.75

.31

.27 .21

.49

.17

WMI

.60

.51

.71

.08

.00

.34

.44

.25

.25

.24 .20

.53

.94

FRI

.55

.92

.07

.00 –.03

.46

.24

.69

.30

.30 .04

.47

.03

.91

.09

.01

.37

.33

.34

.27

.28

.30

VSI

.21

.06

.29

.36

.22

.28

.32

.47

VCI

.14

.09

.42

.30

.34

.39

.42

.51

.00

.21

CAs

.02

.37

.24

.25

.35

.40

.18

–.04

.51

.43

CAr

.47

.26

.11

.32

.35

.02

.30

.30

.33

.26

.20

.42

.47

.00

.25

.32

DSs

.31

.18

.51

.55

.03

.28

.51

.33

.27

.92

.99

.36

.18 –.02

.29

.31

DSb

.27

.25

.28

.08

.14

.18

.28

.41

.43

.04

.37

.29

.39

DSf

.41

.44

.04

.24

.29

.61

.47

.31

.03

.29

.27

.44

.46

.37

.07

.28

.15

.55

.61

.54

.60

BDp

.15

.34

.32

.30

.49

.47

.65

BDn

.07

.27

.18

.39

.45

.57

.49

.53

.27

.24

.46

.27

.45

.55

.64

.60

.56

–.03

.16

.40

.31

.42

.42

.53

.71

.64

CA

.22

.31

.45

.55

.55

.68

.63

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

SS

.17

.44

.37

.45 .61

.23

.36

.29

.47

.48 .45

CD

.50

.42

.36

.43 .47

.39

.37

.33

.43 .58

LN

.42

.38

.35 .32

.41

.39

.50

.36

PS

.45

.55

.36 .49

.42

.39

.29

.53

.37

.43

DS

.37

.36

.42

AR

.42

.29

.43 .38

.29

.43

.49

.52

PC

.49

.53

.47

.44

.55

.45

.44

FW

.45

.45

MR

.51

.46

.29

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.44

SS

.39

CD

VP

LN

BD

.57

.52

PS

.55

DS

CO

.69

AR

.61

PC

IN

FW .68

MR

.68

VP

VC

BD .68

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 8

Table G.5

54

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.42

.24

.46

.45

100.6 14.9

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

100.8 15.0

.41

.37

.30

.32

.34

.38

.26

.23

VSI

10.2 3.1

.44

.45

.25

.41

.40

.48

.17

.25

VC

100.5 15.2

.50

.49

.33

.47

.45

.48

.31

.24

FRI

10.1 2.6

.41

.40

.26

.38

.33

.42

.22

.24

IN

100.3 15.0

.57

.44

.49

.46

.36

.44

.45

.40

WMI

9.9 2.8

.41

.44

.23

.43

.38

.46

.23

.17

CO

100.5 14.2

.34

.19

.38

.19

.14

.20

.37

.28

PSI

10.1 3.1

.34

.26

.26

.22

.25

.27

.20

.25

BD

100.6 14.9

.56

.50

.40

.47

.44

.51

.35

.33

FSIQ

10.2 3.0

.40

.39

.26

.35

.35

.40

.26

.17

VP

100.4 14.7

.48

.42

.35

.41

.37

.42

.36

.25

QRI

10.0 3.1

.46

.42

.32

.40

.39

.41

.27

.27

MR

100.1 14.4

.53

.45

.43

.41

.40

.47

.39

.37

AWMI

10.1 3.0

.39

.40

.23

.39

.36

.39

.25

.14

FW

100.7 15.0

.58

.49

.44

.47

.43

.50

.41

.33

NVI

10.2 3.0

.36

.32

.27

.31

.30

.31

.27

.18

PC

100.7 15.0

.53

.51

.33

.47

.46

.51

.27

.28

GAI

10.0 2.9

.44

.33

.39

.32

.27

.34

.37

.30

AR

100.5 14.5

.56

.39

.54

.40

.31

.40

.50

.42

CPI

10.0 3.0

.46

.36

.40

.36

.31

.35

.36

.34

DS

100.4 15.3

.65

.21

.86

.18

.20

.21

.48

NSL

10.1 3.1

.50

.40

.43

.42

.31

.40

.39

.35

PS

100.0 15.8

.75

.40

.86

.44

.34

.38

NSQ

10.0 2.8

.49

.45

.36

.39

.41

.49

.33

.32

LN

102.1 15.3

.80

.96

.34

.83

.92

IST

10.0 2.9

.26

.13

.30

.12

.09

.15

.32

.19

CD

101.8 15.6

.77

.96

.31

.81

DST

10.1 2.9

.35

.21

.38

.22

.17

.21

.33

.30

SS

101.4 15.0

.77

.93

.36

RST

10.1 3.0

.14

.02

.19

.02

.01

.03

.10

.22

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.40

9.9 2.9

Mean SD

DST

.37

SRI

.48

.38

STI

.17

.20

NSI

IST

.36

RST

NSQ

.32

DST

VCI

.40

IST

.24

.14

NSQ

NSL

.19

NSL

Subtest/ Composite Score

SI

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 8

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.6

200.7 26.8

.81

.35

.48

.48

NSI

10.1 3.4

.34

.26

.26

.22

.25

.26

.20

.25

BDn

305.3 43.6

.82

.84

.90

.92

STI

10.0 3.1

.31

.23

.24

.19

.24

.24

.18

.22

BDp

202.5 25.3

.75

.75

.78

.50

.32

SRI

10.0 3.1

.21

.18

.18

.20

.16

.17

.15

.18

DSf

9.8 3.0

.37

.26

.33

.22

.24

.28

.31

.28

DSb

10.1 2.9

.46

.37

.39

.40

.29

.36

.34

.33

DSs

10.1 2.8

.10

–.01

.16

–.01

–.02

.01

.06

.20

CAr

10.0 2.9

.18

.05

.21

.06

.04

.05

.13

.22

CAs

55

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.40

.34

.72

.54

.48

.52

.74

.45

10.0 9.8 3.0 3.2

PSI

FSIQ

QRI

AWMI

NVI

GAI

CPI

Mean SD

9.6 2.8

.48

.73

.58

.49

.60

.71

.36

.44

9.9 3.2

.51

.62

.54

.55

.51

.65

.34

.52

.39

.36

.66

.70

.42

.54

.63

.23

.37

.51

.43

.68

.70

.43

.52

.66

.33

.39

.84

.46

.38

.36

.73

.72

.38

.84

.69

.26

.35

.87

.54

.41

.35

.36

.37

.38

.34

.40

.28

.31

.31

.29

.33

.57

.65

.61

.62

.83

.69

.39

.56

.48

.49

.62

.70

.52

.54

.90

.52

.66

.33

.85

.40

.44

.46

.71

.44

.60

.52

.41

.50

.33

.86

.33

.32

.39

.56

.56

.54

.90

.54

.62

.31

.63

.44

.38

.53

.12

.73

.36

.56

.30

.36

.55

.89

.32

.30

.24

.32

.25

.26

9.9 10.0 10.2 10.0 9.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.9 3.0 3.0 2.8 3.1 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1

.43

.74

.75

.39

.55

.71

.31

.41

.53

.88

.55

.10

.06

.25

.30

.12

.14

.13

.14

.18

.36

.13

.05

.04

.12

.92

.92

.16

.42

.73

.74

.38

.53

.70

.30

.41

.51

.88

.47

.11

.15

.32

.34

9.7 10.1 9.9 3.1 3.0 2.9

.76

.41

.48

.34

.33

.51

.89

.36

.32

.30

.37

.36

.32

.27

.10

.46

.36

.31

.63

.30

.45

.15

.62

.22

.26

.39

.03

.08

.57

.39

.45

.67

.42

.51

.27

.68

.30

.40

.34

.07

.58

.48

.51

.77

.50

.59

.29

.68

.43

.40

.39

.28

.14

.14

.11

.14

.19

.33

.13

.07

.05

.29

.10

.11

.13

.12

.16

.34

.13

.03

.53

.84

.62

.56

.61

.81

.38

.50

.46

.45

.79

.82

.46

.62

.76

.31

.45

.59

.56

.56

.46

.83

.83

.47

.81

.79

.35

.43

.46

.46

.82

.56

.67

.83

.54

.68

.39

.46

.46

.84

.43

.59

.36

.39

.60

.57

.57

.76

.96

.93

.71

.82

.37

.52

.55

.53

.57

.67

.59

.56

.82

.80

.59

.40

.40

.70

.60

.60

.61

.61

.75

.89

.35

.41

.56

.54

.53

.61

.59

.55

.51

.58

.65

.57

.54

.49

.45

.45

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

9.8 10.1 10.1 9.9 10.3 9.9 19.9 20.0 20.2 20.0 19.6 69.9 20.0 20.0 60.1 50.0 39.6 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.9 5.6 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.5 14.4 5.1 5.4 12.2 11.2 8.9

.39

.67

.71

.36

.50

.64

.27

.38

.49

.85

.41

.07

.08

.31

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.52

.80

.62

.54

.59

.78

.37

.51

.47

.88

.46

.12

.07

.58

.27

.57

WMI

.45

.45

.69

.18

.14

.35

.22

.04

.02

.39

.50

.80

.03 –.01

.18

.80

.41

.20

.11

FRI

.58

.92

.02

.03

.47

.39

.07

.13

.47

.11 –.07

.06

.30

.78

.40

.26

.73

.91

.16

.06

.36

.43

.34

.22

.23

.19

VSI

.06

.14 –.04

.38

.26

.73

.30

.32

.12

VCI

.11

.15

.40

.27

.34

.31

.33

.13

.10

.06

.32

.23

.15

.35

.37

.43

CAs

.14

.43

.37

.15

.36

.40

.43

.11

.37

.34

.22

.17

.21

.38

CAr

.37

.36

.21

.47

.47

.10

.32

.34

.27

.25

.36

.39

.10

.29

.23

DSs

.35

.35

.58

.56

.13

.34

.25

.26

.35

.92

.99

.18

.32

.91

DSb

.35

.35

.36

.01

.23

.08

.36

.34

.41

.05

.23

.24

.14

DSf

.42

.48

.04

.32

.36

.29

.33

.24

.14 –.06

.29

.26 .35

.39

.16

.30

.24

.57

.29

BDp

.06

.34

.28

.37 .57

BDn

.12

.35

.17

.34 .27

.10

.25

.42

.21 .29

.33

.30

.34

.26 .30

CA

.29

.32

.30 .47

SS

.30

.50

.23

.33 .61

.28

.47

.34

.36

.41 .46

CD

.52

.41

.41

.43 .43

.46

.35

.37

.43 .54

LN

.42

.48

.53 .31

.30

.40

.57

.32

PS

.45

.58

.29 .40

.40

.22

.25

.56

.25

.28

DS

.28

.49

.46

AR

.29

.33

.35 .47

.32

.43

.36

.39

PC

.40

.37

.41

.34

.56

.33

.42

FW

.46

.42

MR

.54

.48

.37

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.46

SS

.37

CD

VP

LN

BD

.64

.62

PS

.62

DS

CO

.77

AR

.70

PC

IN

FW .68

MR

.68

VP

VC

BD .68

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 9

Table G.7

56

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.38

.36

.45

.49

99.7 15.4

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

99.9 14.9

.39

.38

.27

.29

.39

.39

.32

.16

VSI

9.8 3.2

.42

.36

.34

.30

.35

.36

.37

.24

VC

100.5 14.8

.37

.38

.22

.29

.38

.40

.26

.14

FRI

9.6 2.8

.49

.47

.36

.42

.44

.45

.39

.25

IN

100.0 14.8

.48

.44

.37

.38

.41

.42

.35

.31

WMI

9.9 3.2

.52

.52

.35

.49

.49

.47

.35

.28

CO

99.0 15.4

.39

.27

.35

.23

.25

.27

.37

.26

PSI

9.9 3.0

.31

.29

.22

.20

.31

.31

.30

.10

BD

99.8 14.6

.55

.51

.40

.42

.50

.53

.45

.28

FSIQ

10.0 3.0

.37

.38

.24

.31

.38

.37

.26

.18

VP

100.0 15.0

.45

.39

.36

.27

.40

.42

.41

.25

QRI

10.2 2.8

.31

.36

.15

.33

.31

.36

.19

.08

MR

100.0 14.9

.53

.52

.36

.46

.47

.51

.36

.30

AWMI

10.0 3.1

.32

.30

.23

.17

.34

.33

.25

.16

FW

100.1 14.8

.51

.47

.36

.36

.47

.49

.41

.24

NVI

9.7 2.8

.30

.29

.21

.26

.25

.31

.21

.17

PC

100.0 14.6

.49

.48

.34

.38

.47

.49

.40

.22

GAI

10.0 3.0

.43

.35

.38

.28

.33

.37

.43

.25

AR

99.3 15.4

.53

.42

.44

.36

.40

.42

.44

.35

CPI

10.0 3.0

.45

.42

.33

.39

.39

.41

.30

.29

DS

99.7 15.7

.72

.33

.90

.30

.31

.31

.61

NSL

10.0 3.0

.38

.33

.30

.27

.33

.32

.29

.24

PS

99.9 15.3

.76

.40

.89

.36

.36

.41

NSQ

10.0 3.0

.49

.50

.32

.44

.45

.51

.34

.24

LN

100.8 15.6

.80

.95

.41

.74

.91

IST

9.9 3.1

.36

.25

.32

.20

.24

.27

.35

.22

CD

99.1 15.8

.80

.96

.37

.77

DST

9.7 3.1

.33

.22

.31

.21

.20

.22

.32

.24

SS

99.3 15.7

.76

.90

.36

RST

10.1 3.0

.12

.04

.17

.04

.03

.03

.16

.15

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.42

10.0 3.0

Mean SD

DST

.47

SRI

.45

.46

STI

.40

.32

NSI

IST

.40

RST

NSQ

.42

DST

VCI

.47

IST

.25

.35

NSQ

NSL

.22

NSL

Subtest/ Composite Score

SI

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 9

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.8

199.6 27.8

.83

.41

.61

.61

NSI

9.9 2.9

.30

.29

.22

.19

.31

.31

.29

.10

BDn

299.2 44.0

.84

.78

.90

.88

STI

9.8 3.0

.26

.26

.17

.17

.28

.27

.24

.07

BDp

199.3 26.2

.69

.77

.78

.53

.46

SRI

10.1 2.9

.29

.35

.12

.34

.34

.31

.13

.09

DSf

10.1 2.9

.34

.23

.33

.20

.22

.24

.29

.29

DSb

9.9 2.9

.43

.42

.30

.39

.38

.41

.27

.27

DSs

10.3 3.1

.12

.03

.16

.01

.03

.05

.15

.14

CAr

9.9 2.9

.13

.05

.18

.06

.05

.03

.17

.16

CAs

57

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.35

.41

.34

.48

.31

.26

.19

.48

.48

.33

.29

.39

.14

.19

.94

.55

.52

.43

.32

.78

.56

.50

.60

.81

.46

10.0 10.1 9.9 3.0 2.9 2.7

PS

LN

CD

SS

CA

BDn

BDp

DSf

DSb

DSs

CAr

CAs

VCI

VSI

FRI

WMI

PSI

FSIQ

QRI

AWMI

NVI

GAI

CPI

Mean SD

.46

.71

.59

.52

.56

.69

.27

.47

.49

.57

.76

.15

.11

.43

.26

.36

.50

.51

.14

.25

.22

.50

.40

.43

.28

9.9 3.0

.37

.61

.51

.38

.50

.58

.26

.34

.44

.46

.64

.07

.04

.27

.18

.27

.44

.43

.07

.23

.22

.40

.32

.28

.41

.40

.45

.41

.66

.75

.44

.57

.64

.24

.42

.53

.90

.54

.15

.15

.36

.26

.29

.57

.59

.16

.21

.22

.42

.38

.37

.46

.40

.53

.37

.41

.67

.67

.42

.51

.65

.23

.43

.83

.45

.39

.22

.16

.43

.25

.27

.41

.42

.19

.19

.22

.36

.38

.39

.45

.30

.45

.39

.78

.75

.48

.87

.74

.24

.40

.87

.59

.54

.24

.21

.42

.29

.21

.48

.52

.24

.17

.26

.50

.33

.37

.51

.43

.37

.56

.51

.33

.44

.55

.24

.36

.43

.48

.51

.16

.15

.37

.22

.19

.45

.46

.17

.22

.22

.29

.33

.31

.34

.59

.63

.66

.58

.87

.68

.41

.53

.57

.50

.54

.17

.16

.46

.42

.36

.48

.44

.16

.30

.44

.53

.44

.50

.72

.52

.57

.90

.50

.67

.26

.90

.44

.46

.44

.04

.06

.81

.79

.79

.42

.45

.05

.20

.26

.58

.57

9.9 10.0 9.8 10.2 10.1 10.0 9.9 3.1 3.1 2.8 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1

.53

.78

.82

.49

.57

.78

.37

.48

.58

.90

.53

.25

.21

.44

.31

.34

.91

.98

.26

.26

.40

.43

.40

.45

.45

.47

.54

.57

.60

.60

.88

.59

.64

.29

.63

.51

.47

.53

.18

.16

.56

.44

.41

.43

.43

.18

.23

.29

.73

.37

.55

.30

.40

.54

.89

.28

.28

.35

.30

.32

.25

.25

.22

.15

.37

.39

.31

.59

.04

.22

.22

.71

.28

.39

.24

.26

.38

.90

.24

.21

.26

.25

.32

.24

.23

.25

.26

.29

.12

.23

.27

.35

.05

.25

.23

.17

.92

.91

.08

.10 –.01

.19

.27

.24

.31 .91

.51

.76

.79

.49

.55

.77

.35

.48

.56

.87

.53

.23

.16

.43

.32

.35

.28

.51

.73

.75

.48

.55

.73

.36

.47

.52

.82

.53

.23

.17

.42

.32

9.9 10.0 10.1 10.1 9.8 10.0 9.8 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.8 2.8 3.1

.71

.50

.64

.62

.44

.56

.27

.88

.42

.43

.43

.06

.06

.52

.42

.48

.41

.40

.05

.23

.25

.53

.54

.37

.42

.71

.41

.50

.18

.69

.32

.32

.31

.00

.02

.45

.64

.54

.58

.78

.50

.64

.27

.76

.50

.45

.43

.07

.07

.21

.22

.25

.12

.22

.23

.27

.07

.22

.20

.14

.70

9.9 10.0 10.1 9.8 2.9 2.8 3.1 2.7

.57

.39

.41

.69

.33

.50

.19

.73

.28

.35

.36

.05

.04

.49

.48

.17

.50

.87

.66

.54

.62

.83

.31

.49

.55

.60

.52

.80

.87

.52

.63

.79

.34

.50

.62

.62

.62

.47

.86

.84

.53

.83

.82

.27

.48

.45

.45

.80

.58

.68

.87

.53

.69

.29

.57

.57

.80

.37

.52

.30

.37

.51

.59

.59

.75

.97

.93

.74

.82

.38

.53

.62

.51

.67

.68

.68

.56

.81

.81

.61

.51

.51

.73

.63

.66

.58

.58

.70

.75

.90

.36

.48

.60

.52

.61

.59

.64

.50

.63

.70

.69

.45

.49

.47

.45

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

9.9 20.1 19.9 19.9 19.8 20.2 69.9 20.2 19.9 59.8 49.9 40.0 2.8 5.6 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.2 14.8 5.5 5.1 12.5 11.6 8.4

.26

.27

.29

.12

.23

.28

.36

.06

.27

.23

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.47

.82

.63

.53

.61

.78

.26

.50

.52

.57

.94

.13

.11

.42

.28

.34

.52

.52

.13

.21

.26

.53

.47

.42

.48

.43

DS

.50

.54

.47

.48

AR

.49

.33

PC

.53

.44

.49

.62

.38

.40

FW

.52

.50

MR

.51

.52

.42

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.50

SS

.49

CD

VP

LN

BD

.62

.54

PS

.58

DS

CO

.77

AR

.66

PC

IN

FW .77

MR

.77

VP

VC

BD .77

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 10

Table G.9

58

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.30

.19

.37

.35

100.3 15.2

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

99.7 15.4

.42

.42

.29

.36

.37

.43

.30

.23

VSI

10.1 2.9

.35

.38

.18

.31

.34

.40

.13

.17

VC

99.8 14.9

.46

.44

.33

.36

.38

.47

.35

.25

FRI

9.9 2.7

.36

.36

.23

.27

.34

.40

.17

.23

IN

99.5 14.9

.44

.33

.40

.29

.29

.34

.33

.39

WMI

9.9 3.0

.36

.42

.19

.35

.38

.45

.17

.17

CO

100.6 14.8

.32

.25

.30

.19

.26

.24

.28

.26

PSI

9.9 3.1

.39

.39

.25

.34

.35

.40

.28

.18

BD

99.8 15.0

.51

.47

.37

.38

.42

.50

.36

.31

FSIQ

10.0 3.1

.38

.36

.28

.31

.31

.37

.27

.23

VP

100.5 16.0

.49

.41

.40

.33

.35

.48

.38

.35

QRI

9.8 2.8

.39

.34

.29

.30

.33

.33

.34

.20

MR

99.7 14.1

.47

.36

.43

.29

.34

.38

.39

.39

AWMI

10.2 3.2

.40

.40

.28

.32

.33

.47

.26

.23

FW

99.7 15.0

.53

.48

.41

.40

.43

.51

.40

.34

NVI

10.1 3.1

.26

.33

.09

.30

.29

.34

.05

.10

PC

99.8 15.1

.48

.48

.31

.40

.43

.51

.30

.25

GAI

10.0 3.1

.46

.33

.44

.27

.29

.36

.42

.38

AR

100.1 14.5

.47

.36

.43

.30

.34

.36

.38

.40

CPI

9.9 3.1

.38

.26

.37

.21

.23

.28

.32

.35

DS

99.3 13.6

.75

.36

.91

.27

.34

.38

.64

NSL

9.9 2.8

.40

.33

.34

.31

.28

.33

.27

.34

PS

100.8 13.0

.74

.38

.90

.33

.35

.37

NSQ

10.0 2.7

.47

.38

.40

.30

.36

.40

.37

.34

LN

102.4 14.8

.82

.95

.41

.75

.89

IST

10.1 2.8

.29

.19

.30

.13

.20

.21

.30

.25

CD

100.6 16.0

.80

.95

.38

.76

DST

10.1 3.0

.29

.25

.24

.22

.26

.23

.22

.21

SS

99.8 13.6

.74

.89

.34

RST

9.8 2.8

.10

.07

.12

.05

.12

.02

.17

.05

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.35

10.0 3.0

Mean SD

DST

.32

SRI

.39

.32

STI

.15

.18

NSI

IST

.26

RST

NSQ

.31

DST

VCI

.32

IST

.18

.16

NSQ

NSL

.16

NSL

Subtest/ Composite Score

SI

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 10

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.10

200.0 24.0

.82

.40

.64

.64

NSI

10.0 2.8

.38

.39

.24

.34

.35

.40

.28

.16

BDn

302.7 41.4

.84

.78

.88

.88

STI

9.8 3.1

.38

.37

.26

.34

.32

.37

.30

.18

BDp

200.6 23.7

.70

.77

.80

.51

.48

SRI

9.9 2.9

.31

.25

.28

.18

.24

.27

.23

.28

DSf

10.0 2.8

.26

.18

.26

.13

.19

.18

.23

.25

DSb

10.1 3.1

.38

.26

.37

.22

.21

.29

.34

.33

DSs

9.8 2.7

.08

.01

.14

–.01

.06

–.02

.16

.09

CAr

9.9 2.8

.14

.13

.12

.11

.18

.07

.18

.04

CAs

59

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. .26

.60

.21

.23

.45

.37 .47

.51

.44

.34

.66 .33

.76 .33

.49

.46 .50

.62

.60 .70

.52

.59

.91

.73

.40

.63

.57

.61

.50

.56

.90

.48

.77

.27

.54

.35

.22

.70

.32

.47

.25

.23

.42

.30

.18

.22

.12

.15

.22

.48

.75

.76

.45

.59

.75

.36

.49

.72

.75

.45

.59

.72

.36

.48

.33

.38

.64

.37

.45

.14

.65

.53

.42

.48

.71

.48

.55

.22

.66

.60

.46

.53

.76

.49

.59

.28

.71

.36

.23

.15

.18

.09

.14

.18

.37

.02

.11

.15

.10

.73 .14

.33

.17

.23

.12

.12

.22

.42

.12

.11

.19

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.37

.64

.70

.59

.35

.48

.42

.45

.39

.45

.40

.09

.06

.59

.42

.87

.62

.50

.60

.82

.25

.45

.53

.60

.54

.79

.87

.50

.65

.79

.38

.50

.43

.40

.84

.80

.45

.78

.80

.23

.36

.83

.53

.71

.85

.53

.68

.50

.82

.33

.56

.34

.25

.80

.71

.96

.92

.71

.58

.48

.80

.75

.64 .72

.56

.86 .77

.52

10.0 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.1 10.2 10.1 10.3 10.1 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.4 10.3 10.0 10.0 10.2 10.1 10.2 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.1 19.9 70.7 20.3 20.1 60.7 50.7 40.0 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.1 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 2.9 3.2 3.1 5.6 5.3 4.9 5.2 5.2 14.2 5.1 5.3 12.0 11.3 8.6

.37

.76

.64

.33

.57

.60

.90

.43

.26

.39

.31

.08

Mean SD

.39

.51

.76

.42

.86

.49

.89

.07

.54

.27

.28

.01

.39

.67

.78

.34

.32

.69

.32

.27

.53

.84

.48

.21

.17 –.02 .03

.39

.36

.30

CPI

.81

.44

.44

.87

.67

.33

.38

.12

.88

.52

.22

.20

.38

.34

.45

.57

.78

.52

.45

.44

.49

.29

.68

.24

.19

.13

.92

.93

.08

.07

.92 .30

.60

.34

GAI

.59

.38

.54

.71

.30

.87

.18

.36

.24

.44

.36

.23

.14

.05 –.03

.33

.34

.43

.64

.54

.42

.60

.63

.22

.86

.38

.32

.21

.31

.29

.27

.25

.20

.31

.31

.32

.31

.45 .48

NVI

.44

.30

.64

.14

.52

.30

.43

.48

.14

.13

.58

.47

.43

.37

.38

.15

.25

.60

.44

.47

.57

.77

.26

.32

.44

.40

.36

.11

.00

.44

.35

.41

.33

.32

.06

.32

.64

AWMI

.55

.52

.29

.41

.50

.48

.43

.09

.54 .34

.50

.50

.54

.64

.39

.31

.35

.54

.53

.15

.04

.80

.80

.73

.45

.43

.07

.20

.32

.64

.50

.55

QRI

.77

.23

.44

.85

.46

.46

.10

.19

.47

.46

.41

.49

.51

.18

.25

.29

.51

.33

.50

.60

.48

.73

.20

.45

.84

.58

.50

.06

.01

.32

.22

.10

.42

.41

.07

.23

.17

.30

.27

.57

.53

.46

FSIQ

.24

.39

.53

.44

.39

.12

.06

.26 .29

.50

.21

.41

.54

.89

.51

.11

.13

.39

.38

.24

.52

.51

.08

.15

.10

.33

.28

.43

.50

.29

.58

.48

PSI

.40

.31

.89

.53

.23

.08

.23

.27

.19

.38

.39

.12

.26

.20

.30

.23

.30

.34

.29

.42

.42

.42

.47

.39

.59

.17

.19

.40

.33

.19

.58

.57

.12

.28

.24

.38

.36

.40

.44

.40

.42

.61

WMI

.52

.47

.71

.13

.10

.40

.35

.29

.92

.98

.22

.36

.34

.38

.34

.44

.52

.43

.50

.62

.65

.68

.63

.46

.55

.92

.12

.10

.28

.29

.20

.27

.31

.15

.19

.22

.36

.34

.33

.28

.34

.52

.38

.65

.65

.61

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

FRI

.13

CAs

.08

.42

.27

.25

.57

.57

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.91

.11

CAr

.36

.28

.24

.38

.41

.13

.19

.16

.36

.32

.39

.57

.41

.42

.36

.37 .39

SS

.53

.37

DSs

.29

.25

.43

.48

.10

.21

.22

.42

.32

.38

.48

.43

.47

.39

.41

.42

.57

CD

VSI

.29

DSb

.49

.48

.32

LN

VCI

.26

DSf

.14

CA

.47

.22

SS

.44

.16

CD

BDp

.45

LN

BDn

.34

PS

PC

.50

.42

FW

.40

.45

MR

DS

.32

VP

AR

.48

.46

BD

.52

.52

PS

.56

DS

CO

.72

AR

.59

PC

IN

FW .68

MR

.68

VP

VC

BD .68

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 11

Table G.11

60

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.33

.31

.29

.23

.33

.34

10.0 3.0

VCI

.21

.21

.37

.35

.35

.23

.38

.36

100.5 15.0

IST

DST

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

Subtest/ Composite Score

NSL

NSQ

IST

DST

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

100.9 14.9

.35

.37

.23

.38

.31

.34

.24

.18

VSI

10.2 3.1

.33

.36

.19

.34

.32

.34

.19

.16

101.1 14.6

.34

.38

.20

.35

.35

.36

.21

.16

FRI

10.2 2.9

.42

.43

.26

.44

.41

.37

.24

.24

IN

100.3 15.0

.56

.54

.38

.45

.53

.52

.34

.36

WMI

10.2 3.1

.35

.30

.29

.37

.24

.23

.23

.29

CO

99.9 14.6

.38

.23

.41

.25

.21

.18

.38

.36

PSI

10.1 3.0

.31

.30

.23

.32

.27

.27

.25

.17

BD

100.8 14.5

.52

.50

.36

.46

.46

.46

.36

.31

FSIQ

10.2 3.0

.31

.35

.18

.36

.28

.34

.17

.16

VP

100.9 14.7

.44

.42

.29

.39

.41

.38

.30

.23

QRI

10.1 2.9

.30

.31

.20

.30

.27

.30

.17

.20

MR

100.2 14.6

.59

.55

.41

.48

.52

.53

.36

.39

AWMI

10.3 3.0

.28

.33

.14

.30

.31

.30

.18

.07

FW

100.8 14.7

.50

.48

.34

.46

.44

.45

.33

.30

NVI

10.1 3.1

.32

.31

.24

.30

.24

.31

.23

.20

PC

100.9 14.7

.41

.43

.25

.41

.39

.41

.25

.20

GAI

10.0 2.9

.48

.40

.38

.39

.39

.35

.35

.34

AR

100.1 14.9

.57

.46

.47

.42

.44

.42

.43

.43

CPI

10.0 3.0

.54

.49

.39

.42

.48

.46

.37

.34

DS

99.4 14.7

.73

.27

.92

.30

.24

.21

.67

NSL

10.0 3.1

.45

.45

.28

.37

.44

.43

.22

.29

PS

99.0 14.0

.74

.29

.91

.33

.26

.23

NSQ

10.0 2.8

.54

.51

.35

.46

.47

.50

.28

.36

LN

102.3 15.1

.73

.95

.24

.74

.90

IST

10.0 2.8

.41

.25

.42

.24

.24

.21

.37

.39

CD

100.9 14.5

.76

.95

.27

.76

DST

10.0 2.9

.28

.16

.30

.20

.14

.12

.30

.25

SS

101.0 13.7

.75

.89

.35

RST

10.1 3.1

.28

.11

.33

.16

.08

.06

.34

.26

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.21

.20

NSQ

VC

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 11

NSL

SI

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.12

198.4 26.3

.80

.31

.67

.67

NSI

10.4 3.1

.30

.30

.22

.32

.26

.25

.24

.16

BDn

304.2 40.3

.80

.77

.89

.88

STI

10.3 3.1

.30

.30

.19

.30

.27

.27

.23

.13

BDp

200.4 23.4

.71

.72

.69

.47

.43

SRI

10.0 3.1

.28

.26

.19

.22

.27

.24

.17

.18

DSf

10.0 3.2

.43

.36

.34

.30

.35

.34

.32

.30

DSb

10.2 2.9

.53

.51

.37

.43

.49

.50

.37

.30

DSs

10.1 3.2

.23

.08

.28

.13

.05

.04

.30

.22

CAr

10.2 3.1

.28

.13

.31

.19

.10

.08

.32

.26

CAs

61

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. .10

.15

.53

.56

.57

.79 .58

.81 .42

.50

.46 .54

.68

.66 .81

.69

.70

.93

.74

.58

.71

.63

.70

.66

.67

.92

.58

.73

.39

.55

.44

.29

.77

.48

.58

.48

.43

.57

.32

.21

.27

.23

.16

.27

.53

.79

.78

.52

.60

.76

.40

.51

.76

.75

.48

.59

.73

.40

.60

.54

.52

.74

.43

.62

.32

.69

.68

.56

.59

.74

.50

.66

.39

.75

.73

.62

.63

.81

.58

.70

.46

.76

.56

.49

.59

.16

.26

.17

.21

.19

.12

.22

.34

.11

.12

.20

.17

.64 .18

.33

.23

.30

.22

.16

.28

.40

.17

.19

.27

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.59

.75

.81

.57

.58

.56

.40

.47

.56

.40

.50

.13

.67

.65

.90

.75

.71

.70

.89

.44

.65

.68

.71

.59

.84

.87

.58

.70

.81

.45

.55

.68

.65

.90

.90

.65

.84

.87

.41

.45

.87

.71

.79

.87

.66

.79

.63

.84

.48

.62

.51

.40

.81

.83

.97

.95

.82

.64

.63

.84

.82

.74 .82

.73

.93 .83

.71

10.0 10.2 10.2 10.1 9.9 10.0 10.2 10.0 9.9 10.0 10.0 10.2 10.2 10.0 9.9 10.0 10.0 10.1 9.8 10.1 10.0 10.0 9.9 20.2 20.0 20.1 20.3 19.9 70.3 20.0 20.2 60.3 50.3 40.2 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.1 5.7 5.5 5.7 5.7 5.2 16.5 5.6 5.7 13.9 12.7 9.3

.56

.79

.79

.42

.60

.72

.89

.50

.45

.44

.53

.19

.56

Mean SD

.61

.71

.82

.57

.89

.61

.91

.16

.59

.88

.60

.28

.17

.50

.60

.78

.79

.58

.38

.79

.47

.45

.61

.90

.62

.28

.18

.53

CPI

.83

.63

.56

.90

.67

.34

.37

.17

.25

.18

.89

.19

.41

.36

.40

.85

.67

.51

.59

.50

.47

.72

.43

.45

.42

.34

.90

.43

.37

.42

.93

GAI

.69

.65

.68

.77

.35

.89

.32

.36

.37

.38

.27

.18

.12

.19

.24

.70

.64

.61

.77

.30

.89

.57

.53

.66

.22

.33

.47

.34

.28

.25

.60

.52

NVI

.67

.57

.73

.36

.57

.58

.45

.51

.12

.18

.36

.36

.29

.39

.39

.62

.37

.66

.69

.76

.38

.41

.63

.54

.65

.19

.03

.68

.34 .33

.33

.71

.62 .50

AWMI

.67

.74

.41

.62

.60

.60

.64

.17

.17

.54

.52

.62 .39

.41

.56

.64

.77

.41

.59

.43

.37

.51

.08

.16

.82

.50

.56

.42

.48

.22

.44

.62

.71

QRI

.82

.43

.53

.89

.65

.61

.12

.08

.48

.84

.43

.37

.41

.08

.36

.40

.59

.83

.39

.48

.89

.60

.60

.22

.04

.37

.39

.80

.57 .25

.59

.70

.69

.67

FSIQ

.42

.57

.68

.92

.62

.23

.16

.54

.33

.40

.46

.48

.20

.45

.40

.71

.59

.59

.70

.67

.40

.56

.62

.92

.61

.26

.20

.45

.50

.23

.50

.52

.19

.36

.27

.55

.49

.51

.59

PSI

.61

.58

.52

.75

.20

.17

.48

.51

.36

.30

.32

.07

.28

.25

.41

.35

.37

.34

.67

.67

.61

.64

.62

.81

.11

.21

.42

.38

.44

.54

.54

.09

.40

.25

.49

.54

.56

.59

.34

.58

.58

.67

WMI

.64

.61

.94

.17

.16

.53

.36

.40

.51

.54

.21

.37

.31

.52

.49

.56

.47

.41

.58

.72

.68

.76 .73

.64

.17

CAs

.15

.54

.48

.41

.69

.68

.23

.43

.32

.52

.44

.51

.57

.33

.65

.56

.66

.74

.76

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

FRI

.16

CAr

.56

.43

.46

.93

.97

.23

.40

.34

.46

.39

.47

.53

.34

.56

.54

.69

.69

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.93

.54

DSs

.48

.43

.47

.50

.22

.35

.42

.60

.42

.59

.51

.40

.51

.51

.46

.69

SS

.64

.46

DSb

.47

.55

.57

.14

.41

.30

.61

.42

.57

.64

.48

.58

.55

.58

.56

.49

CD

VSI

.51

DSf

.54

.55

.17

.40

.35

.62

.48

.61

.62

.48

.58

.54

.59

.54

.67

LN

VCI

.61

.59

BDp

.17

CA

BDn

.39

SS

.47

PS

.61

.61

DS

.35

.57

AR

CD

.47

PC

LN

.57

.56

FW

VP

MR

.61

.57

BD

.70

.78

PS

.70

DS

.73

AR

CO

PC

IN

FW .74

MR

.74

VP

VC

BD .74

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 12

Table G.13

62

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.65

10.0 3.0

VCI

.41

.46

.65

.60

.60

.47

.66

.68

100.5 15.5

SRI

Mean SD

Subtest/ Composite Score

NSL

NSQ

IST

DST

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

99.9 15.4

.61

.61

.41

.55

.57

.60

.45

.30

VSI

10.2 3.1

.61

.59

.43

.53

.54

.59

.41

.38

100.4 16.6

.62

.59

.44

.56

.51

.59

.45

.36

FRI

10.2 3.3

.62

.59

.45

.57

.53

.56

.45

.37

IN

100.7 16.4

.68

.63

.52

.59

.55

.62

.49

.47

WMI

10.1 3.4

.60

.53

.47

.50

.47

.52

.45

.42

CO

99.8 14.6

.58

.39

.56

.35

.36

.39

.53

.51

PSI

9.9 3.1

.57

.57

.37

.52

.54

.54

.39

.29

BD

100.3 16.8

.76

.70

.57

.65

.63

.69

.57

.49

FSIQ

10.0 3.0

.56

.55

.39

.48

.51

.56

.44

.26

VP

99.9 16.2

.67

.61

.50

.59

.53

.60

.53

.38

QRI

10.2 3.2

.52

.49

.37

.44

.44

.50

.35

.33

MR

100.6 16.1

.71

.63

.56

.60

.55

.62

.53

.51

AWMI

10.0 3.2

.58

.55

.41

.55

.47

.54

.45

.30

FW

100.3 16.7

.73

.68

.53

.63

.62

.67

.54

.44

NVI

9.9 3.1

.37

.44

.19

.37

.43

.44

.19

.16

PC

100.3 16.5

.72

.69

.49

.64

.63

.68

.50

.41

GAI

10.0 3.1

.61

.54

.48

.50

.48

.54

.49

.39

AR

100.2 16.0

.73

.60

.62

.56

.54

.60

.59

.56

CPI

10.0 3.2

.65

.56

.54

.54

.49

.56

.52

.48

DS

100.3 14.2

.76

.37

.92

.36

.33

.35

.72

NSL

10.2 3.2

.54

.55

.37

.50

.50

.55

.34

.34

PS

98.5 15.8

.80

.40

.93

.41

.35

.37

NSQ

10.2 3.0

.65

.61

.49

.57

.54

.60

.46

.46

LN

99.4 15.6

.79

.95

.39

.76

.92

IST

10.0 3.0

.49

.33

.49

.29

.30

.32

.45

.46

CD

99.0 15.0

.79

.96

.37

.76

DST

9.9 2.7

.55

.39

.51

.35

.35

.38

.49

.45

SS

99.3 14.9

.76

.90

.42

RST

10.0 2.9

.30

.23

.30

.19

.22

.23

.25

.31

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.63

STI

.58

DST

.57

.62

IST

.46

.45

NSQ

NSI

.39

NSL

VC

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 12

RST

SI

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.14

198.8 27.9

.84

.42

.72

.72

NSI

10.0 3.1

.57

.57

.38

.53

.54

.54

.41

.29

BDn

297.7 42.6

.84

.78

.90

.89

STI

10.1 3.3

.55

.56

.36

.51

.52

.54

.39

.27

BDp

198.2 24.8

.72

.75

.76

.56

.53

SRI

9.8 3.1

.48

.47

.36

.48

.40

.45

.32

.34

DSf

10.1 3.2

.53

.43

.44

.39

.38

.45

.41

.41

DSb

10.0 3.0

.62

.51

.54

.49

.44

.51

.54

.45

DSs

10.0 3.0

.21

.16

.21

.13

.15

.16

.18

.22

CAr

9.9 3.1

.34

.27

.33

.23

.27

.26

.26

.35

CAs

63

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.47

.22

.76

.57

.44

.58

.81

.41

10.0 10.0 10.1 9.9 10.1 10.1 9.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8

PSI

FSIQ

QRI

AWMI

NVI

GAI

CPI

Mean SD

.38

.69

.55

.45

.55

.66

.18

.46

.38

.61

.50

.37

.46

.60

.26

.37

.45

.46

.72

.75

.38

.53

.70

.34

.42

.49

.89

.50

.39

.62

.72

.34

.51

.59

.23

.41

.51

.88

.50

.41

.70

.69

.38

.49

.68

.28

.41

.83

.47

.48

.25

.49

.45

.25

.43

.46

.12

.31

.45

.39

.46

.53

.63

.64

.54

.86

.67

.33

.55

.53

.53

.57

.12

.66

.50

.52

.90

.53

.65

.26

.85

.46

.37

.44

.11

.69

.51

.68

.53

.51

.56

.30

.87

.45

.44

.43

.20

.12

.55

.49

.51

.90

.50

.57

.28

.63

.43

.36

.42

.21

.11

.74

.27

.53

.26

.28

.49

.91

.26

.25

.24

.18

.40

.34

.26

.78

.34

.51

.29

.30

.47

.90

.33

.28

.35

.26

.42

.26

.35

.36

.19

.29

.14

.15

.26

.42

.15

.15

.19

.12

.91

.94

.17

.45

.72

.74

.36

.54

.69

.32

.42

.49

.87

.51

.23

.18

.28

.23

.45

.69

.73

.38

.54

.68

.33

.40

.49

.84

.48

.26

.21

.28

.49

.39

.39

.72

.44

.50

.16

.67

.37

.26

.33

.49

.40

.39

.68

.38

.51

.18

.66

.37

.28

.35

.04 –.01

.09 –.09

.63

.44

.48

.75

.46

.57

.34

.72

.35

.37

.42

.28

.16

.24

.10

.14

.22

.33

.12

.12

.15

.40

.20

.33

.17

.15

.27

.46

.18

.18

.44

.88

.64

.48

.65

.83

.24

.50

.61

.48

.76

.83

.40

.59

.73

.32

.47

.56

.57

.57

.50

.86

.83

.49

.81

.83

.29

.53

.44

.44

.79

.59

.70

.83

.60

.70

.33

.48

.48

.84

.34

.58

.30

.32

.53

.64

.64

.75

.96

.92

.68

.81

.28

.50

.61

.55

.57

.68

.65

.55

.81

.78

.57

.49

.49

.67

.55

.57

.62

.62

.78

.87

.30

.51

.54

.54

.56

.61

.56

.60

.54

.55

.72

.68

.56

.49

.44

.41

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

9.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.1 10.1 10.0 10.1 9.9 10.0 10.1 20.0 20.2 19.7 20.1 20.3 69.8 19.7 20.0 60.0 49.7 40.4 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.8 3.3 3.1 3.2 2.8 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.3 3.1 5.5 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.7 14.2 5.1 5.1 12.2 11.2 8.8

.43

.76

.71

.45

.87

.73

.23

.49

.86

.48

.55

.11

.07

.55

.18 –.06

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.41

.83

.61

.45

.63

.78

.22

.46

.51

.40

.65

.13

.14

.46

.13

.07

.57

WMI

.58

.48

.73

.18

.09

.79

.44

.16

.23

.55

FRI

.54

.92

.15

.10

.45

.36

.14

.11

.51

.25

.10

.16

.79

.49

.32

.12

.93

.21

.10

.34

.31

.37

.29

.26

.73

VSI

.12

.18

.26

.20

.79

.36

.34

.19

VCI

.10

.16

.36

.34

.41

.37

.41

.13

.10

.17

.29

.29

.19

.32

.31

.47

CAs

.10

.34

.23

.35

.49

.50

.45

.13

.37

.26

.27

.29

.29

.16

.46

CAr

.40

.24

.22

.43

.44

.16

.30

.24

.39

.27

.24

.39

.40

.09

.27

.25

DSs

.29

.16

.56

.56

.14

.30

.25

.35

.31

.93

.97

.11

.12

.92

DSb

.31

.32

.34

.12

.22

.24

.30

.41

.44

.14

.27

.21

.21

DSf

.45

.48

.12

.27

.30

.32

.43

.22

.35

.09 .36

.47

.19

.22

.19

.49

.40

BDp

.16

.19

.23

.22 .64

BDn

.11

.24

.14

.37 .25

.12

.28

.35

.30 .26

.24

.24

.27

.41 .24

CA

.14

.36

.36 .47

SS

.17

.35

.37

.43 .62

.16

.42

.40

.34

.40 .48

CD

.41

.33

.34

.47 .47

.38

.39

.32

.47 .48

LN

.39

.31

.43 .24

.39

.39

.51

.41

PS

.40

.55

.44 .49

.42

.25

.33

.51

.36

.44

DS

.39

.44

.44

AR

.43

.36

.41 .41

.42

.44

.42

.45

PC

.54

.45

.39

.48

.57

.44

.34

FW

.43

.43

MR

.48

.48

.37

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.45

SS

.45

CD

VP

LN

BD

.62

.45

PS

.58

DS

CO

.70

AR

.66

PC

IN

FW .72

MR

.72

VP

VC

BD .72

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 13

Table G.15

64

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.40

.37

.28

.43

.44

10.0 3.0

VCI

.27

.25

DST

RST

NSI

STI

SRI

Mean SD

Subtest/ Composite Score

NSL

NSQ

.48

.47

100.0 14.9

STI

SRI

Mean SD

100.5 14.6

.41

.37

.28

.34

99.0 14.3

.37

.32

.29

.27

.30

.34

.31

.21

FRI

10.1 2.9

.47

.41

.35

.33

.37

.44

.34

.30

IN

100.2 14.6

.45

.32

.43

.27

.27

.34

.43

.36

WMI

9.9 3.0

.41

.39

.29

.39

.34

.34

.28

.24

CO

100.9 16.3

.31

.12

.33

.13

.12

.10

.38

.22

PSI

10.1 3.0

.41

.35

.31

.34

.31

.32

.34

.23

BD

99.8 14.4

.52

.42

.42

.37

.37

.41

.43

.33

FSIQ

10.1 3.0

.31

.32

.19

.26

.29

.34

.21

.14

VP

99.2 14.8

.49

.39

.40

.35

.37

.39

.41

.33

QRI

9.9 2.8

.30

.26

.23

.19

.24

.27

.26

.15

MR

99.9 14.1

.43

.29

.42

.25

.23

.31

.41

.36

AWMI

9.8 3.0

.34

.30

.26

.26

.26

.30

.27

.20

FW

100.0 14.7

.50

.39

.41

.34

.36

.40

.44

.30

NVI

10.0 2.9

.30

.35

.14

.29

.32

.37

.16

.09

PC

99.6 14.6

.50

.46

.34

.40

.42

.46

.34

.28

GAI

10.0 3.0

.51

.39

.44

.35

.38

.37

.43

.38

AR

100.6 15.2

.46

.26

.46

.24

.23

.26

.49

.35

CPI

10.0 2.9

.34

.20

.37

.19

.15

.21

.36

.31

DS

100.2 13.6

.72

.28

.91

.24

.23

.29

.66

NSL

10.1 3.0

.44

.36

.38

.29

.33

.38

.38

.31

PS

100.4 14.1

.75

.29

.92

.29

.22

.30

NSQ

10.0 2.8

.43

.31

.39

.25

.27

.35

.38

.33

LN

100.3 14.3

.78

.94

.33

.72

.89

IST

10.1 3.3

.25

.05

.31

.07

.04

.03

.36

.20

CD

100.2 13.9

.74

.95

.25

.76

DST

10.2 3.1

.31

.17

.29

.17

.17

.15

.33

.20

SS

99.0 13.9

.72

.89

.29

RST

10.0 3.2

.14

–.01

.22

–.03

–.01

.01

.20

.20

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.41

.28

NSI

.33

.37

.31

.21

VSI

10.0 2.8

.44

.45

.25

.39

.42

.46

.21

.24

VC

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 13

RST

.48

.42

IST

.44

.25

NSQ

DST

.26

NSL

IST

SI

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.16

200.5 25.3

.81

.31

.66

.66

NSI

10.1 2.8

.41

.34

.31

.34

.30

.32

.33

.23

BDn

299.6 39.1

.80

.76

.89

.86

STI

10.1 3.0

.35

.28

.28

.26

.25

.26

.32

.19

BDp

199.8 22.9

.66

.71

.74

.46

.45

SRI

10.0 3.1

.26

.17

.28

.13

.16

.18

.26

.24

DSf

10.1 2.9

.24

.14

.24

.17

.08

.14

.22

.22

DSb

9.9 3.0

.32

.18

.35

.17

.14

.20

.36

.28

DSs

10.0 3.3

.11

–.04

.20

–.06

–.03

–.02

.17

.20

CAr

10.1 3.1

.14

.02

.20

–.02

.02

.05

.21

.15

CAs

65

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.28

.78

.67

.58

.64

.82

.51

9.8 2.9

PSI

FSIQ

QRI

AWMI

NVI

GAI

CPI

Mean SD

.38

9.8 2.9

.49

.79

.61

.58

.64

.76

.30

.52

.61

.48

.91

.03

.07

.46

.37

.39

.38

.34

.07

.23

.28

.57

.43

.50

.61

.44

.55

.50

.48

9.9 3.1

.42

.76

.61

.50

.67

.71

.25

.46

.63

.55

.78

.18

.11

.40

.29

.35

.43

.46

.15

.26

.17

.49

.40

.43

.63

.38

.58

.49

.51

.49

.61

9.9 3.1

.44

.66

.55

.48

.57

.65

.27

.46

.53

.43

.73

.07

.08

.40

.28

.30

.33

.33

.09

.20

.26

.47

.42

.41

.54

.33

.48

.43

.41

.37

.45

.71

.78

.45

.62

.67

.27

.48

.64

.91

.56

.16

.14

.40

.38

.25

.64

.60

.18

.28

.19

.41

.43

.43

.52

.44

.60

.50

.48

.77

.72

.52

.54

.74

.29

.51

.85

.54

.57

.21

.13

.43

.40

.39

.47

.44

.18

.26

.25

.47

.42

.49

.50

.43

.48

.51

.80

.77

.54

.90

.77

.32

.54

.86

.63

.60

.12

.10

.47

.36

.38

.52

.51

.14

.30

.26

.50

.45

.51

.63

.40

9.9 10.0 10.1 9.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1

.52

.74

.79

.45

.53

.72

.39

.48

.59

.90

.47

.12

.05

.36

.35

.30

.91

.97

.10

.34

.34

.42

.44

.42

.41

.28

.55

.47

.63

.06

.82

.83

.75

.40

.36

.04

.35

.33

.73

.61

.57

.72

.66

.63

.90

.74

.33

.62

.65

.52

.69

.77

.63

.64

.92

.63

.75

.39

.90

.58

.47

.58

.25 –.01

.23

.56

.51

.45

.37

.37

.27

.26

.31

.56

.50

.62

9.7 10.0 9.9 2.9 3.0 2.9

.34

.51

.48

.35

.44

.49

.19

.38

.48

.40

.48

.10

.05

.28

.30

.19

.28

.28

.09

.17

.16

.34

.37

.31

.39

.69

.63

.64

.93

.58

.71

.41

.74

.56

.46

.60

.08

.10

.65

.59

.50

.38

.36

.10

.31

.39

.75

.34

.55

.38

.31

.53

.87

.38

.29

.30

.26

.24

.22

.32

.18

.29

.31

.31

.26

.50

CD

.70

.37

.44

.35

.31

.45

.86

.30

.33

.34

.29

.35

.31

.30

.26

.27

.31

.32

.36

SS

.11

.26

.18

.22

.08

.22

.20

.35

.07

.19

.16

.16

.90

.92

.02

.08

.05

.12

.91

9.8 2.9

.47

.70

.74

.38

.49

.67

.36

.42

.55

.87

.44

.13

.05

.30

.30

.26

.59

.48

.47

.67

.46

.57

.33

.65

.45

.30

.44

.00

.07

.45

.45

.61

.49

.51

.76

.48

.57

.25

.76

.44

.40

.44

.02

.13

.54 .01

.66

.56

.58

.79

.57

.66

.36

.75

.52

.42

.52

.02

.23

.14

.17

.09

.18

.17

.31

.08

.14

.10

.15

.69

9.9 10.0 9.9 10.1 9.8 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.1 2.9

.48

.69

.75

.42

.49

.68

.36

.45

.58

.85

.44

.14

.07

.32

.31

.33

.57

.55

.88

.68

.63

.72

.85

.32

.59

.68

.68

.54

.80

.87

.50

.64

.77

.37

.53

.58

.91

.87

.62

.84

.88

.36

.61

.48

.48

.83

.67

.75

.88

.64

.76

.39

.61

.61

.84

.41

.57

.43

.36

.57

.50

.50

.80

.97

.94

.78

.84

.36

.64

.66

.62

.60

.66

.69

.60

.84

.80

.65

.63

.63

.78

.68

.69

.73

.73

.79

.90

.36

.57

.65

.57

.65

.68

.64

.67

.62

.58

.65

.71

.45

.51

.50

.56

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

9.9 19.6 19.8 19.9 19.6 20.0 69.2 19.8 20.0 59.4 49.4 39.6 3.0 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.2 15.0 5.5 5.6 13.0 11.6 8.7

.22

.18

.22

.04

.21

.18

.34

.04

.19

.16

.13

.63

.63

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

9.7 10.1 10.0 10.0 9.8 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9

.73

.56

.71

.65

.53

.62

.32

.90

.51

.48

.48

.08

.07

.53

.54

.43

.40

.40

.10

.20

.35

.60

LN

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.56

.20

CAs

WMI

.20

CAr

.63

.48

DSs

FRI

.43

DSb

.91

.40

DSf

.56

.42

BDp

VSI

.45

BDn

VCI

.22

PS

.30

.45

DS

CA

.56

AR

SS

.65

PC

.52

.44

FW

.20

.55

MR

CD

.54

VP

LN

.47

.54

BD

.66

.75

PS

.67

DS

.67

AR

CO

PC

IN

FW .66

MR

.66

VP

VC

BD .66

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 14

Table G.17

66

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

9.8 2.9

VCI

.19

.38

.51

Mean SD

Subtest/ Composite Score

NSL

NSQ

IST

98.9 14.2

SRI

Mean SD

.46

99.5 15.2

.48

.51

.27

.49

.50

.45

.35

.13

VSI

9.8 2.9

.45

.45

.27

.40

.40

99.7 15.3

.50

.53

.26

.51

.49

.49

.34

.14

FRI

9.9 3.1

.49

.51

.28

.48

.48

.48

.33

.17

IN

98.9 15.1

.58

.54

.38

.48

.52

.52

.42

.26

WMI

9.9 3.1

.46

.37

.37

.39

.34

.32

.38

.29

CO

100.0 14.8

.43

.29

.39

.28

.28

.26

.43

.27

PSI

9.9 3.0

.44

.44

.26

.45

.41

.37

.35

.13

BD

99.2 15.2

.62

.59

.39

.55

.56

.55

.48

.23

FSIQ

10.0 3.0

.42

.48

.20

.44

.49

.44

.28

.09

VP

99.5 16.0

.54

.53

.34

.48

.51

.49

.42

.19

QRI

10.1 3.0

.40

.44

.21

.44

.39

.40

.25

.12

MR

99.9 15.6

.59

.53

.40

.49

.51

.50

.46

.26

AWMI

9.8 3.1

.45

.47

.25

.44

.45

.43

.34

.11

FW

99.3 15.7

.59

.58

.35

.55

.56

.53

.44

.20

NVI

9.7 2.9

.28

.39

.05

.33

.40

.38

.11

–.01

PC

99.2 15.2

.57

.58

.32

.55

.55

.54

.41

.17

GAI

10.0 3.0

.53

.47

.37

.42

.47

.45

.42

.24

AR

99.3 15.1

.60

.49

.45

.45

.48

.46

.51

.31

CPI

9.9 2.9

.54

.49

.37

.43

.47

.47

.43

.25

DS

102.0 14.8

.65

.15

.90

.18

.14

.11

.61

NSL

9.7 2.9

.48

.48

.29

.43

.47

.46

.32

.20

PS

102.2 14.1

.77

.36

.89

.35

.31

.35

NSQ

10.1 3.1

.54

.50

.36

.49

.47

.46

.42

.24

LN

99.5 15.4

.76

.95

.25

.79

.90

IST

10.0 3.1

.36

.21

.35

.21

.20

.19

.38

.26

CD

100.1 14.8

.76

.95

.25

.79

DST

10.0 3.0

.37

.28

.31

.27

.28

.25

.37

.19

SS

101.6 14.9

.74

.91

.29

RST

9.8 2.9

.17

.05

.21

.06

.05

.04

.17

.20

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.52

.53

STI

.32

.51

SRI

NSI

.50

STI

.50

.29

NSI

.46

.43

RST

RST

.51

DST

DST

.48

IST

.32

.16

.16

.37

NSL

VC

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 14

SI

NSQ

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.18

204.2 25.9

.79

.28

.61

.61

NSI

9.8 2.9

.39

.39

.23

.40

.36

.33

.31

.11

BDn

301.2 42.4

.80

.81

.89

.89

STI

9.9 3.0

.34

.38

.16

.39

.35

.32

.26

.03

BDp

202.5 23.9

.71

.73

.73

.51

.31

SRI

10.0 2.9

.37

.35

.24

.29

.35

.34

.25

.18

DSf

9.9 3.1

.44

.38

.32

.33

.38

.36

.36

.22

DSb

10.1 3.1

.50

.44

.36

.41

.41

.43

.42

.23

DSs

9.8 2.9

.15

.03

.19

.03

.02

.02

.16

.19

CAr

9.9 3.0

.14

.06

.17

.07

.06

.04

.13

.17

CAs

67

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.45 .53

.26 .23

.75 .80

.56 .65

.47 .54

.61 .68

.79 .83

.44 .47

9.9 2.9

PSI

FSIQ

QRI

AWMI

NVI

GAI

CPI

Mean SD

.51

.66

.61

.46

.58

.66

.34

.47

.47

.78

.79

.37

.57

.75

.34

.41

.57

.47

.72

.80

.44

.58

.70

.31

.45

.61

.51

.40

.75

.71

.48

.56

.73

.24

.42

.87

.54

.39

.76

.72

.45

.87

.73

.17

.45

.85

.57

.56

.43

.51

.51

.45

.52

.53

.25

.44

.40

.45

.49

.58

.67

.67

.62

.87

.71

.34

.59

.59

.52

.60

.22

.72

.57

.62

.92

.58

.71

.28

.88

.54

.45

.50

.22

.69

.44

.60

.60

.47

.50

.24

.88

.34

.38

.44

.20

.59

.51

.54

.91

.55

.59

.26

.70

.46

.36

.51

.20

.11

.69

.21

.45

.25

.24

.42

.88

.22

.16

.22

.18

.36

.30

.74

.35

.50

.27

.28

.45

.89

.29

.26

.41

.30

.35

.32

.28

.38

.24

.35

.20

.22

.30

.39

.23

.22

.28

.13

.93

.94

.20

.45

.75

.76

.36

.54

.72

.31

.40

.56

.87

.55

.33

.24

.38

.23

.56

.48

.49

.71

.43

.58

.22

.68

.44

.36

.44

.16

.16

.56

.41

.46

.74

.45

.54

.21

.69

.42

.30

.35

.14

.45

.63

.51

.56

.76

.51

.62

.26

.76

.45

.44

.34

.22

.32

.15

.21

.27

.35

.19

.23

.24

.39

.24

.35

.23

.21

.31

.40

.23

.19

.62

.50

.89

.70

.56

.67

.85

.27

.54

.52

.82

.87

.44

.63

.79

.36

.47

.65

.67

.67

.46

.88

.84

.55

.82

.85

.24

.50

.48

.48

.80

.58

.69

.86

.60

.69

.29

.55

.55

.81

.32

.53

.29

.29

.49

.57

.57

.73

.96

.94

.71

.82

.24

.58

.61

.60

.63

.70

.64

.55

.82

.80

.61

.52

.52

.72

.59

.64

.67

.67

.76

.90

.23

.40

.58

.55

.67

.66

.56

.62

.59

.63

.72

.65

.49

.43

.43

.46

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

9.8 10.1 10.0 9.9 10.2 10.0 19.7 19.8 19.8 20.0 19.8 69.5 19.8 19.9 59.6 49.5 39.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.3 3.1 5.4 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.3 14.5 5.0 5.5 12.1 11.6 8.5

.45

.75

.77

.36

.55

.72

.32

.40

.58

.87

.55

.33

.28

.36

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

9.8 10.1 10.0 10.1 9.8 10.0 9.8 10.3 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.9 10.0 9.8 10.1 9.8 3.0 3.2 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.1

.43

.73

.61

.51

.63

.69

.22

.47

.52

.61 .91

.20

.16

.18

.13

.64

WMI

.58

.91

.57

.15

.17

.56

.15

.15

.54 .59

.65

.54

.17

.22

.50

.21

.17

.29

FRI

.74

.58

.20

.18

.83

.54

.19

.10

.54 .64

.33

.15

.48

.41

.19

.78

.91 .91

.24

.24

.40

.81

.51

.36

.16

VSI

.18

.15

.41

.43

.40

.21 .22

.23

VCI

.16

.29

.37

.29

.78

.27 .28

.10

.12

.20

.40

.36

.43

.33

.33

.51

CAs

.13

.41

.36

.23

.38

.38

.51

.09 .08

.44

.30

.33

.47

.47

.17

.44

CAr

.42

.24

.42

.42 .38

.19

.26

.29

.36 .46

.28

.35

.47 .49

.21

.26

.25

DSs

.30

.31

.51

.49

.23

.30

.91

.31 .34

.30

.67

.63

.20

.25

.30

DSb

.43

.95

.92

.19 .16 .30

.36 .43

.47

.45

.21

.25

.33

DSf

.46

.46

.19

.38

.24

.35

.45 .55

.37

.33

.57 .30 .35

.47 .53

.24

.39

.18

.44 .57

BDp

.16

.32

.11

.38

.33

BDn

.12

.17

.41 .24

.11

.17

.37

.39 .22

.28 .26

.28

.23

.34 .16

CA

.41

.21

.25 .55

SS

.07

.46

.36

.45 .67

.18

.15

.45 .49

.33

.49 .48 .55

CD

.41

.47 .44 .48

LN

.35

.49

.39

.56

.38 .43

.42

.53

.53

PS

.47

.57 .39

.42 .50

.41 .52

.50 .60

.42

.37

DS

.45

.32

AR

.42

.50

.48

.40 .49

.41

.48

.51

PC

.47

.54

.54

.48 .54

.48

.45 .49

.67

FW

.49

MR

.58

.49

.49

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.50 .61

SS

.48 .56

CD

VP

LN

BD

.58

PS

.62 .58

DS

.63 .73

AR

CO

PC

IN

FW .67

MR

.67

VP

VC

BD .67

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 15

Table G.19

68

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

IST

99.5 15.3

.48

.52

.22

.45

.50

.52

.26

.16

VSI

9.8 3.0

.39

.50

.10

.37

.49

.55

.11

.08

99.4 14.9

.45

.51

.18

.44

.49

.52

.20

.15

FRI

10.1 3.2

.38

.47

.13

.35

.46

.50

.13

.11

IN

99.9 15.3

.53

.47

.32

.38

.43

.50

.32

.29

WMI

10.0 2.9

.60

.61

.33

.56

.56

.60

.33

.28

CO

99.6 15.0

.41

.21

.41

.18

.20

.21

.47

.30

PSI

10.1 3.0

.43

.44

.22

.39

.42

.43

.25

.16

BD

99.6 14.7

.58

.59

.30

.49

.56

.62

.33

.24

FSIQ

9.8 3.0

.44

.51

.17

.43

.48

.52

.21

.11

VP

99.4 14.6

.52

.53

.26

.45

.51

.54

.28

.21

QRI

10.0 3.1

.35

.41

.13

.35

.39

.42

.12

.12

MR

99.7 15.4

.54

.50

.31

.43

.46

.52

.30

.29

AWMI

9.8 2.9

.43

.47

.20

.40

.44

.47

.22

.14

FW

99.5 14.5

.60

.58

.34

.50

.54

.59

.38

.26

NVI

10.3 3.1

.39

.46

.14

.35

.45

.49

.15

.12

PC

99.5 14.9

.52

.61

.19

.50

.59

.63

.21

.15

GAI

10.0 2.9

.49

.46

.26

.39

.44

.47

.26

.23

AR

99.6 14.6

.58

.42

.45

.34

.39

.44

.49

.37

CPI

10.0 3.0

.44

.39

.28

.32

.36

.42

.27

.25

DS

100.1 15.9

.71

.17

.94

.20

.15

.14

.77

NSL

10.0 3.0

.49

.43

.29

.34

.40

.46

.29

.26

PS

99.9 16.1

.76

.25

.94

.30

.21

.18

NSQ

9.9 3.0

.54

.51

.30

.45

.47

.53

.28

.28

LN

98.2 15.9

.71

.95

.17

.78

.91

IST

10.0 3.0

.37

.11

.43

.11

.08

.11

.49

.32

CD

99.8 15.4

.73

.96

.19

.79

DST

9.8 3.0

.35

.25

.28

.20

.26

.25

.33

.21

SS

99.8 16.2

.73

.91

.27

RST

10.1 3.3

.35

.23

.29

.20

.22

.22

.30

.23

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

99.2 14.5

.64

NSQ

Mean SD

.15

NSL

.47

.11

Subtest/ Composite Score

.59

VCI

Mean SD

SRI

9.9 2.9

SRI

STI

.47

STI

.14

.58

NSI

NSI

.15

RST

.58

.46

DST

.46

.57

IST

RST

.61

NSQ

VC

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 15

DST

.11

.16

NSL

SI

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.20

200.0 30.1

.78

.22

.77

.77

NSI

9.8 3.1

.39

.42

.18

.36

.40

.41

.20

.14

BDn

297.8 44.6

.77

.80

.90

.89

STI

9.8 3.0

.37

.41

.16

.35

.39

.41

.20

.09

BDp

199.4 24.8

.70

.69

.67

.47

.40

SRI

10.1 3.0

.35

.35

.18

.28

.34

.37

.17

.18

DSf

10.0 3.0

.35

.24

.28

.21

.20

.26

.29

.25

DSb

9.9 2.9

.40

.39

.21

.32

.36

.42

.19

.20

DSs

10.2 3.3

.31

.21

.26

.19

.20

.20

.28

.20

CAr

10.0 3.1

.36

.24

.29

.21

.23

.24

.31

.25

CAs

69

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.59

.31

.79

.64

.56

.66

.82

.52

10.3 10.1 10.1 10.3 10.1 10.1 9.9 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.2

PSI

FSIQ

QRI

AWMI

NVI

GAI

CPI

Mean SD

.38

.72

.59

.45

.65

.67

.21

.44

.37

.65

.53

.43

.57

.62

.19

.45

.51

.59

.77

.82

.53

.65

.78

.45

.57

.59

.43

.66

.74

.47

.60

.64

.28

.45

.53

.91

.57

.48

.78

.75

.50

.57

.74

.29

.53

.88

.52

.56

.27

.42

.39

.30

.44

.40

.16

.30

.36

.37

.42

.55

.79

.74

.62

.91

.78

.33

.62

.68

.68

.71

.78

.63

.66

.91

.60

.75

.44

.89

.54

.53

.55

.11

.72

.57

.69

.63

.48

.61

.35

.88

.49

.45

.52

.18

.55

.57

.58

.91

.51

.61

.25

.70

.49

.46

.54

.10

.11

.77

.38

.60

.33

.30

.57

.91

.39

.32

.37

.30

.28

.31

.78

.30

.45

.36

.25

.43

.90

.42

.21

.35

.23

.31

.29

.36

.31

.09

.20

.13

.11

.15

.35

.18

.09

.12

.04

.92

.94

.19

.58

.76

.80

.53

.64

.76

.42

.57

.61

.86

.55

.12

.11

.47

.43

.59

.77

.81

.53

.66

.79

.47

.54

.63

.85

.58

.54

.47

.46

.71

.43

.56

.27

.67

.38

.42

.42

.17 –.03

.14 –.01

.43

.66

.51

.54

.72

.45

.62

.40

.74

.44

.42

.45

.12

.68

.55

.61

.79

.54

.65

.40

.76

.49

.47

.47

9.9 10.2 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.0 9.9 10.0 10.0 10.1 10.2 9.9 10.0 9.9 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.2 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

.41

.78

.73

.48

.90

.74

.22

.48

.85

.56

.59

.15

.19

.37

.12

.29

.10

.20

.12

.12

.15

.33

.16

.08

.53

.90

.72

.60

.71

.85

.30

.61

.66

.56

.78

.86

.55

.69

.78

.40

.56

.62

.66

.66

.51

.89

.85

.57

.84

.85

.29

.58

.51

.51

.84

.68

.76

.87

.61

.77

.45

.56

.56

.86

.38

.59

.38

.30

.56

.62

.62

.78

.97

.94

.75

.84

.41

.65

.64

.63

.68

.72

.70

.53

.86

.81

.61

.65

.65

.73

.66

.68

.65

.65

.79

.91

.40

.54

.59

.61

.60

.72

.62

.65

.63

.63

.76

.70

.59

.56

.49

.58

FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI

9.9 10.1 20.4 20.1 19.8 20.1 20.0 70.2 19.9 20.0 59.9 50.2 40.0 2.9 3.1 5.7 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.6 15.6 5.3 5.5 12.9 12.0 9.3

.30

.08

.19

.13

.11

.15

.33

.18

.09

.10

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.46

.86

.68

.57

.70

.81

.25

.55

.58

.91

.56

.13

.13

.64

.38

.62

WMI

.65

.46

.68

.06

.13

.55

.34

.14

.59

.55

.74

.08

.12

.79

.48

.27 –.03

.06

FRI

.61

.93

.11

.07

.54

.47

.21

.02

.55

.14

.08

.17

.83

.49

.39

.76

.94

.11

.06

.44

.45

.38

.46

.39

.17

VSI

.12

.12

.42

.25

.79

.42

.41

.19

VCI

.07

.04

.38

.35

.46

.42

.46

.13

.04

.07

.47

.40

.26

.54

.54

.51

CAs

.04

.39

.32

.33

.63

.64

.44

.00

.37

.44

.34

.31

.29

.11

.52

CAr

.47

.33

.33

.56

.52

.19

.32

.46

.41

.33

.43

.53

.53

.12

.42

.42

DSs

.39

.27

.63

.62

.14

.31

.43

.45

.26

.93

.96

.14

.15

.90

DSb

.39

.45

.47

.06

.14

.16

.40

.49

.47

.08

.23

.38

.12

DSf

.57

.52

.09

.25

.29

.36

.52

.13

.38

.14 .32

.51

.06

.15

.25

.52

.31

BDp

.10

.21

.29

.27 .62

BDn

.05

.19

.26

.40 .23

.02

.42

.45

.26 .22

.24

.19

.43

.38 .32

CA

.17

.42

.47 .59

SS

.25

.38

.37

.47 .65

.32

.43

.45

.47

.53 .56

CD

.52

.39

.43

.60 .49

.49

.39

.55

.65 .61

LN

.46

.40

.55 .27

.52

.40

.62

.43

PS

.51

.68

.38 .65

.52

.28

.36

.64

.27

.26

DS

.44

.52

.51

AR

.40

.49

.40 .49

.39

.56

.46

.43

PC

.59

.55

.51

.52

.66

.50

.38

FW

.50

.50

MR

.57

.54

.46

CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI

.49

SS

.50

CD

VP

LN

BD

.60

.51

PS

.66

DS

CO

.71

AR

.68

PC

IN

FW .75

MR

.75

VP

VC

BD .75

CO

SI

IN

VC

Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score

SI

Intercorrelations of Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 16

Table G.21

70

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.25

.55

.48

NSQ

IST

DST

101.1 15.3

Mean SD

.52

100.3 15.0

.53

99.3 15.2

.48

.52

.25

.45

.48

.52

.28

.18

FRI

10.1 3.1

.43

.46

.23

.44

.36

.47

.25

.18

IN

100.1 15.4

.54

.46

.39

.41

.42

.45

.40

.32

WMI

10.3 3.0

.45

.39

.32

.37

.33

.40

.30

.29

CO

99.9 15.7

.51

.32

.49

.28

.31

.31

.51

.39

PSI

10.1 2.9

.54

.49

.38

.46

.44

.46

.40

.30

BD

100.2 15.8

.63

.59

.40

.53

.54

.59

.42

.31

FSIQ

10.1 3.0

.44

.47

.22

.40

.45

.47

.26

.14

VP

99.6 15.5

.50

.50

.28

.47

.44

.50

.31

.22

QRI

9.9 3.2

.44

.47

.21

.37

.46

.48

.26

.14

MR

100.0 15.3

.49

.42

.34

.40

.37

.41

.34

.29

AWMI

9.9 2.9

.40

.43

.22

.42

.36

.42

.23

.18

FW

99.9 15.4

.63

.60

.40

.53

.55

.59

.43

.30

NVI

10.2 3.1

.23

.34

.04

.30

.31

.33

.06

.01

PC

100.4 15.5

.57

.60

.29

.53

.55

.60

.33

.22

GAI

10.0 3.0

.49

.47

.30

.43

.42

.48

.33

.21

AR

100.1 16.0

.61

.45

.51

.40

.42

.44

.53

.42

CPI

10.0 3.0

.50

.37

.41

.33

.34

.36

.40

.36

DS

99.9 15.7

.69

.16

.92

.20

.11

.13

.70

NSL

10.1 2.9

.45

.44

.27

.39

.39

.44

.30

.21

PS

99.1 15.8

.77

.29

.92

.29

.23

.29

NSQ

10.0 3.0

.38

.39

.20

.39

.33

.38

.20

.17

LN

97.6 14.6

.73

.95

.23

.75

.91

IST

9.9 3.2

.48

.31

.45

.30

.29

.29

.47

.36

CD

100.1 14.8

.71

.95

.18

.75

DST

10.0 3.0

.43

.26

.41

.21

.26

.25

.43

.34

SS

99.8 15.6

.71

.90

.27

RST

10.0 3.2

.18

.11

.18

.11

.09

.10

.23

.10

CA

Note. For intercorrelations, uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal, and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.

.53

.48

SRI

.33

.47

.49

.51

.36

.24

VSI

10.1 3.0

.42

.48

.17

.41

.44

.51

.22

.10

VC

Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest, Process, and Composite Scores for Age 16

STI

.47

.16

NSL

.22

VCI

Subtest/ Composite Score

NSI

10.3 3.1

Mean SD

RST

.51

.48

.24

NSI

SRI

.46

RST

STI

.52

.46

DST

NSQ

IST

.19

.25

NSL

SI

Subtest/ Composite Score

Table G.22

199.1 29.1

.79

.24

.70

.70

NSI

10.1 2.8

.52

.45

.37

.42

.41

.44

.39

.30

BDn

297.5 42.0

.77

.77

.89

.89

STI

10.2 3.0

.51

.46

.35

.43

.41

.45

.37

.27

BDp

198.4 24.0

.67

.67

.70

.49

.36

SRI

9.9 3.0

.32

.27

.25

.21

.28

.26

.21

.25

DSf

10.0 3.0

.44

.30

.38

.25

.27

.32

.37

.34

DSb

9.9 3.0

.46

.33

.39

.35

.28

.31

.40

.31

DSs

9.9 2.9

.14

.07

.16

.08

.04

.08

.22

.08

CAr

10.1 3.1

.22

.16

.20

.16

.14

.14

.24

.13

CAs

Appendix

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3 and WIAT–III, by Age Group

71 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

H

72

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

99.7 12.9 80

Mean SD  n

RC

99.3 12.6 79

.54 .60 .59 .57 .31 .28 .45 .42 .36 .43 .43 .22 .53 .13 .29 .10 .68 .36 .51 .40 .29 .70 .57 .55 .53 .66 .52

96.1 12.9 68

.10 .44 .38 .18 .43 .24 .27 .15 .47 .34 .55 .10 .30 –.16 .13 –.06 .36 .41 .27 .40 .00 .53 .36 .49 .37 .45 .32

NWD

PP

101.1 13.4 79

.43 .46 .50 .43 .30 .19 .38 .48 .29 .39 .43 .20 .49 .08 .17 .01 .56 .29 .50 .39 .16 .64 .58 .53 .48 .59 .42 99.6 12.0 68

.29 .41 .50 .28 .20 .23 .25 .12 .32 .08 .49 .10 .35 .08 .13 –.12 .45 .27 .24 .36 .15 .51 .15 .50 .31 .41 .38

WRF

DF

98.8 13.4 31

.19 .55 .30 .27 .43 .13 .13 –.01 .24 .31 .56 –.06 .22 –.16 .12 –.32 .47 .34 .09 .37 –.01 .47 .26 .46 .12 .42 .31 96.8 12.7 67

.18 .27 .45 .21 .14 .24 .29 .02 .09 .32 .39 .12 .21 .41 .36 –.02 .27 .24 .22 .32 .49 .44 .26 .35 .38 .28 .57

SRF

RV

98.5 12.4 68

.40 .60 .58 .39 .35 .28 .39 .25 .30 .35 .48 .10 .41 .07 .17 .05 .62 .39 .40 .36 .18 .67 .42 .52 .45 .62 .42 98.3 12.8 80

.49 .58 .64 .57 .42 .48 .55 .61 .39 .57 .59 .23 .38 .10 .26 .03 .65 .55 .68 .51 .24 .81 .77 .56 .69 .74 .57

MCA

96.1 11.5 80

.33 .26 .33 .24 .40 .23 .38 .41 .35 .53 .26 .09 .23 .23 .32 –.07 .36 .38 .47 .24 .36 .55 .64 .27 .49 .52 .42

MC

95.9 11.8 67

.20 .30 .33 .16 .28 .24 .40 .41 .26 .41 .27 .05 .27 .32 .39 –.04 .32 .32 .49 .21 .44 .58 .57 .32 .51 .47 .46

MF

97.6 13.6 80

.32 .35 .36 .47 .31 .19 .31 .12 .13 .44 .37 .06 .38 .17 .23 –.15 .42 .31 .27 .27 .26 .51 .42 .45 .36 .42 .41

WE

SP

98.5 12.5 80

.34 .43 .49 .36 .35 .21 .42 .22 .38 .43 .55 .13 .49 .25 .40 .04 .49 .34 .41 .43 .41 .66 .47 .61 .47 .53 .62 96.4 12.8 49

.07 –.23 –.24 –.12 –.31 –.24 .00 –.26 –.02 –.16 –.16 .08 .15 .55 .25 .43 –.13 –.33 –.14 –.05 .49 –.09 –.29 .00 –.07 –.24 .31

WF

LC

96.5 13.4 77

.36 .68 .63 .62 .18 .31 .35 .43 .16 .36 .49 .16 .43 –.02 .16 .10 .64 .31 .46 .40 .10 .65 .55 .55 .42 .57 .41

OE

95.4 11.0 79

.25 .48 .44 .52 .21 .23 .20 .26 .28 .18 .39 .13 .41 –.14 .07 .12 .46 .27 .26 .32 –.03 .44 .31 .48 .27 .41 .26

AF

98.5 13.6 80

.28 .41 .28 .49 .14 .15 .30 .28 .16 .13 .14 .07 .25 .06 .16 .18 .44 .18 .35 .13 .15 .42 .28 .23 .30 .41 .22 96.0 14.3 80

.13 .25 .27 .21 .14 .06 .17 –.02 –.07 .12 .20 .17 .26 .31 .35 .09 .24 .11 .10 .24 .41 .30 .08 .26 .25 .22 .46

ONF

95.4 13.6 78

.36 .34 .44 .14 .15 .17 .24 .15 .22 .25 .56 .23 .46 .31 .41 .17 .43 .20 .24 .49 .45 .53 .30 .58 .37 .38 .66

LNF

Note. KTEA–3 subtest abbreviations are: LWR = Letter & Word Recognition, RC = Reading Comprehension, NWD = Nonsense Word Decoding, PP = Phonological Processing, WRF = Word Recognition Fluency, DF = Decoding Fluency, SRF = Silent Reading Fluency, RV = Reading Vocabulary, MCA = Math Concepts & Applications, MC = Math Computation, MF = Math Fluency, WE = Written Expression, SP = Spelling, WF = Writing Fluency, LC = Listening Comprehension, OE = Oral Expression, AF = Associational Fluency, ONF = Object Naming Facility, LNF = Letter Naming Facility. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.48 .52 .64 .43 .37 .27 .38 .31 .31 .44 .53 .19 .44 .04 .25 –.02 .61 .39 .43 .45 .20 .67 .52 .56 .49 .61 .50

LWR

KTEA–3 Subtests

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3, by Age Group

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI KTEA–3

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 6–9

Table H.1

73

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

99.2 12.9 79

Mean SD  n

96.8 11.7 80

.46 .48 .55 .46 .46 .41 .52 .56 .42 .61 .49 .19 .34 .17 .32 –.01 .58 .53 .64 .43 .32 .77 .77 .47 .67 .71 .55

97.4 12.1 80

.36 .45 .47 .49 .39 .24 .41 .20 .29 .49 .52 .10 .49 .23 .35 –.06 .51 .37 .39 .38 .38 .66 .50 .59 .47 .54 .57 97.1 12.0 79

.52 .59 .64 .56 .46 .37 .51 .46 .42 .59 .56 .18 .52 .20 .37 .00 .67 .50 .57 .47 .38 .80 .71 .62 .63 .72 .63

Academic Skills Battery

98.5 12.2 67

.24 .52 .46 .28 .40 .24 .35 .39 .45 .42 .55 .19 .42 –.06 .16 –.07 .49 .39 .45 .46 .08 .65 .56 .57 .48 .59 .41

SoundSymbol

97.3 12.2 68

.28 .51 .53 .27 .43 .27 .32 .24 .44 .40 .57 .13 .35 –.12 .18 –.05 .50 .44 .35 .44 .06 .63 .46 .53 .43 .56 .39

Decoding

100.3 11.5 31

.28 .62 .30 .25 .46 .24 .21 .15 .30 .27 .54 –.11 .27 .23 .22 –.34 .56 .43 .22 .32 .31 .64 .33 .47 .32 .52 .46

Reading Fluency

98.3 12.1 68

.45 .63 .58 .46 .31 .29 .42 .31 .35 .41 .45 .16 .48 .08 .22 .05 .65 .38 .45 .38 .21 .69 .50 .54 .48 .65 .45 95.6 12.8 76

.37 .70 .58 .70 .25 .31 .37 .43 .26 .32 .42 .14 .45 –.02 .15 .15 .67 .35 .47 .35 .09 .65 .52 .52 .45 .61 .36 96.6 14.1 80

.25 .42 .34 .44 .17 .13 .30 .16 .06 .15 .21 .14 .32 .24 .33 .18 .43 .19 .30 .23 .37 .45 .23 .31 .34 .40 .43 97.8 13.1 76

.50 .71 .68 .68 .30 .34 .47 .47 .29 .45 .49 .22 .54 .08 .24 .09 .73 .40 .55 .46 .21 .75 .61 .61 .55 .69 .52 95.5 11.9 79

.34 .49 .46 .59 .33 .24 .30 .24 .23 .40 .44 .10 .46 .02 .20 –.04 .52 .35 .32 .34 .16 .57 .46 .54 .38 .50 .39 96.7 12.3 67

.30 .42 .53 .17 .25 .23 .32 .12 .37 .27 .62 .14 .45 .31 .41 .03 .45 .29 .30 .48 .46 .64 .30 .63 .42 .45 .66 96.2 10.7 31

.24 .38 .00 .01 .24 .07 .17 .00 .30 .24 .30 –.03 .32 .44 .32 .05 .39 .19 .12 .21 .49 .49 .21 .35 .25 .32 .52

Reading Oral Oral Orthographic Academic Understanding Language Fluency Comprehension Expression Processing Fluency

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.54 .62 .66 .55 .37 .31 .43 .41 .36 .45 .51 .20 .52 .10 .30 .06 .70 .41 .50 .45 .26 .74 .58 .60 .54 .68 .53

Reading

Written Math Language

KTEA–3 Composites

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3, by Age Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI KTEA–3

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 6–9

Table H.1

10.0 10.2 9.9 10.1 9.3 10.0 9.4 9.9 9.4 9.6 9.8 9.5 9.8 9.6 9.6 10.1 100.5 98.1 97.8 98.1 97.9 97.7 98.1 98.8 96.7 98.4 97.4

Mean 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.5 3.1 3.2 2.9 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.6 3.0 12.5 15.0 13.0 13.1 11.9 11.7 11.2 13.1 12.4 12.9 11.4

SD 

WISC–V

n 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 79 80 80 79 80 80 80 80 80 79 79 78 80 79 79 80 78

74

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

98.6 13.7 127

Mean SD  n

100.5 14.9 122

.73 .72 .57 .55 .47 .45 .48 .55 .36 .62 .49 .49 .39 .01 .13 .18 .79 .53 .61 .55 .08 .72 .66 .48 .64 .74 .41

RC

99.6 13.1 127

.43 .46 .43 .34 .29 .29 .25 .37 .36 .47 .42 .52 .44 .10 .13 .06 .48 .33 .38 .52 .13 .49 .48 .46 .48 .45 .42

NWD

100.6 11.6 127

.52 .54 .45 .31 .49 .42 .42 .38 .41 .51 .58 .39 .36 .13 .25 .16 .58 .52 .49 .55 .22 .65 .50 .51 .59 .61 .49

PP

101.0 14.0 125

.46 .66 .57 .46 .37 .31 .29 .38 .42 .56 .58 .50 .44 .18 .27 .22 .61 .39 .40 .60 .25 .61 .53 .55 .53 .55 .56

WRF

100.4 12.9 126

.38 .48 .48 .25 .32 .35 .25 .39 .44 .51 .50 .42 .44 .10 .20 .12 .47 .38 .40 .51 .17 .51 .51 .51 .48 .46 .44

DF

103.0 13.9 125

.46 .48 .37 .33 .37 .26 .27 .37 .37 .44 .45 .37 .46 .49 .42 .35 .50 .36 .39 .46 .51 .60 .45 .49 .55 .50 .63

SRF

99.8 13.8 127

.63 .78 .62 .52 .42 .41 .43 .47 .46 .65 .44 .54 .44 .14 .19 .24 .77 .47 .55 .55 .19 .70 .64 .48 .63 .69 .48

RV

99.2 15.4 127

.71 .72 .69 .53 .61 .53 .56 .62 .47 .77 .55 .50 .47 .21 .29 .29 .78 .66 .71 .59 .29 .82 .79 .55 .78 .81 .57

MCA

100.4 13.8 127

.56 .60 .51 .48 .48 .32 .41 .49 .23 .64 .40 .37 .44 .20 .31 .12 .63 .45 .55 .43 .29 .66 .65 .45 .60 .65 .47

MC

100.1 13.0 127

.34 .33 .29 .23 .24 .08 .17 .23 .20 .47 .38 .17 .31 .37 .33 .22 .37 .19 .25 .32 .39 .44 .40 .37 .33 .33 .47

MF

100.5 14.0 126

.66 .67 .49 .49 .46 .29 .49 .49 .29 .55 .49 .53 .49 .31 .25 .22 .72 .42 .59 .57 .31 .74 .59 .53 .66 .69 .57

WE

100.5 13.2 126

.46 .48 .38 .35 .32 .21 .22 .38 .37 .49 .51 .45 .53 .20 .16 .11 .51 .30 .38 .53 .20 .54 .49 .56 .46 .49 .48

SP

99.3 14.8 127

.13 .18 .18 .29 .22 .03 .01 .15 .13 .36 .29 .35 .33 .42 .27 .14 .17 .14 .11 .35 .38 .29 .28 .33 .30 .18 .47

WF

LC

97.9 14.4 124

.54 .67 .48 .39 .37 .43 .31 .37 .31 .46 .29 .26 .26 .17 .37 .26 .66 .47 .41 .31 .31 .57 .47 .29 .50 .58 .41 97.9 15.0 127

.47 .46 .40 .48 .37 .31 .32 .28 .32 .48 .32 .34 .19 .22 .22 .29 .51 .39 .37 .36 .25 .52 .43 .27 .49 .47 .41

OE

99.1 15.6 127

.37 .41 .34 .39 .39 .31 .27 .26 .15 .45 .30 .41 .34 .31 .40 .23 .43 .40 .32 .39 .40 .49 .40 .34 .50 .42 .50

AF

97.5 14.2 127

.29 .21 .19 .20 .24 .09 .09 .31 .20 .37 .38 .30 .36 .25 .23 .21 .27 .19 .26 .38 .29 .38 .38 .40 .35 .30 .43

ONF

99.5 13.4 127

.23 .11 .16 .33 .16 .13 –.06 .21 .20 .31 .25 .17 .29 .21 .21 .22 .19 .17 .10 .25 .23 .23 .29 .29 .21 .17 .31

LNF

Note. KTEA–3 subtest abbreviations are: LWR = Letter & Word Recognition, RC = Reading Comprehension, NWD = Nonsense Word Decoding, PP = Phonological Processing, WRF = Word Recognition Fluency, DF = Decoding Fluency, SRF = Silent Reading Fluency, RV = Reading Vocabulary, MCA = Math Concepts & Applications, MC = Math Computation, MF = Math Fluency, WE = Written Expression, SP = Spelling, WF = Writing Fluency, LC = Listening Comprehension, OE = Oral Expression, AF = Associational Fluency, ONF = Object Naming Facility, LNF = Letter Naming Facility. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.61 .68 .57 .39 .42 .37 .35 .47 .48 .54 .49 .52 .49 .14 .20 .13 .70 .44 .50 .57 .20 .66 .57 .53 .60 .65 .49

LWR

KTEA–3 Subtests

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3, by Age Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI KTEA–3

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 10–16

Table H.1

75

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

99.5 14.4 122

Mean SD  n

99.7 14.6 127

.68 .70 .65 .54 .59 .46 .53 .60 .39 .76 .52 .47 .49 .22 .32 .23 .75 .60 .68 .55 .31 .80 .77 .54 .74 .78 .56

100.2 13.1 125

.64 .64 .50 .47 .44 .29 .41 .49 .37 .59 .56 .55 .57 .29 .23 .20 .69 .40 .55 .62 .30 .72 .62 .62 .63 .67 .60 99.3 14.4 120

.76 .79 .67 .60 .57 .44 .51 .62 .45 .75 .61 .61 .57 .26 .30 .21 .83 .57 .68 .68 .32 .84 .78 .64 .75 .82 .64

Academic Skills Battery

100.0 12.6 127

.56 .58 .52 .39 .45 .42 .38 .45 .45 .58 .59 .53 .48 .14 .22 .13 .61 .50 .51 .63 .21 .66 .58 .58 .63 .62 .54

SoundSymbol

98.8 13.3 127

.56 .62 .54 .39 .37 .36 .32 .45 .46 .54 .49 .56 .50 .13 .18 .10 .64 .41 .47 .59 .18 .62 .57 .53 .58 .60 .49

Decoding

101.1 13.7 123

.49 .61 .54 .41 .43 .34 .32 .43 .47 .57 .61 .51 .51 .34 .37 .28 .60 .43 .46 .62 .40 .66 .57 .60 .60 .58 .65

Reading Fluency

99.8 14.7 122

.74 .82 .65 .59 .49 .48 .51 .56 .45 .70 .52 .56 .46 .08 .18 .23 .84 .55 .64 .61 .14 .78 .71 .53 .69 .79 .49 97.6 14.7 124

.62 .70 .57 .59 .51 .49 .40 .40 .35 .63 .41 .45 .36 .34 .48 .36 .72 .57 .49 .49 .46 .71 .58 .41 .67 .67 .61 97.9 15.3 127

.40 .38 .32 .36 .39 .25 .22 .34 .21 .50 .41 .44 .43 .35 .39 .27 .43 .37 .36 .48 .43 .52 .48 .45 .51 .44 .58 99.4 14.5 121

.72 .79 .61 .54 .49 .49 .46 .53 .40 .63 .46 .44 .38 .10 .28 .26 .82 .56 .60 .51 .21 .75 .65 .45 .66 .76 .47 99.0 14.2 126

.67 .67 .54 .58 .49 .37 .48 .46 .36 .62 .46 .51 .40 .32 .29 .30 .73 .49 .57 .55 .34 .74 .62 .46 .68 .69 .58 99.7 13.4 124

.49 .53 .48 .49 .35 .27 .19 .42 .42 .58 .57 .47 .52 .25 .29 .24 .56 .35 .38 .58 .31 .58 .57 .59 .50 .51 .57 99.3 13.1 126

.37 .43 .42 .34 .35 .20 .18 .34 .34 .60 .52 .43 .47 .40 .36 .23 .45 .31 .33 .53 .44 .54 .53 .53 .48 .42 .62

Reading Oral Oral Orthographic Academic Understanding Language Fluency Comprehension Expression Processing Fluency

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.73 .77 .63 .53 .49 .45 .45 .57 .46 .64 .55 .55 .48 .08 .17 .18 .82 .53 .61 .62 .14 .76 .68 .56 .67 .76 .49

Reading

Written Math Language

KTEA–3 Composites

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3, by Age Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI KTEA–3

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 10–16

Table H.1

10.2 9.7 9.9 9.7 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.7 9.9 10.0 9.9 9.6 10.0 10.0 9.9 10.4 99.9 99.1 98.7 98.3 99.5 99.1 99.1 99.8 98.4 99.2 98.6

Mean 2.7 2.8 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.8 3.0 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 13.7 13.6 14.2 14.0 13.5 13.8 14.9 14.0 13.3 14.4 13.3

SD 

WISC–V

n 127 125 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 125 127 127 127 127 125 127 127 127 125 127

76

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.12 .45 .08 .23 .11 .31 .14 .33

96.8 11.7 80

.23 .41 .24 .32 .27 .35 .29 .46

99.2 12.9 79

Reading

99.3 12.6 79

99.7 12.9 80

96.1 12.9 68

.12 .18 .35 .32 .33 .17 .35 .37

NWD

97.4 12.1 80

.15 .21 .26 .31 .19 .20 .27 .34

Written Math Language

.21 .39 .16 .25 .21 .32 .23 .40

RC

.23 .38 .31 .36 .31 .33 .34 .48

LWR

97.1 12.0 79

.20 .42 .22 .33 .21 .34 .27 .44

Academic Skills Battery

101.1 13.4 79

.00 .14 .33 .33 .35 .08 .36 .28

PP

98.5 12.2 67

.04 .11 .42 .37 .42 .09 .41 .34

SoundSymbol

99.6 12.0 68

.28 .30 .32 .39 .28 .32 .35 .48

WRF

DF

97.3 12.2 68

.16 .25 .33 .32 .32 .22 .34 .41

Decoding

98.8 13.4 31

.27 .28 .38 .44 .21 .32 .37 .47

100.3 11.5 31

.35 .33 .43 .50 .28 .39 .44 .55

98.5 12.4 68

.21 .23 .15 .23 .11 .24 .17 .30

RV

98.3 12.8 80

.15 .44 .15 .29 .23 .33 .23 .40

MCA

96.1 11.5 80

.06 .37 –.02 .12 –.04 .23 .01 .20

MC

95.9 11.8 67

.24 .55 .04 .14 .04 .45 .09 .42

MF

97.6 13.6 80

.08 .15 .18 .21 .11 .12 .19 .23

WE

98.5 12.5 80

.19 .26 .26 .32 .21 .26 .28 .39

SP

96.4 12.8 49

.32 .21 –.23 –.20 –.23 .30 –.23 .10

WF

LC

96.5 13.4 77

.15 .22 .20 .29 .18 .21 .24 .31

OE

95.4 11.0 79

–.04 .05 .37 .35 .31 –.01 .35 .21

98.3 12.1 68

.20 .26 .15 .23 .15 .25 .18 .32 95.6 12.8 76

.08 .22 .31 .40 .35 .16 .37 .36 96.6 14.1 80

.24 .41 .26 .34 .31 .34 .32 .48

97.8 13.1 76

.22 .35 .21 .31 .20 .31 .26 .41

95.5 11.9 79

.03 .12 .31 .33 .23 .07 .32 .25

96.7 12.3 67

.33 .38 .39 .42 .26 .41 .37 .57

96.2 10.7 31

.52 .49 .26 .30 .18 .58 .28 .59

AF .08 .22 .14 .25 .33 .15 .25 .28 98.5 13.6 80

Reading Oral Oral Orthographic Academic Understanding Language Fluency Comprehension Expression Processing Fluency

KTEA–3 Composites

Reading Fluency

96.8 12.7 67

.22 .32 .27 .30 .15 .31 .25 .42

SRF

KTEA–3 Subtests

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the KTEA–3, by Age Group

99.2 100.2 99.1 99.5 100.2 99.4 99.3 98.8

Mean

96.0 14.3 80

.29 .41 .27 .31 .18 .38 .25 .47

ONF

16.0 14.2 12.8 13.0 13.4 15.5 13.1 13.8

SD 

WISC–V

95.4 13.6 78

.34 .50 .42 .45 .32 .48 .43 .64

LNF

n 77 80 80 80 80 77 80 77

Note. KTEA–3 subtest abbreviations are: LWR = Letter & Word Recognition, RC = Reading Comprehension, NWD = Nonsense Word Decoding, PP = Phonological Processing, WRF = Word Recognition Fluency, DF = Decoding Fluency, SRF = Silent Reading Fluency, RV = Reading Vocabulary, MCA = Math Concepts & Applications, MC = Math Computation, MF = Math Fluency, WE = Written Expression, SP = Spelling, WF = Writing Fluency, LC = Listening Comprehension, OE = Oral Expression, AF = Associational Fluency, ONF = Object Naming Facility, LNF = Letter Naming Facility. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI KTEA–3 Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 6–9

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI KTEA–3 Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 6–9

Table H.2

77

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

.20 .59 .48

98.6

13.7 127

NSI STI SRI KTEA–3

Mean

SD  n

.16 .59 .45

99.5 14.4 122

NSI STI SRI KTEA–3

Mean SD  n

13.1 127

99.6

.32 .57 .54

.31 .31 .51 .53 .57

NWD

99.7 14.6 127

.16 .51 .40

.06 .24 .46 .47 .51

100.2 13.1 125

.25 .56 .50

.21 .27 .51 .50 .52

Written Math Language

14.9 122

100.5

.10 .46 .34

.07 .14 .45 .41 .42

RC

99.3 14.4 120

.22 .61 .50

.17 .25 .55 .55 .57

Academic Skills Battery

11.6 127

100.6

.08 .44 .32

.08 .07 .38 .44 .39

PP

100.0 12.6 127

.25 .61 .52

.24 .24 .53 .57 .57

SoundSymbol

14.0 125

101.0

.37 .47 .52

.37 .30 .49 .47 .38

WRF

DF

98.8 13.3 127

.28 .63 .55

.25 .28 .57 .57 .59

Decoding

12.9 126

100.4

.42 .40 .52

.39 .36 .38 .38 .36

13.8 127

100.4

.10 .42 .32

.01 .17 .38 .41 .41

MC

13.0 127

100.1

.13 .15 .19

.01 .18 .10 .12 .13

MF

14.0 126

100.5

.18 .56 .44

.11 .25 .51 .51 .53

WE

13.2 126

100.5

.29 .40 .42

.29 .24 .36 .36 .39

SP

14.8 127

99.3

.40 .27 .40

.36 .42 .29 .24 .30

WF

LC

14.4 124

97.9

–.09 .31 .13

–.14 –.06 .33 .30 .26

15.0 127

97.9

.36 .44 .48

.29 .40 .44 .43 .41

OE

99.8 14.7 122

.42

.60

.11 .19 .53 .51 .50

97.6 14.7 124

.48

.31 .50

.22 .36 .50 .45 .46

97.9 15.3 127

.52

.48 .37

.41 .51 .36 .31 .40

99.4 14.5 121

.27

.00 .45

–.04 .04 .45 .42 .38

99.0 14.2 126

.56

.32 .59

.25 .39 .57 .56 .55

99.7 13.4 124

.63

.53 .47

.51 .47 .47 .43 .42

99.3 13.1 126

.51

.43 .37

.35 .44 .35 .34 .36

AF

.42 .34 .46

.32 .47 .35 .26 .39

15.6 127

99.1

Reading Oral Oral Orthographic Academic Understanding Language Fluency Comprehension Expression Processing Fluency

.15 .56

101.1 13.7 123

15.4 127

99.2

.19 .52 .43

.09 .28 .49 .47 .52

MCA

.45 .52

.40 .40 .49 .48 .43

13.8 127

99.8

.17 .53 .41

.12 .22 .49 .50 .48

RV

KTEA–3 Composites

Reading Fluency

13.9 125

103.0

.34 .43 .48

.24 .35 .39 .39 .40

SRF

99.6

100.7 98.6

100.8 100.4 98.7 98.7 99.5

Mean

14.2 127

97.5

.36 .27 .38

.35 .35 .23 .25 .28

ONF

14.8

15.2 14.4

15.2 14.3 14.4 14.6 14.0

SD 

WISC–V

13.4 127

99.5

.59 .25 .54

.56 .58 .27 .20 .27

LNF

127

127 127

127 127 127 127 127

n

Note. KTEA–3 subtest abbreviations are: LWR = Letter & Word Recognition, RC = Reading Comprehension, NWD = Nonsense Word Decoding, PP = Phonological Processing, WRF = Word Recognition Fluency, DF = Decoding Fluency, SRF = Silent Reading Fluency, RV = Reading Vocabulary, MCA = Math Concepts & Applications, MC = Math Computation, MF = Math Fluency, WE = Written Expression, SP = Spelling, WF = Writing Fluency, LC = Listening Comprehension, OE = Oral Expression, AF = Associational Fluency, ONF = Object Naming Facility, LNF = Letter Naming Facility. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.13 .19 .55 .53 .53

NSL NSQ IST DST RST

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Reading

.17 .21 .55 .54 .54

Ages 10–16

LWR

NSL NSQ IST DST RST

KTEA–3 Subtests

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the KTEA–3, by Age Group (continued)

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 10–16

Table H.2

78

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

99.1 15.8 66

Mean SD  n

100.1 14.3 55

.57 .32 .45 .42 .25 .35 .34 .13 .21 .36 .61 .31 .42 .22 .26 –.12 .56 .35 .27 .54 .25 .58 .33 .53 .43 .57 .46

ERS

100.9 13.9 63

.61 .51 .46 .50 .36 .52 .41 .19 .27 .47 .46 .34 .48 .37 .30 .01 .69 .51 .34 .46 .35 .70 .43 .51 .58 .69 .51

RC

99.4 12.5 66

.51 .51 .54 .53 .53 .60 .50 .37 .43 .71 .68 .38 .65 .46 .38 .05 .63 .65 .50 .61 .46 .85 .69 .72 .73 .77 .68

MPS

103.6 14.7 55

.38 .31 .35 .16 .37 .35 .17 –.04 .18 .37 .10 .12 .26 .16 .17 .18 .43 .41 .07 .10 .17 .33 .21 .21 .32 .43 .16

AWF

98.5 14.5 63

.61 .48 .42 .24 .46 .35 .30 .18 .24 .59 .41 .32 .49 .43 .33 –.03 .67 .47 .27 .43 .40 .71 .50 .50 .55 .68 .53

SC

99.5 14.0 62

.56 .39 .44 .42 .25 .17 .28 .25 .21 .47 .68 .33 .41 .20 .32 –.14 .59 .24 .31 .57 .29 .63 .47 .57 .40 .59 .52

WR

96.9 14.5 31

.14 .45 .34 .59 .51 .55 .25 .19 .41 .54 .32 .34 .51 .51 .22 –.06 .44 .61 .26 .37 .36 .66 .46 .48 .61 .55 .51

EC

100.9 11.7 31

.27 .35 .28 .45 .45 .35 .26 .11 .29 .53 .28 .25 .40 .39 .13 –.15 .40 .47 .22 .30 .28 .57 .41 .40 .47 .51 .39

EC-GMa

99.9 14.2 61

.53 .39 .44 .39 .29 .06 .23 .22 .21 .47 .60 .26 .36 .23 .22 –.21 .57 .20 .26 .48 .23 .60 .46 .50 .34 .56 .44

PD

99.7 12.5 66

.28 .12 .31 .17 .16 .18 .27 .20 .26 .52 .31 .16 .35 .35 .39 –.01 .25 .20 .27 .24 .41 .37 .47 .35 .35 .36 .43

NO

99.4 11.6 66

.57 .61 .50 .55 .14 .29 .24 .12 .32 .39 .70 .30 .59 .28 .23 –.01 .72 .25 .21 .57 .26 .65 .34 .70 .38 .58 .51

OE

101.2 13.5 61

.56 .39 .26 .28 .11 .14 .02 .11 .14 .34 .52 .18 .50 .31 .40 –.03 .60 .14 .09 .39 .39 .55 .30 .57 .25 .45 .52

ORF

100.7 13.6 61

.52 .34 .30 .16 .16 –.02 .12 .22 .22 .28 .49 .20 .39 .31 .28 –.09 .54 .08 .21 .38 .32 .58 .34 .49 .28 .49 .45

ORAa

101.0 13.8 61

.53 .36 .23 .31 .16 .13 .02 .12 .18 .32 .53 .16 .48 .25 .37 –.01 .56 .17 .09 .38 .33 .54 .28 .56 .24 .44 .47

ORRa SP

101.4 13.2 66

.58 .43 .46 .38 .32 .19 .26 .31 .24 .60 .64 .35 .51 .31 .35 –.10 .62 .30 .34 .57 .36 .69 .58 .61 .47 .63 .58 100.8 13.1 62

.41 .32 .27 .11 .26 .41 .21 .18 .24 .60 .26 .29 .45 .45 .39 .14 .46 .39 .23 .30 .46 .51 .50 .39 .48 .48 .50

MFA

99.9 14.7 62

.28 .31 .34 .19 .34 .52 .31 .38 .36 .73 .52 .33 .47 .49 .49 .10 .38 .49 .40 .48 .53 .67 .69 .54 .62 .55 .66

MFS

107.3 17.7 31

.10 .07 .07 .20 .02 .07 –.11 .12 .45 .35 .43 .14 .42 .40 .35 –.18 .10 .07 .01 .28 .39 .32 .31 .47 .19 .08 .47

MFM

a

Supplemental scores.

Note. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension, ERS = Early Reading Skills, RC = Reading Comprehension, MPS = Math Problem Solving, AWF = Alphabet Writing Fluency, SC = Sentence Composition, WR = Word Reading, EC = Essay Composition, EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics, PD = Pseudoword Decoding, NO = Numerical Operations, OE = Oral Expression, ORF = Oral Reading Fluency, ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy, ORR = Oral Reading Rate, SP = Spelling, MFA = Math Fluency–Addition, MFS = Math Fluency– Subtraction, MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.62 .56 .53 .60 .38 .39 .36 .06 .26 .57 .61 .50 .56 .31 .12 –.05 .71 .44 .24 .64 .22 .71 .41 .63 .54 .66 .53

LC

WIAT–III Subtests

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III, by Age Group

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 6–9

Table H.3

79

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

99.0 14.2 66

Mean SD  n

101.1 12.7 59

.65 .47 .44 .38 .24 .22 .19 .24 .24 .48 .67 .31 .49 .29 .31 –.08 .68 .27 .26 .57 .32 .71 .48 .64 .42 .62 .56

Total Reading

99.8 14.4 61

.59 .41 .45 .42 .26 .12 .25 .24 .24 .48 .66 .33 .40 .22 .27 –.16 .62 .21 .28 .56 .25 .64 .47 .56 .38 .59 .50

Basic Reading

102.0 13.1 43

.55 .48 .36 .41 .12 .42 .02 .24 .24 .43 .60 .23 .59 .41 .38 .05 .65 .34 .17 .46 .41 .66 .40 .66 .42 .52 .59 99.5 14.0 65

.63 .47 .44 .38 .51 .40 .28 .18 .32 .64 .52 .38 .56 .36 .30 –.01 .67 .53 .26 .51 .35 .72 .54 .59 .56 .68 .54

Written Expression

99.5 11.9 66

.44 .36 .49 .39 .39 .44 .43 .32 .40 .69 .58 .31 .57 .46 .44 .02 .50 .49 .44 .51 .49 .72 .65 .62 .62 .64 .64

Mathematics

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.65 .64 .56 .63 .32 .38 .33 .09 .32 .54 .71 .46 .63 .32 .19 –.03 .78 .40 .24 .67 .25 .74 .41 .73 .51 .68 .57

Oral Language

Reading Comprehension and Fluency

WIAT–III Composites

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III, by Age Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 6–9

Table H.3

102.2 13.5 61

.39 .29 .28 .16 .32 .46 .27 .29 .38 .72 .45 .38 .55 .54 .53 .13 .43 .44 .33 .46 .58 .64 .63 .55 .59 .54 .68

Math Fluency

100.8 12.0 60

.61 .55 .52 .44 .46 .39 .32 .22 .36 .65 .73 .47 .63 .35 .32 –.02 .72 .49 .31 .70 .36 .82 .57 .75 .59 .72 .66

Total Achievement 9.6 9.5 9.9 10.0 9.8 9.9 10.4 9.7 10.1 10.2 9.9 9.3 10.0 10.4 10.3 9.9 97.5 99.1 100.2 98.0 102.1 99.4 99.5 100.2 99.2 98.6 99.9

Mean 2.5 2.9 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.7 3.2 2.7 2.3 2.7 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.6 12.3 13.6 13.1 12.2 14.7 11.1 12.7 13.1 12.9 11.5 12.9

SD 

WISC–V

n 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 65 66 66 65 66 66 66 66 66 65 65 64 66 65 65 66 64

80

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

104.8 13.1 145

Mean SD  n

102.8 12.1 144

.55 .46 .36 .50 .23 .18 .32 .27 .22 .40 .27 .23 .30 .18 .12 .05 .56 .24 .36 .27 .16 .56 .43 .33 .40 .55 .28

101.3 12.0 145

.41 .39 .33 .30 .37 .29 .31 .42 .11 .59 .35 .18 .39 .23 .20 .00 .45 .37 .44 .31 .23 .61 .64 .43 .51 .57 .35

MPS

100.6 12.7 145

.33 .41 .36 .32 .25 .13 .24 .24 .17 .34 .33 .27 .41 .23 .15 .14 .42 .22 .29 .34 .20 .51 .38 .43 .38 .44 .34

SC

102.4 9.8 143

.40 .53 .55 .46 .23 .22 .29 .26 .18 .45 .51 .32 .36 .19 .08 –.01 .51 .26 .34 .47 .15 .59 .46 .50 .42 .51 .37

WR

101.2 16.2 145

.34 .25 .18 .29 .10 .08 .18 .27 .17 .22 .12 .22 .18 .25 .22 –.03 .33 .10 .27 .19 .26 .38 .32 .18 .31 .36 .29

EC

101.7 16.3 145

.28 .20 .16 .25 .05 .08 .24 .24 .10 .26 .16 .24 .21 .28 .20 –.01 .27 .07 .30 .22 .26 .37 .33 .21 .31 .31 .31

EC-GMa

102.5 12.3 143

.22 .33 .44 .25 .27 .16 .25 .14 .14 .39 .48 .39 .39 .13 .07 .07 .31 .24 .24 .48 .11 .46 .34 .50 .37 .37 .35 101.2 12.0 145

.55 .46 .39 .45 .29 .25 .23 .40 .22 .52 .43 .26 .45 .35 .24 .11 .56 .31 .39 .40 .33 .66 .57 .51 .50 .58 .46

NO

101.3 12.7 144

.66 .62 .56 .52 .39 .40 .21 .43 .35 .51 .46 .25 .60 .13 .14 .16 .70 .45 .39 .41 .15 .69 .60 .60 .50 .67 .35

OE

104.1 11.0 145

.39 .42 .36 .30 .20 .12 .14 .06 .11 .37 .30 .15 .48 .40 .24 .20 .45 .18 .13 .26 .34 .47 .28 .45 .31 .37 .39

ORF

99.8 12.9 145

.19 .25 .22 .16 –.02 .01 .32 .00 .01 .24 .27 .13 .20 .19 .08 .10 .25 –.01 .21 .23 .15 .31 .17 .28 .19 .22 .24

ORAa

103.5 9.5 145

.39 .43 .37 .30 .22 .14 .14 .05 .12 .35 .29 .16 .46 .39 .23 .19 .46 .21 .12 .26 .34 .47 .26 .44 .32 .37 .38

ORRa

100.4 13.1 145

.42 .52 .55 .37 .23 .24 .38 .24 .22 .50 .54 .36 .49 .27 .24 .01 .52 .27 .39 .51 .28 .63 .46 .58 .48 .54 .50

SP

100.0 13.4 145

.20 .10 .13 .12 .09 .01 .14 .15 .01 .51 .33 .00 .31 .41 .32 .07 .17 .06 .20 .21 .40 .38 .42 .37 .24 .24 .41

MFA

99.5 12.9 145

.35 .23 .26 .28 .14 .11 .25 .25 .04 .58 .43 .21 .44 .39 .32 .04 .32 .15 .32 .37 .40 .52 .54 .50 .39 .39 .49

MFS

99.2 13.9 145

a

Supplemental scores.

.30 .18 .20 .21 .13 .01 .17 .26 .04 .50 .38 .09 .51 .43 .29 .06 .27 .08 .26 .28 .40 .47 .47 .51 .31 .32 .44

MFM

Note. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension, ERS = Early Reading Skills, RC = Reading Comprehension, MPS = Math Problem Solving, AWF = Alphabet Writing Fluency, SC = Sentence Composition, WR = Word Reading, EC = Essay Composition, EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics, PD = Pseudoword Decoding, NO = Numerical Operations, OE = Oral Expression, ORF = Oral Reading Fluency, ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy, ORR = Oral Reading Rate, SP = Spelling, MFA = Math Fluency–Addition, MFS = Math Fluency–Subtraction, MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.65 .68 .56 .57 .26 .42 .23 .34 .27 .37 .34 .32 .40 .15 .21 .06 .72 .40 .35 .37 .19 .63 .45 .44 .48 .64 .35

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III

RC

PD

LC

WIAT–III Subtests

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III, by Age Group (continued)

Ages 10–16

Table H.3

81

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

103.5 13.6 144

Mean SD  n

102.5 11.4 142

.52 .57 .56 .49 .32 .23 .34 .26 .22 .53 .51 .36 .51 .30 .16 .09 .61 .32 .37 .48 .25 .68 .50 .58 .50 .60 .46

Total Reading

102.3 10.9 143

.33 .45 .53 .37 .27 .20 .30 .23 .18 .46 .54 .37 .42 .16 .08 .04 .43 .27 .32 .51 .13 .57 .43 .55 .42 .47 .39

Basic Reading

103.8 11.4 144

.59 .56 .46 .51 .27 .19 .30 .22 .21 .49 .35 .25 .49 .35 .22 .14 .64 .26 .32 .34 .31 .63 .45 .48 .45 .58 .42 100.7 13.5 145

.47 .50 .46 .40 .24 .19 .33 .32 .24 .46 .41 .35 .45 .32 .25 .06 .53 .24 .40 .43 .31 .63 .49 .49 .49 .56 .47

Written Expression

101.3 11.6 145

.54 .47 .41 .42 .37 .31 .30 .45 .19 .62 .44 .25 .48 .33 .24 .06 .56 .39 .46 .40 .32 .70 .67 .53 .56 .64 .46

Mathematics

Note. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.72 .72 .62 .60 .36 .46 .24 .43 .34 .49 .44 .32 .55 .16 .20 .12 .77 .47 .41 .43 .19 .73 .58 .57 .54 .71 .39

Oral Language

Reading Comprehension and Fluency

WIAT–III Composites

Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III, by Age Group (continued)

SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 10–16

Table H.3

99.7 13.4 145

.31 .19 .22 .22 .14 .04 .21 .25 .03 .58 .42 .10 .46 .45 .34 .07 .28 .10 .29 .31 .44 .51 .52 .51 .34 .35 .49

Math Fluency

102.6 11.6 141

.69 .69 .62 .60 .40 .34 .38 .43 .31 .63 .55 .42 .60 .33 .24 .11 .75 .42 .49 .54 .31 .80 .67 .65 .62 .74 .53

Total Achievement 10.1 10.3 10.1 10.4 10.2 10.3 10.0 9.9 10.4 10.2 10.1 9.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.4 101.3 101.2 99.5 99.8 100.2 100.5 100.2 100.1 100.1 100.6 100.0

Mean 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.8 3.2 2.9 12.0 13.0 13.0 13.7 15.0 11.8 12.6 13.5 12.4 11.9 13.9

SD 

WISC–V

n 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 144 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 144 145 145 144 144 145 144 144 145

82

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

100.1 14.3 55

99.1 15.8 66

99.4 12.5 66

.22 .54 .40 .41 .40 .36 .41 .52

MPS

.18 .32 .21 .21 .18 .28 .21 .38

101.1 12.7 59

99.0 14.2 66

Total Reading

100.9 13.9 63

.12 .42 .30 .32 .30 .27 .32 .41

RC

.24 .47 .46 .40 .42 .35 .44 .56

Oral Language

.16 .30 .28 .26 .23 .21 .28 .33

ERS

.19 .39 .42 .34 .37 .28 .39 .48

LC

98.5 14.5 63

.17 .50 .20 .21 .12 .35 .18 .40

SC

99.8 14.4 61

.24 .30 .21 .21 .18 .33 .21 .45

Basic Reading

103.6 14.7 55

.36 .33 .13 .13 –.01 .44 .10 .40

AWF

96.9 14.5 31

.20 .42 .02 .02 –.10 .31 –.04 .18

EC

100.9 11.7 31

.20 .38 –.04 –.03 –.09 .29 –.08 .14

EC-GMa

102.0 13.1 43

.11 .47 .25 .19 .23 .27 .23 .36

Reading Comprehension and Fluency

99.9 14.2 61

.23 .30 .22 .23 .19 .33 .22 .44

PD

99.5 14.0 65

.18 .41 .15 .17 .06 .33 .13 .36

Written Expression

WIAT–III Composites

99.5 14.0 62

.24 .30 .25 .24 .20 .32 .24 .46

WR

99.5 11.9 66

.27 .57 .34 .35 .31 .43 .33 .51

Mathematics

99.7 12.5 66

.25 .49 .21 .22 .17 .40 .18 .39

NO

WIAT–III Subtests

99.4 11.6 66

.25 .48 .42 .39 .41 .38 .42 .55

OE

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III, by Age Group

102.2 13.5 61

.28 .53 .12 .11 .03 .45 .07 .37

Math Fluency

101.2 13.5 61

.26 .54 .26 .19 .18 .41 .21 .44

ORF

101.0 13.8 61

.21 .46 .18 .11 .11 .35 .13 .34

ORRa SP

101.4 13.2 66

.25 .38 .22 .20 .14 .35 .19 .41

100.8 12.0 60

.19 .43 .22 .26 .21 .31 .23 .41

Total Achievement

100.7 13.6 61

.28 .37 .22 .19 .10 .38 .20 .46

ORAa

101.4 100.5 98.6 98.5 98.8 101.1 98.3 100.1

Mean

100.8 13.1 62

.10 .41 .20 .18 .03 .26 .14 .29

MFA

15.4 12.8 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.3 14.7 13.1

SD 

WISC–V

99.9 14.7 62

.20 .48 .10 .12 .06 .35 .08 .32

MFS

64 66 66 66 66 64 66 64

n

107.3 17.7 31

.47 .47 –.13 –.18 –.17 .53 –.19 .23

MFM

a

Supplemental scores.

Note. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension, ERS = Early Reading Skills, RC = Reading Comprehension, MPS = Math Problem Solving, AWF = Alphabet Writing Fluency, SC = Sentence Composition, WR = Word Reading, EC = Essay Composition, EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics, PD = Pseudoword Decoding, NO = Numerical Operations, OE = Oral Expression, ORF = Oral Reading Fluency, ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy, ORR = Oral Reading Rate, SP = Spelling, MFA = Math Fluency–Addition, MFS = Math Fluency– Subtraction, MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 6–9

NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 6–9

Table H.4

83

WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.

102.8 12.1 144

.13 .45 .36

103.5 13.6 144

NSI STI SRI WIAT–III

Mean SD  n

100.6 12.7 145

.13 .33 .29

102.5 11.4 142

.34 .41 .47

.31 .29 .37 .40 .30

Total Reading

101.3 12.0 145

.08 .40 .30 101.2 16.2 145

.05 .21 .15

.18 .26

.13

102.3 10.9 143

.28 .31 .37

.26 .23 .27 .32 .23

Basic Reading

102.4 9.8 143

.24 .29 .33

.31 .21

.24

102.5 12.3 143

.27 .30 .35

.29 .23

.26

101.2 12.0 145

.28 .39 .43

.33 .38

.32

103.8 11.4 144

.33 .38 .45

.28 .29 .35 .36 .29

Reading Comprehension and Fluency

101.3 12.7 144

.21 .45 .42

.39 .37

.42

.17 .18

100.7 13.5 145

.18 .39 .35

.19 .15 .31 .37 .35

Written Expression

WIAT–III Composites

101.7 16.3 145

.02 .21 .13

.17 .23

.14

.22 .30

101.3 11.6 145

.22 .45 .42

.16 .22 .39 .41 .40

99.8 12.9 145

.14 .09 .15

.09 .04

.05

.13 .13

ORAa

Mathematics

104.1 11.0 145

.37 .25 .41

.23 .18

.26

.34 .32

ORF

99.7 13.4 145

.40 .21 .39

.37 .35 .13 .20 .26

Math Fluency

103.5 9.5 145

.35 .21 .37

.20 .15

.23

.33 .28

ORRa

100.0 13.4 145

.38 .16 .35

.16 .20

.07

.33 .35

MFA

99.5 12.9 145

102.6 11.6 141

.27 .53 .49

.25 .24 .48 .49 .43

.31 .21 .33

.20 .26

.14

.27 .29

MFS

Total Achievement

100.4 13.1 145

.26 .37 .39

.34 .29

.29

.26 .21

SP

100.6 97.5 98.7

100.8 100.5 97.5 97.8 98.9

Mean

99.2 13.9 145

.39 .20 .38

.18 .24

.14

.39 .32

MFM

14.6 13.3 13.9

13.9 14.6 12.8 13.8 14.4

SD 

WISC–V

145 145 145

145 145 145 145 145

n

a

Supplemental scores.

Note. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension, ERS = Early Reading Skills, RC = Reading Comprehension, MPS = Math Problem Solving, AWF = Alphabet Writing Fluency, SC = Sentence Composition, WR = Word Reading, EC = Essay Composition, EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics, PD = Pseudoword Decoding, NO = Numerical Operations, OE = Oral Expression, ORF = Oral Reading Fluency, ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy, ORR = Oral Reading Rate, SP = Spelling, MFA = Math Fluency–Addition, MFS = Math Fluency– Subtraction, MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978).

.12 .11 .46 .39 .36

Oral Language

104.8 13.1 145

NSL NSQ IST DST RST

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Ages 10–16

Mean SD  n

.14 .35 .30

.31 .27

.29

.28 .21

.05 .37 .25

.39 .32

.38

.03 .02

NSI STI SRI WIAT–III

.33 .28

.29

.08 .06

.31 .28

.19 .22

OE

.39

.14 .08

NO

DST RST

.06 .08

EC-GMa

IST

.10 .14

EC

.06 .03

WR

NSL NSQ

SC

PD

MPS

LC

RC

WIAT–III Subtests

WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score

Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III, by Age Group (continued)

Ages 10–16

Table H.4

References

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. Brown, T. E. (2001). Brown attention-deficit disorder scales for children and adolescents. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Cohen, B. H. (1996). Explaining psychological statistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks & Cole. Delis, D. (2012). Delis rating of executive functioning. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson. Donders, J. (2008). Traumatic brain injury of childhood. In J. E. Morgan & J. H. Ricker (Eds.), Textbook of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 158–170). New York: Taylor & Francis. Guilford, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Magnusson, D. (1967). Test theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pearson. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior assessment system for children (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

84 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved.