Vol 12. Propless Mentalism @MagicTuts

 

Vol # 12 Prop-less / Mentalism AA Introduction Welcome to the volume of this month . In the volume of this month, we take take a look at the mentalism of support less . If I was really really honest , I have tried tried to distance themselves from from th thee record on the sub su bject of - of its contro controver versial sial nature , which is the subject has a single , directed divided community . After taking a recent survey ( through social media ) is , it seems , the topic , which is slightly affected in detail and people from both camps ( people , who like to support smaller and mentalism people, Who expressed their disgust for this ), want a series of ideas , gathered in one place , thus deciding to write this volume . I do not expect to change th thee view with the inf information ormation in this volume volume , or claim , that any correct correct camp . I should here simply discuss my results on the subject and share some of the ideas about the subject . In fact, I think one thing , which one thing is for sure , this volume is going to annoy a few feathers WHAT IS NOT MY INTENTION . I think , that it - time , when I make my position on this sub subject ject area is very clear clear , as I have seen on many forums people , requiring the entire process of things , which I did not say . I want to make it clear from the start ; I am not a defender of support mentalism less . I DO NOT approve of support material less , and I am not in adverse use of supports . I don’t even give a ffuck uck ( mind the explicit ) if I am honest about th thee methods . I lov lovee a good presentation , I like a good premise, and no matter , the method corresponds to the most convenient representation repre sentation , which I create . In fact , I really do not know , what is mentalism less support . Imagine , that , acknowledging I really do not know , what it is and trying to capture the entire volume of the subject matter ! The reason , I do not know , what it is , is that , because the definition is controversial . Trying to give any type of determination is another contentious issue , from which I refuse to even try to be a part of . How do we even begin to consider , what is the support ? This question is the one , that I am well thought of before , than to try to write this volume . The effects in this volume , all are very close to , that ' I ' believe mentalism support smaller , to be .

I'm going to try to stick cl close ose ( just a little w wondering ondering , outside if completely necessary ), participant , not having to consider /, generates information from books , playing cards , index cards, and so on . d . - Take the game notes , are mentioned in this volume briefly ( namely , in the essay ) to express the point , but are not going to used in the standard sense ( I promise , you'll understand , when you consider the essay ). On the subject of the participant will be nothing involved involved in recording to record record at any time and onl on ly time , artist writes that - or , as a reference point ( to make the disclosure of the theater ). The idea of using reverence point remains true throughout this volume as an example , to express my point , if we are going to look at , ' which hand ' style routine in what , the participant simply would imagine coin ( instead , to physically contain a coin ), I feel when it comes to discovery , it can be

 

boring and flat for the audience . The reason , it can not lead to the delight of the audience , is , that the only evidence , they have you , was correct , the participant response . If the reaction member is flat , it is - then , what can be expected from their audience . If the participant is physically contains a coin , the audience has the confirmation , when a contestant opens their hand , and it gives them the time , in which they can respond , and the routine comes at a faster faster pace . I will however however , when the subroutine cover coverage age as it gives you ( the reader ) the choice to perform routine however , you wish and if you want to show the information verbally , that is your prerogative . The only routine , you will not be able to show in this volume orally , must be ' called the place ' for reasons , you understand , when you consider the effect , the participant of the subroutine does not record NEVER anything , and so it turned it into this volume . Another specification , which I try to stick - that , that mentalism should also be everywhere , at any time of mentalism . Impromptu , should not be more than a few established seconds . Most importantly, the material should have a solid result . I want to ensure , that each of them , in the subroutine has a solid result so , you do not worry about the concept of failure . I do not want to rely on the probability or bold performance , to ensure , that the routine is performed .

These restrictions are limitations , I suppose , that mentalism support less . This does not make for a second middle value , that my determination will fit your or someone - or even , as I honestly feel , that the definition is subjective . Anyway , are now , when we looked , in which we are going to stick to the specifications , I would like to speak openly about some of the common gripes , which some rightly so ( the time ) had a less support material . One common gripe - then , that the process , to bring to a conclusion the effect is too long, and often does not make sense . These are terribly important factors in any routine . If the routine is getting to the point , it is too long or too difficult for the participant , to follow , it was never ( even if you use a support ), going to be good or interesting routine . Similarly , if the process does not make any sense at all then , for participating / audience becomes glaringly obvious , that method should be put out there as there are like a sore slider . I personall personallyy believe , that , if if the process seems unusual then , it' it'ss up to nothing more than a background , which is not a good enough . If you are skilled in making the correct frame for the method , in order to exist within it , very easy to make any process seem logical from the point of view of the participant . Mark the reader *** Warning Tangent ! I would like to elaborate on its point , using a simple analogy . Since it is - a tangent here, simply , to better detail the point , I'm trying to express , I am going to use an example , using the support - as it is - the subprogram type , we all at some point perform , and therefore theref ore it is the th e most logical sense . If I am asked , that you ( the reader ) responded in your head , which is a more impressive feat 1. That , to ask , to a participant chosen playing card from from a deck of cards and disclosure of OR

 

2. That , to beg , to the participant thinking about playing cards and then disclosure disclosure

that . What would your answer be ? In all honesty, no answer is wrong - Let me explain . Good invisibility know , how to draw the tongue , around a simple process , to structure it in the light , which makes it seem more impossible . Let me explain , I personally believe , that it is easier to cause a playing card from a deck mechanically , than it is psychologically ( if I'm at 100% honest ) way , how we make this mechanical option seem more fair and more impossible than a psychological option ? Let's pretend , that we are working with rosette participant , Artist : " Being completely honest , if I asked , that you think about your favorite playing card , the probability , I could take an educated guess as to , what it is . For example, this could be a queen or an ace foundations or number seven , as it has the tendency to be the favorite number of most people . The fairest waymake I can you thinkchoose of off one of the my ,head to get , youwhere , to think of a playing card at , random should of top the of deck then ,put it back - somewhere in the deck which guarantees , that I would never touch the deck or cards . That way, even , you did not know , what kind of card you are going to think, and it exclusively dictated by chance . " - To To a member it would would seem a lot fairer fairer than they thinking a playing card . Note , I give the Party Par ty time , to think about , what could be their favorite map and if they really thought about the queen , ace or number seven , as long as you take ( which are very often choose the cards ), then , the point , you done is not even controversial . It adheres to the sense of the party , that they consider logical and so if you were to ask them or the audience , a massive census would consist in the fact , that the choice of cards from the deck is the fairest way for participants to think about the map at random The method is simple , if you just called a playing card and then said , that " I do not want to affect , deck , to look at your card put it in and rearrange the cards . Keep the card in front of you , I do not need them ," a fully seemingly as fair as possible .

If we look at things on the back , and we wanted to make it seem , that psychologically compelling playing card fairer than the mechanical compulsion card , it's as simple as a change in the script , Artist : " I want to be really honest from the off , every time , when I propose to assume that , that someone - then people think , invented the most crazy decision . I want to ensure , that all - as fair and a surcharge as much as possible . If I asked , that you physically have chosen playing card from a deck , the skeptics would have left and just would argue , I used some form of sleight of hand , to ensure , that you're done with a particular card . There is really only one way , that I can think of , to ensure , that this is as true as possible . If you imagine a deck of cards in the air and just imagined one playing card from a deck of the imaginary

 

time there is no way , that I , perhaps , using sleight of hand , because the card only exists in your mind . " It can be seen , as it would be in a structured way , which the participant thinks and if you ask the participants after the expression of the above scenario , the participant will assume , that the fairest way to choose a card is psychological , party and the audience as a mass census would would agree upon , which is , perhaps , not have have been more true . The way you structure the process / paint process , is the most important for both , even the most bizarre of the proces p rocesss may seem completely completely logical if structured struct ured properly . In fact , when you reall reallyy think about it , most of the things in mentalism do not make sense - support or not . Here are just a few examples of things , that do not make sense to me Why does the participant record their thoughts ? Why participant writes in bold block letters , when they write down a thought ? Why should a participant think about the first word from a page in a book ? Why should a participant choose a long word from a book ? Why the participant chooses a word from the Book of - first ? Why performer tearing paper party time sheet , they recorded that - something ?

Why performer should handle part of the map when , as a participant wrote that - something ? If we really had super powers , why would we bend spoons with them ? If we could predict that - anything , why would we have predicted , to which the number of participants , scrolled to a game of dice , reversed reversed ? If we could buy the right for the future , why don't we use our opportunities to predict the lottery ? Questions could go on and on and on , these are just a few . Most of that , what we do as mentalists without context , can be questionable and ignore the party and the natural logic of the audience . Next press my point , if I asked you - that the connection ( without context ) contact code has a playing card ? The answer is absolutely none at all . However , if you just say , Artist : " I want , that you think of a playing card , but I do not want , that you just think about the first map , which appears in your head . I want to kill two birds with one stone . One of the most private thoughts , we are hesitant , to share even those closest to us , it is a contact code to our bank . Of course , it w would ould be rude of me to show your contact code , instead I want to , so tha thatt you are mentally choose one figure and then the thought of playing card suit . Then combine the two , to create a random playing card . If I somehow manage to show a playing card , do you think , will prove it with a little more thought , I could guess your contact list . "

 

Now there is a context . In the code, and contact cards now have a connection , which did not exist bef before ore and logically logically linked . Not only , that , by doing that - something as simple as opening a playing card ( which is much easier than disclosing the contact code ) You meant that you could guess the member's contact code , and you get additional credit for nothing more than adding a script proposal .

If you feel a part of mentalism support less and thought , that the process was odd or no sense , perhaps , that routine , which lack a logical process / context for the process , in order to exist within - it did not have an odd process . Process with a bit more thought , perhaps , fully imelsmysl . After these words - part of mentalism support smaller , floating around today fully , lacks logic and the only doubt is bad and there is nothing , what can be done about it . On the other hand, it is just my opinion , and your opinion might be that , that some of the things , be shared in this volume , no parity . I hope , when you reall reallyy think some of the ideas in this volume , you'll see , as I have tr tried ied to make the process as little as possible at the same time being so logical as possible from the point of view of the audience . Another common gripe , which mentalists, - then , that so easily get the participant to write down their thoughts, and ahave quickmany glance it . This - 100% - the first true statement , but only because it is - a linear option is to obtain information , not mean , that it should be the only option , open to the artist , to obtain , the information said . Sometimes the routine just does not warrant the need for participants to record it - it - sometimes logically in terms of choreography , it's not good at all and less logical than the manifestation of the approach is less support . The book test, ffor or example , where where the point is , to ask , to anyone - the chosen word and then write it ? If they are going to spell a word one way or another , it would not make more sense to ask , to what do people think about - or a word and write it ? Only , because it is - a viable method , does not mean , that it is always meant , to be move to the option , I would like to share a story and then finish my opinion about this apprehension . This story takes place in the 'Davenports', which is based in London - the story , which I am sure , that Daniel Young ( working at said establishment ) would be checked , whether the doubt someone - either the authenticity of , what happened . I was half halfwa wayy through one of my visits to the th e two-year Davenports, Davenports, when w hen a gentleman gent leman , who looked like a businessman , crawled into the vault . I was sustained about the glass of the counter , the speaker Dan since when looking around storage businessman , which close the counter . I pulled back and let the gentleman talk to Dan . Man confidently asks Dan , if he had any - any any books on anyone - that , writing that - then and

ways to secretly count it . He explained , that was interested in magic , he saw , that the mentalist did it , and was so impressed by them , he wanted to learn everything about it .

 

Dan explained to the guy , to talk to me about all things related to mentalism . I continued to perform multiple effects , which are required , the performer did not record things in the traditional sense ( as the telephone contact , unlocked , opening zodiac sign , spider psychological force ), and the guys response was insane . After calming Man , on which meet my performance in the way , which I would never have expected . He said , that that - something to the tune of " You should be on a different level guy , which we ordered in the past three years . We have XX in logged and entertain at corporate events , and after seeing it I thought several times , that he should be in the state in one way way or another , secretly secretly see what , that someone - then wrote , and it's not really telepathy . I have no explanation , what I just saw . Can I take your business card and call you about a potential order for you instead of XX? It will be a refreshing change . " I will not name the artist and all , I will say , then , that th at the perpetrator is known known a mentalist, who I know charges a huge amount of money for , what he is doing . Did I bring the gentleman up to da date te on his proposal proposal ? No . I did however insist on several things in my reply to the gentleman . I just told him , that I am not on a different level, and I closely follow the work of the XX and learned many things from him . I also explained that to my knowledge there is no way to secretly consider it , that someone - then wrote , because , if there was a way to do it , it would have saved me a hell of a task . I then gave in a littl littlee , as if to let him him in on the secret and said a silent speech , " If I'm really really honest , the reason , that we force people to write things , is that so , that information was the last thing , about which they thought consciously , and this makes our lives so much easier to get someone - then emit it , what we need, even accidentally , than it does , if it is mixed among a series of other random thoughts ." The guy looked like a serious impression , that he was admitted to a secret - we all know , was not really a secret , but he is relieved his sense of logic , and he left the shop in order , he came to find ( without giving it that - a ) .

Not only , that , the next time he looks XX, it re instills a sense of wonder , he felt , when he first looked look ed XX, perf p erform orm . It got me τηινκινγ ... a lot . Many times I thought the debate from both camps ( traditional methodologists, and prop less methodologists), each makes a great point, and when everything is reduced to its simplest form , I'm on the fence and trying to do something , I think , the most logical thing ( which many strong supporters in both camps refuse to do ) - Take the items , which I love from from each side of the th e fence fence and use th them em holding hands together tog ether . That way I get the best of both worlds and the reason , it works , best of all , because every set of methods other balances . If you have a way to guess gu ess the inf information ormation without using u sing a stand warrant and are conveniently conveniently using that methodology it is on one participant . Have a second participating record that - the bottom , which you could use as a forward order , to get the idea of a third party if the third party , used by another process ( the choice of words in the book ).

 

And if any - any any member of the audience assumes , that someone - it has to be written written that - something for the artist , to see it , their assumptions choke point , that you are displaying inf information ormation , which is never recorded the first participant . One may wonder at this point , if I had to use one forward at all , why not just use it twice and show all three details , well you are open , to do this , but with the option we have opened ourselves , if we show the inf information ormation support is less first first orally , then we just destroyed destroyed the th e concept of the th e possibility of forward - if the analytical type of really trying to support the track that - ever . Each method works nicely to complement the other , and it is - the way , that ' I ' feel , that the support is less than should be included in a set of works . It can never be considered to be all and to end everything in the same way that no one should have a traditional methodology . Another grasp of the general question that is being revealed is - where can support be used - is there less mentalism ? Of course , this cannot have a place in the corporate or professional action of mentalism . While I agree , that the support mentalism smaller hands better close-up scenarios , and in social situations even better this does not mean for one

second , it can not be used in step / corporate set ( if it - much of mentalism and used correctly ). Bob Cassidy confirms this view , which opens with a macro - effect of the nature of the support less , which completely completely destroys the audience aud ience . That , really , really pisses me off - to the point I feel sick , is some 'mentalists', will be happy to go out and use ( in turn ) the electronic dice , electronic coin detector , an electronic device experience and assert , that they - mentalist. Please , do not think , what I say , that the above-mentioned electronics has no place in mentalism , in fact each is a brilliant self , and I strongly recommend , that each of them , but the presence of the electronics to make your work for you , I'm sorry to say , does not You mentalist. They should be used wisely unsophisticated methods , combined with the actual mental acumen , to be worthy of the former caused mentalism . In my opinion , this is the equivalent of "milli vanilli scandal ." This funnycause ; the asame people are , who complain , I never could talk, which to someone whenis they corporation andpeople have , to listen to an automated speech offers every them atime , series seri es of options . We become lazy ; it seems , that most people do not want to study classics longer . Rarely do people not in a hurry , to learn from the greats . Never forget , that we are standing on the shoulders of giants , and the classic - that - that , to be studied ( more so than the support is less than or e-mentalism ). Skill is one thing , which have traditional mentalists, which slowly begins to fade , and I understand , why there is concern for the future of mentalism . Mentalism should not be used in a professional context for this , to be relevant ; it can be used socially and for fun as long as it is respected . If any - or mentalist claims , that was the authority on the subject , because they perform at weddings , or on cruise ships it again - not always the case . Neither does it make them a better mentalist than a mentalist who only wants to perform socially . I know mentalists in both camps, and some of the best singers / mentalists, I know , those , who do not want to use their gift for corporate , cruise ships or wedding settings .

 

I also by no means consider myself an authori authority ty , nor do I want to be considered an authority ; this is too much responsibility . Do I have a fri friend end ( who will remain nameless ), who is a well respected respected agent / trainer t rainer and writer writer ( who is also , it turns out , a mentalist), who has worked with many celebrities in film , television and theater , which has such an aversion to mentalists, is performed on cruise ships , he asserted , that , if he found out , that I had to work on a cruise ship ( which I have no intention to - not because I believe , have that - it is not so with the work on a cruise ship , I just do not like the idea of being captured on bo that ), it would no longer respect me as a mentalist. His reasoning , I feel aligned with the width of the - of his pure respect for mentalism . He believes , that it is - an art form , which should be respected as much , how much the music , TV or theater, and if you agree with this feeling then , you should know that , what happens to the agents , when they fall into despair . ( He filled me on the following ollowing information information - I was blissfully blissfully uninformed uninformed of her ). ). The agents on the decline start up , giving acting classes , then go to the theater , pantomime , local production and when things become really scarce , they go and work the cruise ships at the last stop ( mind the pun ) His question - why is this - the last stop of the agent , when it is , it seems , one of the first stops mentalist? One way or another , what I take from all this is much simpler It never hurts to know the array of effects / principles from the areas of range of mentalism so , so that you can be prepared for any given situation , pprof rofessional essional or social . There is nothing wrong with studying mentalism effects , which can be used in social productivity Even if you did perform professionally . There are no rules . Finish the famous *** Now I got rid of my rant , let's go back to the introduction to volume of this month . Just five years ago , while the number of support-type effects less existed the concept assumption , that the contact code or name without the party , writes that - either , were seen as an impossible dream . I spent a few few years ago

almost two years , being interviewed by mentalist's worldwide ( online and otherwise ) and slowly but surel su relyy I made people to believe , that it is absolutely absolutely possible - even if my or original iginal method in order , to do so has been hit and miss , it had a ' method '. I am very open and honest , the method was not the greatest method , it was very raw data and it was not even close to that , to be infallible , but it worked for me , when I was comfortable , where and when to use it . I share the original method in this volume , as I feel , that it serves as a good reminder of , hhow ow far far we've all come to success in this area of mentalism . Plus , I feel , that there is that - something enchanting about the method , and I honestly still occasionally use it . In fact, this volume inspired me ; I'm going to revisit the effect and update it . I reall reallyy hope , that these routines give you moments of fun and cause a ffeeling eeling of excitement excitement , when you run them - matter , the context in which you are performing .

Peter Turner 2017 Elegant Introduction

 

Note to the reader , *** it - one of the effects , which falls in the controversial category , of which I spoke extensively in the introduction to this volume . Do you have have a menu - pale when it comes to choosing cho osing , you submit this eff effect ect . This effect effect can be made as outlined in general terms ( the way , that I'm doing it ), or orally, which I personally would not recommend for the reasons , you understand , when you consider the refusal routines . I love love this rroutine outine and I think , that the treatment of attention on that in particular is that , where I woul wouldd put my focus , because it gives you a beautiful , to be used with any subroutine , which has a psychological nature . Finish the famous ***

Effect Artist acquainted with the participant , after , to meet artist explains , that one can not simply assume the thought of another , but must use intuition , if they hope to get remotely close to the private thoughts of another creature . Offering to explain , that he has in mind , the Executive says that - something on the map , folds it and puts in the participant's hands for safe keeping .

He explains , what he thinks about the letter , he asks , to party to only one in their mind ( never saying something - or loud ) tried to think about , which means it's letters , can be . Artist then explains , what he thinks about the name , which starts with the letter , which he thought , but a few seconds ago, and requests , to the participant thinking about the name , which appears in their head , that starts with each letter , of which they thought . Participant confirms , that they did it . This is explained by the Executive , of possible participants , thinking of the same letter , are each twenty-six , features that , they thought , that the same name as one in well over a thousand of - of all names , which can be created from the letters of the alphabet . Artist asks the participant , he calls , they thought - a participant said , that Daniel , performer points to part of the map , which implies , that the participant has to open it . The participant opens it and inside is the name Daniel !

Renouncement

First , what I begin to outline a routine , I think , that it is - the perfect display ' questionable choreography '. I 'll be ho honest nest right right from the off , it is - then , as I introduce billet into play in the wa wayy , which I feel , original ( I say this is the least egotistical way possible ), I'm really proud of this simple alignment . Note to the reader *** Please , read before the effect of skipping over it presupposes , that the billet used in the subprogram as a movement to - you can display the information by word of mouth , but as I stated in the introduction to this end , to do so would be a waste of a beautiful opportunity . Finish the famous *** In order orde r to effectiv effectively ely refine refine the necessary steps , to bring this effect effect to the implementation imp lementation , let's run with the name - This is , how big the effects of the support is less than is not infallible , but the result is 100%, which sounds contradictory , but bear with me , I promise , that all explain .

 

This method was inspired by , watching older restarts Derren Brown episodes and has its roots in the ' Brain Game Benecheka '.

The most important factor in this routine, remember the name of the participant - as it is - only factor dictating that , what name you will write in the billet . We pretend , that I meet a member named James . Artist : " Hello my names Pete , your name ?" Member : " James ." Artist : " This is - a pleasure to meet you, James , I'm sure , you know what , that is , I'm doing , all , what I want , that you know , then , that it is impossible to guess what , that someone - then think . Really need to use intuition , to be able to be near somebodies private thoughts . I just want to prove it . " Artist says that - something on the map , keeping it without first looking at the participant . *** Mark the reader reader It - it , where you need to look at the participant's name , to solve it , that you record - in this case , the participant cause James . If I were asked to choose from within the letter name , I , probably , would go for the lettername ' M .' ,(which Whichappears is a brain -esque roots was talking about ). Then I would think of the first plug-in in game my mind , which runs, Ifrom that letter - That would be ' Mark .' MARK - then , I'd recorded in the billet . This is the th e rule to follow - let's look at another anothe r example . Let's pretend , that the party called Derek , the letter , which I will choose the inside of the name , would be the letter 'R' and the first plug-in name , which appears in my mind , would be ' Rob '. This - the same logic , that you apply on your party , choose , the letter in their name do not think of the first plug no fit for name of both sexes , which appears in your head , and make a note of it . Pay close attention to the next part of the script , as it is clever and deceptive . Finish the famous *** After , you have written the name , part of the map ( billet ) is placed in the participant's hands for safe keeping , and the address of the artist .

Artist : " James , we run a little and then quickly move on to that - something more ambitious . I think about a certain letter of the alphabet , and I want , that you have tried to solve , what it is . The moment I say , your brain immediately jump off , to some the letter you think , that this is , I do not want , that you do , it's just looking at me . I am going to be very honest , this is not the fir first st letter of your name , this is another . Get a diff different erent letter in the memory , and with any letter you have in mind , think of the first plug-in name , which pops into your head name , which I think , not suitable for persons of both sexes , it categorically .

 

*** Mark the reader reader Pay close attention to this paragraph of scripti scripting ng Artist : " I'm going to be very honest , it is not the first letter of your name , it's - the other . Get a different letter in the memory , and with any letter you have in mind , think of the first plug-in name , which appears in your head . The name , of which I think is not suitable for both sexes , it is categorical categor ical . " - This line is completed completed in a few few seconds and is suggestive to party , what is required , so they chose the letter in his name , I read a paragraph back a few times , because it is very easy to miss the subtlety , reading . The great thing about this routine is that you never actually tell me , what you want , that the party was thinking about the letter in their name . This line performance is flying so quickly , that the audience will not hear it as being what - or unfavorable - scenarios scenarios that are realized realized in a moment mom ent again , completely completely hides it further . Asking plug name , which is not suitable for persons of both sexes , limiting options for further participant . We will continue the routine after using this line . Finish the famous *** The Contractor addresses the participant , Performer : " If you managed somehow to think of the same letter as me , which would be one in twenty-six being that , you just chose a letter from the alphabet at random .

The chances of you thinking of the same name , I would be one in well over a thousand of - for all of the different names , which can be created from those letters . About what name did you think think ? " *** Mark the reader reader Itwe- will it , where orof notMiss , I think , that both results will be pleasantly surprising - first, cover the a hit,name and will thenhitcut . Finish the famous *** Member : " Mark ." Artist : " Do you really use your intuition , to pick up on this (? Participating bows ), had this one - or even , that it will be different . If you ( Performer address of another element of the group ) must have been thinking about the letter again that - it is just as obvious as the first letter in your name , but random letters and then think about the name , which is pushed into your head , what would it be ? " Member # 2: " Sarah ." Performer : " YYou Performer ou see a completely completely different different one . It should have been you , and you need to enjoy enjoy your intuition , did you say Mark right ?" He points down on the part of the map and gesturing party , to open it . The participant opens it , and it says Mark !

 

They successfully managed to comprehend the intuitive name . Mark the reader *** It - it , where the effect would have ended here - should hit behalf . Look at the language in these paragraphs Artist : " Do you really use your intuition , to pick up on this (? Participating bows ), had this one - or even , that it will be different ." Note , I have noticed , that the party has hit on the name , therefore , I mentioned , they used their ' intuition '. This is important as it was then , when you you read the turnov turnover er ( party , missing , you will see , it is different ). Another row , which really sells fact , it is by chance ,

Artist : " If you ( Performer address of another element of the group ) must have been thinking about the letter again that - it is just as obvious as the first letter in your name , but random letters and then think about the name , which is pushed into your head , what would it be ? " I know , that it will hit , as soon as the participant expresses words of their choice , and so I w want ant to distance the participant and audience by the potential of the method , asking someone - then even changing a few things ( subtly , of course ), asking the second participant , it helps the audience in the wrong memory . Obviously , if the party does not hits then , I would not use that line . This is important , to remember , do not make if you hit , then do not ask the second participant . Note , how this time I say - " not as obvious as the first letter in your name random letters " - which is different from that , I asked the first participant ( only very slightly different ), BUT it is - then , the audience will always remember me , asking the first participant . Note , I also do not consider asking the name of the plug , when I ask the second participant . Again, this helps sell fair subtlety fact , it's completely random . Names are going to be the worlds , apart of being , that the second party will avoid purposefully go for the same letter as the first and as you mentioned , that the name will be different , the second participant will make a conscious effort , to make a different different name na me . Then move to the disclosure . Mark the reader *** Now let's look at the party , transmissive name , it can happen , but I think , that you will truly appreciate Miss ( which is odd , to say ) for the reasons , you will understand in a moment . Finish the famous *** Artist : " What name are you thinking ." Member of " Christopher " Performer : " Did you just guess that name right ?" - Notice , as I mentioned , that the participant , the name suggests , made no mention intuition as I did , when they hit . Member : YYes es . Artist : " Open the part of the map , and I think , that it proves my point ."

 

The participant opens part of the card . Artist : " You see , you can not just assume whose - the private thoughts . I woul wouldd like to aattempt ttempt this on the contrary , you have have written the name down , and I will use intuition , to try to pick up on the name . " Mark the reader *** You have now completely aligned the billets ! You are essentially going to attempt the same experiment on the contrary , but you can just see the billet , to get the name , and therefore the result of the subroutine is 100%! Open to this sub-program takes less than 30 seconds , to come to a conclusion , if it hits , you have incredible small miracle, and if it does not make you have a perfect alignment for the party , writes that - that and having a valid alignment for orders at a stand . It - it , why I classify this as a routine controversial support less . I hope , that you excuse the fact , that I have included this effect in this volume , but I felt , it fits perfectly and is , to describe some of the points in a finer sense , which I expressed in the introduction of this volume . Not only , I think , that it is important to detail , how to use the support is less mentalism mentalism combined with tradition . Please , remember this , if you when - or want to use the psychological effect of - any kind , you can just use this method , and you never have to worry about routines not be 100%

Guess what? Mark the reader *** I 'm going to share three changes , using the same method . I made my the upmost, to ensure , that that it is as optimized as possible , and I have a road , tested it extensively . When you know the technique , it might seem really simple , but I promise you almost , you would not believe , how amazing it plays out . In second gear through this volume, I also added a series of methods to further trick this simple name prediction . Finish the famous ***

Effect The contractor offers to predict just the thought of a name on behalf of its participant . Artist but does not want to , that party was thinking about someone - something , they know , however, creates a random name in their mind , which is the only rule , that the name should not be a fit for both sexes so , that he ( performer ) is not confused and thrown off than - it is just as inappropriate , as the man caught on the floor , on which the party thinks . In ten seconds after the party , thinking about the name nam e , the contractor can sho show w this .

Variety # 2 Artist asks , that the party was thinking about playing cards and name . The participant creates a playing card and a random name . The contractor is able to successfull s uccessfully withdraw both .

 

Variety # 3 Party requests , to three people at random generated name in their mind . Artist looks at these three members and is then , what he believes , that the names . Each participant confirms , that the perpetrator was correct !

Renouncement I think , that you'll be pleasantly surpr surprised ised , how simple simple it is . It was born off the back of not wanting too much of the process , making the process , easy to understand for the participants and so faithful as possible . The best wa wayy to show you , how h ow big it is , is that t hat , to perform perform interactive -esque effect ffor or you the reader . After a moment , when you think about the name , see . name in its simplest form , thus , Edward Ed would not choose fit for both sexes the name , because it will confuse things . This is the only agreement that should be followed when creating a name . Clear your mind in this experiment , we use divination , to generate a random name .

Think about the two digits of your contact code pretty much on the air in front of you for example , if you chose 9 and 8, you would see big 9 on the air , and big number 8, but for obvious reasons it doesn’t go for the same numbers as I , it should be your own thoughts not mine . Imagine any two numbers , which you think of as a two-digit number, and now instead , to see these figures in the air , because of their imagined the words written in the air as a ' ninety-eight . " Now , when you're done , it's in your mind tends to the first letter in the word and think of the first plug-in name , which appears in your mind , which starts with any letter , it - you , think . Again , please , do not go for the name of suitable and see for both sexes , it is the name in its simplest form , peter would be Pete . Did you get a random name in mind ? If you think of someone - then , you know with the same name , it is only by chance , what do you think about this man , really see . this name is at the forefront of your mind . Think about the number of letters in that name Well there are a few people , reading this at the same time , I will try to suggest names , which do you think - here goes One of you is thinking of Frank or Fred ( you changed your mind between the two ); Can I see the name Tom and Steve ? I was close ?? If I was not close , you , probably , thought about Sean Sean /. I rarely get , those names come up and I will explain the method , you will understand why . Method , if you have not already figured , ' limits , without seeming restrictive '. Let us look at the limitations , In - First , since no fit Unisex names are not used this idea , it drastically reduces the number of names , which can think participant . I delete the number 9, which means that all of the names , that begin with

 

N, also destroyed , and I delete the number 8, which means , that all the names , beginning ' with E', also destroyed . Let's look at the numbers and names , which could relate to those numbers , and then we'll look at , both immediately go to the same name ).

1 would be 'O' - ( does not apply , because there is no way , that member may choose the word ' one ' method , which we have issued a set ) 2 and 3 - start with 'T' - ( After , like , destroying everything fit Unisex names we are left with Tim Tom /, I always alw ays infer infer Tom Tom , I do not mind to miss only a slight mispronunciation mispronunciation ), one thing t hing really really to pay p ay attention to is that , if you are in another country outside England and have names , more popular , than Tom then changes the name , which you use in your submission for any name , which , probably , will think participant . Take into account the fact , that I'm , that participant thought about the name , which appears in their head , and again it drastically reduces the number of possibilities . 4 and 5 - Begin ' to F' - (Fred /, Frank is the only name , that I can think of ). 6 and 7 - Begin with 'S' - (Steve / Sean , I have found , that Steve hell of a lot , more consistent than Sean , but it is good to take into account , that Sean could go ). 8 and 9 are deflected at the start of the subroutine , and so the names , to run with those letters , and rejected . The reason , I have chosen those letters , to reject , is that , because there are a lot of names , which could be created , using the letter 'N'. I dismissed the letter 'E', because the letter E has mainly four letters in the name , and for an instant reduction process ( outlined later ), I chose this letter , to eliminate also . You can decide to eliminate any numbers , that you feel , that should be eliminated - I personally found , they are the best numbers , to reduce . Note to the reader ***, these names work well here , if you are , Sean Sean / going longer , than Steve just pumps up it instead of Steve . I can honestly say , I never did , so Sean approached . But talking to my American friends, they said , that Sean could come more often than Steve . the principle is still the same, and if you were under way - or worry about the participant , going for that name in the performance , simply add this line in the script - " If for example you end up , they thought about the name Sean , imagine it , you feel , that Sean might look like . for obvious reasons, I now say , that Sean does not go for it . " It rejects the name Shaun / Shaun of the list completely and stops any concerns about it being a problem ( which I have never found , that is ).

The thing , which I found really interesting about , getting people to think about the name this way , is , it seems so random , and yet it is - a very restrictive attention board to a process , which I paint this redness in productivity ( I do not make it out as fortunetelling ). You'll notice , I asked ( by performing an effect on you the reader ) to think about the plug-in name . There are ways to ensure , that the participant chooses plug name , which is not so transparent, and if you really like , make your party chose either sex , I also cover this a little later also . Just knowing the number of letters in the name you are either immediately down to one or the names .

 

If you have a name , what you find , it continues to pop up , simply add it to the list of names and use it as part of your performance ( I know , it reiterated that point several times , but I really feel , that it is important to note ). Try to keep the formula as simple as possible , you will find , it's very safe , and it is stunning only , as a quick routine is finished, and how big a reaction . Now that we have the basic structure of the outlined subroutine . Let's put it all together and damage it down part by part .

Total Performance / Failure Subtlety Changes # 1 Performing to one member ( for a group or one on one ) Mark the reader *** We assume , that the singer met with the participant . Finish the famous *** Artist : " If I am asked , that you think about the name , the likelihood is in fact , that you will think of someone - then , you know . I really really do not mind you thinking of someone - then , you know , the problem is , that the more skeptical people , watching , will always assume , that I somehow found from Facebook or some other social platforms . " - One thing , for which I am always always fighting , is that , to make the most fa fair ir seeming to point in

performance time , that the method occurs . As mentioned in the introduction, I always try to calm the logic of the participant . This framework allows me to implement the method , while the presence of the participant agrees , that it is more true than just thinking about the name . Artist : " let's make a name in the strangest yet most fair way , that I can think of off the top of my head , imagine , say ...,number that thelike two98, numbers yourreasons contactit’s encode seenumbers those numbers , because the two-digit but forfrom obvious not forand those , as I said them . " - What have have we achieved achieved , there must be eliminated eliminated 9 and 8 that th at drastically reduces the number of names . Note , that it happens before , than I even mention that - or the use of numbers , to generate the name , and therefore does not seem to suspect or restrictive . Note , I ask , to party thinking of two numbers , it subtly makes the whole thing seem a little more impossible , when in fact the second figure is little more than fluff , to make the effect effect seem larger .

Participant could think of one number , and it will still work , or they could think of a random number from that - then , such as ' life equation ' or any other force , which guarantees results , and again it subtly would limit party small amount names . A massive , massive thing , which makes this routine in flight is easy , is , to make it appear , that you invent the process of off the top of your head . If you think , that you were a process in place , the process is no longer a strange process , it is by accident , and the occasional well .

 

I think , that it is important at this point to talk about ' drawing something - something red red ', if you specify , that the process is going to be a strange and random , it does not seem out of place , it becomes a natural part of the process . One rule , I always adhere to , is that , if there is a defect routines , paint it red and trying to make a defect appear , it is - the fairest part of the process . Using the contact code again , I feel a great solution , because we can say that - something like , " let's take that - the more impossible than the name , let's say , two numbers from your contact code ". Let's continue from the point of the participant who sees two numbers on the air . Artist : " Instead , to consider these numbers as digits , imagine seeing the number , the recorded broadcast as words ."

Member : " Good ." Artist : " In your mind tend to first letter ( Pause for one second ) and allow the first plug name , runs with any letter , about which you think , now appear in your mind , but , please , do not go for fit for Mixed persons floor behalf , I need you , to be dogmatic . " - This is a ssimple imple set of of instructions ; this paragraph paragraph is the most an important paragraph of all , as this completely leads the participant to one of the limited results . Artist : " The name , you think now about you , can coincidentally know someone - then with the same name , but you have reached this name by chance is not an option . Concentrate on your behalf ." - This is just to pr press ess the point , that the name was not achieved by chance selection . Artist : " Imagine a name in its simplest form for me , so , for example, peter would be Pete ." - This is - the only area area , we need to apply any real real work - Figuring Figuring number of letters . I personally use the principle of CUPS Michael Murray , as I think , that it is the most elegant tool for the job . With permission from Michael Murray, here 's how we use his principle princ iple of CUPs. CUP s. Artist : " Think about the exact number of letters in that name ." - If the participant rresponds esponds immediately , what did they think the number of letters , this is a good bet , the name is 3 or 4 letters long , once you become good in this method , you will be able to differentiate between 3 and 4 letters . If they struggle a little , then the name is probably 5 letters long - This swing is in short a principle of the Cups . This allows you to be able to know a rough amount of letters in one word . Please , refer to the work of Michael , to see all his wonderful use for this principle . Using the principle of Cups with a hovering operator will give you an instant amount of letters . Work out at first , if you think , that this - the letter 3/4 or letters 4/5, using the cups , and then the address of the participant for the sake of example , we will assume , that the participant thinks of 3 letters . Artist : " It's three ... ( Pause )."

 

- Member says , that yyou ou are ccorrect orrect . Let's look look at the same statement statement , if the member thought about the four letters of the name . Artist : " This is three ... ( pause ), do not four indicate the long right in letters ?" - Note , I finished the operator at this time bef before ore the confirmati confirmation on from the participant stopped me in the middle of my statement . These same views apply to 4/5 letter names as well . Mark the reader *** I often ffeel eel , that t hat mentalism lacks impression Drama / force force . Everything Everything , it seems , flows flows very smoothly , and the participant is easy to feel , that you know their thoughts before , than it is to arrive at the opening - which is what - that , I believe , that we should strive to avoid . As mentalists, we must predict others that are not predictable . Let's assume for a moment , we watched the show as a city Holby or ER ( for those outside the UK , they - TV shows about hospitals ), imagine a patient , brought to the hospital , which is in a critical condition and needs in operation and the surgeon , said " there is 100% - s chances of success " bef before ore , than the work took place . After observing the surgery takes place is another story , where the doctor approves , that the patient must take the tablet , and the condition will be allowed for 24 hours . People , checking in and out of hospital with injuries easily as cuts or sore throat , I can guarantee , that the show would become boring rather quickly . In fact , thinking about it the most perfect show I can think of , to present my point , a hospital for animals Based show . In 98% of time on such a show , which the animal is experiencing , but the producers show , there is a way to edit the show so , that was the suspension of the impression , every moment is a dynamic , by speech , complete the conversation between the ' professionals ' of the animal each time , carefully created , to indicate the chance of failure on parts of veterinarians and suggests a possible decline in the animal . Only at the very end of the show , we understand the result of each special occasion . The creators of the show there is a way to draw an image in our mind , which assumes , that the animal is or is going to do it or not , and it keeps us trapped . Then , when the animal does not make it , it immediately breaks for us the viewer - the reason for this , then , not only because , the animal lost its

life ( which breaks in itself ), but because they affect us the sad story of the time we start to get comfortable comf ortable with th thee fact , that the animals animal s survive . You have never Have you noticed that the saddest broadcast b roadcast of stories stories was during our most convenient viewing moments ? - Which is no coincidence . This kind of view should be applied to mentalism . This will add the impression of drama and impossibility . If a participant is thinking , you know the number of letters in the name , which they think , and you are on - apparently expect the number of letters with ease , it suggests , that you are somewhat close to the suggestion the name , which they think . If however , you are wrong to imagine the number of letters in the name , and you do not remotely close , it will lead the participant to think , that you are completely off track and then when you do show the name , you will break completely participant and audience for six . Of course , it is not reduced and closed , I thought about the name , here it is - to be facial expressions , but you get my point .

 

This routine does require , that you know , that the number of letters in the name leads to withdrawal effects eff ects . Once you are fully satisfied with the principle of Cups , incorrectly incorrectly refers refers to the number n umber of letterss , to create the drama letter d rama , the th e simple yet elegant pri p rinciple nciple , what I feel , if you rejected rejected it , would be a shame . Finish the famous *** Because the abundance of explanations here are a few alternative methods to the possibility to bring the number of letters , if you used Cups principle earlier in your performance , and for any reason you do not want to use the same principle for fear of catching a party at you using it ( which should not happen , but there is nothing wrong with acting for sure ). One method looks for the appropriate number of digits , the method is simple , because it is - one in three chances , to be correct , assuming - the name can only be a 3, 4 or 5 characters long . Addressing the party and saying , Artist : " Okay, so , how many letters , I think , are in the name ... hmm , I would say 4 ( pause slightly , to expect a reaction ) or 5" If a participant responds , nodding , or confirming any of them if you know the length of the name , if not then you - immediately to a name ' Tom '. If a participant does not speak , when you deliver , the above scenario just say , Performer : " I did not ask , do not give me a clue , I spoke out loud ."

This type of quick suggestions - that - then , I've always loved , a very simple yet elegant , and makes sense of participating , they accidentally added a hint that - then , that they should not have . Otherwise, it should reduce the number of letters through a proxy . It - it - it , that I like to use in the performance , because it allows me to completely , not absent , either to know the exact number of letters or reduce the number of characters ( or objects , words in general , you use it for ). We are going to use the use of the second participant for this , to address the second participant Artist : " Dave , I would like , that you have tried to suggest the number of letters in the name , you feel , it's three , four or five ?". Dave : " Three ?" If a participant , everyone says Dave , is correct , great credit taking on the fact , that you have chosen Davee , who kn Dav knows ows , he could could have imagined . When Dave Dave slips look at him and say , " You are too far from absent , it only proves , how much of a feat it is to even guess the number of letters in the name ." The most important thing to remember here is , to say , that " You are too far from absent ", because it makes it seem , that you know the number of letters in the name . You must listen carefully to , what they say Dave and the participant , if the assumption is correct Dave Dave moved to the t he disclosure . If however he does not , which is more likely to happen , you are up to two numbers . If he resolves ves four four , you know , it - three or five letters letters long . If he resolves ves five , you know kn ow , it - three or four letters long and if it resolves three , you know , what it is for or five letters long . It may seem like a given to some , but the number of e-mails / messages , which I get every week , because I do not describe things like this t his , completely completely ridiculous . Let's look at each scenario one at a time .

 

Dave eliminates the three letters Dave letters , leaving leaving these four letters and five letter names nam es . Keeping in mind Fred , Frank and Steve remain The interesting thing here is , that Frank Fred / is not worlds apart and can be connected together - After the first elimination of Steve . By far the easiest way to do this is using Derren's repetition of this trick . Address the member , " Continue to speak the name to yourself

many times as Steve , Steve , Steve - If this - Steve , the participant must respond , and your job is done . If however, a participant does not respond , you know , you up the last two names . I’m just pushing the blame on the participant so far , displaying two names Artist : " stared at me , imagine saying this name, and it is suppose to talk to me ... well , I normally would not consider it this hard . I think , that it - because you thought about a name, and then changed their minds or were torn between two names anyway , that does not matter , I'm going to tell you two names , let's see , how close I get ... Fred or frank ? " This should be a big hit , the one thing , which is very important , to remember here , is the moment , I mention , that the party was thinking about the two names , I quickly bothering to tell them , they do not think of two names , saying, " One way or another , that it does not matter " is quite fast and then continue speak so , that partyassume has listened it is -therefore an interesting , consists in the fact , thattothe audience would , that it. The is thereason truth ,, and assumemethod , that you are not only tied the name , of which the participant thinks only one , from which they changed their minds also . Once you have determined the number of letters per name , you immediately know the name or are up to two names . Using any return process ( discussed many times in these volumes, you will quickly be up to one ). The great thing about this effect is , that , as soon as you know the number of letters , you pretty much know the name .

Variant # 2 The Psychological Variety of the Fiction cards It uses the same method , but instead , to ask , to party thinking of two numbers from their contact code this time , it will be a playing card . The method , which you structure it , is completely up to you as a performer , I only offer instructions that , I found the job nicely . Artist : " One thing , that I am often asked - can I use my powers for low funds ? As long as the honest answer is yes , I am not inclined to use it , what I do outside of the context , which you can see here . I often try to think of a range of sc scenarios enarios ; my my skills might come in handy hand y . One such arena would be in a card game . Obviously , I have learned a few of you a few , so , I need it , to be random , we are going to create fake fake gambling scenario scenario in what wh at , we

make a random playing card and the opponent . I think , that I will attempt this with you . " Artist indicates a gentleman gent leman , followed followed by sitting a table .

 

Artist : " I want , that you think about the random playing card , because the obvious reason not to go for a card , you feel , that everyone else could . See . Card in the air to a large extent ... as many as nine of the foundations ." - It gives yyou ou a first first opportunity opportu nity for for a hit , if they w went ent to nine out of a miracle of basics ! If not you use this card as an example . Artist : " obviously , now I have mentioned , that the number nine is not going to do , but you have a map in mind ? Good . Now imagine a name card recorded in the air as the words . In your mind tend to the first lletter etter in the word and think of the first first plugin name , which appears in your head , but , please , do not go for the name of either sex Suitable for for individuals individua ls , it must be b e categorically . "

- Of course course , it reduces reduces us to about the same number of outlined nam names es in the firs firstt change . Artist : " You have now created a random playing card and a random opponent for me , to try and play the game gam e of psychological warfare warfare with ." ." - When applying , to the participant thinking about the num number ber of letters letters in in the name of and knowing the exact exact amount, you will now be up to every every second value when it comes to playing cards and you will know the name ! Fishing for a lawsuit is easy and outlines in the psychological playing cards volume I of these rows . One thing to remember is , that certain values are chosen more than others I found this 3 is selected more so than 2. 4 is chosen more so than 5. 7 is chosen more so than 6 ( if it is not a magician , you perform to then 6 more , so than 7). You can assume the name and playing card in one . If you place an invisible deck to the table before the effect , you have to any situation , which arises . If you are not able to call the card out loud

any reason ( if you're off by one, and so on . d .), you always have the classic methodology , relying as perfect for any situation . It again expresses the point , I have tried to weave throughout the entire volume , the traditional methodology and the methodology of the support is less so well hand in hand .

Variety # 3 Kind of hoya This change is very , very similar to an interactive effect , apart from which I performed on you at the beginning of this effect , with the audience . If you perform this effect to three participants at the same time , you can just say , Artist : " Keep a straight face and do not give anything . Even if I say your exact idea , please , do not react .

 

Close your eyes eyes for for me and don't d on't forget forget to keep the th e poker surface . I feel feel ( point to one o ne of the t he par party ty ) outright or Fred , ( specify who - what else ), Tom , and ( enter the last party ), Steve . Open your eyes to me , only yes or no - did I get your thought ? " Firs Firstt participant : " Yes ." Artist : " Your ?" Second participant : " Yes ." Artist : " And yours ?" Third participant : " Yes ." - Pointing to the participants ( while their eyes eyes are cl closed osed ) the audience will assume , that t hat you intend to separate the thoughts of each person . The participants , of course , can not see , it never knows , that you have indicated to them . When they confirm , that you hit on the name , this - all proof , which requires audience . If one party says , do not ask them , what he calls , they think about and say , " Two of the three , not bad ." This is a simple change , but so powerful , imagine sitting at a table and pinning three thoughts on names without a quick look at a billets or using one in advance !

Extra Thoughts

If you would like to apply that same logic to all names , it is necessary to compile a list of names of bush , that crop up most frequently in your area . Again, I would recommend eliminating names of both sexes . Rosette names are much more difficult to get hit from than plug-in names . 2/3 could be Tina or Teresa 4/5 could be Fiona or Faye 6/7 could be Sarah or Stacy These are names that I can think of from the top of my head . Being honest , I have always performed this routine , using a plug-in names . I really experimented with rosette names , but this was not true , and I quickly returned to using plug-in names . I do howev however er think of a clever w way ay to make the participant to tell you a person's gend gender er , which they think , never knowing , what they have . Performance would have to be a little longer , this adds a small amount of process to the subroutine , but it is interesting and therefore therefore does not detract from work efficiency . Artist : " I do not know , do you know this , but whose - the characteristics , and traits can completely lead you to someone's - the name . Do not believe me ? How many people are named Herbert Percy or you know , that it is cold ? Jokes aside , man , that you think , they are high or small ? Let the participating answer . What color hair ? Let the participating answer . What are his hobbies ?

 

This is an answer that is important ; a person’s hobby will usually lead you completely to the man’s floor ! When you get an answer partic participant ipant , you will find , that they are too obvious , which should lead you to the floor . As an additional thought, you can also get additional hits from the characteristics .

I found that ,was if you want about to addthe features features to the, usual routine routinedescription phase , completing it andparticipants asking , that the ,party thinking plug name , the selected Tall Dark hair ( brown and black t . D .) Medium build The way to get closer to this is simple , Artist : " I want , that you think about this man , in a moment you are going to make some of the characteristics characteri stics of this man ." Write down the ' high ' word and save it to you directly , Artist : " Is this person tall or small ?" If a participant says high , then flip it over and show the party , you were correct . Write down the words ' black hair ' reason , I use the dark hair , it is , it covers a range of colors . Artist : " What colored hair does this person have ?" Member : Brown . Again, turn your piece of paper , to show , that you hit . Record the word 'Medium' Artist : " Is this person a thin , heavy set or carrier ?" Member : " Carrier " If you felt especially bold , then you could record a word sport and ask for a person’s hobby and if it hits BOOM ! Miracle . If none of the above hit ( which may be the case ) simply says , Artist : " I'm going to make some notes , as you go along " Just write it , that the participant , and then finish , saying , Artist : " You said , that man was XX, and their hair color was XX and their hobbies XX, there is only one name , which I know now - XX" It wraps a routine manner , which causes the participant to believe , that the description , which they gave you , you somehow brought the idea of the name !

The inverse of the principle of limitation

This method is not new in his views or original to me , but I feel , that it is a little studied and the way , which I have used it , absolutely new .

 

I personall personallyy believe , that this method is going to open ope n a lot of doors , when we full fullyy grasp its potential and examine it a little more . To briefly outline the concept , we will use a quick example , aimed at the English reader ( this method does not rely on the English language ), but this brief example using British coins . Do not miss it - even if you're not from England , it is - the method of scheme and explains the method completely even I , you do not know the coins . Read the following following passage and follow it fforward orward , if you're British British , are manipulated . " Imagine to reach his pocket and take out a coin and see the coin , as if it was four times its own size , so , if it was a coin of one pound , it would now be like a huge coin per pound increased size . Since obvious reasons do not go for that coin . in fact, let's make it more casual , if a coin , that you think , even the name or change the value of an odd , if it is - an odd change in value even in this case , do you think of completely brand new oh coin . did you do that ? " Coin , to which should now think , is the coin of 5 pence . It may be 1 penny , but this is unlikely to be the number of times a word , each was mentioned in the previous paragraph . The reason this works , is that , if you look at the coin - 1 point 2 points 5 points 10 points 20 points 50 points £ 1, £ 2 There is only 1 point 5 points and 1 £, which are odd value coins , I mention a pound coin ( rref efer er to it as coin coin of one pound , thus , I mention that often ), and so the pound deviate deviatess and the word , each repeatedly repeatedly pushes peo people ple away away from the pen penny ny . Also Al so statisticall statisticallyy 5 points are more likely to be selected . The method must find a category which - or , what have categorical groups within it , where one category is much larger than the other . That way , when the audience think about what - the random similarity , lies in the fact , that they will choose from a larger group . If the participant has a change of mind , they should ( based on probability alone ) end up in a smaller group , and then you can limit further ,

to guarantee almost ( I use the word almost , since nothing is set in stone ), a definitive result . Here is one idea , I set up the use of this principle , I feel ( WARNING COMMENT CLICHÉS ) is worth the price of this entire volume . I DESTROYED with this , and it went right into my completion set .

Phantom Dictionary Test Effect Artist asks , to the audience to create a dictionary in their mind , think of a word to the dictionary from within , and then be able to quickly get the word out !

Renouncement As noted earlier, the method for this should be incredibly obvious , but still fun and very devious . I will briefly outline one view and then will corrupt the view down part by part . We assume , that there are three members ( this can be done one-on-one ). Artist : " I want to imagine between the four of us , we are going to create an imaginary dictionary , ( artist's views on the first participant ), what color is the dictionary ?" Participant number one : Blue .

 

Contractor addresses participating number two , Artist : " What is the name of this blue dictionary ?" Participant number two : The Book of Words . Artist : " Perfect , finally ( he looks to the participating number three ), you have the most important job of all . In the dictionary of words separated az, therefore , I , your head thinking about the first letter , which appears in your mind . In fact , I do not want you to check out , thinking , I put pressure on you in one way or another, and that the letter , about which you think , is the letter , which all would have chosen , so let's go with the opposite of , what you are thinking right now . If you are thinking about changing the vowel to consonant , if - compatible change to the vowel so , that you are on an entirely new letter . Got one ? " Participating Number Three : YYes es .

Artist : " Think of a word , which is longer than 5/6 of letters long , which can be visualized as an image , that - that , which suggests physical touch , which starts with any letter , you go ... If you can not think of anything Starts with the letter , remain within either category , you are in and change the letter . " Member : " I did it ." Artist : " Imagine word written in the air , see . Letters , thoroughly explained , and suggested to consider this item as picture , stretched in the air ." Artist : " Word , do you think about the Elephant ?" Member : " Yes !" Even reading the subroutine to be seen , as this routine is reached . The method is simple , there are 21 consonants and only 5 vowels - If a participant had to choose a letter at random , they are much more likely to choose a consonant . If there is a participating change to the vowel , if they are consonant and harmonious , if they are on a vowel vowel , they should think about the vow vowel el - Based on probability , and I even covered , packed , they are not . Let's look at the words , which can be seen as a picture ( which the participant may assume to be physically touching ) created from off the back of the vowels . A - Aircraft Aircraft - ( I have rar rarely ely had it , fit ) E - Elephant O - Splitter - ( I have rarely had it , fit ) I - ( Cannot think of of one ) U - Umbrella ' Elephant ' is the most likely choice of all these words , to occur . One key proposal , to remember , " think of the word , which is more durable than the letter 5/6, which starts with the letter . The only rule , should be able to visualize the thing , that you think of as an image

 

, and it should be that - then , which suggests physical touch . If you are struggling to make it to the letter , you go , stay within the same category, and change the letters .

This ensures , that , if a participant is struggling with a vowel , they move to another , the speed , in which the participant creates a word , should give you a good indication as it was then , when I realized that string . I created a series outs ( mechanical outs) that you can use this , I will outline in this effect . But first, let's take a look at the finer details in this effect . Do you have have one in four four chance of one only guesses , to get the thing , that the party is thinking about law and by using any method , or returns process ( littered through these volumes ), should quickly be able to negate the one word with ease . I know the issue , burning on your mind - what , if the participant chooses to begin with a vowel vowel ? If you were worried worried about abo ut this being the case , that t hat you could always always use this as a for forecast ecast type effect effect as opposed to a telepathy effect effect . You could , if you were addicted , create a series series of outs o uts ( multipl multiplee outs) if you so demanded . When you ask , that party called the word out loud , if a participant says the word out loud , which starts with a consonant , then just say - good and let's do it again , to prove , like worlds apart both words , we will go with any word , which you finish then . Possible participants , choosing two vowels in a row , are ultra-thin . I think , even , that the process is a little more durable , it completely destroys a routine method, and makes it impossible to keep track . Mark the reader *** I revisit revisit this effect effect ( during d uring my second transfer transfer of this volume ) from this point ; I found an incredibly simple yet elegant way to fulfill this effect on the fly . I would skip the introduction for this change , where the participant creates an imaginary dictionary and a title for the said dictionary . To this effect, we are going to use our mobile phone as an electronic billet ( it will make sense in a moment ) to write down our forecast - I 100% sure , that it will work on any smartphone Go to the notes app and write " choose - Umbrella " If you wanted the right thing , go to the newsletter and make a text message on the phone , such as ' Spider ' from the power of the spider ( outlined in general

terms of psychological led forces forces ) or a playing card , which can easil e asilyy cause . Switch back to the umbrella note . Then open the Internet and look for the word elephant and open the image of the elephant . Close each application - on iPhone, you double-tap the return button and swipe the app , it will shut it down down . When the application is rreopened eopened , it will immediately immediately open to that page . Then , when you are with your participant , open the application notes and put them in the name of the first , than " choose - Umbrella ", thus , it now says "the XX-th, choose - Umbrella ". Then close the

 

application again . You now have two multiple outs. Address of the participant , Artist : " I think , this is going to be important later ." Lock the phone . Follow the vocabulary test , when it comes to opening words , start to look for the color , which I would recommend to bring , " I can feel it , there is really white / is greyish ?" If a participant says yes - followed with " you , I go to the airplane ?" if a participant says , " no " ask them , what they have gone , it has to be an elephant - If it is a large , simply unlock the phone ( without removing it off the table ). Ask , that they clicked on the internet and saw that , what you expected , that they would go to . If a participant says , they went to an umbrella , just unlock your phone and ask them , that they clicked clicked on application notes , and you'll get a hit . If a participant does not speak the color problem , then ask , if they went to the splitter , if a participant says , " no " ask them , for what they really were - They are , perhaps , will say , " Umbrella " - if the participant goes to an umbrella , just ask , so that they open the phone and open the notes application , and the effect will come to a strong conclusion . What happens , if a participant does not go for any of the words ? Just say , that " I think , what it says I do , that I should know about you ," and then move to the right and to do , to a participant has opened distribution means the application , and it will be a hit . This ensures , that you have a solid routine , which comes to a firm conclusion very quickly .

Phone is a natural way to transmit information on the fly, and is another way to reduce the number of supports , which we have to move around on our personalities , to quickly move to anywhere anytime mentalism routine . Finish the famous *** This routine is simple and elegant, and fun , to perform , because it is quick and there is little , to remember . The only thing , left the scheme , is a process , which I represent routine ( if I want to run a quick change of this effect ). There is a small lie , used to introduce for this purpose , but a lie , I'm sure , that 99% of people will not pick up on . Artist : " The English language is one of the fastest growing languages in the world , today there are close to half a million words , and more than 40,000 of those words are words , which can be visualized as the formation of images . Each of those words created from the 26 letters in the alphabet . Letters az performed simultaneously through a dictionary and I'm going to do , that you create a full , randomly . " This is - the way , which I imagine the effect , with participants creating an imaginary dictionary , then , that I use , if I decide to , I want to shake up routine is very little . As you can see , it is - a simple , but beautiful routine and routine is , I feel , is going to attract the most attention of all this volume , because it is - a neat effect . To challenge the method , which you think , think about ways , that you could use a ' Reverse limitation principle ' think of the category , which you might use , to create a miracle .

 

Name a place Mark the reader *** This is my version of the classic , this is of course a completely new kind of Bruce Bernstein / ' Bob Cassidy Place Subroutine '. In the past, I explored this wonderful wonderful graph in many different different ways ways , and I found this way to be the most linear - the most linear , being accepted as an effective part of mentalism .

There is NOTHING wrong with the original ' Name / Place ' subroutine at all and if you don't know the original , I urge you to check it out - you won't be disappointed . Finish the famous ***

Effect One participant is asked to think of a place , and after thinking the place instructed , they can change their mind - even after , as a performer conveys what , what he feels , that the party will go for . Artist continues , to write down , that puts , he feels , that the party is going to end on , after , they changed their minds , and throws the paper in the glass , in order to isolate the forecast . Artist gives the participant five seconds , to make a decision . Let's assume , that the party says - ' Paraguay '. The second participant is asked to think of the name - artist writes his prediction and discards the piece of paper in the glass ( again , in order to isolate the forecast ) and then asks the participant to , on behalf of what he thought , Let's assume , he says Franck . Tips artist paper from the glass on the table and gestures for one of the party , to open the sheets of paper . It is shown , that the singer recorded ' Paraguay ' and ' Frank '!

Renouncement It is simple and elegant , the routine uses several traditional methodologies - I really hope , that you appreciate the fineness / twisting , that I have applied these methodologies . Mark the reader *** I thought , th that at briefl brieflyy mention that - that , I feel feel , has a massive importance . Often , people allow themselves liberties , expressing , what's my job . I never said , that the classics should be scattered , ignored or not followed by . On the contrary consider as many of the classical texts , as far as possible they are - my driving force . I constantly visit and re revisit visit the classics .

 

I have over the years years has thought tho ught a lot of subtleties , which is an excellent excellent complement to tthose hose , who stood in front of me . I fully stand on the shoulders of giants , who come in front of me . Finish the famous *** If I performed a theatrical performance , I , probably , would choose to use the changes Cassidy , as it looks more in terms of space , used , to bring the effect to its conclusion . Also , if you have not seen the ' Bob elimination principle ' using a billet order, you missed one of the most incredible principles in mentalism ( which is being explored a bit ). Close-up but I wanted to create a similar routine , that did not have that entire section of the process - I would like , to seem routine , very transmits , and still ensure a solid result . The only installation required is to take a billet ( or piece of paper ) and write to Fred through the center of it and then put a string through it - thus , it is deleted , but Fred still see . Take a second billet and place it on top of the billet , thus , it remains hidden , when you make a billet . As an additional idea ( it does not need to ) take a sharpie and purified nail tip so , that it has dried hard ( representing it useless as a feather ), cut a notch in the lid tricksters and then placed it tricksters in your pocket next to your work sharper . The reason for the reduction in the cover notch is so , so only one touch you can differentiate gimmicked tricksters tricksters from working . *** Mark the reader reader If you do not consider the introduction , I urge you to - well , to be able to understand my definition mentalism ' support -less'. In short , in this routine, party, nothing will ever write , billets are just in the game so , that the audience can see , that we were correct in our views as a ' landmark '. Finish the famous *** You are all set . This routine is best played out in social situations . Let's draw a scene ; at the performer are a table with two participants and a group of spectators . The performer is located in the middle of these two participants . Empty the glass on the table and you are set to begin .

For the sake of keeping it on track and linear as possible , we suppose , that the singer met with the participants . The performer turns to the participant alone , puts his hand in the participating shoulder of the number and examines their eyes and addresses them Artist : " I want , that you begin to change your mind through the place for me , thinking about the countries , and the city continues to change many times ." The Contractor takes off the shoulder arm of the participating number one turns to the participating number two and places his hand on the shoulder of the participating number two , addressing them I want , that yyou ou have gone through the alphabet in your mind , to run with A and then B, C, D, but do not nod forward , back to the top of A, B ... " Artist allows the participant to move, and then says participating number one , " stop everywhere , where you " and then turns to a participating number two " and you stop anywhere , where you are ." He then addresses participating number one , Artist : " Think of the first plug-in name , which appears in your mind , runs with any letter , you go is now ."

 

Participant confirms , that they have done so . It - it , where the first part of the method plays a role . The first participant really has the freedom to choose any place , the second participant however does not have the freedom to choose a name , this is power . Strength is more mechanical than psychological / brain . The real beauty is that , like the force is deflected , to instill in the mind of the party , they also had a truly free choice . When you turn to a participating number one place a hand on their shoulder ( use the hand , which is closest to the participant ). Tell them to change their minds many times , as you say this touch on their shoulder very softly a couple of times . Turn to the participating number two , put a hand on their shoulder ( using the arm , closest to him ), and ask , so they began to go through the alphabet , runs with ( as you say, touch the shoulder member , then B again dealing with a shoulder member, and then C shoulder branch member . Then, do not say anything except touch the participant's shoulder ( sticking with the same rhythm ) and touch again ( staying in rhythm ), saying , " Do not nod or giving it - or , let's go back to the top ( tap ), B ( touch ) " touch , where you would say C, then tap for D, this where you look away and continue to deal with , when you get to the F, look at the party and say " Stop ! Everywhere , where you and think of first

plug-in name , which appears in your head . " The names of more than , probably , going to be Fred and Frank . I know that , that ( the reader ) to think , that , because the participants , followed by your touch , they think , that you know the letter , about which they think ( which is true ), but we are going to dispel it . A look at the two party ( party , think of the name ), addresses them , Artist : " Concentrate on the name for me , imagine being recorded on the air . Is this a rather long name right for about 7 or eight letters ?" Participant number two : "Erm, no ." Artist : " Wasn't that Lawrence ?" Participant number two : no . Artist : " well , I will return to you ." It , plays an important role in the method , it completely destroys the idea , that you know the letter . Why would you get it so wrong in terms of the length of the name and the actual letter , which begins with the name ? The answer - that , that , if you knew the letter , you would not have expressed such a radical suggestion . This implicitly assumes indirectly , that you do not know the letter . We - now alone - forward . Artist turns to the participating number one ( party , think of a place ) Artist : " We run from the place , I think , now that I know , that you are good enough to convey the place and make you change your mind as many times , as you like , and I think , that I can predict , where you end up . Do not teshite yourself no illusion , it's not deja vu in the sense , that it happened , before we re-experience it . it's - vu-ja-de in the sense , I just buy the right to have , what will happen before , it happens . " The contractor writes down the place and folds part of the card and throws part of the card into the glass . Artist : " I'll give you five seconds , to change your mind and no matter , what you say out loud at the end of the five seconds , the place , to which we go . Five ... Four ... Three ... Two ... the performer holds one finger and gestures for the participant . "

 

Member : Paraguay .

There are several things , which occur here , I hope , that you appreciate the beauty of a small subtleties in action . When you go , to record the place , remove the billet , which you have prepared ( with Fred , struck off on it ) and wri write te to Frank above above or below the appointment appointmen t . Fold the billet order and throw it in the glass . Obviously , we use one - forward . I've always hated the moment , using one - forward , that the perpetrator will ask , to party , " said all your mind " or , " thus , it is impossible to change his mind , what do you think t hink ?" I would like to receive receive infor information mation in a wa wayy , that was logical, yet impossible . When writing your one - forward, first ( in this case the name ) and then asking , to the participant changed his mind and everywhere , where the party ends after , like , five seconds is the idea , that he / she has to settle in . This forces forces the participant to say their tthoughts houghts aloud the fairest airest way possible , which is important for this sub-program , to come to the net conclusion . Party to change its mind adds a level of impossibility to all effects , as you write your prediction before , than even the party decided to settle on the idea on their own . We are at the point in the effect , that the participant said aloud their thoughts . The contractor turns to the participating number one , Artist : " Think of this name , suppose to say it to me . Suppose to shout this name at me ." The performer takes out his pen and wrote the name , he crosses out the name and looks at the participant , Artist : " Imagine telling me the name , look at me in the head , the name is saying ." The artist wrote the name down , collapses part of the card and discards it in the glass . In fact performer performer removes a pen , that does d oes not work , says Fred ( Very open way , so that people can follow a pen ) on the part of the map ( there is nothing written , because the pen does not work . Artist looks uncertain and then put a string through it , he wrote ( again , billet is still empty ). A pen enters a pocket and an inverted billet order . It - it , where there is a moment of mimicry , in which the artist makes it seem , that he fights, and then deletes the working pen and write down the place that the two participating number , say it out loud . Think about it for a few seconds , when both billet open a moment later , and they see the name of Fred , recorded it with a cross through it , they would not have amused myself no illusions in his mind that the last billet , recorded on . If you do not have an additional cheater or do not want to use a gimmicked cheater , you can still use this trick , pretending to write to Fred on the second billet order ,

cleaning your nail through the billet ( so , that participant can hear the sounds of a fountain to be recorded ), and then also pretending to hold a cross through it ( again clean your nails ). This will achieve the same effect , but a little more boldly . Once you have done this , write down any place the participant has chosen . Now the billeting order only recorded a place on it . Fold the billet order and throw it in the glass . Artist : " Staying in the same letter, I'm going to give you 5 seconds , to change the name of the 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ...." ( Artist gestures to party , to say the name aloud ). Participating Number One : Frank .

 

Artist : " From what have you changed ?" Participant number one : Fred . Artist : " Take the glass , I don’t want to touch it and provide clues to the paper ." One of the participants does as instructed . Sheets of paper to open and prove , that the perpetrator was correct ! Mark the reader *** As long as you have synchronized touch correctly , and you are working with a party , which has an average average lev level el of intelligence ( do d o not attempt this with whom - then , who wh o can not pay attention or listen listen to ), then , you have it - then , it is easy and largely error free . The only other name , which I can think of , which is a plug-in and start with the F, is Francis , and Frank is a short version of Francis , so , you are guaranteed hits . Note , I say party to change their mind , remaining in the same letter so many times , as they like . If they end up at Frank and Fred changed from perfect , if it is on the contrary , it is - still a hit .

A simple unprepar unp repared ed question This is - another way to get access to the letter , of which the participant thinks without them really knowing , you know the letter - which makes it perfect for this sub-style name space . I have in the past , expressed , that knowledge is the first letter of the name and the rough length significantly enhances the capabilities behalf assumptions .

I’m not ffor or one second sentence , so that you alwa always ys know the exact name that the participant is thinking about , BUT even if you are close , the audience will always feel this as a hit . The way you are limiting the participant ( without seeming restrictive , of course ), helps determine the outcome of the entire process , which the party chooses a name , and it will greatly improve your chances . I found a simple string ones , which " do not go to the floor of either the name fit for people , because I need you , to be as categorical and clear in your mind as much as possible ." This eliminates the node names . I have also found , that the audience does not really care and focus on the fact , that you are restrictive , if you say , " Think of the first plug-in name , which appears in your mind ." If you are worried about such things , please refer to the " Assumption name Billet less " in this volume , as there are some interesting ways to structure a definitive selection of sex in that , in order to appear very clean and open ( non-limiting ) as possible . Anyway, I felt it fair , to get rid of it before , which I addressed this nice little trick , because getting a feel for , to pick up on behalf important when using this principle . Mark the reader *** I will outline this trick , sstays tays true to the abov abovee ' naming places ' routine . Finish the famous *** Turn to the participant You want to think about the place and address them , Artist : " I would like , that you think about a random place for me , it can be a country or city . Continue to change your mind many times ."

 

Then turn to the first participant , Artist : " I want , that you begin to go through the letters of the alphabet as a , AB C, run , when I click your fingers ." Artist snaps his fingers , then returned to the participant , who thinks about the place , waits a few seconds and then said , Artist : " stop anywhere , where you are now ." Then, turning to the man , passes through the letters of the alphabet ,

Artist : " You stop anywhere , where you are now . In fact, the letter is not it , that imposing think of the first plug-in name , which appears in your mind , runs with any letter , you go right now ." Mark the reader *** This line is a small line , which is sealed by the contract , which it flies completely . " Finish the famous ***

Small cheeky essay / effect One of the points , which I have done in a small amount of depth in the introduction to this amount - then , how / when I feel mentalism ' support -less', must be used . If you repeatedly use a - a method in mentalism is completely water down the food , hospitality and the efficiency of , what you are doing . For example , when I wrote , " Dare to be Bold " ( which contained a large ' double reality '), I did not understand , how to write or express any opinion , which I would like to share in a way , that was understandable . Therefore, I feel , that the essence of the book has been completely lost , and I feel today ( who knows , what I know now ), that the book is not only badly written , but not in such detail , as it should be . To fix this , I plan to ( in the future ), rewrite the book and send it to any free , who is interested in reading a book . It was very difficult for the reader to understand , by reading the book , within which I will use only one of the ideas during each performance ( if at all ), and it made it seem , that all , what I did , it was a double reality , Based , which is 100% not a case and never was . I also share a few ideas , which used the ' time stooging' - What remembering , perhaps , was not the best idea as the people once again , taken , I used the time stooging as a method , which is not the case . If I had to create an analogy ( I'm sorry , I , perhaps , is not expressed , at this time ), when the boat you hope never to use life vests , but you feel much better / safer knowledge , that they are there , and outlining me those methods are the same . I hope never to have to use them , but if I made it to the top pageant , and that - that is not so , as it is necessary , I will use the method , if I have to ensure , that the show goes by , I expect , that this will go . I lost one element opinions audiences me , than the audience . I guess the point , I'm trying to expres expresss , although in a roundabout way that , that it should be used in moderation at the right time and the right

place , IF it should be used at all . I have many , many ideas , which I have used in the past , which I no longer use , BUT when the time arises , I feel , that the older routine more relevant , than routine

 

planning to execute you , could bet , that I use more the old routine , without blinking an eye . If you decide , that you are going to use all of the ideas in this volume in turn then , I feel , that you are doing yourself a disservice , confident studying them and change them , to fit your character , but PLEASE mix and match the material to the traditional methodology . In fact, here's a story from last night , which fully expresses my point . I work worked ed alongside another hypnotist in the corporate eevent vent staff at the hotel called ' heaths ', I reached the venue , to find , the hotel is placed a large marquis ( for any English speakers giant tent ) stage and was not 100 guests ( not a massive amount ), and they like the connection , and mix and a theatr th eatrical ical performance . The hypnotist asked , if I make the connection, and mixed , and he would make a theatrical performance - I very rarely bring concerts in working condition , because I'm constantly swamped with balancing consultation , recording , production company and my social life ( which is the area , I spend the least amount of time ). They asked me 3 months ago , if I give a concert , and I said , that would be ( even though , I forgot , that said , I will ), I , probably , was asked , while my mind was on what - something else , one way or another as a man of my word ( as best , I can ), and not a desire to bring a friend , I moved some things and went to the concert . I literall literallyy took nothing but a sharpie and business cards wi with th me . I noticed the roul roulette ette wheel at the time of your connection , and mix , and I thought tho ught , it would be a great idea to have some fun , use this , since the support acts in my completion . I managed to steal a series of passcodes from the notes to someone - the phone and after a tape measure performance , I quickly moved to the manfor asking telephone which ithave was appointed to assume ,name that we a random web - site ( which I asked , so ,that other viewers ) . Ihave askedcreated her , what her username will be , to which she replied , and then I said - " In your mind , create a password , the one , which you can easily remember and perhaps one , which you have used before for authenticity or if you really you dare to use that , you really would have used . " She thought, and changed her mind , I handed billet other spectators and asked , that she recorded the name of a friend from school , whom she had not seen for a long time ). Coming back

audience , think about the password , which I'm beginning to catch , what I feel and it was fast and powerful discovery . I then returned to the name , looked billet and began to show the name , which point acid women , which reversed , hit by her way through , a small group that , I was interested . She actually interrupted the performance and said , “ What's going on , what , does he suggest ?” to which her friend , pacified her and , told her to look . I briefly explained , that her friend thought of the name and that I was going to try to show it , and her answer was very typical response from someone - or , which is skeptical , " How will we know , you have that right ?" I just said , that she wrote the name down and had , contain it , and she could see at the end , if I was correct or not . I thought at that moment , to establish that , in advance using a woman so , that she was busy and will not be interrupted during the performance time , but quickly changed my mind , because I thought , that was not going to entertain essential chapter , and I did not want to confuse things and break in the relationship , which I created with the participants , who are very directed to me , in order to successfully execute . The subroutine came to the conclusion , the group was damn absent , and I made my final statements and moved on . Later in the evening a woman , it seemed , followed me around the room , close to the servo , what I was doing , I do not know , why she did it , she did ( the hell with these types of people , who does ?) I decided to talk to her for a moment moving from the bar to the marquise . She told me , she was skeptical, and that she did not think , that it was possible to do half of the things , that she had seen , what I've done . To which I replied , that its previous statement was an oxymoron , and it should be possible , as it was the witness of this . I asked her , why she thought , it was not

 

possible , and her response was , that she understands , that I can influence people , but she does not understand , how could I suggest a name , of which one - the only thought and that maybe somehow I learned about people through Facebook, knowing , that I came today . Her reply was perfect , I made a deal with her , that , if I could suggest a name , she thought , she did not know , that was going to think about it , she admits , that sometimes there are things , we just do not understand , and we must accept this . I produced pen and billets and when I pulled them out , she said , " If I write it down , you could see me , though " - I knew at that point , if she wrote it down , then she would not hand me billet , and it would burn my hands , so , I simply replied , " it is for me , to write down my thoughts , you are just going to think about the name so , that it existed only in your head ." I then went on to use ' Guess who ' from within this volume . She went for the ' Frank '.

I , of course , tied fact , she thought about Frank , and she completely lost her s ** t. The following statement , which she did , was a complete 180 from that , what assumptions it has made previously , " You , should be , born this opportunity ." Then she apologized for the character previously and left , telling anyone , anyone who will listen , that I just showed her . Use different propagation methods, and do not assume , that the support is less than or mentalism mentalism are interactive and any future , who tells you , that this is , is completely wrong . I feel so severely about this , a GOOD prop subroutine should be less consistent with the rest of your subroutines naturally and not seem forced into your group . It should be used , to balance the other methods , and that is why we use a variety of methods instead of one . I hav havee in the past , these methods aand nd principl principles es , which we use as tools in the toolbar . It does not hurt to have an array of principles and techniques so , that in any given situation, you have been prepared . Here is an example , how to use the traditional way of support to the Segway in support - less performance easily . This routine takes some confidence , to perform , as the first phase needs you , to purposefully stop working . It is located on the border of , what I would consider mentalism support less technically , the name indicates , completely support smaller , but the preparation for it is not . Take the deck of the game of cards and on several of the cards the signatures are placed , but make them italic thus , they are none , I read capable . Take a map with a large space on the ( as two of the clubs ) and record Steve quickly , but in a way , it is quite readable . Perform routine , in which the participant signs a playing card , casually mentioning , that every time the effect performed , map , obviously , would be different . But as the structure the script - " Obviously , if you would choose a diff d ifferent erent card , you have signed a diff d ifferent erent map . The reason for for you , to sign it is so , so you can immediately identify the fact , that it is - your card ." This can be any effect , in which there is a mental flash , or it could be that - something lik likee ' getting to know you you ' reading based effect . Let that routine to come to a conclusion , and then without missing a beat is controlled by two of the clubs to the top and force it to the participant , speaking

 

" For me to be able to assume , that this card remembers every detail of the map . The seeds , the number of which - either on the map , which makes it stand out , if it was a queen , it could be grown on the pattern or color ." This , of course , guarantees , that the participant fully explores a playing card, and takes note of the name . The card is returned to the deck , and the goal is , to assume a playing card . Do not rush to asking , to the participant thinking about color , suit replay process, and then calls the wrong color map so , that you stopped working completely . Look astonished , saying , that " This is not a basis ?" Again getting another sonorous no . Offer to return to the map later . Casually say , that " Some people see the pictures better than others , of some people and some of the images . It is all about finding the best in the design , how and when you have a connection , that - or maybe ". Turn to another an other viewer and ex execute ecute another an other routine ( one that th at is fas fastt and straightf straightforward orward to punch ). Return party , which thinks of a playing card . " Because I'm not sure , if you think of the memory card or the number of the map , let's ignore the card for a second . I need to know , how do you think , think of random images for me ... There is still nothing , do not think of a name for me . " Wait for a few seconds and then declare , that " It's better ! Be honest , is it - the name , that you knew , or did you change your mind ? Because it's important , that any name , which you've been thinking , constantly constantly registers registers " Let the member tell you . If the participant was of the same name then , it will be Stephen . If they changed their minds , simply advise them to go back to the very first name , they when - ever knew , and concentrate on it . You are now able to show the name and completely fool the participant and the audience at the same time . I woul wouldd advise you to speak ( after , you have have shown the name ), " I feel , that you are much better in the design of words and names , than you - the number and picture . Let's ignore the map , I do not think , that I was going to be able to assume this , if I'm honest . " It is simpl simplyy , but effectively effectively demonstrates , as it is sometimes good goo d to stop working . Completel Com pletelyy rejecting rejecting the card you give a name for himself as a free information information , and I think , that we have have to agree , that the name is much more impressive than the card .

If you do decide to , they wanted to show a playing card , which I will not personall personallyy recommend it , I would would advise having a double card in the deck ( without a signature ). Ask , to party , to think about the map - simulate read the claim and the fact , it is - the number , runs through the deck and pulls up , keep it to yourself , muttering , that " I think , I know , why are you thinking about right now ." Participants suggested , you're looking at two of the clubs with the name Steve , the audience only guess , what you are doing untrained comment . Ask the participants , who thought about the map , to close their eyes and show everyone a copy of the unsigned . Then ask , that the party has opened their eyes and explained the group is on the number three , to say aloud a playing card . You count to three , everyone says the same card and standard finishes at a tremendous pace . The beauty of this graduation is , the participant assumes , that you have shown over the map , saying, ' Steve ' about him , and so it cleans itself - why would , party when - or ought to mention it now , if you have all seen it .

 

There is no such thing as a stupid question This is - a simple , but effective change in the very popular " question and answer " type effect . One thing , I always liked about Q and type routines , it is to force the introduction of , to enter in response to questions . I'm going to skip the description , that the question and answers , that routine is like , since header pretty much sums it up . I have have over the years years gathered gathered as a massive amount of Q + routines, each of them having a quality , which I really liked , but everyone is not fitting my personal style , thus created my own . Before jumping into the structure of the Q and I think , that it is important to talk about the biggest method - plausibility . If the audience does not believe , that can be considered their inner most thoughts , they , of course , are not going to entertain you with answering questions about their private private life life . In fact, it is patronizi patronizing ng and could be seen as off offensive ensive , if you are not likely to occur . What makes the performer believable - well, in all honesty, there is nobody , the answer , but one of the main factors is ' synchronization '. Never racing , to move to the Q and subroutine type , expected , until a connection has been established between you and your party .

A great time - after , how you ask , " is it - a gift , you were born with , or is it - learned talent ?" That type of audience is perfect for the question and answers the type subroutine . I would recommend to perform a small group , behind which sit the table 4-10 and if you can create an environment for the table , such as candles and so on . etc. ,. Candles and low light - that - that , that can play on a large scale in your favor and is a nod to the great men . There is a big responsibility , answering the specific questions of people , the last thing , you want to do , give the answer , that a. It affects whose - that life , and b. violates your moral obligations as a performer . NEVER talk about people , who passed , never try to speak with the dead and will never interfere with anyone - that to achieve their goals . Let me give you a quick example , if someone - it wants to know for example , if they get a higher education , and you say - " yes ", the participant could try to stop their work , because they feel , that it is in the bag . As a performer, you are responsible to come down from the middle of the road , saying that - something like , " I feel , that it is possible to achieve something - or , what you put your mind , you do not have to remove the eye ball yet . Stay consistent to the end , and you definitely graduate . " This - the same as saying yes , guaranteeing , that the participant knows , that they should try , if they are to successfully execute . If there is when - or question , do you feel , too deep , to answer , just honest , participants say , you could not answer the question , because you do not qualify , to answer such questions . If you think Q and as a reception on the other hand , it is - probably , not routine for you . Now that I have it all out of the way , let's start from the beginning . I often feel , that the process , which most artists opens the question and answers , introduces a subroutine , called and is like the effect of the mind . I did not want it , I want , that people want to ask questions and get excited , to feel , that they are going to respond . I wanted to do it all , at the same time getting free hits . To answer the first question , I'm just saying the participants to answer the question , they never asked me .

 

- This is , probably probably , does not n ot make sense , which so allow me to give it context context . Once , as a subroutine concluded , refer to the party and say ,

Artist : " One last thing , you always said to ourselves that , if you ever - ever met someone - something , which could enter in sync with your thoughts and feelings , you will ask them a specific question - if I had to give advice to you is now , knowing , what I know about you now , that would be okay ? " Member , obviously , so to say . Note the way , which I have argued , that was the question , that they ask ( even if it is not ), offering advice , the participant should not be able to resist the hearing , it must be said . I would advise you to open this subroutine to a female participant , as I noticed , that they are more open respond to such operators . Once , as a participant said , that they would like to , who follow this line . Artist : " Hopefully , it would respond to any question , you , perhaps , have to ask me at the same time ." - As you can see , that this line is simple simple and requires requires , that you will answering the question as well . Contractor : " I feel with you at the moment , you have a conflict between your head and your foundation . It - it - it , that each of us from time to time go through , I know , that you are at a crossroads , where you must decide - always trust your base . It is necessary to address the situation head on and talk to the man said , if you want to see the resolution . I hope , that it makes sense to you . " - Let's look at , what it could mean , well, not every situation , you could could when - or imagine a situation , where your head tells you to do one thing , your base other . With a party , wanting to believe in something , you say , that they find relevant to this line and the situation , you are talking about . You say party is not run from their problems more and agreement with them head on , you have not defined again , what the problem is . Who say Again you never determined . This could be related to love , work related , connected each , connected family , contain associated assistant and again because the participant finds relevance in a situation , they will also need to know , who the other person is in a situation . This first person is just used , to open the routine and help people understand the nature of this type of subroutine . It works so unanimously and it was what - then , I have used on their own for a long time , as soon as I answered the question the man , everyone else , it seemed , was a question to ask me . What is the best way to open Q and a routine ? Introduction -

Artist : " Each of us sat at the table , has a range of things , going on in our lives right now , that we can not oursel ourselves ves alwa always ys know the answer . These questions tend to get into the t he career categories , money , love , romance or health . I would like , that you all thought about the question , you would like to reply to and then to think about how , in what category your question falls . I'm never going going to show Your Your question someone - or more , if you do not want me to answer , I give you , you completely understand , but again, everything else does not matter knowledge , it is , probably , will not make sense . I cannot contact the dead or give advice on diseases . - This is a really really smart way way to open Q and the th e routine , as it calls participant in one of the fields ( love , career , money ). Note , as I mention love and romance , which are technically the same thing , and I also mention health , but later delete that category

 

certifies people , do not ask questions about the disease . This means , that there are only really 3 categories , which you can ask questions from within . Moreover , it forces member in the field , you logically have apologized for that , to give ambiguous answers , that no one will understand ! Obviously , the goal is , to be certain , answering questions as possible , but it buys us drift , to be specific , which requires you to use your own intuition , and that - that - that , I can not go into details , as this relies on you . Additional phase ( Question is free ) This phase is the phase , you will love , or you hate , I use it , I feel it is time , because it allows people to know , that they should not feel feel stupid , if they have a question to ask , and at the same time it makes them feel , that they may be open to the group . Group address , Artist : " first , before we start , is there anyone , who does not object to the group , knowing their question as , to all of the table was an example , what types of questions can be asked and how to answer those questions ." - No matter , that question is asked , you you must play the role role of a seer to answer . Imagine , that you - the whole psychic knowledge , play the role of omniscient psychic . One thing , which I found really , makes these types of routines , should be pretty philosophical , not to such an extent , that you bear with her . I have found , that the reading of " meme " on the Internet really helps in a large scale , responding to questions . They make it seem , that you have a well-rounded view of the world and at the same time if a meme, or a history of interest , it makes your involvement . This gives you the excuse to share one story ( as long as that story cramps with the question , this

ask ). I urge , you check out the inspirational stories / memes , based around love , money, or career . I personally have never seen , no one recommends to investigate this type of information . One thing unanimously understand is , to change the meme so , to base the message is still there all the same , it is not recognizable in its original form . As a testament to that , how severely they work perfect type of response , how many times you have seen , that people share similar memes on social media ? For this first question, I would keep the answer short and simple , here are a few answers to the questions ( as examples ). Member : " I'm going to change the place of residence , the following will be contained , I move to be better than the one , in which I am now ?" Artist : " You know the answer in all honesty . I feel , that you have always been the kind of person , who was strong in the creation of the house , the house . You can zoom in or out , and you do it just right . I think , the real question is , really are you ready for an all new adventure , which will bring the movement ? This is - the question , only you know the answer to . " - Note , I played played a better half half of the participants . I put participant in a double bind , in which they can not deny the fact , what you are saying . What woman does not want to admit , that they make a house a home ? Note also , as I also picked up a way , that politicians respond to questions and apply it here . I ended up asking a participant to issue , it reflects the attention away from the answer , which you have given the participants' questions . I also gave the party that - then , to think about in a positive light , which is more than a question of a house . It - it , where things start to get really devious , we are going to use the method , known as the " poll the audience ', to get information . Artist : " I'm going to run this regularly , satisfied with this people for a table , thinking about love or romance , if I come back to you later ?" As you say , it is , to the backend script begins to nod . This will make people , thinking about love nod back at you - ultimately leading to knowledge , who thinks about lo love ve for for the table . Sync two of these people and remember them for later .

 

Are you ready to start , point to the participant , at which sit the table and use the sign of the zodiac prediction , are outlined in the ' chapter ' mentalism Zodiac . This will give you instant communication with the participant , address them Artist : " I feel with you , that you were torn , between which a question to ask , these questions are closely related, even though , they still seem to be on . The answer to your question is the time . Be really careful , where you want to invest your time , as this is one of the only things in life , you will never come back "

It - it , which I would recommend using your own intuition , to continue to answer the question . I understand , that not everyone knows , how to do it , so , you can finish the answer to the question , if you really need as a so Artist : " A new feature , which recently opened up to you , I feel , is positive , as long as you are constantly - promotion . If this feature is destroying things , you have at the moment is the continuation of in your lif lifee , think twice before before , than tha n you take it ." - Again this is a very ' Barnum Operator Op erator ' -esque. You You could quite easily easily get away away ( which is a term , which I hate ) with operators by giving to Barnum around the table . I did it , experimenting , and I realized fairly quickly , that it works, and if people will actually believe you then , it will be above and beyond that , just to get away from the water . But I prefer to have a routine , grow and become more and more , as we go along . The following two phases are simple , yet a thing of beauty and inspired by the psychomotery subroutine of Jerome Finley . The ' Invisible Spectator ' trick long preceded my own work and Jerome's work and is a little show up or used as a tool . Group address , Artist : " There is someone - that of the table , who recently said that - that someone - then , they were sorry to say - As I promised at the launch , I will never break the tie privacy , but I would like to share a story , which reminds us , that all the words of the effect may have on the people around us . At the parent she had a son , who had a very bad mood . He would often do or say say some extremely extremely harmful things , after which he seemed truly repentant . No matter , what made the parent of , she could not bring a child element to think first , what he responded . One day , my dishes , she had a great idea . She called her son into a room with her and handed him a plate . “ Throw that plate to the ground, ” she informed the young man . After some support young people did , as he was told . As expected, the plate burst into several parts .

" Now let's glue this plate back " Parental said member , thus , they worked for a long enough time and had a plate , looking close enough to its orig original inal state , although several several cracks and microci microcircuits rcuits were were still visible . " Now tell me , you're sorry to the plat platee ," said the parent element . Child element looked confused , but he saw , that he was the parent element was serious . Thus , he said his apology .

" Is the plate now good as new ?" the parent asked . Child element shook his head no , because , although she returned together , it will never look the same . Parent element went on explain thatcorrected is what we ,are to the basics of our favorite , when wewill are angry . Although thetopain can, be anddoing an apology can be given , the attitude

never nev er be able to be put back together the same again . My friend , share a story, and each time , when I think , I could say that - something , which I regret , that I remember the story . "

 

- It's - the first way way , we we are going to use the ' invisible invisible participant ' trick trick - who - is behind the table , based on probability , likely , say that - then , they do not mean anything to anyone - that , as we always do it . This expressive element of the story adds dynamism to performance while appealing to the audience of the watch . We're going to use this principle on - to another in a few moments . Before that, we have an additional phase , that DO use a billet ( I actually use this phase ), and in the spirit , to be open, even though , it is - the head of mentalism support smaller , I hope , that you excuse me this one , honestly it's worth it and that then , I have never seen , that no one is doing in Q and above - it is completely binds all and is fully compliant in accordance with the mixing of more old and new , to create miracles .

Do you have have two options - one can use the real time of a billet billet , or the two can be used billet in the work before the show , I will outline both of the methods . In - First , we will deal work billet real time . Artist : " It is clear there are people behind the table , which are still on the fence as to whether , if I do say questions , which are asked . There is only really one way , I can prove , what really matters to raise . I woul wouldd like , that you you have thought about the question, q uestion, Sir , where the question is more interest interesting ing , than the answer and the answer is ambiguous . Let me give you an example , a question might be - when I lasted , cuts cut s my grass g rass ? The answer would be Friday Friday . Take Take a few few seconds and wri write te down the question and answer here , we we can use this as evidence later " - There will be a small amount of time loss loss here while while the participant records on a billeting order . Fill the time , let the rest of the group , together, use a small part of what , who you are with them , are sharing a bit about your background . Too often do we find out that things are about our members and they will never know things about us .

For the group , to be receptive and open they should feel , that you are open . It will also destroy the loss of time . Use any method to switch the order so wait , that you had Billet party and considered him . I am not going to outline the method here , as I want to stay as close to this volume subject as possible . Artist : " There is only one way , which I can prove , that really raised on the issues . I want , that you sir gave me an ambiguous answer to the question , which you think . I propose to tell you a question !" - When you fix a question , itit strengthens strengthens the mind in the participant’s mind. You , should be , raised in previous issues . This is - the best way, without exception , to ensure , that the audience feels , you really pick up on the issues , I feel , that this phase is important , to tie it all , but I understand , that we all have different ways to present things . Variety before the show It is simply , yet makes all the action seem consistent ( looks , that support less begins to run ). To set up the exhibition just approaching someone - then ( before then , to sit at the table ) and explain , what you want , to write down a question with an ambiguous answer ( the same scenario , outlined above , using the real-time work order wait a minute ). A quick look at the billet order and then addresses the participant , Artist : " Do you think , that can remember the question , which you recorded later ?" They will say yes - I never did , so that no one said no . Artist : " Well, well, we don’t need it then ."

 

Break the billet into pieces so , that there was nothing for the party , to produce for the table later . Address of the participant , Artist : " Later on, I'm going to ask you to answer the question , I want , you give me an answer to the question , which you have written down . I will try to suggest a question . So later I will ask the answer , make sure , that does not tell me a question ." - It is - all , there there is to it . Do not be tempted to get get to this phase in the routine , to say , " I asked , that you recorded that - the first , we were were for the table ", it is also possible to make real time of a billet , if you're going to feel guilty about the use of the work before the exhibition .

It - it , where we are moving in the use of " invisible audience " trick in ( which , in my opinion ) a very smart way . Remember folks , who nodded straight at the beginning of the subroutine of love / romance ? We are going to select those two members . Artist : " I want , that all felt for the table , they have a chance to ask their questions . All focused on your questions , and I'll pick up on that , who concentrates the hardest ." Make it seem , that you concentrate and then choose two people , who were nodding , when you were interviewed at the launch . Artist : " I'm going to answer both of your questions right away , I'm going to try to be really specific , but obviously to protect your privacy , which I'm never going to show , what question belongs to that person . Half the battle , output category , please , do not react in anyway . I feel , that one of you thinks about the business bu siness , and the other thinks about love or romance romance . Give me a yes , if I'm on the right track . " “ Both think of love like like that, of course , they are both going to say yes yes .” The audience a udience is now believed , that each party thinks about the issues , relating to the various categories . Artist : " Again, do not forget to keep a straight face and not give that - either . Let me deal with a person , think of love / romance first . I feel , that it is - a very delicate situation , if I was to give you an answer , I honestly I feel , that would play with your good will in this situation , and I could not live with that on my conscience . I will say however , that I feel , that you already know the answer . Since I feel bad about the short answer , I gave the question of love , which allows me to give a more detailed and specific answer to a person who thinks about business . " - You can just say say , you do not want want none of the participants think about the business , meaning , it can be so in the form of specific as possible . Here is an example , you might say . Artist : " I feel , that the person to think about the business there is a very stubborn personality type . Thus , I would say , probably , Taurus or Aries , I am going to bet on the Taurus . Whatever anyone thinks about business , suggest to tell me the date , You were born ... Well, I'm not clear , I would say the 26 th or the 28 th April . Promotion , for which you had hoped to work , I think , that you're going to be nice

surprised , but you just have to continue to do that , what you do only one last Great Depression . "

 

The Contractor addresses one of the participants , Artist : " If you understand , that the answer to your question gives me yes ." Member : yes . The Contractor addresses the second participant , Artist : " If you understand , that the answer to your question gives me yes ." Member : Yes Yes . - The table is 100% , that you picked you up on the zodiac sign and date ofsimultaneously birth , based on your zodiac sign believe s uggesting suggesting previous participant . Small convincers, convincer s, working throughout this routine completely , helping to build the whole thing believable . The performer then looks at the whole group and addresses them , Artist : " I have answered so many questions , as I can yet , I want to leave the band with the idea , more than one person at this table felt recently down a bit , and I want to remind you all alone , how important do you , asking you a question , that requires no response . I'm not going to second-guess the answers to this question , as I feel , that the answer should be absolutely private . Question , what would you have given , to spend five minutes with someone - then , who is not here is now ? To hug them and tell them , you love them only once more . For me it would be my Grandfather , I never got a chance to say goodbye . He became ill with cancer and was taken to the theater and of the - of my differences with the other an element from the family family I never got a chance ch ance to say goodbye go odbye . I recei received ved a text message twelve twelve minutes after that , he entered the theater saying , ' ripped up , he was dead . " I woul wouldd give it - or , to spend five minutes with with him , to get my chance to tell him , how much of the inspiration he was , and get , to say my goodbye . There's a reason , I asked this question , when you are feeling down , just remember , there is someone - something there , which would have given it - any and all within five minutes of your time . Every time , when you feel , down remember , that , you - time , it is important , and you - the inspiration inspirat ion . " - It's - the last statement statement , made in the Q and A, the history of my my

grandfather at the end of a 100% - the second truth . Please , if you want to share this change of feeling the last bit about my grandfather's true self-feeling . I think , that this is - the best way to end this type of routines where all the worksheet , feels better than it was then , when they arrived . Try to use your own intuition , by performing this routine, and get a feel for the issues , what you feel , that the participant might think . If you answer , what question do you feel , that the party is thinking condemned ( should really believe it ), the participant will be also . Recorded this sub seem long and drawn out , in the performance , which it really is not . I've had people , literally standing in line for me , to answer questions after , as the show ended in the past .

RRV - Pablo Amira History I love love crea creative tive challenges , and the ability a bility to know , that simple idea propless way way has been bee n and is one of them for a long time . I believe , that it is - one of my best creations in propless area . With a simple , bold method you will be able to know the first letter of the word and thought out to start your psychic

 

journey , ending , ( we hope ), with the opening of your thoughts participant . I love this type of uncertainty , makes me alive duri du ring ng a performance performance that is different different from reading a stand order, for example , in which I clearly see a thought , and the opening process is a pure action . In here you will know , but not very , therefore , the realistic aspect and the ability to use your psychological and intuitive capacities will be huge .

External Reality During a chance meeting, they ask a strange sentence . A mysterious man asks , his companion imagined any fruit in his hand . Then through the process of visualization and some time of empathic connection , the thought of fruits is shown !

Inner Reality RRV stands for " Real Number Take Off Vision " because, in a sense , you are . Transmission is a beautiful theme , to learn in life , especially as a performer . We can improve our lives , understanding the best wa wayy to subtle aspects aspe cts of effective effective communication , and performance, performance, we can create a difference difference between someone - then , who can not connect with it

participant / audience and success in creating entertainment and human connections , using Mentalism . You know , we both Mentalist has a tendency to make the all-too-rational and put too much attention to it , what we say , write a script , language samples rather than thin , but the fundamental aspects of the action / theater , applied in our context , is not verbal communication and an excellent method , which we can use , to arrive at the results of our demands . RRV is not based on words in order to receive inf information ormation , it is more likely likely to observe o bserve in a secret way way the imaginative proc process ess from your member membe r . Mentalism at its roots the establishment of reality with our minds , and it is - then , what we are doing . Through your appropr ap propriate iate scenario scenario , but b ut most importantly , your effective effective communication and observation, you will really know your member thought . The basic way you ask , to visualize a number of participant " Alphabet cards flash - memory " from AZ, and you just ask to deal with them one by one , until it is able to visualize the first letter of his thoughts about the word . From there, you will know some very important information , which will lead you through other methods , to arrive at the final revelation . This observation of actions will be secret , of course . Only the “ gypsy peek ” can be used for the propless approach .

 

As you can see , I press the tip of the fingers to the right eye , showing a little of the obvious pressure used , but in reality I looked with my left eye . If you need direct vision , you can use the gap between your ring and your little finger .

You can also use a blindfold , though it always takes propless aspect , not that , that is an important and sometimes he gives the performance a visual dramatic element . So , as you can tell , with RRV can show any type of information , such as fruits , vegetables , beverages , names , signs of the zodiac , musical bands , and so on . d . Just adjust depending on your performance perf ormance context , participating and personal preference preference . So , at first I act much , and I take that - something invisible from his pocket . Let us say , then , that we use the theme ' favorite fruit . " Thus , you ask , to a participant in the vacuum visualized their favorite fruit and thought that image , but also a word in his mind . Then out of my other pocket I take the " invisible alphabet cards flash - memory ," and I explain important aspects . They are in order from AZ, and the instruction must deal one card after another, "AB X ... " so on on the table , until it reaches the first letter of his thought about the word, and only look at the letter in bold , print, and nothing to say after this , until you connect to them ( in here , you can make an allusion to the fact , that you drive with the conscious / rational buts and then unconscious / irrational mind , begging , so that he visualized the fruits in your empty hand ) Thus , now the participant starts the dealing procedure in his hand , passing the cards to the bottom or in the table , as you want . At this point you will use the " gypsy quick look " to create implication , that you do not look . You can use the indirect line , such as : " Make it , while I focus here in an attempt to connect to your samples mind ." Do not claim directly , you will not see , because it will put too much attention to that fact . So your participating stars are in contact and you just settle with him ! As you secretly watching , you know , when he stops , so knowing the first letter of the word . Remember , that in your instructions you clearly said , that just do not look up to you an invisible map " to connect with him ." After a few seconds , which stops my party , I say : " I begin to understand your pattern of mind . Now lets , do that - something else ( Now , you can actually close both eyes , take your hand away from the Roma peek , to gesticulate in an instant , thus indirectly indicating , that both eyes were closed before ) , Choose what - or another letter from the thought of fruits , good ? Now you just cut a piece of card ( make the action handed ), and see . The new letter for μομεντ ... "

Thus , now your participant sees a new random letter , which , obviously , you do not know , but create a small cognitive shift and add an attitude to the process . It also shares a logical idea to know the letters , because it is incompressible , to know only information , but then , to ask , to another cut invisible set of cards . So you know , that you effectively know the first letter of his words , in this case, his favorite fruit . From this simple information, you can work just a word, or at least 2-3 options , you can use it , what I call " verbal Fishingor" refutes to knowyour , it takes on your part to, and be observant to nonverbal your party first ,non THAN he agrees statement verbally so the original operatortransfer can obviously rephrase you to correct it . Now, remove the focus on " card flash - memory " and go to render fruits in your other hand . As it is very important , to make the process interesting , to really identify the different images , sensations , variety , color , and so on . d . Avoid direct and quick discoveries , make it probable

 

So let's say , that the first letter is "P", thus , option : Papaya , Passion Fruit , Pear , Pineapple and Plum . My strategy at this stage is that , just to suggest the use of my first feelings : " What fruit, I think , that he chooses ?" As can be appreciated , each letter to each of the selected categories will be different , so , you'll need to be flexible and to be focused to arrival at the climax / TADA moment . Although it is part can be used in a formal performance , I prefer to use it in informal situations , in which I have no power , to create a more theatrical context TADA. I really do not care , if I do not hit directly with a certain thought , far from it , if my assumption is not 100% correct , this is one design in myself the identity of the operating secrets and fraud in the pejorative sense of the word . You can do " Not Verbal Fishing " with the size , shape , color, and in this case a kind of object . Play with your creativity , options , that you can come and do RRV your own . With practice and a proper understanding of your own paths, you will discover many subtle methods . You can even create an impromptu " Progressive anagram ", if you know , that the potential of thought 2 or 3, and you can narrow down the floor , using a certain letter , to distinguish . Thus , here we have a basic approach to the RRV, a simple way to know the idea , which will allow you to create moments of telepathy anytime anywhere with the figurative collection of inf information ormation , the probable moments and fun challenges .

To take the place in the support , but I have found , that this approach to mentalism , in which you are completely focusing in a direct hit , creates a huge probability among the real audience . Magicians can be memorable his great manual dexterity and intelligence , but we are able as a Mentalist create a memorable subjective and fantastic experience for the other , only using subtle methods , the likelihood of accidental action and psychological direction , and RRV is a prime example of this

Additional Ideas 1. If your party has not deal dea lt any cards , clear the fir first st letter isis "A", so again in the initial routine , expect a moment and then ask , that he visualized any of the letters from the word through the contracting process . 2. This method RRV may also be used for for the " invisible numbered cards flash - memory ". You You can play with options for ACAAN for example .

Loans and Inspira Inspiration tion The use of observation , using participating action and invisible objects is inspired by Kenton , Knepper- truly Invisible , who took without permission the very famous British mentalist in his Card Magic DVD . The idea is original in Kenton , and we need to know , that it supports the creators . At Fraser Parker is also a work of great methods , to know the secret letters in words .

SHERLOCKED - Th Thaddius addius Stripping tripping Pliers Introduction Many of us believe , that the schedule ACAAN holy grail of mental magic , and magicians , that may be so . There are countless changes , which each artist brings his or her own touch . The problem is , that to the average lay person - it can be quite mild and predictable , to watch . Sure , this is an impressive feat , but to them it is only other card tricks . This is not to say , that I do not like the inclusion of playing cards in mentalism - they , of course course , has its place - but as society changes , so do the interests of our spectating audience . The impact effect , which is centered around playing cards , depends on the conditions

 

, you want to include . The premise - something , which makes it - is significant , and relevant ( the same could honestly be said about most of all , that we do ).

So , what is the way , which we can quickly weaken the barrier between the interests of our audience and our art ? We hit them , where they live , which for most of us , is on our cell phones . There are countless effects and the room , which is waiting , to be explored , which revolve around cell phones . One of the most impressive , and most affected , discovery of the PIN code . 4 small numbers , which contain as much impact on the lives of our customers ; 10 000 possible combinations , to choose from . So many creators in front of me contributed their thoughts to this idea ; now it's - it's my turn to add that - something to the mix .

Effect The performer takes his place in front of his audience . Once settled , he asks his audience , " With a hands- on demonstration , how many of you here have a cell phone for you tonight ?" Almost every audience arm goes up the air . " As I thought . And , demonstration of hands , how many of you have a secret PIN , which you use , to lock or unlock the phone , or perhaps manage banking credit card or checking account ?" Even more hands restore performance . " For this experiment I'm going to choose only one of you , a hand that rises . You , Miss ," he says with a finger , which indicates , " You , have objected to accompany me on the stage ?" A woman makes her way to the stage and is next to the performer . " Thank performer Than k you for raising raising , for the benefit b enefit of clar c larity, ity, we talked tal ked about before before the show s how or preplanned that - anything ?" “ No, ” she answers . " Good . Now , I suppose , that you have a PIN code in mind - most likely belong to your cell phone or your bank card . However , from the - for confidential PIN code , I'm not revealing it in front of all out of respect for you . instead, I'm going to ask , that you create a new PIN code - the one , which is simple and easy for you , to remember . for this, I would like to , you to think about the day of the year . It may be that , which contains a kind of value you , as a birthday Whether anniversary , or it could be something , which is completely random . I only ask , that you try to refrain from using any dates , that have a recurring number , which will make it more challenging for me and more interesting for all of you . Once you have done it is , I want , that you have made this date in the PIN code - 4 digit PIN code with 2 digits for month and 2 digits for the day of that month . this makes sense "? “ Yes , ” she says .

" Wonderful . And you can feel free to change his mind so many times , as you want to , but once you have settled on the PIN code of your choice , let me know ." " Well , I have one ." " Great . Fair enough , to say , it is impossible for me to know what kind of - any of these 4 digits of the PIN ?" " There is no way ," she claims , shaking her head . " I would like for you to assume , that the PIN codes , as if he had written on the air between us on an imaginary glass window with a big black marker Sharpie . Concentrate on each διγιτ ... In fact , I want , that you think about the figure , which has the lowest - the lowest number among them , you can do it ?

 

Think , where the figure is in sequence with the other ". The performer observes the participant's eyes , almost tracing their path to this imaginary arrangement . " Is it in second position ?" " Yes !" she confirms . " In fact , let's start with the highest number , whereas , it is always the most challenging . Can you concentrate on its location for me instead ?" Again , he peers into her eyes , as if to trace their movement . " This is in the last position , right ?" " That's right ," she says . " Good . I get the sense , that it is - the higher the number - more than five ?" She nods . " It's not an even number , is it ?" " This ." " Great . Just say it in your μινδ ... is it 6? No, don't expect it - it 's 8, right ?" " Yes !" she exclaims . " Let's see , if we can speed up the process a little bit . Just concentrate on the rest of the PIN once again . Yes , I think , that I have it ." Artist fights for a notepad and sharpie marker , and begin to sketch out his convictions on the page in front of him . He then goes on , to give a woman notebook , saying , " Please , keep it against his chest and refrain from looking at it just yet ." Artist summarizes marker before , what to replace it in its envelope , and sighs , before asking , " For the first time , what is the PIN code , which did you think ?" "1028, " she says .

" I'll let you be the first , to look at it , that I recorded , your face has to say to us all , we need to know ." Member slowly turns a notebook in her hands , while she can not see the forecast , recorded through it . Her eyes light up in surprise . " Turn this way , so that everyone else can see ." She spins the notebook around , representing the numbers "1 - 0 - 2 - 8" in a large bold notation , as she had imagined .

Method Let me say , that the above effect is not a pipe dream . Method , you are going to learn , it can be used independently or in conjunction with almost any other routine opening of the PIN code . It was a method , which I have used for for their own private private performance performance , which has undergone un dergone several changes over the last few years , of which only a chosen few people privy to . I believe , that this is one of the most effective means of finding freely thought of PIN code - which I now share use with the magic community for the first time . In my experience, experience, numbers are much easier to predict predict when done don e in bulk ; PIN code is no exception exception . This routine uses ' res restricti triction on , without seeming restrictive restrictive ' principle principle . We begin by discussing the th e many different uses of PIN codes and their inherent confidential nature . We then affirm , that of respect for the privacy of our participants were asked , that they have created a new PIN code in place . You will note , that this does not require any complex math or forces , and the number , they create - even though , it is different - still significant and potentially applies to the participant , if they settle on a date , which is special for them . Using a date , as the PIN code is not a far-fetched concept ; how often do we use u se our birthday , favor favorite ite holiday , or o r anniversary as a pin ?

 

Instructions for the participants , in order to generate the required PIN is quick and easy , which is important . What - or , that requires too many steps , I believe , poses a threat to the integrity of the freedom of choice and emotional relevance to the subroutine . It is important to clarify , that they could change their minds and choose any date , while there is no repetition of numbers . This is of utmost importance to the rest of the subprogramme . Although seemingly a fair and innocent request , which is aligned with the width of the above scenarios , we strongly , reduces the number of dates , to choose from for each month of the year . Definitely , we will go from 365 different possible only up to 129 options ( which sounds like a lot , but the knowledge , that

the location of the th e lowest lowest rated figure helps to reduce this even more). We also guarantee gu arantee a few few things for the rest of the routine: The digit with the lowest value in this randomly generated PIN code will always be '0' (no matter what). Placing this lowest number will tell us a substantial amount about the rest of the IDU. The ideal placement of this figure anywhere, but the first position is the acceptance that we use the MM / DD format (that is, 03/28); for DD / MM format (ie, 28/03), the ideal placement lowest figures have been anywhere, but 3 - rd position.

( MM / DD format ) If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 1 - om POSITON, there are many possible outcomes to follow, but we still have limited success of our party options, whereas, can be number 0 where - or back in the sequence. The choice will be: January 23 - January 1, 29 . 13- 02/02/19 in February. February. 03/12, 14-03.03.19, 03/21, 24 3/3/29 in March. 12-04.04.13, 15-04.04.19, 04/21, 04/23, 25 4/4/29 in April. 12-05.05.14, 16-05.05.19, 05/21, 23-05.05.24, 262 6- 05.05.29, 05/31 May. 12-06.06.15, 17-06.06.19, 06/21, 23-06.06.25, 27- 06.06.29 June. 12-07.07.16, 18-07.07.19, 07/21, 23-07.07.26, 282 8- 07.07.29, 07/31 July. 08/08/08, 08/19, 08/21, 08/23/08. August 27, 08/29, 08/31. 12-09.09.18, 09/21, 23- 09/09/28 in Septembe September. r. If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 2 - oh a position, we know that other numbers will always be "102 _". The last digit will change, but we know that it cannot be 0, 1, or 2. If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 3 - rd position, we know that other numbers will always be "120 _". Again, the last digit will change, but nonetheless, we know that it cannot be 0, 1, or 2. If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 4 - oh positions, the only possible sequence of numbers would be "1230".

( DD / MM format )

 

If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 1 - oh positions, we know that other numbers will always be "0_12". Again, the second digit will change, but nonetheless, we know that it cannot be 0, 1, or 2. If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 2 - oh positions, the only possible sequence of numbers would be "3012". If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 3 - rd POSITON, there are many possible outcomes to follow, but we still have limited success of our party options, whereas, can be number 0 where - or back in the sequence. The choice will be: 23 / 01- 29/01 of January 13 / 02- 19/02 February. February. 12/03, 14 / 03-19 / 03, 21/03, 24 / 03- 29/03 March. 04-13.12.04, 15 / 04-19 / 04, 21/04, 23/04, 25 / 04- 29/04 April. April. 05-14.12.05, 16 / 05-19 / 05, 21/05, 23 / 05-24 / 05, 26 / 05- 29/05, 31/05 May. 06-15.12.06, 17 / 06-19 / 06, 21/06, 23 / 06-25 / 06, 27 / 06- 29/06 June. 07-16.12.07, 18 / 07-19 / 07, 21/07, 23 / 07-26 / 07, 28 / 07- 29/07, 31/07 for Jul July. y. 08-17.12.08, 19/08, 21/08, 23 / 08- 27/08, 29 29/08, /08, 31/08 August. 09-18.12.09, 21/09, 23 / 09- 28/09 September. If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 4 - oh positions, we know that other numbers will always be "2_10". The second digit will change, but we know that it cannot be 0, 1, or 2. The month of November is not even an option, since the two numbers dictating the month are copies of each other. There will always be any 1 and / or 2 existing in this 4 - bit sequence. This gives us a free hit during our deductive process. We can just say, "I get 1 or 2." The viewer will help us in verifying that it is - if not and - and we then determine its location. Each number in the sequence will depend on, or play away, the other numbers there. If you study the chart above, you will notice that each month only has between 7 and 15 possible choices (save for "12/30" or "30/12"), in contrast to which it would usually be 28 - 31 days. Remember that - in

format MM / DD - if we infer , that this one is in the 4 th position , a month can only be May , July or August , and 3 rd figure would have to be 3. If it was DD / MM, then 1, located in the 2 nd position , I would have told us , that the 1 st figure would be 3, and months again can only be between May , July or August . So , in this case, only know the credentials of 2 digits , which are already data , actually tells us the credentials of the other 2. We will never have to display more than two numbers in the sequence , since the other two are " freebies " from - for the scripts ( ie , 0 and 1 and / or 2). Then , where these numbers are falling , once again , dictates other numbers , which might or might not be present . So , how do we identify the latter opposite number or two ? There are countless methods ; let's discuss .

Logics Silly , as it may sound , this is - a good method . After determining the location of the lowest estimated figures (0) - which will always be our first step - going , asking , that the party has focused on the large number , because it is the most difficult ( which is true ). We can now approve the following :

 

" This is a higher number , yes ?" assumption , it is - more than 5. If they express any - any kind of reluctance , just confront with , " This is - the greatest number , correct ?" ( In this sequence of numbers ), like to clarify clarify something , that you originally originally appro app roved ved . We can then proceed , to inquire with the known symmetrical question , " This is not an even number , is not it ?" Whether they say yes or no , we can say , " It - it , I thought ." If they answer " Yes ", we , obviously , know , it's - actually an even number ; if they respond " No ", we know , it is - an odd number . Now , depending on their answer to the first two questions , this number will be one of two options : If they respond to both questions with " Yes ", we know , that the number is either 6 or 8. If they answer the first with “ Yes ” and the second with “ No ”, the number will be 7 or 9. If they answered both questions with " No ", the number or will be 3 or 5. If they answered " No " to the first question and " yes " to the second question , we know , that the number is either 2 or 4.

At this point we can only sa sayy after a pause moment momen t , " I be believ lievee , that this is - 7 -" - " ( or whatever , what do you think , that it might be ), pauses for another moment , to gauge their reaction and searches any resistance from your member ; if present , quickly confront with , " No - 9!" If you are unhappy with this option , you can write 7 on a notepad as a contingency plan and then say , " Is this really 9?" If they say " yes ," then do not call attention to the notebook ; if they say " No ", then followed with , " This is - a good thing , I went with the gut ", as you show your recordings . Alternatively , you can use cleansing agents principle , what , you ask , that the party imagined this number , as if it were written on the air between you , and you start pulling one of these two numbers , which you believe , it is . If they respond positively , you , probably , have drawn the right ; if not, then do an annoyed look , as you wipe an imaginary number, and then pull the other option before them . If you are unhappy with this option , then you can consider the call to another participant from the audience which is similar , that paid attention . Ask, ,tothat your first participant , who, that sent feels the number of, participants , and for they the second participant express in words the number good to them . If they guess this number correctly , you have a good addition to your routine ; if they do not assume it is correct , assured that the second person with kind words , saying , that it is not as easy , as it looks . Then continue , to show the correct answer .

Finger Knows and Speaks by Al Baker To my knowledge, the method for this principle principle was discussed by Peter in the section on the psychological forces of the playing card . But to summarize this , the participant is asked to ascribe a number from 1 to 10 to each of their fingers . In this case, we know , it will not be 1 or 10, and there are no options for the 0th finger . If you use this method in conjunction with the method of Logic, you can use this principle , to pay attention to only two of their fingers , but to create the illusion , that you are working on a broader spectrum . Just ask , to party to focus on his finger , which coincides with this number , they are concentrating on , and expect , that used the finger , to ask the appropriate key that number on their phone or ATM. This should make their finger be a little tougher than others ; one way or another, this finger will stand out from the rest . With their outstretched fingers, use the dominant index finger , to gently move the tips of each finger , until you get to the order , which does not follow the same basic

 

line as the other - the one , which deviates from the norm . This will give you your answer . I use this principle sparingly , but it is - a single type of the routine , in which it makes sense next to everyone else ,. If you want , you can use this method for both numbers , which are left to guess after freebies - or even all of the code pin in this respect .

Springboard by Michael Murray If you are already familiar with Michael Murray's Springboard principle , you can use it next to this routine . The format of MM / DD leads to the code PIN , which will always start with either 0 or 1. When , to ask , to participants to identify the lowest estimated figure , if it is , it turns out , is in the 1 st position - and you perform for an audience , which uses the format of MM / DD - then you know , it's 0. from there, you can Springboard principle completely , or you can use a shortened version , to help you with more difficult number ( Lamy ). This method can be used in the DD / MM format , but it could be a little more challenging . Use as you wish .

Bob Principle by Peter Turner As an alternative , ending to your routine , you can turn on Bob Prinkipla Peter from his book Biggie 2. After , as you found out 4- bit sequence , you can write it on pad surface or a business card , and then continue , to say , " If I can only assume this PIN code , safe to say , that it would not take much more , to find out the PIN to your bank account , will not you speak ? At least you made an impression , if I could tell you your PIN bank ? " Expect confirmation of their response , and then bow down in , like whispering , " As previously approved , I'm not going to show your actual PIN , but I think that , you think , now _____." The participant will be to respond to the fact , that you have shown randomly generated PIN completely , while the audience is working under the assumption , that you have just shown the PIN code to their bank account . Then finish , saying , " Once again , we are not going to show all of your banking information here , but would you mind , to tell everyone here the PIN code , you just thought ?" They claim their free-generated PIN , and then you are mirrored around your notebook, or a business card , to show your recorded outlook , as though for the first time .

Soft per pe rsuasion The result , as used herein effect effect , ideal , while , there is much less guesswork involved ved . Statisticall Statisticallyy speaking , this is much more likely

for the participant choose a date between January and September ; it is - the only problem , to which we are facing . Therefore , it would be in our interests to try to gently encourage our member to choose a date that is not at the beginning of the year . The method , which I personally do it , creating an example , what I want , so they did . The following ollowing is a selection from the description of the effect effect with an additional added touch : "¼Instead, I'm going to ask , that you create a new PIN code - the one , which is simple and easy for you to remember . For this, I would like to , you to think about the day of the year - it can be so , that contains some sort of value to you , as a birthday or anniversary , or it could be something , which is completelyy random . I only ask , that you try to refrain completel refrain from using any dates d ates , that hav h avee a recurr recurring ing number , which will make it more challenging for me and more interesting for all of you . Now, , if you were to pick a date for Mr. chalu year , as the 28- th March - which is my birthday - you have turned it into a 4- digit code for PIN - 03/28 - 2 digits for month and 2 digits for the day of that month . This makes sense ? Of course , I want , that you think about what - what kind of your own choice , so , please , settle on what - is another . "

 

Giving a demonstration of the 28 th March , I sort , create an imaginary timeline before my audience with my hands , as if the present period of the year . I gesture to , where they would see the month of March , falling , and access to the specified date with the finger , which indicates . After doing this, I ask , so they settled on what - the other , making the arch movement , which is returned to the other end of the imaginary spectrum . In this example, we used the visual and speculative proposal , to dissuade them from movement with the date to the beginning of the year . We selected dates , which occur in January and February , there will always be 0, 1, and 2 existing . Everyone considers these numbers to be free , because 0 will be our lowest number , and we have our question , with which we rant and 1 and 2. So , we could also use the date by the middle of the year for our example with the intent to convince them to choose a date on the edge of either side of the year instead .

Seasonal Confirmati Confirmation on Principl Principlee If our party is still grounded on a date with a 0 in the least desired position , we can use the seasonal principle princi ple of Confirmation , to discover discover , that th at the approximate approximate location of a year , in conjunction with Peter , ' but then you ' principle , giving us a period of 3 - 4 months selects from . " I'm going to say , you went with a date , which was closer to the end of the year - as the Fall or Winter ," and then pause to check . If they respond

negative way , quickly confronted with , "¼but then you changed and settled on a date where - somewhere to the beginning of the year in the Spring or Summer . It was Spring?" Determination of the season , in which the selected date , will provide us with a window 3 - 4 months of options , to choose from . In America, Spring usually occurs between the months of March and May . Summer occurs between the months of May and July , sometimes August . The fall is usually between the months of August and November . Winter between the months of December and February . Schedule changes depending on whether during the four seasons , where you are from ; remember participating audience , for which you are doing and where they live .

Locating the Lowest and Lowest High Rated Figures F igures In the descri description ption of this effect, effect, I try t ry to deduce d educe the location location of the lowest lowest digit first first . To To do this t his , I'm just asking , to visualize participant PIN code in order and concentrate on this very low number . Then I just follow the movement of their eyes . This will usually lead to positive results results , telling you , where this is the t he lowest figure drops . If you guess wrong , it honestly doesn't matter ; it is - only the potential bonus routines , whereas , we have not even begun to predict that - either all the same . This is an assumption . Once we know its location , we can collect the identity of most of the other numbers there . The highest number will always be, or 2 nd or 4 th position . Once we deduce the location of the lowest estimated figures , we on - apparently changed their minds , asking , so they concentrated on the highest digit . We now know that , that we should continue with the routine , so there is no reason to show , that we know , it is the lowest 0. If the highest number , is 6, we know , that the other numbers in the sequence may be slightly higher than 5. The knowledge and the highest and lowest number tells us about a range of numbers , we have to work with .

Probable miss I woul wouldd like to clar clarify ify that , while there there is an abundant amount a mount of methods method s , to bring bring the remaining number ( la ) after the freebies , it's okay to be absent from time to time . If you managed to quickly and easily output 3 from a 4- bit PIN , just make an educated guess for the remaining digit . Even if you guess wrong , then it will seem impressive to your audience , that you were able to bring all the other

 

numbers with such precision . Miss can give rise to credibility with the right audience ; do not be afraid of them .

Closing Thoughts I can understand , if you have any - any rreluctance eluctance to implement this due to the fact , that you can not always the ease, what of opening . This is - leads one oftothose routines , thatyou , when hits , it's -for fire . When you guarantee get is not exactly you want , it still a process , which haveitdesigned it to . One result is just a little more of a difficult process , which - for mentalism - is good . The trip makes our audience appreciate the destination . If you can get a copy of Peter Turner Biggie 2, it covers some thought , I had unconsciously used the same way to show the PIN code next to their own original ideas . If ESP is a real number , I feel , that there is a mutually beneficial connection between the two of us because every time to look at a new idea runs through my mind , it is , it seems , had entertained it also . It is both a flattering concept as well as unbearable . Part of me hopes , that many of you to read this book pereskochat through this section , thus allowing me to keep this discovery knowing the PIN code to only a few selection . If you got to this point , I hope , that , should you choose to use this method , it serves you well - I know , she's got me . Thanks for your time , T

Color the Seer with Fraser Parker Then , it should be , it is the idea of my laptops for a true change in the classical psychological power of color . It is not force , as it - a way to always know what , that stain , the viewer focuses . The problem with the classic psychological power of color is , it can sometimes stop working . This has limited its use situations , where you could either take a hit or ignore it with an audience , not being aware , that the effect of even took place . Then , what it is special in my approach , is the way , which it is structured , to enable 100% - th correct result , which is always the premise effect . The effect and how it looks externally , woven into a method to such a degree , there seems to be no deception in action , whatever .

I have alway alwayss felt , that the use of color was what - then , it has been bee n relatively relatively unexplored unexplored in the literature literature of mentalism . In my opinion , the opportunity to feel , that stains the viewer , focus , mind that - then , a true psychic or a mind reader would be able to do , fairly easily . The use of color also lends itself perfectly presentation mentalistic, where each color can be considered as having a unique mental vibration corresponding to , it is - a visual duplicate of the real world , when it exists only in the imagination of the participant . Another interesting fact , to consider about the colors in terms of method - is , as they can be mixed together , to give you extra leverage , anticipating information . This is - a tool , which has yet to be fully explored . I experimented with this in my Zodiac Sign Prediction Observation Signs and continued to play with this concept in the work , which follows .

 

Moreover , it opens up avenues for you , to know something , he thinks the audience , it also creates a very logical view , and process , which corresponds to the aesthetic , while helping to create a context believable performance of mentalism . I firs firstt will outline scenarios , which I would normall normallyy be used in th thee performance of this effect effect is so , so that you can see , how this plays out and then break method , for simplicity and clarity of the study . Artist sitting in front of the participant before , than any telepathy start and offers , so they will first try to tune into thought processes of each other . " I would like to , so we tried to be in tune with each other's thought processes to us , to work on the same mental wavelength ." " So focus on one of the primary colors : red , yellow or blue and imagine written in front of you . You can calculate , how many letters are in that color ?" The viewer , as noted , struggles to settle a little on the number of letters . " In fact , we will focus on this color in its natural state . In each of the colors of the rainbow have them keep vibrating level , and it is - then , what I try to tune , mentally . So just focus on color and imagine it isis in in ffrront ont of of yyou ou as bright ght an and bbrright ght as as you you can and and Iw wil illl do do tthhe ssam ame. e. " The performer looks at the viewer and pauses for a moment , as if trying to be in tune with their thoughts . " Interestingly , I now focus on color red ... so imitate and mix it with any color that you focus on so then , that you create an entirely new color . "

" If you are , it turns out , focusing on the same color , then mix this color with any of the other primary colors , you wish ." The artist pauses a little . " Well , I feel , that both of our thoughts are now perfectly blended together , and we can start ." You are now ready to start your group after this simple process of tuning with thoughts about your viewer . That , that great without the help of this view , is the fact , you now know the exact color , which focuses the audience - even after , they mixed the colors , to create a brand new color . In this situation you you will know for for a specific , viewer focuses focuses on color ORANGE They will be only when - or focus on color ORANGE or PURPLE You can now call back to this color later in your group or use it for a “ pig’s back ” to other information or simply show it before moving on with your telepathy demonstration . Now you understand , how it looks externally , I will break each of the components , which make it work . First of all, we begin the premise of entering a tune with the thoughts of the viewer as an introduction to telepathy . This creates a context for , it should be , which guarantees , that will always appear , as if it were - then , as is the case . " I would like to , so we tried to be in tune with each other thought processes to us , to work on the same mental wavelength ."

 

We then made , so that the viewer focused on one of the primary colors . The reason for using the primary colors will be self-evident participant every time , when they have to blend the two colors together later . They - the most basic color palette , which can be mixed together , to create all the other colors of the spectrum with very little effort effort . " So focus on one of the primary colors : red , yellow or blue and imagine written in front of you . You can calculate , how many letters are in that color ?"

Before , than move to a proper representation , we first calculate how much force the viewer letters are in their chosen color . It - it , so , so that we can get a signal first , with respect to which the viewer focuses color . This is - the only part of the method , which does not correspond to the ideal , aesthetic , we are going for . Preferably , we would have just made , so that the viewer focused on color and imagined it as the actual color , but not in this - the verbal equivalent . This, however , is a necessary part of the method . It is for this reason , we apply the " principle " shift context Teylers Ross and immediately change our process to the one , which best fits our premise , both on - apparently rejecting , what came before . That , that great without the application of this principle , so it is , allows us to obtain the information , which we need without it seeming , as if we do that - either . It will appear , like any process , which is , perhaps , help , was now thrown out , and for this reason, the participants also ignore the fact , that arrived , first, and the feeling is negligible . This means , that no matter what , the process , which you use later , effectively deprived of any method , which was continued by his . We will actually move forward with the information , which ultimately will help us to anticipate whatever color , which ultimately focuses the viewer . This is the main use for the Michael Murray Cups principle . I will not explain this principle fully , because it is not mine , to teach , enough , to say , varies whether a viewer or struggling to calculate , how many letters are in your thoughts about the color , it is safe to assume , what they think about the the long word of these three primary colors and therefore therefore , focusing on color YELLOW If they perform this task relatively quickly then , you know , that they are on one of the other primary colors RED or BLUE So far , we are only interested in the viewer , we focus on color YELLOW We secretly know , what they think about this color and can continue with the script . " In fact , we will focus on this color in its natural state . In each of the colors of the rainbow have them keep vibrating level , and it is - then ,

which I will try to be consonant with , mentally . So only focus on color and imagine it isis in in ffrront ont of of yyou ou as bright ght an and bbrright ght as as you you can and and Iw wil illl do do tthhe ssam ame. e. " The performer looks at the viewer and pauses for a moment , as if trying to be in tune with their thoughts . " What is interesting , now I focus on the color red ... so impersonate and mix it with any color , on which you focus so , that you create an entirely new color ."

 

Here we derive a different color to that , we know , that they focus . It - it , so , so that we can do , so that the audience was mixed to a different color , which we will always know . If they mix it thought about the color yellow with our idea of the color red then , they will have to always end up , that focused on the color of an orange . We add the following scenarios , to make it appear , as if the viewer have even more choices to mix any color , every time , when they are , it turns out , are focusing on the same color as us . Of course , they will not think about the same thing , colorize this situation , so they will never get a chance to deviate from color APELSIN . " If you are , it turns out , focusing on the same color , then mix this color with any of the other primary colors , you wish ." Then , what is good about this view - that , as the fair is looking . It appears , as if the viewer , perhaps , just mix any colors together . Of course , the subtext , the proposed performance - something , that you mix colors , to substantially mix your thoughts , to be in tune with each other such mental fluctuations . " Well , I feel , that both of our thoughts are now perfectly blended together , and we can start ." If the viewer does not think about the color yellow color , then the effect would be played out as follows, with the following changes in the values of the script , which takes place . " In fact , we will focus on this color in its natural state . In each of the colors of the rainbow have them keep vibrating level , and it is - then , what I try to tune , mentally . So just focus on color and imagine it isis in in ffrront ont of of yyou ou as bright ght an and bbrright ght as as you you can and and Iw wil illl do do tthhe ssam ame. e. " The performer looks at the viewer and pauses for a moment , as if trying to be in tune with their thoughts . " What is interesting , now I focus on the color red ... so impersonate and mix it with any color , on which you focus so , that you create an entirely new color ."

Previous scenarios will now be viewed either as disclosures or as further directions that the viewer should follow . This sets the situation for us , to show color , in which the viewer focuses . The way we do this is to bring out one of the colors that they could focus on with the Hanging statement . " Interestingly , I am now focusing on color red ..." We pause a little after the output of the color RED and if the viewer reacts , we end the performance there . Presentation of come full circle , and we did , what we say , that attempted . We successfully entered the tune with the thoughts of the audience , and the proof is that we are both considering the same color . If they do not respond immediately, then , we can assume , that it is not struck by their color and can continue with the presentation as intended . We now know , that they have to think of the color blue color and may cause them to mix our colors with them . Of course , it would have told us , that they must now think about the color PURPLE These scripts can therefore be used , like , always to be seen , successfully anticipate their thought , paint instances , they focus on the color red as well as allow you to secretly know , whether the viewer focuses on the color orange color or purple after , they have , by - apparently it has the freedom to mix colors . Everything is aligned in width by an obvious process of you trying to get into tune with their vibrations of thought . The value and the result of your script , obviously , vary , depending on which color the audience , turns , focuses , and works as a sort of self contained multiple .

 

If you prefer to always do , so that the audience ended on the color purple color after color mixing then , you can do , so that the audience has changed their first color to a different every time , you know , that they are on the color yellow color . I prefer prefer to be in a situation , where whe re they are 2 of the 3 times , get , to mix colors , so do not bother to change them from color YELLOW initially . You can also choose to display the color blue instead of red when using " freezes " the operator for the same reason , as red most psychologically attractive color of the two . Obviously , it has in most cases the audience , blending the colors . Depending on whether , you want to use this method , if you want , hits , the color itself then output the color red , while , if you use it , to secretly know , that their idea of color is used later in your group , then BLUE , the color , to withdraw . There you go . A simple and effective way to always be aware , that the stain of your audience , focus .

Conclusion This leads us to conclude this volume . I really hope , that you understand the power of the material , be shared within these pages . Mentalism less support - of course , that - then , what have its place alongside the classics , but classics are resting less , mentalism is relevant context . Through my experiments in the world of mentalism support less I arrived , to which the subject is the one , which is a little studied . That is why name predictions , contact discoveries, and element / object guesses are so popular in this area of mentalism . I'm worried about , to see , how far things are progressing progres sing in the coming year yearss . We are getting closer and closer to the ' Grail ' that the mentalists have pursued since the dawn of art form . I still feel feel , that traditional methods are going nowhere in the near future , and any worrying about the current trends in the destruction of mentalism mentalism less support should send their concerns to bed . Episode of the month was difficult , to write out - for pure lack of information out there about the subject . I reall reallyy hope , that you enjoyed enjoyed some of my thoughts on the subj s ubject ect -

Peter Turner 2017