United Deco Summery Suit

 

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIS HAZARI DISTRICT COURTS, DELHI SUIT NO.

OF 2011

(SUMMARY SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF C.P.C.)

I N TH E MATTER OF U NI TED DEC OR ATI VE P R I VATE L I MI TED Ha v i n g i ts regi stered off i c e a t: 109-110, Esse l H o u se , 10, Asaf Al i R o ad , De l h i -110002.

P L AI NTI FF FF

 VERSUS

Mr . AMI T BANSAL propri etor, M/S AMI T ENTER P R I SES SES T-1/110, I n d u str i al Ar e a, Mangolpuri Phase-I, Ne w De l h i

DEF ENDANT

SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE F OR R EC OVER Y OF RS. 2, 63, 682/AL ONGWI TH P ENDENTEL I TE AND F U TU R E I NTER EST AND C OS TS OF TH E SU I T.

  V a lu a t io n o f t h e s u it f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f c o u r t f e e :

Rs. 2,63,682/-

Court Fee paid;

Rs. 5,000/-

RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. 

That

pl a i n ti ff i s a Pri v a te L i m i ted Com pa n y i n c orpora ted a n d

regi stered u n der t h e In di a n Com pa n i es Ac t, 1 9 5 6

having

i ts

regi stered off i c e 1 0 9 - 1 1 0 , E ssel Hou se, 1 0 , Asa f Al i R oa d, New Del h i - 1 1 0 0 0 2 a n d w ork s of fi c e a t 4 6 /3 , S i te- IV , U PS ID C In du stri a l Area , S a h i ba ba d- 2 0 1 0 1 0 , D i stri c t G h a zi a ba d, U . P. a n d i s en ga ged, i n ter a l i a , i n t h e bu si n ess of m a n u f a c tu ri n g

 

a n d di stri bu ti on of PU /PV C c oa ted f a bri c (S y n t h eti c L ea t h e r ) etc .

The

has

a n esta bl i s h ed presen c e i n t h e sa i d bu si n ess for t h e

Pl a i n ti f f i s a ren ow n ed a n d repu ted Com pa n y a n d

pa st m a n y y ea rs.   2. 

That

t h e presen t su i t i s bei n g f i l ed on be h a l f of t h e pl a i n ti f f 

by Mr. S h y a m S u n der Bo h ra S /o S h ri G a u ri S h a n k er Bo h r a R /o D - 1 4 9 , S h y a m Pa rk E xten ti on , S a h i ba ba d, U . P. w h o i s a u t h ori sed a n d em pow ered v i de R esol u ti on of Boa rd of   D i rec tors of t h e Pl a i n ti f f Com pa n y da ted 0 8 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1 to si gn , v eri fy a n d f i l e t h e presen t su i t a n d to do a l l su c h a c ts on b e h a l f of t h e pl a i n ti ff w h i c h a re n ec essa ry f or prosec u ti on o f t h e presen t su i t.   3. 

That

def en da n t represen ted to be propri etor of M/s Am i t 

E n terpri ses a n d i s en ga ged, i n ter- a l i a , i n t h e bu si n ess of  tra di n g a n d reta i l m a rk eti n g of PU /PV C c oa ted f a bri c i ts off i c e a t 

T - 1 /1 1 0

having

In du stri a l Area , Ma n gol pu ri P h a se- I,

New Del h i .   4. 

That

bei n g a w a re of t h e trem en dou s goodw i l l a n d repu ta ti on

en joy ed

by

t h e

pl a i n ti ff

in

t h e

m a rk et,

t h e

defen da n t 

a pproa c h ed pl a i n ti ff i n t h e f i rst w eek of Au gu st, 2 0 1 1 a t i ts R egi stered of fi c e a t 1 0 9 - 1 1 0 , E ssel Hou se, 1 0 , Asa f Al i R a od, D el h i for pu rc h a se of f a bri c / m a teri a l s a n d m a de v a ri ou s

a sserti on s

and

represen ta ti on s

rega rdi n g

t h e

bu si n ess opportu n i ty off ered by a n a ssoc i a ti on w i t h t h e def en da n t.

Pl a i n ti ff

a sserti on s

and

a greed

en ter

to

w a s su f fi c i en tl y

represen ta ti on s i n to

a

m a de

bu si n ess

i m pressed w i t h by

defen da n t

rel a ti on s h i p

w i t h

t h e and t h e

a ddressee.  ddressee.   5. 

That

i n term s of t h e spec i fi c u n dersta n di n g a rri v ed betw een

 

t h e pa rti es, a s a n d w h en def en da n t pl a c ed Pu rc h a se O rder t h e

for

su ppl y

of

m a teri a l s

and

/

or

f a bri c s,

pl a i n ti f f 

di spa tc h ed a n d su ppl i ed t h e sa m e a n d ra i sed i n v oi c es w i t h   respec t to t h e sa i d su ppl i es on t h e def en da n t. 6. 

That

t h e pl a i n ti f f su ppl i ed t h e

In v oi c e

N os.

1637,

1655

&

goods 1830

desc ri bed da ted

in

t h e

17.08.2011,

1 8 . 0 8 . 2 0 1 1 & 2 9 . 0 8 . 2 0 1 1 to t h e defen da n t perta i n i n g to Pu rc h a se order da ted 0 6 . 0 8 . 2 0 1 1 pl a c ed by defen da n t on t h e pl a i n ti f f a n d ra i sed i n v oi c e a s per a greed ra tes. F u rt h e r , t h e pl a i n ti ff a l so su ppl i ed t h e goods deta i l ed i n In v oi c e N o. 2 1 6 1 da ted 1 9 . 0 9 . 2 0 1 1 pu rsu a n t to t h e pu rc h a se order da ted

27.08.2011

pl a c ed

by

t h e

defen da n t

and

ra i sed

i n v oi c e. Ac c ordi n gl y fol l ow i n g i n v oi c es w ere ra i sed on t h e def en da n t rec ei pt

a ga i n st

of

whi ch  

t h e had

su ppl y been

of

du l y

v a ri ou s

m a teri a l ,

a c k n ow l edged

by

t h e t h e

def en da n t: -  - 

7. 

Sr. N o.

D a te i n v oi c e

1.

17.08.2011

1637

2,34,096. 00

2.

18.08.2011

1655

90,139.00

3.

29.08.2011

1830

3,11,552. 00

4.

19.09.2011

2161

2,52,073. 00

That

of   In v oi c e N o.

  Amount in (Rs.)

t h e goods su ppl i ed by pl a i n ti f f w ere a c c epted, w i t h o u t 

dem u r, a n d u ti l i zed by t h e def en da n t f or i ts ben ef i t. v a ri ou s

i n v oi c es/bi l l s

ra i sed

by

t h e

pl a i n ti ff

w ere

The

du l y

 

a c k n ow l edged by t h e def en da n t.  t.   8. 

That

i n term s of spec i fi c u n dersta n di n g betw een t h e pa rti es

a s di sc ern i bl e f rom v a ri ou s pu rc h a se orders a n d i n v oi c es, t h e def en da n t w a s l i a bl e to m a k e pa y m en t of a f oresa i d i n v oi c es, w i t h i n a peri od of 6 0 (S i xty ) da y s f rom t h e da te of   rec ei pt of goods / i n v oi c es, fa i l i n g w h i c h i t w a s spec i fi c a l l y a greed, a s w el l a s sti pu l a ted i n t h e i n v oi c es a n d Pu rc h a s e orders t h a t t h e def en da n t s h a l l be l i a bl e to m a k e pa y m en t  w i t h i n terest @ 1 8 % perc en t per a n n u m on t h e ou tsta n di n g a m ou n t f rom t h e da te of i n v oi c e ti l l pa y m en t. 9. 

That

despi te spec i fi c u n dersta n di n g a n d a greem en t, t h e r e

w a s c on si dera bl e del a y on t h e pa rt of defen da n t i n m a k i n g pa y m en t i n respec t of v a ri ou s i n v oi c es ra i sed by pl a i n ti f f. F rom

t h e

v ery

begi n n i n g

def en da n t

sta rted

del a y i n g

pa y m en t a n d som e of t h e pa y m en ts m a de by def en da n t  t h r o u g h v a ri ou s c h equ es a t t h e regi stered of fi c e of t h e pl a i n ti ff w ere n ot ev en i n term s to t h e s c h edu l e of pa y m en t  a s a greed i n respec ti v e Pu rc h a se order/perform a In v oi c e. O n v a ri ou s oc c a si on s def en da n t a ssu red pl a i n ti f f t h a t  s h a l l m a k e t h e pa y m en t of a greed i n terest @ 1 8 % p.a p.a . del a y ed

pa y m en ts

as

per

u n dersta n di n g, bu t def en da n t 

a greem en t has

and

he

for

spec i fi c

n ot m a de a n y su c h  

pa y m en t tow a rds t h e i n terest ti l l da te.   10. 

That

ev en a fter t h e a c c epta n c e of su c h del a y ed pa y m en t by

pl a i n ti ff , t h ere w a s c on ti n u ou s defa u l t on pa rt of def en da n t  i n ti m el y pa y m en t tow a rds t h e rest of t h e i n v oi c es ra i sed.   And t  h e def en da n t c on ti n u ed to rem a i n i n def a u l t for R s. 2 , 5 2 , 0 0 0 /- bei n g pa rt of pri n c i pa l ou tsta n di n g debt tow a rds t h e m a teri a l su ppl i ed by pl a i n ti f f u n der In v oi c e N o. 2 1 6 1

 

da ted 1 9 . 0 9 . 2 01 01 1 . 11. 

That

pl a i n ti ff v i si ted t h e of fi c e of def en da n t i n t h i s rega rd

m a n y ti m es bu t t h e def en da n t sta rted a v oi di n g pl a i n ti f f a n d resorted to i m pl a u si bl e exc u ses to a v oi d a n d del a y t h e pa y m en t.

The

pl a i n ti f f i ssu ed v a ri ou s rem i n ders to t h e

def en da n t t h r o u g h em a i l a n d i ssu ed sev era l n oti c es i n t h i s respec t, w h i c h w ere du l y rec ei v ed by t h e def en da n t, bu t  def en da n t m i sera bl y fa i l ed to m a k e t h e a foresa i d pa y m en t.   12. 

That

c on stra i n ed by t h e a f oresa i d c on du c t of def en da n t, t h e

pl a i n ti ff c a u sed a l ega l n oti c e da ted 1 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1 serv ed u pon def en da n t t h rou g h i ts c ou n sel , w h i c h w a s du l y rec ei v ed by t h e

defen da n t

on

12.12.2011.

D espi te

t h e

rec ei pt

of 

a f oresa i d l ega l n oti c e defen da n t di d n ot m a k e a n y pa y m en t  and

t h e

defen da n t

c on ti n u ed

to

rem a i n

in

bel l i geren t 

def a u l t.  t.   13. 

That

def en da n t i s l i a bl e to pa y to t h e pl a i n ti ff t h e l i qu i da ted

a m ou n t of R s. 2 , 5 2 , 0 0 0 /- bei n g pa rt of pri n c i pa l ou tsta n di n g a m ou n t i n respec t of v a ri ou s i n v oi c es i n c l u di n g i n v oi c e da ted 1 9 . 0 9 . 2 0 1 1 a l on g w i t h a n i n terest @ 1 8 % p. a . f rom t h e da te of i n v oi c e ti l l su c h pa y m en t a n d t h e c ost of   l i ti ga ti on .  .  14. 

That

c a u se of a c ti on fi rst i n f a v ou r of pl a i n ti f f a n d a ga i n st 

def en da n t a rose i n t h e f i rst w eek of Au gu st w h e n t h e def en da n t a pproa c h ed pl a i n ti f f a t 

his

regi stered of fi c e a t 

  Asa f Al i R oa d, f or pu rch a se of goods m a n u f a c tu red by t h e pl a i n ti ff , a n d pl a i n ti ff a greed to en ter i n to bu si n ess rel a ti on w i t h defen da n t on fu rt h er

a rose

on

his

a sserti on s a n d represen ta ti on s. It 

06.08.2011

w h en

pu rc h a se order w i t h t h e pl a i n ti f f.

The

defen da n t

pl a c ed

c a u se of a c ti on i n

 

fa v ou r of pl a i n ti f f a n d a ga i n st defen da n t a l so a rose on 17.08.2011, 18.08.2011 & 29.08.2011 w h e n t h e pl a i n ti f f  su ppl i ed

m a teri a l

pu rsu a n t

0 6 . 0 8 . 2 0 1 1 , a n d t h e def en da n t.

The

goods

to

pu rc h a se

w ere

du l y

order

da ted

rec ei v ed

by

t h e

c a u se of a c ti on f u rt h er a rose on 2 9 . 0 8 . 2 0 1 1

w h en a n ot h er pu rc h a se order w a s pl a c ed by def en da n t.

The

c a u se of a c ti on i n f a v ou r of pl a i n ti f f a n d a ga i n st def en da n t  a rose on 1 9 . 0 9 . 2 0 1 1 w h e n t h e pl a i n ti ff su ppl i ed t h e m a teri a l to defen da n t pu rsu a n t to pu rc h a se order da ted 2 9 . 0 8 . 2 0 1 1 and

ra i sed

i n v oi c e

a c c ordi n gl y ,

w hi ch

was

duly

a c k n ow l edged by t h e defen da n t a n d t h e goods su ppl i ed by t h e pl a i n ti ff w ere du l y a c c epted, w i t h ou t dem u r, a n d u ti l i zed b y t h e def en da n t f or i ts ben ef i t.

Th e

c a u se of a c ti on a l so

a rose on 2 2 . 1 0 . 2 0 1 1 , 8 . 1 1 . 2 0 1 1 a n d 2 4 . 1 1 . 2 0 1 1 w h e n t h e pa rt

pa y m en ts

c h eques

w ere

h a n ded

m a de

by

t h e

def en da n t

t h r o u g h  

ov er to pl a i n ti f f a t  h i s regi stered off i c e a n d

t h r o u g h R T G S i n pl a i n ti ff s a c c ou n t w h i c h pa y m en ts w ere w el l bey on d t h e du e da tes a s per a greed term s of t h e c on tra c t.

The

c a u se of a c ti on i n f a v ou r of pl a i n ti ff a n d

a ga i n st def en da n t a rose on 1 8 . 1 1 . 2 0 1 1 w h e n t h e payment  a ga i n st t h e i n v oi c e da ted 1 9 . 0 9 . 2 0 1 1 bec a m e du e bu t t h e def en da n t fa i l ed to m a k e t h e pa y m en t.

The

c a u se of a c ti on

a rose on v a ri ou s da tes w h e n t h e pl a i n ti ff v i si ted t h e off i c e of defen da n t f or rec ov ery of ou tsta n di n g a m ou n t. It f u rt h e r a rose on 2 6 . 1 1 . 2 0 1 1 , 2 8 . 1 1 . 2 0 1 1 , 2 9 . 1 1 . 2 0 1 1 , 3 0 . 1 1 . 2 0 1 1 a n d 0 1 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1 w h e n t h e pl a i n ti f f sen t v a ri ou s rem i n ders to def en da n t on em a i l f or ou tsta n di n g pa y m en t a n d t h e def en da n t fa i l ed to m a k e t h e pa y m en t. fu rt h er a rose on

02.12.2011

The

c a u se of a c ti on

and 05.12.2011

when

t h e

pl a i n ti ff i ssu ed n oti c e to t h e def en da n t to t h a t eff ec t bu t 

 

t h e defen da n t di d n ot m a k e a n y pa y m en t.

The

c a u se of 

a c ti on a rose on 1 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1 w h en pl a i n ti ff sen t a l ega l n oti c e to t h e def en da n t for rec ov ery of ou tsta n di n g a m ou n t  a l on gw i t h i n terest a n d l ega l expen ses.

The

c a u se of a c ti on

i n f a v ou r of pl a i n ti ff a n d a ga i n st def en da n t fu rt h er a rose on 1 2 . 1 0 . 2 0 1 1 w h e n t h e pl a i n ti f f rec ei v ed t h e l ega l n oti c e da ted 1 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1 bu t di d n ot m a k e t h e pa y m en t.

The

c a u se

of a c ti on i s sti l l su bsi sti n g a n d c on ti n u i n g a s t h e defen da n t  has

n ot m a de t h e pa y m en t a n d c on ti n u es to rem a i n i n

bel l i geren t defa u l t.  t.   15. 

That

t h i s Hon bl e c ou rt 

has

terri tori a l ju ri sdi c ti on a s t h e

pa rt of c a u se of a c ti on a rose i n t h e ju ri sdi c ti on of t h i s Hon bl e Cou rt. a n d f u rt h e r t h a t t h e def en da n t resi des a n d w ork s f or ga i n a t D el h i . Hen c e t h i s Hon bl e Cou rt 

has

 ju ri sdi c ti on to try a n d en terta i n t h e presen t su i t.   16. 

The

t h e su i t i s v a l u ed for t h e pu rpose of c ou rt f ee a t R s.

2 , 6 3 , 6 8 2 /- ( R u pees

Two

L a c s S i xty t h ou sa n d on l y ) bei n g

R s. 2 , 5 2 , 0 0 0 /- tow a rds ou tsta n di n g pri n c i pa l a m ou n t a n d R s. 1 1 , 6 8 2 /- tow a rds a c c ru ed i n terest on t h e a foresa i d a m ou n t from t h e da te of i n v oi c e ti l l da te of f i l i n g of presen t  su i t, on w h i c h a n a dv ol eru m c ou rt f ee of R s 4 , 9 3 1 . 0 0 been pa i d.

The

h as

c ou rt fee on pen den tel i te a n d fu tu re i n terest 

s h a l l be pa i d a t t h e ti m e of c a l c u l a ti n g t h e sa m e w h e n t h e a f oresa i d rel i ef i s gra n ted. It i s fu rt h er su bm i tted t h a t i f   t h ere

is

any

def i c i en c y

in

t h e

c ou rt

fee,

t h e pl a i n ti f f 

u n derta k es to pa y su c h o t h er/fu rt h er c ou rt fee a s a n d w h e n di rec ted by t h i s Hon bl e Cou rt.  rt.  

 

P R AYER

It i s th   eref ore m ost respec tfu l l y pra y ed t h a t t h i s Hon bl e c ou rt m a y k i n dl y be pl ea sed to:

a )   Pa ss a m on ey dec ree for R s. 2 , 6 0 , 0 0 0 /- ( R u pess L a c s S i xy

T h ou sa n ds

Two

O n l y ) i n fa v ou r of pl a i n ti f f a n d

a ga i n st defen da n t.

b )   Pa ss a dec ree a w a rdi n g pen den tel i te a n d f u tu re i n terest  @ 1 8 % p. a . i n f a v ou r of pl a i n ti f f a n d a ga i n st def en da n t 

c )    Aw a rd

c ost

of

su i t

and

ch a rges

l i ti ga ti on

i n c l u di n g

a dv oc a tes f ee f or t h e su i t i n f a v ou r of pl a i n ti f f a n d a ga i n st defen da n t 

d )   Pa ss su c h o t h er a n d/or f u rt h er orders a s t h i s Hon 'bl e Cou rt

may

deem

fi t

and

proper

in

t h e

f a c ts

and

c i rc u m sta n c es of t h e c a se i n t h e i n terest of ju sti c e.

It i s pra y ed a c c ordi n gl y .

PLAINTIFF T HROUGH

SANJEEV GOYAL & ASSOC I ATES,  Advocates, 6 0 2 , L a w y ers C h a m ber Bl oc k - III, D e l h i Hi g h Cou rt, N ew D el h i PL ACE : N E W D E L HI. DATED:

 

   VERIFICATION:   Verified at New Delh i on t h i s 2 1 st da y of D ec em ber 2 0 1 1 , t h a t t h e c on ten ts of pa ra s

1 to 1 3

of t h e pl a i n t a re tru e a n d

c orrec t to m y k n ow l edge a n d t h ose of pa ra s

1 4 to

16

of t h e

pl a i n t a re tru e u pon i n form a ti on rec ei v ed a n d bel i ev ed to be tru e a n d c orrec t. L a st pa ra i s a pra y er before t h i s Hon 'bl e Cou rt.

PLAINTIFF

 

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIS HAZARI DISTRICT COURTS, DELHI SUIT NO.

OF 2011

(SUMMARY SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF C.P.C.)

IN THE MATTER OF: U NI TED DEC OR ATI VE P R I VATE L I MI TED

P L AI NTI F FF F

 VERSUS Mr . AMI T BANSAL

DEF ENDANT

MEMO OF P AR TI ES

U ATI VE L I MI TED HaNI v i TED n g i tsDEC regiOR stered offP i cRe IaVATE t: 109-110, Esse l H o u se , 10, Asaf Al i R o ad , De l h i -110002.

P L AI NTI FF FF

 VERSUS

Mr . AMI T BANSAL propri etor, M/S AMI T ENTER P R I SES SES T-1/110, I n d u str i al Ar e a, Mangolpuri Phase-I, Ne w De l h i

DEF ENDANT

PLAINTIFF T HROUGH

PL ACE : N E W D E L HI. DATED:

SANJEEV GOYAL & ASSOC I ATES,  Advocates, 6 0 2 , L a w y ers C h a m ber Bl oc k - III, D e l h i Hi g h Cou rt, N ew D el h i Mob N o. 9 8 1 0 4 9 8 8 8 9

 

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIS HAZARI DISTRICT COURTS, DELHI SUIT NO.

OF 2011

(SUMMARY SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF C.P.C.)

IN THE MATTER OF: U NI TED DEC OR ATI VE P R I VATE L I MI TED

P L AI NTI F FF F

 VERSUS Mr . AMI T BANSAL

DEF ENDANT

 AFFIDAVIT I , S h yam S u n der Bo h r a s / o S h r i G a u r i S h a n k e r B o h r a a g e d a b o u 5 0 year s R/ o D -1 4 9 , Shyam Par k E x t en t io n , S ahibabad ( U . P. ) pr esen t ly at   New D el h i , d o h e r e b y s o l e m n l y a f f i r m a n d d e c l a r e a s u n d e r : 1. 

T ha t

I am th   e A u t  h o r i s e d R e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h   e plaintiff company d u l y a u t  h o r i s e d a n d e m p o w e r e d v i d e R e s o l u t i o n o f B o a r d o f   Directors of plaintiff Company dated 08.12.2011 and am well conversant with   t h e f a c t s a n d c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f t  h e c a s e a n d a s such competent to swear th   e present affidavit.

2. 

T ha t

t h e

accompanying

Procedure Code, 1908, instructions. I

have

has

suit

under

Order

XXXVII

of

Civil

been drafted by my counsel under my

r e a d a n d u n d e r s t o o d t  h e c o n t e n t s o f t h  e

sam e, w hi ch ar e n o t r epr o du ced

herein

for th   e sake of brevity

a n d m a y b e r e a d a s p a r t a n d p a r c e l o f t  h i s a f f i d a v i t .

D E P O N E NT  

 V ERIFICATIO N   V erified at New D elh i o n t h i s

Day of December,

2011 th   a t t h e c o n t e n t s o f a b o v e a f f i d a v i t a r e t r u e a n d c o r r e c t t o t h  e best o f m y kn o wledge an d belief an d N o th   ing material

has

been

concealed th   erefrom.

D E P O N E NT  

 

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TIS HAZARI DISTRICT COURTS, DELHI SUIT NO.

OF 2011

(SUMMARY SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF C.P.C.)

IN THE MATTER OF: U NI TED DEC OR ATI VE P R I VATE L I MI TED

P L AI NTI F FF F

 VERSUS Mr . AMI T BANSAL

DEF ENDANT

L I S T OF DOC U MENTS

Sr . No .

P ar ti cu l ar s

P ag e

1.

Certi fi c a te of In c orpora ti on of Pl a i n ti ff Com pa n y

1

2.

E xtra c t of R esol u ti on of Boa rd of D i rec tors of   t h e pl a i n ti f f c om pa n y

2

3.

Copy of Pu rc h a se order/Perform a In v oi c e da ted 06.08.2011

4.

Copi es of In v oi c e N o. 1 6 3 7 , 1 6 5 5 & 1 8 3 0 da ted 1 7 . 0 8 . 2 0 1 1, 1, 1 8 . 0 8 . 2 01 01 1 & 2 9 . 0 8 . 2 0 1 1 respec ti v el y a l on g w i t h pa c k i n g sl i ps

5.

Copy of Pu rc h a se order/Perform a In v oi c e da ted 29.08.2011

6.

Copy of In v oi c e N o. 2 1 6 1 da ted 1 9 . 0 9 . 2 0 1 1 a l on g w i t h pa c k i n g sl i p

7.

S ta tem en t of Ac c ou n t of defen da n t a s per book s of pl a i n ti f f.

8.

E m a i l rem i n ders sen t by pl a i n ti f f to defen da n t  dated 26.08.2011, 28.08.2011, 29.08.2011, 30.08.2011 & 01.12.2011

9.

N oti c es da ted 0 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1 sen t by pl a i n ti f f to defen da n t a l on g w i t h proof of di spa tc h  

10.

R em i n der N oti c es da ted 0 5 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1 sen t by pl a i n ti f f to defen da n t a l on g w i t h proof of  di spa tc h  

 

  11.

L ega l N oti c e da ted 1 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1 sen t by pl a i n ti f f  t o t h e defen da n t t h r o u g h i ts c ou n sel

12.

Proof of di spa tc h a n d del i v ery of a f oresa i d N oti c e da ted 1 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 1 1

PLAINTIFF T HROUGH

SANJEEV GOYAL & ASSOC I ATES,  Advocates, 6 0 2 , L a w y ers C h a m ber Bl oc k - III, PL ACE : N E W D E L HI. DATED:

D e l h i Hi g h Cou rt, N ew D el h i Mob N o. 9 8 1 0 4 9 8 8 8 9