The Philosophy of Plotinos
Short Description
Philosophy of Plotinos 1000003040...
Description
THE
PHILOSOPHY
PLOTINOS
OF
,
0
NEW
THEOSOPHICAL 244
YORK
PUBLISHING LENOX
AVENUE.
Co.
Entered
according
to
Act
DUNLAP
In
the
Office
of
of
Congress,
PRINTING
the
Librarian
in
the
year
1896,
by
the
COMPANY,
of
Congress
at
Washington,
D.
C.
PLOTINOS.
OF
PHILOSOPHY
THE
INDEX,
Page PLATONISM
I.
Chapter
..."
1.
Plato's
2.
The
Archetypal
3.
The
World
6. The
Human
2.
The
3. The 4. The
3 3
Soul
4
6 6
Aristotle
and
Deity Psychology
7 7 8
.-
Ethics
STOICISM
9
1.
Plato, Aristotle, and
2.
The
3.
Cosmology
4.
Ethics
the
Stoics
9
Dialectic
Aristotelian
9 10
:
ii
EMANATIONISM
IV.
Chapter
3
ARISTOTELIANISM
III.
Chapter
2
of Ideas
Rank
II.
Plato
i
of Ideas
World
of Matter
Universe
1.
Realms
Three
4. The 5. The
Chapter
i
1.
The
Date
2.
Relation
of
12
Christianity
to
3. Difference 4. Hermetic
12
Hermes
from
12
Platonism
14
Conceptions
14
5. Cosmology 6. Ethics
14
7. Spiritual Destiny
15
AMMONIUS
V.
Chapter
THEIR 1.
Ammonius
2.
Plotinos
3.
Relation
4.
The
SAKKAS,
RELATION
TO
VI.
AND
PLOTINOS, CHRISTIANITY
17
Sakkas
17 17
Christianity Recognition of the Authority
5. Relation
Chapter
15
18
to
to
MIKROKOSM
1.
The
2.
Mikrokosm
3.
Psychology Cosmological
of Plato
20
Philosophy
Greek
AND
Contemplative
20
MAKROKOSM
22
Life r
.
y.
.
.
.
_v .
4.
22
22 .r/v1r.'. 23 ttS"f^ftttW-JiiU M .
'
Import
of
Psychology
146280
24
INDEX.
Page Chanter 1.
2.
3. 4.
5.
6. 7.
VII. THE FIRST GOD THE REALM, and the Many The One The God Above Cognisability The Nomenclative Symbol for the Divinity The God is the First Cause The God's Necessity to Love of Begetting Manner and Relation of Cause World
THE
Chapter VIII.
SECOND
GOD,
REALM,
26 26 26 27 27 27 28 28
COSMIC
MIND 1. 2.
Chapter 1.
2.
30
Saturn, the Cognisable Deity Identity of Being and Thought
THE
IX.
THIRD
REALM,
Trinity : Over-God, Co-equality of Souls
The
Saturn,
30 30
THE
SOUL
32
and
Zeus-Rhea
32
33
World-Soul Over-Soul Transcendent The 4. and Over-Soul 5. Inter-relation of 3. The
Chapter 1. 2.
FOURTH
THE
X.
33 34
Souls
34
REASON
REALM,
Mind Individual World-Souls Other
36
SENSE FIFTH THE REALM, Senses of the Over-Soul 1. The 2. Unity of Souls in the Fifth Realm Sense-Realm 3. Human and Physical Senses Celestial 4.
Chapter
XI.
5. Senses
Chapter XII.
37 37 37 37
38
of Animals
THE
SIXTH
39
REALM,
VITALITY
Sixth ivealm of the Over-Soul Realm Sixth The 2. of Sympathy Doctrine 3. The Beautiful The 4. Vaticination 5. Astrology and 1.
7. The
1.
39 39 40 40 4i
Will Daemon
Chapter XIII.
THE
39 39
The
6. Free
36 36
42
SEVENTH
Evil
MATTER....
REALM, "
43 43
2.
Uncognisability of Matter
44
3.
of Matter Intelligibility
44
-
Hi
INDEX.
Page
1.
2.
REINCARNATION
XIV.
Chapter
Need
for
46 Three
Factors
3. 4.
Objection
from
5.
Objection
from
46 Oblivion
47
Suicide
47
ETHICS
XV.
Chapter
2.
46
Justice The
1.
45
Reincarnation
Virtue
and
48
Vice of
Philosophy
48 Sin
49
"
3.
The
Path
4.
The
Daemon
5.
Ecstasy
51
6.
Happiness
52
Chapter
XVI.
1.
The
2.
Human
Chapter 1.
Enlightenment
of
of
:
Conscience
50
AESTHETICS
God,
54
Over-Beautiful
the
"
Beauty
XVII.
Pagan Monotheism
3.
Augustine's
4.
The
Last
54 54
PLOTINOS
AND
PAGANISM
56
Deities
2.
49
56 56 Debt
Light
to ot
Plotinos
Greece
:
56 56
I.
CHAPTER
PLATONISM.
We
felt
the
by
most
cursory
it is
as
is the
"genesis,"
the
eternal
of
unity,
apply fittingly to the existing being Being,
will
"
has
true
"
We
But
knowable
and
the
represented in
witnessed
matter,
hule,"
"
"
"
apply
must
of
realm
third
a
which
intelligible world, being, reason,
the
alone "
and
which
istence," ex-
three
world
the
of
realms
before
however, creation
the
"
existence
ed. form-
was
which,
existence,
of
formless,
the
to
which
that
:
"
of the
world
cause,
the
; and we
One
the
be
may
definite
a
"
the~Father,
world
of
sense-
from
phuetai,"
of
tinction dis-
Unlimited.
the
fittingly
which
the
of this
reduce
that
the
on
;
in which it becomes that (matter), world), which it is copied God, world). (the intelligible the it grows," the the whence hothen reason,
(the
that
and
in
categories
contrary, "
recognizes
thus
becomes
thing
and
existed having distinguished as world. of the phenomenal
be
formation Plato
the
on
reach
thus
only
or
such,
as
Ousia."
Logos,
on,
chaotic
odorless,
can
Ontos
Manifold,
The
their
of "
world.
phenomenal Unity
philosophy none
ousia,
to
Limited
which
Becoming
of
process
the
these
fitting description
united
mixture,
lem prob-
of
Which
finite
further the
are
both
their
"
any
a
was
terms,
conceptions
truth
their
to
proceeded
He
these
so
is
attributed
he, be
is one,
; but
Being,
wholly.
Plato
its Pythagorean of
Earlier
The
inasmuch
Greek
question
this
to
that
the
reveals
qualities.
its
can
and
noeton."
to
object
every
in
distinction?
answers
"
sense-world
for
:
which
that
:
aistheton,"
"to
knowable,"
manifold
world.
both
number,
"
Many
the
"becoming," to
is
and
satisfied
phenomenal
Many
the
thought
not,
contrary,
the
of
various
conclusions
As
examination
yet fundamental
most
could
"
object,
an
given
had
the
One
of the
the
senses,
realms
great
two
"sensible"
understood,
be
can
into
existence
divides
which
philosophy.
Greek
of
sketch Plato
his. preceded in our nary prelimi-
Plato
with
immediately
which
that
system
which
philosophy
of
systems
his
in
united
Plato
"
begin
therefore
may
be
the
in
valuable
was
Realms.
Three
Plato's
i.
thus, must "
the not
"
to
is the
; matter "
ho
En world
fail
noeton."
"
gignetai analyze The
and
this
phrase
the
nurse,
of
God
intelligible given
above,
comitant con-
of
gignomenon,"
to
offspring
is the to
mother
and
the
Matter.
world, "that
this from
The
Philosophy of Plotinos.
"
which it is copied implies that somebody copies something : that the Deity copies the Ideas or archetypes. There is then, the intelligibleworld above still of exa higher realm istence, proper the Deity : which, in the Pythagorean duced terminology adwould be the Mind, the above the Nous," principle or "
"
"
aition," of the phenomenal
world. four realms of existence : the Deity, the world of Ideas, the world of Sense, and Matter. But as the latter realm has ceased the exist since to creation of the phenomenal world three realms as of existence, which such, there remain sometimes referred to as the Platonic Trinity : are Nous" or the Deity, the intelligible world of Ideas, and the Sense-world the How loose and sensible," to aisthetikon." inaccurate such an appellation is,is clear from the fact that Plato himself did not recognize it. The Sense-world, the supposititious third member of the Trinity, is the only-begotten Son, "Huios monothe the of Eikon aidion tou Deity, genes Theou," "Zoon kai noeton," it is a second future before its genesis. God, created and after it ; a blessed deity." As the world of Ideas Zoon is a aidion kai noeton,". an eternal and intelligible of Sense is a organism," so the world Zoon ennoun," an reasonable intelligible organism," a living being, the creating principleof "Nous," Reason, having reduced the chaotic, necessary, and to alogos," irrational Matter an of the world of Ideas. image Thus of the One the problem and the Many was apparently solved : every object being One, in view of its similarityto the Idea according to which, as a pattern, it has been created ; and had been which the Manifold, in view of the formless matter condition of its origination. cause
We
'
"
have
thus
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
The
Archetypal World of Ideas. In explaining what Plato of Ideas, we meant notice the fact that he must by his World the and identification of of Parmenides. Being Thought accepts As a consequence, his the world of true is intelligibleworld it participates existence, and everything exists only inasmuch as in this existence. An Idea is that which horse makes a a horse, and a tree a tree ; in short it is a general notion, an universal, a which abides unchanged amidst all the changes species or genus, it applies. Hence the world of the individuals to which of Ideas is in the supercelestialplace," En yond topo huperouranio," beall change, far beyond this world, separate from the objects participating in it. The Ideas are archetypes, "paradigms" Ideas quality and every Paradeigmata," of every thing, many and the same at times being present in one thing, as "just" and These Ideas are man." tall in a co-ordinate, being distinct the highest also rank hierarchicallyfrom entities,although they to the lowest species,as they are the existence,being, aim genus and end under them. Yet of everything subsumed they are passive thoughts, and are without energy only objects ; they are the world. of contemplation, far from 2.
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
Platonism.
"
"
One of Matter." It the Intelligible world, the is nonexis real existence, it follows that Matter, the Many," istence. It is therefore absurd to call Plato's philosophical system the has dualism. only Hule," indeterminate, a Matter, ative negbe apprehended predicates,it lacks form and quality,and cannot It can wardness, only be space, the form of outby the senses. It is and unordered an that is,coexistence sequence. be impressed upon it. It to form waiting for a content empty sity, necesis nothing, an abstraction from reality; yet it is absolute able the divine power, to and though not able to oppose yet its works. mar World
3. The
"
"
beautiful world * Universe. The Sense- world is the most possible,being framed according to the most perfectof patterns,5 in and He the best was a cause. good ; good being no by but in relation to anything ever resides, being without this envy like himself as possible."We he wished as everything to become that the Sense-world an was intelligible organism," "Zoon saw acteristic ennoun." It is consequently able to think: and this is the charof mind, and mind exists in a soul, and soul in a a should not rule the elder,and mind rules body. As the younger the body, the mind older than the body of the of the world was is therefore a living being, with a rational world. The Universe soul interpenetrating the its body. It regulates and harmonizes bodies partake of the physical Universe, world ; for as human do human souls proceed from the souls of the Universe. so 4.
The
"
"
"
The
Universe
thus
is formed
in two circles with a ed inner circle is subdividcommon planes into seven circles moving in directions opposite to that of the Here have the fixed stars and the seven outer one. we planets with their orbits. created
centre, in different
5. The Rank remains for us
; the
of Ideas. of Ideas it Having explained the nature All to describe the rank and dignity they occupy. world." an "intelligible together they form an "intelligible place" an "intelligible organism," "Kosmos noetos," a "Topos noetos," of a thing is not Zoon noeton." The cause the condition of a its existence, but its purpose and the ultimate of ; purpose poses puris the ruler of all other Ideas, basileus," the king of Plato combined here the Mind of heaven, Dophia, Zeus." Anaxagoras, and the Good /-vgathon," of the Megareans and into an Sokrates somewhat Epekeina tes Ousias," a beyond existence" an existence beyond all Being, the Ideas partaking of ousia." This Being is both Mind and Being, Good : a con) scious good Being, the Idea, the absolute Unity excluding all, Manifoldness, a glorious fulfilment of the Eleatic dreams. Such : the him in of lifts a conception Deity tence, a separate realm of exisabove all other Ideas soever. "
"
"
"
"
"
"
That
this was Plato's conception has been much doubted. He, Creator, has been identified with the Idea of the Good, as both are called by Plato the best of the intelligible and nally eterexisting beings." He is himself the pattern he copies in
the
"
The
Philosophy of Plotinos.
The the creation, since he is said to copy eternal pattern. an telligible world is therefore called a sensible God," an image of the inand an image of the eternal gods." Zeller thinks tence the ideas cannot depend on God without affectingtheir self-exisbe dependent on the ideas, for the same son, reacannot ; God and both cannot be co-ordinate without creating a dualism Plato knows nothing of. Consequently, God and the Idea of culties diffithe Good identical. This view of Zeller's creates more are than it explains ; for it does not account for the language it the Idea of quoted above, and it permits us to ask, why was itself the the Good other which took Idea and not some upon office of a Creator ? Why do not several Ideas create separate universes? ly And besides, a Creator such as we have described is absoluteneeded by Plato in his Physics. The Ideas are true existence, shall How and Matter is non-existence separate. ; and both are it a rational the rational principleinfuse itselfinto matter to make contemplates the Idea, genorganism, unless the God who erates nates incarin and to them so speak, himself, thus, a as poet to them ? For Plato has no principleof Emanationism "
"
"
assist him, as had Aristotle. verse that the Soul of the UniSoul." We have seen 6. The Human Yet other have accounts the human souls. we began compounded of their creation, which set forth that the Creator he had compounded vessel in which human souls in the same the Soul of the Universe, the difference being that the elements after creating them, the Creator signed asused were less pure ; and World-Soul the Thus to each Soul its appropriate star. soul are and each human sisters,and not related to each other and daughter. mother ten Each soul is composed of three parts. The firstis reason, of " logistikon," which has its seat in the head, and is the organ the called virtue is Its moderate regulation wisdom,) knowledge. The second the opposite of this virtue is the vice, foolishness. is the part of the soul attends to all bodily wants, and its name its and has of It is the perception, Epithumetikon." organ soul of the To this in the abdomen seat (the solar plexus). part of intuitive and has added, in the liver,an presenGod organ of this exercise The moderate timentative part of knowledge. and its opthe virtue the soul is Sophrosune," self-control, as
"
"
"
vice Akolasia," intemperance. Lastly, we\ \ the courageous have the third part of the soul, "to Thumoeides" the presumably secondary deities, part of the soul, prepared by moderate cise exerof whose the World-Soul, and this is the organ as opposed to the vice is the virtue Andria," courage,
'positehabits
"
is the
"
The fourth virtue, Dikaiosune," justice, Deilia," cowardice. it three virtues,and when the above is the right relation between towards Hosiotes," holiness or is exercised God, it becomes it is man's end resemble to God, who is absolutely piety, since health and the order and good. This is happiness. Virtue is harmony of the soul, and should therefore be followed irrespec"
"
"
Platonism.
tive
of
than
to
is
just
incarnation
next
soul that
in
persisted of
chose
Pleasure
is
is
If
from
and
itself
ways,
the
be
If in
the
worse
demands
soul
the
of
good
antithetically
The
of
wise
a
a
exists
soul
all
erred,
man
woman
incarnation
if
;
the
would
several
be
incarnations become
soon
forms
nently perma-
reincarnating. :
are
of
God
patent.
through
for
would
is
all.
body next
it
soul
souls
soul
the
a
necessity
of
is
injustice
transmigrates
the
howeyer
necessarily
not
be
philosophy, the
health in
evil
to
cannot
it
justice.
its
of
study
life
life;
would
animal.
an
the
freed
Pleasure
this this
inexorable
to
do
philosophy
injustice
earth,
on
after
and
to
man.
consequently
:
according his
life
for
;
This
another.
entire
single
a
before
both
from
the
of
in
Yet,
it
suffer
rationality
sanctions
or
consequences
it
may
indeed
be in
pleasurable opposed
to
all
true
evil
;
eration mod-
themselves.
insight.
j
CHAPTER
II.
ARISTOTELIANISM.
Plato
i.
will
be
all
the
his
were
agreed
mother
"
Matter
ho.w
With
En
or
Matter, Plato
to
With
Plato,
participated With
in
the
things
are
only
These
universals
Matter, united
Reality
invariable
which
results
reality, the
moved,
cal, having to
moves
We
union
passive.
of
;
all the
for
every a
A
of
of
the
haunted
by,
Reality becomes
and
which
is thus essence,
"
;
and
which and
all
the the
real. in
They form.
energeia," and
larize particu-
aim
purposive
the
"
appearance
only of
essence
what
it is
the
the
the
restated
phenomena
might the
be
realisation
that
recurring
of
velopment, de-
lem prob-
philosophy being,
exist
of
was
terms.
new
; to
in
principles. is
ever
in
to
through
moved
Greek
which
Many,
solution
ranging
Aristotle
to
solved
finally
Plato
and
moving original
tion, mo-
existence.
impressed
were
activity,
of
real
satisfactory Ideas
magnet
reason
is
In the
teleologi-
is
the
as
which
a
the
mover
very
statue
shape. and
reality
moves,
;
is
why
the is
he
matter
This
the
the
the
is the
closely
so
as
and
all
it
which
are
principle.
substance," bronze
which
of
here
which
One
them.
third
a
Thus
teleological
creation,
conception
immanence
denied
matter,
distinguish
to
change principle have
with
einai
aim
question
we
octaves
This
the
of
may
or
as
perceptible
the
unanswered
Matter
"
union
and
steel.
that
objectively
energy,
or
both
we
have
Plato's
is the
end
the
Form,
from
active an
now
and
therefore,
the
and
in
;
World
the
energy,
themselves
results
from
a
"
species,
monism
from
apart was
according a
things.
potentiality,
or
that
their
all
the
realise into
as
which."
dualism.
above
them
of
than as
self-existent,
in
undeveloped
real
moie
ground
principle,
"out
described
existence
participated
themselves
ference dif-
they separate. vo'id, "in which"
hou,"
interpreted
were
all objective
of
Ex
transcendent
were
the
incomplete,
"
be
be
They
essence
is
may
may
Ideas
which the
system
Here
emptiness,
is much
Aristotle,
them.
Aristotle,
it
and
feminine
world.
possibility,
former's
the
with
contact
the
cause,
the
Matter
and
latter's
the
though
even
Aristotle
indeterminate,
was
of
Aristotle
to
of
points
Matter
nurse
power
the
;
his
is non-existence,
according
understand
to
concomitant
"
dunamis
notice
that
the
Plato,
order
Master.
great
and
In
"
to
from
Plurality, the
With "
Aristotle.
advantageous
Both of
and
"
"
essence.
"
To
ousia," ti
en
The
A ristotelianism.
inert.
"
becoming
"
of Plato
has
"
become
the living development as soon as a teleologicalview of it is taken. This in the Sense-world self-realization of essence is called an entelechy, Entelechia," which takes place under four principles, The first two of these principles Matter, Form, End and Cause. refer tp things related to each other ; and the latter to individual mere,
"
"
things. The
ask for the origin of the motion we Deity. When of the moving it is answered that this must principles, again be a make into moving principle. As, however, we cannot a regress the infinite,we to come some musr moved, prime Mover, himself unthat excludes all passivity and potentiality,and is pure This is without activity and energy. Matter, aneu hules," in eternal its motion, simple, continuous, without actus, purus 2.
"
"
the source the limitation of space. Thus of movement is found outside of the substances moved. It cannot cause cause motion, beend aimed is instance of this at an and the every process, the of the world is its final end, prime Mover best, the efficient All realitylies between Matter and the prime Mover after cause. which strives and which desires. The everything everything Mover all is One, devoid of prime multiplicity:therefore immortal, it is the desiring nothing, desired of all. On this account pure, end of scientific cognition ; and because and eternal, eternally desired of all,no and unification between God his world yond beeternal desire is possible. The divine Mind thinks of itself eternally: in it thinker and thought are eternally one, and at of something else it would rest ; ^f it thought of creation or not be at rest. Human speculationor contemplation of pure thought is the most divine occupation possible to man, re-discovering in blissful rest. God Thus God is the end of human plation, contemof thought thought. The Idea of Ideas ; according an Deity, according to Plato, was ity, of all realto Aristotle,it was a self-contained prime Mover transcendent his world. And this world above lay between himself and Matter, opposed to him, because excluded from him. The that of of the Deity of Aristotle is the same name as claims these The The Mind. and Aristotle take to Good, Plato, from Plato but from names not Deity Anaxagoras, from whose Plato has also borrowed Yet it the name of his Idea of Ideas. is true that the Deity of Aristotle is nearer to that of Anaxagoras than that of Plato ; for the former the all-includingend one was in allreality. of all the "Logoi" of things, the principle of motion
The Psychology.The psychology of Aristotle is radically is a mikrokosm different from that of Plato. Man ; his soul theless, unites all the faculties of other orders of living beings. Neversoul may the human be divided into two parts: that which pre-existsand survives the body, and that which dies with it. The in general. It is the faculty former is called Nous," reason, which excels all man by living beings. The latter is subdivided into five Each souls ists exor planes of consciousness. organ in view of some end, which is an activity: so the body ex3.
"
"
"
"
The
ists
soul.
the
for
The
"
"
central
"
dunamis
hand
parts
two
"
is
"
active
the
alone
is represented
"
no
place
since
God,
rapt
in
sphere
direct
a
himself
consider
will 4.
only one, elements,
as
have
seven.
The
Ethics.
As
"
Ethics
we
in
Plato's in
finds
and
this
Aristotle's
his
as
here ; he
adds
without
we
;
this and
subordinate
have
the
two
only stituent conaddition, we six
in
and
logy psycho-
with
agree
with
empiricist them
to
"
God In
take
we
one,
true
son rea-
Nous
and
seven
connected
the
"
psychology
Ethics
intimately
five virtues
soul
cosmology
of
other
active
Universe.
to
body
system
be
philosophies,
found
Aristotle's
as
to
be
the
on
cosmology
of
the
ed divid-
passive
active
Aristotle's
the
is however
account
other
man
little
saw
Aristotle
will
counting
or
little does
so
agree,
Plato's
then
be
; the
The
motive loco-
self-activity.
;
inconsistent. cosmology So far, then, the human soul is composed of If however souls planes of consciousness. or lowest
"
may
forms
unification
transcended
must
we
in
although
such
up
receives
or
With
and
reason
forms generates eternal existence.
divine, for
active
and
between
possess.
desire, faculty,
"
energeia
as
found
and
rasa
substantial
has
its highest
passive
similating as-
centre
not
and
human
"
and
common
do
appetitive,"
memory,
distinctively
tabula
a
"
"
difference a
former
sensitive,"
include
the
:
have
in
possesses
vegetable
The
latter the
man
"
the
:
"
souls
souls.
the
"
the
souls, itself, the
reason
"
; which
which
into "
share
men "
heart
"
plants
is that
the
organ,
animals, The
animals
and
plants
and
reproductive
or
Plotinos.
of
lowest
two
animals
with
common
Philosophy
either. his
; he
other
chology. psy-
finds
virtues
he
much
regard to his psychology. in virtue he differs from Plato the mean Besides, making a whereas his Master had of between two only known extremes, of its contradictory vice. end virtue and The. teleological a which Aristotle is happiness, action eudaimonia," assumes "
the
habit
mean
his to
define
various with
virtues what
its
its powers, the dianoetic he
and will
neglect?
to
natural
and
virtues
of as
be
being
; but
He
are.
every
man's the
define
is
the
here
these
But
we
quality have
all-important
it
He he
vides di-
forgets
only
rational
characteristic
highest.
deduce
to
self-evident.
of which truth-conception, of intelligible principles grasp
good
of
pretends as
of
immediate The
it
assumes
dianoetic
the
He
activity.
human
finally ; but into dianoetic
gradations
highest.
that
of
experience
from
out points the Nous," "
reaches
is
already virtues.
the
development his
reason,
remarked
CHAPTER
III.
STOICISM.
Stoics
the
that
of
the
it
as
with
for
ready-made Sokrates, and
looking
with
the
its treats
of
is divided
then
is
Doing
errors.
categories, "
orthos
they "
Logos rasa"
at
essence
images
the Final and
of
product Cause, of
of
which "
a
pure
of
are
Energeia,"
Platonic
best
of
of
only
or
reason,"
logical mind
from
or
Nous
but
Aristotle
Efficient
"; they
do
only
real
the was
Cause
principles, the They
tal men-
is
nothing
is nothing
a
telian Aristo-
these
with
two
sity. neces-
being
Ideas
that
avoid
Aristotle's
reality
inseparable. "
of
which
Form,
business to
right
assent,
us
Logic
how
the
cause be-
conceived
; its
"
truth,
shows
Reality
product
from
Logic,
four
first
abstraction
or
This
space.
named
proper
sensation,
instead
; the
the
ence prefer-
they borrow
teaching
compelling
from
principles, Matter,
now
ones,
of
reflection
matter
four
is
passive
anything
the
Thus,
occupying
of
quality
all
impressions.
or
corporeal
except
but
criterion
quality
have
we
man.
which
this
is already
Dialectic
Ethics,
to
originates first.
of
wise
"explicit" "Prophorikos."
and
with
the
Knowledge "tabula
Rhetoric
a
followers
by
is
which
reason,
and
reach
It
changes.
Logos,"
away
almost
Herakleitos.
philosophy
Dialectic
Their
"
secondary
only
however
Dialectic
reasoning.
following
into
theoretic
characterized
being
Dialectic.
"
in
were
in
virtuous
the
movement
combine
to
themselves
of
tics Peripate-
the
from
Physics
or
former
Epicureans
their
pattern
the
"Endiathetos"
"implicit"
as
as
of
abstract
over
Aristotelian
Aristotle
the
sics." "Phy-
Plato all
life, than
practical
considered
centuries,
Ethics
for The
2.
on
several
for
him
and
Stoics
their
and
theirs
Epicureans,
borrow
to
they
beginners
the
were
lasted
Ethics
in
interest
this
or
Aristotle,
from
the
the
preferred
They
discussions.
In
Ethics,
in
interested
nized recog-
either
for
the
;
Aristotle
glance
remained and
Besides,
before.
given
was
It
and
called
comprehensive
cendence trans-
while
than
age
Plato,
the
things
Deity, that
so
Stoics
later
a
Stoics
the
in
the
ended.
was
immanence
world,
to
latter's
Academicians,
and
more
belong
the
work
constructive
the
Dialectics,"
Stoics
the
Aristotle,
what
"
Theology
Yet
in
immanent
denied
Aristotle's
of
transcendence
the
to
was
Aristotle
their
beyond
Aristotle
What
"
Aristotle.
to
Ideas
only
his
called
Stoics.
the
were
denied
Stoics
and
Aristotle
Plato,
1.
and active
not
know
know of
The
io
a
"
conscious with "
Philosophyof Plotinos.
"
principle Reason the universe, just as
"
or
the
Logos
"
connected arably insepsoul or Reason This cosmical force, "
human
"
"
is united to the human Logos body. moving, active,moulding, reasonable, is Reason," Logos," and is the Deity. This form-principle is called Logos," Soul, ether, nature, Zeus, and fire not destructive,but constructive. Being constructive this divine fire is the womb and grave of all things, containing the rational germs spermatic reasons," soul is of like logoi spermatikoi," of all things. The human character with the World-Soul, and the breathing-in of the cool air of the atmosphere assists its generation and preservation. The human soul however, seems to be composed of different the logical powers," elements, the governing force, is to logistikon," seated in the breast,the generative function, speech This make and the five senses. would eight component parts, the crudeness of which classification is apparent at first sight. Although the Stoics recognised only two principles,the passive God He. apoios ousia," and the active, The matter," in which Ho reason Theos," exists,"yet on the other hand the divine soul is represented as of being composed Hexis, and Nous." phusis, psuche," habit," nature," soul," finally or
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
In
"
"
"
this
we
may
"
trace
"
"
a
faint
resemblance
Aristotle's
to
psychology. formation of the world then took place by change of the divine fire into air and water water separates into earth, ; which and fire. Earth and water are water passive ; the finer air and fire are active. Finally at the end of a definite age, all things are resolved into the divine fire (conflagrative)after which the world will be once things as before happening more created, the same This of without any thing new. without variation into infinity, course destiny brings into the finite sphericalworld absolute ". and "Pronoia ever howDestiny Heimarmene," providence," that primary causes so mained reonly related to auxiliary causes seen foreactions were in our free will and desire,whose own tality but not predetermined by providence. As to the immordiffered. of the soul, Stoic teachers of into the domain introduced Ethics. The Stoics The 3. In the first several man was Ethics new place, conceptions. considered only in relation to himself, not in relation to the is not To live according to nature State of Plato or Aristotle. one's but to the of live according to nature others, according to the Thus himself. im maxneed only know nature own ; the sage exhortation becomes to an reason to live harmoniously with In the second in absolute sense. place, live harmoniously, an ofncium ". This does they introduced the conception of Duty, not only regulate a natural impulse, as with Aristotle, but has the it. It suppresses all "affective states,""Pathe." to suppress power fear, trouble, desire and pleasure, as leading only to morbid The
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"Apathy pain and therefore worthless. states, pleasure and in conhuman tradistinction state the is consequently highest Apatheia This state from pain. to the Epicurean freedom
"
"
"
CHAPTER
IV.
EMANATIONISM.
The
1.
with
identity aubon
been
the
of
of
Hermes
name
his
doctrines
Sokrates
;
have
must
thoroughly
have
been
his
an
a
the
That
Sakkas, several
be
of
Relation
for
as
the
Justin
condemned
have
which
Hermes also
become
Philo
Logos
at was
to
so
time
him
a
were
of
lepios. Ask-
for
ing call-
whenever
misunderstood rather
as
raise
heathen
authorities
Cyril
dria Alexan-
of the
even
God,"
second
the
support
to
were
and
; for "
the
who
Ammon,
ground
who
(2)
only
in
well-known
nothing
or
him
Besides,
the
should
Homer,
be
Ammonius
tian Chrisa
trine doc-
Nicaea.
familiar familiar
considered
and
lived
fragments
quote
be
from
Lactantius
Tertullian. have
endeavouring
were
little
means
the
they
writings
of
an
good
however,
quotations
That
him
held
for
Plato
instance
or
fact
by
heathen.
(3) praised
If
;
opinions
own
writers, among
purpose.
presumption
opposite their
This
whose
must
in
O
could
must
refers
Hermes.
to
no
Fathers
theirs,
with
agrees
fit. their
is
He
over
of
living
There
"
have
thePoemandres,
Hermetic
Hermes
works.
and
who
mention
addressed
if these
The
Christian.
a
doctrine
his to
Christianity.
in
logues dia-
Tertullian.
grandson
are
of
disciple
a
to
Hermes
reputed
Sakkas,
of
writer
by
possible
fragments
Ammonius
times
the
2.
Asklepios,
the
his
Plato.
influence
had
writings
for
Besides,
of
that
his
introduced
Martyr,
one
the
that
so
thought
Josephus,
work.
and
D., is rendered
Hermetic
might of
A.
him,
Josephus
Hermetic
241
of
works
of
time
the
he
Plato
of
at
assumed
because
one
with
Hermetic
extant only complete 136-216, A. D., mentions
between
and
identical
the
and
writings Justin
God,
that
fame
and
to
first.and
have
as
of of
verbally
passage
authority the
Unity
the
the
or
just
Cas-
Hermetica
may
Hermes,
with
of
the
either
his
assume
fame.
of
who
Judaeus,
contemporary
of end
speaker,
Trismeg-
to
Egyptian
the
at
Philo
early
Hermes
writer
of
a
gain
to
imbued
doctrine
contains
as
after
impossible
reasons,
those
Hermes
lived
is
century,
several
with
finally,
or,
been
to
second
agreed
He
living
for
which
of
the
suppose
the
introduced
It
in
Hermes
Alexandrian
an
time
uncertainty.
Menard
beginning
the
The
"
traditional
the L.
and
have
in
is lost
lived
istus
Hermes.
of
Date
with with
inspired.
writings
the the
locutions On
this
of
Philo,
of
the
ground,
he
must
Septuagint. therefore,
if
Emanationism.
13
do the like by Philo. is considered Christian,we must a advanced often as proofs of the which most are passages O follows. Child, send Thou, are as Christianity of Hermes of all things. But God, Father an acceptable sacrifice to The Dia tou Logou (4)." add also, O Child, through the Logos in Philonic These particular; especially the words are every therefore constitute acquaint"The ance God." They cannot name Tat." of the Trinity. Again, with the Christian dogma ? Son The Hermes. of the regeneration is the generator Who of the God, One Man, by the will of the God (B)." Here we see Hermes
The
"
"
"
"
"
man," one Philonism again, especially in the expression since the human be a man must which refers to the Logos, who -That the in the the cannot of one man is race Logos. image ing followbecause of from the refer to the human Jesus is plain body before the creexisted ation that this one man we see passage of the human iginated of the world, whereas body Jesus only orBut the Father of all after it. several thousand years Man and like unto the life a light,began Mind, being things, he tiful, beauhe his for loved child, own was as himself, whom very God For The loved his having the image of the Father. all his creations delivered and this over own (8)." to own form, ? the Of the son of God Of whom sowing, O Father (7)." of all things (8) and the Tool of Thus the Son is the Organism God's Will (9). asserted It has also been that the following words constitute a But The reference to the Holy Spirit: Mind, The God, being masculine-feminine, originating life and light,begat by reason another of the Fire and Mind-Creator, who being God Spirit created administrators seven (10)." This refers to the Logos, shall see these seven administrators and as we not the seven are the the of of which the world but heavens names seven Spirit is composed. It is therefore another for the Logos, and name "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
nothing more. Immediately Again, "
the downborne elements springs forth the Word of The God, to the pure creation of all Nature, and united to the creative Mind, for it was consubstantial, was with thus it We that what above (Homo-ousios) see (")." of the Trinity is here appeared to be referred to the third person the referred to what would be the second ; which is also called Word the mo-ousios "Howord spiritual "consubstantial," (12)." Besides, used by any Christian writer of repute for not was than a century after this,in the days of Athanasius. sequently, Conmore Hermes have in the distincused this word tively cannot theological meaning, whereas it agreed with his Philonism, that all things were in them. in God, but not God But besides showing negatively that Hermes tian, not a Chriswas' show this positively by noticing the fact that he we may held to doctrines never countenanced by Christian authorities The t here is a metempsychosis Deity is masculine-feminine (13), of souls,regeneration is accomplished by silence,and divination is aporoved of (14). from
"
"
"
The
14
Philosophy
of Plotinos.
doctrine differs from 3. Difference from Platonism." Hermetic in several important particulars. Platonism In the first place,we must notice the crude anthropomorphism, the first which and second by orders of existence are likened to the human figure. Plato's conception of the Deity was too exalted to call it anything but that Epekeina tes Ousias," which is beyond all Being," Over-Existence." Plato's highest order oi being was alone Mind, Nous." Here Nous is predicated of the two out highest orders of being, withmaking it clear whether there is any difference of degree between them. Hermes limits the transmigration of souls to human bodies, and the souls from saves this shame," of represents that God being sent into the bodies of animals. Plato in his figurative "
"
"
"
^ "
"
"
way
seemed
to
such
countenance
animal
transmigration.
of the author Conceptions. In the Emanationism 4. Hermetic of the Hermetic writings,the Universe is composed of a number of spheres of being, each the image of the other next above it The (1B). highest sphere of being is The God (16),the next is the Logos, the Son of God (17),and beyond him, there are seven successive spheres of Being of which and all things in heaven earth are there nine spheres of being, are (18).Thus, composed each proceeding from the other, in the image of its begettor ; Matter being the outermost is considered God (19). When apart the world, the latter,including the Logos, is called the from "
Ogdoad
C20).
Psychology is analogical into four parts (21) But : "
to
the
The
cosmology. soul
of
man
soul is divided in is carried on
this way. in the reason, in the The Mind Logos," the reason Death is soul, the soul in the spirit,the spirit in the body." the the of the from only retiring spirit physicalbody (22). the Hermetic writer speaks of an 5. Cosmology. Although besides God, he usually sums all existence in three Ogdoad up "
"
orders
of
the seven ing being, by comprehending spheres proceedfind under Thus the sofrom the Logos the title Soul. we called Platonic trinity: The God, the World, and the Soul (23). He First The God, Second the World, third the Man ; says: of the God the but Man the World because of because Man, in ideas, but in bodies, some Of the entities some indeed are in in but is idea and but some ideas, energies ; body energy body (24)." of The first principle,The God, is the beginning and cause all things (25); his name is Logos, the God, the beautiful,the is not in there is nothing which good (28). In the Universe neither magnitude, nor the God; whence quality,nor place, nor and Universe is the about the God. He is the Universe figure is around all things. the God." The second principle is God," as contrasted with God." He is the "first-begottenof God," and the "second ("). the Logos He is also called (*)." also be called The third principleis Soul, which may God," "
"
"
"
"
"
Emanationism.
though second The
in
lower
sense
a
than
15
in
that
which
it
applied is the
principle(29).
Logos is the archetypal system of ideas C30),and is the the first principlegenerates, because it is his nature Creator, whom he for For has be and because a good. to passion good, the God live apart from life,so neither can cannot just as a man live without Life, and as doing the good. For this is as it were all things, and to vivify (81)." motion of the God, to move it were "
in respect While the First Principle is the Creator Second Principle is the Creator Principle,the Second "
to
the
proper
C2)." The
physical world
is of
the body
course
of the World-Soul
C33)human soul develops by the experiences it The (34)which are limited to gathers in a series of reincarnations of bodies human by the guardianship of good spirits. "For soul from this so great is this law, to guard a human The God disgrace C36) of entering the body of an animal. the Father is the Logos, or Second Between the Soul and the of God's the will (36). mediating element, Principle, organ This is the tion prize for souls (37)." And this is the administrathe nature of the One of the Universe, dependent from and Mind One. Than it the of the which pervading through nothing unitive of men is more divine and energetic, or more to the Daemon. This is the Good Blessed Gods, of Gods to the men. the soul which is fullest of this ; unfortunate the soul that is void of this C38)." Man hate the body, in order to love himself, the Soul must is Man attracted to God C"). by contemplation, as iron to the C40).Thus, contrariwise,impiety brings its own ment punishmagnet in darkness and fire '(41).The only evil is ignorance of the Deity C42). And it is possible to discern him through all motely things by natural knowledge, since everything is his image, re-
6. Ethics.
"
"
"
"
directly (43). by which the soul reaches its development is the silent prayer of silent contemplation, the of the regeneration later mystics. from soul and Accept rational sacrifices pure heart intent upon by thee, O Unspeakable, Ineffable, Invoked lies in silence (4B). silence C44)." Thus intellectual wisdom Draw it will come and it becomes. to thyself and Lay ; wish of the body and it will be the generation of the to rest the senses of the Matter Deity. Purify thyself from the rational avengers C46)."The road to be travelled by every soul passes through the twelve signs of the Zodiac indeed, but of all (4T) of the nature forms." shaped is to wrong Besides silence,the way to reach God no man (48) ; But the worship of God is one to be evil C48)." : not divine. end of life is to become 7. Spiritual Destiny. The For it is possible, O Child, that the soul be deified,placed in the body of man, having beheld the beauty of thy good (M)." "Knowest thou not that thou hast been born The God, and Son of or
The
manner
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
16
the
One,
one
but
strife and
after
the
this
piety
have
to
Transmigration deification
the
human
body, is
piety
to
becomes
not
divine;
have
such
striven
known
the
God,
the
(62)."
Mind
humanity
every
and
having
wholly
their
and
soul,
and
the
of
already,
can
to
(")"" must
continuity hasten
the
those
is
nigh
Thus
the
to
to
One
they
attain seest,
and
and
O
how the
stars
Only
many we
God
in
there, deliver
The
must
(M)."
to
how
of
many
to
up
be
is
made bodies and
daemons,
accomplish,
a
they
This
God.
knowledge,
choirs
order,
themselves
become
Child,
such
which
by
means
And
they
who
of
courses
the
and
powers
through,
and
"
Father,
"Thou
Again,
pass
the
only
accomplished.
of
ending
good
divine
is
becoming
and
powers,
souls
of be
upwards
mount
may
But
daemonhood
man)
no
Plotinos.
(53).
Deity
the
"
from
strife
(but
Gods
are
of
departure
wronged
men
the
kind
a
of
(51)"
I?
am
is
pious,
the
of
some
also
which
soul,
a
we
Philosophy
The
that
we
CHAPTER
TO
Sakkas.
Ammonius
1.
Ammonius
Theodoret,
Sakkas,
of
he
the
was
and occupation Christianity,
his
The
"
founder
of
son
of
TION RELA-
Christian
himself
devoted he
Neo-Platonism
According
labourer.
a
as
THEIR
CHRISTIANITY.
Alexandria.
became
and
AND
PLOTINOS,
SAKKAS,
AMMONIUS
V.
could
not
to
Porphyry
Soon
of parents however
to
philosophy. of
approve
was
and
humble he
cumstances cir-
changed He
doned aban-
Christian
tility hos-
in life, he Later speculations. taught philosophy with teaching orally, and great demanding success, a from his students to promise keep his doctrines secret. Among his students the two Herennius and Plotinos. Origens, were We of his doctrines that he discovered the agreement only know of Aristotle with Plato, a remark supported by a statement of his doctrines said that he felt himself by his disciple Plotinos, who bound after the heathen by his promise no more and Origen
science
to
Herennius and
body,
theirs.
"
always
of
place
and
birth
would that in
Lycopolis,
he
of his
greatness
Ezetoun," him, he never broke
wisdom
that
East.
the
himself forced
mutual
determined
of
in
campaign
is the
left his
Feeling he
that
to
the
been
his
man
for
side
until
had to
the
the
army
East
;
to
but
Persia
Gordian
when
of
the
time
now
to
bind
and this which army
he
Ammonius
had
ties
with
said
India, purpose was
broke
first met Sakkas eleven andria, Alex-
to
learn
to
he
the
had
destined up,
the
"Teuton
lasted him
D.,
became
away
have
the
death
accomplish of
to
he
a on
A.
205
or
year
carried
so
which
other
no
go
To
in 204
is reported me!" From
intercourse, he
was
day birth-
having it is supposed
Yet born
his of
twenty-eighth
and he
about
ashamed
picture.
a
Sakkas
silent
almost
have In
teacher
this
their
up
years.
"
remained was
must
Egypt.
pupil of Ammonius
the
he
;
sit for
not
authority
good in
broken Plotinos
had
Plotinos.
2.
and
he
tached atto
a
was
with it to where he settled teacher Rome, as a consultations and holding successfully managing his school till in his sixty-sixth year he died (270 A. D.) his As teacher well a was instructing success as great, poor rich. The Gallienus and the Emperor as Empress Salonina, his lectures. This due others, attended success not was among but also to his personal influence and only to his wisdom power. Above of it to his genuineness much and all, he owed ity. spiritualthe that time lived with he him During Porphyry enjoyed four the times which he had others to preached ecstasy as being the attainment. height of human
of
to
return
philosophy,
i8
The
Philosophy of Plotinos.
According
to his wish, Porphyry collected and edited his writings. These consisted of twenty-one and earlier, thirty-three later short essays various topics. Porphyry on gathered these into groups of nine, which he called Enneads. The order in which he placed them of the times the was chronological order when they were written, so that they are not arranged according The to the subjects discussed. by style of Plotinos is marred continual repetitions and very and obscurities of thought many diction,so that a systematic representation of his doctrines is no easy task. As Plotinos considered himself a disciple of Ammonius Sakthat his for kas, we may practicalpurposes assume writings represent all important points. the thought of his Master on
ful of Plotinos is so beauti3, Relation to Christianity.The system and that Christian been coherent writers have slow so not all that in the is good it to to ascribe early Christian training of "
be underSakkas. How stood Ammonius littlesuch a claim means can of Alexandria accused when recollect that Clement we Homer and Plato of stealing their best thoughts from the Jewish prophets. Consequently such an explanation of the good elements if it merit any of Neo-Platonism would not answer that such still made claim (which is not were a to-day) the by value of nonChristian philosophy is seriously impaired, and it deserves. than Christianity is credited with more In the first place, Ammonius child when Sakkas mere was a he became able to as Christian, and left Christianity as soon think for himself. Besides, Eusebius (2)distinctlystates that he left Christianity on of its hostilityto science and osophy, philaccount that the very subject of dispute ; and it is well known beliefs. the bitterest enemies of their former become converts would Would it be likely that Amirpnius Sakkas permit himself of to be influenced by Christianity in the very thing on account he left it? which Not a single word or similarityof expression in the Enneads betrays any acquaintance with the Christian formulations, nor does Plotinos anywhere betray that his doctrines had arisen in opposition to or imitation of Christianity ; he utterly ignores it. longed And the reason of this is plain ; for the Christians usually beand to the lowest most unphilosophic classes, with a it almost few exceptions ; and seems amusing to think that a man so deeply read in philosophy as Plotinos or Ammonius ently Sakkas all their best doctrines from eminshould borrow were
unphilosophic sources. Christian examine the state of contemporary Further, if we reotyped stewithout that almost a will it is exception see philosophy we Testament. form of Philonism adapted to the New There are no original conceptions, and no learning ; Clement's at Greek literature being mostly made quotations from up this then could second hand from cheap anthologies (8). How rich results of Neobarren furnish the acknowledged source Platonism?
+
20
earlier
Greek
good,
The
Philosophyof Plotinos.
philosophy.
Before, however, making
notice
that
this statement
whether
think so or not, it we that Plotinos either thought so, or affected to think in every work of his now extant. Plotinos relies upon the authority of Plato in every small detail the philosopher," or (*). He refers to him as with even must
we
is certain so
"
"
a as we
he
"
he says without (5); or even sign of quotation any in the famous the paragraph on transmigration of souls which shall see later ("). If his opinion clashes with that of Plato,
mere
will
resort
what
to
Plato
from
to
us
seems
a
misinterpretation
in order
(7). He considers that he is reestablishing Platonism, and desires to be called a Platonist; pure if the issue is raised,he will refuse to depart from Plato's norm. Other often referred to merely philosophers are the as ancients the and ancient or blessed philosophers Hoi archaioi Hoi archaioi kai makarioi or philosophoi (8)." He believes that his teaching concerning the Good, the Mind, and the Soul is Platonic (9); but he finds it also in Parmenides, to
save
censure
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
and Herakleitos, Anaxagoras is said Empedokles ; Anaxagoras be he who attained He believes (10) through age accuracy. of the ancients that some have the truth ; the only must known of them it most, which knew question remains quently, fully. Consehe feels at liberty to criticise them, as he does okles Empedand Anaxagoras (n). Worthy of notice is the fact that he claims that the very marrow to
of his system
that of Sokrates is the same and Plato : as know Gnothi Seauton." He Let us obey thyself says : the command of the Deity, and learn to know ourselves (u)." This fact might be used to prove that there existed such a thing in which the moral esoteric Platonic element doctrine as an the prevailing one and which handed under oath down was was the Fathers of secrecy. of Church look this maxim Many upon sufficient guide to salvation and it is remarkable how it meets as of being Platonic. At any us name everywhere under the same tics, rate it is certain that the problems of Cosmology, Physics, Polimain and the were Sociology which topics of exoteric Greek as philosophy, are to Plotinos important only inasmuch of the deductions from his the welfare of soul. doctrine they are "
"
"
"
Aristotle is indebted Plotinos Greek Philosophy. To tion partiallyfor his conception of development and emanaand for his the of transcendence lines outfor psychology, God, ; of or suggestions cosmology. of his Nous To (with the Platonic name Plato, Plotinos owes most God) his conception of the Earth-Soul, his categories, and alall his details,as well as the transmigration and destiny of souls. moral for his exclusive is indebted the Stoics Plotinos To the of of his and touches conception some interest, possibly in of the uncertain indeed, spite Earth-Soul, though this is very 5. Relation
opinion To
to
"
of Erdmann.
the Emanationist
doctrines
of writers such
as
the
inditer
of
Relation
the
"
Plotlnos
Hermetica,"
and
completed
which
Plotinos Thus
we
philosophy he
is
;
not
last
that and
which most
of
before of
Greek
the
proportions.
various To
Thus, we
philosophy
may
source,
haps, per-
a
former
to
owes
his
claim
that
osopher phil-
high-souled
whatever
of
was
look of
upon
Greece
value
is
Neo-Platonism
as
the
spirituality.
admit but
system
one
time.
this
Plotinos to
of
stages
burning
originality,
into his
system
scruple
not
philosophy,
represents
perfect
his
bold
combined
philosophy phase
we
need
and
Emanation,
of
conception
development.
of
much
and
inventor
an
who in
how
see
21
the
mysticism,
his
owes
his
owes
of
^
Christianity.
inter-connected
conception
Aristotelian
to
his in
system its
noblest
the as
CHAPTER
MIKROKOSM
interesting
in
not
To
some
this
subjects
the
it be
Let
indirectly,
worth
to
therefore
us
to
know
Ennead
last
that
two
refer
cessories ac-
us
first and these
are
efficient
commands
between
object
no
are
?
soul
topic
or
other
would
who
Ennead
directly
manner,
the
is
they
what
about
no
All that
measure
Concerning
is
there
Soul.
the
the
the
there
and
devoted,
are
Plotinos
Deity absorbing
of
()."
ourselves
To
"
than
rather
command
the
obey
"
end.
think,
MAKROKOSM.
except in
him
to
this
to
and
speak
Life.
consideration
of
worthy only
AND
Contemplative
The
1.
VI.
to
does
subject
the
again. In
order
therefore
true
aspect,
very
summarily,
the
nature
of of
views
shall
we
those
from
both
places
life
practical in
shadow
Yet
must
we
is not
the
attain. of
reach
matters
discussion
time
of
partiality
this
as
fact
the "
theoretic
life
the
life, and
have
of system Plotinos
a
far
above
the his
above
was
life is only
practical the
lative specu-
may
that
as
Olumpos
in
the
philosophers,
Plotinos
from
of
his
to
professional
Plotinos
the
of
is
the
aim
life in
the
ian Hegel-
latter
limited
terms
their
all, whatever those
to
which such
Besides, who
"
"
contemplative of the philosopher of philosophy,
this
abstractions,
metaphysical
the
other
exposition
an
their
of
Hercules
demands
with
acquaintance to
take
not
which
sense,
of
of of
"
theoretic
the
hand
being
or
For
its
in
(3).
former
the
(2).
Hades attain
to
means
in
system also
"
real
the
as
Plotinos
the
to
space
most
that
and
;
all
reason
the
philosophy contemplative
"
the
with
deal
our
taken
fact
upon
of
Soul.
devoted
the
philosophy
to
of
the
The
looked
they have speculative
all
have
have
considerations. arisen
forced
be
who
Plotinos
the
present
reserving destiny of
and
Most
"
to
have
and
a
contemplative moral
private lived
all vices
life
than
more
habit
would
logician
no a
nothing
think
to
have
is
ficulty dif-
within and
life
has
out
of themselves.
been,
is exclusively life of Plotinos contemplative it is something life of the moral based perfection a proves upon life is The contemplative than skill in logomachy. more mere of face to in attains that God, the which soul to knowledge one The
fact
face, rapt Such 2.
a
that
the
in
ecstasy.
Mikrokosm.
originator
life is it that
contemplative in
"
We
have
philosophy
seen
of
the
Plotinos that
before word
"
seeks. Aristotle
mikrokosm."
was
His
the con-
Mikrokosm
ception
that
was
is
is
man
a
enlarged.
man
a
and Makrokosm.
in miniature, just as the universe is advantage of this observation
universe The
will constitution of one of these terms, we in order be able to reason of the other. Thus to the constitution ourselves : will only have to know know the Universe, we to God. If man and seek our and if we highest self,we will know be separate, how God shall man ever hope for an at-one-ment with God ? is not Plotinos inclined to use mikrokosm though althe word be he has the full Aristotelian conception of it. It may in his that him it into with not we are reading proved crediting that of Aristotle ; for his Aristotelian psychology, and system his continual ascription of psychologicalterms to the World-Soul that
if
know
we
the
"
"
that
he holds the mikrokosmic theory. We will therefore proceed to give a sketch of his psychology, in order that our investigationsin cosmology and theology may become lucid. soul is the unity of the following 3. Psychology. Every human elements : seven Ho 1. Theos," The God (4). '* Nous 2. Koinos," Universal Mind Idios," Individual Mind (6) 3. "Nous Reason Logos, Dianoia," (T). 4^" 5? To Aisthetikon Meros," The psychophysical mechanism/ Y of sensation (8). 6. To Phutikon Meros," Vegetable life (9): To Soma," The form, body, matter (l"). 7In presenting this scheme remember of psychology we must that nowhere does Plotinos give us a complete exposition of it ; but it may be proved satisfactorily that he holds it, since he ner. always speaks of these particular faculties in a consistent man-
assure
us
"
"
"
"
"
The the first four of these psychological elements compose Psuche the soul ; the later three the or body, compose "Eidolon Psuches or image of the body (n). The body is furnished to us, as we shall see, by the World-Soul, called the lunar gods (12)." The Soul is alone ourselves ; it is created It is divided into two by God. parts : the ideal, and rational soul" (18). The rational soul is composed of reason vidual and indimind which faculties are realized in almost soul ; every the ideal soul consists of the two highest faculties that are in souls latent,or undeveloped. many The -facultyof reason constitutes the individuality of the Soul, for it has the power of identifying itself with the highest faculties of sinking into the lower. When the soul does sink into or the flesh,the higher faculties quiesce, become latent,and may in extreme Of the latent faculties may cases atrophy. at course, later date be revivified (14). some While the soul is incarnate, all the seven indisfaculties are and the bond is olubly bound broken together ; only at death, when the soul abandons the body as an old dress. "
"
"
"
The
24
In
this scheme
of the Soul the
We become become
must
of psychology
are
of Plotinos.
assured
both
the immanence in thei is of the Soul[ "
in every part of the body, as the body the transcendence of the higher faculties
Soul," and above
Philosophy
body (15). remember
for Plotinos to know to a thing, and canf with identical terms one were (19).Therefore we with whatever have know one God-' we : and as we a consciousness, the life of contemplation is the highest of all that we shall come God to know possible lives for it means (20). As a consequence of this we carnate, inepitomize the universe, when into comby having organs we come by which can munication of the Seven of which the with every Realms one world consists. is Therefore man Panta," all (16); he is a soul is not an Kosmos world (21).The noetos," an intelligible but like around a centre house, a a unity revolving aggregate, it can into which draw itself inwards to (22). The soul ascends its highest heights not by addition, or adding itself to God, but union with him by immanent (18). into the body furnished Once the soul has incarnated by the World-Soul, it is an indissoluble unity with it,using it as a tool than the workman (22),not being affected by its pains more is affected by the injuriesto his tools (29). Then the soul is like man a standing with his feet in a tub of water (30),reaching down the form and lowest of to being, matter, being one very with or having a faculty to become Nous with the cosmical one and even The that the soul is kin to the God (2a). For we know Nous and God, by faculties like them, though at times Cosmical obscured by being fallen into the flesh (24). Plotinos does not always speak of the various faculties of the soul in detail. He usually assumes the practicaldistinction,soul is and the World, so and God body. The soul placed between that like an amphibian it lives now here, and then beyond (25) its will think able without and against the will of at to being he the body divides the soul into a double (32). Often, again, self : the inner world, true or self,that lives in the intelligible that
it
"
"
the
"
ideal
lives in the
"
soul
we
external
saw
(2e);
above
world,
the
"
and
rational
the "
external
self that
soul just mentioned
(")" How
the
incarnation
into the
furnished
body
by
Earth-
the
place is not quite clear : the soul is said to emit a of light or heat (28)which is probably the celestial spiritual This about later on, in the Fifth Realm. body we shall see more the form the heat World-Soul, to body supplied by gives light or Soul kind
takes
and
becomes
even
forms
4.
united
to
the
earthly spiritualbody,
or
perhaps
it.
Cosmological Import of Psychology. "
In
order
to
show
forth
universe the large one, must we to the relation of the small while bound by an premise that each separate faculty of man, exists in a universe of its own. indissoluble tie to the other faculties, The table physical body dwells in a realm of dead matter ; the vegesoul in a realm of organiq life in which organic life is pos-
Mikrokosm
and
sible,
universal
The
of
nature
miniature.
is other
the
including
being,
have
image, transcends
all
individual
mind
is
body
is
image
the
form
or
beyond which
not.
in
of
each
Realm God
as
his
the
all
the
lower
of
the
vegetable life
;
the
call
may
of ;
in
life
this
is
absolute
Mind
realms
is
again
the
the
;
finally,
pro-
the
turn,
again the
is
the
of
image of
grade
darkness
its
being God
their
this ;
lowest
is
which
image
Divine
the
matter
of
Realms
sake
of
separately, shown
of
is
said
universes
These
in
or
third, be
cannot
World,
the
God,
Mind
Mind, The
which
in
us
thinkable
all
Divine
the prope~.
and
and
;
we
mind
these the
their
of
being
;
nought,
exist.
even
the
as
in
before
is above
is
soul,
Soul
sensual Thus
abstraction
that
does
for
the
mind.
is
While
forced,
or
of
much
Tait,
existence.
possesses
image
image
who
of
Divine
through
form
individual
the
(31).
universal
lies
essence,
Realm
God
The
rate sepa-
become
to
and
Realm
The
in
else.
similarly
ceedng
it
other.
the
other
existence
God
The
and
the
although
immanent
are
is Second
four,
each
interpenetrate
of
being
Divine
the
to
Stewart
process
the ;
in
order
Universe."
Realm
First
which
Nous,
whole
in
each
Messrs.
Unseen
The
being
and
so
interpenetrate of
the
The
perfection
of
"
book,
co-exist that
ourselves
open
universes
interesting
the
only
25
powers
fitted
are
Realms
different
the
they
need
we
different
These
to
which
for
realms
human
all
Thus
on.
so
Makrokosm.
and
forth
Plotinos is
in
in
then his
immanence
inseparably
clearness and
the
image,
to
and
conjoined,
exposition, consider man.
to
the
we
cendence trans-
will
consider transcendence
be first
CHAPTER
FIRST
THE
1.
The
and
One
it is necessary reflection and these will
they
from
the
If
Many.
In
"
order
to
the
mind
ideas
and
representations.
the
understand
receive
should
anything, sensation
through
The
more
understood
thoroughly
more
GOD.
are
fined sharply dethey ; and tinct by and dis-
limited degree that they are ideas and Ratiocination representations. which is subsumed implies a Manifold, mind. is therefore apprehending Unity
clear
in
other
necessarily of the Unity
fundamental
THE
REALM,
that
are,
be
the
VII.
than
the
fore thereunder more
Manifoldness.
considerations Divine the to apply these Being, the thought necessarily implies a Manifold, of being and and activity (*). As a duality of thinker thought, the Divine of called Divine this, activity Thought consequence the realms be the of Divine Life. Above cannot highest plane of of Divine realm of the Divine be the Unity thought must above God is then which all thought. is above Apperception, all all describable all Divine above above Thought, thought, all Divine Divine Life, above (2). Being foldness ManiThe be Manifoldness cannot highest ; for ; it is Unity of Unity is after all only a Manifoldness (3), and everything is thus above is One is itself only because it thus (4). God and above and Divine all Divine Goodness, Unity (5), even then the is God Goodness, that Divine Being (6). If we say and has its of this Divine Goodness object subject thought ; it And becomes of the quality of goodness. good by partaking this quality, this if it thus needs depends on quality, if it thus we
should
we
that
see
then
Divine
it cannot
same
be
be
may
said
Therefore and Being. Unity must (7), original being compound be must independent being : cause
Divine
the
of
The
Goodness.
self-existent
and
independent the
precede simple must of derivative independent is above all categories of effect, and (8). God Unity, of Manifoldness then The is God and of Life, Being, Activity. Thought In and Over-activity. Over-thought, Over-life, Over-being, could who left behind this last point Aristotle by Plotinos, was
the be
not
on
logical
purus,"
pure
God
all
at
God
causes.
2.
He
The
God
is above
(10).
grounds
energy we
only is thus Above
;
his
see
God
know even
to
way
is above
this.
even
by
seeking
above
the
a
Prime
first
"
God
call
cause
Mover
even
That
there
of
all
actus
is
other
of Aristotle^
unknowable. is therefore Cognisability. God ite infinand is he incomprehensible (9),
all description
"
a
The
28
Philosophyof Plotinos.
"
The universal soul has an universal love ; each individual soul has its individual love ; and the love of the highest soul is God (36)." Apart from partaking of the Divine Good no things love loved (") and the soul by the very constitution of its naor are ture loyes God and is ever forced to begin over and over to love
(38).
him
of Begetting. Love 6. Manner is ; but the question remains, "
love
a
sufficient reason getting for all bedoes this disinterested How
beget?
This
is
the
been wisest have never able to explain of illustrations drawn from the natural world. except by the use Plotinos likens God is so full that it overflows to a river which its banks and the has does the same, which overflowed water ;
question
a
itself
extending
in
wider
circuits
(39). This
figure must with caution ; for it should not indicate either a temporal becoming (4"),since creation always takes place from the inner or causal side (41); nor should it be understood to be however
be
such
as
would
abstract
latter remains unmoved and of being flows from him (42).
stream
which
That
proceeds
from
him
in it as if contained by it illustration of the sun
not
of the first undiminished, while the
from
; the
cause
is
taken
emanation
an
ever
ever
the
remains
(43).Plotinos and
honoured
the ray
power
in him
; but
he
the timeadvances of light that proceeds
diminishing its light or heat (44). These illustrations are from the to-day no longer intelligible, fact that the law of continuity demands that the sun's heat should less is from it in the the that substracted amount by just grow form the the heat be so the sun's of light of though ray, even from
it without
loss be not Unless therefore we apparent. of explaining the continued self-existence is doubtless the ot God, in spite of his eternal begetting, which of be whole said the Plotinos to be yet unmust proved. theory case, suffer alone ; the would not Nevertheless, Plotinos that
enormous
find
some
other
the
means
fall together with his. of details of the process the is the which sun enlightens begetting are as follows : God Universe (48). He is (45)and rules all existence with his power which the centre around (47); every little everything revolves knowledge part is organically related to the whole, so that from be deduced of the centre of its nature, the nature (48). All may creation has a natural longing for the first cause (49)and turns in the degree that itself towards him sunflower to the sun, as a its nature of the nature permits it to do so ; arrd'tne excellence is judged by the power it possesses of turning to the first cause much (80). This is the natural instinct of self-preservation; for inasit itself the does itself its turn creature turns to as creator, whole
philosophy
of
7. Relation' of Cause
Christianitywould and
World.
"
The
highest good (B1)velopment dethe natural be likened to of begetting may process is begotten of a plant from a seed (52)and that which be called the son of the begettor, the latter thus becoming may it has begotten (M). The the father of that which first-begotten is the image of the Begettor, the second-begotten of the First, to
its
The
The First Realm, The
God.
29
decreasing simultaneously fulfilsits a Unity, and Ideas Mind its function and impresses with a seal,so that things are living expressions of in matter as of never Idea (5T). That which is begotten is of course a divine each getting bewhich that it with at of begot being equal intensity ; off into the of an image the light of perfection dims darkness of non-existence, Manifoldness increasing, and Unity disappearing. In matter, things are separated by space ; but in the Divine the soul is (ss). Thus Mind, they are only separated by form of the body ; therefore we wholly in every single member may is also God correctly the body is in the soul (5"). Thus say for and all of the the world, world, wholly in every single part of the divine is always, for that is,is in him (**).The presence of the intermediate lower beings, mediated through the presence of in the there are Thus World physical Being. stages where everythree stages of being : God, the Nous, and the Earthand
so
on
(M) Unity and
Perfection
is itselfinasmuch as Divine The (6"i). nature
(M). .Each thing
it is
Soul. If the centre of the Universe be God, then the is that of Nous, enlightened by God : the Second
First
Sphere
is that
soul,
enlightened by the Nous ; the Third is that of body, enlightened by that of soul (Ol). The body turns to the soul, the soul to the ferent C52). Thus each sphere is a difNous, and through it to God each depending on the next plenitude of divinityC13), est highsphere (64)In this manner all the different Realms interpenetrate each other. this conception clear by illusPlotinos sought to make trating it from the natural world : The soul is everywhere in the body, as light as in air (65); but the body is in the soul as air in ba'sic light ; the light being rightly distinguished as the most principle of the two ("6). The intellect generates and governs the lower powers as splendour is in the ray. the ray in the light, the light in the sun (*7). does each soul get an The question occured to Plotinos, how This difundivided unit or quality of life from the World-Soul? ficulty settled by referring to the fact that many was ears can hear the same in each undivided case voice, the sound being (OT). the three presences, we Thus, wherever God, the Mind, are, are and the World-Soul, which known are by the goodness, beauty, and life which we find inherent in all things on earth ( ). in the physical world, is excess What is space tensity, inof power, in all higher spheres (70); in the physical world the categories and of space time represent nothing in the intelligible ferent World, form alone differentiating beings there (n). Thus, on difeach is of itself in conscious its own facultyof man planes, and in its own kinds of limitation, connecting man with all way, the octaves of the universe (72). These major and minor Realms each other form all a perfect harmony interpenetrating together; and their activityproduces that harmony of the spheres which haunted all Greek philosophy, and which was the great Te Deum of creation (7S).
CHAPTER
SECOND
THE
God.
REALM,
the
Saturn,
1.
The
VIII.
Cognisable
GOD,
Deity.
second,Plotinos
COSMIC
The
"
calls
MIND.
first
Realm
called
was
Saturn,
for
shortness
Realm,
that
ratiocination
of
pellation ap-
0). We
iji speaking
saw,
besides
apperception, intension
the
and
then
of
just
the
as
Divine
is primary
said
that
things The
of
for
the
it and
(1Z) but
what
is below
Nous
there
are
matter any
human
it,
on
is
system this four ;
Thought. And
being. Thoughts that
account
as
the
of
if matter at
is
only
all, they
an
must
Mind in
(8), no
no
ory mem-
cannot
still
behold
cribe des-
can
the
actual
behoM
it cannot
(14). Over-being and
Being Divine
These
Categories.
only
it may
actuality
thinking
was
Plotinos
Divine
and
thought
God
"
is
exist.
the
but
never
can
Mind
ratiocination
(13). Moreover,
ness, good-
it comprehends
(10) and
apperception,
itself is wholly
full
Categories
of
being,
eternity (5),
to
future
Nous
him
and'
Stoical but
of
the
so
of
potentiality
powers
Over-
Divine
shall
is that
templates con-
image,
tion, appercep-
Mind
that
or
unknown
Unity
Being
of
the
and
As
it, because
Divine
(18). It is
no
As
not-thinking
from
(9),
describe
can
exist,
determination between
actual
grasp
Identity
identical,
(n).
past the
God
this
progress
thinking
contemplate
of
no
that
existed, of
no
inconcluded
the
have
is
; the
(6). Thus
time
the
tiful; Over-beau-
was
Mind
Divine
the
(3).
Over-being,
(4).
self
of
Unity It
of
unity
is
Divine
its
in
not
distinction
(7),
thought
in
eternity,
consequence
knows
2.
in
it is
God
; the
but
Mind
God
Divine
object
which
itself.
tion ratiocinathe
think?
hind be-
applied
of
and
higher
lies
when
unity,
is Over-activity
complete intelligible action
live
to
the
than
Over-thought God
of
that
is beautiful.
thought.
the
Divine
of
more
activity of
intensity be
thinks
Mind
Over-life, life, and
of
of
strict
of
logical
same
was
subject
plies im-
Unity
which
universe,
more
thinks
reason
is conscious
the
good,
thus
human
which
all
and
the
thought, the
of
Unity
and
to
does
the
Unity
a
ratiocination,
no
and
under
apperception,
applied
thoughts
iself,
by
of
Manifold
therefore
(2), thinker
kind
subsumed
limited
This
is
It
Manifold
What
be
becomes,
Nous.
Mind,
First
Unity of Unity
God.
universe, itself
with
This
Manifold
the
shall
being
itself.
as
the to
which
Manifold,
a
of
Thought
Mind
are
the
refutes treated
and
of
ten
the
are
reality totelian Aris-
ities qual-
if mind, image of Mind, be Categories
of
then
Second
The
of
ideas
"
to
Ideas
as
has God
one
it
all
forms
and
of
of
in
perfect
any
are
is
all
all
It
things,
thing
and
;
as
one
C22).
this
is
beauty
as
it.
inasmuch it
were
proceeds
telligible in-
true
Mind
thus all
power
Even
in
(2B)
a
is
propositions
and
life
represented
which
(19)
things
is
Divine the
to
cludes in-
Mind
it
The is
possesses
things
blessedness
all
motion.
(").
contains
It
Divine that
so
geometry of
(a).
(24)
world
beauty in
presence
thinks
Gods
lower
this
of
(20).
powers
of the
it
;
archetypes
human
peace
for
all
original
the
(18)
in
contained
science
31
The
numbers,
Noetos"
Kosmos
the
Mind.
(").
Being all
and
things
all
World, its
and
Thought
with
beginning
Cosmic
Realm,
small The
versal unias
powers,
itself
in
its
and
has
(*)
things
and
harmony as
the
from
it
accounts
of
trace
the
its
ness still-
CHAPTER
THIRD
THE
The
i.
Trinity
from
It is very it in
Trinity in
original,
the
lower
speculations
the
three
The
"
form
a
much
so-
altered
Plotinos. be
to
of
Zeus-Rhea.
in
of
seems
speaks
SOUL.
and
found,
be
Plotinos
He
THE
:
Saturn
may
the
that
true
places.
some
REALM
Over-God,
:
Platonic
called
IX..
little
a
uncertain
successive
about
of
states
being, O."
and "Gods, daemons, men he if there four orders the the Again, Good, speaks as were : the and which the human souls Nous, World-Soul, daemons, are he of of souls and (*)" Again, speaks spheres spheres, stars, and the below the to corresponding divine, human, moon, space one
than
bestial
and
Yet, order
of
Of
rule, he
a
"
the
third
begetting being unargumentative of
one
The
the
souls
the
world
is
but
simply
Soul
is therefore of it
In
begins
Thus
the
she
stifled
through Mind to
matter
It process
will
of
and
light of light
of
the
case
is this
much
second is
God. which that
its
there in
"
to
herself, and Nous,
her
may
which
body
therefore
body
as
understand its
time
or
space it
beneath
nothing of
passions
to
light; and
yond be-
in
;
begins
the
space.
time."
Manifoldness
and
to
neither
forth
(10) ;
the
agonies
is the
bring
of
spheres
is the
sphere
(8).
darkness
and
into
down
or
inner
So
the
imaged,
the
called
be
may
impassible
the
bound
not
(9)
is said
sink
may
in
which
Mind,
time
is
(e).
further
adorned and lights, being lightened enmany souls do who when not thinking (7) speak when incarnated of the (14). The not sphere
illimitable
Soul
Soul
The but
fire, and
of
therefore
surround
being,
of this
Idea
an
of
have
to
those
Divine
the
of
is
ordinated sub-
Christian
plane
reason
still intelligible light, although
begins
Soul
is
many
glow,
outermost
is full
individually
said
by
(5).
Soul
the
begetting
the
to
The
of light which
heaven
partake
led
that
same
first
the
the
second,
(*).
like
wise
of
three-fold
a
hierarchically
are
no
image
of the
love
in
Soul
the
they
and
the
was
enunciating
and
that
other,
image
the
circles
highest
all
the
second
the
Nous,
the
understood to
one
As
is the
is
in
hesitate
not
God,
:
it
course
the
so
does
existence
Trinity.
"
(s).
men
as
other,
to
of
individual
Yet
flesh.
intellection
she
:
the
through
(u) and
body
the
Divine is
reason
her
harm
can
the
as
;
be she
reasons
mon Comform
is
(12). the explain of begetting
of the soul if position is always proceeding a
we
remark into
that
Manifoldness
the
The
from
we
Third
Soul
Realm, The
33
the Unity of appercepwas tion, Unity. Consequently, the Good foldness, Maniwith Nous The was Unity mingled Over-Unity. In Soul the however, the Unity still predominating. the Manifoldness with Manifoldness, dominating premingled see Unity that from all idea have much to discerpted as so
others,
so
all others
that
other
"
are
"
to
it(13).Beneath
the
Manifold croaches enSense, Vitality and Matter, the Unity, until in matter, Unity more on is in its last degree of degradation into Manifoldness. All souls were originally equal ; they 2. Co-equalityof Souls. all originalthe highest heaven from ly all came (15). They were alike that and Divine Mind are the of they (16), same parts fact the that from is derstand unand can nature they to idea proved as be at the another, and in the intelligibleworld one time, that is,that they can communicate same place at the same in
Soul,
the
Reason, more
and
"
(") with
each
other.
of origin, there is no possible spite of this community confusion that there appears to reign much doubt injusticeand it. Yet, dissimilarityin the dispensationof the world as we know down there below of disorder, in spite of this appearance reigns order world obtains in the intelligible here just as absolute as and differ only Nous from the same Souls come above (w). The cause differ bein essential qualitiesor characteristics (10). Souls may of these original characteristic differences (20)then by the in former incarnations of experience gotten amount (21) the of air (22), bodies given them differed, being celestial, ethereal,or have differed (23); but their education or discipline may or the this inexorable thread of Justice, all runs inequality through is out which metes happiness according to goodness, which The is it that merit. good alone are happy ; on this account and difference between the Gods men are happy (23)." The in human is of incarnated Gods are development ; men only one bodies, the Gods have spheres or worlds as bodies,and are called sisterGods in respect to man because they give to their souls also divine the opportunity of incarnating. Men are brothers of the souls sisters and beings (24)and are the that human of the Gods (25). Besides, Plotinos states explicitly and the will hold souls will have the same same dignity powers into themselves the World-Soul, especially if they will turn as without C26). spot 0 15 ff in
Yet
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
World-Soul." We treat of the World-Soul. must now 3. The the Stoics as some Plotinos took his conception of it,not from Plato. authorities have thought, but from The latter seems to the souls of men have been uncertain whether proceeded from the World-^oul,whether they had all been created by God, in the but smaller .in size. Plotinos solves the difficulty same ) mould, born of the World-Soul in were by saying that the souls of man respect to their bodies ; but that their impassible self,the rea- '""' and mind had been created son or begotten by the same Nous, the World-Soul her sister-souls opportunities for^ only offering above development. We would thus explain the fact that we saw
The
34
Philosophyof Plotinos.
three presences, God, the everywhere on earth there were souls and the the and that human and World-Soul, Nous, yet and for short C27), brethren, were World-Soul, also called Jupiter equal as to origin. Plato never defined accurately whether his World-Soul was the earth. the Soul of the whole of physical universe, or only The when Stoics distinctlylooked to the Soul of the Universe gotten. bespeaking of a World-Soul, from which all other souls were Plotinos was the first philosopher to limit this WorldSoul to the earth, assuming that each star soul possessed its own soul. He says : One sphere, and single life inheres in the one each in all is located Thus creatures one living being. sphere which are on the sphere return to the same one life,and thus all souls on one (28)." sphere are to a certain extent one We must now more enquire particularlyconcerning the nature of this World-Soul. rise to the The we by which argument certainty of its existence is the Stoical one : just as in pur body is a soul, which keeps the body together, so every physical body is kept together by a soul in which the body is (29). For bodies in the souls, which are (30). The form of its body pervade them is spherical,because it is perfect; for when unincarnate, the form of the spiritualbodies of human souls are also spherical (81). In the Third dividual Over-Soul. Realm, that of in4. The Transcendent souls and the World-Soul mind, as we have seen, human different as to individuality,and are coequal as to origin (82). of the World-Soul are so Nevertheless, the intellectual powers much lect intelthat she is called more developed than ours pure of sense but by C33),"knowing things not through organs direct intuition (84).She is outside of the world-body, and bears all that is bodily within herself (35). Her self-consciousness (**) that
"
"
"
is
so
memory
much
needs any that she neither has nor higher than ours all Since she has (8T). knowledge present to her mind,
which to Plotinos seems to be the characteristic of the memory of stable souls, that is,the higher faculties of the soul, which are and Nor which are not left behind at death (M). does impassible the World-Soul that is,reflection,of the Fourth possess reason, Realm (89), Logizesthai," since an equal and perfect thought has as littleneed of ratiocination as for a search after facts which in the past. has known She were no receptivityfor sensual of the no sense having sky serving her as an (w) things, organs conscious She like ratiocination above or God, creates, eye. divine necessity of love (**). She choice, impelled by the same into connection with matter, her time being spent never enters in undisturbed meditation. There is also a lower World-Soul, which is related belonging to the Sixth Realm, called Rhea (**), in like the soul of a realms much its lower to the human race is related to the fruits born tree by the tree (**). It is begotten ed by the higher one, Zeus, as its image ; and is intimately connectwith the matter of the world's body. have and Souls. We already seen 5. Interrelation of Over-Soul is to men that the World-Soul a God, affording them oppor"
"
CHAPTER
THE
Mind.
is the
Realm this
faculty lower
double
when
the
discursive
and
"
ideal
and
Logikon," In
this
then
This
It
Dianoia." it may
but
only in
the
O,
of
other
of
the
of
the
neither same
the
reason
case
the
soul
(4).
matter)
"
"
Logos
reason,
in
incarnating
ever
the
called
the
Gods, of
possibility
Earth, They,
like as
called soul
;
its individuality,
lose
to
as
also
impassible
Nous
similar
be
Zeus, their
to
the
are
Zeus,
memory
Earth-Soul
like nor
lacks
visible
the
as
Zeus,
the
they ly, quiet-
and
seen
the
Earth-Soul,
they
have
we
(u).
souls
Gods, live
ratiocinative them
"Gods"
Earth-Soul,
(9)
the
is
Zeus
of
perfect
most
far
from
producing
souls
the
body,
Like
steadily
(10). Again,
called
World-Soul must
(8).
Gods
nor
eternal
flesh
the
is
and
one,
the
the
there
harmoniously,
reason,
ty. facul-
separate
as
were,
individual
atrophy. As
are,
of
in
buried
cosmic
spheres
his
World-Souls, it
as
destiny.
his
for
exist
human
part
useless
invisible the
peacefully, have
so
stars.
the
contemplate music
lowest
consequently
and
image
is the
World-Souls." Soul
the
may
with rational
with
to
of
that,
essentially
becoming
Other
2.
as
(6).
the
become
and
its
reason
ceases
the
good
so
is
we
and
responsible
his
reason
in
happens
realm
This
the
disappeared
falling has
is
man
identifies
that
become
have
who
of
possibility
reason
man
it is plain
Nous,
"
of
realm
however,
When,
the
it
changed,
Nous)
rational
"
Mind
(5).
animals
of
body
the
reason
"
called
upon
Therefore,
contrasted
vitality
(2).
lower
doubly
as
or
tween be-
looked
Consequently
soul,
(sense
is
and be
individual
(individual
soul
preclude
to
mind
:
"
the appear
"
higher
choosing
may
(3).
rational
parts
human
with
reason
irrational
the
Besides,
itself
soul,
a
his
imagination.
imagination
every
three
soul,"
(reason)
and
and
soul
individual
as
higher
Realm
the
Third
the
the
with
the
:
Third
of a
it is
represented
intellect
"
in
distinguish
is
"
makes to
himself
daemons
permanent
what
in
lacking
Mind
conjoined
the
identifies
intellect
that
occurs
containing
reason
of
soul
of
is
reason
individual
identify
its two
Mind"
:
of
"
reason
the
loves,
''individual
as
Realm the
may
Thus
its two The
of
man
powers.
REASON.
characteristic
faculty
which
by
This
"
essential
lower
REALM,
Although
C).
World-Soul
yet
FOURTH
Individual
1.
X.
powers,
for
XL
CHAPTER
of
Senses
of
the
lacking
in
the
The
1.
fashion
Plotinos
makes
(').
It might
in
begotten the
system
that
this
Since
of
and
the
sense
beget 2.
image of
that
human
sense
Earth-Soul
in
this
on
Human
3.
is
its
this.
the
body
fact
life
than
which
has of
and
It
that
is
here is
body
so
The
itself, the
soul
at
physical life
the
earthly the
suppose
first
time
the
kind
education
for
incarnate
by
soul
(*).
her
Plotinos
which
higher lower
Plotinos
would
to
the
with
with
recedes
the
withdrawal and the
explained
of
form; body
nature
the
former.
and but lasts ruptible. cor-
soul
dle. can-
spiritual We
appearance
\ 1 \
passible, im-
departure
lighted
celestial
the
the
rational
a
of
body
order
in
by
are
our
much
spiritual
the
spiritual
both
to
is
to
identical
are
body
have
This
belongs
part
earthy
though
association
follows
spiritual
image.
an
it
Yet,
the
belongs
The
spiritual
light
we
perfect
furnishes
(3).
meet
They
body,
Sense
between the earthly separation takes all vitality has left place when that
of
realm
the
matter
passions
The bodies
able
be
this
for
that
every
of
Realm
sensations
The
as
and
in
is are
vitality, and
This
"
separable
Soul,
vents prereason
separately.
remembered
to
the
order,
opportunities
souls
existed
nothing
Nous
It
"
ing dur-
Mind have
continually.
death.
the
existing
be
development.
must
perfect
Earth-Souls
sense,
Earth-Soul.
than
it
in
rule
reflection,
on
of
to
he
should
Besides,
Realm.
will
seen
individual
furnishing
of the
given the
it
two-fold.
again eternal
are
the
of
physical
dispensation they longer
and
Sense-Realm.
psychical more
Fifth
body,
her
faculties
lowest
plain
in
lacking
individual
the
subsist
sister
be
that
the
the
for
;
her
affords
incarnating insists
souls
need
is the
as
factor
into
when
as
animals no
one
one,
career.
into still
in
united
organically
three
as
Souls
Unity
it is
well
of has
are
lower
each
great
merged
may
realms
these
however
the
merged
man
their
will
Earth-Soul's
the
though
that
It
development, oi
time
some
allegorical
races
Zeus,
called
higher
next
overlooks becomes
reason
process at
the
Plotinos.
objection
the
of
the
parently ap-
sensation.
through
image
of
eyes,
in
yet
and
Earth-Soul,
if that sight seem that is impossible
it
the
its
as
souls
all higher
to
organs;
sense
is also
Realm
Fifth well
as
no
sky
the
highest
first
at
Earth-Soul,
the
has
information
gather
to
The
This
"
World-Souls,
Earth-Soul
veins
its
Over-Soul.
The
Gods.
SENSE.
REALM,
FIFTH
THE
;
"
may
of
The
38
ghosts
death
the
Phtinos.
the
body
its
What
being
as
person,
before
Senses.
Physical
and
of
spiritual
earthly
the
Celestial
4.
of the
with
sensations?
Plotinos,
man
do
to
utter
these
have
senses.
between
spiritual
bodies Plotinos
fact
During
physical while active.
A
subject
who
in
as
in
case
be
dreams,
be
ideal
the
Consequently,
of
celestial of
set
of
that
apple
bodies
spiritual
other.
celestial
would
point
relishes
the
of
perception
both
on
of
set
connection
psychical
the
position sup-
earthly
an
opportunities the
the
long-sought
incarnation,
reacting
will
times,
at
and
spiritual
On
corresponding
senses,
and
the
two
way.
of
celestial, sees
of
each
excitations
every
sets
a
;
time
the
united,
closely
are
two
modifications
cerebral
them.
has
this
two
In
Much,
ances appear-
extinction.
"
bodies
to
after
shortly of
of
Philosophy
vision is
senses
the
;
alone
somnambulistic
suggested
the
by
her
to
operator. It
is
thus
perfect of
The
of
with
the
animals
that
of
only
celestial
with
nature
here
have
nature
of
animals.
(4). in
so
in
an
be
organs
in
senses
earthly
the
ual spirit-
souls, that
they
would the or
the
quiescence
soul
souls
higher quiescent
The
equally
might extreme
of
although have
earthly and
if
oppose
faculties state.
would
man hu-
enough,
"
in
incarnate
vegetables
and
as
nature
higher
the
"
less
in
the be
of
are
developed. (Fourth
Reason
developed that
the
quiring en-
spiritual like
degraded
infinitely a
of
of
case
animals
of
opportunity
an
them
most
a
The
Nothing animals
upon
human
human
dormant
to
that
low
asserts
even
has
or
of
set
body),
We
present
would
animal.
an
Plotinos
Realm)
so
a
this of
body
is
men,
faculties, although
men,
spiritual
Earth-Soul
the sensation
useless.
Animals.
concerning of
that any
a
"
body
one
fact
possesses
become
having
the
without
things
(celestial
body,
Senses
5.
all
Earth-Soul
spiritual body
explains
of
knowledge
sense.
her
Plotinos
that
case
present,
of
bad but
CHAPTER
SIXTri
THE
Realm.
Sixth
The
1.
cell, and
living
Sixth
The
2.
Sixth
a
Realm
which
and
Soul
its lower
also
phases
"
allo
body
(3). soul
(*).
It
the
with
that
the
begets
with
as
this
on
Cosmical is that
of
the
the
various
3.
be
world
in
Cosmical all
begat
world,
Platonic
the
account
Nous
(10).
a
just rigid
as
of
products
from
of
begetting avoid
which
The
there
are
; but
does
They the
not
; and
the
consequence
in
cyles
they
the
ing shin-
everlasting eternal, therefore
was
for
its image,
it,and
repetition.
necessary
proceeds tion. ratiocina-
of
from
was
man
"the
are
working
eternally.
('). Yet
fatalistic
circumstances
love
sleeping sensation
it cannot
degree;
Nous
that
the
the
to
is below
its images
is eternal in
led
is ; it is
purposeless
body
as
-
name
can
and a
earth-body
earth
(*). This
soul
Her
other,"
the
its
interruption
lower
"
from
its quiet
which
much
its light upon that which of (8). This necessity
exist
yet
in
only
(7).
original
two
body
as
much
;
the
love
of
necessity
Nous;
of
matter
Earth-Soul
with
simple, just
without
instinct,
of
word
highest
is
"
of
representant
appearance,
sensation
made
are
of
the
inner
same
Cosmic
as
in
of
the
human
the
; but
have
to
dreams
certainty
It
the
said
the
therefore ; it differs very in its full psychical state
body
materials
with
of,
Earthsome
the
by
sensible
of
self-conscious
be
may
through
also
spoken
lower
is connected
meditate
cannot
This
indicated
Earth-Soul
substrate
not
sensation
of
lower
the It
but
thought,
higher,
has
higher
the
a
ness. conscious-
is
soul,
vitality.
life is connected
is
(8).
Nature
has
The
all
the
probably
are
human
as
lower
of of
the
(2), as
toplasmic pro-
between
already
lower
Aphrodite
every
from
it from
this
times
called
image
which
mediators,
distinguish
At
functions
reproductive
is tfce begotten "
Rhea,to (*).
Zeus
in
Earth-Soul
have
we
is
being
difference
The
which
soul,
human
apart
Over-Soul.
the
lower
; a
is called
called
the
of
Realm
the
considered
when
the
vitality present all
makes
body,
in
Realm
; the
body
which
dead
a
Sixth
The
the
and
VITALITY.
REALM,
"
life of
vegetable
the
XII.
the
history Stoic
not
are
furnish
only
development
of
or
the souls
"
The said
impress image.
Doctrine to
of On
be
of
Sympathy."
imperfect
the
perfect
it she
:
but
divine
depends
In
if
we
certain look
nature.
for
being.
we
She She
Nature
senses
may
is
see
its
only
in
may
her
offspring has
the and
existence
The
40
Philosophy
of Plotinos.
the Divine exists in her (u). She is not built up inasmuch as of foreign elements, as an aggregate, as a house is built of separate bricks. She is,in her body and souls, an organic whole, elements are all united in the highest Earthan organism, whose in mutual mony, harSoul (12). As in a human are body the members there is a unity although it be composed of sounds low in human in the human and high (14). As a body, so ism organAll and member is react act interdependent. things every all and This is the each means on psychical. other, by physical doctrine doctrine of resulof sympathy," which the modern used by Lotze of forces has re-established,and which tance was "
as
supposititiouslyoriginal proof of Causation. There The is nothing which is Beautiful.
his 4.
"
to
nearer
the
is beautiful ; the of Plotinos than the belief that the world had to enforce his view beautiful world possible. Plotinos he Gnostics and also Christian Gnostics, whom against heathen in this polemic as being those who mentions say that the worldand the world evil (1B). Plotinos thinks (16)that are creator if it was be composed of matter be the should to the world is he that the of God matter assumes image of (of course image is the image of which God) ; and within this sphere of matter than beautiful world could not ours. God, we imagine a more beautiful in that the made should order It was spirits so higher into the be forced to pollute their glance by looking out not man oj the especially to remind night of non-existence ; and who therefore be and it of whose can is, goodness God, image How his known the by contemplating world, image. Again, (") be said to honour the invisible Gods, if he despises man can be their visible images? the guidance of Providence How can ted admitin the direction of minor if it be not admitted matters be called immortal, in that of major ones? How can a man if you deny immortality to the beautiful stars, and that these have? have souls like men heart
most
above explained doctrine Astrology and Vaticination. The of things, or law of resulof the coherence or sympathy ogy of forces (18)explains all the truth there is both in Astroltance his way and Vaticination. Plotinos cannot to accepting see that the daily position of a crude Astrology (19)which supposes If the the stars influences our daily life in a supernatural way. then should their ferent difStar-Souls Gods are they are good ; why have little men we position alter their influence? What influence done to the stars that they should wish us evil? The 5.
"
"
"
of the stars can of the moon as men (21). The commit
are
be littlemore
just as important,
life-givinginfluence of which
the
than
the tides, the on deeds of men which
soul
finds
the
in
sun
her
that of their natural the life and sun on as
influence,
spiritsof they
responsible creatures
if not more the so (21). Of course is part of the physical influence into the body of the incarnation
much Rarth-Soul influence exerts sun ; for evidently the the and the of Thus of (25). men growth nature, powers of Sense and Vitality of man affected by the state are
on
the
Realm of the
The
physical
of
influences soul
escapes
Sixth Realm, Vitality.
the
sun
and
them, except
; but
moon
in
a
reflex
41
passible higher imthrough
the manner
body (*'). As to Vaticination, Plotinos
the
does not go beyond the scientific of a single tooth or bone consideration of a long extinct the and reconstruct can nature, powers age, law of coherence or Therefore, granting the sympathy, if race. of from conclude the condition skilful enough, we can we are the the of other of conditions cosmical to the organism one part judges of the position of the foot parts, as easily as the dancer that of the hand ";4).Both of the same from are consequences The heavens will other tell of each are therefore (26). they cause; read what the in skilful will which can happen, a celestial writing "The entrance of souls because all things are interdependent (i!6). into the world, and the general course of their actions is part of dependence the universal order of nature (27). A good analogy of interbe found in of this world of the phenomena may each other's follow the fact that two the are not same yet eyes from
vaticination which
motions,
so
that
from
the
position
of one,
of the other (28). In connection with Astrology and the of state of the dead. They speak us
good
;
they
exist after death clearer than see
one
may
tell the
Vaticination, can
still harm
we
us,
sition po-
should or
do
that souls by showing themselves, prove inspire the Oracles, as they finally,they can do, not being fettered by the flesh (29).
can, ; we
led to the question of the relation 6. Free-Will. We are now His poof this world-order to the free individualityof the soul. sition the subject is almost exactly that of Kant. Virtue and on free ; but the realm are the motion of tliesoul in the intelligible soul's deeds in the world are part of the law of continuity, psychical has no well as physical (30). Plotinos taste as (81)for the crude predestination of fatalism,and like immoral doctrines. all The design of the world and what should happen in it was of the divine Mind, not anteceding in part of the Providence but in the world is the image of the Divine for time, causality, be said to degenerate that it Nous cannot dwelling within it,so or (32). Therefore the soul is, in respect to her three go wrong which lowest faculties, ditioned belong to the World Order, rigidly confor it the Earthsoul had been this lower given by ; Soul. Yet, in its higher impassible self it is free as self-existence make it ; "and the soul will therefore be free exactly according can she identifies herself with her higher or lower culties fato whether is therefore a slave of body, (when his reason (33). Man has identified itself with his vitalityand matter) (34); a slave of has identified itself with his sensefortune, (when his reason is free (when his reason world (35). But man has identified itself with his individual Nous,) turning all things to intellect (36); has identified itself with the and man is free (when his reason Cosmic Nous,) when the soul lives in contemplation neglecting all else (37)Freedom is serving one's own ving good, rather than serthat of another, that is,of the lower faculties contributed to "
The
42
it
entirely than
on
his
The
have
We
the
of
days
They between
see
can
(42),
senses
(43) hearing of
increased
a
ality Plur-
of
the
needed
their
inherent
as
a
no
have
thoughts light.
Dai-
classical
erature, lit-
acquainted.
are
eternal
spiritual
(*), celestial
spiritual
celestial
physical
to
"
God,
all
they
seen
guarded
intermediate
their
by of
we
in
mons dae-
Christianity.
by
thoroughly
latter
have
They
communicate
world
carefully it
development
realm
possession
the
is
of
stage
Like
prayers.
none
glow
rather
and
men
with
high
as
so
was
intelligible
implying
course
intelligible
the
their
at
are
given
was
quite
Plotinos
Gods.
and in
freedom,
were
interchangeable
was
remained
who
men
depend
introduce
be
must
which it
which
souls
are
is
would
there
daemon
meaning
Homer,
with
which
that
seen
word
probably
and
mon,"
This evil
later
God
highest
C40)
actions
many
Unity.
utter
Gods.
its
therefore the
nature
"
from
but
his
Daemon.
and
and
(39),
of
master
into
In
While
circumstances
even
7.
C38).
Earth-Soul
the
by
Plotinos.
of
Philosophy
body
(44)
language that
each
souls other
in
the
_by
an
;
The
44
the
whole,
in
nor
belongs
that of
is
diminution
of soul
The
fourth
can
forms
of
size,
but
is
but
measure
It
(22).
It
is
C23).
It
is unsatisfied
of
weak
a
its the
these
The
active
Each
act
course
He sort at
of
of
that
be
Being
spiritual
the
is the
thought
Sixth
the
have
To
apply
to
their
by
an
idea
in
seed;
a
forms,
Nous
ponding corres-
may
say
form,
and
we
future
the
the
or
Stoics.
the
to
Thus
of
form
the
we
telligible in-
the
here.
cosmic
the
getting be-
sure,
of
owed
number.
suitable
be from
spermatic
Plotinos
of
process
germination
idea
idea,
its
takes
This
a
of
known
dark.
the
is like
shall
has as
is
that
also
formed
of
"
this matter
between
is
matter
the
in
to
which
intelligible, and
matter
lowest
being, of
marrow
of
is
and
(23),
by
comes
that as
there his
what
still
telligible in-
of
contention Plotinos far
epistemology
he
of
form
the
cal, identi-
are
and
intelligible.
itself
questions
the
result,
us
is
is
the
still
also
matter
This
is
is
being
Thought
and
Being
Since
Matter.
nature.
pushed
unity
length.
is
it
;
of
seed.
that
to
little
generation
that
Therefore,
its
never
thinks
of It
It
measure,
bodily
possibility
C'4).
natural
only
we
active
form
lowest
driven
be
not
is' not
only
(ltt).
quality it is ;
It
Being
So
and
are
well
an
Idealists,
the
to
"
should
seed.
as
Intelligibility
in
to
sense
the
intelligible.
is
world,
begetting
is
the is
the
the
it,
in
it
principles
of
seed
3.
the
disposition
or
declension
and after
Matter.
matter,
of in
to
,
shadow
principle
of
two
dwelling
it is
Being;
not
that
image,
things
Ideas
that
(18). is
it
utmost,
(space) (20).
itself
yearning
general side
and
is
of
Being,
of
have
a
emptiness
without
and
makes
unto
image,
Uncognisability
2.
gradual
(25).
nothing
Realm
size
it
(21).
(18)
stuff
which
assumes
"Asomatos"
the
at
:
source
one
be
(17).
formless
that
should
declension
a
is
there
privation,
evil
only
or
there
characteristic
the
if
pure
called
evil,
being
itself
Matter
is not
that
be
of
require
Besides
annihilation,
never
reduction
lower
reasonable
it into
Plotinos.
we
(15).
part
only
of
should
part
one
another
to
it
good,
Philosophy
enough road.
another must
cosmology
of
be
some
shows
CHAPTER
XIV.
REINCARNATION.
should
Reincarnation.
for
Need
1.
it will
reincarnate,
all necessary This
God.
life
of
is
ethical
an
like
happiness,
it;
meriting
for
even
itself
necessary
seek
the
is lower
all
only
can
the
on
of
form the
soul
where
the
soul
will
it will
progress,
will
therefore
generate
the
The a
2.
be
have
for
enough
cannot
heaven
this
inequalities
present But
here
the
into
such
will
purify
souls
order
passage
foolish
kings etc.
in
of
Plato
The
accounted
as
retribution
life
in
(*).
is
not
Justice
which
the
for.
their
the
as
worthy end
Retribution
of
soon
for
; and
Divine
lives
other
(T) ;
free
own
will
(8)
Earth-Soul
(9), these
her
(5). one
single
soul.
by
retribution
collaborates
especial
one
come
furnished
this
be
to
and
seemed
reincarnation.
enticed
or
habitation,
circumstances she
has
as
coming be-
incarnated
the clear, Plotinos quotes sets forth, for instance*, that
(") which reincarnated
eagles,
as
quiet
citizens
as
(").
Superficial Plotinos
of will
have
satisfactorily
parts
make
to
famous
bees,
not
by
indissoluble
In
of
circumstances the
why
seen
soul
soul
this
a
place
if the
And of
purpose
for
development
purpose
led
are
earth
another
moral
a
moral
if souls are
is another
souls
and
is
the
(3),
have
World-Drama
is therefore
this
she
;
carnation in-
for
reason
Unless
place
the
out
(2)
procreation
there
Thus
(*)."
already
vindicated
a
(*).
attractions
naturally.
itself
body working
Plotinos,
of We
"
build
incarnation as
creation
Justice.
long
and
of
serious
as
the
a
in
Will
purpose
man
of
Divine
itself
propagate
may
then
for
progress,
to
knowledge
for "
it is
learn
may
The
evidently.
love,
it will
Therefore
mere
desire
a
have
they
body.
a
soul
the
never
will
with
of
part divine
by
gotten
whether
all lower
than
in
had
be
will
that
off
of
they of gainopportunity ing
an
faculties
teacher
be
only
own
world
work
better
a
its
of
the
stedfastly, and
body,
at
is vision
because
happy
higher
or
in
be
to
is after
experience
and
a
souls
good
Experience
it is
why
life
of
can
have
to
decide
its lower
with
for
only
are
therefore
it. It is necessary merit, to let our reason
end
The
one.
all happiness,
Gods
merited
identify
asking
while
worth
we
incarnate.
to
aim
The
be
why
ourselves
asking
Before
"
readers
taught between
a
have
theory
human
and
seized of
upon
this
reincarnation animal
bodies.
passage
which
There
to
made can
that
prove no
not,
ference difhow-
The
46
Philosophy
of Plotinos.
doubt that Plotinos held no such theory ; ever, be the slightest of fact,many and as a matter have been led into commentators in this blunder because from Plotinos, quoting this passage is his custom, Plato, does not state that it is not his own, as when the philosopher." quoting Plato, who was that Plotinos took the In the first place, we have already seen trouble to say that the human rational that reason was so in the body of an it should not be likely to desire to incarnate the Idea of a cow Nous animal (13). Besides, in the Cosmical or of it be natural those and therefore would as dog are as men, mind to'enter into an animal body ("). unnatural for a human "
"
"
of haphazard interchange would interfere with Such a scheme strict retribution among men. Plotinos's own scheme of reincarnation (15)will be found very become rational : bad masters slaves,rich people who have used their wealth are badly, poor ; murderers murdered, and rapers are
raped. During the intervals between
in incarnations souls (which are this condition that of often confused with daemons) to part go is appropriate to their merits and their the World-Soul which fering sufcondition, the good souls being at rest, and the evil ones in the meanwhile (16). to The idea of a physical resurrection most was repugnant than the tool or prison of the Plotinos ; as the body is no more perfectio soul, it.would be cruel to enclose the soul in it and all its imits whither forever (1T)- After death, the soul goes inclination leads it,so that true friends will meet more : once in the body most able suitthe soul reincarnates it reincarnates when that the soul has left its body, it becomes for it (18). When towards which it had directed its activity(")" of utter and reit may Thus indeed happen, that on account peated and in tial besdie sink into wickedness soul matter a may circumstances (*")so that it will reincarnate in an animal or bestial,it is not vegetable body (21); for if the soul has become than a bestial body. able to form for itself anything more reincarnations earth are The souls that need on no more the universe, and be see placed on the stars, whence they may The in such circumstances fitted to develop them. most as are and Cosmical souls towards the turn rethemselves Nous, turn purest for ever home. to their intelligible 3. The
Three
Factors.
"
There
are
three
factors in each
nation. reincar-
is in all Being the yearning of love ; to communicate There of itselfto that which is below. For such a reason, The God begat in his own the Nous image. Likewise souls seek to beget their them. and the things below of themselves to give or image, she From better than such a divine mission the soul returns was when she incarnated ; for she has been, as Methodius says, to a certain extent Christ. She must become individualized,and a the till self-determined be seek there to no more bility possigood, of falling(M) although in another place Plotinos says that
Reincarnation.
for
is always
there
development
highest
the
unto
even
her
47
soul
a
reach
can
earth,
on
possibilityof falling C28). Her
the
desire
it
for and
care
the world
first
but enlighten senses; anxious if she forgets herself in this occupation, and becomes for the welfare of the body and for its lusts, she is held down by is to
to
of the
("). place, it is from
sire inclination, and departicular body (M). of hers was Yet, lastly, this very foreseen, foredetermined her in the fulness of time, with magical destiny (*") ; the body the Earth-Soul she enters has prepared for her; powers remain for in the she was to not enough intelligible strong In
second
the
that
her
own
in any desire
incarnates
she
"
C27).
world 4.
Oblivion.
Objection from
is the
Reincarnation souls
do
Plotinos
usual
The
contention their
remember
not
"
that
former
objection
the theory of life human
to
in the present incarnations.
this
The lower objection in the following way. wliich faculties of the soul, including Sense, Vitality, and Body include also the passions and the physical memory, furnished are incarnates. have soul which We to every new by the Earth-Soul the that death the soul leaves behind at already seen earthy (M). This earthly spiritual body, with its passions and memories spiritual body lasts longer than the physical body, but begins to learnt on earth, with decay at death, having in itself all that was all the remembrance of the petty things of the life (29). As we there is a higher memory have in the eternal impassible seen, meets
"
which
soul
soul
consciousness
the in
the
for the In
of
an
faculties
lower
and
yet
A
most
he
the
of the
a
that
and
when
it will
recollection
uses
very
have
become
carnate in-
into
come
says
that
forgotten, is put
aside
clear, we
definite
facts he
training which
may
make
life,has learnt
that
use
ably probat
lege, Col-
learning
years. "
There
If reincarnation efficient
the
(").
graduate, in middle
if not all the that mental
him, to the end of his from Suicide. Objection 5.
safe, but
soul
College
gave
reincarnation.
Platonic
the point of Potinos
order to make illustration.
forgotten
of
of a)l its past lives. Thus Plotinos be between incarnations much would
interval and consequently
anyway,
the life : far enough,
also has the records will have developed
means
is still another
objection to suicide is not only
be
true, then free oneself
to
unendurable
for the
time
from
stances circum-
being. is the only theory theory of reincarnation that will yield an It is foolishness adequate argument against suicide. it is foolish to waste opportunities of development ; and is ready to abandon leave the world until the soul the cumstance cirto and has learnt all lessons it, surrounding possible On
from
the
contrary,
them
(w).
the
CHAPTER
XV.
ETHICS.
As
have
we.
of is
already
pointed is ethical,
Plotinos
the
highest
contemplative or important Virtue
i.
Vice.
and
practical. possible to
life.
All
"
But
import The
virtues
scful lusts itself from the disentangle may the cannot purifications change soul, since eternal the to they alter its relation ; but it hand and the lusts from (2) freeing upper
(3).
flesh
the
It
then
its likeness
state
appears
God
to
in
its
also
his
seen
tem sys-
is the
that
how
remely sup-
of
by
which
the
flesh.
the
These
it is
and impassible it the body, giving
disturbances
and
(4), in
original purity all (5). Purity to
of which
of
patent
appears
osophy phil-
tne
of
(-1).
purifications,
are
of
end ; and
man
have
we
life is morality
this
to
main
or
attainment theoretic
the
out,
soul
the ual individidentify itself with seeking reason Mind (6). As long as it keeps its purity, the soul Nous, or life is an evil ; let purity be lost, and evil ; for life finds nothing inasmuch is The itself is is good evil soul repelled (7). only as descend from the not (8). not evil, as long as it does good the the of soul? What Anger, impediments cupidity, lust, are avarice the (9). What pain, fear, gluttony, intemperance, are attain? fortitude, must goods Just habits, pure we temperance, divinity of mind (10). calmness, modesty, consists
in
What
the
virtues?
are
for
good
effective
her
"The
(12).
nature
four
The
Platonic
lie in
Cardinal
and
Magnanimity,
Virtues
Prudence.
soul,
which
that
is the
Virtue effective that
than
is virtue
is most even
the
to
Courage, Temperance, tue unpurged by virare is the of fleeing bodily lusts, sensual the attainment of utter purity. of the fear of death, that is, fear This ence the body. implies indifferbe which cannot anything or is time of death. Magnanimity
Those
Hades.
all
to
taken the
earthly wth
away
the
advantages
from
away
It. would
our
all
at
lower
who
earth.
on
things,
and
is
Prudence
turning
to
wisdom
things
the
(14).
above
this,
soul
are
"
advantages,
the
of
contempt
turning
men,
being more the body,
to
Temperance gratification, and pleasure is but the Courage overcoming of the soul outside of of being
of
the
(")."
(13).
soul
in
of
energy
her to according of development, is What beauty
means
prayer
to
or
a
be
life
but
hard
discipline to
is
not
become
to
that to
find leads
avoid God
a
more
to
evil
(15).
a or
rule of searching than this higher end the examples copy
life than :
the
of
end
good
Ethics.
2.
Philosophy of Sin." We
must
49
now
enquire concerning
the
of the higher with the lower It is the agreement obedience them (16). The to of instead compelling faculties, lower soul cease the but never sin, rational soul itself can may influence its control and break loose from to be its image, and into the it is merged of the when soul death The occurs (1T). in the buried with when ground. it, body, and thus dies along (18). by Hades This externalization of the soul is what is meant of the body which leads to sin is laziness,whereby The weakness spring in generating offthe soul becomes overweighted with matter in themselves (19).The natural appetitesof the body are the world misused not likewise, C20) are as so they long good, ; be recalled to God. that souls may is beautiful by nature, so dissolution the first perceptions of some Pain and sorrow are of sin are otherness," rashness," primary (21). The causes above and a desire to belong to oneself C22). But all,the first of sin is cause fallinginto generation (23)." The meaning of is turning into oneself from the flesh and itslusts (")" temperance nature
of sin.
"
"
"
from the flesh, its for turning away The of been reason assigned. yet that all actions of the body in the it is as follows : we have seen been have strictlypredetermined, dispensation of the world-order It and that liberty exists only in the intelligible world. is plain, therefore, that if the reason identifies itself with the of absolutely the slave of the determinism body, it becomes it identifies itselfwith its ideal external causality. If however soul, or with its individual Nous, then it has identified itselfwith that part of itself which is free,and outside of the sphere of determinism The lusts of the flesh lead to slavery ; purity leads and freedom self-determination. to We not to be a live are the but embodied Inside an body, spirit(25). body, the soul is preordained, along with all things ; outside of it she is free. Therefore the aim of her struggles is to separate herself from the body (M). Yet
the
lusts,and
definite
the
reason
body, has
not
"
"
The Path of Enlightenment. This part of the Soul's development is called enlightenment C27),"for she is herself a light. This development may be divided into three C28)or seven grees: (29)deI. Purification by virtues; II. Prayer; III. The adorning and of purificationof the soul; IV. Beginning to be conscious the intelligible Perseverance in this VI. Full course ; world^V. fruition in it ; becoming like God, and unable to fall back ; VII. Becoming God (30). Thus the development of every successive faculty,assisted by knowledge of the right doctrine. Although this path of development is the same for all souls, different kinds of souls, or souls with differing yet as there are it is plain that the course characteristics, of development must be changed for each, although probably the same stages, or like stages will occur. This Plotinos calls the threefold return of the soul to God in (31)." Each soul must its since the own progress manner, perfect life is, in each degree, to live according to nature (w). 3.
"
"
"
The
50
Philosophy of Plotinos.
learns kinds of Souls : the Musician, who by and the seeks the who Philosopher, knowledge, experience ; it is to love (33). Active and Lover, whose characteristic power sensual exiles from their true home turn remen are ; the Active who easier than the Sensual are to their fatherland men, like beasts laden down with prey Plotinos then says that the in sounds Musician is led upward from harmonious to harmony telligibl the path to the ingeneral, and from this to ideality whence is at first entangled in Lover world is plain (34). The the beauty of the flesh,but rises by his utter unselfishness to the the science and Nous to (35). beauty of morals, and thence seeks to knowledge, is so near Lastly, the Philosopher, who from the free him ness weakthat needs he to a guide only perfection
There
three
are
"
of the
The
4.
body
(3e). of Conscience.
Daemon
"
But
who
shall this
necessary
Plotinos's explanation of Conscience, the Daemon. guide be? the phenomena is singularly clear and interesting. of conscience The Daemon is not, as might be supposed, a supernatural guide. of psychology. It is not an It is only a natural phenomenon it external is ourselves our own to higher self. only intelligence ; in that himself many have We principles. man seen epitomizes identified itselfwith some His reason, one as lar particua rule, has his individual either his or of his Nous, principle nature, him faculis that ty that leads him and warns has with which his reason is next above the one of his which of for instance, that the reason identified itself. Let us suppose, Tne their itself and lusts. has identified with his man a senses, Daemon
The
senses.
him of the higher principlewill then guide him and warn Daemon this the his In of case self-indulgence. consequences his reason be his own would individual Nous. Again, suppose next
in Daemon identified itself with his individual Nous : the if his Once Mind. Nous will be the Cosmic this case or more, then Cosmic itself with his further should Nous, reason identify the Daemon could be God himself. has
lead him in the this point ; it Plotinos is not very clear on first instance. very of hear he doubts the Voice could the lower would man seem chooses Thus his own God. according to the man Daemon, is he will act (3T). Thus which choice man no of principleon but listen to if will in the dark, by God left to flounder man ; will change with his own his inner voice, which change for he will be led into the full glory of Divinity. better or worse C38), the value of prayer The inner voice is heard by prayer ; and will Mere is great. intellectual will and desire certainly get an of things appropriate answer through the law of the coherence the of command Divinity but is not true adoration, (3U); prayer The
could question arises,why
not
God
himself
o. full meaning of the maxim, know self thyGod. This of is self divinity man highest every is quiescent in him until he have developed it. To man human The ourselves. have God, we only to know
thus
We
come
(41). The of every
become
to
the
The
52
godlike
become must
In
beautiful
and
herself, and
to
polish herself the
Philosophy of Plotinos.
as
himself
(60)." The
soul
must
turn re-
if she does not find herself beautiful,she the sculptor polishes his statue.
three of ecstasy there are stages : expectation of the Divine, absoluts trust in it,and final self-immolation, which is above conscious Nor can we thought in silence and peace. if we then be outside of ourGod see : for selves, could, God would whereas rises into us from within (82). Thus God God is the Light which is seen, but which is lost in the very vision of it : for Ta duo hen gignetai," both become one (81). Eternal from eternal proximity to God felicitycomes (82),the eternally forced to begin beautiful,so that the soul loves God and is ever act
"
again
to
"Since
love
God
him
(63).
admits become He us.
no
Diversity into himself, he is always
sent; pre-
versity Diwe put away present to him whenever from forced does not seek us, as though he were seek him and live for him. to live for us; but we Although indeed him contindo not are ever see we revolving around him, we the supreme uallv : but as a choir of singers which turns around for while be distracted from Master short a contemplation may in the harmony, yet when of the Master, and blunder they turn and
we
everything is perfect once again, thus do we always when revolve around we forget about it. But when God, even him then is wish crowned, utmost look towards our we again, him. and we revolving around sing to him a Divine song, ever ("4)." Every Soul in its natural state loves God, desiring to be united to him, affectingthe honest love of a pure virginity (M)." is the life of Gods, of divine and blessed men, Such turning from the desolate life here below, flying alone to meet away God alone, face to face C66)." the are 6. Happiness. Such are delights of ecstasy. These the that is however are most not given to .all. Happiness many able to reach ; and intelligible happiness all can have, although world all be free from pain (6T). As the intelligible they cannot be no addition of pleasure by reis outside of time, so there can petition is a sounding of ecstasy ("*); the only possible increase Aristotelian famous of deeper depths within (89).The ble quiblife is when about the happiness of life being only known and at an end is nothing but a very transparent sophism (T0) over since happiness, after all, does not depend on deeds (71). for nothing The will have both joy and sorrow wise man (72), him taken from If they are be added him. to or equally can be rich and the will the man equally happy ; for if wise, poor external add anything to intelligible things, how goods cannot can happiness (T). Happiness is they add aught to intelligible the change of death has no turb of the soul so that even to dispower terrible than it (74). Death is after all nothing more a change of dress on the stage (7B).It is only terrible to children, not to men (78).The soul should use the body as a tool, and not be more is affected by affected by its injuries than a workman in the bull of Phalaris. the wise the injury to his tool (7T). Even
to
him
then
"
"
"
Ethics.
is
man
usually is
to
and is
(7*).
happy
as
or
After
possible.
if
divine
life
wise
if
they
enjoys
man
different
(82),
happy its
and
man
earthly
continually
of
;
so
that
nightmare with
God
he
the
misery,
(84).
be
sick
fault
and do
the
its
sounds external
an
enjoy
the
world,
enjoy
into real
fish unselnot can-
all
waking
of it hours
the
O53).
depths
itself
a
The
therefore
deepest
portunity op-
weakness
consciousness
awakens its
as
not
not
one
well
(80)?"
happiness may
at
souls
godlike of
tion. educa-
evil
give
souls
man
and
of
means
to
own
this
soul
a
to
become
wise
the
is
if
to
affect
of
our
wonder
the
when
life
happiness
life,
only
is
fleshly,
the
though
can
the
highest For
it
seek
not
the
pleasures
Circumstances
is
do
(81).
intuitions exist
What
not.
are
and
is
pains
its Misfortune
inextirpablc
the
of
time
has
virtue'
of
(79).
certain
are
bear
it
he
;
end
that
possible
evil
purpose
happy, "
we
the
until
as
the
the
says
that
they
must
we
all,
become
to
to
bodies,
and
but
Stoical
so
he
well
as
and
have
we
another
;
borne
good,
the
to
While time
be
must
nothing
body
always
not
when
as
sense,
from
soul
sorrows
is
Plotinos
common
more
separate
53
the
forgets are
CHAPTER
XVI.
AESTHETICS.
Beauty,
that
if it did
not
of
review
a
his
forth
set
God
As
Over-Beautiful.
the
God,
1.
is
his philosophy the opinion on
Over-Good,
is
Plotinos
"
is he
so
could
be
not
of
fond
passionately
so
complete,
subject.
Over-Beautiful.
The
Cosmic
Nous
it is the is beautiful, because of God (') ; the World image it is the of the Nous beautiful, because image are (*}. There beautiful therefore Cosmic three the most things : the Nous, and the Men who slaves World-Soul, World-Body. to are is
Venus
do
only of
beautiful
these
beautiful is
; when
(6).
form
Cosmic
Nous
beautiful
In
The
again,
is
Beauty
(") the Realm 2.
Nous, inner
in
possesses
is
especially of
of
virtue,
or
The
"
itself
nobody it himself, so he
mind. within
As
judge
Manifold
kalon,
of
;
he our
of
an
This
the
or
eye
of
beauty
a
(12).
Incorporeal
the
normally
last
pressing ex-
tiful beauin
the
of the image (since the she recognizes
of
speak
can
physical dare
should
nobody
returned
physical
beaiJty
beautiful
to
sight of
or a
ourselves
himself, hearing statue,
or
before
until
beauty of
judge by the
to
of
the
judge rather
or
be
must
of we
a
he
song,
dare
A have
incorporeal man
of
of ;
seen
beauty his
own
incorporeal
incorporeal
become
beauty Light
Divine
faculties
is
beauty
is the
beauty
(").
Idea
Divine
Sensual
is the
which
soul,
reason
which is
formula
ear.
an
or
by
incorporeal
sensutffand of the
formula
Over-Good),
beautiful.
the
itself
being
it himself perceived is outside Corporeal beauty cannot consequently, man a
the
Idea
is the
fully revealed
more
have
have
Nous
the
Divine
the matter
is
kallos,
mega
begotten
as
matter,
being
the
;
As
until
Soul
innate
itself.
until
Protos
therefore
soul,
the
God,
both that
;
beautiful,
"
therefore
of the begotten image Nous is it (its Unity)
the
is
is the
matter
(5). Beauty
any
in
Unity
as
(10).
self is The
Beauty
as
Idea
matter
beauty Beauty.
instinctively
things
beauty vanquishing
form
of nature Human
three
one
things, we thing ugly (4). Anyit is an image,
are
we
inasmuch
of
beautiful
them,
only
is
them
to
image
the
way
behold
we
is in
itself through
faint
some
then
Nous
; and
beautiful
seems
ignore
its
Divine
kalon"
noeton
in
far
as
what
When
we
resembles
(7). Thus
ugliness. (8).
it is
(3).
beautiful, therefore, of these faint, of one
however, in
that
because
things
three
become
lies
understand
not
beauty
perfect
perfect before we must we just so give a judgement
can
be on
Aesthetics.
we
the
oregetai holy
of
must
enter
naked
with
vision
(")
"
at
God
them
the
Father."
find
we
the
that
soul
every
Those
who
by
which
inner
strives
off seek
Whoever
their
ments, gar-
and
;
the
end
fly all
the
vision,
of
there
therefore
things, eye
which
all
the
of
sees
the
body, indeed
strive we
possess,
the
eternal ;
fleet
no
to must
desire
a
or
and
"
trials
There" is
our
"
;
and very
must
we
;
more
which
the
there
ships
assume
but
he
of and
bliss.
any
see
does
beauty
sorrows
came
we
neither
all
for
desire
for
whose
souls,
need
we
what
;"
beloved
whence God
to
with
burn,
the
fatherland
away
develop."
with
he
:
into
penetrate
taking they
understand
forgetting
To
closed another
which "
purified
be
does
one
is
from
is
and
after
(13).
into
love
a
be
of
keep
if
until
cut
"
what
to
yearn
that
first
live,
and
exist,
they this,
is
psuche,"
pasa
-holies
and
throw
beautiful
and
good
Hou
we
and
perfect.
be
The "
polish
must
and
ourselves,
to
return
must
beaut.iful,
not
are
statue
We
beauty.
incorporeal
55
but
ing hav-
resurrect
few
deed in-
CHAPTER
XVII.
PLOTINOS
Deities.
Pagan
1.
of
system
His of
sake
his
cutting
full
from
list
the
that
find
a
Zeus
indicated
life
be
the
Debt
into
Besides,
its
of
orders
cosmic
the
basis
Pagan 4.
the
as
it
was
absolutely of
dogma
Greece.
of He
in
possible,
Augustinian justice
Christian
Light
world.
preserving
worth that
and
Last
The Greek
unless
just,
the
of
outside as
took
the
is supposed
of
to
the
have
do
demanded
the
all
and
conceive absolute The
much. the
be
not
admit
to
great
to
tering al-
merely
last
and as
almost
was
almost
predecessors,
Love,
Plotinic
it could
bottom
is the
of
alterations.
by
himself
in
found
three
that
at
public. Re-
Plotinos's
in
willing
are
his
be
conception
certain
of
source
material of
theism mono-
conception
monotheism
in
rigid
may
stood
any
would
Olympic
whole
Christianity, not
a
only
this
it
each
Plotinos
absolute could
is
of
were
of
Plotinos
by
religions
Proof
up
labours
Christianity God
"
summed
used
Pagan
we
most
them.
the
it not
is
dogma,
we
the
possibility
no
with
this
are
wields,
Then of
many
One
Christian
Zeus,
tible incompa-
power
the
as
clature, nomen-
he
Pagan
without
act over
called
Kronos
with
Plotinos
of
three,
other
into
Pagan
dogma
of
relations
Dei,
nomenclature, of
"
of
and
Deities
the
divided
into
existence
literally transcribed the
then
system
Herennius
when
of
Hippo
Civitate
De
his
the
the
not
glance
we
sister-souls."
apply
to names
Plotinos. of
all
entirely,
which
does
totally
nomenclature,
conception
to
if
many
"
out
the
he
Uranus
are
incompatible
seems
in
the
system,
Augustine
that
monotheism works
Zeus
pagan
whole
his
light
fact
still give
to
; for
changed
and
find
we
taken. mis-
totally
is sometimes
that
left
If the
"
which ;
is
duplications
many
instance,
in
realities
Augustine's
3.
order
dogmatical
a
and
find
and
;
ganism Pa-
basis
illustrative, for
Besides,
souls
being
cosmic
;
we
human
of
names
to
for
and
Monotheism.
have
matter.
Hermes
as
lack
important
2.
the
deities, which
total
finding
in
and
conceptions, and
short
his
dogmatical
a
merely
are
Earth-Soul,
Rhea,
still ruling
Gods
framing
rehabilitate
conception
a
explanations
references
as
Aphrodite,
the
in
to
it with
Such
before.
Plato
of
such
seeking
was
furnishing
to
that
supposed
Plotinos
had
not
PAGANISM.
been
by
references
differently the
has
religion,
a
it had
as
It
"
philosophy,
as
such
AND
that
?
same
light that
of
was
proving of
God
beauty. absolute
damnation
of
Plotinos
the
whole
he
race
by the
of his
ruin
absolute
super-natural
a
had
no
Plotinos education
;
not.
dieth
to
And
conception
of God
forward
God
and
could
tide
not
all else, indiscrimin
only
the
over
the
as
cated vindi-
be
of
emergency
gustine scruple to say AuBeauty. of all, after salutary
absolute
salvation
the
to
57
infants
need
we
still speaks
Augustine
of
love
mediation
creatures.
looked
that
Paganism.
unbaptised
made,
had
The
and
of eternal
fire and
of the
worm ,-
The
of the way to explain his conception difficulty of Plotinos in which God affects Christianity equally : begets his creatures, and difficulty of providing Christianity has the additional an planation exmode for the other of origination called creating." Both Plotinos and Christianity preach lofty morality ; but the of human life of Plotinos is God himself guidance ; whereas hesitates the lest the of Son Augustine to as much, glory say "
be
surpassed.
Christianity preaches Plotinos
cannot
degree
the
away
of
comfort
resurrection
physical
with
it ; he
being
does
enclosed
the
ot
look
not
flesh
forward
;
with
all
for
eternity in the the old body, even when glorified. He guards the truth implied in it by the fact that souls when reincarnating reassume flesh, without them condemning to it for all eternity. Last of all, Plotinos little injustice in the world, explains every any
limitations
every
at
of
sorrow,
; for
tear
every
and
furnishes
reincarnation
of absolute
justice. Christianity closes its in its sublime inequality of this world
the
to
eyes
faith
a
that
scheme
injustice, somehow
God is just ; but the Christian the before for priest is mute cry justice in this world the sorrowful from and oppressed. Plotinos is long dead since is philosophy, as his own, ; his it has long dead died : for it has strutted in about ; but never borrowed plumes since his day till now. cannot Yet, the world look
back, :
ancient will
be
few
it has will
history a
too
have on
which
satisfaction
days, God was his prophets
in his and
much the
his
for
in
time we us
world, saints.
the or
read to
and
future
leisure
know
the
name
that
revealed
to to
it with
crown
look of even.
himself
at
the
Plotinos. in as
those ever
cess suc-
page
of
Yet.it
gloomy through
NOTES. CHAPTER Where
2.
Aniinsi.
Al..
Clem.
4.
c.
1:
(2)
Lact. 1:
(6) 1:
(17) 1:
26.
13.
(22) 10:
4.
(24)
1:
190.
Patritius,
(33) 2: 4:
(44) 1:
(50) 10:
23.
31.
(45)
6.
13:
2.
14.
(52) 10:
1:
11;
(26) 1:
10; 17.
19,
(31)
11:
8.
(35)
10:
7.
19.
11.
13:
12:
(It
Vita.
Plotini.
Christian 1
Beg.
4:
4:
22.
4:
the
1:
3:
(8) 3:
7.
(12)
God
to
cusmati
of
1
3:
proem
3:
know
1.
91:
1
325,
C.
"Let
ourselves"
hautous
"
Note 6:
Beg.
be
6:
Knn.
4:
3:
1.
1:
8.
(6) 1:
1:
8;
9.
(9) 1:
4:
9, 6:
3:
12;
(14) 4:
13:
2:
4:
1:
4:
9, 10.
7; 4: 3.
See
4:
36.
8:
in
E.
9.
6;
19.
(27) 12: 8:
14;
2.
10:
23.
21.
(43)
11:
12:
23.
(49)
10:
(37)
(55) 4:
6.
8.
p.
persuaded
(3) Bigg.
(5) 1:
1:
(6) 3:
D.
7, proem the
by de
2.
690
(10) 3:
19, 7.
6:
9:
(4) 3:
"Peithouinetha
(2) 1:
general 4:
7: 4:
See
15. 1:
6: 1:
1:
12.
1:
4:
5:
3:
12;
See
5.
(15) 1:
(22) 4: 4:
4.
11:
1:
2.
(7)
325,
(11)
C.
of
commandment
t6
an
12;
4:
tou
parkel-
Theou
gignoskein."
1:
8.
H.
17,
8.
CHAPTER (1)
(21)
is understood.
2.
1:
(9) 5:
us
16.
Meinecke,
14:
11:
10:
26;
(13)
14;
12,
699
9:
5. 12: 15.
8, 9, 13,
(48)
(2) Eusebius,
46.
p.
10:
4.
13:
1:
5; 13:
(20)
(42)
(54) 1:
Quoted. (5)
V.
3.
c.
20.
12.
given "Ennead
Alex.
Beg.
7,
4:
is
name
Porphyry,
Platonists
2:
2:
no
9:
5;
(36)
20.
1.
CHAPTER Where
(32)
(41) 10:
(47)
(53)
(12)
7:
1:
c.
4.
Phys. 16;
2:
18.
21.
8;
9:
Bpit.
Al.
25;
22.
2, 5;
'Stobaeus
8.
(46) 13:
12:
(19) 8:
11;
1:
8.
4, 9, 13,
5:176b.
8:
de
5:
9.
Cyril
(4) 13:
8;
5:
26.
274c;
(11)
9.
11-7.
Ex
(40) 4:
8: 33c.
Lib.
7:
23,
15.
2:
6, 11;
25.
6: 8:
64c; Jul.
4:
3;
65.
5:
(10)
8; 5:
Tat.
4:
17;
(39) 4:
(51) 13:
0.
3:
1-3.
1:
(30)
(34) 2:
5.
(38) 10:
to
(25) 10: 1.
6.
Hist. 1:
Inst.
Dei,
c.
31;
(23) 1:
Thai,
12:
(29)
8:
1-4;
3, 6.
22.
10.
16.
4.
p.
63e,
Al.
12,
9-11;
(18) 1:
of
57b,
(9) 9: 1:
(15)
12:
Hermes
1:
(28)
26.
13;
Of
8.
19.
56b,
4.
(8) 5:
2.
Civ.
(3) Cyril
9.
4:
12:
(14)
7.
1:
(16) 10:
(7) 13:
12. 5:
9;
Inst.
Div.
de
Aug.
52a,
2:
33c;
31b,
30a,
13.
2:
8, 9, 6.
Val.
c.
Pamph.
Div.
Lact. 4:
16;
understood.
is
Tertullian.
6.
:
Euseb.
Van.
Firm
15,
13,
Gent.
4.
6:
21;
11,
2:
Adv.
Arimbius Jul.
1:
Strom., Inst.
Div.
; 2
22
Idol.
"
Poemandres
21,
:
de
Cyprian,
33.
1
Apol.
Martyr,
Justin
ill
"
given
is
name
no
IV.
(10) 4:
7:
12;
(18) 6:
7:
30.
3:
20-24;
4:
7:
8.
(24) 4:
7:
12.
(3) 3: 9, 16; 3.
8: 4:
4, 5 7:
(7) 1:
4:
9, 10;
9; 2:
1:
5;
5:
3:
2:
23;
1; 6:
(19) 3: 1; 6: (25)
4:
1:
2:
5: 4:
8: 16.
1:
7:
2.
3:
5:
4;
3:
3:
6.
4:
15.
12,
13;
3;
16.
5,
1:
5; 6:
(20)
4:
8:
3: 7:
4;
8.
3:
6: 17.
6:
7:
12;
1:
1:
(8) 1:
4:
15.
4:
6;
2:
1;
3; 4: 6:
6.
5:
4;
1;
14;
3:
2:
3:
4:
4:
7:
1: 3:
4:
2:
7:
3: 7:
(12) 6:
(13)
(21)
12:
7:
4.
(17) 6:
4:
4:
7:
7:
9:
Int.
5; 3: 6:
6:
6.
7:
11;
(5) 4:
(11) 2:
12;
5: 6:
(16)
(23) 6:
9;
6:
9:
(4) 6:
seqq.
12,
6:
1:
15; 4:
VI.
5,
12; 14.
(26)
1:
62
The
Philosophyof
Plotinos.
1:
7; 2: 10; 5: 1: 10. (27) 1: 1: 10; 1: 4: 16; 1: 7: 4; 6: 7: 5. (28) 1: 1: 7; 1: 8: 5; 5: 7: 5; 6: 4: 15. (29) 1: 1: 3, 4. (30) 6: 9: 8. (31) 6: 5: 11. (32) 5:
1:
10.
CHAPTER
VII.
(1) 3: 8: 7, 8; 5: 1: 4; 5: 3: 10; 5: 6: 2; 6: 7: 39; 6: 9: 6, 7. (2) 5: 3: 10-13; 6: 7: 37. (3) 5: 3: 12; 5: 6: 3; 6: 6: 13. (4) 6: 9: 1. (5) 3: 8: 10; 5: 3: 17. (6) 6: 2: 17. (7) 5: 4: 1. (8) 5: 3: 11; 6: 7: 17; 6: 9: 6. (9) 3: 8: 9. (10) 6: 8: 11. (11) 1: 7: 1; 1: 8: 2; 6: 8: 16 End. (12) 4: 3: 8; 6: 7: 17; 6: 9: 6. (13) 6: 7: 17, 32, 33; 6: 8: 11; 6: 9: 3. (14) 1: 6: 6, 9; 5: 8: 8. (15) 5: 5: 12. (16) 6: 8: 12; 6: 9: 6. (17) 4: 4: 9, 10. (18) 1: 7: 1; 6: 7: 17; 6: 8: 12; (19) 5: 3: 12. (20) 3: 8: 10; 3: 9: 3; 5: 3: 11, 12; 5: 6: 2. (21) 6: 7: 41; 5: 3:
13.
(22) 5: 3: 13; 14; 5: 5: 6, 10; 6: 7: 32; 6: U: :",.(23) r": 12, 17; 6; 7: 38 Beg. (24) 5: 5: 6; 6: 2: 9; 6: 9: 5. "2o) 1: 8: 2; 3: 8: 8; 5: 5: 9; 6: 9: 6. (26) 3: 8: 9; 4; 8: 6; 5: 3: 16; 5:X4: 1; 6: 9: 5. (27) 6: 8: 12, J6, 20; 5: 4: 2. (28) 6: 8: 8. (29) 6: 9: 3 Bud. (30) 6: 9: 8. (31) 2: 9: 4, 8; 3: 2: 1, 2. (32) 3: 2; 2; 3: 3: 7 Beg; 5: 3: 12 Beg; 13
5:
Beg.;
6: 2:
1; 4: 8: 6; 6: 7: 1, 3; 6: 8: 18 End. (33) 6: 7; 3. (34) 2: 9: 3. (35) 2: 1: 2; 2: 9: 3. (36) 3: 5: 4. (37) 6: 7: 22. (38) 6: 7: 31. (39) 5: 1: 6; 5: 2: 1. (40) 5: 1: 6. (41) 2: 3: 12. (42) 3: 8: 9; 5: 1: 3; 6: 5: 3 Beg; 6: 9: 5:
4:
5; 5: 1: 6. (43) 5: 5: 9. (44) 1: 6: 3; 3: 8: 9; 5: 1: 6; 5: 3:
12, 15. (45) (46) 1: 7: 1; 6: 5: 5; 6: 8: 18. (47) 1: 7: 1; 1: 8: 2. (48) 3: 2: 3: (49) 6: 7: 16. (50) 1: 7: 1; 1: 8: 2; 5: 1: 6; 5: 5: 12; 6: 5: 5: 7; 6: 4: 9; 6: 8: 18.
4: 8; 6: 5: 10.
(51) 6:
5: 1. (52) 3: 2: 16.
(53) 3: 8: 10; 5: 8: 12. (54) 1: 7: 1; 3: 3: 7; 6: 2: 11; 6: 4: 9. (55) 6: 2: 11; 6: 5: 1. (56) 5: 5: 5; 6: 2: 11; 6: 9: 1. (57) 4: 4: 13.
(58) 4: 4: 16. (59) 6: 5: 6. (60) 5: 5: 9; 6: 5: 3, 4, 6: 3; 6: 4: 3, 2; 6: 5: 1. (61) 4: 3: 12; 5: 5: 9; 6: 5: 4. (62) 1: 7: " (63) 3: 2: 16. (64) 5: 1: 7. (65) 6: 4: 7. (66) 4: 3: 22; 5: 1: 3. (67) 5: 2: 2. (68) 6: 4: 13, 14. (69) 6: 4: 2, 3. (70) 6: 4: 13. (71) 6: 5: 2. (72) 5: 3: 1. 6: 2:
(73) 2: 3: 18.
CHAPTER
VIII.
(1) 5: 1: 7; 5: 9: 1-13. (2) 5: 1: 5; 5: 3: 15; 5: 9: 6; 6: 9: 5. (3) 5: 6: 2. (4) 1: 8: 2. (5) 3: 7: 5. (6) 5: 1: 4. (7) 2: 9: 1; 5: 3: 7. (8) 5: 1: 4; 5: 35.
(9) 1: 8: 2; 5: 3: 9; 5: 5: 1; 5; 9: 7; 6: 2: 21. (10) 6: 2: 8. (11) 4: 3: 25; r": 5: 1. (12) 5: 3: 7, 11. (13) 5: 6: 2. (14) 5: 3: 6. (15) 1: 8: 2; 3: 6: 6; 5; 3: 6; 6: 2: 21. 6: 7:
13.
5: !": 11.
(16) 6:
(21) 3: 2:
1; 5:
1-3.
(17) 6: 2: 2. (18) 6: 2: 20. (19) 6: 7: 8. (20)
8: 3, 4; 6: 7: 15.
(22) 6: 7: 8. (23) 6: 7: 9. (24)
(25) 5: 1: 4; 5: 8: 4; 6: 2: 21.
CHAPTER
IX.
fl) 1: 8: 2. (2) 2: 9: 2. (3) 2: 9: 9. (4) 2: 9: 13; 4: 3: 10; 6: 5: 10; 6: 7: 42.
(5) 5:
1: 7; 5: 2:
1; 5: 8: 12. (6) 2: 1: 7. (7) 4: 3: 14. (8) 4: 3: 17. 10, 12. (10) 4: 7: 13. (11) 3: 9: 1; 4: 1: 1; 4:
(9) 4: 4: 25; 5: 8: 12; 3: 7:
1. (12) 1: 1: 13. (13) 1: 9: 1. (14) 4: 3: 18. (15) 4: 3: 17. (16) 4: 9: 4. (17) 4: 9: 5. (18) 4: 3: 16. (19) 4: 3: 5; 4: 8; 3; 5: 7: 1. (20) 4: 3: 5. (21) 3: 2: 18; 4: 3: 6. (22) 3: 2: 18; 4: 3: 6, 15. (23) 3: 2: 4. (24) 4: 7: 13. (25) 4: 7: 12. (26) 5: 1: 2. (27) 4: 4: 9, 10 etc. (28) 6: 5: 9. (29) 4: 9: 1; 2: 9: 7. (30) 4: 3: 20, 21. (31) 2: 2: 2. (32) 4: 3: 2. (33) 5: 1: 3. (34) 4: 4: 1, 2, 2:
(37) 4: 4: 6. (38) 4: 3: 25-27, 29-32. (40) 4: 4: 24. (41) 4: 3: 10; 4: 4: 10. (42) 5: 1: 7. (48). 3: 1: 4; 4: 3: 4. (44) 4: 3: 2, 3. (45) 4: 3: 6. (46) 3: 2: 17. (47) 2: 9: 7. (48) 2: 9: 17. (49) 4: 3: 12. (50) 2: 9: 17. (51) 3: 5: 4; 4: 3: 4; 4: 9: 3.
5. (35) 3: 4: 4; 3: 9: 2. (36) 4: 4: 24. 4: 4: 6.
(39) 4: 4: 10, 12.
Notes.
63
CHAPTER
X.
(1) 4: 4: 12. (2) 3: 5: 4. (3) 5: 3: 2. (4) 5: 3: 3. (5) 6: 7: 4. (6) 2: 9: 5, 18; 4: 4: 6. (7) 2: 9: 5, 18. (8) 2: 9: 8; 3: 5: 6; 4: 3: 11; 5: 1: 2, 4; 5: 4: 4: 6-8, 42, 30. 8: 3. (9).5: 8: 3. (10) 4: 4: 8. (11) 2: 2: 2 End.
CHAPTER
(2) 1: 1: 7; 2: 1: 5; 2: 3: 12, 13, 15, 9. 2: 9: 17. 4: 3: 27. 6: (3) 1: 1: 7. (4) 6: 5: 12.
4: 41.
(1) 4:
XL
r,. 6, 12, 15, 16.
4:
CHAPTER 1: 7. (2) 3: 5: 2, 8; 5:
ill 5: :.: :".
13. (7) 3: 8: 3. (8) 2: 9:
2; 3:
2: 2; 3:
3:
3; 4:
3:
(6)
10; 4:
6: 7: 1, 3. (9) 2: 1: 1-4; 3: 2: 1; 4: 3: 9. (10) 4: 3: 12; 5:
10:
4:
13; 6: 8: 6. (3) 3: 8: 4. (4) 2: 1: 5; 2:
17, 18; 3: 5: 2, 3, 6; 4: 9: 4; 3: 4. (5) 2: 3: 17; 3: 8: 3; 4: 4: 13. 2, 3. 4: 4:
:'.:x:
8:
XII.
6:
17; 5: 1: 2; 5: 9: 5; Beg;
'_':!":
4:
2; 6: 3: 15. (12) 3: 2:
7: 1. (11) 7; 4: 4: 36.
(14) 3: 2: 16. (15) 2: 9. (16) 2: 9: 4, 8, 13, Beg 17. (17) 2: '.": r". 6, 18. (18) 2: 3: 7; 3: 3: 7; 3: 4: 1; 4: 4: 22, 23, 26, 30. (19) 2: 3: (IX)
4:
1 U,
8.
4: 45.
13, 16, 26; 3: 1: 6; 4: 4: 31, 34.
:": 7; 3: 1:
(20) 3: 1: 6. (21)
11.
(24) 4: 4: 33, 35, 39; 2: (22) 4: 4: 35. (23) 2: 3: 9: 6; 4: 3: 12. (25) 4:4: 34, 39. (26) 2: 3: 7; 3: 1: 6. (27) 4: 3: 12.
3: 6.
3:
CJXi
2: 3: 12, 15.
3: 1: 16.
."":14;
2:
See
(29) 4: 7: 15.
(30 4: 4: 6, 39.
(31) 3: 1. (32) 3: 2: 1. (33) 2:
1: 9. (34) 6: 8: 2. (35) 6: 8: 2. (36) 6: 8: 3. (37) 6: 8: 3. (38) 6: (39) 6: 8: 5. (40) 6: 8: 12. (41) 3: 5: 6. (42) 5: 8: 10 Beg. (43) 3: 5: 6. i44" 4: 4: 43. (45) 4: 3: 18.
:!: !": 3: 4.
x:
CHAPTER il) 6: 9: 3. (2) 1: 8: 5. (3) 1: 8: X:
10.
X:
;{.
"J: r":
(17)
13, 14, 16.
(4) 1: 8: 11. (5) 1:
(6) 1: 8: 11; 6: .7: 23; 1: 8: 3. 10-13: 2: 4: 16. (7) 1: 8: 6. (8) 1: (9) 1: 8: 4, 8. (10) 1: 8: 10, 12. (11) 2: 3: 11. (12) 3: 2: 4. (13) 3: (14) 3: 2: 11. (15) 3: 2: 14.
1:
8:
4.
(18) 2:
8; 3: 6: 7.
2: 4:
XIII. 11. 2: 4:
7:
3.
(16) 1: 8: 7; 2: 3: 18; 3: 2: 5; 4: 3: 9. (19) 2: 4: 8. (20) 2: 4: 7, 11; 3: 6: 16-18. (21)
(22) 2: 5: 5. (23) 3: 8: 10.
CHAPTER
XIV.
(1) 4: 7: (7) 3: A. 3:
Tim. 2:
14. (2) 4: 8: 7. (3) 4: 8: 7. (4) _4lj^JL_ (5) 4: 7: 13. (6) 2: 1: 2. 82 4, 13. (8) 2: 3: 15. (9) 4: 3: 24. (10) 2: 3: 16. (11) Phaedo
91.
13.
de
Rep.
10:
6: 20.
(12) 3: 4: 2. (13) 6: 7: 4. (14) 6: 7: 7. (15)
(16) 3: 4: 6, 4: 8: 5. (17) 3: 6: 6. (18) 4: 3: 13, 15. (19) 3: 4: 2. (21; 3: 4: 2. (22) 4: 8: 5, 7. (23) 4: 4: 5. (24) 4: 3 17; 4: 7:
1: 8: 13
iL'("
18:
2:
ii'Xi
8: 4.
(25) 3: 2: 12; 4: 8: 5; 5: 1: 1. (26) 4: 3: 13. (27) 4: 8: 5, 6. 1: 1: 10, 12; 1: 10: 6. (29) 4: 7: 14; 4: 18: 5. (30) 4: 3: 25, 27, o2; 4:
4:
I: 1-5.
(31) 1: 9: 1; 2: 3: 10; 2: 9: 17.
CHAPTER (1) (": 7: 15. "2:
1. (6) 1: 2:
r".
(11) 1: 7: 1.
XV.
(2) 3: 6: 5; 1; 2: 5. (3) 1: 4.
2: 3; 1: 6: 6. (4) 1: 2: 3. (5) 1: (7) 1: 7: 3. (8) 1: 8: 5. (9) 1: 2: 5; 1: 6: 5. (10) 1: 6:
(13) 2: 9: 16. (14) 1:_6: 6. (15) 1: 2: 6, 7 See 1: 6: 6 etc. (16) 1: 1:~9. (17) 1: 1: 12. (18) 1: 8: 13; 2: 3: 17. (19) 1: 8: 14. (20) 1: 8: 15. (21) 4:4: 19. (22) 5: 1: 1. (23) 3: 5: 1, 5: 1: 1. (24)
(12)JJ:Jh15.
64
1:
The
2:
7; 1: 6: 5. (25) 2:
(29) 6:
36.
7:
1:
(35) 1:
(39) 4: 4: 26, 38. 5:
8:
7:
10;
1:
4:
9:
11; 6:
(51)
4.
8:
(44)
9:
3:
7:
34.
6:
8.
(65) 6:
5:
Quest
4:
15.
13.
9.
3.
1:
4:
8:
5:
(41)
3:
1.
4.
8.
7:
35.
1:
8:
8:
(1) 1:
(5)
9:
11.
Quest
4:
14.
7:
5.
(80) 3:
2:
11.
35.
9:3.
9; 5:
8:
8:
(6) 1:
8:
7.
(14) 1:
6:
from
The
Father
children
the
the
6;
5:
6:
with
13.
Gods
all
from
8:
8:
9:
1;
6.
(43)
4, 9.
(50) 5: 3:
11.
7, 11; 4:
1; 6: 9:
(53) 5:
4:
3:
5:
(47)
17, 6: 8; 5:
5:
5:
5:
7, 8; 6:
7:
36.
(55)
9,
10.
(59) 6:
9:
11.
(60)
See
1:
(68) 1:
Quest
(2)
21. 2.
10.
8.
4:
(64) 6: 9:
6.
Quest
5:
2.
(72) 1: 4:
(77) 1: 1:
(82) 1: 4:
is
retains
within is
The
physical
13.
1:
(69)
16.
3.
11.
(3) 5: 8:
3; 5:
(73) 1:
(78) 1: 4:
(83) 1: 4:
8:
8.
13.
3.(12) 1: 6:
6:
God;
the
tale
world,
is
explained
as
Hgre,
Dgmeter
well
as
10.
(4) 5:
8:
(8) 1: 6:
4;
(13) 1:
6:
4.
Hermes
sinking
of
the
and
flight, by
6:
5:
its 8.
The
with world
guest
of
is also
story gifts,
is Zeus called
4:
called is the
Rhea,
into
of
begetting
of
the
Soul
It
is also
4.
the soul 5:
called
Hestia
are
27.
Apollo
is
entangling of
Ulysses
As
mirror
and
image of
beholding 1: 7.
of
Dionysios,
called
explained
flesh
by
can
is
Circe
12.
or
by and
explains 3:
the
rise
shown
intelligible 4:
8:
6:
denying
as
fleeing
and
2, 8;
5:
Unity
Pandora the
parence trans-
is
19, which
6:
3:
Logos, the
beyond
Aphrodite, 3:
Aphroditg,
ideas.
the
World-Soul
The
4.
Prometheus
3:
describes
and
myth
the
active
8:
is the
soul
its
Lynkeus
his
devours
all
double
4:
who
Kronos, itself
of
5:
the
4:
Zeus,
6.
1:
8:
5:
(7) 1: 6: (11) 1:
2.
him,
intelligible
5:
adorned
Earth-Soul
9:
12.
Uranus
12; 5: 1: 4, 7.
Again, as
The
becoming
8.
11.
additions.
escaping
soul
Narcissus,
the
(88) 3:
17; 6:
34.
7:
8:
XVI.
8:
(10) 5:
who
Manifoldness,
Calypso,
6:
6.
5: 5: 3; 6: 4: 6; 2: 3: 31; 5: 8: 10.
8iuk.
8:
9:
(58)
(81) 1: 4:
8; 5:
Nous
the
World-Soul,
world
6:
2, 6.
of
double 5:
6:
the
when
"T
(46) 4:
(76) 1: 4:
3, 8, 13; ,6: 2:
Zeller,
of
Zeus,
3:
(63) 6: 7: 31.
15.
5, 6.
5:
(33) 5: 9:
8.
is
Nous.
8.
It
(9)
Note
Xeus,
7; 5:
(49) 6:
(71) 1: 5:
2:
4:
4. 3.
1.
6:
3.
5:
(67) 1: 4:
5.
(37) 3:
(28)
*.
(32) 1:
(54) 5: 3: 17;
5.
(75) 3:
5:
5:
(27) 3: 9:
3, 4. (42) 1: 2: 7; 6: 9:
1; 5:
11, See
6:
(57)
(66) 6:
4:
CHAPTER
13.
8.
3.
(45) 6: 9:
(48) 6: 5:
3:
1:
(62) 6: 7: 32.
(70) 1: 5: 2:
14.
11; 4:
(52)
5:
9.
(74) 1:
(79)
(84)
6:
9:
(36) 1:
35; 6: 9: 10, 11.
(56)
(61)
1:
(26) 3:
9:
4:
14.
10, 11; 6: 7:
6:
4:
3; 4:
5:
2.
3:
34; 6:
3.
9; 3:
9, 15.
(40) 2: 9:
7:
3:
5:
3:
P latinos.
(30) 6: 7: 36; 6: 9: 4. (31) 1: 3 Title.
(34) 1: 3:
1:
Philosophy of
the
world Minos
Unity, 6: 9: 7." TheLower
View more...
Comments