The King's Speech: How to Justify a War

August 10, 2017 | Author: aegreider | Category: United Kingdom, Unrest, Politics
Share Embed Donate

Short Description

Rhetorical Analysis Essay...


Greider 1! Alice Greider CAS 137H Robin Kramer
 6 Oct. 2013 The King’s Speech: How to Justify a War Royal Prerogative requires that a declaration of war come from the reigning monarch. So on September 3rd, 1939, King George VI of England addressed the people of the British Commonwealth. It was a radio broadcast, and although official pictures had him seated in Buckingham Palace, he gave it standing up in a small room only accompanied by his speech therapist. “The King’s Speech,” as it’s known, is famous not only for its historic message but also for the content of the speech itself. The speech uses careful diction; effective logos, ethos, and pathos; and descriptive imagery, and is coupled with the powerful context of the situation. King George VI’s speech constructs an argument justifying going to war and assuaging the fears of a nation by analyzing how Britain is on the side of the righteous. Even before analyzing the content, the mode through which he addressed his audience proved to be very effective rhetorically. The invention of radio was a recent one; his father, King George V, had started a tradition seven years previous of addressing the nation at Christmastime. Otherwise, royal addresses were new. In fact, this was the first wartime broadcast. Radio allowed the speaker to seemingly speak to his audience personally, as stated in lines 1-4, “I send to every household of my peoples...this if I were able to cross your threshold and speak to you myself.” This endears people to their King, making him seem on the level of the people, speaking “with the same depth of feeling,” yet also a man in whom they can place their trust (3). George VI was never meant to be king, it was always assumed that his older brother Edward would be. Edward abdicated the throne to marry the twice-divorced American socialite Wallis

Greider 2! Simpson however, leaving the shocked and unconfident George to rule. He struggled with a crippling stammer growing up, but overcame it by the early years of his reign, and proved to be more well versed in matters of state and governance than his brother would ever have been. As he and many other contemporary leaders found, the radio became a means to connect with their people personally. FDR delivered his fireside chats to the people during the Great Depression and WWII. Similarly, George VI found that through the radio, he could reach people on a more personal level despite class limitations, geography, literacy, and ideological viewpoint. Through his wartime broadcasts, George VI became a symbol of national resistance and courage, and this speech set a precedent for rallying and encouraging his large audience. The language and chosen diction within the speech is simple, designed to be understood by the vast number of people who would hear the address. Despite the simple diction, the words carry a connotation that makes clear the author’s opinion of his subject. The use of phrases such as “fateful,” “forced into a conflict,” “prevail,” “fatal,” “selfish pursuit of power,” “ might makes right,” and “bondage of fear” convey a negative connotation, characterizing the enemy— who is never defined outright in the speech— as evil, brutish, and uncivilized (1,8,9,11,18). The enemy civilization is even purposefully separated from Britain’s with the description of being “fatal to any civililsed order in the world,” clearly meaning that the Germans are not civilized by making that distinction (10). The separation of civilized orders from Germany and the loaded words make it clear that the speech is priming the audience to feel a certain way about its enemy. From the negatively connotative words in the first half of the speech there is a paradigm shift, and positively connotative words are utilized instead to juxtapose and characterize Britain and her people. The words “order,” “peace,” “calm,” “firm,” “united,” and “resolutely faithful”

Greider 3! are used: all strong and proud words associated with rightful and justified power, unlike the enemy’s brutal and conniving seizure of power (21,24,25,28). They imply that Britain's’ purpose in fighting the war is a high one and Germany’s, a selfish rejection of the “sovereignty and independence of other states” (13). These words function to explain that the doctrine of “might is right” compels Britain, a high law-abiding nation, to go to war (15). This “mere primitive doctrine that might is right” epitomizes why Britain must go to war, fulfilling the entire purpose of the speech (15). Just like the war that now engulfs Europe, Germany has thus become primitive, and Britain is anything but. The combination of the aforementioned diction and the person uttering it, the King of the whole British Commonwealth of Nations, reinforces the idea that Britain is civilized. She doesn’t seek out war; war is primitive. She doesn’t want to fight. However, in the face of an aggressor who so blatantly “disregards its treaties and its solemn pledges,” she will rise to protect the justice, order and peace of the world (12-13). By characterizing and juxtaposing the “mere primitive doctrine” and the “civilized order in the world,” King George generates a picture of Britain as a fatherly magistrate who disapprovingly looks down on the squabbling children and intervenes only to stop their fighting (14,10). Britain is not actually sinking down to their primitive level— just being the keeper of the justice. This is the logos that King George offers his people as a justification for going to war again for the second time in as many decades. To assuage the fear stemming from the prospect of war, the King makes it clear that he understands the fears of “[his] people at home and [his] peoples across the seas” (23-24). Establishing that “we have tried to find a peaceful way out of the differences between ourselves and those who are now our enemies,” he thus explains that Britain has tried other measures to

Greider 4! avoid conflict; they are not just blindly going straight to war (6-7). He concedes that “war can no longer be defined to the battlefield” (26). Indeed, World War I had taught the world that warfare now required entire nations to support and fight wars, not just armies, involving each and every citizen. He calls out to all members of society. The days ahead will be dark, and he asks his peoples to “stand calm, firm, and united in this time of trial,” reiterating that Britain is in the right here and its people must act confident of that and “do the right and see the right” (24-25, 27). He asks that his people be “ready for whatever service or sacrifice it [the war] may demand,” solidifying the idea that Britain is fighting as a nation rather than as a political entity (28-29). During the paradigm shift from comparing the heinous enemy to resolute Britain, he shapes the argument so that his audience believes they must fight this enemy or risk losing “all that we ourselves hold dear,” asserting that “it is unthinkable that we should refuse to meet the challenge” (20-22). Acting as their King who understands their fears and concerns over going to war, he issues these challenges and requests knowing that ethos will compel people to trust him. And trust him they did. Even in the face of a near invasion during the Battle of Britain, the British people kept their heads up and did their best for the war effort. Even as their children were being shipped off to the countryside for safety, they did as King George asked them to. Even as London and other cities were bombed nightly, they acted as King George asked them to. And even as more and more of Britain's allies fell, they acted as King George VI asked them to. They did this in order to release the people of the world from the “bondage of fear” (18). The King refused to relocate the royal family somewhere safer, solidifying the image of the wartime King united with his peoples. This speech reflects that image. It establishes that Britain is fighting this war not because it agrees with war as a principle but because it is forced to in order

Greider 5! to protect the peaceful world. It instills and recognizes the fears people may have and reassures them of the strength of the British Empire and its ruler. Even though King George has no real legislative power as a constitutional monarch, he uses this chance to address the people to explain why Britain is going to war and alleviate their fears during this grave hour of their history.

View more...


Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.