The Blessed Angles, The Reality of Things Unseen - Manly Palmer Hall

April 12, 2018 | Author: Monique Neal | Category: Angel, Archangel, Michael (Archangel), Gabriel, Book Of Enoch
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

TOC: Introduction, The Blessed Angels, Angels in Art, The Celestial Hierarchies, The Blessed Angels of Thomas Heywood, T...

Description

l H3 13SS3 0

N 831S

VN  W dH

S  WVN' . d. O v 1

HV''

THE

BLESSED

ANGELS

he eality of hings Unseen

y

MANLY P. HALL

c'

_

   , . os gees, Califrnia

ISBN No. 0-89314-8075 LC 8027119

Copyright© 8 By the Phlosophl Rsh Society, I

All of rihts No part thisreserved. book may be reprodued in any for m without permsion om the pu lisher

ibrary f Cngress Catalng in Publicatin Data Ha, Mnly Pamer 1901 The blessed nges

1. Anges I Tite. BL47734 2912'15 ISBN 0-89314807-5

8027119

Published by THE PHOSOPHCA RESEARCH SOCETY NC 3910 s Felz Bulevad, s Angeles, CA 90027 Pinted in the U.SA.

TLE OF CONTENTS

ntductin   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    . . . . . . . . . . 5 The Beed Ange . ....   .... ..  9 Ange n At  .  . . . 16 The Ceeti Hechie  .. . 19 The Beed Ange f Thm Heywd  The Bk f Ench . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . 5 



 

 



 



  ·















.

.

Dnyu the Aepgite   .    .  The Pnety Achnge . . 

.























.



7 .  34





LIS F ILLUSTRATIONS The olemaic System of Astronomy      Rying Buddhist Angels . A Siamese Angel     :   A Six-Winged Seraph  . .   The Nine Hierarchies  .  The Works of St.Dionysius the Areopagite .  "When the Morning Stars Sang Together   Seraph Mosaic and Postage Stamp .   The Seraphim .... .  The Cherubim .  .  .  The Throne  The Dominations           The Vertues  .  .  The Powers  . .  . The Principat     .       .  S Michael Archangel . The Angell      



























































.

.















.





















.















T LSSD NGLS T RLITY OF TINGS UNSN

INTRODUCTION

 Chitin nept f mg wee bed upn the unive heme fmuted b Cudiu Pt em n gptin tnme wh fuihed in the end entu A. He w pbb indebted t Pein ttheg Pthgen mthemti phi ph, nd Jewih metphi f the tem whih he deveped He ped the eth in the ente f the  tem beue  f  humnit i nened  mi fe nvege upn the gbe inhbited b mn kind The geenti  Ptemi nept dminted t  nm t the time f Gie Cpeniu, Bhe nd Kepe The eehe f thee tnmemthemti in euted in the etbihment f heienti  tnm. ven thugh the diveed tht the pnet inuding the ethevved und the un, thee vnt  ptied tg nd t thei hpe ding t the d geenti tem Mt mden 5



THE BLESSED ANGELS

trologers their example. There is evidence that Pythagorasfollow was aware that the gods of the planets drove their chariots around the flaming altar of the sun, but his thoughts on the subject received little attention for over two thousand years Modern astronomy deals with the anatomy and phy siolgy of the universe whereas the Ptolemaic system was psychological and in a sense theological It sought to organze the invisible processes which maintained phy Nurmbrg sical existence. That wonderful old bookhundreds Chronicl published in 93, contains of wood engravings Among these is a full-page illustration depicting the Ptolemaic system of astronomy. t is divided into three sections. Deity is enthroned and bears the rb of the world. He is attended by a retinue of spiritual beings who adore him and become the ministers of his will. He is seated above and beyond the zodiac as the Primum Mobile the first motion by which all other things -

areThe moved. two circles outside the zodiac are referred to in Genesis as the regions above the firmament These con stitute the imperium and from these descend the heavens of the fixed stars most especially the zodiacal constella tions which enclose the orbits of the seven sacred planets known to the ancients Below and within these are the regions f the material elementsfire, air water and earth. To the viewer's the corners nine hierarchies are listed inof descending order. left At the are representations the four winds. The complete picture sybolizes the regions of spirit or the zodiacal hierarchy regions of the soul or the planetary system and the regions of body

 N.H ) N

  d   - : s ts   OJ -s  u t 1      f£  mu OJ    n a wqai o   U/ pa·

l

8

THE BLESSED ANGELS

which i theieceptace f the enegie Thi engaving baed upn theupephica initiatin ite f eteic de and wa deived fm a ti de paten taught in the Mte Sch It wa futhe aumed that thi inviibe gvenment etabihed the patten f a tem pal uehip Timu Shah bette knwn a Tameane wa bn abut 1336 and died in 1405 He deveped a tem f gvenment baed amt entie upn gecentic at nm atg. divided hi dmain accding t the and zdiac ceatedHe a piv cunci anagu t the panet paced himef unde the ue f cmic de and imped the tem upn the cuntie and egin ve which he had authit A phica thing ae manifetatin f piitua pinci pe Thee ae inviibe but a-pwefu and the king dm f the eath ae a ubevient t the kingdm f heaven Paaceu decaed that man i a theefd ceatue deiving hi piit ta hi u f m the panet and hi bd fmfm the the eam f  phica matte The atnm f the Bibe i gecentic If we ack nwedge a divine authit bend u wn it i bviu that the hieachie f beed being becme necea t the gvenment f the cm. The cai ficatin f ideea adminitat f the Divine Wi euted age fm the ab f tw mteiu pe nthe pphet Ench and Diniu the Aepagite Wking fmtematized the tete-bad Ptem the pacepvided ppuatingbit Caudiu with ea but inviibe ceatue. Fm thei ab and vaiu in tepetatin theen the angeg f St. Thma Aquina wa funded. Reigin ha awa had it m

TH BLSSD ANGLS

9

ere mu becnfdence apprached by fah bu here me n he dea ha rderpreval hng  npre and ha he Crear ha ampe reurce wh whch  admner h crean Arlgy a we nw  day f helgzed, wuld uan he dcrne f he bleed angel and he cncep ha ar and plane are em are f he cmc rder

TE BLEED NGEL

Reference  angel ccur hrughu he Bble frm Gene  Revelan Only hree are acually named n he acred cannhe archangel Mchael, Raphael and Gabrel A furh archange, Urel  named n he ap cryphal Secnd B f Edra hefurher B f The nereed n purung h and ubjec canEnch mae ue f he cncrdance whch are appended  m Engh edn f he Kng Jame Bble   wrh nng ha nne f he andard reference b  nclud ng he Encyclopedi Britnnic The Ctholic Encyclo pedi The Univerl Jewih Encyclopedi Encyclo pedi of Religion d Ethic (eded by Jame Hang) and A Religiou Encyclopedi (eded by hlp Schaff,

D.D, hee myeru beng paed be fg men LLD) f heaume magnan N judgmen cncernng he realy f angel and hey are acceped by all hee urce a belngng  relgu beef whch have been veneraed fr age

0

H BSS ANGLS

The Bible indicates that angels are capable of taking on a physical appearance and functioning in the material world. This is certainly implied in the account of Jacob wrestling with the angel In other cases the descriptions suggest that angels appear in visions, dreams or mystical experiences n pre-Christian art winged figures also occur as in the designs which adorn Etruscan vases. n Roman times the guardian spirits of communities and illustrious persons were winged and resemble ery closely the anges of Christian art. Although angelolatry or veneration for angels did not arise in Western Chris tianity until the ourth century AO. it rapidly gained favorespecially with artists depicting sacred scenes Illu minated Christian writings were soon embellished with angelic figures. The oo o K now in the Dublin Mu seum dates from the seventh or early eighth century and is a Latin transcript of the Four Gospels based upon the Vulgate Version The extraordinary ornamentations of this manuscript include quaint depictions of angels and the symbols of the Evangelists. The four great archangels are included and Uriel is among them. n the symbolism of the Evangelists Mark is represented by the lion Luke by the ox and John by the eagleall shown with wings. Matthew is in his approved natural form but is also por trayed winged. Angels and archangels are found in many early rishChristian remais and monuments. The belief in angels found many supporters and inter preters among respected scholars of the Church. The writings on this subject attributed to Dionysius of the Areopagus formed the bridge between Neoplatonism and the scholastic philosophers. The writings of Oionysius were popular in the Eastern Church for several centuries

THE BLESS ED ANGES

1

befre hey were ranlaed n an Jhanne Scu Ergena n he nnh cenury In hbyreprn f Dr Everard ranlan f The Mytcl Dvnty he Rever end Jhn arker nclude a frewrd enled "Relang  Dnyu Th  ungned, bu cnan me ueful nfrman ncludng he fllwng "Many her ran lan fllwed geher wh nnumerable Cm menare by he m emnen hnker f he me, amng whm were uch a Hug f S Vcr, Alberu Magnu, Thma Aquna, andwh Dnyu he Carhu an Bnaenura  auraed her nfluence and  are al he grea German myc Eckhar and Tauler arker al ne ha afer he Refrman he mycal deal f Dnyu f he Arepagu nfluenced a uccen f rean myc ncludng Jacb Behme See The Mytcl Dvnty ranlaed by Dr Jhn Everard, wh remark by Revered Jhn arker hladelpha 1926) . Unvel ewh Encycloped Accrdng  Thehad he ec f he Eene an ndependen angellgy he ecre and myere f whch were enrued nly  he naed Member f he ec were requred under ah never  dcle he ecre eachng f he cmmuny The ame urce furher ne ha he arcana f he Eene Order very pbly had dcrne abu he Meah r he angel, and me f hee eachng may have fund her way n apcalypc leraure The

December ay ha abu k refuge n1958 a relgu cener a 100 BC he Eene f

Ntonl Geogphc

Wad Qumran n he Judean wlderne Th hey aban dned n 68 BC and cncealed her lbrare n cave  whch hey never reurned

2

THE BLESSED ANGELS

In Judaism he hierarchy of anges, ofen caed he hos of heaven or he company of divine beings' is no sricy defined Seve anges someimes caed archanges ead he heaveny hoss These are se forh in he noncanonica Firs Book of Enoch chaper 20, as rie (eader of he heaveny hoss) Raphae (guardian of h human spiris) Rague (avenger of God) ichae (guardian of Israe)  Sarie (avenger of he spiris)  Gabrie (ruer of Paradise, he seraphim and he cherubim) and Remie aso caed Jeremie! (guardian of sous in he aferife) In Isam four archanges are recognized Jibri or Gabrie (he reveaer)  ika!, or ichae (he provider) Izrai (he ange of deah) and Israfi (he ange of he Las Judgmen) (See Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15h ediion). Differen arrangemens occur in oher ri ings I mus be udersood ha he docrine of anges passed hrough a series of recensions by hich i gra duay became compex The Chrisianizing he beiefs expressedmore in he Od Tesamen resued inofcon siderabe confusion Various iss of arhanges are no aays consisen. Names appear ofen ihou appro priae inerpreaions Wih he rise of he cabaa srange names ere besoed upon a muiude of siderea spiris, boh good and evi and demonoogy provided ong iss of subversive spiris each ih a srange and unfamiiar name Cabaism ineresed a number of pro minen Chrisian ineecuas, among for hem von Rosenroh o hom e are indebed heKnorr firs Lain ransaion of he Zhar. The beief in anges aso found is ay ino he fairy aes of Hans Chrisian Andersen and he Brohers Grimm. The guardian ange no akes he

TH BSSD ANGS

13

appearance fairy godmother bringsThe miracu lous poers of to the rescue of mortals ho in distress star tipped and of the good fairy is reminiscent of the magic scepters carried by the archangels Several modern mys tica sects offer prayers to these invisible beings convinced that their supplications ill be heard. The beief in angeic eings as eld by many ancient peoples each culture group developed its on explana tions and interpretations of these mysterous creatures They are asoand prominent in the ritings the oroastrians in Persian artscriptural Figures of angelsof and archangels are numerous in Christian art afer the fourth century A Choirs of celestial beings atend representa tions of Deity, the Holy Trinity, and the Blessed Virgin. Pictures of this type are called o and the various hierarchies are depicted in the order of their preemi nence. Both the Eastern and Western Churches have venerated especially the archangels ichael, Gabriel and Raphae elevating them to sainthood by canoniza tion According to scriptural testimony both angels and arch angels have appeared in human form ith or ithout ings. They are androgynous creatures and artists in depicting them have been required to call heavily upon inspiration or intuition Some painters have been more successful than others and perhaps Raphael has been the most inspired These supernatural beings hich Dante caed Birdsith of God are shon youthfu handsome persons quiet and benign as expressions variously robed and garmented according to prevailing customs. Archanges may ear elegant vestments ela borately embroidered and beeeled Each carries sym-

4

TH BLSSD ANGLS

bolic attributes witness his station and mission They are neverbearing represented astoaged and, while they are not actually considered immortal they endure as long as they are sustained by the will of God The principal arch angels have been named but the angeic host is con sidered as a group mong the angels a body of celestial musicians is recognized forming a heavenly chorus Some are also shown playing upon terrestrial musical instruments incuding harps violins, and trumpets Christian art wings an adornment and are notand to bentaken literally Theseare pinions are of various sizes artists have devoted much time and talent to this subject They are almost invariably derived from the natural wings of birds and may be varicolored with the iridescence of peacock feathers and other rare plumage Though some times depicted in flight angels are more often represented standing or kneeling with their pinions folded The kingdomcourt of heaven wasofregarded in early times ast a magnificent like that an Oriental monarch was appropriate in fact more or less necessary, that God should have a retinue suitable to his station n contem plating the wonders of creation it was unreasonable to assume that Deity could alone regulate the realms of exis tence s the chief executive of the world he must administer his domain through orders of living beings bound to him by eternal love Mortal kings have their prime ministers and their and these in turn delegate other officials to privy carry councils out the divine commands The word  from the Greek  means "mes senger, and the angelic orders of life inhabit qualitative distances between divinity and humanity Their equiva

THE BESSED ANGES

15

lets must exist i every solar system ad beigs of icoceivable spledor preside over cosmic systems ad galaxies. There is o doubt that this cocept gave verisi militude to the agelic hierarchies. Most religios ad philosophies have directly or idirectly sactioed the reality of orders of ivisible life assistig i the maage met of uiversal law  the West St Gregory the Great affirmig the exis tece of ie orders of agels follows the classificatio of Dioysius of the Areopagus Joh of Damascus also followig Dioysius attempts a defiitio statig that a agel is a itellectual substace which is always mobile ad edowed with free will is icorporeal serves God has received accordig to grace immortality i its ature ad the form ad character of whose substace That aloe who created it kows (See Encyclopadia of Rli gion and Ethics, "Demos ad Spirits) Peter Lombard (1100?-160 or 1164) is recogized as the first systematic theologia of the Wester hurch He also arraged the hierarchy accordig to the order give by the Areopagite Thomas Aquias the greatest of the scholastic aters devoted a etire tract to the agels i his Summa. He writes "Agels are altogether icorporeal ot composed of matter ad form; exceed corporeal beigs i umber ust as they exceed them i perfectio differ i species sice they differ i rak ad are icorruptible because they are immaterial Agels ca assume a aerial body but do ot exercise the fuctios of life Thus they do ot eat propri as hrist did after His resurrectio. Agels ca be localized but caot be i more tha oe place at the same time. The substace of agels is ot pure thought because i a created beig activity ad sub

6

THE BLESSED ANGELS

sane are never idenial Similarly he  of anels is no pure houh They have no sensory oniion Their oniion is objeiveno hoever hrouh deermina ions in he obje bu hrouh innae aeories The oniion of he hiher anels is effeed by simpler and feer aeories han is ha of he loer Anels by heir naural poers have knolede of God far reaer han men an have bu imperfe in iself    The anels ere reaed in a sae of naural no supernaural beaiude Alhouh hey ould love God as heir Creaor hey ere inapable of he beaifi vision exep by Divine rae They are apable of aquirin meri hereby perfe beaiude is aained; subsequenly o is aainmen hey re inapable of sin Their beaiude bein perfeed hey are inapable of proress

ANGELS IN ART

n Chrisian ar erain aribues ame o be assoiaed ih anels and arhanels and hese ere elaboraed and refined in laer enuries They ere shon in human form and ere radiionally of he masuline sex bu ere feminized in he orks of many rea ariss They ere usually houh no alays shon as ined o emphasize heir poer o asend or desend hrouh he various levels of he spae dimension n Chrisian ar hey inheried hese ins from pre-Chrisian soures Anels are alays represened fully lohed Prior o he sevenh enury heir robes ere hie and of a Greian

ANGLS N ART

7

yle aer her garmen were lred red r ble, fen magnfenly Angel andarhangel have nmb ab rnamened he ead Th nmb ally gld anda n he Eaern Chrh may be rnaely deraed Orgnally hee perphyal beng wre n har rnamen b, n mre reen me a haple, rle, r rne ha been nrded Gradally her arbe ave been added and bh angel and arhangel may arry ymbl bje h a wrd, lane and pray f flwer Angel are ally hwn baref, b he arhangel are fen prvded had wh very andal The rean Refrman lle effe pn he l f angel In he Anglan Chrh he angel a meenger f he Dvne Wll are flly regnzed In he re f me, hwever, ngregan have hwn very lle nere n he bje In he Book of Common Pryer he wenynnh f Sepember  dedaed  S Mhael he Arhangel, and by exenn  all angel beng n Bddh ar TheyIn areAngel allybeng hwnfreqenly aendngappear Bddha r Bdhava parade ene hey fla amng ld, aer flwer, r fll he ar wh her m The grea fane f Hryj, he andng example f xh enry Japanee rel g arhere, wa rgnally deraed wh a ere f mral panng f Bddh dvne Thee exqe wr f ar wer nearly all deryed by a dar fre n 1949 One f he few rvvng panng dep a Bddh angel Thee radan beng, fen alled tennin, are ally repreened n mn They d n have wng b her flwng garmen ream frm her bde n graefl fld The har  arranged n a hgh

8

Flying Buddhist angels; from Toshio Nagahiro.

THE B LESSED ANGELS

A Study of Hiten or Fying Angels by

hnn nd the hed s rnetted Drk tresses hn pn the shlders nd t wld pper tht the mery sBdhsttv bsed pn trdtnl lkenesses f dy Knnn the f Cmpssn nd Mery. Grdn sttes tht n Bddhsm nels re lwys femnne whees n the West they r e rdtnlly mslne (See Wor Heaer pes 390-39) . There s  lss f pntns referred t s Raigo-Zu, r vsn senes In these the Bddh Amd flts thrh the r n lmns lds t ndt the sls f tre belevers t the re nd Amd s ften mpned by  lry f nels There  fmsbyvsn sene t nd Mt Ky n whh Bddh s s ttended bdhsttvs twentyfve rdnt bens plyn vrs msl nstr ments snn the sns f prdse r rryn sred bnners In the henx Hll t Uj n Jpn, Amd s m pned by fftytw Unh KyBsts represented s stndn r seted pn lds (See Buhm an Py chotherapy pes 7475) . In Bddhst wdrvns nels re ften nlded n the elbrtely rved nd lded nmbses pled dretly behnd the mes In  few nstnes these re shwn s hmnheded brds nd rry msl nstrments Anels pper mn the

THE CEESIA HIERARCHES

19

A Siamese angel from an lluminated manuscrp of the eghteenh centuy.

empe painings of Korea and he sacred ar of India Siamese painings of he ife of Buddha ofen sho him accompanied by guardian spiris from he unseen ords. Anges accompanied uhammad on his nigh ourney o heaven he ange (Gabrie) appeared o he Prophe and in he cave Jibri on  Hira o announce his minisry. I is obvious herefore ha Asia recognized he reaiy of the bessed anges.

TE CELESTL ERRCES

Ahough accouns of he inercessions of spiriua beings in human affairs are scaered hroughou Hoy Wri i remained for he eary Chrisian heoogians o cassify he various divisions and eves of he heaveny

20

THE BLESSED ANGELS

host Thewere invisible powers whichhierarchies Deity administers his creation divided intobythree which were further subdivided into nine choirs The first hierarchy is the Councillors of God which are made up of the three choirs of the Seraphim, the Cherubim, and the Thrones; these remain in constant attendance upon Deity The second hierarchy is the Governors, composed of the choirs of Dominations, Virtues, and Powes these regulate the created universe The thir hierarchy is the Messengers whichthese are divided into Principalities, Archangels, of andGod Angels are principally concerned with the well-being of humanity In this arrangement of the celestial hierarchies accord ing to Dionysius, only the lower choirs are technically members of the angelic orders n the crse of time the various levels of the divine hierarchies were not clearly distinguished, and they are all grouped together and referred to as members of the archangels or the angelic order Aof tenth division sometimes consists the human soulsis on three levelsmentioned of spiritualand de velopment These are liste as good souls, aspiring souls, an sanctified souls With the exception of the archangels indiviual members of these hierarchies are not specifically named Those belonging to the angelic order when pictured in religious art are usually shown in white robes a nd winged Seven archangels are recognized as possessing special characteristics andart clearly defined responsibilities In old religious the Seraphim are often depicte as chillike faces only, usually with six small wings A good example is shown in Perugino's painting The Assumption f the Virgin. The Cherubim resemble the Seraphim

TH CLSTIAL HIRARCHIS

A sx-wged eaph om the Assumption of he

21

Virgin by Peugo.

excep ha hey have ony four ings. The cherubs on he Ark of he Covenan are ofen picured ih four faces human bodies and ings ha mee over he ercy Sea The Thrones Domnaions Poers Virues and Principaiies sedom appear in ar and no acua ikenesses are appied o hem. Severa of he Archanges are described in deai and are herefore e represened in sacred ar. The Anges appear ny in groups and ogeher ih he Archanges are specificay described as messengers communicaing he Divine Wi o moras and coming o he assisance of orhy persons in disress. In Raphae's paining in he Vaican shoing he reease of S Peer from prison an angeic being comes o he aid of he grea discipein one scene he ange is depiced as inged bu inbyanoher sceneaura is shon ihou ings and surrounded a radiaing of igh. I is ineresing o noe ha in hagioogy he Archanges ichae Gabrie and Raphae have been canonized

22

THE BLEED ANEL

TE LESSED NGELS OF TOMS EYWOOD

The mos mporan book deang h hs subec s The Hierarchie of he Bessed Anges by homas Heyood London 1635. The upper par of he e page s devoed o a symboc represenaon of he angec orders surroundng he rune naure of Dey. The voume sef s usraed by engraved paes of he chors of anges accompaned by mporan symbos These are reproduced a he end of hs arce. Ths s a rare nsance n hch a of he nne orders of anges are acuay pcured. The seraph n hs seres of paes s smpy pcured as an ange, bu  s of speca neres ha  s suspended beeen Jerusaem and Dephos, possby sugges he mngng of Jesh and Greek nfuence n o angeoary. The cherub has he radona four ngs and beo s a scene shong he banshng of Adam and Eve from he Garden of Eden. In he foreground are sages and schoars ho have conrbued o he docrne of anges. The desgn for he Thrones s obvousy nfuenced by he Book of Reveaon. The enyfour eders are grouped abou he eerna hrone. The four creaures assocaed heage he Evangess are presen. The on, bu and he are appropraey nged bu he fourh evanges s shon as a seraphn hs case a face h ngs. Beo he ark bears o cherubs as nged heads. The broken saue s caed Dagon and s used o

THOMAS HEOOD

2

Te nine ieacies; a deai fo te te page of Heywood's

Hierarchie of he Blessed Anges.



symboize idoatry The Dominations are symboized by an ange carrying the cross and sord Beo the nine hierarchies are arranged as a gory around the Agnus Dei. In the engraving of the Virtues the angeic being is fying toard the symbo of the Hoy Spirit and is carrying embems of the Passion At the vieer's eft is a group of cherubs and at the right the Grecian deities associated ith the panets. At the bottom of the design the three reigions hich taught the mystery of the anges are represented. oses stands for the Od Testament the crucified Christ for th Christian dispensation and the seated figure of uhammad is intended to portray Isam 

2

THE BESSED ANGES

He is accompanied by a small demon he Poers are pictured by a valiant angel ith the flaming sord of punishment in one hand and the heart of mercy in the other At upper right is a hand holding the thunderbolt of Zeus Belo are the as of perdition ith fallen angels and evil spirits cast out of the heavenly regions It is implied that the Poers have sovereignty but act forever ith ustice tempered by mercy he Principalities have authority over the governments of the orld he inged angel carrying a scepter of sovreignty is surrounded by symbols of temporal poer. A good monarchy is shon in clouds at the vieers left and in the loer foreground the false kingdom that as set up in the abyss ruled by might rather than by right Spiritual poer is suggested by the church and temporal poer by the alled city he Archangels are personalized in the form of St Michael carrying symbols of Christendom He is croned it stars and stands on the prostrate body of the fallen angel from hose mouth proceed monstrosities and infernal creatures he Angels picture forth the story that is told in Luke 2:911 hen the angel of the Lord appeared to the shepherds In the loer foreground are the shepherds ith their sheep; behind them a magician standing in a magic circle is conuring up evil spirits and these finally turn upon the sorcerer and destroy him. he Star of Bethlehem is above beteen the ings of the angel he order of blessed souls is not pictured in Heyood's ork It as recognized hoever as part of the heavely hierarchy When man as placed upon the earth he as given dominion over all the creatures hich the ord had fashioned He had responsibilities to the animals plants



H BOOK OF NOCH

2

meals ad all te elemets o s plaet. I ode to asced  godless e must see tese lesse oms o lg tgs ad be mecul accodg to te laws o eae ad atue; t s toug log kidless tat uma souls atta to te edempto

THE BOOK OF NOCH

No study o agels could be cosdeed compeese wtout a dscusso o te Book o Eoc. Ts wok is o ukow oigi ad as be te subject o co sdeable teologcal cotoesy. Ealy Cista wtes make equet eeeces to te mystcal expeeces o Eoc ad wile book iso ot caoical it was edetly kow by te te auto te Epistle o Jude I Jude eses 14-15, we ead "Ad to tese also Eoc te seet om Adam popesied sayg Beold e Lod comet wt te tousads o s oly oes To execute udgmet upo all ad to coce al te ugodly o al tei woks o uodless wc tey ae ugodly wougt ad o all te ad tgs wc ugodly ses ae spoke agaist im. Tee ae two of Enoch o wc oe is called te esios te Book Etopao ad te ote te Slaoic to idicate te egos  wic te ealest mauscipts wee oud Te Book o Eoc is a omdable wok lagely co ceed wt alle agels el spits ad elapsed

26

THE BESSED ANGELS

hman Thee s no Fahes dob ha  nlenced he hnkngbengs o ealy Chch who wee wanng heecs and nonconomss o he eenal hoos ha awaed hem beyond he gave Chsan a o he welh ho egheenh cenes develoed many vaaons on he heme, esecally n eesenaons o he as Jdgmen The ohec wngs o Enoch esled om a sees � vsons n whch he ohe was led  o he hghe ealms whee he was nsced by odoveall and ealed bengsnsaon Howeve nhee s no slendosal and myscal he Book he o Enoch as s se oh n he es o Donyss o he Aeoags  canno be dobed, howeve, ha Enoch olaed he ay dsances wh naons o good and evl ss The Slavonc Veson o Enoch was anslaed no Englsh by WR Moll, MA and blshed n 896 a he Claendon Pess Ood, nde he le he Book of he of wes, Enoch"The n hs nodcon wok R HSeces Chales Slavonc Enoch noshs esen

om was wen somewhee abo he begnnng o he Chsan ea s aho o nal edo was an Hellens Jew, and he lace o s comoson was Egy n he same nodcon Chales he saes ha n s svvng om  s easonably cean ha  ognaed n he s ceny A obably n Aleanda n he Slavonc Veson he cosmologcal elemens ae eanded Enoch ae o he hsnsons. The sevealbyvsons moeenlghenmen eavagan o han he Ehoan Veson Thee s consdeable emhass on angels who gde Enoch hogh he nvsble ealms o he cosmos

DIONYSUS THE AREOPAGIE

27

I s beeved ha he Frs Book of Enoch s assocaed wh he Essene communy a Qumran. Some secons probaby go back o he second cenury B.C, and ohers were added as ae as he second cenury A. In The Book of the Serets of Enoh here s an addona accoun of Enochs fe and hs fna ascenson o he heaveny regon Modern hnkng es hs wh Aex andransm. The sevenh chaper of he Frs Book of Enoch (Rchard Laurence ransaon) s of speca neres o our presen subec. I happened afer he sons of men had muped n hose days, ha daughers were born o hem, eegan and beaufu. And when he anges, he sons of heaven, behed hem, hey became enamoured of hem sayng o each oher, Come, e us seec for our seves wves from he progeny of men, and e us bege chdren.

DONYSUS TE REOPGTE



The frs reference o Donysus he Areopage s found n Acs 17: 34 Bu some men oned hm, and beeved  among hem Donysus he Areopage, and a woman named Damars, and ohers wh hem. In The Golden Legend of Jaobus de Voragine (Voume I, page 617, RyanRpperger ransaon  194 1 edon)  s saed ha Donysus was caed he Areopage because of he secon of Ahens where he had hs dweng. The Areo pagus was he quare r of Mars and was he bes secon of

28

THE BESSE ANGES

he city where nobles and scholars assembled. It may be remembered that the trial of Socrates was held in the Areopagus Dr ohn Everard in his introduction to The Mstcal Dvnt of Donsus, The Areopagte writes hough we know nothing of the man who is called Dionysius the Areopagite except the few references he has made to himself and his contemporaries (and history cannot help us he stands at the fountain head of Christian Mysticism: reflecting what was the best and noblest in the spiritual thought of the Old World Philo sophy re-expressed in the ight of Christ. The works of Dionysius referred to in the writings of the early Church Fathers are first On the Heavenl Herarch; second On the Ecclesastcal Herarch third On the Names of God; and fourth On Mstc Theolog. In addition are ten letters which are generally accepted as authentic. The basic concepts set forth in these works provided the pattern necessary to the structuring of a systematic Christian philosophy After being converted by Paul Dionysius with his wife Damaris and his whole household were baptied The Golden Legend also states that this Dionysius was instructed for three years by St Paul and that he was ordained Bishop of Athens The account then continues "It is said that Paul made known to him the things that he had seen when he was rapt to the third heaven and this Dionysius himself seems to insinuate in seeral places. Hence he has written so aptly and clearly of the hier archies of the angels their orders dispositions and offices that yo would not think that he had learned this of another but had himself been rapt to the third heaven and had there viewed all these things

_.



a

"'' >· ,, .�, �     \ I

¥ffNi'I �NTWOf TH(

/

.

•¥ If··

Orm,�){!"eu (�1!ntrwlv I\�TAlftOnJ 

 r:

VeA[Y NMl to'c.M €n e1A nxfr �A:o'yr{ -



O.aA "

' f

/

. eITAS�;Muf'{tX

7

I\�rn/lNM "

f

/

TvNMOI1y £ f� �' \tMn mr TWc:ln!e f�r1i\

5 z ( c (   [ ) :  0  ) C = 

TICnl\)tlGri�XN 

HtCl\"

The woks o St Dionysius the Aeopagie; from a Gee uncial manuscip o the ninh centuy in the Lauentian Libay at Floence.

l \

30

THE BLESSED ANGELS

In the Nag Hammadi Codices edited by Douglas M. Parrott, published in Leiden 1979 there is a translation of the Apocalypse of Paul One cannot read this without receiving the strong impression that it describes the initia tion of the Apostle into a system of Christian Gnosticism. Paul was caught up to the third heaven and then passed to the fourth heaven where there were angels resembling God He then ascended to the fifth heaven where there was a great angel holding an iron rod He then went on to the sixth heaven from which he passed to the seventh heaven where he saw an old man seated upon a throne From here he passed to the eighth heaven, then to e ninth, and finally to the tenth. Of the upper regions there is no description and the brief work ends with the words "The Apocalypse of Paul t has been stated that Dionysius was present at the death of the Blessed Mary. He also visited Rome and was later sent to France by Clement where he built a number of churches He was burned afterwards as a martyr in95 A. The life and career of Dionysius, however, would have slight interest for modern scholars had it not been for the small but important tract On Mystic Theology by Dionysius the Areopagite which had come into circula tion about the fifth century A.. It has been widely assumed that this was written by an unknown author who has come to be termed the Pseudo-Areopagite. From the time of their first appearance the Dionysian writings pro foundly influenced Christian mysticism Even today the concepts which they set forth are held in the highest veneration by both Catholic and Protestant religionists It seems to me that the books may be based upon an oral tradition that could go back to the first or second century

DIONYSIUS THE AREOPAGITE

3

A We knw fr exmple tht the Cptc mnuscrpts fund t Ng Hmmd belng t the furth r erly ffth centures A Evdence hwever pnts t these bks beng trnscrptns f texs knwn tw r three centures erler f the Dnysn bks were sscted wth the Gnss they culd hve been held n secret fr  lng tme befre beng publcly crculted One mght suspect they were prductns f the Alexndrn schl whch prduced  cnsderble number f pcryphl wrks sscted wth bth Old nd New Testment wrtngs f such be the cse they belng t  clss f erly pstChrstn lterture the uthrshp f whch remns unknwn t the present tme Dnysus the Arepgte s credted wth hvng systemtzed erler belefs but the mysteres f the hevenly hsts nd the herrches f ngelc bengs s frequently referred t by the gret Church thelgns St Pul mentns severl f these rders f celestl bengs n the Epstle f Pul t the Clssns 1:16, "fr n hm were ll thngs creted n the hevens nd upn the erth thngs vsble nd thngs nvsble whether thrnes r dmnns r prncpltes r pwers n the uRems Englsh Versn f the Bble fvred by Rmn Cthlcs n the Epstle f St Pul t the Ephesns 1:2021 there s  further reference t the her rches "Whch he wrught n Chrst rsng hm up frm the ded nd settng hm t hs rght hnd n the hevenly plces Abve ll prncplty nd pwer nd vrtue nd dmnn nd every nme tht s nmed nt nly n ths wrld but ls n tht whch s t cme n the Kng Jmes Versn the wrd virtues s mtted

32

THE BESSED AGES

Robet lit Fludd in hi Collecto Operum the the tenRoicucian hieachie mytic in the followin ode decendin fom the hihet oup Seaphim Cheu bim Thone Domination Powe Vitue Pinci palitie Achanel and Anel He include humanity a the lat of the hieachie unde the name "Soul. He alo place the ten ode upon the ten banche of the ephiothic tee of the late cabalit n hi Three Books of Occult Phlosophy Heny Coneliu Aippa include a numbe of table theinanelic hieachie and of thecoepondence ode of piitbetween involved cee monial maic. Pofeo Milton S Tey in hi book The Sbyllne Oracles mention a lae body of peudepiapha which oiinated between 150 B.C. and 300 A He include the Book of Enoch and the Second Book of Eda and note that the poduction of uch wok wa mot notable in Alexandia in the time of the Ptolemie. Mead Oracles, that they believe accodin to The Chaldaean wee "a poduct of Hellenitic and moe peciely Alex andian) yncetim. He ay "The Alexandian eliio philoophy pope wa a blend of Ophic Pythaoaean Platonic and Stoic element and contituted the theo loy of the leaned in the eat city which had adually fom the thid centuy B.C. made heelf the cente of Hellenic cultue. The manificent libaie of Alexandia wee a ich

ouce of ancient eliiou and philoophical witin which wee lot to the wold when thee eat collection wee detoyed. t i not neceay to aume that the vaiou aced text which wee fit available to chola wee actually witten by Alexandian theoloian. They

DIONSIUS THE AREOPAGITE

33

may have only translated or transcrbed earler works, gvng credt to the orgnal athors Ths brngs  certan dobts abt the exstence of the PsedoAreoagte No nformaton s avalable concernng hm excet that he mst have lved abot 500 A Whoever he was, t s sosed that he falsely attrbted wrtngs of hs own to Donyss of the Areoags A Relgous ylopeda, edted by Schaff, contans the followng nterestng qota ton: The non-athorsh of Donyss the Areoagte once agreed on, the qeston arose, by whom, then, and at what tme, these works were wrtten and a nmber of hyotheses were roffered, from that of BamgartenCrss, lacng the athor at Alexandra, n the thrd centry, to that of Westcott, lacng hm at Edessa, at the begnnng of the sxth centry Actally there s no roof that the PsedoAreoagte actally exsted If Bamgarten-Crss s correct the Donysan wrtngs mst certanly be nclded among the rodtons of Alexandransm It s qte ossble therefore that the mystcal wrtngs of Donyss of the Areoags cold date back to the frst centry A and are roerly credted to ther tre sorce In roblems_ of ths knd, modern onons are not alwas deendable The great Alexanran lbrares were destroyed by Arelan n 273 A The Seraem was comletely razed n 388 A on the edct of Theodoss As a reslt whch of mght these have destrctons, vndcated the vrtally aocryhal all sorce wrtngs materal was lost to the world The fate of the relgos books whch were rejected by the Concl of Ncaea, 325 A, also remans ncertan

THE BLESSED ANGES

34

TE PLNETRY RCNGEL

There s lack of conformty n the tables of the planetary angels The orgnal concept nspred cabalstc specula tons whch resulted n the namng of hundreds of sprts, good andofbad For our purposes we wll follow class fcaton Robert Fludd as t appears n hs the Collecio Operm Although Fludd wroe extensvely on the cabala, he was bascally an exponent of the Roscrucan teachngs of the early seventeenth century e lsts the planetary archangels as follws SATURN

Zephkel, the contemplaton of God

UPITER MARS SUN VENUS MERCURY MOON

Zadkel, of God Samael, the the rghteousness severty of God Mchael, lke unto God anael, the grace of God Raphael, the medcne of God Gabrel, the strength of God

In the Old Testament the Archangel Mchael s the guardan of Israel, Gods vceregent, the heavenly hgh prest, and the keeper of the keys of heaven In Chrs tanty he s patron sant of the Church on earth and judge of the souls of the dead As generalssmo of the armes of heaven, Mchael was commssoned by the ord to war aganst ucfer and hs rebel sprts In Revelaton 12:710

THE PLANETAR ARCHANGELS

35

th ifGoldn of th Lgnd rbiouitpirit i ad th dragon, but in Th i tatd that thi dragon wa Luifr Miha i omtim hown in Roman armor baring a an and arrying a baan or a for th wighing of ou Rapha i rgardd a th guardian of humanity and i  th patron of th haing art Rapha wa th arhang who brought to th hphrd th gad tiding of th birth of Chrit H i rprntd with a kindy and gnt xprion drda taff a aand pigrim hairhung i bound with a fit  and H arri ha aHi wat on hi bt Rapha i oftn hown arrying a fih a a harm of mdiation ( Tobit 66). n 1921 Pop Bndit XV dard Otobr 24 a Rapha' univra fat day Sin th ixtnth ntury St Rapha ha ao bn rognizd a th patron of travr Th Arhang Gabri i mntiond four tim in th Bib, twi in Dani and twi in Luk H i bivd to hav fortod thth birthkpr of Samon Aording popuar bif, h wa of th tiatotraury Aording to Luk Gabri annound th birth of John th Baptit and Ju n ary painting of th Annun iation n, Mary humbd hrf bfor th ang, but aftr h bam th Qun of Ang Gabri kn to hr n art thi arhang i prntd a a grafu bing with a bautifu fa and had and a fam ik ur of hair abov th forhad Hi attribut ar a iy and a ro inribd witha "Av Maroriaan Gratia   H hown with ptr oivPna branh aiaomtim ymbo of pa on arth On January 12 1951 Pop Piu XI dard Gabri to b patron of tho invovd in  troni ommuniation tviion, tphon, and

36

THE BESSED ANGELS

tlgraph ths phaszng Gabrls nton as a s sngr. Passng rns t o th othr or arhang ls or n Jwsh rlgos lgndr bt ar not arrd ovr nto Chrstan anglolog. On othr arhangl thogh not assoatd wth th plantar sptnar shold b ntond Url th lght or r o God s on o th or ajor arhangls. H stands wth Mhal Raphal and Gabrl as a gardan o th thron o God H s not ntond n arl Jdas bt s nad n th Sond Book o Esdras and th Book o Enoh. H s sad to b assoatd wth natral phnonash as arth qaks, volan rptons and thndrstors. H also ors n th Gnost tradton. n addton to ths shold b ntond Mtatron on o th ost portant o all th arhangls n Jwsh ths and lgnds H s assgnd to th Primum Mbile th rst oton o th world t s th oton o ong orth ot o God and dns Dt as th novd ovr o all thngs Mtatron s th lstal srb and rords th vrts and vs o han bngs n th Book o  Also th Arhangl Jophl shold b notd; h prsds ovr th havns o th xd stars H s nthrond abov th rant H s gardan o th zoda th lstal wall nlosng th plantar sst. H s also alld th bat o God n th pra to hs translaton o Ptol's Tetra bibls r Fur Bks f the Inuence f the Stars,

JM Ashand nots that Ptol "ba an llstros dspl o th shool o Alxandra n whh t h lorshd drng th rgn o Adran and that o Antonns Ps As Alxandra was th radl o

THE PLANETARY ARCHANGES

37

Western was mysticism, it iswith reasonable to assume that ·Ptolemy acquainted Neoplatonism nosticism and Egyptian philosophy. On the title page of his book Ashmand notes that he has translated Ptolemy from the reek paraphrase of Proclus who has been surnamed the Platonic Successor Proclus was born in Constantinople about the year 410 AD. He likewise studied at Alexandria and succeeded Syrianus as the head of the Platonic school at Athens Amon the most important of the literarydiscussion labors of ofProclus was theof preparation extensive the theology Plato. In thisofisan set forth the order and enumeration of the gods and the elaborate symbolism of preChristian mysticism. It is almost inevitable that Proclus realized that the hierarchies as developed in early Christianity had their srcin in earlier religious systems including the reek Mysteries. The niverse of Ptolemy was accepted in large part by most of the Alexandrian schools including Christianity. Although the astronomical of Ptolemy is no longer scientifically accepted system he made many useful contributions to the knowledge of his times He advanced the art of navigation organized a wrking calendar, classified celestial phenomena and made many useful observations bearing upon geography and agriculture Having organized the anatomy and physiology of the uni versal structure it was inevitable that his findings would be theologized The systematizing of the physical cosmos brought into clearer focus the problem of the need for a sovereign intellect responsible for the splendor of exis tencein other words the world body must have a soul On this point Lord Bacon says I had rather believed all the fables and the Legend and the Talmud and the

38

THE BESSED ANGES

 Mind  hn h his universl Frme is wihou  All livin hins re compounds of spiri nd mer. Forms re moved by n indwellin life If here is  science of mer here is lso  science of spiri. The invisible srucure mus be undersood before he purpose of life cn be known. The myholoies of ncien nions were ll concerned wih he orders of superphysicl powers which reuled physicl ffirs. Amon he ncien nd Sbins he nels fixed srs we he eyes round of spiriul beins he sr ssembled in lory he hrone of he Mos Hih. To ech of he sins of he zodic ws ssined  presidin enius nd hese oeher reuled he sesons nd he re cycles of ime by which creion is mesured The morl sphere lso hd invisible inhbins which re remembered in folklore s elemenls or nure spiris The nomes ssocied wih he elemen of erh were he urdins of llsl hend precious subsnces emsnd even col mellic ores. Themels wer  reion ws uder he urdinship of undines or nymphs who hd specil dminisrion over veeion nd creures exisin in he se The spiris of fire were clled slmnders They seldom ppered in ny form oher hn onues of flme nd hey hd secil uhoriy over volcnoes ho sprins nd he use of fire in indusry The sylphsofen clled firieswere he denizens he iry They urded life birds nd of insecs ndelemen he pollenion of plns.pln The ele menls form pr of he folklore of ll nions nd rces. The eher or luminous mosphere which consiues

THE PLANETARY ARCHANGELS

39

"When the Morning Sars Sang Togeher; egraving from the Book of Job by Wam Blake.

40

THE LEED ANGEL

te energy fied of te panet was regarded as a diret manifestation of teinpanetary Tomas Tayor, is notesanges to Voume I of th D- . scriton of Grc by Pausanias, deriving is information from te piosopies of Pytagoras and Pato writes, "Tere are tree orders of sous wi are te perpetua attendants of te gods Te first of tese orders anges ompose; te seond daemons and te tird, eroes. But as tere is no vauum eiter in inorporea or or porea natures, but on te ontrary profond union, it is neessary, in order to aompis tis, te tatsummit te ast of in one k of a superior order soud oa ese wit proximatey inferior Hene terefore between ssntial eroes wo perpetuay attend te gods, and are on sequenty impassive and pure, and te buk of uman sous wo desend wit passivity and mpurity, it is neessary tere soud be an order of uman sous wo desend wit impassivity and purity Later Tayor adds (See Voume III, pages 229230 But as every god beginning fro on ig produes isompreends proper seriesmany as far as to te ast of tings, and tis series essenes different from ea oter, su as Angeia, Daemoniaa, Heroia, Nympia, and te ie, te owest powers of tese orders ave a great ommunion and pysia sympaty wit te uman rae, and ontri bute to te perfetion of a teir natura operations, and partiuary to teir proreations It soud be under stood tat in Greek piosopy te word damon signifies a supernatura being intermediate between gods and men and soud not be onfused wit te modern onept of demon as an evi spirit

THE PAET ARY ARCHA GE S

41

From the bove t s evdet tht clsscl Greek theology cluded the cocept tht vsble begs pre sded over the vrous orders of lfe ufoldg  the mortl world There were rcl d tol detes whch overshdowed the mjor dvsos of hum socety Ech cty d stte ws uder the protecto of  ptro dvty for whom temples d shres were bult d pproprte rtes d ceremoes were coducted Athes for exmple ws ot merely  ggregto of Athes t ws  collectve etty d t ws held tht ths etty ws Plls Athe t ws her cty d her eerges were dffused throughout the populto d ll the sttutos whch she hd spred As the hum soul presdes over the lfe of the dvdul so Athe ws the soul of Athes Ths ws ot  poetc or symbolcl belef but ws held to be lterlly true Athe spred the phlosophy scece d rt of her cty d whe eed rose spoke through her prests d orcles d elghteed the mds of her scholrs Every rce hd ts gurd gel wth whose protectg cre ts cultures ufolded d ts people fulflled the ppoted desty.  strl theology ll dvsos of lfe o ths plet or elsewhere hve ther rulershps d the plets std s symbols for ther predg dvtes  hs lst dscourse Socrtes declred t to be hs belef tht there were cretures lvg log the shores of the r s me lve log the shores of the se To the old pgs there were coutless sprts most of them fredly whch mgled vsbly wth mortls d occsolly com mucted wth them There ws o emptess  spce Eveywhere there ws lfecoscous d tellget

42

HE BESSED ANGES

thogh nseen It s generally aepted that the lt of angels orgnated an d has gradally eome nvolvednnpreChrstan the elefs oftmes manknd regardless of set or reed ateralty as a phlosophy of lfe s a sterle delson All ms orgnates n the song of agels so a glory of angel engs s shown n anent art as horses and symphones of nvsle sprts Franz Shert one sad that he frst heard hs ompostons n the ar arond hm he anonzed sants of Chrstendom elong to that order of Heroes desredther n the Platon and the Greeks addressed prayers anddotrne spplatons to defed mortals as nteressors etween themselves an the Olympan gods The earth was not a all of drt smlng ts way arond the snt was a lvng eng wth a heart and a mnd It had ts own nerves arteres, and vens and lovngly provded for the welleng of ts hldren It old e approprately honored as Iss the other of ystees and Dana the great goddess of the Ephesans Ths elef also explaned to pagan mnds how the prayers of prvate tzens old e heard and answered f the heart was pre and the plea was honorale o mtter how ntellgent or gfted the hman eng may eome he annot ope wth the total mystery of hs own exstene, and t has een assmed that a gardan angel attended hm from the radle to the grave In hs work On the Mysteries Iamlhs devotes onsderale spae to natal gardan sprts who lke nvsle parents dret the nfoldment of harater and the release of sol powers Those engs most ntmately nvolved n hman onerns and ther mtal relatonshps are of the order

HE PLANEARY ARCHANGELS

43

f prtecting angesange It wasdeparts beievedScrates that when a bdy dies the guardian ntes that shrty befre his death his prtecting spirit bade him farewe Death itsef hwever, is an essentia part f ife and thse departing frm mrtaity pass int the custdy f the nge f Death This is nt a mnstrus shadw but a faithfu servant f the Universa Pan  the hierarchies are manifestati ns f divine ve and mercy mng thse prfundy infuenced by the mystica repagite was St Francis fthegy ssissi f(  Dinysius 82- 226)theTw years befre his death St Francis received a visin f a seraph and this

P�.A YI

A seap fom a mosai in te Catedal C of St ak in Venie, wit an aimail postage stamp issed by te Vatian City in 974 based pon tis mosai



TH BLSSD ANGLS

was foowed amost immediatey by the appearance on his body of the stigmata or the five wounds of Christ n his mystica raptures St Francis experienced the unity of iving things. n one of his poems he caed upon Brother Sun Sister Moon Brother Wind and Sister Water. He even referred to his own body as Brother Bea st whom he had i treated When it became necessary for his physician to cauterize him with a red hot iron St. Francis besought Brother Fire to dea kindy with him He preached to the birds and the ritua of bessing animas is a tribute to his memory Jacob Boehme (575- 624  the Protestant mystic whie in prayerfu meditation passed through a series of remarkabe mystica experiences t seemed to him that the physica atmosphere which surrounded him was actuay opaue but with the eye of his sou he was abe to cear away te materia mist and behod the spendors of the superphysica reams. He was in the midst of a iving ight which fowed and moved in patterns of cees tia coors Space was fied with spirits administering the physica phenomena of the universe. He coud endure such visions for ony a short time and aowed the vei to cose but the memory of what he had seen remained with him; these gimpses of reaity were incorporated in his phiosophy and sustained him through ong years of adversity. There is an od engraving of Boehme which reveas so far as is possibe the wonders of he divine order sustains existence. upper sym boizeswhich the unbearabe radiance The fowing fromsection the nature of Deity. The Seraphim and the Cherubim adore their Creator and the Four Evangeists attend the majesty of Deity

THE PLANETARY ARCHANGELS

45

mst in bewhich nderstd in all aspects f angellgy that thet frms these beings are generally represented are artistic cntrivances The actal bdies f angels r archangels are fields f light frm which they are able t prect temprary appearances They belng in dmen sins f existence beynd the sensry pereptins f the hman being, bt he mst embdy them with frms created in his wn mind if he wishes t have awareness f their presence Each rder f This animals, vegetables, and has its gardian angel. has seemed t be themnerals nly explana tin fr the wnderfl gidance everywhere bvis in the prcesses f existence grwth, and prpagatin The heavenly kingdm incldes them in its wisdm and cmpassin. Each frm f life which has nt yet been individalized has a grp spirit garding and giding its destiny The hierarchy f sls, the next divisin belw the angels, is hmanity which was given dminin ver all the the creatres f the earth. angelic beings that direct inner grwth f the The varis species depend pn mankind t gard the physical rights f the varis kingdms and their sbdivisins. n the mineral kingdm, the stnes and metals, gems and elements all have their rights and privileges. Any abse f natral resrces is a misdemeanr carrying a heavy penalty. Plants have their gardian angels and all frms f vegetatin live in bedience t the laws f their Creatr. Eachreglates species f animals is ensled by a gardian spirit which their cndct fr they t are citizens f the csmic cmmnwealth. n his descriptin previsly qted, Thmas Taylr assigns the ensling f rivers, mntains, glens, and gardens t

4

THE BLESSED ANGELS

the nymphs who inhabit the invisible etheri bodies of plants and minerals Everything beneath God is in onstant need of divine help In Genesis God gave Adam dominion over all the kingdoms of nature Man was to be the protetor of life and when he fails to be a good and faithful servant of the Divine Plan he brings disaster upon himself Many will probably feel that the ult of angels is inom patible with the progress of modern siene So long as siene has no satisfatory explanation for the intelligene everywhere present in the natural world it atually has no valid hypothesis with whih to refute the Greek belief in hierarhies of ministering spirits regulating osmi affairs A genuine vision by whih a devout person beomes aware of a superphysial presene annot be disredited simply beause the majority of human beings has not had suh experienes

fL

THE BLESSED ANGELS

P6

THE BLESSE ANGEL S

0 e Dominats

SI

52

TH BSSD ANGS



54

THE BLESSED ANGELS 

MIH ACGEL

SS

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF