Section 3 Group 15 Apurv Mittal – FT153025 Survesh Chauhan – FT153047 Naveen K. – FT153066 Mukesh Shah – FT153090 Sumit Arora – FT153107 Gagandeep - FT153114
Situation Before Hiram Ten years of continuous growth due to good
economic conditions Company was “Fat and Happy” Then came the economic slump and Rainbarrel could not cope with it. They were slow to react due to their indiscipline and lax attitude.
Hiram‟s Vision Focus on cost reduction via “Lean and Mean”.
He reduced labor cost by forced layoffs - 10%
reduction in all units. Improved call center metrics. He brought in “Wall Of Shame”. New metric of measuring customer service was brought in.
Hiram‟s Vision Contd.. Standardized the meaning of the term „shipping‟
Consideration of selling price as a measure of
commission to sales people. Removed the confusion in the minds of the sales personnel. Bottomline - Keep things simple.
Unexpected Backlash Employee developed tendencies to find loopholes.
Employees started filing patents which were
commercially non-viable. The current and retired employees were cold shouldered by the sales people. Layoffs were reducing happiness.
Unexpected Backlash Contd.. The headcount reduction was the target and not the
cost. Firing of low performing employees was crippling the company. Even high performing department had to lay of high performing individuals. Long term customers were getting disgruntled.
Contd.. Stocks were not getting replenished.
Stuff was lying on the railroad siding outside the
warehouse. Customer service personnel were in hurry to hang up the phone calls from customers. Hence multiple calls were required to resolve a single issue. In short, Hiram had lot of thinking to do.
Experts‟ take on this case •
• • • •
Make shipping efficient rather than faster. Layoff increases costs of hiring too. It is very difficult to define a right metric. Compromising long term businesses for short term operating gains. PMS should be launched as a pilot .
Contd.. •
• •
•
The employees were humiliated due to Wall Of Shame Introduction of intangible reward system. Top performer need to be nurtured as they are 50% more productive than other. The pay for performance was illogical game.
Thank you for interesting in our services. We are a non-profit group that run this website to share documents. We need your help to maintenance this website.