Synthesis of epicyclic gear trains

August 8, 2017 | Author: Ashok Dargar | Category: Kinematics, Vertex (Graph Theory), Graph Theory, Gear, Matrix (Mathematics)
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Synthesis of epicyclic gear trains...

Description

SYNTHESIS AND ANALYSIS OF EPICYCLIC GEAR TRAINS

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Brief History of Synthesis And Analysis In Mechanical Engineering design, an engmeer uses scientific principles, technical information and imagination in the description of a Machine to perform a specified task. The designer uses his knowledge and imagination to generate as many feasible solutions as possible. Out of the three important inter related phases of design process i.e. 1) product planning phase 2) conceptual design phase and 3) product design phase, the second phase is an important phase, as many design alternatives are generated, analyzed and selection of most promising choice is made for detailed designing. In this phase the skeleton form of the machine or a part of a machine component is developed. Hence a lot of attention is paid by the designers to this conceptual design phase of mechanisms. The conceptual phase of design is accomplished by the designer's intuition, ingenuity and experience. An alternative approach is to generate an atlas of Mechanisms classified according to functional characteristics for use as the source of ideas for Mechanism designers. This approach in general may identify all feasible mechanisms and lead to an optimum design. In this systematic design process, the

designer uses kinematic structure representation of

Mechanisms. The kinematic structure contains the essential information about which link is connected to which other link by what type of joint.

Study of

kinematic structure of mechanisms for the understanding of their function helps in development of enumeration, identification and classification of kinematic chains

and mechanisms. Checking for isomorphism at the conceptual stage will avoid duplication in generation process. Though many stages are involved in the creative phase of design, Analysis and synthesis are two important phases. In kinematic Analysis the relative motion associated with links of a mechanism or machine are studied, and this is a critical step towards proper design of mechanisms. While in Kinematic Synthesis, which is the reverse process of analysis, the designer generates different alternative structures to satisfy the desired motion characteristics of an output link for the given motion to an input link in relation to fixed link.

There are three phases of kinematic synthesis, viz, Type synthesis, Number synthesis and Dimensional synthesis. Dimensional synthesis deals with the determination of proportions of different links of a pre-decided structure in the first two phases.

In Type synthesis, designer at the conceptual design phase

considers all possible types of mechanisms and selects most suited one to meet the functional requirements, materials, manufacturing process and cost. In the second phase i.e. Number synthesis, designer decides about the number of links, types of joints and number of joints needed to achieve a given number of degrees of freedom of mechanism selected in phase one. Number synthesis also involves enumeration of all feasible kinematic structures or linkage topologies for a given number of degrees of freedom, number of links, and type of joints. Hence this

2

phase is also known among kinematicians as Structural Synthesis or Topological Synthesis. Although understanding of structural characteristics of a given type of mechanism is critical for the development of efficient algorithms, various methodologies have been developed for systematic enumeration of kinematic structures. First, the functional requirements of a class of mechanisms are identified and the structures of same type are enumerated systematically using graph theory and combinatorial analysis. Structural synthesis of kinematic chains and mechanism is of two stages.

First one is determination of all possible

structurally distinct kinematic chains with a given number of links and specified degree of freedom and the other one is identification of distinct inversions that can be obtained from a given kinematic chain.

Many researchers in the field of

kinematic synthesis and analysis of mechanisms had focused their attention on the investigation of planar linkages. A substantial amount of literature is available for planar linkages. Freudenstein [I] in 1955, gave an appropriate but a numerical method for dimensional synthesis of a four bar linkage.

This paper is intended to make

the construction of 4-link Mechanism for the functional relationships for computing purposes relatively easy and certain, as the design of synthesis of linkages is generally a problem of choosing a set of arbitrary parameters, so that the resulting configuration produces a desired motion.

3

McLaman C.W. [2] in 1963 synthesized six link plane mechanisms using numerical analysis. He developed equations relating the link dimensions and the input & output crank angles for Watt & Stephenson chains. An iterative solution is explained and the example problems are solved and discussed. Crossley F.E. [3] in 1966 made a comparison of the unpublished work of Alt (1953) with a previous work of Crossley. The unpublished work of Alt has a collection of ten link plane kinematic chains. While compiling the collection of I0 bar chains the greatest problem was to distinguish whether two arrangements, which might appear alike, were actually the same or different and this lead to the definition of isomorphism between linkages so that the links arrangement in a kinematic chain with a given number of links and DOF is unique and distinct. Thus coined is the word topological isomorphism.

Two patterns form an

isomorphic pair if there is one to one correspondence, if not they are nonisomorphic. In 1966 Davies T.H. and Crossley F.E [4] obtained the censuses of

seven, nine, ten and eleven bar kinematic chains. They state that at early stage in design process the question of dimensions is largely irrelevant both in respect to distances between pairs and cross sections of the bodies they connect. Though Reuleaux [5] devised a comprehensive symbolic notation capable of describing kinematic relationships, his notation is rarely used because the graphic qualities of drawing are entirely lost. A graphic representation of a kinematic chain is more

4

desirable as the number of links increases. Denavit & Hartenberg [6] worked out a matrix fonn-taking cognizance of the different fonns of joints in the chain. In 1967 L.S. Woo [7], gave Type synthesis of plane linkages. enumerated plane kinematic chains (PKC) having ten links.

He

He also gave an

algorithm for deriving all PKCs from those of lower number of links. He for the first time gave all the 230 graphs of ten links and one DOF kinematic chains (KC). Freudenstein F [8] in 1967 presented the basic concepts of Polya's theory [9]. Polya's Hauptsatz is stated without proof using permutations, groups and graphs and its use is illustrated with reference to the structural classification of mechanisms.

He presented the elementary aspects of theory needed for the

enumeration of graph structures, which can be defmed as graphs. Davies. T in 1968 [10] extended

the Manolescu's classification of

PKCs and mechanisms with mobility greater than or equal to one using graphs theory. These extensions enabled general theorems to be presented that concern the structure of many kinematic chains including those having mobility one. Turner J. in 1968 [ 11] gave generalized matrix functioning and studied the graph Isomorphism. He proves that a graph is not characterized by the Eigenvalues [12, 13, 14] of its Adjacency Matrix and gives several non-isomorphic graphs with the same Eigen values. He therefore gives a set of Matrix functions also known as "lmmanants" to characterize graphs for isomorphism.

5

Haas S.L. and Crossley F.R.E. [15] in 1969 used number synthesis of linkages to produce a collection of linkage forms with mobility four.

The

procedure explained in four steps and to describe the same Frank's notation is used. In 1971 Manolescu N.J. [16] described a method of linkages census based on transforming of Baranov Trusses into PKCs using graphisation. Kinematic chains with m multiple joints and simple links (KCMJSL) obtained by using dyad amplification (DA), with greater number of links but with same DOF. This paper was presented in memory of Baranov, Dobrovolski and Artobolevski, the founders of the modem theory of mechanisms. Baranov Truss (of zero DOF) is a structural framework composed of pin-jointed bars or beams related by 3 *1 2 * j = 3 where l is number of bars and j is number of simple joints. Huang M and Sony A.H [17] in 1973 used graph theory and Polya's theory of counting to synthesise and analyze structures of planar and threedimensional kinematic chains.

They gave a mathematical model to perform,

structural analysis and synthesis of PKCs with kinematic elements like revolute pairs, cam pairs, springs, belt- pulleys, piston - cylinder and gears, they enumerated eight link KCs with above kinematic elements. They also developed a model for analysis and synthesis of multi-loop spatial KCs with lower and higher kinematic pairs. Artobolevskii I.I [18] in 1974, while addressing the 13 1h ASME Mechanisms Conference, New York besides other aspects stressed the need for

6

creating new mechanisms, automatic machines for the automation of manual and intellectual labour of man.

He underlined the necessity of designing complex

reduction gears with planetary and differential schemes. In 1974, J.J. Uicker Jr and A. Raicu [19] presented a method for determining a set of identification numbers for a kinematic chain and thereby using these numbers to detect isomorphism in kinematic chains. These authors present a procedure based on graph theory, which leads to a numerical algorithm for testing for isomorphism of two kinematic chains. Though counter examples are found to this method by later researchers [26,29] this paper is a pioneering work in the field of analytical isomorphism of kinematic chains. A.C.Rao [20] in 1975 introduced moment concept to kinematic chains and used this moment method for the analysis of planar complex mechanism. This is a very simple method for the velocity and acceleration analysis of complex mechanisms. Gred Kiper and Dieter Schian in 1975 [21] gave a computer-assisted synthesis of 12 link Grubler kinematic chains.

They used linear graphs for

synthesis of these 12 link chains. A.C.Rao in 1977 [22] illustrated with an example that a five bar single loop linkage can be used as mechanism with single input, even though a five bar single loop chain is a two DOF chain. In 1978 [23] gave an accurate analysis of slider crank mechanism. He underlined how the performance of a linkage is influenced by the elasticity of

7

hnks and JOmt dearances. He also stresses that the assumption of rigid link is not vahd when the mechanism designed based on the above assumption, is operated under high static and inertia forces. In 1979 [24) described an easy and alternative method for the design of spatial slides crank mechanism for function generation using minimum standard deviation as criterion for closure error. The method is illustrated by a numerical example with six precision points. Mrutyunjaya T.S. and Raghavan M.R. in 1979 [25) presented a method based on Bocher's formulae for determination of characteristic coefficients, which are indices of isomorphism in kinematic chains. They gave a physical meaning of these coefficients and presented algebraic test for determining whether a chain possesses total, partial or fractionated freedom [ 10]. They also gave generalized Matrix notation to represent and analyze multiple jointed chains. T.S. Mruthyunjaya [26] in 1979 synthesised kinematic structures by transformation of binary chains. This can be used to derive all possible simple and multiple jointed chains of positive, zero or negative DOF. The method is illustrated by applying the theory to the case of chains with DOF -1,0,1 & 2. M. Kothari and A.C.Rao [27] in 1980 synthesised two DOF slider crank Mechanisms for minimum structural error.

The synthesis equations of

seven links two DOF Mechanisms are highly non - linear.

Hence special

techniques are required for this solution. They used an epicyclic gear train driven

8

slider crank mechanism with flexibility-attached slider to generate functions of two variables.

The resulting linear displacement equations are convenient for

closed form synthesis of the mechanism. Mayourian M and Freudenstein F in 1984 [28] developed an Atlas of kinematic structures of Mechanisms using graphs theory. The Atlas contains 35 graphs, which define the kinematic structures of a wide class of plane and threedimensional mechanism with up to six links.

They have shown that 4000

mechanisms can be obtained from these 35 graphs with turning, prismatic and gear pairs and having one DOF. T. S. Mrutyunjaya in 1984 [29] gave a computerized methodology for structural synthesis of kinematic chains in two parts. In part one he presented the formulation of a methodology which led to the development of a computer programme for the structural synthesis and analysis of kinematic chains with simple joints and DOF more than zero. While, in part two he established the reliability the above computer programme for structural synthesis and analysis of simple jointed kinematic chains by applying the programme to several cases such as ?link zero freedom chains, 8 and 10 link single DOF chains. T.S. Mruthyunjaya and M.R. Raghavan in 1984 [30) used link-link incidence Matrix to represent simple jointed kinematic chains. Algebraic methods are developed to determine structural characteristics like - type of freedom of a chain, the number of distinct linkages and inversions that can be derived from a

9

chain.

Graph theory is used for the computer-aided analysis of kinematic

structures. Several typical examples are presented to supplement the theory. In 1984 A.K. Khare and A.C.Rao [31] used reliability concept for structural error synthesis of mechanism.

This method is simple and leads to

closed form solution. The mechanism designed by this method can perform with any desired reliability. Reliability of a system can be defined as the probability that the system will perform intended design function satisfactorily under specified conditions. A numerical example is given to illustrate the method and results are compared with those available. This concept can be extended to the design of other mechanisms like cam mechanisms without any difficulty. In 1984 [3 2] synthesised a slotted link with a flexibility-attached

slider with seven precision points for path generation.

The displacement

equations obtained are linear and give closed form as well as optimum design of a mechanism. The given equation is in a convenient form for the application of the least square methods. In 1985 [33] gave a method to select the input and output links in

distinct mechanisms under the study of structures analysis and syntheses of kinematic chains and mechanisms. The method is based on the minimum number of joints among the input and output links. This concept is applied to two DOF links. Method is illustrated with seven and nine link chains as examples. The concept can be extended to linkages with larger number of links having higher DOF, fractionated DOF and input and output on floating links.

10

In 1985 [34) presented a method to overcome the shortcomings in general graph theory and reflect the node and circuit properties.

Logarithmic

functions or entropies, which can be used to detect isomorphism and get a clear idea of the quality of motion transmission, are derived using circuit and cut-set matrices. Entropy of a coefficient Matrix for a kinematic chain is an invariant and becomes a property of the chain. Wayne J. Sohn and Freudenstein Fin 1986 [35] applied dual graphs to the automatic generation of the kinematic structures of mechanisms.

A

powerful new representation of the kinematic structure of mechanisms has been developed that permits a highly efficient, completely automatic procedure for the computer-generated enumeration of the kinematic structures of mechanisms. The kinematic structures of one, two and three DOF planar linkages with up to four independent loops have been enumerated. The path generated by a mechanism deviates from the specified path and the deviation is expressed by the reliability index. In 1986 R.P. Sukhija and A.C.Rao [36], used reliability index for optimal synthesis. Tolerance is also allocated on link lengths using the concept of reliability index. The reliability is maximized for optimal synthesis of mechanisms. Also this synthesis method gives a closed form solution, which is a great advantage over iterative methods of formulating an objective function and minimizing it.

II

Many space mechanisms can be fonned with four links and joints having different DOF. No measure was available to know which of the available mechanism possess greater mobility or flexibility. Flexibility is different from DOF. Though the mobility of a chain increases with the number of links, one is not sure how the topology of links, types of links and joints, their number and sequence influence the mobility. A.C.Rao in 1986 [37] combined graph theory with the concepts of probability and developed simple equations to investigate the relative merits of planar and spatial kinematic chains. Greater the flexibility or mobility, higher is the ability of a kinematic chain to meet the motion requirements. Entropy corresponds to the total connectivity of each link and for given entropy; linkages in which all the links have equal corrnectivity have greater flexibility. Distinct ten-link kinematic chains are identified by C. Nageswar Rao & A.C.Rao in 1986 [38], using an invariant obtained by the criteria of shortest

path through which motion is transmitted from joint to joint. The number of flowlinks between various joints may be arranged for a mechanism in the form of a Matrix. The total of each row in the matrix is obtained and then the sum of all such totals. MNL scheme is used to obtain the invariant and can be used to detect isomorphism. An assessment of merits and demerits of available methods for

detection of isomorphism in kinematic chain is presented by T.S. Mrutyunjaya and H.R. Balasubramanian in 1987 [39]. Another test based on the characteristic

12

coefficient of the degree matrix of a graph is proposed to detect isomorphism in kinematic chains. The test is successfully applied to simple jointed kinematic chains with single DOF and with up to ten links, two DOF chains with up to nine links and three DOF chains with up to ten links. Ambekar A.G. and Agrawal V.P. in 1987 [40], used min code for canonical numbering of kinematic chains and isomorphism problem. It explains the concept of min code and discusses its properties relevant to kinematic chains. The algorithm given is based on the method available in graph theory literature in chemistry. Min code is unique and is suitable for testing isomorphism in kinematic chains. The code can be decoded positively hence possible to use in storing and retrieving of the kinematic chains and mechanisms. Ambekar A.G. and Agrawal V.P. in 1987 [41), used min code as canonical number to give a unique number for kinematic chains with simple joints.

A method is suggested to identify mechanisms, path generators and

function generators through a set of identification numbers.

Min code is also

shown to be effective in revealing the topology of kinematic chains and mechanisms with different types of lower pairs and or simple and multiple joints. Pseudo-Hamming distance of a kinematic chain is an invariant and hence it can be associated with some structural property of the chain. Hamming distances are sensitive to changes in the type & number of links and loop formation.

This aspect is studied in 1988 [42] and proves that higher the

Hamming value the better is structural error performance of the chain. For chains

13

with the same connectivity, the chain having greater Hamming value contains joints of greater DOF.

Chains having different Hamming value have different

capabilities even though the two chains have same connectivity. The number and type of loops and their arrangements in the chain may be such that the chain may have total or partial or fractionated freedom. The methods reported to that date were not very efficient computationally. In 1988 [43] presented a simple and computationally efficient method using Hamming distances to detect isomorphism, inversions and type of freedom in multi - DOF and multi loop mechanisms. Isomorphism among kinematic chains with sliding pairs was studied by A.C.Rao & C. Nageswar Rao in 1989 [44]. This method is based on the concept of equivalent chains and the method is an improvement on the method given by Uicker and Raicu. In 1990 [45] made a companson of linkage mechanisms usmg

Hamming number method. Selection of ground, input and output links for the specified task like path or function generation can be made. It is explained with examples of single and multi - DOF mechanisms. Comparison of inversions is also made. Hwang W.M. and Hwang Y.W in 1992 [46] presented a computeraided structural synthesis of planar kinematic chains with simple joints.

This

paper consists of systematic generation of contracted link adjacency matrices, detection of degenerate chains and identification of isomorphic chains.

The

14

programme used by the authors automatically synthesises planar kinematic chains with the given number of links and DOF and they have listed kinematic chains with up to 13 links. They obtained 6862 distinct and non-degenerate kinematic chains with 12 links and one DOF as against the earlier result of 6856 kinematic chains given by Kiper and Schian [47]. They state that characteristic polynomial of degree matrix given by Mrutyunjaya and Balasubramanian [39] is successful in distinguishing the structure of an the kinematic chains with up to I 0 links. However it fails to distinguish the kinematic chains with 12links and one DOF. Two linkages with the same number and type of links but with different topology, when optimized for the same task win behave differently from the viewpoint of dynamics.

This is due to difference structure. In 1992 [48]

studied the structure dependent dynamic behaviours of linkages. Comparison of linkages based on structure for dynamic performance can be made at the pre design stage. It is shown that a degree of non-linearity exists between the input and output links of a kinematic chain depending on the structure. Accelerations of the links in the chain are correlated to this non-linearity. Validity of the method is proved by taking six bar and eight bar chains as examples.

A chain which

possesses good dynamic behaviour need not be good from viewpoint of static behaviour. A.C.Rao and C. Nageswar Rao in 1993 [49] made a comparison of performance of Robotic structures. The accuracy, ease of control, size of working space, computational effort and accessibility depend upon the structure of the

IS

open chain. A numerical approach using linkage adjacency matrices is used to rate the linkages for their relative abilities. Varada Raju et al in 1994 (50) gave a method for structural synthesis of simple jointed PKCs. They presented a direct, quick and reliable method to synthesise planar simple jointed chains, open or closed with single or multi - DOF and with any number of links. A simple, concise and unambiguous notation is used to represent a chain. In 1997 [51] used Hamming number Technique to generate planar

kinematic chains. The Hamming number Technique is extended to reveal identity and symmetry among the links and joints of chains.

This in turn enables

generation of distinct chains without having to test for degeneration and isomorphism. Formulae are given to calculate the number of such chains using this method. Only a few chains generated needed to be tested for isomorphism. A.C.Rao and Jagadeesh Anne in 1998 [52] presented quantitative methods, based on the topology of chains, in order to compare all the distinct chains with the specified number of links and DOF. In this work topology based characteristics of kinematic chains like work space, rigidity, input joint and isomorphism in kinematic chains are dealt with. Compact linkages do not have greater workspace. Using distance and self-loop concepts of graph theory one can decide the joint at which motion is to be supplied to get best result from the input link.

16

In 1999 [53] discussed a method based on the moment concept to test isomorphism among kinematic chains and inversions.

The numerical strings

represent kinematic chains uniquely. Symmetry in kinematic chains is studied and numerical measures are proposed to quantify symmetry in PKCs. Multi DOF kinematic chains are compared for parallelism so that selection of a best chain for a robot can be made. The proposed theory is applied to six bar and eight bar planar kinematic chains to illustrate the method. Multi - DOF PKCs can be considered for application as in-parallel robots in view of their greater rigidity.

Since a number distinct chains are

available with the same number of links and DOF for consideration as in-parallel robotic structures. In 2001 [54], presented a simple and logical method to decide which of these chains is more in-parallel so that chain selected fulfills the specified task such as workspace, rigidity. Measure of parallelism developed is also used to compare distinct chains for efficiency and component velocities. Robot arms are open chains and each joints is actuated independently. These suffer from disadvantages like less rigidity, accumulation of mechanical errors from shoulder to end effects, control problem etc. Platform type robots are an alternative to open chain robot arms. In 2001 [55] proposed numerical measures to compare all the distinct planar linkage mechanisms at the conceptual stage of design.

The method presented is based on the deployment of design

parameters in different topological features of the chains viz., links, joints and

17

loops. The theory is applied to two - DOF nine link chains and three - DOF ten link chains. A.C.Rao and P.B. Deshmukh in 2001 [56] gave a computer aided structural synthesis of planar kinematic chains obviating the test for Isomorphism. Link assortment of a kinematic chain is an orderly sequence of the number of binary, ternary, quaternary etc. links that are needed to form a chain. Important feature of link assortment is total number of links with connectivity 3, 5, 7 etc cannot exist in odd number with other links of even connectivity. The steps involved in arriving at the kinematic chains are simple and straightforward and allows the designer to visualize the generation throughout the process. The type of freedom, full, partial etc can be known right at the time of generation. Also a lot of saving in computer space is accomplished.

1.2 Review of Literature on Planetary Gear Trains It is a known fact that these techniques used for the structural

synthesis of planar linkages can be extended to other types of mechanisms such as Gear drives, Cam mechanisms, Hydraulic piston-cylinder mechanisms, spring mechanisms etc,. However studies dealing with such extensions or development of techniques suitable for structural synthesis of these specific types of mechanisms are quite limited. Recently, the attention of the researchers ha shifted to the structural synthesis of geared kinematic chains. Nearly all branches of industry require reliable mechanisms for variable transmission.

Of different

18

available means of Power transmission from one shaft to another, gear trains constitute one of the best methods, because gear trains (gears) represent a high level of engineering achievement besides rolling contact bearings.

There are

enormous variety of possible gear train configurations for such application as automobiles and helicopters and differentials, gas turbine-engines, machine tools, robotic wrist mechanisms, steering mechanisms for track laying vehicles etc,. A gear train is referred as an "ordinary gear train" if the shaft axes are fixed in space throughout their motion.

Since for the given number of gear

elements and size, the gear ratio is less for an ordinary gear train, Epicyclic or Planetary Gear Trains (EGT or PGT) are used to achieve the same or higher gear ratio with less number of elements. An Epicyclic Gear Train (EGT) consists of one or more central sun gears with gears in mesh with them revolving around them like planets of sun, giving Epicyclic motion to the planets. Each planet is associated with a link called Gear Carrier or Arm, which ensures the constant center distance between two gears in mesh. A Kinematic Chain with gears as elements, from which an Epicyclic drive can be obtained by keeping one link fixed is also known as a Geared Kinematic Chain (GKC) or an Epicyclic Chain (EC). Because of the inherent advantages of lightweight, compactness, differential drive and above all high-speed ratios possible with limited number of elements, Planetary gear trains are often used in transmission systems.

19

In the earlier stages of study of PGTs the attention is towards their analysis. Levai (1968), Colbourne ( 1972), Townsend (1972), Mihal (1978), Wojcik (1978), Willis (1982) and Wilson et al (1983) used Vector Analysis [57] to study the PGTs. Martin (1982), Wilson (1983), Tye and Cleghorn (1985 and 1987) used Table Method [57] for the analysis of PGTs. Train Value method [57] is used by Tailai (1983), Pazak et al (1984) Bacgi (1987) and Freudenstein (1971)) Freudenstein and Yang (1972), Tsai (1985), Hsieh et al (1988), ChengHo Hsu and Kin-Tak Cam (1992) used graph theory method [57] for the kinematic analysis of PGTs. In 1968 Levai [58] has described in his publication how all-34 types of PGTs can be derived from one general fonn of the single gear train. He has also given a family tree of planetary gear trains. Though analysis of planetary gear trains has spanned over three decades from 1968, the synthesis of planetary gear trains in a systematic manner started in 1979 by Buchsbaum and Freudenstein [59]. They used network concepts and combinatorial analysis to develop methods for the enumeration of PGTs according to kinematic structure. They illustrated that separation of kinematic structure from functional considerations is useful at the conceptual stage of design and in identifying the potentially useful PGTs. They also introduced three different ways of representing PGTs, i.e., Schematic, Functional and Graph representations.

20

1.2.a. FUNCTIONAL REPRESENTATION The functional representation of an epicyclic gear train refers to the conventional schematic structure drawing of the mechanism. When analyzing the kinematic structure or motion of planetary gear trains, the schematic diagram is commonly used to represent the relationship among the links and joints of gear train. The simplest epicyclic gear train is shown in fig. ( 1.1 ). The functional representation of a planetary gear train is shown in fig (l.la).

The elements

labeled as P and S are gears meshed together and A is an arm carrier.

1.2.b. GRAPH REPRESENTATION For the systematic synthesis of epicyclic gear trains, a graph can be used to represent the structure of a gear train. In a graph a vertex represents a mechanical element and edge represents a joint. The edge connection between vertices corresponds to the pair connection between links. An epicyclic gear train has two kinds of joints one is a turning pair which connects the axis of a gear and a carrier, and the other is a gear pair between two meshing gears. In order to distinguish a turning pair connection from a gear pair connection, turning pairs are represented by line and gear pairs by double line. Furthermore, the thin edges are labeled according to their axis locations. A graph made of this and heavy edges is some times referred to as a bicoloured graph since the two different edges can also be represented by two different colour codes. A bicoloured graph without labeling its thin edges is called an unlabelled graph. Fig (1.2) shows the graph 21

representation of the mechanism shows in fig where vertices 1,2 and 3 correspond to links 1,2 and 3 the thin edges 1-2 and 1-3 correspond to the turning pair connecting links 1 and 2 and 1 and 3 the edge labels a and be correspond to the joint axis locations a-a and b-b and the heavy edge 2-3 corresponds to the gear pair connection between links 2 and 3 respective.

1

2 ..._ _ _. 3

Fig (1.2)

22

1.2.c. ROTATIONAL GRAPH REPRESENTATION A rotational graph consists of gear pair edges and incident vertices and each edge is labeled with a symbol of the transfer vertex associated with the edge which represents the carrier of two meshing gears fig shows the rotational graph of the mechanism shown in fig where the edge 2-3 is labeled with the number of transfer vertex. The transfer vertex is the vertex, which is not incident with geared edge.

1

21

~

Fig. (1.3)

According to Freudenstein the rotational graph of a planetary gear train is defined as the graph obtained by deleting the turning edges of the transfer vertices from the structural graph and labeling each geared edge with the symbol for the associated transfer vertex. This is shown in figure (1.3). According to Ravi Shankar.R and Mruthyunjaya the defmition of rotational graph is obtained from the structural graph by deleting the turning edges and joining the end vertices of each geared edge directly too the associated transfer vertex with new turning edges.

23

Displacement graph is obtained by labeling the new turning pair edges of rotational graph according to their axis locations in space. All the turning edges forming a circuit must share a common levels in some cases a rotational graph may contain more turning edges than the structural graphs from which it is derived and hence may not represent a feasible structural graph. Moreover several structural graphs may correspond to identical displacement graph. These facts result in a difficulty in detecting the displacement isomorphism of planetary gear trains. The term isomorphism is defmed as the one to one correspondence between the graphs i.e., the two graphs though they have different structures, represent the same motion. They also gave five levels for the structural classification of PGTs. In Graph representation of a GKC the vertices in the Graph are links and the Edges are Pairs between the elements. Also because of different types of pairs between various elements in the graph Hi-coloured Graph representation is used.

In 1971 Freudenstein [60] used Boolean algebra to investigate the kinematic structure of PGTs. He has given the correspondence between the graph representation of PGTs and form of the displacement equations. He gives a Canonical graph representation and determination of algebraic displacement equations by inspection from kinematic structures. Also the same can be applied to dynamical equations and sketching of the PGTs. Graphical representation of

24

PGTs is clearly explained. The fundamental rules of graphs of PGTs are given by Freudenstein and Buchsbaum [59] and are elaborated by Freudenstein [60]. He also introduced the concept of Transfer Vertex and gave its significance. He has also given a method for the determination of transfer vertices in a graph of PGT. He describes linear displacement equations and rotational displacement equations. He introduced the concepts of Rotation Graphs and Rotational Isomorphism. Rotation graph of a PGT is obtained by deleting the Turning Pair Edges and the labeling the each geared edge with its corresponding transfer vertex. Transfer vertex is the vertex in a fundamental circuit incident with only turning pair edges and all edges on one side of the transfer vertex are at the same level and edges on opposite side are at different level. He also defined the Pseudo Isomorphism in PGTs. Seventeen non-isomorphic single Degree Of Freedom (DOF) epicyclic chains with up to three gear pairs i.e. five elements are listed. Their corresponding functional (Levai Notations) representations are also given.

In 1972, D.J.Sanger [61] described the techniques for the structural and numerical synthesis of multi speed planetary transmissions. The structural characteristic of PGTs are tabulated and a numerical example is given to illustrate the use of the methods. Ravisankar and Mrutyunjaya [62] in 1985 have given a fully computerized method for synthesis of structures of PGTs. In this work the GKCs are represented by graphs using the procedure given by Buchsbaum and

25

Freudenstein (59]. The graphs in tum are algebraically represented by VertexVertex incidence matrices on the lines similar to that given by Uicker and Raicu [ 19] for planar kinematic chains. Various useful concepts introduced and results developed by earlier researchers in GKCs are combined with certain concepts in the area of planar kinematic chains for systematic computerized synthesis of structures of geared kinematic chains. A stepwise procedure for computerization of the synthesis procedure for PGTs is given and the computer programme is applied to single degree of freedom geared kinematic chains with up to four gear pairs i.e. six elements. A different definition for rotation graph is given. The results are in concurrence with earlier published work (59,60]. All the possible non-isomorphic rotational graphs and non-isomorphic displacement graphs are listed. A procedure is explained to label the turning pairs in each graph to obtain different non-isomorphic single degree of freedom {displacement) geared kinematic chains with up to four gear pairs. Twenty-seven distinct graphs and eighty functional diagrams are given with levels.

L.W.Tsai (63] in 1987 extended Linkage Characteristic Polynomial method given by Uicker and Raicu [19] for the topological synthesis of EGTs of one degree of freedom with up to four gear pairs. PGTs are represented by hicoloured graphs, thin edges for turning pairs and heavy edges for gear pairs. Graphs with N elements are generated from (N-1) elements by recursive method. In recursive method of generation, each time number of vertices is increased by

26

one. This new vertex is joined to different other vertices by one turning pair and one gear pair in different possible ways. The definition of Linkage Adjacency Matrix for a kinematic chain given by Uicker and Raicu

[19] is modified to

include gear pairs in the graph. Accordingly the GKC adjacency matrices are written with the following rules.

Each element in an adjacency matrix of a GKC a [i, jl is given by a [ i, j a and

I=

1

I i, j I= g

a [ i, j

I=

if a vertex i is connected to another vertex j by a turning pair, if the pair is a gear pair

0, otherwise.

Further a[ i i I =0 .

The linkage characteristic polynomial p (x, g) of a PGT is given by the determinant of the matrix (X I-A) where X is a dummy variable, I is unit matrix and A is the adjacency matrix. Random number technique is used to compute the value of a linkage characteristic polynomial and check for isomorphism in graphs of GKCs of one DOF and with up to six elements. 26 nonisomorphic rotation graphs and 80 non-isomorphic displacement graphs are given for PGT with six links and one degree of freedom. Different ways of leveling the turning edges also given.

27

Kim and Kwak (64] in 1990 applied Edge Permutations Technique for structural synthesis of PGTs. Edge permutations which are induced from the symmetric group of vertex permutations are used as mapping functions to check isomorphism in graphs of PGTs. The result of the enumeration of graphs of PGTs with up to seven elements and one degree of freedom are presented. The entire procedure given is computerized without interactive job. While selecting a graph from isomorphic graphs for next level, a graph with maximum number of ways of labeling is selected. Label at a turning pair edge indicates the spatial location of the axes joining its elements. Therefore isomorphic graphs with different edge labeling have different mechanical structures. In their work there is concurrence of results for graphs of PGTs with up to 6 links. For graphs of PGTs with 7 links the generated graphs are 780, rotation graphs are 1089 and rotationally nonisomorphic graphs are 144. The resulting non-isomorphic labeled graphs listed are 642. Olson et a! [65] in 1999 dealt with Topological Analysis of single degree of freedom of planetary gear trains. He gave a new graph representation, which is useful in specification of input and output links. The coincident joint graph representation makes it possible to easily determine the number of distinct kinematic inversions of a P.G.K.C and to recognize whether or not there exists feasible input output links.

28

lnl993 J K Shin and S. Krishna Murthy [66] developed an efficient solution procedure for the enumeration of Epicycle Gear Trains based on the standard code technique for bi-colored graphs. The standard code for a graph consists of three separate codes, namely the codes of parent graphs, the vertex codes and edge codes. The parent graph is obtained by replacing all the heavy (geared) edges with thin edges. Isomorphism in displacement graphs is detected efficiently using the standard code technique. They have also given the step-bystep procedure. From canonical numbered graphs, the edge sets with in which levels are the same are identified. These sets are rearranged in the ascending order starting from the smallest edge number with in each set. The edges are leveled with the first set as 1 and second set as 2 etc. The levels of each edge are concatenated in the descending order of the edge numbers to obtain the level codes of the displacements graphs.

A colored graph with a symmetry of "m" will result is almost "m" distinct level codes. The three stages of non-recursive generation scheme are explained, they are enumeration of parent graph, distributions of gear pair edges to generate bi-colored graphs from parent graphs and verifying are bi-colored with fundamental rules of GKCs.162 non-isomorphic rotation graphs are reported in this study for one DOF GKCs with seven elements or five gear pairs which is totally different from that given in [64].

29

Cheng-HO HSU and Kin-Tak Lam [67] in 1993 studied the kinematic structure of Planetary Gear Trains with any number of degree of freedom. Graphs are used for canonical representation of structures of PGTs by Displacement and Rotation graphs. A single identification number used to test displacement isomorphism in PGTs. They gave a method to identify non-fractionated multi DOF PGTs from their rotational graphs. In this paper an algorithm is given for the automatic analysis of kinematic structure of PGTs. Olson Erdman and Riley [65] in 1987 and 1988 proposed coincident joint graph for canonical graph representation of PGTs. Hsu and Lam (69] in 1989 gave a new graph representation for PGTs. ln 1989 Tsai and Lin [70] presented a method for the identification and enumeration of kinematic structure of non-fractionated two DOF PGTs. Hsu and Lam in their paper used the above concept for automatic analysis of kinematic structure of Planetary Gear Train with any number of degree of freedom. A Simpson gearbox shown in figure (1.4) is represented by a graph as shown in figure (l.4a) and the corresponding new graph is shown in figure ( 1.4b).

In new graph representation all the joints at the same level are represented by a multiple joint polygon instead of simple joints as in graph representation used by other authors. This avoids the formation of Pseudoisomorphic graphs at the generation stage. For automation, the graphs are represented by vertex-vertex adjacency matrices, both for displacement and graphs, using definite rules given by them. He also gave linear displacement

30

equation and rotational displacement equations. Characteristic polynomial concept used by these authors too for identification of isomorphism in graphs on the same lines as L.W. Tsai [63]. These too used random numbers to evaluate the value of determinant of adjacency Matrices of displacement and rotation graphs. The flow chart of the Automation algorithm is given in seven steps. Utility of the computer programme is demonstrated by taking some examples A.C.Rao and J Anne [72] in 1996 studied topological characteristics of planetary gear trains. A simple method to detect isomorphism among PGTs is explained and best possible rates of PGTs based on their topology is explored. Guidelines required for selecting a best possible gear train from an atlas of PGTs are given. Comparison of characteristics like velocity ratio, loss of motion and power is made. Rating of the inversions is also made based on edge values or connectivities of vertices. Goutam Chatterjee and L.W.Tsai [73] in 1996 gave an enumeration of epicyclic

gear trains

used in automatic transmission.

Most automatic

transmissions employ one type of epicyclic gear trains to achieve proper equilibrium, between power and torque produced by an engine and demanded by the road wheels. A configuration of a PGT is selected to have desired speed ratios and meet other kinematic and dynamic requirements. In this work a systematic methodology is formulated using canonical graphs to systematically enumerate all possible configurations and to identify Kinematic structural characteristics of epicyclic gear trains. The concept of automorphism is introduced in this paper.

31

Jo

Ic 6 -

tor

LJ

l

4 6

a

~ 5

T

T

Fig (1.4a)

Fig (1.4)

4

5

Fig (1.4b)

32

By permuting the nwnbering of vertices in an unlabeled graph, different isomorphism graphs produced. But certain permutations produce graphs whose corresponding vertices bear the same nwnber as the original one. These graphs are called automorphic graphs. Cheng Ho Hsu and Jin-Juh Hsu [74] in 1997 gave a methodology for structural synthesis of PGTs. Acyclic graphs are used for the Synthesis of kinematic structures of a Gear Kinematic Chains (GKC). A systematic procedure is given for enwneration of N-vertex Acyclic graphs and generation of N-vertex geared kinematic chains by adding (N-f-1) geared edges to each N-vertex Acyclic graph. Structural codes are used to detect isomorphism in GKCs generated. They assert that there is no concurrence in the result given by different researchers regarding the total number of non-isomorphic GKCs with more than six elements. The results given by these authors for one-DOF GKCs with up to six elements are in complete agreement with those of earlier researches. For 3 elements the number of GKCs is one, for four elements the number is three, for five elements the result is 13 GKCs and for six links the resulting GKCs are 81. However Kim & Kwak [64] enumerated 642 displacements graphs with seven elements. Hsu & Lam [67] enumerated 636 one DOF seven element graphs. Shin and Krishna Murthy [66] listed 659 GKCs with seven links and one DOF. Hsu & Hsu [74] listed 647 one DOF graphs with seven elements. The catalogue of 647 one DOF GKCs with seven links is incorporated.

33

A C Rao and A. Jagadeesh (75] in 1998 out lined Hamming number technique and proved the reliability of Hamming number Technique by using it to detect isomorphism in Planetary Gear Trains. Other benefits of Hamming number technique like identifying distinct inversions are also explained. A C Rao (76) in 1985 applied Information theory to synthesise Planar

Kinematic Chains. Structural errors that exist in linkages are taken as continuous random variables and an entropy function is formulated in terms of design parameters. Minimization of maximum entropy leads to optimum design parameters that assume accurate performance. A.C.Rao and D. Varada Raju [77] m 1991 developed Hamming number Technique to defect isomorphism among kinematic chains and inversions. The connectivity Matrix of a linkage, with zeros and ones, is formed and from that using the rules given by them [23) Hamming number matrix is written. The linkage Hamming sting is obtained by concatenating the linkage Hamming number and arranging in descending order Hamming numbers of different links in the linkage. A number of authors (48-56, 75-79] borrowed this Technique to test isomorphism of planar linkages of different DOF and with any number of links. The hamming matrix also reveals at a glance how many inversions are possible out of a given chain. B.P.Rao (78] in his doctoral thesis discussed the concept of structural symmetry in civil structures. He defmed the term symmetry in graphs. Hamming number matrix developed by AC. Rao and Varada Raju [77] is used to study the

34

symmetry in structures with zero and negative DOF. He has also shown the utility of Hamming Matrix of a Graph to know the Structural symmetry in Chains. In 2003 [79], has given a genetic algorithm for testing isomorphism in generation of epicyclic gear trains. Quantitative measures are developed in a very simple way using principles of genetic algorithms. These measures are utilized to list isomorphism in PGTs and to know the characteristics like speed ratios and transmission efficiency in a comparative sense. This will help to know the merits and demerits of GKCs with out having to actually design fabricate and test them for the required performance.

35

1.3 MOTIVATION BEHIND SELECTION OF THIS TOPIC Thorough study of available kinematic literature reveals that computerization of structural synthesis of kinematic chains has received much wider attention. Also a large number of studies have been reported in literature concerning isomorphism among chains and inversions.

Graph theory is

extensively used for structural Analysis and synthesis of Planar Kinematic Chains. Some studies using graph theory are available on the isomorphism of Planetary Gear Trains. Though the gears have lion share in transmitting motion it is felt that it has not received as much attention as linkages and hence the desire to explore this area more in detail. Another feature that prompted this study is that even to date there is no convergence on the number of gear trains generated with 7 & 8 elements. All the listed or available studies on PGTs pertain to synthesis of PGTs with two major differences, The first one in the method used for generation of PGTs and the second one in the test used for checking isomorphism in the generated chain. However all the pertinent study available so far will not have much significance if quantitative methods are not developed to compare all the distinct gear trains with the same number of elements and DOF for different aspects. Also it is always much desirable to anticipate the behaviour of the gear trains without having to actually design, fabricate and test them.

At present

designer depends on his intuition to select the best possible gear train and this may not always lead to the optimum solution. 36

In this work besides giving a method for generation of epicyclic gear trains using Hamming number method, a new method based on Moment concept developed by Rao [53] for linkages is extended to PGTs and the same is also used for testing isomorphism in PGTs generated along with Hamming number Technique. Also moment concept is used to estimate relatively the aspect of compactness in PGTs. Using Hamming number Method structural characteristics of the PGTs like symmetry in PGTs, parallelism, pseudo isomorphism, rigidity, greater speed ratios are studied. Information theory applied earlier to kinematic chain is adapted to PGTs and rating of EGTs is done based on their structures right at the design stage. The aspects studied are transmission capacity power circulation and power transmission efficiency.

*********

37

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF