Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes Small
Short Description
Descripción: Demethanizer...
Description
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes Muneeb Nawaz Supervisor: Dr Megan Jobson
L07- 1
PIRC Annual Research Meeting 2009
Centre for Process Integration © 2009
When a design problem dealing with low temperature separations is approached in a systematic way, the number of separation alternatives to be studied is generally very large. The assessment of all possible flowsheets with numerous options is a time consuming task with a lot of simulations required to select the economically best option. Therefore, a systematic approach for synthesis is required to generate effective and economic design of such processes like demethanizer system with minimal time and effort. To define an optimal configuration problem, it is necessary to devise an adequate superstructure of the integrated process with new demethanization processes that is rich enough to account for all potential configurations and connectivity. This aim of this research is to extend an existing platform for the design of heat integrated separation systems to address the demethanizer subsystem which is characterized by complex interactions between the distillation column and other flowsheet components, including turbo expander, flash units, multistream exchangers and refrigeration cycles. Opportunities for heat-integration within the subflowsheet and also in the overall flowsheet are identified to improve the economics of the process. Case study demonstrates the strength of the methodology developed.
Outline 1. Problem Statement 2. Overview of Previous Research a. Introduction b. Limitations
3. System Parameter Identification 4. Column Design Method a. Need for a new method b. Boundary Value Design Method c. Case Study
5. Heat Recovery in Multistream Exchanger 6. Overall Flowsheet Synthesis and Optimization 7. Conclusions & Future Work
Centre for Process Integration © 2009
L07- 2
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
1. Problem Statement
Centre for Process Integration © 2009
L07- 3
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
A Typical Low Temperature Gas Separation Process
Products
Feed Cold Box
Centre for Process Integration © 2009
L07- 4
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Low temperature processes usually consist of three main components; the process i.e distillation, the heat exchange system (cold box) and the refrigeration system. It is important to note that compression and refrigeration constitute the main factors that regulate both capital and operating costs in this type of plant. The continuous emphasis on increasing plant efficiency, driven by the increased cost of energy and feedstock, has led designers and owners to drive down the operating and installation cost.
Demethanizer Subsection
For Example
Ethane recycle Drying & chilling
Ethane
Cold box & Expander
Ethane cracking furnaces LPG E/P
Ethylene sales Storage
Acethylene reactions
LPG splitter
Propane Buy
Off-gas sales
Propylene sales
Propane cracking furnaces
Caustic Wash
Sell
Propane C4+ sales Propane recycle
Ethane/Propane cracking process diagram for ethylene production * * The Dow Chemical Company, 2005, 17th Annual Ethylene Producer’s Conference Centre
L07- 5
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The figure illustrates Dow’s process for an ethylene plant based on a gas feedstock (ethane and propane). After cracking the feed in the furnace it is sent to the demethanizer section where the methane\ethane separation takes place at low temperatures. The C2 splitter follows the demethanizer. The recovered ethane and propane from deethanizer are recycled to the cracking furnaces.
ABB Lummus Global Residual Recycle High Ethane Recovery Process *
* Patel et al., US 7,107,788 (2006) Centre
L07- 6
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The figure illustrates ABB Lummus residual recycle process for high ethane recovery from the natural gas. The process is flexible to recover ethane or propane depending upon the market conditions. The process utilizes an additional reflux steam leaner in ethane and propane compared to the demethanizer overhead stream. The additional reflux stream is taken as a side stream of the vapour stream from the cold separator.
Self or External Refrigeration? How many Feed Streams? Number of Flash Columns Multistream Heat Exchangers
There are well-established process packages for low temperature separation systems ... But which choice is the best ? And can we produce novel designs? Centre
L07- 7
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Demethanizer Process Issues Process Selection Issues P Complex interactions among different components of flowsheet P Various options for refrigeration P Structural and parametric degrees of freedom.
Process Design Issues P Different designs offered by licensors P Can licensed flowsheets be further optimized? P Selection of flowsheet package for specific feed and products specifications
Centre
L07- 8
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The heart of every cold train is the demethanizer system and this is where various technology licensors have different designs. There are many possible options for optimizing the design of a single column. Depending on the scenario it may be beneficial to cool the feed, or to split the feed in multiple separators at different pressures before entering into the column at different stages. The feed cooling is usually done by heat exchange with the top product in a multistream exchanger. Similarly the heat for distillation can be provided by side reboilers taking the energy from the feed stream. As the separation requires very low temperatures, so there is a need for refrigeration which can be provided by using turboexpander or using external refrigeration cycles.
Objective At preliminary design stage provide a high level screening and scoping methodology that would allow energy-efficient and costeffective demethanizer flowsheets to be generated and evaluated.
Centre
L07- 9
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
2. Overview of Previous Research
Centre
L07- 10
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Previous Research P Synthesis and optimization of low-temperature gas separation (Jiona Wang, Robin Smith,2005). P Operating conditions optimization in natural gas processing plants (Diaz, Serrani, Be Deistegui, 1995) P Energy expenditure in the thermal separation of hydrocarbon mixtures using a sequence of heat-integrated distillation columns (Markowski, M., Trafczynski,M., 2007) P Automatic design and debottlenecking of ethane extraction plants (Diaz, Serrani, Bandoni Brignole, 1997)
Centre
L07- 11
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Limitations of the Previous Work
P Multiple feed columns not modelled P No model for column with side reboilers P Heat integration through multistream exchangers not adressed P No systematic methodology to screen and optimize such highly integrated flowsheets
Centre
L07- 12
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
3. System Parameter Identification
Centre
L07- 13
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
COMMERCIAL DESIGNS *
P P P P
GSP (Gas Subcooled Process) CRR( Cold Residual Reflux Process) RSV (Recycle-Split Vapor Process) RSVE (Recycle-Split Vapor with Enrichment Process)
* Next Generation Processes for NGL/LPG Recovery by ORTLOFF (77th Annual GPA Conference) Centre
L07- 14
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
COMMERCIAL DESIGNS *
GSP Process
CRR Process
* Next Generation Processes for NGL/LPG Recovery by ORTLOFF (77th Annual GPA Conference) Centre
L07- 15
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
For ethane recovery the most widely used process is the gas subcooled process. In this process a portion of the feed gas is condensed and subcooled, fash down to the tower operating pressure and supplied as an external reflux stream. The remainder is also expanded by employing a turboexpander) and fed to the tower at one or more intermediate feed points. The Cold Residue Recycle (CRR) process is a modification of the GSP process to achieve higher ethane recovery levels. The process flow sheet is similar to the GSP except that a compressor and condenser have been added to the overhead system to take a portion of the residue gas and provide additional reflux for the demethanizer. This process is attractive for extremely high ethane recovery. Recovery levels above 98% are achievable with this process.
COMMERCIAL DESIGNS *
RSV Process
RSVE Process
* Next Generation Processes for NGL/LPG Recovery by ORTLOFF (77th Annual GPA Conference) Centre
L07- 16
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The Recycle Split-Vapour (RSV) process uses the split vapour feed to provide the bulk ethane recovery in the tower. The external reflux stream is produced by withdrawing a small portion of the residue gas, condensing and subcooling and flashing it down to the demethanizer pressure. The additional cost of adding a compressor in the CRR process is avoided as well as the shaft power is reduced. A slight variation of the RSV process is the recycle split-vapor with enrichment (RSVE) process in which the reflux stream from the residue gas is mixed with the split vapour feed before being condensed and subcooled. Since the ethane content of the reflux stream is richer as compared to the RSV process, but the lower capital cost and simplicity justify the slight loss of ethane recovery.
Comparison of NGL Recovery Processes Process
Recovery %
Main feature
Comment
Gas Subcooled Process (GSP)
90%
Subcooled feed gas as reflux at demethanizer
When switching to LPG recovery, propane recovery decreased
Cold Residue Reflux (CRR).
97%
Uses GSP advantages, while creating a reflux stream of nearly pure methane.
Can be operated for near complete rejection of ethane while maintain high propane recovery.
As CRR uses the split-vapour feed to provide bulk ethane recovery, but produced by withdrawing a small portion of the residue gas
Requires less capital investment. A separate compressor is not needed for the recycle stream. Can be operated as GSP.
Variation of RSV. The recycle stream is mixed with the split vapour feed before being condensed and subcooled.
Do not require a separate exchanger as RSV. Ethane recovery limited. Lower capital cost
Recycle Split-Vapour Process (RSV)
Recycle Split-Vapour with Enrichment (RSVE)
97%
94%
Centre
L07- 17
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Base case for Sensitivity Analysis*
Process and Apparatus for Hydrocarbon Separation * * Ohara et al. U.S 7,357,003 (2008) Centre
L07- 18
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
HYSYS SIMULATION OF BASE CASE
* Ohara et al. U.S 7,357,003 (2008) Centre
L07- 19
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Process Data Process Conditions Feed Gas Composition Com ponent
Mole Fraction
CO2 N2 Methane Ethane Propane i-Butane i-Pentane
0.010 0.005 0.894 0.049 0.022 0.013 0.006
Feed Conditions Parameter Temperature (°C) Pressure (bar) Molar Flow Rate (kmol/h)
Value 17 62.4 13700
Sales Gas Conditions Param eter Temperature (°C) P ressure (bar)
V alue 35 60
Process Specifications P Minimum P Maximum methane in the demethanizer bottoms: 1.5% mol. P Apply 2 freeze point in the coldest area of the plant. P 75% compressor efficiency and expander efficiency * Ohara et al. U.S 7,357,003 (2008) L07- 20
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Centre
Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is being performed to identify the key parameters which affect the flowsheet performance. These parameters are then examined in order to find the optimal range of operation conditions. P P P P P
Pressure of column Feed stage location Side reboiler location Temperature of high pressure separator Vapour split ratio
Centre
L07- 21
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Column Operating Pressure Effect of Pressure on Compression Power
P High operating pressure is required in order to decrease the compression power but this in turn affects the volatility of the key components and therefore the recovery P The column pressure is varied from 2000 kPa to 4000 kPa keeping a constant pressure drop of 50 kPa across the column
16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Pressure (kPa)
Effect of Pressure on Reboiler Duty 16,000.0 15,000.0 14,000.0 13,000.0
With the increase in pressure
12,000.0 11,000.0 10,000.0 2,000
P The total power consumption decreased by 58% P Ethane recovery also decreased by 8.8% P Reboiler duty increased by 20%
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Pressure (kPa)
Effect of Pressure on Ethane recovery 98.00 97.00 96.00 95.00 94.00 93.00 92.00 91.00 90.00 89.00 88.00 2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Pressure (kPa)
Centre
L07- 22
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
4,000
4,500
Side Reboiler Location Side reboilers in low-temperature distillation columns are particularly important because they enable: P Recovery of refrigeration at temperatures lower than the temperature of the column reboiler P The cost of generating refrigeration is lowered as the temperature decreases. P For example, the generation of a BTU of refrigeration at -35 F requires roughly twice as much compression horsepower as a BTU of refrigeration at P The side reboiler is studied for a fixed temperature difference between the outlet and inlet stream
* Elliot,D.G., Chen, J.J., and Brown, T.S.,(1996), Fluid Phase Equilibria 116, 27-38 Centre
L07- 23
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Vapour Split Ratio The split ratio from the low pressure separator is an important factor as it directly affects the amount of external reflux entering the column. The split ratio between the column upper feed and the external reflux stream has been varied from 0.3 to 0.7 to yield the following results
Effect of Vapor Split on Reb duty
Effect of Vapor Split ratio on Refrigerant Power 6000
18000 16000
5000
14000
4000
12000 10000
3000
8000
2000
6000
1000
4000 2000
0
0 0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5 Split Ratio
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Split Ratio
Centre
L07- 24
30
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
0.7
0.8
Demethanizer Feed Stage Effect of Feed stage on Total Compression Power
The top feed point is moved from Stage 2 to Stage 14. This range of feed points is studied as the column simulation converges for the given specifications. As the feed stage moves down the column the results observed are listed below:
8125 8120 8115 8110 8105 8100 8095 8090 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
14
16
14
16
Feed Stage Location
Effect of feed Stage on Reboiler Duty 14200 14100
P Ethane recovery increases. Larger
14000 13900
changes are seen in the first stages of the
13800 13700
column, and then the changes are very
13600 13500 0
small after the middle of the column. P There is very slight decrease (0.4%) on the total power consumption P The reboiler duty decreases by 4.3%
2
4
6
8
10
12
Feed Stage Location
Effect of Feed Stage on Ethane Recovery 95.0 94.5 94.0 93.5 93.0 92.5 92.0 91.5 91.0 90.5 0
2
4
6
8
10
Feed Stage Location
Centre
L07- 25
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
12
Temperature of High Pressure Separator Effect of Separator Temperature on Compression Power
The temperature has a significant effect as it
9000
affects the ratio of vapor to liquid leaving the separator, which in turn affects the performance of the column and the rest of
8600 8400 8200 8000
the –60
8800
7800
The C.feasible operation range is
7600 7400
above
-65
-55
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
LTS Temperature (C)
minimum approach temperature criterion of 2
-60
C
Effect of Separator Temperature on Ethane Recovery 97.0 96.5 96.0
The results are:
95.5 95.0 94.5 94.0
P Ethane recovery diminishes from 95 % to
93.5
91.5 %. P Compression power decreases by 14%
92.0
93.0 92.5 91.5 -65
-60
-55
-50
Centre
L07- 26
-45
Temperature (C)
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
-40
-35
-30
Conclusion of Sensitivity Analysis At this stage of the process analysis we can conclude that in general the key parameters that have the most impact on the demethanizer process performance are: P The column operating pressure P The upper feed location in the column P The location of side reboiler P Temperature of the high pressure separator, and P The split ratio between the upper feed and the external reflux stream
Centre
L07- 27
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
4. Column Design Method a. Need for the new method
Centre
L07- 28
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Design Challenges
P Multiple feed points P Side reboilers P External reflux stream P Large change in relative volatility over the column
Centre
L07- 29
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Modelling Challenges Shortcut Models P Constant molar overflow and constant relative volatility assumptions P Unable to address complex column configurations P Give inaccurate design of demethanizer
Rigorous Models P Solve MESH equations on each stage P Requires complex iterative methods to solve P Requires good initial guess P Difficult to employ in optimization framework
Centre
L07- 30
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
At present, there is no shortcut method for determining the minimum ratio for a complex column like demethanizer. The major characteristics of this column are the multiple feed, side reboilers and reflux from an external source. The rigorous methods can be applied to solve the column but the computational time to solve the model will be increased and that will further increase when this model will be employed in a flowsheet superstructure and optimized.
Simulation Models of Separation Options - Shortcut vs Rigorous Input Shortcut model
P Feed information P Recovery specification P Constraints
Rigorous model
Output
Feature
P Product profile P Overall heating/cooling requirement P Approxiamte sizing of device P Cost estimation
P Simple P Acceptable accuracy P Fast P Suited to preliminary design
P Product profile P Local heating/cooling requirement P Final design of device P Rigorous cost estimation
P Complicated P Sensitive to process specifications P Slow and unavoidable iteration P Suited to device optimization
Centre
L07- 31
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
4. Column Design Method b. Boundary Value Design Method i) Introduction
Centre
L07- 32
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Introduction P Analogous to McCabe-Thiele method for column design P Composition profiles starting from distillate and bottom product compositions P Gives column design details e.g. number of stages, heat duty of condenser and reboiler, minimun reflux etc.
McCabe- Thiele Method
Boundary Value Method
Centre
L07- 33
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The boundary value method or BVM is first developed for simple column. It requires the calculation of liquid composition profiles at a given reflux ratio. Composition profiles of a column show liquid phase compositions on each tray, which vary from stage to stage because of material and energy balances between trays and phase equilibrium of the mixture. At a given reflux ratio, the composition profile of the rectifying section of the column starts from a specified distillate composition. For the stripping section of the column, the composition profile starts from a specified bottom composition.
Modeling Column Profile Continuous Differential Equation P Develop continuous differential equation for evolution of column profile (Doherty, 1985) P Taylor expansion truncated after first term xi, n+1 = xi,n + x i, n + 1 =
dxi dh
2
h=n
(∆h) + 1 d x2i 2 dh
h=n
(∆h)2 + .....
s 1 y i, n + x i, B s + 1 s + 1
Continuous column profile with independent variable h Rectifying Section dx dh
i
= x
i
−
r y r + 1
i
+
1 x r
i, D
Stripping Section dx i s 1 = yi − xi + x i, B dh s +1 s +1
* Levy, S.G., Van Dongen, D.B., and Doherty, M.F., (1985), Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 24, 1463. Centre
L07- 34
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The method is based on finite difference approximations of column profiles in ordinary differential equation form under the assumption of constant molar overflow (CMO). Conditions such as minimum reflux are determined using a boundary value method, in which the rectifying profile for the liquid compositions is integrated from top to the feed stage while the stripping profile is integrated from bottom to the feed stage. Thus a feasible column configuration is one in which the rectifying and stripping profiles intersect and the reflux ratio for which these profiles just touch each other corresponds to minimum reflux.
Original Boundary Value Design Method (BVM) V2, y2
P For ternary mixtures P First developed for homogeneous azeotropic distillation* P Calculation of composition profiles
D, xD, hD
Stripping profile
Vm ym V hm
0.8
Rectifying profile
0.6
profiles at a given reflux ratio starting from
P Composition
n Vn+1 yn+1 V hn+1
Hexane 1
L1, x1
2
Ln xn hnL
< distillate < bottoms
Lm+1 xm+1 L hm+1
P Calculate column profiles
m
from
B
material and energy balances < Vapour Liquid equilibrium
0.4
F
2
<
V1, y1, hV 1
0.2
0
0
Nonane
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
D
Pentane
composition (xD) composition (xB)
L2, x2, h2L
B, xB, hB
* Levy, S.G., Van Dongen, D.B., and Doherty, M.F., (1985), Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 24, 1463. Centre
L07- 35
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The BVM requires the specification of the product and feed compositions, reflux ratio and either feed condition or reboil ratio. The next step is to calculate composition profiles of each column section from material and energy balances together with vapour liquid. The feasible design is identified from the intersection between the striping profile and the rectifying profile. Then, we get column design information such as the number of stages, feed location, condenser and reboiler duty. Finally, the column designs can be used to evaluate their capital and operating costs.
4. Column Design Method b. Boundary Value Design Method ii) New Boundary Value Design Method
Centre
L07- 36
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
New Boundary Value Design Method Boundary value method has been extended to # Multicomponent feed mixtures # Double-feed columns # Column with side reboilers # Reboiled absorber column with an
external reflux stream
Software:
" Matlab " HYSYS < Physical properties
Centre
L07- 37
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The major problem with the original BVM method proposed by Doherty et al. is the visualization of mixtures of more than four components. For this purpose the concept of “minimum distance” between a pair of is employed instead of the strict criterion of the intersection of the composition profiles. The intersection of the profiles is assessed by calculating the shortest distance in composition space between the two profiles. If this distance is the same or smaller than the “minimum distance” the lines are considered to intersect.
Model Formulation & Implementation P Model developed in MATLAB involving mass and energy balance P Stage by stage VLE calculations to avoid constant relative volatility assumption P Complex column configuration addressed in the model P Physical and thermodynamic properties retrieved automatically from HYSYS VLE and Enthalpy
MATLAB
HYSYS Mass and Energy
Balance
Centre
L07- 38
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The model is originally formulated in MATLAB with the mass and energy balance original equations. For the calculations of physical properties and vapour liquid equilibrium, the extensive physical property packages available in ASPEN HYSYS are used. This is done by developing a link between HYSYS and MATLAB where HYSYS gives respective equilibrium and enthalpy data for respective composition from MATLAB
Double-feed Columns V, y2 I II
Upper Feed x FU
D, xD
L, xR
Lower Feed xFL
B, xB
P Double-feed column may be more economic than a single-feed column < Require fewer stages
P BVM has been developed for double-feed columns separating homogeneous mixtures*
* Levy, S.G., Van Dongen, D.B., and Doherty, M.F., (1985), Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 24, 1463. Centre
L07- 39
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
New boundary value method Double-feed column â Initialisation steps • •
Specifications - compositions of upper and lower feeds - compositions of products Specify - reflux ratio and reboil ratio or feed quality
ä Identify feasible designs from the intersection of rectifying and middle profiles
•
ã Composition profile calculation of stripping, rectifying and middle sections from < Material and energy balances < Phase equilibrium
•
Calculate middle profiles starting from various stages of stripping section
• •
The location of lower feed is chosen such that the smallest number of stages is required The intersection point is the upper feed location Design parameters are obtained < Number of stages in each section < Upper feed location < Feed condition or reboil ratio < Condenser and reboiler duty
Centre
L07- 40
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
To get the number of stages and location of both feeds in the column, all products and feeds are first specified. At a given reflux ratio the stripping and rectifying profiles are calculated. The middle profile can be generated starting from a stage either in the stripping section or the rectifying section. The middle profile calculation from a stage on the stripping section is easier. The lower feed location becomes a degree of freedom. To choose the lower feed location, middle profiles are generated starting from different stages in the stripping profiles. The feasible designs are identified from the intersection between the middle profiles and the rectifying profiles. Then, the most attractive designs can be chosen.
Double-feed column design by BVM BVM
FU
FL
10 D
22 30
Composition : Methane Ethane Propane Flow rate (kmol/h) Condenser duty (MJ/h) Reboiler duty (MJ/h)
FU
FL
D
B
0.8 0.15 0.05 100
0.64 0.26 0.9 100 202.8 1368
0.997 0.0028 0 145.5
0.98 0.012 0 54.5
B
HYSYS
Reflux ratio = 0.22 Composition : Methane Ethane Propane Flow rate (kmol/h) Condenser duty (MJ/h) Reboiler duty (MJ/h)
FU
FL
D
B
0.8 0.15 0.05 100
0.64 0.26 0.9 100 205.3 1372
0.997 0.0028 0 145.5
0.98 0.012 0 54.5
P Results from HYSYS are in good agreement with the specified compositions for the design method Centre
L07- 41
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
4. Column Design Method C. Case Study
Centre
L07- 42
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Pressure : 30 bar, Reflux ratio =0.2516, Column Specificaion : 94.5% Recovery of Ethane in Bottom product Feed Data Upper Feed Flowrate, FU = 1000kmol/hr Upper Feed Composition (Mole Fraction) Methane: 0.8595, Ethane: 0.102, Propane : 0.023, i-Butane: 0.0155 Lower Feed Flowrate, FL = 1000kmol/hr Lower Feed Composition (Mole Fraction) Methane: 0.62, Ethane: 0.21,Propane : 0.10, i-Butane: 0.07
Top Product
FU
FL
Q1 Q2
Bottom Product
Side Heaters Q1at 11th stage = 1200 MJ/hr Q2 at 16th stage = 1000 MJ/hr
Ref: Foglietta et al. US 7,159,417 (2004) Centre
L07- 43
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Validation of Model
BVM Resu lts
HYSYS Results
% Difference
Num ber of Stages
23
23
-
Upper Fee d Stage Location
6
6
-
Lower Fee d Stage Location
12
12
-
2075
2087
0.6
11 079
11 083
0.035
Condenser Duty (MJ /hr) Reboile r Duty (M J/hr)
Centre
L07- 44
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Comparison of Models Column Composition Profiles 1.0 0.9
Methane(HYSYS)
0.8
Ethane(HYSYS)
0.7
Propane(HYSYS)
0.6
i-Butane (HYSYS)
0.5
Methane (BVM)
0.4
Ethane (BVM) Propane (BVM)
0.3
i-Butane (BVM)
0.2 0.1 0.0 Top 1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
Bottom
Stages
Comparison of composition profiles obtained from BVM with HYSYS Centre
L07- 45
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Summary P Simplified model for demethanizer has been developed. Model is suitable for multicomponent systems P Model represents process behaviour satisfactorily P Model accommodates complex column features such as multiple feed, intermediate heating and external reflux stream P Complex column simulation has been tested against HYSYS simulation. Model represents column behaviour well P New BVM can be used for assessing the feasibility of a proposed specification and setting up designs < Number of stages < Feed locations < Reboiler/condenser duties Centre
L07- 46
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
5. Heat Recovery in Multistream Exchangers
Centre
L07- 47
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Heat Recovery in Multistream Exchanger P Obtain Process Heat and Material Balances < Analysis of the entire process to obtain a heat and material balance for each operation. The heat and material balances should be performed as if all of the exchanger duties were independent. For this step, refrigeration and external loads are supplied independent of the process and should be ignored. P Tabulate Duties < The second step is to list the inlet and outlet temperatures and duties for all units involving heat exchange.
Centre
L07- 48
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Heat Recovery in Multistream Exchanger P Match Duties and Temperatures < Matching the duties by starting with the largest cooling loads. < If heating loads with temperatures lower than the exit temperature of the cooling load are available, these should be accumulated until the duty approximately matches the cooling load. Any excess cooling load will have to be handled by refrigeration. P Balance Loads < Heating and cooling loads balanced by separately summing the duties on each side of the exchanger < Residual duty must be reduced to zero by refrigeration or a heat source P Temperature cross within the exchanger < Phase change or large flow rates across a narrow temperature range results in the cumulative cooling load temperature drops below the cumulative heating load temperature Centre
L07- 49
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Multi-steam exchanger design according to the balanced composite curves
T
H1
H2 H3
H
C1 C2
H3
H3 Cold Utility
H2
H1
H3
H1 H2 Hot Utility
C1 C2
C1
C2
C2 Centre
L07- 50
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
6. Overall Flowsheet Synthesis and Optimization
Centre
L07- 51
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Synthesis Methodology • Develop simplified model for demethanizer < New model compares well with rigorous simulation results for simple columns
• Optimise column design parameters with simplified model • Develop systematic approach for generation and evaluation of flowsheets • Develop optimisation framework for overall flowsheet synthesis and optimization
Centre
L07- 52
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Base Case Simulation Process Conditions Feed Gas Composition Com pone nt Methane
M ole Fraction 0.865
Ethane
0.075
Propane
0.035
i-Butane
0.015
n-Butane
0.006
i-Pentane
0.004
Feed Gas Conditions Param e ter
Condition
Temperature (°C)
25
Pressure (bar)
60
Molar Flow Rate (kmol/h)
36000
Demethanizer Conditions Parameter Number of trays Operating pressure (kPa) Pressure drop (kPa)
Condition 25 3000 50
Product Specifications: methane to ethane in bottom =1.5% Ethane Recovery = 90% * Campbell et al. US 4,157,904 (1979) L07- 53
Centre
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
The feed to the gas subcooled process for ethane recovery based on US patent 4,157,904 is selected as the case study. The objective has set to be minimising the operating cost of the system which is essentially reducing the compression power and reboiler duty for the system. Steam and cooling water next to refrigeration system are provided as utility for the system. Overall ethane recovery of more than 90% is used as a specification for the process. The process is selected as it is the most widely employed process for NGL recovery, with all the necessary flowsheet components present.
Base Case Simulation Gas subcooled process* is selected as the base case for the study and simulated with the shortcut models developed in MATLAB Reflux Exchanger
Sales Gas
Expander Inlet Gas
Flash Column
Multistream Exchanger
Bottom Product * Campbell et al. US 4,157,904 (1979) Centre
L07- 54
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Comparison of Model with Rigorous Simulation
Model
HYSYS
Methane Recovery in Sales Gas
99.40
99.7
Ethane Recovery in NGL
90.2
Total Shaft Power Reboiler Duty Number of Trays of Demethanizer
90.4
38.12MW
38.4 MW
57420 MJ/hr
58870 MJ/hr
25
25
Model shows good agreement with rigorous HYSYS simulation
Centre
L07- 55
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Optimization of the Process P The total shaft power required for the recompressor and refrigeration need to be optimized and compared against base case P Design variables < Column operating pressure (10 ~40 bar) < Flash column temperature (-20 ~ -40 C) < Side reboiler location ( 5th ~ 20th stage) < Upper feed to reflux ratio (0.2 ~ 0.8)
P Objective function: Minimize total shaft power P Constraint: Ethane recocery in NGL > 90%
Centre
L07- 56
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Optimization Approach Base Case Initial conditions and structure
Objective Function
Minimize total shaft power
Optimization Algorithm (SQP)
Variables Constraints
Optimum demethanizer flowsheet Centre
L07- 57
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Optimization Results Condition
Power (MW)
Base case without optimization
38.12
Base case with optimization
33.6
Optimized Variables P Column pressure = 25 bar P Side reboiler location = 8th stage P Flash column temperature = -30 C P Upper feed to reflux ratio = 0.6 Centre
L07- 58
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Now Let’s try a different configuration to increase the ethane recovery
Centre
L07- 59
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
RSVE Process Optimization
* Campbell et al. US 4,854,955 (1989) Centre
L07- 60
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Comparison of Results with Rigorous Simulation Model
HYSYS
Methane Recovery in Sales Gas
99.8
99.8
Ethane Recovery in NGL
94.3
Total Shaft Power Reboiler Duty Number of Trays of Demethanizer
94.2
42.8 MW
42.4 MW
70280 MJ/hr
69820 MJ/hr
30
30
P Increase of ethane recovery compared to GSP at the expense of increased shaft power and reboiler duty P The model shows good agreement with rigorous HYSYS simulation Centre
L07- 61
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Optimization Results Optimization condition
Power (MW)
Total shaft power without optimization
42.8
Total shaft power with optimization
36.6
Optimum values of variables P Column pressure = 30 bar P 1st side reboiler location = 12th stage P 2nd side reboiler location = 20th stage P Flash column temperature = -42 C P Upper feed to reflux ratio = 0.75 Centre
L07- 62
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Summary GSP (90.2% Ethane Recovery )
Total Power Requirement (MW)
RSVE (94.3% Ethane Recovery )
Without Optimization
38.2
With Optimization
33.6
Without Optimization
42.8
With Optimization
36.7
P Optimization brings significant benefits P Trade-off between power input and ethane recovery P Need to optimize total cost Centre
L07- 63
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
7. Conclusions and Future work
Centre
L07- 64
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Conclusions P Shortcut models developed for demethanizer, flash column, turbo-expander and compressor P Heat recovery issues with multistream exchangers addressed P Different flowsheet configurations are modelled and validated against rigorous simulation P Important variables affecting the overall process are identified P Different flowsheet configurations are optimized to decrease the total power requirement
Centre
L07- 65
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Future Work
P Development of superstructure to accommodate all important features for synthesis and optimization of flowsheet P Development of systematic methodology to create heat integration opportunities P Application of stochastic optimization methods for structural and parametric optimization P Application of developed methodology to industrial case studies
Centre
L07- 66
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
Centre
L07- 67
Synthesis of Demethanizer Flowsheets for Low Temperature Separation Processes
View more...
Comments