Strategic Audit
Short Description
Download Strategic Audit...
Description
MKTG 7027 Marketing Strategy Tutor: Tutor: Dr Gary Buttriss Semester 2, 2009
Strategic Audit
Sarah Sudewa Sheng Fan
(u4605996) (u4458889) (u4704387) (u4503506)
Preamble
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle. Sun Tzu – Art of War
Agenda What is strategic audit Purpose of strategic audit
How to do a strategic audit Competitive advantage
Performance objectives Key success factors and strategic assumptions
Definition
“Strategic Audit is the process of evaluating a firm’s
strategy.‖ -John Kay 1995
Strategic Audit Framework
Source : Ray, S, No Date
Purpose
Analyse firm is going in the right direction with respect to Strategy formulation
Corporate governance tool used by the independent directors in evaluating executive management
How to audit 1. What business are we in? 2. What forces are shaping our competition? 3. What is competitive advantage? 4. Is there money to be made? 5. What is our current strategy? 6. What is our distinctive competence? 7. What about functional area indicators? 8. How do we best compete for the future? 9. What of priorities, timing and resource? 10.What provisions exist for the implementation?
Business Definition Satisfy the consumer need for a safe, reliable mode of transport Firm A, D and E
Satisfy consumer passion for status, style and performance Firm B and C
Competitive advantage
―Competitive strategy is the search for a favourable competitive position in an industry‖
-- Porter 1985
Competitive advantage is a status in which one company is able to receive profits above that of the industry average, or even another firm.
Sources of Competitive Advantage
COST ADVANTAGE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE DIFFERENTIATION ADVANTAGE
Sources of Competitive Advantage (1) —cost advantage
In StratSim, there are generally several aspects relevant to a firm’s cost: 1.Productive capacity 2.Experience curve 3.Technological capability
1.1 Productive Capacity as an advantage
Cost savings are achieved by doing things more efficiently or differently in volume In Stratsim, firms that have great productive capacity benefit from economies of scale. (presumes full capacity utilization) Rank: 1.D; 2: A; 3: C;4: B; 5: E
Period 6:
1.2 Experience as an advantage
In Stratsim, products that have market share leadership positions in a product category have a lower cost position because of the experience effect. (Rank: 1. B&D; 3.A; 4. C; 5: E )
1.3 Technological capabilities as an advantage
In Stratsim, the advantage of a firm ’s technology also contributes to a lower base cost. Firm D Vs Firm A
Rank: 1.B&D; 3.C; 4. A; 5. E
Sources of Competitive Advantage (2)
—Differentiation advantage
Product differentiation Distribution differentiation
Advertising and Promotion differentiations
2.1 Product differentiation as an advantage
To demonstrate the unique aspects of your product and create a sense of value
Product upgrade period 6:
Innovation
Product differentiation (con’t)
2.2 Distribution differentiation as an advantage
This comes from using different outlets, having a different network or a different coverage of the market. Firm D
2.3 Advertising and Promotion differentiations
Enhance a product’s awareness and attractiveness Minivan Market Rank: 1. C; 2: B; 3.A; 4.D; Period 6: 5. E
Summary of firms’ competitive advantages in industry 5
Competitors’ Performance Objectives Understanding the objectives of competitors can give guidance to strategy development on three levels. What they are trying to achieve?
Assess competitors’ objectives
Why are they trying to achieve it?
Are they satisfied with their achievement?
Two types of performance objectives More/same profit Temporary objectives (short term) More/same market share Temporary objectives (short term)
. .
Cumulative net income Final objectives (long term)
Market value
Analysis object
Family class:
Alfa, Boffo, Cafav Defy, Efizz
Review the actions different firms have taken in this market and analyze their respective objectives during each round
Family class-Period 1:
Name
Sales MSRP (000’s)
Adv Pro (mill.) (mill.)
size
Eng. (hp)
Int
styl
safe
qual
Alfa
315
$24,084
$80
$40
28
165
2
1
3
2
Boffo
98
$35,003
$60
$40
49
200
4
3
2
2
Cafav
191
$31,361
$60
$40
49
165
4
2
2
2
Defy
417
$25,921
$80
$40
43
165
2
1
3
2
Efizz
418
$18,869
$80
$40
35
140
1
1
2
1
Period 2 Name
Sales (000’s)
MSRP
Adv (mill.)
Pro (mill.)
size
Eng. (hp)
Int
styl
safe
qual
Alfa*
317 ↑
$25,499
$90 ↑
$50 ↑
28
165
2
2
4↑
3↑
$80 ↑
49
200
4
3
2
2
↑
Boffo
105 ↑
$35,003
$120
Cafav *
220 ↑
$29,999
$70 ↑
$40
49
165
4
2
3↑
2
Defy
449 ↑
$80
$40
43
165
2
1
3
2
$80
$40
35
140
1
1
2
1
↑
↓
$25,922 ↑
Efizz
423 ↑
$19,341 ↑
Period 3: Name
Sales MSRP (000’s)
Adv (mill.)
Pro (mill.)
size
Eng. (hp)
Int
styl
safe
qual
Alfa
382 ↑
$85↓
$45 ↓
28
165
2
2
4
3
$65 ↓
$40 ↓
49
200
4
3
2
2
$100
$40
49
165
4
2
3
2
$50 ↑
43
165
2
1
3
2
$40
35
140
1
1
2
1
$25,789 ↑
Boffo
88 ↓
$34,997 ↓
Cafav
264 ↑
$29,999
↑
Defy
465 ↑
$25,922
$70 ↓
Efizz
447 ↑
$19,631 ↑
$80
Period 4 Name
Sales MSRP (000’s)
Adv (mill.)
Pro (mill.)
size
Eng. (hp)
Int
styl
safe
qual
Alfa
311 ↓
$25,99 8↑
$70 ↓
$40 ↓
28
165
2
2
4
3
Boffo
98↑
$33,49 7↓
$65
$40
49
200
4
3
2
2
Cafav
286 ↑
$29,99 9
$100
$40
49
165
4
2
3
2
Defy*
482 ↑
$26,00 0↑
$75 ↑
$55 ↑
43
165
2
2↑
4↑
3↑
Efizz
414
$19,82 8↑
$80
$40
35
140
1
1
2
1
↓
Period 5: Name
Sales MSRP (000’s)
Adv (mill.)
Pro (mill.)
size
Eng. (hp)
Int
styl
safe
qual
Alfa*
385 ↑
$26,998 ↑
$75 ↑
$60 ↑
40 ↑
165
3↑
2
5↑
4↑
Boffo
109 ↑
$31,250 ↓
$65
$40
49
200
4
3
2
2
Cafav
210 ↓
$29,999
$100
$40
49
165
4
2
3
2
Defy
536 ↑
$26,260 ↑
$70 ↓
$60 ↑
43
165
2
2
4
3
Efizz
239 ↓
$20,224 ↑
$80
$40
35
140
1
1
2
1
Period 6: Name
Sales MSRP (000’s)
Adv (mill.)
Pro (mill.)
size
Eng. (hp)
Int
styl
safe
qual
Alfa
528 ↑
$26,99 9↑
$75
$65 ↑
40
165
3
2
5
4
Boffo*
100 ↓
$31,25 0
$65
$40
55 ↑
200
6↑
5↑
4↑
4↑
Cafav *
203 ↓
$29,99 9
$115↑
$45↑
49
165
5↑
2↑
4↑
3↑
Defy*
480 ↓
$26,26 0
$70
$70 ↑
45 ↑
165
2
2
5↑
4↑
Efizz
190 ↓
$20,73 0↑
$80
$40
35
140
1
1
2
1
Summary of firms’ competitive advantages in industry 5
Different firms often set different objectives at different round
Objectives reflects their conditions and their external circumstance
Key success factors What is required for firms to execute their strategy successfully?
Framework (Ralf Boscheck):
Split each of the critical success factors in to three parts: 1. Assets needed to manage the factor 2. Capabilities ( people) needed to execute the factor 3. Systems needed for managing the business process of that particular critical part Compare those individual factors to best competitor or to market ideal to find gaps to them Based on the gap analysis, define the precise areas where key strategic initiatives are needed.
If your strategy is a ..., what would you do in Stratsim to execute it successfully? 1. 2. 3.
low price strategy high price strategy large distribution strategy
Low price strategy
Costs leadership Price war Invest in technology Minimize upgrades or use it to decrease attributes Economy of scale Little increase of price for each round
High price strategy
Invest in technology Invest in R & D Product development Product differenciation, uniqueness => Upgrade attributes High profit margin Enter new segment => monopole
Large distribution strategy
Increase production capacity Outspend competition in terms of advertisement and promotion Increase dealership, dealer discount Increase dealer training budget New vehicle class, customer segment First to market B2B
Strategic assumptions What assumptions have been made? Have they been confirmed?
Strategic assumptions: firm B
High price strategy Not do any upgrades (family segment) Introduce a new car (Hybrid, Delivery)
Strategic assumptions: firm C
High price strategy No upgrades Introduce new car (Sport, Hybrid, Delivery)
Strategic assumptions: firm D
Similar to our firm Large distribution strategy Attributes match Small price increase Introduce a new car (Utility, Hybrid, Delivery)
Strategic assumptions: firm D
Strategic assumptions: firm E
Low price strategy No upgrades Little price increase Risk averse => not introduce new car Managed by a computer
Strategic assumptions: firm E
Conclusion [Agenda]
Reference: BAYSINGER, B. & HOSKISSON, R. E. (1990) The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 15, 72-87. Electronic sources: Critical success factor analysis as a tool for strategy execution, viewed 21st September 2009, < http://enduragement.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/critical-successfactor-analysis-as-a-tool-for-strategy-execution/> Hooley, G, and N.F. Piercy, B. Nicoulad: Marketing Strategy and Competitive Positioning. (2008) 4th KAY, J. A. (1995) Why firms succeed, Oxford, Oxford University Press. RAY, S. (No Year) Strategic Audit. Indian Institute of Management Calcutta.
View more...
Comments