Siddhanta Deepika Volume 2
Short Description
Siddhanta Deepika Volume 2 Siddhanta Deepika Volume 2...
Description
THE
SIDDHANTA DEEPIKA OR
THE LIGHT OF TRUTH A MONTHLY JOURNAL DEVOTED TO
RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, LITERATURE AND SCIENCE
THE
LIGHT OF TRUTH O R
SIDDHANTA DEEPIKA. A MONTHLY JOURNAL DEVOTED TO
RELIfllON, PHILOSOPHY, LITERATURE, SCIENCE, Ac. VOL.
II.
JUHE 1898-MAY )899.
M A D R A S . ]'UIJI.lSllh;i) -AT ' T J I i : S I D D H A N T A m-ACK 1 RiNTEU
TOWN ;rADRAS
AX T H E
C.
DKKPJKA
I'y tin.- J'cv. ( ; . Mm.ioi.i, il.i, fs. i. ji. ji. (Jod a n d i b f Vi'mld l>y llic J-jTini;.
C.
.Jii>li(.L' i^anadi' I'li " Smitli liidi:i.'' bv t Ik- IImti.i,- .. J .
IP, 4 0 , 05, fefi, 131, 220, 270
37 187
Ainoijos.—(Cciih'/iHc/.)
I'Al.Et.
K.
19, 1-2, 0 8 , 9 1 , T o l
' : u " i b i i u b y T . ClIF-'VAKESAVAir VA M l DAUAl., JM. A..
181
K a i v s l y t i Dud A i n i r d n b i n d u U p a i i i s l i c d s b y t i e J£DITOK K a l i t t o k a i M e t r o s b y T . VIRABADKA MUH.IUAR, B. A , u. I
225
Kuiidiilakesi and V a l a y a p a t ' i y b y N . B .
I l l , 184
L o r d S a i n b a u d i i a a n d an u n k n o w n T a m i l i a n P r o s o d y b y T . VIBA.ADBA MOOUALIAK, U. A , B. L. M.
159
i l o t k ' i u O n e n i i i l S o b o l a i s b i p b y V . V . 1!>MANAN, IS. A., C. M. M. B. ^ L o u d o u ) & c . N.
203
\ o t f s bv liif E d i t o r O. Oi>!.olete S y l l a b l e s SfHi^ a n d iSeasn iu M o d e r a V e n b a s b y T . VIEADADKA MUDAUAK, li. A., B. L..
129
O u r ivffllclod Bretlii-en b y t h e EDITOR...
loo P. 159
" P a t r i o t i s m in tlie n i i i k i n g o f H i s t o r y " by Ihe EMTOI!
140, 160
P o e t s of the T a m i l L a u d s b y t h e Rc-v. G . U , POPE, m. A u. d.
2 U
P r o i . Fail bairn on t h e P h i l o s o j j h y .>f B e l i g i o n b y t h e EDITOK Purra-PONIL V e i i b a M a l a i b y t h e R e v . G . U . POPE, M.
2 2 7 , 2oG, 2 7 3
I>. D. O x i o u u
P o e t r y of S t e p h e n I ' h i l l i p s b y V. V . RAMAN^I^, B. A., C. M. M. S. ( L o n d o n ) &C.
231
I ' r o p h e t s a n d t h e i r M i s s i o n by V . V
277
RAMANAN, B. A.j. C. M. M. S. ( L o m l o u ) & c . S.
ISouie A s p e c t s ot t h e G o d - H e a d by the EDITOK
252
S o g v e p a t i o n t r o m thi; H i n d u StHnd P o i n t b y J. V . RAMASWAMI NAIUU, L. M:
S.
203
T. T h e T a m i l F o u r H u n d r e d L y r i c s , P u r i a - N a n u u i u b y t h e R e v . G . U . P o r t u . A,
D
Oxford
•J ) e T w o G e m s — ( b n t a n d S a t a s a t ) b y t h e EJ>ITOK T h e T h e o l o g i c a l S i t u a t i o n in I n d i a
17 61
15C
Do. V.
13
Y o w e ' s a n d c o n s o n a n t s ( M i n d a n d B o d y ) b y the E D n o i ; V'acciuatiun b y A n c i e n t H i n d u s b y L i e u t e n a n t c o l o n e l W . G . KINO, M. D., D R. U., I. M, E. i c . ...
201
W. W e e k of g r e a t P r o m i s e b y Ihe EDITOU,.
180
MISCELLANEA.
E. Extracts...
" 0 , 1J7, 190, 2-.iH, 2 3 4 N.
Notes and Comments.
2 3 , 4 7 , 7 1 , 9 4 , 119, 142, 2 1 0 , 2 3 8 , 2 0 3 . 2 8 0 R.
Rvicws
2 3 , 4 5 , l i b , 105, 2 H i , 22f<
THE
LIGHT OF TRUTH O li
SIDDHANTA A Monthly Journal Commenced
Devoted to Religion, on
the
THE
Queev^s
Philosophy,
Literature, Science
Commemoration
Day,
R A N H L A
VEDA'NTA-SUTRAS
r WfTH
I O N S . S'KL'KANTHA
HHA'SHYA. Ctnf-
ued fnniL page 270, ]'(,/. I
A d h i k a r a n a - 6. As jgainst this view, we h(,lrl that the A'iiiiiiflinnn_v;i A'un.m is the ParaToes'vara, hecaiisc tliis A'n;niila (ubl.ss is repeatedly spoken nl' ;is iinsm-passcd. BeLrinning with ' t h e r e arises tiiis enciuiry ns to A'niiinl;i,'* tlie s'ruti speaks of several grades (jf bliss, fi-iiri hu.nan bliss to that ot Pi-aja,puti, each, lii-^ht-r fiiiide l/eirio- a hundred times s"]ienur to rli.' b>-lii\v it, and then (.-nncludf;; uitli '• that the unit of Hi-ahpiaii's bliss," tlms declaii ii^ bv ri'|ii'[itii that Hralinian's biis~, •iiii.uds nusiii-p^is'^cd ;il tin- lu :ai 'J'he s:'.msiriii cannot, lie sjnikcn ol ^m li ii'|ji.>itoiy nt misiif))a^scJ blips.
U|'iitiiiliai.l 2
No. t.
answer is hs follows Just as the hiyhly lustrous im on attains clearness only on the disappcavani-e of clon ls which hide lier, so, too, in the case of Him who is ever pure, purification consists in merely rL'mo\ in^' the tirodluhiii-iiiala, the dirt which acts tl veil ccjucealing H.in from our view. WlicrelonViiiiiidainaya is none other ihun I'aiaiiies'\-ar:i.
{Olijirfioii] —
i t s e l t
Is di'cUri d
In- UrMli-
luaii: and A'rianihuna va must lie an t lU i ipii n.il i' n tberc(!i, Iticc the siiMi\ ' iiKiva nnpii'. Ichailn'r 11 A'naUilai'ia\u I'.-'wi i:i. il follow that I's'v.iia dilfercut hI'.r,. thus, I's'vara a nion- vik.ir;i . Is it, llr also be non-etermil. 'I'hr >utr:ikara sf:it( nli|e'/ig)
souls by
ne.\t
verily
referred
tlie
Hirari-
y a g a r b h u . " T l i e r c f o i e it is vei ily tlie H i r a n y a g a r b h a w h o is describ^'d l u r e as t h e c a u s e o f the b i r t h
of the
w o r l d a n d so on.
Hiranyagarbha
as
as
distinct
I'ar.-imes'vara, that is t r e a t e d of h e r e ; f o r ,
follows:
from the
tMc attri-
b u t e s of P a r a m e s ' v a r a — s u c h as beinf,' tlfe c a u s e o f ^ h ^ gai-bha.
T h e Heiiig s p o k e n ^ f
the causi-of
the
Universe,
iliranya-
at th(! b e g i i i i i i n g
as
as
the
being-".whence
p r o c e e d e d the birth of the Universe""
descrijjed. to
p l a n t s , i;iirr-i-c.'d irJ;o men a n d b e a s t - , into all lieing.s
b e h i g h e t than all a n d far t r a n s c e n d i n g t h e
m o v i n g ioid • i n m o v i u g . " t
o r the re:,'ion
T h e d o u b t a: ises us r(j w h e t h e r the I'ui i i s l u i sp(jkeii
that
t h e " i i n b o r u is
o r i g i n ot t h e U n i v e r s e — c a n n o t a p p l y to t h e of)
^it
the
A s Jigainst the f o r e g o i n g view we h o l d
B e i n g i b y watei- sent f o r t h the ( b o d i e s inid
to
I'lM.japati m o v e s in t h o w o m b within
It is n o t tfie
" W h e n c e i . r o c c e d e d t h e birtli of the U i i i v e K e , earth,
made
Pri)jai)ati"lha.t is t i e a t c d of ; f c r , we find it said
Universe
Kot tlie oilier, beeasse of incongruity.
to
.attributes
passages,
hi the .section first r e f e r r e d to h e r e , it
Ad h I karana—7. by
that
Uii anyag:iri)ha at first was & c
is P a v a m e s ' v a r a .
at
right
H e was b o r n of ws^rrs i
within the Mjuniarie I'-g;/. .Moreover, nioksha oi' inurtality i- snid rocisiilt troiu
im-
knowledge oi' "IJini,
in the words ••'I'Ih
Tljis ch;\i':ie-
teristie inar'< of His is found di-serih.-d 'ii ilie |I:IS>;IL;' :i flvi''
at the beginning
as
" Tln^-e is vt^^ily none else higlier aiid^ubtleiwthan This wliich is higher riian the high and i,Meater than the gre^u;•^^rllich is 7, loo. i-;iijiin; i rlc i 1 Lriiiiii jo;irl)li;i. lor, as u S|jiri.ii ilind not the name (sound). Where
you iearn fo say that Sftbda is substance
:ihd not the tiling. 7.
Perception (knowledge) of a thing iS induced
when the%oul is in conjunctioii with the internal and external senses and their cause
" Human beings "have numerous experiences of the
you s a y , that
Yishiui I's monkey if nmncl be tho real substance ?
(Prakriti)
tffing perceived and the light of God-
and
In
the
such a
involving the order
beiri^ coi?nected with words. stock
the sight of uhe blow.
tl.d substance.
'flie Sabda is not e t e r n a l ; it; will
This Sabda was p r o d u c e d b y
the
Almighty
the practice
As thus explained and e.vposed, ic might b e thought that t^g pjsteni deserves very little consideiation, that this represents an effete and obsolete system. the tr.llaciM inherent in this sj'stera are so
But
deep-root-
ed that tliey rtin be detected in many a subtle reasonMa; .y of the w o n i - j u g g l e s existing
in the
VedaHta phiLisophy can be traced to tfce influence of this syste-Ti, such as the myth of the ifama
Riipa
as illusti^ated by flife simile of the sea and
tlu wave and the foam and in tininy an other argument. The mimes or sounds are themselves t^iken f o r ami hence the c o ; i f t « i o n in thought.
things
It i': forgotten
that a name is ' mei ely a m^rk attached to a thing to enabW ii. to tie spoken about,' and that there may be knowledg*! oitliour names.
language
and
thin;i,'s
without
Says D r Bain, " T h e k n o w l e d g e that i^uides
the' lower .animals
is
unconnected
with
language.
They observ"e by tbeir senses the things about them ; and the ob.sei-vntions forms.
are
romenibereJ
sensible
npon,' are k n o w n
-sought after, by the sole guidance_^ o f sions,"
in
Tlie bush that gives jhelter.'tlte herbage
food, the animals to be preyed
intellectual
the next
profes.sion,
P h y s i c , the consummation
of
as
skill
requires a largS*sense k n o w l e d g e passing b e y o n d the scope of language.
T h e physician learns from b o o k s ,
e v e r y t h i n g that can be expressed in words ; but there are delicate shades o i diagnosis that no language can c o n v e y , stored up without verbal expression, in the eye, th"? ear and the t o u c h . " " A n d there are numerous sources
of
error,
pitfals and
names, and mostly in
snares
the abuse of
in
the use of
abstract
names,
which is exemplified in the almost irresistible tendency suggest
the existence
of things in the
T h e othsr branch of the S a d b a B r a h m a -
vadis, believe
in
the V e d i c
mantra
(sound)
as all
powerful and that no h i g h e r p o w e r like G o d is at all necessary to explain the
existence and origin of the
Universe and that Sahda
is itself
God.
T h e r e are
the eflBcacy of V e d i c rites and ceremonies, and y e t w h o
MCJTES.
Prapanclta,
of
highly
o the stone polisher
o n c e suggests
believers in the V e d a like Jaimini and his pupils end in
God and as snch the Sabda cannot be G o d .
ing to-d;iy.
surface at
Even in a
they h a v e to
perish.
iiiv^'erstand
sists, for the largest part, in ass' ciStiojis between sen?i-
abstract."
A s a l a m p ' l i g h t s the things lying in darkness,
without
The skill of the ai tizan con-
Ijle appearances and movements ;
the thing or substance. 1.
of nature,
The cjiild has a large
of sen.'ic-Rnowlsdge- b e f o r e it can
and employ l a n g u a g e .
perception or knowledge there is no name but only
so Sahdn is an instrument or aid foi- understanding
DEEPIKA.
for and
sensejimpres-
believed Tn no God.
A m o n g the m o d e r n ^ a y brahmins,
many may b e fo^nd w h o strictly ^adhere to the belief that the V e d i c tftantra alone is all p o w e r f u l and
Siddhis
&c. can be acquired b y the p o w e r of the mantra without belief i n G o d . the
fallacy
Divine
T h e phrase ' M a n t r i c PoW^er' embodies of
Poi^r.
from Barth,
the whole Consider
sj'stem, the
opposed
to
quotation
" Sacrifice is only an act of preparation,
it is the best of acts, but it is consequently perishable. sections of
as
following :in act and
its fruits
A c c o r d i n g l y although w h o l e
these treatises (Upanishads' are taken up
exclusively with specuhitions
on the rites, what they
teach may be summed up in the w o r d s of the «4undaka Upanishad, ' Kno^x the A t m a n only
and
a v ^ y with
e v e r y t h i n g else ; it alone in the b r i d g e of immortality.' The V e d a itself and the whole circle of sacred science are quite place.
as
s w e e p i n g l y consigned
to
the
second
T h e Veila is not the true Brahm ; it is only its
reflexion.
A n d the science of
this jjnperfect B r a h m ,
this Sabda Brahm
or B n i h m in words only is a science
S^f a lower order.
T h e true science is that which has
the
the
true
Brahm,
T h e Rishis of
Para
Tarnkavanc
Brahm
were
for its s u b j e c t . "
votaiies of the Sahda
T H E L I G H T OF T R U T H OE S I D D H A N T A D E E P I K A . €9
tind they believed that t h ^ could effect thvir
Brahn
TAYUMANAVAR.
salvation by the V e d i c Mantra alone and thought, like I n d r a and A g n i . o f o l d noticed in the K e n a ¥ p a n i s h a d that they Fsqnired all their- powers by their o w n ' w i l l and i n d e p e n d e n t
of the D i v i n e h e l p ,
and
became
t h o r o u g h l y filled jvitli Kgoism (AhanKkra). T h i s A h a n kara had to b e d e s t i o y e d .
Their p o w e r and sanctit"
had to b e put to the test.
Their p o w e r was so frail
that their sanctity left them the moment they nnd their wives saw tl.e f o r m of Mohini and Then
they
Beings.
tried
powers
Bitcfiadana.
t o ' destroy
tliese
The V e d a is often symbofised b y the deer,
iiirawu>«»^''cliiefly
as the
sound
uttered by
it is
supposed to resemble the V^edic Miant and the Risbis
GOD AND T6E WOEI.D This pueni of the Saint T&yanaaavav, remftvkable alike for beaiity of ideas and o j setting, and to which no translation can do justice, descHbe* (as ftft- as words' can) God, the only reality, and by contrast the World, with its "Just of the flesh, and the lust of vLp eyes an/i(^'S^0 ^tSfh /S iSo fuji-isCX^-.imifiiiA-f.mOT^Gil,n «a/rii5(?g) QtHtjU'^tSeat tfiuu^em g tun iiS^Lja iSoem>a eaS^ a id
0 Benefactor, let me know the real secret oF it. JS^
O / 3 LE 6TR OFF UJ 7 S
G iGeiilLj''i-Q'uiiTe!!r ^(^eJifdsBT^jiuGiiie ' VSisif i) smewCiair Oeua^'E tsiLjua^Qupi «1 cm oSSni owevt-r , that volition or thought could not in any sense be confounded vith I'et-ling: "What Dr. Bain liowever means in the above quotation is that without tlie acquisition of feelings, no volition
i
we soon
change
this
become conacious again
train, and then
'J'amil philosophers state this
revert.
'Piie
principle in the axiom
'/SSwuL/iiwG'^sv, i^^uLyeri^Lfftj,' ' I f
there is thought
there is forgetfulness also.' Dr. Bair.'aknost confesses that both
on the
mental
reaypn for this exhibition
nnd
physical
of this hiw
explicable.
But ^ i n d u
as s h o w i n g
that man's intelligence
side, 4/he
is not
«Ty
philosophers take this ig
[Sipflj-Sii:) and it can become stronger and strODgSV and b e c o m e all thought
by
practice
fSadnnaX
In
Y o g i c practice, what comes first 'nMporo,, darknaA, dblivion luau light
Hat contiiH:ic^.'Wl>he*anio fiatlh
there dawns true light in the la^'t MiBaft, inid U J * ' nature of the light is so often mista^iSb irfthe intjnVaJ so many shades of it breaking out.) •'g)^.Tt''-fchclia: by a
Feeling sense
of
determines our
oiu Intellect.
ously - a s
Intellect is ejialyse^l into
difference and sense of simijarity
Hetentiveness or conception
A h d ou^ volition
actions as impelled
Memory.
memory, and
raason, juagniciit,
others
tlie.>e three kintls. b a y s of our intellect.
VV'hat are
And
are
all
called
and vari-
imagination,
resolvable
into
differcuce lies at tlie very
No knowledge and no intellec-
tual peration is possible, if there is no "difference in the constituent elements, if tbcre is nwrt-sonieness. If there was only one colour, the ;irt ol •^r.in.'ing will be an iinpossibility; if there was only one su uul or tune, music we conjcr never hoar. As it-is, tliff law of relativity •.'•overns onr ve'j." being. Siimeiiess could g i r e knowledge, only 1f tliere^wns difference and hence the sense of similarity i s ' also accounted an -intellectual fuuctioii ; and a gceat function it performs in the field of inventiun.- And no high Hegree fif intellectual
THE-LIGHT OF 'J^HTH OK SIDDHANTA DEEPIKA
U
power is possible if we do not possess the power of remembeiiiig
ou.- past experiences
and
impressions.
And one peculiarity of tlie Ivunmn i.iiiid, may we call it a defect, -nay be also uoted liere, as b=ise(f law of relativity
already
sti^te.].
on tlie
T h e i n i n d „ i s uot
conscious of all the i.iipFessions through all the sense organs all at once. A nian does uot become conscious of a sight,, a tpiich. a soand, or a smell all
at once.
There must be a transition from one to the other h o w ever momentary it might be. A n d the c.nse of an is no exception to this.
vadajii
memory, time
the move avadanatw
do s he
analysis of
taice.
mind,
Assisted by
he performs 'the more
It will be nated
that in this
no distinrtion ^s drawn
between
- a feeling and a consciousness of a feeling, and
a
c^nsciousnesR
of
Ashtaa good
a "^'olition,
and the consciousness of reasoning.
a
volition reasoning
Both are
taken
longer. Such states arc n'f slinrt duration, nicrctits, glimpges ; they ;irc constantl.v V,liiftcd and alterimted with ofijcct states, and whiD tliey last and have their full ,lower, wo nro in a different world j the material world is blotted out, cdipsed, f c r the instant unthinkable. These eiibject-movenieiiis n.o stuuiod to advantage it. Amrsto of intcns« pleasure nr intense pain, in Ht of engrossed reflection, especially roflectioi. on nieii#Bl facts ; but the;;; a.-e seldom sustained in purity, beyond a very f^iort interv.il ; we are constantly returning tu the object side of thin-rs—to t)ic w orld Shose basis is extension and place."
H o w e v e r widely these may differ, there is this r e m a r k able fact about them that they are .ound united t o g e ther in a .sentient b f i n g — m a n or
animal.
these two sets of phenomena is what Dr.
this
conjunLtion and c o r r e s p o n d e n c e d o not warrant us in stating that mind causes b o d y or b o d y There
is
q, 'duality
in
mere feeling or willing or thinking is separated f r o m
ultimate analysis b u t
consciousness of such functions, and the pure
be
consci-
in
takes This
I n Hindu philosophy, they are distinguished,
ousness is taken as the soul or Sat, and the rest class-
Bain
very groat trouble to*show in several chapters.
to be identical and therefore n e e d i n g no distinction. a
the
we need not deny s s Dr. Bain fully admits that
but his position i.s that m i n d - b o d y
and
And
e x a c t correlation, c o r r e s p o n d e n c e or concomitance
thought
of
causes
mind ;
causes m i n d - b o d y .
the very
final
resort
a disembodied, mind
and- he
uses
such as, an ' u n d i v i d e d t w i n '
various
and
cannot
expressions
a ' double f a c e d unity,'
ed with b o d y and t i e world as non-soul o r Asat ( e t h e r
'one substance with two sets of p r o p e r t i e s . ' & c . A n d we
than Sat). And we will speak of tl.is distinction more
don't
ftpther on.
materialists if he is not g o i n g to call this
rtjntrasted
From these mental functions h o w e v - e t a r e the b o d y and its functions a n d the so-call-
ed external world.
This collectively called matter o r
the non-ego or the .object*possess certain
characteris-
see
why
Dr.
Bain
not as matter altogether
should ally
himself
with
one auhstance
but as only matter-mind or
m i n d ^ a t t e r ; unless it be that himself tlie existence of
he is unable to p r o v e
mind e x c e p t
fin c o n j u n c t i o n
ticB aud'properties.v.'bich are nol f o u n u in mind at all,
with an o r g a n k e d
"ucTi. as breadth and length (order in place, extension
again causes ncT difficulty to the Siddhanti who postu-
hardness said
lates
softness
(inertia),
weight YfiTavUy)
colour, heat, i i g h t , electricity, organi.sed
properties
chemical properties &c., &c., and the mo»^t important of this ib extenrion tended,
Matter is extended^Mind.
is
iincx-
S^ays Dr. Bain,
" W e are in this fix states and bodily states are utterly contra't«d ; they cannot be compared, they liavo nothing in common eicept the most general of all attributes—degree, order in time; when engaged wfth one lye must be oblivious of all that distinguishes the other. When I am studying a brain and nerve conimnnications, I aic enfnossed with properties exclusively belonging t
Chit) and an e x t e n d e d t h i n g (as A c j i t ) ; and all such
does the .siibject; and in sut-li r pure subjective state,
expressions external and internal, containei and c o n -
where is the objec'j?
tained
{Sunyam).
Are
also
misleading nnd
c o n n e c t i o n if not a causal
mischievous.
ccnnectiou.
I t is
wrOtig
on the
other,
the other ns an insirument.
(The
t o call SDch c o n j u n c t i o n as one a c t i n g or
as one
using
theory of ocdasional causes harmony non
are also
is a most
n o single similar we
may
The
and
oT
antiquated no.?.
uuique
one
in
conjunction
coqipare it b y
pie-established The
phenome-
n a t u r e ; there'
in
nature,
so
is
It has b e c o m e also non-apparent
Segardim,'
the possibility however of
matter b e i n g the primary element,
there is the fact,
matter is f o u n d both as organic and inorganic, what a world
of diffe^euce
is there
between
and these
conditions of matter? Is the peculiar organization igiven to i t b y the presence f o r the time b^i'ng of mind in it or is it derived solely b y its inherent power.
W e have
that
admitted that, the so-called dead matter might po.ssess
a n a l o g y sine' there is
no
potenli;i]ities without number. Still is'lih^re a n y s o i t of
either.
similarity between the inorganic fVope^tic a exhibited
The only a i o q n a t e expression to denote a transition
by matter and the organic or vital properties. H o w e v e r
fitting langnaj^e to express such
conjunction
from an o b j e c t cognition to a subject one is a change of state.
L a n g u a g e fails,
this union though in
analo'.'y
fails, to
explain
this be, we will now proceed to .state our analogy. is the analogy of vowels and consonants.
It
W e have
itself a fact ; and it remains a
quoted the Gita verse, but w e look in vain even in
mystery in a sense, ihou-rh to seek an explanation for
Sankarii's commentary f o r the meaning we have tried
an ultimate f a c t c m in no sense b e l o g i c a l ; and all
to give it.
that w e can d o has b e e n d o n e when we hnvo tried to
explanation as it would conflict with his preconceived
^ n e r a l i z e the various sets of phenomena into the fewest
theory.
possible n u m b e r a n d if wo
locked
.generalization than t w o , w e
cannot pass to a higher can
only rest and
be
thankful.
Possibly SRnkara would not g i v e such an
S o if there was truth and th3 key
Siddhanta writers
in
it,
it
altogether remained
remained with
the
The most familiar example of the
analogy occurs in the sacred Kural, in the very first verse'of it.
W e are sure that this is a perfectly safe position to hold and our o b j e c t in p e n n i n g this article is in no w a y to difEer f r o m this v i e w ; only we f a n c y , we h:-ve an analogy in Tamil, which will « x a c t l y answer the point and make the union more intelligible, besides b r i n g i n g out the nature of tnind and mattei, in a much more fav6nrBb]e light, than f r o m the stand point of a mere materialist, qualified or otherwise ; and w a f a n c y w e have been almost e v e r y day using l a n g u a g e to describe this union, though the name in itself is a puzzle, and embodies both a paradox and a contradiction. B e f o r e we state them h o w e v e r w e will state one or two fasts so far as they bear upon the relation of mind end matter, and which D r . Bain states more fully in his Mental Science. It ie that all objectivity implies the subject-mind at the same time. " All objective states are in a sense also mental." Unless the mind is present, though unconscious, y o u cannot have object k n o w l e d g e at all. We cannot have a pure objective condition at all without the subject, supporting it as it were, though lOr the time b e i n g , it is non-apparent, is entirely I lotted out. (Sunyam) Or rather shall we say, though dissimilar the min'd has become thoroughly identified with m f t t e r . But mind can ascend to pure subjectivity and i f d o e s not imply the presence of objects, as the o b j e c t
us^aisir (ifiS^Q/Dii^ffiig." " As ' A ' ia the tirst of all leuerg, So the ancient Bagavnn is the first in this world."
W e m i g h t fancy an alphabet, in which ^hgrleltMr " A " is not the first, and if the point o f merely to denote G o d ' s order in placa. aa the fi^ g o mauj icr analogies might b e thon^ht* o f . A h d Parimelalagar iiccordingly notes that the order is not order in place but order in its origin. It is the most primary and first sound that the human voice can utter, and it is also tbo rne sound-which is plesent in every other sound vowel or ccnscnant. All other vowels are formed by modifications of this suan'd. A n d what are vowels and consonanto pray ? A vowel is defined as a sound that can be pronounced of itself, without the aid of any other soflnd. . A n d a consonant is one which cannot be sounded except with the aid of the vowel. Let us look more carefully into the nature of these sounds. W e every d j y utter these sounds, and yet we fail to r e o g n i z j the mystery in their connection, solely on account of their familiarity. W t try to-utter ' A . ' It conies pure anJ simple, by the mere opening of the mouth, without any modification whatever, and requires no other aid. Bat let ns pro_nouDCe say ' K . ' It is ' K f r ' in Englisb,
THK LIGHT OF TlfUTH on SIDDHANTA DEEPIKA.
16
iu Taiiiil - i t is ' K a ' ' ar ' I k . '
There is a rowel^ sound
precent in it, ' e ' cJ? ' a ' ' i.' vowel
u e t us eliminate this
souD(f and try lb pronounce
tie
consonant.
"Well, the task is impossible, y o u don't g e t any c o n sonant so,lu)d
at nil.
there is always
Jr. the consonant' t h e r e f o r e
a vowel so'uid present, t h o u g h we
n e v e - consciously recngnize Tamil, the symbol;-m
its presence, though in
i? so highly philosophical that
we itivanabir mark its presence even w h e n we write purely consonants. ' f,'
W e dot all our consonants as ' ii,'
and the dot
or circle
symbolism the letttfr '
represents in
This dot
alniopt every cue of the tta-sindu, before the •ireation of man, befose the combining o£ earthly elements, jefore the s ^ p i n g and moulding of the primeval chaos, before the tirtSe when heaven and earth spi-ang into exii?. tence out of nothing at God's eonimnnd, God existed, most blessed in Himself and from Himself, eternal, infinite, unchangeable and siicli as he even exists-in this moment of time. W h y so ^ Because fJod owes his c.xistence to none : but He is tlie only sflf-existent, the only necessary Being; that is, s(yHe exists lliitt ""'c^annot but exist, as he possesses in Himself the necessity of his exVhtence. W h o can grasp adei|iiatly tliis iiiTinitely comin-ehensive idea ? W h o can fathom tin's abyss 'f Jf we luok aronnd ns, we find no creature in the Universe but Hiiitp. bnt contingent, namelj- which so exists as not exclude the pos.sibility of not existing, and which actually once did not exist. Self existense is the absolute characteristic of the First Cause. God exists really, and creatures also exist really; God is, and the creature al.so is. Y^ii tlic divine Being arttl the created being differ iufinitc'Tv" fi nni ontf another, in that the former is indeiie.ident, the liitteidependent; the former uncaused, aud'tlie latlei-caused the former has all things of itself and the hitter lias absolutely nothing j f itself, but is itself an effect pro i need out of nothing according to a preconceived idea derived from the Divine essence. This infinite difference is ftidieated by saying that, God not only is, but is of IJiniself in virtue of his own es.serree; ill a word; f f e is self-existciit. (1) c. f. B. Boedder. S. Y Natiual Tlieulony i,ai;c ."..n.
DEEP'.KA.
19
was reared on its gor und, it might also not Invc been i-eared, and con.seqoently, its existence limittil, finite, caused orcontingeu*But if '4 be so, the efficient flanse of the house or the archite(;t must be prior to the house itself, as the first condition of a cause is its priority in i-e^fard to the eifect. G. BAKTOI.I, S. .T., D. D. (_To hi.' continued.)
KAMBAN. {Conthnlfd from paye J^ngazhendi tellectual
WM.S fully aware of the fir.st rate in-
powers of K^nibaii and respected him as
his snpt-rior.
Piiga/.liendi
(juldsniitli a lioincly dicriou tlioiiglit.
Vol. [.;
poet.
and delinGatioii
like
Cowpei-
and
and was Sliakospearian
Uo would lirive
lived iu cai liri^ln_ri_s sneueS'iii a n i c l a^etPGiu.
" ^SMX/ u>TSQfiii fif^iB fii^^iu^eBr ififttf fieaaffmp iSeirjD^
uffmeuQiui
jfLLQi—neif ujir^^s/irius saoisas
Oerrtiita- &c..
"
u>ili_«u sfp/Su.- C/ILAjl/ix AC." dam.
A careful examination of Scaml.a coiiviiiccs us C
(IG
is ovideiiti
the pur-
port of " Ojaji^iO,-:- '^SOT etc." (."j. V'l).
Qajii-UcOir Q^eLsiiLCiLDp
^ SS"^'!agt^:, '^'siar.^
View more...
Comments