Sailendra yak TSA Presentation English

May 25, 2016 | Author: International Consortium on Governmental Financial Management | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Treasury Single Accounts Sailendra Pattanayak, Senior Economist, Fiscal Affairs Department, The International Monetary ...

Description

Establishing a Treasury Single Account (TSA) – Concept, Issues and Challenges Sailendra Pattanayak Fiscal Affairs Department International Monetary Fund

Overview of presentation 1. 2. 3. 4.

5. 6.

May 2010

Typical banking arrangements TSA principles and benefits Different TSA structures TSA coverage and interface with transaction processing systems Banking Arrangement for Donor Flows Issues/Preconditions for establishing a TSA

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Typical Payment System with Many Bank Accounts Spending Ministry

Bank Accounts

SU SU SU

Ministry of Finance

SU

Spending Ministry

SU SU SU

Spending Ministry

SU SU

May 2010

SU = Spending Units

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Banking Arrangements under TSA Regime 







Transit / zero-balance bank accounts of the treasury

Current / deposit bank account(s) of the treasury (TSA)

Debt administration

 Subsidies



Daily settlement with TSA

Local governments

 

Suppliers

 Wage earners Government Borrowings

May 2010

Tax payers

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

2. TSA Principles and Benefits

TSA Principles 

A TSA is a unified structure of government bank accounts that gives a consolidated view of government cash resources 









It could be just one account or a set of linked accounts (main and subsidiary)

All public monies are seen as fungible to prevent inefficient use of cash resources The consolidation of government cash resources through a TSA is comprehensive  It covers all budgetary and extrabudgetary funds The TSA should be legally recognized, institutionally robust and stable The TSA can contain ledger sub-accounts for control and monitoring purposes, but these should not contain over-night balances

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

TSA Principles – contd. 





Options for accessing the TSA is mainly dependent upon institutional structures and payment settlement systems The cash balance in the TSA is maintained at a level sufficient to meet daily operational requirements of the government Treasury-related revenue and disbursement floats in the banking sector are kept at the minimum realizable level 

May 2010

Significant revenue and disbursement floats in the banking sector benefit the banks at the expense of the government

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

TSA and Consolidated Fund Concept 

All government revenues should accrue to a common pool (such as the Consolidated Fund) and no source of revenue be earmarked for specific expenditure 

In general, there is no need for revenue-specific or expenditurespecific bank accounts



Revenue and expenditure transactions should be classified through a well-developed chart of accounts and not by maintaining distinctive bank accounts for them



The TSA should be maintained in domestic currency, as this parallels the currency in which most budget transactions are executed

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

TSA Benefits 

 

Ensures complete, real-time information on government cash resources Helps preparation of accurate and reliable cash flow forecasts Optimizes the cost of government operations 

 

 

including minimizing the volume and cost of government borrowing and lowering liquidity reserve needs

Facilitates efficient payment mechanisms Improves operational and appropriation control during budget execution Enhances efficiency and timeliness of bank reconciliation Facilitates timely and more complete accounting statements/reports 

E.g. preparation of full statements of sources and uses of cash

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

3. TSA Structure and Operation

TSA Structure – Option 1 State Treasury Head Office

Recon c.

Central Bank Settleme nt

State Treasury Regional office State Treasury Local office May 2010

Payment order

Central Bank Regional branch

Limited Treasury communicatio n and information systems

Settleme nt

Budget unit Payment order

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

TSA Structure – Option 2 State Treasury Head Office

State Treasury Regional office State Treasury Local office May 2010

Recon c.

Central Bank

Settlemen t

(2a)

Advanced Treasury communicatio n and information systems

Budget unit Payment order

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

TSA Structure – Option 3 State Treasury Head Office

Reconc.

Commercial Bank Head Office

Central Bank Settlement

Very Reliable and Advanced Commercial Bank Sector

Commercial Bank Regional Branch Payment Order

Budget Unit May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Requirements for an efficient TSA  







Co-operation of the line ministries Development of an Interbank settlement/clearing system Real Time Gross Settlement System (RTGS) at the central bank for high value transactions Major commercial banks and treasury connected to the RTGS Development of a small payments clearing system

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Different Models for transactional banking under TSA 







Use commercial bank branch networks to channel funds to/from regional treasury offices to the TSA at central bank (CB) Use regional branches of the CB where a reliable commercial branch network is not available Regional treasury offices act as banks (only recommended where the commercial banking sector is regarded as too unstable) Use commercial banks branch network to clear funds directly between TSA and taxpayers/suppliers

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

TSA using Commercial Banking system network and RTOs TSA at CB

Bank A

Bank B

Branch 1

Branch 2

Branch 1

Branch 2

RTO and BIs

RTO and BIs

RTO and BIs

RTO and BIs

Taxpayer/supplier

May 2010

Taxpayer/supplier

Taxpayer/supplier

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Use of regional CB offices TSA at CB

Regional CB office

Regional CB Office

Bank Branch 1

Bank Branch 2

Bank Branch 3

Bank Branch 4

RTO and BIs

RTO and BIs

RTO and BIs

RTO and BIs

Taxpayer/supplier

May 2010

Taxpayer/supplier

Taxpayer/supplier

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

TSA using Commercial Banking network (no RTOs) Treasury and BIs

TSA at CB

Bank A

Bank B

Branch 1

Branch 2

Branch 1

Branch 2

Taxpayer/supplier

Taxpayer/supplier

Taxpayer/supplier

Taxpayer/supplier

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Management of Receipts 

Collection through commercial banks 

 

Impose penalties on late remittances Framework agreements between Ministry of Finance (MoF)/Treasury and agency banks   



Alternatively through treasury system

Standardized services and transparent fees Penalties for delays and under-performance Monitoring

Detailed information available to MoF and agencies

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Management of Payments   

    

Agencies submit payment requests Covered from TSA after control and verification Clarify roles and responsibilities between ministries, agencies, banks, central bank and MoF Maximize use of direct bank transfers Use checks, credit and debit cards when efficient Minimize imprest accounts and cash payments Ensure that payments are made on due date Eliminate layered cash flows

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Management of Balances 



  

Define separate pools of funds within TSA system, for instance:  Liquidity  Deposit  Investment Differentiation based on liquidity needs, level of uncertainty, costs of alternative sources, etc Select instruments that match expected cash needs Integrated management of assets and liabilities Transparent and efficient pricing of assets, liabilities and services

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

4. TSA Coverage and Interface with Transaction Processing Systems

TSA Coverage 

Only central government   



Central and sub-national governments 



Should include extrabudgetary funds, if any Could include autonomous government entities Could be extended to social-security funds and other trust funds Either under a single TSA or separate TSAs

Public corporations are generally not included

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Bringing social security and other trust funds under TSA 



Each Trust Fund could be distinctly identified and controlled through the Treasury Ledger and/or TSA sub-account The key issues are: 



Whether Government has the legal right to use, even temporarily, the surplus cash available The risk of perverse incentive to use the cash reserves of these funds to finance budget deficits 

May 2010

This risk is quite high in low-income countries, particularly those with underdeveloped PFM systems

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

One TSA for both central and sub-national governments 



Could be done through the use of correspondent accounts The key issues are: 

Has the advantage of consolidating the surpluses and deficits of all correspondent governments participating in the TSA system 







May 2010

Minimizes the cost of general government borrowing

Requires well-developed Treasury Ledger System to monitor the balances of each correspondent Need to consider the risk of abuse by the central government to finance its deficits at the cost of subnational governments Need for safeguards to ensure timely availability of funds to each correspondent government

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

TSA interface with transaction processing and accounting systems 

TSA with centralized payment and accounting controls 

 



Payment requests are prepared by individual budget agencies and sent to a centralized Treasury for payment Treasury manages the float of outstanding invoices Might lead to inefficiencies and high transaction costs (particularly with manual processing)

TSA with deconcentrated payment and accounting controls 



Individual budget agencies process and make payments directly to suppliers (and account for these transactions) MoF sets the cash disbursement limits (monthly or quarterly)

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

5. Banking Arrangement for Donor Flows

Covering donor funds within TSA 

What are donor concerns? 







Assurance for use of donor aid on specific projects (or non-diversion of funds) Some ring-fencing to avoid liquidity problems (and ensure timely payments during project execution) Minimize exposure to exchange related fluctuations/losses in the value of donor aid (when currency exchange rate regime is volatile) Reliability of controls (in managing donors’ funds) and information produced by the national PFM systems

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Banking arrangement for donors’ funds – possible options 

Converting donors’ funds into local currency on transfer to the TSA (best option)  The use of the resource-source arrangement would still allow donor funds to be linked to specific projects  This, being a single-currency TSA, has technical and transparency benefits



Opening separate foreign currency sub-accounts within the TSA  There could be one account for each foreign currency, or one for each of the main donor currencies  The government’s accounts would still be reported in local currency, with foreign currency converted at the relevant exchange rate

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Banking arrangement for donors’ funds – possible options Maintaining foreign currency accounts outside the TSA, but bringing the flows within the accounting regime





May 2010

Weakens the concept of the TSA, and requires additional administrative processes, but at least has the benefit of tracking transactions through the accounting system

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

6. Issues/Preconditions for Establishing a TSA

Some country-specific issues for design of a TSA 

Associate a resource source (e.g. resource from a donor) with specific expenditure categories  Could be done through sub-accounts of a TSA



Need for transit accounts  e.g. for major revenue streams to monitor their collection and remittance or to facilitate revenue sharing



Technical feasibility of daily settlement between the zero-balance accounts of budget agencies and the TSA

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Some country-specific issues for design of a TSA – contd. 

Appropriate interface between the TSA and transaction processing/accounting systems  This issue should be carefully examined at the conceptual design stage in case of an IFMIS



Identification of non-bank transactions (after closure of agency-specific bank accounts)



Elimination of below-the-line transactions



Strategy for obtaining retail banking services from commercial banks, including use of e-payment/EFT options

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Preconditions for establishing a TSA 

Political support is essential (such as for closure of agency a/cs)



Legal and regulatory requirements  TSA should be legally recognized  Authority to open bank accounts should vest with the MoF/Treasury



Technological requirements  Reach of the banking network and reporting architecture  Transaction clearing and inter-bank settlement systems

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

Preconditions for establishing a TSA – contd. 

Formalization of agreements between the Treasury, TSA Bank and Banks providing retail banking services  Should cover services offered by the banking system, service charges/fees, penalties for nonperformance, reporting and reconciliation arrangements, etc.



Revisiting the chart of accounts for coverage of non-bank expenditure transactions



Capacity development of TSA users

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

May 2010

Sailendra Pattanayak, IMF

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF