RNP Simulation Procedure&Simulation Result Summary for WC&EC0315
Short Description
RNP simulation...
Description
RNP Processes & Simulation Summary for Northern Part of UAE
15th March 2004
Contents
RNP Methodolody RNP Procedure RNP Parameter Setting RNP Results Summary
Contents
RNP Methodolody RNP Procedure RNP Parameter Setting RNP Results Summary
Objectives of Radio Network Planning
RNP achieves balance among:
Capacity: to support the predicted subscriber traffic with sufficiently low blocking and delay
Coverage: to ensure the availability of the service in the entire service area
Quality: tinking the capacity and the coverage and still provide the required Gos/QoS Costs: to enable an economical network implementation and a controlled network expansion during the life cycle of the network
What is New in WCDMA
Multiservice environment ―
Bit rates from 8 kbits/s to 2 Mbit/s and variable rate
―
Quality classes • Different QoS requirements
―
Asymmetrical up and downlink traffic
Air Interface ― ― ―
Capacity and coverage coupled via interference margin Neighbor cells coupled via interference Receiver performance depends on • bit rate • environment
―
Soft handover
What Is New in the RNP of WCDMA WCDMA system is interference-limited. Capacity vs. Coverage • Increasing system loading offers more capacity while increasing intra-cell interference and thus reduce coverage range (Application: Cell breathing)
Dependency among Capacity, Coverage and Quality of WCDMA System
Capacity vs. Quality • System capacity can be achieved by relaxing quality requirement for some connections (Application: Reduce BLER target value by outer-loop power control)
Coverage vs. Quality • Coverage range can be expanded by relaxing quality requirement for some connections (Application: Slow down data speed by AMRC or DCCC to accommodate large path loss)
Capacity
Interference Quality
Coverage
Planning Methodologies There are basically two possible types of 3rd Generation
planning methods ―
Static Calculation • A deterministic algorithm is used to analyse the performance of the network configured within the planning tool • Repeating an analysis gives the same result
―
Simulation • Statistical processes and an iterative system status calculation used to analyse the performance of the network configured within the planning tool • Repeating an analysis may give different results
Some tools use a combination of methods or hybrid
methods
Static Calculation A statistical analysis of the network is used to derive design
thresholds In UMTS the following mechanisms must be accounted for:
Soft handover gain (typically ~5dB at the cell edge)
Interference Margins (both intra cell and inter cell)
Control and signalling overheads
Fading Margins (to achieve a given coverage probability)
Special technique margins(Adaptive antenna, Transmit diversity, Mult User Detection…)
Simulation Simulation proved to be essential in
developing and deploying 3G Systems ―
Link Level Simulation • For physical layer algorithm development and performance evaluation • Its output for hardware&ASIC implementation and for higher level simulations • Tools: COSSAP, SPW
―
―
System Level Simulation • For RRM algorithm development and RAN System performance evaluation • Its output for RRM Algorithm implementation and higher level simulation • Tools: OpeNet Network Level Simulation • For network volume prediction and network perfromance evaluation • analyse the performance of a ‘snapshot’ of the network • Tools: Enterprise, Atoll
Simulation There
are two types of simulations
Dynamic ―
―
Simulate UEs moving through the network in successive timeslots Link level & System level simulations belong to dynamic simulation
Static ― ―
―
Simulations
Simulations
Analyse the performance of a ‘snapshot’ of the network network A snapshot is an instance in time, with UEs in in statistically determined places Network level simulations
Static Simulations One or more snapshots of the network are taken In each snapshot a mobile or terminal list is generated Various failure mechanisms are typically considered
maximum mobile power
maximum Node B power reached
no available channels
low pilot Ec/Io
uplink/downlink interference
The performance of the network is then analysed from
the results of the snapshots carried out
Monte Carlo Simulations
Monte Carlo Simulation is a simulation Method in Noisy Environment.
It relies upon a large number of statistically independent snapshots
The mean performance of the network over these snapshots is then determined
The number of snapshots needed depends on the performance to be simulated, the smaller the probability, the more snapshots needed
Overview of Monte Carlo Simulation
Overview of Snapshot
Monte Carlo Simulation
1 iteration
500 iteration
10 iteration
100 iteration
1000 iteration
10000 iteration
Dynamic Simulations Dynamic simulations look at mobiles moving through the
network A mobile list is generated and solved for the first timeslot The simulation may consider time to be split into:
Sample, chip periods: Link level simulation
bit periods: used for particular algorithm development (Coding, Decoding)
timeslots (SNR considered): System level simulation
Successive timeslots are then simulated dependant upon
the results of the previous timeslot
Comparison of methods
Static Analysis
Accuracy
Complexity
Time Taken
Static Simulation
Not very – particularly Reasonable – but with global margins doesn’t deal with the (IS-95 experience) dynamic network performance Relatively More difficult to straightforward to use configure and more once configured complicated results. Shortest – as ‘quick’ as for GSM
Dynamic Simulation Probably quite high assuming no bad assumptions are made to speed it up Difficult to judge results.
Moderate – Extremely long if depending on number multiple runs of terminals and cells performed for statistical validity
Contents
RNP Methodology RNP Procedure RNP Parameter Setting RNP Results Summary
Radio Network Planning Flowchart Preparation Phase
Network Dimensioning
Nominal Planning
RF Engineering
Detailed Planning
Site Construction
•Link Budget •Capacity Analysis
•Simulation •RNP Tools
Preparation Phase In the preparation phase, prerequisites of
network planning are defined: ―
Coverage & capacity objectives
―
Selection of network planning strategies • What Strategies
―
Initial design and operation parameters • Geographical information • Forecast of service distribution & traffic density • GoS/QoS requirements • Cell Parameters
Network Dimensioning Network dimensioning is carried out in the beginning of a
project. It results in: ―
― ―
First and most rapid evaluation of the network elements count and capacity of these elements. Offered traffic estimation. Joint capacity-coverage estimation.
Activities ― ― ―
―
Link budget and coverage analysis Capacity estimation Estimation of the BS hardware and sites, RNCs and equipment at different interfaces. Estimation of Iur, Iub, Iu transmission capacities. Cell size estimation
Network Dimensioning Input System Constrains ― ―
Spectrum available Target Area to coverage
Output Scale of network ―
Site configuration
Traffic ― ― ― ―
Traffic type Traffic model Traffic distribution Forecast of growth
GoS & QoS ― ― ―
Coverage probability Blocking rate Delay & Delay Variance
Number of sites
―
Sectorisation
―
Carrier number
Cost ―
Cost of Node B & RNC equipment
Assumptions for Network Dimensioning
The planning area is covered with a hexagonal grid for each morphology.
For roads, there is no hexagonal grid, takes into account cells face to face. Usually the length of the roads is divided by twice the cell range to find the required number of cells.
The cell range is defined for each morphology or for the roads by the link budget of the limiting service in this morphology
The different morphologies generally considered are dense urban, urban, suburban and rural.
No tuned propagation model available in this phase, the standard propagation model of COST231-Hata is generally used.
The sites are not positioned, only a global number of sites is given.
Network Dimensioning-Coverage&Capacity Est. Simple coverage estimation ―
Link budgets are used to calculate maximal path losses.
―
Path loss is converted into cell range for different environments.
―
Cell ranges are used to estimate typical site coverage areas.
―
Estimate the average site coverage area for each environment.
Simple capacity estimation ―
Given an estimate of the traffic profile per subscriber we can calculate the offered traffic per km 2 in each type of environment
―
Given the capacity of a cell we can estimate the average sites in each type of environment
Network Dimensioning Tools aided dimensioning
Dimensioning for UMTS The coverage and capacity relationship in UMTS is very
close Typically spreadsheet dimensioning tools for UMTS take a
combined iterative approach:
The range of a cell is calculated from a link budget containing an interference margin The area covered by one cell is then calculated from the range The traffic is then calculated from the area and subscriber density The loading of the cell is then calculated from the captured traffic And then the link budget is recalculated from the new loading
The loop is repeated until convergence is reached
Network Dimensioning Service-specific Information Service Type, Proportion Service Density Service Forecast
Propagation Model COST231-HATA, COST231-HATA,.. ....
Geographical information DU km2 2 ??km^2 UDU km 2 km^2 U km ?? SU 2 SU km ??km^2 RA RA km ??km^2 HW
HW ??km
UL cell range with specific UL loading
DL Loading 覆覆覆覆覆覆覆覆 in specific 下行负负 circumstances
Cell Range
Number of Site
Shrink the Cell N Adjust UL loading Downwards
Add the amount of configuration (sectorization, carriers,...)
If the upper limit of configuration be reached
Y
Larger than (Capacity-limited) Less than (Coverage-limited)
Cell Range
Cell Loading vs. Equal to Maximum Allowable Value SiteConfiguration
Nominal Planning A nominal plan is initially a hypothetical wireless network
and a starting point for the cell rollout process. Information of theoretical
sites is presented in the nominal plan, including following specifications: ―
Site coordinates
―
Antenna height above ground: this specification requires the knowledge of the average clutter height in each morphology
―
Antenna azimuths and tilts
Nominal Planning Site location and cell configurations like azimuth and tilt of
antenna are adjusted to fulfill the requirements on coverage.
Nominal Planning Constraints on nominal planning: ―
Performance objectives • The definition of the target zones – Residential zones – Business zones – Mix business/residential zones – Busy roads, avenues, highways – Harbor, Airport, other zones with high traffic – Etc…
• For each target zone – Priority & schedule for deployment – Expected traffic and service distribution – Type of coverage per zone: outdoor, in car, indoor window, deep indoor, etc… – Type of service per zone: voice, 64 UDD U/L and D/L, etc… – QoS
Nominal Planning
―
Antenna Height, which is needed in the dimensioning phase and must be refined for the pre-engineering
Note that the antenna height above ground are only given as example. They depend on the morphology and link budget.
RF Engineering
For each theoretical site, a physical site will be acquired in
this phase through following steps: Define search areas Identify site options Site selection Site acquisition
Probably best to use:
Static analysis for initial candidate shortlisting Static Simulation over a small area for final candidate selection Static Simulation over a large area for final validation
RF Engineering: Define search areas ― ― ―
―
The sites in a nominal plan are only imaginary. To become a real network, physical sites are required. A suitable physical site must be found for each nominal site. A suitable physical site must amongst other things :
Give adequate radio coverage. Have connectivity into the transmission network. Be aesthetically and politically acceptable to the local community. Have power nearby, good access and a co-operative owner. ―
A survey of each nominal site is normally carried out to identify possible site options which meet the above criteria.
RF Engineering-Define search areas
―
Guidelines have to be given to the surveyor so the options give appropriate radio coverage.
―
The guideline is given in the form of a search area. Could be: • Radius from the nominal site. • One or more polygons following height contours.
Or
RF Engineering: Site selection ―
Radio coverage and interference ranking • Static analysis by the help of RF tool or relevant function in RNP tools
―
A3rd
Deployment ranking • Site sharing
D1st
• Room for equipment • Power supply transmission line • Etc …
―
Nominate a preferred option and possibly a backup option.
&
C2nd
B - Unsuitable
RF Engineering: Site acquisition
― ― ― ― ― ―
Run more than one site simultaneously. Negotiate with site owners. Prepare drawings. Draw up leases. Apply for planning permissions. As soon as one option is ready to proceed • Sign the lease • Abandon the alternative • Enter site into building program.
Detailed Planning
By approaching a practical operation environment for radio network, more accuracy is achieved in the simulation in this phase.
The process of detailed planning involves repeated static analysis, static simulations by simulators based on: ― ― ― ― ― ― ―
Digital map Tuned propagation model Site coordinates and parameters Node B parameters Cell parameters Service & traffic distribution Call admission and radio resource management algorithms
Detailed Planning The simulator consists of three basic parts:
Detailed Planning
Contents
RNP Methodology RNP Procedure RNP Parameter Setting RNP Results Summary
Parameter Classification
Quite a lot of parameters need to be set during simulation
Classified into three types
Traffic&Service Parameters
Equipment (BS, UE) Parameters
Propagation Environment Parameters
Traffic&Service Parameters Specified by Etisalat Radio Access Bearers Supported ―
UL(kbps): CS12.2, CS64, PS64
―
DL(kbps): CS12.2, CS64, PS64, PS128, PS384
Composite service supported(UL,kbps/DL,kbps) ―
CS(kbps):12.2/12.2k, 64/64
―
PS(kbps):64/64, 64/128, 64/384
Each subscriber support all the service
Required Service Throughput Service
Traffic/User (DL)
Traffic/User (UL)
Voice 12.2
0.0500
0.0500
CS64
0.0055
0.0055
PS64/64
70KB/H
30KB/H
PS64/128
140KB/H
60KB/H
PS64/384
280KB/H
90KB/H
Activity factor Assumed : 0.67 for Speech and 1 for CS 64kbps
Traffic Related Parameters Parameter
DL Erlang(Erl)
Gos
Best Effort
Retransmission ratio
1%(5% suggested)
Service Peak to Average Factor
1.4
Activity Factor
0.7
Relation between throughput and Traffic: ErlangPerS ubscriber =
Thouthput * 8 * (1 + RetransmissionRate) * TrafficPeaktoAverageratio 3600 * TransmissionRateofService * ActivityFacgtor
Traffic per Subscriber
Service
Activity Factor
UL Erlang(Erl)
DL Erlang(Erl)
Voice
0.67
0.0500
0.0500
CS64
1
0.0055
0.0055
PS64/64
0.7
0.0021
0.0049
PS64/128
0.7
0.0042
0.0049
PS64/384
0.7
0.0063
0.0033
Traffic Density Number of subscribers ―
―
Total Number of Subscribers accommodated in network is decided by number of sites, propagation condition, and QOS requirements Active Subscribers determined by total Number of Subscribers and the traffic of each subscriber
Subscriber distribution ―
―
Subscribers distributed into polygons based on number of sites; Distribution in one polygon dependent on clutter types
Traffic Density In WCDMA, AMRC (Adaptive multi-Rate Control)
for voice and DCCC( Dynamic Channel Configuration Control) for packet service make traffic modeling even more complex ―
In the simulation, AMRC and DCCC not considered
Activity factor ―
While the subscriber is inactive during a call, less power is required and less interference is caused. That is, the subscriber release some of resource.
Traffic Density :Total Number of Subscribers
City
Number of Sites
Total Number of Subscribers
Sharjah&Ajman
27
22000
UMM
2
2320
Ras al Khammah
7
7700
Al Fujeirah
5
5800
Traffic Density (Number of Active Subscribers) City
Voice
CS 64
PS64/64
PS128/64 PS384/64
Shj&Ajm
1100
120
108
108
72
UMM
116
13
11
11
8
Ras al Khammah
385
42
38
38
25
Fujeirah
290
32
28
28
19
Number of Active subscribers derived from total number of subscribers and the traffic of each one, and is finally used in simulation
Traffic User Density among Clutters %in Building
Weight
Normalized weight
Blockbuildings
90
150
22.22
Openinurban
80
120
17.78
Residential
90
100
14.81
Denseurban
80
100
14.81
Meanurban
70
100
14.81
Industrial
80
50
7.41
Village
70
10
1.48
Rural
70
10
1.48
Parks
0
10
1.48
Open
0
10
1.48
Sea
0
5
0.74
Inlandwater
0
5
0.74
Forest
0
5
0.74
Clutter type
BS&UE Parameters UE Parameters related to performance are needed in
simulation UE is supposed to support all types of service predefined BS parameters related performance are needeed in
simulation BS hardware resources are considered in terms of channel
elements System configuration will affect the performance, such as
diversity, Sectorisation, Power Control Mode. Beside hardware resource, all parameters related to link loss budget in given capacity situations.
UE Parameters Voice
Other Services
Max Mobile Power (dBm)
21
24
TX Dynamic Range (dB)
70
70
Required Pilot Ec/Io (dB)
-15
-13
Power Ctl. Step Size (dB)
1
1
Antenna Gain (dBi)
0
0
Body Loss (dB)
3
0
Noise Figure (dB)
7
7
Terminal
According to 3GPP TS 25.101, four classes of output power are
specified for UE: 21dBm; 24dBm; 27dBm; 33dBm Required Pilot Ec/Io is different among bearers
BS Hardware Resource Max Number of Primary Channels
384 for three sectors
Number of Channel Elements
307 for three sectors
Max Number of Handover Channel Elements Max Power per User (dBm)
77 for three sectors 33 for voice and 36 for other service
NodeB in 3-sector configuration is applied in simulation
Cell Parameters UTMS CELL Parameters
Noise Rise Limit (dB)
6
Orthogonality factor
0.55
Pilot Power (dBm)
33
Max TX Power (dBm)
43
Pri Cmn Channel Power (dBm)
31
Sec Cmn Channel Power (dBm)
31
Pri Sync Channel Power (dBm)
28
Sec Sync Channel Power (dBm)
28
Soft Handover Window (dB)
5
Noise Figure
3
Active set size
3
Demodulation Performance
Bearers
Qos(BLER)
UL Eb/No
DL Eb/No
CS12.2k
1%
2.85
7.16
CS 64k
0.2%
1.2
4.36
PS 64k
5%
0.84
4.08
PS 128k
5%
0.14
3.48
PS 384k
5%
0.02
4.3
Antenna Parameters Sectorization: 3-sector configuration Four types of antenna used in northern part Antenna
Gain (dB)
Horizontal Beam Width
Vertical Beam Width
GB 5162100
16
66.5
5.5
GB 5165100
17
64.5
6.5
TG D3
16.8
65.5
5
MG D3
15.8
61
5.5
Diversity Diversity mode ―
Uplink receive diversity used in simulation • two-antenna Diversity • Rake Receiver & maximum Ratio Combining • Macro Diversity
―
Downlink receive diversity used in simulation • Rake Receiver & maximum Ratio Combining • Macro Diversity
―
Transmit diversity: not used in simulation • TSTD (Time Switched Transmit Diversity) • STTD (Space time Transmit Diversity) • Closedloop transmit diversity
TMA&Cable Tower mounted amplifier (TMA) not used in simulation ―
―
―
TMA can compensate for cable loss in uplink, thus improve uplink coverage TMA causes attenuation to Downlink transmit Power, thus decrease downlink coverage and capacity. Nominal Insertion loss is 0.5dB, connector loss is 0.2dB; Nominal gain is 12dB.
Cable ―
7/8 inch type is assumed in simulation
―
Nominal loss : 6dB/100meters
―
Length: Site height+5meters
TMA only suitable to uplink coverage limited situation
Propagation: Morphology Information ―
Generally, there are 5 types of planning area: • • • • •
―
Dense Urban Urban Suburban Rural Area Highway
The type of area impacts: • Mean penetration loss • Standard deviation of slow fading • path loss
―
Propagation properties should be modeled for simulation, or the typical models can be used.
Channel model ―
―
The channel model defines the number of signal path, relative path losses and delay variances to abstract the wireless channel. According to specifications of 3GPP R4 TR25.943 V4.0.0, typical channel models are used as followings: • • • • • • •
Static: no multipath (line-of-sight) TU3: typical urban area, pedestrian, 3km/h TU50: typical urban area, vehicle, 50km/h TU120: typical urban area, vehicle, 120km/h RA120: rural area, vehicle, 120km/h RA250: rural area, vehicle, 250km/h HT120: hilly terrain, vehicle, 120km/h
Channel model (Ctn.) ―
Values of parameters varies with the channel in the wireless environment. The variances are acquired generally by the link simulation. Link performance: required Eb/No in both ends
of the channel Downlink interference margin: due to the variance of orthogonal factor in different channel environments Fast fading margin (Power control headroom): due to different link performance Soft handover gain over fast fading margin: due to different link performance
Scenario of Link Budget
PL_DL
Soft Handover Area
Antenna
Cable
• Interference Margin • Fast Fading Margin • Margin for Background Noise
Duplexer
PL_UL • SHO Gain
• Slow Fading Margin
• Penetration Loss
TX RX Node B
Antenna
Duplexer TX RX UE
• Body Loss • Interference Margin • Fast Fading Margin • Margin for Background Noise
负 Receiver Sensitivity 负 PDCH_Max 负 Minimum Required Signal Strength 负 EiRP 负 PUE_Max
Propagation Model :COST231-Hata Lu (d ) = 46.3 + 33.9 * log( f ) − 13.82 log( H b ) − a ( H m ) +
[ 44.9 − 6.55 * log( H b )] * log(d ) + C m
a( H m ) = [1.1* log( f ) − 0.7]] * H m − [1.56 * log( f ) − 0.8] C m
C m
=
=
3
For metropolitan centers
0
For Medium sized city and suburban centers with moderate tree density
Frequency f Base Station Height Hb Mobile Height Hm Distance d
1500-2000MHz 30-200m 1-10m 1-20km
COST231-Hata model applied to large and small cells in urban areas
Propagation Model: Asset Standard Macro Model
Lp ( d ) = K 1 +
K 2 * log(d )
+
K 3 * H ms
+
K 4 * log( H ms )
+
K 5 * log( H eff )
+
K 6 * log( H eff ) * log(d )
+
K 7 * Ldiff
+
Lclutter
Asset Standard Macro Model is the general type of COST-231-Hata for calibration
Carrier Wave (CW) Measurements
CW measurements are accurate
radio measurements used to calibrate propagation models. A number of temporary test sites
are used for the test transmissions. Signal strength measurements
and GPS fixes are made along predefined routes. These measurements must be
averaged before they can be used for model calibration.
GPS
CW Test Sites A typical network would require 4 different propagation models
eg. ― ― ― ―
Dense Urban Urban Suburban Rural
The test sites used for propagation modeling should: ― Be representative of typical cellular sites. ― Should be free of obstacles. Sufficient measurements must be made in each clutter type for
the model to be valid. Typically the distances driven for each site would be in the order of ― ―
80km per urban test site. 160km per rural test site.
CW Measurement
Carrier wave measurements are
made from test transmitters. The measurements are plotted
vs. log(distance). A straight line is fitted through
the data. A basic y=mx +c formula can be
used to estimate path loss. The formula can be modified to
account for other factors eg. Tx height, Rx height & terrain effects.
Plot of measurements vs. log(distance)
Referent Model: Cost231-Hata at 2GHz Model
K1
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
K7
Dense Urban
165.55
44.90
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Urban
162.55
44.90
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Suburban
150.28
44.90
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Rural(Qu asi-open)
135.04
44.90
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Rural (open)
130.04
44.90
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Correction factors given in Okumura-Hata Model are used for Suburban and Rural
Contents
RNP Methodology RNP Procedure RNP Parameter Setting RNP Results Summary
Coverage & Capacity Objectives Coverage Area: Totally 254.16 Sq. Km. 2 sites in
East Coast not considered 覆
Sharjah
Ajman
UMM
Ras Khammah
Fujeirah
Number of sites Dense Urban Urban Total (sq.km.) Coverage Reliability: Area Coverage Probability no less than
95% for voice service
Coverage & Capacity Objectives (ctn) Traffic density: Active Users for each
Service determined by number of sites
City
Voice
CS 64
PS64/64
PS128/6 4
PS384/6 4
Shj&Ajm
1100
120
108
108
72
UMM
116
13
11
11
8
Ras al Khammah
385
42
38
38
25
Fujeirah
290
32
28
28
19
Examples of User Distribution
Propagation Model: Tuned Results K1
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
K7
Dense Urban(Shj)
151.8 4
59.90
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Dense Urban(Ajm )
148.8 4
59.90
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Urban
139.7 4
53.11
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Suburban
132.9 1
53.64
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Rural
126.0 0
48.75
-2.93
0
-13.82
-6.55
0
Model
144.3
54.92 -2.93 0 -13.82 -6.55 0 Korfukan 1 Model for Korfukan is inaccurate due to out-of-date digital
map
Propagation Model: Comparson Model
Tuned
Cost 231-Hata
K1
K2
K3
K4
Dense Urban
151.8 4
59.90
165.55
44.90
Urban
139.7 4
53.11
162.55
44.90
Suburban
132.9 1
53.64
150.28
44.90
Rural
126.0 0
48.75
130.04
44.90
Constant values of K1 are less than that of standard model,
caused mainly by Clutter definations Slope values of K2 are larger than that of standard model. Similar conclusions in other districts.
Clutter Offset
Clutter Type
Offset (dB)
Open
0
Sea
-1
Inlandwater
-1
meanUrban
0
Forest
15
BlockBuilding
7
rural
-0.9
Composite Simulation Results Coverage Probability
CS 12/ 12kbps
CS 64/ 64kbps
PS 64/ 64kbps
PS 64/ 128kbps
PS 64/ 384kbps
Shj&Ajm
92.59%
87.35%
82.4%
67.83%
36.53%
UMM
95.24%
92.05%
85.30%
66.36%
34.72%
Ras al Khammah
95.68%
88.98%
83.28%
67.36%
38.51%
Fujeirah
93.93%
88.63%
76.82%
65.29%
30.99%
Simulation Results-12.2k Coverage Probability
Simulation Result Analysis Coverage Probability near target value of
95% for 12.2K Service. UMM contains 2 sites, less interference to
each other, hence get good performance. Put less users per site in Ras al Khammah
than in UMM, performance is acceptable. Due to propagation condition, network in
Shj&Ajm accommodates less users per site.
Engineering Parameter Optimization Azimuth and tilt are key parameters to determine the
intercell interference, coverage, and hence capacity The optimal Tilts related to Ant. Height and cell radius. The optimization of azimuths and Tilts: Best Pilot Strength
in Serving area; In suburban, rural and the boundary of network, coverage
capability needs to be considered. Optimization of azimuth needs to consider Operator's
experience and knowledge: traffic distribution and near- by obstacles
Please refer simulation documents for detailed adjustments
Simulation Results after Adjustment
Coverage Probability
Shj&Ajm
CS 12/ 12kbps 95.59%
CS 64/ 64kbps
PS 64/ 64kbps
PS 64/ 128kbps
PS 64/ 384kbps
91.69%
88.61%
76.42%
44.89%
UMM
95.24%
92.05%
85.30%
66.36%
34.72%
Ras al Khammah
95.68%
88.98%
83.28%
67.36%
38.51%
Fujeirah
93.93%
88.63%
76.82%
65.29%
30.99%
Improvement through Adjustment
Coverage Probability
PS 64/ 64kbps
PS 64/ 128kbps
PS 64/ 384kbps
3.00% 4.34%
6.21%
8.59%
8.36%
UMM
2.16%
5.14%
9.76%
16.93%
11.47%
Ras al Khammah
2.17%
0.32%
2.57%
6.55%
5.78%
Shj&Ajm
Fujeirah
CS 12/ 12kbps
CS 64/ 64kbps
1.97% 0.97%
7.23% 11.24%
10.59%
Further Considering Downtilts affect coverage, capacity, handover region and
pilot pollution, so downtilt adjustments are strongly recommended. Polygon definition affects azimuth adjustment. Coverage
should be considered in initial stage. The suggestion can only be taken as a reference. Sites with big antenna height are expected to adjust with
priority. Omni-sites need to be replaced in time, because they
severely interfere neighbors. The engineering parameters are expected to keep up-to-
date during adjustment
RNP simulation can only model the real network to some accuracy, detail suggestions will be available after first round radio network optimization
View more...
Comments