Hazid Worksheets Including Risk Calculations And Definitions
2
ChevronTexaco Reuire!ents
R"#I"W A$D A%%RA' Rev
A 0
D"(CRI%TI&$
A)TH&R
R"#I"W
Issue to Client for Re5ie6
)# Dean
( /ilare
Issue for "se
)# Dean
( /ilare 7 8 (pener
'os Consulting :Aust; Pt< +t
A%%RA'
DAT"
1- April 2004 & De+aughter
1. April 2004
Veritas DGC Risk Assessment for Offshore Refuelling Veritas Viking II
April 2004 Page $ of 9
1 INTRODUTION A ha=ar ientifiation an risk anal $ Or (treet> 8est Perth on 14 th April 2004# !he Veritas Viking II is operating in the Io7&ans= permit areas 8A?1?R> 8A?2.?P> in a sur5e< area entrall< loate appro@imatel< 2-0kms 88 :Dampier; 7 420kms 8est :Port *ealan;# !here are no kno6n ostrutions or fishing ati5ities 6hih oul interfere 6ith refuelling operations# !he isussion ontaine in this report sets out the risks of offshore refuelling to pro5ie unerstaning an a le5el of omfort 6ith respet to the o5erall risk e@posure#
2 O!"#TIV#$ !he oBeti5es of the stu< are3 •
!o ientif< ha=ars assoiate 6ith refuelling Veritas Viking II at sea
•
!o ensure that risks are As +o6 As Reasonal< Pratiale :A+ARP; an
A ha=ar ientifiation ontaining a risk alulation for eah ientifie ha=ar an
•
A isussion of the risks an risk mitigation strategies to reue risks to alarp#
A fault tree 6as e5elope to ai in unerstaning of the relati5e risks of offshore 5s port refuelling# !he risk anal ie# •
ientif< operations an ati5ities
•
rainstorm E6hat ifsF
•
etermine auses> onseuenes an safeguars 6hih are alrea< in plae an
•
to e5elop risk reution measures to aress an< efiienies an reue the risks to As +o6 As Reasonal< Pratiale :A+ARP;#
*a=ars 6ere ientifie an risk reution measures e5elope# !hese are isusse in rele5ant setions of this report an inlue in full as Appenies# !he follo6ing people attene the *a=i3 $a!e (te5e )a< (imon De6ing 8all< (pener Dik 8atson &akie De+aughter (ean /ilare
Title Auisition A5isor !ehnial representati5e *(' )anager )arine 'ngineering (uper5isor Vessel (uper5isor 'n5ironmental A5isor to CV
Veritas DGC Risk Assessment for Offshore Refuelling Veritas Viking II
)ike Dean
ailitator
April 2004 Page 4 of 9
:'os Consulting :Aust; Pt< +t;
, R#$U)T$ !he refuelling operation 6as i5ie into the follo6ing ati5ities3 •
'stalishing ommuniations
•
Preparation
•
!ransferring personnel
•
Vessel approah
•
)ooring
•
!ransfer of hoses
•
!ransfer of fuel
•
Reo5er hoses
•
Release 5essel
•
Reo5er personnel
•
Depart
!he ha=ars ientifie an a reako6n of the numer of issues ientifie < 6orkshop partiipants for eah e@posure are sho6n elo6# 8hilst this oes not iniate the se5erit< of an< partiular risk e@posure> it illustrates 6here the partiipants fouse attention on ientifie risks uring the *a=i 6orkshop#
Risk "xposure
Issues identified
Collision
-
Damage to Reputation
$
'ntanglement
.
ailure of ommuniations
$
alls 7 !rips
2
ire
2
Inaeuate ontrol of fuel hoses
1
Inaeuate hose length
1
InBur< to personnel
1
+oss of propulsion 7 steerage
$
)an o5eroar
2
)ooring failure
2
Personnel inBur<
1
Punture hoses
$
(pills
-
!O!A+
40
!he main e@posures are3 •
Damage to reputation
•
'ntanglement
•
ailure of ommuniations
•
+oss of propulsion 7 steerage
•
Punture hoses
'os Consulting :Aust; Pt< +t
Veritas DGC Risk Assessment for Offshore Refuelling Veritas Viking II •
+reakdo,n of Risk "xposure Issues During Hazid Workshop
- RI$. RAN.IN* Risks 6ere ranke using the Veritas DGC Risk (ore Calulator# Risks for eah of the rele5ant ha=ar items 6as either lo6 risk or meium risk# !he highest risks are assoiate 6ith loss of propulsion an7or steerage of the unkering 5essel an entanglement of the unkering 5essel in to6e euipment# o high risks 6ere alulate# Calulate risk sores are inlue in the 6orksheets in Appeni@ 1#
/ RI$. R#DUTION '#A$UR#$ Risk reution measures 6ere e5elope to reue the ientifie risks to A+ARP# Risk reution measures fall into t6o ategories3 •
•
Ph training> oaring on lee sie of 5essel> )OPO (uitale sea state> 6eather onitions> 6in> ourse7 heaing for entire operation !iming> oorination> proper release of 5essel> aeuate propulsion> steering an propulsion to e full< teste an operational> ommuniations an Vane rope to e seure> taking into aount 6eather onitions an e@periene of re6# At isretion of )aster %unkering Vessel (peifiations3 •
Vessel to ha5e minimum 2000hp t6in sre6s an o6 thruster
•
Vessel fuel argo apait< to e minimum $00 m$ total
•
%oth 5essels must ha5e failities to eplo< the ,okohama feners
•
Deiate manning le5els on 5essel to e aeuate to ensure permanent monitoring of unkering operation :at )asterHs isretion;
'os Consulting :Aust; Pt< +t
Veritas DGC Risk Assessment for Offshore Refuelling Veritas Viking II •
•
•
April 2004 Page of 9
Vessel to ha5e appropriate raio ommuniations Cre6 to e e@periene 6ith fuel transfers :inluing mooring alongsie mo5ing 5essel; at sea *eight of unkering 5essel to e suitale to moor alongsie :to a5oi fouling 5ane 6ire;
3 DI$U$$ION !he ha=ar ientifiation :*a=i; 6orkshop resulte in a numer of reommenations to mitigate ientifie e@posures to spillage of fuel# It 6oul e e@pete that these issues 6ill e ealt 6ith as a matter of ourse# 'stalishment of ommuniations> preparation an planning for the fuel transfer operation are inlue in proeures an are seen as pre?onitions to the onut of the operation# ailure of an< of these proesses prior to mooring 6ill result in aorting of the operation# 'ntanglement> 5essel ollision> ommuniations> loss of steerage are ealt 6ith through proeures an ensuring that reunant propulsion an steering s from 5essel approah an mooring through fuel transfer an 5essel release# It 6oul e e@pete that this 6oul result in inient free operation#
10INDU$TR+ !#$T &RATI# !he refuelling at sea proeure is a stanar maritime operational proeure> an is suessfull< omplete gloall< 6ithout inient on a ail< asis# !he proeures that ha5e een e5elope prior to an follo6ing the *AID 8orkshop iniate that Veritas 6ill e@ee 6hat is onsiere to e inustr< :maritime; est pratie for this operation#
11ON)U$ION A ha=ar ientifiation an risk assessment has een onute to assess risks assoiate 6ith refuelling the Veritas Viking II at sea# As a result of the ha=ar ientifiation> a range of measures ha5e een ientifie> inluing amenments to proeures an ph to reue the ientifie risks to As +o6 As Reasonal< Pratiale :A+ARP;# !he ha=ar ientifiation an resulting risk reution measures aress eah of the Che5ron!e@ao reuirements for onsieration of a proposal for refuelling the Veritas Viking II at sea#
'os Consulting :Aust; Pt< +t
Veritas DGC Risk Assessment for Offshore Refuelling Veritas Viking II
Veritas DGC Risk Assessment for Offshore Refuelling Veritas Viking II
A%%"$DI- 2
April 2004 Page 9 of 9
CH"#R&$T"-AC& R")IR""$T(
!he follo6ing reuirements ha5e een set out < Che5ron!e@ao 6ith respet to refuelling at sea3 •
!he operation is to ompl< 6ith VeritasJs )OPO as ontaine in the ProBet (peifi *(' Plan> 6ith the aitional onition that no refuelling is allo6e uring the hours of arkness
•
!he 5essel use for the refuelling must e auite an appro5e < CV
•
ener arrangement to e pro5ie for oth 5essels an appro5e < CV
•
!he use of r< reak oupling:s; for the transfer hoses
•
!he transfer hoses must ha5e een reentl< inspete an ertifie
•
Refuelling is onl< to e onute in a position to e appro5e < CV
•
•
•
•
•
A)(A to e a5ise as per )arine Orers .72002 &*A is to e onute prior to the refuelling an is to e appro5e < CV CV personnel to e present uring the operation on the Veritas Viking II> an7or the refuelling 5essel 6ith the authorit< to stop the operation if eeme unsafe Agree proeures et6een CV an Veritas DGC an o other ati5ities suh as transfer of euipment an stores to e onute simultaneousl< 6ith the refuelling#
!he *a=i speifiall< aresse eah of these reuirements#
Thank you for interesting in our services. We are a non-profit group that run this website to share documents. We need your help to maintenance this website.