Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations PDF
November 14, 2022 | Author: Anonymous | Category: N/A
Short Description
Download Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations PDF...
Description
Marine Safety Forum - Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
Qualifying the Risk The matrix used for determining the risk rating for this Stage 1 Risk Assessment has come from the Step Change in Safety Task Risk Assessment Guide (2007). Hazard Severity M ode rat e
N e gligible
Slight
H igh
Ve ry H igh
Negligible injury, no absence absence from w ork
M inor injury injury requiring first aid treatment
Injury leading to a lost time incident
Involving a single death or serious injury
M ultipl ultiple e deaths
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
M
M
L
L
M
M
H
L
M
M
H
H
M
M
H
H
H
Very U nlikely nlikely A freak combination of factors w ould be required for an an incident to result
Unlikely e c n e r r u c c O f o d o o h i l e k i L
A rare combination of factors w ould be required for an an incident to result
Possible Could happen w hen additional factors are present but otherw ise unlikely unlikely to occur
Likely Not certain to happen but an additional factor may result in an accident
Very Likely Almost inevitable inevitable that an incident w ould result result
Risk Rating Criteria To determine the Risk Rating (RR), multiply the Hazard Severity (S) by the Likelihood of Occurrence (L). Low Risk
Identified as L in the matrix. May be acceptable; however, review task to see if risk can be reduced further.
Medium Risk
Task should only proceed with appropriate management authorisation after consultation with specialist personnel and assessment team. Where possible, the risk should be redefined to take account of the hazards involved or the risk should be reduced further prior to task commencement.
High Risk
Page: 1 of: 18
Identified as H in the matrix. Task must not proceed. It should be redefined or further control measures put in place to reduce risk. The controls should be reassessed for adequacy prior to task commencement.
Risk Matrix Applicable to Main Example Stage 1 Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
MSF AIDE MEMOIRE TO STAGE ONE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR PLANNING MOU MOVES The process that is usally followed whe when n planning a MOU relocation is as follows; 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Identify surface location and surrounding infrastructure Identify Rig Develop basic principles and a step by step method statement of how the MOU relocation will be carried out. Hold a high level Risk Assessment and Hazard Identification meeting (Stage 1) Publish and close-out actions arising from above Develop formal MOU-Relocation procedures based on output of Stage 1 Risk Assessment Publish and circulate MOU-Relocation for review toand all st stake-holders ake-holders Hold pre-MOU-Relocation-meeting pre-MOU-Relocation-me eting as aprocedures final Risk Assessment document check Amend and agree final procedures and issue for operations Hold Stage 2 Risk Assessment offshore to review the procedures and Stage 1 Risk Assessment and apply loca locall MOU and/or situation specific peculiarities Hold documented Job Safe Analyses (JSA) and Toolbox Talks (Stage 3 Risk Assessment) onboard individiual vessels and installations offshore
Each Operator/Duty Holder during the process of planning MOU-Relocations is required to assess key risks associated with the activity and apply appropraite mitigations to reduce risk to "as low as reasonably practicable". Stage 1 of this document is intended to be a worked example of a risk assessment assessment to act as a prompt for individual Operators/Duty Holders to hold their own internal risk assessments/hazard identification. It is recommneded that stage 1 of this document is used in the planning stage prior to development of formal procedures for the activity. Stage 2 of this document is intended to be a prompt list to carrying out risk assessments offshore prior to the MOU move commencing and ideally should involve the operator/duty holder, MOU owner, towmasters and vessel masters as a minimum. The basis of the stage 2 risk assessment is to review the approved MOU move procedures and stage 1 risk assessment and apply local variations where applicable.
Page: 3 of: 18
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
Originated: First Annual Revision Second Annual Revision:
Example Risk Assessment – Stage 1 Summary of Activities Covered by this Worked Risk Assessment This example of High Level Risk Assessment applies to the planning and execution of rig move operations. Existing Control Measures North W est European Area Guidelines - Version 2 Current Common Marine Inspection Document with all actions addressed MSF Template of Data
National Statutory Requirements MOU Owner Safety Management System Marine Operations Manuals – all parties
M SF MOU AnchoMove r Hand ling Manua MSF Procedure - lContent Guidance MSF AHTS Checklist MOU Move Specific Procedures
#
Activity
Hazards
Apr-08 Sep-09 Feb-11
L essonsManufacturers Learned from Handling previous o perations Anchor Instruction International Shipboard Management Code
Consequences
Initial Risk S
L
Control Measures
RR
Action By
Residual Risk S
L
Actions
RR
Step 1 – Confirmed Location and Rig Identification.
Page: 4 of: 18
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
Activity
#
Hazards
Step 2 - Planning Identifying Specific Requirements Assessing the location W eather W ater depth Seabed conditions Currents
Consequences
Inability to achieve location Inadequate procedures
Initial Risk S
L
RR
VH
VL
H
Inadequate vessel and equipment specification
Tides Subsea infrastructur ture
Damage to seabed assets and/or towing and mooring assemblies
Survey
Page: 5 of: 18
Residual Risk S
L
RR
VH
U
M
VH
U
M
Actions
Location approval Catenary Calculations Location historical data (where applicable)
T raffic density Dynamic loadings Lack of competence/ Lack of Incorrect data time/ resource constraints Experience Naval Architects Approval authorities Warranty Assurance
Define limits of weather Site survey Mooring analysis & deployment / recovery load analysis Traffic Survey
Action By
Field drawings Hind Casting & Weather Forecasting Heights determined for seabed clearances for anchor handling and towing
Mooring assemblies Other assets
People
Control Measures
VH
e.g. Inability to achieve required location Inadequate procedures Inadequate vessel and
VL
H
Previous experience of location Tidal & Current Data Approved vendors
Contractor audits Industry accreditation Proven history
equipment specification
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
#
Activity
Hazards
Consequences
Initial Risk S
Step 3 - Planning Develop Procedures Input data
Lack-of or wrong input data
Competence of author Lack of knowledge
VH Schedule delay Inadequate selection of vessels, personnel, equip Incorrect moorin lan Incorrect location
VH
Schedule delay
L
RR
VL
H
VL
H
Inadequate specification / selection of vessels, personnel, equipment Incorrect mooring plan Damage to property and equipment
Lack of understanding of required content
Harm to personnel Unrealistic scheduling Schedule delay Inadequate specification / selection of vessels, personnel, equip
Control Measures
Site survey data Mooring analysis and recovery / deployment load analysis Location HAZOP / HAZID Accurate field survey data Survey procedures Verification of data Lessons learned including use of previous procedures Review and approval process which should define reviewers Approved Vendors
Action By
Residual Risk S
L
RR
VH
U
M
VH
U
M
VH
VU
L
Actions
Contractor audits Proven history Realistic schedule to be identified VH
VL
H
Existing control measures No additional controls identified
Incorrect mooring plan Damage to property and equipment Harm to personnel Critical items / issues not identified
Page: 6 of: 18
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
#
Activity
Preparation, Review, Approval and distribution of Procedures and Onshore pre-move meeting
Hazards
Pressure of time
Competency of review team.
Distribution
Consequences
Inadequate time to prepare, develop and review procedures
Inadequate review
Initial Risk S VH
VH
Correct procedures are not distributed to the relevant parties. Relevant parties not prepared
VH
L L
L
L
Control Measures
RR H Sufficient time and resources allowed for preparation and developing procedures
Action By
Residual Risk S VH
L U
RR M
H
Procedures issued in sufficient time to allow adequate review Procedures to be reviewed by competent
VH
U
M
H
personnel and as a minimum to include: (i) Operator (ii) MOU Owner (iii) Survey Reps (iv) Procedure Author (v) Marine competent MOU mover Define distribution list
VH
U
M
Actions
F al revision ofpersonnel procedures to be signed off byinaccountable
Potential delays
Page: 7 of: 18
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
Activity
#
Step 4 - Planning In-Field Operations Timing
People
Hazards
Inadequate preparation period SIMOPS
Lack of competent and experienced people Inadequate manning
Shortcuts
Equipment, vessel and personnel lead times / availability Damage to Equipment Harm to personnel Damage to equipment Delay to schedule
Poor or lack of meaningful communication Unsafe practices
Lack of continuity
operations Fatigue Loss of focus
Initial Risk
Dilution of experience
Control Measures
S
L
RR
VH
VL
H
Planning Adequate notification period for moves to be defined. Resources Integrated communication between relevant parties
VH
VL
H
Existing control measures
Time pressure Delay in operation
Changes to personnel
Lack of understanding of equipment, operation and procedures Inexperience of proposed
Page: 8 of: 18
Consequences
Action By
Residual Risk S
L
RR
VH
U
M
H
U
M
Actions
Approved vendors with competency assurance systems in place Demonstrable work experience available (CV, work history) Shift change not to be undertaken during critical operations Realistic schedule that includes allowance for familiarisation, delays and rest periods Personnel competent for proposed operation
Clear roles and responsibilities Adequate shift change handover to take place Staggered shift change where possible New crews to be adequately briefed in the operation Crew changes during MOU move operations to be adequately assessed using Management of Change process
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
#
Activity
Chartering Vessels
Hazards
AHTS not fit for purpose
Consequences
Damage to, or loss of vessels, property / assets
Initial Risk S VH
L VL
RR H Existing Control Measures
Inadequate selection of vessels and crew Injury to personnel Schedule delay Mobilisation demobilisation of Equipment
Delay to schedule Equipment and/or mobilisation location not fit for purpose Incorr Incorrect ect ve vesse ssell prepar preparati ation on Damage Damage tto o equ equipm ipment ent / property / assets Competence of people Harm to people
H
P
Control Measures
M
Duty Holders to satisfy themselves that a vessel assurance process is in place and is verified. Person chartering vessel has to be familiar with the operation and the vessels intended activity Vessel requirements clearly defined Vessel meets defined specification in procedures Existing control measures
Action By
Residual Risk S H
L U
RR M
M
U
L
Actions
Correct Load out plan with defined load list supplied to vessels Approved vendors responsible for supplying equipment as per operators / rig owners standards Confirmation of equipment at mobilisation meets procedural requirements Certified equipment Level 2 Risk Assessment to be undertaken specific to the equipment being mobilised Substitute equipment to be confirmed with operator / MOU owner prior to mob Adequate time given to vessel configuration
Page: 9 of: 18
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
#
Activity
Vessel Procedural Review and Detailed Operational Briefing and final assurance and mobilisation
Hazards
Consequences
S VH
Insufficient time to mobilise personnel, undertake MOU induction and familiarisation Insufficient time to review procedures
Delay in operation
Lack of understanding of procedures
Harm to people
Inadequate briefing
Lack of understanding of operation Fatigue Delay in operation
Insufficient rest time Mobilisation, Insufficient time to mobilise Procedural Review and personnel, undertake MOU Detailed Operational induction and familiarisation Briefing of assigned MOU move personnel e.g. Tow Master, Marine Rep, Survey rep, etc.
L VL
Control Measures
RR H Existing control measures
Damage to, or loss of vessels, property / assets
VH
VL
H
Existing control measures
Competent and experienced personnel familiar with the operation Adequate time given to review and discuss
Inadequate briefing
Lack of uunderstanding of operation
the procedures, understand the operation and their role Sufficient time in process to ensure MOU induction and familiarisation is undertaken
Insufficient rest time
Fatigue
procedures
Action By
Residual Risk S VH
L U
RR M
VH
U
M
Actions
Adequate time given to vessel to review and discuss the procedures, understand the operation and the vessels role Competent and experienced personnel familiar with the operation to conduct the vessel briefings and final assurance
Damage to, or loss of vessels, property / assets Harm to people
Insufficient time to review procedures Lack of understanding of
Page: 10 of: 18
Initial Risk
Sufficient rest time to be given prior to commencement of operations
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
#
Activity
Pre-Operational Commencement Meeting (offshore)
Page: 11 of: 18
Hazards
Vessels do not understand the MOu requirements MOU does not understand the vessels capabilities and limitations
Consequences
Initial Risk S VH
Delay in operation Damage to, or loss of vessels, property / assets
L P
Control Measures
RR H Existing control measures
Action By
Residual Risk S M
L U
Actions
RR L
Discussion between the MOU and the vessels to ensure accurate sharing of information and vessel equipment availability
Failure to manage any Harm to people changes MOU and vessel crew are not familiar with their roles in the operation. Clear lines of communication and accountability are not defined.
MOU to fully understand the vessels capabilities and limitations Confirmation and agreement from vessels that they understand their roles in the operation Operational status of vessels and MOU to be confirmed
Lack of co-ordination of operation Failure to identify specific risks associated with the operation
Define communication lines and accountability Continual review of all factors to be undertaken and communicated until such times as a start time has been identified and agreed between all parties. Confirmation that Level 2 Risk Assessments have been undertaken and any issues shared with all parties involved in the operation Management of change assessment
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
#
Activity
Establishing and assessing environmental Conditions
Page: 12 of: 18
Hazards
Consequences
Information on environmental Damage to, or loss of vessels, conditions and forecast not property / assets available or incorrect
Initial Risk S VH
L VL
Control Measures
RR H Operational sta tattus of ves vessels and MOU to be confirmed within operating limits and continual reviews to be undertaken
Insufficient environmental working window
Harm to people
Suitable weather window identified and agreed for each phase of the operation to
Inadequate monitoring and appraisal of environmental conditions
Damage to the environment
commence suspended S uitable monor itobe ring equipment to be available onsite and utilised
Operating out with the safe working limits of the vessels and/or and MOU
Accurate and up-to-date Environmental information and forecasting to be provided provided and verified Open lines of communication between MOU and vessels and vice-versa to advise of any change in status
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Action By
Residual Risk S M
L U
Actions
RR L
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum -Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Relocation Operations
#
Activity
Hazards
Consequences
Initial Risk S
L
RR
VH
P
H
Control Measures
Action By
Residual Risk S
L
RR
VH
U
M
Actions
Step 5 - Vessel Demobilisation Re Rele leas ase e of v ves esse sels ls
Page: 13 of: 18
Pr Prem emat atur ure e rele releas ase e of ves vesse sels ls Re Redu duce ced d redu redund ndan ancy cy a and nd/o /orr capability of remaining vessels
Planning - adequate notification period for moves to be defined. Resources Integrated communication between relevant parties
Main Stage 1 Example Risk Assessment Document
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum - Stage 2 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Move Operations
Risk Assessment – Stage 2 Prompt Activity
Typical Hazards
Potential Consequences
Originated: First Annual Revision Second Annual Revision: Typical Control Measures
Apr-08 Sep-09 Feb-11 Comment
The following points are included to act as an 'aide memoire' to assist in the Stage 2 Risk Assessment - To be discussed Offshore Anchor Handling
Dropped Objects
Transfer / Receiving PCP
Failure to follow procedures Harm to people
Cha Chasing sing Ou Outt / Str triipp ppiing back back
Vesse essells in in cl close ose pro proxi ximi mity ty to rig / platform and each
Damage to the environment
J Hooking / Grappling
other Collision
Delay to schedule
Crane / lifting operations
Vessel capsize
Man Overboard
W inch Operation
Other marine traffic
Flooding
Breaking Out Recovery / Decking the Anchor
Breakdown in communications Equipment failure
Recovery and deployment of mooring system
Working on deck and / or over side
Mooring analysis calculations
Fitting of specialised moorings
Over stressing equipment
Bolster / Un-bolstering Anchor
High breakout loads
Decking / Overboarding to be carried out in “safe area” (clear of such as subsea assets) Awareness of anchor orientation when decking / overboarding overboarding
Page: 14 of: 18
Damage to, or loss of vessels, property / assets Break out limits and strategy to be defined Good communication between rig / vessels Extension line to be highlighted beyond anchor position Identify vessel excursion limits from intended mooring track Back deck clear policy when wires and equipment are are under tension Planned Maintenance System Certified and/or inspection and testing regime of equipment in place
Stage 2 (Offshore) Risk Assessment Example Prompt List
Version 3- Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum - Stage 2 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Move Operations
Activity Setting Anchor
Typical Hazards
Potential Consequences
Vessel(s) unable to hold station and/or heading Loss of control of anchor and/or equipment on deck
Survey equipment not working, ready or set-up properly Entanglement of wired with vessel(s)
Excessive movement of crane assemblies Lack of understanding of emergency preparedness during operation Operating outwith safe working limits Tandem operations Unable to maintain required tension
Typical Control Measures
Comment
Adequate positive stability to be maintained in worst case scenario Minimum separations and distances to be agreed and adhered to between all parties involved in the operation Change of rig thruster status to be advised Operational status of vessels and rig to be confirmed within operating limits and continual reviews to be undertaken Suitable crane assembly (pennant length, hook, headache ball) All Emergency release procedures to be defined and clearly understood Equipment to be operated within manufacturers specification Survey Quality Assurance Procedures Redundancy in survey equipment Water tight integrity policy strictly adhered to during the operation
Page: 15 of: 18
Stage 2 (Offshore) Risk Assessment Example Prompt List
Version 3- Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum - Stage 2 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Move Operations
Activity
Typical Hazards
Potential Typical Control Measures Consequences Damage to, or loss of Existing control mea measures vessels, property / assets
Towing
Other marine traffic
Passing Passi ng / Recov Recovery ery of Tow Bridle Bridle
Proxi Proximity mity of towing towing vessel Harm to people to rig Tow len length gth vs w wate aterr de depth pth Damage Damage tto o th the e environment Inadequate pa passa sag ge pl plan Delay to sch sche edule
Under Tow
Change in environmental conditions Critical motions exceeded (rig and vessels)
Collision Floodi Flooding ng an and/o d/orr caps capsiz ize e
Towing arrangements and Lo Loss ss of of cont contro roll o off tow tow equipment not fit for Purpose Loss of tow Man Overboard
Equipment failure Equipment failure Loss of water tight integrity Inadequate communication
Good communication
Comment NW EA EA Guidelines to be reviewed with regard to SWL vs BL ISM reference to be resolved
Limitation of equipment known and understood Certi rtifie fied an and in inspecte cted eq equipmen ment and connections Planned Maintenance System Tow Mast Master er vi visua suall ins inspec pectio tion n and review of rig towing system Limi Limiti ting ng loa loads ds to to take take int into o ac acco coun untt age and condition of equipment Emergency Tow arrangements clarified before commencement of tow W ater tight integrity checks to be undertaken Rig specific passage plan prepared Spare tow wire available and accessible on tow vessel Navigation warnings If heli-ops undertaken during tow then speed and heading to be agreed
Page: 16 of: 18
Stage 2 (Offshore) Risk Assessment Example Prompt List
Version 3- Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum - Stage 2 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Move Operations
Activity Manoeuvring / Positioning
Typical Hazards Proximity to other assets (surface and subsea) Inability to maintain intended track Equipment Failure Poor communication Excessive thrust from rig
Potential Typical Control Measures Consequences Damage to, or loss of Existing control measures vessels, property / assets Harm to people
Good communication
Damage to the environment Delay to schedule
Lo Loss ss of co cont ntro roll o off ttow ow
Limitation of equipment known and understood Certified and inspected equipment and connections Planned Maintenance System Limitin Limiting g loa loads ds to take take int into o acco account unt age and condition of equipment Co Cont ntin inge genc ncy y pr proc oced edur ures es to be
Unable to achieve final position
agreed and understood Emergency Procedures clarified before commencement of approach
Collision Floodi Flooding ng an and/o d/orr caps capsiz ize e
Comment
Interfaces with other assets / 3 rd parties
Page: 17 of: 18
Stage 2 (Offshore) Risk Assessment Example Prompt List
Version 3- Revision 00 - February 2011
Marine Safety Forum - Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example - Mobile Offshore Unit (MOU) Move Operations
THE FOLLOWING ‘ACTIONS’ WERE IDENTIFIED AS NECESSARY TO REDUCE THE RISKS INVOLVED TO A LEVEL THAT IS ‘AS LOW AS IS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE':
No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ACTION
WHEN
BY WHOM
ACTION TAKEN
CLOSED
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Action Tracking Sheet
Stage 1 Risk Assessment Example Action Tracking List
Version 3 - Revision 00 - February 2011
View more...
Comments