Qualified Theft Case

Republic of the Philippines Department of Justice NATIONAL PROSECUTION SERICE CIT! PROSECUTION SERICE O" #ANILA Cit$ of #anila

%EAREAN LO&ISTICS SERICES Complainant;

-versus-

I.S.________________   For: Qualifed Thet

DANDIN TRINIDAD SECRETARIO Respondent.

x--------------------------------------------x

CO#PLAINT' A""IDAIT Compla Complaina inant nt %EAREAN %EAREAN LO LO&ISTICS &ISTICS SERICES SERICES an entit! dul! esta"lished and re#istered re#istered in a$$ordan$e %ith the la%s o the Repu" epu"li li$ $ o the the &hil &hilip ippi pine nes s an and d main mainta tain ins s an o'$i o'$ial al pla$ pla$e e o  "usiness at Room ()) *adri#al +uildin# ,s$olta Street +inondo *anila Cit! throu#h the undersi#ned $ounsel respe$tull! avers that; ). The $omplain $omplainant antis is en#a#e en#a#ed d in the "usines "usiness s o provi providin din# # lo#i lo#ist sti$ i$s s tru$ tru$i in# n# an and d othe otherr an an$i $ill llar ar! ! serv servi$ i$es es to the the pu"li u"li$ $ an and d is dul ul! ! re#ist istere ered under der pert pertiine nent nt la%s a%s. tta$ tta$hed hed and made made an inte# inte#ral ral part part o this this $ompla $omplaint int-a'davit is a $op! o re#istration %ith the /epartment o   Trade  Trade and Industr! Industr! mared mared as nnex nnex 0 01. 2. In the re#ular re#ular $ourse $ourse o "usiness "usiness o the $omplainan $omplainant t the latter hired the servi$es o *r. /andin Trinidad Se$retario reerred hereto as 0Respondent1 as its 3iaison 4tilit! and +ill +illiin# 5'$er '$er %hose ose prim rimar! ar! un$ un$ti tion on in invo volv lve es the ollo%in#:su"mission o do$uments %ith "illin# details to $lie $lient nts s an and d $oll $olle$ e$ti tion on o the the same same to ma mae ne ne$e $ess ssar ar! ! %ith %ithdr dra% a%al als s an and d depo deposi sits ts as in inst stru ru$t $ted ed pa!m pa!men entt o  $omp $ompan an! ! "ill "ills s an and d the the pro$ pro$es essi sin# n# o impo import rt relat elated ed transa$tions. tta$hed and made an inte#ral part o this $omplaint-a'davit is a $op! o the ,mplo!ment Contra$t o the respondent mared as nnex 0+1. 6. s mentioned a"ove part o the un$tions o the respondent is to %ithdra% rom the $omplainant7s "an a$$ount upon order o his superiors. In the perorman$e o 

Pa(e ) of *

the said un$tion on )8 9ul! 28) the respondent %as instru$ted "! his superior to mae a %ithdra%al in the amount o TR,, 4