Property Digests (2013 – 2014) Atty. Vivencio Abano
Short Description
Download Property Digests (2013 – 2014) Atty. Vivencio Abano...
Description
PROPERTY DIGESTS (2013 – 2014) G.R. No. 158687
ATTY. VIVENCIO ABANO January 22, 2008
DOMALSINversusSpousesVALENCIANO
Plaintiffs:FRISCOF.DOMALSIN Defendant:JUANITOVALENCIANOandAMALIAVALENCIANO Ponente:Chico-Nazario J. Summary:Betterreadthebackground.It’stheverysummary. DOCTRINE/APPLIC DOCTRINE/APPLICATION(asapplica ATION(asapplicable):Aband ble):Abandonment onmentofa ofa thingisthe voluntaryrenunci voluntaryrenunciationofallrights ationofallrightswhichapersonmayhaveinathing, whichapersonmayhaveinathing, withtheintenttolosesuchth withtheintenttolosesuchthing.Athingisconsid ing.Athingisconsideredaban eredabandonedand donedand possessionthereoflostifthespesrecuperandi(thehopeofrecovery)is gone gone and thean theanimus imus reverte revertendi ndi(t (the he intent intention ion of return returning ing) ) is finally finally givenup.
BACKGROUND:
PropertyisinSitioRiverside,Camp3,Tuba,Benguet FriscoB.Domalsin,alawyer-businessman,claimedthathewas in conti continu nuou ous, s, adve adverse rse posse possessi ssion on and and in the the conce concept pt of an ownerforthepast19yearssince1979asevidencedbyhisTax Declarationin1983. DomalsinlikewiseallegedthatSpousesValencianoenteredthe premise premises s on August August 1, 1998 1998 to constr construct uct a buildin building g made made of cementandstrongmaterials,withouttheauthorityandconsent ofrespondent,bymeansofforceandstrategy,andwithouta buildingpermitfromDPWH. Sps. Sps. Valen Valencia ciano no claime claimed d that that the the ongoi ongoing ng const constru ruct ction ion was was consentedbyDPWHwhiletheimprovementswereintroduced by the residen residents ts thereo thereof, f, includi including ng its first first residen residents, ts, William William andGloriaBanuca,andnotbyValenciano.Sps.Valencianowas
just starting the construction because the permission was just givenbyGloriaBanuca. Summary Summary of testimoniespro-Domalsin testimoniespro-Domalsin: : Domalsin Domalsin is a manager manager ofSalamanderEnteprisesengagedinhaulingofgravelandsand whogotthelandfromCastilloBinay-an(occupantoftheland) throughaDeedofWaiverandQuitclaim.Hisworkersincluding the truck truck driver drivers s Marian Mariano o and Tonsing Tonsing and forema foreman n William William Banucawereawarded Banucawereawardedwithhousestha withhousesthattheyconstru ttheyconstructedinthe ctedinthe areaasakindgesturetothe areaasakindgesturetothemandgiven mandgiventhenature thenatureoftheirjob oftheirjob exceptforthelandareaalongtheKennonroadwherethefirst housewaserected.Saidhouses,however,wascannibalizedand nowpossessedbytherespondents. Materialtestimonyfortherespondent:GloriaBanucadisclosed thatitwasshewhoinvitedthespousestotheland.Sheclaimed that that althoug although h Domalsin Domalsin operat operated ed his business business from from 1981, 1981, he ceasedand ceasedand never never return returnedfrom edfrom 1985.She 1985.She wasthe one who level level and improv improved ed the area area includi including ng the portio portion n ofKennon roadafterthesamewasdestroyedbytheearthquakeof1990. MCTCfavoredDomalsinandorder MCTCfavoredDomalsinandorderedthespousestovacate edthespousestovacatethe the land land and and remo remove ve the the stru struct ctur ure e base based d on mate materi rial al prio prior r possessionofthelandandthatthedestructionofhishouseby theearthquakewasnottantamounttoabandonment. RTC RTC affi affirm rmed ed the the decis ecisio ion n of the the MCTC MCTC sayi saying ng that that the the Domalsin’sactofpayingthetaxeswasaclearmanifestationof hisintentionnottoabandonthepropertyandsinceGloriaacted inbadfaithforpassingtheproperty,Art.449apply-Theyshall losewhatwasbuilt. CA reve revers rsed ed and and set set asid aside e RTC’ RTC’s s deci decisi sion on sayi saying ng that that the the property property is a portion portion of theroad-right-of-wayof theroad-right-of-wayof Kennon road which which form forms s part part of the the publ public ic domin dominio ion n not not susce suscept ptib ible le to private acquisitionof acquisitionof eitherparty regardless regardless of theprolonged occup occupat ation ion, , tax tax paym paymen ents, ts, and and impro improve veme ment nts s intr introd oduc uced ed thereon.
ISSUESTOBERESOLVED:
RACHELLEANNEGUTIERREZ
PROPERTY DIGESTS (2013 – 2014)
ATTY. VIVENCIO ABANO
1. Issue1:W/NDomalsinabandonedtheproperty? RESOLUTIONSANDARGUMENTS ISSUE1 Domalsinneverabandonedtheproperty
MajorPoint1:Hisoppositiontotheconstructionofrespondents’house uponlearningofthesameandthesubsequentfilingoftheinstantcase areclearindiciaofnon-abandonment. Thefactthatthehousewasdestroyedbytheearthquakedonot signifyabandonment GloriaBanucahadnorighttodemolishthenhousetantamount toforcibleentry MinorPoint:SCsaidthattheissueofabandonmentshouldhavebeen resolvedbythaCAbecauseitwilldeterminewhetherthespousescan begivenpossessionofthelandsinceabandonmentistheonlywayby whicha possessor may lose a possession. Moreover, priorpossession shallbethebasisofthelocusstandiforanactionofforcibleentryand notownershiportitle. FINAL VERDICT: Neither party can own the property. Respondents
JuanitoandAmaliaValencianoareorderedtoremovetheirstructureon thesubjectlandwithinsixty(60)daysfromreceiptofthisdecision,and tovacateanddeliverthephysicalpossessionthereoftotheOfficeofthe District Engineer, Benguet Engineering District, Department of Public WorksandHighways.
RACHELLEANNEGUTIERREZ
View more...
Comments