Procedure Students

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR BACHELOR SCIENCES PROGRAM (STUDENTS’ COPY)

FACULTY OF COMPUTER AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES

2012

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY OF COMPUTER AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES Project Formulation (CSP600) Scheme of Work Week

Topic

Hours

Check List

1.0 Overview of CSP600 • Project Formulation

4

FYP flow chart

2.0 Choose a Project/Research • Area of Interest • Research Questions Formulation • Problem Statement, Objective(s), Scope and Significance Identification

8

Week 3

4-6

3.0 Literature Review • Literature Search (may do class at library) • Plagiarism • Literature Review • Citations and References

10

6-8

4.0 Proposal Outline Presentation • Individual Presentation

10

Week 8 Submit draft proposal

9-10

5.0 Research/Project Methodology • Types of Research Methodologies • Methodology Identification • Research Design

8

Week 10

11

6.0 Writing a Research/Project Proposal • Research/Project Format

4

12

7.0 Plagiarism Check

2

8. 0 Final Presentation

10

1 2-3

12-14 16

-Submit Mutual Acceptance Form (F1) -Submit Proposal Outline Exercise (Articles Review)

Submit literature review

Submit research methodology / research design

Submission: Final Proposal Report + Plagiarism Report + In Progress Report Form

Note: Week 1-14 excluding Semester Break

Assessment Methods Evaluator

Assessment (%)

Lecturer

10% 10% 10% 10%

Supervisor

40% Proposal Presentation Form (F4) and Proposal Report Evaluation Form (F5)

Examiner

20% Proposal Presentation Form (F4) and Proposal Report Evaluation Form (F5)

Proposal Outline Form (F2) + Draft proposal

Literature review Research methodology / Research design Attendance and participations

REFERENCES James D. Lester. Writing Research Papers: A Complete Guide, 12th Edition, Longman, 2006. Nicholas Wallman. Your Research Project: A Step by Step Guide for the First-Time Researcher, 2nd Edition, Sage Publication, 2005. Mikael Berdtisson. Thesis Projects: A Guide for Students in Computer Science and Information System, 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2007. Noorzan Mohd Noor. Writing Research & Thesis Proposals: Publication Center (UPENA), UiTM 2010.

Guidelines & Examples, University

PROSES PENGENDALIAN PROJEK SARJANA MUDA

TANGGUNG JAWAB

TINDAKAN

A. Peringkat Cadangan Projek

Pelajar

1. Mendaftar kursus ‘Projek Formulation’ CSP600 2. Menyediakan tajuk cadangan projek 3. Mencari pensyarah untuk dijadikan penyelia projek 4. Menghantar borang Mutual Acceptance Form (MAF) –F1 yang telah ditandatangani oleh pelajar dan penyelia kepada pensyarah kursus. 5. Berbincang dengan penyelia secara terperinci berkenaan cadangan projek dan mengisi borang Proposal Outline Form – F2 6. Menghantar borang F2 untuk disemak oleh pensyarah kursus. 7. Membentang cadangan projek untuk dinilai dan ditapis oleh pensyarah kursus. 8. Berbincang dengan penyelia dari masa ke semasa dan mengisi Proposal In Progress Form –F3 untuk setiap pertemuan. 9. Membentang perkembangan cadangan projek kepada penyelia kursus. 10. Menyediakan kertas kerja cadangan projek yang lengkap mengikut format yang disediakan 11. Menghantar kertas kerja yang lengkap kepada pensyarah kursus 12. Membuat pembentangan cadangan projek dihadapan pensyarah kursus, penilai dan penyelia 13. Membuat pembetulan cadangan kertas kerja projek berdasarkan komen daripada penilai dan

1

penyelia 14. Menghantar kertas kerja cadangan projek yang lengkap kepada pensyarah kursus 15. Selesai B. Peringkat Perlaksanaan Projek Pelajar

1. Mendaftar kursus ‘Projek Formulation’ CSP650 2. Berbincang dengan penyelia dari masa ke semasa dan mengisi Proposal In Progress Form –F3 untuk setiap pertemuan. 3. Membentang perkembangan projek kepada penyelia kursus. 4. Menyediakan thesis yang lengkap mengikut format yang disediakan 5. Menghantar thesis yang lengkap kepada pensyarah kursus 6. Membuat pembentangan projek dihadapan pensyarah kursus, penilai dan penyelia 7. Membuat pembetulan thesis berdasarkan komen daripada penilai dan penyelia 8. Berjumpa dengan penilai untuk memastikan pembetulan yang dibuat adalah menepati kehendak penilai 9. Menghantar thesis yang lengkap dan telah ditandatangani oleh penilai dan penyelia kepada pensyarah kursus. 1 hard copy, 3 softcopy 10. Tandatangan rekod penyerahan thesis yang akan disediakan oleh pensyarah kursus 11. Selesai

2

Carta Alir Prosedur Pengendalian Projek Sarjana Muda A. Peringkat Cadangan Projek Tanggungjawab

Aliran kerja

Proses Kerja Mula 1. Daftar kursus ‘Projek Formulation’ CSP600 2. Menyediakan tajuk cadangan projek

Pelajar

3. Mencari pensyarah untuk dijadikan penyelia projek 4. Menghantar borang Mutual Acceptance Form (MAF) –F1 yang telah ditandatangani oleh pelajar dan penyelia kepada pensyarah kursus. 5. Berbincang dengan penyelia secara terperinci berkenaan cadangan projek dan mengisi borang Proposal Outline Form – F2

3

Rekod/AP/PA

6. Menghantar borang F2 untuk disemak oleh pensyarah kursus. 7. Membentang cadangan projek untuk dinilai dan ditapis oleh pensyarah kursus. 8. Berbincang dengan penyelia dari masa ke semasa dan mengisi Proposal In Progress Form – F3 untuk setiap pertemuan. 9. Membentang perkembangan cadangan projek kepada penyelia kursus. 10. Menyediakan kertas kerja cadangan projek yang lengkap mengikut format yang disediakan 11. Menghantar kertas kerja yang lengkap kepada pensyarah kursus

4

12. Membuat pembentangan cadangan projek dihadapan pensyarah kursus, penilai dan penyelia 13. Membuat pembetulan cadangan kertas kerja projek berdasarkan komen daripada penilai dan penyelia 14. Menghantar kertas kerja cadangan projek yang lengkap kepada pensyarah kursus 15. Selesai

5

B. Peringkat Pelaksanaan Projek Pelajar

Mula 1. Mendaftar kursus ‘Projek Formulation’ CSP650 2. Berbincang dengan penyelia dari masa ke semasa dan mengisi Proposal In Progress Form – F3 untuk setiap pertemuan. 3. Membentang perkembangan projek kepada penyelia kursus. 4. Menyediakan thesis yang lengkap mengikut format yang disediakan 5. Menghantar thesis yang lengkap kepada pensyarah kursus 6. Membuat pembentangan projek dihadapan pensyarah kursus, penilai dan penyelia

6

7. Membuat pembetulan thesis berdasarkan komen daripada penilai dan penyelia 8. Berjumpa dengan penilai untuk memastikan pembetulan yang dibuat adalah menepati kehendak penilai 9. Menghantar thesis yang lengkap dan telah ditandatangani oleh penilai dan penyelia kepada pensyarah kursus. 1 hard copy, 3 softcopy 10. Tandatangan rekod penyerahan thesis yang akan disediakan oleh pensyarah kursus 11. Selesai

7

UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/MAF/2012

CSP600

S i

Faculty of Computer & Mathematical

F1 - MUTUAL ACCEPTANCE FORM Student’s Photo

F

A

A. STUDENT

K

U

L

T

I

Name Student ID Program E-mail Phone No B.

SUPERVISOR/CO-SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR

CO-SUPERVISOR (if any)

Name Faculty / Department E-mail Phone No C. PROJECT Project Area Working Title D. AGREEMENT (terms and conditions applied) i.

(SUPERVISOR) I agree to supervise the above project title until completed. SUPERVISOR: CO-SUPERVISOR:

ii. (STUDENT)

(Signature)

(Signature)

DATE: DATE:

I promise to attend the weekly appointment with my supervisor as my project progress. I will submit all the required documentations at the end of the project. I agree that the project will be the sole property of UiTM. STUDENT :

(Signature)

DATE:

UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/POF/2012

CSP600

Faculty of Computer & Mathematical Sciences

F2 – PROPOSAL OUTLINE FORM

STUDENT NAME

STUDENT ID

PROGRAM SUPERVISOR PROJECT TITLE CRITERIA

SCORE 1-10

DESCRIPTION

Title Problem Statement Scope Objective Significance Research Element (including programming element if any) Expected Outcome

Overall Comments

Lecturer CSP600’s Name

Signature

Date

UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/PIF/2012

CSP600 and CSP650

Faculty of Computer & Mathematical Sciences

F3 – PROPOSAL / PROJECT IN-PROGRESS FORM

STUDENT NAME

STUDENT ID

PROGRAM SUPERVISOR PROPOSAL TITLE MEETING DATE

COMPLETED ACTIVITIES

SUPERVISOR/CO-SUPERVISOR NEXT ACTIVITIES/COMMENTS

SIGNATURE

UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/PIF/2012

MEETING DATE

COMPLETED ACTIVITIES

SUPERVISOR/CO-SUPERVISOR NEXT ACTIVITIES/ COMMENTS

SIGNATURE

UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/PPF/2012

CSP600

Faculty of Computer & Mathematical Sciences

F4 - PROPOSAL PRESENTATION FORM T

I

STUDENT NAME

STUDENT ID

PROGRAM SUPERVISOR PROJECT TITLE HANDOVER DATE Weight Score Marks

Assessment Criteria

(W)

1. Depth of Knowledge (Possess high understanding and able to explain subject matter)

3

2. Overall Organization of Project Presentation (Exhibit/Present the project in a clear, engaging and appropriate form)

2

3. Use Variety of Presentation Materials (Use several materials or media in presenting the project)

2

4. Delivery Skills (Proper language used, speak clearly, loudly and at appropriate pace, effective eye contact and presentable attitude)

3

Comments:

Supervisor (40%) Name of Supervisor/Examiner: Signature:

Examiner (20%) Date:

(S) [1-10]

(W*S)

UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/PEF/2012

CSP600

Faculty of Computer & Mathematical Sciences

F5 - PROPOSAL REPORT EVALUATION FORM

STUDENT NAME

STUDENT ID

PROGRAM SUPERVISOR PROJECT TITLE HANDOVER DATE L

T

I

Weight Score Marks

Assessment Criteria

(W)

1. Project Background and Problem (Appropriate working title, clear problem statement, well-defined project scope)

3

2. Objectives (Clear, measureable and achievable)

3

3. Significance of the Study (Relevant to the community and practitioners)

2

4. Literature Review (Able to identify, collect, summarize and analyses relevant and latest/issues of subject matter)

5

5. Project Methodology (Appropriate approach, methods, sources and deliverables in accomplishing the project)

4

6. Presentation of the Report (Follow the given guidelines, consistency of the contents, clarity, and language of the report, contain valid references and citations)

3

7. Progress Evaluation (Supervisor only) (This may include supervisory meetings (Project In-Progress Form- F3), supervisory independency, responsibilities, commitment, maturity, etc.)

2

Comments: Supervisor (40%) Name of Supervisor/Examiner: Signature:

Examiner (20%) Date:

(S) [1-10]

(W*S)

UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/PRF/2012

CSP650

Faculty of Computer & Mathematical Sciences

F6 – PROJECT PRESENTATION FORM T

I

STUDENT NAME

STUDENT ID

PROGRAM SUPERVISOR PROJECT TITLE HANDOVER DATE Weight Score Marks

Assessment Criteria

(W)

1. Depth of Knowledge (Possess high understanding and able to explain subject matter)

3

2. Overall Organization of Project Presentation (Exhibit/Present the project in a clear, engaging and appropriate form)

2

3. Use Variety of Presentation Materials (Use several materials or media in presenting the project)

2

4. Delivery Skills (Proper language used, speak clearly, loudly and at appropriate pace, effective eye contact and presentable attitude)

3

Comments:

Supervisor (50%) Name of Supervisor/Examiner: Signature:

Examiner (40%) Date:

(S) [1- 10]

(W * S)

UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/PVF/2012

CSP650

Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences

F7 - PROJECT REPORT EVALUATION FORM

STUDENT NAME

STUDENT ID

PROGRAM SUPERVISOR PROJECT TITLE HANDOVER DATE Weight (W)

Assessment Criteria 1. Abstract (Summarizes the whole project – consists of project motivation, methodology, findings and future work.) 2. Introduction (Appropriate title; clear problem statement; well-defined project scope; clear, measurable and achievable objectives; and significant to the community and practitioners.) 3. Literature Review (Review of current, related literature and research reports. Consist of relevant, correct facts and substantial references - able to identify, collect, summarize and analyze relevant and latest/issues of subject matter.) 4. Methodology (A detailed and in depth explanation of the appropriate approach, methods, sources and deliverables in accomplishing the project.) 5. Results / Findings/ Prototype (The result of research carried out to solve the problem defined. This may include analysis, usability, design, implementation, testing, prototype or framework.) 6. Conclusion and Recommendations (Conclusion of what has been achieved, explaining limitations/problems and recommendation for future work.) 7. Report Presentation (Structure, organisation and standard report format. Clarity of language, consistency of the content, logical flow and use of figurative language for all materials.) 8. References and Citations (Standard citation and references based on the guideline given. Valid source of references and other appropriate supporting documents.) 9. Progress Evaluation (supervisor only) (This may include supervisory meetings (Project In-Progress Form-F3), supervisory independency, responsibilities, commitment, maturity, etc.)

1

2

3

4 5 2 2 1 2

Comments: Supervisor (50%) Name of Supervisor/Examiner: Signature:

Examiner (40%) Date:

Score (S) (1-10)

Marks (W*S)