Pre-Requisite Programs (PRP) & Critical Control Points (CCP)

July 23, 2017 | Author: Engr Nomaan Asim | Category: Hazard Analysis And Critical Control Points, Food Safety, Hygiene, Sanitation, Foods
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

ISO 22000 PRP manual...

Description

STANDARD MALAYSIA – CERTIFICATION BODY FORUM 19 June 2012

Pre-Requisite Programs (PRP) and Critical Control Points (CCP)

Zahara Merican

Presentation Guide Introduction Pre-Requisite Program – PRP PRPs & oPRPs  Critical Control Point (CCP) & Its Determination  Summary Zahara Merican

2

Introduction

FOOD SAFETY PLAN

=

PRP/support programs (GMP, SOP, SSOP, etc.) +

HACCP + Effective training

Zahara Merican

3

HACCP = Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Point  A system that identifies, evaluates & emphasize controls of hazards which are significant for food safety  Other hazards are controlled under GHP/GMP (PRP)  Identifies specific hazards & preventive measures for their control  Consists of seven principles Zahara Merican

4

FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRP (GMP/GHP)

HACCP PRINCIPLES

• Design & facilities • Control of operation • Maintenance & sanitation • Personal hygiene • Transportation • Product information & consumer awareness • Training

1.Conduct hazard analysis 2.Determine Critical Control Points (CCP) 3.Establish critical limit(s) 4.Establish monitoring system 5.Establish corrective actions 6.Establish verification procedures 7.Establish documentation & records

Zahara Merican

5

References: Malaysian standards MS 1480:2007 Food safety according to HACCP MS 1514: 2009 Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Equivalent: Codex Food Hygiene Basic Text, Rev. 2003 Others: o ISO 22000: 2005 Food Safety Mgt Systems – Requirements for any organization in the food chain o USFDA cGMP Regulations & specific HACCP regulations o EU – legislations on Hygiene of Foodstuff, and specifics for different food products Zahara Merican

6

PRE-REQUISITE PROGRAMS (PRP)

Zahara Merican

7

PRE-REQUISITES TO HACCP Establishment is legal - food premises must be registered Operate according to relevant by-laws Products comply with appropriate regulatory requirements such as:  Food Act 1983: Food Regulations 1985; Food Hygiene 2009; etc.  mandatory codes of hygienic practice Products comply with:  customer/importer requirements Zahara Merican

8

Prerequisites to HACCP (PRP) Practices and conditions needed prior to and during the implementation of HACCP and which are essential for food safety as described in the Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene and other Codes of Practice

Zahara Merican

9

PRPs provide foundation for effective HACCP Implementation  Developed, documented and implemented before implementing HACCP  Required to control factors that may or may not be directly related to the manufacturing controls, but support the HACCP Plans

Zahara Merican

10

PRP Required conditions can be achieved through: • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) / Good Hygienic Practices (GHP) • Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SSOP) Coverage depends on :  regulatory requirement  size of business  types of product Zahara Merican

11

PRP and operational PRPs • PRP

• Operational PRP

Basic food safety conditions and activities that are necessary to maintain a hygienic environment throughout the food chain suitable for the production, handling and provision of safe end products and safe food for human consumption

Measures identified by the hazard analysis as essential in order to control the likelihood of introducing food safety hazards and/or contamination or proliferation of food safety hazards in the product(s) or in the processing environment

Ref: ISO 22000: 2005 Zahara Merican

12

SSOP – USFDA REGULATIONS  Safety of water –

contact with food, food contact surfaces, or used as ice

 Condition & cleanliness of food contact surfaces –

including utensils, gloves, and outer garments

 Prevention of cross contamination – –

from insanitary objects to food / food contact surfaces from raw product to cooked product

 Maintenance of sanitary facilities – hand washing, hand sanitizing, and toilet

   

Protection of food from adulteration Proper labeling, storage and use of toxic compound Control of employee health condition Exclusion of pests from the food plant Zahara Merican

13

CLEANING AND SANITATION An effective cleaning and sanitation program is important to minimize food contamination  Need to consider (SSOP): • what to clean • how to clean • when to clean, and • who will clean

 Need to have appropriate equipment cleaning and sanitizing facilities  Cleaning of cleaning facilities/implements shall be documented & implemented Zahara Merican

14

PERSONNEL HYGIENE – what active records are needed – which needs to be filled in every shift, every day, etc. • Hygiene and health requirements • Communicable diseases & Injuries • Attire and conduct of workers • Policy on visitors Zahara Merican

15

CHEMICAL CONTROL Documented procedures in place to ensure segregation, storage and proper use and control of non-food chemicals in the plant. Includes cleaning chemicals, fumigants, baits, etc. Chemical safety data sheets available Chemicals should be: • correctly labeled including containers for mixing • stored in designated and well ventilated area, hazardous chemicals under lock • protected from cross-contamination with food or food contact surfaces or packaging material • dispensed and handled by trained and authorized staff with procedures for receiving & issuing in place > records Zahara Merican

16

PEST CONTROL PRP

oPRP

• Pests include birds, rodents, cockroaches, flies and other insects • Effective and continuous pest control program in place  prevent entry of pests  elimination of breeding grounds of pests  if using chemicals, get expert advice

• In-house monitoring activities – – – – –

What How Who Frequency CA

• External service provider monitoring activities

Zahara Merican

17

WASTE MANAGEMENT • Solid and liquid waste disposal – SSOP – Schedule of waste disposal from processing area and from plant – Drains to have proper flow & traps for solids • Proper covering of waste disposal containers, including those in the processing area • Cleaning of waste containers & • Central waste collection bins – away from processing area • Discharge must comply with DOE requirements Zahara Merican

18

SPECIFICATIONS • Written specifications for raw (including origin) and packaging materials and finished products • Based on regulations, standards, scientific references or own experiments  Ensure raw materials meet company’s requirements  Prevent / reduce hazards in raw materials  Prevent unsuitable raw materials being used in production  Ensure uniform products  Contribute to HACCP implementation, e.g. reduce cost of analysis, etc.  Meet regulatory requirements  Meet customer’s requirements Zahara Merican

19

RECALL AND TRACEABILITY • Documentation of recall procedure and traceability system in place to ensure complete and rapid recall of affected lot • Do a mock recall to evaluate effectiveness • Able to trace up & down

CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS • Documented procedure for customer complaints (including auditing) • Records of complaints and actions taken. Use as feed back • Returned products isolated & appropriate action taken (destroyed, reworked or reprocessed)

X

Zahara Merican 20

Maintenance of PRP • Maintenance is essential to ensure continuous control of favourable operational conditions • The premises & equipment should be kept in good state of repair • Sanitation control should be monitored for their suitability & verified for effectiveness Good record keeping to provide evidence on continuous adherence to sanitation control Zahara Merican

21

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All PRPs should be: - Documented (including plant lay-out for materials, equipment, workers amenities, footbaths, bait stations) - Monitored and records/checklists kept - Corrective actions taken and documented - Records and CA verified - PRPs maintained & verified where applicable, e.g. hygiene & sanitation, raw materials, clean rooms - Use results to update and improve PRPs if necessary - Reviewed before implementing HACCP Plan, to verify if all requirements have been met, and if all the necessary controls and documentation are in place Zahara Merican

22

CRITICAL CONTROL POINT & ITS DETERMINATION

Zahara Merican

23

Critical Control Point A step in the food chain where activities are carried out, or conditions prevail which can have an influence on the safety of the product, and where control can be exercised over one or more factors to prevent or eliminate a food safety hazard or reduce it to an acceptable level Zahara Merican

24

Critical Control Point (CCP) HACCP Principle 2 • CCPs are points, procedures or operational steps in the process that can be controlled to prevent or eliminate the hazard, or minimize the likelihood of its occurrence • CCPs are determined through thorough knowledge & expert judgment of team members (& specialist advisor) in Principle 1

Zahara Merican

25

PRINCIPLE 1 Conduct a hazard analysis • Prepare a list of steps of the plants’ processes • Identify where significant hazards could occur – Also identifies all possible hazards

• Describe the control/preventive measures – At all identified steps – Controlled under HACCP or PRP

Zahara Merican

26

Hazard Analysis - definition The process of collecting and evaluating information on hazards and conditions leading to their presence to decide which are significant for food safety and should be addressed in the HACCP plan

Zahara Merican

27

Hazard Analysis • A thorough hazard analysis is the key to preparing an effective HACCP plan • When conducting a hazard analysis, safety concerns must be differentiated from quality concerns • Hazard analysis & identification of associated control measures accomplish three objectives: – Those hazards and associated control measures are identified – The analysis may identify needed modifications to a process or product so that product safety is further assured or improved – The analysis provides a basis for determining CCPs in Principle 2 Zahara Merican

28

hazard analysis involves two stages: hazard identification & hazard evaluation 1. Hazard identification –

Consider all potentially significant hazards



Assess likelihood of occurrence of the hazards

2. Hazard evaluation – assess severity of the hazard  Use flow diagram that has been verified  identify preventive measures for their control Zahara Merican

29

 significant hazards = likelihood x severity reasonably likely to occur

Zahara Merican

likely to result in an unacceptable risk to consumers

30

hazards that are reasonably likely to occur Decision is based on: – Experience – Illness data – Scientific reports – Other information (e.g., Hazards and Control Guide)

Zahara Merican

31

Hazard-Analysis Worksheet • Set up the hazard-analysis worksheet • Identify the potential species-related hazards • Identify the potential process-related hazards • Complete the hazard-analysis worksheet • Understand the potential hazard • Determine if the potential hazard is significant • Identify the critical control points • (Identify the oPRPs) Zahara Merican

32

HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET (MS 1480) 1

Process Step

2

Potential hazard State whether B, C or P

3

4

Rational for inclusion or exclusion as a hazard

5

What preventive measure Is this a or control significant can be hazard? applied to prevent (Yes / No) this significant hazard?

6

Is this step a critical control point? (Yes / No)

B= CCP 1 C =

P=

Zahara Merican

33

Control Measures • Actions and activities that can be used to prevent or eliminate a food safety hazard or reduce it to an acceptable level • Control measures must be validated for effectiveness • Column 5 on Hazard-Analysis Worksheet

Zahara Merican

34

Hazard Analysis Worksheet 1

Process Step

Example 1. Receiving of semi-process raw soya sauce

2

Potential hazard1 State whether B, C or P

3

Rational for inclusion or exclusion as a hazard

4

5

Is this a significant hazard? (Yes / No)

What preventive measure or control can be applied to prevent this significant hazard?

Biological

In / Ex: justify

Chemical

In / Ex: justify

Physical

In / Ex: justify

2B:

Pathogens: S aureus

In: Likely to occur

3C:

Ex: Strict control of suppliers under Approved Supplier Program

(Leave Blank)

Testing every 6 months to ensure compliance. PRP #5 Chemical Analysis Records

(Leave Blank)

(Leave Blank)

(Leave Blank)

3 MCPD (3-

chloro-1,2propanediol)

4P:

None

Yes

based on historical data

Zahara Merican

Control water activity below (aw) 0.75; salt content above 20%.

6 Is this step a CCP?5 (Yes/No)

No

35

PRP or CCP? How to know if the hazard is to be controlled under PRP or HACCP

Zahara Merican

36

Hazard Analysis Worksheet - Explanation 1

Process Step

2

Potential hazard1 State whether B, C or P

3

Rational for inclusion or exclusion as a hazard

4

5

Is this a significa nt hazard? (Yes / No)

What preventive measure or control can be applied to prevent this significant hazard?

6

Is this step a CCP?5 (Yes /No)

1

Identify potential food safety hazards introduced, controlled or enhanced at this step. Do not carry the hazard through subsequent steps 5Column

6 will be answered yes only if the step in column 1 is a critical control point. The control measure is applied at that step Zahara Merican

37

Hazard Analysis Worksheet - Explanation 1

Process Step

Example 1. Receiving of semiprocess raw soya sauce

2 Potential hazard1 State whether B, C or P 2B:

3

4

Is this a significant Rational for hazard? inclusion or (Yes / exclusion as a No) hazard

In: Likely to

Pathogen: occur based S aureus on historical data

Yes

5

6

What preventive measure or control can be applied to prevent this significant hazard?

Is this step a CCP?5 (Yes /No)

Control water activity below (aw) 0.75; salt content above 20%.

No

2

If the group identifies a potential hazard in column 2, and is “Inclusion”, justification is required in column 3. This justification normally includes the scientific, regulatory, or historical reasons for the decision. A control measure is required in column 5. The group then determines whether the hazard is significant using the hazard matrix (Y/N in column 4) Zahara Merican

38

Hazard Analysis Worksheet - Explanation 1

Process Step

Example 1. Receiving of semiprocess raw soya sauce

2 Potential hazard1 State whether B, C or P

3C:

3 MCPD (3chloro1,2propanedi ol)

3 Rational for inclusion or exclusion as a hazard

Ex: Strict control of suppliers under Approved Supplier Program

4

5

Is this a significant hazard? (Yes / No)

What preventive measure or control can be applied to prevent this significant hazard?

(Leave Blank)

6 Is this step a CCP?5 (Yes/No)

Testing every 6 months to ensure compliance. PRP #5 Chemical Analysis Records

3

If the group identifies a potential hazard in column 2, & is “Exclusion”, justification is required in column 3. This justification normally includes PRP or procedures that manage the hazard to ensure that this step is not necessary to be controlled under HACCP. A control measure is required in column 5. Column 4 will be left blank 39

Zahara Merican

Hazard Analysis Worksheet - Explanation 1

Process Step

Example 1. Receiving of semiprocess raw soya sauce

2 Potential hazard1 State whether B, C or P

4P:

None

3

4

5

Rational for inclusion or exclusion as a hazard

Is this a significant hazard? (Yes / No)

What preventive measure or control can be applied to prevent this significant hazard?

(Leave Blank)

(Leave Blank)

(Leave Blank)

6 Is this step a CCP?5 (Yes/No)

4If

the group does not identify a potential hazard in column 2, then columns 3, 4 and 5 will be blank

Zahara Merican

40

More examples – safety alone is not sufficient 1 Process Step

1. Pasturization (soy sauce)

2

3

4

5

6

Potential hazard1 State whether B, C or P

Rational for inclusion or exclusion as a hazard

Is this a significant hazard? (Yes / No)

What preventive measure or control can be applied to prevent this significant hazard?

Is this step a CCP?5 (Yes/No)

B: 1. S aureus

Inc. Known to occur due to x cont’n from fd handler

2. A. oryzae

Exc. Quality issue (Inc.)* Exc. Quality issue (Inc)*

3. Film yeast

No

(Yes)* (Yes)*

- Testing of fd handlers every 3 months to ensure not a carrier, oPRP #7. * - Fd handlers hygiene in place. No/Yes SOP 1 Ensure time-To met Ensure time-To met

C: Nil P: Nil

* No – technically correct, but need Yes to control spoilage, so its CCP Zahara Merican

41

More examples 1 Process Step

2

3

4

5

6

Potential hazard1 State whether B, C or P

Rational for inclusion or exclusion as a hazard

Is this a significant hazard? (Yes / No)

What preventive measure or control can be applied to prevent this significant hazard?

Is this step a CCP?5 (Yes/No)

2. Pasturi- B: zation Salmonella (milk) Brucella, S. aureus

Inc. Known to occur in milk

Yes

Ensure time-To to destroy pathogens met (>65oC, >15min)

Yes

C: Nil P: Nil

Zahara Merican

42

More examples 1

Process Step

2 Potential hazard1 State whether B, C or P

3. Washing B: E coli, S. aureus, of hands Salmonella (bakery/ catering/ restaurant)

C: free chlorine

P: Nil

3

4

Is this a Rational for significant inclusion or hazard? exclusion as a (Yes / No) hazard

Inc: Happen ned before. Likely to occur from fd handlers hands

Yes

Exc: Residue validated for SOP

-

-

Zahara Merican

-

5 What preventive measure or control can be applied to prevent this significant hazard?

1. Ensure fd handlers wash & sanitize hands every h 2. Fd handlers undergo medical check every 6 month to isolate carriers Ensure correct amount used, strict adherence to SOP -

6 Is this step a CCP?5 (Yes /No)

Yes

43

HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET (US) FIRM NAME:

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:

FIRM ADDRESS:

METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION AND STORAGE: INTENDED USE AND CONSUMER:

1

INGREDIENT/ PROCESSING STEP

2

3

IDENTIFY POTENTIAL B, C&P HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PRODUCT & PROCESS

ARE ANY POTENTIAL FOOD SAFETY HAZARDS SIGNIFICANT AT THIS STEP? (YES/NO)

4

JUSTIFY YOUR DECISION FOR COLUMN 3

Zahara Merican

5

6

WHAT PREVENTIVE MEASURE(S) CAN BE APPLIED FOR THE SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS?

IS THIS STEP A CRITICAL CONTROL POINT? (YES / NO)

44

Relationship between a significant hazard and a CCP • CCPs are steps in the process where HACCP control activities will occur • For every significant hazard identified during the hazard analysis (principle 1) there must be one or more CCPs where the hazard is controlled Zahara Merican

45

DETERMINING CCP • CCP - step where control can be applied & is essential to prevent, eliminate or reduce a food safety hazard to acceptable levels • CCPs can be determined through the Use of the CCP Decision Tree • Caution - CCP must be correctly identified – too many CCPs will dilute effort – too few could result in unsafe food

Zahara Merican

46

use of a CCP decision tree • Application of the CCP decision tree can be useful in determining if a particular step is a CCP for a previously identified hazard • It is merely a tool and not a mandatory element of HACCP • A CCP decision tree is not a substitute for expert knowledge Zahara Merican

47

CCP Decision Tree (MS/Codex) Questions to be answered for each potential hazard for each step Q1. Are there preventive measure(s) for the identified hazard?

Modify process step, Process or product?

YES

YES

Is control at this step necessary for product safety?

NO

Q2. Is step specifically designed to eliminate or reduce likely occurrence of a hazard to an acceptable level?

NO

Not a CCP

STOP

YES

NO Q3. Could contamination occur at unaccept. levels or increase to unaccept. levels?

YES

NO

Not a CCP

YES Q4. Will a subsequent step eliminate or reduce hazard to an acceptable level?

NO

STOP

CCP

CCP DECISION TREE (US) Q1.

DOES THIS STEP INVOLVE A HAZARD OF SUFFICIENT RISK AND SEVERITY TO WARRENT ITS CONTROL?

YES

Q2.

NO

NOT A CCP

DOES CONTROL MEASURE FOR THE HAZARD EXIST AT THIS STEP?

YES

NO IS CONTROL AT THIS STEP NECESSARY FOR SAFETY?

Q3 Zahara Merican

NO

MODIFY THIS STEP, PROCESS OR PRODUCT

YES

NOT A CCP

STOP* 49

CCP DECISION TREE Q3.

IS CONTROL AT THIS STEP NECESSARY TO PREVENT, ELIMINATE OR REDUCE THE RISK OF THE HAZARD TO CONSUMERS?

YES

NO

NOT A CCP

STOP*

CCP

This decision tree is derived from one that was developed by the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods, USA 50 Zahara Merican

HAZARD A biological, chemical or physical agent in, or condition of, food with the potential to cause an adverse health effect

Zahara Merican

51

SUMMARY HACCP is not a stand alone system depends on management commitment depends on a solid foundation of PRPs: GMP/ GHP; SSOPs & relevant codes of practice HACCP does not replace nor diminish PRP attention must be focused on basic hygienic practices before embarking on HACCP The effectiveness of PRP has to be assessed during the development & implementation of the HACCP Plan Zahara Merican

52

Pre-requisite Programs  PRPs must be developed, documented and implemented  They have to be effectively monitored and controlled, including proper record keeping, validation and verification  They are required to control factors that may or may not be directly related to the processing controls, but support the HACCP Plan

Zahara Merican 53

CCP – HACCP Principle 2 determined from hazard analysis in Principle 1 Principle 1 – identifies hazards associated with food production at all stages from raw materials to point of consumption – The first most important step, wrong hazard analysis results in faulty HACCP plan – Identifies steps to be controlled as CCPs or oPRPs – Significant hazard = likelihood x severity – Identify control measures for hazard elimination/ reduction/ prevention in the HACCP Plan

Zahara Merican

54

Zahara Merican

55

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF