August 2014
Port State Control Annual Report [English]
Photographs of Deficiencies identified during Port State Control Life Saving
Inappropriate resetting of on-load release gear
Poor condition of lifeboat hull
Broken safety belt
Damaged lifeboat seat
Fire Safety
Cracked fire door
Noncombustible compound missing on A-class bulkhead
Unacceptable hold-back hook for A-class fire door
MARPOL Oily inside of discharge pipe
Oily water separator clogged
Machinery Space
Oily and dirty engine room
Oily lagging of F.O. piping
Load Line
Holed ventilator top
Wasted hatch cover securing device
Gap of hatch cover side cleat
Others
Heavily wasted on-deck piping
Wasted mooring line
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
Foreword This annual Port State Control (PSC) report summarizes deficiencies identified by PSC inspections carried out in various countries around the world. This report is prepared with the objective of building awareness of the present state of PSC as well as to improve future maintenance and inspections, and also Safety Management System is compiled into the following Chapters. “Chapter 1”: Status of Implementation and Recent Developments in PSC Worldwide “Chapter 2”: Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships registered to ClassNK “Chapter 3”: Statistics & Analysis of ISM Deficiencies raised to NKSMC Ships “Chapter 4”: Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU and Paris MOU Port State Control has been found to be a very effective tool in reducing the number of substandard ships as well as improving maritime safety and pollution prevention. There has been a significant increase in PSC activity worldwide in concert with a number of amendments to relevant international conventions. In order to carry out the effective implementation of PSC provisions, many countries have already signed and accepted a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for regional cooperation in PSC for many regions, and have established a centralized computerized database system and/or a harmonized approach. PSC inspection procedures have been improved to cover not only a ships’ hardware or documents, but also the operational requirements of the relevant conventions or shipboard maintenance under the ISM Code. In light of this background, ClassNK is working hard to increase the transparency of information related to PSC issues and to make it even more difficult for substandard ships to survive in the market place. August 2014 Note: Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented in this report. However, as information is collected from a variety of sources, ClassNK cannot be held responsible for any erroneous data, judgements or conclusions that may appear in this report, in cases were the information available should prove to have been incomplete or incorrect in any respect.
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Status of Implementation and Recent Developments in PSC Worldwide 1.1 Amendments to the relevant conventions 1.1.1 Electronic Chart Display and Information System ········································ 1 1.1.2 Plans and procedures for recovery of persons from the water·························· 1 1.1.3 Means of recharging breathing apparatus ··················································· 2 1.1.4 Fire-fighter’s communication ···································································· 2 1.1.5 Types of fire-fighter’s outfits ····································································· 2 1.2 Recent global developments 1.2.1 MOUs around the world (1) European and North Atlantic region (Paris MOU) ····································· 3 (2) Asia-Pacific region (Tokyo MOU)····························································· 4 (3) Latin-American region (Viña del Mar or Latin-America Agreement) ············ 5 (4) Caribbean region (Caribbean MOU) ························································ 5 (5) Mediterranean region (Mediterranean MOU)············································ 5 (6) Indian Ocean region (Indian Ocean MOU)················································ 5 (7) Black Sea region (Black Sea MOU) ························································· 6 (8) West and Central Africa region (Abuja MOU)············································ 6 (9) Arab States of the Gulf (Riyadh MOU)····················································· 6 1.2.2 Port State Control in the United States (USCG) ··········································· 6 1.2.3 Equasis ································································································· 7 1.3 Measures adopted by ClassNK 1.3.1 Treatment of the Deficiencies Identified by Port State Control Inspections (1) Cooperative assistance with Port States and treatment of the deficiencies ····· 7 (2) Treatment of inspection reports by PSC officers ········································ 8 1.3.2 Minimizing the number of detained ships in order to reduce substandard ships (1) Special training at several in-house meetings ··········································· 8 (2) Meetings and informal gatherings with ship owners ·································· 8 1.3.3 Visits to Port States················································································· 9
Chapter 2 Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships Registered to ClassNK
2.1 General····································································································· 10 2.2 Data on Detentions 2.2.1 Detentions by Flag State ········································································· 10 2.2.2 Detentions by ship type ··········································································· 12 2.2.3 Detentions by ship’s age··········································································· 13 2.2.4 Detentions by ship size (Gross Tonnage) ····················································· 14 2.2.5 Detentions by Port State·········································································· 15 2.3 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies 2.3.1 Detainable Deficiencies per Category ······················································· 16 2.3.2 Frequently Reported Deficiencies ···························································· 17 2.4 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies by Port State 2.4.1 China·································································································· 23 2.4.2 Australia ····························································································· 24 2.4.3 Japan·································································································· 24
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.4.4 U.S.A. ································································································· 25 2.4.5 India··································································································· 25 2.4.6 Republic of Korea·················································································· 25 2.4.7 Indonesia····························································································· 26 2.4.8 Canada································································································ 26 2.4.9 Russian Federation ··············································································· 26 2.4.10 Italy ·································································································· 27 2.4.11 Netherlands ······················································································· 27
Chapter 3 Statistics & Analysis of ISM Deficiencies raised to NKSMC Ships
3.1 Statistics of ISM deficiency cases 3.1.1 Total number and average rate ······························································ 28 3.1.2 Statistics of NKSMC Ships and ISM Deficiencies ······································· 28 3.1.2.1 Per Property of ship ········································································· 28 3.1.2.2 Per Factors related to Company ························································· 33 3.1.2.3 Per Port State··················································································· 36 3. 2 Analysis of ISM Deficiencies 3.2.1 Number of ISM deficiencies sorted by relevant ISM Code requirement ········· 37 3.2.2 ISM Deficiencies and Detentions per Port State ········································ 38 3.2.3 ISM Deficiencies and PSC Action Code ····················································· 39 Appendix: Sample of PSC inspection reports ················································· 43
Chapter 4 Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU and Paris MOU
4.1 Tokyo MOU 4.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities········································ 52 4.1.2 Black List of Flag States ········································································ 53 4.1.3 Detentions by Recognized Organization ···················································· 54 4.1.4 Deficiencies by Category········································································· 55 4.2 Paris MOU 4.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities········································ 56 4.2.2 Black List of Flag States ········································································ 57 4.2.3 Deficiencies by Category········································································· 58 4.2.4 Recognized Organization Performance Table ············································· 59
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
Chapter 1 Status of Implementation and Recent Developments in PSC Worldwide 1.1 Amendments to the relevant conventions Major amendments to international conventions and to the relevant regulations that came into effect from 2012 through 2014 are summarized below. 1.1.1 Electronic Chart Display and Information System (SOLAS V/19) Entry into force: 1 July 2012
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0907] Paragraphs 2.1.4 and 2.10, 2.11 relating to the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) were revised and newly added to SOLAS Chapter V/19. An Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) and back-up arrangement will be phased in from 1 July 2012. （１） Passenger ship (i) Passenger ship constructed on or after 1 July 2012, not later than the initial safety equipment survey. (ii) Passenger ship constructed before 1 July 2012, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2014. （２） Tanker (i) Tanker constructed on or after 1 July 2012, not later than the initial safety equipment survey. (ii) Tanker constructed before 1 July 2012, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2015. （３） Cargo ship other than tanker (i) Cargo ship, of 10,000GT and upwards constructed on or after 1 July 2013, not later than the initial safety equipment survey. (ii) Cargo ship, of 3,000GT and upward but less than 10,000GT constructed on or after 1 July 2014, not later than the initial safety equipment survey. (iii) Cargo ship, of 50,000GT and upward constructed before 1 July 2013, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2016 (iv) Cargo ship, of 20,000GT and upward but less than 50,000GT constructed before 1 July 2013, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2017. (v) Cargo ship, of 10,000GT and upward but less than 20,000GT constructed before 1 July 2013, not later than the first safety equipment survey on or after 1 July 2018. （４） Ship constructed under the conditions of above (1)(ii), (2)(ii), (3)(iii), (iv) and (v), but delivered after the applicable due date, not later than initial safety equipment survey.
1.1.2 Plans and procedures for recovery of persons from the water (SOLAS III/17-1) Entry into force: 1 July 2014
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0985]
SOLAS chapter III was amended to add new regulation 17-1 and this new regulation states that "Plans and procedures for recovery of persons from the water" shall be provided for all ships engaged in international voyage (all passenger ships other than ro-ro passenger ships and cargo ships of not less than 500 tons). Application: 1
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
1) New ships constructed (keel-laid) on or after 1 July 2014: Classification survey at new building stage 2) Existing ships (ships constructed before 1 July 2014): By the first periodical or renewal safety equipment survey of the ship, whichever comes first after 1 July 2014 1.1.3 Means of recharging breathing apparatus (SOLAS II-2/15.2.2.6) Entry into force: 1 July 2014
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0947 & 0990]
SOLAS regulation II-2/15 was amended to add new paragraph 2.2.6 and this new paragraph states that an onboard means of recharging breathing apparatus used during drills or a suitable number of spare cylinders shall be carried on board to replace those used. Application: 1) New ships constructed (keel-laid) on or after 1 July 2014: Classification survey at new building stage 2) Existing ships (ships constructed before 1 July 2014): By 1 July 2014 1.1.4 Fire-fighter’s communication (SOLAS II-2/10.10.4) Entry into force: 1 July 2014
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0947 & 0990] SOLAS regulation II-2/10 was amended to add new paragraph 10.4. This new paragraph states that a minimum of two two-way portable radiotelephone apparatus for each fire party for fire-fighter’s communication shall be carried on board and those two-way portable radiotelephone apparatus shall be intrinsically safe or of an explosion-proof type. Application: 1) New ships constructed (keel-laid) on or after 1 July 2014: Classification survey at new building stage 2) Existing ships (ships constructed before 1 July 2014): By the first survey after 1 July 2018
1.1.5 Types of fire-fighter’s outfits (Amendments to SOLAS II-2/1 & 10.1) Entry into force: 1 July 2014
[Refer to ClassNK Technical Information TEC-0947 & 0990]
SOLAS II-2/1 & 10.1 were amended and due to these amendments, compressed air breathing apparatus shall be fitted with an audible alarm and a visual or other device which will alert the user before the volume of the air in the cylinder has been reduced to no less than 200 l. Application: 1) New ships constructed (keel-laid) on or after 1 July 2014: Classification survey at new building stage 2) Existing ships (ships constructed before 1 July 2014): By 1 July 2019
New amendments to conventions are also introduced on the ClassNK Website in the section, ‘IMO International Convention Calendar’. (http://www.classnk.or.jp)
2
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
1.2 Recent global developments 1.2.1 MOUs around the world In order to carry out PSC effectively, a recommendation concerning regional co-operation in the control of ships and discharges was adopted as a resolution by the IMO. In July 1982, fourteen European countries signed the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MOU), and today many countries have signed and accepted similar MOUs around the world. Currently, nine MOUs exist around the world and their respective activities in terms of implementing PSC are described below. European and North Atlantic region Asia-Pacific region Latin American region Caribbean region Mediterranean region Indian Ocean region Black Sea region West and Central Africa region Arab States of the Gulf
：Paris MOU ：Tokyo MOU ：Viña del Mar ：Caribbean MOU ：Mediterranean MOU ：Indian Ocean MOU ：Black Sea MOU ：Abuja MOU ：Riyadh MOU
(http://www.parismou.org/) (http://www.tokyo-mou.org/) (http://www.acuerdolatino.int.ar/) (http://www.caribbeanmou.org/) (http://www.medmou.org/) (http://www.iomou.org/) (http://www.bsmou.org/) (http://www.abujamou.org/) （http://www.riyadhmou.org/）
(1) European and North Atlantic region (Paris MOU) 1) Activity Established: 1 July 1982 Members: Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom -1 The Paris MOU consists of 27 participating maritime Administrations and covers the waters of the European coastal States and the North Atlantic basin from North America to Europe. The Paris MOU states that their aim is to eliminate the operation of sub-standard ships through a harmonized system of port State control. -2 Press releases have announced the recent activities of the Paris MOU as follows. Press release dated 14 October 2013 The Paris MOU announced that seven (7) ships were detained for MLC-related deficiencies during the first month since entry into force of MLC2006 and this corresponded to 10% of the total number of detentions (68) in the Paris MoU area in this period. Press release dated 17 February 2014 The Paris MOU announced the preliminary results of the Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery, which was conducted from 1 September to 30 November 2013. - 68 ships (41% of all detentions) were detained over the 3 month period as a direct result of the CIC for deficiencies related to propulsion and auxiliary machinery. - More than half (54%) of all CIC-topic related detentions involved ships of 20 years or more. Press release dated 16 June 2014 - The Paris MOU announced new targeting lists Paris MOU which take effect from 1 July 2014. 3
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2) New Inspection Regime (NIR) -1 Classification of the Ship Risk Profile A Ship Risk Profile is based on the flag, Recognized Organization and company performance, the number of deficiencies and detentions recorded for the ship, past inspection records of the ship, as well as the ship’s age and ship type. The Ship Risk Profile classifies ships into Low Risk Ships (LRS), Standard Risk Ships (SRS), and High Risk Ships (HRS). The time window is set according to the Ship Risk Profile as follows: - HRS: between 5-6 months after the last inspection - SRS: between 10-12 months after the last inspection - LRS: between 24-36 months after the last inspection -2 Banned Ships The banning criteria for the first and second ban have been amended as follows: - If the ship flies a black listed flag, it will be banned after more than 3 detentions in the last 36 months - If the ship flies a grey listed flag, it will be banned after more than 3 detentions in the last 24 months Any subsequent detention after the 2nd banning will lead to a ban, regardless of the flag of the ship. -3 Reporting obligations The ETA72 (a 72 hour pre-arrival) notification requirement has been widened to include all ships with a HRS profile as well as all bulk carriers, chemical tankers, gas carriers, oil tankers, and passenger ships 12 years of age or older subject to an expanded inspection. Further, all ships are required to notify their ETA24 (a 24 hour pre-arrival), ATA (the actual time of arrival), and ATD (the actual time of departure). (2) Asia-Pacific region (Tokyo MOU) 1) Activity Established: 1 December 1993 Members: Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu, and Vietnam -1 The main objectives of the Memorandum have been announced as follows: 1. to establish an effective Port State control regime in the Asia-Pacific region through the co-operation of its members and the harmonization of their activities, 2. to eliminate substandard shipping so as to promote maritime safety, 3. to protect the marine environment, and 4. to safeguard working and living conditions onboard ships. -2 Press releases announced the activities of the Tokyo MOU as follows. Press release dated 1 November 2013 The Tokyo MOU announced that the 24th meeting of the PSC Committee of the Tokyo MOU was held in Tokyo, Japan from 28 to 31 October 2013. - The Tokyo MOU celebrated its 20 years anniversary during this meeting and the relevant forum was organized. - The Committee approved the arrangements for the CIC on STCW Hours of Rest that will be carried out from 1 September to 30 November 2014 with the Paris MOU jointly. 4
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
- The 25th meeting of the PSC Committee will be held in New Zealand in November 2014. Press release dated 1 April 2014 The Tokyo MOU announced the preliminary results of the Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery, which was conducted from 1 September to 30 November 2013. - A total of 282 detentions were recorded during the CIC inspections, among which 72 or 25.5% of them were detained as a direct result of the CIC. - A detailed analysis of the results of the CIC will be considered by the PSC Committee in November 2014, after which a full report will be submitted to the International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2) New Inspection Regime (NIR) The NIR will enter into force from 1 January 2014. A Ship Risk Profile is based on the flag, Recognized Organization and company performance, the number of deficiencies and detentions recorded for the ship, past inspection records of the ship, as well as the ship’s age and ship type. The Ship Risk Profile classifies ships into Low Risk Ships (LRS), Standard Risk Ships (SRS), and High Risk Ships (HRS). The time window is set according to the Ship Risk Profile as follows: - LRS: 9 to 18 months after the last inspection - SRS: 5 to 8 months after the last inspection - HRS: 2 to 4 months after the last inspection (3) Latin-American region (Viña del Mar or Latin-America Agreement) Established: 5 November 1992 Members: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela (4) Caribbean region (Caribbean MOU) Established: 9 February 1996 Members: Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Curacao, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Netherlands Antilles, St. Kitts and Nevis, Suriname, and Trinidad & Tobago (5) Mediterranean region (Mediterranean MOU) Established: 11 July 1997 Members: Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey (6) Indian Ocean region (Indian Ocean MOU) Established: 5 June 1998 Members: Australia, Bangladesh, Djibouti, Eritrea, France (La Reunion Island), India, Iran, Kenya, Maldives, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sultanate of Oman, Tanzania, Union of Comoros and Yemen -1 In 2013, the Indian Ocean MOU carried out a Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery from 1 September to 30 November 2013 in line with the CIC carried out by the Tokyo MOU and the Paris MoU. -2 According to Annual Report 2013 of the Indian Ocean MOU, a total of 5,320 inspections were carried out and 376 vessels were detained in 2013. 5
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(7) Black Sea region (Black Sea MOU) Established: 7 April 2000 Members: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, Russian Federation, Turkey, and Ukraine -1 In 2013, the Black Sea MOU carried out a Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery from 1 September to 30 November 2013 in line with the CIC carried out by the Tokyo MOU and the Paris MoU. -2 The 15th meeting of the PSC Committee of the Black Sea MOU was held in Constanta, Romania from 8 to 10 April 2014. -3 According to Annual Report 2013 of the Black Sea MOU, a total of 5,080 inspections were carried out and 169 vessels were detained in 2013. -4 CIC on STCW Hours of Rest is scheduled to be carried out from 1 September to 30 November 2014. (8) West and Central Africa region (Abuja MOU) Established: 22 October 1999 Members: Angola, Benin, Cote d’Ivoire, Gabon, Ghana, Nigeria, Republic of Congo, Republic of Guinea, Sao Tome & Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa、The Gambia and Togo (9) Arab States of the Gulf (Riyadh MOU) Established: 30 June 2004 Members: The Kingdom of Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, The Sultanate of Oman, and United Arab Emirates 1.2.2 Port State Control in the United States (USCG) 1) Activity Although the United States Coast Guard (USCG) is not a member of any MOU, it is an observer at a number of MOUs, and undertakes effective PSC in cooperation with other MOUs. In the 1970's, the U.S. Coast Guard increased its emphasis on the examination of foreign vessels. Although this emphasis was primarily driven by requirements to ensure compliance with the then new U.S. pollution prevention and navigation safety regulations, boarding officers also exercised Port State authority when instances of non-compliance with SOLAS and MARPOL were noted. In 1994, the U.S. introduced risk-management methodologies into the Port State Control program in order to allocate limited inspection resources to where they could do the most good, by identifying those ships, ship owners, classification societies and Flag Administrations that were most often found lacking in meeting their international Convention responsibilities. On 1 January 2001, the USCG implemented an initiative to identify high-quality ships, called Qualship 21, quality shipping for the 21st century. This program has since proven to be very effective in recognizing well operated and maintained ships of good quality and continues in use today. 2) PSC Safety Targeting Matrix The USCG uses the Port State Control Safety and Environmental Protection Compliance Targeting Matrix which enables the Coast Guard to rationally and systematically determine the probable risk posed by non-U.S. ships calling at U.S. ports. The matrix is used to decide which ships Port State Control Officers should examine on any given day, in any given port. The numerical score, along with other performance based factors, determines a ship's priority for examination. (reference: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cgcvc/) 6
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
3) Banning of foreign vessels All foreign flagged vessels operating in U.S. waters are required to be maintained in compliance with U.S. regulations, international conventions and other required standards. However, when a vessel has been repeatedly detained by the USCG (totaling three detentions within a twelve month period) and it is determined that failure to effectively implement the SMS onboard may be a contributing factor for the substandard conditions that led to the detentions, the USCG Headquarters (USCG-HQ) will issue a Letter of Denial prohibiting the ship from further entering any U.S. port until such time as certain actions have been taken to rectify the situation. However, even if a vessel has less than three detentions in twelve months, a Letter of Denial may be issued to any vessel which, in the option of the USCG; 1. may pose a significant risk to the safety of the vessel, crew or the marine environment; or 2. has a history of accidents, pollution incidents, or serious repair problems which creates reason to believe that such a vessel may be unsafe or create a threat to the marine environment; or 3. has discharged oil or other hazardous material in violation of any law of the United States or in a manner or quantities inconsistent with the provisions of any treaty to which the United States is a party. 1.2.3 Equasis Equasis is a unique database that collects safety-related information on the world’s merchant fleet from both public and private sources and makes it easily accessible on the Internet (http://www.equasis.org/). It displays information from public authorities (Port State inspection and detention information from the three participating PSC regions, i.e. the Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, and USCG) and industry players (such as information on class, insurance, participation in industry inspection schemes, and quality organizations), all free of charge. 1.3 Measures adopted by ClassNK 1.3.1 Handling of the Deficiencies Identified by Port State Control Inspections (1) Cooperative assistance with Port States and treatment of deficiencies When surveyors of the Society are notified of the detention of a ship classed with ClassNK, the Society actively co-operates with the reporting PSC Authority in a number of ways. The more direct of these steps include the following. - Surveyors liaise with port state control authorities to ensure that they are called in as soon as appropriate when deficiencies related to class and/or statutory matters are identified. - Surveyors liaise with PSC officers to ensure uniformity of interpretation of class and statutory requirements. - Surveyors provide PSC officers with background information, extracts from reports pertinent to the inspection, and details of outstanding recommendations of class and statutory items whenever so requested by the port state. - Attending surveyors examine not only the condition of the deficiencies identified by the PSC officers but also the general condition of the hull, machinery and equipment of the subject ship to the extent of an annual survey, carefully considering the seriousness of any deficiencies when they attend ships that have been subject to an intervention action by the port state. 7
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(2) Treatment of inspection reports by PSC officers When a surveyor receives an inspection report from a port state authority, the report is sent to the ClassNK Head Office. The report is immediately examined by experienced staff to identify the causes of the deficiencies. This examination is carried out for all ships for which such reports are received, and the results are circulated to all sections concerned, including all members of the board of directors, as necessary. The results are also reflected a ClassNK PSC database that has been developed for the purpose of providing surveyors with PSC related information electronically. The results of this examination are also submitted to the Flag State Administration of the ship, as required. Further, visits may also be made to the ship owner or manager, when deemed appropriate, to advise them of the relevant deficiencies noted and to encourage them to more proactively improve the routine maintenance of their ships and take other measures as necessary to ensure the highest levels of safe and environmentally friendly operation. In cases where the deficiencies pointed out by the port state authority are determined to be related to previous surveys conducted by surveyors of the Society, those surveys are treated as a non-conforming service, and appropriate corrective and preventive actions are taken in accordance with the ClassNK quality system. 1.3.2 Minimizing the number of detained ships in order to reduce substandard ships (1) Special training at several in-house meetings Special training on PSC related issues is conducted at several meetings held regularly for general managers and managers, to ensure that surveyors carry out full and effective surveys with an uncompromising attitude towards ensuring the quality and safety of the ships classed with the Society. Special re-training is also carried out under the supervision of the Head Office and regional managers, as needed, for those surveyors who have conducted any surveys determined to be a non-conforming service under the quality system of the Society. (2) Meetings and informal gatherings with ship owners (a) Visiting Management Companies When a ship classed with ClassNK is detained by a Port State, if deemed necessary, a senior surveyor or manager of the Society visits the owner or the company managing the ship to discuss what steps can be taken to improve the routine maintenance of the ships in their fleet, so as to prevent both a recurrence of the deficiencies noted and the occurrence of similar problems in the future. (b) Meetings and seminars PSC related issues are regularly discussed at informal gatherings and technical committee meetings held with ship owners. At such times, explanations are given and documents presented, with emphasis placed on the importance of proactively ensuring the proper maintenance of ships and education of crew in order to prevent the detention of ships. (c) Publications The “ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control” is distributed to all registered shipowners and operators in the ClassNK fleet. A checklist entitled “Good Maintenance on board Ships” has also been prepared in electronic format, which can be used by the ship’s crew for quick and easy inspection of a ship before entering port. 8
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
1.3.3 Visits to Port States Personnel from the ClassNK Head Office as well as local survey offices are assigned to visit the headquarters or offices of various Port States with the aim of introducing ClassNK and exchanging views on matters of mutual concern. In 2013, the ClassNK Head Office visited the following Port States for the above-mentioned purpose. Australia China India
Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) Maritime Safety Administration (MSA) Indian Maritime Administration
9
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
Chapter 2 Statistical Analysis of Detained Ships Registered to ClassNK 2.1 General The data in this chapter, on ships detained due to deficiencies identified during PSC inspections, is based on the following sources: (1) Notifications from Port States issued in accordance with IMO Resolution A.1052(27) “Procedure for Port State Control, and (2) Publications related to detained ships issued by the USCG, the Paris MOU, and the Tokyo MOU. From January to December 2013, 447 PSC detentions were reported relating to 411 ships classed by NK. This included cases of detention for reasons not related to class or to NK itself. The total number of NK-registered ships (500 GT or over) was 7,620 at the end of December 2013. Therefore, the 411 ships detained represent about 5.4% of the total number of ships in the NK fleet. Further, detention ratio (Detentions/Registered number in 2013) of the NK fleet in 2013 is about 5.9%. 2.2 Data on Detentions 2.2.1 Detentions by Flag State Table 2.2.1 Detentions by Flag State (NK) Flag State Panama Liberia Marshall Islands Malta Singapore Hong Kong Indonesia Thailand Bahamas Turkey St. Vincent * Cook Islands Cyprus Japan Philippines Others Total
Number of Registered Ships (500GT or over)
Number of Detentions
2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 3,048 3,160 3,160 246 258 249 299 349 396 26 17 36 249 307 343 18 19 21 181 184 200 18 16 21 610 649 691 21 21 17 422 435 458 18 17 14 108 160 170 4 4 9 72 72 67 8 10 8 131 134 144 14 9 7 58 68 69 7 3 7 27 25 22 8 8 6 3 9 21 1 3 6 86 85 86 7 6 5 810 840 860 0 3 5 99 89 87 4 8 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ 31 35 31 6,914 7,319 7,620 431 437 447
Detention Ratio (%) (= Detentions / Registered Number in each year) 2011 2012 2013 8.1 8.2 7.9 8.7 4.9 9.1 7.2 6.2 6.1 9.9 8.7 10.5 3.4 3.2 2.5 4.3 3.9 3.1 3.7 2.5 5.3 11.1 13.9 11.9 10.7 6.7 4.9 12.1 4.4 10.1 29.6 32.0 27.8 33.3 33.3 28.6 8.1 7.1 5.8 0 0.4 0.6 4.0 9.0 5.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.2 6.0 5.9
* Refers to St. Vincent and the Grenadines. The same applies in all subsequent tables or figures.
10
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
300.0 258 246 249
Detentions
250.0
2011 2012
200.0
2013
150.0 100.0 50.0
26
36 17
181921
212117
181621
18 17 14
14 9 7
8 10 8
8 8
7 3 7
313531 6
1 3 6
7 6 5
0 3 5
4 8 5
M
Pa n
am a ar Li sh be al l I ria sl am ds M a Si ng lta ap H on ore g K In ong do ne Th sia ai la Ba nd ha m a Tu s St r . V ke y in c C oo en t k Is * la nd C s yp ru s Ja Ph pa n ili pp in es O th er s
0.0
4 4 9
Flag State Fig 2.2.1-1 Detention by Flag (NK)
35.0 29.6
33.3 33.3 27.8
2011
28.6
25.0
2012
20.0
2013
15.0 10.0 5.0
13.9
8.1 8.2 7.9
8.7 9.1 4.9
9.9 7.2 6.26.1
8.7
11.1
10.5
3.4 3.2 2.5
4.3 3.9
12.1
11.9 10.7
10.1 8.17.1
6.7 3.1
3.7 2.5
5.3
4.9
4.4
0.0
9 5.8
4
5.7
0 0.40.6
Pa n
am a M Li ar be sh ria al lI sl am ds M al Si ng ta ap or H e on g K on In do g ne s T h ia ai la Ba nd ha m as Tu rk St ey .V in c C oo ent * k Is la nd s C yp ru s Ja Ph pan ili pp in es
Detention Ratio (%)
30.0
32
Flag State
Fig 2.2.1-2 Detention Ratio by Flag (NK)
Of those Flag State Administrations with ten (10) or more NK classed ships, the following Administrations were identified as having a detention ratio higher than 10% in 2013: Malta, Thailand, Turkey, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Cook Islands.
11
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.2.2 Detentions by ship type Table 2.2.2 Detentions by Ship Type (NK) Number of Detention Ratio (%) Registered Number of Detentions (= Detentions / Registered Ship Type Ships in 2013 Number in each year) (500GT or 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 over) Bulk Carrier 3,180 216 246 7.2 7.2 7.7 209 General Cargo 766 100 80 14.3 13.6 10.4 93 Container Carrier 594 38 35 5.3 6.5 5.9 31 Chip Carrier 128 9 6 8.5 6.5 4.7 13 Cement Carrier 105 0 1 1.0 0 1.0 1 Ro-Ro Ship 44 6 6 9.8 12.8 13.6 9 Reefer Carrier 142 18 18 8.6 12.1 12.7 15 Vehicles Carrier 352 10 14 2.3 2.8 4.0 8 Oil Tanker 752 6 10 1.4 0.8 1.3 10 Oil/Chemical Tanker 672 27 22 5.0 4.2 3.4 31 Gas Carrier 365 6 6 2.5 1.7 1.6 9 Others 520 1 3 1.0 0.2 0.6 2 Total 7,620 437 447 431 A detention ratio of General cargo ships, Ro-Ro ships, and Reefer carriers was more than 10% and they were identified as having a higher detention ratio than other ship types noted. (‘Detention ratio’ was determined by dividing the number of detentions by the number of ships of each respective ship type in the NK fleet.) 250 200
2011 2012 2013
246 209 216
150 100
93 100
80
50 0
31 27
38 35 13
9
6
1
0
9
1
6
6
15
18 18
8
10 14
10
6
22
10
9
6
en er al C ar C on go ta in er C ar ri e r C hi p C ar rie C r em en tC ar ri e r R oR o Sh ip R ee fe rC ar Ve rie r hi cl es C ar rie r O il Ta O il/ nk Ch er em ic al Ta nk er G as C ar rie r
31
6
1
3
O
th er s
2
G
Bu lk
C ar rie r
Detentions
300
Fig. 2.2.2-1Detentions by Ship Type (NK) 13.6
12.8 10.4
12.1
2011
12.7
2012
9.8 8.5
7.7 6.5 5.3
5.9
8.6
2013
6.5 5
4.7
4 2.3 1
2.8 0.8
1.3
G
Bu lk
1.7 1.6
en er al C ar C go on ta in er C ar ri e r C hi p C ar rie C r em en tC ar ri e r R oR o Sh ip R ee fe rC ar rie Ve r hi cl es C ar rie r O il Ta O il/ nk Ch er em ic al Ta nk er G as C ar rie r
0
3.4 2.5
1.4
1
4.2
Fig. 2.2.2-2 Detention Ratio by Ship Type (%) 12
1
th er s
7.2 7.2
13.6
O
14.3
C ar rie r
Detention Ratio(%)
16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0
0.2
0.6
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.2.3 Detentions by ship’s age Table 2.2.3 Detentions by Ship’s Age (NK) Detention Ratio (%) Number of Number of Detentions (= Detentions / Registered Registered Number in each year) Ships in 2013 (500GT or over) 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013
Ship’s age Up to 5 years old
3,055
71
67
57
2.6
2.2
1.9
Over 5 and up to 10
1,663
68
78
116
5.3
5.4
7.0
Over 10 and up to 15
1,105
94
86
77
7.7
7.4
7.0
Over 15 and up to 20
1,050
88
98
101
10.5
10.4
9.6
Over 20 and up to 25
404
41
35
43
10.7
9.2
10.6
Over 25
343
69
73
53
16.5
18.8
15.5
7,620
431
437
447
Detentions
Total
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
116 94 71
67
57
68
78
86
88
77
2011
98 101 69 41
Up to 5
Over 5 and up to 10
35
53
43
Over 10 and Over 15 and Over 20 and up to 15 up to 20 up to 25
2012
73
2013
Over 25
Detention Ratio (%)
Fig. 2.2.3-1Detentions by Ship's Age (NK)
18.8
20.0
16.5
15.0 10.5 10.4
10.0 5.0
5.3 5.4
7
7.7 7.4
9.6
10.7
9.2
15.5
2013
7
2.6 2.2 1.9
0.0 Up to 5
Over 5 and up to 10
Over 10 and Over 15 and Over 20 and up to 15 up to 20 up to 25
Fig. 2.2.3-2 Detention Ratio by Ship's Age (NK)
13
2011 2012
10.6
Over 25
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.2.4 Detentions by ship size （Gross Tonnage) Table 2.2.4 Detentions by Ship Size （Gross Tonnage) (NK) Detention Ratio (%) Number of Number of Detentions (= Detentions / Registered Registered Gross Ton (x 1,000) Number in each year) Ships in 2013 (500GT or over) 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 Up to 10 2,586 164 147 137 6.6 5.8 5.3 Over 10 and up to 20 1,273 89 97 100 7.4 7.8 7.9 Over 20 and up to 30 910 63 64 55 8.1 7.4 6.0 Over 30 and up to 40 1,051 61 68 76 6.7 6.9 7.2 Over 40 and up to 50 592 28 26 20 5.5 4.6 3.4 Over 50 and up to 60 331 7 8 16 2.6 2.6 4.8 Over 60 and up to 80 213 7 9 14 3.5 4.3 6.6 Over 80 664 12 18 29 2.1 2.8 4.4 7,620
Detentions
Total 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
431
437
447
164 147 137
2011 89
2012
97 100 63 64
61 68
55
76
2013 28 26 20
Up to 10
7
8
16
12 18
14 7 9
Over 60 Over 50 Over 30 Over 40 Over 20 Over 10 and up to and up to and up to and up to and up to and up to 80 60 50 40 30 20
29
Over 80
x 1,000 GT
Fig.2.2.4-1 Detentions by Gross Tonnage (NK)
9.0
Detention Ratio (%)
8.0 7.0 6.0
7.4
7.8 7.9
6.6 5.8
8.1 7.4
6.7 6.9
7.2
6
2011
6.6
2012
5.5
5.3
4.8
4.6
5.0 4.0
3.5
3.4
2.8
2.6 2.6
3.0
4.4
4.3
2.1
2.0 1.0 0.0 Up to 10
Over 10 and up to 20
Over 20 and up to 30
Over 30 and up to 40
Over 40 and up to 50
Over 50 and up to 60
Over 60 and up to 80
Over 80
x 1,000 GT
Fig. 2.2.4-2 Detention Ratio by Gross Tonnage (NK) 14
2013
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.2.5 Detentions by Port State China
Table 2.2.5 Detentions by Port State (NK)
Port State China
120 117 79 77 83
Australia
2011 2012 2013
27 31
Japan
117
120
141
Australia
83
77
79
Japan
40
31
27
U.S.A.(*1)
21
18
27
India
26
32
20
Indonesia
6
15
15
Canada
23
24
14
Russian Federation
3
6
10
Italy
12
14
9
Netherlands
Italy
5
2
9
Netherlands
9
8
7
United Kingdom
6 6 6
United Kingdom
6
6
6
France
6 2 4
France
4
2
6
Iran
5 6 5
Iran
5
6
5
Egypt
1
6
5
Brazil
Brazil
0
7
5
Viet Nam
4
Viet Nam
9
8
4
Chile
4 4 4
Chile
4
4
4
Singapore
Singapore
3
6
4
New Zealand
New Zealand
1
2
4
Turkey
Republic of Korea Indonesia Canada Russian Federation
U.S.A.(*1)
0
5
4
Spain
10
11
3
Slovenia Gibraltar
2 1
0 0
3 3
Gibraltar
Bulgaria
0
0
3
Bulgaria
40 431
27 437
30 447
(*1) Including Puerto Rico
26
32
15 15
6
14
3
40
27
20
Republic of Korea
Turkey
Others Total
18 21
India
Egypt
141
24 23
10
6
9
14 12
9
2 5
7 8 9
1
0
2013 2012 2011
5 6 5 7
8 9
4 6
3
4 2 1
0
4 5
Spain
3
Slovenia
3 0 2 0 1 0 0
11 10
3
3
Fig. 2.2.5 D etenti ons by Port Sta te ( N K )
Detentions by members of the Tokyo MOU made approximately two thirds of the total number of ships detained in 2013.
15
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.3 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies 2.3.1 Detainable Deficiencies per Category In 2013, a total of 1,169 detainable deficiencies were reported relating to 447 detentions, i.e., deficiencies which were serious enough to jeopardise the ship’s seaworthiness, safety of the crew onboard, or to present an unreasonable threat of harm to the environment and therefore warranted the detention of the ship. The deficiencies are categorized as shown in Figure 2.3.1 and categories in this figure are based on those of the Tokyo MOU. Deficiencies related to fire safety and life-saving appliances combined accounted for about one-third of the total in 2013. FIRE SAFETY
195
LIFESAVING APPLIANCES
215 219
166
125
155
123 118 109
EMERGENCY SYSTEMS
119
ISM SAFETY OF NAVIGATION
94
65 69 52
POLLUTION PREVENTION - MARPOL ANNEX Ⅰ WATER / WEATHERTIGHT CONDITIONS
65
39
50 47
45 43
RADIO COMMUNICATIONS CERTIFICATE AND DOCUMENTATION -SHIP CERTIFICATE
20
29
81
52
35
PROPULSION AND AUXILIARY MACHINERY
65
131 134
2013 2012
61
36
2011
31 34 32
STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS
25
CERTIFICATE AND DOCUMENTATION -CREW CERTIFICATE
21
32
24 20 25
WORKING AND LIVING CONDITIONS - WORKING CONDITIONS POLLUTION PREVENTION - MARPOL ANNEX Ⅴ
22
4 3
21
POLLUTION PREVENTION - MARPOL ANNEX Ⅳ
22
35
18 10 15
POLLUTION PREVENTION - MARPOL ANNEX Ⅵ ISPS
18
2
WORKING AND LIVING CONDITIONS - LIVING CONDITIONS
12 12
5
12
CERTIFICATE AND DOCUMENTATION -DOCUMENTS
11 12 18
OTHER
11 10 16 8
ALARMS
14 15
5 2 5
CARGO OPERATIONS INCLUDING EQUIPMENT
0
Fig. 2.3.1 Deficiencies per Category (NK) 16
50
100
150
Deficiencies
200
250
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.3.2 Frequently Reported Deficiencies Figure 2.3.2 shows those items of detainable deficiencies that were reported frequently, in conjunction with the actual detention of ships in the NK fleet. Lifeboats, emergency fire pumps, and fire-dampers continue to be the major items where most detainable deficiencies were found. The items reported from 2011 to 2013 are explained in detail in paragraphs (1) to (15) below. Lifeboats
68 53
Emergency Fire Pump
52
Fixed fire extinguishing installation
33
15
4
32
15
0
Charts
23
20 19
22
Maintenance of the ship and equipment
31
21 21
Development of plans for shipboard operations
20
Oil filtering equipment Ventilators, air pipes, casings Launching arrangements for survival craft
18
Sewage treatment plan
2013
17 16
2012
24
17
2011
16
5 6
15
Fire detection
14 14
MF/HF radio installation
14
18
16
14
6
9
8
10
14
13 14
Operational readiness of lifesaving appliances
13
Means of control (opening, pumps ventilation, etc)
15
0
41
34
14
Fire fighting equipment and appliances
24
11
Fire prevention
Covers (hatchway-, portable-, tarpaulins, etc.)
26
19
9
Propulsion main engine
42
19
12
0
33
26
15
ISM
Embarkation arrangements survival craft
57
38 36 37
Fire-dampers
Emergency souce of power- Emergency Generator
78
52
23 19
13
2
10
20
30
40
Deficiencies Fig. 2.3.2 Deficiencies reported Frequentry (NK)
17
50
60
70
80
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(1) Fire Safety Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Fire Safety)” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(1) below. Table 2.3.2-(1) Fire Safety Item
11 12 13
Fire-dampers Fixed fire extinguishing system Fire prevention
Noted Deficiencies Wasted and holed fire-dampers 37 36 38 Operation failure of fire-dampers Corroded and holed CO2 lines 15 26 33 Operation failure of fire extinguishing systems Deteriorated non-combustible materials for cable 17 14 18 penetrations in A-class divisions 14 18 15 Inoperable fire detection units
Fire detection Fire fighting equipment and appliances Quick closing valves, Remote control devices Jacketed piping system for high pressure fuel lines
15 19 13 Inoperable quick closing valves
Fire pumps and its pipes
12 17 12 Wasted and holed fire main line
Ventilation
12 11 11
Doors within main vertical zone
12 10 11 Malfunction of self-closing devices
8 10 14 Wasted and holed fire hoses
14 8 12 Operation failure of F.O. leakage alarm
Corroded and holed ventilator casings Malfunction of mechanical ventilators
(2) Life Saving Appliances Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Life Saving Appliances” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(2) below. Item Lifeboats
Table 2.3.2-(2) Life Saving Appliances 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Lifeboat engine not started 68 52 78 Poor maintenance of rechargeable batteries Inadequate resetting of on-load release gears
Launching and recovery arrangements for survival craft Operational readiness of lifesaving appliances Embarkation arrangements of lifesaving appliances Rescue boats
11 9 19 Corroded boat falls 23 14 13
Inoperable / Inadequate resetting of on-load release gear
0 2 13 Embarkation ladder heavily corroded and broken 10 8 7 Rescue boat engine not started
18
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(3) Emergency Systems Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Emergency Systems” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(3) below. Table 2.3.2-(3) Emergency Systems 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies
Item
Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes Emergency source of powerEmergency Generator
52 57 53 Inoperable and unable to pressure the fire main 0 15 32 Emergency generator unable to start 14 21 11 Fire drill failed
Fire drills
8 8 10 Abandon ship drill failed
Abandon ship drills
(4) ISM Related Deficiencies Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “ISM Related Deficiencies” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(4) below. Item
Table 2.3.2-(4) ISM Related Deficiencies 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies
ISM Maintenance of ship and equipment Development of plans for shipboard operations Resources and personnel
4 15 33 Implementation of SMS failed generally 42 31 22
Inadequate implementation of SMS by crew Inadequate maintenance of ship’s equipment
26 21 21 Charts management not followed SMS Ship’s crew not familiar with operation of ship’s 15 22 12 equipment
(5) Safety of Navigation Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Safety of Navigation” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(5) below. Table 2.3.2-(5) Safety of Navigation Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Navigation charts not updated 19 20 23 Navigation charts for intended voyage not Charts available Defective VDR / S-VDR 9 13 12 Voyage date recorder(VDR) Alarm panel showing “system error” Nautical publications (tide table, list of lights, list 7 5 10 Nautical publications of radio signals, etc.) not updated Inoperable navigation lights 7 4 7 Lights, shapes, sound -signals Navigation lights not supplied by batteries Gyro compass
3 3 5 Not Operable
19
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(6) MARPOL Annex I Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “MARPOL Annex I” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(6) below. Item Oil filtering equipment (Oily-Water Separating Equipment) 15PPM alarm arrangements Control of discharge of oil Oil discharge monitoring and control system
Table 2.3.2-(6) MARPOL Annex I 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Inoperable oily water separator Inoperable bilge pump 41 24 20 Oily water inside overboard discharging line Ship’s crew not familiar with operation of oil filtering equipment 10 9 12 Failure of 15PPM alarm Unapproved by-pass line fitting on oil filtering 3 2 5 equipment Inoperable automatic stopping device 3 5 4 Defective automatic stopping device
(7) Water/ Weathertight conditions Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Water/ Weathertight conditions” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(7) below. Table 2.3.2-(7) Water/ Weathertight conditions Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Wasted/Holed ventilators and air pipes 34 12 19 Damaged float of air pipe heads Ventilators ,air pipes , casings Damaged closing devices Wasted / Holed hatch covers 9 6 14 Wasted hatch cover cleats Hatch covers Deteriorated rubber packing Wasted / Holed hatch covers 8 4 5 Cargo and other hatchways Wasted / cracked hatch coamings Doors
9 5 3 Doors not closed tightly
(8) Propulsion and auxiliary machinery Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Propulsion and auxiliary machinery” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(8) below. Table 2.3.2-(8) Propulsion and auxiliary machinery Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Defective oil mist detectors 6 5 16 Propulsion main engine Leakage of cooling water Auxiliary engine
15 12 12 Inoperable Auxiliary engines
Other (machinery)
11 11 9
Operation of machinery
Safety valve of auxiliary boiler seized Oil leakage around auxiliary engines Ship’s Crew not familiar with simulation test of 8 5 7 over-speed trip of M/E 20
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(9) Radio Communications Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Radio Communications” are shown in the Table 2.3.2-(9) below. Table 2.3.2-(9) Radio Communications Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Defective MF/HF radio apparatus MF/HF radio installation 14 16 14 Not operable by DC power 22 12 10 GMDSS reserve source of energy failed
Reserve source of energy
1 0 3 Ship’s officer not familiar with operation of NBDP
Operation / maintenance
(10) Ship Certificate Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Ship Certificate” are shown in the Table 2.3.2-(10) below. Table 2.3.2-(10) Ship Certificate Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Certificate expired 1 4 6 Cargo Ship Safety Equipment The original certificate not onboard Mandatory annual survey overdue Certificate expired 1 1 5 The original certificate not onboard Cargo Ship Safety Radio Periodical survey overdue Certificate expired 1 2 4 Load Lines The original certificate not onboard The original certificate not onboard 3 1 3 EIAPP Technical files not onboard (11) Structural Conditions Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Structural Conditions” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(11) below. Item
Table 2.3.2-(11) Structural Conditions 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies
Electric equipment in general
3 1 5 Low insulation alarm malfunction
(12) Crew Certificate Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Crew Certificate” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(12) below. Item Certificates for master and officers
Table 2.3.2-(12) Crew Certificate 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Missing of endorsement on STCW certificates 6 14 12 by flag state Valid certificates expired
21
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(13) Working Conditions Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “Working Conditions” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(13) below. Table 2.3.2-(13) Working Conditions Item 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies Dirty and oily engine room due to oil leakage etc. 10 14 23 Cleanliness of engine room A large quantity of oily bilge in engine room (14) MARPOL Annex V Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “MARPOL Annex V” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(14) below. Item
Table 2.3.2-(14) MARPOL Annex V 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies 9 17 24 Inadequate entry in Garbage Record Book
Garbage
(15) MARPOL Annex IV Major types and details of deficiencies noted under the category of “MARPOL Annex IV” are shown in Table 2.3.2-(15) below. Item Sewage treatment plant
Table 2.3.2-(15) MARPOL Annex IV 11 12 13 Noted Deficiencies 17 24 16 Not operable
22
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.4 Analysis of Detainable Deficiencies by Port State Most frequent detainable deficiencies per port state are shown in Tables 2.4.1 to 2.4.11 according to number of detentions reported from 2011 to 2013. 2.4.1
China Table 2.4.1 China Category of Deficiency
Fire Safety Lifesaving Appliances Emergency Systems Water/Weathertight conditions MARPOL Annex I ISM MARPOL Annex V Radio Communications Ships Certificates and Documents Safety of Navigation Dangerous goods Structural Conditions MARPOL Annex VI MARPOL Annex IV Crew Certificates and Documents
2011 2012 2013 69 88 67 46 44 58 34 33 42 19 11 24 25 17 19 16 24 18 0 1 17 22 9 15 6 9 15 5 11 14 3 1 12 6 9 9 4 2 8 5 12 7 4 7 7
Type of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Lifeboats 29 19 36 Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 15 24 22 Ventilators, air pipes, casings 13 5 14 Oil filtering equipment 19 10 11 Fire-dampers 8 14 11 Emergency source of power-Emergency Generator 0 3 11 Embarkation arrangements survival craft 0 2 11 Fire prevention 9 8 10 Quick closing valves 8 10 8 Ventilation 5 3 7 Certificates for master and officers 0 5 7 Maintenance of the ship and equipment 10 6 6 Jacketed high pressure lines 6 6 6 Incinerator 2 0 6 Charts 1 4 6 Covers (hatchway-, portable-, tarpaulins, etc.) 1 2 6 Means of escape 0 3 6 Garbage 0 1 6 A total of 352 detainable deficiencies relating to 141 detentions were noted in 2013. (2.5 detainable deficiencies/detention)
23
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.4.2
Australia Table 2.4.2 Australia Category of Deficiency ISM Lifesaving Appliances Fire Safety Emergency Systems Water/Weathertight conditions Radio Communications MARPOL Annex IV Safety of Navigation
2011 2012 2013 45 36 24 16 19 28 19 16 14 6 6 14 6 9 10 10 4 8 6 8 6 8 7 2
Type of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Development of plans for shipboard operations 20 17 14 Operational readiness of lifesaving appliances 22 13 11 Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 5 3 9 Fire-dampers 10 7 6 Sewage treatment plant 6 7 6 MF/HF radio installation 4 3 5 Covers (hatchway-, portable-, tarpaulins, etc.) 2 2 5 Fixed fire extinguishing system 0 1 5 Other(ISM) 0 1 4 Launching arrangements for survival craft 0 0 4 A total of 102 detainable deficiencies relating to 79 detentions were noted in 2013. (1.3 detainable deficiencies/detention) 2.4.3
Japan Table 2.4.3 Japan Category of Deficiency
ISM Fire Safety Emergency Systems Lifesaving Appliances Crew Certificates and Documents Safety of Navigation Water/Weathertight conditions Other Alarms Structural Conditions
Type of Deficiency
2011 2012 2013 9 11 10 15 11 9 17 14 7 9 5 7 2 3 4 2 0 3 6 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1
2011 2012 2013 Fire drills 8 11 6 Resources and personnel 6 6 6 Lifeboats 2 2 5 Fixed fire extinguishing system 1 0 4 A total of 46 detainable deficiencies relating to 27 detentions were noted in 2013. (1.7 detainable deficiencies/detention)
24
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.4.4
U.S.A. Table 2.4.4 U.S.A. Category of Deficiency Fire safety ISPS ISM MARPOL Annex VI
2011 2012 2013 7 7 15 2 0 12 10 4 4 0 0 3
Type of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Fixed fire extinguishing system 0 0 10 Access control to ship 2 0 5 Other(Maritime security) 0 0 4 Electric equipment in general 0 1 2 Sulphur oxides 0 0 2 Ship security officer 0 0 2 A total of 48 detainable deficiencies relating to 27 detentions were noted in 2013. (1.8 detainable deficiencies/detention) 2.4.5
India Table 2.4.5 India Category of Deficiency Safety of Navigation Emergency Systems Fire Safety
2011 2012 2013 31 8 18 5 13 13 23 16 9
Type of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 1 10 8 Lifeboats 5 4 5 Nautical publication 4 1 5 Voyage data recorder(VDR) / S-VDR 7 2 4 Safe means of access Deck/Hold/Tank, etc. 0 0 4 A total of 101 detainable deficiencies relating to 20 detentions were noted in 2013. (5.1 detainable deficiencies/detention) 2.4.6
Republic of Korea Table 2.4.6 Republic of Korea Category of Deficiency Fire safety ISM Lifesaving Appliances
2011 2012 2013 4 8 9 3 5 9 2 5 9
Type of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Launching arrangements for survival craft 0 0 5 Maintenance of the ship and equipment 2 4 4 Lifeboats 1 2 3 A total of 40 detainable deficiencies relating to 15 detentions were noted in 2013. (2.7 detainable deficiencies/detention)
25
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.4.7
Indonesia
Table 2.4.7 Indonesia Category of Deficiency
Fire Safety Radio Communications MARPOL Annex I ISM
2011 2012 2013 19 17 11 7 12 5 2 6 5 2 6 4
Type of Deficiency
2011 2012 2013 Fire-dampers 4 5 4 Lifeboats 1 3 3 Fire detection 0 2 3 A total of 42 detainable deficiencies relating to 14 detentions were noted in 2013. (3.0 detainable deficiencies/detention) 2.4.8
Canada
Table 2.4.8 Canada Category of Deficiency Emergency Systems Minimum requirements for seafarers Pollution prevention
2011 2012 2013 0 2 6 0 0 4 0 0 3
Type of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Emergency source of power-Emergency Generator 0 0 4 Emergency Fire Pump and its pipes 0 2 2 A total of 15 detainable deficiencies relating to 10 detentions were noted in 2013. (1.5 detainable deficiencies/detention) 2.4.9
Russian Federation Table 2.4.9 Russian Federation Category of Deficiency Lifesaving Appliances Safety of Navigation Fire Safety
2011 2012 2013 5 4 8 2 3 6 1 6 5
Type of Deficiency 2011 2012 2013 Lifeboats 4 4 6 Fire detection 0 2 2 Magnetic compass 0 1 2 Voyage date recorder(VDR) / S-VDR 0 1 2 A total of 24 detainable deficiencies relating to 9 detentions were noted in 2013. (2.7 detainable deficiencies/detention)
26
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.4.10
Italy
Table 2.4.10 Italy Category of Deficiency Safety of Navigation Lifesaving Appliances Fire Safety ISM
2011 2012 2013 0 0 15 2 0 13 4 1 12 3 1 8
Type of Deficiency
2011 2012 2013 ISM 1 1 6 Charts 0 0 6 Launching arrangements for survival craft 0 0 4 Auxiliary engine 0 0 4 A total of 82 detainable deficiencies relating to 9 detentions were noted in 2013. (9.1 detainable deficiencies/detention) 2.4.11
Netherlands
Table 2.4.11 Netherlands Category of Deficiency Lifesaving Appliances Fire Safety Emergency Systems Type of Deficiency
2011 2012 2013 3 4 7 3 0 7 2 0 5
2011 2012 2013 ISM 0 1 3 Lifeboats 2 1 2 Fire-dampers 2 0 2 Emergency source of power-Emergency Generator 0 0 2 A total of 38 detainable deficiencies relating to 7 detentions were noted in 2013. (5.4 detainable deficiencies/detention)
27
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
Chapter 3 Statistics & Analysis of ISM Deficiencies raised to NKSMC Ships This chapter is constructed based on the analysis result of Port State Control Inspection Reports which were collected in 2013. The contents of the records are available as “Monthly PSC Information” in “Safety Management Systems (ISM)”on ClassNK web-site ＜http://www.classnk.or.jp/＞. In this chapter, definition of the terms is as follows: NKSMC ship : Ship holding an International Safety Management Certificate issued by NKDOC company ISM deficiency
: :
ISM deficiency case : ISM deficiency rate* :
ClassNK Company holding a Document of Compliance issued by ClassNK Deficiency with safety management system related to the requirement of ISM Code Case where any ISM deficiency was recorded in PSC inspection report Percentage of ISM deficiency cases to the whole NKSMC ships or a group of NKSMC ships in consideration
* Defining ISM deficiency rate as percentage of ISM deficiency cases to NKSMC ships that subjected to a PSC inspection is more meaningful. However, as the total number of such NKSMC ships is unknown, the total number of the whole or a group of NKSMC ships was used instead.
3. 1
Statistics of ISM deficiency cases
3.1.1 Total number and average rate The total number of ISM deficiency cases and the average ISM deficiency rates in the past 4 years are shown in Table 3.1.1.1. Since year 2010, the rate has been on the increase to 5.2% in year 2013. Table 3.1.1.1 Total number and rate of ISM deficiency cases Year
ISM deficiency cases (A)
NKSMC ships total No. （B）
ISM deficiency rate （A/B）
2010
169
4212
4.0
2011
202
4505
4.5
2012
237
4677
5.1
2013
251
4868
5.2
3.1.2 Statistics of NKSMC Ships and ISM Deficiencies 3.1.2.1 Per Property of Ship (a) Per Type of Ship ISM deficiency rate per type of ship is shown in Table 3.1.2.1 (a) and Figure 3.1.2.1(a). The ISM deficiency rate of bulk carrier decreased 1.1% in 2013. The ISM deficiency rate of the other cargo ship and oil tanker decreased 0.3% in 2013, respectively. The ISM deficiency rate of chemical tanker decreased to the level of 2011. The ISM deficiency rate of Gas carrier has been decreased to one-fifth of 2012. 28
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
There has been no report of ISM deficiency of passenger & MODU since 2010. Table 3.1.2.1 (a)
ISM deficiency rate per type of ship
No. of ISM No. of deficiency NKSMC cases ships
Type of ship
ISM deficiency rate （％） （A/B）
2013
2013
2010
2011
2012
2013
Bulk carrier
119
2062
4.2
5.3
4.7
5.8
Other cargo ship
114
1783
4.8
5.1
6.7
6.4
Oil tanker＊
15
759
2.3
2.0
2.3
2.0
Chemical tanker**
1
27
8.3
3.8
12.0
3.7
Gas carrier
2
232
1.8
2.6
4.5
0.9
Passenger & MODU
0
5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total
251
4868
4.0
4.5
5.1
5.2
(A)
*
Including oil/chemical tankers.
(B)
** Excluding oil/chemical tanker.
ISM deficiency rate (%)
14.0
2010
12.0
2011
10.0
2012 8.0
2013
6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0
Bulk carrier
Other cargo ship
Figure 3.1.2.1 (a)
Oil tanker
Chemical tanker
Gas carrier
ISM deficiency rate per type of ship
29
Passenger & MODU
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(b) Per Age of ship The numbers of ISM deficiency cases per age of ships in recent four years are shown in Table 3.1.2.1 (b) together with the number of NKSMC ships. Figure 3.1.2.1 (b)-1 shows ISM deficiency rates. Figure 3.1.2.1(b)-2 shows ISM deficiency rate per type and age of ship in 2013. Generally, the ship’s age and ISM deficiency rate are correlated. In 2013, the group of the age 20-24 shows the highest rate, that is the same tendency in 2012. In 2013, “Bulk Carrier” of Age 20-24 shows a significantly higher deficiency rate than those of other ship types. Table 3.1.2.1 (b)
No. of ISM deficiency cases （A）
Age
ISM deficiency rate (A/B) (%)
No. of NKSMC ships （B）
2010
2011
2012
2013
2010
2011
2012
2013
0-4
31
52
46
47
1671
1803
1865
1849
5-9
32
37
50
70
940
1064
1211
1391
10 - 14
39
47
44
38
773
744
670
652
15 - 19
27
39
56
53
381
463
529
602
20 - 24
16
16
24
26
210
218
193
204
25 -
24
11
17
17
237
213
209
170
169
202
237
251
4212
4505
4677
4868
Total 14.0
2010
12.0
2011 2012
10.0
2013
8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0‐4
5‐9
Figure ISM deficiency rate (A/B) (%)
No. of ISM deficiency cases per age of ship
3.1.2.1 (b) -1
10 ‐ 14
15 ‐ 19
20 ‐ 24
25 ‐
ISM deficiency rate per age of ship
35.0 30.0
Bulk carrier
25.0
Other cargo ship
20.0
Oil tanker
15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 0‐4
5‐9
10 ‐ 14
15 ‐ 19
20 ‐ 24
25 ‐
Figure 3.1.2.1 (b) -2 ISM deficiency rate (%) per ship type and age of ship
30
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(c) Per Gross Tonnage of ship The numbers of ISM deficiency cases per ship’s gross-tonnage in recent four years are shown in Table 3.1.2.1(c) together with the number of NKSMC ships. Figure 1.2.1(c) shows ISM deficiency rate. The ISM deficiency rate of ships with GT “less than 10,000”, “20,000-30,000” and “60,000-80,000” has decreased in 2013 but other groups’ are increased. Table 3.1.2.1 (c) GT （ x 1,000）
No. of ISM deficiency cases per ship’s GT
No. of ISM deficiency cases （A） 2010
2011
2012
2013
2010
- 10
62
67
90
70
10 - 20
31
43
46
20 - 30
18
24
30 - 40
24
40 - 50
No. NKSMC ships (B) 2011
2012
2013
1134
1106
1083
1096
62
757
815
804
850
31
31
474
515
567
605
34
31
38
578
672
695
731
8
17
14
22
389
438
491
508
50 - 60
6
4
10
12
222
241
275
302
60 - 80
6
3
4
2
169
171
176
175
80 -
14
10
11
14
489
547
586
601
169
202
237
251
4212
4505
4677
4868
Total
ISM deficiency rate (A/B) (%)
9.0
2010
8.0
2011
7.0
2012
6.0
2013
5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0 ‐ 10
10 ‐ 20
20 ‐ 30
30 ‐ 40
40 ‐ 50
50 ‐ 60
60 ‐ 80
80 ‐
GT ( x 1,000)
Figure
3.1.2.1 (c)
ISM deficiency rate per Ship’s GT
31
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(d) Per Nationality of ship ISM deficiency rate per nationality of ship from 2010 to 2013 is shown in Table 3.1.2.1 (d) together with the numbers of ISM deficiency cases. ISM deficiency rate of Panamanian ships is increasing gradually since 2010. ISM deficiency rate of Liberian increased in 2013. ISM deficiency rate of Japanese, Bahamas and Singaporean decreased in 2013. Table
Flag St. Kitts and Nevis Philippines Turkey Thailand Greece Antigua and Barbuda Malta Liberia Panama H.K. (China) Marshall Islands Cyprus Bahamas Singapore Vanuatu Japan Malaysia St. Vincent and the Grenadines Cook Islands Total/Average
3.1.2.1 (d)
ISM deficiency rate per Nationality of ship
2010 No. Rate 0.0 0
No. 0
2011
Rate 0.0
2012 No. Rate 0 0.0
2013 No. Rate 1 100.0
3 5 5 0 0
6.8 6.9 9.4 0.0 0.0
4 4 5 0 0
9.1 5.3 8.8 0.0 0.0
4 1 5 0 1
8.5 1.2 7.8 0.0 11.1
5 9 7 2 1
11.9 11.0 10.0 9.1 7.7
8 4 97 9 7 4 2 15 3 4 2 1
6.5 2.1 4.1 3.9 5.0 6.9 1.8 3.1 6.5 2.3 6.1 7.1
7 11 126 9 9 3 1 16 2 3 1 1
5.8 5.1 5.1 3.6 4.6 4.7 0.9 3.1 4.2 1.6 2.6 9.1
8 7 143 13 9 1 5 21 5 9 3 1
6.7 3.1 5.6 5.0 3.7 1.7 4.2 4.0 11.1 4.4 7.9 12.5
9 14 151 14 13 3 4 14 1 3 0 0
6.6 6.2 5.8 4.9 4.7 4.6 3.5 2.5 2.1 1.4 0.0 0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
169
4.0
202
32
4.5
237
5.1
251
5.2
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
3.1.2.2 Per Factors related to Company Note: The analysis presented in this section covers only NKSMC ships under the management of NKDOC Companies. (a) Per Number of Ships under management by Company ISM deficiency rate per number of ships under a Company are shown in Table 3.1.2.2 (a) together with ISM deficiency rate. The group of 1-5 ships shows the highest ISM deficiency rate 7.5%. There shows a tendency - more ships, lower deficiency rate. However, the ISM deficiency rate of the group of 41-50 ships shows 5.9%, that is an exception of the above tendency. Table 3.1.2.2(a) ISM deficiency rate per No. of ships under management of Company No. of No. of ISM No. of ships No. of ISM deficiency NKSMC ships deficiency under Companies cases rate management (A) (B) (A/B) 1-5
445
76
1020
7.5
6 - 10
97
42
736
5.7
11 - 15
47
37
617
6.0
16 - 20
29
17
521
3.3
21 - 30
25
29
605
4.8
31 - 40
12
15
433
3.5
41 - 50
9
24
407
5.9
51 -
6
11
529
2.1
670
251
4868
5.2
Total
ISM deficiency rate (%)
8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1‐ 5
6 ‐ 10
11 ‐ 15
16 ‐ 20
21 ‐ 30
31 ‐ 40
41 ‐ 50
51 ‐
No. of ships under management of Company
Figure 3.1.2.2(a)
ISM deficiency rate per No. of ships under management of Company
33
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
(b) Per Country/Region where Company is located ISM deficiency rate per country/region where Company is located is shown in Table 3.1.2.2 (b) (together with the numbers of ISM deficiency cases) and in Figure 3.1.2.2 (b). The average ISM deficiency rate of ships under the management of Companies located in Turkey, Greece, Korea and Hong Kong have increased from 7.7% (2012) to 9.4%, from 4.7 % to 8.4 %, from 6.4% to 7.2%, 2.7% to 3.3%, respectively. In Taiwan and mainland China, the rate have decreased from 12.3％(2012) to 9.4%, from 6.5％ to 4.2％, respectively. Table 3.1.2.2(b) ISM deficiency rate per country/region in which company are located
Country/Region
No. of Companies
No. of ISM deficiency cases (A) 1
No. of NKSMC ships (B)
Norway
4
Netherlands
4
2
21
Turkey
54
18
191
Taiwan
18
19
202
U. A. E.
8
1
11
Thailand
7
7
79
110
30
359
Philippines
29
17
232
Korea
36
11
152
2
1
14
Japan
182
96
1833
China
58
8
190
7
2
55
H.K. (China)
16
11
334
Singapore
71
24
878
(Others)
64
3
307
670
251
4868
Greece
Canada
Germany
Total
34
10
ISM deficiency rate (A/B) 2012 2013 10.0 0.0 6.3 7.7 12.3 0.0 8.6 4.7 7.1 6.4 0.0 5.5 6.5 0.0 2.7
9.5 9.4 9.4 9.1 8.9 8.4 7.3 7.2 7.1 5.2 4.2 3.6 3.3
2.9
2.7
2.3 5.1
5.2
1.0
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
12.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
Figure 3.1.2.2 (b) Deficiency rate per country/region in which company are located
35
Singapore
H.K. (China)
Germany
China
Japan
Canada
Korea
Philippines
Greece
Thailand
U. A. E.
Taiwan
Turkey
Netherlands
0.0
Norway
ISM deficiency rate (%)
10.0
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
3.1.2.3 Per Port State The number of ISM deficiency cases per port state is shown in Table 3.1.2.3. The number of ISM deficiency cases in Japan, USA, Korea and Netherland has decreased in 2013. The number of ISM deficiency cases in China, Indonesia, India, Germany and Russia were similar to the ones in 2012. In the Paris MOU region, there shows a tendency of increasing. The number of ISM deficiency cases in Italy, UK, Spain, France and Canada has increased in 2013.
Authority Australia China Japan U.S.A. Korea Italy Indonesia U.K. Spain France India Germany Netherlands Russia Canada New Zealand Singapore Belgium Poland Gibraltar Brazil Chile Bulgaria Argentina Greece H.K. (China) Viet Nam Turkey (Others) Total
Table 3.1.2.3 ISM deficiency case per Port State No. of ISM deficiency cases 2010 2011 2012 50 63 53 15 17 38 26 36 34 11 22 23 6 5 15 3 4 3 2 8 9 5 7 5 6 6 4 7 4 2 1 5 7 2 1 5 2 3 7 3 2 5 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 5 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 1 2 2 0 1 0 4 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 0 12 8 7 169 202 237
36
2013 55 37 29 20 12 11 8 8 7 7 6 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 7 251
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
3.2 Analysis of ISM Deficiencies 3.2.1 Number of ISM deficiencies sorted by relevant ISM Code requirement The total number of ISM deficiencies recorded in PSC reports from 2010 to 2013 and the numbers sorted by the relevant ISM Code requirements (Section No.) are shown in Table 3.2.1. Table 3.2.1 No. of ISM deficiencies sorted by relevant ISM Code requirement ISM Code requirements (Section No.) Year Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 99* 2010
0
6
14
1
12
26
46
23
10
87
11
4
3
1
244
2011
0
10
5
2
12
25
44
28
11
86
17
5
2
24
271
2012
0
9
10
0
10
56
76
26
17
96
12
7
2
4
325
2013
0
11
9
0
5
27
75
19
6
93
19
9
0
30
303
Note 1) Where PSCO did not specify ISM Code Section No. relevant to the ISM deficiency, ClassNK estimated it as far as possible. 2) 99* : Ones which did not or could not specify the relevant ISM Code Section No..
Section 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Requirements for General (1.2.3 Compliance with mandatory rules, etc.) Safety and environmental protection policy Company responsibilities and authority Designated persons Master’s responsibility and authority Resources and personnel Shipboard operations Emergency preparedness Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences Maintenance of the ship and equipment Documentation Company verification, review and evaluation Certification and periodical verification
In 2013, in 251 cases, some ISM deficiencies were pointed out. The number of cases was increased comparing with the number in 2012 (237 cases). On the other hand, total number of ISM deficiencies was decreased from 325 (2012) to 303. The average number of ISM deficiencies per ISM deficiency case was decreased to 1.21 (cf. 1.37 in 2012). ISM deficiencies related to “Section 10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment” has been showing the highest percentage (abt. 30%). The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “Section 6 Resources and personnel” decreased from 17.2% to 8.9% and that of “Section 7 Shipboard operations” slightly increased from 23.4% to 24.7%. The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “Section 8 Emergency preparedness” decreased form 8.0% to 6.3%. The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “Section 9 Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences” decreased from 5.2% to 2.0%. For “Section 11 Documentation” and “12 Company verification, review and evaluation” the ratio were increased from 3.7% to 6.3% and 2.2% to 3.0%, respectively. Also, the ration of ISM deficiencies which could not specify the relevant Section Number was increased from 1.2% to 9.9%. 37
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
3.2.2 ISM Deficiencies and Detentions per Port State The number of ISM deficiencies and detentions per relevant ISM Code requirements and Port State are shown in Table 3.2.2.1. Bracketed numbers mean detentions. Table 3.2.2.1 No. of ISM deficiencies & detention per Port State & ISM Code requirements ISM Code requirements (Section No.) Authority Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 99* 1 2 26 6 2 18 6 4 65 Australia (2) (2) (2) (23) (2) (15) 1 5 11 1 15 8 3 44 China (5) (1) (1) (15) (3) (4) (1) 2 9 7 3 3 10 1 35 Japan (6) (8) (2) 6 3 1 10 3 2 25 U.S.A. (2) (2) 5 4 7 2 1 19 Korea (5) (1) (7) (1) 1 8 2 11 Italy (3) (3) 1 1 4 3 9 U.K. (3) (7) (4) 1 1 1 3 3 9 Indonesia (1) (1) (3) (1) 2 4 3 6 14 5 1 25 7 2 17 86 (Others) 6 3 10 2 4 29 4 0 11 9 0 5 27 75 19 6 93 19 9 0 30 303 Total (0) (3) (0) (0) (0) (16) (25) (5) (0) (32) (4) (2) (0) (10) (97) (
): Number of detention
99*: The ISM Code requirement by Section with which the deficiencies were raised was not specified.
The largest number of ISM deficiencies was pointed out by PSC in Australia. The numbers in China, Japan, U.S.A. and Korea follow it. Number of detention was the largest in Australia. The numbers in China, Japan, UK and Korea follow it. As “detainable ISM deficiencies”, those related to “Section 10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment” shows the largest number 32 and the highest ratio 33.0%. The ratios of “Section 7 Shipboard operations” and “Section 6 Resources and personnel” are 25.8% and 16.5%, respectively.
38
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
3.2.3 ISM Deficiencies and PSC Action Code Number of ISM deficiencies sorted by ISM Code requirements (Section No.) and PSC Action Code, is shown in Table 3.2.3.1. Distribution of the same per Action Code is shown in Figure 3.2.3.1. Table 3.2.3.1 Distribution of ISM deficiencies per ISM Code requirement and PSC Action
1
0
2
11
3
9
4
0
5
5
6
27
7
75
8
19
9
6
10
93
11
19
12
9
13
0
Unknown3) G. Total
30
G. Total4)
5
1
3 4
1 1
99
-
Unknown
within 30 days
50
Defic. to be rectified
before back to US port
40
Defic. to be rectified
302) Grounds for detention
within 3 months
1 2
1
1
1
2 1
3
18
Defic. to be rectified
before departure
17
Defic. to be rectified
within 14 days
16
Defic. to be rectified
next port
Sect. No.
Total Defic. rectified
ISM Code
15 Defic. to be rectified by
10
Others
PSC Action Codes1)
1
2
2
3
7
16
12
26
25
1
12
5
5
1 1
6 1 1
5
52
32
8
4
4
7
2
1
4
13
11
3 1
1
1
303
10
2
4
36
133
98
6
2
4
8
325
5
0
8
51
124
110
10
5
9
3
Notes: 1) The Action Codes are those used under Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, and USCG as follows. Action Code 10, 15, 16, 17 and 30 are used under Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU and USCG Action Code 18 and 99 are used under Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU Action Code 40 and 50 are used under USCG. (In 2012, USCG abolished「40: Rectify deficiencies within 7 days」and Code No. of「70: Rectify deficiencies to next US port after sailing foreign」was altered into 40. 2) The number of Action Codes 30 includes Action Code 19 “Rectify major non conformity before departure (Only for ISM defective items and always with a detainable deficiency)” used under Paris MOU, Vina Del Mar MOU, etc., not used under Tokyo MOU and USCG. 3) Related ISM Code requirement is not specified. 4) GT, Ground total. The data of 2012 were presented for comparison.
39
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
140
No. of ISM deficiencies
120
2012
100
2013
80 60 40 20 0 10
15
16
17
18
30
40
50
99
Action Code Figure 3.2.3.1 Distribution of ISM deficiencies per Action Code a) General For the ISM deficiencies found during PSC inspections, Action Code “18: Deficiency to be rectified within 3 months” was applied most frequently (43.9%). Frequency of Code “30: Grounds for detention” was 32.8% and that of Code “17: Deficiency to be rectified before departure” was 11.9%. The number of ISM Deficiencies resulted in “30: Grounds for detention” decreased from 110 (year 2012) to 98. Also, its percentage to the total number decreased from 33.8% (2012) to 32.3%. In relation to ISM Code requirement, deficiencies with “Section 10 Maintenance of ship and equipment” were pointed out most frequently, and it is followed by “Section 7 Shipboard operations” (was the most frequent in 2012) and “Section 6 Resources and personnel”, “Section 8 Emergency preparedness”, “Section 11 Documentation”. The percentage of “Section 5 Master’s responsibility and authority” to the total number of deficiencies decreased from 3.1% (2012) to 1.7%. b) ISM Deficiency and its Objective Evidences ISM Code Section 6 Resources and personnel The number of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code Section 6 decreased to the half of 2012 and also its percentage decreased to 8.9%. Frequency of Action Code “30: Ground for detention” to the deficiencies related to this Section increased from 35.7% to 59.3%. Analysis of typical objective evidences is as follows: The findings of “Crew not familiar with fire drill including the usage of fireman’s outfit”, “Crew cannot start the engine of lifeboat or rescue boat”, “lack of communication between crew due to different nationalities of crew”, “Insufficient skills for smooth function tests of GMDSS or 15ppm alarm” often resulted in “30: Ground for detention”, then ISM related deficiency was additionally pointed out in many cases. “Fire doors tied opened at the entrances of Galley, E/R or other spaces”, “Crew not familiar with function tests of fire alarm/ steering gear alarm “, “Insufficient knowledge of on-load release mechanism,” etc. were also pointed out as one of the objective evidences of ISM deficiency. ISM Code Section 7 Shipboard operations The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code Section 7 increased from 23.4% (2012) to 24.8%. Frequency of Action Code “30: Ground for detention” to the deficiencies 40
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
related to this Section decreased from 44.7% to 33.3%. Analysis of typical objective evidences is as follows: “Obstacles in front of fire hose box or on emergency escape route”, “Lifeboat etc. not ready for immediate use”, “Insufficient skills to operate fixed fire extinguishing system”, “Malfunctioned sewage treatment unit”, “Non-separated plastic or other garbage” often resulted in “30: Ground for detention”, then ISM related deficiency was additionally pointed out in many cases. “Not familiar with the operation of lifeboat and rescue boat”, “No execution of abandon ship drill”, “Insufficient record of crew’s rest or working hours”, “Lack of voyage planning”, “Chart & nautical publication not updated”, “Wrong storage condition and record of garbage, etc. were also pointed out as one of the objective evidences of ISM deficiency. ” ISM Code Section 8 Emergency preparedness The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code Section 8 decreased from 8.0% (2012) to 6.3%. Frequency of Action Code “30: Ground for detention” to the deficiencies related to this Section increased from 46.2% to 63.2%. Analysis of typical objective evidences is as follows: As a result of drills required by PSC Officer, “Lack of the skills as duty officer”, “Lifeboat cannot be lowered”, “Improper usage of Fireman’s outfit”, “Malfunctioned fire alarm and its sensors” were considered as lack of emergency preparedness and resulted in “30: Ground for detention”, then ISM related deficiency was additionally pointed out in many cases. “Insufficient knowledge for the use of Lifeboat equipment (radar reflector, search light, etc.)”, “oily rags or other burnable left near furnaces or heated parts”, “Insufficient lighting for embarkation spaces for lifeboats and rescue boats”, “Crew not knowing the position of isolation valve on fire main line”, “Crew not wearing safety shoes, suits and helmets”, “Taking too long time to wear fireman’s outfit”, etc. were also pointed out as one of the objective evidences of ISM deficiency. ISM Code Section 9 Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 9 decreased to 2.0%. Deficiencies such as “Damage or malfunction of equipment, etc., had not been reported to the company”, “Company do not respond to the deficiency reported from ship”, “No corrective action taken for the deficiency pointed out during the previous PSC inspection”, etc. were pointed out. They were counted as ISM related deficiency itself or objective evidence of ISM related deficiency case by case. There found the cases where there was no reporting specified in SOLAS Chapter 1 Part B Regulation 11 “Maintenance of condition after survey” (c) to Flag Government, Classification Society, Port Authority, etc., regarding the deficiencies with steering gear, generator engine and other important equipment, it was pointed out as ISM related deficiency. ISM Code Section 10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 10 has increased to 30.7%. Frequency of Action Code “18: Deficiency to be rectified within 3 months” were 55.9% (41.8% in 2012) and Action Code “30: Ground for detention” 34.4% (30.2% in 2012), “17: Deficiency to be rectified before departure” 5.4% (17.7% in 2012). That is to say frequencies of Action Codes 18 & 30 have increased and that of Code 17 have decreased. For the technical deficiencies which were pointed out as objective evidences of ISM Code 41
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
Section 10- related deficiency, Action Code “30: Ground for detention” or “17: Deficiency to be rectified before departure” were applied. Analysis of typical objective evidences is as follows: (a) Hull structure and Hatch cover, etc. Corroded or fractured hold frames and brackets, Wasted hatch cover packing and cleat, Wasted or deformed watertight/ weather tight doors (b) Main & aux. engines, Machinery and Equipment Oil leaks, Broken pressure gauges, Malfunctioned sewage treatment unit, oil filtering unit & 15ppm alarm, Windlass/ winch brake lining worn-down, Corroded or holed sea water piping, Broken self-closing device of FO tank sounding pipe head, Malfunctioned FO tank quick closing device, Malfunctioned emergency generator (c) Navigation & Radio Equipment Malfunctioned VDR, AIS, Echo-sounder, Radar, GMDSS, Magnet compass, Navigation light. Dropped emergency power source for GMDSS, Overdue or missing records of VDR annual maintenance (d) Life Saving Apparatus Lifeboat- Engine not started (incl. dropped starter battery), damaged hull and outfitting, missed or expired equipment/ accessory Launching appliance- No-good condition of on-load release gear, boat falls & hanging device and davit Insufficient maintenance of Life buoy, Radar transponder (e) Fire Safety System Insufficient maintenance of main & emergency fire pumps, Tied-opened or not selfclosing fire doors, Corroded or holed piping, Insufficient maintenance of fire dampers, fireman’s outfit & SCBA, Leaking Hydrant (f) Ventilators and Air Pipes Corroded or holed coaming or vent/ pipe head. Corroded or broken closing device. Examples of PSC inspection report issued in Australia, China, France, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea and U.S.A. in 2013 are shown in the Appendix, for introduction of typical PSC cases where ISM deficiencies were raised with objective evidences i.e, other deficiencies of ship’s structure & equipment, crew license, etc.
42
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
Appendix:
Sample of PSC inspection reports
Samples of reports of PSC inspections carried out in Australia, China, France, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea and U.S.A. in 2013 are given in the Appendix below showing the descriptions of ISM deficiencies together with relevant deficiencies on ship constructions, equipment, etc. (Abbreviations used in the table) “DEF_CD”: Deficiency Code, “ACT_CD: Action Code” 1. AUSTRALIA CASE DEF_CD 1 05105 05118
04114
DEF_ITEM MF/HF radio installation Operation of GMDSS equipment
NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY MF/HF Radio Defective. Unable to demonstrate operation of DSC test call to coaster radio station with MF/HF Radio running on GMDSS Reserve Batteries. Back-up batteries bank for bridge equipment in deteriorated condition. (electrode plates cracks/deformed & casing top cracked) Sailing direction NP34 (2009 5th Edition) for intended voyage not current edition. ( Indonesia Pilot Vol. II ) Sewage Treatment Plant defective. Aux. Oil Fired Boiler protective alarm panel lights mostly defective. Gyro compass error & standard compass deviation log not maintained as per STCW Watch keeping Requirements. Portable stanchions and lifeline between accommodation & fwd. work station on main deck not maintained. Oily water separator automatic waste oil discharge arrangement defective. Proper personal protective equipment (Goggle and Mask) not provided on board for cargo dust. Oil record book not of MARPOL Annex current edition. Starboard lifeboat manual bilge pump rubber diaphragm with many surface crack. 3-way rotary valve for hospital sewage& drain line to sewage plant stuck open. Power supply to bridge fire detection system turned off. Main engine jacket cooling system shown signs of external leak below thick paint / sealant. Starboard bridge wing rudder angle indicator glass cracked.
10116
Emergency source of power - Emergency Generator Nautical publications
14402 13107
Sewage treatment plan Other (machinery)
10106
Compass correction log
03103
14104
Railing, gangway, walkway and means for safe passage Oil filtering equipment
18412
Personal equipment
01315
Oil record book
11101
Lifeboats
14405
13101
Other (MARPOL Annex IV) Operation of Fire Protection Systems Propulsion main engine
10119
Rudder angle indicator
14611
Ozone depleting
Records & measures for minimize pollution
substances
from shipboard ozone depleting substance
07123
(HCFC-22) from ref. plant not maintained.
43
ACT_CD 30 17
17
17
30 17 99
17
17 99
17 17 15 17 15
16 15
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2
15109
Maintenance of the ship and equipment
10111
Charts
04110
Abandon ship drills
06107
Cargo operation
07112
Emergency Escape Breathing Device and disposition Means of escape Ventilators, air pipes, casings Winches and capstans Fire fighting equipment and appliances Development of plans for shipboard operations
07120 03108 09229 07110 15106
3
11102 11101
Lifeboat inventory Lifeboats
03108
Ventilators, air pipes, casings Other (load lines)
03115 07112
07108 03115 11132 17102
Emergency Escape Breathing Device and disposition Readily availability of fire fighting equipment Other (load lines) Maintenance and inspection Other (SOLAS operational)
Ref. to above deficiencies #1,3,6,7,8,10,11,&16, there are objective evidence that the company SMS is not effective. Out dated Chart AUS235, etc. used for the voyage to Brisbane; BA Chart 4635 and AUS Chart 815, 816 not onboard. Life boat drill not carried out as per SOLAS requirements. No drill records for life boat water borned of the last 6 month was found. Ship/shore safety check list not signed by terminal representative. Two air bottles for SCBA pressure low.
18
Gym apparatus in way of Escape route. APT air pipe defective.
17 17
Mooring lines (Fwd.) on drums. Hyper- L P water pump set at manual.
17 17
The SMS does not ensure effective implementation of procedure and instructions for key shipboard operations. Stb'd Lifeboat: magnetic compass defective. Stb'd Lifeboat: primary starting system defective. Stb'd Side main deck: rubber packing for vent flap for stevedore toilet defective. Forward bosun store: port side bilge valve defective. EEBD in E/R workshop with low pressure.
30
17
15
17 17
17 17 17 17 17
SCBA in fire station not readily available.
17
Water in bilges & on deck in conveyor belt room forward. Port Lifeboat: passenger's seats damaged.
17 17
Master failed to report defective navigational equipment to class/port state/flag state authority. Port Lifeboat: release gear defective.
30 18
11129
Operational readiness of lifesaving appliances
15109
Maintenance of the ship
All above deficiencies are objective evidence
and equipment
that SMS as implemented on board failed to ensure that the vessel is effectively maintained.
44
17
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
2.CHINA CASE 4
DEF_CD 10111 15109 15109
11112 15109
5
DEF_ITEM
NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY
Charts Maintenance of the ship and equipment Maintenance of the ship and equipment
BA chart No.1604 not updated. BNWAS not consider as critical equipment included in maintenance record book. PV testing for INMARSAT station (included lRIT 435635010) not carried out from Dec. 10 2012. Means of testing freefall L/B release system without launching L/B not provided. No proper testing means for heat detectors of fire detectors (located in E/R, galley room etc.) not proper be periodically tested. Corrective method for Garbage record book - Not proceeded properly. Voyage plan (from Singapore to Dalian) - No Chief Officer's signature. Fire drill's record - Not proceeded properly. Communication equipments in fire drill - Not checked. Subsequent procedure of abandoning ship in fire drill - Not proceeded. INMARSAT-C - Not tested timely.
Launching arrangements for survival craft Maintenance of the ship and equipment
01320
Garbage record book
10127
Voyage or passage plan
04109 04109
Fire drills Fire drills
04109
Fire drills
05106
INMARSAT ship earth station MF/HF radio installation
05105 05118 07110 07105
07117 15109
11118
Operation of GMDSS equipment Fire fighting equipment and appliances Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions Jacketed high pressure lines Maintenance of the ship and equipment Lifejackets incl. provision and disposition
No evidence show duty officers have made a test for NBDP. Key crew not familiar with the operation of NBDP. Fire hose in engine room aft main engine Exceed 15m. Self-closing device for the fire door between engine room and steering gear room - Need adjusted. High pressure fuel oil leakage alarm system for main engine -Malfunction. Deficiencies mentioned above as evidences show that operation of SMS on board Failure. Light for the lifejacket in engine control room - Malfunctioned.
45
ACT_CD 17 18 18
17 18
99 17 99 99 99 17 17 17 17 17
30 30
17
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
3. FRANCE CASE DEF_CD 6 01101
DEF_ITEM Cargo Ship Safety Equipment (including Exemption) Gyro compass Evaluation of Crew Performance (fire drill)
NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY Window for second annual survey expired.
ACT_CD 30
Gyrocompass inoperative. (ISM) Last fire drill performed the 14th August 2013 (More than 1 month). (ISM)
30 30
15107
Emergency preparedness
Fireman breathing apparatus not ready to
30
07105
Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions
11117
15150
Lifebuoys incl. provision and disposition Emergency lighting, batteries and switches ISM
09127
Cleanliness
10104 07125
04103
4. INDIA CASE DEF_C D 7 10130
use (10 minutes to open the bottle). Self closing device of 2 fire doors in staircase and 1 between E/R and Steering Gear room inoperative. (ISM) MOB Lifebuoys on bridge wings damaged. (ISM) Several emergency lights on deck inoperative. (ISM) Internal audit and corrective action is required within 3 months. Deficiencies marks ISM are objective evidence of the ISM Code. Galley floor and filters of cooker extraction hood dirty.
30
17 18
-
DEF_ITEM
NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY
Other (navigation)
17 17 17 17 17
17
11101
Lifeboats
07110 13101 15107 14118 14305 10111
Fire fighting equipment and appliances Propulsion main engine Emergency preparedness Other (MARPOL/Annex I) Other (MARPOL Annex III) Charts
08111
Other (alarms)
08111
Other (alarms)
03108
Ventilators, air pipes, casings
AIS/VDR annual performance test is due, as last annual performance test was done on 11 September 2012. Life Boat (P&S) Annual servicing test done on 09/2012. Portable fire extinguisher last hydro pressure test record not available. E/R emergency stop from ECR not tried out. Damage stability booklet not available. Garbage record book overwritten. Oil record book overwritten. Vessel using Indian chart, no updates available for BA chart of the same area. Span gas not available on board for calibration of portable gas equipment. Vessel does not have personal gas measuring equipment. Air vent rubber packing (Goose neck) observed damaged.
05111
Satellite EPIRB 406
Performance test and servicing of EPIRB
MHz/1.6 GHz
carried out on 09/2012.
46
ACT_CD 17
17 17
17 17 17
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
5.INDONESIA DEF_C CASE D 8
DEF_ITEM
NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY
ACT_CD
16105
Access control to ship
ISPS not conducted properly.
99
10116
Nautical publications
NTM not update.
17
05113
Radar transponder
SART can't be detected by radar.
17
10111
Charts
Chart correction not update.
17
10127
Voyage or passage plan
Passage plan not recorded properly.
99
05115
Radio log (diary)
GMDSS radio log book not recorded since
99
October 2012. 10106
Compass correction log
Compass correction book not update.
99
10116
Nautical publications
IMDG Code old edition.
17
10116 10114
SOLAS consolidated not available on board . VDR showing error.
17 30
15105
Nautical publications Voyage data recorder (VDR)/Simplified Voyage date recorder (S-VDR) Resources and personnel
30
11104
Rescue boats
09201
Ventilation (Working spaces) Gauges, thermometers, etc.
All deck officers not familiar operating MF/HF DSC. Ships identification of rescue boat not visible from above. Stb'd E/R ventilation defective.
13103 07105 14608 14608 14104 14104 09208 07117
Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions Incinerator
01134 01308
Incinerator Oil filtering equipment Oil filtering equipment Protection machinery Jacketed high pressure lines Means of control (opening, pumps, ventilation, etc.) Machinery spaces Means of control (opening, pumps, ventilation, etc.) Machinery spaces Machinery controls alarm Means of control (opening, pumps, ventilation, etc.) Machinery spaces Other (certificates) Records of rest
09112
Medical equipment
07114
07114
08107 07114
17 30
Exhaust gas temperature indicator on panel control engine side missing. Escape trunk fire door hold by wire.
16
Manual instruction operating incinerator N/A. Incinerator abnormal. OWS piping diagram not posted. OWS solenoid valve not operating normally. Eye protector grinding machine N/A. High pressure FO line Emergency generator engine N/A. Quick closing valve DO service tank not ready to use.
17
17
30 17 30 17 17 17
Emergency air tank low level.
17
Engine telegraph indicator light out of order. Safety valve economizer not fitted properly.
17 17
OWS certificate not available. Crew work/rest hour period record N/A.
17 99
Alcohol tester not available.
17
47
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
6. JAPAN CASE DEF_C D 9 15106
10127 10111 14503 14503 11117 07123 07101 04110 10
04109
15105
14601
11108
07105 10111
DEF_ITEM
NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY
Development of plans for shipboard operations
ACT_CD
Non-compliance with mandatory rules & regulations for the safe operation, new edition charts were not onboard, voyage plan was not appropriately planed, be using many not up to date charts. Voyage or passage plan Not adequately planed with many not up to date chart. Charts Charts for intended voyage: absence of new edition’s charts. (13 sheets) Garbage management plan Garbage not separated according to garbage management plan. Garbage management plan Not up-to-date. (not conformed to MARPOL) Lifebuoys incl. provision and Lifeline of lifebuoy at boat deck stb’d side: disposition not no-kinking type. Operation of Fire HFO settling tank & service tank: drain Protection Systems valves secured open. Fire prevention structural Self-closing fire door between E/R and integrity steering gear room: kept open by the rope Abandon ship drills Crew not familiar with how to put on immersion suit. Fire drills The crew were unable to demonstrate proficiently in performing a satisfactory fire drill. Resources and personnel Senior officer were not aware of their tasks, duties and responsibilities as evident by the above deficiency. Technical files and if Engineer didn't know how to maintain the applicable, monitoring engine for main propulsion and auxiliary in manual accordance with NOx technical code. This ship missing Nox technical files. Inflatable liferafts Both side liferafts: Not readily transferred for launching to each side of the ship.
30
Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions Charts
17
Fire doors of stair case: Kept in open position. Chart for intended voyage: absence of corrected navigational charts, the vessel is using the out dated charts. (W126, W1106)
48
17 30 17 17 16 17 17 17 30
30
17
17
17
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
7. KOREA CASE DEF_C D 11 10118
12
DEF_ITEM
NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY Speed log indicated -3.5kt in Inchon inner harbor. BNWAS reset switch located in bridge chart room not providing proper look out.
17
10130
Speed and distance indicator Other (navigation)
07110
Fire fighting equipment and
Some fire hoses in machinery space more
17
03115
appliances Other (load lines)
15105
Resources and personnel
01104 17102
Cargo Ship Safety Radio (including Exemption) Other (SOLAS operational)
than 15m. A cable penetrated ACC. Area between ACC. Space and open deck. C/O cannot demonstrate how to operate gas detector. SR annual survey overdue.
07122
Fire control plan
15109
Maintenance of the ship and equipment
8. U.S.A. CASE DEF_C D 13 07108
14
IMO number inside marking not in accordance with requirement. Fire Control Plan not made with IMO symbols. In related to deficiency of SR Certificate, maintenance of ship not satisfactory in view of ISM code.
DEF_ITEM
NATURE_OF_DEFICIENCY
Readily availability of fire fighting equipment
Vessel is required to have Four Fire-Fighting suits only three are in good working order. Maintenance records by crew state all fire suits are good working order. Vessel had plastic, paper and grease mix with food waste ready to be discharged overboard according to ships garbage management plan containers are not marked properly, it is also believed that paper food plastic, has been discharged into the sea. The ladder for talking Draft reading was down on the Starboard side for approximately 3 hours. Excess keys were located in the engine control room and Crew specific duties in regards to security were found posted throughout the Vessel. Sediment documentation is not being recorded, discussed bio-fouling, VGP requirements with Captain, Chief officer and Chief Engineer. Expired PYRO Technics, batteries and 4x20L containers of kerosene were found in various accommodations spaces. Believe safety officer has not followed or understands the basic reasoning behind ISM objective. Rudder shifts 4 degrees port and stbd while operating the steering gears at follow up mode.
14501
Garbage
16105
Access control to ship
15101
Safety and environmental policy
15101
Safety and environmental policy
13108
Operation of machinery
49
ACT_CD
17
17 18 30 17 16 30
ACT_CD 17
10
10
10
10
17
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
15
15104
Masters responsibility and authority
13100
Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery
If the vessel's primary steering gear stops operating properly, the person directing the movement of the vessel must report it to the nearest captain of the port. The following Pipes were patches.
10
17
1. Atmosphere Condenser Pipe 2. M/E F/W Cooler - S/W Outlet Pipe
02110 07111 15109 17100
11133
14104 07106 14201 15106 17100
Beams, frames, floors operational damage Personal equipment for fire safety Maintenance of the ship and equipment Other
3. #1 Condenser S/W Pipe to Refer Under deck area in Steering Flat has several Stiffeners that are bent. 2 of 4 Fireman Outfits were damaged. Stretcher has a damaged.
Vessel is mixed Gray and Black water together and maybe killing the bacteria built up in the MSD. Other (life saving) Portside Muster Station in the vicinity of Survival Craft missing signs for Lifeboat and Liferaft. Oil filtering equipment The Oily Water Separator has 4 patches on various Pipes. Fire detection Ship does not have Test Kit for the Heat and Flame Detectors. Efficient stripping A/C Vent is holed, which will allow air to continue to flow when system is stopped. Development of plans for Vessel has conflicting Ballast Plans and shipboard operations SOLAS Training Manuals. Other No BIO Fouling Plan onboard vessel.
50
17 17 17 40
10
17 17 17 40 40
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
Chapter 4 Statistical Data from Tokyo MOU and Paris MOU Several regional MOUs and Port States publicly announce their PSC data on their websites and publish Annual Reports every year. Based on these public data available, this Chapter introduces abstracts of the recent results of detentions by the Tokyo MOU and the Paris MOU in 2013. The full text of each respective Annual Report can be obtained from the following websites. Tokyo MOU Paris MOU
http://www.tokyo-mou.org http://www.parismou.org
51
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
4.1 Tokyo MOU In 2013, 31,018 inspections were carried out in the Tokyo MOU region, and 1,395 ships were detained due to serious deficiencies found onboard. 4.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities Table 4.1.1 shows the numbers of Port State inspections carried out by each Port State from 2011 through 2013. Table 4.1.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Port Authorities (Tokyo MOU) Authority Australia Canada 1) Chile China Fiji Hong Kong, China Indonesia Japan Republic of Korea Malaysia 1) Marshall Islands New Zealand Papua New Guinea Philippines Russian Federation 2) Singapore Thailand Vanuatu Vietnam Total
No. of Inspection 2011 3,002 325 861 7,821 33 746 2,150 5,076 2,070 848
2012 3,179 487 907 8,321 28 743 2,673 5,193 2,350 892
479 476 102 70 1,812 2,004 1,136 1,081 740 779 333 456 0 0 1,093 1,290
No. of Detentions
Detention ratio (%)
2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 3,342 275 210 233 9.16 6.61 6.97 416 8 7 9 2.46 1.44 2.16 896 28 16 17 3.25 1.76 1.90 8,078 678 596 659 8.67 7.16 8.16 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 740 25 34 40 3.35 4.58 5.41 2,784 77 67 35 3.58 2.51 1.26 5,365 217 237 199 4.28 4.56 3.71 2,214 126 113 109 6.09 4.81 4.92 898 13 12 17 1.53 1.35 1.89 1 0 0 329 12 16 7 2.51 3.36 2.13 106 3 0 5 2.94 0 4.72 2,128 4 3 4 0.22 0.15 0.19 972 25 28 15 2.20 2.59 1.54 782 29 44 22 3.92 5.65 2.81 499 6 1 3 1.80 0.22 0.06 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,438 36 37 21 3.29 2.87 1.46
28,627 30,929 31,018 1,562 1,421 1,395 5.46% 4.59% 4.50%
1) Data for the Marshall Islands is only for November and December 2013. 2) Data is only for the Pacific ports.
52
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
4.1.2 Black List of Flag States Table 4.1.2 shows the Black List of Flag State announced in the Tokyo MOU Annual Report. Table 4.1.2 Black List of Flag States (Tokyo MOU) Flag State Tanzania
No. of Inspections 2011-2013 73
Korea, Democratic People’s Republic
Black to Grey limit
Black to Grey limit 9
593
110
52
39
10
764 4,996 408 531 42 36 137 614 126 959 2,290 1,184
131 767 70 79 9 8 18 64 16 86 192 103
6 66 380 38 47 6 6 15 54 14 81 181 98
Papua New Guinea Sierra Leone Cambodia Mongolia Indonesia Georgia Tonga Bangladesh Kiribati St. Kitts & Nevis Thailand Vietnam Belize
No. of Detentions 2011-2013 18
53
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
4.1.3 Detentions by Recognized Organizations Table 4.1.3 and Figure 4.1.3 show the detention data of IACS affiliated Recognized Organization in the Tokyo MOU Annual Report. Table 4.1.3 Inspections and Detentions per Recognized Organization (Tokyo MOU) (*1) RO No. of No. of No. of RO Recognized Detention responsible Inspections Detentions responsible Organization ratio (%) detention 2011-2013 2011-2013 detentions ratio (%) ABS
9,118
268
14
2.94
0.15
BV
9,417
418
15
4.44
0.16
CCS
8,126
81
1
1.00
0.01
DNV
10,524
283
10
2.69
0.10
GL
9,489
432
20
4.55
0.21
KR
8,115
141
1
1.74
0.01
LR
11,311
361
11
3.19
0.10
NK
28,105
1,005
46
3.58
0.16
RINA
2,239
105
1
4.69
0.04
RS
1,462
93
2
6.36
0.14
(*1) According to the Tokyo MOU annual report, in cases where a ship’s certificates were issued by more than one recognized organization (RO), the number of inspections would be counted towards both of organizations, while the number of detentions would be counted only towards the RO that issued the certificate relating to the detainable deficiency or deficiencies.
7.00% Detention RO responsibility
Detention ratio
6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00%
ABS
BV
CCS
DNV
GL
KR
LR
NK
RINA
RS
図 4.1.3 Detention Ratio by Recognized Organization (Tokyo MOU)
54
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
4.1.4 Deficiencies by Category Figure 4.1.4 shows the number of deficiencies by category for the three years from 2011 through 2013.
17,539 Fire safety measures
20,522 18,114
2013
16,275 17,124 17,435
Safety of navigation
2012 2011
11,507 12,070
Life saving appliances
12,281 5,899 6,753
Load lines
8,139 3,511 3,593
Stability, structure and related equipment
8,257
3,099 ISM related deficiencies
3,292
3,497 37,433 36,976
Others
35,826 0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Deficiencies 図 4.1.4 Deficiencies per Category (Tokyo MOU)
55
25,000
30,000
35,000
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
4.2 Paris MOU In 2013, 17,687 inspections were carried out in the Paris MOU region, and 668 ships were detained due to serious deficiencies found onboard. 4.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities Table 4.2.1 shows the numbers of Port State Inspections carried out by each respective Port State from 2011 through 2013. Table 4.2.1 Port State Inspections carried out by Authorities (Paris MOU) Authority Belgium Bulgaria Canada Croatia Cyprus Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Malta Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russian Fed. 1) Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Total
No. of Inspections 2011 971 552 895 269 127 400 196 316 1,253 1,411 1,015 63 242 1,707 246 185 237 1,604 615 432 448 776 1,039 240 1,794 421 1,604
2012 1,068 567 983 223 103 334 169 283 1,233 1,208 1,164 70 285 1,468 267 173 176 1,531 572 425 424 728 951 199 1,668 493 1,543
No. of Detentions
Detention ratio (%)
2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 1,003 11 13 21 1.13 1.22 2.10 536 24 25 20 4.35 4.41 3.70 890 34 27 33 3.80 2.75 3.70 200 12 5 13 4.46 2.24 6.50 100 10 6 8 7.87 5.83 8.00 379 2 4 3 0.50 1.20 0.80 151 1 1 1 0.51 0.59 0.70 294 2 1 3 0.63 0.35 1.00 1,305 38 45 41 3.03 3.65 3.10 1,325 37 46 29 2.62 3.81 2.20 1,027 54 42 49 5.32 3.61 4.80 63 1 0 2 1.59 0.00 3.20 313 14 21 23 5.79 7.37 7.30 1,420 114 110 131 6.68 7.49 9.20 204 1 2 1 0.41 0.75 0.50 160 1 5 4 0.54 2.89 2.50 190 10 12 17 4.22 6.82 8.90 1,496 55 36 57 3.43 2.35 3.80 609 8 11 9 1.30 1.92 1.50 376 12 17 12 2.78 4.00 3.20 400 8 4 9 1.79 0.94 2.30 747 17 16 16 2.19 2.20 2.10 822 24 29 37 2.31 3.05 4.50 185 29 6 12 12.08 3.02 6.50 1,554 122 117 63 6.80 7.01 4.10 398 5 5 3 1.19 1.01 0.80 1,540 42 63 51 2.62 4.08 3.30
19,058 18,308 17,687
688
669
668 3.61% 3.65% 3.78%
1) Only movements to the Russian ports in the Baltic Azov, Caspian and Barents Sea are included
56
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
4.2.2 Black List of Flag States Table 4.2.2 shows the Black List of Flag States announced by the Paris MOU. Table 4.2.2 Black List of Flag States (Paris MOU) Inspections
Detentions
Black to
2011-2013
2011-2013
Grey Limit
289
53
Honduras
30
7
Dominica
103
18
Togo
282
37
Moldova, Republic of
611
73
54
Sierra Leone
355
42
33
Cook Islands
240
29
Comoros
350
37
1,004
87
84
526
47
47
Flag State Tanzania, United Republic of
St. Vincent and the Grenadines Cambodia
57
High Risk Medium to High Risk
Medium Risk
28 5 12 27
24 33
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
4.2.3 Deficiencies by Category Figure 4.2.3 shows the number of deficiencies by category for the three years from 2011 through 2013.
6861 6816 6528
Safety of Navigation
6657 7488 6591
Fire safety 4579 5067 5252
Working and Living Conditions (ILO147)**: Working Conditions
4526 4393 4782
Life saving appliances 3069 3297 3491
Certificate & Document: Documents Certificate & Document: Ship Certificate
2754 2856 3046
Propulsion and auxiliary machinery
2710 2442 2951 2202 2216 2808
Structural Conditions
2184 2029 1952
Emergency Systems
2013
2111 2121 2597
Water/Weathertight conditions
2012 2011
1946 2182 2313
Working and Living Conditions (ILO147)**: Living Conditions
1821 1736 1644
ISM
1301 1476 1704
Radio communications
1060 1127 1318
MARPOL ANNEX I
1013 1005 1101
Certificate & Document: Crew Certificate MARPOL Annex Ⅴ
889 303 347
MARPOL Annex VI
492 449 358
Alarms
490 398 464
Other
424 570 602
ISPS
401 485 578
Working and Living Conditions (MLC,2006)*: MLC,2006 Title4
0 0
390
MARPOL Annex IV
341 324 253
Cargo operations including equipment
329 319 332
Working and Living Conditions (MLC,2006)*: MLC,2006 Title3
0 0
258
100 98 125
Dangeous goods Working and Living Conditions (MLC,2006)*: MLC,2006 Title2
0 30 36
MARPOL ANNEX II 29 0
2000
4000
6000 Deficiencies
Fig. 4.2.3 Deficiencies per Category (Paris MOU) 58
8000
10000
12000
ClassNK Annual Report on Port State Control
4.2.4 Recognized Organization Performance Table Table 4.2.4 shows the PSC performance of IACS affiliated Recognized Organizations among those announced by the Paris MOU for the three years from 2011 through 2013. Table 4.2.4 Recognized Organization Performance Table (Paris MOU) Recognized
Inspections
Detentions
Medium /
Performance
Organization
2011-2013
2011-2013
High limit
Level
11,405
10
203
ABS
5,323
4
89
DNV
10,382
9
184
CCS
746
0
8
NK
6,584
18
112
RINA
2,895
7
45
BV
11,217
35
199
GL
12,850
45
230
KR
825
1
9
RS
4,338
18
71
PRS
513
3
5
CRS
173
0
0
IRS
99
0
0
LR
59
High
MEDIUM
Port State Control Annual Report [English]
ClassNK Survey Operations Headquarters 4-7, Kioi-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8567, JAPAN Tel: +81-3-5226-2027, -2028 Fax: +81-3-5226-2029 E-mail:
[email protected]
www.classnk.com
August 2014㩷
