PIL lecture 1 (1)

USJR. Public International law: Oppenheim, Brierly,Tunkin Brownlie, Hiin!

Reme"ial law you o to rule! o# court, but here in Public International law i! "i$erent. %e will "i!cu!! International law, accor"in to the &ow o# the !yllabu!. '. The (r!t o# PI) PI)* The concept concept an" nature nature o# International International )aw. )aw. +. +n" part International law an" the ommunity. -. -r" part the relation between International )aw an" municipal )aw . th Part Source! o# )aw. By the way cla!!, with rear" to /loria lea0in the Report.. TRO i! e1ecutory, 2otion o#  Recon!i"eration "oe! not !tay the TRO, TRO i! an e1traor"inary relie#, it "oe! not "eal with the merit! o# the ca!e, the nece!!ity nece!!ity #orm o# TRO to pre0ent! pre0ent! irreparable irreparable "amae. The riht to tra0el i! a con!titutional riht. 3e )ima !ai" the TRO i! e$ecti0e i# you are talkin about thi! con!titutional riht. . . But !he i! in0okin #or political con!i"eration! i# /loria an" her hu!ban" lea0e!, it4! ob0iou! that they are beyon" our Juri!"iction. So now let4! o to our "i!cu!!ion. %hat i! International law accor"in to Oppenheim: I know the wor"! are e1tra5or"inary : but we ha0e no other choice to !tu"y PI) e1cept with what the e1pert! ha0e to !ay.. 6ow accor"in to Oppenheim. International International )aw : I! the bo"y o# cu!tomary an" treaty rule! which are con!i"ere" leally bin"in between !tate! in their intercour!e with one another. ' Oppenheim "i!tinui!he! International law #rom uni0er!al international law an" particular international law. %hat i! : 

Uni0er!a Uni0er!all Interna Internationa tionall law7 Such part o# the!e the!e rule! rule! ! i! bin"in upon all State! without e1ception, a!, #or in!tance, the law connecte" with the riht o# leation an" treatie!.



Particular international law7 7 %hich i! bin"in on two or a #ew State! only. only.



/eneral International law 7 Bo"y o# rule! a! are bin"in upon reat many State!, inclu"in the lea"in State!. +

%hich you think i! plau!ible amon the three7 Uni0er!al, /eneral, or Particular7 '

 Oppenheim, International )aw, 8ol. ', pae! 5 9

+

 Oppenheim, International )aw, 8ol. ', pae 9

 Tran!cribe"  Tran!cribe" by by : /e!al 2arie rno;a. rno;a. Ba!e" on PI) UP law law Syllabu! #rom #rom tty tty.. )iutan Pae '

USJR. Public International law: Oppenheim, Brierly,Tunkin Brownlie, Hiin!

oul" we ha0e Uni0er!al International law7

 Brownlie, The Reality an" Ncacy o# International )aw, pae ?

 Tran!cribe" by : /e!al 2arie rno;a. Ba!e" on PI) UP law Syllabu! #rom tty. )iutan Pae G

USJR. Public International law: Oppenheim, Brierly,Tunkin Brownlie, Hiin!

en#orcin treaty !tan"ar"! 'E, like u!e o# #orce prohibite" in U6 charter, !ine" by mo!t State!. On the 0i"ence the law pro0i"e! a more practical ba!i! #or approachin international problem! an" the !ettlement o# "i!pute! than, #or e1ample, natural law in it! 0ariou! #orm!, I!lamic Curi!pru"ence, the principle! o# !ociali!t internationali!m, or !o calle" Me@uity4 '' %hen the law i! !een to be Mine$ecti0e4, the cau!e i! not Mthe law4 but the ab!ence o#  orani;ation, political will, !uNcient per!onnel or #un"in, an" !o #orth. )aw whether national or international, i! not a !ource o# alibi! #or politician! an" a"mini!trator!

Hiin!, Problem! an" Proce!!: International )aw an" How %e U!e" It '>>Q Hiin!, #or me thi! i! more timely rele0ant. So what i! international law #or Hiin!, remember the @ue!tion in the Bar, who i! the current pre!i"ent o# the IJ, "o you remember that in#amou! @ue!tion7The an!wer i! , !he i! the an!wer Ro!alyn Hiin!, +EEG to +EE> !he !er0e" a! pre!i"ent o# The IJ. International law i! not a !et o# rule!, but a proce!!, the entire "eci!ion makin proce!!. International law i! not rule!. It i! a normati0e !y!tem '+. ll orani;e" roup! an" !tructure! re@uire a !y!tem o# normati0e con"uct, .. International law a! a normati0e !y!tem, harne!!e" to the achie0ement o# common 0alue!.

International law i!  not rules. It i! a normati0e !y!tem.by Hiin! Hiin!, Problem! an" Proce!!: International )aw an" How %e U!e" It '>>Q:  The 0iew that International law i! a bo"y o# rule! that #ail! to re!train !tate! #all! !hort on !e0eral count!. In the (r!t place, it a!!ume! that law i! in"ee" Mrule!4. But the !peciali;e" !ocial proce!! to which the wor" Mlaw4, but not the only part. I remain committe" to the analy!i! o# 

'E

 Brownlie, The Reality an" Ncacy o# International )aw, pae -

''

 Brownlie, The Reality an" Ncacy o# International )aw, pae ?

'+

 Hiin!, Problem! an" Proce!!: International )aw an" How %e U!e" It '>>Q, pae '

 Tran!cribe" by : /e!al 2arie rno;a. Ba!e" on PI) UP law Syllabu! #rom tty. )iutan Pae D

USJR. Public International law: Oppenheim, Brierly,Tunkin Brownlie, Hiin!

international law a! proce!! rather than rule! an" to the 0iew I e1pre!!e" many year! ao ,when I !ai": %hen.. "eci!ion! are ma"e by authori;e" per!on! or oran!, in appropriate #orum!, within the #ramework o# certain e!tabli!he" practice! an" norm!, then what occur! i! leal "eci!ion  makin. In other wor"!, international law i! a continuin proce!! o# authoritati0e "eci!ion!.  Thi! 0iew reCect! the notion o# law merely a! the impartial application o# rule!. International law i! the entire "eci!ion5makin proce!!, an" not Cu!t the re#erence to the tren" o# pa!t "eci!ion! which are terme" Mrule!4.

 Thu! Mrule!4 are Cu!t accumulate" pa!t "eci!ion!. n", i# international law wa! Cu!t Mrule!4, then international law woul" in"ee" by unable to contribute to, an" cope with, a chan in olitical world.  To rely merely on accumulate" pa!t "eci!ion! rule!Q when the conte1t in which they were articulate" ha! chane"5 an" in"ee" when the context in which they were articulate" i! unclear i! to en!ure that international law will not be able to contribute to to"ay4! problem! an" , #urther, that it will be disobeyed for