Pig Trap Design and Assessment Considerations - Pipeline & Gas Journal

July 28, 2018 | Author: Mahesh Madas | Category: Pipeline Transport, Pipe (Fluid Conveyance), Chemical Engineering, Industries, Gases
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Design Consideration for PIG trap...

Description

Menu

(/)

ucrie to P&GJ' Monthl Newletter You will have the option to unucrie at an time.

IGN UP

(http://www.linkedin.com/compan/pipeline&ga journal(http://www.outue.com/c/Pipelineandgajournal) magazine) magazine) (http://www.faceook.com/PipelineGaJournal(http://twitter.com/pipelineandga) 363113944628/)

Pig Trap Deign And Aement Aeme nt Conideration Conideration Januar 2011 Vol. 238 No. 1 (http://pgjonline.com/iue/januar (http://pgjonline.com/iue/januar-2011-vol-2011-vol-238-no-1/) 238-no-1/)

A pig trap mut e deigned to match t he pipeline ection deign pecication. The mechanical deign characteritic of the pig trap hould meet or exceed the deign preure, have the ame deign factor, have compatile material tpe, e deigned uing the ame deign code and e uitale for the ame temperature range a the pipeline ection that it erve. Alo, a pig trap mut e dimenionall uited for the tpe of pigging that i expected on the pipeline ection. The critical length of the arrel and line ize pipe ection mut e long enough to accommodate the longet pig t hat will e ued in the pipeline ection. When deciding where to locate a pig trap, there are variou thing to conider. The pig trap hould not e placed near an open ame or ignition ource. Man uilding code and pipeline companie have rule and regulation a out what tpe of powered equipment i allowed within certain ditance of an opening to the pipeline uch a a cloure door. If the pig trap i to e located in an area where horizontal pace i not at a premium (uch a on an ohore platform or a rener), then care hould e taken to provide ucient work pace adjacent to the cloure door for pigging operation. Thee operation can take the form of loading and unloading long inpection pig, removal of liquid and deri from the pipeline and into a wate container, intallation and operation of a temporar eparator, etc. Another conideration that i important to the afe and ecient operation of a pig trap i how the arrel i oriented at the pigging tation. An valve or intrumentation aociated with the operation of the pig trap hould e given adequate pace to provide routine maintenance or replacement. The cloure door hould face awa from other equipment and place where people tpicall congregate (i.e. reak area, parking lot, etc.). There have een rare occurrence where where pig have hot out of pig trap and damaged equipment, a well a, injured people. The overized pipe ection of a pig trap i not named arrel  coincidence. In recent ear, the energ indutr ha ecome increaingl focued on what eect it operation are having on the environment. The placement of a pig trap i alo a concern in thi area. When a pig trap i vented or a cloure door i opened, forethought hould e taken to minimize or eliminate the occurrence of hazardou contaminant within a pipeline from reaching the outide atmophere or contaminating the near ground or water. Pipeline companie that operate large-diameter pipeline hould conider the ue of material-handling equipment when it come to conducting pigging operation. Mandrel or pherical pig ued in a pipeline that i 20 inche in diameter or large can e too heav or awkward for one or two people to handle afel. In addition, even mall-diameter inpection tool are tpicall too heav and long for one or two people to eail manipulate into or out of a pig trap. There are variou deign of pig tra availale on the market. ome pig tra have wheel while other are tationar. There are other pig tra that have automation for puhing a pig into or pulling a pig out of a pig trap. Man pig tra are tted with drip pan for collecting liquid or ne deri that ma fall o of a pig once it i out of the receiver. In ome cae, lifting equipment ma e necear to move large pig into poition. Ji crane, gantr crane and fork lift are all example of pig-handling equipment. Pig trap and pigging tem hould e deigned according to the ame deign code a the pipeline to which the are connected. The predominant predominant code ued for pipeline deign in man countrie are written  AM. The AM code commonl encountered in the pipeline indutr are AM 31.4 which govern the deign of liquid pipeline; AM 31.8 which govern the deign of ga pipeline; AM 31.3 which govern the deign of proce piping and AM ection VIII, Div. 1 and 2 which govern the deign of preure veel (ometime referred to a the oiler Code). There are other code in ue that govern the deign of pig trap uch a CA Z-662 in Canada or AM 31.11 for lurr pipeline. pipeline.

It i helpful to the purchaer of pipeline equipment to undertand ome of the dierence among the commonl ued AM code. AM 31.4 – Pipeline Tranportation tem for Liquid Hdrocaron and Other Liquid (crude oil, liquid petroleum ga, anhdrou ammonia, alcohol and caron dioxide) allow for deign with certain teel material – ATM A694 F42 to F70, A707 L3 CL3, A105, A350 LF2, A182 F316, A182 F51 (Duplex) and other; the deign maximum allowale tre value are determined  deign factor (0.72 or 0.6) multiplied  pecied minimum ield trength (MY) of material; Pipe Wall Thickne Formula: wt = PD/2F (wt=wall thickne; P=deign preure; D=pipe diameter(OD); =allowale tre; F=deign factor); aed upon the allowale hoop tre of the material in quetion; welding tandard i per API 1004. AM 31.8 – Ga Tranmiion and Ditriution Piping tem. Ga (not gaoline) a ued in thi code commonl refer to natural ga, manufactured ga and liqueed petroleum ga ditriuted a a vapor. Thi code allow for deign with imilar material a in AM 31.4. Deign maximum allowale tre value are determined  deign factor (0.8, 0.72, 0.6, 0.5 or 0.4) multiplied  MY of material. Deign factor are related to population denit in proximit of the pipeline. Pipe Wall Thickne Formula: wt = PD/2F (wt=wall thickne; P=deign preure; D=pipe diameter(OD); =allowale tre; F=deign factor); aed upon the allowale hoop tre of the material in quetion. Welding tandard i per API 1004. AM 31.3 – Proce Piping (ha een referred to a rener piping) Allowale material are retricted to 31.3 “lited” material – uuall A105, A350 LF2, A182 F316. ome commonl ued high-ield material (i.e. A694 & A707) are not permitted under thi Code. Deign maximum allowale tre value are determined  the leer of (1/3 x u(tenile trength)) or (2/3 x (ield tre)); the allowale tre value are found in 31.3 a “taulated” value. Overall, material thicknee calculated uing 31.3 tend to e more conervative or thicker than thoe calculated uing 31.4 or 31.8. Pipe Wall Thickne Formula: wt = PD/2(+PY) (wt=wall thickne; P=deign preure; D=pipe diameter(OD); =allowale tre; =qualit factor; Y=coecient) ; aed upon the tenile trength of the material. Welding tandard i per AM ection IX. AM ection VIII Diviion 1 – AM oiler & Preure Veel Code Rule for Contruction of Preure Veel. Allowale material are retricted to AM ection II “lited” material – uuall A105, A350 LF2, A182 F316. ome commonl ued high-ield material (i.e. A694 & A707) are not permitted under thi Code. Deign maximum allowale tre value are found in AM ection II a “taulated” value. Overall, material thickne calculated uing AM ection VIII Div. 1 tend to e more conervative or thicker than thoe calculated uing 31.3. Pipe Wall Thickne Formula: wt = PR/2(-0.6P) (wt=wall thickne; P=deign preure; R=pipe radiu(inide radiu); =allowale tre [leer of (u(tenile trength) divided  3.5) or (2/3 multiplied  (ield tre))]; =qualit factor) ; aed upon the tenile trength of the material. U tamp – the ocial Code U mol for tamp (marking) on the veel or cloure to denote inpection and teting in compliance with Code requirement. All of the code dicued can e ued to deign pig trap. Inpection criteria var among thee dierent code. Generall, given the ame pipeline deign parameter, a pig trap deigned from AM 31.3 will tend to e cotlier than for one deigned from AM 31.4 or 31.8 ecaue of the dierence in material grade and thicknee. In addition, a pig trap deigned from AM ection VIII Div.1 will tend to e more expenive than one deigned from AM 31.3 for the ame reaon. Pig Trap/Pigging tem Aement Like an other piece of equipment connected to the pipeline, pig trap hould e aeed at regular interval for variou reaon. The pipe and tting that make up a pig t rap will age and deteriorate over time. Pipeline companie ma acquire exiting pipeline with pig trap and i t will e important to know the condition of thee ued aet. ome exiting pipeline undergo a change in ue whether it ha to do with a reveral of ow direction or a change in product eing tranported. xiting pig trap can change the wa the are ued. A pig trap ized for cleaning pig ma need to e modied o that it can accommodate inpection pig. A launcher ma need to e changed from a manuall operated pigging tem to an automated pigging tem. A receiver ma need to e modied o that it can receive more than one pig at a time. The initial deign of the pig trap ma e inappropriate for the current pipeline condition. At ome point in the hitor of the trap, modication ma have een made that were inappropriate for the proper performance of the pigging tem. Thee are all reaon for performing an aement on a pig trap or pigging tem. The time it take to perform a trap aement depend on the level or level of aement required, the experience of the trap aement team, the working condition where the trap i located, the remotene of the trap to e a eed (onhore and ohore) and the operational circumtance of the pipeline ection at the time of aement. There i a dierence etween trap aement and piggailit aement. A trap aement i an evaluation on the piece of pipeline equipment ued for introducing or retrieving a pipeline tool from the pipeline without interruption of pipeline ow. Thi aement deal with the evaluation of an exiting piece of pigging equipment or pigging tem ued for launching and receiving pig or pipeline tool. In contrat, a piggailit aement i an evaluation of an exiting pipeline for the purpoe of determining the necear modication in order to make a pipeline ection capale of afel launching, running and receiving pipeline tool. Level Of Trap Aement A trap aement can range in complexit and ophitication. There are man level of trap aement that can e conducted. Let u look at a decription of each level of trap aement. It ma e noted that each level of aement increae in complexit. The rt level – or Level 1 – trap aement i called a Reearch Aement. Thi level of aement explore the hitor and deign parameter of the pig trap. It note an modication that have een made to t he pig trap from the time of intallation to the preent, mechanical deign limitation of the pig trap, the phical location or deignation of the trap or pipeline ection, trap dimenion, the location and ue of each nozzle on the pig trap. The Level 2 trap aement i called an Operational Aement. Thi level of aement i concerned with the current-da operational condition of the pig trap and apect of the overall pigging tem. Thi aement oerve whether the cloure open, cloe or eal properl, whether the preure warning device on the cloure operate correctl, whether the variou valve on the piggi ng tem eal adequatel, whether the pig ignal and preure gauge work a the hould and whether the kicker or pa nozzle are ized properl. The Level 3 trap aement i called the Functionalit Aement. Thi level of trap aement determine if the pigging tem i performing to it eak eectivene. If it i deirale to launch or receive in ection tool, i the tra or the urroundin area dimenionall ca ale of handlin thi

operation? Are there phical otruction (handrail, tair, piping, etc.) that make it dicult to afel load or unload pig? Are piping modication needed to allow for inpection pigging? hould a n equalization line e added acro the trap reducer for afet or to improve pigging operation? hould additional vent and preure gauge nozzle e added to the line ize pipe for afet? hould additional drain nozzle e added to the pig trap? Thee are all quetion that thi level of trap aement eek to a nwer. The Level 4 trap aement i called the Corroion Aement. Thi level of aement i the mot complex and tpicall will require an ND technician or engineer to e on the trap aement team. Thi evaluation eek to determine the exitence of corroion agent acting on the component of the pig trap and whether or not thee corroion agent have aected the tructural integrit of the caron teel enough to caue the trap to e unafe to operate. Are liquid or deri ample eing taken? If o, are the ample analzed for corroion agent? Are there ampling port for otaining liquid or deri ample on the pigging tem? Have an inhiitor or iocide een applied to thi pipeline ection? If o, what wa the name of the inhiitor or iocide ued and what wa the interval of application? Did the inhiitor or iocide have a poitive eect or not? Have in-line inpection een conducted on thi pipeline ection? Ha an form of ND een conducted on the trap ince it wa intalled? If o, ha the data een analzed to ae minimum pipe wall thicknee? I ND performed regularl on the trap to monitor corroion growth rate? If previou ND data i provided, corroion growth rate can e ued to etimate the time when repair or replacement of the trap would e necear. Trap Aement Team A Trap Aement Team hould e compoed of the following memer at a minimum: (1) Team Leader/Project Manager – thi memer i reponile for the aement team in the eld and enure that the necear data i collected for the technical writer to create the aement report. (2) Project ngineer – thi memer i the te chnical expert on the deign and operation of pig trap and pigging tem. Thi memer can aume the role of Team Leader/Project Manager for econom of workforce. (3) Technical Writer – thi memer a emle the data collected into a technical report which explain to the client the nding of the aement. (4) ND Technician (optional memer, for Level 4 Aement onl) – t hi memer perform the non-detructive examination on the trap and provide the data to the Project ngineer for mechanical integrit evaluation. Aement Procedure 1. Aemle a much information aout the trap and pipeline ection a poile efore conducting the on-ite aement. Note the hitor of the trap, pipeline/trap deign parameter, location, etc. 2. Onite Aement. a) Compare the exiting trap with the a-uilt drawing. If there are an dierence, note and ketch them. ) If an a-uilt drawing i not availale, make a ketch of the trap with dimenion. Note nozzle ize and ue. Alo note valve tpe, make and condition in the pigging tem. c) Quetion the operator and pigging crew aout the pigging tpe, frequenc and the operational condition of the dierent part of the pigging tem. d) Take picture of the t rap. Care hould e taken to capture an area of concern on the trap or pigging tem. It ha een aid that a picture i worth a thouand word. Thee picture will e ueful a illutration within the Aement Report. e) If poile, look inide the trap and note the condition of the inide pipe wall and cloure door. f) If a Level 4 Aement i  conducted, the ND technician hould take ultraonic tet reading and record them for further evaluation. g) Aemle the data in an organized fahion and tranmit the data to the technical writer. 3. Write the Aement Report and umit it to the client. Concluion Pig trap development ha occurred over man ear and will continue a long a there remain the need to pig a pipeline. An undertanding of the component, the function of each component and certain performance enhancing and afet feature for a launcher and receiver help one to grap the function of the overall pigging tem and procedure for launching and receiving a pig. Deign conideration hould extend eond the limit of the pig t rap to the oundarie of the pigging tation. Trap aement are extremel valuale to the reponile pipeline operator that i concerned with the condition of the pipeline equipment and the afet of the pigging crew in the eld. Acknowledgment Thi article i aed on a preentation at t he 22nd Pipeline Pigging and Integrit Management (PPIM) Conference held Fe. 17-18, 2010 in Houton. Author Chritian J. Clode, P.., i operation manager of the Pigging Product Diviion of T.D. Williamon, Inc. He graduated from The C itadel in 1993 with a .. degree in civil engineering and i a licened profeional engineer in Oklahoma. He ha experience with g eotechnical and material teting; geotechnical invetigation; hot-dip galvanizing proce; municipal deign review; pipeline deign of water, torm water and watewater tem; pipeline equipment aement; and automated pigging tem. He i a founding memer of the Profeional Intitute of Pipeline ngineer (PIP). He can e reached at: Chri.Clode@tdwilliamon.com.

Related Content (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/meauring-methane-emiion-part-of-ga-pipeline-future/) Meauring Methane miion: Part of Ga Pipeline’ Future (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/meauring-methane-emiion-part-of-ga-pipelinefuture/)

(http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/natural-ga-indutr-till-upeat-jut-le-o/) urve Find Natural Ga Indutr till Upeat, Jut Le o (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/natural-ga-indutr-till-upeat-jut-le-o/)

(http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/22450/) National Grid at Home and Aroad (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/22450/)

Find article with imilar topic

Integrit Management (http://pgjonline.com/tag/integrit-management/), Technolog (http://pgjonline.com/tag/technolog/)

Recent Update

View More » (http://www.google.ca)

Tenneee Ga eek Approval for $170 Million xpanion (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/tenneee-ga-eek(http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/tenneeeapproval-for-170-million-expanion/) ga-eek-approval-for-170-millionexpanion/)

Kinder Morgan’ Tenneee Ga Pipeline ha applied to FRC for a…

(http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/what-What’ New in Product & ervice (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/what-new-in-product-ervice/) new-in-product-ervice/)

aren Analtical aren Analtical ha added the O AFTAP retractale…

(http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/en- N ngineering Preident on Acquiition, Growth and the Future (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/enengineering-preident-on-acquiition-growth-and-the-future-2/) engineering-preident-onacquiition-growth-and-the-future-

N ngineering ha een on an acquiition mode, oth acquiring…

2/) Meauring Methane miion: Part of Ga Pipeline’ Future (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/meauring-methane(http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/meauringemiion-part-of-ga-pipeline-future/) methane-emiion-part-of-gapipeline-future/)

When examining the growing cottage indutr of methane emiion control,…

Magellan Midtream, TranCanada to uild Houton Connection (http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/magellan(http://pgjonline.com/2016/01/13/magellanmidtream-and-trancanada-et-to-uild-houton-pipeline-connection/) midtream-and-trancanada-et-touild-houton-pipeline-connection/)

Magellan Midtream Partner and TranCanada announced denitive plan to connect…

Advertie ( http://pgjonline.com/advertie/) ucrie (http://pgjonline.com/ucrie/) Contact (http://pgjonline.com/contact/) Copright Oildom Pulihing Compan of Texa, Inc. All right reerved.

(http://www.linkedin.com/compan/pipeline&ga journal(http://www.outue.com/c/Pipelineandgajournal) magazine) (http://www.faceook.com/PipelineGaJournal(http://twitter.com/pipelineandga) 363113944628/)

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF