FACTS: Edgar Dawaton was found guilty by the trial court of murder qualied by treachery and was sentenced to death. On 20 September 1998, Leonidas Lavares and several companions, including Dawaton were drinking in the house of the accused’s uncle. Already drunk, Leonidas Lavares decided to sleep while the accused and his companions connued drinking. Dawaton awakened Lavares by stabbing him at the base of the neck. Dawaton connued stabbing Lavares unl the vicm died. Dawaton then ran away to the house of his other relave, where he was later on arrested by the police. Dawaton was found by the trial court guilty of murder qual qu ali ied ed by tr trea each cher ery y an and d se sent nten ence ced d to de deat ath, h, or orde dere red d to in inde demn mnif ify y th the e he heirs irs of th the e vic vi cm m P5 P50, 0,00 000. 0.00 00 pl plus us th the e ac acce cess ssor ory y pe pena nal les es pr prov ovid ided ed by la law, w, wi with thou outt su subs bsid idia iary ry imprisonment in case of insolvency, and to pay the costs of suit. The accused argues that trial court erred in imposing the death penalty despite the aendance of migang and alternave circumstances in his favor. He avers that he is entled to the migang circumstance of plea of guilty. ISSUE: WON the accused is entled to the migang circumstance of plea of guilty. DECISION: No. While the accused oered to plead guilty to the lesser oense of homicide, he was charged with murder for which he had already entered a plea of not guilty. The Court has ruled that an oer to enter a plea of guilty to a lesser oense cannot be considered as an aenuang circumstance under the provisions of Art. 13 of
Thank you for interesting in our services. We are a non-profit group that run this website to share documents. We need your help to maintenance this website.