People vs. Ang Cho Kio

January 18, 2019 | Author: Sarah Tarala Moscosa | Category: Prosecutor, Law Enforcement, Crime & Justice, Social Institutions, Society
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

case digest...

Description

The Attorney General Mr. John R. Liwag Law Office and the Attorney Mr. Jose Bautista on behalf of the appellant. Mr Francisco Reyes F. Lardi!abal and ". #aonil on behalf of the appellee. #A$L J. % The co&plaint in the first cause is the following lines% That on or about the '(th day of )ece&ber *+,- in Mountain #roince #hilippines and within the /urisdiction of this 0onorable 1ourt the aboe2na&ed accused then passenger of #hilippine Air Line plane #3212'4 entroute fro& Laoag to Apa Aparri rri and while sai said d pla plane ne was flying flying oe oerr Mou Mountai ntain n #ro #roin ince ce did then and the there re wil willful lfully ly unlawful unlawfully ly and feloniously and ar&ed with .5, and .'4 caliber pistols with &utiny and 6nown pre&editation shot 7duardo )iago the purser of the aforesaid plane thus inflicting gunshot wound on his 87duardo )iago9 body and as a result thereof said 7duardo )iago died instantly. Baguio City, March 9, 1953 (p. 1, REC., Criminal Case No. 419. !he complaint in the secon" cause is the #ollo$ing%. !hat on or a&out the 3'th "ay o# ecem&er, 195), in Mountain *ro+ince, *hilippines an" $ithin the uris"iction o# this -onora&le Court, the a&o+ename" accuse", then passenger o# *hilippine /ir 0ine *lane *C32 enroute #rom 0aoag to /parri sai" $hile the plane $as #lying o+er Mountain *ro+ince, "i" then an" there  $ill#ully, unla$#ully unl a$#ully an" #eloniously, an" $ithout authority o# la$, compel *e"ro *earls, pilot o# the a#oresai" plane, against the latters $ill an" consent, to change the route o# the plane a n" tae him (accuse" to /moy, an" $hen *eter *earls #aile" to comply imme"iately $ith sai" or"er, sai" accuse" $ho $as then arme" $ith . 45 an" .32 cali&er pistols, $ith mutiny an" no$n preme"itation, "i" then an" there ill#ully, ill#ully, unla$#ully unla$#ully an" #eloniously, shot sai" *eter *earls, thus in#licting gunshot $oun"s on the "i##erent parts o# his (*eter *earls &o"y an" as a result thereo# sai" *eter *earls "ie" instantly.

Baguio 1ity March + *+,' 8p * rec. 1ri&inal 1ase :o. 5-(. 9. 3nfor&ed 3nfor&e d the accused accused of the tw two o co& co&plai plaints nts with the assistanc assistance e of his lawyers lawyers he ple pleaded aded guilty. guilty. The 1ourt sentenced senten ced hi& in the first cause to twele twele 8*-9 AOA i&prison&ent as a &ini&u& to twenty 8-(9 years of te&porary confine&ent confin e&ent as &a;i&u& with co&pensation co&pensation to the heirs of 7duardo )iago in the su& of #3n the eent that a single fact constitutes constitutes two go &ore offenses or when one of the& is necessary necess ary &eans for co&&i co&&itting tting the other the penalt penalty y shall be red stop 6ey light co&e to the &ore serious offense offense applying it in its &a;i&u& degree. > The accused co&pelled co&pelled the aiat aiator or #edro. #earls to change the direction direction of the airplane and how does not co&ply  with its order 6illed hi&? the accused ran two different facts and not /ust one? therefore they cannot these two successie acts constitute the co&ple; cri&e of coercion with &urder. 3f the aiator had followed the order of the accused accuse d this would not hae felt the need to 6ill hi&? the pilot was put in the hard choice to co&ply with the order or

die. 7laiador did not want to be disloyal to its obligation and was dead. The accused could be depried of his life #eter #earls #earls without forcing you to change the direct direction ion of the airplane? airplane? it was not necessary coercion coercion to co&&it the &urder. :or was it essential the ase natio to co&&it the coercion but =uite the contrary? for haing 6illed the pilot the accused did not succeed in its desire to reach out to A&oy% co&&itted two acts that consitutyen the cri&es of coercion trustrada and &urder. >The dwelling dwelling that paes the others &a6ing yield to force the door 6noc6s and cerradra of the sa&e and in it 6ills  wo&en residing there and by who& he had before relations ilicitass> does not co&&it an offense of allna&iento co&ple; of dwelling with ho&icide. Must be i&posed on the accused the penalty for each of the offenses. 8Judg&ent of January -5 *44*. 9 8- 1o&&onalty ,.ed.
View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF