Partnership, Agency and Trusts Syllabus

Course Outline Partnership, Agency and Trusts Section 173 II-E U.P. College of Law First Semester, SY 2013-2014 Rocky L. Reyes Course Outline[1] I. Introduction II. Partnership A. General – Articles 1767 to 1783 Cases: 1. Commissioner vs. Burroughs 142 SCRA 324 2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Suter and Court of Tax Appeals, 27 SCRA 152 3. In the Matter of the Petition for Authority to Continue Use of Firm Name “Sycip, Salazar, etc.”/“Ozaeta, Romulo, etc.” 92 SCRA 1 4.Ortega vs. Court of Appeals, 245 SCRA 529 5.Estanislao, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, 160 SCRA 830 6.Campus Rueda & Co. vs. Pacific Commercial & Co., 44 Phil. 916 7.Vargas & Co. vs. Chan, 29 Phil. 446 8.Ngo TianTek vs. Phil. Education Co., 78 Phil 275 9.AngPue& Co. vs. Sec. of Commerce and Industry, 5 SCRA 645 10.Pascual vs. Commission of Internal Revenue, 166 SCRA 560 11.Ona vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 45 SCRA 74 12.Gatchalian vs. Collector of Internal Revenue, 67 Phil. 666 13.Sardane vs. Court of Appeals, 167 SCRA 524 14.Deluao vs. Casteel, 26 SCRA 475 15.Kiel vs. Estate of Sabert, 46 Phil. 198 16.Jo Chung Cang vs. Pacific Commercial Co., 45 Phil. 142 17.Agad vs. Mabolo, 23 SCRA 1223

18.Tuason vs. Solanos, 95 Phil. 107 19.Auerbach vs. Sanitary Wares, 180 SCRA 350 B. Obligations of the Partners among Themselves – Articles 1784 to 1809 Cases: 20. Lozana vs. Depakakibo, 107 Phil. 728 21.Sancho vs. Lizaraga, 55 Phil. 60 22.Uy vs. Puzon, 79 SCRA 598 23.U.S. vs. Clarin, 17 Phil. 84 24.People vs. Campos, [C.A.] 54 O.G. 681 25.Martinez vs. Ong Pong Co., 14 Phil. 726 26.Ramnani vs. Court of Appeals, 196 SCRA 731 27.Moran, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, 133 SCRA 88 28 Ng Ya vs. Sugbu Commercial Co., [C.A.] 50 O.G. 4913 29.Teague vs. Martin, 53 Phil. 504 30.Santos vs. Villanueva, [C.A.] 50 O.G. 175 31.Bachrach vs. “La Protectora,” 37 Phil. 441 32.Machuca vs. Chuidian, 2 Phil. 210 33.Fue Leung vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 169 SCRA 746 34.Sison vs. H. Mc Quaid, 94 Phil. 201 35.Ornum vs. Lasala, 74 Phil. 241 C. Property Rights of a Partner – Articles 1810 - 1814 Cases: 36. Clemente vs. Galvan, 67 Phil. 565 37. Leyte-Samar-Sales and K. Tomassi vs. S. Cea and O. Castrilla, 93 Phil. 100

D. Obligations of the Partners to Third Persons – Articles 1815 to 1827 Cases: 38. Phil. National Bank vs. Lo, 50 Phil. 803 39.Co-Pitco vs. Yulo, 8 Phil. 544 40.Island Sales, Inc. vs. United Pioneers Gen. Construction Co., 65 SCRA 544 41.CompaniaMaritima vs. Muñoz, 9 Phil. 326 42.Dietrich vs. Freeman, 18 Phil. 341 43.Santiago Syjuco, Inc. vs. Castro, 175 SCRA 171 44.Liwanag and Reyes vs. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, 105 Phil. 741 45.McDonald vs. National City Bank of New York, 99 Phil. 156 46.Pioneer Insurance & Security Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, 175 SCRA 668 47.Viuda de Chan vs. Pen, 53 Phil. 906 E. Dissolution and Winding Up – Articles 1828 to 1842 48.Yu vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 224 SCRA 75 49.Testate Estate of Mota vs. Serra, 47 Phil. 464 [1926] 50.Bearneza vs. Dequilla, 43 Phil. 237 51.Lota vs. Tolentino, 90 Phil. 829 52.Goquiolay vs. Sycip, 108 Phil. 947 53.Goquiolay vs. Sycip, 9 SCRA 663, Resolution of Motion for Reconsideration 54. Ng Cho Cio vs. Ng Diong, 1 SCRA 275 55. Lichauco vs. Lichauco, 33 Phil. 350 56.Soncuya vs. De Luna, 67 Phil. 646 57. Singsong vs. Isabela Sawmill, 88 SCRA 623 58. Po YengCheo vs. Lim Ka Yan, 44 Phil. 172 59.Laguna Transportation Co., Inc. vs. Social Security System, 107 Phil. 833

60.Sison vs. McQuaid, 94 Phil. 201 61.De La Rosa vs. Ortega Go-Cotay, 48 Phil. 605 62.Magdusa vs. Albaran, 5 SCRA 511 63.Lim Tanhu vs. Remolete, 66 SCRA 425 64.Bonnevie s. Hernandez, 95 Phil. 175 F. Limited Partnership – Articles 1843 to 1867 III. Agency A. General – Articles 1868 to 1883 65. Orient Air Services & Hotel Representatives vs. Court of Appeals, 197 SCRA 645 66.Rallos vs. Felix Go Chan & Sons Realty Corp., 18 SCRA 251 Death extinguishes agency except when the agency is coupled with interest and the agent and the third person acted in good faith or without knowledge of the death of the principal. 67. Air France vs. Court of Appeals, 126 SCRA 448 Teresita was an agent to the Ganas. What was told to her by Lee Ella was considered told to the Ganas. 68. Santos vs. Buenconsejo, 14 SCRA 407 power of attorney was void since the parents of the buenconsejo children were still alive and even granting that the poa was valid, he can claim that the land was for himself and that he cannot ask for the division of the land without the concurrence of the co-owners. 69. Albaladejo y Cia vs. Phil. Refining Co., 45 Phil. 556 Plaintiff was not an agent as alleged. 70. Thomas vs. Pineda, 89 Phil. 312 71. Palma vs. Cristobal, 77 Phil. 712 72.Valera vs. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695 73.Cui vs. Cui, 100 Phil. 913 74. Allied Free Worker’s Union [PLUM] vs. CompaniaMaritima, 19 SCRA 258 75. Far Eastern Export & Import Co. vs. Lim TeckSuan, 97 Phil. 171 76. Nielson & Co., Inc. vs. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Co., 26 SCRA 540 77. Shell Co., of the Phil. Ltd. vs. Firemen’s Ins. of Newark, N.J., 100 Phil. 755 78. Sevilla vs. Court of Appeals, 160 SCRA 171 79.Lim vs. People, 133 SCRA 333 80.San Diego, Sr. vs. Nombre, 11 SCRA 165

81.De la Peña vs. Hidalgo, 16 Phil. 450 82.Conde vs. Court of Appeals, 119 SCRA 245 83.Harry E. Keller Elec. Co. vs. Rodriguez 44 Phil. 19 84.Rallos vs. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269 85. Macke vs. Camps, 7 Phil. 553 86. Jimenez vs. Rabot, 38 Phil. 387 87.Liñan vs. Puno, 31 Phil. 259 88.Katigbak vs. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil. 622 89.Danon vs. Brimo& Co., 42 Phil. 133 90.Infante vs. Cunanan, 93 Ohil. 693 91. Manotok Brothers, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 221 SCRA 224 92.Domingo vs. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131 [1971] 93.Siasat vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 139 SCRA 238 94.German & Co. vs. Donaldson, Sim& Co., 1 Phil. 63 95.Municipal Council of Iloilo vs. Evangelista, 55 Phil. 290 96.Caballero vs. Deiparine, 60 SCRA 136 97.Phil. National Bank vs. Sta. Maria, 29 SCRA 303 98.BA Finance Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, 211 SCRA 112 99.Director of Public Works vs. Sing Juco, 53 Phil. 205 100.Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co., vs. Poizat, 48 Phil. 536 101.Rural Bank of Bombon, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 212 SCRA 25 102. Commercial Bank & Trust Co. of the Phil. vs. Republic Armored Car Service Corp., 9 SCRA 142 103. Lim Tiu vs. Ruiz y Rementeria, 15 Phil. 367 104.Phil. National Bank vs. Agudelo y Gonzaga, 58 Phil. 635 105.Syjuco and Viardo vs. Syjuco, 40 Phil. 634 106.National Food Authority vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 184 SCRA 166

107.Awad vs. Filma Mercantile Co., 49 Phil. 816 B. Obligations of the Agent – Articles 1884 to 1909 108. Phil. National Bank vs. Manila Surety & Fidelity Co., Inc. 14 SCRA 776 109.Ramos vs. Caoibes, 94 Phil. 440 110.Gutierrez Hermanos vs. OriaHermanos, 30 Phil. 491 111.Domingo vs. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131 112.U.S. vs. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791 113.Villa vs. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil. 126 114. Development Bank of the Phils. vs. Court of Appeals, 49 SCAD715, 231 SCRA 370 115. Phil. Products Co. vs. PrimateriaSocieteAnonyme Pour Le Commerce Exterieur: Primateria [Phil.] Inc., 15 SCRA 301 116. National Power Corp. vs. National Merchandising Corp. 117 SCRA 789 117.Albert vs. University Publishing Co., 13 SCRA 84 118.Eugenio vs. Court of Appeals, 239 SCRA 207 119. Green Valley Poultry & Allied Products, Inc. vs. Intermediate Appellate Court 133 SCRA 697 120. Metropolitan Bank Trust Co. vs. Court of Appeals, 194 SCRA 169 C. Obligations of the Principal – Articles 1910 to 1918 121. Prudential Bank vs. Court of Appeals 223 SCRA 350 122. Cuison vs. Court of Appeals, 227 SCRA 391 D. Mode of Extinguishment of Agency – Articles 1919 to 1932 123. Rallos vs. Felix GoChan& Sons Realty Corp., 81 SCRA 251 124.Diolosa vs. Court of Appeals, 130 SCRA 350 125.Philippine National Bank vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 189 SCRA 680 126.DyBuncio& Co. vs. Ong Guan Gan, 60 Phil. 696 127.Infante vs. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 693

128.Coleongco vs. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577 fraud principal 129.Herrera vs. Luy Kim Guan, 1 SCRA 406 principal died in China, date of death was not proven 130.Buason and Reyes vs. Panuyas, 105 Phil. 795 extinguishment not applicable since the agent does not know of that his principal died IV. Trusts A. General – Articles 1440 to 1442 131. Salao vs. Salao, 70 SCRA 65 [1976] 132.De Leon vs. Molo-Peckson, 6 SCRA 978 133.Government vs. Abadilla, 46 Phil. 642 134.Cristobal vs. Gomez, 50 Phil. 810 135.Araneta vs. Perez, 5 SCRA 338 136.Mindanao Development Authority vs. Court of Appeals, 113 SCRA 429 137.Roa, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, 123 SCRA 3 [1983] under Art. 1456 138. Perez vs. Araneta, 4 SCRA 430 B. Express Trust – Articles 1443 to 1446 139. Cuaycong vs. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192 140.Sinaon vs. Soroñgon, 136 SCRA 407 C. Implied Trust – Articles 1447 to 1457 141. O’Laco vs. Co Cho Chit, 220 SCRA 656 142. Special Services Corporation vs. Centro La Paz, 121 SCRA 748 143.ChiaoLiong Tan vs. Court of Appeals, 46 SCAD 435, 228 SCRA 75 144.Homena vs. Casa, 157 SCRA 232 145.Heirs of Candelaria vs. Romero, 109 Phil. 500 146. PNB vs. CA, 217 SCRA 347 Administrative Matters Announcements

Please access http://uplawpat2013.blogspot.com/ at least once a week for further assignments and announcements. The website will be updated weekly on or before Wednesday. Class Days June 8, 15, 22 and 29 July 6, 13, 20 and 27 August 3(Mid-terms), 10, 17 and 24, 31 September 7, 14, 21 and 28(Finals). Grading Method Attendance - 10% [2] Recitation - 20% Mid-term Examinations (August 3, 2013)[3] - 30% Final Examinations (September 28, 2013)[4] - 40%