1. Has P&G India managed to carve out a distinctive position in the Indian Detergents market? 2. Commnent on the company’s journey towards achieving milestones as per ‘Project 2-‐3-‐4’ 3. What challenges does P&G India face in 2011? 4. Assess P&G India’s product line strategy. 5. What recommendations will you make to the P&G India team to help them achieve the target set forth in Project 2-‐3-‐4?
Overview It is clear that P&G was left behind in captureing India’s growth story in the Detergents market. Currently P&G has a reach of 1.3m outlets (which is not far behind HUL with 1.6m outlets). In terms of sales, India is one of the smallest markets of P&G. To carve out a distinctive position in the Indian detergents market, P&G initiated project 2-‐3-‐4 to double the number of indians using P&G products and trebling the per capita spending by indians and quadrupling sales in its india operations by 2015. I feel P&G even though it has captured market leadership in 6 segments and a reach of 1.3m outlets still lags behind HUL interms of overall product usage. According to the data given, P&G will not be able to achive its goals by 2015.
Current Progress Although this was successful, most of the categories that P&G dominated were still small. In the segments that mattered such as detergents and hair care – which accounted a little over half of the home and personal care segment, HUL was the leader.
Challenges The real challenges faced by P&G for achieving the goals set by Project 2-‐3-‐4 are. • Increase BOP consumption (aka. Rural consumption) • Target mass market (high price sensitive consumers) • Restructuring of brand portfolio
Target Mass Market Resturcturing brand portfolio
Increase BOP Consumption
Project 2-‐3-‐4 The challenges faced by P&G going forward includes playing catchup to HUL even though they play in far lesses categories than HUL. P&G needs to decide whether it should confront head on to HUL in categories such as detergents. Also, P&G needs to figure out if it should make efforts to increase consumption and develop fledgling markets such as skin care. Moreover, P&G needs to assess why the average percapita spending on P&G products is much lower than the average of P&G’s top-‐ 11 asian markets. Other decisions that P&G needs to assess are whether it should launch another brand to compete with wheel and fill the void at the bottom of the pyramid. Or whether it should launch more variants for its existing brands. Another area that needs to be taken care of is advertising. How will advertising budget changes impact the brands awareness.
Recommendations If P&G has to achieve the targets set forth by Project 2-‐3-‐4, it needs to compete with HUL at all levels and all products, including deep in the rural areas. P&G’s goal should be to win in all the three market classificiations (India 1, 2 and 3). Further growth can be driven by outreaching by running community-‐led programmes in rural india to ensure awareness of their brands. P&G should refrain from getting into price wars. They are poor pricing strategies. It needs to come up with an effective long term pricing strategy and avoid short term predatory strategies as HUL will always undercut them and make them ineffective.
Thank you for interesting in our services. We are a non-profit group that run this website to share documents. We need your help to maintenance this website.