Origins of South African Law

December 20, 2016 | Author: ValentineSithole | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Origins of South African Law...

Description

FLS101-V

The Origins of South African Law FLS101-V

1

FLS101-V

2

FLS101-V

2

FLS101-V

3

FLS101-V

Study Unit 1: General ntroduction 

 

 

  

 

 

The external history of the law traces the sources and factors which have contributed directly or  indi indirec rectly tly to the devel develop opent ent of the le!al le!al syste syste" " These These relate relate to the polit politica ical# l# consti constitut tution ional al## econoic# sociolo!ical and reli!ious factors that have influences the developent of the le!al syste The internal history of the law covers the ori!ins and developent of the le!al rules and principles theselves# under the influence of external historical events $xternal history of the law sheds li!ht on the internal history of the law

The ain sources of ori!in of our law% le!islation& court decisions& coon law& custoary law and indi!enous 'frican law (oon law% is the centre around which other sources that !enerate law revolve" )efers t o )oan*utch law as influenced by $n!lish law" +s a livin! law# which is capable of adaptin! to the chan!in! values of society (ivil law% systes have been influenced by )oan law Three a,or coponents of our law% the western or $uropean coponent  )oan *utch and $n!lish law.& the indi!enous 'frican coponent and the /niversal coponent huan- ri!hts law. Fundaental )i!hts are those ri!hts that are possessed by all huan bein!s because they are huan" )eferred to as universal as a result of the oveent towards the universal reco!nition of  huan ri!hts  'frican (oponent% (oponent% has existed existed since tie ieorial ieorial estern coponent% consists of )oan law# *utch Law and $n!lish law" istory of the western coponent started with the foundation of )oe 3 4( firstly to the estern $pire and at the death of 5ustinian oved to the $astern $pire 6 th ( '*" $n!lish law can be traced to 11th ( '* '* /niversal coponent% coponent% can be traced bac7 to the rise of natural 8 law as well as to the (hurch fathers th of 9  ( '* There is no coprehensive written version of our law that has the force of le!islation- our law is not codified

The )eception phenoenon  )eception refers to the absorption or adoption of the rules# principles and institutions of a le!al syste syste  in an exist existin! in! le!al le!al syste syste"" if the recepti reception on is very very copre coprehe hensi nsive ve we spea7 of an in complexu receptioncomplexu  reception- a reception of an entire le!al syste  Transplantation eans the iportation or introduction of a le!al syste into a territory which has no le!al syste  +position iposin! a le!al syste on a territory which already has an existin! le!al syste- a!ainst the wishes of the local inhabitants  )oan- *utch law was an iposition on indi!enous law" $n!lish law was received

9

FLS101-V

)eception of )oan law into estern $urope% 3 phases 1" :re-reception area% few )oan-law rules were chosen and then incorporated in ;eranic custoary law" Started in th ( 2" +ntellectual )ediscovery% rediscovery by a !roup of ,urists called !lossators of 5ustinianorth-$ast >i!eria and (aeroon" The 4antu spea7ers cae to South 'frica about 100 years a!o- established theselves as ironusin! farers in the Lipopo re!ion in 00 '* 4antu spea7ers have a preliterate tradition ?ral traditions are oral narrations# or counications fro the past" They are unwritten verbal accounts of the past" Son!s# le!ends and epic poes# eori@ed and transitted fro !eneration to !eneration ?ral traditions for the ain source of inforation on a preliterate counityetherlands- interested in the South  'frican +nterior for its strate!ic position as it was on the shippin! route fro +ndia to the far east  The )aad van 5ustitie- court established in 16A run by layen and then inexperienced lawyers   's the colonist started ovin! out eastwards# they overpower the 7hoi and the San" 4y 1= the 7hoi were alost extinct  The pre-colonial era is re!arded as havin! coe to an end in 1= when the 4ritish too7 control of  the (ape The colonial $eriod  *urin! the colonial period adinistrators tried to Bcivili@eC the indi!enous population" here indi!enous law was reco!ni@ed# it was sub,ect to the strict application of a repu!nancy clause" The repugnancy clause determined that indigenous law would only apply as so far as it was not contrary  to the western notion of public policy and natural justice



FLS101-V 









4y iddle 1= th ( south 'frica had been divided into 2 4ritish colonies >atal and the (ape.# nuerous indi!enous 7in!dos the Dulu and 4asotho 7in!dos bein! the lar!est. and 2 Voortre77er republics  the Duid-'fri7aansche )epublie7 and the )epublic of the ?ran!e Free State . The (ape% 2 re!ions The (olony proper% )oan- *utch law as influenced by $n!lish law and as odified by o le!islation applied" +ndi!enous law was expressly disre!arded except when it was not contrary to any law or opposed to the western notions of orality# public policy or eEuity The Trans7eian territories% area was predoinantly populated by the indi!enous population and o was considered far enou!h fro the white areas not to be a threat" The indi!enous counity in the Trans7eian territories was well structured and or!ani@ed and for the first tie indi!enous law was reco!ni@ed as a syste of law" +n 1AA3 a criinal code for the Trans7eian territories was adopted >atal% in 1A93 the authorities decided to pursue the (ape policy of non-reco!nition of indi!enous law" Sir Theophilus Shepstone attepted to restore tribal leadership and reco!ni@ed indi!enous laws# sub,ect to the proviso that it was not repu!nant to the !eneral principles of huanity observed throu!hout the civili@ed world" +n 1AA a codification of Dulu was adopted in >atal- was disre!arded by the indi!enous counity as it was not a true reflection of indi!enous law of the territory" +t has since been revised several ties# the current version was proul!ated in 1=A The Voortre77er republics%  The )epublic of the ?ran!e Free State% also followed the policy of non-reco!nition of indi!enous o law and in the Thaba >chu reserve specific reco!nition was !iven to custoary arria!es" +n 1A== custoary unions were forally reco!ni@ed throu!h out the territory The Duid-'fri7aansche )epublie7 Transvaal.% first followed the non-reco!nition policy and then in o 1AA the application of indi!enous law was reco!ni@ed in civil disputes where all parties were blac7# sub,ect to the proviso that the relevant indi!enous law had to be in accordance with the !eneral principles of civilisation ac7nowled!ed throu!hout the world"   ;eneral% the +nter-colonial >ative 'ffairs (oission of 1=03-1=0 saw the ultiate !oal for the adinistration of ,ustice as bein! the iproveent of indi!enous law and its eventual assiilation into colonial law" +ndi!enous counities were not in favour of the colonial law" They either i!nored it and unofficially aintained their indi!enous laws and institutions or obeyed the colonial laws out of  fear 

The )ost-colonial era   'lthou!h the 'partheid era officially coenced in 1=9A# a policy of separatin! the different races had been developin! since the turn of the 20 th (" as early as 1=0 the inter-colonial >ative 'ffairs (oission recoended that a territorial se!re!ation was necessary to safe!uard white interests" :olicies of political# social and econoic se!re!ation lead to the proul!ation of any acts which were aied at 7eepin! blac7s in a position of subordination and which also ipacted on the developent of indi!enous law    The 4lac7 'dinistration act 3A of 1=2% practical reason was that a unifor approach to the reco!nition and application of indi!enous law was needed  hen the /nion was fored in 1=10# all the areas which were to a7e up the provinces reco!ni@ed indi!enous law to soe extent# yet the le!islation of the different areas did not uniforly re!ulate the application of indi!enous law" The act consolidated the colonial le!islation"  S 11 1. indi!enous law would be applicable only in as far as it was not a!ainst the principles of  public policy or natural ,ustice"  :roul!ated to created a coprehensive syste of blac7 adinistration   ' separate court syste ca created for blac7s  The act consolidated the colonial le!islation  The 4lac7 authorities 'ct 6A of 1=1% ade provision for the establishent of self-!overnent at local# re!ional and territorial level# and paved the way for the creation of hoelands" The hoelands consisted of independent national states as well as sell-!overnin! territories" The oelands were reincorporated into the )epublic of South 'frica on 2 'pril 1==9 and the (onstitution provided for  the incorporation of the le!islation of these hoelands into South 'frican law  Special (ourts for 4lac7s 'bolition 'ct 39 of 1=A6% in 1=A3 the oexter (oission found it unreasonable and unrealistic to restrict urban blac7s to coissioneratal% Giddle 1=  ( Guslis and indus cae fro +ndia to the 4ritish colony of >atal to wor7 as labourers on the su!ar-cane plantations  The Duid-'fri7aansche )epublie7 Transvaal.% +sla was introduced to the Transvaal by Gusli railway wor7ers# artisans and sall traders fro >atal 8 it also spread to Dibabwe# Dabia# Galawi# 4otswana# Lesotho and Swa@iland  The )epublic of the ?ran!e Free State% +n 1A=1 +ndians were prohibited fro settlin! or reainin! in the ?ran!e Free State for lon!er than 2onths without perission fro the !overnent



FLS101-V

The :ost-colonial :eriod  +slaic :ersonal Law% the personal law of the Guslis was not reco!ni@ed 8 arria!e and law of  succession- Gusli arria!es were considered to be potentially poly!aous but so are 'frican arria!esI  yland + 2dros- the court stated that the values of huan di!nity# eEuity and freedo ust always be at the forefront when the constitution is interpreted"  A#od + ,ultilateral ,otor Vehicle Accident Fund- the S(' reco!ni@ed a Gusli woanapoleon in 1A09  /nder >apoleon laws were codified# feudalis abolished# efficient !overnent created and education# science# literature and the arts fostered  (ode (ivil or (ode >apoleon. incorporated soe of the freedos !ained by French people durin! the French revolution on 1A= reli!ious tolerance& abolition of slavery.

Ger#any The reception of )oan law  +n coplexu reception% there was !reat variety in their law- there was a need for a ore !eneral and better developed le!al syste each re!ion had its own custoary law& different le!al systes for different classes.&  the )oan catholic church was established in ;erany and throu!h it canon law# and ultiately )oan law cae th  )oan law was tau!ht at the ;eran varsities fro the 19  ( onwards th  1  ( ;erany established a !eneral court of appeal 8 ost of the ;eran ,urists were schooled in )oan law  )oan law infiltrated the ;eran le!al syste within 2 centuriesK Le!al developent durin! the 16 th (  The ;eran uanists% were not as far reoved fro actual practice and therefore had a !reater influence than the French huanists  Basius: first outstandin! writer of )oan law in ;erany& founder of ;eran le!al huanis in early 16th& re!arded as a forerunner of the French huanist school Le!al developent durin! the 1 th and 1Ath (  /sus odernus pandectaru% Bthe odern usa!e of the :andectsC :andects is another nae for the *i!est of (orpus iuris (ivilis.  Gethod% they followed a theoretical-practical line of thou!ht & they concerned theselves with )oan law in so far as it was still in use and was applicable& they described )oan law as it applied in practice# sub,ect to aendent and suppleentation in their own laws and courts  /sus odernus pandectaru and canon law% re,ected the coentators rules re!ardin! the application of canon law" The /sus odernus pandectaru were of the opinion that canon law should have preference over )oan law# but ;eran custoary law should have preference over )oan and canon law  "ar$o+ius : ai of his wor7 was to describe the prevailin! law of his tie as it actual was in practice" e suari@ed and copiled the laws which developed before his tie# both )oan and ;eran sources- actual founder of ;eran national law Le!al developent fro the 1= th ( th  istorical school 1=  (- was established in reaction to the doctrine of the law of nature there is a hi!her# universal# unchan!eable law to which all ust confor.  The historical school did not reco!ni@e any peranent or unchan!eable law& it considered law to be both chan!eable and related to the national spirit& )oan law was studied erely for scientific interest  Sa+igny: re!arded as the !reatest ,urist of all tie  (odification% in 1=00 the civil-law code the B4ur!erliches ;eset@buchC was introduced to the whole ;eran epire

The 4etherlands  

 provinces% olland& Deeland& /trecht& ;elderland& the ?elands& Friesland and ?veri,ssel 2 phases of reception% the early reception phase and the phase in which reception proper too7 place

29

FLS101-V

$arly reception% late 13 th ( to iddle 1 th (  The ecclesiastical church; udges who were ostly trained at 4olo!na or ?rleans- their 7nowled!e of )oan-canonical procedure played a role in the early reception of )oan law  The 3utch urists: helped the reception process alon! by usin! their roan law s7ills in the draftin! of le!al docuents  Friesland: there was no stron! central !overnent in the province# the runnin! of the counities affairs were left in the hands of the cler!y- canon law served as a vehicle for the reception of )oan law in the Friesland )eception proper- 2 nd half of the 1th ( to end 16th ( th  :olitical factors: 1  >etherlands was under 4ur!undian rule- a policy of centrali@ation the eliination of all diversity which existed as a result of t he fact that there were to any provinces with different adin and laws. was introduced to the >etherlands Legislation: 16th ( the 4ur!undians introduced statutes which contained explicit reference to the o application of the BwrittenC law )oan law. in all atters not covered by the statute itself  "usto#ary law- order and certainty: provincial custos had to be put in writin! and subitted o for confiration to eliinate contradictory provincial custos" ' clause add to be added statin! the )oan law was the subsidiary law "ourts: prooted reception by- the ,ud!es of the hi!h courts were )oanist-orientated and had o little or no 7nowled!e of local custoary law& French law applied in the *utch courts# French law was influenced by )oan law and the ,ud!ents of the hi!her courts had persuasive value for the lower courts )roof of custo#ary law: 1th ( the hi!h courts reEuired that custoary law had to be proved by o a !roup of witnesses  $conoic factors% Social change and a de+elo$ing econo#y: 16th( >etherlands a!ricultural econoy had !iven o way to a rapidly developin! coercial econoy# with the ephasis on trade" The local law syste was not systeatic or unifor enou!h to cope with the new deands and recourse was had to )oan law Legal ad+ice: the rich erchant class often needed le!al advice- the advocates they consulted o relied heavily on )oan law as systeatised by t he huanists 3i+ersity in town law: each town council wanted !reater autonoy for its own town and also o wanted to 7eep the diversity of the laws applicable to different towns to a iniu" Giddles 1 th ( the towns adopted a ore systeatic approach to the frain! of their local le!islation 7euren.  (ultural factors% the university of Louvain Founded in the 1th ( by the church and the rich duchy of 4rabant" The influence of the church o resulted in the ephasis on canon law# which naturally stren!thened the influence of )oan law Faculty of o#an law and canon law: o nfluence of #edie+al uni+ersities: the universities of ?rleans and the +talian universities o exerted influence of the law school at Louvain Glossa Ordinaria and *artolus: the law lecturers in the early days followed the ;lossa o ?rdinaria and well as the wor7s of 4artolus- as a result a hi!h standard of civil-law teachin! was established For#er students at the uni+ersity: any too7 up positions in the hi!h court# !overnent or o advisors to wealthy town bur!esses )rofessors at the uni+ersity: acted as propa!andists in the furtherance of )oan law o The extent of the reception in the >etherlands  )epublie7 der Vereeni!de >ederlanden% northern provinces. Friesland- )eception in coplexu& olland and Deeland- extensive reception (odification in the >etherlands th  +n the late 1A  ( it was decided to codify the law of >etherlands- actin! secretary Van der Linden was appointed- before the tas7 was copleted >apoleon conEuered >etherlands and appointed his brother# Louis 4onaparte as the $peror of >etherlands

2

FLS101-V 





+n 1A0= Louis introduced the (ode >apoleon (ode (ivil. into >etherlands and adapted it for the conditions there" $ven thou!h the >etherlands was no lon!er under French rule# a civil code odeled on the (ode (ivil# was proul!ated in 1=3A The iportance of the date of codification to S' ,urists% as )oan-*utch law developed in the >etherlands# these developents also affected the way t he law was applied in S'- )oan-*utch law continued developin! until codification too7 place in >etherlands in 1A0=- the (ivil code of the >etherlands does not apply in S'# as S' was no lon!er under the control of the >etherlands at the tie of the codification" The province of olland is si!nificant to S' because the law of the province of olland was the leadin! law in the >etherlands" )oan-*utch law was also received in Lesotho# 4otswana# Swa@iland# Dibabwe and >aibia

2ngland The *evelopent of $n!lish (oon law% 3 a,or influences 1" illia the (onEueror% 1066 the >oran in! illia the (onEueror went to conEuer $n!land- at that point people o lived in sall settleents# had local courts and applied local custoary law# suppleented by a few royal statutes illia set the process creatin! a unified le!al syste in otion by establishin! the in!etherlands# the *utch $ast +ndia applied )oan-*utch laws in its colonies or that the adinistration of the (ape applied the law of olland" )oan-*utch law becae applicable in the (ape throu!h custo" This law which was later influenced by $n!lish law# eventually becae 7nown as the basic (oon law of South 'frica

=hat is o#an-3utch lawC The >arrow interpretation of )oan-*utch law th  )oan-*utch law ay be understood as the law of the province of olland as it existed in the 1 and 1Ath (  +t consists of )oan law received in the province of olland# aended by custoary law and le!islation placaeten. of olland as they existed in the 1 th and 1Ath ( The broad interpretation of )oan- *utch law   Gay be interpreted as includin! the law of all  *utch provinces as well as eleents pf the $uropean ius coune The view of the South 'frican 'ppellate *ivision  /ntil 1=AA# there was conflict of opinion- the S(' settled this old dispute in *u :lessis v Strauss by decidin! in favour of the narrow interpretation The relevance of the ius coune and the law of the other *utch provinces  $uropean +us coune% (anon law# )oan law# ;eranic custoary law  +n the *u :lessis case the '* ephasi@ed the historical context of the rules of )oan *utch law)oan *utch law is re!arded as an iportant branch of the ius coune

2A

FLS101-V  



 

The foral source of our coon law is the law of the province of olland as it existed in the 1 th and 1Ath ( +n practice# we ust distin!uish between the search for authority for the law in !eneral and the search for specific le!al rules" hen we loo7 at the law in !eneral ters# we note that there is unity in the law of western $urope# but when we loo7 at specific rules# we ay find inor differences in the various systes which belon! to the $uropean ius coune e will loo7 at the coon law of western $urope before codification when authority is sou!ht with re!ard to !eneral principles# ideas and doctrines of )oan *utch law& the law of the province of olland when authority is sou!ht for specific rules of )oan-*utch law The '* does not hesitate to adapt )oan-*utch le!al rules which have fallen out of step with the needs of present day S' 4ecause of the spirit pf universalis that has existed in $urope for the past 00 years# )oan-*utch law and the $uropean ius coune have influenced one another- as a result it is easy for S' lawyers schooled on )oan-*utch law# to consult the le!al systes of the $uropean ius coune in his search for a solution to a new le!al proble

The Sources of o#an-3utch law 

The old writers# statuteJ le!islation# collections of court decisions# collections of opinions and custo

The old writers  Mstudy the inforation about the wor7s of the old writers to!ether with an evaluation of their authority in present day le!al practicesM  Facts that deterine the iportance of an old writer% 1hich province did the writer represent I The authoritative writers on )oan-*utch law are 1stly o those who wrote on the law of the province of olland" Those who did not write on the laws of t he province of olland# in so far as they bear witness to the reception phenoenon in estern $urope and therefore to the western $urope ius coune which was received into the >etherlands The period in which the writer lived % )oan-*utch law existed as an independent le!al syste in o olland for alost 3 (- the B!olden a!e of *utch ,urisprudenceC too7 place in the 1 th (" )oan*utch law consists of the law of olland of the 1 th and 1Ath (- so you would first consult the writers of this period The type of work written by the author % (oentaries on )oan-*utch law in its entirety t he o +nleidin!e of ;rotius.& (oentaries on )oan law 5ohannes Voet (oentarius ad :andectas.& coentaries on existin! coentaries ;roenwe!en and Schorer. and treatises on aspects of )oan-*utch law *e lure 4elli as :acis by ;ortius. The influence of these writers on (outh )frican legal practice% 5ohannes Voet 8 the reason for his o popularity is that in his (oentarius he covered a very wide field of the law and wrote authoritatively on it" To South 'frican ,ud!es he personified the B!olden a!eC of *utch  ,urisprudence" :ercival ;aneotes on ;rotiuss +nleidin!e and Tractatus de Le!ibus 'bro!atis >otes on ;rotiusetherlands" This a7es Voetetherlands of his tie" e paid re!ard to the achieveents of the iddle '!es# since it was the elaborations and restateents of )oan law by the edieval writers that had shaped the law that was valid in practice" Voet too7 what was !ood fro the huanists and fused it with the virtues of the 4artolists is reputation was ainly due to the fact that he provided a coprehensive review of the whole field of )oan-*utch law" is writin! is usually easy to understand# since he states his propositions clearly and is very lo!ical in his reasonin!" is influence and fae were not restricted to his hoeland but extended throu!hout $urope" The $n!lish translation with annotations. of the (oentary by Sir :ercival ;ane was published in the 1=0etherlands Voet "ornelis +an *in7ershoe7- 1th N 1Ath ( 4i,n7ershoe7 !raduated as a doctor of 5urisprudence and established hiself as an advocate at The a!ue" e later becae a eber of the oo!e )aad van olland en Deeland the supree (ouncil. of which he was president until he died" is ethod was huanistic ost faous eber of the *utch uanist School# alon!side Schultin!. 2 ost iportant wor7s% Huestiones +uris :ublici and ?bservationes Tuultuarie Huaestiones% deals with the public international law# it earned hi an international reputation" )e!arded as one of the classics in this field# to!ether with ;rotiusatal# ?ran!e Free State and the Transvaal >atal  1A3A the Voortre77ers declared that the ollandsche )echtsple!in! )oan-*utch law. would serve as the basis for the adinistration of ,ustice around the port at port >atal *urban."   'fter the 4ritish too7 control of >atal in 1A9 it was stipulated that the le!al syste of the *istrict of >atal would be the syste practiced in the (ape colony- )oan-*utch law as odified by $n!lish procedural laws The Voortre77er republics   'fter the ;reat Tre7 the 4oers settled in the Transvaal and the Free State# which they declared independent states  )eferred to as the B4oer republicsC or the BVoortre77er republicsC" The Transvaal was 7nown as the B Duid-'fri7aansche )epublie7C  They were also influenced by $n!lish law  The Duid-'fri7aansche )epublie7% The ollandsche wet would for the basis of the law of the D')it coprised of Van der Linden
View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF