Module 9 Problems_Mrnak
Short Description
Download Module 9 Problems_Mrnak...
Description
Problem 16-16: Joint-cost allocation, insurance settlement. Given: Quality Chicken grows and processes chickens. Each chicken is disassembled into five main parts. Information pertaining to production in July 2009 is: Parts Breasts Wings Thighs Bones Feathers
Pounds of Product 100 20 40 80 10
Final Wholesale SP/Pound $0.55 0.20 0.35 0.10 0.05
1. Compute the cost of the special shipment destroyed using a. Sales value at the splitoff method Product Produced Breasts Wings Thighs Bones Feathers Total
Pounds of Product 100 20 40 80 10 250
SP per Pound $0.55 0.20 0.35 0.10 0.05
Sales Value at Splitoff Pt. $55.00 $4.00 $14.00 $8.00 $0.50 $81.50
Joint Cost Allocated $33.74 $2.45 $8.59 $4.91 $0.31 $50.00
Cost of destroyed Product Product Produced Breasts: Wings Total
Joint Cost Per Pound $0.3374 $0.1227
Pounds Lost 40 15
Insurance Claim $13.50 $1.84 $15.34
b. Physical measures method Product Produced Breasts Wings Thighs Bones Feathers Total
Pounds of Product 100 20 40 80 10 250
Joint Cost Allocated $20.00 $4.00 $8.00 $16.00 $2.00 $50.00
Joint Cost Per # $0.2000 $0.2000 $0.2000 $0.2000 $0.2000 $0.20
Cost of destroyed Product Product Produced Breasts: Wings
Joint Cost Per Pound $0.2000 $0.2000
Pounds Lost 40 15
Insurance Claim $8.00 $3.00
Joint Cost Per Pound $0.3374 $0.1227 $0.2147 $0.0613 $0.0307
Total 2. What is joint-cost allocation would you recommend? Sales value at the splitoff method generates the highest insurance recovery value.
$11.00
Problem 16-17 Given: Quality Chicken grows and processes chickens. Each chicken is disassembled into five main parts. Information pertaining to production in July 2009 is: Parts Breasts Wings Thighs Bones Feathers
Pounds of Product 100 20 40 80 10
Final Wholesale SP/Pound $0.55 0.20 0.35 0.10 0.05
Joint cost of production in July 2009 was $50. Quality Chicken is computing thhe EI values for its July 31, 2009, balance sheet. EI amounts on July 31 are: Parts Pounds of Product Breasts 15 Wings 4 Thighs 6 Bones 5 Feathers 2 1. Compute the cost of the ending inventory if all products are accounted for as joint products. The sales values at the split-off point is used to assign joint manufacturing costs. Product Produced Breasts Wings Thighs Bones Feathers Total
Pounds of Product 100 20 40 80 10 250
SP per Pound $0.55 $0.20 $0.35 $0.10 $0.05
Sales Value at Splitoff Pt. $55.00 $4.00 $14.00 $8.00 $0.50 $81.50
Joint Cost Allocated $33.7423 $2.4540 $8.5890 $4.9080 $0.3067 $50.0000
Joint Cost Per # $0.3374 $0.1227 $0.2147 $0.0613 $0.0307
EI in Pounds 15 4 6 5 2
EI in Dollars $5.0613 $0.4908 $1.2883 $0.3067 $0.0613 $7.2086
2. Assume Quality Chicken uses the production method of accounting for byproducts. What are the EI values for each joint product on July 31, 2009, assuming breasts and thighs are the joint products and wings, bones, and feathers are byproducts? Product Produced Breasts Wings Thighs Bones Feathers Total
Pounds of Product 100 20 40 80 10 250
SP per Pound $0.55 $0.20 $0.35 $0.10 $0.05
Sales Value at Splitoff Pt. $55.0000 $4.0000 $14.0000 $8.0000 $0.5000 $81.5000
3. Comment on the differences between the two methods.
Joint Cost Allocated $29.8913 $4.0000 $7.6087 $8.0000 $0.5000 $50.0000
Joint Cost Per # $0.2989 $0.2000 $0.1902 $0.1000 $0.0500
EI in Pounds 15 4 6 5 2
EI in Dollars $4.4837 $0.8000 $1.1413 $0.5000 $0.1000 $7.0250
Product Produced Breasts Wings Thighs Bones Feathers Total
EI in Pounds 15 4 6 5 2 32
Units Sold 85 16 34 75 8 218
Joint Cost Per # $0.3374 $0.1227 $0.2147 $0.0613 $0.0307
Cost of Goods Sold $28.680982 $1.963190 $7.300613 $4.601227 $0.245399 $42.791411
EI in Dollars $5.0613 $0.4908 $1.2883 $0.3067 $0.0613 $7.2086
Both methods account for all of the $50 of joint manufacturing costs as either COGS or EI. Both methods are arbitrary and acceptable under GAAP.
Total Costs $33.7423 $2.4540 $8.5890 $4.9080 $0.3067 $50.0000
Joint Cost Per # $0.2989 $0.2000 $0.1902 $0.1000 $0.0500
Cost of Goods Sold $25.407609 $3.200000 $6.467391 $7.500000 $0.400000 $42.975000
EI in Dollars $4.4837 $0.8000 $1.1413 $0.5000 $0.1000 $7.0250
Total Costs $29.8913 $4.0000 $7.6087 $8.0000 $0.5000 $50.0000
Corn Syrup
Joint costs (costs of processing corn to splitoff point) Separable cost of processing beyond splitoff point Beginning inventory (cases) Production and Sales (cases) Ending inventory (cases) Selling price per case
Separable cost of processing beyond splitoff point Net realizable value at splitoff Weighting Allocation of Joint Costs
Joint Costs $325,000
$375,000 0 12,500 0 $50
Corn Syrup Final Sales
Corn Starch
$93,750 0
6,250 0 $25
Corn Starch
Joint Costs
$156,250
$781,250
375,000
93,750
$250,000
$62,500
468,750 $312,500
$625,000
80%
20%
$260,000
$65,000
$325,000
Sales Value at Splitoff 1.a - Allocation of cost
Beef Ramen Shrimp Ramen
$100,000
Sales Value Weighting Joint Cost
$300,000
25%
$60,000
1.a - Income Statement - June 2009 Revenues Cost from Panel above Separable Costs Gross Margin Gross Margin Percent
$400,000
75%
$180,000
Special B
Special S
$216,000 60,000 48,000 $108,000
$600,000 180,000 168,000 $252,000
50%
Total
42%
$240,000
Total
$816,000 240,000 216,000 $360,000 44%
Physical Measure at Splitoff 1.b - Allocation of cost Physical Measure (tons) Weighting Joint Cost
1.b - Income Statement - June 2009 Revenues Cost Separable Costs Gross Margin Gross Margin Percent
Beef Ramen Shrimp Ramen
10,000
20,000
33%
$80,000
Total
30,000
67%
$160,000
Special B
Special S
$216,000 80,000 $48,000 $88,000
$600,000 160,000 $168,000 $272,000
40.7%
45.3%
$240,000
Total
$816,000 240,000 216,000 $360,000 44.1%
Net Relizable Value at Splitoff 1.c - Allocation of Cost - June 2009 Revenues Deduct Separable Costs Net Relizable Value Weighting Joint Cost Allocated
Special B
Special S
$216,000 48,000 168,000
$600,000 168,000 432,000
28%
$67,200
Total
$816,000 216,000 600,000
72%
$172,800
$240,000
1.b - Income Statement - June 2009 Revenues Cost Separable Costs Gross Margin Gross Margin Percent
Special B
Special S
Total
$216,000 67,200 $48,000 $100,800
$600,000 172,800 $168,000 $259,200
$816,000 240,000 $216,000 $360,000
46.7%
43.2%
44.1%
View more...
Comments