List of Cases in Agency

May 27, 2016 | Author: Xuagramellebasi | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

List of cases in Agency...

Description

x

1

x

A.     General Provisions (Art. 1767-1783)

1.     What is a contract of partnership? (Art. 1767)

x x

2.     Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769)

x

x x x x 3.     Distinction between partnership and a private corporation

x

- 1 Fletcher, Cyc. Corp., Sec. 20

x x

4.     Formalities required by law for the organization/constitution of partnership

x

(Art. 1771, 1772, 1773, 1843)

x x x x

Week No. 2 5.     Different partnership

kinds

of

2

x

a)     As to object (Art. 1777, 1778, 1780, 1783)

x

i.              Universal Partnership

x

ii.              Partnership

x

b)     As to liability of the partners

x

i.              General Partnership

x x

ii.             Limited Partnership

Particular

x

6.     Different partners

x

a)    Industrial Partner

x x x

b)    Capitalist Partner c)    General Partner d)    Limited Partner

x x

e)    Managing Partner f)     Silent Partner

x x

g)    Ostensible Partner h)    Secret Partner

x x

i)      Partner by Estoppel x

kinds

of

Week No. 3

x

B.     Obligations of the Partners (Art. 1784-1827)

x

1.     Obligations of the partners among themselves (Art. 1784-1809)

x

a)     Distribution of profits and losses of partnership

x

i.              With agreement

x

ii.             Without agreement

x

b)     Principle of Delectus Personae (Art. 1804)

x

-Ortega, et al. v. CA, et al., 245 SCRA 529

x

-Tocao, et al. v. CA, 342 SCRA 20

x

-JG Summit Holdings v. CA, Sept. 24, 2003, G.R. No. 124293

x

c)     Management of Partnership (Art. 18001803)

x

d)     When partner can demand for a formal accounting of partnership affairs (Art. 1807, 1809) x x

x x

Week No. 4 1.     Property rights of a partner (Art. 1810-1814)

x

a)     Incidents of ownership (Art. 1811)

x

b)     Partner’s interest in the partnership (Art. 1812)

x

c)     Effect of conveyance of interest in the partnership to third persons (Art. 1813)

x x

co-

d)     Charging order upon partner’s interest (Art. 1814)

x

2.     Obligations of the partner with regard to third persons (Art. 1815-1827)

x

a) Requisites prescribed by law in order that a partnership may be held liable to third persons for the act of one partner (Art. 1816, 1822, 1823, 1824)

x

b) Concept of Mutual Agency (Art. 1818)

x

c) Partner’s liability for partnership obligation (nature)

x

(Art. 1816 in rel. to 1824)

x

-Liwanag vs. Workmen’s Compenstion Commission, 105 Phil. 741 d) Prohibited acts of partners (unless authorized) (Art. 1818, par. 3)

x x x x

Weeks No. 5 and 6

x

x

C.     Dissolution Winding Up (Art. 1842)

and 1828-

x

1.     Definition and Effects (Art. 1828, 1829)

x

-difference between Dissolution and Winding Up

x

2.     Causes of dissolution (Art. 1830,1831)

x

3.     Effect of dissolution caused by act, death or insolvency of a partner (Art. 1833)

x x

4.     Residual powers of managing partner and exceptions thereto (Art. 1832, 1834)

x

5.     Duty to wind up/ liquidate partnership affairs (Art. 1836)

x

-Aldecoa & Co. vs. Warner, Barnes & Co., 16 Phil. 423

x

-Po Yeng Cheo vs. Lim Ka Yan, 44 Phil. 172

x

-Guidote vs. Borja, 53 Phil. 900

x

6.     Order of payment in the winding up of partnership liabilities (Art. 1839) x x

Week No. 7

x

x

D.     Limited Partnership (Art. 1843-1867)

x

1.     Definition/ Nature

x

2.     Power/ Duties/ Rights of a Limited Partner 3.     Entitlements of a limited partner after dissolution

x x x x x x

Concept/

Week No. 8 II. AGENCY

x x

A.    Historical Context 1. World Context

x

2. Philippine Context

x

-Laws 28 and 32, Title 12, Partida 3

x

-Spanish Civil Code (Civil Agency)

x

-Spanish Code of Commerce (Commercial Agency)

-Civil Code – Art. 2270 (2)

x x x

B.     Nature, Concept and Purpose

x

1. Agency as a contract

x x

x

a) Definition (Art. 1868)

x x

b) Essential requisites/ elements (Art. 1318)

x

x

-Rallos vs. Felix Go Chan & Sons Realty Corp., 81 SCRA 251

x

c) Characteristi cs

x

d) Purpose

x

2. Agency as a relation

a) Fiduciary character

x

b) Representati ve character

x x x

Week No. 9

x

3.     Agency distinguished from/ compared with other relations

x

a) Partnership (Art. 1767)

b) Lease of Work or Service (Art. 1644)

x

x

-Nielson & Company, Inc. v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company, 26 SCRA 540

x

- De la Cruz v. Northern Theatrical Enterprises, 95 Phil. 739

x

c) Independent Contractor (Art. 1713)

x

- Fressel v. Mariano Uy Chaco & Co., 34 Phil 122

x

- Shell Company of the Phil. V. Firemen’s Insurance, 100 Phil. 757

x

- Africa v. Caltex Phil., Inc., 16 SCRA 448

x x x x

d) Negotiorum Gestio (Art. 2144-2145) e) Loan (Art. 1933)

x x

- Jai Alai Corp. v. BPI, 66 SCRA 29 f) Sale (Art. 1458)

x

- Quiroga v. Persons Hardware, 38 Phil. 501

x

- Gonzalo Puyat and Sons v. Arco Amusement Co., 72 Phil. 402

x

- Velasco v. Universal Trading Co. v. Lim Teck Suan, 97 Phil. 171

x

- Pearl Island Commercial Corp. v. Lim Tiang Tong, 101 Phil. 789

x

- Lim v. People, 133 SCRA 333

x x

- Green Valley Poultry & allied Products, Inc. v. IAC 133 SCRA 697

x x

Bert Associates SCRA 395

Osmeña & v. CA, 120

x x x

g) Trusteeship (Art. 1440) - 2 C.J.S. 1034 h)    Broker

x x

- Pacific Commercial Co. v. Yatco, 68 Phil. 398 i)      Guardianship

x

- 2 C.J.S. 1027

x

- 3 AmJur 2d 421

x

- Fessenden v. Jones, 75 Am. Dec. 445

x x

- McDonald v. spring Valley, 120 N.E. 476, 2 ALR 1355 j)      Bailment

x x

- 2 C.J.S. 1027 k)    Ship Agent

- Switzerland Genral Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Ramirez, 96 SCRA 297

x x x

Week No.10

x

C.    Kinds, Creation and Existence

x

1. General Classification a) Actual Agency (Art. 1868)

x

b) Apparent or Ostensible Agency (Art. 1873)

x x x x

c) Agency by Estoppel

x x x x

- Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 553

x

2. Kinds of Actual Agency

x

a) As to manner of creation (Art. 1869)

x

b) As to character (Art. 1875)

c) As to extent (Art. 1876)

x

d) As to scope of authority (Art. 1877, 1878)

x x

x

3. Creation and Elements of Actual Agency a) Consent/ Mandate

x x

x x

x x

x

x x

- Jimenez v. Rabot, 38 Phil. 357

x

- Liñan v. Puno, 31 Phil. 259

x

- Katigbak v. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil. 622

x

- Amigo v. Teves, 96 Phil. 252

x

- Villa v. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil. 126

x

- Dir. Of Public Works v. Sing Juco, 53 Phil. 205

x

- BPI v. De Coster, 47 Phil. 594

x

- Germann & Co. Donaldson, 1 Phil. 63

x

- Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 533

x

- Municipal Council of Iloilo v. Evangelista, 55 Phil.290

x

- Yu Chuck v. Kong Li Po, 46 Phil. 608

v.

- Insular Drug v. PNB, 58 Phil. 683

x x x

Week No. 11

x x

D.   Obligations of the Agent

x

-Int’l Films (China) v. Lyric Films Exchange, 63 Phil. 778

x

-Nepomuceno, et al. Heredia, 7 Phil. 563

x

-Domingo v. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131

x

-U.S. vs. Kiene, 7 Phil. 736

x

-U.S. v. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791

x

-Ojinaga v. Estate of Perez, 9 Phil. 185

v.

x

-De Borja v. De Borja, 58 Phil. 811

x

-PNB v. Welch,Ffairchild, & Co., 44 Phil. 780

x

-Harry Keeler Electric Co. v. Rodriguez, 44 Phil. 19 -Austria v. CA, 39 SCRA 527

x x x

E.     Obligations Principal

of

x

-Gonzales & Gomez Haberer, 47 Phil. 380

the

v.

-Albaladejo y Cia. Phil. Refining Co., 45 Phil. 556

x x x

Week 12

x

x

F.     Modes of Extinguishment of Agency

x

-Barretto v. Santa Maria, 26 Phil. 440

x

-Coleongco v. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577

x

-De Buncio & Co. v. Ong Guan Gan, 60 Phil. 696

x

-New Manila Lumber Co., Inc. v. Republic, 107 Phil. 824

x

-Infante v. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 693

x

-Valera v. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695

x

-Buason and Reyes Panuyas, 105 Phil. 795

v.

x

-Herrera, et al. v. Luy Kim Guam, 110 Phil. 1020

x

-Del Rosario v. Abad, 104 Phil. 648

x

-Pasno v. Ravina, 54 Phil. 378 -Perez v. PNB, 17 SCRA 834

x x x x

Week No. 13 III. TRUSTS

x x x

A.    Definition B.    Parties

x

C.   Different Kinds of Trusts

x

1. Express Trust (Art. 14431446)

-Ramos v. Ramos, 61 SCRA 284

x 2. Implied Trust (Art. 14471457)

x

CUAYCONG V. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192

x x

3. Resulting Trust

x x

4. Constructive Trust Week No. 14

x

D.   Enforcement of Trust

x

1. In relation to laches

a) Fabian v. Fabian, 21 SCRA 213

x

b) Sotto v. Teves, 86 SCRA 154

x x

x

2. In relation to Statute of Limitations

a) Gerona v. De Guzman, 11 SCRA 163

x x

x

E.     Period of Prescription for Reconveyance of Real Property Based on Implied Trust

x

-Carantes v. CA, 76 SCRA 514

x

-Alarcon v. SCRA 390

x

-Bueno v. Reyes, 27 SCRA 1179

x

-Varsity Hills, Inc. Navarro, 43 SCRA 503

x

-Ecsay v. CA, 61 SCRA 369

x

-Jaramil v. CA, 78 SCRA 420

x

-Vda. De Nacalaban vs. CA, 80 SCRA 428

Bidin,

120

v.

x

-Duque v. Domingo, SCRA 654

80

x

-Tongoy v. CA, 123 SCRA 99

x

-Caragay-Lagno v. CA, 133 SCRA 718

3

- Santos vs. Sps. Reyes, 368 SCRA 261

-Heirs of Tan Eng Kee vs. CA, 341 SCRA 740 (citing Evangelista vs. Collector of Internal Revenue, 54 O.G. 996) -Negado vs. Makabenta, 54 O.G. 4082 -Yulo vs. Yang Chiaco Seng, L-12541, Aug. 28, 1959

4

i. Critique/ Articles

-Espiritu, XV Lawyers Journal 297

J.B.L. Reyes, XVI Lawyers Journal 138 ii. Other definitions

-De la Peña v. Hidalgo, 16 Phil. 450 -2 C.J.S. 1030

-J.B.L. Reyes 16 Lawyers Journal 138 -Rallos v. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269 -Compañia General de Tabacos v. Diaba, 20 Phil. 321

- 2 C.J. 444-445 - 2 C.J. 464-466

i. Manifestation of Mandate

Express (Art. 1869, 1874) - Implied

- Conde v. CA, 199 SCRA 245 ii. Manifestation of Acceptance

-Express (Art. 1869, 1870) -Implied (Art. 18701872)

5

6

1

2 3

4

Collector of Internal Revenue, 54 O.G. 996)

5 6 7 8

9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

7

8

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

36

37

38 39 40

41

42 43

44

45

46 47 48

49 50

51

52

53

54 55

56

57

58

59 60

61

62 63 64 65 66

67

68

69

70

71

72 73

74

75

76 77

78 79 80 81

82 83

84

85 86 87 88 89 90

91 92 93

94

95

96

97 98 99 100

101 102

103

104 105

106

107

108 109 110

111

112 113 114

115 116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124 125 126 127 128 129

130

131

132

133 134

135 136

137 138 139 140 141

142 143 144 145

146

147 148 149 150

151 152 153 154 155

156

157 158 159 160

161 162 163 164 165

166

167

168

169 170

171

172 173

174 175

176 177

178

179 180 181

182

183

184

185 186

187 188

189

190 191 192 193 194 195

196

197

198 199 200

201

202

203

204 205 206 207

208

209 210 211 212

213 214

215

216

217

218 219

220

221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232

233 234

235 236 237 238 239 240

241

242 243

244

245 246

247 248 249 250

251 252 253

254

255 256 257

LIST OF CASES IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION 1 ATTY. RANADA / SATURDAY / FACULTY

No. Case Title 1 Santos vs. Sps. Reyes, 368 SCRA 261

Topic What is a contract of partnership? (Art. 1767)

2 Heirs of Tan Eng Kee vs. CA, 341 SCRA 740

1.    Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769)

3 Negado vs. Makabenta, 54 O.G. 4082

1.    Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769)

4 Yulo vs. Yang Chiaco Seng, L-12541, Aug. 28, 1959 5 Ortega, et al. v. CA, et al., 245 SCRA 529 6 Tocao, et al. v. CA, 342 SCRA 20

1.    Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769) b) Principle of Delectus Personae (Art. 1804) b) Principle of Delectus Personae (Art. 1804)

7 JG Summit Holdings v. CA, Sept. 24, 2003, G.R. No. 124293

b) Principle of Delectus Personae (Art. 1804)

8 Liwanag vs. Workmen’s Compenstion Commission, 105 Phil. 741

Partner’s liability for partnership obligation (nature) (Art. 1816 in ok rel. to 1824)

9 Aldecoa & Co. vs. Warner, Barnes & Co., 16 Phil. 423

5. Duty to wind up/ liquidate partnership affairs (Art. 1836)

ok

10 Po Yeng Cheo vs. Lim Ka Yan, 44 Phil. 172

5. Duty to wind up/ liquidate partnership affairs (Art. 1836)

ok

11 Guidote vs. Borja, 53 Phil. 900

5. Duty to wind up/ liquidate partnership affairs (Art. 1836)

ok

12 Rallos vs. Felix Go Chan & Sons Realty Corp., 81 SCRA 251

Essential requisites/ elements (Art. 1318)

ok

Nielson & Company, Inc. v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company, 26 13 SCRA 540 Lease of Work or Service (Art. 1644) 14 De la Cruz v. Northern Theatrical Enterprises, 95 Phil. 739 15 Fressel v. Mariano Uy Chaco & Co., 34 Phil 122

Lease of Work or Service (Art. 1644) Independent Contractor (Art. 1713)

16 Shell Company of the Phil. V. Firemen’s Insurance, 100 Phil. 757 17 Africa v. Caltex Phil., Inc., 16 SCRA 448 18 De la Peña v. Hidalgo, 16 Phil. 450 19 Jai Alai Corp. v. BPI, 66 SCRA 29 20 Quiroga v. Persons Hardware, 38 Phil. 501

Independent Contractor (Art. 1713) Independent Contractor (Art. 1713) Negotiorum Gestio (Art. 2144-2145) Loan (Art. 1933) Sale (Art. 1458)

ok

ok ok ok

21 Gonzalo Puyat and Sons v. Arco Amusement Co., 72 Phil. 402 22 Velasco v. Universal Trading Co. v. Lim Teck Suan, 97 Phil. 171 23 Pearl Island Commercial Corp. v. Lim Tiang Tong, 101 Phil. 789 24 Lim v. People, 133 SCRA 333 25 Green Valley Poultry & allied Products, Inc. v. IAC 26 Bert Osmeña & Associates v. CA, 120 SCRA 395 27 Pacific Commercial Co. v. Yatco, 68 Phil. 398 28 Fessenden v. Jones, 75 Am. Dec. 445

h)    Broker h)    Guardianship

29 McDonald v. spring Valley, 120 N.E. 476, 2 ALR 1355

h)    Guardianship

30 Switzerland Genral Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Ramirez, 96 SCRA 297 31 Rallos v. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269 32 Compañia General de Tabacos v. Diaba, 20 Phil. 321 33 Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 553 34 Conde v. CA, 199 SCRA 245 35 Jimenez v. Rabot, 38 Phil. 357 36 Liñan v. Puno, 31 Phil. 259 37 Katigbak v. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil. 622 38 Amigo v. Teves, 96 Phil. 252 39 Villa v. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil. 126 40 Dir. Of Public Works v. Sing Juco, 53 Phil. 205 41 BPI v. De Coster, 47 Phil. 594 42 Germann & Co. v. Donaldson, 1 Phil. 63 43 Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 533 44 Municipal Council of Iloilo v. Evangelista, 55 Phil.290 45 Yu Chuck v. Kong Li Po, 46 Phil. 608 46 Insular Drug v. PNB, 58 Phil. 683

h)    Guardianship Apparent or Ostensible Agency (Art. 1873) Apparent or Ostensible Agency (Art. 1873) Agency by Estoppel Manifestation of Mandate - Implied Manifestation of Acceptance - Implied (1872)

ok ok ok

ok ok ok ok ok ok ok

A.    Obligations of the Agent 47 Int’l Films (China) v. Lyric Films Exchange, 63 Phil. 778 48 Nepomuceno, et al. v. Heredia, 7 Phil. 563 49 Domingo v. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131

ok ok ok

Page 49 of 56

A.    Obligations of the Agent

No. Case Title 50 U.S. vs. Kiene, 7 Phil. 736 51 U.S. v. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791 52 Ojinaga v. Estate of Perez, 9 Phil. 185 53 De Borja v. De Borja, 58 Phil. 811 54 PNB v. Welch,Ffairchild, & Co., 44 Phil. 780 55 Harry Keeler Electric Co. v. Rodriguez, 44 Phil. 19 56 Austria v. CA, 39 SCRA 527 57 Gonzales & Gomez v. Haberer, 47 Phil. 380 58 Albaladejo y Cia. Phil. Refining Co., 45 Phil. 556 59 Barretto v. Santa Maria, 26 Phil. 440 60 Coleongco v. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577 61 De Buncio & Co. v. Ong Guan Gan, 60 Phil. 696 62 New Manila Lumber Co., Inc. v. Republic, 107 Phil. 824 63 Infante v. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 693 64 Valera v. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695 65 Buason and Reyes v. Panuyas, 105 Phil. 795 66 Herrera, et al. v. Luy Kim Guam, 110 Phil. 1020 67 Del Rosario v. Abad, 104 Phil. 648 68 Pasno v. Ravina, 54 Phil. 378 69 Perez v. PNB, 17 SCRA 834 70 Ramos v. Ramos, 61 SCRA 284 71 CUAYCONG V. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192 72 Fabian v. Fabian, 21 SCRA 213 73 Sotto v. Teves, 86 SCRA 154 74 Gerona v. De Guzman, 11 SCRA 163 75 Carantes v. CA, 76 SCRA 514 76 Alarcon v. Bidin, 120 SCRA 390 77 Bueno v. Reyes, 27 SCRA 1179 78 Varsity Hills, Inc. v. Navarro, 43 SCRA 503 79 Ecsay v. CA, 61 SCRA 369 80 Jaramil v. CA, 78 SCRA 420 81 Vda. De Nacalaban vs. CA, 80 SCRA 428 82 Duque v. Domingo, 80 SCRA 654 83 Tongoy v. CA, 123 SCRA 99 84 Caragay-Lagno v. CA, 133 SCRA 718

Topic ok ok ok ok ok ok A.    Obligations of the Principal A.    Obligations of the Principal A.    Modes of Extinguishment of Agency

ok ok ok ok ok ok ok

Express Trust (Art. 1443-1446) Implied Trust (Art. 1447-1457) In relation to laches In relation to laches In relation to Statute of Limitations E. Period of Prescription for Reconveyance of Real Property Based on Implied Trust ok

ok ok ok ok ok

Page 50 of 56

TABLE OF CONTENTS No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73

TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Title Rallos vs. Felix Go Chan & Sons Realty Corp., 81 SCRA 251 Nielson & Company, Inc. v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company, 26 SCRA 540 De la Cruz v. Northern Theatrical Enterprises, 95 Phil. 739 Fressel v. Mariano Uy Chaco & Co., 34 Phil 122 Shell Company of the Phil. V. Firemen’s Insurance, 100 Phil. 757 Africa v. Caltex Phil., Inc., 16 SCRA 448 De la Peña v. Hidalgo, 16 Phil. 450 Jai Alai Corp. v. BPI, 66 SCRA 29 Quiroga v. Persons Hardware, 38 Phil. 501 Gonzalo Puyat and Sons v. Arco Amusement Co., 72 Phil. 402 Velasco v. Universal Trading Co. v. Lim Teck Suan, 97 Phil. 171 Pearl Island Commercial Corp. v. Lim Tiang Tong, 101 Phil. 789 Lim v. People, 133 SCRA 333 Green Valley Poultry & allied Products, Inc. v. IAC Bert Osmeña & Associates v. CA, 120 SCRA 395 Pacific Commercial Co. v. Yatco, 68 Phil. 398 Fessenden v. Jones, 75 Am. Dec. 445 McDonald v. spring Valley, 120 N.E. 476, 2 ALR 1355 Switzerland Genral Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Ramirez, 96 SCRA 297 Rallos v. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269 Compañia General de Tabacos v. Diaba, 20 Phil. 321 Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 553 Conde v. CA, 199 SCRA 245 Jimenez v. Rabot, 38 Phil. 357 Liñan v. Puno, 31 Phil. 259 Katigbak v. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil. 622 Amigo v. Teves, 96 Phil. 252 Villa v. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil. 126 Dir. Of Public Works v. Sing Juco, 53 Phil. 205 BPI v. De Coster, 47 Phil. 594 Germann & Co. v. Donaldson, 1 Phil. 63 Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 533 Municipal Council of Iloilo v. Evangelista, 55 Phil.290 Yu Chuck v. Kong Li Po, 46 Phil. 608 Insular Drug v. PNB, 58 Phil. 683

Int’l Films (China) v. Lyric Films Exchange, 63 Phil. 778 Nepomuceno, et al. v. Heredia, 7 Phil. 563 Domingo v. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131 U.S. vs. Kiene, 7 Phil. 736 U.S. v. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791 Ojinaga v. Estate of Perez, 9 Phil. 185 De Borja v. De Borja, 58 Phil. 811 PNB v. Welch,Ffairchild, & Co., 44 Phil. 780 Harry Keeler Electric Co. v. Rodriguez, 44 Phil. 19 Austria v. CA, 39 SCRA 527 Gonzales & Gomez v. Haberer, 47 Phil. 380 Albaladejo y Cia. Phil. Refining Co., 45 Phil. 556 Barretto v. Santa Maria, 26 Phil. 440 Coleongco v. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577 De Buncio & Co. v. Ong Guan Gan, 60 Phil. 696 New Manila Lumber Co., Inc. v. Republic, 107 Phil. 824 Infante v. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 693 Valera v. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695 Buason and Reyes v. Panuyas, 105 Phil. 795 Herrera, et al. v. Luy Kim Guam, 110 Phil. 1020 Del Rosario v. Abad, 104 Phil. 648 Pasno v. Ravina, 54 Phil. 378 Perez v. PNB, 17 SCRA 834 Ramos v. Ramos, 61 SCRA 284 Cuaycong V. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192 Fabian v. Fabian, 21 SCRA 213 Sotto v. Teves, 86 SCRA 154 Gerona v. De Guzman, 11 SCRA 163 Carantes v. CA, 76 SCRA 514 Alarcon v. Bidin, 120 SCRA 390 Bueno v. Reyes, 27 SCRA 1179 Varsity Hills, Inc. v. Navarro, 43 SCRA 503 Ecsay v. CA, 61 SCRA 369 Jaramil v. CA, 78 SCRA 420 Vda. De Nacalaban vs. CA, 80 SCRA 428 Duque v. Domingo, 80 SCRA 654 Tongoy v. CA, 123 SCRA 99 Caragay-Lagno v. CA, 133 SCRA 718

Page No. 1~2 3~4 5~6 7~8 9 ~ 10 11 ~ 12 13 ~ 14 15 ~ 16 17 ~ 18 19 ~ 20 21 ~ 22 23 ~ 24 25 26 27 ~ 28 29 ~ 30 31 ~ 32 33 ~ 34 35 ~ 36 37 ~ 38 39 ~ 40 41 ~ 42 43 ~ 44 45 ~ 46 47 ~ 48 49 ~ 50 51 ~ 52 53 ~ 54 55 ~ 56 57 ~ 58 59 ~ 60 61 ~ 62 63 ~ 64 65 ~ 66 67 ~ 68

69 ~ 70 71 ~ 72 73 ~ 75 76 ~ 77 78 ~ 79 80 ~ 81 82 ~ 83 84 ~ 86 87 ~ 88 89 ~ 90 91 ~ 92 93 ~ 94 95 ~ 96 97 ~ 98 99 ~ 100 101 ~ 102 103 ~ 104 105 ~ 106 107 ~ 108 109 ~ 110 111 ~ 112 113 ~ 114 115 ~ 116 117 ~ 118 119 ~ 120 121 ~ 122 123 ~ 124 125 ~ 126 127 ~ 128 129 ~ 130 131 132 ~ 133 134 ~ 135 136 ~ 137 138 ~ 139 140 ~ 141 142 ~ 143 144 ~ 145

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF