Lembar Penilaian Debat

Lembar Penilaian Debat No.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Nama

Ketepatan Analisis Latar Belakang

Sumber Data

Kesesuaian Penggunaan Penampilan Konsistensi Kejelian Kesesuaian Jumlah Data Data saat Memberi Kesimpulan dengan Terkini Berbicara Tanggapan dengan Argumen (Rebatt) Proses Debat

Alamsyah Asti Novitasari Devi Putriana Elisa Putri agung Fitriyanti Arifin Haeruddin Hamria Pratiwi Muh. Khaliq Nur Muqarramah Veggi Plentisari

Pedoman Penilaian: Skor : 1 = Kurang 2 = Cukup 3 = Baik

  =

    

=

   

Rubrik Penilaian No 1

Aspek yang dinilai Ketepatan Analisis Latar Belakang

2

Sumber Data

3

Kesesuian Data dengan Argumentasi

4

Penggunaan Data Terkini

5

Penampilan Saat Berbicara

6

Konsintensi

7

Kejelian Memberi Tanggapan (Rebatt)

Skor 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

3 2 1 3 2 1

8

Kesesuian Kesimpulan dengan Proses Debat

3 2 1

Kriteria Analisis tepat, terorganisasi dan sesuai dengan keadaan nyata Analisis tepat, sesuai dengan kenyataan namun kurang terorganisasi Analisis kurang tepat, kurang teroganisir namun sudah sesuai dengan kenyataan Hasil penelitian dan artikel dari web sains atau universitas terpercaya Bacaan dari web terpercaya Tulisan di blogspot atau wordpress dan sejenisnya Data terpercaya dan sesuai dengan argumentasi Data terpercaya namun kurang sesuai dengan argumentasi Data tidak terpercaya dan tidak sesuai dengan argumentasi Data dari 3 tahun terakhir (2013- 2016) Data dari 7 tahun terakhir (2009- 2012) Data dari 11 tahun terakhir (2005- 2008) Percaya diri dan mampu mengendalikan situasi debat Kurang percaya diri dan mampu mengendalikan situasi debat Kurang percaya diri dan kurang mampu mengendalikan situasi debat

Sangat yakin dan tidak terpengaruh dengan argumen lawan Kurang yakin dan tidak terpengaruh dengan argumen lawan Kurang yakin dan terpengaruh dengan argument lawan Mampu menangkap kekurangan argumen lawan dengan tepat dan memberi sanggahan yang logis terhadapnya Kurang mampu menangkap kekurangan argumen lawan dengan tepat dan memberi sanggahan yang logis terhadapnya Kurang mampu menangkap kekurangan argumen lawan dengan tepat dan tidak dapat memberi sanggahan yang logis terhadapnya Kesimpulan sesuai dengan proses debat dan mendukung argumentasinya Kesimpulan tidak sesuai dengan proses debat dan hanya mendukung argumentasinya Kesimpulan tidak sesuai dengan proses debat dan tidak mendukung argumentasinya

Debate Assessment Sheet No.

Name

Background Analysis Accuracy

Source Data

Data Suitability with Arguments

Data Usage Update

Appearance while Speaking

1 2

Alamsyah Asti  Novitasari 3 Devi Putriana 4 Elisa the great  princess 5 Fitriyanti Arifin 6 Haeruddin 7 Hamria Pratiwi 8 Muh. Khaliq 9 Nur Muqarramah 10 Veggi Plentisari Assessment Guidelines: Score: 1 = Less 2 = Enough 3 = Good Assessment rubric No

Rated aspect

Score

Criteria

Consistency

Careful Response (Rebatt)

Conformity Conclusion with Debate Process

amount

1

Accuracy of Analysis Background

2

Data sources

3

Data conformity with Arguments

4

Latest Data Usage

5

Appearance While Talking

3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1

6

Consequences

7

Foresight Responds (Rebatt)

Analysis precise, organized and in accordance with the real situation Precise analysis, is realistic, but less organized

The analysis is less precise, less organized but is in conformity with reality The results of the research and science articles from the web or university reliable Readings from the web reliable Writing on blogspot or wordpress and the like Data reliably and in accordance with the argument Data reliable but less in accordance with the argument The data is not reliable and does not correspond with the argument Data from the last 3 years (2013- 2016) Data from the last 7 years (2009- 2012) Data from the last 11 years (2005- 2008) Confident and able to control the situation debate

Lack of confidence and being able to control the situation debate Less confident and less able to control the situation debate 3 2 1 3

Very confident and is not affect ed by the arguments opponents Less assured and is not affected by the arguments opponents Less confident and unaffected by the argument opponents Able to capture the opponent's shortcomings argument with precise and logical to make objections against

2

Less able to capture the opponent's shortcomings argument with precise and logical to make objections against

1

Less able to capture the opponent's deficiencies with appropriate arguments and can not answer that is logical for him

8

Conclusions conformitywith Process Debate

3 2

Conclusions in accordance with the process of debate and support his argument Conclusions are not in accordance with the process of debate and only supports the argument

1

Conclusions are not in accordance with the process of debate and do not support his

argument