LBP vs De Leon

LBP v. De Leon G.R. No. 143275 September 10, 2002 Sec. 5 Art. 7 of the on!t"t#t"on$ %h&t R#'e! of proce(#re of !pec"&' co#rt! &n( )#&!"*+#("c"&' bo("e! !h&'' rem&"n eect"ve #n'e!! ("!&pprove( b- the S#preme o#rt. A%S$  %he pet"t"oner!*&ppe''ee! pet"t"oner!*&ppe''ee! Ar'ene Ar'ene (e Leon Leon &n( Bern&r(o Bern&r(o (e Leon Leon &re the re/"!tere( oner! of & p&rce' of '&n( !"t#&te( &t S&n A/#!t"n, oncepc"on,  %&r'&c  %&r'&c covere( covere( b- %% %% No. 13051 13051 "th & tot&' tot&' &re& of 50.1171 50.1171 hect&re!. hect&re!. %he !#b+ect propert- &! vo'#nt&r"'- oere( for !&'e to the /overnment p#r!#&nt to RA 57 &t P50,000.00 per hect&re. %he Dep&rtment of A/r&r"&n Reform DAR m&(e & co#nter oer of P17,5.20 per hect&re, or & tot&' &mo#nt of P4,77.54, b#t the !&me &! re+ecte(. Another oer &! m&(e b- DAR "ncre&!"n/ "ncre&!"n/ the &mo#nt to P1,55,3.35. 6n v"e of the pet"t"oner!*&ppe''ee! f&"'#re to re!pon( to the ne oer m&(e b- DAR, the Dep&rtment of A/r&r"&n Reform A(+#("c&t"on Bo&r( DARAB too8 co/n"9&nce of the c&!e p#r!#&nt to Sec. 1 ( of RA 57. S#b!e)#ent'-, the DARAB "!!#e( &n :r(er ("rect"n/ re!pon(ent*&ppe''&nt LBP to recomp#te the v&'#e of the !#b+ect propert- "n &ccor(&nce "th DAR A(m"n"!tr&t"ve :r(er No. , Ser"e! of 12. re!pon(ent*&ppe''&nt #pon &pp'-"n/ the DAR A: N:. 12 &rr"ve( &t & recomp#te( &//re/&te '&n( v&'#e of P2,41,731.5 h"ch &! &/&"n re+ecte(. Pet"t"oner!*&ppe''ee! ;'e( "th the Re/"on&' %r"&' o#rt, Br&nch 3, %&r'&c, h"ch "! the (e!"/n&te( Spec"&' A/r&r"&n o#rt "n the &re& &n( &!8e( the co#rt, &mon/ other!, to ;< the +#!t compen!&t"on of the !#b+ect propert-. =h"ch ;