Kirin Case Study_5
Short Description
Kirin Case Study...
Description
Conjoint and Segmentation analysis The KIRIN Case study
Sejong YOO (B00702551) BLANLUET Ambroise (B00603115) GABELLA Victor (B00698126) HATIM Leila (B00604795)
Contents • Background • Key issues • Conjoint Analysis KIRIN BEER Conjoint and Segmentation Analysis for ICHIBAN SHIBORI
• Segment Analysis • Recommendation
2
Background #1 Beer firm in Japan KIRIN
KIRIN Brewery Limited was the largest beer firm in Japan, and fourth largest in the world.
Dominant market leader in Japan’s beer market
Although Kirin diversified into food, liquor, and even biotechnology, its performance relied largely on its market position in beer. In 1990 its market
Asahi launched the new beer and achieved favorable market acceptance
share was almost 50% in Japan, nearly twice its nearest competitor, Asahi. Sapporo was the third largest brewer in Japan, followed by Suntory.
Kirin answered with a new product, Ichiban Shibori, which was a huge success
3
Background US import Market
On the US market, Kirin started with a niche strategy and is trying to get new consumers
US import beer market is mostly made of young upper-middle classes
Kirin first entered the US market in 1983 with a niche stragtegy, targetting Japanese people. Later, they signed contracts with beer distributors to get sold in other places than Japanese restaurants. Their major market is located in New York and Los
It is dominated by European and Mexican beer producers Among Japanese producers, Kirin is only second to Sapporo
Angeles.
4
Key Issues
New product launch in the US
Market Share in US
Product attributes
Segmentation and Targeting
They think about bringing Ichiban Shibori to the US market
1
Kirin would need to sell an additionnal 300-400.000 cases to beat Sapporo
3
Would that be the right product to launch into that market, and wich consumers should be primarily targeted ?
2
5
Product Attributes Are our new product attributes suitable to the consumers in the US
Conjoint Analysis
6
Discrepancy between actual vs predicted M/S Based on managerial judgments on competitors European Heinken
Beck’s
Bass Guinness
Standard Awareness
100 100 27.0%
50 80 13.5%
30 70 8.1%
25 100 6.8%
65 85 17.6%
60 100 16.2%
20 50 5.4%
20 50 5.4%
Standard Distribution
15.7%
12.6%
11.0%
15.7%
13.4%
15.7%
7.9%
7.9%
Weighted Average
22.5%
13.1%
9.3%
10.4%
15.9%
16.0%
6.4%
6.4%
First Choice
13.0%
12.0%
14.0%
14.0%
3.0%
39.0%
5.0%
N/A
Choic of preference Logit
16.0% 16.0%
15.0% 14.0%
14.0% 14.0%
14.0% 14.0%
11.0% 10.0%
17.0% 22.0%
13.0% 11.0%
Awareness Distribution
Amstel Light
Molson
Corona
Sapporo
Old Kirin
Note
0.6 SA * 0.4 SD
• Choice role is dependent on the context. - High Stake choice -> First Choice - High Variety of Seeking -> Choice of Preference - In between -> Logit
7
Discrepancy between actual vs predicted M/S Weighted Average
Why discrepancy? European
First Choice
Choic of preference
Logit
39%
40%
• All the other tangible and intangible attributes that
30%
are not reflected in the 23%
product profile.
22%
20%
16%16%
- Brand Power
13%
- Distribution Networks - Advertising Budget
15% 14% 13% 12%
14%14%14% 9%
10%
16%
16% 14%14%14%
10%
17% 13% 11%
11% 10% 6% 3%
0%
Heinken
Beck’s
Bass Guinness
Amstel Light
Molson
Corona
5%
Sapporo
6%
Kirin
8
Conjoint Analysis : New product profile Origin •European •Canadien •Japanese
Aftertaste •Strong •Mild •Very Mild
Calories Price •6.19 •5.49 •4.79
Body •Rich Full Body •Regular •Crisp and Clear
•Full •Regular •Low
Packaging •Six 120z Large •Six 120z Small •Four 160z
Glass •Green Label •Brown Label •Brown Painted 9
Methodology 1 Each attribute Level - First Choice
The relationship between each product attribute and the market share
10
Conjoint Analysis: Attribute Test 1 Kirin New (Baseline) Attributes
1
2
Tests
3
4
Origin
5
6
Price
7
8
Body
9
10
Aftertaste
11
12
Calories
13
14
Packaging
Glass
Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren Curren New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S New M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S t M/S Origin
Japanese
European
Canadian
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Price
5.49
5.49
5.49
6.19
4.79
5.49
5.49
5.49
5.49
5.49
5.49
5.49
5.49
5.49
5.49
Body
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Regular
Crisp and clear
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Aftertaste
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Strong
Mild
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Very mild
Calories
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Full
Low
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Packaging
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Large
Four 16Oz
Six 12Oz Small
Six 12Oz Small
Glass
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Brown Label
Green Label Brown Painted
Heinekin+
13%
12%
13%
11%
13%
12%
13%
13%
13%
12%
13%
13%
13%
13%
13%
13%
13%
12%
13%
9%
13%
11%
13%
11%
13%
12%
13%
12%
13%
12%
Becks
12%
11%
12%
11%
12%
11%
12%
10%
12%
10%
12%
12%
12%
12%
12%
10%
12%
11%
12%
12%
12%
10%
12%
9%
12%
9%
12%
11%
12%
10%
Bass/ Guiness
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
9%
14%
13%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
Amstel Light
14%
13%
14%
13%
14%
14%
14%
13%
14%
13%
14%
13%
14%
13%
14%
14%
14%
13%
14%
12%
14%
12%
14%
13%
14%
13%
14%
14%
14%
14%
Molson
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
1%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
2%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
Corona+
39%
39%
39%
37%
39%
36%
39%
39%
39%
38%
39%
39%
39%
39%
39%
38%
39%
39%
39%
37%
39%
38%
39%
35%
39%
37%
39%
39%
39%
36%
Sapporo
5%
3%
5%
4%
5%
4%
5%
4%
5%
3%
5%
2%
5%
4%
5%
3%
5%
3%
5%
4%
5%
4%
5%
2%
5%
2%
5%
3%
5%
2%
Kirin
n/a
4%
n/a
7%
n/a
9%
n/a
4%
n/a
5%
n/a
3%
n/a
2%
n/a
6%
n/a
5%
n/a
13%
n/a
8%
n/a
13%
n/a
10%
n/a
4%
n/a
9%
11
Conjoint Analysis: Attribute Test 1 Graph 6.62%
European
Origin
8.52%
Canadian 3.79%
6.19
Price
5.21%
4.79 Regular
Body
3.15%
Baseline: 3.94
Crisp and Clear 1.89%
Strong
Aftertaste
6.31%
Mild
5.05%
Full
Calories
13.25%
Low
8.36%
Six 120z Large
Packaging
12.62%
Four 160z
9.94%
Green Label
Glass
4.26%
Brown Painted
0.00%
8.52%
3.50%
7.00%
10.50%
14.00%
12
Methodology 2 Global attribute Level - Choice of Preference
Optimization of the attribute
13
Conjoint Analysis: M/S Optimization European
5 optimal products that maximize M/S Attributes / Optimal Product Profiles
Optimal Product 1 Optimal Product 2 Optimal Product 3 Optimal Product 4 Optimal Product 5
Origin
European
European
European
European
European
Price
4.79
5.49
4.79
5.49
4.79
Body
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Crisp and clear
Crisp and clear
Rich full bodied
Aftertaste
Mild
Mild
Mild
Mild
Mild
Calories
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Packaging
Six 12Oz Large
Six 12Oz Large
Six 12Oz Large
Six 12Oz Large
Six 12Oz Large
Glass
Brown Painted
Brown Painted
Brown Painted
Brown Painted
Brown Painted
M/S
17%
17%
17%
17%
17% 14
Conjoint Analysis: Optimization for new product European
Attributes / New Product Profiles
Kirin New 1
Kirin New 2
Kirin New 3
Origin
Japanese
Japanese
Japanese
Price
4.79
5.49
6.19
Body
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Rich full bodied
Aftertaste
Mild
Mild
Mild
Calories
Low
Low
Low
Packaging
Six 12Oz Large
Six 12Oz Large
Six 12Oz Large
Glass
Brown Painted
Brown Painted
Brown Painted
M/S
16%
16%
16% 15
Recommendation on product profile
Price & Packaging • Sell at 6.19 per case • Premium and large packaging
Market Share • Initial product profile : 12 % • New product profile: 16%
Body, After taste, and Calories • Rich Full Body • Mild After taste • Low calories
Glass • Brown Painted
16
Target consumers Who is our target consumers and going to buy our product ?
Segmentation Analysis
17
Segmentation Analysis
Cluster Size
Size / Cluster
Cluster 1
Cluster 2
Cluster 3
Number Of Observations
115
103
99
Proportion
36.3%
32.5%
31.2%
31.20%
36.30%
32.50%
18
Segmentation Analysis on the taste Segmentation Variables 1.98
Rich full-bodied
5.26 7.48 3.16
Light beer
4.06 4.03 3.17
No aftertaste
5.05 5.68 3.2
Refreshing
5.14 7.02 3.47
Goes down easily
5.65 6.64 2.97
Gives a "buzz"
3.47 3.81 0.426
0.748
Good taste
8.33 0
2.25
4.5
6.75
9
19
Segmentation Analysis on price and image Segmentation Variables 3.1
4.13
Low price 3.71
4.63
4.55
Good value 3.24
5.84
4.05 4.24
ountry with brewing tradition 2.83
3.01 3.18
Attractive bottle 2.54
3.31
Prestigious brand
3.85
1.42
5.04
High quality
7.44
2.2
2.32
For young people
2.19
Masculine 0
2
3
2.56
3.33 4
6
8
20
Segmentation Analysis on consumption Segmentation Variables 2.29
Drink with friends
6.3 5.83 2.1
5.22
Drink at home
6.02 2.54
6.03
To serve dinner guests
6.53 2.83
6.27 6.3
For dining out
2.82
5.14 5.3
Drink at bar
3.56
5.13 5.15
Drink at picnics 0
1.75
3.5
5.25
7
21
Segmentation Analysis Discriminant Variables Cluster 1
Cluster 2
Cluster 3
8.6
Weekly consumption
9.73 9.9
4.783 4.8 4.8
Age (1-7)
5.383 5.6 5.4
Income (1-7) 4.322 4.5 4.6
Education (1-6) 1.139 1.1 1.1
Sex (M=1)
3.513 3.5 3.5
Adapt to new situations
3.33 3.4 3.2
Make friends easily
3.583 3.6 3.5
t like to be tied to timetable 3.165 3.2 3.0
Like to take chances
3.278 3.4 3.2
Like to travel abroad
3.487 3.6 3.4
Like ethnic food 2.948 2.9 3.0
Knowledgeable about beer 0
2.5
5
7.5
10
22
Recommendation on segmentation and targeting Advertising Scope
Focused regional advertising
Demographic information
Male, Aged 40-50, Mid and high income and education,Weekly consumption
1 2 2 3
•
Due to budget constrains, launching the product in one specific region with strategic promotions. If initial outcomes in the test markets are positive, we expand the campaign into major U.S. cities.
•
Our main target consumer is male, aged 40-50, mid and high income and education and consumes beer usually on weekend.
23
Recommendation on segmentation and targeting Narrowly Targeted advertising
3
Expanding target customers
4
Medium of the advertising
5
Our product’s compatibility with Cluster 3
Cluster 2 and 3 are quite similar preference in beer.
POP advertising focusing on distributors
•
Based on the demand of cluster 3, our product should aim for a premium market because our target consumer has knowledge and values good taste, rich full-bodied taste, and refreshing, high quality beer.
•
Since cluster 2 and 3 have similar preference, we might consider targeting two clusters. Our customer values a high quality beer more than the price, and has the highest knowledge of beers and values a prestigious brand.
•
Since we don’t have enough advertising budget, we need to invest on point of advertising focusing on distributors such as bars, retail chains, and restaurants. 24
Thank you
Name Surname Donec ullamcorper nulla non metus auctor fringilla.
Name Surname
Name Surname
Sed posuere consectetur est venenatis at lobortis.
Integer posuere erat a ante posuere velit aliquet.
25
View more...
Comments