IPL Business Model.pdf

December 15, 2017 | Author: SharmashD | Category: Investing, Cricket, Revenue, Ball And Bat Games, Sports
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

IPL Business Model.pdf...

Description

15 April 2008

Indian Premier League (IPL) Participate in a media property of the future – India Cements Ltd

Yasmin Shah (+91-22-6639 9175) [email protected]

Dhaval Parekh (+91-22-6639 9128) [email protected]

Nitesh Momaya(+91-22-6639 9181) [email protected] 1

Opening doors to the next big media movement  Indian Premier League ushers in a new era of marketing of sports in India. We take this opportunity to analyze IPL and compare it with leagues like EPL and ICL (Indian Cricket League).  IPL- already a US$2bn property, is essentially an attempt to sell cricket as a reality show. Creation of club culture – would be key to its success. Nevertheless IPL provides a new entertainment genre which cuts across classes.  Some of the franchisee would look at IPL as a means to promote their brand (UB group) while the others would look it as a financial investment e.g. (India Cements).  The concept is yet to evolve and revenues streams though difficult to predict would be numerous. Our belief is that the three successful teams could easily do revenues of Rs3bn per year in the next three-four years and all the teams are likely to turn profitable after twothree years. Their OPMs could range from 15-20%.  Value unlocking for teams would happen through listing and P/E participation. The world over, average teams like Tottheham Hotspurs are trading at a 1.5X sales while a successful team like Manchester have been sold for 2-5X sales.  Investors looking for an exposure to IPL should look at investing in India Cements Ltd. We believe that the company would be EBIDTA positive in the first year. On conservative basis, it is likely to earn a turnover of Rs3bn from IPL in the next three-four years. Assuming a m cap/sales multiple of 2X, the value per share would be Rs20.

2

Key features of IPL  

The Indian Premier League or IPL is a 20-20 format cricket tournament. This league was formed by the Board of Cricket Control of India (BCCI) and sanctioned by the International Cricket Committee (ICC). IPL has been conceived on the lines of the English premier league, where local football teams with a defined fan base (supporters) play against each other.

 

The idea behind IPL is to sell cricket as a high involvement reality show that would appeal to all audiences. IPL has eight teams sold to franchises for perpetuity. These franchises can run the league in their individual styles and can raise resources from the primary market. The teams have been capped at 10 – with one at the end of every three years.



SONY-WSG has bagged broadcasting rights for 10 years for US$918mn, excluding marketing for US$108mn.



The franchise amount collected is US$724mn, with each of the clubs being sold for US$67-112mn, depending on the city.



Besides acquiring teams, each of these franchises has spent US$6-7mn on acquiring players for their teams.



A total of 59 matches, including finals and semi–finals will be played in this season. (56 league matches plus two semi finals and one final). 7 matches are to be played on the home ground.



Its final leg will be called ‘Champions Twenty20 League’ and all the finalists from across the world will play in it. The champion team will get US$5mn – the highest ever price money in a cricket event. TVRs in India for International Cricket in India 2007

25

ESPNStar Sports

5

NEO Sports

10

ESPNStar Sports

15

ESPNStar Sports

20

0 ICC world Twenty 20 Average tournament

ICC world Twenty 20 India matches

“The key brand values of Twenty20 and the IPL e.g. Modern, Racy, Engaging, Fresh, Accessible – allied to the traditional values of cricket e.g. Reliable, Honest, Traditional, Gentlemanly - make for an extraordinarily and compelling mix for brands”.

India vs Pakistan English vs India ODI series average Test series average

Source: IPL

“In England, where it was first introduced in 2003, Twenty20 has resuscitated a moribund domestic game, packing stadiums on summer evenings" The Economist, September 22nd 2007

3

The broadcasting angle 

The BCCI created history when it sold television rights of this yet untested format to Sony–World Sports consortium for US$1.02bn.



However, of this US$1.02bn, US$108mn is to be spent by Sony on promoting the event over the next 10 years. This brings down the actual cost to US$918mn.



Of this US$918mn, Sony has to pay US316mn for rights of broadcasting for the first five years, and then pay US608mn – if this format has been remunerative in the first five years.



In the first year, payouts are not dependent on TRPs. However, TRPs would drive payouts from the second year. ƒ The franchisee have a share of 80% in the first year decreasing to 60% in the fifth year of broadcasting rights and the balance would go to IPL. ƒ There is an overall cap of US$918mn on the rights which can be shared with the franchisees.

Cash flows for Sony Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 6

Year 7

Year 8

Year 9

Year 10

Ad inflows

2725

3134

3604

4144

4766

5243

5767

6344

6978

7676

Promotions

432

432

432

432

432

432

432

432

432

432

Outflows

2448

2448

2448

2448

2448

4896

4896

4896

4896

4896

P/L

-155

254

724

1264

1886

-85

439

1016

1650

2348

Rs mn

Source: Company, Alchemy

4

Minimum cash outflows for franchises Owners

City

Price paid for team franchise (US$ mn)

Cash outflow per year (US$ mn)

Price of Players (US$ mn)

Team cash outflow per year (US$ mn)

Deccan Chronicle

Hyderabad

107

10.7

6.0

16.7

India Cements

Chennai

91

9.1

6.2

15.3

UB Group –Vijay Mallya

Bangalore

111.6

11.2

5.7

16.9

Emerging Media

Jaipur

67

6.7

3.6

10.3

GMR Group

Delhi

84

8.4

6.4

14.8

Preity Zinta/Ness Wadia/Burman

Mohali

76

7.6

6.6

14.2

Reliance – Mukesh Ambani

Mumbai

111.9

11.2

5.4

16.6

Shah Rukh Khan/ Juhi - Jay Mehta

Kolkotta

75.0

7.5

6.2

13.7

Source: Alchemy

5

What comes in and goes out? Revenues

Expenses

 World over, any league has three main sources of income namely media receipts, gate receipts and sponsorships. Under IPL, these three streams are categorized under central and local. Central revenues are through IPL.  Central

 Team franchising costs – A franchisee has to pay 10% of total franchisee costs every year to IPL. Assuming that a team is bought by a franchise at US$100mn – it would have to pay US$10mn per year to IPL.

ƒ

Media rights – To be shared equally amongst franchises after removing IPL’s share.

ƒ

Sponsorship rights (IPL sponsors) – 60% of the amount collected to be distributed equally amongst the franchises.

 Marketing costs – Each franchise is expected to incur a marketing cost of US$3-4mn for promoting its team.

 Local ƒ

ƒ

 Player costs – Franchisees have acquired players at a total cost of US$4-6mn per year. This includes cost of managers and coaches. Each franchise has 18-22 players who are tradable after a year. The players have a three year contract with the franchise.

Sponsorships – Team sponsorship revenues are the most variable and are dependent on the marketing skills. For example, teams like India Cements have marketed their teams based on the format of IPL – where sponsorships are sold on categories. ICL’s main sponsor is Aircel. In contrast, the other team of Deccan Chronicle will have team partners. These partners will have ownership of the team. For example, in case of an entertainment partner, anything to do with entertainment from cheerleaders to fours and sixes will be seen by that party.

 Stadium expenses – The franchises have to contract stadiums for seven matches at BCCI agreed rates. On an average, the expense is Rs2.5mn per match.  Other expenses management.

like

administration

and

event

Gate receipts – Are anticipated to be a major source of revenues. 20% of tickets are to be allocated to IPL.

6

P&L of a franchise - The business of sport Rs mn

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 6

Year 7

Year 8

Year 9

Year 10

Income Media rights (% share)

80

80

70

70

60

60

60

60

60

60

245

245

214

214

184

367

367

367

367

367

72

72

72

72

72

144

144

144

144

144

154

200

260

338

440

528

633

728

838

963

31

46

69

104

156

172

189

208

228

251

50

80

104

135

162

178

196

216

238

261

Lead sponsor

150

180

216

432

497

571

857

943

1037

1348

In stadia advertising

100

150

210

263

315

362

417

479

551

634

Licensing programme

20

40

46

53

61

67

74

81

89

98

Merchandising

30

50

58

66

76

84

92

101

111

122

Appearances

50

70

95

123

154

184

221

265

318

366

902

1133

1344

1800

2116

2657

3190

3532

3921

4555

Global media rights Sponsorships (IPL) Other sponsorships Gate receipts Ticket sales F&B Team sponsorships Shirt sponsorship

Total Expense Franchisee costs

400

400

400

400

400

400

400

400

400

400

Player acquisition

240

312

406

608

791

1028

1542

1851

2221

2887

Marketing

120

150

188

234

293

337

387

426

490

564

Administration

80

96

115

138

166

191

219

252

290

334

Event management expenses

20

23

26

30

35

40

46

53

61

70

Stadium management

1.8

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

Total

862

983

1137

1414

1688

2000

2599

2987

3468

4261

40

150

207

386

428

658

590

545

453

294

OPM

4%

13%

15%

21%

20%

25%

19%

15%

12%

6%

EBIT

40

150

207

386

428

658

590

545

453

294

Operating profit

Source: Alchemy

7

Assumptions for our model 

80% media rights will be paid to the franchises in equal proportions and 20% will be based on final league positions. However, in our model, we have assumed them to be distributed, equally.



The media rights accrue to teams in the formula, with a re-pricing after five years as per the Sony-WSG contact.



For central and team sponsors, we have assumed renegotiation of contract every five years and three years, respectively, in keeping with the nature of deals signed by most teams.



Team costs are amortized over 10 years.



Since players are contracted for three years, we have assumed a renegotiation in salaries after it.



Player acquisition cost is assumed to increased at 30% per year.



We have not assumed any trading of players.



We have not assumed any debt in the financing of the leagues. Further, interest on working capital loans would not be significant hence we have not considered the same. The asset is likely to be treated as an intangible asset.

The franchises will receive the following share of central revenues Television revenue

Sponsorship revenue

Time period

Share (%)

Time period

Share (%)

Year 1

80

Year 10 onwards

60

Year 2

80

Year 11 onwards

50

Year 3

70

Year 4

70

Year 5-10

60

Year 11 onwards

70

Source: IPL

8

India Cements Ltd - An opportunity to play on IPL Year 1

share (%)

Rs mn

Revenues thru IPL

 Revenues ƒ

The matches are to be held at the Chidambaram stadium in Chennai which have a capacity of 50,000. 20% of the tickets would be offered to the local cricket associations for use of the stadium for seven league matches .

ƒ

We have assumed 80% capacity utilization for matches and average ticket prices of Rs500. We have assumed the collection to be about half of that in a normal ODI .

ƒ

Aircel is its lead sponsor, who has paid Rs150mn for it. Sponsorship includes cap, leading arm, shirt center, six in- stadia boards.

ƒ

Of the total 72 in-stadia boards, a sixth are available to the local franchises. Of the 12, 6 would go to main team sponsor.

ƒ

The remaining boards are expected to generate ~Rs0.8mn per board.

ƒ

Besides playing matches for teams, players are also contracted to make appearances for the franchises for 10 days and eight hours a day .

Broadcasting rights SET

60%

275

Other sponsorships

70%

69

100%

13

Pouring sponsors

357

Total Team sponsors Main sponsor

150

Co-sponsors

50

Cheer leader, mascots

30

Merchandising

20 250

Total Gate receipts Total revenues

80%

128 735

Expenses Franchisee

360

Team

240

Advertising

70

Admin

60

Total

730

Net profit/loss Source: Company, Alchemy

5

 Expenses ƒ

The franchisee has spent Rs240mn on acquiring its team including players, manager, coach and physiotherapists.

ƒ

The marketing expenses for events including local and national advertising are assumed at Rs70mn.

 Conclusion ƒ

On conservative basis, India Cements is likely to do turnover of Rs3bn from IPL in the next 3-4 years. Assuming mcap/sales multiple of 2X, the value per share would be Rs20.

9

International perspective 

We have analysed the business models of various clubs from the English Premier League like Tottenham Hotspurs, Liverpool and Arsenal.



These clubs usually own their stadiums and invest heavily into modernizing/constructing stadiums and training their teams.



Most of these leagues are more than 100 years old and have a strong and established local fan base.



These clubs also have high community involvement and offer training facilities for upcoming players and children in the area.



However lately some league matches have been telecast with players and teams finding support overseas in countries like China and the Middle East.



Growth in revenues is largely dependant on the on field performance of the teams, nevertheless all teams have had positive EBIDTA



Recently some of these leagues have been sold/ bought by individuals. The valuations received by these leagues depend on their success on field and from 1.5X to 5X sales.

Source: IPL

10

EPL – A case study Structure of EPL EPL has 20 teams and its top five teams qualify for the European cup.

IPL versus EPL 

In IPL, media revenues for all teams would be almost EQUAL, internationally they vary depending on the success of the league.



Gate revenues in IPL are largely dependent on stadium capacity and purchasing power of city. They are expected to vary between Rs200-Rs5,000 premium seating. 20% of tickets will go to IPL. Internationally, most of these teams own stadiums.

However, though this revenue break-up is similar across most clubs, the depending on the popularity of the club the amount differs significantly.



The club culture already existed in the West. In India, it is yet to develop. This would be a litmus test for IPL’s success.

The total revenues of three of the total 20 clubs are given below:



Trading of players in IPL to start from year 2.

We analyzed a few of teams and found that ~35% revenues are from gate receipts ~30% from media ~25% from sponsorships

 Arsenal- £177mn  Tottenham -£103mn Revenue break up for Tottenhan Hotspurs

 Birmingham City -£40mn 7

Concept of trading players - Trading of players is another big source of income for teams. Sometimes, it can also result in a loss.

6

33

29

25

Gate receipts

Sponsorship

Media and broadcasting

Merchandising

Others

Source: Company, Alchemy

11

Case study 1: Tottenham Hotspurs 

Totteham was not the top rated club but it entered the top five in 2006 and qualified for the European Cup.



This had a positive impact on its revenues from 2007 which increased by 28%. The main jump was in gate receipts which were up 43% as the clubs earned a revenue share from its international games. There was also a 25% increase in its sponsorship revenues which is attributed to its increased popularity on an international level.



On the operational front, the margin jumped from 6% to 31%.



It has to be noted that even in a bad year, the company’s OPM was always positive.



The debt for CY07 was £40mn, implying debt to equity of 0.83:1

in £ mn

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007 120

Revenues

7.05

100

Gate receipts -Premier league Gate receipts Cup competitions Sponsorship Media and broadcasting

16.4

16.3

16.8

17.4

18.0

1.4

3.4

4.2

0.14

12.7

60

13.6

14.4

14.2

15.7

25.4

40

24.7

23.8

25.4

28.6

33.7

Merchandising

5.2

3.8

4.9

5.1

7.0

Others

4.9

4.3

4.7

6.9

6.0

66.5

66.3

70.6

74.3

103.6

-0.3

6.1

5.0

28.2

Total revenue Growth (%)

80

20 0

4.99

5.18

33.73

23.89

25.48

28.68

25.42

14.59 17.93

14.24 21.86

15.73 17.57

30.89

2005

2006

5.26

3.84

24.75 13.68 17.94 2003

Total gate receipts

2004 Sponsorship

Media and Broadcasting

2007 Merchandising

Expenses Staff costs

38.0

34.5

33.1

40.6

43.8

Other operating costs

14.8

20.3

22.7

28.9

27.3

Operating profit

13.6

11.5

14.7

4.5

32.4

17%

21%

6%

31%

18.6

10.9

12.7

11.7

2.2

2.6

1.7

1.8

2.2

19.0

-7.6

-1.0

0.1

-9.4

11.1

OPM(%) Amortisiation Depreciation of tangible fixed assets Profit / loss

Source: Company, Alchemy

12

Case study 2 : Arsenal 

Arsenal is one of the most successful football clubs in UK .



The company has three divisions – Arsenal property development, Arsenal men's league, Arsenal women’s league.



For their football division, the overall revenues were up 25% in 2007. The gate revenues saw a 51% growth – attributed to the team shifting to a new stadium. While the older stadium had a capacity of ~ 40,000, the new stadium has a capacity of almost 60,000 and therefore gate revenues rose from £44mn to 90mn.



Its merchandising or retail revenues contribute 7% to sales due to its popularity.



The operating margin was 34%.



The debt for CY07 was £340mn, implying debt to equity of 2.5:1.

in £ mn

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Turnover (from football) Gate revenues

27.9

33.7

37.4

44.1

90.6

broadcasting

51.8

59.7

48.5

54.8

44.3

8.5

6.8

8.3

10.2

12.0

15.5

14.1

20.7

22.8

29.5

Retail Commercial Player Trading

0

0.5

0.0

0.1

0.5

Total revenue

103.8

115.0

115.4

132.6

177.7

10

0

13

25

Growth (%)

Staff costs

60.5

69.8

66.0

82.9

89.7

Other operating Charges

22.0

22.8

27.6

37.7

28.4

Operating profit

21.2

22.2

21.8

11.9

60

19

19

9

34

20.6

22.0

16.9

17.7

44.6

103.1

114.8

110.5

138.4

162.7

0.6

0.2

4.9

-5.8

14.9

OPM(%)

Total revenue Profit/ loss

Source: Company, Alchemy

12.06 10.22 6.89

8.39

59.78

48.59

15.58 27.91

14.31

20.7

33.77

37.4

44.1

2003

2004

2005

2006

8.53

51.8

Gate revenues

Expenses

Depreciation and Amortization

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

Commercial

44.31 29.52

54.87 22.8

Broadcasting

90.61

2007 Retail

13

The Indian Cricket League (ICL): The underdog 

Launched by Subhash Chandra in May 2007, ICL is a unique concept in cricket after Zee was not able to secure rights of the World Cup 2011.



ICL initially had six teams which have now increased to eight (over 200 players). All these teams were owned by Subhash Chandra unlike the eight teams in IPL owned by different franchises.



The investments in ICL are in excess of Rs1bn .



ICL is scheduled to have four tournaments in an year, of which three are televised events while IPL has only one season.



ICL has evolved despite several constraints like unavailability of venues and professionals associated with ICC.



The first season was telecast on Zee Sports and was held in one venue.



The second season was more successful as ICL was able to secure three venues for 24 matches. ICL was able to telecast matches on Zee Sports and Ten Sports. Other telecasters include Geo Super in Pakistan, Astro & Telkom Malaysia, Starhub in Singapore, Showtime Arabia in Middle-East, Zee Sports in USA & Canada and Zee Cinema in United Kingdom & Europe. Global rights have been sold for US$10mn.



Besides, the second tournament was able to garner good sponsors. Edelweiss was the title sponsor with Rs150mn (for ten years) while JVC, Aircel, Vodafone and Intel were associate sponsors.



Stakes in teams like Kolkotta and Lahore have been sold to Mithun Chakraborthy and Moammar Rana, respectively.



It had a TVR of 1.2. Its revenues till date have been Rs750mn and is expected to break even in FY09E.

14

Impact of IPL on other media  TV GEC ƒ

IPL is scheduled to be telecast in the most sought after prime time slot of 8-11 pm. Currently, this slot is the most popular among housewives for soaps aired on general entertainment channels (GECs) like Star Plus, Zee and Set.

ƒ

Most homes in India are single TV homes and it is likely that IPL will cause a dent in the ratings and revenues of other GECs.

ƒ

Not only will the Hindi GECs face problems, even regional channels which hitherto did not face competition from national level reality shows are likely to take a big hit. Channel

Genre

Average TRPS

Zee

Soaps + Rock and Roll family

5 - 5.5

Star

Soaps + Paachvi Pass (SRK)

4-5

Chak De Bacche+ Reality

0.7 - 1.35

Mythological + Drama

1.25 - 2.12

9X NDTV Source: Industry

 Box Office ƒ

Besides impacting TV ratings, IPL fever could have a negative rub off on the revenues of movies at the box office. Some of the moves expected to be released in the IPL season are U Me aur Hum, Tashan, Krazzy 4 and Bhootnath.

ƒ

But IPL is in talks with Multiplex operators to telecast the semi-finals and finals. No decision on the same has been reached.

15

Should one have an exposure to IPL? 

The franchises are to be treated as a media property generating money over long time. The first season would be most crucial as it would be a test whether there are takers for city rivalry.



Since, the 20-20 format has resurrected cricket in countries like England, the chances of it failing in India are low.



ICL, promoted by Subhash Chandra, has completed two seasons successfully despite a quiet marketing and constraints like availability of two-three stadiums only (which are not with BCCI). The finals generated a TVR of 1.1 while most of its other matches generated TVRs of 0.7-0.9.



Amongst listed players, India Cements, Deccan Chronicle and Reliance Industries have exposure to IPL. Our study of India Cements shows that the company would have a cash break even in the first year itself.



Most of these companies would look at listing its franchises in the next three-four years.



Our analysis shows that the there would be at least two to three successful teams. On a conservative basis, the teams can earn annual revenues of Rs3bn in the next three years and OPMs of 20-25%. Successful teams can fetch a valuation of 2-5x sales.



The downside risks include teams not performing like India’s early exit in the World Cup 2007. However, in the IPL format, as all franchises are guaranteed to play the full league season and there is no marketing risk associated with early elimination. The top Indian and international players are distributed among all teams and hence they will participate in semi final and finals. This is expected to ensure that IPL has audiences across the world interested in it till the very end.



We have taken India Cements Ltd as a case study. We believe that the company would be EBIDTA positive in the first year. Investors looking to have an exposure to IPL should look at investing in India Cements Ltd. On conservative basis, India Cements is likely to do turnover of Rs3bn from IPL in the next 3-4 years. Assuming mcap/sales multiple of 2X, the value per share would be Rs20.

16

Growth in International Leagues Franchisee

Owner

Year bought

Value when bought (in $ mn)

2007 revenue

Value in 2007 (in $mn)

CAGR (%)

Top 5 Major League Baseball Franchises New York Yankees

George Steinbrenner

1973

10

302

1200

15

New York Mets

Fred Wilpon

2002

391

217

736

13

Boston Red Sox

John Henry & Tom Werner

2002

380

234

724

14

Los Angeles Dodgers

Frank McCourt

2004

355

211

632

21

Chicago Cubs

Tribune Corporation

1981

21

197

592

14

Top five National Football League Franchises Dallas Cowboys

Jerry Jones

1989

150

242

1500

14

Washington Redskins

Daniel Snyder

1999

750

313

1467

9

New England Patriots

Robert Kraft

1994

172

255

1199

16

Houston Texans

Robert McNair

1999

700

225

1056

5

Philadelphia Eagles

Jeffrey Lurie

1994

185

224

1052

14

Top 5 National Basketball Association Franchises Toronto Maple Leafs

Bell Globemedia

2003

224

119

332

10

New York Rangers

Cablevision Systems

1997

195

109

306

5

Detroit Redwings

Michael Illitch

1982

8

89

258

15

Dallas Stars

Tom Hicks

1995

84

89

248

9

Philadelphia Flyers

Comcast-Spectator

1996

150

88

246

5

Source: IPL

17

Teams - Annexure I DECCAN CHAREGERS

CHENNAI SUPER KINGS

ROYAL CHALLENGERS

RAJASTHAN ROYALS

PLAYERS

PLAYERS

PLAYERS

PLAYERS

Andrew Symonds

M.S. Dhoni

Rahul Dravid

Mohd Kaif

R.P. Singh

Jacob Oram

Jacques Kallis

Yousuf Pathan

Rohit Sharma

Albie Morkel

Anil Kumble

Graeme Smith

Adam Gilchrist

Suresh Raina

Cameron White

Shane Warne

Shahid Afridi

Muralitharan

Zaheer Khan

Munaf Patel

Herschelle Gibbs

Matthew Hayden

Mark Boucher

Younis Khan

V V S Laxman

Stephen Fleming

Nathan Bracken

Kamran Akmal

Chaminda Vaas

Parthiv Patel

Dale Steyn

Justin Langer

Scott Styris

J. Sharma

Praveen Kumar

Shane watson

Nuwan Zoysa

Michael hussey

Shivnariane C

Sohil Tanveer

Chamara Silva

Makhaya Ntini

Wasim Jaffer

Dimitri Maskerenhas

Halhadar Das

Sudeep Tyagi

Misbah-ul-haq

Morne Morkel

Kalyankrishna

Srikkanth Anirudha

Ross Taylor

Ravindra Jadeja

Pragyan Ojha

R Aswin

Abdur Tazzak

Taruvar Kohli

Ravi Teja

S. Badrinath

Balachandra Akhil

Pankaj Singh

Venugopal Rao

Napolean

KP Appanna

Anup Revandkar

Vijaykumar

Shabad

Jagadeesh Arunkumar

Legend

Arjun Yadav

Abinav Mukud

Sunil Joshi

Bowlers

Lakshmipahy Balaji

Vikrant Kohli

Batsmen

Devraj Patil

All rounders

Bharat Chipli

Wicket keepers

Shreevatas Gosawi Vijay Kumar

18

Teams - Annexure I DELHI DAREDEVILS

KINGS XI PUNJAB

MUMBAI INDIANS

KNIGHT RIDERS

PLAYERS

PLAYERS

PLAYERS

PLAYERS

Virender Sehwag

Yuvraj Singh

Sachin Tendulkar

Saurav Ganguly

Gautam Gambhir

Irfan Pathan

Sanath Jayasuriya

Ishant Sharma

Manoj Tiwary

Brett Lee

Harbhajan Singh

Chris Gayle

Mohammed Asif

K. Sangakkara

Robin Uthappa

B. McCullum

Daniel Vettori

S. Sreesanth

Shaun Pollock

David Hussey

Dinesh Karthik

M. Jayawardene

Lasith Malinga

Murali Kartik

Shoaib Malik

Piyush Chawla

Loots B

Shoaib Akhtar

Glenn McGrath

Ramnaresh

Ashwell Prince

Ricky Ponting

A B de Villiers

Simon

Dilhara Fernando

Ajit Agarkar

T. Dilshan

Ramesh Powar

Abhishek Nayyar

Umar Gul

Farveez Mahroof

Luke P

Manish Pandey

Tatenda Taibu

Rajat Bhatia

James Hopes

Ajinkya Rahane

Siddharth Kaul

Brett Geevs

Ajitesh Agral

Pinal shah

Iqbal Abdulla

Shiikar Dhavan

Kyle Mills

Yogesh Takawale

Salman Butt

Mahesh

VRV Singh

Saurabh Tiwari

Mohd Hafeez

Mithum Manhas

Tanmay Srivastava

Ashish Nehra

Pradeep

Karan Goel

Luke Ronchi

Mayak

Uday Kaul

Legand

Bowlers Batsmen All rounder Wicket keepers

19

Schedule of matches - Annexure II

Source: IPL

20

Disclaimer

For further information contact Sales Arun Singh

[email protected]

91-22-6639 9125

Dealing Chetan Chitroda

[email protected]

91-22-6639 9134

Disclaimer This report is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial products. The information and commentaries are also not meant to be endorsements or offerings of any securities, options, stocks or other investment vehicles. The report is intended for general circulation and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. The securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of any particular investment or strategy whether opined on or referred to in this report or otherwise will depend on an investor’s circumstances and objectives and should be independently evaluated and confirmed by such investor, and advice should be sought from a financial adviser concerning the suitability of the investment or strategy, taking into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of the investor, before the investor makes a commitment to deal in an investment or implement a strategy. Investment ideas and/or corporations discussed in this website may have a high level of volatility. High volatility investments may experience sudden and large falls in their value causing losses when the investment is realised. Those losses may equal the original investment. Some investments may not be readily realisable and it may be difficult to sell or realise those investments. Similarly, it may prove difficult to obtain reliable information about the value and risks to which such an investment is exposed. Neither us nor any of our affiliates shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect, misleading or altered information contained in this report. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results and there can be no assurance that any investment will achieve comparable results or its investment objectives. Investors may not get back the full amount invested and the net asset value of the investment will fluctuate. Exchange rate fluctuations may affect the return to investors. Alchemy Share and Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd., their respective affiliate companies, associates, directors and/or employees may have investments in securities or derivatives of securities of companies mentioned in this report, and may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the views expressed in this report.

ALCHEMY SHARE & STOCK BROKERS PVT. LTD. Navsari Building, 4th Floor, 240 Dr D. N. Road, Fort, Mumbai: 400 001. India (Tel): 91-22-6639 9100 (Fax): 91-22-2203 3575

21

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF