IPCRF for Master Teacher (6).xlsx

May 27, 2018 | Author: jelica | Category: Lesson Plan, Teachers, Educational Assessment, Curriculum, Classroom
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download IPCRF for Master Teacher (6).xlsx...

Description

Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Regional Office No. VIII CATARMAN CATARMAN II District CATARMAN CATARMAN II CENTRAL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER T June 2016-2017  Name of Employee Position "chool

ROWENA V. MARINO MT-I Catarman II Central

Name of Rate! Position #ate of Re$ie% TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUTS

KEY RESULT AREAS

OBJECTIVES

(KRAs)

(!ite lesson plans)logs base* on the stan*a!*s+base* cu!!iculum gui*es *aily.

,acilitate lea!ning th!ough the use of  %!itten)compute!i-e* lesson plans mo*ules teaching gui*es an* othe! lea!ning !esou!ces %ith the a*e/uate an* up*ate* inst!uctional mate!ials.

TIMELINE

WEIGHT PER KRA

&'

&'

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 5

 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 

4

150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 

3

90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 

2

60-9 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 

1

1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 

5

10 instru!tional materials used/produ!ed are appropriate" ade#uate and updated 

4

 instru!tional materials used/produ!ed are appropriate" ade#uate and updated 

3

6 instru!tional materials used/produ!ed are appropriate" ade#uate and updated 

2

4 instru!tional materials used/produ!ed are appropriate" ade#uate and updated 

1

 2 instru!tional materials used/produ!ed are appropriate" ade#uate and updated 

5

100 o$ t%e indi!ators in !lassroom wal&-t%roug% are o'ser(ed 

4

)*-++ o$ t%e indi!ators in !lassroom wal&-t%roug% are o'ser(ed 

3

70-), o$ t%e indi!ators in !lassroom wal&-t%roug% are o'ser(ed 

2

**-6+ o$ t%e indi!ators in !lassroom wal&-t%roug% are o'ser(ed 

1

*, $n >eo! o$ t%e indi!ators in !lassroom wal&-t%roug% are o'ser(ed 

5

100 o$ t%e pupils mont%ly attendan!e and are monitored and su'mitted e(ery last day o$ t%e mont%

4

)*-++ o$ t%e pupils mont%ly attendan!e and are monitored and su'mitted e(ery last day o$ t%e mont%

3

70-), o$ t%e pupils mont%ly attendan!e and are monitored and su'mitted e(ery last day o$ t%e mont%

2

**-6+ o$ t%e pupils mont%ly attendan!e and are monitored and su'mitted e(ery last day o$ t%e mont%

1

*, $n >eo! o$ t%e pupils mont%ly attendan!e and are monitored and su'mitted e(ery last day o$ t%e mont%

(Supporte !"t# !r"te-up $n o%u&ent$t"on' T*&c+i", L*&r"i", Prc*ss (-./) Initiate *iscipline of stu*ents inclu*ing class!oom !ules gui*elines an* in*i$i*ual an* g!oup tas0.

Monito! atten*ance *i$e!sity app!eciation safe positi$e an* moti$ating en$i!onment o$e!+all physical atmosphe!e cleanliness an* o!*e!liness of class!ooms inclu*ing p!ope! %aste *isposal.

&'

&'

In"%$tor. 1/ Tet uet"on !"t# TOS

Monito! e$aluate an* maintain pupil5s)stu*ent5s p!og!ess th!ough

 2/ $ Re%or (!"t# $te o3 4u"55e $"n&ent pro8e%t  port3o"o et%/'

2Assessment fo! Lea!ning  

3,o!mati$e4

9/ R$t"n #eet 1' 5

2Assessment as Lea!ning  

3Reflecti$e4 2Assessment of Lea!ning

 

3"ummati$e4 2Pe!io*ic Test

Con*uct p!og!ams in*icato!s

to

 ,/ L"t o3 pup":;tuent: output "eo! pupils/students were gi(en remediation/enr i!%ment su!!ess$ully 

5

100+ o$ t%e pupils/students re!ords were prepared and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time wit%out error 

4

)*-++ o$ t%e pupils/students re!ords were prepared and su'mitted on or 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time wit%out error 

3

70-), o$ t%e pupils/students re!ords were prepared and su'mitted on or 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time wit% minimal error 

2

**-6+ o$ t%e pupils/students re!ords were prepared and su'mitted one wee& a$ter t%e due time

1

*, $n >eo! o$ t%e pupils/students re!ords were prepared and su'mitted two wee&s 'e$ore t%e due time

5

5+ and a'o(e o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y*

4

2-4+ o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y 

3

,9+-1+ o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y 

2

,6+-,+ o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y 

1

,5+ o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y 

5

 Attained ,5+ and a'o(e AT M.S per su'e!t area

4

 Attained 65+-,4+ o$ AT M.S per su'e!t area*

3

 Attained 55+-64+ o$ AT M.S per su'e!t area*

2

 Attained 44+-54+ o$ AT M.S per su'e!t area*

1

 Attained 45+ or 'elow o$ AT M.S per su'e!t area*

5

initiated at least one su!!ess$ul instru!tional program to 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers wit% $ull do!umentation*

4

Initiate imp!o$ements in inst!uctional p!og!ams

1'

3 2 1 5 4

Lea* in the p!epa!ation of inst!uctional mate!ials.

1'

 All indi!ators were prepared and su' mitted two wee&s 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled due time

3 2 1

initiated at least one su!!ess$ul instru!tional program and in(ol(ed 4+-99+ o$ t%e tea!%ers wit% do!umentation* initiated at least one su!!ess$ul instru!tional program and in(ol(ed 6)+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers wit% do!umentation* initiated at least one su!!ess$ul instru!tional program and in(ol(ed 52+-62+ o$ t%e tea!%ers wit% do!umentation* no e(iden!e o$ initiating instru!tional program* lead 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers in preparing inno(ati(e instru!tional materials wit%in a year wit% do!umentation* lead 4+-99++ o$ t%e tea!%ers in preparing inno(ati(e instru!tional materials wit%in a year wit% do!umentation* lead 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers in preparing inno(ati(e instru!tional materials wit%in a year wit% do!umentation* lead 52+-6,+ o$ t%e tea!%ers in preparing inno(ati(e instru!tional materials wit%in a year wit% do!umentation* no e(iden!e o$ leading in preparation o$ instru!tional program*

$ull $ull $ull

$ull $ull $ull $ull

3!ellent ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and e!ellent mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration

Attain the !e/ui!e* 6"A fo! 6!a*e le$el an* lea!ning a!eas

Attain 7&' MP" pe! sub8ect a!ea in the National Achie$ement Test

1'

1'

St%*"ts0 L*&r"i", O%tc1*s (2./)

2

**-6+ o$ t%e pupils/students re!ords were prepared and su'mitted one wee& a$ter t%e due time

1

*, $n >eo! o$ t%e pupils/students re!ords were prepared and su'mitted two wee&s 'e$ore t%e due time

5

5+ and a'o(e o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y*

4

2-4+ o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y 

3

,9+-1+ o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y 

2

,6+-,+ o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y 

1

,5+ o$ t%e pupils pro$i!ien!y le(el %a(e mastered t%e re#uired learning !ompeten!y 

5

 Attained ,5+ and a'o(e AT M.S per su'e!t area

4

 Attained 65+-,4+ o$ AT M.S per su'e!t area*

3

 Attained 55+-64+ o$ AT M.S per su'e!t area*

2

 Attained 44+-54+ o$ AT M.S per su'e!t area*

1

 Attained 45+ or 'elow o$ AT M.S per su'e!t area*

5

initiated at least one su!!ess$ul instru!tional program to 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers wit% $ull do!umentation*

4

Initiate imp!o$ements in inst!uctional p!og!ams

1'

3 2 1 5 4

Lea* in the p!epa!ation of inst!uctional mate!ials.

1'

3 2 1

5

"e!$e as *emonst!ato! teache! facilitato! o! !esou!ce spea0e! at the school le$el an* o! p!o$i*e* mento!ing se!$ices to *emonst!ation teache!s.

4

1'

3 2 1 5 4

Inte!p!et test !esults an* utili-e.

1'

3 2 1 5

Initiate p!o8ects an* p!og!ams that %ill enhance the cu!!iculum an* its *eli$e!y to achie$e 7&' NAT pe!fo!mance.

4

1'

3 2 1

Pr!isi" # $%&'it B&sic E%c&ti"

5 4

Obse!$e teache!s e$e!y /ua!te!.

&'

3 2 1

initiated at least one su!!ess$ul instru!tional program and in(ol(ed 4+-99+ o$ t%e tea!%ers wit% do!umentation* initiated at least one su!!ess$ul instru!tional program and in(ol(ed 6)+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers wit% do!umentation* initiated at least one su!!ess$ul instru!tional program and in(ol(ed 52+-62+ o$ t%e tea!%ers wit% do!umentation* no e(iden!e o$ initiating instru!tional program* lead 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers in preparing inno(ati(e instru!tional materials wit%in a year wit% do!umentation* lead 4+-99++ o$ t%e tea!%ers in preparing inno(ati(e instru!tional materials wit%in a year wit% do!umentation* lead 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers in preparing inno(ati(e instru!tional materials wit%in a year wit% do!umentation* lead 52+-6,+ o$ t%e tea!%ers in preparing inno(ati(e instru!tional materials wit%in a year wit% do!umentation* no e(iden!e o$ leading in preparation o$ instru!tional program*

$ull $ull $ull

$ull $ull $ull $ull

3!ellent ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and e!ellent mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er  ery Satis$a!tory ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and ery Satis$a!tory mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er  Satis$a!tory ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and Satis$a!tory mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er  air ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and air mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er* .oor ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and .oor mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er  100+ o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* 4+-99+ o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* 6+-)+ o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* 52+-6, o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* 51+-'elow o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* nitiated a $ull 'lown proe!t and program t%at en%an!e t%e !urri!ulum and a!%ie(e ,5+ in AT .er$orman!e* nitiated a $ull 'lown proe!t and program t%at en%an!e t%e !urri!ulum and a!%ie(e 65+-,4+ in AT .er$orman!e* nitiated a $ull 'lown proe!t and program t%at en%an!e t%e !urri!ulum and a!%ie(e 55+-64+ in AT .er$orman!e* nitiated a $ull 'lown proe!t and program t%at en%an!e t%e !urri!ulum and a!%ie(e 54+-'elow in AT .er$orman!e* t%e proe!t or program did not materialied  100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter* 4+-99+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter* 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter* 52+-6, o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter* 51+-'elow o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter*

ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional

5

"e!$e as *emonst!ato! teache! facilitato! o! !esou!ce spea0e! at the school le$el an* o! p!o$i*e* mento!ing se!$ices to *emonst!ation teache!s.

4

1'

3 2 1 5 4

Inte!p!et test !esults an* utili-e.

1'

3 2 1 5

Initiate p!o8ects an* p!og!ams that %ill enhance the cu!!iculum an* its *eli$e!y to achie$e 7&' NAT pe!fo!mance.

4

1'

3 2 1

Pr!isi" # $%&'it B&sic E%c&ti"

5 4

Obse!$e teache!s e$e!y /ua!te!.

&'

3 2 1

5

Con*uct mento!ing)coaching acti$ities an* p!epa!e inst!uctional mate!ial a$ailable.

4

&'

3 2 1

I"str%cti"&' S%3*r!isi" (-./)

5 4

6ui*e* co+teache!s in the pe!fo!mance of *uties an* !esponsibilities.

&'

3 2 1 5 4

Chec0 lesson plans of teache!s in the assigne* g!a*e)sub8ect a!ea.

&'

3 2 1

Con*uct !egula!)pe!io*ic meetings)confe!ences

PTA

&'

3!ellent ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and e!ellent mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er  ery Satis$a!tory ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and ery Satis$a!tory mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er  Satis$a!tory ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and Satis$a!tory mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er  air ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and air mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er* .oor ee!ution o$ t%e lesson plan and .oor mentoring ser(i!es pro(ided to t%e demonstration tea!%er  100+ o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* 4+-99+ o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* 6+-)+ o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* 52+-6, o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* 51+-'elow o$ t%e test results were analyed and interpreted per grading period and su'mitted 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* nitiated a $ull 'lown proe!t and program t%at en%an!e t%e !urri!ulum and a!%ie(e ,5+ in AT .er$orman!e* nitiated a $ull 'lown proe!t and program t%at en%an!e t%e !urri!ulum and a!%ie(e 65+-,4+ in AT .er$orman!e* nitiated a $ull 'lown proe!t and program t%at en%an!e t%e !urri!ulum and a!%ie(e 55+-64+ in AT .er$orman!e* nitiated a $ull 'lown proe!t and program t%at en%an!e t%e !urri!ulum and a!%ie(e 54+-'elow in AT .er$orman!e* t%e proe!t or program did not materialied  100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter* 4+-99+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter* 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter* 52+-6, o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter* 51+-'elow o$ t%e tea!%ers were o'ser(ed #uarterly and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation !%e!&list $orm at t%e end o$ t%e #uarter*

ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional materials $ully do!umented* ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 4+-99++ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional materials $ully do!umented* ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional materials $ully do!umented* ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 52+-6,+ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional materials $ully do!umented* no e(iden!e o$ mentoring/!oa!%ing !ondu!ted  100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arry-o(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 4+-99+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arryo(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arryo(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 52+-6, o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arryo(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 51+-'elow o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arryo(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%* 4+-99+ o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%* 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%* 52+-6, o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%* 51+-'elow o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%*

5

100 o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

4

4+-99+ o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

3

6+-)+ o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

2

52+-6,+ o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

1

51+-'elow o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

100 o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit%

5

Con*uct mento!ing)coaching acti$ities an* p!epa!e inst!uctional mate!ial a$ailable.

4

&'

3 2 1

I"str%cti"&' S%3*r!isi" (-./)

5 4

6ui*e* co+teache!s in the pe!fo!mance of *uties an* !esponsibilities.

&'

3 2 1 5 4

Chec0 lesson plans of teache!s in the assigne* g!a*e)sub8ect a!ea.

&'

3 2 1

Con*uct !egula!)pe!io*ic meetings)confe!ences

PTA

&'

C11%"it I"!'!*1*"t (45/) Visit pa!ents of pupils)stu*ents nee*ing aca*emic monito!ing)follo% up

:n*e!ta0e)initiate p!o8ects)e$ents)acti$ities %ith e;te!nal fun*ing)sponso!ship

Con*ucte* action !esea!ch

Ta0e cha!ge of the school !ea*ing p!og!am !eme*ial an*)o! en!ichment p!og!am.

Pr#*ssi"&' Gr6t+ &" D*!*'31*"t (45/)

&'

&'

4+-99+ o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%* 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%* 52+-6, o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%* 51+-'elow o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%*

5

100 o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

4

4+-99+ o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

3

6+-)+ o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

2

52+-6,+ o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

1

51+-'elow o$ t%e target o'e!ti(es were a!%ie(ed" a!!omplis%ment wit% set agreements were $ully do!umented*

5

100 o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

4

4+-99+ o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

3

6+-)+ o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

2

52+-6, o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

1

51+-'elow o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

5

100 o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment !ompleted were a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

4

4+-99+ o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment partially a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

3

6+-)+ o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment partially a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

2

52+-6, o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment partially a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

1

51+-'elow o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment partially a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

5

ondu!ted a !ompleted a!tion resear!% and %a(e presented in at least in t%e 7i(ision 8e(el Resear!% on$eren!e/Summit 

4

ondu!ted a !ompleted a!tion resear!% and %a(e presented in at least in t%e 7istri!t 8e(el Resear!% on$eren!e/Summit 

3

ondu!ted a !ompleted a!tion resear!% 'ut %a(e not presented t%e result in any le(el o$ resear!% !on$eren!e/summit 

2

.roposed an a!tion resear!%*

1

on!eptualie an a!tion resear!%

5

8ed at least 5 tea!%ers in !ondu!ting enri!%ment program to impro(e pro$i!ien!y le(el o$ at least 4 pupils to at least one step %ig%er in e(ery #uarter*

4

8ed at least 5 tea!%ers in !ondu!ting enri!%ment program to impro(e pro$i!ien!y le(el o$ at least 2  pupils/students to at least one step %ig%er in e(ery #u arter*

3

8ed at least ) tea!%ers in !ondu!ting enri!%ment program to impro(e pro$i!ien!y le(el o$ at least ) pupils to at least one step %ig%er in e(ery #uarter*

2

8ed at least ) tea!%ers in !ondu!ting enri!%ment program to impro(e pro$i!ien!y le(el o$ at least 1  pupils/students to at least one step %ig%er in e(ery #u arter*

1

o e(iden!e o$ !ondu!ting remedial program

5

.arti!ipated in t%e planning o$ at least 1 training program !ondu!ted in t%e di(ision le(el and su'mitted t%e !onsolidated outputs 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time*

&'

9'

ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional materials $ully do!umented* ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 4+-99++ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional materials $ully do!umented* ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional materials $ully do!umented* ondu!ted mentoring/!oa!%ing a!ti(ities to 52+-6,+ o$ t%e tea!%ers and prepared inno(ati(e instru!tional materials $ully do!umented* no e(iden!e o$ mentoring/!oa!%ing !ondu!ted  100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arry-o(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 4+-99+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arryo(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 6+-)+ o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arryo(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 52+-6, o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arryo(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 51+-'elow o$ t%e tea!%ers were guided and pro(ided wit% t%e ne!essary te!%ni!al assistan!e in t%e !arryo(er o$ t%eir duties and $un!tions* 100+ o$ t%e tea!%ers lesson plan/log were properly !%e!&ed and su'mitted t%e o'ser(ation log e(ery end o$ t%e mont%*

.arti!ipated in t%e planning o$ at least 2 training programs !ondu!ted in t%e distri!t le(el and su'mitted t%e

C11%"it I"!'!*1*"t (45/) Visit pa!ents of pupils)stu*ents nee*ing aca*emic monito!ing)follo% up

&'

:n*e!ta0e)initiate p!o8ects)e$ents)acti$ities %ith e;te!nal fun*ing)sponso!ship

&'

Con*ucte* action !esea!ch

5

100 o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

4

4+-99+ o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

3

6+-)+ o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

2

52+-6, o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

1

51+-'elow o$ t%e parents o$ t%e students needing a!ademi! monitoring was $ollowed up supported wit% do!uments*

5

100 o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment !ompleted were a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

4

4+-99+ o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment partially a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

3

6+-)+ o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment partially a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

2

52+-6, o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment partially a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

1

51+-'elow o$ proe!t a!!omplis%ment partially a!%ie(ed wit% do!umentation*

5

ondu!ted a !ompleted a!tion resear!% and %a(e presented in at least in t%e 7i(ision 8e(el Resear!% on$eren!e/Summit 

4

ondu!ted a !ompleted a!tion resear!% and %a(e presented in at least in t%e 7istri!t 8e(el Resear!% on$eren!e/Summit 

3

ondu!ted a !ompleted a!tion resear!% 'ut %a(e not presented t%e result in any le(el o$ resear!% !on$eren!e/summit 

2

.roposed an a!tion resear!%*

1

on!eptualie an a!tion resear!%

5

8ed at least 5 tea!%ers in !ondu!ting enri!%ment program to impro(e pro$i!ien!y le(el o$ at least 4 pupils to at least one step %ig%er in e(ery #uarter*

4

8ed at least 5 tea!%ers in !ondu!ting enri!%ment program to impro(e pro$i!ien!y le(el o$ at least 2  pupils/students to at least one step %ig%er in e(ery #u arter*

3

8ed at least ) tea!%ers in !ondu!ting enri!%ment program to impro(e pro$i!ien!y le(el o$ at least ) pupils to at least one step %ig%er in e(ery #uarter*

2

8ed at least ) tea!%ers in !ondu!ting enri!%ment program to impro(e pro$i!ien!y le(el o$ at least 1  pupils/students to at least one step %ig%er in e(ery #u arter*

1

o e(iden!e o$ !ondu!ting remedial program

5

.arti!ipated in t%e planning o$ at least 1 training program !ondu!ted in t%e di(ision le(el and su'mitted t%e !onsolidated outputs 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time*

4

.arti!ipated in t%e planning o$ at least 2 training programs !ondu!ted in t%e distri!t le(el and su'mitted t%e !onsolidated outputs 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time*

&'

Ta0e cha!ge of the school !ea*ing p!og!am !eme*ial an*)o! en!ichment p!og!am.

9'

Pr#*ssi"&' Gr6t+ &" D*!*'31*"t (45/)

Pa!ticipate in the planning an* implementation of t!aining p!og!ams in school *ist!ict an* *i$ision le$el.

1' 3 2 1 5

.arti!ipated in t%e planning o$ at least 1 training program !ondu!ted in t%e distri!t le(el and su'mitted t%e !onsolidated outputs 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time* .arti!ipated in t%e planning o$ at least 2 training program !ondu!ted in t%e s!%ool le(el and su'mitted t%e !onsolidated outputs 'e$ore t%e s!%eduled time o e(iden!e o$ parti!ipation in planning training programs  Attended ) or more seminars" wor&s%ops trainings and e!%oed to tea!%ers in an e!ellent way wit% do!umentation

4

 Attended 2 seminars" wor&s%ops trainings and e!%o ed to tea!%ers in an e!ellent way wit% do!umentation

3

 Attended ) or more seminars" wor&s%ops trainings 'ut $ailed to e !%o to tea!%ers*

2 1

 Attended 2 seminars" wor&s%ops trainings 'ut $ailed to e!%o to tea !%ers* o trainings attended 

Attain fi$e of the follo%ing

5

 Attained 5 indi!ators wit% do!uments

>

9 . 9 ??

"atisfacto!y

= . & >>

1 . 9? ?

:nsatisfacto!y

< . &>>

= . 9 ??

Poo!

< . >>>

< . 9??

Ra t ee 

ROWENA V MARINO

A*8ecti$al Rating "cale Outstan*ing

9 . & >>

& . > >>

Ve!y "atisfacto!y

1 . & >>

9 . 9 ??

"atisfacto!y

= . & >>

1 . 9? ?

:nsatisfacto!y

< . &>>

= . 9 ??

Poo!

< . >>>

< . 9??

ACHERS

AMADOR B. LAGRIMAS PRINCIPAL II

TOB FILLED UP DURING E@ALUATION  E@ALUATION 

ACTUAL RESULTS $

E

RATING

SCORE

. 8. .

.8..

. 8. .

.8..

. 8. .

.8..

T

Ra t ee 

ROWENA V MARINO

ACHERS

AMADOR B. LAGRIMAS PRINCIPAL II

TOB FILLED UP DURING E@ALUATION  E@ALUATION 

ACTUAL RESULTS $

E

RATING

SCORE

. 8. .

.8..

. 8. .

.8..

. 8. .

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

T

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

98..

.84-

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

98..

.84-

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

0.12 #N/A

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

.8..

0.12 #N/A

R&t*r:

AMADOR B. LAGRIMAS S!%ool ead 

R&t*r:

AMADOR B. LAGRIMAS S!%ool ead 

Transmutation Table

1.000 1.!00 ".!00 ).!00 4.!00

1.499 ".499 ).499 4.499 !.000

Pr #n$at%$&a'tr( Sat%$&a'tr( Ver( Sat%$&a'tr( O*t$tan+%n,

Transmutation Table

1.000 1.!00 ".!00 ).!00 4.!00

1.499 ".499 ).499 4.499 !.000

Pr #n$at%$&a'tr( Sat%$&a'tr( Ver( Sat%$&a'tr( O*t$tan+%n,

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF