Intl Copyright Pil 2004
Short Description
df...
Description
International Copyright Law William Fisher June 23, 2004
© 2004. 2004. All rights reserved.
The Sectors of Intellectual Property Law
Patent
The Sectors of Intellectual Property Law
Copyright
Patent
The Sectors of Intellectual Property Law
Copyright
Patent
Trademark & Unfair Competition
The Sectors of Intellectual Property Law
Copyright
Right of Publicity
Patent
Trademark & Unfair Competition
The Sectors of Intellectual Property Law
Copyright
Right of Publicity
Patent
Trademark & Unfair Competition
Trade Secrets
Intellectual Property Protection for Industrial Designs
Copyright
Patent
Copyrights for Useful Objects
Right of Publicity
Trademark & Unfair Competition
Trade Secrets
Intellectual Property Protection for Industrial Designs
Copyright
Patent Design Patents
Right of Publicity
Trademark & Unfair Competition
Trade Secrets
Intellectual Property Protection for Industrial Designs
Copyright
Right of Publicity
Patent
Trademark & Unfair Competition
Trade Dress
Trade Secrets
Intellectual Property Protection for Industrial Designs
Copyright
Patent Design Patents
Copyrights for Useful Objects
Right of Publicity
Trademark & Unfair Competition
Trade Dress
Trade Secrets
The Sectors of Intellectual Property Law
Copyright
Right of Publicity
Patent
Trademark & Unfair Competition
Trade Secrets
Basic Copyright Law • Long-term, medium protection for “original forms of expression” • “Original” = independently created + minimal degree of creativity ( Feist ) • “Original” does not require novelty, aesthetic merit, or truth
Examples of Things Protected by Copyright • • • • • • • • • •
literary works; musical works; dramatic works; pantomimes and choreographic works; pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; motion pictures and audiovisual works; sound recordings; architectural works; compilations computer programs
Idea/Expression Distinction • Not copyrightable
• Copyrightable
– Ideas
– Expression
– Facts
– detailed plots
– "truths of a science"
– "methods of an art" – "system of bookkeeping" – generic plots – generic characters
– research
– distinctive characters
Statutory Entitlements (1) Reproduction (2) Derivative Works (3) First Distribution (4) Public Performance (5) Public Display
Proving Infringement • Copying – Defendant’s admission – Evidence of access + similarities – “striking similarity”
– common errors
• “Improper Appropriation” – “substantial similarity of expression” – lay audience test – scenes a faire doctrine
Fair Use Doctrine Supreme-Court Case Law • Sony v. Universal City Studios (1984)
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
Studios Hold copyrights in movies & shows
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Networks
Studios Hold copyrights in movies & shows
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Networks
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public
Studios
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers Networks higher prices for products
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public
Studios
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers price of ads
Networks higher prices for products
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public
Studios
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers price of ads
Networks higher prices for products
license fees
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public
Studios
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers price of ads
Networks higher prices for products
Studios
license fees
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public VCRs cost of VCRs
Sony
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers price of ads
Networks higher prices for products
Studios
license fees
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public VCRs cost of VCRs
Sony
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers price of ads
Networks higher prices for products
Studios
license fees
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public VCRs cost of VCRs
Sony
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers price of ads
Networks higher prices for products
Studios
license fees
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public VCRs cost of VCRs
Sony
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers price of ads
Networks higher prices for products
Studios
license fees
free programming (with embedded ads)
Public VCRs cost of VCRs
Sony
Compensation System for Network Broadcasts of Copyrighted Programs
broadcast licenses
Advertisers price of ads
Networks higher prices for products
Studios
license fees
free programming (with embedded ads)
?
Public VCRs cost of VCRs
Sony
Fair Use Doctrine Supreme-Court Case Law • Sony v. Universal City Studios (1984) – time shifting is fair use – manufacturing VCRs is not contributory copyright infringement
• Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises (1985) – reproducing juicy excerpts of Ford’s autobiography is not fair use
• Campbell v. Acuff-Rose (1994) – rap parody of “Oh, Pretty Woman” is fair use
Fair Use Doctrine • Purpose and Character of the Use – commercial use disfavored – transformative uses preferred – parody strongly preferred – propriety of defendant’s conduct relevant
• Nature of the Copyrighted Work – fictional works/factual works
– unpublished/published
Intensity of Copyright Protection
Intensity of Copyright Protection
Intensity of Copyright Protection
unpublished
published
Intensity of Copyright Protection
fact
unpublished fiction
published
Fair Use Doctrine • Purpose and Character of the Use – commercial use disfavored – transformative uses preferred – parody strongly preferred – propriety of defendant’s conduct relevant
• Nature of the Copyrighted Work – fictional works/factual works – unpublished/published
• Amount and importance of the portion used • Impact on Potential Market – rival definitions of “potential market” – only substitution effects are cognizable
Topics • Basic Copyright Law • International Copyright Agreements • Case Studies – Software Protection – Database Protection – Moral Rights
Topics • Basic Copyright Law • International Copyright Agreements • Case Studies – Software Protection – Database Protection – Moral Rights
Major Agreements (Potentially) Global Agreements:
Berne Convention (1886-1971) Universal Copyright Convention (1952) WIPO Copyright Treaty (1996) TRIPS (1994) Rome Convention (1961)
Regional Agreements
EC Directives NAFTA (1992)
Bilateral Agreements
E.g., US/Germany – Atlas
Films
Berne Convention -- chronology • 1858-1885: Preliminary negotiation • 1886: Original Berne Convention (10 countries) • 1896: Paris Revision (13) • 1908: Berlin Revision (18) • 1914: Berne Revision (27) • 1928: Rome Revision (36) • 1948: Brussels Revision (37) • 1967: Stockholm Revision (59) • 1971: Paris Revision (63)
10 countries
Berne Convention -- 1886 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens
– Except as to term of protection
• Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture
– No protection for photos; political articles; news
• Exclusive rights: – 10-year translation right
13 countries
Berne Convention -- 1896 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens
– Except as to term of protection
• Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture
– No protection for photos; political articles; news
• Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work
18 countries
Berne Convention -- 1908 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Except as to term of protection
• No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture – No protection for political articles; news
• Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right
27 countries
Berne Convention -- 1914 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Except as to term of protection – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries permitted • No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture – No protection for political articles; news • Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right
36 countries
Berne Convention -- 1928 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Except as to term of protection – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries permitted • No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture; lectures – No protection for political articles; news • Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right; moral right; broadcasting right; adaptation right
36 countries
Berne Convention -- 1928 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Except as to term of protection – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries permitted • No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture; lectures – No protection for political articles; news • Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right; moral right; broadcasting right; adaptation right
Varieties of “Moral Rights” • Integrity • Attribution • Divulgation • Withdrawal • Droit de Suite
Article 6 bis of the Berne Convention: “Independently of the author's economic rights, and even after the transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work, which would be prejudicial to his honor hono r or reputation.”
36 countries
Bern Bernee Con Conve vent ntio ion n -- 1928 1928 • National treatment treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Except as to term of protection – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries permitted • No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Protecte d Works: Works: – books; pamphlets; pamphlets; drama; drama; music; design; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture; lectures – No protection for political articles; news news • Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right; moral right; broadcasting right; adaptation right
37 countries
Bern Bernee Con Conve vent ntio ion n -- 1948 1948 • National treatment treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries permitted • No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Protecte d Works: Works: – books; pamphlets; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; sculpture; maps; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture; lectures – No protection for political articles; news news • Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right; moral right; broadcasting right (TV); adaptation right; public performance right; optional droit de suite • Minimum term: LOA + 50 years
59 countries
Berne Convention -- 1967 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens e c – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries n permitted a t s • No formalities as condition of protection b • Protected Works: u s n – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; o 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; e architecture; lectures t a – No protection for political articles; news m• Exclusive rights: e l a – translation right for term of original work; recording right for t S music; cinematograhic right; moral right; broadcasting right (TV); adaptation right; public performance right; optional droit de suite • Minimum term: LOA + 50 years • Formation of WIPO
63 countries
Berne Convention -- 1971 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries permitted • No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture; lectures; folklore; legitimation system for films – No protection for political articles; news • Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right; moral right; broadcasting right (TV); adaptation right; public performance right; optional droit de suite; reproduction right • Minimum term: LOA + 50 years • Formation of WIPO
63 countries
Berne Convention -- 1979 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries permitted • No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture; lectures; folklore; legitimation system for films – No protection for political articles; news • Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right; moral right; broadcasting right (TV); adaptation right; public performance right; optional droit de suite; reproduction right • Minimum term: LOA + 50 years • Formation of WIPO
http://www.wipo.org/treaties/ip/berne/index.html
currently 150 countries
Berne Convention -- 1979 • National treatment – Signatories give citizens of other signatories same treatment as their own citizens – Discrimination against authors from non-member countries permitted • No formalities as condition of protection • Protected Works: – books; pamphlets; drama; music; design; painting; sculpture; maps; 3D works in geography and architecture; photos; choreography; architecture; lectures; folklore; legitimation system for films – No protection for political articles; news • Exclusive rights: – translation right for term of original work; recording right for music; cinematograhic right; moral right; broadcasting right (TV); adaptation right; public performance right; optional droit de suite; reproduction right • Minimum term: LOA + 50 years • Formation of WIPO
http://www2.unesco.org/clt-bv/html_eng/01universalcopy.htm
36 countries
Universal Copyright Convention (1952; revised 1971) • National Treatment principle • Members must provide “adequate and effective protection” for copyright • Formalities permitted as precondition for protection • Minimum term: LOA + 25 • Exceptions permitted that do not “that do not conflict with the spirit and provisions of this Convention”
40 countries
Rome Convention (1961) • National Treatment principle • Performers’ rights include: broadcast of a performance; fixation of a performance; reproduction of a fixation • Producers of phonograms have exclusive rights to reproduce them • Broadcasters have exclusive rights to fix or reproduce fixations of their broadcasts • Article 12: Performers and producers must be paid “equitable remuneration” when phonograms are broadcast Minimum term: 20
http://www.wipo.org/treaties/ip/rome/
currently 76 countries
Rome Convention (1961) • National Treatment principle • Performers’ rights include: broadcast of a performance; fixation of a performance; reproduction of a fixation • Producers of phonograms have exclusive rights to reproduce them • Broadcasters have exclusive rights to fix or reproduce fixations of their broadcasts • Article 12: Performers and producers must be paid “equitable remuneration” when phonograms are broadcast Minimum term: 20
Other “Neighboring Rights” Agreements • Geneva Phonograms Convention (1971) • Brussels Satellite Convention (1974) • WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (1996)
currently 146 countries
TRIPS -- Copyright • Article 9: – Incorporate Berne Convention, Arts. 1-21, except 6bis – Idea/expression distinction
• Article 10: – Computer programs protected (both source and object code) – Intellectually creative aspects of databases protected – not data itself
currently 146 countries
TRIPS -- Copyright • Article 11: – Authors of computer programs and films may authorize or forbid commercial rentals
• Article 12: – Minimum terms for works not tied to LOA is 50 years
• Article 13: – Exceptions shall be limited to cases that do not conflict with normal exploitation or unreasonably prejudice legitimate interests
currently 146 countries
TRIPS -- Copyright • Article 14: – Performers control fixation and broadcasts – Producers of phonograms control reproduction and commercial rentals – Broadcasters control fixation, reproduction, rebroadcasts – Performers and producers get minimum term of protection of 50 years – Exceptions permitted to extent of Rome Convention
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Territoriality Principle Treatment of “works for hire”; Priority rules
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Feist (US) Tele-Direct (Canada)
Schricker (Germany)
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Territoriality Principle --Atlas Film
(Germany)
UCC, art. IV Berne, art. 7(8) EC Term Directive --LOA + 70
Sonny Bono --LOA + 70; Eldred
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Utility Models; Conceptual Separability; Overlap with creativity requirements
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Utility Models; Conceptual Separability; Overlap with creativity requirements
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
CONTU (US) EC Software Directive TRIPS Art. 10
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Berne Arts. 2, 11bis Rome Art. 12; 1992 EC Directive; DPRA & DMCA (US) CARP (US)
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
European blanktape systems; Sound recordings
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Germany, Japan, & US withhold © Great Britain: Crown and Parliamentary copyright
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Is TRIPs compatible with US fair use? Should TRIPs mandate fair use?
Fair Use? Berne Convention, Article 10 (1) It shall be permissible to make quotations from a work which has already been lawfully made available to the public, provided that their making is compatible with fair practice, and their extent does not exceed that justified by the purpose, including quotations from newspaper articles and periodicals in the form of press summaries. (2) It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union, and for special agreements existing or to be concluded between them, to permit the utilization, to the extent justified by the purpose, of literary or artistic works by way of illustration in publications, broadcasts or sound or visual recordings for teaching, provided such utilization is compatible with fair practice.
Fair Use? Berne Convention, Article 10 (1) It shall shall be permissibl permissiblee to make make quotations quotations from a work which which has already already been lawfully made available to the public, provided that their making is compatible with fair practice, and their extent does not exceed that justified by the purpose, including quotations quotations from newspaper articles articles and periodicals in the form of press summaries. summaries. (2) It shall be a matter matter for legislation in the countries of of the Union, and for special agreements existing or to be concluded between them, to permit to permit the utilization, to the extent justified by the purpose, of literary or artistic works by way of illustration illustration in publications, broadcasts or sound or visual recordings for teaching, provided such utilization is compatible with fair practice.
Fair Use? Berne Convention, Article 10bis (1) It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit the reproduction by the press, the broadcasting or the communication to the public by wire, of articles published in newspapers or periodicals on current economic, political or religious topics, topics, and of broadcast works of the same same character, character, in cases in which the reproduction, broadcasting broadcasting or such communication thereof is not expressly reserved. Nevertheless, the source must always be clearly indicated; the legal consequences of a breach of this obligation shall be determined by the legislation of the country where protection is claimed. (2) It shall also be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to determine the conditions under which, for the purpose of reporting current events by means of photography, photography, cinematography, cinematography, broadcasting or communication to the public by wire,literary or artistic works seen or heard in the course of the event may, may, to the extent justified by the informatory purpose, be reproduced and made available to the public.
Fair Use? Berne Convention, Article 10bis (1) It shall be a matter matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit the reproduction by the press, the broadcasting or the communication to the public by wire, of articles published articles published in newspapers newspapers or periodicals on current economic, political or religious topics, topics, and of broadcast works of the same same character, character, in cases cases in which the reproduction, broadcasting broadcasting or such communication thereof is not expressly reserved. Nevertheless, the source must always be clearly indicated; the legal consequences of a breach of this obligation shall be determined by the legislation of the country where protection is claimed. (2) It shall also be a matter for legislation legislation in the countries of the Union to determ determine ine the conditions under which, for the purpose purpose of reporting current events by means of photography, photography, cinematography, cinematography, broadcasting or communication to the public by wire,literary or artistic artistic works seen or heard in the course of the event may, may, to the extent justified by the informatory purpose, be reproduced and made available to the public.
Fair Use? TRIPS, Article 13 Members shall confine limitations or exceptions to exclusive rights to certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holder.
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Is TRIPs compatible With US fair use? Should TRIPs Mandate fair use?
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Issues include: Duration; Alienability; Preconditions to integrity right; Responsibility of heirs/devisees
Berne 6bis TRIPS exclusion
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
Sore Spots in International Copyright Law • • • • • • • • • •
Authorship Creativity Duration Useful Objects Software Public Performances Neighboring Rights Government documents Fair Use Moral Rights
drive toward harmonization by selecting most author-protective option on each issue
Possible Goals of International Copyright • Political Democracy (Netanel) • Economic Efficiency – Reducing barriers to free trade
• Cultural Vitality – Semiotic democracy
• Distributive Justice – Distribute justice across countries – Egalitarianism (economic democracy)
– Respect artists’ rights – Respect natural rights
• Universal Right to education
Dahl’s definition of Political Democracy 1. Elected officials govern 2. Frequent and fair elections 3. Universal adult suffrage 4. Universal qualification for elective office 5. Freedom of expression 6. Available alternative sources of information 7. Freedom of association
Dahl’s definition of Political Democracy 1. Elected officials govern 2. Frequent and fair elections 3. Universal adult suffrage 4. Universal qualification for elective office 5. Freedom of expression 6. Available alternative sources of information 7. Freedom of association
Possible Causal Connections Democracyenhancing Democracyconsolidating Democracyinducing
Possible Causal Connections Democracyenhancing Democracyconsolidating Democracyinducing
Impact of Copyright • Foster free flow of information and diversity of expression • Promote independent sector of artists & publishers • Venerate individual innovation and expression
Possible Causal Connections Impact of Copyright
Democracyenhancing Democracyconsolidating Democracyinducing
? ? ?
• Foster free flow of information and diversity of expression • Promote independent sector of artists & publishers • Venerate individual innovation and expression
Embodiments of the “Democratic Entitlement” • • • • • • • •
ICCPR ECHR Charter of OAS ACHR Africa African n Char Charter ter on Human Human and and People People’’s Righ Rights ts Charter of Paris Moscow Document International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
Implications of the Democracy / Free Speech Principles • Compel countries not members of Berne or WTO to adopt copyright systems • Mandatory limits on copyright: – Temporal limits – Idea/fact/expression distinction – Some fair-use exceptions – Exception for transient, incidental reproduction – No – No prior restraints or punitive damages damages
• Interpret Berne/TRIPS provisions – E.g., Art. 13 – Permissible “cultural exceptions” exceptions”
Legal Protection for Databases
What is a Database? • WIPO Draft Treaty Definition: “‘database’ means a collection of independent works, data or other materials arranged in a systematic or methodical way and capable of being individually accessed by electronic or other means” • Examples: – nationwide telephone directory – compilation of financial data on companies – Lexis/Nexis compilation of public-domain materials
Possible Sources of Legal Protection • Copyright • Misappropriation Doctrine • Contract • Sui Generis Legislation or Treaty • Encryption/Anti-“Black Box” Legislation • Trespass Doctrine • Branding – e.g., Lexis; Westlaw
Possible Sources of Legal Protection • Copyright • Misappropriation Doctrine • Contract • Sui Generis Legislation or Treaty • Encryption/Anti-“Black Box” Legislation • Trespass Doctrine • Branding – e.g., Lexis; Westlaw
To secure copyright protection for a database, one must show: • DB is within subject matter coverage • DB is fixed in a tangible medium of expression • DB is sufficiently “original” – Feist problem – TRIPS Article 10(2)
Possible Sources of Legal Protection • Copyright • Misappropriation Doctrine • Contract • Sui Generis Legislation or Treaty • Encryption/Anti-“Black Box” Legislation • Trespass Doctrine • Branding – e.g., Lexis; Westlaw
INS v. AP (1918) Constriction • Cheney Bros. (CA2 1929)
• Erie RR (1938)
• NFL v. Del. (1977)
• NBA (1997) • Alcatel (1999)
Expansion
• Radio broadcast cases (1932-1955) • Metropolitan Opera (NY 1950) • Pottstown News (PA 1963) • Bond Buyer (NY 1966) • Dow Jones (Ill 1983) • US Sporting Products (Tex 1993) • Lynch, Jones (NY 1998) • Internet “framing” cases?
Facts of NBA (1997) NBA game
Facts of NBA (1997) NBA game
Live audience TV audience
Radio Audience
Facts of NBA (1997) NBA game
Live audience TV audience (STATS reporters)
Radio Audience (STATS reporters)
Facts of NBA (1997) NBA game
Live audience TV audience (STATS reporters)
Radio Audience (STATS reporters)
STATS computer
Facts of NBA (1997) NBA game
Live audience TV audience (STATS reporters)
Radio Audience (STATS reporters)
STATS computer Satellite
Facts of NBA (1997) NBA game
Live audience TV audience (STATS reporters)
Radio Audience (STATS reporters)
Motorola pagers Satellite
STATS computer
Facts of NBA (1997) NBA game
Live audience TV audience (STATS reporters)
Radio Audience (STATS reporters)
Users
Motorola pagers Satellite
STATS computer
NBA (CA2 1997) A “hot news” misappropriation claim survives preemption iff: P generates or creates information at some • cost Information is highly time-sensitive • • D “free rides” on P’s efforts • D competes directly with P such free-riding would threaten the existence • or quality of the service P provides
Possible Sources of Legal Protection • Copyright • Misappropriation Doctrine • Contract • Sui Generis Legislation or Treaty • Encryption/Anti-“Black Box” Legislation • Trespass Doctrine • Branding – e.g., Lexis; Westlaw
Contract • Use Restrictions in Ordinary Contracts or Licenses • Shrink-wrap licenses – ProCD
Excerpt from Martindale-Hubbell Website "You are hereby granted a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited license to view, reproduce, print, and distribute insignificant portions of materials retrieved from this Site provided (a) it is used only for informational, noncommercial purposes, (b) you do not remove or obscure the copyright notice or other notices. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this Site, including but not limited to materials retrieved therefrom and the underlying code, may be reproduced, republished, copied, transmitted, or distributed in any form or by any means. In no event shall materials from this Site be stored in any information storage and retrieval system without prior written permission Martindale-Hubbell."
Excerpt from Martindale-Hubbell Website "You are hereby granted a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited license to view, reproduce, print, and distribute insignificant portions of materials retrieved from this Site provided (a) it is used only for informational, noncommercial purposes, (b) you do not remove or obscure the copyright notice or other notices. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this Site, including but not limited to materials retrieved therefrom and the underlying code, may be reproduced, republished, copied, transmitted, or distributed in any form or by any means. In no event shall materials from this Site be stored in any information storage and retrieval system without prior written permission Martindale-Hubbell."
Limitations of Contractual Protection Creator
contract with valid restraints on use and alienation
Purchaser
Limitations of Contractual Protection Creator
contract with valid restraints on use and alienation
Purchaser
Rival conveyance without restrictions
Limitations of Contractual Protection Creator
contract with valid restraints on use and alienation
Purchaser
Rival conveyance without restrictions
distribution --e.g., over
Public
Limitations of Contractual Protection Creator
contract with valid restraints on use and alienation
breach of contract (damages and injunction)
Purchaser
Rival conveyance without restrictions
distribution --e.g., over
Public
Limitations of Contractual Protection claim for tortious interference with contractual relations?
Creator
contract with valid restraints on use and alienation
Purchaser
Rival conveyance without restrictions
distribution --e.g., over
Public
Limitations of Contractual Protection No practical remedy
Creator
contract with valid restraints on use and alienation
Purchaser
Rival conveyance without restrictions
distribution --e.g., over
Public
Possible Sources of Legal Protection • Copyright • Misappropriation Doctrine • Contract • Sui Generis Legislation or Treaty • Encryption/Anti-“Black Box” Legislation • Trespass Doctrine • Branding – e.g., Lexis; Westlaw
Efforts to Secure Sui Generis Protection • EC Directive 96/9 • Federal legislation in the United States
EEC EEC Dire Direct ctiv ivee 96/9 96/9 -- Cove Covera rage ge • Applies to any “collection of independent works, data or other materials arranged in a systematic sy stematic or methodical way and individually accessible by electronic or other means." • Plai Plaint ntif ifff mus mustt prov prove: e: “th “that at the there re has has bee been n qualitatively and/or quantitatively a substantial investment in either the obtaining, verification or presentation of the contents” contents”
EC Direct Directive ive 96/9 96/9 -- Entitl Entitleme ements nts • No unauthorized extraction or reutilization of any part of the database
EC Directive 96/9 -- Entitlements • No unauthorized extraction or reutilization of any part of the database
EC Directive 96/9 -- Entitlements • “Extraction” = “the permanent or temporary transfer of all or a substantial part of the contents of a database to another medium by any means or in any form” • “Reutilization” = “any form of making available to the public all or a substantial part of the contents of a database by the distribution of copies, by renting, by on-line or other forms of transmission.”
EC Directive 96/9 -- Entitlements • No unauthorized extraction or reutilization of any part of the database • No first-sale doctrine • No compulsory licenses
EC Directive 96/9 -- Privileges • Copying of “insubstantial” portions for any purpose – unless it conflicts with the “normal exploitation” of the DB
• Member states may permit extraction or reutilization for noncommercial teaching or scientific research if credit is given • Member states may permit extraction or reutilization of “substantial” portions for “private purposes”
EC Directive 96/9 -- Duration • 15 years • additional 15 years each time the database is “substantially modified”
Proposals for American SuiGeneris Legislation • 104th Congress: Database Investment and Intellectual Property Antipiracy Act of 1996 • 105th Congress: HR 2652 passed the House; S 2291 died in Senate • 106th Congress: Two House bills pending: – HR 354: Collections of Information Antipiracy Act, introduced 1/19/99; approved by House Judiciary Comm. – HR 1858: Comsumer and Investor Access to Information Act of 1999, introduced 5/19/99
H.R. 354 • Protected databases include: information that has been collected and has been organized for the purpose of bringing discrete items of information together in one place or through one source so that users may access them – specific exception for works of narrative literary prose, but inclusion of collections of such works
H.R. 1858 • Protected databases include: a collection of discrete items of information that have been collected and organized in a single place, or in such a way as to be accessible through a single source, through the investment of substantial monetary or other resources, for the purpose of providing access to those discrete items of information by users of the database. – However, a discrete section of a database that contains multiple discrete items of information may also be treated as a database.
H.R. 354 • Information: facts, data, works of authorship or any other intangible material capable of being gathered and organized in a systematic way – specifically includes works of authorship in definition, but states that it does not provide any greater protection than copyright to works of authorship included in collections, other than a work that is itself a collection
H.R. 1858 • Information: facts, data, or any other intangible material capable of being collected or organized in a systematic way, with the exception of works of authorship
H.R. 354 • Exclusions: – Government databases – real-time market information – computer programs – databases for facilitating digital online communications
H.R. 1858 • Exclusions: – Government databases – computer programs – databases to facilitate internet communications
– Nonprotectable subject matter: individual ideas, facts, procedures, systems, methods of operation, concepts, principles or discoveries – Preexisting databases
– Works of authorship
H.R. 354 • Prohibitions: – Making available or extracting to make available all or a substantial part of a collection of information, causing material harm to the primary or related market for the product of the other party or a successor in interest – Extraction of a substantial part of a collection of information so as to cause material harm to the primary market
H.R. 354 • Prohibitions: – Making available or extracting to make available all or a substantial part of a collection of information, causing material harm to the primary or related market for the product of the other party or a successor in interest – Extraction of a substantial part of a collection of information so as to cause material harm to the primary market
H.R. 354 • Primary market: all markets in which the product is offered or in which the party derives or reasonably expects to derive direct or indirect revenue • Related market: [1] any market in which similar products are offered and in which the parties offering similar products derive or expect to derive direct or indirect revenue or [2] any market in which the protected party has taken demonstrable steps to offer a product within a short period of time and with the reasonable expectation to derive direct or indirect revenue
H.R. 1858 • Prohibition: – Distribution of duplicates: sale or distribution to the public of a database that is the duplicate of a database (substantially the same database made by extracting the information from the original) collected and organized by another person, in competition with that other database.
H.R. 1858 • Prohibition: – Distribution of duplicates: sale or distribution to the public of a database that is the duplicate of a database (substantially the same database made by extracting the information from the original) collected and organized by another person, in competition with that other database.
H.R. 1858 • In competition with: the duplicate database displaces substantial sales or licenses of the original database and significantly threatens the opportunity to recover a return on the investment in the collecting and organizing of the database
H.R. 354 • Privileges: – Use of Individual items of information or insubstantial portions of the compilation – The lawful owner of a copy of the original collection may sell or transfer that copy – News reporting – Nonprofit educational, scientific or research purposes that do not materially harm the primary market
H.R. 354 • Privileges: – Reasonable use for illustration, explanation, example, comment, criticism, teaching, research or analysis commercial
or nonprofit purpose amount extracted appropriate to purpose good faith extent of incorporation into an independent work and degree of difference between independent and original works development for and marketing in the same field as the original
H.R. 1858 • Privileges: – News reporting (except time-sensitive material collected by a news reporting entity when use is part of a consistent pattern of activity engaged in for the purpose of direct competition) – Scientific, educational or research purposes, if not a consistent pattern engaged in for the purposes of direct commercial competition
H.R. 354 • Term: Protection of information ends 15 years after original collection was first offered in commerce, with no extension for later changes to collection; burden of proof is on plaintiff to show that portion of collection to be protected is no more than 15 years old
H.R. 1858 • Term: No term of protection specified
Lobbying for H.R. 354 Pro
Anti
• NYSE
• Chamber of Commerce
• Real Estate Agents
• Consumers Union
• AMA
• Research Libraries
• EBay
• Charles Schwab • Yahoo
Possible Sources of Legal Protection • Copyright • Misappropriation Doctrine • Contract • Sui Generis Legislation or Treaty • Encryption/Anti-“Black Box” Legislation • Trespass Doctrine • Branding – e.g., Lexis; Westlaw
Possible Sources of Legal Protection • Copyright • Misappropriation Doctrine • Contract • Sui Generis Legislation or Treaty • Encryption/Anti-“Black Box” Legislation • Trespass Doctrine – Bidder’s Edge v. Ebay (May 2000)
• Branding – e.g., Lexis; Westlaw
Possible Sources of Legal Protection • Copyright • Misappropriation Doctrine • Contract • Sui Generis Legislation or Treaty • Encryption/Anti-“Black Box” Legislation • Trespass Doctrine – Bidder’s Edge v. Ebay (May 2000)
• Branding – e.g., Lexis; Westlaw
Wednesday
View more...
Comments