IN THE COURT OF FIFTH ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE AT RAYACHOTY Counter

 

IN THE COURT OF FIFTH ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE AT RAYACHOTY

E.A No.

/2018 In

E.P No.26/2018 In O.S No. 10/2014 1. 2. 3.

Veeraballi Mallikarjuna Vankiriaplli Rizwan basha Syed Sadaq Ali

…Petitioners/D.Hrs …Petitioners/ D.Hrs Vs.

1. 2. 3.  

Shaik Nissar Ahammad Shaik Ghouse Mohiddin Khayamkhni Tayubulla Khan

…Respondents/J.Drs …Respondents/ J.Drs

COU CO UNTER F I LE D O ON N BE H ALF OF THE RE SP SPO ONDE NTS 1 TO 3

1.

The E.A is unjust and not maintainable either in law or on

2.

The petitioners are put to strict proof on all the

facts.

allegations made in affidavit which are not expressly admitted here in by these Respondents. 3.

The petitioners filed this false petitioner for receiving

statement of E.C and registered sale deed dated 21-12-2010 for the purpose of E.P No.26/2018. There is no necessity for filing those documents at this state. 4.

The respondents are ready and willing to execute

registered sale deed in favour of the petitioners if the petitioners pay the balance sale price of Rs.31,50,000/- as per the agreement of sale executed by the respondents in favour of the petitioners. The respondents did not get cash in E.P No.9/2018 from the respondents J.Drs on 10-10-2018. But they got registered sale deed on 10-102018 for some property. There is no necessity for receiving the documents mentioned in the petition. There are no merits in this petition and this petition is liable to be dismissed. The respondents have no cash to pay to the petitioners. The respondents are always ready and willing to execute registered sale deed in favour of the

 

::

::

petitioners for some property for discharging this E.P amount of the petitioners. 5.

Therefore the respondents pray that the Honourable

court may be pleased to dismiss this petition in the interest of  justice.

The above stated facts are verified and those facts are true and correct to the best of our knowledge, information, and belief and signed this at Rayachoty on 30th Day of October 2018

ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS

 

IN THE COURT OF FIFTH ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE AT RAYACHOTY

E.A No.

/2018 In

E.P No.25/2018 In O.S No. 9/2014 V.Chinna Hussanin

Vs.

1. Shaik Nissar Ahammad, 2. Shaik Ghouse Mohiddin, 3. Khayamkhni Tayubulla Khan

… Petitioner/D.Hr Petitioner/D.Hr

… Respondents/J.Drs Respondents/J.Drs

COU CO UNTER F I LE D O ON N BE H ALF OF THE RE SP SPO ONDE NTS 1 TO 3

1.

The E.A is unjust and not maintainable either in law or on

2.

The petitioners are put to strict proof on all the

facts.

allegations made in affidavit which are not expressly admitted here in by these Respondents. 3.

The petitioners filed this false petitioner for receiving

registered sale deed dated 10-10-2018 and another sale deed 21-122010 for the purpose of E.P No.25/2018. There is no necessity for filing those documents at this state. 4.

The respondents are ready and willing to execute

registered sale deed in favour of the petitioners if the petitioners pay the balance sale price of Rs.63,00,000/- as per the agreement of sale executed by the respondents in favour of the petitioners. The respondents did not get cash in E.P No.9/2018 from the respondents J.Drs on 10-10-2018. But they got registered sale deed on 10-102018 for some property. There is no necessity for receiving the documents mentioned in the petition. There are no merits in this petition and this petition is liable to be dismissed. The respondents have no cash to pay to the petitioners. The respondents are always ready and willing to execute registered sale deed in favour of the petitioners for some property for discharging this E.P amount of the petitioners.

 

::

5.

::

Therefore the respondents pray that the Honourable

court may be pleased to dismiss this petition in the interest of  justice.

The above stated facts are verified and those facts are true and correct to the best of our knowledge, information, and belief and signed this at Rayachoty on 30th Day of October 2018.

ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS

 

IN THE COURT OF FIFTH ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE AT RAYACHOTY

E.A No. /2018 E.P No.26/2018 In O.S No. 10/2014 1. Veeraballi Mallikarjuna 2. Vankiriaplli Rizwan basha 3. Syed Sadaq Ali …Petitioners/D.Hrs  Vs.

1. Shaik Nissar Ahammad 2. Shaik Ghouse Mohiddin 3. Khayamkhni Tayubulla Khan … Respondents/J.Drs Respondents/J.Drs  

COUNTER FILED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3

Filed by: Sri. K. Venkata Reddy, B.Com., B.L., Advocate for the Respondents/J.Drs,

Kadapa

 

IN THE COURT OF FIFTH ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE AT RAYACHOTY

E.A No. /2018 E.P No.25/2018 In O.S No. 9/2014  V.Chinna Hussanin …Petitioners/D.Hrs  Vs.

1. Shaik Nissar Ahammad 2. Shaik Ghouse Mohiddin 3. Khayamkhni Tayubulla Khan … Respondents/J.Drs Respondents/J.Drs  

COUNTER FILED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3

Filed by: Sri. K. Venkata Reddy, B.Com., B.L., Advocate for the Respondents/J.Drs,

Kadapa