I - Development Framework

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK GENERAL BACKGROUND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Numerous stories and beliefs had passed on through the years regarding how Caloocan came to be known by its present name. The following stands out as the most popular: from its beginning as a humble barrio of the town of Tondo located in a ‘libis’ (lowland), it became known as ‘Libis Espina’ or ‘Aromahan’. Another interesting story tells of Caloocan originating either from the Tagalog word ‘look’ meaning bay or ‘sulok’ meaning corner. Caloocan might have meant ‘nasa sulok’ or in the corner since Caloocan is located where the ends of the old town of Tondo and Tambobong (now Malabon) meet. th

At the end of the 18 century, the fishermen of Aromahan climbed the hills to open homesteads in Caloocan. Here, the land was free of thorny plants that infested the banks/ shorelines and although the hill was naturally stony, some form of agriculture was possible and fishermen became farmers. In 1815, Caloocan was separated from Tondo and became an independent municipality. Its original territory extended to the foothills of Marikina, San Mateo and Montalban in the east; from Tinajeros, Tanza and Tala Rivers in the North; San Francisco del Monte, Sampalok, Sta. Cruz and Tondo in the south; and Dagat-Dagatan or Aromahan in the west. (See Map No. 1 and 2) Caloocan was part of history, which unfolded during the 1896 Philippine Revolution. The first settlement in Libis Espina, established Map No. G-1 by oppressed people from Tondo, sought refuge in the thorny shores Geographical of Dagat-Dagatan. They climbed the hills for more arable lands only to Location find out these had titles under the name of the Hacienda de Maysilo. Then they fought their landlords for a hundred years until Andres Bonifacio led them, the Katipuneros, to that fateful day of August 30, 1896 in Balintawak. The Filipino forces in Caloocan participated actively in Intramuros siege of the Spanish forces in Manila until their surrender to the Americans on August 13, 1898. On January 11, 1899, the people of Caloocan showed resistance to coming to terms with the Americans, who were bent on extending their supremacy over the country. When the Americans seized the railroad yards that stood between them and the fleeing Emilio Aguinaldo, the men of Caloocan fought the new invaders on February 23, 1899, in a counter-attack which, but for Gen. Antonio Luna’s rift with Aguinaldo’s loyalists, could have turned the tide of war in favor of a free and independent Philippines. In 1901, under the American Regime, Caloocan became one of the towns of the Province of Rizal. Due to the consolidation of several municipalities, Novaliches became part of Caloocan pursuant to Act 942, as amended by Acts 984 and 1008 of the Philippine Commission. In 1939, pursuant to Commonwealth Act 502, which created Quezon City as Capital of the Philipines, Caloocan lost the following barrios or sitios, namely: Balingasa, Kaingin, Kangkong, La Loma, Malamig, Matalahib, Masambong, San Isidro, San Jose, Santol and Tatalon.

Page 1

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

Map No. G-2 Original Territorial Boundaries

2008 -2013

In 1949, boundaries of Quezon City were redefined pursuant to Republic Act 392 as recommended by the Capital City Planning Commission. Caloocan again lost several barrios, namely: Baesa, Bagbag, Bahay-Toro, Banlat, Novaliches, Pasong Tamo, San Bartolome and Talipapa. This explains why the City of Caloocan has two separate territories. (See Map No. 1) Then in 1961, the late Mayor Macario B. Asistio, Sr., led the people of Caloocan to turn the historic town into a city through a plebiscite held in accordance with House Bill 6038, which was passed and approved by both chambers of the defunct Philippine Congress. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION AND LAND AREA

Caloocan has a combined total land area of 5,333.40 hectares and is located at the northern part of the National Capital Region (NCR, Region IV-A). The city is divided into two geographic locations, namely: South Caloocan, with an area of 1,362.50 hectares and North Caloocan, with an area of 3,970.90 hectares. South Caloocan is bounded on the north-northwest by Valenzuela, Malabon and Navotas; on the east by Quezon City; and on the south by the City of Manila. The greatest length, north to south of the boundaries is about six kilometers and the greatest width, east to west is seven kilometers. North Caloocan, on the other hand, is bounded on the north-northwest by the province of Bulacan; on the south-southeast by Quezon City; and southwest by Valenzuela. Its extreme southern boundary is about 1.7 Kilometers apart from the northern extreme boundary of South Caloocan. The greatest length, north to south of the boundaries is eight kilometers and the greatest width, east to west is Map No. G-3 ten kilometers. Metro Manila Map

TOPOGRAPHY SOUTH CALOOCAN The topography of South Caloocan is characterized to have a westward trend of flat lands covering a land area of about 1,001.64 hectares or 74.25% of the whole southern portion of the city, with slopes ranging from 0% to 3%. Being flat and highly accessible to neighboring cities and municipalities, these broadly level lands cover most of the commercial and industrial establishments in the city. Along the North Diversion Road, the topography of South Caloocan, gradually changes into gently to moderately sloping to rolling, with slopes ranging from 3 to 18%. Adjacent to residential and industrial areas within the sector, vast tracts of land still exist. Also in these areas lies the highest point found to be 35.00 meters above mean sea level, while the lowest is in the southernmost end of Kaunlaran Village (Dagat-Dagatan Development Project) measuring about 0.993 meters above mean sea level.

Page 2

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Map No.G-4

NORTH CALOOCAN Out of the total land area of North Caloocan, 58.49% or 2,322.80 hectares are characterized to have gently to steeply undulating to rolling topography with slopes ranging from 3 to 18%. This terrain is noted in the northern and central portion and gradually transforming into a southward trend of flat lands down to the southwestern tip of the boundary. Several industrial and residential subdivisions have already been developed in these broadly to nearly level lands, because of its proximity to some of the major access roads in the area. The central and northern portions on the other hand, are also known to consist of residential subdivisions dispersed in different areas along with the development of Tala Estate Resettlement Project, which is significant in the

Page 3

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

northernmost end of the city. It is with the contours of Tala Estate (part of Pangarap Village) that the highest point of elevation can be traced to be 120.00 meters above mean sea level, while the old district of Kaybiga covers the lowest part to about 25.00 meters above the same index. CLIMATE Just like the rest of the towns and cities of Metro Manila, Caloocan City falls under type 1 of the Philippine Climate Classification. The two distinct seasons recognized are the dry high pressure season, which comes in the months of November till April and the wet season, which starts from May and lasts up to October. The dry season corresponds with the northeast monsoon (October to January) and the wet season with the southwest monsoon (June to September). Between these two well-defined monsoon periods, the southeast trade winds blow from February to May. Table No. G – 1 CLIMATOLOGICAL NORMALS Caloocan City (1994) Month

Rainfall (mm)

Rainy Days

January February March April May June July August September October November December Annual

41.2 1.6 12.0 22.4 169.3 241.8 761.7 367.8 276.4 80.7 44.7 96.3 2,115.9

10 1 3 2 15 19 31 16 18 11 3 7 136

January February March April May June July August September October November December Annual

162.0 1.0 158.0 14.0 3,255.0 4,959.0 4,747.0 5,183.0 3,512.0 2,242.0 1,654.0 25,887.0

3 1 4 1 13 23 26 27 15 14 17 144

o

Temperature ( C) Mean Sea Level Pressure Maximum Minimum Mean South Caloocan (Port Area Station, Manila) 29.8 25.4 27.6 1,012.0 31.3 26.1 28.7 1,011.7 32.2 26.5 29.4 1,012.7 34.2 27.8 31.0 1,009.7 33.9 28.1 31.0 1,008.6 32.9 27.4 30.2 1,008.3 29.9 26.0 28.0 1,006.3 32.1 27.3 29.7 1,008.4 31.9 26.8 29.4 1,008.4 31.5 27.1 29.3 1,009.9 31.5 26.6 29.1 1,012.7 30.5 25.9 28.2 1,013.3 31.8 26.8 29.3 1,010.2 North Caloocan (Science Garden, Diliman, Quezon City) 30.9 20.4 25.7 1,011.2 32.8 21.5 27.2 1,009.9 31.0 19.9 25.5 1,011.1 32.9 23.0 28.0 1,008.0 36.1 24.4 30.3 1,007.4 34.4 25.2 29.8 1,006.0 32.0 24.3 28.2 1,005.3 31.1 23.8 27.5 1,004.7 31.0 24.0 27.5 1,006.2 31.2 24.0 27.6 1,008.4 30.9 20.4 25.7 1,011.2 32.8 21.5 27.2 1,009.9 31.0 19.9 25.5 1,011.1

Page 4

Prevailing Wind Direction Speed (mps) N W WSW W SSW SSW SSW SSW SSW SSW NE NE SSW

10 10 10 13 12 15 17 10 15 28 10 12 14

N W N S S W S W W N N W N

12 18 18 18 20 16 13 20 26 12 18 -

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

RAINFALL Since Caloocan is divided into two separate geographical location, two recording stations were considered in the study of the city’s annual rainfall. The recording station in Port Area, Manila was considered for South Caloocan, while the Science Garden in Diliman, Quezon City was for North Caloocan. In 1994, maximum rainfall in North and South Caloocan occur in the months of July, August and September. The annual rainfall was recorded to be 2,115.90 mm with a maximum of 761.70 mm in July and a minimum of 1.60 mm in February for the South Caloocan. North Caloocan recorded 2,588.70 mm annual rainfall with a maximum of 518.30 mm. WIND DIRECTION In South Caloocan, northeast winds prevail during the months of November and December. West wind is predominant in February, March and April. From May to October, the southwest monsoon blows. This procures the heavy rain experienced during that period. Maximum wind speed recorded in South Caloocan was 28 miles per second, which occurs in October. Meanwhile, the north winds prevail during the months of January, March, October, November and December over North Caloocan. From April till July, the southwest monsoon prevails, this explains the heavy rains experienced during these months.

Figure No. G-1 MONTHLY RAINFALL (in mm.) Caloocan City (1994) 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 January

February

March

April

May

June

South (Port Area)

Page 5

July

August September October November December

North Science Garden)

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Figure No. G – 2 MEAN TEMPERATURE ( Deg. C ) Caloocan City (1994) 50 40 30 20 10 0 January

February

March

April

May

June

South Port Area)

July

August September October November December

North (Science Garden)

SLOPE Slope is an important factor in determining the suitability of a land for its future development. Level to moderately sloping areas with good soil characteristics are most suitable for urban development while steeply sloping and rolling lands, highly prone to erosion are considered less favorable for any extensive land development. Utilizing these types of slope require higher development costs and may not be viable for the city’s economy. An estimated 2,158.14 hectares or 40.46% of the city’s total land area are found to be generally level to nearly level with a slope range of 0% to 3%. These slopes characterize most parts of South Caloocan and the southern part of North Caloocan in the old districts of Kaybiga, Llano and Deparo. Some areas are gently to moderately undulating to rolling with a slope range of 3% to 8% and with a covered land area of 1,052.51 hectares or 19.73% of the whole territory. On the other hand, an estimated 1,611.76 hectares of land or 30.22% of the total planning areas are noted to be moderately to steeply undulating to rolling with slopes ranging from 8% to 18%. About 510.98 hectares of land are traced to be very steeply sloping, with a slope range of 18% to 50% representing only 9.58%. (See Map) Table No. G – 2 1 LAND AREA BY SLOPE CLASSIFICATION Caloocan City (1987) PERCENT SLOPE

LAND AREA (in hectares)

% DISTRIBUTION PER PLANNING AREA

SLOPE CHARACTERISTICS

00 - 03% South North

1,011.64 1,646.50

74.25 28.87

Broad to level to nearly level

03 - 08% South North

271.01 781.50

19.89 19.68

08 - 18% South North

70.56 1,541.20

5.18 38.81

18 - 50% South North

9.28 501.70

2.05 12.63

Gently to moderately undulating and gently rolling to rolling in more than one direction Moderately to steeply undulating and has gently rolling land Very steeply sloping in more than one direction

1

Source : Based on Topographic Map prepared by Almar Surveying Co., Inc., 1987

Page 6

RECOMMENDED USE High density urban development Medium density urban development Low density urban development "Non-functional" open spaces

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

Map No. G-5

Page 7

2008 -2013

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

Map No. G -6

Page 8

2008 -2013

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Map No. G-7

SOIL BASIC SOIL TYPES Soil found in Caloocan City predominantly fall under the Novaliches series. This series is found in both South and North Caloocan. In area distribution, Novaliches clay loam has the largest coverage with an area of 2, 538.87 hectares or 47.60% of the total land area. This is followed by Novaliches clay loam adobe with an area of 1,195.94 hectares or 22.42% of the total area and Novaliches loam with an area of 869.70 hectares or 16.31% of the total area. In some areas, about 9.79% or 522.25 hectares of land comprises Prensa clay loam type falling under the Prensa series and the remaining 206.64 hectares representing 3.87% of the land area consist of Hydrosol type. THE NOVALICHES SERIES The Novaliches soils cover 96.13% of the total land area of the city. The soils are light reddish brown, reddish brown to bright reddish brown in color. The surface and subsoil are friable in consistency and granular in structure. In the subsoils, spherical concretions are present and underneath are tuffaceous material of varying

Page 9

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

degrees of disintegration and weathering. In some places, this tuffaceous material is exposed by extensive erosion. (See Table No. and ) Table No. G-3

2

AREA DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL TYPES PER PLANNING AREA Caloocan City (1987) LAND AREA (in hectare) SOUTH NORTH

TYPE NO.

SOIL TYPE

11

Novaliches Loam

-

12

Novaliches Clay

17

% DISTRIBUTION SOUTH

NORTH

869.70

-

21.90

368.22

2,170.65

27.02

54.66

Novaliches Clay, Loam and Adobe

787.64

408.30

57.81

10.28

6

Prensa Clay

-

522.25

-

13.15

1

Hydrosol (Rizal)

206.64

-

15.17

-

CHARACTERISTICS Poor in organic matter,surface soil is friable and easily eroded Surface soil is friable when dry and slightly sticky when wet, substratum are highly weathered tuffaceous materials Surface soil is friable and in some places shallow, substratum is compacvt volcanic tuff / adobe rock Surface soil is loose and granular, presence in some places of volcanic tuffaceous materials used for building purposes Former body of water now a reclaimed area, presence of salt intrusion

2

Source : Based on Topographic Map prepared by Almar Surveying Co., Inc., 1987

Table No. G – 4 3 SOIL TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS Caloocan City SOIL TYPE

DEPTH (in cm.)

CHARACTERISTIC

20 – 40

Reddish brown, friable and fine to coarse granular loam. Concretions are present and the soil is comparatively poor in organic matter. Being friable, the soil is easily eroded.

40 – 60

Brownish red, friable and granular clay loam with concretions and gravel.

60 – 111

Light brick to rusty red.

Novaliches Loam

111 – below Novaliches Clay Loam

Varying degrees of weathering.

12 - 29

Red to light reddish brown clay loam, granular and friable when seemingly dry and slightly sticky when wet. Presence of brown concretions in considerable amount.

54 - 81

Brick red clay loam to clay with gravel reddish brown concretions

100 - 150

Highly weathered tuffaceous material

Page 10

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

SOIL TYPE

Novaliches Clay Loam Adobe

DEPTH (in cm.)

CHARACTERISTIC

0-5

Brown loose and friable loam to clay loam.

5 -20

Dark brown granular clay loam with gravel and concretions

20 - 35 60 Downward Prensa Clay Loam

2008 -2013

20 – 25

40 – 50 50 – downward

Adobe clay loam with concretions and gravel, highly weathered tuff. Weathered adobe rock, slightly compact Compact and massive adobe rock Brown to dark yellowish brown clay loam, loose and granular with plenty of spherical iron concretion. Gray, light yellowish gray to dull grayish brown, loose and gravelly clay grading to sandy clay with plenty of concretions. Gravelly clay, light grayish brown or dark brown in color.

3

Source : Soil Map based on Bureau of Soils Report, 1935

TERRITORIAL COMPOSITION The City of Caloocan is divided into 16 zones, which is composed of 188 barangays. The breakdown is as follows: Zone 01 – Barangay 1 – 12

Zone 09 – Barangay 94 – 105

Zone 02 – Barangay 13 – 24

Zone 10 – Barangay 106 – 120

Zone 03 – Barangay 25 – 35

Zone 11 – Barangay 121 – 131

Zone 04 – Barangay 36 – 48

Zone 12 – Barangay 132 – 141

Zone 05 – Barangay 49 – 58

Zone 13 – Barangay 142 – 155

Zone 06 – Barangay 59 – 70

Zone 14 – Barangay 156 – 164

Zone 07 – Barangay 71 – 80

Zone 15 – Barangay 165 – 178

Zone 08 – Barangay 81 – 93

Zone 16 – Barangay 179 – 188

It is further divided into two political boundaries, namely: District 1 and District 2. District 1 is composed of 70 barangays, which include Barangays 1 to 4, 77 to 85 and 132 to 188, while District 2 is composed of 118 barangays, which include Barangays 5 to 76 and 86 to 131.

Page 11

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Map No. G-8

Page 12

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

Map No. G-9

Page 13

2008 -2013

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

DEMOGRAPHY Population and Average Annual Growth Rate In 1903, the Census of Population and Housing (CPH) reported a population of 7,847 for Caloocan City. This figure significantly doubled in 1918. In 1960, the population zoomed to 145,523 and in 1980, Caloocan’s population was just nearing its half a million mark at 467,816. As of the latest census conducted by the National Statistics Office (NSO) in 2000, the city’s total population reached its one million mark at 1,177,604, 15.09% higher from the census of 1995. The average annual growth rate based on 1995 and 2000 actual census is 3.06% extremely higher compared to the National Capital Region’s (NCR) 1.06. Caloocan City ranked third among the cities and municipalities in the country and accounted for 1.54% of the national population of 76.5 million. It is projected that by year 2013 the population of Caloocan will reach 1,743,152. Table No. G - 5 HISTORICAL GROWTH OF POPULATION (1903 – 2000) Caloocan City, 2000 DATE March 2, 1903 December 31, 1918 January 1, 1939 October 1, 1948 February 15, 1960 May 6, 1970 May 1, 1975 May 1, 1980 May 1, 1990 September 1, 1995 May 1, 2000

ACTUAL POPULATION 7,847 19,551 38,320 58,208 145,523 274,453 397,201 467,816 761,824 1,023,159 1,177,604

GROWTH RATE 5.9674 3.3202 4.2423 8.4209 6.3853 7.6734 3.3268 4.9973 5.6858 3.0584

Source: Various Census Years, National Statistics Office

Figure No. G-3 HISTORICAL GROWTH OF POPULATION (1903 – 2000) Caloocan City, 2000

1200000 1100000 1000000 900000 800000 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0

8.4209

7.6734

6.3853

5.9674 4.2423 3.3202

0

Page 14

5.6858 4.9973 3.3268

3.0584

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Table No. G - 6 ACTUAL AND PROJECTED POPULATION (1990-2013) Caloocan City YEAR

TOTAL 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

ACTUAL P R O J E C T E D

P O P U L A T I O N

781,824 1,023,159 1,177,604 1,213,674 1,250,849 1,289,162 1,328,649 1,369,346 1,411,289 1,454,517 1,499,069 1,544,985 1,592,308 1,641,080 1,691,346 1,743,152

Based on Geographic Location North South 277,635 484,189 482,351 540,808 609,812 567,792 628,491 585,183 647,741 603,108 667,582 621,581 688,030 640,620 709,104 660,242 730,824 680,465 753,209 701,308 776,280 722,789 800,057 744,928 824,563 767,745 849,819 791,261 875,849 815,497 902,676 840,476

Based on Political District District I District II 421,517 340,307 653,704 369,455 789,129 388,475 813,300 400,374 838,211 412,637 863,886 425,277 890,347 438,303 917,618 451,728 945,725 465,564 974,692 479,825 1,004,547 494,522 1,035,316 509,669 1,067,028 525,280 1,099,711 541,369 1,133,399 557,947 1,168,111 575,041

Figure No. G - 4 COMPARATIVE NORTH AND SOUTH CALOOCAN POPULATION 1990 to 2013

1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 1990 1995 0

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

YEAR

YEAR

North

South

Population Distribution The 1995 Census of Population and Housing showed that the population in South Caloocan exceeds that of North Caloocan. However, the 2000 census, showed otherwise. Barangay 176 in North Caloocan, was registered as the biggest barangay in the Philippines. It had a population of 188,419, which accounted for 16% of the city’s total population. On the other hand, Barangay 76 in South Caloocan registered the least number of populations at 106. Barangays 84 and 105 had the fastest growing population in the city with an annual growth rate of 31% and 25%, respectively.

Page 15

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Household Population, Household Size and Population Density As of year 2000, the city represented 11.88% (1,174,673) of NCRs total household population of 9,880,102. At an average household size of 5 persons per household, Caloocan City has a total number of 249,567 households. This number increased by 3.014% from 1995 to 2000. The average city household size decreased from 6 in 1970 to 4.7 in 2000. Bagong Silang has the most number of households at 38,388 while Bgy. 76 have 12 households. In 2000, population density was placed at 221 persons per hectare reflecting an increase of 29 persons per hectare for the past five years. In the same year, South Caloocan had 417 persons per hectare and North Caloocan had 154 persons. In 2013, it is projected that there will be 327 persons living per hectare in the city at a population of 1,743,152. Table No. G - 7 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE PER BARANGAY City of Caloocan (2000) BARANGAY NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ZONE 1 BARANGAY NO. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ZONE 2 BARANGAY NO. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ZONE 3

POPULATION

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.)

2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

HOUSEHOLD SIZE

LAND AREA (HECTARE)

2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

2,719 5,071 2,385 2,313 3,050 1,236 2,584 19,679 2,042 1,066 1,669 27,841 71,655

3,461 6,455 3,036 2,944 3,883 1,573 3,289 25,051 2,599 1,357 2,125 35,441 91,215

645 1,161 548 557 726 245 541 4,343 403 227 375 5,931 15,702

820 1,477 698 709 924 312 688 5,530 513 289 477 7,557 19,995

4.22 4.37 4.35 4.15 4.20 5.40 4.78 4.53 5.07 4.70 4.45 4.69 4.56

3.40 4.16 3.80 5.00 6.18 2.36 4.68 30.44 8.80 3.26 3.72 40.72 116.52

799.71 1,281.99 627.63 462.60 493.53 523.73 552.14 646.48 232.05 326.99 448.66 683.72 614.96

1,017.94 1,551.92 798.94 588.80 628.32 666.53 702.78 822.96 295.34 416.26 571.24 870.36 148.33

2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected)

2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

1,724 26,358 2,117 3,962 5,143 13,292 4,525 9,326 4,436 9,125 3,093 3,312 86,414

300 4,335 339 740 869 2.058 735 1,523 729 1,654 500 569 14,351

382 5,514 431 941 1,106 1,647 935 1,939 928 2,107 636 725 17,292

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.51 4.78 4.91 4.21 4.65 8.07 4.84 4.81 4.78 4.33 4.86 4.57 4.73

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 5.26 18.70 5.98 17.68 4.96 31.55 5.10 36.68 5.36 35.16 3.30 3.56 173.29

2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected)

2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

362 756 843 5,794 385 690 903 597 1,254 1,194 3,794 16,572

460 963 1,073 7,371 490 879 1,150 760 1,597 1,520 4,829 21,091

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.54 4.59 4.35 4.74 4.70 4.86 4.91 4.85 4.57 4.74 4.78 4.72

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 2.88 4.82 4.48 30.50 3.90 6.00 17.08 3.95 3.00 3.00 16.18 16.18 11.96 11.96 104.75 104.75

POPULATION 1,354 20,706 1,663 3,112 4.040 10,442 3,555 7,326 3,485 7,168 2,430 2,602 67,883

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

POPULATION 1,642 3,473 3,665 27,448 1,808 3,355 4,435 2,895 5,732 5,660 18,132 78,245

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS 2,090 4,421 4,665 34,941 2,302 4,271 5,646 3,685 7,297 7,205 23,082 99,604

Page 16

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

257.41 1,107.27 278.09 176.02 814.52 330.97 687.06 199.73 650.19 203.87 736.36 730.90 391.73

327.76 1,409.52 354.01 224.10 1,036.90 421.30 887.25 254.25 827.61 259.53 937.27 930.34 498.67

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

570.14 720.54 570.14 720.54 818.08 818.08 899.93 818.08 899.93 463.59 818.08 463.59 559.17 559.17 259.66 259.66 732.91 732.91 1,910.67 1,910.83 349.81 349.81 1,516.05 1,615.05 746.97 746.97

726.39 917.22 1,041.29 1,145.61 590.26 711.83 330.56 932.91 2,432.33 445.30 1,929.93 950.87

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

BARANGAY NO. 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ZONE 4 BARANGAY NO. 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ZONE 5 BARANGAY NO. 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ZONE 6 BARANGAY NO. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ZONE 7

POPULATION

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2000 (Actual) 2008 (Projected)

5,885 4,162 4,195 1,735 1,493 1,212 615 4,287 685 691 1,957 571 549 28,037

7,491 5,298 5,340 2,209 1,901 1,543 783 5,457 872 880 2,491 727 699 35,691

2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

1,262 952 854 367 319 228 142 849 128 158 481 116 141 5,997

1,608 1,212 1,088 467 406 290 181 1,081 163 201 612 148 180 7,636

POPULATION

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2000(Actual) 2008 (Projected)

LAND AREA 2008(Projected) (HECTARE) 2000(Actual)

5,175 1,570 1,405 2,878 1,275 1,250 1,403 3,824 1,096 852 20,728

6,588 1,999 1,789 3,664 1,623 1,591 1,786 4,868 1,395 1,085 26,386

1,032 324 334 701 275 285 280 753 224 185 4,393

2008 (Projected)

2000(Actual)

5,854 2,435 2,176 672 4,842 2,363 1,489 2,508 3,522 2,408 3,894 5,343 37,507

909 437 371 129 733 386 245 424 566 286 616 817 5,919

POPULATION 2000(Actual)

4,599 1,913 1,709 528 3,804 1,856 1,170 1,970 2,767 1,892 3,059 4,197 29,464

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS)

POPULATION 2000(Actual)

941 214 15,204 3,265 2,781 106 877 1,478 621 2,968 28,473

1,315 412 425 891 350 362 356 958 285 235 5,591

2008(Projected)

1,157 556 472 164 933 491 312 539 720 364 784 1,039 7,531

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2008 (Projected)

1,198 272 19,354 4,156 3,540 135 1,116 1,881 791 3,801 36,246

2000(Actual)

207 47 2,240 753 669 12 202 312 139 597 6,278

2008 Projected)

263 60 4,254 958 851 15 257 397 177 760 7,992

Page 17

2008 -2013

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.66 4.37 4.91 4.73 4.68 5.32 4.33 5.05 5.35 4.37 4.07 4.92 3.89 4.68

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 4.80 6.00 4.10 1.92 3.32 3.28 3.32 3.60 3.64 3.64 4.16 3.64 3.64 49.06

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 5.01 4.85 4.21 4.11 4.64 4.39 5.01 5.08 4.89 4.61 4.72

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 4.88 3.10 5.14 3.64 4.50 6.80 6.80 3.80 4.80 4.50 47.96

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 5.06 4.38 4.61 4.09 5.19 4.81 4.78 4.65 4.89 6.62 4.97 5.14 4.98

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 4.50 4.50 6.90 6.90 4.20 2.80 2.15 4.00 5.02 5.70 3.00 5.50 55.17

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.55 4.55 4.55 4.34 4.16 8.83 4.34 4.74 4.47 5.00 4.54

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 4.30 4.24 13.70 6.75 4.25 2.15 5.10 5.80 6.20 31.50 83.99

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

1,226.04 693.67 1,023.17 903.65 449.70 369.51 185.24 1,190.83 188.19 189.84 470.43 156.87 150.82 571.48

1,560.63 883 1,302.44 1,150.52 572.59 470.43 235.84 1,515.83 239.56 241.76 598.80 199.73 192.03 727.50

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

1,060.45 506.45 273.35 790.66 283.33 183.82 206.32 1,006.32 228.33 189.33 432.19

1,350.00 644.84 348.05 1,006.59 360.67 233.97 262.65 1,281.05 290.63 241.11 550.17

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

1,022.00 425.11 247.68 76.52 905.71 662.86 544.19 492.50 551.20 331.93 1,019.67 763.09 534.06

1,300.89 541.11 315.36 97.39 1,152.86 843.93 692.56 627.00 701.59 422.46 1,298.00 971.45 70.23

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

218.84 50.00 47.00 1,109.78 483.70 654.35 49.30 171.96 254.83 100.16 94.79

2008 Projected)

278.60 64.15 1,412.70 615.70 832.94 62.79 218.82 324.31 127.58 120.67 431.55

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE BARANGAY NO. 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ZONE 8 BARANGAY NO. 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ZONE 9 BARANGAY NO. 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ZONE 10 BARANGAY NO. 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ZONE 11

POPULATION

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2000 (Actual) 2008 (Projected)

2,490 2,308 1,540 2,164 1,173 2,491 751 2,569 1,564 2,241 117 732 4,073 25,213

3,170 2,938 1,960 2,755 1,493 3,171 956 3,270 1,991 2,853 1,422 932 5,185 32,096

POPULATION 1,119 3,755 1,955 2,737 3,133 965 1,972 2,961 3,012 1,107 1,240 3,110 27,066

POPULATION 1,054 1,867 1,192 1,754 610 2,181 1,692 275 1,842 1,444 1,324 1,898 5,905 1,799 8,698 33,534

2000 (Actual) 2008 (Projected)

481 2,185 1,303 711 1,649 1,510 2,262 1,658 1,792 2,766 2,980 19,297

755 650 416 596 325 760 229 636 468 715 284 208 1,189 7,232

2000(Actual)

182 635 344 483 493 158 360 504 503 177 233 539 4,611

2008 (Projected)

232 808 437 615 628 201 459 641 641 225 297 687 5,869

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2000 (Actual) 2008 (Projected)

828 1,467 936 1,378 479 1,713 1,329 216 1,447 1,134 1,040 1,491 4,639 1,413 6,833 26,343 26,343 POPULATION

587 511 327 468 255 597 180 500 368 561 223 163 935 5,675

2008 (Projected)

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2000( Actual) 2008 (Projected)

879 2,950 1,536 2,150 2,461 758 1,549 2,326 2,366 870 974 2,443 21,262

2000(Actual)

612 2,781 1,659 905 2,099 1,922 2,879 2,111 2,281 3,521 3,793 24,565

2000(Actual)

2008 (Projected)

171 218 315 401 223 284 315 401 100 127 365 465 268 341 64 81 305 389 239 305 196 249 366 466 1,042 1,327 332 422 1,550 1,972 5,851 7,449 5,851 NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS 2000(Actual)

105 468 295 136 350 301 508 343 360 585 586 4,037

2008 (Projected)

134 596 375 173 446 383 647 437 458 744 745 5,138

Page 18

2008 -2013

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.24 4.52 4.71 4.62 4.60 4.17 4.17 5.14 4.25 3.99 5.01 4.49 4.36 4.44

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 6.76 5.00 6.04 14.70 5.04 6.32 7.36 7.82 7.36 8.06 8.96 5.04 6.24 94.70

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.83 4.65 4.47 4.45 4.99 4.80 4.30 4.62 4.70 4.92 4.18 4.53 4.61

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 4.60 6.36 9.52 3.96 2.64 3.30 5.40 9.36 5.40 8.06 7.15 6.40 72.15

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.84 4.66 4.20 4.37 4.79 4.69 4.96 3.38 4.74 4.74 5.31 4.07 4.45 4.26 4.41 4.50 4.50 HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.58 4.67 4.42 5.23 4.71 5.02 4.45 4.83 4.98 4.73 5.09 4.78

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 5.24 4.92 4.92 7.62 2.52 2.79 2.56 2.86 1.18 1.92 1.92 4.00 2.64 4.10 6.08 55.27 55.27 LAND AREA (HECTARE) 5.12 4.80 2.56 2.56 3.60 5.40 3.96 2.20 2.20 2.00 5.00 39.40

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

368.34 461.60 254.97 147.21 232.74 394.15 102.04 328.52 212.50 278.04 124.67 145.24 652.72 266.24

2008 Projected)

468.93 587.60 324.50 187.41 296.23 501.74 129.89 418.16 270.52 353.97 158.71 184.92 830.93 338.92

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

191.09 463.84 161.34 542.93 932.20 229.70 286.85 248.50 438.15 107.94 136..22 381.72 294.69

2008 Projected)

243.26 590.41 205.36 691.16 1,186.74 292.42 365.19 316.35 557.78 137.34 173.43 485.94 375.14

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

2008 Projected)

158.02 201.15 298.17 379.47 190.24 242.28 180.84 230.18 190.08 242.06 613.98 781.72 519.14 660.94 75.52 96.15 1,226.27 1,561.02 590.63 752.08 541.67 689.58 372.75 474.50 1,757.20 2,236.74 344.63 438.78 1,123.85 1,430.59 476.62 606.73 476.62 POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

93.95 455.21 508.98 277.73 458.06 279.63 571.21 753.64 814.55 1,383.00 596.00 489.77

2008 Projected)

119.53 579.38 648.05 353.52 583.06 355.93 727.02 959.55 1,036.82 1,760.50 758.60 623.48

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE BARANGAY NO. 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 ZONE 12 BARANGAY NO. 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 ZONE 13 BARANGAY NO. 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 ZONE 14 BARANGAY NO. 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ZONE 15

POPULATION 2000 (Actual)

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2008 (Projected)

6,678 4,982 1,036 634 410 1,060 1,463 3,499 995 3,129 23,886

8,501 6,342 1,319 807 522 1,349 1,862 4,454 1,267 3,983 30,406

POPULATION 2000 (Actual)

5,353 4,567 5,396 6,704 3,869 4,525 4,982 6,134 5,964 5,912 5,445 5,140 4,672 4,425 73,088

POPULATION 2000 (Actual)

7,554 3,907 2,603 5,217 17,899 10,057 15,888 10,570 15,276 88,970

POPULATION 2000(Actual)

20,358 13,365 19,142 19,675 3,961 8,696 33,152 15,965 9,715 14,778 34,813 188,419 50,938 64,148 497,125

1,654 1,370 284 215 109 322 387 930 262 846 6,379

2000(Actual)

849 737 888 1,054 685 787 828 1,033 977 993 840 893 752 750 12,066

2008 (Projected)

1,081 938 1,131 1,341 871 1,001 1,053 1,314 1,242 1,263 1,070 1,137 957 956 15,356

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2008(Projected)

5,934 3,069 2,045 4,098 14,061 7,900 12,481 8,303 12,000 69,891

1,299 1,075 223 169 86 253 304 731 206 665 5,011

2008 (Projected)

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS

2008 (Projected)

4,205 3,588 4,239 5,266 3,039 3,555 3,914 4,819 4,685 4,644 4,277 4,038 3,670 3,476 57,415

2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

25,915 17,013 24,367 25,046 5,042 11,070 42,202 20,323 12,367 18,812 44,316 239,853 64,843 81,659 632,830

2000(Actual)

1,204 674 429 913 3,050 1,760 2,746 1,814 2,589 15,179

2008 (Projected)

1,532 859 546 1,162 3,883 2,240 3,492 2,308 3,299 19,320

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS 2000(Actual)

4,793 3,105 4,309 4,200 756 1,991 7,158 3,246 2,011 3,114 7,235 38,388 10,683 13,369 104,358

2008 (Projected)

6,098 3,957 5,488 5,352 962 2,533 9,115 4,131 2,560 3,960 9,213 48,850 13,594 17,012 132,824

Page 19

2008 -2013

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 5.14 4.63 4.65 3.75 4.77 4.19 4.81 4.79 4.83 4.71 4.77

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 5.50 3.60 8.84 8.84 8.72 8.72 8.84 8.50 5.56 5.84 72.96

HOUSEHO LD SIZE 4.95 4.87 4.77 5.00 4.44 4.52 4.73 4.67 4.80 4.68 5.09 4.52 4.88 4.63 4.76

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 3.00 2.30 2.96 3.40 2.84 3.92 3.12 3.88 4.04 1.76 5.00 2.90 3.00 5.00 47.12

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.93 4.55 4.77 4.49 4.61 4.49 4.55 4.58 4.63 4.60

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 6.40 2.00 11.20 15.84 69.76 51.20 49.28 41.92 66.08 313.68

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.25 4.30 4.44 4.68 5.24 4.37 4.63 4.92 4.83 4.75 4.81 4.91 4.77 4.80 4.76

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 110.76 170.28 179.20 309.20 57.72 42.56 537.48 136.84 96.56 152.64 266.36 524.68 188.08 313.12 3,085.48

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

1,214.18 1,383.89 117.19 71.72 47.02 121.56 165.50 411.65 178.96 535.79 327.38

2008(Projected)

1,545.64 1,761.67 149.21 91.29 59.86 154.70 210.33 524.00 227.88 682.02 416.75

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

1,401.67 1,560.00 1,432.09 1,548.82 1,070.07 906.89 1,254.49 1,242.01 1,159.65 2,638.64 855.40 1,392.41 1,223.33 695.20 1,218.48

2008(Projected)

1,784.33 1,985.65 1,822.97 1,971.76 1,362.32 1,154.34 1,596.79 1,580.93 1,476.24 3,859.09 1,089.00 1,772.41 1,557.41 885.00 1,551.10

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

927.19 1,534.50 182.59 258.71 201.56 154.30 253.27 198.07 181.60 222.81

2008(Projected)

1,180.31 1,953.50 1,825.89 329.36 256.58 196.43 322.40 252.15 231.17 283.63

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

183.80 78.49 106.82 63.63 68.62 204.32 61.68 116.67 100.61 96.82 130.70 359.11 270.83 204.87 161.12

2008(Projected)

233.97 99.95 135.98 81.00 87.35 260.10 78.52 148.52 128.08 123.24 166.38 457.14 344.76 260.79 205.10

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE BARANGAY NO. 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 ZONE 16 TOTAL DISTRICT I DISTRICT II NORTH SOUTH

POPULATION 2000(Actual)

18,645 8,799 18,645 8,799 16,792 16,792 7,586 7,586 3,124 3,124 2,066 2,066 17,671 17,671 11,484 11,484 11,673 11,673 14,847 14,847 112,687 112,687 1,177,604 789,129 388,475 609,812 567,792

2008(Projected)

23,735 11,201 21,376 9,657 3,977 2,630 22,495 14,619 14,860 18,900 143,449 1,499,068 1,004,547 494,522 776,280 722,789

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS 2000(Actual)

3,831 1,742 3,8311,742 3,461 3,461 1,572 1,7421,572 658 3,461 457 457 3,628 3,628 2,386 2,386 2,608 2,608 3,224 3,224 23,567 23,567 249,567 166,490 83,077 127,925 121,642

2008 (Projected)

4,874 2,218 4,407 1,999 837 582 4,619 3,039 3,317 4,100 29,992 316,687 211,909 103,971 162,817 152,614

2008 -2013

HOUSEHOLD SIZE 4.86 5.05 4.87 5.05 4.85 4.85 4.82 4.83 4.75 4.75 4.52 4.524.87 4.87 4.874.81 4.81 4.81 4.44 4.48 4.54 4.61 4.77 4.78 4.72 4.74 4.68 4.77 4.67

LAND AREA (HECTARE) 190.48 52.00 190.48 52.00 78.39 78.39 120.33 120.33 49.48 49.48 27.20 27.20 66.58 66.58 151.44 151.44 87.08 87.08 62.44 62.44 885.42 885.42 5,296.92 4,507.16 789.76 3,970.90 1,326.02

POP. DENSITY (POP./H.) 2000(Actual)

2008(Projected)

97.73 169.21 97.88 169.21 214.21 214.21 63.02 63.04 63.14 63.14 75.92 75.96 265.40 265.41 75.83 75.83 133.04 134.05 234.18 237.78 127.27 127.27 222.32 175.08 491.89 153.57 428.19

124.61 215.40 272.69 80.25 80.38 96.69 337.86 965.33 170.65 302.69 162.01 283.00 222.88 626.17 195.49 545.08

Table No. G - 8 POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSEHOLD DENSITY Caloocan City, 2000

Caloocan City GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION South North POLITICAL DISTRICT District I District II

Caloocan City GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION South North POLITICAL DISTRICT District I District II

POPULATION

LAND AREA (Hectare) 5,333.400

Number 1,177,604

Density 221

1,362.50 3,970.90

567,792 609,812

417 154

High Density Medium Density

4,538.20 795.20

789,129 388,475

174 489

Medium Density High Density

Population 1,174,673

HOUSEHOLDS Number Size 249,567 4.71

TYPE OF DENSITY Medium Density

Density 47

565,393 609,280

121,642 127,925

4.65 4.76

89 32

787,669 387,004

166,490 83,077

4.73 4.66

37 104

AGE, SEX COMPOSITION The City had a median age of 23 which means half of the population was below 23 years old. The age sex pyramid for Caloocan shows a higher proportion of population aged 1-34 years old. Young population ages below 14 years old constituted about 34.60% of the total population, while those aged 65 years old and over form about 2.50%. During the last 15 years, population ages below 14 years old had been declining from 36.69% in 1980 to 35.74% in 1995. The same age group bracket continuously declined to 34.60% in 2000. The working population ages 15-64 years old showed an increase of 61.04% in 1980 to 62.90% in 2000. These economically active groups (15-64) composed the main bulk of the city’s population.

Page 20

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Table No. G - 9 AGE, SEX COMPOSITION Caloocan City, 2000 AGE GROUP Under 1 1 to 4 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 to 69 70 to 74 75 to 79

80 & over Caloocan City

HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 30,978 121,264 137,015 117,196 113,552 119,083 106,948 99,683 85,354 72,372 54,368 41,472 25,347 20,673 13,098 7,868 4,440

MALE

FEMALE 16,054 62,012 70,401 59,081 55,017 57,125 52,836 50,191 43,069 36,914 27,878 20,924 12,736 9,785 5,949 3,370 1,705

SEX RATIO 14,924 59,252 66,614 58,115 58,535 61,958 54,112 49,492 42,285 35,458 26,490 20,548 12,611 10,888 7,149 4,498 2,735

108 105 106 102 94 92 98 102 102 104 105 102 101 90 83 75 62

3,962

1,303

2,659

49

1,174,673

586,350

588,323

100

Source: National Statistics Office, 2000 Census of Population and Housing

The sex ratio of the population in the city showed a slight dominance of female population over the male population from 1980 to 2000. It can be noted that in 2000, there is a male dominance in the productive age groups from 30-34 to 55-59. Figure No. G - 5

POPULATION PYRAMID Caloocan City, 2000 80 & over 75 to 79 70 to 74 65 to 69 60 to 64 55 to 59 50 to 54 45 to 49 40 to 44 35 to 39 30 to 34 25 to 29 20 to 24 15 to 19 10 to 14 5 to 9 1 to 4 Under 1

Female Male

Dependency Ratio Dependency ratio from 1995 to 2000 increased by 2.32% with the bulk of dependents coming from age group 0-14. In 2000, male dependents exceeded female in age group 0-14 while in age group 65 and above; the female dominated the male dependents.

Page 21

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Table No. G - 10 DEPENDENCY RATIO Caloocan City, 2000 TOTAL Caloocan City Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) Old-Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) Total Dependent Potential Labor Force (ages 15 - 64) North Caloocan Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) Old-Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) Total Dependent Potential Labor Force (ages 15 - 64) South Caloocan Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) Old-Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) Total Dependent Potential Labor Force (ages 15 - 64)

NUMBER MALE

TOTAL

MALE

RATIO TOTAL

MALE

406,554 29,514 436,068 741,536

207,595 12,401 219,996 367,894

198,959 17,113 216,072 373,642

55 4 59

56 3 59

53 5 58

210,530 15,284 225,814 383,998

107,501 6,422 113,923 190,511

103,029 8,862 111,891 193,487

55 4 59

56 3 59

53 5 58

196,024 14,230 210,254 357,538

100,094 5,979 106,073 177,383

95,930 8,251 104,181 180,655

55 4 59

56 3 59

53 5 58

Table No. G - 11 COMPARATIVE DEPENDENCY RATIO: 1995 and 2000 Caloocan City, 2000 1995 365,646 23,101 388,747 634,412

Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) Old Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) Total Dependent Potential Labor Force (ages 15-64)

2000 406,554 29,514 436,068 741,536

2008 517,536 36,636 554,172 943,622

Figure No. G - 6 COMPARATIVE DEPENDENCY RATIO: 1995 and 2000 Caloocan City

2000

2008

406,554

741,536

29,514

943,622

Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) Old Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) Potential Labor Force (ages 15-64)

517,536

36,636 Young Age Dependent (ages 0-14) Old Age Dependent (ages 65 and above) Potential Labor Force (ages 15-64)

POPULATION BY MARITAL STATUS Caloocan City was composed of 644,763 population with single marital status (including population ages 9 years old and below) or 54.75% of the total population and 413,498 married population or 35.11% of the total population as of the 2000 census. Of the 413,498 married populations 69,357 belong to the age group of 30-34 and 58,230 belong to the age group of 25-29. Meanwhile, the very young individuals who belong to age 20 and below totaled to 9,695. Divorced/separated individuals registered a total of 13,341 while 56,763 were under the common law or live-in status.

Page 22

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Table No. G - 12 TOTAL HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 10 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY AGE GROUP AND MARITAL STATUS Caloocan City, 2000 AGE GROUP Caloocan City Below 20 20 – 24 25 – 29 30 – 34 35 – 39 40 – 44 45 – 49

50 – 54 55 – 59 60 – 64 65 – 69 70 – 74 75 - 79 80 & 0ver

TOTAL POP’N. 10 YRS. OLD & OVER 888,290 231,125 119,928 107,462 99,957 85,566 72,526 54,511 41,570 25,404 20,727 13,147 7,918 4,463 3,986

SINGLE

MARRIED

355,449 207,380 72,504 34,338 17,498 9,313 5,307 3,213 2.227 1,117 994 611 411 256 280

413,498 9,695 31,329 58,230 69,357 65,070 57,314 43,082 31,775 18,772 13,958 7,832 3,983 1,779 1,322

WIDOWED

DIVORCED/ SEPARATED

32,221 447 465 600 998 1,469 2,393 2,883 3,882 3,513 4,377 3,863 3,061 2,208 2,122

OTHERS

13,341 492 1,047 1,641 1,884 2,084 1,923 1,533 1,145 678 426 250 131 59 48

56,763 4,399 11,639 11,192 9,170 6,899 5,093 3,401 2,268 1,128 730 455 187 92 110

UNKNOWN 17,018 8,712 2,944 1,461 1,050 731 496 399 333 196 242 136 145 69 104

Source: National Statistics Office, 2000 Census of Population and Housing

Figure No. G - 7 TOTAL POPULATION 10 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY AGE GROUP AND MARITAL STATUS Caloocan City, 2000

56,763 13,341

17,018 355,449

32,221

Single Married Widowed Divorced/Separated Others

413,498

Unknown

Population By Religious Affiliation The 2000 census indicated that the city is predominantly composed of Roman Catholics with a percent share of 88% of the total population. The remaining 12% were shared by other identified religions each having a less than 1% share.

Page 23

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Table No. G - 13 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION Caloocan City, 2000 RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION Total Roman Catholic Iglesia ni Cristo Evangelicals Islam Buddhist Aglipayan Other Protestants Others None Unknown

BOTH SEXES 1,174,673 1,034,788 38,983 36,758 3,207 2,284 1,386 17,319 11,542 743 27,663

MALE

FEMALE 586,350 517,065 19,491 17,895 1,566 1,108 679 8,326 5,672 390 14,158

588,323 517,723 19,492 18,836 1,641 1,176 707 8,993 5,870 353 13,505

Source: National statistics Office, 2000 Census of Population and Housing

Figure No. G - 8 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION Caloocan City, 2000 Buddhist Islam

Aglipayan

Others

Evangelicals Other Protestants

None Unknown

Iglesia Ni Cristo

Roman Catholic

Table No. G - 14 LANGUAGE OR DIALECT GENERALLY SPOKEN IN THE HOUSEHOLDS Caloocan City, 2000 DIALECT Total Tagalog Ilocano Bikol/Bicol Cebuano Bisaya/Binisaya Waray Pangasinan/Panggalatok Marano Hiligaynon/Ilonggo Tausug Other Local Dialect Chinese American/English Other Foreign Ethnicity

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS 249,567 238,945 1,171 1,160 1,137 1,062 802 722 593 575 571 1,742 356 44 22

Source: National statistics Office, 2000 Census of Population and Housing

Page 24

PERCENTAGE 95.743 0.469 0.468 0.455 0.425 0.289 0.321 0.237 0.230 0.228 0.698 0.142 0.176 0.176 0.008

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Population By Mother Tongue: The 2000 census showed that Tagalog is mother tongue to about 96% of the city’s total household population. The remaining 4% of the population speaks other dialect having less than 1% share each.

Figure No. G - 9 LANGUAGE OR DIALECT GENERALLY SPOKEN IN THE HOUSEHOLDS Caloocan City, 2000

802

1,137

1,160

1,062

722

593 575

571 44

1,742

22

Tagalog

356

Ilocano

1,171

Bikol/Bicol Cebuano Bisaya/Binisaya Waray Pangasinan/Panggalatok Marano Hiligaynon/Ilonggo Tausug Other Local Dialect Chinese American/English Other Foreign Ethnicity

238,945

Population By Ethnicity: The 2000 census revealed that the Tagalogs dominated the inhabitants of the city with 69.72% of the total population. Other residents particularly those from Regions 1, 5 and 8 shared the remaining percent of 30.28%.

Table No. G - 15 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY ETHNICITY AND SEX Caloocan City, 2000 ETHNICITY Caloocan City Tagalog Bikol/ Bicol Bisaya/ Binisaya Ilocano Waray Others Other Foreign Ethnicity Not Reported

BOTH SEXES 1,174,673 818,954 59,276 46,374 44,487 37,523 134,230 302 33,527

Page 25

MALE

FEMALE 586,350 409,908 30,311 22,473 22,105 18,330 66,166 204 16,853

588,323 409,046 28,965 23,901 22,382 19,193 68,064 98 16,674

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Figure No. G - 10 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY ETHNICITY Caloocan City, 2000 Tagalog

302 134,230

33,527

Bikol/ Bicol

37,523

Bisaya/ Binisaya

44,487

Ilocano

46,374

Waray Others

59,276

Other Foreign Ethnicity Not Reported

818,954

Literacy of Population Ages 10 Years and Over: The 2000 census indicated that there were 863,982 household populations over 10 years old who are literate. Literacy rate was registered at 97.58%. The males posted higher literacy rate at 97.61 than the females at 92.55 in year 2000 as compared to the 1995 census wherein the females recorded higher literacy rate of 94.39 over the males 94.17.

Table No. G - 16 LITERACY OF HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 10 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY SEX Caloocan City, 2000 AGE GROUP AND SEX

TOTAL Total 863,982 427,427 436,555

Total 885,416 437,883 447,533

Both Sexes Male Female

Total 21,434 10,456 10,978

Figure No. G - 11 LITERACY OF HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 10 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY SEX Caloocan City, 2000

Age Group and Sex Literate

Age Group and Sex Illiterate

427,427

436,555

10,456

10,978

Male

Male

Female

Female

Page 26

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Population By Highest Educational Attainment In 2000, 37% of the 5 years old and over population (1,022,431) reported high school and 28% elementary as the highest educational attainment.. Around 5% had a college degree while 14.23% was classified college undergraduates. A smaller proportion (3%) of the population did not complete any grade level. Table No. G-17 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 5 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Caloocan City, 2000 HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

HH POPULATION 5 YRS. OLD & OVER

MALE

FEMALE

1,022,431

508,284

515,147

No Grade Completed

26,910

13,952

12,660

Pre-School

25,910

13,429

12,481

Elementary

285,683

141,717

143,966

High School

373,923

185,243

188,680

Post Secondary

50,738

26,115

24,623

College Undergraduate

145,458

73,267

72,191

Academic Degree Holder

54,235

24,813

29,422

Post Baccalaureate

4,606

2,090

2,516

Not Stated

55,266

27,658

27,608

Caloocan City

Figure No. G-12 HOUSEHOLD POPULATION 5 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Caloocan City, 2000

No Grade Completed Pre-School Elementary

200,000

High School

150,000

Post Secondary

100,000 50,000 0 Male

Female

College Undergraduate Academic Degree Holder P Post Baccalaureate Not Stated

Page 27

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

LAND USE Land use is a term provided herein to illustrate or describe specific use or predominant activity being permanently or temporarily undertaken within a defined land area and boundary. These land uses are believed to characterize the urban development trends and are formed as a result of socio-economic and political activities and decisions prevailing within an area. Likewise, land use patterns and distributions affect the general safety and quality of life of local residents in terms of their length and convenience of travels between one land use activity to another, susceptibility to air, water and noise pollution, environmental and sanitary conditions, the distribution of basic commodities and other variables relative thereto. South Caloocan is known for industries and commercial centers but based on its actual land use distribution, 63% of the total land area is residential use. Industrial use covers the next highest share of about 11%, followed by the commercial which is 7%. And only 7% are identified as vacant and urbanizable. North Caloocan has a different land use character from South Caloocan. Only 46% of its total land area are residential use, followed by a big share of 36% of vacant land. Only 4% of this total covers industrial use and a very small 0.4% for commercial use. Table No. G – 18 Comparative Land Area Distribution, Existing & Proposed Land Use, South Caloocan City, January 2003 Land Use

Existing Land Use Distribution - - 1990 Land Area

Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Utilities Agro-Industrial Cemetery Parks & Recreation Open Space Vacant Land PLAND TOTAL

819.80 95.10 96.00 47.00 53.90 64.94 4.70 181.06 1,362.50

Existing Land Use Distribution - - 2001

% Share 60.2% 7.0% 7.0% 3.4% 4.0% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.3% 13.3% 0.0% 100.0%

Land Area 682.55 201.97 218.53 60.21 42.62 2.08 64.937 1.28 88.32 1,362.50

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION SOUTH CALOOCAN CITY 1990

Parks & Open Space 0.34% Recreation 0.00%

Difference

% Increase

% Share 50.1% 14.8% 16.0% 4.4% 3.1% 0.2% 4.8% 0.1% 0.0% 6.5% 0.0% 100.0%

(137.25) 106.87 122.53 13.21 (11.28) 2.08 1.28 (4.70) (92.74) 0.00

-16.7% 112.4% 127.6% 28.1% -20.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -100.0% -51.2%

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION SOUTH CALOOCAN CITY 2001 Parks & Recreation 0.09%

Vacant Land 13.29%

Cemetery 4.77%

Cemetery 4.77%

Open Space 0.00%

Vacant Land 6.48%

Utilities 3.13%

Utilities 3.96% Institutional 4.42% Institutional 3.45% Industrial 7.05%

Commercial 6.98%

Industrial 16.04% Residential 50.10%

Residential 60.17% Commercial 14.82%

Figure No. G -13

Page 28

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Comparative Land Area Distribution, Existing & Proposed Land Use, North Caloocan City, January 2003 Existing Land Use Distribution - - 1990

Land Use

Land Area Residential

Existing Land Use Distribution - - 2001

% Share

Land Area

Difference

% Increase

% Share

1,775.70

44.7%

2,597.10

65.4%

821.40

46.3%

12.60

0.3%

47.72

1.2%

35.12

278.7%

154.10

3.9%

171.45

4.3%

17.35

11.30%

Institutional

49.20

1.2%

64.97

1.6%

15.77

32.1%

Utilities

57.70

1.5%

57.70

1.5%

-

0.0%

Agro-Industrial

33.60

0.8%

9.78

0.2%

(23.82)

-70.9%

Cemetery

22.90

0.6%

30.34

0.8%

7.44

32.5%

-

0.0%

9.77

0.2%

9.77

0.0%

Open Space

187.20

4.7%

-

0.0%

(187.20)

-100.0%

Vacant Land

1,677.90

42.3%

982.07

24.7%

(695.83)

-41.5%

PLAND

-

0.0%

-

0.0%

-

0.0%

TOTAL

3,970.90

100.0%

3,970.90

100.0%

-

Commercial Industrial

Parks & Recreation

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION NORTH CALOOCAN CITY 1990

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION NORTH CALOOCAN CITY 2001

Vacant Land 42.25%

Parks & Recreation 0.25%

Open Space 0.00%

Vacant Land 24.73%

Cemetery 0.76% Utilities 1.45%

Parks & Recreation 0.00%

Residential 44.72%

Open Space 4.71%

Cemetery 0.58%

Commercial 0.32%

Institutional 1.64% Industrial 4.32%

Utilities 1.45%

Commercial 1.20%

Industrial 3.88% Institutional 1.24%

Page 29

Residential 65.40%

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

2008 -2013

Comparative Land Area Distribution, Existing & Proposed Land Use, North and South Caloocan City, January 2003 Existing Land Use Distribution - - 1990

Land Use

Land Area Residential

Existing Land Use Distribution - - 2001

% Share

Land Area

Difference

% Increase

% Share

2,595.50

48.7%

3,279.65

1.15%

684.15

26.4%

Commercial

107.70

2.0%

249.69

4.7%

141.99

131.8%

Industrial

250.10

4.7%

389.97

7.3%

139.87

55.9%

96.20

1.8%

125.19

2.3%

28.99

30.1%

111.60

2.1%

100.32

1.9%

(11.28)

-10.1%

Agro-Industrial

33.60

0.6%

11.86

0.2%

(21.74)

-64.7%

Cemetery

87.84

1.6%

95.28

1.8%

7.44

8.5%

-

0.0%

11.06

0.2%

11.06

0.0%

Open Space

191.90

3.6%

-

0.0%

(191.90)

0.0%

Vacant Land

1,858.96

34.9%

1,070.39

20.1%

(788.57)

-42.4%

PLAND

-

0.0%

-

0.0%

-

0.0

TOTAL

5,333.40

100.0%

5.333.40

100.0%

0.00

Institutional Utilities

Parks & Recreation

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION NORTH AND SOUTH CALOOCAN CITY 1990

EXISTING LAND USE DISTRIBUTION NORTH AND SOUTH CALOOCAN CITY 2001

Vacant Land 34.86% Parks & Recreation 0.00%

Parks & Recreation 0.21%

Open Space 0.00%

Vacant Land 20.07%

Cemetery 1.79% Utilities 1.88% Open Space 3.60%

Institutional 2.35% Residential 48.67%

Cemetery 1.65% Utilities 2.09%

Institutional 1.80%

Commercial 2.02%

Industrial 7.31% Commercial 4.68%

Industrial 4.69%

Page 30

Residential 61.49%

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

Map No. G - 10

Page 31

2008 -2013

CALOOCAN CITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE

EXISTING LAND USE MAP NORTH CALOOCAN CITY

Map No. G - 11

Page 32

2008 -2013