Hydrocarbon Processing - RENTECH

Heat Recovery Steam Generators | Waste Heat Boilers | Fired Packaged Watertube Boilers | Specialty Boilers

We’ve been around awhile.

The RENTECH team has

a heap of experience – a total of more than 3,000 years – making boilers that operate efficiently and safely on six continents. Our formula has been tested and perfected so you can be assured that a boiler from RENTECH will perform reliably and earn your trust. So don’t be tempted to saddle up with a greenhorn; insist that your boiler be built Texas-tough by the skilled people at RENTECH.

WWW.RENTECHBOILERS.COM

BOILERS FOR PEOPLE WHO KNOW AND CARE

Select 58 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

MAY 2011

HPIMPACT

SPECIALREPORT

TECHNOLOGY

HPI recovery underway

MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY

Design exchangers for ‘dirty’ service

Advanced materials and programs protect critical assets

Improve design of closed-drain drums

Biodegradable polymers CAFE could boost US auto profits

www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com

O U R

E N G I N E E R I N G

AT

R E N T E C H

C R E AT E S

RENTECH Boiler Services specializes in engineered repairs, rebuilds and upgrades of industrial boilers using headered membrane waterwall design. We retrofit any style of boiler, making RENTECH your one-source boiler company. Our work meets NBIC and ASME standards. To reduce operating costs, eliminate shutdowns, allow faster start-up and cool-down, and reduce emissions, call for personal service from RENTECH Boiler Services. Select 58 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

RENTECH

Boiler Services, Inc.

For more information, email us at [email protected] visit us online at WWW.RENTECHSERVICES.COM or call us at 325.672.2900

MAY 2011 • VOL. 90 NO. 5 www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com

SPECIAL REPORT: MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY

41

Consider new developments in antifouling coatings for rotating equipment Innovative materials and applications protect critical centrifugal compressors and steam turbines from erosion and corrosion P. Dowson

45 49 55

Deferred maintenance causes upsurge in pump failures Not addressing the root cause of a failure puts resources and employees at risk H. P. Bloch

Avoid costly engineering faults, missteps and miscalculations Experience does count, especially in achieving success in capital and revamp projects K. Sanghavi

Nickel recycle: Extending service life for reformer tubes Case studies investigate methods to conserve high-nickel tubes for fertilizer facilities S. B. Kunte

61

Consider new materials for ethylene furnace applications

65

Testing and repair options for critical dry-gas seal: Updates

71

How to justify root-cause failure analysis for pumps

75

Spiral heat exchanger in desalter service solves fouling issues

79

Optimize reordering of critical raw materials and parts

An innovative metallurgy solves maintenance issues G. Verdier and F. Carpentier Do your research when sending compressor seals out for renovations C. Carmody New method uses annualized risk to determine RCFA analysis levels R. X. Perez Technology offers problem-free operation along with considerable maintenance savings C. Wajciechowski New models evaluate the ‘total’ costs in receiving and storing materials for a refinery A. Goti, N. Zabaleta, A. Garcia, M. Ortega and J. Uradnicek

HEAT TRANSFER

83

Cover Tray-Tec, Inc. craftsmen installing a random packing holddown grid in a 46’ diameter Vacuum tower for a major refining company in the Texas City area. Also in this Vacuum tower Tray-Tec installed new internals, including 13,000 cuft of random packing, grid packing and performed variousvessel repairs, including weld metal build-up in thinned areas and replaced the bottom boot section. During this turnaround Tray-Tec also performed repairs and maintenance on numerous towers, reactors and drums including a 21’ diameter Atmospheric tower. Tray-Tec, Inc. is based in Humble, Texas, and performs vessel mechanical services for the refining, chemical, and gas industries across the United States. Photo courtesy of Tray-Tec, Inc.

HPIMPACT 17

HPI recovery underway despite uncertainty

17

Small-scale chemistry could improve biodegradable polymers

19

US auto industry could boost profits with higher mileage standards

Update on designing for high-fouling liquids A critical analysis of shell and tube exchanger systems looks at ‘clean and dirty’ service performance J. M. Nesta and C. A. Coutinho

GAS PROCESSING

87

Is your antifoam compatible with the amine system? Several options help minimize operation costs and mitigate unscheduled shutdowns A. Atash Jameh, A. Z. Gharaghoosh, S. Mokhatab and A. G. Shazadeh

COLUMNS

SULFUR 2011—SUPPLEMENT

95

Sulfur 2011

9

HPIN RELIABILITY Consider ‘water washing’ for steam turbines

11

HPIN EUROPE Biofuels audience warms to advocate for third industrial revolution

13

HPIN ASSOCIATIONS The era of the integrated oil company has passed

Innovation will play a key role in managing sulfur compounds

LOSS PREVENTION

107

Review unit-wide impacts on closed-drain drums API 521 standard helps decipher the correct operating pressure for this system R. Mukhopadhyay, Consultant, Bangkok, Thailand

PROCESS DESIGN

113

Design an efficient exchanger network Advanced heat integration and pinch technology reduces energy consumption F. Rikhtehgar

ENGINEERING CASE HISTORIES

117

Case 62: Useful shaft stress equations to remember Committing several equations to memory can be useful T. Sofronas

DEPARTMENTS 7 HPIN BRIEF • 25 HPINNOVATIONS • 31 HPIN CONSTRUCTION 38 HPI CONSTRUCTION BOXSCORE UPDATE 118 HPI MARKETPLACE • 121 ADVERTISER INDEX

122 HPIN WATER MANAGEMENT Legionella—to test or not to test?

www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com

Houston Office: 2 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1020, Houston, Texas, 77046 USA Mailing Address: P. O. Box 2608, Houston, Texas 77252-2608, USA Phone: +1 (713) 529-4301, Fax: +1 (713) 520-4433 E-mail: [email protected] www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com

MAGAZINE PRODUCTION Director—Production and Operations Sheryl Stone Manager—Editorial Production Angela Bathe Artist/Illustrator David Weeks Manager—Advertising Production Cheryl Willis

Publisher Bill Wageneck [email protected] EDITORIAL Editor Stephany Romanow Process Editor Tricia Crossey Reliability/Equipment Editor Heinz P. Bloch Technical Editor Billy Thinnes Online Editor Ben DuBose

ADVERTISING SALES See Sales Offices page 120.

Associate Editor Helen Meche European Editor Tim Lloyd Wright Contributing Editor Loraine A. Huchler Contributing Editor William M. Goble Contributing Editor Y. Zak Friedman Contributing Editor ARC Advisory Group

CIRCULATION +1 (713) 520-4440 Director—Circulation Suzanne McGehee E-mail [email protected] SUBSCRIPTIONS

BURNDY® Engineered System

Hitting the Mark With Safe and Easy Installation ®

®

The BURNDY HYGROUND irreversible compression grounding system’s safety features anchor this costeffective and time-efficient grounding method. s )NSTALLATIONDOESNOT require drilling, tapping or welding, or produce heat, smoke or fumes— no hot work permit required! s !NINDUSTRYRECOGNIZED die embossment system quickly confirms the proper connector, tool and installation die were used meeting UL467, #3! AND)%%% s ( 9'2/5.$ compression connections can be made in just three minutes— even in rain, wind or snow. ®

There is no substitute for the BURNDY system. Why take the risk with anyone else?

Subscription price (includes both print and digital versions): United States and Canada, one year $199, two years $359, three years $469. Outside USA and Canada, one year $239, two years $419, three years $539, digital format one year $199. Airmail rate outside North America $175 additional a year. Single copies $25, prepaid. Because Hydrocarbon Processing is edited specifically to be of greatest value to people working in this specialized business, subscriptions are restricted to those engaged in the hydrocarbon processing industry, or service and supply company personnel connected thereto. Hydrocarbon Processing is indexed by Applied Science & Tech nology Index, by Chemical Abstracts and by Engineering Index Inc. Microfilm copies available through University Microfilms, International, Ann Arbor, Mich. The full text of Hydrocarbon Processing is also available in electronic versions of the Business Periodicals Index. ARTICLE REPRINTS

If you would like to have a recent article reprinted for an upcoming conference or for use as a marketing tool, contact Foster Printing Company for a price quote. Articles are reprinted on quality stock with advertisements removed; options are available for covers and turnaround times. Our minimum order is a quantity of 100. For more information about article reprints, call Rhonda Brown with Foster Printing Company at +1 (866) 879-9144 ext 194 or e-mail [email protected]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING (ISSN 0018-8190) is published monthly by Gulf Publishing Co., 2 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1020, Houston, Texas 77046. Periodicals postage paid at Houston, Texas, and at additional mailing office. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Hydrocarbon Processing, P.O. Box 2608, Houston, Texas 77252. Copyright © 2011 by Gulf Publishing Co. All rights reserved. Permission is granted by the copyright owner to libraries and others registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) to photocopy any articles herein for the base fee of $3 per copy per page. Payment should be sent directly to the CCC, 21 Congress St., Salem, Mass. 01970. Copying for other than personal or internal reference use without express permission is prohibited. Requests for special permission or bulk orders should be addressed to the Editor. ISSN 0018-8190/01. www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com

®

Experience. Technology. Answers.

TM

GULF PUBLISHING COMPANY

© 2011 BURNDY LLC

John Royall, President/CEO Ron Higgins, Vice President Pamela Harvey, Business Finance Manager Part of Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.

1-800-346-4175 USA | 1-603-647-5299 International | 1-800-387-6487 Canada 011-52-722-265-4400 Mexico | 011-55-11-5515-7200 Brazil | www.burndy.com

Other energy group titles include: World Oil® Petroleum Economist Publication Agreement Number 40034765

Printed in U.S.A Select 151 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS 4

YOUR GLOBAL GASKET PROVIDER

ANOTHER REASON WHY YOU DON’T GOLF IN

°C 450 WEATHER.

Graphite oxidizes at high temps. So gaskets made with graphite ®

deteriorate as well. Thermiculite , the revolutionary sealing material from Flexitallic, maintains its integrity up to 982º C. Preventing leakage and the loss of bolt load that can be so costly— and ultimately dangerous. Replace your graphite gaskets. It will cut your handicap. Visit: www.flexitallic.com, or call us at USA: 1.281.604.2400; UK: +44(0) 1274 851273.

Select 93 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

We didn’t invent the compressor.

We’re perfecting it. Ariel Corporation 35 Blackjack Road Mount Vernon, OH 43050 www.arielcorp.com

Visit us at:

MIOGE June 21-24 • Moscow, Russia

Turbomachinery Symposium September 12-15 • Houston, TX Select 76 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Gas Machinery Conference October 2-5 • Nashville, TN

HPIN BRIEF BILLY THINNES, TECHNICAL EDITOR

[email protected]

Dow Global Technologies (DGT) has announced the invention and development of a new, high-molecular-weight brominated polymeric flame retardant (PFR). The PFR is expected to be the “next-generation industry-standard” flame retardant for use in both extruded polystyrene (XPS) and expanded polystyrene (EPS) foaminsulation applications globally. The development of the new PFR is the result of Dow’s continuing search for more sustainable products and, in this case, for a flame retardant that can replace hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). DGT also announced its first license agreement with Chemtura Corp. This first license agreement makes it possible for Great Lakes Solutions, a Chemtura business, to produce and sell the newly developed PFR for use in XPS and EPS foam.

A poll released in April shows that 90% of Americans believe the nation’s petroleum refineries and petrochemical manufacturing plants are among America’s “most important” or “important” industries. NPRA, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, announced results of the poll conducted by Opinion Research. A total of 44% of Americans believe the refining and petrochemical sectors are “among the country’s most important industries,” while 46% consider the sector “among the country’s important industries,” the poll found. Only 5% of those surveyed said the refining and petrochemical sectors were “not among the country’s important industries” and the remaining 5% said they did not know.

The board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the US has voted to grant preliminary approval for a $2.84 billion direct loan/loan guarantee to Colombia’s Refinería de Cartagena S.A. (Reficar). The financing, when finally approved, will support the purchases of equipment and services from over 150 large and small US engineering/design, equipment supply, contracting and process license firms, including Chicago Bridge & Iron, Foster Wheeler, ExxonMobil and UOP. This is part of a $5.18 billion refinery and upgrade project in Cartagena, Colombia, supplying petroleum products to the domestic and export markets.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will require electronic submissions for new chemical notices under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Beginning last month, companies can no longer submit their new chemical notices and support documents on paper for the EPA’s review. On April 6, 2010, the EPA issued a final rule that put in place a two-year phaseout of paper and optical-disc reporting for new chemical notices to the agency. The rule included a one-year phaseout of paper reporting and a two-year phaseout of optical-disc reporting. Under TSCA, companies are required to submit new chemical notices, including pre-manufacture notices (PMNs), to the EPA at least 90 days (in the case of PMNs) prior to the manufacture or import of the chemical. The EPA reviews the notice and can set conditions to be placed on the use of a new chemical before it enters into commerce.

Marking the one year anniversary of the tragic accident at the Tesoro refinery in Anacortes, Washington, the US Chemical Safety Board (CSB) released a video safety message in which Chairperson Rafael Moure-Eraso urged refinery companies to “make the investments necessary to ensure safe operations.” The video highlighted the CSB’s ongoing investigation into the April 2, 2010, accident that killed seven workers. At the time of the incident, a heat exchanger was being brought online when the nearly 40-year-old piece of equipment catastrophically failed, spewing highly flammable hydrogen and naphtha that ignited and exploded. Tesoro disputes the findings of the CSB. Company spokesperson Mike Marcy said in a statement that, “We disagree with the chairman’s characterization of Tesoro’s operations at Anacortes. The heat exchanger was maintained and inspected in accordance with regulations and industry standards. We continue to cooperate with the CSB.” HP

■ BASF foam insulating LNG pipes in Korea BASF’s specialty foam Basotect is now, for the first time, being used to insulate pipes in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) tank terminal in Gwangyang, Korea. The pipe cover with Basotect provides energy-efficient thermal insulation, easy handling and flame retardancy. LNG is natural gas that is temporarily liquefied at very low temperatures, in order to transport or store it more easily. As the temperature of LNG must be kept below –162°C, efficient insulation for the pipes is necessary. According to SKI Insulation, the system supplier of the removable insulation cover, the pipe cover made from Basotect is more energy-efficient as it is 20% thinner than conventional foam insulation. “Basotect shows a high degree of stability at low temperatures. In laboratory tests even at temperatures of around –200°C the material retains its properties. The high degree of elasticity and the thermal insulation capacity of the foam remain unaffected, in contrast to conventional foam insulation, which becomes brittle when exposed to such extreme cold,” said Dr. Peter Wolf, head of Global Business Management Basotect at BASF. SKI Insulation discovered that the system material with the lightweight and flexible BASF foam can be easily removed for regular inspection of pipe integrity and later reused, unlike rigid conventional foams that are hard to replace. This translates into reduced maintenance costs. Additionally, Basotect is a highly flame-retardant material, another key consideration for SKI Insulation, as natural gas burns easily. Basotect is an open-cell foam and it has a unique range of properties. The base material makes it flame-retardant; it can be used at up to 240°C while retaining its properties over a wide temperature range. Because of its open-cell foam structure, it is light (9 g/l), sound-absorbing, flexible even at low temperatures and thermally insulating. HP HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I7

GE Power & Water Water & Process Technologies

Meeting your challenges head on As the global economy slowly recovers, refiners can expect to see a positive shift in the demand for finished petroleum products in mature markets and growing, developing regions. Now more than ever, GE’s advanced treatment technologies, monitoring tools, and unmatched domain expertise for the hydrocarbon process industries provide a variety of solutions to help our customers find new ways to solve their toughest challenges. For more information, contact your local GE representative or visit www.gewater.com

Phase Separation

Corrosion Inhibitors

Embreak* demulsifier technology improves desalter performance and efficiency, maximize crude throughput and reduce fuel gas consumption.

LoSALT* and pHilmPLUS* minimize corrosion in critical production units and extend equipment life, maintaining throughput and increase operational flexibility.

Antifoulants

Finished Fuels

Our Thermoflo* chemistry, engineering expertise, and Heat-Rate Pro software provide a state-of the-art antifoulant treatment program.

ProSweet*, SpecAid* and ActNow* products help ensure refined fuels and other hydrocarbons meet required specifications and improve final product quality.

* Denotes a trademark of General Electric Company.

Select 86 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

HPIN RELIABILITY HEINZ P. BLOCH, RELIABILITY/EQUIPMENT EDITOR [email protected]

Consider ‘water washing’ for steam turbines Occasions may arise when deposits form on the internal parts of steam turbines. The accumulation of these deposits may be indicated by a gradual increase in stage pressures over time with no evidence of vibration, rubbing or other distress. Such deposits have a marked detrimental effect on turbine efficiency and capacity. When deposits cause extensive plugging, thrust-bearing failure, wheel rubbing and other serious problems can result.

Boiler stop valve Boiler

Water washing. Turbine washing at full speed (onstream

cleaning) can be and has been successfully used on many mechanical-drive steam turbines. Considerable hazards are possible with water-washing methods, and full-speed washing is more hazardous than washing at reduced speed. But this can be accomplished, provided great care and judgment are exercised. While we know of no steam turbine manufacturer who would guarantee the safety of turbines for any washing cycle, capable manufacturers recognize that deposits do occur. They will, therefore, help operators as much as possible in dealing with such problems until effective prevention is established. Saturated steam washing by water injection is the conventional and well-tried method of removing water-soluble deposits from turbines. The amount and rate of superheat to be removed and the steam flow required for operation determine the waterinjection rate. Injecting large quantities of liquid (such as may be required on process drivers) creates potential problems. The nature of a typical impulse turbine lends itself to fullspeed water washing. Axial clearances between first-stage buckets and nozzles and between moving buckets and diaphragms will range from 0.050 in. to 0.090 in. The typical NiResist labyrinth packing radial clearance when the unit is cold will be approximately 0.007 in. The labyrinth will seal on the shaft only; the moving blades will not require seals. With impulse turbines, these

Governor valves Turbine

Water-steam mixer

Deposit types. Deposits are classified as water insoluble and

water soluble. The characteristics of these deposits should be determined by analyzing samples, and corrective measures should be taken to eliminate such deposits during future operation. When it has been determined that deposits have formed on the internal parts of the turbine, three methods may be applied to remove the deposits: 1. Turbine shutdown, casing opened and deposits removed manually 2. Turbine shutdown and allowed to cool; the deposits crack off due to temperature changes 3. Online water washing (while running), essentially removing water-soluble deposits. Plant operating conditions will dictate which method is best in restoring the turbine to optimum performance. In a generatordrive service, shutting down the unit or water washing at low speed and reduced load may create minimum plant upset.

T&T Recording valve thermometer

Feedwater

Driven machine

Exhaust steam to drain

Turbine speed held at approximate 500 rpm by adjusting steam and water flow with these valves

FIG. 1

Flow diagram of low-speed water-wash system.

liberal clearances help minimize hazards associated with water washing. Nevertheless, numerous reaction turbines have also been successfully water washed. Water injection is accomplished by a piping arrangement for atomization and injecting water into the steam supply , thus ensuring a gradual and uniform reduction in temperature of the turbine-inlet steam until it reaches 10°F to 15°F superheat. It is probably a safe rule that the temperature should not be reduced faster than 25°F in 15 minutes or 100°F/h. Fig. 1 shows suggested piping arrangements for admission of water and steam, and a simple assembly of fabricated pipes to form a desuperheater can be found in the text reference. Failure of water injection pumps presents a great hazard, especially at maximum injection rates. To guard against pump failure, untreated boiler feedwater is used since these pumps are usually the most reliable. If plant operating conditions allow, the vacuum on a condensing turbine should be reduced to 5 mmHg to 10 mmHg. For non-condensing turbines, the exhaust pressure should be reduced to atmospheric pressure. Note: On any non-condensing unit requiring full-speed washing, the manufacturer should be consulted about minimum allowable exhaust pressures. Extraction turbines should be operated with the extraction line shutoff. A steam gauge and thermometer should be installed between the trip-throttle valve and governor-controlled valves. The thermometer should be a recording type and be very responsive to small changes in temperature. Low-speed wash (see Fig. 1) represents a well-understood method for deposit removal. HP The author is Hydrocarbon Processing’s Reliability/Equipment Editor. A practicing consulting engineer with close to 50 years of applicable experience, he advises process plants worldwide on failure analysis, reliability improvement and maintenance cost-avoidance topics. This excerpt is taken from Bloch, H. P. and Dr. M. P. Singh, Steam Turbines: Design, Applications and Re-Rating, 2nd Ed., 2009, McGraw-Hill, New York. The original material was contributed by Dresser-Rand Co.

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I9

emirates.com/usa

When flying to Dubai, I enjoy QThe “me time” during

long layovers. QThe convenience of two

non-stop flights a day. More flights. More flexibility. Non-stop Houston to Dubai. Twice daily. When you fly Emirates from Houston, you have the choice of a midday or evening non-stop flight, and the ease of faster connections in Dubai. After all, the only thing better than enjoying an exceptional flying experience is enjoying it on your schedule. Discover more at emirates.com/usa or contact your travel professional.

Fly Emirates. Keep discovering. Select 80 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Over 400 international awards including Air Transport World 2011 Airline of the Year. Discover frequent flyer benefits at skywards.com

HPIN EUROPE TIM LLOYD WRIGHT, EUROPEAN EDITOR [email protected]

Biofuels audience warms to advocate for third industrial revolution Here is a thesis on energy that’s being expounded at the heart of European policy-making these days: Thirty years after peak oil per capita and at the apex of peak globalization, the machines and infrastructure of the oil age are on life support. Oil prices will not edge over $150/bbl without turning off the engine of global growth, as they did in 2008. But, there is an alternative—a third industrial revolution. So says the US author and polemicist, Jeremy Rifkin, who is something of a controversial figure back home in the US. He’s been outspoken long, and loudly, enough to have his detractors. I might hesitate to give space to him in this editorial here if his ideas weren’t influential in reshaping European policy making. A new herald. Rifkin, the president of a Washington, DC,

think tank, and a fellow and lecturer at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, spoke at the World Biofuels Markets conference in Rotterdam. He is a natural choice for this event. Rifkin professes optimism grounded in pessimism, one might say. According to Rifkin, oil has peaked; the atmosphere is in big trouble; and nuclear is finished. No surprise then that a speech with those premises would pep up the European biofuels industry. For added impact, the delivery is that of a big-screen prosecutor pressing home his case in a courtroom drama. But starched collars and deftly handled statistics aside, Rifkin’s talk of an energy revolution has been influential. Indeed, a version officially adopted by the European Parliament has been formative in policies that are even now powering the biofuels industry, and a raft of other sustainability initiatives across Europe. It is striking that, at this well-attended event, there were more engineers, operators and vendors than attend Europe’s largest oil refining conference. And they pay slightly more to do so as well. After the plenary, during coffee, members of this industry actually seem pepped up. Two years ago, the biofuels industry was being blamed for food riots in Mexico and was seeing credit evaporate during the financial rash. A year ago, biodiesel plants were by some accounts being driven out of business by US “splash and dash” exports of 99% biodiesel blends. But the big reason that they’re in a more buoyant and conference-going mood this year is because European policy-making on renewables is really taking hold! When a recent initiative to introduce a 10% blend of bio-ethanol into gasoline was bungled in Germany this winter, it wasn’t just a blow to ethanol producers. The oil companies distributing transportation fuels in Germany could face two or three hundred million euros in fines if they’re found short of their blending obligations by the year end. They can be fined 62 eurocents for each mandated liter that goes unburned (US $3.33/US gal) in German vehicles this year.

Crisis in the making. Rifkin begins his keynote speech by outlining two crises. The first problem is peak oil per capita. We’re in an end game, he tells delegates, because our energy reserves have not been measured against the benchmark of massive population growth. “When China and India made a bid at a 8%–10% growth rate,” he says, “raking one third of the human race into the game in 10 years, the aggregate output and demand against reserves pushed the price up and the global economy collapsed at $150/bbl.” Our first major problem, he claims, is that our oil-driven engine of economic growth won’t work at prices above that threshold. The second problem is what he calls the entropy bill for the first two industrial revolutions: “This is not a metaphor…it’s spent energy. We’ve exhumed too much carbon and we’re not getting enough sunlight off the planet. So we’ve hit peak globalization with $147/bbl, and we’re now paying an entropy bill for 200 years of the industrial revolution and we’re also facing a mass extinction event because of global warming in this century, so what do we do?” Policy. Rifkin is credited with helping to form the European energy strategy that he goes on to describe. One point is that renewable energy will provide a third of European electricity production (20% of energy) by 2020. Approximately 191 million buildings will be partially repurposed to generate power, and a supergrid technology learned from distributive computing will provide a nervous system to the new infrastructure. It will, in time, displace what he calls elite, centralized technologies like oil, gas and nuclear. He names €8 billion of investment into energy storage, largely using hydrogen, to provide base-load generation, when the wind isn’t blowing and the sun isn’t shining. Preparing for change. And as a young generation turns to distributed and collaborative ways of solving energy problems, Rifkin draws parallels between the fossil fuel industry and other 20th century ones, which will need to adapt or end. “The music companies just didn’t understand file sharing,” he says. “When millions of kids started file sharing music, they laughed. They tried to legislate against it; then they went out of business, within five years. Encyclopedia Britannica didn’t understand Wikipedia, now Wikipedia rules.” HP

The author is HP’s European Editor and is also a specialist in European distillate markets. He has been active as a reporter and conference chair in the European downstream industry since 1997, before which he was a feature writer and reporter for the UK broadsheet press and BBC radio. Mr. Wright lives in Sweden and is the founder of a local climate and sustainability initiative. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 11

Select 54 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

HPIN ASSOCIATIONS BILLY THINNES, TECHNICAL EDITOR

[email protected]

The era of the integrated oil company has passed The National Petrochemical and Refiners Association (NPRA) gathered in San Antonio, Texas, for its 109th annual meeting in March. Key points of conversation included the ongoing battle with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), possible discriminatory tax treatment toward downstream oil companies from the US federal government and the status of energy policy in the US. Keynote speakers included former US Senator Alan Simpson (R-WY), journalist Robert Bryce, PBF Energy Chairman Tom O’Malley and television personalities Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski.

be drilled the future. He wonders why Brazil is drilling deep wells now but the US has stopped drilling completely. Mr. Klesse also expressed concern about the EPA’s regulation of GHGs under the Clean Air Act. The way it appears the agency would go about such regulation would mean that in order for Valero to expand a refinery, it would take 18–24 months just to get a permit. He thinks that would have a crippling effect on the US economy, on output of refined products domestically and most importantly, on energy prices for the US consumer.

EPA and GHGs. The NPRA supports the Upton-Inhofe legislation which says the EPA does not have the authority to regulate greenhouse gases (GHGs) under the Clean Air Act. Another bill that is in Congress, penned by Senator Rockefeller (D-WV) would delay implementation of EPA’s GHG regulation for two years. While Mr. Drevna thinks two years is better than immediately, he wonders what happens two years from now? He thinks the GHG and climate change debate won’t change much two years from now and that using the Rockefeller bill is more like a stay of execution than an actual solution.

Strategic petroleum reserve.

US energy policy. The US’ current

The future. Mr. Klesse looked to the

With the price of oil on the rise recently, some politicians and pundits have called

energy policy, or lack thereof, has been a hot topic of conversation in Washington among both industry types and environmentalists. Bill Klesse, of Valero, who is serving as the NPRA’s board chairman, and NPRA President Charlie Drevna spoke about this and other subjects in a press conference with reporters at the meeting. “We have an energy policy that is no policy at all,” Mr. Drevna said. “The government manages from crisis to crisis rather than having a crisis management program. For instance, a town or city doesn’t wait until there is a fire to organize the fire department. We shouldn’t wait until the next crisis to develop a real energy program.” While Mr. Drevna is keen for the US to develop and implement a rational and fair energy policy based on sound science and pragmatic perspectives, he does not see that happening anytime soon. “Long term, I don’t see any grand energy policy coming out of this Congress, at least during the first session,” Mr. Drevna said. “We do need an energy policy that makes sense but it is going to be very difficult to get anything through this Congress. Not because we have a Republican House and a Democratic Senate, but because the deficit debate is going on and resolving that is front and center.”

future, taking the position that the world is going to use more energy as the standard of living in places like India and China continues to go up. He further acknowledged that, while the Macondo well explosion in the Gulf of Mexico was a tragedy, it should be remembered that the oil industry had drilled 14,000 wells before that without incident. This line of thought led Mr. Klesse to comment that President Obama visited Brazil, a place where deepwater drilling is occurring and more deepwater wells will

Tom O’Malley meets with reporters after his speech at the industry leadership breakfast.

The NPRA’s 109th annual meeting took place in San Antonio, Texas.

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 13

HPIN ASSOCIATIONS for tapping into the US’ strategic petroleum reserve (SPR). The NPRA’s position has always been that it should only be tapped into when there is a supply shortage, which is not the case today. Using the SPR as a price control mechanism is not good public policy and it is something the NPRA does not support. Mr. Drevna pointed out that even President Obama is against tapping into the SPR. Over capacity. On the subject of the

long term need to reduce overall refining capacity in the US and the world, Mr. Klesse offered a distinctive perspective. “I believe there is still excess refining capacity in Japan [despite the recent disaster], North America and Western Europe,” he said. “You can tell by looking at operating rates. In the world, refining capacity is going to continue to be built and oil demand is going to continue to increase. In 2020, this is going to be a 95–100 million bpd business.” As an aside to Mr. Klesse’s remarks, it should be noted that EIA reported that 72.2 million bpd was produced in 2009. On the subject of refining margins and refinery closures, Mr. Klesse noted that Valero had shuttered a refinery recently and sold it to another company. He pointed out that refineries have been shut down in the US, Canada and Europe. “When you look at the distribution in these markets, you see refineries that over time cannot compete in this environment,” he said. “Rationalization will continue to occur. However, with a cold winter and refinery upsets in many markets, margins have been better in regional markets. But not all refineries are benefitting in this environment.” Integrated oil companies. During

an industry breakfast at the event, PBF Energy Chairman Tom O’Malley shared his belief that the era of the integrated oil company has passed. Mr. O’Malley first entered the industry in 1984 when he purchased Hill Petroleum for $3 million. He noted that, in 1984, the refining industry was dominated by integrated companies both upstream and downstream. For instance, in 1984, integrated companies controlled about 84% of the refining capacity. What is shocking about how much the industry has changed is that, by the end of 2010, 14

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

integrated companies controlled only 41% of capacity. “This is an incredible drop,” Mr. O’Malley said. “But it is clear the era of integration has passed. Integration was developed when you couldn’t sell all your crude. It came out of an era pre-1973 when crude was $2 a barrel and oil companies needed to find a home for their production.” Mr. O’Malley expects the trend of integrated companies exiting the refining business to continue. “To some extent, refining has been a lousy business,” Mr. O’Malley said. “This trend will continue and we will be below 25% integrated companies soon, as merchant refining will gravitate to non-integrated companies. This shift in manufacturing is just specialization; we’ve seen it in every other industry, so why not ours?” Retail business. Mr. O’Malley said that integrated companies are also leaving the retail business. Is refining and marketing within one company a good business strategy? When he was at Tosco, the company acquired Circle K and ran about 2,500 retail sites and 2,500 branded sites. “The business at Circle K wasn’t about selling gasoline, it was about convenience,” he said. “The best stores were not operated by oil companies but rather by retailers. The retailers saw gasoline as a necessary part of business, but not their reason for existence.” The central message is that specialization is the way to go. Mr. O’Malley advises that if a company is in refining it should not go into retail and vice versa. “We’ve morphed over the past few years from an integrated model to the disintegrated model,” he said. “Specialization is the buy word for the future.” Rate of return. Investment banks have

tried to calculate rate of return on the HPI for many years, Mr. O’Malley said. His research has revealed that the common rate is 2% per year over the last 20 years, which is not a reasonable investment. Underscoring the difficulty of being a refiner in this era of razor thin margins, Mr. O’Malley said, “If you buy at the right price and manage your business correctly, you can make money on some, but not all, of the assets in the marketplace. For instance, the Northeast system

[two refineries] we bought from Valero is a heavy system and we believe that the heavy/sour barrel discount is going to work out for us. The synergies between these two plants should allow us to work very well.” What’s going to happen? According to Mr. O’Malley, the best summary from an analytical point of view was a study by Turner Mason released at the beginning of 2011. In the next 15 years, the study said the world is going to consume another 20 million bpd of oil products. It further clarified that Europe and the US are not a part of the growth factor. There will be a tightening of capacity between now and 2020. It should also be noted that these projections were preJapan earthquake/tsunami, which will certainly enhance oil product consumption worldwide. Petrochemical Conference. The

week following its annual meeting, the NPRA hosted another conference in San Antonio. The International Petrochemical Conference (IPC) was attended by nearly 2,800 people working in the petrochemical sector from over 45 nations. “In the United States, prospects for growth and development are strengthened by the potential additional supply of tremendous natural resources right in our own back yard,” Mr. Drevna said in a statement from the IPC. “The natural gas reserves of the Marcellus Shale formation in the northeastern US, the Texas Eagle Ford reserves and the Rocky Mountain formations could sustain and grow not just the petrochemical industry, but manufacturing in general and the American economy as a whole—if they’re developed properly.” NPRA Petrochemical Committee Chairman Jeff Ramsey, who is senior vice president for refining and chemicals marketing at Flint Hills Resources, also spoke at the opening session. Honn Tudor, senior manager commercial at Total Petrochemicals, presided over the conference. Outside speakers at the IPC included: Brian Habacivch, senior vice president of Fellon-McCord, an energy consulting and management company; and Fox Business anchor John Stossel. The IPC featured discussions of key governmental, economic and environmental issues affecting petrochemical manufacturing. HP

JOHNSON SCREENS : ®

TRUSTED NAME, TRUSTED QUALITY

Trusted Experience in Inspection, Installation and Maintenance From problem detection to recommissioning of the reactor, Johnson Screens® åeld serWice team comes with a wealth of knowledge and experience applicable to numerous applications:

Trouble doesnnt usuallZ giWe adWance warning The moment something goes wrong, Waluable productiWitZ is lost EWerZ minute costs more and more, so speed is critical

q 1roKect engineering assistance for reWamping or upgrading

q Johnson Screensn åeld engineers can be onsite within  hours of an emergencZ

q Technical assistance when damage on reactor internals) is found or assumed

q Upon arriWal, a damage assessment and recommendation report will be generated within 12 hours of the inspection

q Internal expertise after catalZst unloading q 0nsite installation of Johnson Screensn products q SuperWision of contractorns installation

q Johnson Screensn worldwide manufacturing capabilities and purchasing power mean that all necessarZ materials can be deliWered to the production facilities with no wasted time

A 8eatherford $ompanZ AUSTRALIA  ASIA 1A$IFI$ TEL: +61 7 3867 5555 salesasiapaciåc!Kohnsonscreenscom

EUR01E  MIDDLE EAST  AFRI$A TEL: +33 )5 2 16 saleseurope!Kohnsonscreenscom

N0RT), S0UT)  $ENTRAL AMERI$A TEL: +1 651 636 3 salesamerica!Kohnsonscreenscom

wwwKohnsonscreenscom Select 90 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

JA1AN TEL: +81 55 7 8511 salesKpn!KohnsonscreenscoKp

We help the environment and refineries grow together. Refineries have to exploit oil resources more efficiently than ever. At the same time, they also have to protect the environment. These two aspects frequently represent considerable obstacles that must be overcome. This is possible with the right combination of expertise and matching processes. We understand refineries in all their complexity. We know their mass flows, their energy balances. We command technologies for optimal desulfurization and fuel upgrading – with a much deeper conversion than before. As you can see, with Lurgi, you can combine what are increasingly perceived as two sides of the same coin: efficiency and environmental protection.

Build on our technologies. Call us: +49 (0) 69 58 08-0 www.lurgi.com

1158_e

A member of the Air Liquide Group

Select 61 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

HPIMPACT BILLY THINNES, TECHNICAL EDITOR

[email protected]

HPI recovery underway despite uncertainty Purvin & Gertz recently released its global petroleum market outlook for 2011. The study provides an analysis of global and regional markets for crude oil and refined products within a framework of world energy demand and economic activity through 2030. The conclusion of the report is that a global economic recovery is well underway, but there are new areas of uncertainty to consider. Political turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa has appeared in the first few months of 2011 and has caused some oil supply disruptions. A massive earthquake and tsunami devastated northeastern Japan, inflicting painful loss of life and serious damage to nuclear power capacity and other energy infrastructure such as refineries and LNG receiving terminals. These negative factors are counterbalanced somewhat by the return of economic growth in many of the world’s economies and by accelerating crude oil supply in countries outside of OPEC. Key conclusions of this year’s analysis include: • Refined product demand increased by 2 million bpd in 2010 as most economies emerged from the 2009 recession. Demand growth was strongest in Asia, the Middle East and parts of Latin America. The company’s long-term forecast for refined product-demand growth has been updated to reflect the impact of higher long-term crude oil prices and more stringent conservation efforts. The challenge to supply energy to a growing global population of expanding financial means is huge. • Product demand in non-OECD countries will grow rapidly from the current level of 37.3 million bpd in 2010 to 59.6 million bpd in 2030. Of the expected 22.3 million-bpd increase, China alone is expected to account for 43% of this increase. The combination of Brazil, India, Russia and the broader Middle East will account for almost 30% of the increase. • Diesel fuel will increase its share of total demand as demand for other fuels grows at a slower pace. Gasoline’s share of demand has been relatively stable for the last 20 years, but is expected to drop in the

OECD countries as higher vehicle efficiency standards propagate through the fleet. However, gasoline demand will still continue to grow in many developing countries. • Residual fuel oil’s share of demand will decline over the next 10 years as competition with natural gas intensifies in some regions and bunker fuel specifications favor a shift to marine diesel by 2015. • Despite the large refined product demand increase seen in 2010, a significant oversupply situation currently exists. The requirement to blend increasing volumes of ethanol and biodiesel into products is further adding to the product oversupply situation in the Atlantic Basin. A few weaker refineries have already shut down and more closures are expected. However, the survivors in some markets will have to operate at significantly lower rates until after 2015 unless further capacity rationalization corrects the capacity imbalance. • Light/heavy price differentials and returns on capital investment declined rapidly in early 2009 as the global economy slowed. A modest recovery in conversion returns was experienced in 2010, but conversion returns are expected to weaken because new capacity will continue to come online in the next few years. • Worldwide refinery investments to 2020 are expected to cost approximately $275 billion which represents 18% of 2010 replacement costs. Additional investments in the range of $145 billion are expected through 2030.

Small-scale chemistry could improve biodegradable polymers Using a small block of aluminum with a tiny groove carved in it (Fig. 1), a team of researchers from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Polytechnic Institute of New York University is developing an improved “green chemistry” method for making biodegradable polymers. Their recently published work is a prime example of the value of microfluidics, a technology more commonly associated with inkjet printers and medical diagnostics, to process modeling and development for industrial chemistry.

“We basically developed a microreactor that lets us monitor continuous polymerization using enzymes,” explained Kathryn Beers, a NIST materials scientist. “These enzymes are an alternate green technology for making these types of polymers. We looked at a polyester, but the processes aren’t really industrially competitive yet.” Data from the microreactor, a sort of zig-zag channel about a millimeter deep crammed with hundreds of tiny beads, shows how the process could be made much more efficient. The team believes it to be the first example of the observation of polymerization with a solid-supported enzyme in a microreactor. The group studied the synthesis of PCL, a biodegradable polyester used in applications ranging from medical devices to disposable tableware. PCL, Ms. Beers said, is most commonly synthesized using an organic tin-based catalyst to stitch the base chemical rings together into the long polymer chains. The catalyst is highly toxic, however, and has to be disposed of. Modern biochemistry has found a more environmentally friendly substitute in an enzyme produced by the yeast strain Candida antartica, Ms. Beers said, but standard batch processes—in which the raw material is dumped into a vat, along with tiny beads that carry the enzyme, and stirred—is too inefficient to be commercially competitive. It also has problems with enzyme residue contaminating and degrading the product. By contrast, Ms. Beers said, the microreactor is a continuous flow process. The feedstock chemical flows through the narrow channel, around the enzyme-coated beads, and polymerized out the other end. The arrangement allows precise control

FIG. 1

Typical NIST microreactor plate for studying enzyme-catalyzed polymerization. Photo courtesy of Kundu, NIST.

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 17

The weather is not always reliable… But you can always depend on CB&I.

www.CBI.com

We have worked in all kinds of environments, from arctic tundras to scorching deserts, in more than 100 countries around the world. CB&I has the experience and ingenuity to design and build energy projects in the most extreme conditions. With premiere process technology, proven EPC expertise, and unrivaled storage tank experience, CB&I executes projects from concept to completion. Safely. Reliably. Globally. Check out one example of CB&I’s innovative climate solutions.

Engineering Solutions . . . Delivering Results Select 87 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

HPIMPACT of temperature and reaction time, so that detailed data on the chemical kinetics of the process can be recorded to develop an accurate model to scale the process. “The small-scale flow reactor allows us to monitor polymerization and look at the performance recyclability and recovery of these enzymes,” Ms. Beers said. “With this process-engineering approach, we’ve

shown that continuous flow really benefits these reactors. Not only does it dramatically accelerate the rate of reaction, but it improves your ability to recover the enzyme and reduce contamination of the product.” A forthcoming follow-up paper will present a full kinetic model of the reaction that could serve as the basis for designing an industrial scale process.

US auto industry could boost profits with higher mileage standards

7

Marginal cost per $/gallon saved

While this study focused on a specific type of enzyme-assisted polymer reactions, the authors observe, “it is evident that similar microreactor-based platforms can readily be extended to other systems; for example, high-throughput screening of new enzymes and to processes where continuous flow mode is preferred.”

6 5 4 3 2

2020 CAFE target at 6% annual reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

1 0 25

30

35

40

45 50 55 CAFE fuel economy, mpg

60

65

70

Source: Meszler Engineering Services

FIG. 2

Marginal fuel economy cost in 2020 by CAFE level.

Select 152 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

As the US ramps up vehicle fuel efficiency standards, new reports from Citi Investment Research, Ceres and longtime independent industry experts conclude that US automakers will be more profitable at a fleet-wide 42 miles per gallon (mpg) average in 2020 (the strictest standard now proposed for that year and one seen as eminently achievable) and that by 2015 more than one in 20 cars sold in the US will be hybrid, plug-in or full electric vehicles (EVs). The two new reports were produced by Citi and Ceres’ Investor Network on Climate Risk in conjunction with the University of Michigan Transportation

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 19

HPIMPACT Research Institute, Baum and Associates and Meszler Engineering Services. Fuel economy. The fuel economy

analysis evaluates the potential impact that changes to the US Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards may have on the auto industry in 2020. Federal and California state agencies tasked with developing these standards are expected to

send their recommendations to the White House as early as this month. Stronger mileage and GHG standards will boost variable profits and sales in 2020 for the auto industry worldwide, with the Detroit 3 (General Motors, Ford and Chrysler) seeing the biggest financial benefits. The Detroit 3’s variable profit gains would garner more than half of all increased profits. The US electric vehicle industry is already robust and viable, and will grow

further under strong standards and other government policies that will boost demand for electric and plug-in electric cars. The 42-mpg standard by 2020 is consistent with a 6% annual mileage improvement, starting in 2017, that would boost fleet mileage to 62 mpg by 2025 (Fig. 2). In addition to increasing profits, these goals are eminently achievable technologically and cost-effective. “Our research indicates that increasing industry average fuel economy to 42 miles per gallon by 2020 could raise industry variable profit by $9.1 billion, or 8%,” said Walter McManus, an economist at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute and director of the Automotive Analysis Group. Savings. Dan Meszler of Meszler Engi-

#1 in Bearing Isolators www.inpro-seal.com

YOUR SAME-DAY SHIPMENT SPECIALISTS When your equipment is down, you need a partner that ships a solution to you same-day…not some day. At Inpro/Seal, we recognize the high cost of downtime facing our customers; that’s why we’ve designed our operations to support quick–turnaround of our custom–engineered bearing protection products. With manufacturing locations in North America and the United Kingdom, we’re able to offer industry– leading products with unparalleled response time and service to customers around the globe. The right technology…right when you need it.

Select 153 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS 20

neering Services provided estimates of vehicle technology costs and fuel economy impacts for the CAFE study. “Technology exists to address a number of continuing inefficiencies associated with internal combustion engines,” Mr. Meszler said. “Between now and 2020, much of this technology is expected to mature, so that a 2020 CAFE requirement of 42 mpg should produce consumer savings starting at gas prices of $2 per gallon. Since current and expected future gasoline prices far exceed that price, these technology-driven fuel savings are extremely cost effective and indicate that a 42-mpg CAFE program will not only reduce petroleum imports, but save consumers money.” In May 2010, President Obama directed the US Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration to work with California to develop the next phase of the nationwide CAFE mileage standards and GHG emissions limits for model years 2017–2025. The agencies are considering a range of standards representing an annual decrease in carbon-dioxide (CO2) emissions of 3%–6%, which translates to a range of 47 mpg to 62 mpg in 2025. The agencies’ recommendation appear headed for the White House sometime this month. Tougher fuel economy standards will have positive implications for sales units and variable profits for the auto industry in general, especially US automakers. The report assumes an industry-wide standard in 2020 of 42 mpg (a 6% improvement per year). Under this scenario, the Detroit 3 could see variable profits jumping 8% globally in 2020 globally. HP

Global Industry Global

Issues Global Leaders

The Place, The Time...

IRPC–ASIA: The Conference Refining and On 19–21 July 2011 Hydrocarbon Processing will host the 2nd Annual International Refining & Petrochemical Conference–Asia. Strategically located in the heart of Southeast Asia’s refining and petrochemical industry, and with easy access from all major refining and petrochemical centers, Singapore is home to IRPC for 2011. IRPC–Asia will bring together many of the world’s leading experts in refining and petrochemical technologies. Like Hydrocarbon Processing, the two-day, two-track conference and exhibition will focus on presenting leading-edge technology, best practices and solutions for the global hydrocarbon processing industry.

PRELIMINARY PROGRAM (Subject to change) WEDNESDAY, 20 JULY 2011 8:15 – 8:30 OPENING REMARKS: John Royall, President & CEO, Gulf Publishing Company 8:30 – 9:30 KEYNOTE PRESENTATION (TO BE ANNOUNCED) 9:30 – 10:00 REFRESHMENT BREAK 10:00 – 11:30

SESSION 1: SAFETY AND PLANT INTEGRITY

SESSION 2: REFINING PROCESS / PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

ExxonMobil Transient Hazop Operations Process (TOH)– ExxonMobil

Advanced Trends in Meeting Refinery Hydrogen Needs–Asian focus–Technip

Critical Proactive Considerations for Enhanced Safety of the Next Generation of Refineries and Gas Processing Complexes– Fluor Corporation

Innovative Energy Efficient Way to Debottleneck Vacuum Units with Improved VGO Yield–Indian Oil Corporation

Flare Structure Revamp: A Case History– Reliance Industries Limited

LCO processing solutions / Bottom of the Barrel Conversion Strategies–Axens

11:30 – 13:00 LUNCH, KEYNOTE: REFINERY–PETROCHEMICAL INTEGRATION–Jacobs Consultancy 13:00 – 14:30

SESSION 3: PETROCHEMICAL PROCESSES / PRODUCTS DEVELOPMENTS

SESSION 4: INFORMATION & ASSET MANAGEMENT

Diversification of Feedstock Options for Petrochemicals: Future Road Map– Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences

Process and Mechanical Design Optimization of Heat Exchangers using a CFD Technique: Two Reference Cases– Walter Tosto Spa

Design of Divided Wall Distillation Column– Engineers India Limited

Key Drivers and Trends for Retrofit of High Temperature Reaction Furnaces and Fired Heaters–KTI Corporation

Solutions for Purification of Refinery Sourced C3s Utilized as Feedstock to Petrochemical Processes– UOP, LLC, A Honeywell Company

Utilizing Advanced Simulation Software for Revamping Steam Reformers for Hydrogen Production– Chem Development, Inc. / PFR Engineering System, Inc.

14:30 – 15:00 REFRESHMENT BREAK 15:00 – 16:30

SESSION 5: MARKET TRENDS Renewable Hydrocarbons–Indian Institute of Petroleum, Dehradun Refining Outlook: Capacity Expansion and Rationalization–Muse Stancil (Asia) Challenges and Opportunities in the Growing Asia Pacific Oils Market–Wood MacKenzie 16:30 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE DAY ONE RECEPTION

for the Global Petrochemical Industry Learn About New Technology and Proven Solutions; Meet Global Experts Networking functions will facilitate exchange of ideas, and an environment for meeting peers from around the globe. Lunches, receptions and coffee breaks will take place at the exhibition. IRPC is a high-level technical and operations focused conference. The structure of the event makes for a productive and enjoyable two days with peers from around the world.

THURSDAY, 21 JULY 2011 8:30 – 8:45 WELCOMING REMARKS: Stephany Romanow, Editor, Hydrocarbon Processing 8:45 – 9:45

SESSION 6: REFINING / PETROCHEMICAL INTEGRATION Refining / Petrochemical Integration–A New Paradigm–GTC Technology Refining / Petrochemical Integration–Panipat Complex of M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.–Indian Oil Corporation Limited 9:45 – 10:15 REFRESHMENT BREAK 10:15 – 11:45

SESSION 7: ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY

SESSION 8: CATALYST TECHNOLOGY: REFINING / PETROCHEMICAL

Impact of Carbon Capture on Oil Sands Development Projects– Worley Parsons, Canada

Jatropha Oil Hydroconversion Kinetics Over Co-Mo / Al2O3 Catalyst–Indian Institute of Petroleum

Comprehensive Energy Optimization in Low Budget Era– Neste Jacobs Oy

Exceed your Hydrocracker Potential using the latest generation Max Diesel Flexible Catalysts–Shell Global Solutions

Adding a third eye towards energy efficiency in Process Industries–Yokogawa Electric International Pte Ltd

Advances in Rare Earth Free Catalysts Provide Cost Savings for Refiners–Grace Davison Refining Technologies

11:45 – 12:45 LUNCH 12:45 – 13:45

SESSION 9: ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY Improving equipment efficiencies in operating plants– Chevron & Rotating Machinery Consultant Achieving Competitive Advantage from Refinery-Wide Business Performance Optimization / Optimizing Refinery Hydrogen Supply, Distribution, Consumption in Real Time–Invensys

SESSION 10: CATALYST TECHNOLOGY: REFINING / PETROCHEMICAL A Case Study in FCC Gasoline Sulfur Reduction for Enhanced Operating Flexibility and a Cleaner Environment– CNOOC, Huizhou Refinery Economic conversion of Natural Oils–Grace Davidson

13:45 – 14:15 REFRESHMENT BREAK 14:15 – 15:15

SESSION 11: INFORMATION & ASSET MANAGEMENT

SESSION 12: REFINING / PETROCHEMICAL INTEGRATION

Sweating the Plant Assets– Jubail United Petrochemical Company, KSA

Refining and Petrochemical Integration Opportunities and Challenges–KBR

Intelligent severity optimization pays off in two months– Sinopec Yangzi Petrochemical Co. Limited

Refining and Petrochemical Integration–Axens

15:15 – 16:15 CONFERENCE KEYNOTE SPEAKER (TO BE ANNOUNCED)

2011 IRPC ADVISORY BOARD: John Baric Licensing Technology Manager Shell Global Solutions International B.V.

Eric Benazzi Marketing Director Axens

Carlos Cabrera President & CEO NICE

Dr. Charles Cameron Head of Research & Technology BP plc

Antonio Di Pasquale Vice President, Refining Product Line Technip

Giacomo Fossataro Technical and Operation Manager Walter Tosto S.p.A.

Dr. Madhukar O. Garg Director Indian Institute of Petroleum in Dehradun

Andrea Gragnani

For registration and lodging information, contact: Gwen Hood, Events Manager for Gulf Publishing Company at +1 (713) 520-4402 / [email protected].

Director, Refining Product Line Technip

James Richardson Director of Southeast Asia Süd Chemie

To register and find out more information, visit www.GulfPub.com/IRPC

Giacomo Rispoli Senior Vice President, Research & Development eni–Refining & Marketing Division

Stephany Romanow Editor Hydrocarbon Processing

Michael Stockle Chief Engineer–Refining Technology Foster Wheeler

For sponsorship and exhibit information, contact: Bill Wageneck, Publisher Phone: +1 (713) 529-4301 Fax: +1 (713) 520-4433 E-mail: [email protected] www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com SALES OFFICES—ASIA-PACIFIC

SALES OFFICES—EUROPE / MIDDLE EAST

SALES OFFICES—AMERICAS

AUSTRALIA—Perth Brian Arnold Phone: +61 (8) 9332-9839 Fax: +61 (8) 9313-6442 E-mail: [email protected]

FRANCE, GREECE, NORTH AFRICA, MIDDLE EAST, SPAIN, PORTUGAL, SOUTHERN BELGIUM, LUXEMBOURG, SWITZERLAND, GERMANY, AUSTRIA, TURKEY Catherine Watkins Tél.: +33 (0)1 30 47 92 51 Fax: +33 (0)1 30 47 92 40 E-mail: [email protected]

IL, LA, MO, OK, TX Josh Mayer Phone: +1 (972) 816-6745 Fax: +1 (972) 767-4442 E-mail: [email protected]

CHINA—Hong Kong Iris Yuen Phone: +86 13802701367 (China) Phone: +852 69185500 (Hong Kong) E-mail: [email protected] INDIA Manav Kanwar Phone: +91-22-2837 7070/71/72 Fax: +91-22-2822 2803 Mobile: +91-98673 67374 E-mail: [email protected] JAPAN—Tokyo Yoshinori Ikeda Pacific Business Inc. Phone: +81 (3) 3661-6138 Fax: +81 (3) 3661-6139 E-mail: [email protected] INDONESIA, MALAYSIA, SINGAPORE, THAILAND Peggy Thay Ann Key Lee Publicitas Singapore Pte Ltd Phone: +65 6836-2272 Fax: +65 6634-5231 E-mail: [email protected]

ITALY, EASTERN EUROPE Fabio Potestá Mediapoint & Communications SRL Phone: +39 (010) 570-4948 Fax: +39 (010) 553-0088 E-mail: [email protected] RUSSIA/FSU Lilia Fedotova Anik International & Co. Ltd. Phone: +7 (495) 628-10-333 E-mail: [email protected] UNITED KINGDOM/SCANDINAVIA, NORTHERN BELGIUM, THE NETHERLANDS Michael Brown Phone: +44 161 440 0854 Mobile: +44 79866 34646 E-mail: [email protected]

AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, MI, MN, MS, MT, ND, NE, NM, NV, OR, SD, TN, TX, UT, WA, WI, WY, WESTERN CANADA Laura Kane Phone: +1 (713) 520-4449 Fax: +1 (713) 520-4459 Mobile: +1 (713) 412-2389 E-mail: [email protected] CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, VA, VT, WV, EASTERN CANADA Merrie Lynch Phone: +1 (617) 357-8190 Fax: +1 (617) 357-8194 Mobile: +1 (617) 594-4943 E-mail: [email protected] BRAZIL—São Paulo Alfred Bilyk Phone/Fax: 11 23 37 42 40 Mobile: 11 85 86 52 59 E-mail: [email protected]

HPINNOVATIONS SELECTED BY HYDROCARBON PROCESSING EDITORS [email protected]

EYESIM Virtual Reality now available on iPhone and iPad Following the successful launch of the innovative Virtual Reality training system EYESIM, Invensys Operations Management, a global provider of technology systems, software solutions and consulting services to the process and manufacturing industries, takes the next step in further developing this technology. The launch of the iPhone and iPad apps adds true mobility to the EYESIM system, allowing “in the field” access to first-principle simulation and augmented reality. The iPhone and iPad apps were demonstrated publicly for the first time in Europe at the Gastech Conference and Exhibition in Amsterdam this past March. EYESIM Immersive Virtual Reality is a comprehensive solution linking control room operators to field operators, maintenance operators and other critical team members in their process by means of a high-fidelity process simulation coupled with a virtual walkthrough plant environment. EYESIM provides a complete plant crew training system, capturing best practices, rarely used procedures and other operations, and makes them systems of record for continuous use and refinement. The introduction of mobile EYESIM extends the usability of the system to iPhone or iPad users, allowing these mobile users to “virtually” be trained on systems, operational procedures and plant environments. The apps are particularly suited to the gas exploration and production industry, where remote and unsafe locations are increasingly the norm. EYESIM addresses the real-life challenges that face operators and maintenance staff daily, and it is of particular value in the area of safety. EYESIM can be used to rehearse safety procedures with standardized, documented processes; for operator initiation training; updating health and ensure appropriate responses occur to infrequent but safety-critical events; and gaining consistency across operations corporate-wide. EYESIM captures the inherent value in customer’s worker’s knowledge base, integrating into a comprehensive training program that grows with their needs. Adopting

this model to mobile devices allows “untethered” access to procedures, processes and operational statement of work’s without having to be sitting at a terminal. Mobile EYESIM is used for classroom training simulating plant experiences. By using mobile EYESIM, instructors and supervisors can monitor dynamically, and in real time, a trainee’s position and behavior in the virtual plant environment through a client application running on an iPhone or iPad. All “touch” facilities are available for a complete user experience. Mobile EYESIM allows workers to more fully experience “real-life” situations through an iPad or iPhone interface, on the plant floor, away from the classroom. EYESIM Virtual Reality Training enables engineers and operators to navigate the plant in a highly realistic and safe training environment on their iPhone or iPad screens. This application provides a combination of virtual-reality technologies with high-fidelity process and control simulation, computer-based maintenance and documentation management. Maurizio Rovaglio, head of Innovation and Emerging Technologies at Invensys Operations Management, describes the iPhone and iPad application as a mobile station that can be used in conjunction with the main application, enabling younger operators and engineers to connect to the server and enjoy the same training experience as on the main system. Instructors and supervisors can monitor, in real time the positions and behaviors of trainees within the plant environment through a client application running on an iPhone or iPad being connected to an EYESIM iPhone or iPad server. Instructors and supervisors can interact with virtual reality gas plant operations by opening or closing valves, changing weather conditions or introducing malfunctions, by using the “touch-screen” commands. Mr. Rovaglio says that, “it is designed to provide complete plant crew training to improve skills that are safety-critical by enabling operators to perform tasks in a simulated environment, allowing them to react quickly and correctly, facilitating reactions in high-stress conditions, and instilling standards for team training and communications.” He went on to explain,

“it can be used to train operators on new systems, as well as train new or younger operators and engineers in a real-time, immersive environment, helping processors and manufacturers retain and replenish the specialized knowledge they need to improve their operations.” John Gilmore, director of Global Industry Solutions Upstream Oil and Gas at Invensys Operations Management says, “It is extremely costly to put a person into the plant for the purpose of training principally because of the plant size or location. If we could do 80–90% of this training in a virtual environment, we can significantly cut down on cost and risk, avoiding the risk of injury and making mistakes, such as spills and the like due to inexperience.” He also highlighted the significance of such training in hazardous or extreme environments. The risk to an untrained or a partially trained person in environments such as the Arctic or a sour gas plant, where conditions are extreme due to high pressures and temperatures, can be great; EYESIM provides an ideal solution in these cases. Select 1 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

XOS installs 1,000th analyzer XOS announced the installation of its 1,000th SINDIE 7039 sulfur analyzer. This analyzer was installed at the Yanshan refinery of the China Petroleum and Chemical Corp. (the Sinopec Corp.). With this milestone, SINDIE analyzers have been sold to hundreds of customers in 33 countries and throughout the US. This announcement builds on XOS’s steady growth in the energy sector. “From the time that we launched production of the first-generation SINDIE As HP editors, we hear about new products, patents, software, processes, services, etc., that are true industry innovations—a cut above the typical product offerings. This section enables us to highlight these significant developments. For more information from these companies, please go to our website at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/rs and select the reader service number.

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 25

HPINNOVATIONS analyzer to the shipment of this 1,000th unit, the SINDIE product line has earned a reputation as an indispensable analytical instrument for today’s energy companies,” said Berry Beumer, vice president of sales and marketing at XOS. “This latest milestone affirms XOS’s commitment to leading-edge technology solutions that address analytical challenges that support the success and productivity of the global energy sector.” SINDIE analyzers help XOS’s customers accurately monitor sulfur content within such diverse fuels as crude, biofuels, gasoline and ultra-low-sulfur diesel (ULSD). SINDIE offers a measurement technique based on monochromatic wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence (MWDXRF). The practical application of this technology in the SINDIE product line enables energy and transportation companies to meet clean-air mandates enforced by global regulators. In turn, this reduces sulfur-oxide exhaust emissions that are responsible for producing acid rain and causing adverse health and environmental conditions. Sinopec received recognition of this milestone at its refinery in Yanshan,

China. Sinopec executives responded to the milestone by issuing the following statement: “We are very proud of becoming the 1,000th user of the monochromatic wavelength x-ray fluorescence sulfur analyzer made by XOS. The analyzer has demonstrated significant performance advantages over other commonly used methods, such as coulometry, UV fluorescence, and conventional x-ray fluorescence. These advantages include high detection precision, high analysis speed, ease-of-use, high stability, and low maintenance. The analyzer has received wide acclaim from operators and technical staff during the course of operation. In particular, the refinery division of Sinopec Yanhua Co. recently received high-octane fuel components, that required high-analysis precision and speed. The XOS sulfur analyzer demonstrated excellent performance during the analysis process, and it made a heroic contribution in successfully completing the factory quality assurance analysis. Please let us thank XOS and its distributor in China, Phase Analytical Solutions, for providing us with an analyzer of outstanding performance.”

In a related development, Phase Analytical Solutions was given XOS’s Asia Distributor of the Year Award in recognition of Phase’s outstanding customer and technical support in the China market. Other features of XOS’s SINDIE product line that make this milestone significant include: • It serves diverse market segments such as petroleum production, refining, and distribution; petrochemicals; biofuels; enforcement; independent testing; and power generation. • End-users include refinery labs, pipeline and marine terminal operators, enforcement authorities, and third-party test labs. • XOS spearheaded the ASTM D-7039 standard development covering the SINDIE measurement method, and the company maintains the task group chair for measuring sulfur in fuels. • Regulators worldwide recognized D-7039 for the purpose of certifying sulfur in fuels. • A portable version of the SINDIE benchtop analyzer—SINDIE On-The-Go (OTG)—received Instrument Business

HOERBIGER valves are the Engineer's best friend. Over 100 years of engineering know-how and expertise have led to our latest innovation: the CP valve. Select 154 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

26

www.hoerbiger.com I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

HPINNOVATIONS Select 2 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

R&D contract provides protection against excavations Magal Security Systems, Ltd., received a contract from a research organization, associated with a large US gas utility, to enhance the capabilities of its PipeGuard system–a sophisticated system (Fig. 1), developed by Magal, that warns and protects against excavations. The research organization has evaluated various technologies for mitigating and proactively alerting personnel when excavations are occurring in the vicinity of buried gas pipes, to enable effective and early response for prevention of potentially hazardous and catastrophic events. The rigorous testing included the ability to distinguish between various types of excavation equipment in the proximity of pipelines, particularly in noisy environments such as busy highways. The PipeGuard system has so far shown to be the most promising technology; with the contracted improvements it should pro-

vide a cost-effective solution for the proactive monitoring of pipelines to prevent third-party damage. Hagai Katz, senior vice president of marketing and business development, Magal S3, commented: “Historically, this system was designed to protect long-distance pipelines against terrorist and criminal activity. Contractors all over the world are inadvertently digging or drilling into gas pipes, disrupting service, risking lives and also cause environmental catastrophes. “Our distributed-system layout covers dispersed risk areas and is the perfect solution for this challenge. This financed development agreement is an excellent opportunity to develop the product for this important application and make it the preferred choice. This is an important step in our corporate strategy to supply sophisticated sensors and solutions beyond our traditional security market; in this case, it is to preserve outdoor safety and green ecology.” PipeGuard is a sophisticated, patentpending sub-surface intrusion detection system for underground asset protection. Based on state-of-the-art geophone

technology, PipeGuard offers a unique solution for the protection of pipelines, communication lines, prisons and even bank vaults, from terrorism, theft and inadvertent third party-damage. Multiple PipeGuard sensor units are typically interconnected through a wireless or cellular mesh network and alarms are displayed on a geospatial map. Select 3 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

FIG. 1

Magal S3 Pipe Guard system.

The new CP valve for small pocket, high speed compression.

Outlook’s 2009 Industrial Design Award for portable instruments.

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 27

HPINNOVATIONS Flowmeter offers small foot print and reduced installation costs Process engineers responsible for crude oil production from wells that employ gas lift systems to increase oil production will find that the rugged, highly accurate V-Cone flowmeter (Fig. 2) from McCrometer features a wide turndown, a small footprint and virtually no maintenance, reducing total installed costs and operating life cycle costs while improving crude oil production efficiency. Gas lift systems employed for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) increase crude oil production by injecting gas into the well bore casing, reducing the oil density being produced. The injected gas mixes with the oil in the casing and the low reservoir pressure in the formation is then sufficient to allow production without the need for pumps. Some oil wells produce natural gas that is separated from the oil stream once it reaches the surface. The well operator then re-injects a portion of this byproduct gas, thus maximizing production from the well. Carbon dioxide, nitrogen or engineered chemical solutions can also be employed in gas-lift wells. McCrometer’s V-Cone flowmeters feature accuracy of ±0.5% of rate and repeatability of ±0.1%, ensuring accurate measurement and control of the injected media. With its no-moving parts design, the V-Cone flowmeter is proven to remain accurate in installations for 25 years or more in the toughest of applications, all but eliminating the need to shut down production for calibrations, inspections, or regular replacement of the primary element, saving not only through production up-time, but also in parts and labor.

FIG. 2

28

Gas-lift well.

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

McCrometer’s differential-pressure V-Cone flowmeter provides built-in flow conditioning, which nearly eliminates the upstream and downstream straight pipe runs required by other flowmeter technologies, reducing typical straight pipe run by 70% or more requiring only 0–3 straight pipe diameters upstream and 0–1 downstream for precise operation. Engineers in the oil/gas industry rely on the versatility of McCrometer’s V-Cone flowmeter available in line sizes from 0.5 in. to greater than 120 in. in materials and flanges compatible with any application. The flowmeter operates over a wide flow range of 10:1, which typically covers the entire flow range required for injection in gas-lift applications. Select 4 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

CO2 removal technology reduces compression cost The Japanese companies JGC Corporation and INPEX Corporation, jointly with BASF SE, have successfully completed tests of a new technology for the removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from natural gas under high pressure. The performance of this new gas treatment technology enables a reduction of 25% to 35% in the cost of CO2 recovery and compression. The so-called “High Pressure Acidgas Capture Technology” (HiPACT) was developed by JGC and BASF. The tests of the technology commenced in August 2010, at INPEX’s Koshijihara natural gas plant in Nagaoka, Japan. “We greatly appreciate the involvement of INPEX, allowing us to test the new technology in a commercial natural gas plant. Targeting demand in the market, we successfully demonstrated an excellent energy saving performance,” said Mr. Yasuda, executive officer and senior general manager of the research and development Division at JGC. “INPEX strives to reduce energy consumption as much as possible. This new technology offers a great opportunity to improve energy conservation. It also reduces our carbon footprint and helps curb greenhouse gas emissions,” added Mr. Yamamoto, executive officer and vice president of the technical division. “This test was a critical milestone in the commercialization of a new technology for which the market has been looking for some time,” said Dr. Northemann, head of the Gas Treatment Solutions business unit within BASF’s Intermediates division.

Saving energy in the removal of CO2. Natural gas, an increasingly important source of energy, often contains CO2 when it is extracted from the well. Most of this CO2 is usually removed directly at the natural-gas source. The removal is achieved by means of an amine-based solvent developed by BASF. The solvent temporarily absorbs the CO2 from the high-pressure natural gas-stream. The solvent is then regenerated at low pressure and fed back to the process, but this regeneration requires energy. Traditionally the CO2 released in the regeneration process has been emitted to the environment. Alternatively, the CO2 can be injected underground for storage after separation from the natural gas. To do that the CO2 must first be compressed above its high pressure. This has, to date, required an additional high energy input, which the new process can reduce significantly. The process uses a solvent that is not affected by high pressure levels and elevated temperatures during regeneration, so it remains stable and intact during the capture process. Thus, the new technology can be operated at a higher pressure. This reduces the cost of compressing the CO2 for underground re-injection. Moreover, the solvent, which has an excellent CO2 absorption capability compared to the existing solvents, enables reduction of the solvent regeneration energy. Select 5 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

New alliance in process analyzer industry Metrohm, trusted for laboratory analysis systems, and Applikon, revered for accurate and dependable process analyzers, have joined forces to bring the best of both brands to the process analytical industry. This Metrohm-Applikon alliance unites process technology with the precision of laboratory instrumentation to offer rugged systems that meet the demands of modern process plants. At-line and online analyzers feature automated sample preparation and continuous monitoring technology — which are integrated seamlessly into any process setup. In addition, each analyzer is customized to meet the exact needs of its environment. Metrohm-Applikon also complement each other’s support offering, and their alliance now brings full application and product support to both the laboratory and process floor. Select 6 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

)BWJOH
UIF
JODPSSFDU
MJRVJE
MFWFM
DBO
CF
EFUSJNFOUBM
UP
ZPVS
QSPDFTT

#SFBUIF
FBTZ
XJUI
UIF
'JTIFS
'06/%"5*0/
GJFMECVT
MFWFM
DPOUSPMMFS ˆ

Š

'JTIFSˆ
'*&-%76&Š
%-$G
EJHJUBM
MFWFM
DPOUSPMMFST
BSF
B
CSFBUI
PG
GSFTI
BJS
GPS
MJRVJE
MFWFM
BQQMJDBUJPOT
5IFZ
NFBTVSF
QSPDFTT
MFWFMT
XJUI
BDDVSBDZ
BOE
SFMJBCJMJUZ
TP
UIFSF´T
OP
VODFSUBJOUZ
1MVT
UIFZ
FOTVSF
DPOTJTUFOU
MPPQ
QFSGPSNBODF
XJUI
UIF
BCJMJUZ
UP
EZOBNJDBMMZ
SFTQPOE
UP
EFOTJUZ
DIBOHFT
JO
ZPVS
QSPDFTT
*OUVJUJWF
HSBQIJDBM
EJTQMBZT
SFBMUJNF
BDDFTT
UP
IJTUPSJDBM
PQFSBUJOH
MPHT
BOE
FBTJMZ DPO»
HVSFE
QSPDFTT
¼
VJET
BEE
SFBM
WBMVF
UP
MFWFM
DPOUSPM
TZTUFNT
%-$G
EJHJUBM
MFWFM
DPOUSPMMFST
BSF
TVSF
UP
NBLF
B
TQMBTI
BU
ZPVS
GBDJMJUZ
-FBSO
NPSF
BU

XXX'JTIFSDPN%-$G


5IF
&NFSTPO
MPHP
JT
B
USBEFNBSL
BOE
TFSWJDF
NBSL
PG
&NFSTPO
&MFDUSJD
$P
‰

'JTIFS
$POUSPMT
*OUFSOBUJPOBM
--$

%9
.9
)

Select 69 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

EBARA CORPORATION

Select 52 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

HPIN CONSTRUCTION HELEN MECHE, ASSOCIATE EDITOR [email protected]

North America Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., LP, is advancing a feasibility study to construct a world-scale ethane cracker and ethylene derivatives at one of its existing facilities in the US Gulf Coast region. The new facility would use the advantaged feed sources expected from development of shale-gas reserves. According to Tim Taylor, COO for Chevron Phillips Chemical, the company is finalizing its evaluation of potential sites and advancing discussions with engineering, procurement and construction contractors. The feasibility study is expected to be complete by the end of 2011. Valero Energy Corp. plans to expand crude-unit capacity at its McKee, Texas, refinery by 25,000 bpd. The refinery will process West Texas Intermediate crude oil from Midland, Texas, to feed the increased charge rate. The expansion project, which will take place over the next three years, will increase the amount of crude oil available to be processed at the McKee refinery to 195,000 bpd. The expansion plans follow the previously announced Panhandle crude-gathering system expansion project, which is nearing completion. That project involves looping an existing pipeline from Valero’s storage facility in Perryton, Texas, as well as building additional pump stations and storage facilities to bring more locally produced crude to the McKee refinery. Merichem Co. has entered into a licensing and equipment-supply agreement with a leading midstream energy-services provider to install a LO-CAT hydrogen sulfide (H2S) treatment system at its shale gas-treating facility in Louisiana. The 6.93-metric-tpd LO-CAT unit, provided through the Merichem Gas Technologies business unit, will be integrated into the overall processing facility, with a proposed startup date during the fourth quarter of 2011. The LO-CAT unit will be treating 34.6 million scfd of amine acid gas with an H2S removal efficiency of 99.9%, far exceeding current environmental standards. This will be the second LO-CAT system to be installed in the Haynesville Shale play for this client, and the third LO-CAT unit to be

installed in the Haynesville play. LO-CAT is becoming recognized as the sulfur recovery system of choice for the shale gas industry. CB&I has been awarded a contract by Imperial Oil Resources for engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) work on the Kearl oil sands project in Alberta, Canada. The value of CB&I’s work scope is in excess of $900 million. This includes $500 million of incremental work releases booked prior to 2011. CB&I will be responsible for the EPC execution of the bitumen extraction plant and tank farms, as well as the design, supply and construction of additional storage vessels. Completion is expected in the third quarter of 2012.

Due to the hydrotreater’s large capacity, the project will include two trains with four hydrotreating reactors in total. They will produce ultra-low-sulfur diesel containing less than 10 wt ppm of sulfur. The diesel hydrotreater is part of an optimization project in PDVSA’s largest refining complex in Paraguana, Falcon State. Haldor Topsøe will supply an engineering design package for the hydrotreaters. The scope of supply includes design of the reactors, basic engineering and catalysts, and detailed design of the proprietary reactor internals. Erection of the unit is expected to commence in 2014, and PDVSA expects to begin production by the end of 2015.

Europe South America Braskem-Idesa, the joint venture between Braskem and Idesa, has taken another important step in developing its Ethylene XXI project in Mexico. The JV has chosen Technip as the technology provider for its 1,050-kiloton/yr ethylene cracker based on ethane. This is part of the petrochemical complex to be built in Coatzacoalcos/Nanchital region, in the Mexican state of Veracruz, and it is planned to be ready for startup by the end of 2014. The complex will also include one low-density polyethylene plant and two high-density polyethylene plants. Braskem-Idesa has also selected Technip as contractor for the front-end engineering design (FEED) of the cracker and high-density polyethylene plants. Technip’s operating centers in Rome, Italy, and in Claremont, California, will execute the ethylene plant’s FEED activities, while the activities related to the FEED for the high-density polyethylene units will be executed by Technip’s office in Lyon, France. The overall FEED activities are scheduled to be completed at the end of 2011. Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) and Haldor Topsøe have signed a contract for the Centro de Refinación Paraguaná project. The contract includes an 85,000-bpsd hydrotreating unit. This will reportedly be the biggest ever designed by Haldor Topsøe, and the capacity will correspond to about half of Denmark’s daily consumption of oil.

Uhde has begun construction of what is said to be its first-ever skid-mounted chlor-alkali electrolysis plant in Leuna, Germany. Leuna-Harze GmbH, one of Europe’s leading producers of epoxy resin, awarded Uhde the contract to build a turnkey membrane electrolysis plant with a production capacity of 15,000 tpy of chlorine. Commissioning is planned for mid-2012. Uhde’s scope of services includes the process licence, design and engineering, procurement, construction work and commissioning support. This, reportedly the world’s first skid-mounted chlor-alkali electrolysis plant, is to be successfully implemented for the first time in Ger-

Trend analysis forecasting Hydrocarbon Processing maintains an extensive database of historical HPI project information. The Boxscore Database is a 35-year compilation of projects by type, operating company, licensor, engineering/constructor, location, etc. Many companies use the historical data for trending or sales forecasting. The historical information is available in comma-delimited or Excel® and can be custom sorted to suit your needs. The cost depends on the size and complexity of the sort requested. You can focus on a narrow request, such as the history of a particular type of project, or you can obtain the entire 35-year Boxscore database or portions thereof. Simply send a clear description of the data needed and receive a prompt cost quotation. Contact: Drew Combs P.O. Box 2608, Houston, Texas, 77252-2608 713-520-4409 • [email protected] HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 31

HPIN CONSTRUCTION Neste Oil celebrates the grand opening of its ISCC-certified renewable diesel plant in Singapore Neste Oil with Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence, Mr. Teo Chee Hean; Finnish Minister for Ownership Steering, Mr. Jyri Häkämies; and some 200 guests celebrated the grand opening of its renewable diesel plant in Singapore on March 8, 2011 (Fig. 1). The startup of the Singapore plant took place in November 2010, and production at the world’s largest renewable diesel plant has run smoothly ever since. Neste Oil’s Singapore plant was completed on schedule and on budget, and marks a major step forward in Neste Oil’s cleaner traffic strategy. The plant produces premium-quality NExBTL renewable diesel, which is the most advanced and cleanest diesel fuel on the market today.

FIG. 1

32

Opening ceremony in which (from left) Managing Director of Neste Oil Singapore Pte Ltd., Mr. Petri Jokinen; Finnish Minister for Ownership Steering, Mr. Jyri Häkämies; Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence, Mr. Teo Chee Hean; as well as Neste Oil’s President and CEO Mr. Matti Lievonen cut the ribbon together.

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

“Only two years ago, we were here to lay the cornerstone of our renewable diesel plan. The rather empty piece of land has since been turned into the world’s biggest renewable diesel plant. As a location, Singapore has fulfilled all our expectations. It is the world’s third-largest center of oil refining, and occupies a central location in terms of product and feedstock flows, as well as logistics. Talent pool in Singapore is absolutely first-class. The government of Singapore has played an important role in promoting Neste Oil’s investment, and the Singapore Economic Development Board has assisted Neste Oil at every stage of the project,” said Matti Lievonen, president and CEO of Neste Oil. The plant has a capacity of 800,000 metric tpy, and cost around €550 million to build. It uses a variety of renewable feedstocks to produce NExBTL, including palm oil and sidestream products of palm-oil production from Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as waste animal fat from Australia and New Zealand. The plant employs approximately 120 people, the majority of which are from Singapore and the nearby countries. The construction project has required close to 14 million man-hours of work from employees and contractors from 13 countries. At peak times, the number of workers at the construction site reached almost 5,000. Before any work aboveground started, over 300 km of piles were put into the ground to prepare the site for heavy structures. Later on, more than 90 km of pipe work was installed. Furthermore, as calculated from the start of the project, the total recordable injury frequency per million hours worked was less than one, clearly below the global safety averages of the industry. Neste Oil has a similar-sized facility under construction in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, which is due to be commissioned in mid-2011. The company already operates two renewable diesel plants that came onstream at Porvoo in Finland in 2007

HPIN CONSTRUCTION and 2009 with a combined capacity of 380,000 metric tpy. After the startup of Rotterdam plant, the production capacity of Neste Oil’s renewable diesel plants totals approximately 2 million metric tons annually. The main markets for NExBTL diesel are Europe and North America. Singapore refinery to receive ISCC certification.

At the end of January 2011, Neste Oil’s Singapore refinery was International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC) certified. More specifically, the certificate confirms that NExBTL renewable diesel produced at the Singapore refinery from certified raw materials, such as from ISCC certified palm oil, meets the strict sustainability criteria based on the EU’s renewable energy directive (RED) and is suitable for meeting biocontent mandates on the German market. The ISCC system, specific to the German market, is approved by the German Federal Office of Agriculture and Food (BLE). Neste Oil’s Porvoo refinery in Finland has already been ISCC certified in November 2010. “Although the ISCC certification is specific to the German market, it reinforces Neste Oil’s sustainability commitment and offers third-party verification for the sustainability of our production chain and our NExBTL renewable diesel,” Lievonen added.

Singapore plant—the world’s largest and most advanced renewable diesel facility Neste Oil’s Singapore renewable diesel plant facility marks a major step forward for the company’s clean-traffic-fuel strategy. Renewable fuels business is an important part of Neste Oil’s strategy; with the startup of the Singapore plant, Neste Oil is regarded as the world’s leading producer of renewable diesel. With its premium-quality product and increasing production capacity, Neste Oil, as an industry pioneer, aims at meeting the world’s growing energy needs and demand for cleaner, bio-based fuels.

Highlights of the Singapore NExBTL project

• World’s largest renewable diesel plant; Neste Oil’s third NExBTL renewable diesel plant • Based on Neste Oil’s own proprietary NExBTL technology • Located in an industrial area of Tuas, in the south-western part of Singapore, approximately 40 km from the city center • Annual production capacity of 800,000 metric tons (or 1 billion liters) of NExBTL renewable diesel. This annual volume is enough for 10 million cars to run continuously with a 10% NExBTL blend. • Operational since November 2010; completed on budget and on schedule at a cost of approximately €550 million • Employs approximately 120 persons; approximately 90% of employees are from Singapore or neighboring countries. • All feedstock used at the plant are fully sustainable and traceable: palm oil, stearin and palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) from Southeast Asia, as well as animal fat from Australia and New Zealand • The main markets for NExBTL diesel are Europe and North America, later possibly also Asia. • Singapore refinery received ISCC certification on Jan. 20, 2011. The certificate confirms that NExBTL diesel produced from certified raw materials is suitable for use in meeting mandated bio-content on the German market. The ISCC system, specific to the German market, is the first standard for sustainability based on the EU’s new renewable energy directive (RED). It is approved by the German Federal Office of Agriculture and Food (BLE). Also, Neste Oil’s Porvoo refinery has been ISCC certified. • Led by Managing Director Petri Jokinen. In addition to the NExBTL plant, Neste Oil also has a commercial office in central Singapore. • Neste Oil has a similar-sized facility under construction in Rotterdam, which is due to be commissioned in mid-2011. The company already operates two renewable diesel plants that came onstream at Porvoo, Finland, in 2007 and 2009, with a combined capacity of 380,000 metric tpy. HP

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 33

HPIN CONSTRUCTION many. The concept was developed by AkzoNobel, UHDENORA and Uhde. CB&I has been selected by Yamal LNG LLC to provide front-end engineering and design (FEED) services for the Yamal LNG project. The work is scheduled for completion in the first quarter of 2012. The Yamal LNG project consists of the production, treatment, transportation, liquefaction and shipping of natural gas and natural

gas liquids (NGL) from the South Tambey field on the Yamal Peninsula in Northern Siberia, Russia. CB&I’s project scope includes FEED development for the 16.5 million-tpy LNG liquefaction plant, including LNG storage and loading facilities. CB&I’s FEED execution plan is based on engaging its international partners—Chiyoda and Saipem, as well as collaboration with the Russian Design Institute, NIPIgazpererabotka, to

address local design and authority approval requirements. The FEED will provide a firm basis for the detailed engineering, procurement and construction phase, as well as project schedule and cost estimates to enable Yamal LNG to secure the final investment decision. The value of the contract was not disclosed. Foster Wheeler AG’s Global Engineering and Construction Group has been awarded a contract by JSC NovoUfimsky Refinery, a subsidiary of Russian oil company Bashneft, for the engineering and material supply of a new Terrace Wall steam reformer heater and air preheating system for the Ufa refinery in the Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia. The steam reformer will be part of the 420-tpd hydrogen production unit being built by the JSC Novo-Ufimsky refinery and will reportedly be one of the largest steam Terrace Wall reformers for hydrogen ever built by Foster Wheeler. The plant is based on Foster Wheeler’s hydrogen technology and process-design package. Foster Wheeler’s scope of work is scheduled to be completed in mid-2012. The balance of the hydrogen plant engineering and construction will be undertaken directly by the client.

Middle East

This bench top analyzer tops all others in its price range for features and performance. It’s equipped with an intuitive user interface, full-color touch screen and on-board Windows XP computer. Ethernet electronics that permit remote access for calibration, diagnostics or service support. Plus, the Phoenix II has a large sample compartment that accommodates spinners and special holders yet requires little or no sample preparation. It all adds up to the lowest cost of ownership, backed by AMETEK’s reputation for reliability and world class customer support. Visit: ametekpi.com

Neste Oil and Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. (ADNOC) have a partnership concerning very high-viscosity index (VHVI) base oils. Along with the cooperation, 600,000 metric tpy of NEXBASE base oil is expected to be brought onto the market at the end of 2013. Takreer, a subsidiary of ADNOC, will supply the feedstock, as well as operate and maintain the plant, while Neste Oil will be responsible for the sales and marketing of the base oil on behalf of ADNOC. There will be no investment costs for Neste Oil related to this activity. The plant is based on ExxonMobil Research and Engineering’s hydroisomerization technology and Neste Jacobs’ distillation technology. It will have a capacity of 500,000 metric tpy of Group III base oil to be used in blending top-tier lubricants, as well as 100,000 metric tons of Group II base oil. Commercial production is expected to start at the end of 2013. KBR has been awarded a contract by Saudi Aramco Lubricating Oil Refining Co. (Luberef ) to implement KBR’s propri-

34

Select 155 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

AD: www.graficadueprint.com © 2010 Costacurta S.p.A.-VICO

SINCE 1921... AND WE STILL LOVE IT For more than eighty years, we at Costacurta have been constantly and resolutely committed to the development and manufacture of special steel wire and plate components used in many different industrial processes. Every day at Costacurta, we work to improve the quality of our products and services and the safety of all our collaborators, paying ever-greater attention to the protection of the environment. Within the wide range of Costacurta products you will also find some, described below, that are used specifically in the oil, petrochemical and chemical industries: - RADIAL FLOW AND DOWN FLOW REACTOR INTERNALS; - GAS-LIQUID AND LIQUID-LIQUID SEPARATORS; - ARMOURING OF REFRACTORY, ANTI-ABRASIVE AND ANTI-CORROSIVE LININGS. For more information visit our website or contact the division 'C' components for the oil, petrochemical and chemical industries at [email protected]. Gas-liquid and liquid-liquid separators

Costacurta S.p.A.-VICO via Grazioli, 30 20161 Milano, Italy tel. +39 02.66.20.20.66 fax: +39 02.66.20.20.99

Management systems certified by LRQA: ISO 9001:2008 ISO 14001:2004 OHSAS 18001:2007

Select 84 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

www.costacurta.it

HPIN CONSTRUCTION etary solvent deasphalting (SDA) technology, ROSE, for Luberef ’s Yanbu Refinery Expansion Project in Saudi Arabia. Under the contract, KBR will provide technology licensing and basic engineering services to revamp and almost double the capacity of Luberef ’s existing propane-deasphalting (PDA) unit. The existing PDA unit, which is based on conventional SDA technology, will be converted to KBR’s ROSE technology. In addition to increasing production volumes, the PDA revamp will allow Luberef to increase brightstock and byproduct production. A subsidiary of Foster Wheeler AG’s Global Engineering and Construction Group, along with the subsidiary’s consortium partners comprising A. Al-Saihati, A. Fattani and O. Al-Othman Consulting Engineering Co. (SOFCON) and Saudi Consolidated Engineering Co.–Khatib & Alami (SCEC K&A) have signed a contract with Saudi Aramco for the provision of services associated with Saudi Aramco’s GES+ initiative for a duration of five years, with options available for extensions. Under contract terms, Foster Wheeler and its consortium partners will perform engineering and project-management services including pre-front-end engineering design (pre-FEED), FEED, detailed design and procurement services for onshore/offshore oil and gas, refining, petrochemicals and associated infrastructure projects in Saudi Arabia. The work will be executed from the consortium’s offices located in the city of Al-Khobar in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. has received an award from the Jubail Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd. (JANA) to provide technical and project-management services for its existing epichlorohydrin plant expansion and a new epichlorohydrin plant at the Jubail, Saudi Arabia, site. JANA is a wholly owned subsidiary of NAMA Chemicals. Under the agreement, Jacobs is providing technical and project-management services for both inside battery limits (ISBL) and outside battery limits (OSBL). The ISBL services involve debottlenecking of their existing epichlorohydrin plant to increase capacity, and the OSBL services cover all utilities and the tankage area. Jacobs’ scope also includes cost-estimate preparation and project-management support for JANA’s new epichlorohydrin 36

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

plant, to be built at the same site in Jubail. This expansion is intended to increase the Jubail site’s epoxy resins production capacity to 240 kiloton/yr. Qatar Petroleum (QP) and Shell have announced the first flow of dedicated offshore gas into the Pearl gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant located in Ras Laffan Industrial City in the State of Qatar. Shell, the operator of the Pearl GTL plant, developed under a production and sharing agreement with QP, has opened natural gas wells offshore, allowing the first sour gas to flow through a subsea pipeline into the giant GTL plant onshore. Sections of the Pearl GTL plant will be started up progressively over the coming months. Once fully operational, Pearl will produce 1.6 Bcfd of gas from the North Field, which will be processed to generate 120,000 bpd of condensate and natural gas liquids and 140,000 bpd of GTL products. Egypt Japan Petrochemical Corp. S.A.E. (EJPC) and Davy Process Technology Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson Matthey Plc (JM), have signed a methanol operating license agreement. EJPC is developing a world-scale combined methanol and ammonia project comprising a 6,000-metric-tpd methanol plant that will use Davy’s technology, and a 2,000-metric-tpd ammonia plant (the Project). The methanol plant, which will use steam reforming of natural gas in conjunction with the advanced methanol synthesis process developed and licensed by Davy and JM, will reportedly be the largest methanol plant in the world. The hydrogen-rich purge gas from the methanol loop will be used in the integrated ammonia plant. This project is a key component in the development of Carbon Holdings’ petrochemicals business, with construction scheduled to commence in 2012. Alfa Laval has received an order for delivery of Alfa Laval Packinox heat exchangers to a refinery in Saudi Arabia. The order value is about SEK 75 million and delivery is scheduled for 2012. The Packinox heat exchangers will be used in a catalytic reforming unit for producing gasoline. Last year, half of Alfa Laval’s big orders came from refineries and the vast majority of these included Alfa Laval Packinox heat exchangers.

Asia-Pacific Fluor Offshore Solutions, a unit of Fluor Corp., has been awarded a front-end engineering and design (FEED) contract by Woodside for the Browse liquefied natural gas (LNG) development. The Browse fields are located in the Browse Basin about 425 km north of Broome off the western coast of Australia. Fluor will be responsible for the offshore central gas-processing facility’s FEED services including the steel jackets, a compression platform and a utilities accommodation platform. Fluor has teamed with McDermott International, Inc., to design the steel jackets and floatover installation. Fluor will staff the FEED with more than 150 offshore experts from its Perth, Houston and Manila offices, and the FEED is expected to be completed in late 2011. The Browse joint venture is scheduled to take a final investment in mid-2012. INVISTA plans to construct a manufacturing facility at the Shanghai Chemical Industry Park in China to meet the region’s demand for nylon 6,6 intermediates and polymer. The company is engaged in project engineering, which will include an environmental impact assessment to be completed by the end of 2011. INVISTA expects to begin plant construction in 2012 and commence production in phases beginning in 2014. When the new plant is complete, it will reportedly be the most energy-efficient and technologically advanced nylon intermediates plant in the world. Using INVISTA’s latest advances in its proprietary butadienebased technology, the state-of-the-art plant will produce hexamethylene diamine (HMD) and adiponitrile (ADN), along with various specialty chemicals and nylon 6,6 polymer. Bayer MaterialScience has inaugurated a manufacturing facility for polyisocyanates at Ankleshwar, in the state of Gujarat, India. With the investment of approximately €20 million, the company wants to expand its business in India and to participate in the strong growth of this local market for coatings and adhesives. The plant will produce Desmodur N grades based on aliphatic hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI). The initial capacity amounts to 15,000 tpy. It will be increased in stages in the coming years in accordance with the predicted growth for polyurethane coatings and adhesives.

HPIN CONSTRUCTION KBR has been awarded a contract by Inner Mongolia Connell Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Connell) to provide licensing, basic engineering and related training and field services for its grassroots aniline plant in TongLiao, Inner Mongolia Province, China. The aniline technology is offered by KBR through a licensing alliance with DuPont. KBR will license the leading process for Connell’s 360,000-metric-tpy aniline plant. This follows an award of the aniline technology to KBR earlier in 2010 by Connell for its 150,000-metric-tpy plant in Jilin City, China.

Basic engineering of the unit, which will include the UOP Pacol, UOP DeFine and UOP Detergent Alkylation processes, is underway, and the project is expected to come onstream in the second quarter of 2012. Foster Wheeler AG’s Global Engineering and Construction Group has received a contract from Huntsman (Europe) BVBA to undertake the front-end engi-

neering design (FEED) for the expansion of Huntsman’s Isocyanates facility at Caojing, in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. Foster Wheeler’s scope will include frontend engineering, technology licensor management and development of the project schedule and cost estimates. The project’s FEED phase is scheduled for completion in the third quarter of 2011, with the overall project scheduled for mechanical completion by the fourth quarter of 2013. HP

BASF and PETRONAS will commence a feasibility study for a new plant for superabsorbent polymers. The companies are also looking into the expansion of the existing production capacities of their joint venture BASF PETRONAS Chemicals Sdn Bhd. The new investment will be part of BASF PETRONAS Chemicals Sdn Bhd, founded by BASF and PETRONAS in 1997. The company operates an integrated complex situated at the Gebeng Industrial Zone, Pahang. The company’s share of capital is 60% held by BASF and 40% by PETRONAS with a total investment of about RM3.4 billion for production facilities for acrylic monomers, oxo products and butanediol. Siemens Energy has received an order for the supply of up to 10 compressor trains to Australia Pacific LNG (APLNG) in Queensland, Australia. APLNG is a joint venture between Origin Energy and ConocoPhillips. The APLNG project will involve developing coal-seam gas fields in south-central Queensland over a 30-year period and includes construction of upstream gas-gathering and processing facilities, together with a 450-km main transmission pipeline from the gas fields to the liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility being built on Curtis Island near Gladstone. The technology of UOP LLC, a Honeywell company, has been selected by Great Orient Chemical for a new petrochemicals complex in China that will produce key ingredient for biodegradable household laundry detergents. Great Orient Chemical expects the new complex to produce up to 100,000 metric tpy of linear alkylbenzene (LAB). Select 156 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

37

HPI CONSTRUCTION BOXSCORE UPDATE Company

City

Plant Site

Project

Capacity Unit Cost Status Yr Cmpl Licensor

Sonatrach Egyptian Methanex SAMIR Qatar Petroleum

Tiaret Damietta Mohammedia Skhira

Tiaret Damietta Mohammedia Skhira

Refinery Methanol Treater, Kerosine Refinery

Chang Zhou Cheml Co UPC Technology Corp Risun Chemical Co UPC Technology Corp Nagarjuna Oil Corp Ltd Mangalore Rfg & Petrochemicals Lotte Daesan Petrochemical BASF Petronas Chemicals Samsung Eng CPC Corp

Chongqing Liaoyang Tangshan Zhuhai Cuddalore Mangalore Banten Kuantan Yeosu Talin

Chongqing Liaoyang Tangshan Zhuhai Cuddalore Mangalore Baten Kuantan Yeosu Talin

MDI Butanediol Epichlorohydrin Malic Acid Sulfur Recovery Unit Treater, Tail Gas (1) Petrochemical Complex Polymers BTX Cracker, FCC-Resid

Neste Oil Hellenic Petroleum SA AGIP KCO Neste Oil Yamal LNG LLC Petronor

Naantali Elefsina Kashagan Rotterdam Yamal Muskiz

Naantali Elefsina Kashagan Field Rotterdam Yamal Muskiz

Maintenance Turnaround Hydrocracker, LP Sulfur Recovery (1) Renewable Diesel LNG Storage Sulfur (2)

La Plata Minatitlan Paraguana

La Plata Minatitlan Paraguana

Desalter, Crude Sulfur Recovery (4) Hydrotreater, Diesel

Sitra Baghdad Mesaieed Yanbu Ruwais

Sitra Baghdad Al Shaheen Yanbu Ruwais

VHVI (Very High Viscosity Index) Crude oil pumping station RE Scrubber Refinery Polyethylene, LD

400 kty 2.5 Mtpy None 400 Mbpd 350 Mtpy

Bakersfield Durango Pascagoula Gallup Mandan Toledo Tulsa Houston Logansport

Kern Refinery Durango Pascagoula Gallup Mandan Toledo Tulsa Houston Logansport

Refinery Amine Unit Desalter, Crude Scrubber Refinery Refinery Benzene Reduction Chlorine Cryogenic Gas Plant

120 50 11 78 170 25 250 120

Engineering

Constructor

Techint Tecnicas Reunidas

Technip|CB&I|Saipem|Chiyoda|Sinopec Techint Tecnicas Reunidas

AFRICA Algeria Egypt Morocco Tunisia

300 6000 600 150

bpd m-tpd t/a bbl

6000 F 2014 P 2012 Davy Process|JM E 2012 UOP 6300 A

ASIA/PACIFIC China China China China India India Indonesia Malaysia South Korea Taiwan

TO BY RE

EX

400 40 100000 30 60 185

Mm-tpy 1212 P 2014 Mtpy 30 P 2013 m-tpy E 2012 Conser Mtpy 15 U 2011 t/a U 2012 Lurgi t/a U 2012 Siirtec Nigi None 5000 S 2017 None S 10 MMtpy 90 E 2013 80 Mbpsd 1219 U 2012 Shaw S&W

BASF Hualu

Hualu

Siirtec Nigi

CTCI

CTCI

EUROPE Finland Greece Kazakhstan Netherlands Russian Federation Spain

None 14 bpsd 3800 m-tpd 800 kty None 110 m-tpd

P U U 945 U F 1081 U

2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011

KTI WorleyParsons Neste Oil CB&I Centry

Tecnicas Reunidas Petrofac|Siirtec Nigi|Black & Veatch Technip Technip Sener

LATIN AMERICA Argentina Mexico Venezuela

Repsol YPF Pemex PDVSA

RE EX

5840 MMm2/y 150 tpd 85 bpd

U 2011 Petreco U 2011 Lurgi P 2015

Tecnicas Reunidas Haldor Topsøe

Constr N. Odebrecht|Rio San Juan

MIDDLE EAST Bahrain Iraq Qatar Saudi Arabia UAE

Neste Oil SCOP Qatar Petroleum Saudi Aramco\ConocoPhillips Borouge III

430 U E H 1300 E 722 E

2011 2012 2012 Belco 2014 KBR 2013 Tecnimont

APS Eng Co Roma Aramco Services Co|KBR Samsung Eng

UNITED STATES California Colorado Mississippi New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Texas West Virginia

Alon/Fina Oil & Chemical Red Cedar Gathering Chevron Chemical Co Western Refining Tesoro Corp Sunoco Inc Holly Corp Samsung Eng MarkWest Hydrocarbon PL

RE RE EX

None MMscfd Mbpd Mbpd bpd bpd Mbpd MMtpy MMscfd

F 18 U E A 35 U 400 C E 816 E 16 U

2011 2012 Petreco |Cameron Belco 2012 2011 2011 GTC, Inc 2013 2011

BOXSCORE DATABASE

FW Thomas Russell Co. Bechtel Belco

Cameron

KP Engineering, LP

KP Engineering, LP

Thomas Russell Co.

Thomas Russell Co.

ONLINE

THE GLOBAL SOURCE FOR TRACKING HPI CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY For more than 50 years, Hydrocarbon Processing magazine remains the only source that collects and maintains data specifically for the HPI community, publishing up-to-the-minute construction projects from around the globe with our online product, Boxscore Database. Updated weekly, our database helps engineers, contractors and marketing personnel identify active HPI construction projects around the world to: • Generate leads • Market research • Track trend analysis • And, decide future budget planning. Now, we’ve made our best product even better! Enhancements include: • Exporting your search results to Excel so you can compile your research • Delivering the latest updated projects directly to your inbox each week • Designing customized construction reports for your company using our 50 years of archived projects. For a Free 2 -Week Trial, contact Lee Nichols at +1 (713) 525-4626, [email protected], or visit www.ConstructionBoxscore.com

38

I MAY 2011 HYDROCARBON PROCESSING

Select 157 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Select 98 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Effluent Wa Water Quality

Before

After

solve processing problems with heavy crudes. we’ll share our experience.

Joe Nguyen, Research Scientist

Solving problems when you process heavy crudes means having a partner with the right knowledge. Visit us at www.bakerhughes.com/xeric

When an upgrader processing 100% heavy crudes had a significant amount of desalter oil carryunder, we had the solution—Baker Petrolite

and find out how our unique combination of experience, knowledge, and the new

XERIC™ 7000 heavy oil demulsifier. Baker Petrolite XERIC heavy oil program

Baker Petrolite XERIC 7000 heavy oil demulsifier program significantly reduced oil losses by more than 70% while maintaining desalter operational stability and the desired salt, water, and solids removal performance.

www.bakerhughes.com © 2011 Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. 31714

Select 67 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

can improve your heavy crudes processing performance.

HPI VIEWPOINT Consider new developments in antifouling coatings for rotating equipment Innovative materials and applications protect critical centrifugal compressors and steam turbines from erosion and corrosion

Over the past fifteen years, a great deal of progress has been made with respect to materials science and related processes applied to various components of centrifugal compressors and industrial steam turbines. Due to the very competitive market, material selection has moved beyond simply finding the material with the most ideal properties. Material cost and delivery has become one of the most important factors in the overall cost of the component. Most original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are continuously reviewing new ways, whether by material or process changes, to reduce cost or delivery to remain competitive. Also, as energy costs increase, the importance of process and equipment efficiency increases. To be more competitive, OEMs are looking for new ways to enhance the components to perform more efficiently. At the same time, process environments are increasing in severity, leading to the need for more specialized materials. Since specialized materials can be more costly and generally have long lead times, other materials such as coatings that are resistant to aggressive environments, are being developed. In some cases, coatings can even enhance equipment performance. Coating technology. Coatings can be applied to rotating

and stationary components of centrifugal compressors and steam turbines to enhance performance in several areas, including: • Increase resistance to corrosive environments • Minimize the rate of solid particle erosion • Minimize the rate of liquid droplet erosion • Improve the foulant releaseability of the component • Prevent/minimize fretting between two components. A number of improved coatings and application processes for enhancing the performance of turbomachinery components in aggressive environments have been developed. One of the major developments has been the application of an anti-foulant type coating, in which amorphous nickel (Ni) is applied to complete assembled centrifugal compressor and steam turbine rotors. These

coatings have superior anti-foulant characteristics for resistance in aggressive environments. Also, multi-component—polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE (also referred to as teflon)]—sprayed coatings have been designed for foulant and corrosion resistance. Fouling issue. Fouling is a common problem in compressors

and, to some extent, steam turbines. Fouling refers to the buildup of solids, usually polymeric materials, on the internal aerodynamic surfaces of the machine. While it does not usually lead to a catastrophic failure, it does gradually reduce the efficiency of the machine by increasing the mass of the rotor, thus altering the aerodynamics and blocking flow paths. If left unchecked, fouling can block the flow path to the extent that production is stopped or it can cause imbalances that can damage the machine. Depending on the service, fouling substances may come from outside of the machine or can be generated internally. External foulants may come from airborne salt, submicron dirt, and organic or inorganic pollutants in the process gas. A well-maintained filtration system usually minimizes this external fouling. In petrochemical compressors, the situation is much more complicated, as the foulants can be generated internally. For example, in ethylene cracked-gas compression, fouling results from the polymerization reactions intrinsic to the compression process. Fouling imposes significant costs on petrochemical production. Solutions on fouling. To resist fouling, the material or coat-

ing must have excellent release properties. Materials with a combination of a low coefficient of friction and chemical inertness are usually used in aggressive environments. A common and widely known coating material for centrifugal compressors is PTFE

100 80 Foulant remaining, %

Phillip Dowson is the general manager, materials engineering, for Elliott Group in Jeannette, Pennsylvania. He has 40 years of experience in the turbomachinery industry. Mr. Dowson is responsible for the metallurgical and welding engineering for the various Elliott rotating equipment lines. He is the author/coauthor of a number of technical articles, related to topics such as abradable seals, high temperature corrosion, fracture mechanics, and welding/ brazing of impellers. Mr. Dowson graduated from Newcastle Polytechnic, now Northumbria University, with a degree in metallurgy and did his postgraduate work (MS degree) in welding engineering. He is a member of ASM, NACE, ASTM and TWI.

Bare steel Proprietary Cr-TiN

60 40 20 0 0

FIG. 1

250

500

750

1,000 1,250 1,500 1,750 2,000 Scrub cycles

Comparison of foulant release performance of bare steel against proprietary coating and Cr-TiN coated samples. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 41

HPI VIEWPOINT 80 Uncoated Coated

75

Stress, ksi

70 65 60 55 FIG. 2

Centrifugal compressor rotor coated with a PTFE-type coating.

50 1e5

25

FIG. 4 Cr-TiN Bare AISI 403 SS Proprietary

Mass loss, mg

20 15 10 5 0 0 FIG. 3

1

2

3

4 5 6 Scrub cycles

7

8

9

10

Comparison of bare AISI 403 stainless steel against proprietary and Cr-TiN coated samples after 10 hours of modified ASTM G32 testing.

(Teflon). PTFE coatings are multi-component, sprayed coatings designed for fouling and corrosion resistance. A dramatic decrease in time required to release an applied foulant on samples coated with two PTFE type coatings vs. bare steel samples was observed and shown in Fig. 1.1 Fig. 2 shows an example of a compressor rotor with PTFE coated impellers. Unfortunately, PTFE coatings can be removed by erosive liquids (i.e., water washing) or solids. Electroless nickel (EN) has also been shown by Dowson (2007) to exhibit excellent release properties, while remaining adherent in erosive conditions. In fact, the release properties are as good as or better than results from PTFE. EN is applied by submerging the component into a Ni and phosphorus (P) containing solution where an autocatalytic process plates the part with a well bonded, amorphous Ni-P alloy. The P in the alloy is believed to be responsible for the release properties, while the amorphous nature of the coating aids in corrosion resistance. Corrosion issues. Fouling and corrosion can also be a problem in steam turbines, not only causing material damage but also reducing turbine efficiency over time. Industrial turbines, whether condensing or noncondensing, can encounter problems with deposit buildup on the turbine airfoils. In a turbine, hydroscopic salts, such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH), can absorb moisture when superheated steam becomes saturated and condenses in the latter stages of the turbine/Wilson line. Wet NaOH has a tendency to adhere to turbine metal surfaces and can entrap other impurities such as silica, metal oxides and phosphates. Once these 42

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

1e6

1e7 Cycles to failure

1e8

1e9

Results of R. R. Moore fatigue testing.

deposits have formed, they can be difficult to remove. Buildup of these deposits may be a root cause for a decrease in efficiency and possibly an increase in vibration. A smooth clean steam path will not collect deposits so easily as a dirty, previously contaminated surface. Consequently, a previously contaminated turbine will accumulate deposits more rapidly than a clean one. Therefore, it is desirable to prevent further deposit buildup and to remove the problems associated with deposits by cleaning the turbine. Water washing of steam turbines (Watson, et al., 1995) can be an effective way to remove deposits. The effectiveness of waterremoval procedures mainly depends on the adherence of the deposits to the substrate. A second route is to coat the surface with a material that has superior antifouling or anti-stick/corrosion characteristics. This, in turn, is beneficial to the turbine blades by reducing the tendency for contaminants to stick to the blades and increasing the effectiveness of the water washing. Titanium nitride coatings with a chromium undercoat (Cr-TiN) have also been used by steam turbine OEMs to coat turbine blades. Cr-TiN coatings provide corrosion protection and can be used on all stages of a steam turbine rotor. However, Cr-TiN coatings provide limited anti-foulant benefits. A recently developed, proprietary corrosion resistant, anti-foulant coating designed for the later stages of the turbine rotor where the deposit buildup is most severe, provides significant improvement in foulant releaseability, as well as excellent corrosion and erosion protection—passes over 1,000 hours of ASTM B117 corrosion testing under a 5% salt solution, (Fig. 3)— while having little effect on the fatigue properties of the blades (Fig.4). HP 1

LITERATURE CITED Wang, W., P. Dowson and A. Baha, “Development of antifouling and corrosion resistant coatings for petrochemical compressors,” Proceedings of the 32 Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, pp. 91–97, 2003.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Guinee, M. J. and E. W. Lamza, “Cost-effective methods to maintain gas production by the reduction of fouling in centrifugal compressors,” SPE30400, pp. 341–350, 1995. Meher-Homji, C. B., A. B. Focke and M. B. Wooldridge, “Fouling of axial flow compressors—causes, effects, detection, and control,” Proceedings of the 18th Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, pp. 55–76, 1989.

Select 94 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

KNOW-HOW DELIVERED We put tested refining technologies and processes to work in your world. From hydroprocessing to fluid

catalytic

cracking

and

Veba Combi-Cracking to resid processing, we offer proven know-how. So you can improve productivity and lives. KBR Technology licenses deliver for greenfield and existing refineries of virtually every type and size. See HOW we can help you meet mission-critical goals. Click refining.kbr.com/HP

REFINING

© 2011 KBR All Rights Reserved K11063 5/11

Select 60 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY

SPECIALREPORT

Deferred maintenance causes upsurge in pump failures Not addressing the root cause of a failure puts resources and employees at risk H. P. Bloch, HP Staff

Operating unsuitable pumps in parallel. Worried about unexpected pump outages, some facilities decide to operate two or more BFW pumps in parallel. However, for reasons of gaining power efficiency, the performance curves for many of these pumps were originally designed to be relatively flat at flows

40 NPSH 800

Head vs Flow

EFF.

BEP

100

20

90

0

80

750

70

700

60

650

50

600

40

550

Efficiency, %

Why bearings go first. Interestingly, and of late, fewer bearings seem to be reaching their design life. Also, and in spite of using better lubricants and installing bearing protector seals, pump bearings tend to be the parts that fail first. Seeking to avert bearing distress, many facilities place greater emphasis on vibration monitoring programs, and these pursuits allow their owner-operators to initiate pump shutdown a short time before disaster would strike. Having shut down just in time, people then congratulate themselves for accomplishing what management has decreed, i.e., repairs were deferred until absolutely necessary and only the glaringly defective parts are getting replaced. Deferring a full repair does not address the real root cause, and repeat failures put both physical and human resources at risk. While the failed part is the weakest link in the component chain and needs to be replaced, something else is pushing the weakest link toward premature failure. It should also be realized that repeat failures are the precursor to far more serious events. More failed pumps per time period thus reduces the mean-times-between repairs (MTBR). This is most noteworthy because statistics that indicate a serious fire occurs for every 1,000 pump failures.1

approaching shutoff. The resulting pressure rise from operating point to shutoff is then either insufficient or non-existent (Fig. 1). As one or more pumps are operating too close to shutoff, shafts deflect and bearings are overloaded. The oil film that must separate bearing rolling elements from stationary elements becomes both too thin and too hot—a vicious cycle. High load, a thin oil film and high metal temperature combine and bearings fail prematurely. Depending on bearing cage type, these failures range from gradual and detectable to sudden, difficult-to-detect-inadvance, and plain catastrophic. Deferring repairs or limiting repairs only to the parts that are labeled broken (i.e., the bearings) overlooks the fact that impeller erosion and loss of internal clearances will have occurred as well. Fear of failure often goads operating departments into parallel operation of more pumps than necessary. Running fewer pumps in parallel would result in each pump operating closer to its best efficiency point (BEP). In contrast, operating too many pumps often causes one or more of them to operate in the prohibited low-flow range, especially if their respective H/Q curves are not identical. Internal recirculation and progressive wear increase the difficulty of suc-

Total head, feet

I

f your facility has recently seen an upsurge in bearing failures on boiler feedwater (BFW) pumps in the 200 kW–2,000 kW range, it will not be the only one with this costly experience. Failure causes are elusive, which is why plants have so many unresolved repeat failures. As we take note of them, we realize that these frequent failures are very often related to economic downturns. During economic downturns, maintenance outlays and, of course, training funds are among the first to be curtailed. Maintenance managers then decide to authorize only those repairs that they deem absolutely necessary. In effect, these decisions often encourage treating the symptoms and discourage looking for the true root causes of failures. Ultimately, higher maintenance expenditures and more outage events are incurred. This article explains how the underlying causes of these and other process pump failures must be addressed and avoided.

1,750 Flow at BEP

500 Horsepower

0 Shutoff FIG. 1

400

800 1,200 1,600 Gallons per minute

2,000

2,400

Typical “flat” pump performance curve with undesirable low-flow characteristics. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 45

SPECIALREPORT

MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY

cessfully operating pumps in parallel. Mechanical parts distress and seemingly small deviations from the least-risk geometry of best available designs now converge, and the BFW pump will become involved in a string of seemingly random failures. Pump operators and reliability professionals need to stand back and understand every one of the various risk factors. Pump owners must accept that, as several risk factors are added, one single additional and in itself seemingly small deviation could bring down the entire plant. Therefore, it should be a priority to examine all probable causes and factors that have recently combined or contributed to costly repeat failures of BFW pumps at a number of facilities in the US. Simply put, operating in the low-flow range forces BFW pumps to run in the flat portion of the head vs. flow (H/Q) curve. By the time pressure sensors signal a small pressure difference in the flat portion of the curve (Fig. 1) and control action is initiated, large differences in throughput will have occurred. Flow control and load sharing are difficult in the flat portion of a pump-performance curve and long-term satisfactory pump operation is simply not possible in the forbidden low-flow range. Rebuilding and upgrading are urgently needed. One of several important points of this discussion is that an inflexible edict to “fix only what is broken” is likely to lead to repeat failures. Internal wear and operation at low flow cause cavitation. The impeller geometries and wear-ring leakage flow in regions subjected to a given pressure will vary with progressive wear. Prevailing pressures multiplied by effective impeller areas will, of course, generate a thrust force. An increase in this thrust force can greatly contribute to bearing failures since bearing life varies inversely and exponentially with load. Moreover, on BFW pumps with sleeve bearings and associated shaft-driven worm-gear lube supply pumps, excessive thrust often leads to worm wheel damage and loss of lubrication. As mentioned previously, bearing distress is generally a symptom and rarely the root cause of pump problems. The root cause of the BFW failure incidents described here is the decision, made by a person, to operate unsuitable pumps in parallel. The best possible remedial action is to rebuild and upgrade all BFW pumps and to then use controls—automated or manual and operatortraining related—that ensure pump operation in the steep region, or close to BEP. Such rebuilding affords an opportunity to upgrade older BFW pumps by using a high-performance polymer as the

FIG. 2

46

Comparing a new slinger ring (left) with an abraded version (right).

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

wear ring and throat-bushing material. Rebuilding all pumps to original equipment manufacturers (OEM) specifications can be entrusted to either the OEM or a competent pump rebuilder. As is so often the case, there are pump rebuilders whose entire focus is on keeping cost low. These parties are often unable to provide the engineered solutions needed for best efficiency and longest equipment life. Performing both an up-to-date competency and experience check, together with a thorough life-cycle cost analysis, will steer the owner-operator to a rebuilder who can prove a solid combination of planning and work execution expertise. The “rebuilder of choice” must perform and report to the owner-operator a large number of critical measurements. Also, the rebuilder must have a proven track record, and the owneroperator of the BFW must spend the time and effort necessary to establish the list of deliverables, the adequacy of the rebuilder’s detailed procedures, and whether or not the rebuilder has just lost four of its five most qualified workers. Lubrication compromises must be addressed. Many

process pumps are supplied with slinger rings supplying oil to the bearings. To perform well, these oil rings (slinger rings) must be concentric within 0.002 in. (0.05 mm) and have a bore finish reasonably close to 32 RMS.2 Oil rings will not survive long if the shaft system is not truly horizontal, or if the depth of immersion in the oil is either too much or too little. While an ISO grade 32 lubricant is required on pumps equipped with sleeve bearings, mineral oils with this viscosity grade are seldom satisfactory for BFW pumps with rolling element bearings. In theory, rolling element bearings will benefit from ISO grade 68 mineral oils. This thicker ISO grade is required for rolling element bearings and major bearing suppliers recommend ISO grade 68 mineral oils up to 176°F.3 Yet, using the thicker ISO grade 68 mineral oil will slow down the oil slinger rings and will, furthermore, risk depriving sleeve bearings of the oil wedge on which the shaft must ride. Special issues and potential problems will arise if, in any pump, both sleeve type and rolling element bearings share the same bearing housing. In essence, viscosity is of greatest importance, and each bearing type fails if there is prolonged metal-to-metal contact. To prevent this contact, the oil film has to be thicker than the asperities (the surface roughness) in the bearing and journal surfaces. The oil film must also be thicker than an occasional dirt particle traveling in the oil. Most importantly, the oil needs to be properly applied and must form a suitable film on the surfaces where such a film is most needed. To make a long story short, a lubricant with all required performance attributes, including film strength and film thickness, must, at the same time, allow slinger rings to function properly. Only well-proven synthetic ISO grade 32 lubricants will satisfy all of these requirements. A preferred supplier usually formulates such lubricants from a PAO/dibasic ester synthetic base oil to which an ionic bonding agent has been added. The oil will have to be viscosity grade 32 and the particular synthetic ISO grade 32 formulation must give users the protection and film thickness/film strength properties of ISO grade 68 mineral oils. While these properties may not be needed elsewhere in one’s facility, they will make lots of technical sense in many BFW pumps that have recently and unexpectedly proven so vulnerable and repair-intensive. While troubleshooting lubrication issues on existing pumps, one will often find sludge in pump-bearing housings. It should be realized that water acts as a catalyst that promotes sludge formation. Sludge is often the result of water and atmospheric dirt, in addition to oil ring (slinger ring) debris. Exposure to airborne

MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY particulates is unavoidable in some environments, and water intrusion is possible in other environments. Another possible source of water is from cracked water jackets. There is some irony in that observation, since—on rolling element bearings—cooling water may not be needed in the first place. Also, the troubleshooter should become familiar with the inadvisability of mixing two “virtually identical” oils from different suppliers. There is ample evidence that, to keep costs low, some oil suppliers skimp on the amount and/or quality of additives. The lowest-cost-supplier games played by a supplier are often encouraged by users. It stands to reason that engaging in these ill-advised procurement practices will lead to not attracting, grooming and/ or retaining top talent. If the user plays along with the low-price strategy, suppliers are encouraged to provide a “commodity product” and commodity lubrication products may not serve those of us who go beyond paying lip service to the term “reliability.” Systematic component upgrades recommended.

During a recent plant visit to a facility in the Southern US, an oil-slinger ring that had been removed from a BFW after one more pump failure was measured. Instead of staying within the allowable eccentricity of 0.002 in., this ring was about 0.06 in. eccentric—30 times the allowable value. The ring was abraded on one side; it also showed very serious discoloration—similar to Fig. 2 (taken from Ref. 4). If one must use slinger rings, they should never be the cheap ones. Good ones will have gone through an annealing step before finish-machining. Again, be certain to subject slinger rings to rigorous specifications and quality control. On pumps furnished with rolling element bearings, the purchaser may be able to avoid slinger rings by insisting on bearing housings configured to accept solid flinger discs. If nothing else, specifying a lube application method other than slinger rings will start a discourse with the pump manufacturer. It should also be realized that slinger rings can become dislodged as the equipment is transported from a factory or shop to an installation site. These slinger rings are later found caught between the shaft and ring locator pin or some other housing component. The point of the story is that truly reliability-focused purchasers have highly justified concerns with certain traditional and all too often failure-prone means of lube delivery. Pump manufacturers must be shown the vulnerabilities of certain pump

SPECIALREPORT

designs. Pump users must use rigorous checklists that lead to better installation procedures, verification of adequacy before startup, and adequacy while running and while doing root cause failure analysis. Thousands of repeat failures occur in industry every day. They are irrefutable testimony to the fact that things are far from acceptable and that striving for improvement is a shared obligation that cannot be disregarded by any of the parties. Systematic upgrading is practiced by best-of-class companies on every pump that enters their repair shops. The causes of “black oil” are then traced to one of only two causes: overheated oil or contaminated oil. The source or sources of either of these root causes is not difficult to find and upgrade as well as failure avoidance measures are outlined in many relevant texts.1 Retrofitting process pumps with only the very best constant level lubricators is part of these efforts. Reliability-driven facilities would use pressure-balanced models that typically cost $30–$50 more than the traditional nonbalanced models one still finds on the majority of process pumps.1,4 In essence, the intrinsic value of systematically upgrading important utility and process pumps can be envisioned by somewhat arbitrarily assuming that each deviation from best practice reduces pump mean-time-between-failures (MTBF) by approximately 10%. Once five seemingly minor deviations combine, pump MTBF will be cut in half. If the negative impact of operating pumps in the flat region of the performance curve is factored in, as well, one has all the data needed to explain the very significant differences in pump reliability among different pump owner-operators. HP 1 2 3 4

LITERATURE CITED Bloch, H. P., and A. Budris, Pump User’s Handbook: Life Extension, 3rd Edition, Fairmont Press, Lilburn, Georgia, 2010. Wilcock and Booser, Bearing Design and Application, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 1957. Bearings in Centrifugal Pumps, SKF Publication 100–955, pp. 20; also Ref. 1 Bloch, H. P., Practical Lubrication for Industrial Facilities, 2nd Edition, Fairmont Press, Lilburn, Georgia, 2009.

Heinz P. Bloch is Hydrocarbon Processing’s Reliability/Equipment Editor. A practicing consulting engineer with close to 50 years of applicable experience, he advises process plants worldwide on failure analysis, reliability improvement and maintenance costavoidance topics.

HIGH PRESSURE PUMPING SOLUTIONS

woodgroupsurfacepumps.com Select 158 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

© 2009 Swagelok Company

In addition to tube fittings, we also make valves, regulators, filters, and happier customers.

Contrary to what you may think, we’re much more than a tube fitting company. And we have our obsession with Customer Focus to thank for that. Yes, we’re known throughout the world for our tube fittings. And yes, we’ve been at it for over 60 years. But when companies are looking harder than ever for greater value, it’s our broad range of products, including orbital welders, modular systems, and a complete line of hose, that helps us offer more than you expect. See for yourself at swagelok.com/moreproducts.

Select 63 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY

SPECIALREPORT

Avoid costly engineering faults, missteps and miscalculations Experience does count, especially in achieving success in capital and revamp projects K. SANGHAVI, Alon USA, Big Spring, Texas

I

n the past two decades, technical manpower and average experience levels within the oil industry and its affiliated engineering, contractors and technology companies declined as the need for lower operating costs drove most decisions. Senior experienced staff members took early retirement or were displaced with younger professionals. Supported by new state-of-the-art technological tools, but lacking adequate training and mentoring, these younger workers are expected to deliver more and faster. At times, designers and engineers are working under rush deadlines and lean supervision, which can lead to frequent accidental engineering missteps, faults and miscalculations. This article illuminates the current industry situation and the need for proper training and mentoring, and a broader and deeper experience base. Several examples illustrate poor design and engineering encountered during a recent refinery project. Case history. The following examples illuminate the present

hydrogen heater provides primary preheat for the feed to reactor No. 2. The reactors, the heart of a hydrotreater operation, can directly impact plant profitability through any compromised design or reliability. A semi-regenerative reformer is the refinery’s sole hydrogen source. New thinking for design. In this project, new thinking

changed old, established reactor design practices for increased operational flexibility and economic advantage. A common industry practice is to design the unit’s reactor and heat transfer equipment, including the heater(s), based on: a) Both reactors being at the start-of-run (SOR) and/or both reactors being at the end-of-run (EOR), in tandem, based on a four-year run length and b) Average hydrogen purity, a value of 80.2% for BSR. But, for enhanced operational flexibility, the RPC asked that other scenarios be taken into the design of the equipment to cover a) staggered reactor operation, with reactor No. 1 being

condition with the energy industry. These incidents were encountered during outside engineering work on just a single project at Alon’s Big Spring Refinery (BSR). Fortunately for BSR, the refinery’s core project team of three members—a project/mechanical engineer, PC Liquid phase a refinery process consultant (RPC) and Feed Heat up flow exchange a process control/electrical engineer—all reactor No. 1 supervising this project are experienced and versatile enough to quickly catch and correct all the problems. The RPC also interjected new thinking, and the refinery’s team was able to achieve a very successful project outcome. Hydrogen Compressor heater Fig. 1 shows an overview of the recent Hot hydrotreater project at BSR. The unit hydrogen feedrate was being increased by more than Purge 25%, while product specifications were Vapor phase stringently tighter. The new equipment Production Heat Effluent down flow separator exchange cooler included a liquid-phase upflow reactor No. reactor No. 2 1, a splitter, stripper product pumps and associated new heat exchange train and pipNew Revamp equipment equipment ing. Additionally, the existing vapor-phase downflow reactor, compressor, hydrogen FIG. 1 Project overview for new hydrotreater at BSR. heater, stripper reboiler, and airfin coolers and piping were being revamped. The

Product

Splitter

Makeup H2 Amine contactor

Offgas Stripper Pumps Reboiler Product

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 49

SPECIALREPORT

MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY

prematurely at SOR while reactor No. 2 continues to run its course and vice versa, and b) the expected 74%–88.6% range for hydrogen purity. The revised basis increased the sizes of a reactor and heat exchange equipment, as well as the sizes of the hydrogen heater and reactor effluent air fin condenser, as listed in Table 1. Also, the RPC further enhanced operational reliability by insisting that a layer of macroporous trap/media layer be added above the planned catalyst grading system to capture particulates TABLE 1. Unit equipment size with various operating scenarios

and iron sulfide that can cause increased reactor pressure drop and thereby shorten the run length. The RPC and the refinery technical service engineer requested use of wedges and pins, instead of traditional nuts and bolts, to facilitate handling of the reactor internals and reduce reactor downtime. The post-startup audit has revealed that this unit will not constrain refinery operations, and it will be in a position to provide the refinery economic advantage and leverage. Also, an outside review has revealed that this unit has the best performance amongst other similar functional units in the industry. Experience and practical knowledge results in savings.

Using practical knowledge, the BSR team found opportunities to reduce and increase plant reliability: Tower trays. After initial work and consultation with tray Makeup H2 purity, % 80.2 74.0 88.6 vendors, the detailed engineering contractor (EC) recommended: Recycle gas, MW 8.4 10.56 3.07 • 20 new trays for an existing amine contactor when the RPC Reciprocating compressor, acfm 1,320 1,320 had expected only minor tray changes H2 flow, lb/hr 17,758 22,257 6,678 • 30 new trays for the stripper when the RPC had expected Reactor No. 2 volume, ft3 1,173 1,675 no change at all. So, the RPC worked directly with the tray vendors with correct Reactor No. 1 steam preheater, ft2 260 603 information and, as a result, it helped eliminate the need for new Reactor No. 2 air cooler, MMBtu/hr 22 42.3 trays in both towers and determined that the amine contactor H2 heater, MMBtu/hr 10.7 13.34 required only a change-out of bolted outlet weirs. This resulted in considerable cost savings and less mechanical work during downtime. Misdirected fractionation tower feed distributor. Due to increased loads, the stripper tower feed distributor hole area needed to be increased from 18 in.2 to 30 in.2. The tower has single pass trays, and the discharge from the existing feed distribuTray tor impinges on a downcomer’s “sacrificial wear plate.” The EC 45° 45° 45° erosion Wear plate designer decided to retain the existing six slots “as is” and install Feed tray a second row of slots on the opposite end of the distributor, as shown in Fig. 2. With such an arrangement, depending on the new slot’s angle, the feed stream from the newer slots could impinge on the tray deck below, discharge into the downcomer or impinge on the tower shell. All these scenarios are unacceptable. This design Existing EC Plan would have led to poor operations and product loss. Typically, FIG. 2 Before and after designs on the fractionation tower feed sacrificial wear plates and feed diffuser plates are typically installed distributor. to break stream momentum. The RPC simply requested that the width of the existing slots be increased from 0.75 in. to 1.25 in., to provide the required Horiz. ells 2-45° additional area; the feed would continue to 18-in. x impinge on existing downcomer wear plate. 16-in. Control valve. An inexperienced pro18-in. x 15-in. 14 ft 18-in. x 14-in. cess engineer would size control valves 18-in. 17 ft 18-in. x 18-in. just for a single case of design rate. In real18-in. 14-in. ity, truly seasoned engineers know that a 45° Reb 18-in. Reb oile H oile detailed study based on hydraulic mod18-in. x r r 14-in. E-0 18-in. els of the piping circuits and associated 12-in. 60

Injection of silicon antifoam to amine solution

180

10

Different antifoam with different effect

1.2

No. of foaming occurrence each day Antifoam injection(cc/hr)

1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

Antifoam alcoholic Antifoam alcoholic Type A Type B

FIG. 12

500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

Antifoam injection, cc/hr

TABLE 3. Laboratory test of different types of antifoams

not reveal composition, thereby making it virtually impossible to make informed decisions regarding supplemental additives. Even mixed amines can be a problem. If the mixture contains MEA and DEA, and the feed gas containing oxygen and organic acids will form readily. If the bulk of the formulation is MDEA, which is sensitive to small concentrations of organic acids, the solution will likely have a severe foaming problem. Lost-treating capacity is often the net effect of foaming in the contactor. The height of the foam increases and the void volume inside the vessel decreases. Reduced void volume increases pressure drop in the system. As the vapor liquid contact area is reduced (filled with foam), the effective mass-transfer zone is reduced and

No. of occurring foaming in contactor

or fatty acids. Fatty acids increase liquid hydrocarbon solubility in amine solution and also cause severe foaming problems. During this study, different tests were carried out for measuring the amount of dissolved oxygen in an amine. Treated water was used to dilute the amine solution. The results show that the source of oxygen reacted with the amine, and that the antifoam was water deionized at about 20 ppm dissolved oxygen based on ASTM measurements (Fig. 10). This was also used to wash the treated gas in the contactor. The oxygen level contained in the feed gas was not measured. Corrosion inhibits for the most part and is created by organic film-forming chemicals. As such, they are surface active and are readily removed by activated carbon until the carbon becomes saturated. When this happens, the carbon begins to unload and can rapidly increase the concentration, causing a foaming problem. Formulated solvents pose a new challenge for the gas-plant operator. The formulations are typically proprietary. Suppliers do

Antifoam silicon base

Characteristics of different antifoams on contactor operations.

polimeri europa eni.com Select 173 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS M_0495_180x125_Hydrocarbon_Polimeri_Ing.indd 1

I

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 201110:36 93 24/03/11

GAS PROCESSING 14 No of foaming in contactor per day

No of occurring foaming 12 Injection of antifoam glycolic type B

10 8 Injection of antifoam glycolic type A

6 4

Injection of antifoam silicon base

2

21.12.04 22.12.04 23.12.04 24.12.04 25.12.04 26.12.04 27.12.04 28.12.04 25.01.05 26.01.05 27.01.05 28.01.05 29.01.05 30.01.05 21.01.05 01.02.05 03.02.05 04.02.05 05.02.05 06.02.05 07.02.05 08.02.05 09.02.05 10.02.05 11.02.05 12.02.05 13.02.05 14.02.05 15.02.05 16.02.05 17.02.05

0

Date FIG. 13

Trend showing decrease in foam that occurred in the contactor.

TABLE 4. Different types of antifoams field tests

Test

Number of foaming occurrences

Injection at each step, cc

Time for overcoming foaming, min

Run 1 Run 2

12 10

400 30

15 13

Glycolic base, Type B

Run 1 Run 2

8 5

200 200

11 10

Silicon base

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

1 3 2

300 650 600

5 8 7

Antifoam type Glycolic base, Type A

During this step, a sample solution of the amine cycle was taken and the effects of three antifoams on foaming symptoms were evaluated. The parameters, such as foaming stability and foaming tendency, were recorded and the results are shown in Table 4. Silicon-based antifoam has a higher efficiency than glycolic types. The laboratory test confirmed that a silicon-type antifoam is more appropriate for an amine solution; the decision was to apply it into solvent at the plant. Data gathered from the plant proved that, since a silicon base was applied, numbers of foam occurrences were drastically reduced, as shown in Tables 3 and 4 and Fig. 13. Using a silicon-based antifoam not only had a higher performance over a glycolic antifoam, but it also could provide the same efficiency with little injection into solution. The study indicated that a high amount of antifoam injection into the system created process problems like clogging the L/R amine exchanger, increasing the number of foaming occurrences in the contactor, gas-treating instabilities and increased unscheduled plant shutdowns. It was shown that the reaction between antifoam and sour gas, preferentially with oxygen of deionized water, produced a particle solid-like agglomeration. If the heat exchanger had a decrease in the amine flowrate due to particular sedimentation, an increase in deferential pressure also occurred. With a decrease in the concentration of antifoam injection from 80 wt% to 10 wt%, this problem along with the amount of antifoam inhibitor remained about 5 ppm in the amine solution cycle. Selecting a new antifoam must encompass a deep study for compatibility. Choosing the right antifoam saved the plant about $100,000. HP ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank Mr. Saifi and Mr. Nori in their cooperation with field and laboratory testing. 1

less acid gas is absorbed. When foaming occurs in the flash tank, it reduces the surface area from which the gas evolves. Reduced surface area prevents the solution from achieving the desired semi-rich loading. Foam prevents gas from immigrating out of the solution. If the reboiler is at full rate, it may not be possible to achieve specification. Tests and methodology. For this study, a determination

of foaming tendency and resultant foam stability of pure liquid and mixtures was used in the following procedure. Air is sparged through a measured amount of solution at a specified rate for a specific period (Fig. 11). The difference between initial and final foam height is measured. When the air stopped, the time required for the foam to collapse was recorded. For measuring the HSS, two methods were used. The first one used titration, which is a traditional method and would be efficient to judge the amine behavior. The second method was using ion chromatographic, an application that should be taken. Appropriate antifoaming effects on amine solvent.

Since injecting more glycolic didn’t have a suitable effect on the foaming upset, another glycolic antifoam was applied. This antifoam, unfortunately cannot completely disperse in solution. As shown in Fig. 9, when a Type B glycolic antifoam was used, it inhibited foaming. However, it needs more time to overcome the foaming symptoms as compared to the Type A glycolic antifoam that was applied and mostly agglomerated, as shown in Table 2 and Fig. 12. 94

I MAY 2011 HYDROCARBON PROCESSING

2

LITERATURE CITED Paul, C. R., “Gas Conditioning—Face the Facts about Amine Foaming,” Chemical Engineering Progress, July 1991. von Phul, S. A. and L. Stern, “Antifoam: What is it? How does it work? Why do they say to limit its use?” Laurence Reid Gas Conditioning Conference, Norman, Oklahoma, 2001.

Abolfazl Atash Jameh is the head of process engineering, a division of engineering and technical services, at the Sarkhoon and Qeshm Gas Treating Company in Iran. He joined the National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC) in 1999 and has 10 years of experience in process engineering, modeling and optimization, as well as troubleshooting gas processing units. Mr. Atash Jameh received an MS degree in chemical engineering from the Sharif University of Technology in 1998 and a BS degree in chemical engineering from the Petroleum University of Technology in 1995. He has authored and coauthored more than seven papers in national and international conferences.

Ahmad Zamani Gharaghoosh is the head of technical inspection department at the Sarkhoon & Qeshm Gas Treating Company (SQGC). He joined National Iranian Gas Company ( NIGC) In 1997.Mr. Zamani Gharaghoosh has more than 11 years of experience in gas refinery processes, static equipment inspection, and risk-based inspection, and is a corrosion specialist at the gas refinery.

Saeid Mokhatab is an internationally recognized expert in the field of natural gas engineering with a particular emphasis on gas transmission, LNG and processing. He has been involved as a technical consultant in several international gas-engineering projects and published over 150 academic and industry-oriented papers. Mr. Mokhatab is a member of the editorial board for most professional oil and gas engineering journals, and serves on various SPE and ASME technical committees.

Special Supplement to

SULFUR 2011

CONTENTS

The ultimate path to H2S-free gas C–97

Corporate Profiles Silcotek C–99 Ametek Process Instruments C–101 Foster Wheeler C–103 WorleyParsons C–105

Lurgi – your clean conversion partner. Lurgi is the worldwide leading partner when clean conversion is postulated. We command sustainable processes which allow us to make better use of oil resources or biomass than ever before. With our technologies we can produce synthesis gases, hydrogen or carbon monoxide: for downstream conversion to petrochemicals. Based on resources like natural gas, coal and tar sand we produce synthesis gas which we convert into low-pollutant fuels. Enhanced sustainability: from biomass which does not compete with the food chain, we can recover ultra-pure fuels burning at a low pollutant emission rate which are excellently suited for reducing the carbon footprint. You see, we are in our element when it comes to sustainable technologies.

Build on our technologies. Call us, we inform you: +49 (0) 69 58 08-0 www.lurgi.com

1120_e

A member of the Air Liquide Group

Select 77 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

SULFUR 2011

The ultimate path to H2S-free gas Z. LIU, GTC Technology US, LLC, Houston, Texas; and B. CHIA, GTC Technology, Singapore Advanced technologies offer competitive advantages over traditional methods With the desire to maintain a clean environment, there is an increasing pressure by worldwide environmental regulatory agencies, as well as petrochemical and refining industries to continue meeting more stringent standards for sulfur emissions from processing facilities. It is important to understand the various sulfur-recovery (SR) methods available and to implement advanced, reliable and cost-effective technologies for SR to ensure continuous and smooth plant operation. Following are highlights of some of the advanced technologies for SR as well as their competitive advantages over traditional methods.

Traditional SR units. In the refinery processes, sulfur is converted to hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which is recovered primarily in amine absorbers to minimize sulfur emissions to the atmosphere. The rich amine solution is regenerated in an amine regeneration unit, producing a H2S-rich gas stream that is then fed to the SR unit (SRU)—the Claus process—where the H2S is converted to elemental sulfur. The Claus reaction is reversible, with sulfur vapor and water vapor always present. This prevents H2S conversion from reaching 100%, and thus the byproducts—carbon disulfide (CS2) and carbonyl sulfide (COS)—cannot be 100% hydrolyzed. From a thermodynamic standpoint, lower temperature is more favorable to equilibrium conversion. However, this is restrained by the dew point of sulfur vapors. Due to the limitation of chemical equilibrium and reaction temperature, the highest SR in a Claus unit is lower than 98%. Without further treatment, the remaining H2S in the feed is combusted and emitted to the atmosphere as sulfur dioxide (SO2). This was the case until 1970, when the first commercial unit was built to treat Claus tail gas (TG). Since then, a number of different TG cleanup processes have been developed to overcome the thermodynamic equilibrium of the Claus reaction and thus, increase the overall SR. Environmental emission regulations are becoming tighter and there is increasing demand to achieve even higher sulfur removal and recovery.

Integrated Claus and TG treating. In view of this need, an optimized and integrated flow scheme combining Claus and tail-gas treating (TGT) has been introduced. This new SR process offers lower capital and operating costs, higher reliability and operability, and a 99.9+% SR efficiency.1

Sour gas from either rich amine regeneration or sour water stripping, or both, is sent to the sulfurproducing burner after entrained liquid removal. In this burner, based on required oxygen for the reaction, the air quantity supplied by a blower is strictly controlled. After burning, all of the organics in the acid gas are oxidized. About 65% of H2S from the feed is transformed into sulfur through a thermal Claus reaction. About one-third of the remaining H2S is transformed into SO2 to meet the stoichiometric amount of SO2 required in the Claus reaction. A small portion of hightemperature process gas from the sulfur-producing burner is used to adjust the inlet temperature of the 1st stage converter via a high-temperature mixing valve. The majority of high-temperature process gas line caption is sent to a waste-heat boilerTwo to produce 1.1 MPaG, 250°C superheated steam. The temperature of the process gas is decreased to 350°C and then cooled to 160°C in the first-stage condenser. Liquid sulfur is separated from the process gas and sent to the sulfur drum. Process gas from the first-stage condenser is then reheated to 258°C by high-temperature process gas and sent to the first-stage converter to undergo catalytic Claus reaction. Due to exothermic reaction heat, process gas from the first-stage converter increases to 308°C and is used to heat up low-temperature process gas from an outlet of the second-stage condenser. Process gas is further cooled to 160°C and liquid sulfur is separated and sent to a sulfur drum. Process gas from the second-stage condenser is heated up to 220°C and sent to the second-stage converter. Process gas from the second-stage converter is sent to the thirdstage condenser. Liquid sulfur is separated and sent to the sulfur drum. The Claus tail-gas is sent to a tail gas treating section after entrained liquid knockout. Waste heat from the first, second, and third-stage condensers is recovered to generate 0.4 MPaG saturated steam. Liquid sulfur from the sulfur drum flows to a liquid sulfur pool. After quinoline and nitrogen

injection, entrained gas in the liquid sulfur is removed through a degassing pump and then sent to the offgas incinerator. Liquid sulfur, after gas removal, is sent to a sulfur shaping machine by a liquid sulfur transfer pump, and then sent to autopacking and to a stacking machine for weighing and packing. Specifications of solid sulfur obtainable in the new SR process are shown in Table 1. The Claus tail gas is heated by flue gas from the offgas incinerator to 300°C and sent to the hydrogenation reactor after mixing with hydrogen. SO2, S2, COS and CS2 are converted to H2S by reduction and hydrolysis reaction. The process gas from the hydrogenation reaction is sent to a steam generator to generate 0.4 MPaG steam. The temperature of the tail gas is decreased to 170°C and sent to a quench column. The tail gas interacts with quench water and is cooled to 40°C. The sour water generated is sent to the sour water stripper. The cooled tail gas is sent to the amine absorber. Lean amine solvent is sent to the top of the amine absorber to reduce H2S, and rich solvent is sent to the solvent stripper for solvent recovery. Offgas from the top of the amine absorber is sent to the offgas incinerator. Flue gas is vented at 296°C after superheating the inside battery limits (ISBL) generated steam and preheating the Claus tail-gas feed before hydrogenation. Acid gas stripped off from the rich solvent is recycled to the sulfur manufacturing burner.

TABLE 1. Solid sulfur specification Property

Unit

Specification

Purity As Ash Acidity (as of H2SO4) Water Organics Fe

wt % wt % wt % wt % wt % wt % wt %

≥ 99.9 (on dry basis) ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.03 ≤ 0.003 ≤ 2.0 ≤ 0.03 ≤ 0.005

Hydrogen Saturated steam

Superheated steam

Sour gas from amine regeneration and/or sour water stripper Boiler-feed water

Tail-gas treating

Claus

Sulfur

H2S-free gas

Sour gas recycle

FIG. 1. Block flow diagram for new SR process.

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING SULFUR 2011

I S-97

SULFUR 2011

• Turndown in normal operation may be as low as 15% • Hydrogen source flexibility within most refineries and petrochemical complexes.

10% 5% Hig hC O

H4S concentration

2

1%

Amine/Claus/TGT

an

du

5,000 ppm

nc

on

10 0t pd ven

Non-aqueous solution (all applications)

1,000 ppm

100 ppm

Scavenging

1,000

tpd

su

5,000 10,000

1t lfu

r

pd

na lg 25

500 ppm

0.1

tio

5t

su lfu

r

pd

as

lfu

r

ap p

t pd

su lfu

50,000 100,000 Gas flowrate, m3/hr

su

lic ati on s su lfu r

r

1,000,000

FIG. 2. Application range of non-aqueous technology.

Sweet gas Lean solution Absorber

Sour gas

Flash gas Slurry tank

Flash vessel

Heated surge tank

SO2

SR application. SR from high-pressure sour natural gas streams with medium amounts of sulfur has historically been a challenge for the industry. Conventional treatment using the amine/Claus/TGT methods is capital intensive and mostly favored for large units. Other systems, on the other hand, were primarily developed for low-pressure applications. A non-aqueous process has been developed specifically for the treatment of high-pressure sour natural gas in medium-sized sulfur applications, with produced sulfur in the range of 0.1 tpd to 30 tpd.2 Fig. 2 indicates the application range of this non-aqueous technology. The non-aqueous solution has a high solubility for elemental sulfur. Because the elemental sulfur stays dissolved in the solution, there are no solids in the liquid circulated to the absorber. By design, the solution avoids the problems that make the aqueous sulfur recovery systems unsuitable for direct treatment of high-pressure gas. With this process, H2S is removed from the sour gas in a conventional absorber tower. The H2S reacts with dissolved SO2 to produce elemental sulfur, which remains in solution. HP Extended version avaiable online at Hydrocarbon Processing.com.

Sulfur filter system

NOTES 1

Scraped surface crystallizer

Sulfur

FIG. 3. Non-aqueous solution technology flow scheme.

In the new SR process, there is only the sulfur manufacturing burner and offgas incinerator consuming fuel gas. The inline burner to generate reducing gas for Claus tail-gas hydrogenation is eliminated. This results in less equipment and fewer controlling loops than those of similar processes. The process not only maintains a high SR rate, but also avoids high costs for energy consumption, investment and operation. The amount of emission vent gas is also reduced. Some similar processes use steam or electricity to heat up process gas as a means to reduce emissions. However, outside battery limits (OSBL) cost on steam and electricity generation cannot be omitted by doing this. Through flow scheme optimization and inside battery limits (ISBL) heat integration, this process consumes the least energy compared with similar processes, thus making it the most environmentally friendly method. In terms of equipment, it utilizes a high-temperature mixing valve, which is critical to this process. At temperatures above 1,200°C and in a strong reducing environment, any metal will be corroded by sulfur S-98

I SULFUR 2011

HydrocarbonProcessing.com

species. The internal-cooling mixing valve controls the surface temperature under the critical temperature of corrosion. This equipment has been used for more than six years of continuous operations, demonstrating proven reliability for long-term operation. The sulfur manufacturing combustion chamber is another key piece of equipment in this process. It is constructed with corundum-mullite bricks, which have been used in continuous operation for more than 10 years without major maintenance. For catalysts, the process uses a self-developed high-performance catalysts for both catalytic Claus and tail-gas hydrogenation applications. In addition, the process has demonstrated the several competitive advantages over the similarities: • H2S concentration in acid-gas feed may range from 30% to 97% • Ammonia over H2S ratio in feed gas may vary up to 0.42 • Single-train capability from 4 tons to 340 tons of sulfur

GTC Technology in alliance with Shandong Sunway—Sulfur Recovery Technology 2 GTC Technology, in alliance with CrystaTech— CrystaSulf technology

Zhepeng Liu is project manager in the technology department at GTC Technology US, LLC, in Houston, Texas. He has over 15 years’ experience in the refining and petrochemical industry and is a specialist in aromatics and derivatives production processes. Mr. Liu’s background covers the fields of catalyst/process development, process engineering design, commissioning/startup, operation/optimization, technical services and project management. Before joining GTC in 2004, he worked for Sinopec SRIPT, UOP and Shanghai SECCO.

Beitian “Shermaine” Chia

is a technical sales engineer at GTC Technology’s Singapore office. She joined GTC in June 2008 and is actively involved in commercial activities involving licensing support and proposal preparation. Ms. Chia graduated from the Nanyang Technological University with a BS degree in engineering (chemical and biomolecular engineering).

CORPORATE PROFILE: SILCOTEK SULFUR 2011

SilcoTek coatings improve system performance SilcoTek’s coating technology allows customers to improve the performance of process instrumentation, and the plant bottom line, by enabling reliable, accurate sulfur and H2S sampling. For nearly 25 years the Scientists, Engineers and Technicians at SilcoTek have been offering innovative coating solutions to petrochemical, refinery, oil and gas customers. SilcoTek’s CVD technology bonds an inert silicon layer into the surface of stainless steel and other alloys, preventing active compounds like H2S, mercaptan, ammonia, sulfur and mercury species from interacting with fluid pathways or components. SilcoTek’s inert coatings have revolutionized sulfur transport and analysis by eliminating adsorptive effects of stainless steel; allowing transport, storage and detection of ppb level active compounds while maintaining accurate, reliable analytical results. SilcoTek’s patented coating technologies include:

Our newest coating! A tough, durable, inert and corrosion resistant coating designed for harsh environments found in oil and gas exploration, transport and processing.

The ultimate inert coating technology. A required coating when analyzing low levels of organo-sulfur compounds, such as H2S.

A corrosion resistant coating that increases the lifetime of system components by improving corrosion resistance by 10x or more.

A non-stick coating designed to reduce the onset of carbon coking and fouling on stainless steel by 8x.

A high purity coating designed to improve the performance of instrument and vacuum systems. SilcoTek is dedicated to offering upstream and downstream oil and gas customers new, advanced coatings to maximize material performance; making the impossible, possible. Contact information SilcoTek Corporation 112 Benner Circle, Bellefonte, PA 16823 Phone: (814) 353-1778, Fax: (814) 353-1697 Email: [email protected] Website: www.SilcoTek.com

Maximize Material Performance! SilcoTek coatings make the impossible... possible. Solving problems for the process, analytical, oil, gas and semiconductor industries for over 20 years. s%LIMINATESURFACEINTERACTIONWITHACTIVECHEMICALS LIKE(23 MERCURYANDMANYMORE
s$RAMATICALLYIMPROVECORROSIONRESISTANCE s%LIMINATECOKINGORCARBONFOULING s2EPELSMOISTURE QUICKDRYING Improve performance of many common process materials s3TAINLESSSTEEL s#ERAMIC s.ICKELALLOYS s'LASS

s4ITANIUM s#ARBON

,EARNHOW3ILCO4EKCANIMPROVETHEPERFORMANCEOFYOURPRODUCTS VISITOURWEBSITEWWWSilcoTekCOMORCALLUSAT   SPONSORED CONTENT

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING SULFUR 2011

I S-99

UV/Vis and NIR SPECTROP HOTOMET ERS WANTED F OR PROCESS ENGINEER ING.

Plant/proc ess engine er seeks high -performan ce spectropho tometer fo r long-term employme nt. Must be co mpact, rug ge and measu re multiple d componen ts simultan eously.

Put AMETEK’s new IPS-4 on the job. High performance, low maintenance and now available in Infrared! Put next-generation technology to work to verify the quality of your feedstocks, intermediates, final products and more. The new IPS-4 spectrophotometer detects and quantifies thousands of chemical species — up to eight at once. With an IP-65-compliant housing and a 2-year-life lamp, the IPS-4 needs no annual maintenance. So it’s perfect for outdoors, next to inaccessible areas along your process. Just 31 inches wide, the IPS-4 is packed with features including 22-key keypad, analog signal output, 3 digital signal ports, high-speed Ethernet port, plug-and-play/web-based queries, alarm contacts, RS232 and RS485 ports. Plus, its multilingual interface includes English, French, German, Russian and Spanish. The IPS-4 is available in UV/Vis and NIR versions with fully integrated sampling systems. AMETEK’s entire family of spectrophotometer-based analyzers is proven in applications from chemicals and petrochemicals to pharmaceuticals, food and metals processing. To learn more call 412-828-9040 or visit our web site.

www.ametekpi.com Select 56 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

CORPORATE PROFILE: AMETEK PROCESS INSTRUMENTS SULFUR 2011

AMETEK offers extended capabilities for sulfur measurement and analysis For decades AMETEK has provided hydrocarbon processors and sulfur recovery operators with a broad line of instruments specifically designed for process measurement and analysis. The recent addition of Asoma Instruments to its Process Instruments group has extended the company’s capabilities even further, especially in the realm of helping processors meet emerging ultra-low sulfur content regulations. AMETEK’s line now includes instruments for: • feed gas process control • residual H2S measurement • continuous SO2 emissions monitoring • tail gas and pit gas measurement and analysis • tail gas treating unit analysis • H2S, H2 and HC in natural gas • ultra-low-S measurement in fuels • S and Cl in diesel, gasoline, crude oil, bunker fuel, other petroleum distillates • S in high-temperature, high-pressure, viscous fluids like residual and crude oils.

Single- and Multi-Gas Analyzers. AMETEK makes a range of gas analyzers capable of measuring SO2, H2S, and other species with high accuracy. The Model 880-NSL tail gas analyzer has become an industry standard for online analysis of tail gas in SRUs. The robust Model 920 allows multi-range SO2 analysis, with virtually no H2O or CO2 interference, while the Model 932 multigas H2S analyzer uses a sophisticated UV-VIS photometer to measure up to five gas species in applications ranging from feed gas analysis and reaction rate monitoring to impurity detection and quality assurance monitoring.

Benchtop ED-XRF Analyzer. The Phoenix II, a polarized Energy Dispersive-X-Ray Fluorescent (ED-XRF) benchtop analyzer, offers extreme simplicity of operation in a low-cost, compact design. Ideal for elemental analysis of liquids, solids, pastes, slurries and powders, this ED-XRF spectrometer can operate in the rugged production process environment or the laboratory with equal ease. A simple, intuitive touch-screen display makes analysis easy for non-technical operators, yet it’s advanced enough for even the most experienced user, with a “Low S” version capable of detecting less than 1 ppm sulfur in fuels. Predefined, factory-calibrated application packages conform to industry, national and international standards; no need for time-consuming onsite method creation and calibration.

682T-HP. The Model 682T-HP is designed for analysis of sulfur in highly viscous hydrocarbons such as residual and crude oils. This highly sensitive unit easily handles high-sample pressures and situations where fouling of flow-cell windows with paraffin or similar substances can occur.

SPONSORED CONTENT

Designed to measure viscous hydrocarbon in crude lines, pipelines, terminals, and blending operations, the Asoma 682T-HP can help meet emerging lower-sulfurcontent regulations. It’s faster, more sensitive and more compact than previous models, and it provides continuous, reliable detection of sulfur at pressures up to 800 psig. It can operate as a stand-alone analyzer or be tied to plant-wide automation systems to provide real-time strategic measurements. Analysis range for sulfur is 0.04%–6.0%.

Experience Makes the Difference. An installed base of more than 2,000 analyzers and 45 years of quality performance make AMETEK the first choice for hydrocarbon processing and sulfur recovery professionals. Serving the industry with solutions that last…that’s AMETEK Process Instruments. Ask us about operator training, too.

Contact information Phone: 412/828-9040 E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: www.ametekpi.com

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING SULFUR 2011

I S-101

Foster Wheeler Acquires Sulfur Recovery Technology This addition to our technology portfolio enhances our ability to help you reach peak operating and environmental performance.

Find out more at www.fwc.com/sru Select 75 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

CORPORATE PROFILE: FOSTER WHEELER SULFUR 2011

Peak operating, environmental performance with Sulfur Recovery Technology Sulfur Recovery Technology Foster Wheeler’s newly acquired sulfur recovery technology brings clear advantages to our refinery customers. The technology provides a smaller footprint, as well as cost-effective designs with enhanced operability features. Included in the proprietary technology is a Claus unit burner that is capable of destroying ammonia up to 25 mole % in the SRU feed, and providing low level oxygen enrichment up to 28 mole %. The units typically deliver overall sulfur recovery efficiencies ranging from 96% to 99.95% and higher, whereas efficiencies of other sulfur removal technology, for Claus type units, trend a bit lower.

Our Expertise Our personnel employed at the new Foster Wheeler Salt Lake City office are knowledgeable in the design of SRU units, including Claus units, tail gas treating units and tail gas incinerators. Our sulfur expertise also includes sulfur storage, sulfur degassing, sulfur pit vent disposition, sour liquid or gas amine absorbers, amine regenerators, sour water strippers, sulfur condensers, and waste heat boilers. Other areas of proficiency include hazardous waste incineration, natural gas processing, and general refinery units.

3 Catalytic Reactor Beds 200LTPD Sulfur Recovery Unit

Our Scope of Work Coupled with the small footprint, our design offers reduced piping runs that are completely free draining. Lower corrosion and reduced pressure drop are clear benefits from the reduced pipe routing, which also results in lower Capex and enhanced operability and maintenance. Furthermore, all sulfur condenser passes–except the final pass–are typically routed through a single shell, based on unit capacity. We have also successfully designed units in which the thermal reactor waste heat boiler was also included with the sulfur condenser, in a single shell. The mechanical expertise required for reliable and safe design of the waste heat boiler and sulfur condenser tubesheets, as well as the partitioning of the condenser passes in the boiler plenums, has been developed through many years of experience. Steam pressures ranging from 50 psig to 600 psig are available, and each plant is designed to be self-sustaining in steam usage during normal operation. These proven, innovative designs help to set our technology apart from the rest.

Tail Gas Catalytic Reactor 200LTPD Tail Gas Treating Unit

Global Reach Our sulfur technology is currently operating all over the world, including North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. Currently, we are performing basic engineering of sulfur recovery units for four refineries in South America, each with an MDEA amine tail gas treating unit followed by tail gas incineration. In addition to our sulfur recovery technology, Foster Wheeler also has heavy oil conversion technologies including delayed coking, and full EPC capabilities. We are also known in the chemicals, petrochemicals and polymers market. From consultancy and small process unit revamps to large integrated grass root complexes, we deliver comprehensive solutions that meet your requirements. We are truly a global engineering and construction contractor, and power equipment supplier adding value with technically advanced services, reliable facilities and equipment.

Reach your peak operating and environmental performance with Foster Wheeler Sulfur Recovery Technology! SPONSORED CONTENT

Contact information Foster Wheeler USA 10876 S River Front Parkway, Suite 250 South Jordan, UT 84095 Phone: 801 382 6900 Fax: 801 382 6901 Email: [email protected] www.fwc.com 585 N. Dairy Ashford Houston, Texas 77079 Phone: (713) 929-5500 Fax: (713) 929-5170 Email: [email protected] www.fwc.com

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING SULFUR 2011

I S-103

World’s Leader in Sulphur Technologies & Gas Processing With Advanced Sulphur Management We are committed to creating value for our customers. With over 60 years of experience in advanced technolgies, we can provide cost effective solutions through all phases of a project.

Sulphur Technologies Conventional Claus Ammonia & Contaminant Destruction Claus Selectox/Recycle Selectox Lean Acid Gases Oxygen Enrichment Technology Sulphur Degassing Internal & External Technologies Sub Dew Point Process - Up to 99.5% Recovery Beavon Sulphur Removal (BSR) New Technologies

Services t
Concept Development t
Feasibility Studies t
Front-End Engineering t
Site Selection t
Detailed Design t
Engineering t
Procurement t
Program Management

100+ tail gas treaters

For more information, contact [email protected] www.worleyparsons.com

t
Construction t
Construction Management t
Start-up t
Training t
Operations Support t
Optimization & Maintenance

500

sulphur recovery units

Select 72 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

400

gas plants with 250 BSCFD of gas processed

CORPORATE PROFILE: WORLEYPARSONS SULFUR 2011

Unrivalled experience in total sulphur management WorleyParsons is a leading global provider of professional services to the resources & energy sectors and complex process industries. Our services cover the full asset spectrum both in size and life cycle—from the creation of new assets to services that sustain and enhance operation assets. Across our comprehensive global network of 32,900 employees in over 41 countries, our four customer sector groups—Hydrocarbons, Power, Mineral & Metals, Infrastructure and Environment—use their extensive expertise to deliver small studies through to mega-projects.

Total Sulphur Management. WorleyParsons has the unrivalled ability to address all sulphur removal and handling issues across all industry sectors. In whichever industry sector you operate–oil, gas, upstream, downstream, minerals and metals or power generation—and whatever your sulphur related problem— environmental protection, sulphur removal, smelter offgas cleaning, sulphuric acid production, safe sulphur handling and storage—WorleyParsons has the answer. Sulphur removal and management have long been core services in which WorleyParsons is recognized as a world leader, servicing the resources and energy sectors on large and small projects. Our expertise has been built up over many years and covers all major aspects of sulphur management, providing a unique total sulphur management capability. In the early stages of development, our Select team assists asset owners to identify the critical steps and decision points that maximize the value of their sulphur management project. WorleyParsons understands what it takes to create and implement a successful development and our team of global sulphur experts provide quality expertise in environmental assessment, technology selection, infrastructure requirements, and safety considerations. Total Sulphur Management project opportunities can be developed using EcoNomics™, which assists our customers in adopting a broader view of the impacts of their operations and incorporates financial, social and environmental risk into their project decisions to deliver optimized and profitable solutions. This initiative delivers projects that are future-proofed with improved risk management for our customers. Sulphur Recovery Technology. WorleyParsons is a world leader in sulphur recovery technology, with a track record extending over 60 years. We have designed and built more than 550 sulphur plants, more than 120 BSR tail gas units, and more than 66 sulphur plants to oxygen enrichment accounting for more than 60% of the world sulphur production. Our sulphur recovery experience includes projects from the North Slope of Alaska, Asia, Africa, the Americas, and deserts of the Middle East. We have also designed and constructed over 400 gas processing plants throughout the world that correspond to a total capacity of over 300 billion SCFD. We offer unrivalled experience in the design, engineering, commissioning and support of sulphur recovery plants. WorleyParsons currently offers more than ten sulphur recovery processes itself and in conjunction with its partners, such as Linde/ BOC. These technologies include standard and oxygen-enriched Claus technology, tail gas treating technology, and sulphur degassing and are able to meet the most stringent environmental standards. WorleyParsons’ expertise has been maintained and developed by building plants throughout the world using our leading-edge designs and know how. Advanced New Technologies and Greenhouse Gases • Greenhouse Gases and Sulphur Technology RSR® (Rameshni SO2 Production): Reduction of the gas stream containing sulphur dioxide to elemental SPONSORED CONTENT

Consolidated sulphur terminal at Vancouver Wharves. Receiving, storage and ship loading (160,000 tonne storage).

sulphur is carried out by reacting a reducing gas with recycled sulphur to produce a stream containing hydrogen sulfide that may be reacted with the gas stream that contains sulphur dioxide. Gas streams with a molar concentration of sulphur dioxide from 1% to 100% may be processed to achieve nearly 100% recovery efficiency, and at a significantly reduced operating cost. • RCTI® (Rameshni Catalytic Tail Gas Incineration): RCTI® is a new Claus Tail gas process that replaces conventional BSR/amine type (patent pending, Feb. 2008). It uses TGU low temperature catalyst and a selective direct oxidation catalyst. The gas leaving RCTI® can go to the incinerator or other units for processing SO2. This process eliminates NG consumption from conventional RGG by using an indirect heater and reducing fuel gas consumption in the incinerator. • RSC-D® (Rameshni Sulphur Collection-Degassing): RSC-D® is a method for collection of liquid sulphur by using a liquid jet pump or eductor and by pumping the sulphur to a storage vessel and using a portion of liquid sulphur as a jet or eductor motive fluid compromising the new invention. The new invention eliminates the gravity flow constrains and plugging problems. In addition, the new invention provides entrainment and enough agitation in the liquid sulphur where simultaneously degassing occurs in the new method of sulphur collection system. • Ammonia Burning in Tail Gas Treating Unit RAC® (Rameshni Ammonia Combustion): The RAC® process consists of ammonia destruction in a Claus Tail gas treating unit, providing less demand on selling ammonia and limited capacity to burn in sulphur plants. This has been developed to process additional ammonia beyond sulphur capability and replace natural gas consumption in the Claus Tail Gas Treating Unit to support GHGs and reduce CO2 emission.

Contact information Mahin Rameshni Vice President and Global Manager, Sulphur Technology and Gas Processing Phone: +1 626-803-9058 [email protected] www.worleyparsons.com HYDROCARBON PROCESSING SULFUR 2011

I S-105

Select 88 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

LOSS PREVENTION

Review unit-wide impacts on closed-drain drums API 521 standard helps decipher the correct operating pressure for this system R. MUKHOPADHYAY, Consultant, Bangkok, Thailand

C

losed-drain drums are generally intended to receive hydrocarbondrained liquids from various upstream sources. These drains may be maintenance drains, continuous-process drains and open-hazardous drains from drip pans. The vent line of this vessel type is normally routed to the low-pressure (LP) cold vent header—ultimately culminating into a LP cold vent tip. Liquid from the drum is removed periodically. The drum inbreathes during pumping out and out breathes during liquid inflow through the vent line on top. Design pressure. The question is what

should the design pressure be without any liquid seal at the vapor outlet to prevent air ingress? To a process designer, a simple design is very straight forward. The process designer will consider gas blowby scenarios from upstream contributory inlet streams and design the vent line of the closed-drain drum, sufficiently large to cater for the largest inflow rate either from non-continuous maintenance drains or the liquid rate from continuous drains coming through restriction orifices (provided for preventing blow-by scenarios). This would prevent the overpressure generation by allowing adequate out breathing facility in case of large inlet flow to the drum. Based on this simplistic concept, the design pressure of an open-to-atmosphere drum system is set at 3.5 barg = 50 psig, as per standard practice. However, most process designers may not be able to explain why a 50-psig design pressure was chosen. Why not another number? To find an answer to why 50 psig was chosen, you have to remember that, apart from inlet streams coming from upstream and creating overpressure pos-

sibility in the drum, there may be another source of over-pressure as well. Since these drums handle hydrocarbon liquid/vapor mixture and are operating at pressure slightly above atmosphere, there is a chance of air ingress to the drum in some circumstances (shutdown or other instances of inbreathing/pump-out, etc.), potentially inducing an explosion inside the drum. Vessels need to be strong enough to withstand such overpressure from the internal explosion. Note, in many cases, the LP vent header is not generally purged to prevent air ingress. Reasons are to minimize waste of hydrocarbon/nitrogen and green house gas emissions. Hence, the designer may need to rethink the vessel’s design pressure. The explosion overpressure from such a potential internal explosion (deflagration) becomes a key point in correctly assigning the design pressure of such drums. In the past, simulations of explosion scenarios using sophisticated software for limited volume (30-m cloud) had been done (Fig. 1). These calculations used unconfined-explosion models. Maximum over-pressure generated in unconfined explosions is 2.5–3.0 barg or 40 psi. This result is extended to arrive at the extent of over-pressure, suitable for the lower bound of the entire range. Instead of using any arbitrary number in the hydrocarbon processing industry, the number tends to fit the minimum design pressure of such low-pressure atmospheric vessels (non-purged, non-sealed on vapor side) at a minimum 3.5 barg. This is based on the results predicted from mathematical modeling/simulation from an explosion scenario. Following are specific company standard requirements regarding design pressure of closed-drain drums:

TOTAL’S GS-EP-SAF-228 (liquid drainage) states: “The design pressure of the closed-drain drum shall be 3.5 barg or more, in line with API RP 521, to provide minimum resistance to an internal explosion. All facilities connected to a closed drain drum shall be designed at no less than the design pressure of the closed-drain drum.” This is an open-ended statement, stating 3.5 barg or more. How much more pressure is not concluded. What is the method used to arrive at this pressure? Shell’s DEP 80.45.10.10 (pressure relief, flare and vent system design), Section - 4.1.3.2 states: “The knockout drum shall be designed as an ASME pressure vessel with a design pressure of at least 3.5 bar (ga) (50 psig). If no seal vessel is used, the design pressure shall be at least 7 bar (ga) (100 psig). The minimum design pressure of 7 bar (ga) (100 psig) is specified for flare knockout vessels so that the vessel will safely withstand the overpressures from an internal deflagration (i.e., flashback).” BP RP-44-1 also mentions a minimum

design pressure of 7 barg. API-521, Section 7.3.2.4, states:

“Most knockout drums and seal drums are operating at relatively low pressures. To ensure sound construction, a minimum design gauge pressure of 345 kPa (50 psi) is suggested for knockout drums in subsonic flare or other low-pressure applications. A vessel with a design gauge pressure of 345 kPa (50 psi) should not rupture if a deflagration occurs. Stoichiometric hydrocarbon-air mixtures can produce peak explosion pressures on the order of seven to eight times the absolute operating pressure. Most subsonic-flare seal drums HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 107

LOSS PREVENTION operate in the range of gauge pressure from 0 kPa to 34 kPa (0 psi to 50 psi). Seven to eight times the absolute working pressure gives the range of explosion overpressure in such drums as: (0+14.7)* 7 psi to (5+14.7) *7; i.e., 102.9 psi – 137.9 psi or 7 barg – 9.5 barg for most of the subsonic flare seal drums/vent knock-out drums (KODs)—unpurged/unsealed atmospheric closed drain drums. Analyzing the API 521 standard, starting from a minimum 50 psi design gauge pressure, it states

that the vessel would not rupture under deflagrations. However, based on the drum operating pressure, the explosion overpressure can go up to 137.9 psi (9.5 barg) in commonly known cases. Hence, you can’t always stick to a single design pressure value of 50 psig (3.5 barg) for all atmospheric drums. Along with a design pressure arrived at based on purely process considerations, an internal explosion overpressure might become significant if the possibility of such deflagration exists.

Select 174 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS 108

These higher design pressure range values can be justified by the API 521 interpretation, from a mechanical design point of view of carbon steel, which is the most commonly used material for such vessels. Let’s look at API 69 (latest edition) clauses to find a relationship. NFPA 69 has taken it a step further to define two different acceptability criteria with respect to vessel deformation/failure that is: 1) Design pressure for a scenario where explosion causes vessel deformation, but no rupture occurs and 2) Design pressure for a scenario where explosion causes no vessel deformation. Obviously, vessels designed for the second scenario will require higher design pressure (may be higher plate thickness). Some clients prefer design 1, but others prefer design 2. Once the design criteria is established and in line with the NFPA— the design matches harmoniously with the API-521 interpretation of two design pressure ranges: minimum 3.5 barg and the higher side up to 9.5 bar. This depends on the drum’s observed operating pressure. ASME has a method of calculating deflagration containment design pressure for vessels as per Section VIII, Division 1, of the Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code defines two terms to explain the previously mentioned “no rupture” and “no deformation” concepts. It defines the ratio of “ultimate stress” and “enclosure material allowable stress” as a dimensionless entity symbolized by Fu. It also defines the ratio of “yield stress” and “enclosure material allowable stress” as another dimensionless entity symbolized by Fy . Fu corresponds to the “no rupture but deformation” concept, whereas Fy corresponds to the “no deformation” concept. Fu = 60,000/20,000 = 3.00; carbon steel plate; SA-516 60 K02100; Temperature < 150°F Fy = 32,000/20,000 = 1.6; carbon steel p; SA-516 60 K02100; Temperature < 150°F The following excerpt illustrated in Table 1 from ASME Section II, Part D, to justify the values mentioned previously. Line 22 values from Table 1 are relevant for this case of Fu and Fy (60,000, 32,000 and 20,000). Using the concepts of NFPA 69’s standing and following mentioned clauses, the intended range of deflagration design pressures of 3.5 barg to 9.5 barg can be established and verified. Relevant clauses from NFPA 69 are defined: 13.3.4* Given an initial pressure and dimensionless pressure ratio for the poten-

LOSS PREVENTION TABLE 1. Allowable stress (ksi), ASME Section II, Part D, USC Units Alloy Min. tensile Min. yield External Max. Line Nominal Product Spec. Type/ design/Units P- Group strength, strength, pressure use no. composition form No. grade No. No. No. ksi ksi chart No. temp. Notes < 100°F < 150°F < 200°F < 250°F Plate

SA-515

60

K02401

1

1

60

32

CS-2

1,000

G13,T3

21.3

22

Carbon steel

Plate

SA-516

60

K02100

1

1

60

32

CS-2

1,000

G13,T3

23

Carbon steel

Plate

SA-283

D

K02702

1

1

60

33

CS-2

700

4.0

0.40

3.5

0.35

3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

FIG. 1

Explosion overpressure, MPa

tial deflagration, Pmawp shall be selected based on the following conditions as defined by Eqs. 1 and 2: Permanent deformation, but not rupture, of the enclosure can be accepted. Pmawp ≥ [R(Pi =14.7)-14.7]/(2⁄3 Fu ) (1) Permanent deformation of the enclosure cannot be accepted. Pmawp ≥ [R(Pi =14.7) -14.7]/(2⁄3 Fy ) (2) where: Pmawp = enclosure design pressure (psig) according to ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code R = dimensionless pressure ratio Pi = maximum initial pressure at which combustible atmosphere exists (psig) Fu = ratio of ultimate stress of the enclosure to the allowable stress of the enclosure according to ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Fy = ratio of the yield stress of the enclosure to the allowable stress of the materials of construction of the enclosure according to ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. 13.3.4.1* The dimensionless ratio, R, is the ratio of the maximum deflagration pressure, in absolute pressure units, to the maximum initial pressure, in consistent absolute pressure units. 13.3.4.2 For use as a practical design basis (since optimum conditions seldom exist in industrial equipment), the value of R is: • For most gas and air mixtures, the value of R shall be 9 • For St-1 and St-2 dust–air mixtures, the value of R shall be 11 • For St-3 dust–air mixtures, the value of R shall be 13 13.3.4.3 A value for R other than the values specified in 13.3.4.2 shall be permitted to be used if such value can be substantiated by test data or calculations. 13.3.4.4 For operating temperatures below 25°C (77°F), the value of R˙ shall be calculated for use in Eqs. 1 and 2: R˙ = R [298 / (273+Ti )] (3) where: R˙ = deflagration ratio adjusted for operating temperature R = maximum deflagration ratio for the mixture measured at 25°C (77°F) Ti = operating temperature (°C)

20

19.5

19.2

21.3

20

19.5

19.2

22.0

20.7

20.2

19.8

50

0.30

30-m cloud–CFD Simulation A 30-m cloud–CFD Simulation B Design pressure–time curve No. 3

0.25

40

0.20

30

0.15

20

0.10 0.5 0.00 0.00

10 0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40 0.50 0.60 Time, seconds

0.70

0.80

0.90

Explosion overpressure, psi

Carbon steel

Explosion overpressure, bar

21

0 1.00

345-kPa (50-psig) design pressure-time curve and typical model calculations.

13.3.5 The presence of any pressure relief device on the system shall not cause the design pressure calculated by the methods of 13.3.4 to be reduced. 13.3.6* The maximum initial pressure for positive pressure systems shall be as follows: • For positive pressure systems that handle gases and liquids, the maximum initial pressure, Pi, shall be the maximum initial pressure at which a combustible atmosphere is able to exist, but a pressure not higher than the setting of the pressure relief device plus its accumulation. • For positive pressure systems that handle dusts, the maximum initial pressure shall be the greater of the following two pressure values: • Maximum possible discharge pressure of the compressor or blower that is suspending or transporting the material • Setting of the pressure-relief device on the vessel being protected plus its accumulation • For gravity discharge of dusts, the maximum initial pressure shall be the atmospheric gauge pressure (0.0 bar or 0.0 psi). 13.3.7 For systems operating under vacuum, the maximum initial pressure shall not be less than atmospheric gauge pressure (0.0 bar or 0.0 psi). 13.3.8 Auxiliary equipment such as vent systems, man ways, fittings and other openings into the enclosure, which could also experience deflagration pressures, shall be designed to ensure integrity of the total system and shall be inspected periodically.

Using the previously stated concepts of “permanent deformation acceptable” and “permanent deformation not acceptable” and the concepts of ultimate tensile stress, yield stress and allowable stress of the material of construction (usually carbon steel material) with the proper number crunching, the following calculation support is: • Permanent deformation acceptable. R = 9 per NFPA 69 for most gas and air mixtures Pi = 0.0 psig (Assuming Atmospheric conditions) Fu = 60,000/20,000 = 3.00 for carbon steel plate SA-516 60 K02100 temperature < 150°F Pmawp ≥ [9 * (14.7 + 0.0) – 14.7] / [(2/3) * (60,000/20,000)] Pmawp ≥ 58.8 psig for vessel operating @ 0.0 psig (59.25 for 0.1 psig) Matches perfectly with NIOSH’s design pressure vs. time curve (Fig. 1). Pmawp ≥ 283.8 psig for vessel operating @ 50 psig Pmawp ≥ 81.3 psig for vessel operating @ 5 psig. The hydrocarbon processing industry appears to have accepted 50 psig as the design pressure for vessels operating at or near atmospheric pressure. The case valid for permanent deformation accepted but no rupture, in case of internal explosion. “R = 9” given in NFPA for HC. A value of R = 7.8 would give Pmawp= 50 psig. The value of R = 7.8 is in perfect agreement with the statement in API 521 that stoichiometric HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 109

LOSS PREVENTION

in Process Unit Decontamination

New Directions

hydrocarbon-air mixture can produce peak explosion overpressure on the order of seven to eight times the absolute operating pressure. • Permanent deformation not acceptable (preferred by some clients): R = 9 per NFPA 69 for most gas and air mixtures Pi = 0.0 psig (assuming atmospheric conditions) Fy = 32,000/20,000 = 1.6 for carbon steel plate SA-516 60 K02100 temperature

< 150°F Pmawp ≥ [9 * (14.7+0.1) – 14.7] / [(2/3) * (32,000/20,000)] Pmawp ≥ 110.25 psig for vessel operating @ 0.0 psig (111.1 for 0.1 psig) Pmawp ≥ 532.13 psig for vessel operating @ 50 psig Pmawp ≥ 153.4 psig (10.6 barg) for vessel operating @ 5.0 psig; R = 9.0 Pmawp ≥ 131.4 psig (9.0 barg) for vessel operating @ 5.0 psig; R = 7.8 Conclusion: This is an unusual case, if

WHO SHOULD ATTEND:

CURRICULUM: ·Global Best Practices

OPERATIONS ·Process Superintendent ·Operations/Unit Engineer ·Plant Manager ·Waste Water Manager ·Operations Manager/ Supervisor

·Safety – Personnel + Asset Protection ·Decontamination – Trends+Methodologies ·Planning + Logistics ·Chemistries ·Effluent Management ·Economic Benefits

MAINTENANCE RELIABILITY ·Maintenance Manager/Engineer ·Turn Around Manager/Engineer ·Turn Around Planner/Coordinator ·Asset Manager

ENGINEERS ·Tech Service Engineer ·Process Engineer ·Construction Manager ·Utility Manager

ENVIRONMENTAL & SAFETY PROFESSIONALS

Decontamination Trends & Global Best Practices Seminar Discover The Latest Held in Cologne, Germany | October 24-28th 2011 Space is limited so register now at www.deconu.com Sponsored by Zyme-Flow® Sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities available )RUPRUHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDFWDVKOH\EDUEHU#]\PHÁRZFRP

110

Select 175 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

permanent deformation cannot be accepted in case of internal explosion. Usually, after an event like an internal explosion, the vessel integrity would be in question and calls for replacement. However, some clients prefer to have design pressure like this. Hence, for the design concept of the “permanent deformation not acceptable” case, the design pressure of closed-drain drum can be in the range of 9-9.5 barg, in line with the API 521 7.3.2.4 (h) clause and the values mentioned in Shell DEP, TOTAL’s GS-EP, BP-RP and other reputed company standards. Mechanical design view point. A

vessel designed for DP = 100 psig will show permanent deformation, but no rupture up to 300 psig (simple ratio of design. Stress vs. rupture stress or UTS). A vessel designed for DP = 100 psig will not show permanent deformation up to 160 psig (simple ratio of design stress vs. yield stress). A carbon-steel vessel designed for MAOP= 50 psig and a thickness of 1⁄4 in. can be as big as 12 ft diameter. So, do not bother till the vessel diameter exceeds 12 ft. If the diameter exceeds 12 ft, consider increasing the length, keeping the diameter at 12 ft. Design pressure of atmospheric vessels like closed drain drums (not purged), considering internal explosion case: Min. 50 psig (would not rupture as per API 521 Max. = in the range of 131–153.4 psi (9–10.6 barg), considering a variation of R from 7.0–9.0. It is established with calculation supports and references that 50 psig–153.4 psig is the range of design pressure of the closeddrain drum type atmospheric low-pressure vessels, handling hydrocarbon vapor/liquid, with no liquid seal for the LP vent from the vessel; the usual operating pressure of the vessel varies from 0–5 psig. This is on the basis of deflagration (internal explosion) over-pressure, mentioned in many operating company standards and API 521. HP Rajib Mukhopadhyay earned a BTech degree in chemical technology and a BSc degree in chemistry from the University of Calcutta. He has more than 17 years of professional experience in oil and gas sector, specializing in the process safety and loss prevention field. Mr. Mukhopadhyay has extensive hands-on experience in operation, commissioning and trouble-shooting process operations. He has worked for numerous engineering and production organizations.

Where do You Want to be on the Performance Curve?

P = People M= Methodologies T = Technologies

Your Company + KBC Produces NextGen Performancen We collaborate with our clients to create unique solutions to their specific challenges. Some of these challenges may include: Strategic Challenges

Capital Challenges

U Creating Effective Business Strategy/Decisions U Increasing Return on Investments U Enhancing Returns on Acquisitions/Divestitures U Reducing Strategic/Capital/Market/Investment Risk U Enhancing Yields U Creating Effective Response to Crude/ Feedstock/Product Markets U Improving Financial Performance

U Increasing Return on Capital Investment U Rationalising/Optimising Environmental Compliance Capital Expenditures U Reducing Capital Risk

Operating Challenges U Improving Yield U Increasing Availability U Reducing Maintenance Costs U Improving Safety Performance U Implementing/Improving U Managing Operational Risk Behaviour-based Reliability U Improving Supply Chain Performance

Organisational Challenges U Increasing Organisational Effectiveness U Improving Employee Competency/Capability U Enhancing Employee Support Systems U Improving Shift Team Function

Environmental Challenges U Reducing Emissions U Ensuring Compliance U Reducing/Managing Environmental Liabilities U Improving Energy Efficiency U Rationalising Compliance Expenditures

For 30 years, KBC consultants have provided independent advice and expertise to enable leading companies in the global energy business and other processing industries manage risk and achieve dramatic performance improvements. Select 99 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

For more information on how KBC can help you achieve NextGen Performance, contact us at: AMERICAS +1 281 293 8200 EMEA +44 (0)1932 242424 ASIA +65 6735 5488 [email protected] U www.kbcat.com

PROCESS INSIGHT Optimizing CO2 Capture, Dehydration and Compression Facilities The removal of CO2 by liquid absorbents is widely implemented in the field of gas processing, chemical production, and coal gasification. Many power plants are looking at post-combustion CO2 recovery to meet environmental regulations and to produce CO2 for enhanced oil recovery applications. The figure below illustrates actual data of fuel consumption in 2005 and an estimate of energy demand for various fuels from 2010 to 2030. The world energy demand will likely increase at rates of 10–15% every 10 years. This increase could raise the CO2 emissions by about 50% by 2030 as compared with the current level of CO2 emissions. The industrial countries (North America, Western Europe and OECD Pacific) contribute to this jump in emissions by 70% compared to the rest of the world, and more than 60% of these emissions will come from power generation and industrial sectors.

formulated solvent without implementing any split flow configurations. This is much less than the reported steam usage for the MEA solvent. The design of a facility to capture 90% of the CO2 from the flue gas of a coal fired power plant is based on the specified flue gas conditions, CO2 product specifications, and constraints. Using the ProMax® process simulation software from Bryan Research & Engineering, CO2 capture units can be designed and optimized for the required CO2 recovery using a variety of amine solvents. The following figure represents a simplified process flow diagram for the proposed CO2 Capture Plant.

Despite the strong recommendations from certain governments, there are very few actual investments in CO2 capture facilities geared toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions mainly because of the high cost of CO2 recovery from flue gas. CO2 capture costs can be minimized, however, by designing an energy efficient gas absorption process. Based on the findings of recent conceptual engineering studies, HTC Purenergy estimated the production cost to be US$ 49/ton CO2 (US$ 54/ tonne CO2) for 90% CO2 recovery of 4 mole% CO2 content in the flue gas of NGCC power plants. A separate study showed the cost for 90% CO2 recovery of 12 mole% CO2 from a coal fired power plant to be US$ 30/ton CO2 (US$ 33/tonne CO2). The cost of CO2 recovery from coal power plant flue gas is substantially less than that of NGCC power plant flue gas due to the higher CO2 content in the feed. The energy efficiency of a CO2 capture plant depends primarily on the performance of the solvent and optimization of the plant. In traditional flue gas plant designs, MEA was the primary solvent and was limited to 20 wt% to minimize equipment corrosion. Recent developments in controlling corrosion and degradation has allowed an increase in the solvent concentration to about 30 wt% thus decreasing the required circulation and subsequent steam demand. A recent DOE study shows the steam consumption for an existing CO2 plant using 18 wt% MEA (Kerr McGee Process) is 3.45 lb of steam per lb of CO2 for amine regeneration. A modern process that uses 30 wt% MEA is expected to use 1.67 lb of steam per lb of CO2 for amine regeneration. The HTC formulated solvent is a proprietary blend of amines and has a lower steam usage than the conventional MEA solvent. Based on the material and energy balances for the plant designed in the recent study, the reboiler steam consumption is estimated at about 1.47 lb steam/lb CO2 using the proposed

The table below presents the main findings for CO2 capture from the coal fired power plant and the NGCC power plant, each designed to produce about 3307 ton per day (3,000 TPD metric). To produce the same capacity of CO2, only one train with smaller column diameters is required in the case of the coal power plant and two trains with larger column diameters are required in the NGCC Power Plant case. This is mainly due to processing a larger flue gas with lower CO2 content in the NGCC power plant. Consequently, a substantial reduction in the capital and production cost was reported for the coal fired power plant CO2 recovery facility.

For more information about this study, see the full article at www.bre.com/support/technical-articles/gas-treating.aspx.

Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 4747 • Bryan, Texas USA • 77805 979-776-5220 • www.bre.com • [email protected] Select 113 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

PROCESS DESIGN

Design an efficient exchanger network Advanced heat integration and pinch technology reduces energy consumption F. RIKHTEHGAR, KBS Co., Tehran, Iran

TABLE 1. Stream data Stream no. 1

⌬H, KW

CP, W/ºC

80

2,000

20

Stream Supply temp., Target temp., type ºC ºC Hot

180

2

Hot

130

40

3,600

40

3

Cold

60

100

3,200

80

4

Cold

30

120

3,240

36

(HENs)–generating savings in processes and total sites. Wherever heating and cooling process materials take place, there is a potential opportunity to save energy. Composite curve. HEN analysis first identifies hot and cold

stream sources (source and sink) from the material and energy balance. For instance, the current typical flowsheet of a specialty chemical process is considered (Fig. 1). For heat exchange, there are only three streams (reactor feed, reactor product and column product). The supply and target temperature and enthalpy change of four streams are given in Table 1.

180 Temperature, °C

E

nergy use in chemical plants, such as refineries and petrochemical facilities is complex and interrelated. Identifying where and how energy use can be improved is best pursed using a system approach that inherently takes these complexities and interactions into account. This article will demonstrate the basic principles and capabilities of pinch technology; how its energy targeting capability is used to determine the scope for reducing energy consumption and costs; and the design methods used to improve heat-recovery networks and process-utility systems for olefin plants. The intent is to illustrate the potential for energy recovery in each chemical process, how much heating/ cooling is actually required for the process, and how we can design a process that achieves the energy target. The term pinch technology was introduced by Linnhoff to represent a thermodynamically based methodology that guarantees minimum energy levels in the design of heat exchanger networks

150

Hot composite curve

100 ΔTmin = 10°C

50

H FIG. 2

Current case composite curve.

60°

QHmin = 960

ΔH 3,200 heat

Condenser

ΔH 3,240 heat

120°

R1

72° Reboiler

R2 130°

180°

FIG. 1

Flowsheet of a case study.

ΔH 2,000 cool

ΔH 40° 3,600 cool

Temperature, °C

200

100° 30°

Cold composite curve

150 100 ΔTmin = 10°C

50

80°

QCmin = 120 H FIG. 3

Composite curve of targeting case.

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 113

PROCESS DESIGN QHmin

Energy

Temperature

Cost

Total

Fig. 2 shows ΔTmin = 10°C, and, for this flowsheet, the hot and cold utility recovery is 960 and 120 units respectively. The importance of ΔTmin is that it sets the relative location of the hot and cold streams, and therefore the heat recovery amount (Fig. 4). The heat-recovery pinch. To achieve

a small ΔTmin, the types of heat exchanger and fluid regime are important. We consider counter-current flow for that and operating with a ΔT min less than 10°C should be avoided. In Table 2, minimum approach temperature for some industries has been shown. The correct setting of composite curves is defined by an economic trade-off between energy and capital cost, according to selecting ΔTmin. Fig. 4 illusTinterval trates the total system cost as the relative QHmin position of composite curves is changed over a range of ΔTmin. There is a trade-off between energy and capital cost and an eco␣ nomic amount of energy recovery, thus this trade-off can be carried out using energy and capital cost targets. Pinch principles include: • Do not recover process heat across QCmin pinch H Grand composite • Do not use cold utility above pinch • Do not use hot utility below pinch • CP rule: CPOUT >= CPIN for feasibility. During pinch analysis, threshold problems may occur when the composite curves are closer together. In this case, one of the hot/cold utilities will be zero while the utility consumption is constant. Finally, the cost graph will be shown according to this constraint. A better method to calculate the energy targets is the problem table algorithm. By shifting the composite curves (CCs), ΔTmin /2, you can do the heat balance across the shifted CC and shifted temperature intervals. In each shifted temperature interval, the calculated energy balance is: ΔTmin

Capital QCmin ΔTmin

FIG. 4

H

Balanced composite curve.

␣

Tinterval

Temperature

QHmin

QCmin H Composite curves

FIG. 5

H Shifted composites

Grand composite curve of a case study.

7

Temperature

6 5

ΔHi = [ ∑ CPC-∑CPH ] ΔTi

4 3 2 1

(

7 qstream 1 ––– ∑ ––– Network area: Amin = ∑ DT H LM interval

)

H FIG. 7

Area integrity of HEN.

Consider steam at 200°C and cooling water (CW) at 20°C for heating and cooling utilities. It is preferable to try to recover the heat between process streams. The scope for heat recovery can be determined by plotting all streams on T-H diagram (Fig. 2). 114

(1)

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

Utility selection. Part of heat recovery is calculated by using external utilities. The remaining maximum heat recovery of HEN should be calculated with utilities after the heat recovery of process-process heat exchangers. The common hot utility is steam in several levels; flue gas or hot oil are designated as high-temperature utilities. Cooling water, air cooling, air preheater and some steam generation are designated as cold utilities. In pinch analysis, the grand composite curve (GCC) is an appropriate tool to show the interface between the process and utility system (Fig. 5). With the GCC method, the premise is to use the specified utility at the appropriate levels. For hot utility, use at the lowest temperature and generate at the highest temperature. For a cold utility, use at the highest temperature and generate at the lowest temperature. Grid diagram. The energy recovery analysis considers two

separated regions as below and above the pinch to achieve energy

PROCESS DESIGN targets during the HEN design. For instance, if there is a chemical plant flowsheet, it is complicated to show the pinch point, streams and the overall required diagram. Thus, another tool to represent pinch design is needed. The grid diagram is used when the designer focuses on streams that need heating/cooling and removal of all unit operations except heat exchangers, heaters and coolers. In the grid diagram, all the hot/cold streams are clear and the related heat-exchange region should be clarified (Fig. 6—Editor’s note: Fig. 6 is available online at HydrocarbonProcessing. com).

this study, the cracking furnace and super-heater were excluded due to acceptable heat integration and the reaction that was done. A ΔTmin value of 10°C was chosen to mention future potential savings. The extracted stream data is shown in Table 3 (Editor’s

Poor economics Good economics

Don’t discard existing area

Heat-exchanger area target. It is possible to predict the Ideal scenario Area

required area for the entire problem by using the vertical enthalpy intervals; the area calculated with this model is only minimal when all the stream heat-transfer coefficients are equal. For each enthalpy interval, we can predict the area requirement from the composite curves. The duty and heat-transfer coefficient are obtained from the stream data, and the log-mean temperature difference (ΔTLM) is derived from the composite curves (Fig. 7).

Existing network

‘Grassroots’ optimum

Grassroots trade-off curve Infeasible

Retrofiting exchanger networks. Most industry own-

Olefin plant pinch analysis. For a

more detailed study, in this step consider a case study of pinch analysis on an olefin plant, located south of Iran (BIPC). The plant’s capacity is 411,000 metric tons/yr of ethylene product. Process data was taken from the design process flow diagrams and discussions with operating engineers. The olefins unit was separated for the pinch analysis into cold and hot sections. This is due to the significant differences in temperatures and operation economics. During

Temperature, C

Temperature, C

ers are interested to do it by considering the minimum required Energy energy consumption. Revamping the heat-exchanger network will be the key factor within these projects. Pinch studies for FIG. 8 Area/Energy trade-off. revamp projects are more common. The technique used in this technology is retrofit. The need to retrofit might arise from a desire to reduce the 900 utility consumption of the existing netHot composite 800 work. If the need to increase throughput Cold composite is required, modify the feed to the process 700 or apply a modification to the product 600 specification. Naphtha furnace 500 A typical capital/energy trade-off durproduct ing a revamp project is explained using the 400 Ethane furnace product grassroots trade-off curve as a basis, (Fig. 8). 300 Any existing design or revamped design will Dilution steam Quench oil 200 lie above the grassroots curve. The shaded Quench water heat recovery area is infeasible for any revamp design. 100 Column reboilers However, in a revamp situation, the Liquid feed 0 objective is to make the best use of the 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Enthalpy, GJ/h existing area. In an ideal scenario, one FIG. 9 Composite curves for ethylene hot section. would like to proceed horizontally, as shown (maintaining the same area but reducing energy). A realistic revamp project will follow a curve that represents increased 900 area requirements and reduced energy Process GCC 800 requirements (Fig. 8). A curve with better Utility GCC Naphtha furnace product economics is closer to the grassroots curve. 700 600

Ethane furnace product

500 400 U: HP steam (gen)

300 200

U: PS steam

100

Dilution steam

0 0 FIG. 10

U: MP steam Pygas rec cooler Quench water heat recovery Liquid feed U: cooling water

100

200 Enthalpy, GJ/h

300

400

GCC for ethylene hot section.

HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 115

PROCESS DESIGN TABLE 2. Industrial recommended ⌬Tmin Industrial sector

Experience ⌬Tmin value, °C

Oil refineries

20–40

Petrochemicals

10-20

Chemical plants

10–20

Low temperature processes

3–5

TABLE 4. Energy targets and gaps Heating

Target, Gj/hr

Now, Gj/hr

To save, Gj/hr

MPS

68.2

133.9

65.7

PS

19.1

50.8

31.7

Total hot

87.3

184.7

97.4

Cooling

Target, Gj/hr

Now, Gj/hr

To save, Gj/hr

PS (Gen)

0

62.1

62.1

CW

114.2

321.1

206.9

HPS (Gen)

148.7

135.1

–13.6

Sea Water

151.5

0

–151.5

C3, 20°C

6.46

0

–6.46

Total cold

420.9

518.3

97.4

Total energy

508.2

703

194.8

note: Table 3 is available online at HydrocarbonProcessing.com). Fig. 9 illustrates the composite curves for the process. The energy targets and the pinch temperatures obtained by the pinch analysis are shown in the Table 4.

Table 4 illustrates that the total potential savings is 194.8 GJ/hr. The majority of the savings should be achieved through reducing steam use and increasing high-pressure steam generation. Fig. 10 shows the grand composite curve for the utility data. According to GCC, it recommends that MPS should be used to increase high-pressure steam generation since it is a higher level and more beneficial for the plant. The other case is using a cross pinch, but it causes some energy penalties within the HEN and using the retrofit project can optimize these problems for energy targeting. Conclusion. The best design for an energy-efficient HEN results in a trade-off between the equipment and operating cost. This is dependent on the choice of the ΔTmin for the process. Pinch technology can help guide the choice of process modification. It can be applied to generate financial savings by improving heat recovery and reducing utility loads. Pinch analysis begins with the heat and material balance, and certain parameters should be chosen. It is very important to extract the required data for taking into account when a new design or a retrofit study is prepared. It consists of the key targeting steps: heat recovery improvement, utility selection and process changes. HP LITERATURE CITED Complete literature cited is available online at HydrocarbonProcessing.com. Farbod Rikhtehgar is a process engineer at KBS Co., specializing in modeling and simulation studies of refineries and petrochemical plants. He has a BS degree in chemical engineering from Iran University of Science and Technology and an MS degree, specializing in energy from Tehran University.

Buzau - ROMANIA phone: +40 238 725 500 www.betabuzau.ro

116

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

Select 176 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

ENGINEERING CASE HISTORIES

Case 62: Useful shaft stress equations to remember Committing several equations to memory can be useful T. SOFRONAS, Consulting Engineer, Houston, Texas

R

emembering complex equations is not required for reasonable on-thespot answers. Neither are sophisticated computer studies when a quick screening study will be satisfactory. This case history shows simple equations1 that have been useful for making quick decisions. Failed solid circular shafts. Too much shaft torque can cause failures; so it’s good to remember this torque equation: Torque due to horsepower (HP): T = 63,000  HP / rpm in-lb Torsional shear stress failure solid circular shaft is: Ss = 16  K  Tin-lb/ (π  Din

3)

lb/in2

K is the stress magnifier caused by sharp corners such as keyways and steps (shoulders). K = 2 can be used for both torsion and bending. Assuming no material data were available for more accurate decisions, calculations showing stress Ss greater than 25,000 lb/in2 for mild steels would be cause for concern. Bending failure solid circular shaft. There is usually a bending moment M (inlb) acting on the shaft. Sb = 32K  Min-lb / (π  Din3 ) lb/in2 Calculating Sb greater than 50,000 lb/ in2 would be a concern for mild steels without materials data. Fatigue failures shafting. Cyclic torque or bending on shafting can result in fatigue cracking at stresses much lower than the yield strength. When fluctuating loads are calculated using the above equations, they need to be compared to the endurance limit of the steel. The uncorrected endurance limit is approximately half the ultimate strength of the steel. “Uncorrected” means a perfectly smooth shaft with no imperfections. Cor-

rosion, poor surface finish and other irregularities could reduce this value by 50% or more. In the case of a welded shaft the cyclic stresses at even a good weld should be less than approximately 2,000 lb/in2 to avoid risking fatigue type failures. Combined stresses. When shear stresses (S s ) and bending stresses (S b) are both present at the same section of the shaft at the same time, the two combine into an equivalent stress Se , which should then be compared to the yield stress:

Motor

M

Failure

Se = ( Sb2 + 3Ss2 ) ⁄ lb/in2 1

2

Equations on a vertical centrifugal pump. Consider a 1-in. broken shaft, as shown in Fig. 1. This is a 75-hp pump operating at 3,560 prm. The shaft broke near a steady bushing and the moment at that point was M. Using the previous equations: FIG. 1

T = 1,327 in-lb and Ss = 13,520 lb/in2 is much less than the 25,000 lb/in2 yield. The shaft should not have failed in torsion unless the material yield properties were lower or there was a torque 2 times or more above design. Lower material properties might be possible due to corrosion or a material substitution made at a repair. Since M is unknown, so is Sb ; we will thus determine what M would have to be to cause the shaft to fail at the location observed: 50,000 =[{ 32  2  M / (π  3  13,5202 ] ⁄ 1

13)}2

+

2

M = 2,170 in-lbf This is a significant bending moment for a shaft that should not have such a moment at this location. Yet, there was a failure. It would be logical to now request a metallurgical examination of the fracture surface, and the outcome of such an examination will be valuable. A bending-torsion failure might suggest misalignment. A pure

Vertical pump shaft failure.

torsional failure might suggest binding. Fatigue might suggest cavitation, or vibratory activity due to misalignment or unbalance. Low-material strength properties due to corrosion damage or inadequate material selection may have led to failure because low-strength materials simply cannot carry the imposed load. HP 1

LITERATURE CITED Sofronas, A., Analytical Troubleshooting of Process Machinery and Pressure Vessels: Including Real-World Case Studies, John Wiley & Sons, p. 6.

Dr. Tony Sofronas , PE, was worldwide lead mechanical engineer for ExxonMobil before his retirement. Information on his books, seminars and consulting, as well as comments to this article, are available at http://mechanical engineeringhelp.com. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 117

HPI MARKETPLACE

Select 201 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Dept. of the Navy approved for cleaning seawater systems

DISSOLVES LIME SCALE It is safe for employees, equipment and the environment. NSF A3 approved • Biodegradable • Non-Corrosive, Non-Flammable • Changes color when spent. For information : [email protected]

800.749.5823 • www.sublimedescaler.com Select 203 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Select 202 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

SURPLUS GAS PROCESSING/REFINING EQUIPMENT 25 MMCFD x 1100 PSIG PROPAK REFRIGERATION PLANT 28 TPD SELECTOX SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT 1100 BPD LPG CONTACTOR x 7.5 GPM CAUSTIC REGEN NGL/LPG PLANTS: 10–600 MMCFD AMINE PLANTS: 60–3300 GPM SULFUR PLANTS: 10–180 TPD FRACTIONATION: 1000–25,000 BPD HELIUM RECOVERY: 75 & 80 MMCFD NITROGEN REJECTION: 25–100 MMCFD MANY OTHER REFINING/GAS PROCESSING UNITS We offer engineered surplus equipment solutions.

0IPE3TRESS 0ROCESS3IMULATION 0ELLETIZING$IE$ESIGN (EAT4RANSFER!NALYSIS &INITE%LEMENT!NALYSIS #OMPUTATIONAL&LUID$YNAMICS 6ESSEL%XCHANGER-ACHINE$ESIGN 2OTOR$YNAMICS3TRUCTURAL$YNAMICS 3PECIALISTSINDESIGN FAILURE ANALYSIS ANDTROUBLESHOOTINGOF STATICANDROTATINGEQUIPMENT

Bexar Energy Holdings, Inc. Phone 210-342-7106 s Fax 210-223-0018 www.bexarenergy.com s Email: [email protected]

WWWKNIGHTHAWKCOM

Select 204 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

(OUSTON 4EXAS 4ELss &AXss

Select 206 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

WABASH SELLS & RENTS BOILERS & DIESEL GENERATORS FAST EMERGENCY SERVICE

800-704-2002

www.wabashpower.com FAX: 847-541-1279 847-541-5600

Select 205 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

NOISE

CONTROL ENGINEERING

HFP Acoustical Consultants Houston TX

Calgary AB

(888) 789-9400

(888) 259-3600

(713) 789-9400

(403) 259-6600

E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.hfpacoustical.com Select 207 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS 118

I APRIL 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

Select 208 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Select 209 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

HPI MARKETPLACE CA Co PE-O mp PE lian N t!

&MJNJOBUF
7BMWF
$BWJUBUJPO s0LACEONEORMOREDIFFUSERSDOWNSTREAM OFAVALVETOELIMINATECAVITATION s%LIMINATENOISE s%LIMINATEPIPEVIBRATION s2EDUCEVALVElRSTCOSTS s2EDUCEVALVEMAINTENANCE

HTRI Xchanger Suite® – an integrated, easy-to-use suite of tools that delivers accurate design calculations for • shell-and-tube heat exchangers • jacketed-pipe heat exchangers • hairpin heat exchangers • plate-and-frame heat exchangers • spiral plate heat exchangers

• fired heaters • air coolers • economizers • tube layouts • vibration analysis

Interfaces with many process simulator and physical property packages either directly or via CAPE-OPEN. Heat Transfer Research, Inc. 150 Venture Drive College Station, Texas 77845, USA

[email protected] www.HTRI.net

Select 211 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Flexware

#53ERVICES,,#

®

0ARKVIEW#IR %LK'ROVE6LG ), 0HONE  sRCRONFEL CUSERVICESNET WWWCUSERVICESNET Select 210 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Turbomachinery Engineers

®

Turbomachinery Training Compressors Steam Turbines Gas Turbines Performance Analysis, Evaluation, Troubleshooting Problem Resolution, Case Studies, Reliability,

Train with the Best

Anibal Arias

Ted Gresh

EXPERT INSTRUCTORS WITH YEARS OF GLOBAL EXPERIENCE "I feel your course is very beneficial because of the technical content. It is one step more advanced than a typical OEM course ..." Yuthana Preechalai, PTT Aromatics and Refining, PLC, Rayong, Thailand

FREE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS SOFTWARE Select 212 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Call 713-520-4449 for details about Hydrocarbon Processing’s

Recruitment Advertising Program Use a combination of print, recruitment e-newsletter, plus Website to reach our total audience circulation of more than 100,000!

o o o o

Maximize Plant Production & Reliability Optimize Your Condition Based Equipment Reliability Program Confirm OEM Performance Guarantee Optimize Equipment Utilization

Pattaya

Istanbul

Quebec City

Ft McMurray

September – October - 2011

www.flexwareinc.com [email protected] 1-724-527-3911 Select 213 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS HYDROCARBON PROCESSING APRIL 2011

I 119

SALES OFFICES—EUROPE FRANCE, GREECE, NORTH AFRICA, MIDDLE EAST, SPAIN, PORTUGAL, SOUTHERN BELGIUM, LUXEMBOURG, SWITZERLAND, GERMANY, AUSTRIA, TURKEY Bill Wageneck, Publisher Phone: +1 (713) 529-4301 Fax: +1 (713) 520-4433 E-mail: [email protected] www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com

SALES OFFICES—NORTH AMERICA IL, LA, MO, OK, TX Josh Mayer Phone: +1 (972) 816-6745, Fax: +1 (972) 767-4442 E-mail: [email protected]

AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, MI, MN, MS, MT, ND, NE, NM, NV, OR, SD, TN, TX, UT, WA, WI, WY, WESTERN CANADA Laura Kane Phone: +1 (713) 520-4449, Fax: +1 (713) 520-4459 Mobile: +1 (713) 412-2389 E-mail: [email protected]

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, VA, VT, WV, EASTERN CANADA Merrie Lynch Phone: +1 (617) 357-8190, Fax: +1 (617) 357-8194 Mobile: +1 (617) 594-4943 E-mail: [email protected]

DATA PRODUCTS AND CLASSIFIED SALES Drew Combs, Gulf Publishing Company Phone: +1 (713) 520-4409, Fax: +1 (713) 525-4631 E-mail: [email protected]

Catherine Watkins Tél.: +33 (0)1 30 47 92 51 Fax: +33 (0)1 30 47 92 40 E-mail: [email protected]

ITALY, EASTERN EUROPE Fabio Potestá Mediapoint & Communications SRL Phone: +39 (010) 570-4948 Fax: +39 (010) 553-0088 E-mail: [email protected]

RUSSIA/FSU Lilia Fedotova Anik International & Co. Ltd. Phone: +7 (495) 628-10-333 E-mail: [email protected]

UNITED KINGDOM/SCANDINAVIA, NORTHERN BELGIUM, THE NETHERLANDS Michael Brown Phone: +44 161 440 0854 Mobile: +44 79866 34646 E-mail: [email protected]

SALES OFFICES—OTHER AREAS AUSTRALIA—Perth Brian Arnold Phone: +61 (8) 9332-9839, Fax: +61 (8) 9313-6442 E-mail: [email protected]

CHINA—Hong Kong Iris Yuen Phone: +86 13802701367, (China) Phone: +852 69185500, (Hong Kong) E-mail: [email protected]

BRAZIL—São Paulo Alfred Bilyk Phone/Fax: +55 (11) 23 37 42 40 Mobile: +55 (11) 85 86 52 59 E-mail: [email protected]

INDIA Manav Kanwar Phone: +91-22-2837 7070/71/72 Fax: +91-22-2822 2803 Mobile: +91-98673 67374 E-mail: [email protected]

JAPAN—Tokyo Yoshinori Ikeda Pacific Business Inc. Phone: +81 (3) 3661-6138 Fax: +81 (3) 3661-6139 E-mail: [email protected]

INDONESIA, MALAYSIA, SINGAPORE, THAILAND Peggy Thay Publicitas Singapore Pte Ltd Phone: +65 6836-2272 Fax: +65 6634-5231 E-mail: [email protected]

PAKISTAN—Karachi S. E. Ahmed Intermedia Communications Phone: +92 (21) 663-4795 Fax: +92 (21) 663-4795

REPRINTS Rhona Brown, Foster Printing Service Phone: +1 (866) 879-9144 ext. 194 E-mail: [email protected]

ARE YOU TAKING FULL ADVANTAGE OF HYDROCARBON PROCESSING?

Subscriber Only Benefits

Discover all the benefits of being a premium subscriber and gain full access to HydrocarbonProcessing.com

Twelve monthly issues in print or digital format and premium access to HydrocarbonProcessing.com, including: • All the latest issues and Process Handbooks • HP’s extensive archive containing 8 years of back issues • A subject/author index of print articles with links to articles available online • Monthly e-newsletters providing an early preview of upcoming special editorial features and exclusive content. Published since 1922, Hydrocarbon Processing provides operational and technical information to improve plant reliability, profitability, safety and end-product quality. The editors of Hydrocarbon Processing bring you first-hand knowledge on the latest advances in technologies and technical articles to help you do your job more effectively.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY! Log on to www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com or call +1 (713) 520-4440.

Subscribe online at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com or call +1 (713) 520-4440

120

I APRIL 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

As a Hydrocarbon Processing premium subscriber, you will receive full access to WorldOil.com as well as World Oil magazine in your choice of print or digital format. Start your subscription today.

FREE Product and Service Information—MAY 2011 HOW TO USE THE INDEX: The FIRST NUMBER after the company name is the page on which an advertisement appears. The SECOND NUMBER, appearing in parentheses, after the company name, is the READER SERVICE NUMBER. There are several ways readers can obtain information: 1. The quickest way to request information from an advertiser or about an editorial item is to go to www. HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS. If you follow the instructions on the screen your request will be forwarded for immediate action. 2. Go online to the advertiser's Website listed below. 3. Circle the Reader Service Number below and fax this page to +1 (416) 620-9790. Include your name, company, complete address, phone number, fax number and e-mail address, and check the box on the right for your division of industry and job title. Name ________________________________________________________

Company ________________________________________________________

Address ______________________________________________________

City/State/Zip ____________________________________________________

Country ______________________________________________________

Phone No. _______________________________________________________

FAX No. ______________________________________________________

e-mail ___________________________________________________________

This Advertisers’ Index and procedure for securing additional information is provided as a service to Hydrocarbon Processing advertisers and a convenience to our readers. Gulf Publishing Co. is not responsible for omissions or errors.

This information must be provided to process your request: PRIMARY DIVISION OF INDUSTRY (check one only): A B C F G H J P

䊐-Refining Company 䊐-Petrochemical Co. 䊐-Gas Processing Co. 䊐-Equipment Manufacturer 䊐-Supply Company 䊐-Service Company 䊐-Chemical Co. 䊐-Engrg./Construction Co.

JOB FUNCTION (check one only): B E F G I J

䊐-Company Official, Manager 䊐-Engineer or Consultant 䊐-Supt. or Asst. 䊐-Foreman or Asst. 䊐-Chemist 䊐-Purchasing Agt.

ADVERTISERS in this issue of HYDROCARBON PROCESSING Company Website

Page

RS#

ABV Energy S.p.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 (156) ACS Industries Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 (159) (97)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-97

Ametek Process Instruments . . . . . . . 34 (155) www.info.hotims.com/35903-155

(67) (57)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-170

Beta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 (176) www.info.hotims.com/35903-176

Bryan Research & Engineering . . . . . 112 (113) www.info.hotims.com/35903-113

Burndy Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 (151) www.info.hotims.com/35903-151

(87)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-87

(84)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-84

Delta Valve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

(54)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-54

Eidos Sap SRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

(94)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-94

Elliott Company. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

(52)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-52

Emerson Process Management (Fisher Controls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

(86)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-86

www.info.hotims.com/35903-157

www.info.hotims.com/35903-165

154

www.info.hotims.com/35903-154

Idrojet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 (166) Inpro / Seal Company . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (153) www.info.hotims.com/35903-153

(90) (99)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-99

KBR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

(60)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-60

Linde Process Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

(81)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-81

Lurgi GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

ENI S.p.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 (173)

(61)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-61

(78)

Merichem Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 (164) Microtherm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 (167) www.info.hotims.com/35903-167

Nace International. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 www.info.hotims.com/35903-96

PARCOL SpA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 (162) www.info.hotims.com/35903-162

Quest Integrity Group LLC . . . . . . . . . 62 (163) www.info.hotims.com/35903-163

Rentech Boiler Services . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

(58)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-58 www.info.hotims.com/35903-160 www.info.hotims.com/35903-100

Saudi Basic Ind Corp . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

(62)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-62

Selas Fluid Processing Corp . . . . . . . . 53

(82)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-82

Servomex Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 (169) www.info.hotims.com/35903-169

Shin Nippon Machinery Co., Ltd. . . . 108 (174) www.info.hotims.com/35903-174

Spraying Systems Co . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

(66)

Sulzer Chemtech, USA Inc.. . . . . . . . . 51

(68)

Swagelok Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

(63)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-63

Total Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

(73)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-73

Trachte USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 (172) www.info.hotims.com/35903-172

Tray-Tec Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 (168)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-164

(80)

(98)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-68

www.info.hotims.com/35903-90

KBC Advanced Technologies Inc . . . . 111

Paharpur Cooling Towers, Ltd. . . . . . . 39

www.info.hotims.com/35903-66

www.info.hotims.com/35903-166

Johnson Screens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

RS#

Sandvik Steel AB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 (100)

Event—IRPC Asia . . . . . . . . . . . 21–24 HPI Maketplace . . . . . . . . . . . 118–119 Hermetic Pumpen GmbH . . . . . . . . . . 72 (165) Hoerbiger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26-27

Page

Samson GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 (160)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-171

www.info.hotims.com/35903-78

(69)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-80 www.info.hotims.com/35903-173

www.info.hotims.com/35903-83

Merichem Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

www.info.hotims.com/35903-69

Emirates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

(83)

Gulf Publishing Company Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Construction Boxscore . . . . . . . . . . . 38 (157)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-57

Costacurta SpA Vico . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

www.info.hotims.com/35903-152

Flowserve Pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

(53)

Bently Pressurized Bearing Co . . . . . . 86 (170)

CB&I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Flottweg AG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 (152)

GE Power and Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

www.info.hotims.com/35903-67

Baldor Electric Company . . . . . . . . . . 74

(93)

(64)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-53

Baker Hughes Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

Flexitallic LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Company Website

www.info.hotims.com/35903-98

GEA Wiegand GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 (171)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-64

Axens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

Eralytics GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 (161)

(76)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-76

Asco Valve Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

RS#

www.info.hotims.com/35903-93

www.info.hotims.com/35903-159

Ariel Corporation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Page

www.info.hotims.com/35903-161

www.info.hotims.com/35903-156

Altair Strickland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

Company Website

(96)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-168

Weir Minerals - Lewis Pumps . . . . . . . 70

(92)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-92

Wood Group Surface Pumps . . . . . . . 47 (158) www.info.hotims.com/35903-158

Zyme-Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

(71)

www.info.hotims.com/35903-71

Zyme-Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 (175) www.info.hotims.com/35903-175

For information about subscribing to HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, please visit www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MAY 2011

I 121

HPIN WATER MANAGEMENT LORAINE A. HUCHLER, CONTRIBUTING EDITOR [email protected]

Legionella—to test or not to test? Legionella pneumophila (“legionella”) bacteria cause Legionellosis, a pneumonialike illness that infects persons with compromised immune systems and can be fatal. These bacteria are common in natural waters and thrive in warm waters found in cooling towers. Cooling towers that have high concentrations of water droplets (aerosols) entrained in the vapor plume can broadcast aerosols several miles before the droplets reach the ground. If water from these cooling towers has high populations of legionella bacteria, vulnerable persons who inhale the aerosols have a high risk for potential infection. Designing the optimal strategy to minimize the risk of legionella infections in populations downwind of the cooling tower requires a combination of mechanical, chemical and operational solutions. One of the most controversial aspects of managing the risk of Legionellosis from cooling towers is the bacteria test protocol and the decision to test or not to test for legionella bacteria. Most European countries have legal requirements to conduct routine testing for legionella bacteria in cooling towers.1 There are no legal or regulatory requirements to conduct legionella testing in the US. However, the Cooling Technology Institute (CTI) is creating a standard2 for cooling towers that requires legionella testing (culture method) for validation of the bacteria control program and bacteria testing for control. Validation methods. Validation

requires that the cooling tower owner conduct successive legionella tests during a specified time period and obtain nondetectable legionella bacteria for all test results. The validation process assumes that the bacteria control program will be effective in controlling the population of legionella bacteria for the remainder of the validation period. At present, the draft standard requires the legionella culture test—a test that requires a certified laboratory to conduct the approximate 10-day test. The draft stan122

I MAY 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com

dard does not currently provide any options for alternative legionella test methods. However, there are technologies available: polymer-chain reaction (PCR) and immunoassay. The qualitative PCR method, Q-PCR, amplifies a synthetic DNA primer molecule known as a probe labeled with a fluorescent dye that binds to the Legionella pneumophila bacteria3 with sensitivity similar to the standard culture method. The KWR study showed that three Q-PCR methods detected the same number of positive results as the standard culture method. The immunoassay method showed a positive correlation to the culture method. The immunoassay test uses antibodies to detect the legionella bacteria. One of the commercially available immunoassay tests is the Fastpath.4 Q-PCR tests are available within 24 hours while immunoassay results are available in less than an hour. Bacteria testing. Industry has documented that the likelihood of detecting legionella bacteria in cooling water increases as the aerobic bacteria population increases. The preferred control method is to monitor aerobic bacteria population. The most common test for aerobic bacteria is a culture method on an agar media. Operators examine the test results on a daily basis and use the preliminary results to adjust the biocide feedrate. Alternatively, operators may use other tests as a control method: adenosine triphosphate (ATP) or biological activity reaction test (BART). ATP methods use bio-luminescence to measure the relative amount of live cells that may or may not correlate to the results of the culture method, depending on the species of bacteria and accuracy of the test method. The BART methods use a nutrient media that is specific to a category of bacteria (e.g., heterotrophic aerobic, slime-forming, fluorescent Psuedomonads, etc.) Conclusions. The legionella culture method is the definitive measure of the bacteria, but the delay in obtaining results makes this method inappropriate as a rou-

FIG. 1

Legionella pneumophila bacteria.

tine control method. Newer technologies for legionella testing, such as Q-PCR and immunoassay-lack sufficient correlation to the culture method and/or sensitivity to be accepted as a standard method at this time. The most common control method is a culture of aerobic bacteria. However, many plants are using supplemental methods such as ATP or BART. All microbiological methods have limitations in the nonculturable species of bacteria and/or in the correlation to population of legionella bacteria. Plant personnel should carefully consider the role of validation and controls protocols in managing the risk of legionella in their cooling towers. HP 1 2

3

4

LITERATURE CITED Spain, United Kingdom, Holland, Singapore: Quarterly testing as a minimum. Draft Standard: CTI STD-159: “Legionellosis Related Practices for Evaporative Cooling Water Systems,” Cooling Technology Institute. Oesterholt, F., D. van der Linde, B. Wullings, and H. Veenendaal, “A new method of screening cooling water and process water for Legionella pneumophila,” KWR ©2008. Fastpath—trademark of Nalco Co., www.nalco.com.

The author is president of MarTech Systems, Inc., an engineering consulting firm that provides technical services to optimize water-related utility systems in refineries and petrochemical plants. She holds a BS degree in chemical engineering and is a licensed professional engineer in New Jersey and Maryland. She can be reached at: [email protected].

Spray Nozzles

Spray Analysis

Spray Control

Spray Fabrication

Why Leading Refineries and Engineering Firms Rely on Us for Injectors and Quills

Retractable Injector, Slurry Backflush Quill, Water Wash Quill (bottom to top)

Dual Nozzle Injector

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Manufacturing quality and flexibility. Need a simple quill or multi-nozzle injector? Insertion length of a few inches or several feet? 25# or 2500# class flange? High-pressure, high-temperature and/or corrosion-resistant construction? Special design features like a water-jacket, air purge or easy retraction for maintenance? Tell us what you need and we’ll design and manufacture to your specifications and meet B31.1, B33.3 and CRN (Canadian Registration Number) requirements.

CFD shows the change in drop size based on nozzle placement in the duct.

D32 (μm) 220

165

Z = 0.6 m

Nozzle spraying in-line with duct

Proven track record. We’ve manufactured hundreds of injectors for water wash, slurry backflush, feed and additive injection, SNCR and SCR NOx control, desuperheating and more. Customers include Jacobs Engineering, Foster Wheeler Corp., Shaw Group, Conoco Phillips Co., Shell, Valero and dozens more. Learn More at spray.com/injectors Visit our web site for helpful literature on key considerations in injector and quill design and guidelines for optimizing performance.

110

55 0

Design validation with process modeling. Let us simulate the injection environment to identify potential problems. We can model gas flow, droplet trajectory and velocity, atomization, heat transfer, thermal stresses, vibration and more to ensure optimal performance.

Nozzle spraying at 45° in duct

1-800-95-SPRAY | spray.com |

Select 66 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS

Specify and order standard nozzles spray.com/ispray

Your objectives in focus Make the most of today’s and tomorrow’s challenges with leading-edge solutions from Axens - Clean and alternative fuel technologies - Petrochemicals - Energy efficiency - High performance catalysts & adsorbents - Revamps

Single source technology and service provider ISO 9001 – ISO 14001 – OHSAS 18001 www.axens.net Select 53 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS