How to Write a Thesis

November 30, 2018 | Author: Ahmed Abou Seif | Category: Thesis, Abstract (Summary), Academia, Science, Epistemology
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download How to Write a Thesis...

Description

How to Write a Thesis A Handbook for Postgaduae Medical Stdes

How to Write a Thesis A Hndbook for Postgrdute Medicl Students

Bangabandhu Sheik Mujb Medical University, Dhaka Banglades January 2008

How to Write a Thesis A Hndbook for Postgrdute Medicl Students

Bangabandhu Sheik Mujb Medical University, Dhaka Banglades January 2008

ISBN: 984-300-002519 984-300-0025191 1 Publishng Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh Cover desig Dr. Md. Mzanur Rahman

Al rghts reseve by BSMMU Frst Editon: January, 2008

©

Price T.

300.00

Prnted  Zama Pntes & Packagig 62, Khilgaon Hazpr, Rampura D.LT Rad Dhaka-119 Phone: 9356977

The Committee and Contributors of the Hadbook 1

Professor Md. Salehuddin Chairman, Departmen o Ophalmology BSMMU, Daka

Charman

2

Professor Syed Professor S yed Atiqu Hoque Deament o Medicne o  Medicne BSMMU Daka

Membe 

3.

Professor M Mesbauddin Chairman Departmen o Phamacology BSMMU Daka

Membe 

4

Professor Kondaer Manzer-EShamim Chairman, Departmen o Anatomy BSMMU, Daka

Membe 

5

Dr Hossan Imam AHad Associae Pofessor of Otoaryngoogy Deament o ENT, BSMMU Daka

Membe 

6

Dr Md Mizanr Raman Assocae Professor Biosatistics Deparmen of Biosaisics NPSOM Daka

Membe 

7

Poessor Md. Shaidula Professor of Biosatsics BSMMU Daa

Member-Secretary

PREFACE After the establishment of the Institute of Post-graduate Medicine and Research (PGM&R) in 65 the Medical Education in Banglades has expanded manyfolds in various dimensions and students of M. Phil & FCPS in PGM&R would write dissertation and thesis as an integral part of their postgraduate program The students of  various postgraduate institutions ie ICVD IDCH, RIHD, NIPSOM and others also have postgraduate education program of wich dissertaton / thesis is an integral part With the establishment of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical Universty in 1998, the necessity was fet for a thess guideline for the students and teachers of all medical institutons n Bangladesh With the passage of time soe governmet medical coleges in Bangadesh also started Postgraduate corses i medcal sciences As a part of the curcula each and evey studen is required to submit a thesis to obtain a Masters or Ph D Degree. For the preparation of a standard thesis adequate nowledge on iostatistics and other basic medical science is a prerequiste Many of our teachers and students lack suicient knowledge in biostatistcs and research methodology A standard book as a guidelne is now the demand of the time. It is expected a standard book n this regard wll equally benet both the teachers and the students who are invoved in research This handbook will be reviewed and updated periodically to accommodate new knowedge and experience Constructve criticisms and useful suggestons for improving the quality and contents of this handboo from al quarers are welcome.  thank the charman and the members of the committee and contributors for their endeavor wthout which this publication would not have been possible

(Professo Md. Tahi)

Vce Chancellor

Table of Contents

.

2.

3.

4.

Topics Chapter  : Overview of he Thess 1 Wha s thesis?  An oveiew of the hess structure 12 121 Thesis e page able o cones 22 Ceticate of gude/superviso 2 Decaao of authorshp 24 125 Ls of tabes and gues Ackowedgemets 126 Dedicaton 27 Abstac I 28 Key pons in hess Wriig 129 Chaper 2  Witng he Thess Itoduction and Backgroud 2  Introduco he ucios of the hesis iroducto 22 Deveopg the thesis raioale 2.3 24 hs s somethig we do o kow aeady 25 Other peope hik his probem as impotat The poem I am sudyng affecs a o of peope in a 26 paticuary uforunae way ad/or costs a o of moey 2.7 Sovig his pobem has mpicatios fo ohe probems he eseach s heoeticaly importa ad eesig 28 29 It wil enable us o do i beer he hess objectives, hypotheses o eseach quesons 10 2  Key pons in wtng toduction  he hesis Chaper 3  Witng he hess eaure Review   How to wre eaue eview 2 Seecio of teatue fo incusion n he ieraure eview  Keep your leaue search unde coto 1 Compuer-asssed lieraure seachg 2 Seaches of colected prined absacs  Maual seachng of liteaues 4 Consulng expets  he eld 5 Oder o dffeet ypes of searches 6 Oganizao and g of ieature materias  he scope o eraure coectios Bbographc sowae 8 4 Key poits i wiig iteraue evew  he hess Cocudig comme 3.5 Chape 4 : Wig the hesis Maeias and Mehods Iroductio 41 42 Research parcipans/subecs 4 Research ools 44 Proocols and procedures 45 Mehodologica defese 46 Deense of sampe size 4 Satistica powe 4.8 Defense of paicipa selecion mehod

Page no 9-11 9 9 10 0 0 10 10 10 0   16 1 1  4 14 14 15 15 5 6 6 119 17

17 17 1 1 18 8 8 8 8 19 19 19 228 21 21 22 22 2 2 2 24

Topics

5

6

7.

8

4. Deense o the researc desgn 4.0 Expemental designs 4 Survey esearc 42 Defese of daa colection meods 42 Direc pysica measremen 422 Clcal observatio 4.23 Se-repored measres and quesionares 424 Ievews Secoday daa coection rom docmens and databases 425 Key poins to remember in wg tess mehodology 43 Caper 5: Wrig e Tesis Reslts toducon 5  5.2 e orgazao of e preseation of ress capers 53 Preseatio desg pricples for e resul section of heses Welpresened ables ad ges 531 532 Carity o pesetaon of sale rests Repog o aiative sdies 533 Good layo 534 A ogical deveopmen of te ndigs 5.4 55 Key pons o remember in wriing abes ad raps Caper 6 Witig the hesis Discssion 6 Introduco 62 Eements o discssio wrig 62 mpoa Eemens Detaied Analysis 622 Hypoess tesg 623 Sources of erors Aeraive modes 624 625 Te fuure 63 Key os o remember in dscussion wrtng Cape  7  Writing te Tess Conclsions and Recommendations 7 Itoducon 72 Summay o e ocomes o te lierate review 73 Major ndgs o  te tess and ow tey itegrae wit previos work 74 Srengs and miaos of e researc 7.5 Fuure avees of researc 76 Te process of wiig te cocldig capter 77 Key ponts to remember i wng tess cocsions ad recommedatios Cape 8 : Wig e esis Reeence or Bibography What is tess refeece o  bbliogapy? 8 I Reeecing ad bibograpc ctation 82 he Harvad Sysem (Ato Dae Method) 8.3 83 Ciation  e ex4 References a e ed of e wor 832 84 American sychoogica Association (AS Syle Ctaion in te text 84 842 Reeeces at e end o e wok Reeence Ls Vancouver Syle 8.5 85 Ciation  the ext References a the ed of e work 8.52 Bibiogapy Appendages Tess Formatting and Sbmssion Sampe Thesis Fomat Sample Bibiograpy

Page 10. 24 25

25 26 26 26 27

27 27 28 29-34 29

29 30 30

32 33

33 33

34 3536 35

35 35 35

35 35 35

36

3740 37 37 38 38 38 39 40 464 4 4 41 41 43

48 48

50 55 56

57 62 63 63 65

87

CHAPTER 1 Overview of the hess .1 What is thesis?

A thess s he wrien document tha esuls fom a perod o supervised research a the Universiy. Theses are geneally equed or 'rst Masers degees, and always o he highe degees - Master of  Philosophy or Doco of Philosophy For some s Masters degees a ess comprehensve piece o esearch may be euired These are efered o as dsseraos Ay thess o mae what the disciplie attemps o make a new claim Is purpose is to shed new ight on somehig or to ook a somehg  a ovel way This s ue whehe the hess s wtten in the medical sciences, he social sciences o the humanities The role o the thesis n Academa is o contribute to knowledge, Ths means hat you, the eseacher, ae conributng to he kowedge base we cureny have aout he wod we live n You have the poetal to nstgae ew reseach change curen pracices ad even chage peopes belies Because o his, your hess is judged agans sc cera I mus eec he expeced sadards of uversity scholashp A thesis eports on ew digs ad mplicatons of eseach udertake, set in he coext o he earlier wok o  ohers and makig appropriae efeece to hose pevious sdes and results hat have ifuenced the conduct of the work The hess s also assessed y scholars exteal o the ivesiy After successfu examnaio of the hesis  s odged n he versiy Lay  boh had copy ad so copy Theses ae genealy avaiabe or perusal by students ad sa of this and ohe uverstes Frequety pas o a hesiso indeed eve the whole thesisae subseuety published ether as journal arcles or as books 1.2 An overview of the thess stucture

The health sciences thesis ypcaly oows a wedesigned ovea sucture I may cotai the folowig eemens: Thess te page i, ii Tale of conets 11 , Certicate o guide/Supervsor Iv Decaraon o authorship v, Ls o ables V List of gures VII Ackowledgemens Vlt  Dedcaton (opoal) X Asract  Inroducio I Lierature review  Materias and methods Xlll Resuls XV Discusso xv Concusons ad ecommedatos VI RefeencesBiogaphy V Appendces ·

.



·

.



• •



Hw t Wie a ess

10

The substance of te thesis appears in the absact, inrodction and iteate eview metods and mateials, rests and dscsson conclusons and ecommendaions chapes. Howeve the podcton of  a reseac tess is not simply a wiing task.  is he clminaton of  an often adous and engthy sequence of tasks perfomed in academic, clncal and community contexts Many peope are invoved in hese asks. is teaise reecs bo a focs on he wtng tasks and reseach context n whic ese ae writen 2. Th l pag

Ts page incldes ttle of the esis (includng subtte) auto's name, instituional aliation name of  respecive deparmen monh and yea of submssion. .22 Tabl  cnn

The tabe of conens should ist a the major sectons of the thesis docment and all their page ranges The skeleton o he table of contens can and shold be produced in daft but i can only be nalized wit e acual page nmbes when the est of the thess as been prined n nal form. 2.3 Cc  gud/upv A ceticate is to be issued by the speviso  of te hesis at e student conceed has competed te esis nde his cose supervison wt s ull saisfaction. .2.4 Dclaan  auhhp •

Te declaation is sgned by the studen and it is genealy caimed tat the thesis s one own work all soces ave been coectly atibed and that the hesis s presented in accoce wit the univesitys guidelines and eguaions fo te degee. 25 L  abl nd gu

The s of tabes and ges shows the exac tiles as they appea in te ext of  al ble  ges nclded n the thess It is bete to c and paste the ites fom the acual e gres o ense ta hey match exacty You shold include thei page nmbes to indice he ceent in he text 26 cknldgmn

e acknowledgements section has no sbstantve mpact pon the eception of the ei t i olite to ank hose who have subsantially assisted you either echnicaly intellec  or cialy drng your eseach work he s paagaph s for the supeviso  and c  ur e econd paagap is fo any peson, oganiaon o instte wo suppoed the eseac for ncing and e hird and e nal paagaph is fo any oter peson(s colleages) wo sbstan ed you n e completon of e tesis wok. A maximum of one page is earmaked for te acowegements -

.

2.7 Ddcan

his is an opona page in wch you can pledge yo ndying devoton to you god. t is okay n books bt not mandaoy in hesis.

How to Wre a Thesis



1.2.8 Abac

An abstract should be viewed as a min verson of the thei. The abstract shoud provide a bref  smmary of each of the main sectons of the thei: Introdcton, matera and methods ret and discsson. So an abtract can be dened as a ummary of  the infomaton n a docment A we prepared abtract enabes readers to dentify the bac content of a docment quickly and accurately to determine ts reevance to ther interet, and th to decde whether they need to read the the in it' entirety The abtract n thes hold not exceed two page of dobe spaced text and hod be designed to defne ceary what i dealt with n the thesis Abtract preferably be tructred and hold () state the princpa objectve and cope of the nvetgation; ) decribe the methodoogy employed; iii) smmarze the reslt; and iv) tate the principa concusion Mot or the entre abtract hod be written in the past tense becaue t refers to work done The abtract houd never gve any informaton or concsion that  not stated in the thesis Reerences to the iterature mst not be cited in the abstract The followings are the ey points to keep n mind A good abstract tels n one ine why the thei  important. A good abstract i concie,  readable and quantitative. Informaton in tite houd not be repeated   Ill, Be expcit  1 V. Anwers to the folowng qeston hod be fond n the abtract a What did yo do? b. Why dd yu do t? What qeton were yo trying to anwer? c. How did you do t? State method. What dd yo learn? State major ndngs. d. e Why doe it matter? Pont out at leat one signcant mplicaton 1.2.9 Ky pn n  ng

Frst and foremot, a   a p f n A great deal of emphasis s paced on your writng abty and yor grade wll depend on how efectvely yo communcate your deas t s mportant to deveop a good cear conce writng style  •  

am for smpcty rather than compex sentence stctre be clear abot the point you are trying to make be concie and drect rather than excevey wordy make mportant ponts trongy

Second your thes hod contan a cear poiton or argument Yor writng need to use the approprate language and writing conventions that reect ths     •

e approprate headngs and sub-headng each paragraph shoud have a cear pont topic sentence each point houd be concded before moving on to the next se appropriate dscorse markers ideas shoud be nked appropratey

Chapter 2 Wiing  Tsis Inoducion nd Bckgound 2.1 Introductio You cannot write a good intoduction unil you know what he body of the hesis is. Be sure o ncude a hook at the beginnng of he inroducion Ths s a saement of somethng sufcienly nterestng o motivate you reader o ead the hes,  s an importan scienic prolem ha your thesi eithe soves or addeses You shoud daw the reader in and make them wan to ead he res o he theis The nroducoy chapter should incude raionae for he hess the pevious reevan eseaches done n ths aea I should cie hose who had he idea o ideas s and houd also cite hose who have done he mos ecen work You should then go on o explain why it was necessary (your work o couse) Wha else belong n the intoducoy section(s) of you hesis? a. A statement o he goa of the thess: why he study was underaken o why he hesis was witen Do no epea absac. b Sucien akgound inormaton o a110w the eade to undesand he conet and sign cance of the quesion you ae tying to addess. c Poper acknowedgement o the pevous wok on which you are uiding Sucient reerences uch that a eade coud y going to the lbay achieve a sophisicated understanding o he contex and gnicance o he question. d. Epan he scope o you work wha wi and wha w no e incuded Remembe hat hs s not a review pape We are ooking or origna wok and interpeaton and analysis by you Break up the intoducion secton no logical segments y using subheads

2.2 The fuctons of the hess introduction Essenia1y he intoduction o a heah sciences thesis ought o perfom the folowng functions n he thesis document a ovde a rationae fo the hess reseach  Review current knowedge in he ed relevan to your thesis hrough he performance of a iteratue review and analyss c Culminate in he saemen of reseach hypoheses or eseach uestons to be answered y the work in th thesis.

23 Developing the thesis rationae An mpotan function of the introducton is to provde a aionae fo the thesis research. he thesis atonae i concerned wih answeng the question 'Why does hs work need o e done? While you mght be convnced that your theis topic is of ovous and ntinsic merit t i the views of he examines that coun! Theefoe it is impotant hat you ae abe to communicate efectively o them a pausble and convincing ationae fo the wok you have peormed and whch you ae attemping to repo in the thesis



ow to Wrt a Thesis

The rationale fo the thesis is not conned to any one section of the thess, bt it ought to e partclly concentate thoghout the intouctory chapte. It needs to e oven closely into the fac of the ntouction an teratue revew A nme of stanad aguments can be sed to defend the esearch wok nclude n yor thesis an can be sed in the eveopment of  your ationale These arguments are dscssed eow n plan angage 2.4   mng  d n kn alady

The most basic rationale fo stuyng something is that we do not know about t aeay f  we d know aleady then why wod we bothe to research it? f we wish to se a bt of jargon we cold say the thesis ntoucton has to entify clearly the 'knowedge gaps that nee to e fuled The knowege gap ationale s a bt weak on its own (ie we o not know this so we should) t t is a basc requste for the other possible agments in the atonae to be mae The knowedge gap agument s a kin of  Sir Edmnd Hlay 'ecause it is there explanaton of why we nee to know An exampe of some text that expesses ths type of agument follows: Thus, the literature review has reeaed that the state of  knowedge in the iterature ;s unsatis  factor cOceing whether ong-term suriors of HV (as dened by 10 ears foowing nec tion without progression to AIDS) have psychoogca characteristics that are dferent from those who have 10t surived. According, the research program was designed to examine this position

25 O pp nk  pbm a mpan

A second line of gument fo a thesis progam atonale is that other people think the pobem s mpoant too Ths elies on ning people who have said that you geneal research agenda o approach s worth prsing Once again this is not a patculary compellng stan-aone ationale as t is a sort of appea to authoity o adherence to acaemc group noms A the ncowd wear dngaees an hang aound at the oca coffee shop so we shou do ths as well On {he basis of these resuls, Teoshok (1988) aseed a 'a bo-psychosoal appoa o A[DS reear is eessary ad . may provide criical ormaio or deradig ad reai ADS'

The aove quotation s an excerpt fom a paper that the reseache wote recently concerning the psychologca charactistics of people wth HV who have svved the illness fo a ong time The researche was aging as a psychologist that psychoogical constucts had not been incude in the stues of ongtem survval ecase the medica reseachers had advocated totally iomedical celua level explanatons fo health hariness The eseacher went on to cite evidence fo the exstence of direct nks etween psychoogy states and mmne competence in humans One of hs aguments along the way was that peope lke Temoshok wee supportng the approach he was avocating Thus he was usng Temoshok as an appeal to authority stication for stdyng what he was studyng ie we wee wearing the same color dungarees 6  pbm I am udyng affc a   pp n a paculay unfuna ay and/ c a  f mny

Now we ae taking! This aspect of the ationale s oen faly easy to deveop in health sciences

How O

Write a Thesis

15

theses If you are studying peole wth a parcla obem, ten a esentaion o the epdemoogy o that olem s de igeur Even bete   costs the community a lot of money. You can ncude statements aot te ablos cost o e condton and ow  you eseac bears  hi faos cos cod be redced. The olowng excet rom one of s paers on ack pan does e trc: For some time. back injuries have ated onsiderable researh aenio aross a ide rage of  COUries / Seden Anderon ) repoed that 'ak kness aounted or on aerae % of he days los due to oupational injr among Swedish orkers. n the UK, nderson ) estimated tha 3% of the toal sik das ere de 0 lo bak pain, representin a loss o / million ork das per ann David  ( /J, hoeer repoed that sprains ad sais o the  bak a ork i the UK, ao!ed Jor an aerae o /4% o all ork absenees oer  3 das Jor  the eriod   to 0, representin approximal 0000  ases for eah ear Be1 & Wood  ) esimated that 3000000  isits per (I o eneral pitioners i he UK ere assoiaed  i! lo bak pblems ad that there ere 6000  10\  bak operaios eah ear

So why are yo no ot ee sdyng ack njures? e on  was estashng was that hs s a g-evaence cosly condon that reqes stdy because o e ssues Laer on n is ae e wen nto how it all coss is is no a patculary academcaly espectabe argumen ut  certanly gets te commnty's atenton Most theses can sand a dose of ts sor of  epdemologca contexaizaon of the wok eorted within  2.7 Solvng  poblm a mplcaon fo o poblm

t can be agued ta soutons to problems whn a partcla eld may ave wde mplicaions Fo  exampe the dscovery of a vaccine or a acla vrus may ead to the se o sma tecnqes or ote vrses  e wee pefomng a stdy of te eah prolems o nses aisng rom swiftwok e migh fee moved to wre sometng le ths While the prtiulr ouption goup hosen for nclsion withn the pesent reearh ws nurses, there is no reon to uppose tht the inding would not be generlisble to ll helth worers involved in egulr wit-work.

In anma wo the anthropomophic agument is a fom of is agmen The liver untion o  the pig h been ound to e  priJly useul model o hmn liver n tion in th 

28  a  ocally mpoan and nng

f  the reseac involves e test o a arclar theoetical aroac o ndersandng e researc problem ten t can be argued tha e wor as mpotan teoetcal mlications Alough the ote argmens esented above ae se argments o ncde n a dscussion o thess topc raionae te eoetcally imporan ne o agument s poably e most academcally esectae Some wods a migt expess ths ne o argment olow Thus the proposed eserh wi provide  direL tet o the ross·lturl vlidty o  the Helth Belie Mode in explining helth re erve tiiztion y peope rom Austrin Gree nd Ausrlin AngloCelt bgronds The vlidiy o the mode h importn mplitions or the predition nd understnding o the tilition o ervies

2.9 I wll nabl u o do  b

Heat sciensts oten ave a srongy alied orentation and eeore wam to the dscsson of  ractice mplications of any reseac Claims and nteventons may e eter tageed moe eecve

How to Wrie

16

a

Thesis

more efcient. cost ess, etc as a resu o the reseach, are aso ceran o p a partial smie on he exaners' aces This s because the eseache has taken he eort to connect hs or he wok o the contex n which it is perfoed as we as pehaps, striven o make the word a sighy better pace Thee ae o course, any oher possibe ines o aguen ha can be advanced to sppo the condc o a eseach pogam However he aove nes o agent ae equenty empoyed in he consrucon of the aionae fo reseach heses and a ought e consideed or ncson n he ationae 2.0

The thesis objectives, hypothee or reearch questions

t has been prevosy noed ha one of he functions o the introdcton o the thess s o cumnae n the saemen o he eseach quesions o be answeed y he woke n the hess and ha he iteare review shoud denify any gap n knowedge pertnen to the eseach qesions to e addessed y he hess The eature review needs to concude wh an expcit sry satement o  wha we know and what we do not' n order tha the esearch qestons can be deveoped rom the eview  s mperatve hat he hesis has cea and unamigous esearch objecives, hypotheses o esearch quesons These quesons need to e deveoped ogicay o iteare review and be supported y the eseach raonae The esearch qesons ae noray staed a concusion of he inroduction and hey ae used over and over houghou he hess They for he asis o methodoogy They are he basis pon whch he esuts are pesened Snce the obecives o the thess are o pose and answe the esearch qestons he discssion and concusion sections necessay focus on the If  they are no we deveoped then the thesis qaty can be seveey compromsed n erms o he reaionship beween reseach questons and hypoheses, consder he foowng exampe or a hypoheca qanative sudy: The objetives o thi eeach wa to d) the lationhi beween age ad diion makzg rfo l The eseah queio addeed by Study I was: 'I thee an aoiation btwn age and  diio g  pomane oh ik o'iy mas odd b th gamblig task? t wa hotheied ,ha thee woud be a gatie aoiation bw atician  ag and     propni oe died om h gambling tak omleted b th atician. 2  

Key point in writing introduction in the hesis In te itoducio, you sould intodce yo reades o the nate of yo eseac and wy e  s sgnicant: Reevant backod ifomatio is appopiate hee;



clde as mc detail i te todctio as possibe it wil el yo eades to ne e dcsos yo ave made



Be se to incde t eseac ojecties eseac qesios o yoteses in e poem steme and ty to anticipae d nswe y esto(s) yo ede my as



e se o dee all tems d symbols tat may be own to yo eades i yo ae cea abot wete to dee it. dee i

Chapter 3 Wiing  Tsis Liu Rviw 3.1 How to write literature review

One of the areas o the thesis in which many students struggle is the wtng of the iteature review. A lteratue evew has severa unctons The most mportant o these ae:

a b

c d e

Revew curent knowledge in the ed eevant to the thesis Descibe the characteristcs of prevous sudies n the area including who conducted them, where they were conducted, who were the patcpants what protocos were oowed and what were the ndings and conclusions Compare and contast reevant studes and ndngs Comment on the stengths and mtatons of the reevant studies and ndings Identfy any gp n nowedge petinent to the reseach questons to be addressed by you thess

A iteature evew shoud be informative evaluatve and integrative These attbutes coespond to the thee stages n the constucton of a iterature review t s suggested that the students rst wite the informative detai o the studies to be reviewed in a neutra way then add crtical (ths does not aways mean negative) anaysis o the iterature they have just descibed They should then ntegrate the various studes to compare and contrast the ndngs 32 Selection of literature for inclusion in the literature review

Part o the skil in constructng a iteature review is the abity to make connectons between elevant mateias and to choose which inomaton to ncude and whch nomation to omit Reading othe iteratue evews in the same area is a useful gude to these decisons The thoroughness wth whch the teature reseaching process is peromed s the best nsurance o ensuing that al pevious wors reevant to your thess are ound. 33 Keep your literature search under control

There are several basic strategies and pocedures o ocatng the teratue that s pertnent to your  seach topc These incude compute-asssted searches using eectronc databases or the intenet more generally searches usng printed coected abstracts, manua iteatue seaching and consultations with expets n the ed 33 Computer-assisted literature searching

Most unvesty ibrares mantan varous computerbased iteature databases often stored using CDROM technoogy The user conducts a search by st accessing the elevant databases Then the user keys n a combnation o subject eywods and also the names of key authos in the ed in oder  to ocate a the wos they have witten at least those that appea n the database) Computezed iteature databases ae a supeb too but ony f used skiuy 3,32 Searches of colected printed abstracts

n the eference section o the libay you wll nd shevesull o boos o abstacts wth associated author and subject ndces to guide you aound them t s aso possble to subscribe to some specalied

How to Wrie a Thess

8

abstractng sevces that povde regular pdates to ndividual users sng search parametes dened by the sbscbe 3.3.3 Manual acng f lau

Ths pocess invoves hittng the bray shelves If yo ae early n yor teratre search poces, t is usef to nd some text-books and read ther reviews of  the iteratre pertnent to yo topc. in ode to dscover key works n the field The basc strategy fo a manual search s smple Most lbaes maintain sepaate lists of ther jornal subscptions Inspect ist wth a ew to possbe nteest fo your research topic and ocate the ournals of pomse 3.3.4 Cnulng xp n  ld A ther source of key refeences s other academcans f you know of any academcan n the eld who s accessbe in person o by teephone or by email, ca him or her p or emal and ask, f  he/she cod point you to his/her recent wok 335 Od f dffn yp f ac

n terms of the order of seqence of seachng, one may puse the folowing seqence: a Locate integratve evews in texts b Condct an eectonic seach usng the keywords and authors ocated in (a) above Perhaps now speak to you spevsor(s for advce c Conduct a manal seach of relevant onas d Usng the keywords and athos found condct another electronc seach e Start reading on a gla bass the jounas whee you have ocated most mateals of eevance to yo Since your canddare n the case of a highe degree, may last a few yeas yo need to monto regaly the iterature and keep up to date In fact at the ast moment before the sbmsson of the thess it is ecommended to the stdents that they repeat their eectonc seach using ther sua search parametes to check that nothing new and vta has appeaed 336 Oganzan and lng f lau maal

Organizaton of the lterature mateals, f done well, can save yo an en0 amount of tme and conversey, f done badly can waste an enomos amount of tme When yo have decided that a efeence s to be ncluded n the database have a physcal copy of t Then the selected atcles ae to be led in alphabetcal ode 3.3.7  cp f lau cllcn

Typca thess (whatever it is contans a fair st of reference citatons A Masters and hD theses mght contain over 100  citations Yo artcle brary may contain eferences that yo do not end up ctng in yor thesis Yo teatre colecton needs to be focused and selectve It s a means to an end bt not an end n itsef The eamines wil never hea of the hge amount of tme and money you wasted n collectng hundreds of extra refeences that you dd not use n your thess!

How to

Write a Thess

19

3.3.8 Bblogapc fwa There  a ange of exceent produc that are available to ait wh he mantenance of lieaue citaion and eference lit in a compute databae. Proably he mot popuar wihn the heah and medcal science etting ae End-Noe, roCite and Refeence Manager Bblogaphc too like the ue of he intenet can ave you a lot f te and dever a hgher quality outcome than manual method You need to nvet ime to be ained in their ue and applcation Attend any coure you can and get out thee and play

3,4 Ky pon n wng lau vw n   In fac you ae enterng a cholaly conveaton aready in proge he teature revew how hat you've een itenng and hat you have omething vauale to ay After aeng he ieature n you ed you houd be able to anwer the followng queion:  Where dd the problem come from?  Wha  aeady nown aout thi poem?  Wha other method have een ed to olve it?  Mae ue that you do not omit relevant pape See an eample Other tude alo upport he concuion that taditonal teaching method hinder learnng cacuu Seden Seden and Maon conclude that ioated tival probem the norm in many claoom nibit tudent fom acuiing te abiity to generalize caculu poblemolvng kill (Seden Seden and Maon 1994) Simlar reult are epoted by Norman and Pichad (994) They demonrate that many learner can not interpre the tructure of a pobem eyond uaceeve ymbol They how tha novce have naccurate ntuion about prolem which ead them to atempt ncoect oution traeges (Noman and rchad 994) Becaue hey cannot ee beyond higheve feaue they can not deveop corec nuion On he othe hand ucceful problem over categorie math prolem baed upon underlying tructura milaitie and fundamenal principe (Slver 979 (Shoenfeld and Herman 1982 Thee caegorie ae often grouped baed upon olution mode whch the epet ue to generate a forwad working tategy (Owen and Sweller 99) Souce

acceed 6/092007

35 Cncludng cmmn By the end of your Literatue Review your reader houd be able o nd hat  The cope of you evew  approprate for your degree  You have revewed the ource reevant to your eearch topc • There ha been ful critica engagement with the liteaure  t i clear how your eearch objectve/quetion/hypohee t in wth pevou cholaly wok

Chapter 4 Wg  T Ml  M .1

Inoducion

This chaper s ntended o assst he suden wih he reporng of he hess mehodology. Methodology s an imporant aspect of knowedge generaton In the teraure revew it s mporant o narrae he methodologcal sances taken by prevous researchers and that ther respecive strengths and weaknesses are discussed when evaating the presented work he methodoogcal themes rased n he introducton shod connec wh hose discssed in the thesis mehodoogy secton. he structre o he indvidua hesis deermnes where he mehod secton(s) are to be placed In a snge sdy research program, the methodoogy woud normaly precede he (rst resuls chaper and wod normally be a separae chapter or secton albe one hat s mch shorer than, for example he inroducory chapter(s It

should be noted tha he mehod secion in journa arcle is qe dferent n scope from a methodoogy secon in a heath sences thesis n a orna arcle becase of space consrans, there s suay no defense of the mehodology excep perhaps n some obique reerences to he strengths and imaions o the work he mehod secion n a journa arcle conains amost no explanaon or raonale for he methodologica choces made his s no an adeqae srategy for the heth scences thesis he methodoogca decisons aken need o be discussed and defended in  sysemac and robs manner. he researcher advocates the use of  a sandard mehod secon sructre and a mehodoogcal defense rrespectve of whether the research has a quntatve or  qaiave focus Both approaches invove knowledge gathering and generation based on procedres and assumpons that need o be expcaed he examners need to be convnced that he suden has an expert ndersanding of the strengths and weaknesses o he echniques chosen and heir heoretca nderpnnngs he specc methodoogic approach chosen, n no way exemps he stdent from this obigation Furher, n mos heah scences theses irrespecive of methodological orenation here are hman paricipants who need o be descrbed, toos ha were sed n the research and protocols in he daa gahering and anayss ha were ollowed I s also advocated the addion of a section enitled 'Mehodology defense and raionale in which he sden deends and provides a raionale or he proocos and procedres employed in hs or her work Le us examine he conten o each componen o he mehod secion in a healh sciences thess 

Rsc icins/subjcs

his is ypcally a very bre section perhaps a hal-spaced page o a page I should descrbe the number of particpants n he research and their basc arbtes incding age sex and diagnostic groupngs  appropriae Describe he inclsion (and exclson criteria or ther particpation in he research t s sometimes use o nclde a abe smmarzng he partcpans demographic attrbues a hs pont n the thesis An exampe o he sort o dea requred s as follows:  volunteers paricipted n the prese reseach There were  men nd  0 women with  men ge f  53  yers he paricipnts' dem gr phic chrcerisics re smmrized i ble J (no shown)

Prcipns were ll curren rheumod  rhrs pties  he Rheumlgy Institute who ttended n he mO/th f  FebLr. 999 f the 60  peple pproched fr recrumen nto the sdy, 42  agreed ieldg a respose e of  70%

2

How to Wrie a Thss

[t s compulsory that age and sex characteiscs of the eseach parcipans ae descibed. It is also essena that the resonse rae e, he percentage of people who wee aoached o aricae  the study ad who actay partcated s dscosed Ths s a essentia ece of  iformaton I reqes that good recods ae ke concenng who was aoached and who nay arcpated If  hs nfomaon s no povded the the eade has no idcation of how repesentaie e paciats mgh e of those who cod have pacpated n the stdy. 4.3 Rac l

his secon should descrie he use of any esearch nsrmet or oo empoyed by e esearche n the condcton of his o her reseach  laboatoy eseach hs secton is labeed'Aparas s these reseach toos ae odced, they shold be eviewed and defended Tha is o ony shod the ools sed be descred t aso the easons fo the seecton Ths secion cod  for seveal pages i a highe degee hess Whee he tools are ot sandadzed ando we know hen they need to be desc in deta so that the eade nderstands exacty what has occed  s mportan hat he eade has a cea dea of exacly what was doe In he case f qesoaires i is o usal to ncde the fl ext of he questionaie in he main ody of the tess i e methods ecto Nomay the qestonaie is incuded as an apendx Whe esenting eecy ales of  esoses to quesons fom a questonnaie t s heful to nclde he exact wodig o e queso n some nstances as ar of the ess ale n a qatatve eseach roject involving ntevews, t s hghy appopae o descrbe he nterview schedule  the case of a scured ineview or focs gop ad/o the temes coveed n an nsrced ntevew n example foows: Each of the focus goups was esented wth the same set of dscussio qestons by he reseacher These icude Wha would you say s he ma hing yo fee aot eng HIV osve? How have your friends eacted o yor HIV-osiive stas? How has yo famly eacted o yor HIVostive stas? How do yo explan that yo have srvved yo llness fo the ime hat yo have? Why do you thnk other peole have no suvived as ong? The examier should be  no dout abot how the informatio was coleced and wy his method was chosen 44 Pcl and pcdu

[n this secon the reseache descies exacty how the reseach was codcted In a hgher degee thess hs secton could r to a coule of pages I s usua to commence wih a bie descrion of  you ethcs approva rocedues foowed by us ad bots of the atcipan ecrime ocedure How wee eole contacted? How dd yo kow where o d them? How was access oaed? Fo example ehica ceaance to condct he esearch was soght and otained fom Ehica Revew Committee (EC) ad foowed the natona ethcal gudeine

How to Wi a Thesi

23

The pates wo aended e Rheumaology Isue du e mo of Febay. 1999, wee appoached y th nstte's ecepton sta when hey peseed fo e appoment at e nses cnc ecepon The paens wee handed a ee om te reeache tha coaned an nvaon o pacpae  he eseac Te paens who wshed o papae, he eseache eeponed he unvesy o dcae he nees n pacpao n he eseac poam e eeache hen aanged o mee a a muuay coveen me wh e eseach pacpans A s mee oown sgnaue o e nomed consen om he pacpa was hen nevewed usng he nevew scedue

Whie t s a commendble ws to spare he reade the guesome details,  is mpon h the work s descrbed to te eve h it would be eproducle by someone else. Unke in  joun ricle tere is penty of space avalbe in a esis Do no sint on he deal o how he sudy ws conducted Te exmines wll expec a ful accoun of ow he eseac ws caed ou. 4.5 Mdlgcal dfn

Ths secon contains a deted deense of te meodologic ppoaches empoyed y he studen in his or her eseac It s  va component o e fc nd ppeance o  hg-quy resec pogam and ess This hs poven o e a dcul secion o his gudeline o we ecuse  cn not pesume o predct the ne deti of he mehodology o every hesis Neverheless here e outine ssues ssocied wh vious ypes o mehodoogcal pproches nd problems The rs re tat needs consideaon in he deense evoves around te generalizion o he resuls obaned by te procedues ools and pcipns nvoved n he eseach 4.6 Dfn f amp z

Ou of l e peope who could have prcped in e reserch te esercher has genealy seleced  smll number This numer as to e used. One uscaon is he ogistic defense Tis uns aong te nes of 'I woud lie o ve more but ey we l have to sop  some pon. In academc sense hs could ranslate nto some phrases le he foowng: e ecme o acpants o he pesen eseach poved o e dcu as s oe he case wh cca popuaos o cease he sample sze was o possbe w he esouces avaae

Ths s magnally bette tn no defense a  A much eter deense n  uanitaive study is  stastca one ased on he statistica powe o te nyss nd te equired sampe sie  yo ae reporting an intervenion study or one n whc group mens ae compaed fo exmpe involving nalyss of vrance hen in ge degree tess some atenon o powe is reuired If you do no now what satsca power s en you need o ead the folowng secton and some associaed reerences ecuse  s very mpotn tha you undestand wh  is aou I you e perfoming a uve study hen sp this secon 4.7 Sacal pr

In  sudy wee here e ess of goup men dierences (hs includes mos inevenion nd expement studies),  s essenal ht te ssue of siscal powe is canvassed in te weup Redes w recl om tei basic sastcal trnng ta wen a eseace ppies a stasca tes in addiion o correc reecion of he null ypohess and coect ccepance o  te nu hypohess here are two ypes of eros t can be made These are he incoec acceptnce of te nu ypotesis Type I ero o miss nd n ncorect reecton of the nu hypotesis Type I error o fase aarm

2

How to Write a Thesi

Th power i a study  the pobabiiy of correcly) rejecig h u hypothi whe the alterativ hypohss i coc It  1 � Typ II o. Cohn ha arged tha a accptab val for powe is 080 i any stdy That s, wh th u hypohei hod b reced (th  a eec) t s rectd on 80% occaion Or on th oher had, on 20% of occaio wh he  a eal efc it is misd. -

Th concept of powe i qit dife from  level uually  at 0.05 n which h ache ca adust he accpanc a of fa aam . correct rction of h l hypoth 00 prsnts a  a of fae aam 00 I prss a I% ate The ad wi call that redcing h fals alarm i makig th a lvl mor rgoro by adsg i fo xapl from 00 10 00 I. simpy mas ha or Typ II rror mss wll b mad Now-adays may ga applicaos eqi a discsson of siica powr i he applcatio Kppe 991 ha noed the pow of a deig i deered by h faco: th gcanc lv (a) chose by h eearcher almot alway 00; the eec iz (th  ot coollabl by h sach; and the apl  I is aly only he ampe ie ha i ameable to admet by he reeache So f  yo choe a nappopatey low sampl z and hc ow-powd tudy you may b pnihd by a xam f yo do ot dicu th u  yo analyes and he itrptato patcarly f yo haV ul eul ded if yo hav  rl  no difc decd o goup c dected hn o dscuing he tastica power of he analyi s a risky bsiess 8 Dn  pacpan lcn md Wh h ampl siz dfe  mor a fae of he qatav tha h qaaive reach proc he eleco of dy participa i impota i boh Mo hah scieces sdies mpoy ncidta ahr than adom samping pocd I has aady b otd tha a ky fa of th potg of  patcipa is h rpos a, i h popoo of pop appoached to paicipa i h ach who actally did o If it  vy low, ay 10% e th ndig wil and oght to b ipeed vry dfenty fro whn he repoe ate wa ay 80%

Th ky ss i paticipa scon  he epeeav of  h partcpa wh pec o he popatio fro which thy were draw One way of demontratig hi i o collect formaton abou he prtcipas ad h compa his infomaon wih kow chaaceiics of he wider popuaio f, fo exape you ar sdyg athl bt yor grop  old tha th gal poplaio of  athts, his mgh hav moat impicatos for ipaion of you t Rcovry ims fom iry mght b a ipota fac of you dy Yo eed to demrae o h xaer ha yo hav condeed thes ius. 49 n   ac dgn

I a aitav dy h itprve method choe ad he theoetcal tace of  the eseach d to be defded ncidealy dfn do o man a poal atac on the popoet of h other mhod! Th ad ed to ow the tanc that yo have cho ad why yo have choen  The defee of alitaiv ptmology and thodology i ore taxig than in a quatatv cotxt bca th s fa l ageemen abou what appoache hod be akn At la the quatav each ha a o abl ba on which to bud an ageement L  exame om of th oe como reearch dig and how hy mgh b appoached

How to Wre

a

Thesi

25

4.10 Experimental designs •

An experiment s a study where a sample of participants is randomy assigned to groups and then the groups receve diferet treatments. The goa of the experment is to attribute the dfferences n the groups foowing the interventons, to the nterventions themselves If  this can e done then the experment s considered to be normaly vaid Poar & Thomas 1995). There are many reasons why an experiment may not achieve nternal valdity As otined n Poar & Thomas Cook and Campel (7 dened a numer of such threats incuding: a. b c.

d. e 1

g

History.  refe o unplanned even a occur a e ame me a e nevenon Fo exampe n an exerce

udy, ome of e pacpan may become  w nenza  aecng e re Matuation  efe o e penomenon of naual cange n e pacpan ove me In a udy o njued peope e njue may ponaneouly leen owng o naual ecpeaon Testing  ree o e penomenon were e e procee mg ae e pacpan Fo example a ee of  exece e may ave e own ne bene que apar fom e nervenon Istrmentatin e meauremen ool o appaau may cange durng e coue of e dy gvng meadng el Regessio to the mean n  penomenon people wo are coen for eecon no e udy on e a of  exreme coe mg 'ponaneouly mprove or declne becae o a meaemen aefac Selectio f assigmet eros n  penomenon e goup owng o auly agnmen o gop may be dfferen a e oue u gvng e o e arefacal appeaance of po-nervenon dfference Mortaity  yo ave a lage ropou rae n your dy  may noduce gop n-eqvaence mla o agnmen ero

Experments can aso e prone to varios expectancy and socia faciitation eects incding Rosenthal and Hawthorne effects f hman observaton s nvoved. The Rosentha effect refers to the phenomenon where researchers may inadvertently alter their reslts to comply wth their expectatons The Hawthorne effect refers to the phenomenon where research partcipants may ater their ehavor as a rest of  the knowedge that they re being observed This is why singe nding (the participants do not know the research hypothess) and doube-blindng neither the partcpants nor the person admnisterng the protoco know the research hypotheses applyng to that partcuar partcipant are employed in some experimenta research projects. Many of  these threats to nteal validity in eperments can be assessed throgh the use of pretestJ posttest design where the groups ae assessed before and after the interventions).f  these threats coud appy to yor eperimental design then yo shod specicay menton them in yor methodoogca defense as we as n the resuts discusson and the concsions n its imtations and strengths of the present study section It hould e noted that a design invoving the comparison of groups need not be an expermenta desgn For eampe studes investigating health diferences in smokers and nonsmokers where group membership has not been determined by the researcher are not experimenta by denition Such desgns are natural comparison or qasiepermental desgns. The asic weakness of  such designs is group n-eqivaence on variabes other than the gropng variable chosen y the researcher Ths can be addressed to a certain extent by the nteligent applicaton of  multivarate statstica technqes. 4 Suvey eseach

A survey invoves the colection of  data about the characteristics of a singe grop of peope his is

How to Wrie a Thess

26

often folowed by an exporaion of the assocations beween varales wthn the sudy. Suc associations ae sensve o e repesentaveness of the seleced sample Tha s, if he sampe s chosen n a ased fashion, te patterns o assocatons wthn tha sample deteced y te esearcer may be at consdeable variance wth hose o e fond in a repesentaive sampe. It is possible to employ a srvey design to compae e chaacteiscs o poplatons This is one of  e advanages o using standardzed ests A conventonal approach to testing whether for example carers o ode people wee ess anxios an people with e same caraceisics wo wee not cares wod be to take two sma grops adminiser the est and compae them on te anxiety mease his is acaly a weak design becase, wih he sma sampe sze, e power wll e ow An aernative appoach wod be to pt a e data coection resorces into one baske (the caer baske) and o se stadadied meases or wc popaon or very arge sampe caracterstcs ae kow It is advised on this mater concenig how to wrte p this sse appears beow: The present study involed the study of a single group of carers I is useful to consider e methodoogical strengths and weakesses of the design appah One alternative wa of  conduting he study woud hae been to include some sort of matched comparison group (not involed i are-giving) i order  fa ompare the responss of the two groups. This approah, however has some aws in compariso 10 the use of stadardized  items and ests as employed in he  present study In the instance where two small samples of participats are ompared high samping ariability issue is present in both samples hus it is dult o rejet the u hpothesis because of both the high withingroup variability and also the high between-group ariabili aused  b small I samplig onditions The use of standardied tests and items from preiously peormed  arge-scae studies drastically redues the sampling ariatio in one of the 'samples This permits muh more sai:[aCo est o/the ul hothesis and between-group comparisons than the sometimes onentiona small comparson group design

4.1 Dfn f daa clcn md

Tee s a rich varety of  daa coecton methods availale to the ealth sciences esearcher incldig diec pysca measuement, clinical obsevaion e se o sel-repoed qesonnaies and venoies, neviews incdng ocs grops, and seconday data collecion from docmens and dataases 411 Dc pycal maumn

Te calaton of e tools sed in e measrements needs to be caefy performed and descred Mos physical measemen tools have plised data concernng ei eliabiiy and vaidy Ts mst be incded in the meodoogy and discssed n he deense Below appears some discssio o sses at cold be nclded in he defense of some of te major data colection mehods empoyed n eal scences researc. 4.1. Cncal bvan

I te osevaion is peromed soley by te reseacher who aso knows e eseach ypoteses and ojecives then e meodologst's waing bels wold be inging oudly here sold be some atempts to stdy the eialty and validity o he observaions, pobably by a asc test-retest and inte-ater reliablity study invoving at leat one other clnician.

How to Wrile a Thss

27

In his sudy, the thigs o be obseved ad rated wold be observed ad ndependenty rated by at east wo osevers ad, if practcabe, the same cases shod be raed wce to es reiabiiy. Othewise he examne may say that yo are stdyig yose ad your outcome expecaces athe ha ea pheomena

4.13 Sf-pd mau and qunna One o the majo proems assocated wh srvey desgs is he extesive se o home-grown' qestionares with unknow propetes I thee s a exsng pshed iveory that deas with the same subec mater as he research quesios with which the research project is cocened the  is bete o empoy these veores wheever possibe (provded, o corse that it has satsactory popetes) I shoud aso be ememered that n selrepoed iventoes peope ca e erocousy about hemseves I wing up esus om se-epoed measures, it is useu to be careu in you use o aguage Fo exampe, he pacpats caimed to have o repoed that ot merely had

4,4 Inv A intevew s a convesatio eween he reseacher and he reseach particpat  ay itervew her is the ecuet probem o esearches imposig ther ageda and perhaps ther views po he paticpats

45 Scnday daa ccn fm dcumn and daaba The mai isse assocaed wth ths mehod o data coecton is data qaity How can the eseache e cerain hat the formaton coected is vad? hs needs to be addressed  the deese Finy when witig the deense i s portant not to adopt a overy apoogetc toe i s resentaio he pon o the exercse is to demostrate tha yo are aware that yor eseach has mitatons ad ht you peromed a thoough schoary ob of evauaig these imations

 

How to Wrt a Tesis

Key points to remember n writing thesis methodology

Folowing checklist appeared to be important for writing thess materials and methods:

Quesons

Componens n research methods

1

What approaches were followed?

Wrte about the study and its desgn

2

What tools were used for research?

Write about selection and development of data collection tools and techniques

3

How many subjects were included in the sudy and how they were selected?

Write cearly about the sampng techniue including sample size. subject selection procedure

4

When and how the data collection was done?

Write about data colecton plan and procedures

5.

What was done for colected data?

Write about data analysis plan and techniques including type of tests and software used

6

What was done to prevent harming the research subjects?

Wrte about ethical issues you consdered durng research incuding subjects selecton, interview and medical interventions etc

7

Whether pre-testing was done before nalzaton of research instruments?

Write details about pretesting about the research insruments

8

What duraton you spent for the research and the place where research was conducted?

Write about the pace and duration of research

Chapter 5 Wiing  Tsis Rsuls 5.1 Introduction

Th rsults consti h major par of h origna work tha is prsnd in th thss. Ths ar vry iportan componns of th hss This chaptr commncs with a discussion o th dsgn o  h strcur of h rsls sctions wihin th rsarch thss Th organizaton of  th prsnation o  rss whn th thss rqurs fndamntal and importan dsgn dcsons o b ad prior o h concnt o wrng A thod o organizaon that ovrcoms so of h dmmas as o whr prcisy crain dscusson poins shoud b ad is prsnd within hs chapr 52 The organization of the presentation of esults haptes

Th locaton o rsults wthn h hsis otn prsnts aor diicutis o th rsarch sudn Hav you vr had the xprnc whr yo hav shown your work to somon, prhaps your suprvisor and thn h or sh has asd you about isss tha yo hav dscssd n ohr pars o  h thss? Prhaps yo spcula that hs rcts t lklhood o shor-trm mory loss rsting rom xcssiv imbbng o  h dparmntal port? Or prhaps i conrms your suspicons concrning th cabr of th prson who has had h tmrty no o 'g t dspit your forts Thn again  may b that th strcur o h prsntaon dd no mt h radrs nds May b hings wr no locad whr h radr xpcd hm o b and h or sh could not nd thm  convnonal rsus scon or chaptr involvs th prsntaon o th rsuls o th daa cotion withot xnsiv commnary or ngraion wth ohr ndings or wor This nvovs a rahr bar bons dscripion of h oucoms o th study or suds It atmpts to wgh up th vdnc supporng th answrs o th rsarch sons posd whin th hss.

Thr ar ssnially wo an ways of organizng h rsls sctons or chaprs n a hsis; thr by data collcon or by rsarch qustion Th dcsion as to how to bst organiz hs atria is nncd by h numbr of suds hat ar o b rpord in h thss f thr is ony on sudy, hn mattrs ar smplid Th prsntaton o th rsus scion or chapr would thn normaly b foowd by a discussion o th rss t s convnonal practc o prsn th rsarch sudy rsuls undr h hadngs of th varous data cocions Thus for xap i you had condctd a survy it woud b typcal to rport h rsuts o hat sdy as a whol in on ocaion (norally a sparat chaptr) within h hsis Thus th organzng prncp or hs typ o prsnaon is h acvs prord by h rsarch sdnt Each daa collction acviy or sudy s rportd sparatly, prhaps in a sparat chapr Howvr whil it maks sns o prsnt dscr acvitis n ths ashion hr s aso th obctv o drcly answring th rsarch ustons hat you hav posd arlr in yor thsis t mght b that varos daa cocons or vdnc tha yo hav assbld or h thss pact on mor han on of your rsarch qustons? Should no thrfor, h rsuts o h hss b organizd undr h rspctiv rsarch ustons? But woud his not ad o a fragntd prsnaton Ths ar undanta docmn dsign issus ha nd to b rsolvd n any hss prior to th concn o aor wriing acivity in ths sctons

30

How o Write a Thesi

5. Pnan dgn pnpl f  ul c f 

Successfl theses sare a nmber of design attibtes. These nclde: a wel-pesened abes and gues  carty of pesenaton of saien reslts

5.1 ll-pnd abl and gu

Mos eses wheer qanitaive or qualitave o mixed n oenaon, ncde ables and ges/graps These need to be well pesened. Bt wha does 'we-presented mean mean? he st feaue of  'wel-pesented s a  you have a specic sye guide o whch te tesis pesenation is to adee ten use  and sck to  lie glue The Amecan Psycologica Assocaton Style Gide s sed wdely thogho he hea scences (Amecan Psychoogical Associaon 1994). I as hndeds of pages in whc everying you may wat to know (and moe) abot wee to p your ndenes and commas s outlned n gm deai Some examnes ealy care ao is suf so yo need o sow them tha yo cae oo f you pay you cads rg yo can spend days of avoidng witing y doing is sot of hing Anoe feaue of 'wepesented is undestandabe on is own We thnk that evey singe gap and tabe in a thess soud ave a ite and axes aeled so at if i s removed fom the hess and sow to a nelgen peso on te stee, he undesands  Fa too many ables ad gaphs pesented in heses are pooy labeled and obscuey pesened to e eten that ntellgen eamnes wonder wha on eat the message behnd a particula graph o ge may be Rememe at mos eaminers wll descend and ascend fom yo hess docmen n a easonaly chaotic way geneay balancng s task wth many otes ceny on tei dess Wha may seem logca and cea wen te thess is read lineary fom begnning o end in one sittng may no seem o be when the docment s ead in ts and sas  needs to e dead ovios and cear even wen randomly accesed iges and taes daw e attenton of the eade and hence must e te sowpeces of  your eposion and convey a message on the own o te peenaion o esponses to mlple quesons in one ae pehaps someing i te oma sed in the foowng tale example coud e used A frthe feaue o 'well-presented s elegant simplcity Do no ty o nclde too mch nomaton n oe tabe o ge o te exen ta e cay o the message  s inended o convey s compomsed

3I

How to Wrie a Thsis

Tabe 1 Frequency of problem gamblng service cent responses to estion 'please indcate the impact the conselng hs had for yo n each o the ollowing es (n=200)

Rpn

Pblm aa G 

N cg

v cg

(%)

(%)

(%

Gmblng ctvty

8.0

30

890

Fnnc sses

4.0

6.0

820

Fmly sses

5.0

0.0

850

Reltonshp sses

10

40

840

Employment

1 1 .0 .0

260

630

Physical health

3.0

.0

860

Lesre se

40

30

830

egal sses

00

00

900

The presentton of gphs is so n re tht reres some desgn ski It hs been seen tht gaphs where there are so many variales re redced to abot 1 mm n wdth n order to t them  n one pge. It s sggested tt n graphcal presenttion a mxmm of  two varbles be presented in one grph. f n dobt, try the lterntves nd maet test them on some of yo esearch bddes If  yo need to provde an exended explnton o what hey are ooking t yo lredy hve yor nswe bot whether it needs chngng Smpfy it! The gre on next page s an exmpe of  simpe gre tht s esiy ndestood. Mny thosands of theses and ppes hve been written wthot the need fo mUlti-pge tbles MUlti-pge tables re genery hrd to foow. Well-presented n the context of gres and tales mens dherng to the style gde aeed so tht t cod be seprted from the thess and stl nderstood nd simple nd elegnt Once gin it is sggested that yo look throgh the theses and jornals in yo rea nd imtate getness

Hw t Write a Thesis

  9 8 7 6 %

 4    o

Health scences

Psychlgy

Soiology

Medical sienes

Dspe

Fgre 1. Percentage of  PhD Stdents enoed at Myical Unversiy n 1981 o 1986 wo had completed wtin 0 years o eir initial enroment 532 Clay f pnan  aln ul

Te resus sections o many eses sfer rom a lack of carty. This s frequently a reslt o a lack of cariy in the mind of  the ahor as o wha he or se is attempting o convey Tis is why it s strongy advocated to se wriing plans n al sections of e tess, incudng the rests and discssion secions Te presenaon o gures and graphs n resus secions in eses olow a sandard roine Tables and gres shold e as simpe as possie and e se of very complcaed grapcs or oscre coour combinai combinaions ons avoded te examiner will not tan yo The table or gre sold no repeat inormaion covered in the main ext, i sould agmen  Every table and gre shod ave a tile that is a concse explanaon of  wat is eng presented; f abbreviations are sed  is mportan ha ey are expained fy Tales where p-vales are qoted sold gve e acta p vale rather han p
View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF