How To Reduce Sho Overhead

 

nabil el haddani 2010-01-13, 01:05 AM Hi experts, I'm working on SHO overhe! optimistion on "M#S$00 n! "M#S2100 "M#S2100 %&ers I hve  %ot o( )e%%s with ex)essive SHO overhe! overhe! *or r+r% sites, i )n pp%& more !ownti%t to re!+)e the SHO re (or +rn n! !ense +rn sites i hve h ve the sme pro%em +t i )n't !ownti%t e)+se the ti%t is %re!& , $ or 10, i tho+ght o+t re!+)ing the A)tive set si.e to 2 +t it's not goo! i!e )+. i wi%% %oose SHO gin// n n&one %ight m& w& with some goo! i!es in or!er to optimise to the norm% rnge whi)h is 30-0 n! shre some experien)e re%te! to this tsk/ r 4i% desi_larka 2010-01-13, 0:35 AM 4i% i m ss+ming + hve the right sorts o( neigho+rs !e(ine!/ there re  ((ew ew w&s to )heive this o+ )o+%! in)rese &o+r thresho%! (or !!ing whi)h wo+%! voi! wek r!io %egs, &o+ )o+%! )hnge h&stersis whi)h wo+%! %so !o simi%r thing/ #here re %so priorities !e(ine! (or the neigho+s so &o+ )o+%! !o tht/ #6 hving more thn 3 78 wo+%! it give &o+ m+)h SHO gin n&w&s 9 i !o+t it nabil el haddani 2010-01-13, 0:5 AM #hnks (or &o+r nswer, i %re!& trie! tht +t in vin; +t 4S4 i sho+%! !ig in r, r, 4i% wolverine

2010-01-13, 05:0 AM Hve &o+ exmine! the possii%it& o( re!+)ing the power o( the pi%ot )hnne% ?@IH9 ? @IH9 #his is +s+%%& the se)on! step i( !ownti%ting !oesn't workBisn't possi%e/ nabil el haddani 2010-01-13, 05:1C AM It's  risk& so%+tion mn : roamR  2010-01-13, 02:20 @M How high is the ntenn height (or +rn re n! !ense +rn imp%emente!9 @h&si)% )hnges s+)h s %owering the ntenn height %so might he%p/ gprastomo 2010-01-13, 05:2C @M Hi,

 

7e!+)ing the SHO, its etter to pp%& to ntenn !ownti%t (or ( or the )e%%s whi)h we !ont wnt to serve, or i( &o+ wnt to mke it !i((i)+%t SHO (or spe)i(i) neigho+r &o+ )n pp%& e%% In!ivi!+% O((set or >)4o O((set (or tht neigho+r/ r nabil el haddani 2010-01-1, 0C:02 @M Hi g+&s, I re%ise! tht most%& %% "$00 )e%%s hve SHO overhe! higher thn 50 seems g%o% pro%em/ An&one hve n i!e/ #hnk + g+&s gprastomo 2010-01-1, 0C:22 @M xport the )tive set si.e sttis)ti)s then )%)+%te the verge: >g: 4+mer o( omponents in A)tive Set o+nt @er)entge

1 222

2

 



3 111

#hen the SHO overhe! D ?1E222 F 2EF3E111B?222FF111 G1-2 is (ine; nabil el haddani 2010-01-1, 0:10 @M Hi gprstomo, p%. (in! en)%ose! the x%s (i%e ( i%e with SHO overhe! sttisti)s (or 7# n! 47# servi)es, it's (i%tere! on SHO overh more thn 50, &o+ )n see tht's it's gener% iss+e (or "$ )e%%s ?%ike 13>61, +t not (or "21 ?with >" nming/ o+ o+ )n (in! %so A)4oO((set on 4S4 3J/ @ositi( v%+e wi%% tret the )e%% s i( etter thn the re% v%+e, negtive v%+e wi%% )t s opposite w&/ w&/ Joo! thre! n! %ern %ot.////:< fahmi 2011-0-13, 0$:1 @M Hi g+&s,

 

I re%ise! tht most%& %% "$00 )e%%s hve SHO overhe! higher thn 50 seems g%o% pro%em/ An&one hve n i!e/ #hnk + g+&s Hi ni%, 6ht's new (or this pro%em, !oes it sti%% persists 9 i( not, how !i! &o+ pro)ee! 9 7 developingrhythm 2011-0-13, 10:1 @M +st  si) )omment/ "$00 goes  %ong w& n! the )e%% )overge hs to e )ontro%%e! in or!er to re!+)e SHO OH/ #hen wht t&pe o( verti)% 6 !o &o+ hve in &o+r network on "$00/ A higher verti)% 6 even with 'his value is eas# to measure> 'he metri$& i>e> measured value of =SHO Overhead= is tuned to a ;ar%itrar#< spe$i$ target value>  'his target value is determined %ased on on uniform tra@$ distri%utions distri%utions and provides de$ent net"or performan$e for su$h $ases> 'he target for the =SHO Overhead= in the tuning is also often set to a value "hi$h is a$$epta%le in terms of the allo"ed$apa$it# allo"ed$apa$ it# for the %a$%one net"or& e>g> u% lins> 'he importan$e of the =Soft Handover Overhead= metri$ is to mae sure that the overhead in terms of the num%er of $onne$tions per $ell is not n ot ex$essive>

 

Soft Handover Overhead is $al$ulated in t"o "a#s> < Average A$tive Set Sie B 'otal  '  'ra@$ ra@$ / ,rimar# 'ra@$> 'ra@$> -< Se$ond Se$ondar# ar# / 'otal 'otal 'ra@$ 'ra@$  '  '#pi$al #pi$al Calues Calues are lie lie > ;Avg A$tive Set Sie<

or 0 ;Se$ondar# / 'otal <

Hope it helps>

Regards>  Originall# ,osted %# haldounh Dear Experts

As  no" there are man# formulas for SHO overhead/Ratio that $an %e $al$ulated from drive test data&$an an# one provide me "ith this formula please????

 'hans ( %est regards regards

)haldounh Still learning>>>>> f #ou nd m# post useful please add reputation and $li$ on 'han Gou Gou %utton

5# default pass"ord is4 HERE Repl#

Repl# *ith +uote

'hans for this post

,ost 'hans-.01.21.& .:4: ,5 60 lamhd%

 

Senior 5em%er

Reputation4 Reputatio n4 -I  8oin Date -..:1.01 ,osts 0 Re4 Drive tesing Soft Handover Overhead/Ratio Formula Formula request ??? !!!! "e no" that SHO Overhead is a ration of resour$e $onsumption> 'his is formular of Jemo ;Assie$ount K Assie-$ountL- K Assie0$ount L0 'his is formular of Jemo ;Assie$ountKKAssie0$ount< Assie-$ountLK Assie0$ount L0 'his is formular of Jemo ;Assie$ount K Assie-$ountL- K Assie0$ount L0