How To Estimate Operating Costs PDF

 

NOMENCLATURE

Feature Report

How to Estimate Operating Costs For assessing the attractiveness of a proposed new or retrofit project, the capital cost estimate is just the first element in the picture. The profitability of the proposal hinges on the operating costs it will incur William M. Vatavuk , Vatavuk Engineering

  CL   Operating labor cost ($/yr) ($/yr)   CLab  Laboratory cost ($/yr)   CM  Maintenance labor and materials cost ($/yr)   CO  Overhead cost ($/yr)   CPC  Pollution control cost ($/yr) ($/yr)   CRMi  Cost of Raw Material Material i ($/unit) CRoy   Royalty cost ($/yr)   CSL   Supervisory labor cost ($/yr)   CUi  Cost of Utility i ($/yr) ($/yr) H      IB    IC    L     M    PB    PC    PL     PPC    PProd    PRMi    PUi    Q    QPC    QProd 

Process annual operating operating hours hours Index value, base date (dimensionless) Index value, current date (dimensionless) (dimensionless) Operating labor labor hours per shift  Maintenance factor (fraction) Commodity price, price, base date ($/unit) ($/unit) Commodity price, price, current current date ($/unit) Operating labor rate ($/hr) ($/hr) Pollution control control unit cost ($/unit removed) Product price ($/unit) Price of Raw Material Material i ($/unit) ($/unit) Price of Utility i ($/unit) ($/unit) Production rate (units/hr) Pollutants removed (units/year) Product production rate rate (units/yr) (units/yr)

RMi  Quantity of Raw Material i required (units/year) uring evaluation of invest- ing hours (that is, when    QQ required (units/yr) (units/yr) Ui  Quantity of Utility i required ment proposals, preparation the process is inoperative),   R    Royalty rat rate e (fraction of product value) of budgets, or other activities,  variable costs are zero as ($) chemical engineers often have well. Operating and super-   TCI  Total capital investment ($)  x   Factoring exponent for labor requirements a need to estimate operating  visory labor, raw materials,   and maintenance (O&M) costs, also utilities, royalties, and polreferred to as direct operating costs, lution control fall into this category. above encompass the most commonly for existing or proposed chemical-pro- Semivariable costs (maintenance, incurred direct operating costs in the cess-industries (CPI) plants. Depend- overhead, and laboratory charges) also CPI. Because the range of processes ing on their underlying purpose, such  vary with the annual operating hours, that fall under the CPI umbrella is so estimates can be made with varying but not proportionately. For example, wide and diverse, it would be impracdegrees of accuracy. The estimating even when a process is inoperative, tical to cover each and every processprocedures presented below are ap- a minimal amount of maintenance industries cost category, including propriate for developing “budget” or is needed. By the same token, the those relevant for only one industry, “study” cost estimates, the accuracy amount of maintenance needed when in a single article. Instead, presented of which typically ranges from plus- a process is running at, say, 8,000 h/  below for each category is general esor-minus 20 to plus-or-minus 30%; yr is less than double the amount re- timating guidance, including rules-ofestimates of greater accuracy involve quired for 4,000-h/yr operation. thumb. Techniques for adjusting (estoo much case-specific detail to allow The so-called fixed (indirect) operat- calating) direct operating costs from generalized treatment. ing costs — taxes, insurance, adminis- one date to another also are given. (On Direct operating costs include the trative charges, finance charges, and the other hand, because the prices of following variable and semivariable depreciation — involve other than engi- labor, maintenance, utilities, and other costs: neering considerations and lie outside direct-operating cost categories vary • Operating and supervisory labor the scope of this article. These expendi- so much by process and geographic • Maintenance (labor, materials, and tures are incurred even if the process area, no actual cost data are provided.) contract maintenance) facility is completely shut down. Note Lastly Lastly,, a detailed example is provided • Overhead (plant and payroll) that of these, depreciation is unlike to illustrate how the individual direct • Raw materials the other fixed costs (and unlike the operating costs are calculated. • Utilit Utilities ies (elect (electricit ricity y, fuels, water, direct operating costs), in that it is not steam, compressed air, other) a real expenditure, with funds being Operating & supervisory labor • Laboratory charges transferred from one entity to another. Most CPI facilities are automated to • Royalties Rather, depreciation is an accounting some degree; many, in fact, require • Pollution contro controll (air, ( air, water, and (“book”) entry, entry, made to offset taxable in- little or no operator attention. Nevsolid waste) come. For For more information on calculat- ertheless, at least some personnel are The variable costs are those that vary ing depreciation and other fixed costs, needed during each shift to monitor proportionately with the process an- refer to such texts as Reference [1]. the control-room instrumentation, nual operating hours. At zero operatThe eight cost categories listed make periodic process-area walk-

D

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUL JULY Y 2005

33

 

Feature Report throughs, and perform other routine tasks. The following straightforward equation can be used to estimate the process operating labor cost (C L) in dollars per year: C L = ( L  L)( H   H   P L)  /8)( P

(1)

where:  L  = operating labor hours per shift    H = process annual operating hours    P L = operating labor rate, in dollars per hour Of the variables in Equation (1),  H is self-explanatory: it ranges from 0 to 8,760, the latter number representing 24 h/d, 365 d/yr. Division by 8 converts  H   from hours per year to shifts per year. The operating labor rate,  P L, is quite fluid, varying by industry, facility, geographical area, and other factors. In particular, geographic

 

PUTTING THE GUIDELINES TO WORK 

 A plant produces an organic chemical, chemical, C, according to the following reaction:

Maintenance factor:

1.75% of total capital investment 

 A + 2B = C For simplicity, simplicity, we assume that the reaction proceeds stoichiometrically, stoichiometrically, with no byproducts nor unreacted reactants. Being an particularly “green” facility, the plant emits negligible negligi ble amounts of air, water, or solid pollutants. The molecular weights of the reactants (pounds per pound-mole) are:  A = 129 B = 78 The plant was built in 2002, and the total capital investment was $67,000,000 The plant’s capacity is 110,000,000 lb/yr  Given the following parameters, all expressed in 2004 dollars, estimate the plant’s direct operating costs, likewise in 2004 dollars:

Overhead factor: Raw material prices:   Royalties:

 

100% of total labor  A: $0.67/lb B: $0.49/lb

$0.057 per pound of product 

Utility requirements per pound of product, and utility prices:   -- Electric Electricity: ity: 0.25 kWh; $0.057/kWh   -- Steam: 1.25 lb; $4.50 per thousand pounds   -- Cooling water: 2.75 gal; $0.22 per thousand gallons Because the annual hours of operation are 8,000, rather than the 8,760 hours in a year, assume that the plant is operating at [100(8,000/8 [100(8,000/8,760)] ,760)] or 91.3% of full capacity, and thus producing

differences in P L can be dramatic. For  Annual hours of operation: 8,000 100,430,000 (0.913)(110,000,000) (0.913)(110, 000,000) lb/yr or example, according to the Engineer  Engineering ing Operating labor requirement: 36 h/shift   News-Record  News-Rec ord labor indexes for the past Operating labor rate: $25/h Solution: several years, common hourly labor Supervisory 1. Determine the amounts of raw materials rates in New York City, have been aplabor factor: 15% of operating labor  required. Because we assume stoichiometric Laboratory proximately three times the rates in operation, the amounts of raw materials and charges factor: 15% of operating labor  product involved are: Dallas, Tex. [ 2  2]; similar geographic differences have been observed for the prices of CPI skilled skill ed labor. In the U.S., U.S.,  L  = L (Q  / Q ) x  (2) maintenance employee; it similarly  2 1  2 1 labor rates can be obtained from such has accounted for the maintenance sources as the  Monthly Labor Review where:  L1  = known labor require- materials costs, as well as the cost of ment for Production maintenance contracts [ 4 (MLR), published by the U.S. Dept.  4].* Rate Q1  of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics In many situations, however, the  x  = a factoring exponent, engineer charged with making a di(BLS). The MLR lists labor rates for ranging from 0.2 to 0.25 rect-operating-cost estimate does not hundreds of industries and a variety [ 3  3] of geographic locations. have a CMMS to draw upon. In these The required operating-labor hours The supervisory labor requirement, cases, he or she must either predict per shift, L, is less straightforward to C SL, also varies by process. However, a the amount of maintenance labor and estimate. While L is a function of the good rule-of-thumb is 15% of the oper- materials the facility will require, or extent of the automation of the pro- ating labor cost: estimate the total maintenance cost cess, it also depends on the number as a percentage of the facility’s total C SL = 0.15C L  (3) of units (distillation towers, for incapital investment (TCI): stance) in the process and the producC M  = (M)TCI   (4) tion rate. Depending on these factors, Maintenance L can range from 1 to 40, 50, or more The cost of maintaining process equip- where M  =  = 0.01 to 0.025, typically [ 6]. labor hours per shift. The best source ment varies considerably according to Generally, the lower end of this range for estimating the operating labor re- the equipment type, age and condition, applies to well-designed plants with quirement consists of plant records the geographical location, and the se- higher-than-average capital costs for identical (or similar) processes,  verity of service. As with the operating and lower-than-average numbers of whether in-house data or information labor requirements, the best sources obtained from other facilities. How- of maintenance-cost data are facility *For companies who do not have a CMMS in ever, if no such information is avail- databases. In the ideal situation, a place or wish to augment an existing one, software packages are available. These packages able, the following equation can be well-designed and previously installed claim not only to track maintenance costs, but productivity,, reduce equipused to roughly estimate L 2, the labor Computerized Maintenance Manage- also to improve labor productivity ment [5 useful ser[downtimes, 5]. Some ofand thisperform softwareother is structured so requirement for Production Rate Q 2, if ment System (CMMS) has consis-  vices as to enable the recording of these data on an the labor requirement,  L1, at a differ- tently, accurately and thoroughly ac- equipment-specific basis (for instance, pumps, ent production rate, Q1 is known: counted for the hours worked by each scrubbers, conveyor systems). 34 

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUL JULY Y 2005

 

 

A  129 129 Thus:

+ 2B = C + (2)(78) = 285 lb A/lb C (product) = 0.453 lb B/lb C (product) = 0.547

2. Escalate the plant’s total capital investment from 2002 dollars to 2004 dollars via the Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index (CEPCI):   CEPCI for 2002 = (based on 1995 = 100)   CEPCI for 2004 =

395.6 444.2

Therefore, TCI in 2004 dollars = $67,000,000(444.2/395.6) = $75,230,000 = 3. Using the equations and guidelines in the main text, estimate each component of the plant’s direct operating costs. (a) Operating labor, via Eq. (1): CL = (36)(8,000/8)(25) = $900,000 (b) Supervisory labor, via Eq. (3): (0.15)(900,000) = $135,000 (c) Maintenance, via Eq. (4): (0.0175)(75,230,000) (0.0175)(75,230,00 0) = $1,316,500 $1,316,500

equipment items to maintain (such as pumps, fans, evaporators). evaporators). The higher end of the range is generally more relevant for less expensive, less well-designed plants having higher-than-average quantities of prime movers and other equipment requiring significant amounts of maintenance. maintenance. But these guidelines for assigning a value to  M   are very rough, and exceptions to them abound. This latter option is in many cases the only practical recourse when the estimate is for a proposed facility employing a new process, because no historical data exist. On the plus side, estimating maintenance costs as a percentage of the TCI requires just a single calculation. But there are two drawbacks: First, this approach tends to overstate the costs for maintaining expensive, well-designed facilities, while understating the maintenance costs for plants having lower capital costs. Consider, for instance, two processes of identical capacity and configuration, one consisting primarily of carbon steel equipment, the other of units fabricated from Type 304 stain-

(d) Overhead, via Eq. (5): 1.00[900,000 + 135,000 + (1,316,500/2)] = 1,693,300 (e) Raw materials, via Eq. (6): Raw Material A: (0.453)(100,430,000)($0.67) = $30,481,000 Raw Material B: (0.547)(100,430,000)($0.49) = $26,918,000   Total = $57,399,000 $57,399, 000 (f) Utilities, via Eq. (7):   Electricity: (0.25)(100,430,000)) X  (0.25)(100,430,000 ($0.057) = $1,431,000   Steam: (1.25)(100,430,000)) X  (1.25)(100,430,000 ($4.50/1,000) = $564,900   Cooling water: (2.75)(100,430,0 (2.75)(100,430,000) 00) X  ($0.22/1,000) = $60,800 (g) Royalties, via Eq. (8):= $5,724,500 (0.057)(100,430, (0.057)(100,430,000) 000) (h) Laboratory charges, via Eq. (9): (0.15)(900,0000) = $135,000 Thus, the estimated total annual operating cost is $69,360,000, or $0.691 per pound of product ❏ less steel. The total equipment cost, and thus the TCI, for the latter process might be several times that of its carbon steel counterpart. But because it is more corrosion-resistant,, the more expensive corrosion-resistant process is actually likely to require less maintenance over its useful life. The second disadvantage of using the percentage-of-TCI method is that in it, the maintenance factor is multiplied by the TCI, which is expressed in the constant dollars corresponding to the year(s) during which the facility was, or might be, built. Therefore, even five, ten, or more years after the facility comes on line, the calculated maintenance cost is still equal to the maintenance cost in the first year. To compensate for this defect, the engineer making the estimate should escalate the TCI to the current dollars corresponding to the year of the estimate. This escalation is typically done via an index, such as the Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index (CEPCI; see p. 64 in this issue), which has been calculated by, and tabulated in, this magazine for over 40 years [ 7 ]. ]. Despite its disadvantages, estimat-

Circle 18 on p. 53 or go to adlinks.che.com/4818-18

 

Feature Report ing maintenance cost as a percentage of the TCI as in Equation (4) is far and away the most commonly used method for computing this expenditure. A commonly used rule-of-thumb with this

quired amounts of these raw materials In addition to plant records, sources will have to be adjusted accordingly. of utility prices include local power, Once the raw-material quantities gas, and water companies and such have been determined (typically, on a publications as DOE’s  Monthly Enmass-per-mass-of-product basis), ob-  ergy Review mentioned above. Steam

equation is to splitmaintenance the calculatedlabor cost evenly between and maintenance materials.

tain current of these rials.the Again, plantprices records are thematebest sources of this information, as they reflect such plant-specific charges as freight and storage. But if these records are unavailable, the engineer should refer to such published sources as Chemical Week  or Chemical Marketing Reporter  (chemical prices) or the U.S. U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE) ( DOE) Energy Information Administration’s Monthly  Energy Review Review (fuel prices). The total raw materials cost (∑C RMi) is simply the sum of the costs of the individual raw materials:

Overhead Overhead is a charge assessed against the total labor cost (the sum of operating, supervisory, and maintenance labor). Some estimators split overhead into two categories: payroll and plant. Payroll overhead covers all costs that the employer company pays for the privilege of retaining its staff. These costs include: Social Security (employer’s contribution); Worker’s Compensation; life, medical, health, and dental insurance; sick leave and vacations; and other similar expenses. Plant overhead is a charge assessed to cover such items as plant lighting and protection, employee amenities (cafeterias, locker rooms, other), and common areas, such as parking lots. The total overhead charge, CO, varies according to the firm’s accounting system. It can range from as low as 50% to more than 150% of the total labor cost. A mid-range estimate is 100%. The relevant equation is, thus, simply:

∑C RMi = ∑Q RMi P RMi 

where:

Q RMi 

   P RMi 

(6)

= quantity of Raw Material i required (units/  year) = price of Raw Material i ($/unit)

Utilities Every process consumes electricity and one or more other kinds of utilities. Electricity is required by motors, heaters, instrumentation and other equipment, as well as for lighting; it is (5) CO = 1.00(C L + C SL+ C M /2 )  also essential to some reactions, such where: as producing chlorine and caustic soda C M /2 = maintenance labor by electrolysis of brine. Steam, com(keeping in mind the monly circulated through the plant rule-of-thumb men via multiple headers at various prestioned at the close of the sures, plays a wide role in most process discussion on mainteplants: for heating, for such process nance, above) applications as stripping, and even in some instances (such as steam-methRaw materials ane reforming) as a reactant. Process For estimating the raw materials cost, water is used in many unit operations; the engineer must in the first place it is a reactant in some reactions; and have a thorough understanding of the it serves widely as cooling water in process, especially with respect to its condensers, heat exchangers and coolinputs and outputs. Before the oper- ers. Compressed air has a variety of ating-cost estimate is made, design purposes in process plants. engineers should have developed comIn general, the cost of each utilplete material and energy balances ity (CUi) is the product of its annual around the process. These should in- consumption (QUi, units/year) and its dicate, among other things, the extent price ( P  PUi, $/unit): to which the production reactions are carried through to completion. If the CUi = QUi PUi  (7) reactants have to be present in greater The total utilities cost is the sum of than stoichiometric quantities, the re- the individual utility expenditures. 36 

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUL JULY Y 2005

and compressed-air however, are rarely published.prices, Rather, plants generally calculate their values internally. For example, steam costs are a function of the cost of the fuel used to produce it, as well as the fixed and other variable costs associated with the steam generator itself.

Royalties Many products are produced under license from other firms. For being allowed to make and sell each such patented product, a company (licensee) must pay a royalty to the firm holding the patent. patent. Under typical royalty agreements, each royalty ( Croy) is as R) of the revenue sessed as a fraction ( R the licensee receives from making and selling the product: Croy = R(Q prod P prod ) 

(8)

where: Q prod 

=

   P prod 

=

annual production of product (units/year) price of product ($/unit)

The value of  R  will vary, of course, according to the licensing agreement made with the patent holder.   Laboratory charges Periodically, raw materials and products have to be sampled and tested to ensure that they meet specifications. The cost of the labor required to do this is charged against the process. Laboratory labor is usually figured as a percentage of total operating labor. While this assessment (C Lab) varies by plant, a rule-of-thumb is 15% of the total operating labor labor,, or: C Lab = 0.15C L 

(9)

Pollution control costs During the past three or four decades, the costs of controlling air, water, and solid waste pollutants have increased dramatically, due to: the increasing stringency of federal, state, and local control regulations in the U.S. and comparable regulations in other nations; pressure from environmental

 

TABLE 1. INDEXES FOR COST ESCALATION O&M Cost

Index Number

Index Name

Operating labor

CEU3232500006 CEU323 2500006

Manufacturi Manuf acturing/Ch ng/Chemical emicalss (avg. hourly earnin earnings) gs)

CEU3232600006 CEU323 2600006

Manufacturi Manuf acturing/Pl ng/Plastics astics and rubber produ products cts

“

CEU3232400006 CEU323 2400006

Manufacturi Manuf acturing/P ng/Petro etroleum leum and coal prod products ucts

“

Electr ic icity

wpu05 054 43

Fuels & relate ted d pr products /i /industr triial electr triic power

Natu Na tura rall gas gas

wpu0 wp u053 5310 1010 105 5

Fuel Fu elss & rel relat ated ed pro produ duct cts/ s/na natu tura rall gas gas

and otheroperating-cost influences. organizations; Engineers preparing estimates should take care not to overlook this source of expense. For some chemical-process plants, admittedly, pollution-control costs consist solely of those for purchasing, installing, operating and maintaining a few pieces of equipment, such as a thermal oxidizer system. For other plants, plan ts, however, control systems are extremely large and complex — indeed, many are virtually process plants in their own right. Prime examples are the lime- and limestone-based fluegas-desulfurization systems used to control sulfur dioxide emissions from large CPI-plant

figures for their sectors. The PPIs and the labor price indexes are compiled by the U.S. Dept of Labor’s BLS. Updated monthly, each index is available from the BLS website [9]. To obtain

“double duty” it is difficult to the indexon-line data, simply enter index distinguish theunits, utilities, maintenance, number in the boxthelabeled and other costs consumed for product “Enter series id(s) below,” below,” indicate the recovery from those applicable to con- year(s) for which index data are detrolling emissions. sired, and click on “Retrieve “Retriev e data”. Nevertheless, an estimate of the To estimate the current price of a pollution-related operating costs is commodity ( P  PC), multiply the comusually wanted by plant and company modity price for the base date ( P B) by management, even when the prepara- the index value for the current date tion of that estimate involves difficult ( I   I C), divided by the index value for the or somewhat arbitrary allocations. base date ( I   I  B): Furthermore, in many instances in  PC = P B (I C/I  (11)  B )  which the engineering project involves a proposed proposed modification to an existTo repeat, however — escalation of ing plant in the U.S., estimates of the O&M prices should only be done as a pollution-related operating costs are, last resort. ■ in fact, required in the course of ob Edited by Nichola Nicholass P. Chopey

boilers, and the elaborate wastewater taining the necessary environmental treatment facilities required for some permits, such as PSD (Prevention of References manufacturing processes and plant Significant Deterioration) air permits. 1. Peters, Max Max S., others, “Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineer s,” 5th Ed., locations. Similar allocations must be made McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003. Information on pollution control when water, solid waste, and other pol- 2.  Engineering News-Record News-Record,, various issues, costs is available in several published lution control permits are developed. McGraw-Hill, New York. 3. “EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual,” 6th sources, among them References [3] Ed., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and [8]. For purposes of making bud- Escalating the costs Research Triangle Park, N.C., 2002. get/study estimates, the direct operat-  A young man once asked Somerset 4. Singer, Tom, “Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation: Accounting for Costs,” ing costs for pollution control (C PC) Maugham his advice on how to beOctober 2002, http://www.keepmedia.com/  are commonly assessed on a dollars- come a writer. After staring at him pubs/ IndustrialMaintenancePlantOperation/2002/10/01/244779. per-unit-of-pollutant-removed basis: for a moment, Maugham solemnly reMaintenance Management Software, Maintenance plied, “Don’t!” The same advice applies 5. Proteus Eagle Technolog Technology, y, Inc., 2005. http://w ww.eaglecmms.com/Industry/Industry_Process.htm. C PC = P PCQ PC  (10) to the escalating of direct operating 6. Jones, Edwin K., “Comparing Maintenance costs. Costs.” http://www.mt-online.com/ http://www .mt-online.com/ curwhere: Q PC  = quantity of pol At any event, unlike current capital rent/09-00mm.html. lutant removed (gaseous, liquid, solid), costs, which can be difficult to obtain, 7. Vatavuk,William M., Updating the CE Plant Cost Index, Chem. Eng., Eng., pp. 62-70, January 2002. units/year the current prices for labor, utilities, 8. Vatavuk, William M., “Estimating Costs To avoid double-counting, this ap- and other O&M costs are readily of Air Pollution Control.” CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1990. proach assumes that the direct operat- available from several sources: pub9. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. U.S. Dept. of ing costs dedicated to pollution control lications, utility companies, and comLabor, http://data.bls.gov/ cgi-bin/srgate. (labor, utilities, etc.) are not included pany records. Thus, escalation of O&M in the various costs calculated via prices should not be necessary. necessary. NeverEquations (1) through (9). Admittedly Admittedly,, theless, on those rare occasions when  Author William M. Vatavuk is it may be difficult in some situations these data simply cannot be found, president of Vatavuk Engifor the engineer to separate process published indexes can be used in an neering (3512 Angus Road, Durham, NC 27705-5404; costs from pollution-control-related attempt to update the prices of some phone: 919-699-3336; fax: costs. For example, at a small facility, direct-operating-cost components. 413-638-1336; e-mail: [email protected]), a an operator might be responsible for For usage in the U.S., Table 1 lists consulting firm specializing monitoring both the production and two selected Producer Price Indexes in air pollution control and chemical-process-industries the pollution-control units. Here, alloallo- (PPIs), for natural gas and electricity, cost analysis. He retired from U.S. EPA’s Air Programs Office cating a portion of the operator’s time and three labor price indexes, for the a 30-year career. Vatavuk is the author of to pollution control might be arbitrary. “chemicals,” “plastics and rubber prod- after two books, two book chapters, and scores of arIn other cases, a pollution control unit ucts,” and “petroleum and coal prod- ticles on cost analysis. He created and regularly “Vatavuk Pollution Control (such as a gas absorber) might be used ucts” sectors. The labor price indexes updates Indexes,”the which appearAir monthly in CE (see p.Cost 64).  Vatavuk has a B.E. in chemical engineering from to recover product, as well as to con- can be used in two ways: as escalation  Youngstown State University and is a registered trol regulated air emissions. emissions. For such indexes, and as actual hourly-earnings professional engineer in North Carolina.  

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUL JULY Y 2005

37