How to Draw Caricatures
April 17, 2017 | Author: Cristian Pantano | Category: N/A
Short Description
Download How to Draw Caricatures...
Description
HOW TO DRAW CARICATURES These kinds of things always start out with a definition,
but
“caricature”
is
a
hard
thing
to
pigeonhole into a single sentence. How can you, when the word encompasses the elegant, minimalist lines of Al Hirschfeld to the lavish, value and color soaked paintings of Sebastian
Kruger to the graphic,
geometrical collages of David Cowles and everything in between? Despite the wild differences in style and technique, “caricature” is the tag that is placed on any of these works of art without hesitation. Obviously there is a connection beyond a common technique, school or format. So, what are the universal elements
PART
ONE:
BASIC
THEORY AND THE FIVE SHAPES
all caricatures have that identify them as caricatures? I would say there are three essential elements that transcend style and medium and must be present in a caricature: •
be, then it is not successful. All good caricatures
This is the first of a series of articles I will post here on The MAD Blog about my theories, methods
and
concerning
how
caricatures.
A
incorporate a good likeness of their subjects. •
lot
of
doing
live,
quick-draw
caricatures. However all of that can be applied to more studio orientated caricature work and I have
also
added
points
and
concepts directly from the less time-constrained
world
of
caricature illustration. Therefore this is not instruction for just the live caricaturist but for any artist interested in caricature for any purpose.
form
of
vary wildly, but there must be some departure. A
information is part of what I teach derived partly from the approach
some
have is a portrait. The level of exaggeration can
this
my theme park artists, so it is
Without
representation of the subject’s features, all you
draw of
Exaggeration-
exaggeration, or a departure from the exact
processes to
Likeness- If you can’t tell who it is supposed to
straight portrait is not a caricature. •
Statement-
I
believe
a
caricature
must
editorialize in some way. The artist must be trying to say something about the subject. It might be something to do with the situation the subject is drawn in, it may just be a play on their personality through expression or body language, it might be a simple as making visual fun of some aspect of their persona or image. Exaggeration itself can accomplish
this
in
some
cases.
The
best
caricatures say something more about the subject than that they have a big nose. By my ‘definition’, a successful caricature therefore looks like the subject, is exaggerated to varying
degrees and also has something
that third item is often turned way down or ignored
to say about the subject… some
completely,
sort
illustration, it’s an important part.
of
editorial
comment.
In
but
in
the
case
of
caricatures
for
“live” caricature at a theme park,
TEACHING SOMEONE TO SEE I’ve
been
with
they draw a square… well,
compared to Mr. Normal,
at
that is all about seeing and
the
theme parks for over two
not drawing. The ability to
minimal. So why is he so
decades
see,
easy?
young
working
caricaturists now,
and
I’ve
and
after
that
the
difference
would
Because
you
be are
learned one very important
ability to exaggerate what
SEEING a difference based
lesson… it’s impossible to
you
humorous
on perception, and that is
teach
draw
effect in a caricature… that
giving you your springboard
teach
has to be developed. For
for
them to DRAW… that isn’t
most that means a lot of
observation of what makes
so hard. Learning how a
drawing
this person different from
face looks and works by
looking.
learning
Have
someone
caricatures.
I
to
can
anatomy,
expression
how
and
a
lot
of
a
you
ever
been
where
face
comes
the
One
and running. The obvious
features, how the angle the changes
caricature.
“normal”, and you are off features
at
the
for
walking along at the mall or
is
changes
see
ever
are
easy
and
along
observations… it’s Johnny
somebody
with
and Susie Normal or, worse
perception of features, how
some
hair grows and falls about
distinct face that maybe
Supermodel that are the
the head… those are things
sports a gigantic nose or a
challenge. That is where
that can be taught. Drawing
Cro-Magnon brow or some
developing
caricatures, on the other
other obviously out-of-the-
“see” becomes important.
hand, is a lot more about
ordinary
There is no face that defies
seeing
what
the
Caricaturists have a term
caricature,
person
in
you
for that kind of face… it’s
sometimes have to dig a
personal
called a “field day”. Think
little deeper to find the
is
about it for a second… why
keys to unlock the more
good,
is that face so ripe for
difficult
caricature compared to the
caricature, the old adage of
next
“practice
unique
makes
front and
interpretation about
than
making
confident
marks
paper.
can
I
of it
on
explain
the to
crazy,
incredibly
features?
guy’s?
Are
really
the
yet,
Johnny
and
an
Susie
ability
you
just
puzzle. makes
to
In
perfect”
someone exactly how to
features
that
has never been truer. The
draw a circle, but if I place
different? If you took a ruler
ability to see doesn’t spring
a circle before them and
and measured the size of
up overnight, and I often
ask them to draw it and
Mr.
tell
Shnozzes’s
nose
eager
young
caricaturists about
they
500
so
impossible
to
help
them
are general concepts that
bad
develop their ability to draw
apply
caricatures in them they
them. There are many ways
approach of a caricature as
have
first
and techniques to help an
well as specific tricks and
before they start noticing
artist develop their ability
tips for individual features
the subtle things that hide
to see what is in front of
and
inside the “ordinary” face.
them,
recognize
elements
Although
makes
what
to
or
have
draw
“impossible” someone caricatures,
out
I
say to to it’s
it’s
they
what see
to
the
overall
important, that
I
main will
be
sharing over the multiple
teach
unique and then amplify
parts
of
draw
that uniqueness to create a
articles.
not
successful caricature. There
this
series
of
THE FIVE SHAPES The human face is perceived by many as an incredible complex object. There are about 52 muscles in the face, depending on your source and its categorization. Age, sex, race, expression (the face is capable of about
5,000
expressions)
weight
and
environment can all play a role in the look and perception of a given face. Sounds pretty complex. Not really. Every building, no matter how complex, starts out with a foundation and framework. Look at this simple drawing: Place
these
shapes
in
their
proper
relationship, and you have a human face. It really is that simple. Drawing the shapes accurately, so they recognizably represent the subject’s features, is the basis for a good likeness. Beyond that is nothing but details…
things
like
dimples,
wrinkles,
eyelashes, cheekbones, etc. They are the decor
to
your
building…
the
millwork,
furniture and drapery that makes the place Show that drawing to any human being in
unique and filled with life. Without the
the world and ask them what it is. Barring a
strong foundation, however, it can all come
language barrier, they will tell you it’s “a
tumbling down.
face”. No other information needed. In it’s
What does that have to do with caricature?
most simple form, the human face is made
Everything. I mentioned a single word in the
up of only five simple shapes:
last paragraph that really is the secret to caricature as a whole no matter what technique
or
approach
you
intend
to
practice: RELATIONSHIPS It’s the manipulation of the RELATIONSHIP of these five simple shapes that create the foundation for your caricature. In fact, I’d argue that 90% of the entire caricature
resides in how you relate these five simple
demonstrate
how
you
can
change
the
shapes to one another. It is the foundation
relationships of the five shapes and create
upon which the rest of your building is built,
very different caricatures:
where the real power of exaggeration is realized. Make it good and almost all the heavy lifting is done, the rest merely referring to details. What do I mean by “relationships”?
I
mean
the
distances
between the five shapes, their size relative to one another, and the angles they are at in relationship to the center axis of the face. Distance. Size. Angle.
In traditional portraiture, the head is divided into “classic proportions” (we’ll get into that more next time), meaning the relationship of
the
features
are
within
a
certain,
accepted range of distance to one another, size and angle relative to the face and head shape. You achieve your likeness in a classic portrait, in it’s most basic form, by correctly drawing the shapes and then the details of each feature according to the model in front of you while staying within the framework of the “classic” proportions. Of course each face varies minutely here and there, but still you do not stray far from the classic formula. In a caricature, like a portrait, the likeness is also achieved by drawing the features as they really look… but you change the relationship of the features based on your perceptions of the face. The relationships you change are as I listed before: distance, size and angle. Look at these
VERY
simple
drawings
that
No detail, and all the shapes are basically the same with the exception of the head shape (again, more on that later… MUCH more) but all are distinctly different and when the details are added will make for highly varied caricatures. The difference is the relationships between the features, and how
they
have
been
exaggerated
and
changed. Caricature is not about choosing one feature and making it bigger, it’s about all the features together and how they relate to one another. Here are some quick studies of the 5 shapes beneath a few caricature sketches:
The relationships differ in distance, size and angle from one another. The bigger the differences are from “classic” proportions, the more exaggerated the caricature. It’s much easier to see the differences when the details are removed and only the 5 shapes are left. It’s also much easier to create those
differences
at
this
simple,
fundamental level. It’s easy to get caught up
in
details
when
the
important
information rests beneath the rendering. How does one determine the “correct” changes to make to a given person’s feature relationships to make a good caricature of them? Well, that’s the trick, isn’t it? That is were that pesky “seeing” comes in. In his book “How to Draw Caricatures“, Lenn Redman
uses
a
concept
called
“The
Inbetweener” as a basis for almost every
perceive the face, and exaggerate that
observation.
classic
perception. The result may be different than
portraiture relationships used as a point of
how others perceive that face, but if the
reference for making observations. Every
three
caricature begins with the observations the
definition are present it’s still a successful
artist makes about the subject, and how
caricature. Hirschfeld used to say he once
their particular face is perceived by them.
drew Jimmy Durante without a nose at all,
MAD
yet it was still recognizable as Durante.
It
legend
is
basically
Mort
the
Drucker
has
been
elements
we
described
in
our
quoted as saying that there is no “one
That’s not to say that any observation is
correct way” to caricature a subject. Any
appropriate…
given subject can have several difference
someone with a small, button nose a
interpretations
gigantic
with
respect
to
the
after
potato
all
you
schnozz
can’t
and
give
call
it
exaggeration of the relationship of their
“exaggeration”. That’s not exaggeration, it’s
features… and each may be as successful
DISTORTION. You can, however, choose NOT
as the other. That’s one of the unique things
to exaggerate the nose’s smallness but
about caricature as an art form. Portraiture
rather find something else to exaggerate.
is basically absolute… Your drawing either
That is the caricaturist’s task, to find what it
looks like the person with the correct
is about the subject’s face that makes it
features, proportions and relationships, or it
unique and alter those relationships to
does not. Caricature is subjective to a point.
exaggerate that uniqueness.
The artists’ goal is to draw how they
PART
TWO:
RELATING
THE
FEATURES
Previously
I
relationships
mentioned between
how
features
are
the
most important jobs, and one of the most
the
difficult to “learn”. The actual difference
driving force behind caricature: “Caricature
is
one
humans does not add up to much in terms
feature and making it bigger, it’s about
of physical measurements… a “big” nose
all the features together and how they
may be only a fraction of an inch larger than
relate to one another.”
a “normal” nose. Yet we can see different
Actually caricature is about changing the
feature relationships on almost everybody,
relationships between features, meaning
some which seem very pronounced. That is
their distance, size and angle relative to one
because we spend basically our entire lives
another, from what they truly are and what
looking into people’s faces… we go it when
is
what
we interact, work, play, go shopping or to
relationships to change and how much to
church… we are social beings and our faces
change them is one of the caricaturist’s
are both our identities and our method of
considered
not
about
“normal”.
choosing
between the relationship of features of most
Deciding
communication. minute
Our
differences
ability becomes
to
observe
very
relate to one another. Consciously making
fine
those observations, especially for those
tuned. Mostly it’s unconscious, but we see
faces in which the unique aspects are not
that fraction of an inch larger nose as “big”,
obvious, is the most difficult part of drawing
or we see this person’s eyes as large or this
caricatures. There are some techniques and
person’s mouth as small based not on
methods you can use to help make those
physical measurements but on our overall
observations.
perception of the features and how they
CLASSIC PORTRAIT PROPORTION AND OBSERVATION It’s important to start somewhere, and the
width of an eye, from corner to corner, as
best place is with what is considered
the primary frame of reference:
“normal” relationships of features for two reasons.
First,
knowing
these
classic
proportions will help you as a caricaturist to observe where your subject’s face might differ by providing a point of reference to compare it to. Second, once you’ve made these observations you can use that same point
of
reference,
the
classic
portrait
proportions, as a guide to get as far away from as possible to create your caricature. Let’s start out looking at the classic human proportions in traditional portraiture (this is boring, but it’s important). One method that has been used for centuries is by using the In this method, the head is five eye widths wide, with a single eye width between the eyes, and between the outside eye corners and the outside of the head. The nose is one eye width wide, and therefore the nostrils are equal to the corners of the eyes. Another simple method for establishing the “normal” relationship between eyes and mouth is via the equilateral triangle that should be formed by the points of the outside corners of the eyes, and the center point of the bottom of the lower lip. Every book on learning to draw the human face has some similar method of standardizing the proportions of the average face. Do human faces really conform to these exact relationships? No, of course not. That’s the point. There are differences from this face to that, some very slight and some more pronounced, and the caricaturist exaggerates these differences to create a caricature. Knowing what is supposed to be there is half the battle of seeing where things are different.
Again, making these observations is the trickiest part of doing caricature, but the good news is you don’t have to come up with a shopping list of deformities in order to do a caricature. In fact, all you have to do is come up with one good observation. Just one and you can use that as your cornerstone and build your caricature around it. It could be as simple as: this person has a skinny face… or big eyes… or a small mouth… or a square jaw… or a bent nose… or whatever. More than one is better, but just one will suffice?
ACTION AND REACTION Why
is
only
one
observation
enough?
Because “no feature is an island”. What I
leave the rest of the face untouched, we have a bizarre looking result:
mean is that all the features relate to one another fundamentally, and you cannot make a change to one feature without it affecting the others. This is one of the few constants you can rely on with respect to drawing caricatures: Action and Reaction. In physics every action causes an equal an opposite reaction. In caricature the action of changing the relationship of a single feature to the others causes the others to react in often predictable ways. You cannot change the eyes without affecting the nose, mouth,
There is awkwardness to the “caricature”
head shape, etc. and how it affects those other features follows (for the most part) a predictable path. Say we make an observation about our subject that the eyes seem far apart. If we move the just the eyes farther apart and
We can’t ignore the effect on the other features. The act of moving the eyes father apart forces the other features to react. Typically when the eyes move father apart, the nose moves closer to the eyes, the mouth moves along with the nose, the head becomes wider and, in turn shorter:
components to any caricature: The head shape and the “T” shape. These are the two elements of a face I look at first and try to make observations them
I
about,
can
push,
because
with
stretch
and
exaggerate the face to great effect with relative ease.
The features work
Hmmm… looks like
better together here
my brother…
When I talk about the “T” Shape I am
Head shape is often Additional
the most affected, and
observations
can
is not coincidentally a
change the path of the
big focus. In fact part
reaction.
our
three of this series will
observations are that
deal entirely with head
the eyes are far apart,
shapes. For now we
but the mouth is also
will
far
interior features and
from
Say
the
nose.
Because of that action,
stick
with
the
their relationships.
of
the
becomes smaller:
head
the
geometric shape
created by the eyes and nose as a single unit. In simplest terms they create a capital “T”. Sometimes the “T”
can
be
short
and
wide,
sometimes it can be long and thin, or somewhere in between. The angle at which the eyes rest to the center axis of the face can change the “T” into shape. I treat the “T” not as a set of
THE “T” SHAPE
simple lines but as a contour shape
and therefore the top part
of
more of a “Y”, or more of an arrow
the lower part of the face must be longer,
speaking
with thickness, therefore the stem (or I have talked a lot
nose) of the “T” can be thicker or
about simplifying the
thinner at one end or the other, and
face by boiling it down
the arms (or eyes) of the “T” can also
into the 5 Shapes, but
change in thickness to accommodate
it can get even simpler
big round eyes or narrow, squinty
than that in terms of
ones. Imagine a contour capital “T”
both
making
drawn around the eyes and nose in
observations
and
varying relationships.
playing
with
in the
relationships features
to
caricature.
of make
In
fact
a I
believe there are two absolutely crucial, key
The shape of the “T” reacts to changes
you
relationship
of
make the
to
the
eyes
and
nose. In most cases the eyes and nose
work
in
a
predictable
tandem within their relationship. Imagine that the eyes and nose are connected by a string that travels through
a two wheel
pulleys located in the center of the eyes. The length of the string is constant. If the person’s eyes are moved farther apart, the string pulls the nose closer into the eyes. If the nose is made longer, then the eyes are drawn closer together. All of this takes place within the “T” shape.
The mouth, nose and chin have a similar connection. They have a constant amount of distance between
each
other.
If
the
mouth is perceived as being close
to
the
nose,
the
chin
moves a little farther away as a reaction. There are similar rules that apply to the head shape, which we’ll get into next time. This is extreme simplification, but
I have said before the
simpler
you
can
make
the
shapes you are working with, the easier it is to exaggerate them and create your caricature. If you imagine a shape as simple as
a “T”,
it’s very easy to
exaggerate that “T” shape and then plug in the features as they really look within your simple shape
and
you
have
your
caricature. Take a look at these caricatures and the “T” shapes within their head shapes:
The “T” Shape and head
anatomy, expression, skin,
details
shape combine to create
hair and other details work
moment and fill up a few
the base of your caricature,
to create the likeness and
sketchbook
over them the 5 shapes
bring
underlying
nothing but the head shape
further
the
structure to life. It’s still all
and “T” shape of the faces
the
built
you
define
relationships
of
the on
these
features, and over the 5
foundations.
shapes
I
the
features
would
themselves are drawn and
exercise
things like bone structure,
rendering
simple
see
pages
when
for
a
with
paging
through a magazine. Draw
suggest to
caricatures
as
forget and
an
one quickly using just your
about
initial observations and first
drawing
impressions
of
the
face.
Then look back at it and try
it
again,
to see where it differs from
exaggerating your first try.
caricature in a given face
the “normal” template of
Do this with a dozen faces a
develops.
classic proportion, then try
day,
and
this
see
how
PART THREE: THE IMPORTANCE OF HEAD
time
ability
to
“see”
the
your but it’s really the “T Shape” and the head shape together as a
SHAPES
whole that acts
are
the
basic
foundation of a caricature. With When I first started drawing live caricatures I felt that
those
the eyes were the most important part of the face,
relationships established, the rest
and I put a lot of emphasis and focus on them. I still
of the caricature quickly follows
think the eyes are a crucial element, but over the
suit.
shapes
and
their
years I’ve come to believe that the head shape is the most important part of a caricature. The head shape is the fulcrum upon which a caricature
hinges.
The
heavy
lifting
of
all
exaggeration is accomplished via the shape of the head, and it is more easily accomplished that way. Considering that the head shape is a single shape, it is easier to recognize how that shape differs from “normal” and it is easier still to draw a corresponding simple shape that exaggerates those properties as opposed to the more complex multiple relationships of the features. By stretching and exaggerating the head shape, you create the framework within which your other features and their relationships are drawn to achieve your caricature. I have spoken of the “5 Shapes” and the importance of their relationships already, but digging a little deeper it’s accurate to say that the head shape is “Shape 1″ and the other four shapes are planets to it’s sun, working within it’s all encompassing field of gravity. If a caricaturist can “see” and exaggerate the head shape, all the other features fall into place and follow along. In the last lesson I talked about the “T” shape being a focal point of the basic caricature,
CLASSIC PROPORTION
SEEING THE HEAD SHAPE I
talk
endlessly
about
seeing
shapes within the features and the face,
and
the
importance
of
drawing those shapes accurately to capture likeness and to create a convincing
drawing.
Again,
it’s
difficult to teach anyone to “see”… that ability is developed over time via practice and hard work. Still, there are a few techniques and tricks I have learned that can help artists to better see what is in front of them, and better interpret it in their drawing. Many work for any feature or “shape” within the face, but some are specific for individual features.
Head
shapes
have
several of these tricks for both initial
observations
exaggeration.
and
As
with
Redman’s
‘”Everyman”
above and below the
observations and come
concept, it’s important to have an
eyes, and how those
up with a simple head
understanding
two areas relate, is a
shape:
of
classic
human
proportion an anatomy to have a
crucial
part
of
springboard from which observations
head
can be made. This is important both
relates to caricature. I
This is an old portrait
for helping to see what makes a given
will refer to it often.
artist’s
shape
the
as
it
face unique by comparing it to those “normal” proportions, and for helping
SIMPLIFYING
to exaggerate those unique aspects
SHAPES
1. Squint Your Eyes: trick.
your
eyes
or
them
so
you
are
through
your
looking
by giving the artist a “starting point”
Squint
eyelashes
close
at
your
from which to depart as much as
The
is
subject. This eliminates
possible.
really made up of a
the details and forces
lot
different
you to see only vague
including
shapes and forms. That
cheeks,
makes it easier to see
head
shape
of
features cheekbones, brow,
jawline,
forehead,
chin,
hair,
etc.
the simple shapes and drawn them.
While these are all important
elements
2.
Points
of
of the whole, at this
Reference:
stage
to
I look for these with
treat the head as a
every feature I draw.
single
and
What I mean by “points
keep it as simple as
of reference” is finding
possible.
Simple
a specific point or part
shapes are easier to
of a feature to use as
The classic adult head is an oval,
draw,
and
an anchor point from
slightly flattened along the top. The
manipulate than ones
which you can make
head is exactly divided in half at the
with a lot of complex
your
eyes, meaning there is equal distance
elements to them. It’s
Each
from the horizontal line of the eyes to
easy to get hung up
unique
both the top and bottom of the head.
on the details and not
reference,
The head is five eye widths wide, and
be able to see past
general
the widest point is typically at the
them
horizontal
or
temples, but can be anywhere from
underlying
dividing
lines
the cheekbones to just above the
foundation.
always be used for this
ears.
more
Here are some tricks
purpose.
accurately the “mass” of the head
to help make initial
The
distance,
or
we
need
shape
control
to
the
observations. feature
has
points
of
but
in
things
like
vertical can
With
the
head
shape,
the
This is a strange but effective way of grasping a
horizontal line create by the eyes
simple head shape, and for exaggerating it at the
is a good point of reference. Using
same time. Try to associate the head shape of your
this imaginary dividing line, it’s
subject with the shape of some inanimate object you
easy to see how much of the head
are familiar with. Maybe this person has a head
lies above that lie, and how much
shaped like a lightbulb (small, narrow bottom of the
below. I also will look for the
face with a big forehead) or that person’s head shape
widest point of the head shape,
may remind you of a peanut (squeezed at the
knowing that once I have found
temples). Whatever strikes you. I don’t mean you
these points I need only to make
draw a light bulb with the face on it, but rather use
sure the rest of the head shape
your imagination and keep that object in mind as a
lies in between them. I will also
template for the head shape you draw.
look for straight lines along the contour of the head shape, and draw them accordingly. Finally, I will look for points along the face contour where there is an angular change of direction. The back of the jaw and sides of the chin will often have these points. Any or all of these points of reference can help you “see” the rest of the head shape
by
comparing
what
is
around it to the point of reference you have established. 3. Shape Association:
Of course, it’s a fun exercise to draw those objects with faces on them just for fun and practice. Doing that helps your ability to spot those associations within your subject’s head shape.
EXAGGERATING THE HEAD SHAPE I mentioned earlier that the
can
head
place
other aspects of the face.
forehead.
where exaggeration is most
Because the head is treated
observations are great, but
easily
as a single shape, it is
one strong one is all you
relatively
need because it will create
shape
is
a
applied
greatest
to
effect.
This
the is
radically
change
easy
to
all
make
a
small
Multiple
shape to any appreciable
decisions
degree creates a drawing
them. Unlike the interior
caricature.
radically different than a
features of the face, which
Here are some methods of
portrait. Any change to the
change
seeing
head
the
from
the
with
head
execute
expression,
shape
is
a
cascading
or
those
and
a
chin,
because altering the head
shape
exaggeration
large
effect
with
your drawing to define your
and
exaggerating
the head shape:
“normal” shape has a very
constant that only changes
high impact to the viewer,
with the angle of the head,
1. Visual Weight:
and the features, by way of
and then only as any object
One key to exaggerating
their
will change when rotating
the head shape is to decide
in
When
where the “visual weight’ of
necessary
relationships
within
the
space.
head shape, are forced to
exaggerating
head
the head lies. That can be
follow
become
shape, all you really need is
as simple as using the afore
exaggerated. My analogy of
ONE observation about it to
mentioned line of the eyes
the head shape being a
build your caricature upon.
as a reference point and
“fulcrum” is an apt one,
It could be as simple as
asking yourself “does more
because
slightest
observing that the model
of the face lie above the
change in the head shape
has a skinny face, or a
eyes, or below?” That is
suit
and
the
the
visual
weight…
the
relative to some point of
placement of head mass
reference like the line of the eyes.
We know that in a “normal” proportioned head the mass is equal. However how we perceive the face is different than it’s physical measurements. Whenever you can depart from the equal mass rule it’s important to do so. That is caricature.
2. The Law of Constant Mass: There are very few
exaggerations… the law of constant
from? You take it from
“rules”
are
mass. By using it, you can take that
the top of the head,
it
“one observation” about the head and
taking away from the
to
follow through with the rest of the
size of the top to make
head shape.
the bottom bigger. That
expressions,
Imagine you have sculpted a perfectly
is the law of constant
posture and unique
proportioned head out of wet clay.
mass.
physical
attributes
Your head is done, but you have used
almost
up all your clay. You decide you want
impossible to be able
to create a caricature rather than a
to say “this is always
realistic bust of your subject. Looking
true”. Here is one
at the model you decide they have a
rule
never
large jaw, so you want to make the
however,
jaw bigger. With no more clay to work
and it’s a powerful
with, you need to get that clay from
tool
somewhere to pack on to the jaw and
that
universal
as
applies caricature… like
make
it
that
changes, to
convincing
things
create
make it larger. Where do you get it
smaller without affecting the other
works
areas. A person with a big chin will
respect to the width of
automatically have a smaller top of a
a face… if the face is
head. Likewise someone with a big
very wide you need to
forehead will also have a smaller
take mass from both
bottom of a face. This serves to
the top and bottom to
create
create that width. Of
exaggerations
of
higher
sideways,
this
impact, since the perception of a
course
large jaw is made more pronounced
affect the relationships
when the top of the head is smaller.
of the interior features,
The head has only so
It’s the same concept as when a gray
because they must now
much
mass.
You
value appears closer to white when
fit
make
one
surrounded by a much darker value
exaggerated
bigger
or
and looks darker when surrounded by
shape.
cannot area
will
with
within
also
he head
white. The law of constant mass also 3. Rubber Concept: Another way to think about how the entire head shape is affected by a single observation is to imagine a head made of soft, goo filled rubber. Now if we make the observation that our subject has a narrow face, we need to squeeeeze our rubber head like a vice to make it narrower. The effect of this is that the head bulges out on the top and bottom. If we decide the head is wide, we pull the outsides out… the result is the top and bottom get sucked in. If we squeeze the forehead, the jaw bulges out.
What is good about this
squeezing, stretching and
constant mass and/or the
method
it’s consequences.
rubber
imagine the features of our
It’s important to trust the
drawing a caricature. Even
subject also molded into
follow through of the cause
if that lantern jawed subject
the initial rubber head, we
and effect associated with
does not appear to have a
can
will
the
the
small top of the head, it is
the
head shape via the law of
important to follow through
see
faithfully
is
that
how
if
they
follow
we
exaggeration
of
concept
when
with that moving of the
awkward and a lot less
observing the head shape,
mass
clear.
making good decisions on
and
The shape of the head is a
where to place the visual
maintain a balance in your
crucial element to a good
weight
drawing… otherwise your
caricature… arguably THE
that shape is central to an
exaggeration
crucial element. Accurately
effective caricature.
if
you
emphasize
want
that
jaw
to
will
be
and
exaggerating
PART FOUR: DRAWING EYES I’ve written in past tutorials on drawing
richly painted to the most minimalist of line.
caricatures that you can’t really teach
In these next series of tutorials some
someone to draw caricatures… that is more
aspects of what I talk about will relate
about
and
specifically with a style of caricature like my
observation skills and also developing an
own… based on cartoon line either inked or
ability to find that which make an individual
in some other medium. Therefore those with
face unique and exaggerating it. Since
different sensibilities and styles can take
every face is different this is an exercise in
from it what they will and apply what makes
personal
sense to them, and ignore the rest. I will try
developing
their
observation
Therefore
after
I
have
“sight”
and
decision.
gone
over
the
to center my discussion on that which
information in my pervious tutorials, I switch
applies to a broader range of styles than
gears an concentrate on teaching rookie live
just my own.
caricaturists how to draw the individual
My method for teaching the individual
features, both how to see them, exaggerate
features begins with a lesson
them and how to draw them in line to best
anatomy.
effect.
memorizing every anatomical name but I do
Here is where style becomes an issue. What
believe you must have a good working
I have written about previously can apply to
knowledge of how a
I’m
not
a
big
on real
believer
in
almost any style of caricature, from the feature is put together in order to have a good command over the drawing of said feature. Following the anatomy lesson, I talk about different techniques to help “see” the shape of the feature and understand how to draw it, including realistic proportion. Finally I talk about interpreting the feature in terms of exaggeration and incorporating it into the whole. POINTS OF REFERENCE case of caricature the correct drawing of the exaggeration of Seeing
and
drawing
them? Either way you still have to “see” the object you are
anything
is
all
about
drawing and understand it’s form first. We have all seen
and
the
correct
depictions of artists on TV raising their arm outstretched
drawing of them or in the
towards their models with the thumb out from the fist and
shapes
squinting their eyes before
accurate observations of the subject. Establishing points of
drawing. That is supposed
reference in the face is key to helping to “see” shapes and
to represent an old artist’s
make observations. With each feature and the face overall I
trick of using their thumb,
will suggest several things I use as constant points of
or hand, or pencil or some
reference, which I can then use as a starting point from which
other object to measure
other observations are based. Any kind of drawing can benefit
their
from this simple concept.
subject’s
features
relative to one another, or
Our first feature is the eyes. I’ve always felt that the eyes of a
to see angles or other
caricature are the center of everything, literally the center of
relationships. The thumb is
the face but figuratively the center of expression, personality
supposed to be a “point of
and “life” as it were. Therefore I’ve always place special
reference”…
emphasis on the eyes and begin and end with them, after the
that
is
a
used
constant to
make
head shape, as the focus of almost any caricature.
ANATOMY OF THE EYE radiate from the pupil out to the edge of the iris), and the sclera (whites of the eyes). The tissue surrounding the eyes
include
the
inner
and
outer
canthus (the “corners” of the eyes), the caruncula (the small, reddish, oval shaped piece of tissue in the inner corner which is sometime incorrectly referred to as the ‘tear duct’), and the semilunar
fold
(where
the
eyeball
caruncula).
The
eyelids
The human eye is made up of a round orb
meets
(eyeball) that rests in and slightly protrudes from
consist of the upper and lower lid
a socket of bone and tissue, surrounded orbital
plates (the actual eyelids that fold
muscles and by covered by skin in the form of
down and up to cover the eyeball), the
eyelids. The visible parts of the eyeball include
eyelashes or cilia, which are attached
the pupil (black circle in the center of the eye),
to the free edges of the lid plates in a
the iris (colored area around the pupil) which
double or triple row and are short, thick
includes the stroma (the thread-like fibers that
and curved hairs.
the
SEEING THE EYE SHAPE Despite what I said about the
“shape” of the eye I am talking about the visible
importance of the eyes, the eye is
portions of the eyeball, created by the space
still just another feature and it has
between the upper and lower lids.
a shape like any other feature of the face. When I refer to the
The exterior part of the eyes, like the lids themselves and the area that surround the eye also are very important in capturing the eye itself, but it’s that initial shape that you use and a springboard for the rest of the eye. In order to “see” the eye shape, you must ignore the pupil, iris and all the lines and visual noise that surround the eye, and look at just the pure shape. Imagine an eye this pure white like the Exorcist eye… that white is the shape you are looking for. Remember also that the eye is not flat, but protrudes quite a bit from the face and the lids have a definite thickness to them. Typically the eye is NOT shaped like a
about 1/3 of the way across the eye and
football or an almond. The upper and lower
then arcs more softly towards the outer
lids are not mirror images of each other. In
corner. The lower lid does the opposite, it’s
fact, they are very different. The lower lid is
“peak” being it’s lowest point, about not
usually much less of an arc than the upper
quite 1/2 of the way from the outer corner
lid, moving more straight across from corner
in, and arcing to the caruncula. In the
to corner. The upper lid overlaps the lower
simplest of geometric terms, the eyes are
lid in the outer corner, and and is farther
quadrilaterals with the four points being the
removed from the horizontal axis of the eye,
inner and outer corners, the highest point of
which is created by an imaginary line
the upper lid and lowest point of the lower
connecting the corners. This horizontal axis,
lid. Naturally we don’t draw the eyes with
or “corner to corner” line, is a central part of
straight lines connecting the dots, but in
making observations about the eye, it’s
“seeing” the shape in simple terms like this
shape and it’s relationship with the rest of
we can use these points of reference to
the face. More on that in a second.
better capture the shape of the eyes, as
The eye shape is more of an asymmetrical
well as using them to manipulate the
ying-yang shape that a symmetrical almond.
feature for exaggeration purposes.
The upper lid line rises somewhat sharply from the caruncula, peaks
Let’s
get
back
the
angle of the arms of the “T
eyes
“corner to corner” line I
Shape” I talked about in an
insides? Lower? Even? Are
mentioned earlier. This is
earlier tutorial. By looking
they the same or is one
very useful in helping to
at how that line intersects
different than the other?
determine
the
the eye itself, we can see
You can use the line to
shape of the eye, but it’s
how much of the eye shape
exaggerate the angle you
relationship to the axis of
lies above the line, how
see to great effect. The
the face. Imaging the line
much
the
Corner-to-Corner line is a
going
outside
contour lines of the eye
great tool for observation
corner of each eye inward
shape travel along that line.
and “seeing” the eye itself,
to the inside corner and
We can also see at what
as
then onward to the center
angle the eye lies to the
reference
both
both
axis of the face, what we
center axis of the face. Are
accurate
drawing
and
really have it the central
the outside corners of the
observation.
not
from
to
only
the
below,
where
higher
well
as
than
a
the
point
of
Another method I use for understanding the eye shape is to look for any straight lines in the contour of the eye. Lines that are straight or nearly straight can be used as another point of reference for seeing the rest of the eye and also used as beginning points for the actual drawing of the eye itself. In many cases, the longer part of the upper eyelid, that from the “peak” to the outside corner, is often close to a flat line. Look for straight lines and observe their relationships to the rest of the eye shape’s contour to better “see” the eye shape.
EXAGGERATING THE EYE The exaggeration of any feature must be
the rest of the face is taken into account, it
done with the whole in mind, and not be
might very well be that the eyes need to be
treated as some separate entity. Seen in a
small and beady within a massive face.
vacuum, it might be tempting to exaggerate
Exaggeration in caricature is all about the
the size of the eyes because they have a
relationships of the features to one another,
round and wide eyed look. However when
and not the features themselves taken
individually.
However
many
the
especially the angle the eyes are at relative
observations you might make about the
to the center axis, and the shapes of the
eyes can factor into the essential whole,
eyes themselves.
The angle of the eyes is the easiest thing to exaggerate. If the outer corners are higher than the inner, then you simply make them higher still, and vice versa. Once you make the observation, doing the resulting exaggeration is easy. Exaggerating the shape of the eye is a little trickier. It can be easy to compromise the likeness, but when done right it actually enhances the likeness of the caricature. That’s because the shapes of features are also describing the expression of the
subject,
and
exaggerating
expression is a central part of good caricature.
If
someone’s
eyes
become squinty when they smile, drawing
them
squinty-er
will
exaggerate their expression as well as their face, and expression is personality. Capturing personality is an essential goal. If your eye shape is squinty, make it squintier.
of
If it’s wide open, make it more wide open. They should still look like the eyes you are drawing, but with your observations as a guide you turn up the volume a bit… or a lot if you can without losing the likeness. Take this set of eyes that are very round and intense:
We can exaggerate the shape of them as well as their look by emphasizing the whites surrounding
the
pupil/iris,
and
the
roundness of the lower eye. In this case I also exaggerate the angle of them by raising the outside corners. Not by much in either
case
here…
what
I
am
or Mort Drucker:
really
exaggerating and trying to capture is the intensity of the eyes themselves. Those little observations combine to allow me to get that piercing gaze. An artist’s individual style aside, it comes to the
same…
seeing
the
shapes
and
uniqueness of the features and drawing it in a way that describes it for the viewer to understand. Certain styles of caricature will go farther and “interpret” the shape and actually
As always, caricature is about PERCEPTION
change it into a representation of the shape
and not hard physical reality. In this picture,
itself. Here are those eyes as might be
our perception of the eyes of this model is
drawn by Al Hirshfeld:
changed by the makeup surrounding them:
like the inner whites of her eyes are much larger than the outer, giving her a “walleye” look that we can make fun of:
The heavy eyeliner and over-thick exterior lashes near the outer canthus make her look Here are some caricatures from some of my sketches where the eyes are a central part of the exaggeration or personality of the subject. Drawing eyes that really look back at the viewer can make for a startling effect. Remember the exaggeration of the caricature involves all the features and their relationships. The eyes may not be as important in another caricature, but as they are one of the chief agents of human communication and expression, they are always of import.
View more...
Comments