hodges vs salas

September 12, 2017 | Author: bebebaa | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

This is just a digest, pls read the original. thanks!...

Description

2. Hodges v. Salas and Salas 63 Phil. 567 Facts: On September 2, 1923, the defendants executed a power of attorney in favor of their brother-in-law Felix S. Yulo to enable him to obtain a loan and secure it with a mortgage on the real property described in transfer certificate of title No. 3335. The power of attorney was registered in the registry of deeds of the Province of Occidental Negros. Acting under said power of attorney, Felix S. Yulo, on March 27, 1926, obtained a loan of P28,000 from the plaintiff, binding his principals jointly and severally, to pay it within ten (10) years, together with interest thereon at 12 per cent per annum payable annually in advance, to which effect he signed a promissory note for said amount and executed a deed of mortgage of the real property. It was stated in the deed that in case the defendants failed to pay the stipulated interest and the taxes on the real property mortgaged and if the plaintiff were compelled to bring an action to recover his credit, said defendants would be obliged to pay 10 per cent more on the unpaid capital, as fees for the plaintiff's attorneys. The mortgage so constituted was registered in the registry of deeds of the Province of Occidental Negros and noted on the back of the transfer certificate of title.The defendants failed to pay at maturity the interest stipulated which should have been paid one year in advance.Plaintiff therefore brought an action for foreclosure of the mortgage. The trial court ordered in favor of the defendants and held that the loan and the mortgage were illegal. Issue: Whether or not the loan obtained and the mortgage executed by Yulo was valid and therefore defendants are bound to pay? Ruling: Yes. The loan obtained and the mortgage executed by Yulo was valid and therefore defendants are bound to pay for it. By virtue of the authority conferred by the defendants by executing a power of attorney, agent Yulo was authorized to borrow money and invest it as he wished, without being obliged to apply it necessarily for the benefit of his principals.

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF