Historical Foundations of Education 001

Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Historical Foundations of Education lecture...

Description

OBJECTIVES At the end of the report, the students will be able to: 1. Dene the the meaning meaning of Naturali Naturalism, sm, Nationali Nationalism, sm, and Developmentalism. 2. Name the dieren dierentt psyhologist psyhologists s and their eduational eduational theories theories and how they in!uened the shools. ". #dentify #dentify the two two points of view view of soiologi soiologial al movement movement..

INTRODUCTION Demorati$ation of eduation stood out among the manifold aims of  eduation during the 1%th and 2&th entury. Naturalism was one of the most in!uential movements whih aeted eduational theories in the ne't two enturies. (he nationalisti theory and the theory of developmentalism were outstanding theories. (he in!uene of nationalism was felt in the e'ternal and internal organi$ation of the eduational system while developmentalism was felt in the internal aspets of shool.  (his topi plays a vital role for it provides useful insights and information on the historial foundations of eduation in the 2& th entury. #t help helps s us to ident dentif ify y the seve severral edu eduat ato ors who made ade outs outsta tand ndiing ontributions to eduation and shools. (hrough this topi, we an better unde unders rsta tand nd the the hist histor ory y of edu eduat atio ion n and and the the impo import rtan antt roles oles of the the gove goverrnmen nmentt on edu eduati ation on.. (he (he impor importa tant nt impl impli iat atio ion n of this this topi topi  is to determine dierent ountries with dierent forms of government and how these dierenes aet the eduational system.

1

NATURALISM #t is the most in!uential movement of the 1) th entury. *tands for eduation in aordane with nature. #t means the appliation of natural laws to the eduational proess.  (o eduate aording to nature ould mean eduation in aordane with human development. #t is the return to the natural as opposed to all that is artiial.

 JEAN – JACQUES ROUSSEAU+ a well-nown naturalist, who believed that the basi tenet of naturalism was onvition and that the natural growth of  hildren in a natural environment onstituted adeuate eduation. Aims: Naturalism aimed at the preservation of the natural goodness and virtue of  the individual and the formation of a soiety based upon the reognition of  the natural individual rights./ousseau too- the view that man, as he ame from nature, was good but he beame evil through ontat with soiety. #n developing the theory of learning, /ousseau emphasi$ed the neessity for the hild to be free to develop aording to his own natural impulses. All restritions and disipline should be done away with so that the hild ould grow and en0oy the things that interested him. /ousseaus eduational aim was to free man from the artiialities and restraints of human soiety.

Types: nder naturalism training should not be for a denite voation and a denite soial position or lass. A pupil had to be made adaptable to hanging times. #t stood for a demorati and universal type of eduation. /ousseau said that eduation was a basi natural right and, therefore, everyone should be eduated in the same way. Naturalism emphasi$ed physial eduation and health training.  (he hild should have: 

3reedom to grow without being onned or uddled but must be allowed the outmost freedom of limb and voie.  4lothing should be loose and the hild should be e'posed to a reasonable amount of old, heat and danger.

2



A hild should be allowed to run, 0ump, limb and swim in the open ountry

/ousseau advoated moral training through natural punishment whih meant that learning ame as a result of the natural onseuene of ones ats. #ntelletual eduation was the development of sense disrimination, free e'pression and auisition of -nowledge through natural uriosity, /eligious eduation should be postponed until the hild ould understand what was bad through nature and not through rituals and dogmas.

Content  (he urriulum onsisted of ativities and interests manifested by the hild in the proess of growing up. 5duation was to be the natural unfolding of the hilds potential to meet is natural needs. #nstead of boo-s and the traditional "/s /ousseau favored the informal e'erises of the senses, the musles, and the tongue.

Agencies and Organization Naturalism emphasi$ed the duty of parents in the eduation of a hild by proteting him from artiial soiety. 6arents should help develop the hilds inherent ualities. 5duation should follow the natural stages of development of the hild. 5ah of these stages had its own dominant harateristis that ould beome the dominating fator in the organi$ation of learning. Tere !ere "o#r stages$ in"ancy% ci&dood% 'oyood and ado&escence( 

)rom 'irt to *+e  + the hild was involved in the growth of his body, in motor ativities, sense pereption, and feeling. (he hild had to be free from restraint and the body hardened by atual partiipation in nature. (his made him reali$e what he ould do or ould not do. )rom *+e to t!e&+e% te stage o" ci&dood + /ousseau advoated a negative, laissez – fair approach, “do o!hi" ad allo# o!hi" !o $e doe%( 7is idea was let the hild develop as his inner nature demanded. 7e was to avoid boo-s, emphasi$e games. 8et e'periene be the only teaher. )rom t!e&+e to *"teen% te age o" reason   + big hanges were brought about, eduation by human agenies should begin. (he hilds natural desire to learn should be developed. (he hild would then reogni$e the usefulness of -nowledge. #n the soial stage, from fteen to twenty, a pereption of human relations arose. *e' impulses

"

appeared to be strong at this stage, and reason had to he- the se'ual desires and hannel them to more desirable outlets.

,etods  (he main ontribution of naturalism to the eduational method was its emphasis on ma-ing the hild the enter of the eduation proess. (he hild in nature should determine the proesses and tehniues of teahing. 5duation should never hamper nor restrain the hilds natural apaities and interests.

Ro#ssea# - modern princip&es o" teacing:  



Te princip&e o" gro!t  + a pupil was not sub0eted to any regimen he was allowed to grow naturally. Te princip&e o" se&" . acti+ity   nothing was to be done for the pupil if he ould do it 7imself  /rincip&e o" indi+id#a&ization   + eah hild was allowed to develop aording to his own nature e'pressed in his priniple of  individuali$ation.

NATIONALISM  (he 1%th entury saw the rapid rise of nationalism. #t was nationalism that stimulated the development of the state ontrolled and state supported publi shool systems that are to be found throughout the world today. 4entral to the ideology of Nationalism was the onept of national sovereignty. A sovereign state was ompletely independent of any e'ternal authority. A sovereign state ould be an absolute monarhy, a onstitutional monarhy with a parliament, or even a republi. nder a TOTA0ITARIAN   form of government, eduation aimed to produe obedient, ontented and e9ient sub0ets, while under DE,OCRAC1 , eduation euipped iti$ens with the -nowledge neessary for the perpetuation of a free government.  (he aim of nationalism was the preservation and gloriation of the state. (he state was usually oneived as a soiety organi$ed primarily to protet its members from e'ternal atta- and internal disintegration. 5duation was seen as the best ageny to assist government in this funtion. • •











Nationalism reogni$ed that an e9ient eduation would promote national goals.

national system of 

Aims  (he Amerian eduational system, partiularly the publi shools, aimed simply to develop responsible iti$enship and national feeling. (he ordinary iti$en had to be made more intelligent, more loyal and more ontended; on the spiritual side, he had to possess positive harateristis of the human personality. (he eduated iti$en had to be onsious of his ountrys traditions and be willing to devote himself to his ountrys needs.

Types Nationalisti systems emphasi$ed seular and ivi instrution. (hese types developed loyalty and patriotism. Nations reogni$ed that law abiding morality was essential for patrioti iti$enship.

Content Steps in te de+e&opment o" nationa&ism   

     



4reation a ommon language. oational training was given emphasis, espeially for the masses who must be voationally e9ient if the nation was to survive.  (eahing of history and geography.  (eahing of ivis was reuired by law. 5mphasi$ed musi as an essential part of the urriula to enable students to partiipate in patrioti songs and marhes. #n the elementary level, the traditional sub0et matter urriulum was on the auisition of -nowledge and s-ills using the ?pro0et method@ whih gave pupils a hane to wor- on atual pratial problems. Attention was given to eld trips, displays, assemblies, and booreports.





#n seondary eduation, beause of the inrease in population, the one ollegepreparatory harater of the high shools beame less dominant.  #nrease in publi funds to support olleges and universities.

,etods 4urriula and organi$ation were usually legislated in the national shool system. (he method was left to supervisors and teahers who had been trained and retrained. *tate teahertraining institutions introdued the atual use of /esta&ozzian and 2er'artian methods. Nationalism alled for a system of disiplines, order and obediene sine the shool and its students were merely supports to the national ideology.

&E'ELO(MENTALISM



#t was a hild entered theory that emphasi$ed a areful study of the hild. Aording to Developmentalists, eduation aimed to unfold the natural apaities of a hild and this development was in!uened by methods used by shools to retard or enhane this development.

SO,E O) T2E /ERSONA0ITIES T2AT /O/U0ARI3ED DEVE0O/,ENTA0IS, 4ERE : 

 JO)ANN )EINRIC) (ESTALO**I +-./012-3 + was a *wiss eduator who agreed with /ousseaus idea that human beings were naturally good but spoiled by a orrupt soiety, and that pedagogial reform would lead to soial reform. 7e replaed memori$ation and reitation with more ative learning. 7e ombined physial, moral, intelletual and manual wor- in his aim to 5psyco&ogize ed#cation6. 7e believed that the aim of eduation was the soial regeneration of humanity. 7e established a shool of Burgdorf where he taught hildren and eduated teahers. Caracteristics o" /esta&ozzi7s Scoo&:

8(  (he atmosphere was generally permissive.

C

9(  (he ontent was made up of physial e'erises, play ativities and nature studies. -( 8earning ame through the senses. ( 7e used the ob0et lesson + a speial method onsisting of three basi sorts of learning: form, number and sound. ;(  (eahing should proeed from the -nown to the un-nown now alled the priniple of appereptionE, from the onrete to the abstrat; from the learners immediate lesson to the distant and remote. ( 4hildren should learn in a slow preise manner, understanding thoroughly whatever was being studied. ?( 7ome environment was neessary for suessful teahing. 

4RIE&RIC5 4ROE6EL +-27– 1823   a
View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF