Handouts - MaPa Ng Loob

6/23/15  

Mapa ng Loob •  Masaklaw na Panukat ng Loob (Mapa ng Loob) Development and Validation: Excerpts

• 

Began as a project in a graduate class on Personality Scale Construction at UP Diliman in 2010 Measures the broad traits that make up the Five-Factor model

Gregorio E. H. del Pilar, PhD PAP Tatlong Panukat De La Salle University May 23, 2015

Mnemonic device for the domains of the Five-Factor Model

Openness to Experience Conscientiousness Extraversion Agreeableness Neuroticism

Facet scales of the Mapa ng Loob Neuroticism (Hina ng Loob, Pagkamaramdamin, Pagkamapag-alala, Pagkasumpungin) Extraversion (Pagkamasayahin, Pagkapalakaibigan, Pagkamasigla, Pagkamadaldal) Openness to Experience (Kakaibang pag-iisip, Hilig sa Bagong Kaalaman, Pagkamakasining, Pagkamaharaya) Agreeableness (Pagkadimayabang, Pagkamapagtiwala, Pagkamaunawain, Pagkamapagparaya) Conscientiousness (Pagkamasikap, Pagkamapagplano, Pagkaresponsable, Pagkamaingat) Interstitial scales: Init ng Ulo, Pagkamatapat Social Desirability Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Mapa ng Loob • 

Completed in May 2013, after six item testing studies over five successive semesters

• 

Initially meant to be a revision of the Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino (PPP)

2002, Vol. 82, No. 1, 89–101

1  

6/23/15  

Conclusion: Katigbak, Church, Lapena, Carlota & del Pilar (2002)

"...most of the dimensions measured by Philippine personality inventories overlap considerably with, and are adequately encompassed by, dimensions of the five-factor model..." p. 97

Factor Analysis • 

Construction of the scales of the Mapa ng Loob

•  •  • 

Construct definition Item-writing Item review (to improve phrasing, to eliminate highly similar items, and assignment of prototypicality ratings) Item testing Reliability analysis Factor analysis

•  •  • 

Principal Component Analysis of Mapa Preliminary Version 6 (Final Version)

Since the Mapa aims to measure the five factors, it has to demonstrate that the five facets group as expected.

Scale

Scale name in English

Cronbach’s Alpha

Number of positively-keyed items

N1 Hina ng Loob

Vulnerability to Stress

.67

3

N2 Pagkamaramdamin

Oversensitiveness

.77

5

N3 Pagkamapag-alala

Worrying anxiety

.75

3

N4 Pagkasumpungin

Temperamentalness

.75

5

E1 Pagkamasayahin

Cheerfulness

.79

4

E2 Pagkapalakaibigan

Friendliness

.81

3

E3 Pagkamasigla

Energy

.73

2

E4 Pagkamadaldal

Loquaciousness

.67

5

O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip

Original Thinking

.66

2

O2 Hilig sa Bagong Kaalaman O3 Pagkamakasining

Intellectual Curiosity

.67

5

Aesthetic Sensitivity

.65

4

O4 Pagkamaharaya

Imaginativeness

.70

6

A1 Pagkadimayabang

Modesty

.69

5

A2 Pagkamapagtiwala

Capacity for Trust

.65

3

A3 Pagkamaunawain

.66

4

A4 Pagkamapagparaya

Capacity for Understanding Obligingness

.70

3

C1 Pagkamasikap

Achievement-striving

.72

3

C2 Pagkapamapagplano

Planfulness

.70

2

C3 Pagkaresponsable

Responsibleness

.79

4

C4 Pagkamaingat

Carefulness

.71

4

Locating people and constructs in a "map" of 5 dimensions Factor 2

Emotional Intelligence

Factor 1

Factor 1

Resilience

Forgivingness

Factor 2

2  

6/23/15  

English version of the Mapa •  Began in 2013 and currently being revised •  First version facet reliabilities, UP Diliman: Sem 1 13-14: .62-.85, mean = .72 Sem 2 13-14: .65-.87, mean = .74 * Excellent factor structure

Validation Studies on the scales of the Mapa ng Loob

International Personality Item Pool (IPIP, L. Goldberg, 2008)

English version of the Mapa: correlations with Filipino version, UP Diliman

Semester I 13-14 (N= 202)

Semester II 13-14 (N=202)

Neuroticism

.81

.84

Extraversion

.87

.92

Openness to Experience

.67

.75

Agreeableness

.79

.85

Conscientiousnes s

.74

.86

Scale

Borlasa, Magayanes, Menorca & Syjueco, 2014

•  • 

Participants: 120 UP Diliman college students Correlated the English Mapa domain scale scores with the International Personality Item Pool Big Five scales (20 items per domain scale)

• 

• 

collection of personality items in the public domain, available on the Internet, established by Lewis Goldberg in the 1990's aims to promote personality and individual differences research by making available, for free, measures that are highly correlated with well-known but copyrighted measures such as the NEO PI-R, the MMPI, the 16 PF, the CPI, etc.

Borlasa, Magayanes, Menorca & Syjueco, 2014

IPIP ES Mapa N

IPIP E IPIP O IPIP A IPIP C

-.73

-.27

.01

-.24

-.28

Mapa E .18

.78

.12

.42

.21

-.14

.10

.56

.23

.04

.32

-.10

-.23

.38

.17

.13

.35

.28

.43

.65

Mapa O Mapa A Mapa C

3  

6/23/15  

Del Pilar, 2014: Ratings from current best friends and childhood best friends

• 

• 

Mapa score

STUDENTS (N = 49)

Rating

BEST FRIENDS (N=49) Mapa Score

Participants: two undergraduate classes in Psychological Measurement in UP Diliman, who recruited current and chilhood best friends Current best friend pairs N=98, childhood best friend pairs N= 80

Participants with current best friends

Participants with childhood best friends

•  •  •  • 

•  •  • 

70 females and 28 males 98 % were aged 17-22 (max age was 26) Mean Age = 19.4, SD = 1.34 56 Psychology Majors; 42 nonPsychology Majors

First five items on the rating instrument

61 females and 19 males Mean Age = 19.3, SD = .92 (17-21) 39 Psychology Majors; 41 nonPsychology Majors

Del Pilar, 2014 •  •  • 

The score on a rating scale for a facet was the rating on the facet, eg, Hina ng Loob. Domain rating score = rating on facet 1 + rating on facet 2 + rating on facet 3 + rating on facet 4 Example: Rating score on Neuroticism = rating on Hina ng Loob + rating on Pagkamaramdamin + rating on Pagkamapag-alala + rating on Pagkasumpungin

4  

6/23/15  

Convergent and discriminant validity matrix: Mapa facet scales vs facet rating scales: 20 cv's, 380 dv's

Convergent Validity Coefficients (Spearman's Rho) for Current and Childhood Best Friends

Facet

Current Childhoo d .26 .38

N1 Hina ng Loob

R1 M1

N2 Pagkamaramdamin

.30

.07

N3 Pagkamapag-alala

.18

.05

α = .01

M3

N4 Pagkasumpungin α E1 Pagkamasayahin

.26

.15

α = .05

M4

.57

.17

M5

E2 Pagkapalakaibigan

.59

.34

M6

E3 Pagkamasigla

.52

.18

E4 Pagkamadaldal

.61

.34

O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip

.32

.16

O2 Hilig sa Bagong Kaalaman

.14

.15

...

O3 Pagkamakasining

.10

.04

...

Significant at

R2

M2

...

...

R20

... ...

... ...

A2 Pagkamapagtiwala

.16

.05

M20

A3 Pagkamaunawain

.27

.13

O4 Pagkamapagparaya

.39

.18

C1 Pagkamasikap

.24

.23

C2 Pagkamapagplano

.25

.16

C3 Pagkaresponsable

.29

.36

... ... CV

Rank-order correlation between Mapa domain scores and rating domain scores: Psych raters (N=56)

Total.18 .21 number of Percentage Coefficient significant coefficients C4 Pagkamaingat Number

Neuroticism

Openness Conscient Extrato Agreeable ious- version Experienc -ness ness e

Mapa N

.40**

-.20*

-.12

-.03

.08

Mapa E

.06

.72**

.33*

-.01

-.08

Mapa O

.08

.22

.40**

.15

-.13

Mapa A

-.16

.29*

.20

.36**

-.15

Mapa C

.04

.03

-.30*

-.02

.46**

75

15

...

CV

...

Del Pilar, 2014: Significant correlations for current best friends

R9

CV

M8

.19

380

R8

CV

M7

.18

57

R7

CV

.28

Discriminan t

R6

CV

.24

20

R5

CV

O4 Pagkamaharaya

15

R4

CV

A1 Pagkadimayabang

Convergent

R3

CV

Comparison of convergent and discriminant correlations between the NEO and the Mapa ng Loob Convergent validity coefficients

Average discriminant validity coefficients (absolute value)

NEO PI

Mapa ng Loob

NEO PI

Mapa ng Loob

Neuroticism

.38**

.40**

.07

.12

Extraversion

.40**

.72**

.11

.09

Openness to Experience

.43**

.40**

.09

.10

Agreeableness

.28**

.36**

.06

.22

Conscientiou s-ness

.40**

.46**

.11

.16

Mapa ng Loob

5  

6/23/15  

College-age Normative Sample N=384 Group

N

N selected for final sample





M

F

Not reporting

UP Diliman (16-23 years old)

(413)

192

29

65

6

varied

College non-UP (16-23 years old)

(330)

192

18

78

4

varied

Metro Manila 1

(83)

48

24

65

11

Metro Manila 2

Frequency 32 85 134 63 39 10 8 8 5 19.5

Major

Tourism Management

(191)

115

20

79

1

Psychology

Central Luzon

(56)

29

29

69

2

Agriculturerelated

Total

(743)

384

25

74

1

College-Age Normative Sample N=384 Age 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Missing Mean

Gender percentage in the final sample

Adult Sample N=190 •  •  •  • 

Metro Manila sample 62% F, 38% M 75% from call centers and BPO's Age: 24-30 - 65% 31-35 - 19% 36 + - 15%

6  

6/23/15  

7