GSM Key Performance Indicator KPI Guidebook-ZTE

Share Embed Donate


Short Description

GSM KPI description...

Description

GSM Key Performance Indicator (KPI)Guidebook

Version: V1.1 Security Category: Secret Serviceable range: Radio Planning Section

GSM Network Planning & Optimization Dept. of Engineering Service Division

ZTE Corporation

Secret▲ Secret▲

Work Guidebook for GSM P&O Dept.

Version Introduction Version V1.0

Date 2008-01-21

Writer Chen Chun

Assessor Zheng Hao

Amendment Records None 1、V3 KPI and EDGE KPI were added. 2、Amendment: mainly directed at V2.97

Zheng Hao, V1.1

2008-12-07

Yang Jiazhi

Chen Chun, Fei Aiping

and V6.0. 3、Some classic KPI cases and comments were added. 4、Principles for KPI risk analysis were added.

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements.

Secret▲ Secret▲

CONTENTS 1

Overview...........................................................................................................................1

2

CS Radio Service Statistical KPI....................................................................................4 2.1

Availability ........................................................................................................................4 2.1.1

SDCCH availability/SDCCH ....................................................................................4

2.1.2

TCH availability/TCH ...............................................................................................4

2.1.3

Cell utilization ...........................................................................................................4

2.2

Accessibility ......................................................................................................................5 2.2.1

Random Access Success rate.....................................................................................5

2.2.2

SDCCH blocking rate................................................................................................5

2.2.3

TCH blocking rate .....................................................................................................6

2.2.4

Radio connection ratio...............................................................................................6

2.2.5

SDCCH drop rate ......................................................................................................7

2.2.6

SDCCH assignment success rate...............................................................................7

2.2.7

TCH assignment success rate ....................................................................................7

2.2.8

Call setup success rate ...............................................................................................8

2.3

Mobility .............................................................................................................................9 2.3.1

2.4

Reliability ..........................................................................................................................9 2.4.1

TCH Call Drop Rate..................................................................................................9

2.4.2

Traffic Call Drop .....................................................................................................10

2.4.3

Call Completion rate................................................................................................10

2.4.4

UL RxQual 0-4 ........................................................................................................11

2.4.5

DL RxQual 0-4 ........................................................................................................11

2.5

3

Handover success rate ...............................................................................................9

Call Setup time ................................................................................................................12 2.5.1

Call setup time (GSM to PSTN)..............................................................................12

2.5.2

Call setup time (GSM to GSM)...............................................................................12 CS Radio Service Test KPI ...........................................................................................13

3.1

Call Setup Success Rate ..................................................................................................13

3.2

Handover Success Rate ...................................................................................................13

3.3

Call Drop Rate.................................................................................................................13

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements.

Secret▲ Secret▲ 3.4

Coverage (Drive Test)......................................................................................................13 3.4.1

SQI...........................................................................................................................14

3.4.2

MOS ........................................................................................................................14

3.4.3

MOS & PSEQ .........................................................................................................15

4

PS Radio Service Statistical KPI ..................................................................................18 4.1

Accessibility ....................................................................................................................18 4.1.1

DL TBF establishment success rate .........................................................................18

4.1.2

UL TBF establishment success rate .........................................................................18

4.1.3

GPRS RLC ..............................................................................................................19

4.1.4

GPRS RLC ..............................................................................................................20

4.1.5

EGPRS RLC............................................................................................................20

4.1.6

EGPRS RLC............................................................................................................20

5

PS Radio Service Test KPI............................................................................................22 5.1

Accessibility ....................................................................................................................22 5.1.1

Attach success rate...................................................................................................22

5.1.2

Average GPRS attach time ......................................................................................22

5.1.3

PDP context activation success rate ........................................................................22

5.1.4

PDP context activation time ....................................................................................23

5.1.5

PING test success rate .............................................................................................23

5.1.6

Average PING test time ...........................................................................................23

5.2

Mobility ...........................................................................................................................24 5.2.1

5.3

Data Throughput..............................................................................................................24 5.3.1

Average FTP download rate ....................................................................................24

5.3.2

Average FTP upload rate .........................................................................................25

5.3.3

Throughput ..............................................................................................................25

5.4

Reliability ........................................................................................................................25 5.4.1

6

Routing Area Update Successful rate ......................................................................24

PDTCH Drop Rate ..................................................................................................25 Introduction to CN Statistical KPI...............................................................................27

6.1

Paging success rate ..........................................................................................................27

6.2

Location update success rate ...........................................................................................27

6.3

Attach success rate ..........................................................................................................27

6.4

GPRS average attach time ...............................................................................................28

6.5

PDP context activation success rate ................................................................................28

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements.

Secret▲ Secret▲ 6.6 7

Routing Area Update Success rate ..................................................................................28 Comments on KPI Cases...............................................................................................30

7.1

Pengshui (Chongqing) PS Test Result.............................................................................30

7.2

Jishou (Hunan) China Mobile EDGE Test Result ...........................................................31

7.3

Acceptance requirements for EDGE KPI of Data Service of a network .........................33

7.4

Operation & Maintenance KPI of a Network ..................................................................34

7.5

Operation & Maintenance KPI of a network in Southeast Asia ......................................36

7.6

KPI requirements for Indonesia Telkomsel network .......................................................40

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements.

Secret▲ Secret▲

1 Overview This guidebook collected the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for CS and PS services, which are now commonly adopted in presales bidding projects; and the definitions of different KPIs and counter formulas for V2/V3 are explained here as 5

well. Meanwhile, with the aim to unify response on KPIs and avoid the possible market risks, after analyzing the performance indicators of current networks of both domestic and overseas key projects, the writer provides the reference values and risk values of different KPIs in this guide. If the KPIs listed in the bidding documents go beyond the reference values and risk values (suppose risk value of

10

the KPI is provided; otherwise, suggested values shall be applied.), we need to conduct risk analysis and evaluation, meanwhile, try to avoid the risk and send out pre-warning. The KPIs can be quite different due to the differences in network structure and dimension. To make sure that our KPI can meet requirements in bidding documents, we need not only support from theories, but accumulation of

15

work experience as well. The suggested values and risk values of KPI mentioned in this guide are reference suggestions concluded from the current conditions of GSM network. As GSM techniques and skills are developing and equipment performance is improving constantly, the reference standards for KPI will change accordingly. The key requirement for engineers engaged in presales network planning is to

20

thoroughly understand and master the related KPIs, which is also the basic but highest demand for radio network planning engineers. Why network operators set up KPIs and what are they aimed at? How to define KPI and what can be resulted from deviation of KPI? How much influence can the value of KPI impose on presales bidding?

25

How to clarify KPI and how to achieve favorable negotiation results during KPI clarification? How to avoid and pre-warn KPI risks? What is the development direction of KPI assessment? Each presales radio network planning engineer shall possess related techniques of

30

and up-to-date answers to the six questions above. For lack of space, the six This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 1,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ questions will not be further discussed in this guidebook. The engineers will be able to experience and get to know them in presales planning work in future. Generally, KPI can be classified into four types: statistical KPI, testing KPI, equipment performance KPI, customer perception KPI. Only statistical KPI and 5

testing KPI are elaborated here. As for equipment performance KPI and customer perception KPI, they are focused on in another guidebook. Nowadays, network operators are attaching more and more importance to KPI during negotiations. Besides the four types mentioned above, a lot more aspects are involved in KPI. KPI is also closely related to the basic network environment. Therefore, KPI is

10

affected by various factors. That is why operators are now regarding KPI as a very important leverage to shift risk and decrease network investment and maintenance cost. Equipment manufacturers must commit themselves to suitable, reasonable and timely KPI, so as to bring down contract risk and ensure profits. “Rationalize commitment, share risks” is an important principle in presales planning work.

15

The following are the factors that shall be taken into consideration when we work on KPI: 1. network dimension; 2. network type; 3. degree of subscriber(number) growth;

20

4. geographical distribution of network(urban, countryside, village) 5. equipment types; there is difference in KPI for V2 and V3. Functional principles for this guidebook (mainly directed at KPI): 1.

This guide is only available to the radio network planning engineers engaged in presales bidding. No one is entitled to spread it outside or extensively spread

25

it inside the company. The right to interpret the serviceable range of this guide remains with GSM Technical Research Section & Resources Section. 2.

It is suggested to release the guidebook in encrypted document. It can not be procured unless logging into document security software.

3. 30

The guide is a reference to radio network planning staff engaged in presales bidding. It can not replace the presales KPI project evaluation.

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 2,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ 4.

The KPI values enclosed in this guide are valid within only half a year since the release of it. After half a year, it needs to be updated and reassessed.

5.

The guide is mostly applicable to V2.97 of V2 and V6.0 (ISMG) and V6.1 (Minos) of V3.

5

Notes: V6.0 (ISMG), V6.1 (Minos), sic passim

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 3,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲

2 CS Radio Service Statistical KPI 2.1 Availability 2.1.1 SDCCH availability/SDCCH KPI KPI

SDCCH availability (SDCCH in service rate) reference

99%

value SDCCH usable total*100%/(SDCCH usable total +SDCCH unusable total)

Indicator definition

V2 Counter formula

V3

C11601*100%/(C11601+C11602) V6.0

C100030122*100%/( C100030122+ C100030123)

V6.1

C900060122*100%/(C900060122+C900060123)

The ratio of the SDCCH usable total to the total SDCCH allocated in network is mainly used to examine equipment performance, especially to inspect the utilization of SDCCH in the cells. It is directly related to the stability of equipment、transmission and power supply,

Notes

etc.. It reflects the utilization ratio of network equipment and the stability of initial network operation.

2.1.2 TCH availability/TCH KPI

TCH availability (TCH in service rate)

KPI

98%

reference value Indicator

TCH usable total*100%/(TCH usable total+ TCCH unusable total)

definition C11607*100%/(C11607+C11608)

V2 V6.0

Counter formula

V3

(C100030125+C100030134+C100030155)*100% / (C100030125 + C100030134 + C100030155 + 100030126+ C100030217+ C100030218) (C900060125+C900060134+C900060155)

V6.1

*100%/(C900060125+C900060134+ C900060155+C900060126+C900060217+C900060218)

The ratio of the SDCCH usable total to the total SDCCH allocated in network is mainly used to Notes

examine equipment performance, especially to inspect the utilization of SDCCH in the cells. It is directly related to the stability of equipment、transmission and power supply, etc..

5

2.1.3 Cell utilization KPI KPI

Cell utilization reference

80%

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 4,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ value Indicator

Cells, in which ratio of actual traffic / desired traffic=18 95% sample >=25

TEMS test value

definition This KPI is for inspecting the sound distortion degree resulted from incapable link transmission. The formula is Ericsson’s patent. It takes into consideration many factors, including BER、FER、handover times、handover conditions、DTX activated (or not)、 Notes

and the encoder in use, etc., to finally get the SQI. There are different SQI top limits for different types of encoders. For half-rate encoder, the SQI top limit is 19; for full-rate encoder, 21; for enhanced full-rate encoder, 30. SQI ranges from 18 to 30. SQI value will increase when EFR is applied.

3.4.2 MOS KPI KPI

Mean Opinion Score ( MOS) reference

Refer to the form attached bellow.

value Indicator

Test value

definition Notes

The commonly used MOS assessment method consists of subjective and objective scoring parts. In the subjective part, engineers subjectively compare the original voice material and the deteriorated voice material according to ITU-T Suggestion book P.800 and P.830, and give their MOS scores respectively, then average the scores from different engineers. While in the objective part, PESQ method from ITU-T Suggestion book P.862 is employed, that is special equipment or software (e.g. the VQT test equipment of Agilent) is used to proceed

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 14,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ the assessment. In MOS, 0 means the worst quality, 5 stands for the highest. Standard PCM quality shall reach around 4.4. The MOS values for commonly used coding formats are as follows: G.711——MOS= 4.8 G.721、G.723、G.726——MOS= 4.2 G.728 ——MOS=4.2 G.729 ——MOS=4.2 G.723.1(5.3)——MOS=3.5 G.723.1(6.3)——MOS=3.98 MOS can be affected greatly by the performance of test equipment. The test results from different manufacturers are different. Currently, the test equipment from Actena performs the best.

Average MOS(Including FR &HR Voice version combination

MOS) Frequency

No

hopping

hopping

100% FR

3.04

3.29

100% EFR

3.63

3.57

100% AMR FR

3.56

3.54

TFO

frequency Frequency hopping

No frequency hopping

60% HR (+EFR) 30% HR (+EFR) 10% HR (+EFR) 60% AMR HR (+AMR FR) 30% AMR HR (+AMR FR) 10% AMR HR (+AMR FR)

3.4.3 MOS & PSEQ Subjective scoring method had been used in assessment on voice quality until 2001. Users were requested to assess the voice quality of incoming calls by scoring 1-5 5

(5- best, 1 - worst). This assessment method was regulated to be a standard by ITU in August, 1996. MOS assessment method was defined in its P.800 standard in details. But later it was found that this method not only took too much time, but also cost a lot. So there was an urgent need for a kind of economic test equipment, which can be used to simulate the voice quality received by users, and thus can

10

play its part in designing、testing and debugging new type of voice encoders. With the aim to meet the need, in February 2001 ITU issued the new test standard on voice transmission quality-P.862 (PESQ-Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality). It adopts the new algorithm developed by Psytechnics company. PESQ This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 15,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ can be used to compute voice sample’s MOS-LQO value (Mean Opinion ScoreListening Quality Objective). The computed result and the subjective scoring result are basically the same. PESQ compares the output signal (collected after the signal is transmitted through equipment) and the reference signal, then works out the 5

difference. In the ordinary course of event, the bigger the difference between the output signal and the reference signal, the smaller the reference value of MOS will be. PESQ is testified to be a reliable、economic and fast measuring tool for voice encoder. Compare PESQ’s predicted value and the result from subjective scoring method, we can see the correlation between the two values is 0.935(refer to

10

《P862E.doc》for correlation factors). For 22 kinds of ITU benchmark tests, the absolute error is within 0.5 MOS, 69.2% among which is within 0.25 MOS. It is worth our attention that PESQ value ranges from 0.5 to 4.5, while MOS value ranges from 1 to 5.

15 Fig 1 MOS/PESQ Correlation Diagram

At the present time, there are two types of QOS test method-subjective and objective methods. MOS subjective test method is defined in ITU-T P.800. The objective test methods includes PSQM、PSQM+ and PESQ etc.. ITU-T P.862 20

( PESQ ) is the method currently recommended by ITU to test end-to-end

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 16,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ network voice quality. It would be ideal if MOS and PESQ are simultaneously supported in the QOS test. Form 1 Definition of MOS Values Level

MOS

Excellent

5

Good

4

Fair

3

Poor

2

Bad

1

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 17,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲

4 PS Radio Service Statistical KPI 4.1 Accessibility 4.1.1 DL TBF establishment success rate KPI KPI

DL TBF establishment success rate Suggested value

95%

value

reference

Risk value

96%

Indicator type

Statistical value

Indicator definition

(GPRS DL signalling TBF link setup times+ GPRS DL data TBF link setup times +EGPRS DL signalling TBF link setup times +EGPRS DL data TBF link setup times)*100%/ DL packet channel request times(V3) (C70043+C70057+C70071)*100/C70041

V2

(C100010007+C100010015+C100010008+C100010016) *100%/(C100010141+C100010142+C100010143+

V6.0

C100010144+C100010145+C100010146+C100010147

Counter formula

+C100010148)

V3

(C900040007+C900040015+C900040008+C900040016) *100%/(C900040141+C900040142+C900040143+

V6.1

C900040144+C900040145+C900040146+C900040147 +C900040148)

This KPI reflects the request fulfilled status of PS downlink resources. Its TBF includes DL signaling TBF、GPRS DL data TBF and EGPRS DL data TBF. DL TBF link setup success rate can reflect the DL PS quality of a cell. Its major influencing factors are as follows: Notes

1.

Interference: internal & external interference;

2.

Parameters setting: eg. errors in Timer and functional parameters

3.

Stability of equipment and transmission: eg. instant breakdown(flash) resulted from high error rate or unstable link;

4.

Usability of data service functions.

4.1.2 UL TBF establishment success rate KPI

UL TBF establishment success rate

KPI

Suggested

reference

value

value

Risk value

Indicator type

92% 95%

Statistical value

Indicator

(GPRS UL signalling TBF link setup times + GPRS UL data TBF link setup times

definition

+EGPRS UL signalling TBF link setup times +EGPRS UL data TBF link setup times)

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 18,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ *100/ UL packet channel request times(V3) V2

(C70042+C70055+C70069)*100%/C70040 (C100010025+C100010033+C100010026+C100010034) V6.0

Counter formula

*100%

/(C100010159

+C100010160+C100010161+C100010168

+C100010163+C100010164+ C100010165+C100010166) V3

(C900040025+C900040033 +C900040026 +C900040034) V6.1

*100%/

(C900040159+

C900040160

+C900040161+C900040168+C900040163

+C900040164

+C900040165+C900040166) This KPI reflects the request fulfilled status of PS uplink resources. Its TBF includes UL signaling TBF、GPRS UL data TBF and EGPRS UL data TBF. UL TBF link setup success rate can reflect the UL PS quality of a cell. Its major influencing factors are as follows: Notes

1.

Interference: internal & external interference;

2.

Parameters setting: eg. errors in Timer and functional parameters

3.

Stability of equipment and transmission: eg. instant breakdown resulted from high error rate or unstable link;

4.

Usability of data service functions.

4.1.3 GPRS RLC KPI

UL GPRS RLC retransmission rate

KPI

Suggested

reference

value

value

Risk value

10% 5%

Indicator type

Statistical value

Indicator

GPRS UL TBF NACK blocks *100% / valid data statistics received by GPRS UL TBF

definition V2 Counter formula

C70066*100%/ C70065 V6.0

V3 V6.1

C100010063*100%/C100010062 C900040063*100%/C900040062

This KPI reveals UL GPRS RLC retransmission rate, which is the most important indicator to reflect the sensibility of GPRS UL service and to show whether instability、 congestion and interference exist in the system. Its major influencing factors are as Notes

follows: 1.

Interference: internal & external interference;

2.

Stability of equipment and transmission: eg. instant breakdown resulted from high error rate or unstable link;

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 19,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ 4.1.4 GPRS RLC KPI

DL GPRS RLC retransmission rate

KPI reference

Suggested

value

value

10%

Risk value Indicatory

5%

Statistical value

type Indicator

GPRS DL TBF NACK blocks *100% / valid data statistics received by GPRS DL TBF

definition V2 Counter formula

C70068*100%/ C70067 C100010065*100%/C100010064

V6.0 V3

C900040065*100%/C900040064

V6.1

This KPI reveals DL GPRS RLC retransmission rate, which is the most important indicator to reflect the sensibility of GPRS DL service and to show whether instability、 congestion and interference exist in the system. Its major influencing factors are as 解读 Notes

follows: 1.

Interference: internal & external interference;

2.

Stability of equipment and transmission: eg. instant breakdown resulted from high error rate or unstable link;

4.1.5 EGPRS RLC KPI KPI

UL EGPRS RLC retransmission rate Suggested

reference

value

value

Risk value

Indicatory

Statistical value

10% 5%

type Indicator

EGPRS UL TBF NACK blocks *100% / valid data statistics received by EGPRS UL TBF

definition V2 Counter formula

C70080*100%/ C70079 V6.0

V3 V6.1

解读 Notes

C100010071*100%/C100010070 C900040071*100%/C900040070

Refer to UL GPRS RLC retransmission rate

4.1.6 EGPRS RLC KPI

DL EGPRS RLC retransmission rate

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 20,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ KPI reference value Indicatory

Suggested

10%

value Risk value

5%

Statistical value

type Indicator

EGPRS DL TBF NACK blocks *100% / valid data statistics received by EGPRS DL TBF

definition V2 Counter formula

C70082*100%/ C70081 V6.0

V3 V6.1

Notes

C100010073*100%/C100010072 C900040073*100%/C900040072

Refer to DL GPRS RLC retransmission rate

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 21,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲

5 PS Radio Service Test KPI 5.1 Accessibility 5.1.1 Attach success rate KPI

Attach success rate

KPI reference value

Suggested

95%

value Risk value

98%

Attach success times/Attach attempt times×100%

Indicator definition Indicatory

test

type Counter

None

formula Notes

Normally, this KPI is the CQT value. Attach success means that the mobile phone receives the Attach Accept signaling within 15 seconds after it sends the Attach Request. It is required to perform the Attach test ten times at each test site.

5.1.2 Average GPRS attach time KPI KPI

Average GPRS attach time reference

value

Suggested value

2 sec

Risk value

1.5 sec

Sum of attach success duration/ Attach success times. It is the Indicator

duration from the mobile sends out the first Attach Request to it

definition

receives the Attach Accept signaling. It is required to perform the test ten times at each test site.

Indicatory type

Test value

Counter

None

formula Notes

Normally, this KPI is the same as the CQT value. Authentication included.

5

5.1.3 PDP context activation success rate KPI KPI value

PDP context activation success rate reference

Suggested

95%

value

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 22,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ Risk value

98%

Indicator

PDP activation success times/attempt times ×100%.

definition

PDP activation success means that the mobile phone receives the Activate PDP Context Accept signaling 15 seconds after it sends the Activate PDP Context Request.

Indicatory type

Test

Counter

None

formula Notes

Normally, this KPI is the same as the CQT value. It is required to perform the PDP activation test ten times at each test site. Test methods for GPRS and EDGE are the same.

5.1.4 PDP context activation time KPI

PDP context activation time

KPI

reference

Suggested value

1.5 sec

value

Risk value

1.2 sec

Indicator

Sum of PDP activation duration/ PDP activation success

definition

times. PDP activation time means the duration from the mobile phone sends out the first Activate PDP Context Request to it receives the Activate PDP Context Accept.

Indicatory type

Test value

Counter

None

formula Notes

Normally, this KPI is the same as the CQT value. Authentication included. GPRS and EDGE are not separated in this test.

5.1.5 PING test success rate KPI KPI

PING test success rate reference

Suggested value

95%

value

Risk value

98%

Indicator

Ping success times/Ping attempt times*100%

definition Counter

None

formula Notes

It is regarded as failure if the time exceeds 30 seconds.

5.1.6 Average PING test time KPI KPI value

PING test time reference

GPRS

Suggested value

1.5 sec

Risk value

1.4 sec

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 23,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲

EDGE Indicator

Suggested value

1 sec

Risk value

0.6 sec

Sum of Ping success duration/ Ping success times

definition Indicatory type

Test value

Counter

None

formula Notes

Authentication is included in this KPI. The Ping package size will have influence on the test result. Generally, the smaller the Ping package is, the better the test result will be. It is sometimes referred as Round Trip Time.

5.2 Mobility 5.2.1 Routing Area Update Successful rate KPI

Routing Area Update Success rate

KPI reference Indicator

Suggested value

90%

Risk value

95%

Routing update attempt times*100% / Routing update success times

definition Indicatory type

test

Counter

None

formula Notes

Usually it can be statistical value. It also can be obtained from DT too.

5.3 Data Throughput 5.3.1 Average FTP download rate KPI KPI

FTP download rate GPRS

reference value

EDGE

Suggested value

20kbps

Risk value

30kbps

Suggested value

80kbps

Risk value

120kbps

Indicator definition

Actual download data quantity (byte)/actual download duration

Indicatory type

Test value

Counter formula

None

Notes

Normally, this KPI is the CQT value. Class 4 mobile. Size of the downloaded document will affect the test result. Usually, the smaller the document size is, the better the test result will be. It is related to the number of PS channels、terminal type、encoding method and test software, etc.. The test result can also be affected

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 24,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ by the adoption of encoding method for CS3 and CS4. 3static time slots are configured.

5.3.2 Average FTP upload rate KPI

FTP upload rate

KPI reference value

GPRS

EDGE

Suggested value

8kbps

Risk value

10kbps

Suggested value

25kbps

Risk value

35kbps

Indicator definition

Actual upload data quantity (byte)/actual upload duration

Indicatory type

Test value

Counter formula

None

Notes

Normally, this KPI is the same as the CQT value. Class 4 mobile. Size of the uploaded document will affect the test result. Usually, the smaller the document size is, the better the test result will be. It is related to the number of PS channels、terminal type、encoding method and test software, etc.. The test result can also be affected by the adoption of encoding method for CS3 and CS4. This KPI is the result of single time slot.

5.3.3 Throughput Mobile phone with multi-timeslot Level 8; single Preconditions

subscriber; 4 DL static signaling channels, 1 UL static signaling channel

Indicators (EN)

Indicators (CN)

Suggested value

GPRS: Max data throughput-DL

GPRS DL maximum transmission rate

9.8kbyte/s

GPRS: Max data throughput-UL

GPRS UL maximum transmission rate

2.4kbyte/s

GPRS: Average data throughput-DL

GPRS DL average transmission rate

5kbyte/s

GPRS: Average data throughput-UL

GPRS UL average transmission rate

1.3kbyte/s

EDGE: Max data throughput-DL

EDGE DL maximum transmission rate

26.5kbyte/s

EDGE: Max data throughput-UL

EDGE UL maximum transmission rate

7kbyte/s

EDGE: Average data throughput-DL

EDGE DL average transmission rate

14kbyte/s

EDGE: Average data throughput-UL

EDGE UL average transmission rate

3.5kbyte/s

5.4 Reliability 5.4.1 PDTCH Drop Rate KPI KPI

PDTCH Drop Rate reference

Suggested value

5%

value

Risk value

2%

Indicatory type

DT test value

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 25,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ Indicator

PDTCH drop times/ FTP download attempt times *100%

definition Counter

None

formula Notes

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 26,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲

6 Introduction to CN Statistical KPI 6.1 Paging success rate KPI

Paging success rate

KPI

reference

Suggested value

90%

value

Risk value

93%

Indicator

Paging response times*100% / Paging request times

definition Counter

Paging request times refer to the sum of PAGING information sent out by all

formula

MSCs in the area, excluding the secondary paging information. Paging response times refer to the sum of the PAGING RES received by all MSCs in the area, including the second paging response. Statistical point is at MSC side.

Notes

BSC can indirectly provide this KPI, but its statistical point differs from that of MSC. The difference lies in call loss at Interface A.

6.2 Location update success rate KPI KPI

Location update success rate reference

Provided by the SMC side

value Indicator

Location update success times *100%/ location update request times

definition Counter

Provided by the SMC side

formula Notes

This KPI can be indirectly provided by BSC, but the value is different and its statistical point differs from that of MSC too.

6.3 Attach success rate KPI

Attach success rate

KPI reference

Suggested value

90%

value

Risk value

95%

Indicator

GPRS attach success times *100% / GPRS attach times

definition Indicatory

GPRS attach success times : SGSN delivers (ATTACH ACCEPT,

type

3GPP TS 24.008),excluding redeliver

Counter

Statistics at SGSN side

formula Notes

excluding Unregistered subs

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 27,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲

6.4 GPRS average attach time KPI KPI

GPRS average attach time Suggested value

To be confirmed

value

reference

Risk value

To be confirmed

Indicator

Customer attach establishment duration *100% / customer

definition

number of attach establishment success

Indicatory type

Statistics

Counter

Attach establishment time refers to the time duration from the

formula

receipt of GPRS ATTACH REQUEST by MS to the delivery of ATTACH ACCEPT by SGSN. If the attach time exceeds the timer, the attach duration is only computed within the attach accepted period.

Notes

6.5 PDP context activation success rate KPI KPI

PDP context activation success rate reference

value

Suggested value

80%

Risk value

85%

success times of PDP context activation started by MS*100%/ attempt times of PDP context activation started by MS Indicator

The attempt times of PDP context activation started by MS is the times

definition

GGSN received Create PDP Context Request from SGSN. The success times of PDP context activation started by MS is the statistic of Create PDP Context Response sent from GGSN to SGSN when Cause value is Request Accepted.

Indicatory type Counter

Test or statistics Statistics at GGSN side

formula Notes

The performance evaluation in China Mobile in 2003 (success times of PDP context activation started by GPRS terminal/ attempt times of PDP context activation started by GPRS) results are as follows: Excellency index: 94% Reach-the-mark index: 90% Lowest Threshold index: 85%

6.6 Routing Area Update Success rate KPI KPI

Routing Area Update Success rate reference

Suggested value

92%

value

Risk value

95%

Indicator

Routing update attempt times*100%/ routing update success times

definition

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 28,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ Indicatory type Counter formula Notes

From statistical value or DT. Statistics at SGSN side, provided by GPRS core network Update success rate at routing area crossing SGSN is lower than that at the SGSN routing area.

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 29,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲

7 Comments on KPI Cases 7.1 Pengshui (Chongqing) PS Test Result 1、 CQT scene,near cell 2、 EDGE Commissioned 5

3、 Multi-timeslot capability3+1 4、 Number of PDCH static channels: 3

Test

Test state

FTP type

serial

FTP

size

(Kbyte)

Download

Download

speed (Kbyte/s)

speed (kbps)

Average timeslot speed (kbps)

Pre-optimization

1

Download

102.381

8.99

71.93

23.98

Pre-optimization

2

Download

48.18

8.10

64.80

21.60

Pre-optimization

3

Download

204.8

2.97

23.78

7.93

Pre-optimization

4

Download

2188.817

7.21

57.72

19.24

Pre-optimization

5

Download

102.381

9.05

72.42

24.14

Pre-optimization

6

Download

102.381

8.66

69.29

23.10

Pre-optimization

7

Download

512.304

15.97

127.73

42.58

Pre-optimization

8

Download

512.304

13.34

106.69

35.56

Pre-optimization

9

Download

512.304

15.81

126.51

42.17

Pre-optimization

10

Download

512.304

15.74

125.88

41.96

Pre-optimization

11

Download

512.304

14.33

114.67

38.22

Ping Ping

package

interval

size

Ping timelag(ms) 1

2

3

839

634

612

4

32

61 2

5

32

816

590

581

2

100

571

650

697

2

500

839

955

5

500

862

760

77 9 75 6

107 5

82 1

857

75

Ping

timelag

success

(ms)

rate

8

9

10

566

765

561

761

655

100%

733

716

692

812

609

709

100%

753

651

711

729

707

688

691

100%

779

737

918

894

875

840

873

100%

672

811

690

811

709

825

775

100%

5

6

608

589

757

7

(byte) 0

Average

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 30,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ 5 2

800

2

1000

2

1200

959

910

115

115

7

880

8 107

8

869

840

897

86

845

9 90 7

102 8

95 7

101 7

823 918 959

781

883

105

881

4 119 1

846

108

103

2

102 0

860

7 101

8

104 2

865

100%

1010

100%

1002

100%

Comments on case: 1. When C/I is in good condition,

the EDGE download speed of current

equipment can reach above 40kbps. 5

2. The Ping success rate and Ping timelag can vary very much due to different Ping intervals、 different Ping package sizes and different Ping servers.

7.2 Jishou (Hunan) China Mobile EDGE Test Result  Test Specification Test equipment:ANT Pilot for E-GPRS; 10

Test phone SEGAM OT490(one set) Test laptop: memory 1024M、harddisk 80G、CPU 1.60Ghz、Windows XPSP2 、 standard 28800bps modem 、 rate at 115200bps 、 modem error control and compression forbidden 、 no software irrelevant to the test.

15

Test method : outdoor static FTP download test Test location : 11 th

th

sites at Baoqing market in Fenghuang county Test time : 19 —30 , June 2008 Test aim : to test E-FPRS network performance under

static state

Test aim:to download 1000KB document 20

Timeslot :4 static timeslots

Test Result This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 31,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ Test Branch

Test sites

office

Test

document

electrical

size

level

(KB)

(dBm)

RLC Download times

Test location

RLC

average

average

rate

rate

(Kbps)

(Kbps)

Fenghuang County Jishou

prefectural government office building

1000

-44

2

Gate of Prefectural government office

201.19

181.3

1000

-40

2

Lobby of MingDu Hotel

192.6

198.98

1000

-51

2

Opposite MingDu Hotel

197.09

206.26

197.74

201.79

207.29

193.91

198.83

196.38

Cell 1 Fenghuang County Jishou

prefectural government office building Cell 2 Fenghuang County

Jishou

prefectural government office building Cell 3

Basketball field

Jishou

Old district Cell 1

1000

-49

2

Jishou

Old district Cell 2

1000

-32

2

Jishou

Old district Cell 3

1000

-56

2

Jishou

Rainbow Bridge Cell 1

1000

-43

2

Opposite Wanmingta River

185.72

191.1

Jishou

Rainbow Bridge Cell 2

1000

-43

2

Opposite Wanmingta River

191.37

181.36

Jishou

TianXia Feng Huang Cell 1

1000

-34

2

197.46

186.55

Jishou

TianXia Feng Huang Cell 2

1000

-59

2

197.09

206.26

Jishou

BaoQing market Cell 1

1000

-38

2

Gate of Linlinlou Drug Store

207.85

198.02

Jishou

BaoQing market Cell 2

1000

-36

2

Gate of Linlinlou Drug Store

162.16

185.34

Jishou

BaoQing market Cell 3

1000

-46

2

Gate of Linlinlou Drug Store

180.51

180.09

Jishou

Xinhua Bookstore Cell 1

1000

-50

2

Lobby of Xinhua Hotel

195.81

191.5

Jishou

Xinhua Bookstore Cell 2

1000

-53

2

Lobby of Xinhua Hotel

198.02

188.38

Jishou

Xinhua Bookstore Cell 3

1000

-45

2

Parking lot of Xinhua Hotel

183.08

190.16

1000

-37

2

Lane, west to ChinaMobile business hall

178.96

157.44

1000

-45

2

Gate of XingGuang Hotel

185.46

187.98

1000

-60

2

Gate of XingGuang Hotel

184.07

184.45

1000

-50

2

Gate of XingGuang Hotel

193.98

184.51

1000

-62

2

Gate of XingGuang Hotel

176.22

185.21

Jishou

Jishou

Jishou

Jishou Jishou

Comprehensive Building Cell 1 Comprehensive Building Cell 2 Comprehensive Building Cell 2 Comprehensive Building Cell 1800M1 Comprehensive Building

of Jiandaoping Primary School Basketball field of Jiandaoping Primary School Kindergarten next to Jiandaoping Primary School

Square in front of TianXiaFengHuang Hotel Square in front of TianXiaFengHuang Hotel

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 32,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ Cell 1800M2 Jishou

Telecom Bureau Cell 1

1000

-51

2

Business Hall of Telecom Bureau

180.75

197.88

Jishou

Telecom Bureau Cell 2

1000

-64

2

Business Hall of Telecom Bureau

171.85

199.19

Jishou

Telecom Bureau Cell 3

1000

-57

2

Backdoor of Supermarket (next to Telecom Bureau)

182.7

179.49

Jishou

Telecom Bureau Cell 1800M1

1000

-59

2

Gate of furniture store (next to Telecom Bureau)

105.44

106.48

Jishou

Telecom Bureau Cell 1800M2

1000

-73

2

Business Hall of Telecom Bureau

181.85

185.85

Jishou

Telecom Bureau Cell 1800M3

1000

-84

2

Business Hall of Telecom Bureau

159.20

166.92

Comments on case: 1. When C/I is in good condition, the average EDGE download speed can reach above 180kbps with a peak value of above 200kbps; 2. This test is the CQT. Cell reselection and RAC renewal can be neglected, that 5

is they are not necessary to the test conditions.

7.3 Acceptance requirements for EDGE KPI of Data Service of a network Serial 1

Indicators

Explanation

GPRS/EGPRS

GPRS/EGPRS

Formula Attach

Target

success

GPRS/EGPRS attach success

attach

means

phone

rate = GPRS Attach success

success rate

receives the Attach Accept signaling

times/attach attempt times ×

15 seconds after it sends the Attach

100%

that

the

mobile

>95%

Request. 2

Average

Attach

time

attach time

duration

from

sends

out

until

it

means the

the mobile

Attach

Request

receives

Average attach time = sum of attach

success

95%

signaling 15 seconds after it sends the Activate PDP Context Request. 4

PDP

average

PDP average activation time

PDP average activation time

activation

means the duration from the

= sum

time

delivery

of

PDP

success

Context

Request

to

the

activation success times

receipt

of

Activate

PDP

Activate

of

PDP

95%

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 33,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ log-in

means

that

the

homepage

rate = WAP

website

log-in

success rate

fully and correctly displays

success times/ website log-

within 60seconds after the

in attempt times×100%。

mobile phone started the WAP website log-in request. 6

average

WAP

WAP homepage displaying time

average

WAP

homepage

refers to the duration from

displaying

time = sum

displaying

the

log-in

successful

time

request is sent out until

displaying

the

homepage displaying success

WAP

website

homepage

fully

and

correctly displays. 7

WAP

webpage

means

success rate

webpage

that can

95%

success rate = WAP webpage refresh

success

webpage

refresh

times

/

attempt

times×100%。 8

Ping

success

Ping success rate = ping

rate

success

times/ping

>95%

attempt

times×100 9

Ping

average

Ping average timelag=sum of

timelag

each

Ping

80kbps

quantity download

time(sec)×9 11

FTP

upload

FTP

speed

upload

speed = actual

>20kbps

upload data quantity(Byte) /actual upload time(sec) ×9

Comments on case: 1. Requirements of operation and maintenance KPI are not as strict as those of acceptance check KPI. 2. Usually these KPI requirements can be satisfied.

5

7.4 Operation & Maintenance KPI of a Network SN

Indicator

Unit

Target Level

Permissible

Remark

Level 1

SDCCH Ratio

Drop

%

1

1.2

Base on system performance report of OMCR, Indication Definition: SDCCH Drop Ratio=SDCCH call drops/ Access

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 34,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ attempt Number 2

TCH Drop Ratio

%

2

2.2

Base on system performance report of OMCR, Indication Definition: TCH Drop Ratio = TCH call drops/ Seized TCHs (include handover )

3

Call

Success

%

98

97

Base on system performance report of

Ratio

OMCR,

Indication

Definition:

Success Rate = 1 - TCH

Call

assignment

failure rate 4

SDCCH

%

0.5

0.75

Base on system performance report of

Blocking Ratio

OMCR, Indication Definition: SDCCH Blocking

Ratio=SDCCH

overflows/

SDCCH call attempts 5

TCH

%

2

2.5

Base on system performance report of

Blocking Ratio

OMCR,

Indication

Definition:

TCH

Blocking Ratio=TCH overflows (include handover)/ TCH call attempts (include handover) 6

TCH

%

98

97

Base on system performance report of

Assignment

OMCR,

Indication

Definition:

TCH

Success Ratio

assignment Success Ratio=Number of TCH assignment successful / Number of TCH call attempts (include handover)

7

GPRS

average

Kbps

28

25

24-Hour measurement

Kbps

45

40

24-Hour measurement

%

99

97

24-Hour measurement

%

94

93

%

< 2 for 98%

< 2 for 90%

of all GSM

of all GSM

cells

cells

%

97

90

Depend on the DT route and method

%

2

3

Depend on the DT route and method

DL throughout per TBF 8

EDGE

average

DL throughout per TBF 9

Attach Success

Rate

(GPRS/ EDGE) 10

Handover Success Ratio

11

Call Blocking Ratio

12

Call

Setup

Success

Based on OMC-R statistics

Rate

(Drive Test) 13

Call Rate

Drop (Drive

Test) 14

Speech

MOS

>=

3

for

>=

3

for

Depend on the DT route and method

This document contains proprietary information of ZTE Corporation and is not to be disclosed or used except in accordance with applicable agreements. Page 35,Total 45 pages

Secret▲ Secret▲ Quality

(Drive

95%

Test)

15

Coverage

dBm

(Drive Test)

16

of

of

measurement

measurement

samples

samples

>= -85 for 95%

UL

90%

of

>= -85 for 90%

Depend on the DT route and method

of

measurement

measurement

samples

samples

Kbps

>10

>10

Based on DT

Kbps

>30

>30

Based on DT

>99.999

>99.999

per BSC/RNC / week

Throughput 17

DL Throughput

18

BSC/RNC down

%

time

(< 6 sec)

(< 6 sec)

(unscheduled) 19

TRX/channel

%

element failure

< 1 of all active TRX

< 2 of all

per BSC/RNC / week

active TRX

(unscheduled) 20

SDCCH Mean

s

99

per BSC/RNC / BH of a week

Holding

Time 21

Radio Access Success Ratio

22

Worst

Cells

Less

GOS

than

Less

than

1.5% cells of

1.5% cells of

Network with

Network with

GOS 5% or

GOS 5% or

above

above

per BSC/RNC / BH of a week

23

RXQUAL 0 to 3

%

>97

>95

per BSC/RNC / BH of a week

24

AMR

%

90%

>97%

>99%

per city / monthly

pre-defined locations and Drive test route/NMS

95%

>98%

>99%

per city / BH of a week (drive test monthly)

3

Paging Success Rate

NMS

>90%

>95%

>97%

per city / BH of week. With condition that Core Network is achived the same value of Level 1 and Level 2

4

Call blocking rate

pre-defined locations and Drive test route/NMS

25(95%)

Pre Defined Drive Test Route

99%

>99%

>99.5%

per BSC/RNC / BH of a week

15

SDCCH Blocking Rate

Pre Defined Drive Test Route/NMS

97% : Inter Cell: >97%

20

RXQUAL 0 to 3

Pre Defined Drive Test Route/NMS

>80%

>85%

>90%

21

AMR voice FER

Pre Defined Drive Test Route/NMS

98%

>98%

per city / BH of a week

NMS

>98%

>98%

>98%

per city / BH of a week

Pre Defined Drive Test Route/NMS

>95%

>98%

>98%

per city / BH of a week

23

24

25

Successful PS Attachment Successful PDP context activation Data session Setup Success Rate (PDP context already exist)

20 Kbps

Pre-defined locations

GPRS (Class 4 MS): >30Kb

GPRS (Class 4 MS): > 9Kbps;

GPRS (Class 4 MS): > 40 Kbps

GPRS (Class 4 MS):> 30Kbps

GPRS (Class 4 MS): > 9Kbps;

per city / BH of a month

per city / BH of a month

GPRS (Class 4 MS): > 40 Kbps

per city / BH of a month

GPRS (Class 4 MS): > 20 Kbps;

GPRS (Class 4 MS): > 20 Kbps;

per city / BH of a month

N/A

> 150 Kbps

> 150 Kbps

per city / BH of a month

NMS

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF