Footbridges - Structure, Design, History (Architecture eBook)
Short Description
poduri...
Description
Footbridges Construction
Design
History
Ursula Baus, Mike Schlaich With photographs by Wilfried Dechau
Birkhauser
Basel· Boston' Berlin
Contents
6 About this Book
8 Bridges and Pictures
10 Characterization of the Footbridge C on st ru c li on . lorm , Ili ... t on
14 Parameters and Structural Design
128 Urban Renovation Pl'dc ~ triJn ... R l' C OIHllh-'r
I
148 The Bridge as Interior Space os t
lc-rrain
Pr ut t l t ion from \Vind .tnt! \\\ '.ltIH'I"
158 Covered and Enclosed Bridges
162 The Call for Symbols .\1ill cllll iulll
,lIHI "1 vcnt -."
Brid gl·... vt t r.« t \ttvoti oll .1. .. le-on s"
18 Retrospective
58 Con struction as an Ethical Maxim
70 Taking Lightness to the Limit
104 Experiments In Construction
Bigger, last cr, Further
Prestressed Concrct c l'ost -War and
Wah-r-t h in St avs and Filigree
Structural Hype and its Erkets since till' 1970s
Traffic, Architect and Engineer
the Prohibit ion or Ornament
Cabl« Bridges
82 Stress Ribbon Bridges
100 Dynamics, Vibrations 116 Curved Bridges
180 Play Stations
196 Landscape, Gardens
214
Footbridges
248
References
h)lding, Tilting, Lifting, Turning
Bridges as Garden Orn.mu-nt s
120 Furopean Examples
250
Index
Bridge Designl'rs I{e'luire Mechanical Engineers
Parks and Landscape
255
Picture Credits
192 Loadbearing St ruct ures fo r M oveable Bridges
6
About this Book
In his int ro duct ion to th e 19 84 re pr int of Georg Meh r tens' classic,
Der Deutsche Briickenbau im XIX. Jahrhundert , which was fir st published in 1900 ,
much of a place in ou r selec t ion as th ose deSign ed to delight th e eye with or name nt . But mor e about thi s later .
Er nst Werner com me nte d succi nc tly : "It is the fate of bridges th at
serv e only th e ped estrian sim ply to be overl ooked in th e chrono logy of br idgebuilding." It was not until th e new m illennium that th is began to change somewhat
~
not least becaus e a rema rkabl y large nu mb er of citie s
Approach This book pr esents arou nd
90
footbrid ges in a latent ch ro nology. By
"late nt ", we mean that we have not blindl y foll ow ed th eir exact dat es,
saw th e beginning of a new er a as an occ asio n to poli sh up their imag e
preferring to explain th eir variety in te r ms of more co mp lex relationsh ips
with a "m illen nium br idge". A bibliogr aphi c searc h on th e subjec t of
th at can best be grasped th ematicall y. After all , some ty pes of structu re
bri dges car r ied out in th e German Nati onal Library at th e beginning of
are the result of tech nologic al or scie nt ific developments linked to
20 0 7
re t urned a total of around
2, 5 0 0
publicat ion s. Wh en th e searc h term
particula r per iod s, while other appr oac hes to deSign belon g to ages with a
was rest r ict ed to footbridges, th e cat alogue produced 31 titles, of wh ich a
particular way of expressi ng form . At on e t ime th e engi nee rs are spu r re d
considerable number were bibliog raph ic lists o f essays and articles. T he
on to achieve ever lighter st ru ctu res; at another th e arch itect s re alise th e
huge discr epancy in the results is partly explaine d by the fact that bridges
br idge's effectivenes s as a qua si-hom o eop ath ic me an s of rep airing the
have a gr eat metaphorical and symbo lic value , and thu s appe ar in count-
dam aged townscape, and at yet anothe r th e br idge as a tech ni cal ar tefact
less titles relating to politics and soc iety. The lit erature on footbridges is
is sublima te d to th e aest hetic of an Arcadi an landscape . T he hi st or y of
sparse at an int ernational level too . Apart from th e published pro ceed ing s
foot br idge co nstructio n is th er efor e a prime exam ple of how th e h isto ri es
of two co nfere nces and th efi b gUidelines of
of tec hno log y, ar t and th e world in ge neral overla p , and we wanted to
20 0 5,
no attempt has yet been
mad e to focus exclusively on this sm all and impressively var ied type of str uct ure . With this book , we hop e to have mad e a mod est star t . T he idea of writing a book about bridges that ar e for th e sole use of peopl e on foot - or at m ost on bicycles - excite d us grea tly. We hop e th at
take into acco unt th e complex int erplay bet ween t hem. The speciali st knowledge of the struct ural eng inee r co mes to th e fore in essays that ex plain th e technical aspects in stra ightfor wa rd and under st and able langu age, so th at anybo dy ca n underst and th e aesth eti c
engi nee rs, architect s, land scape ar ch itect s and tow n planner s will find it
poten tial th at is inh er ent in a pa rticular st r uct u ra l deSign . Finally there is
sti mulating , and that the lay reade r will find it ju st as appealing.
a co mpe ndium , listed by location, of a fu rther
We wanted to give as bro ad a view as possible of foot bridge
120
foot bridges th at we had
no space to dis cu ss in detail. We hop e it will provide a sta rting point for
co nstruct ion in Europe without being tied to any cur rent ideology or
rea de rs who want to disco ver more for th em selves aft er t h is fir st glimpse
do ct rine. Br idges that str ive for perfection as structures alone have as
of a fascinating area of bridgebuildin g.
Selection
Acknowledgements
Which bridges should we discuss in greater detail - and for what
To venture upon the first ever study, however limited, of the
reasons? One thorny question followed another. We had no intention of
construction, design and history of any type of structure is a daring, not
hiding the fact that one of this book's authors works for Schlaich
to say crazy, undertaking, and we would never have begun it if we had
Bergermann and Partners, a practice which to date has built more than
not been able to count on assistance from many quarters. For their
50 footbridges, but as a quick glance at the book will confirm, there was
advice and information we would like to thank Jan Biliszczuk, Berthold
no question of using it as a showcase for their work. So it was back to the
Burkhardt, Keith Brownlie, Dirk Buhler, Jurg Conzett, Cornel Doswald,
difficult decisions. We selected bridges of relevance to one or another
Sergej Fedorov, Andreas Kahlow, Andreas Keil, Martin Knight, Jorg
aspect of the relatively short history of the footbridge; bridges that
Reymendt, Jorg Schlaich, Klaus Stiglat, Rene Walther and Wilhelm
appealed to us both (or to one of us, at least); bridges that are unequalled
Zellner. Without the energetic and support and encouragement of
in some way; bridges that could certainly be improved; bridges that
Auyon Roy, Simone Hiibener and Andrea Wiegelmann, this book would
demonstrate courage in construction, astuteness in design, or an
never have appeared in
infallible sense of form. We made a point of seeing all of the bridges
We would also like to thank our knowledgeable translators, Chris Rieser
ourselves (with a few exceptions), as did our photographer, who enjoyed
and Richard Toovey.
our complete confidence. Our selection is necessarily incomplete, subjective and open to argument - completeness was never our aim. We admit that our view,
2007 -
and might not even have made it in
2008.
In addition, our special thanks go to Wilfried Dechau, who discovered many bridges, especially older ones, during his constant travels as our photographer; he would set off on account of one bridge
naturally, is one from the German-speaking countries. We were kept
and come back with seven. During the last few years he has taken new
busy enough just by having to work together as an engineer and an ar-
photographs of almost all of the bridges in this book - a labour whose
chitectural critic: a rare combination, in which agreement is certainly
documentary value to the study of the history of footbridges cannot be
not reached without argument first, but ultimately we succeeded because
overestimated.
we both had the will to make it work.
Ursula Baus, Mike Schlaich, July
2007
8
Kronsforde, bridge over the Elbe-Trave Canal, 1959
This meant t aking up-to -date photographs of as many of the bridges featured in it as poss ible. T he illustrations that the authors had managed to collec t up to that point wer e very disparate , so it was going to be difficult to produ ce a book that would be pleasant t o look at . The idea of starting again from scratc h and giving the book a consiste nt photograph ic identity th er efor e eliminated a lot of problem s at on e st ro ke . It was clear that thi s could onl y be done to a cer tain degree. Trips
to Coimbra and London, for example, turned out to be unn ecessar y, since outstanding ph ot os of th ese bridges had alr eady been tak en by Christian Richters , Nick Wood and James Mor ris . It also seem ed out of proportion to m ake a long trip through Nor way for a few bridges far apar t , when plenty of photos of th em alr eady ex iste d . Not to mention th e problem of time travel : some br idges no long er existed, because they had be en built for special events, and in th ese cases we were fortunate in being able to use photos taken pr eviously by Leo van dcr Kleij and Florian Holzher r. That still left plenty to do, however . All the same , we were not really aware that we had let ourselves in for an almost end less task. I cam e back from every journey with at least twice as many bridges as I had been
Bridges and Pictures
At th e age of IS, with the fir st singl e-l ens reflex ca me ra of my ver y
expec t ing to find on the basis of th e source material. On my trav els, alm ost
own, I naturally took shots of th e area around my parent's hous e. That
every one I talked to about the objects of my inter est had a suggest ion to
included th e bridge across th e Elbe-Trave Canal. I crossed this bridge
make . And so the itinerary became ever longer and, at the sam e t im e,
every day on th e way to school and I could see it from my room . Of
more fruitful. My thanks ar e du e abov e all to Martin Knight and Cornel
course, it would be going too far to say that this was the origin of my
Do sw ald, from whos e ex pe r t ise I ben efited in Engl and and Switzerland.
affinity for bridges . My enthusiasm for looking at bridges through the
Th e mo st ad venturous discovery for me personally was , by th e way,
med ium of photography was (re -)awakened 30 years later on, when I
thanks to Bill and Alison Landale, my bed-and-breakfast hosts in Ellem -
photographed th e Max Eyt h Lake footbridge by Jorg Schlai ch . In [989,
ford, Berwickshir e , without whom I would never, ever, have found th e
this was a welcome and relaxing diversion for me from th e routine of
un commonly delicate and apparently fragil e - yet astonishingly pr acti cal-
conventional archite ct ure photography. I recently revisit ed th e bridge to
suspension bridges across th e River Esk (see p . [98) .
photograph it again for this book (see p . 92) . In spit e of that refreshing int ermezzo, bridges remained an exce ption
It can, on the other hand, be quite frustrating to have to ask for in-
formation in order to find a ce r t ain bridge. It then becomes clear how
in my work. This changed with the building of the Storeba elt (Great Belt)
mu ch people's perceptions of o ne and th e sam e bridge can differ . In
bridge in Denmark : I visit ed th e site many times between [996 and 1998
Maidstone, for example , neither th e name "Millennium Bridge", nor
to record the exciting process of building what was, for a br ief period,
words like "susp ension cabl e", "con cret e" or "ne w" were of mu ch help in
th e susp ension bridge with th e long est fr ee span in the world . I managed
finding out which way to go . Not to m ention th e name of th e bridge 's en-
to get a lot of int eresting shots , some of which were shown in th e briicken-
gineer, Jiri Strasky. Ever yone who we asked direct ed us to a cabl e-stayed
schlag exhibition in 2004,
2000,
and in a photo calendar. They wer e follow ed, in
by a project on th e Traversiner footbridge. This gave me a uniqu e
opportunity to photograph work on sit e in th e Grisons Alps every day for a period of several months. Its immediate results wer e a book and exhibi-
bridge, wh ich , although it was also called the Mill ennium Bridge, had nothing in com mon with the one that I was looking for, except that it, too, crossed th e River Medway - at th e other end of the town . Int ernet route planners are also of limited use , since th eir purpose
tion about the Trav ersiner footbridge. At the same tim e, plans for this
is to give directions to drivers - who have, of course, no need of foot -
bo ok by it s two authors wer e gaining substance, and I gradually came to
bridges. The most reliable sources of information ar e topographic maps,
th e decision that my camera and I should take an activ e part her e too .
but th ey ar e not alwa ys to hand - or, at least, not all of those that ar e
Vagli di Satt a, bridge by Riccard o Morandi. 5 June 2007, 12.20 and 13.27
needed . And even th en , t hey ar c o nly of usc if t hey ar e up -t o -dat e . O ne "" am ple o f th is was th e footb r idge ove r t he Bregenzer Ach r iver near Lan gen a ru l ltu ch . T he se tw o villages lie five kilometres apart, as t he c ro w fI ics. Th e footpath winds alon g th e valley for st ret ches, pet ering o ut in meado ws amo ng herds of co ws. T he older peopl e in t he yill age st ill rem em be r a br idge t hat was th er e wh en th ey wer e child ren . A spri ng flood washed it away one night. But a little bit fu r t her up stream , t hcv tell me , th er e is ano t her o ne like it , ncar Fischbach and Doren - and th at o ne is sti ll sta nd ing. Off I go aga in . My nayigat ion system kn o ws Illan ~'
Fischbachs, but no ne of t hem nea r Bregenz . The faint hop e th at
Illlight find sig npos ts to thi s, th e only bridge in th e vicinit y, pr oyes, as it so oft en has, to be naive. Signposts tell you about places to get to , not \\ a~'s
of get t ing th ere . In ot her word s: th e next villag e , and not a bridge
on o ne of th e ways to it . T he except ion docs proye th e r ule , of co u rse , and o nce , looking fo r a suspe nsion bridge across th e Subersac h nea r Egg, I d id find a signpost t hat said Wire bridge - l.inq enau, T his at least con fir me d th at th e br idge st ill existed and was passable , so th e walk th ere car r ying a heavy cam er a was not going t o be co mplete lv in vain . alt hou gh you never know wh ether it is go ing to be worth th e effort unt il you act uall y get t o th e bridge. O nly th en do yo u sec , if it is an
o n ly o ne hour apa rt, of R iccard o Morand i' s bridge in Vagli d i Sot to ,
old brid ge , how mu ch of it has sur vived and in what co nd it ion - and how
wh ich is set exqu isitely in th e land scap e . Th e fir st , whi ch I took sho r tl y
mu ch it st ill has in co m mo n with th e o r igina l design . Warning signs ad-
befor e a stor m , shows sh im me r ing green wat er th at is as smooth as a
yisin g ped estrian s t o cross o ne at a time ca n be an ind icat io n th at th e
m irror, wh er eas in th e seco nd , taken as it began, th e su rfa ce has becom e
br idge is in its o r igin al state , but this is not necessaril y so . All th at is
matte , cr iss-c r ossed by fin e ripples.
cer tain, in t hat case , is th at it ha s no t been spoi led by in sensiti ve re in fo rceme nt or ren ovati on . The Kettenst eg in Nu rem berg , for exam p -
O ne of th e last journeys th at I mad e for th is bo ok took me to Bilbao in Jun e
2 0 07 .
Upon ente r ing my ho tel ro om , I har dl y believe my eyes.
lc, Illay appc ar t o hang fro m its chains, but it is now suppo r ted in a
Above th e bed hu ng a d r aw ing of an old , asymm et ri cal footbr idge : one
d ifferent way. T he faint -of-hea r t would nevertheless be well advised not
th at I had never see n before , alt ho ugh I had t ravelled to over
to t read heavilv wh en th ey cr oss this parti cul ar bridge. Th at co u ld set it
in th e previou s three yea rs. Did it perh aps cros s th e Ncrvion r iver ? In
swaying and oscill ating badl y - not dangerously so any more, but not
Bilbao ? Wh en ? Where ? I co uld see , as it wer e , th e w rit ing on th e wall :
ever y sto m ach can co pe w ith it. Aft er a taking a fir st look around, I
o bviously, even if severa l ph ot ograph ers wer e to spend a furth er three
check o ut th e bri dge . Go o n it ; look dow n. Walk across. Get dow n off it
years on t h is qu est, t hey woul d st ill encounter u nknown st ru ct ures . Th e
at t he ot her side , if possibl e . See w hat is suppo r t ing it and how - t hen
next sur pr ise came hard o n its heels, wh en I t ra cked down th e place in
wh ere and how th e loads ar e di stributed an d ult im at ely t ran sferred t o
Bilbao where , acco rdi ng to t he hot el sta ff, th e bridge had o nce st ood .
20 0
bridges
t he abutme nts . Fir st I look , th en I t ake t he ph otos. The weat her and th e
W hat I found was an ar ched co ncre te br idge (w hich up t o th en had bee n
light arc im portant fact or s, without a doubt. O n ly on ce , in Maid st one ,
comp letely u nknown t o us) that co nnec te d to t wo differ ent level s o n th e
d id I have to st ifle th e pangs o f co nscience and set tl e for ph ot og raph s
higher bank o f th e riv er in an except ionally clever way (see p. H ) . O f
taken in bad weather. Th er e wa s no sign of an improyem en t and I had a
co u rse , we had m et a bridge of this t yp e before : it see ms lik ely th at th e
plan e to cat ch at Heath row air por t . Even in r ain , the bridge it self m akes
Bilbao bridge was known to Marc Mimram, t o whom we owe th e Pont
a goo d impression , as can be seen o n page 76 .
de Solfer ino in Pari s.
Wh at ever one ph ot ogr aph s, it can only be "sho w n in th e best light" if t he weat her coo pe r ate s. This is clea r to see in two expos u re s, taken
Wilfried D ech au , 20 07
9
Cha racterization
Voce quis salter? Did you want to jump?
Pascal Mercier. v ght Tram to Lisbon
Looking at the history of bridgebuilding as part of architectural
(with all of the consequences that this involves for large-scale bridge
history, we see that today's comparatively distinct and unquestioned
construction), but a human being, whether standing, walking or jumping,
differentiation between footbridges and other types of bridge came about
remains a constant factor in the equation. To this extent, the interplay of
slowly at first, and by no means constantly. The history of footbridges is
technical progress, imagination and functional variety in the case of
linked to that of bridgebuilding in general- sometimes more so, some-
footbridges is open to other influences, which bring forth an inexhaustible
times less - and this is one of the aspects that make it so interesting to
variety of distinctive designs. It is a brief that again and again allows
study the footbridge on its own, as a type of bridge in its own right. In
more to be done than providing a mere footbridge - the degree to which
order to define the characteristics of the footbridge, which of course has
credit for this is due to architects, or structural engineers, or both,
a longer history than the road bridge, we need to look at when its typology
becomes clear only upon examination of individual cases.
began to differ from that of large-scale bridges. This occurred towards the end of the r Sth century, when Enlightenment thought, science, early
What happens on a footbridge, anyway? Not feeling firm ground
industrialization and the increasing importance of the economy
underfoot usually indicates a precarious situation. At the same time, a
stimulated rapid technological and social change, together with a growth
swaying surface, or a narrow pathway, can also produce a shiver of
in mobility and traffic. In the 19th century, advances in transport
excitement when we have to let ourselves in for more or less perceptible
technology began to exert a fundamental influence on bridgebuilding,
oscillations, or glimpses into a yawning abyss. Bridgebuilders have to
with ever-higher standards required for road and rail. These new, high-
live with the awkward fact that people react to oscillations and heights in
performance modes of transport made fresh demands on bridge
very different ways: some may become dizzy with euphoria, while others
construction, in response to which a specially qualified expert in bridge-
may find their knees turning to jelly.
building appeared on the scene
the structural engineer - whose
profession quickly acquired a coherent profile. Footbridges were only indirectly affected by these technological
Footbridges are generally built to satisfy a tendency to laziness, a love of convenience, or a joy in contemplation; whether they cross rivers, streets or valleys, their main purpose is still to shorten the route from
changes and from this point onwards their development took a course of
one place to another. Only in very rare cases is it the thrill of danger, or
its own. After all, trains today may reach speeds of 400 km/h or more
the temptation to be free of the ground, that motivates people to build
and the volume of road traffic may require six, eight, or even ten lanes
them.
12
Characterization
Tarr Steps, Exmoor, earlier than 1000 BC
Maki ng th ese shor tc uts not onl y safe enough even for sleepwalkers,
enginee r s find th em selve s out of their depth, inasmuch as th ey have
but also pleasant to walk across , is an important part of th e bri ef wh en
received far to o little exposure to design-related topics of this sor t
designing a footbridge. Of course, th e basic principle applies : a bridge
during their studies. Mer ely calling upon th e rep eatedly quot ed Vitruvian
should be st r uct urally sound , easy to maintain and che ap . All th e sam e, a
terms utilitas, firm itas and venustas is not of th e slight est help in enriching
lot more can be achi eved by paying attention to cr ite r ia such as an appro-
t he world of contem porary building. Anyone who seriously demands that
priate route , attractive view s, a co m for table environ ment and a memo-
a structure be useful and sta ble and beautiful mak es them selve s as
rable app earance. A footbr idge's balu strades , parapets , hand rails , surfac-
laughable as a politician who , quoting Go ethe , says that Man is nobl e,
ing, niches and balconies should take into accou nt that people will not
helpful and good . Even when th ey do not app ear banal , Vitruvius' terms
onl y walk across it, but would also like to stop for a moment, lean against
no long er have a definite sub stance to offer . The ar chitects' situation
it, rest on it, sit down and look around, or just be alon e - and tha t what-
mirrors th at of th e engineers : th ey are given a basic understanding of
ever th ey do, they will touch it . Thus, a footbridge does not remain just a
structural th eory as stude nts , but rarely devel op it into an ability to design
bridge , but matures int o a jogging track, a boulevard, a promenade, a
structures. Of all things , th en, it is th e mod est footbridge , a class of
pla ce for a rendezvous and , finally, a landmark . Last but not least, light-
structure comparable in st atus to the semi-det ached hous e, whi ch on
ing design has a prominent part to play, as pedestrians expe r ience night-
account of its complex characte ris t ics puts th e much-vaunted cooperation
t ime illumination in a completely differ ent way from a car driver conce n -
between ar chitect s and engine ers to the test . One of th e professions is
trating on the road. W ith such a variety of tasks, standard solutions seldom
defend ing a source of income; the other is hungry for new one s.
prov e satisfa ctory. The basic types of structure as such ar e in no way adequ ate to meet all of th e differ ent requirem ents. In order to achi eve a de-
For us (an architecture cr it ic and a str uc t ural engineer) th e most impor t ant thing is the result ; we exam ine each case to sec wher e credit is
sign that is more than just the shortest way of con nec ti ng two points, it is
du e and we can recommend, both from our own expe r ience and in gen -
best to vary th em, combine th em and develop th em expe r imentally. This
eral, aiming for amity and lively debate. The fact that the footbridge, such
naturally stimulates the design ambitions of the structural engineer, but
an unpret entious structure, is still capable of exper imental and imagina-
th e ar chitect and the landscape designer also feel called upon to take over
tive development, in spite of all of th e standards and regulations, makes
engi nee ring's choicest task. In matters relating to atmosphere, significant
up much of its charm . This applies throughout Europe , wh er e a jungle of
forms and th e sensory effec ts of material properties , mo st structural
rules and red tap e makes building a complicated and expensive business.
A simple suspension bridge (c. 1890) near Ardez in Switzerland. It can be crossed by only one person at a time.
13
14
Characten anon
Paramete rs and Structural Design
Users experience footbridges much more
alsoopens up new possibilities for emphasizing
longer bridges. Statistics show that such crowding
directly than road or railway bridges. As we cross a
the spatial geometry of the structure. Walkable
(5 kN/m2 is equivalentto 6 people per square
footbridge, we can touch the structure and study
arches and stress ribbon bridges are therefore
metre) is very improbableon a long bridge deck.
the details, thereby allowing us to gras p the struc-
possible design alternatives for footbridges,
As pedestrians are much less sensitive to deflections
ture fully in every sense of the word. These are
although it should be noted that deck gradients
than road or railway traffi c, footbridges may be
bridgesto be to uched. Thedesign freedom for the
greater than 6 percent present problems for
much more slender and lightweight than road or
structural engineer is much more pronounced than
w heelchair users. It is not simply the maximum
railway bridges. Becauseof this, footbr idgesare
for road or rail bridges in spite of some parameters
slope that presents a problem, but the potential
often lively, and dynamic analysis of the structure
particularto footbridge structures. This design
energy required to overcome the slope. This may
should be carried out in the early phases of the
freedom is a welcome and exhilarating challenge.
be expressed asthe inverse of the product of the
design.
In this section, the issues unique to footbridge de-
length and slope. Alternative pathways must be
sign will be summarized briefly. Additional infor-
offered for wheelchair users where there are steep
mation can be found in the technical overviews
deck gradients or stairways.
and the referen ces, which provide an introduction to the technical literature.
Dimensions Most pedestrian bridges are narrow, with
TheThird Dimension
decks between of 3 and 4 m. As a rule of thumb,
Pedestrian bridgesallow the design to break
30 pedestrians per minute for every metre of deck
free of the linearity of high-speed traff ic, whose
w idth can cross the bridge without impeding one
bridge decks generally attempt to join two points
another. Even with the largestcrowds, this figure
separated by an obstacle asdirectly as possi ble.
rarely reaches 100 pedestrians per minute. Most
Thegeometry of the bridge deck in the horizon-
European codes call for a minimum deck width of
tal plane can be chosen freely and may be quite
2 m for bridges open to pedestrian and cycle
curved. A spatial experience may be achieved by
traffic.
the suspension of the bridge deck, by a move-
Given these pedestrian densities, it is surpri-
able bridge, or by the intersection of multiple
sing that the pedestrian live load of 5 kN/m 2 called
pathways.
for in most European codes is roughly equal to the
Thegeometry of the gradient of the bridge deck may also be relatively freely chosen, w hich
loading of the main lane of a roadway bridge. In many countries, this load may be reduced for
Load testing - where numerical calculations cannot replace the intuition and experience of the engineer, here on site for the construction of the footbridge in Sassnitz
15
16
Charactenzanon
Materials and struct ure
give the usera sense of safety. It often seems
In addition to asphalt and concrete, many
appropriate to integrate the lighting system into
other materials can be used asdeck surfacing. For
the handrails or railing posts, just asthe shadows
timber surfacing, the danger of slipping should be
cast from the railing effect the visual impression of
considered, especially if the wood planksfollow
the deck during the day. New materials and
the longitudinal direction of the structure. The
innovative structuralsystems are often more readily
moisture expansion of the wood must also be
approved by the owners and local administrations
taken into account. Grating surfaces are cheap,
than large bridges w here the total risk and costs
allow light to pass through the deck and do not
are much higher.
require drainage . They are, however, difficult surfaces to cross for pedestrians who are barefoot or wearing high heels. Laminated glass surfaces
Freedom of design Bridge desig n has long been regarded asthe
must have a high level of opacity to prevent people
most rigorous in the challenging field of civil
below from viewing through the deck. Glass
engineering. With the smaller scale of footbridges,
surfacing is primarily found in interior spacesor for
bridge designers can finally let their hair dow n and
covered footbridges.
t ruly indulge their creative side. Self-critical engi-
Railings require particular attention and
neers often seek advice from architects, industrial
must be at least 1.2 m for bridgesopen to cyclists.
designers, and landscape architects for design
The railing should be designed to withstand a
issues such asthe integration of the structure into
transverse load of 1 kN/m applied at the height of
the surrounding environment, the light, colour,
the handrail. Because of the height of the guard-
and feel of the structure. In cases w here the
rails, they are often incorporated into the global
engineers and architects in the design have a good
structural system of the bridge. The design of the
history of cooperation between one another, the
handrail has an important impact on the visual
traditional roles of architect and engineer become
impression of the bridge. The railing may appear
blurred to the benefit of the overall project.
either opaque or transparent from afar and must
It is often said of large bridgesthat "a bridge
St Gallen-Haggen, Bridgeover the Sitter, Rudolf Dick, 1937'
is no destination". Thisis however not at all true for the designof footbridges. The pedestrian should rememberhis or her experience crossing the structureas being particularlypleasant. The footbridge designs of the lastfew years have shown just how much is possible in bridge design. The increasingly large number of designcompetitions hasshown how seriously the design of these structures is taken. Thechallenge of structural innovation, the audacityof competition, and the owner's desire to createa landmarkstructure often overshootthe goal. Bridges that aredesigned to impress often breakwith rational technical designtenets. We haveto admit that thesetechnicallyunreasonable structuresmay becomequite impressive given the right lighting and spatialperspectives but must not be taken asdesignideal. Thedesignteam should not overlook the role of the structuralsystem asa catalystfor the diversityof footbridge design. Moreover, the developmentof the appropriatestructure, given the surroundingenvironment, functional requirements, or the additional requirements of the
1 Dick, Rudolf. Von der Sitter-
owner, must be seen asthe central challenge of
brikke Haggen-Stein bei SI.
the project.
Gallen, in: 5chweizerische Bauzeitung, 118, 1941, pp 122-123
Retros pective
Truly, opposing what is customary is a thankless task.
Heinrich Heine
Any general history of bridge construction inevitably begins with
manoeuvre. Because people experience the built environment much
footbridges. The search for the origins of bridgebuilding has so far taken
more slowly and with greater immediacy on foot than they do in cars or
us back to early civilizations in China, Mesopotamia and South America.
trains, this freedom was used, then as now, in a cultural, time-dependent
There is archaeological evidence of simple suspension bridges for those
sense: intuition and experience, experimentation and science; displays
with a steady head for heights, small timber beam bridges and stone slab
of magnificence; gracefulness and bareness - these are the themes that,
walkways for people and animals, like those at Tarr, Exmoor, or in Post-
in retrospect, are of specific relevance to the history of footbridges.
bridge on Dartmoor, and Lavertezzo in Switzerland (see p. 20). It may
They do not replace each other in sequence, but rather add to a growing
well be that globally accessible Internet data banks, such as Structurae,
wealth of design and structural concepts, which the present age can
Bridgemeister and Briickenweb, are creating a riew basis for writing a
draw upon and continue to work with.
more reliable history of early bridgebuilding. That is neither within the capacity of this book, nor is it our intention. Our interest begins explicitly with the time in which traffic-related requirements resulted in quantum leaps in bridgebuilding and also in the birth of structural engineering as a definable profession -- one that has dominated the construction of footbridges, too, to this day. It soon becomes clear that the qualifications and professional ethos of the structural engineer were determined to a great degree by each new means of transport: first the railway train, with bridges and vast station sheds, then the car, with gigantic motorway bridges. Cost-effectiveness, too, played an increasingly important part, which limited the structural engineer's freedom to play with forms in order to achieve a particular, contemporary design. Looking back over the development of the footbridge in comparison, we see that the relationship between construction, material, form and cost-effectiveness allowed much greater room for
20
Retrospective
The mediaeval stone bridge at La vertezzo in the Verzasca valley, Switzerland
Bigger, faster, further - traffic, architect and engineer Ever since traffic and its technical requirem ents began to drive
canal and bridgebuilding from the hands of the ari sto cracy, tradesm en' s
innovation in large-scale bridge constr uction , th e footb rid ge has devel oped
associ ations and religious orders . His aim was to make it better and ,
along a re cognizably sepa rate path. The small-scale structure for human
abov e all , efficie nt , as part of a poli cy of centr aliz at ion under the absolute
be ings and animals g radually became som ething special. Build ing it
monarchy. Once again, politi cs was driving developments in th e
rem ain ed nonetheless the responsibility of struct ural engineers . Their
construct ion industry. T he process had begun in 1716 with th e establish-
profession al identity change d rep eatedl y from the mid-rsth century
ment of an engineer ing corps, from which the l:cole Nationale des Ponts
onwards, as exper ience wa s arrange d in a syste mat ic framewo rk,
et Ch aussees was later cre ate d . Man y parts of th e country be cam e mor e
th eoreti cal knowledge grew expo nent ially and economics put pr essure
acc essibl e : at the beginning of th e i Sth cent ur y, t he stone bridges in
on t he construction industry. This becom es evide nt if we outline how
France had number ed ar ou nd 600 , but by 1790, 400 more had been bu ilt,
things stood towards th e end of th e isth ce nt u r y.
whil e th e number of wooden bridges do ubled during the same period.' Th e militar y had alr eady started cr uci al initiatives to advance knowledg e
Economy in bridgebui lding
of ro adbui lding and for t ress construct ion in th e 17th century; th ese
On 14 February 1747, Jean- Rodolphe Perronet was appointe d head
resulted in th e founding of a military engineering school in Mezier es in
of th e newly found ed Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees (National
1736 .2Colbert th en drew a fateful co nclusion : he postulated that eco nomy
School of Bridges and Roads) in Pari s. He wa s not merely an engineer, but
is essent ial for an infrastructure to be built up efficie ntly - and Perron et ,
also an ext raordi nar ily tal ented organizer and an important contributor
of all people, rai sed economy of m ate ri al to th e sta t us of an aesthetic
to an ambitious ly planned compe ndi um of knowl edg e : th e encyclopaedia
principl e. Towards the end of h is working life, he pr ided him self on
ed ite d by d 'Alembert und Diderot . Per ron et took th e ar t of building
having been th e first to give works of ar t a form "qui ti re de I' economic
I
Berrey, Bern ard: l.cs Pout s
Mod crncs, ,8(' - ' 9(' siccles,
Paris, ' 9 90 , p. 2~f.; Grclo n . Stuc k, 19 9 4 , p. 84
(wh ich even now we keep wanting to see as an inviolate who le) and split it
de mati ere un moyen de dccoration'l.r The efficie nt use of material it self
with an axe that has continued in use to this day: eco nomics. Adm itted ly,
bec ame an aesthet ic cr iterion, the fir st step on a path that was to have
Stra ub, 1992, p. 16 3f. 3 Picon, An to in e: Pcr ro n ct ,
he d id so on orders from abov e : Jean -Baptiste Colbert , th e fin ance
immeasurable conse quences for (engineering) bridge construction and
in : L' ar-t de I'i ngen icu r, Par is
minister of th e Sun King, Loui s XIV, had decided to w re st contro l of road ,
later for ar chit ecture as a whole .
pp. 39 and 6of.
2 Ku r t -or; 2003, p.39;
1997, p . ~ 64 ; Mar -re v, ' 990 ,
Tarr Steps, Exmoor, 1000 BC
Thus th e Q!1erell e des A nciens et des Modern es, a peculiar di sagreement
Clapper Bridge, Postbridge, Dartmoor
assessm ent of archi tecture in gen er al (and of bridges in particular) up to
oyer reverenc e for Antiquity and the mod ern spir it of innovation th at
thi s da y. Ther e is, aft er all , no agreem ent about what a true construction
had broken out in liter ary cir cles half a ce nt ur y earl ier, was join ed by
mi ght be and wh ether , if it were taken t o mean so me t h ing like a right
anot her issu e. No soo ne r had enginee rs liber at ed th emselves fr om th e
constru ction , it would always also be beautiful.
dogma of clas sicism, th an design bec ame pervaded by th e co ncept o f
T he aes t het ics of eco nomy and th e truth of co nst r uct ion were
economy. This d id not change with th e degradation of th e EN PC t o a
ultimately join ed at ar o und th e same time by a furth er aspect , th at of
practi ce-oriented school and th e re-establishment of th e Ecole Polyte ch -
esteem for t he fun ctional. T his was th e work of an Itali an Fr an ciscan
niqu e for more acad emi c st ud ies. On th e cont ra ry: th e th eoret ical and
monk, C arlo Lodoli (16 90 -1761), who promoted th e opinion that arc h i-
pra cti cal branch es of th e new profession , t he eng inee r, drift ed eyer
te cture (which wh en referred to th en alwa ys included wh at we now
furth er apart. 4
t hi n k of se par ate ly as engineer ing con str uc t ion) shou ld be func t io nal. In his w ritings, Lodoli relates fun ct ion less to th e ar ran gem ent of spa ces th an
Truth of Construction
to th e material di spla y of pu rposes. 6 Th ese topics belonging t o arc h ite c-
Th riftiness was a conce rn not ju st of th e Fren ch , but of th e English
tural theory pe netrated far into ar eas in whi ch th e im age of th e na scent
to o .\ It is also worth r em embering that a Jesuit sign ifican tly influen ced
st r uc t ural eng ineer ing professio n (in a narrow sense) was becoming
th e forma tion of op ini on in th e ar chitectural deb at es th at began in the
more sharply foc use d: intuition and ex pe r ience ; scienc e and eco no my.
m id-rxth century. In 17B , Marc Antoin e Laugi er, who was livin g in Pari s (;rdon , Stu ck, 1994, p. 171'.
ibid. , p. X5" 6
Laugic r, Mar c Antoi ne, Essai
sur l'a rchitccturc , 170 /86; Mc m mo, And rea (cd .}; Andre a
lodoli 7 Sc-hu t te. Ul rich, Baumeister
in Krieg und Friede n , Wo ll'enhiitt d,1984
It sho uld not be forgott en th at, for bridgebuilding espe cia lly,
as co ur t chaplain, published hi s Essai sur I'architect ure, on e of th e m ost
cr uc ial impulses came from th e military sph er e . Matters r el at in g in an y
important tex ts o n arc h itec t ura l th eor y of it s tim e . In it , Laugi er
way to visual appea rance had no part to play th ere , fun ctionality and
fulmina tes against pomp and di spla y and, taking as an exa mple a
effic iency being th e sole criteria for a way of building that event ually
tou chingly primitive hut co ns ist ing of four tree trunks , a pitched roo f and
develo ped a lon g and inv entive tradition ."
a bit of wattl e -and-daub, ex po unds on tru th of construction . This marks th e fir st app earan ce of a te rm that ha s r emain ed hotly di sputed in th e
21
22
Retrospective
Cambridge, reconstruction of the bridge of 1749
Old Walton Bridge, oil painting by Canaletto, 1754
Intuition and Experience In England and, above all , France , the technical and scie nt ific aspects of construction played an ever great er part in defining the pr ofil e of the engineer, who in principl e was also think ing econom ically. In Eng land, wh er e th er e was no institution comparabl e to th e Ecole Nationa le des Ponts et Ch aussees, an attempt to educat e st udent s spe cifically in const r ucti on was mad e by John Soan e (1753-1837) , th e best -known architect in th e country, who became a professor at th e Royal Acad emy in London in 180 6. He was alre ady greatly interested in bridgebuilding wh en he set off on th e Grand Tour for th e first time in 1778. On th e way to Rom e, he stopped off in Paris to visit Perronet and see hi s brand new stone bridge , the Pont de Ncuilly, built in 1768 -74.' It was wooden bridges , how ever , that Soan e encountered on his return through Sw it zerla nd. The history of wo od en br idge constr uc tion has many cele brate d str uct ures: Julius Caesar's rather vaguely described bridge across th e Rhine, built du ring his suc ces sful advance northwards through Europe;' th e Danube bridges th at are carved on Trajan's colum n in Rom e and th e bridges described by Alb erti: and Palladio - respectively - th e latter inspiring cou nt less foo tbridges throughout Eu rop e . Wooden bridge co nst r uct ion in England might best be represented by a
I
2
:\ \agg i, Navonc, zooj , P: II Galus Julius Caesar, De hello
gallico
3 Alber ti, Leon Battista , Zdm Bucher tiber die Baukunst , cd . Max Thcuer, Dar mstadt ' 975,
small footbridge designed by William Ether idge (1707-1776) and built by
p. 202fT.
Jam es Essex in Cambridge in 1749 . Known as the "mathematical bridge",
4 Palladia, And rea, Die vier Buch er zur Architektur, eds .
it also serv ed as a mod el for Garret Hostel Bridg e in Trinity College
Andreas Beyer and Ulr ich Schutte , Zuri ch / Muni ch
(1769) and th e bridge at Iffley Lock in Oxford (1924) .
19'+( ') , P' 219fT.
23
Schaffhausen, 1795
Wett ingen, 1795
Hittisau. Kummabridge, 1720
Et her idge foll ow ed it so o n aft e r wa rds w ith a lar ger wood en br idge : Old
hi s ar t by h im sel f that he is justl y co unted amo ng t he innovat ive mast e r
Walt o n Br idg e, which sur vives on ly' in th e w cll-kn own pai ntin g of it by
bu ild ers of the ccnt ur v."
Ca nalet to from IH4 . It w as a lar ger vers ion of th e "m athemati cal bridge"
Soa ne and hi s assist ant s pain st aki ngly dre w th e covere d wood en
in Ca m br idg e, which was reconst ru ct ed in 18(,(, a nd 1 9 0~. The design d id
br id ges in Schaff haus en (1757 ) , Wettinge n (17(,0 ) and m any others t hat ,
no t gi ye th e wo od e n eleme nt s su ffic ie nt prot ecti on for a bri dge of thi s
in spit e of spa ns of oyer ~o m , fitt ed into t he la nd scape well. Beca use
sor t t o sur vive,
mo st of the Grubenma n ns' woode n brid ges w er e dest r oyed by 1800, these drawings would have been of g re at valu e , but in Basel , John Soa ne
~
quote-d b~ Killer, Jm cf: dcr Haum c-i-tcr
[ l ie \\ '~ T k c
ruuhonmann, l ell'\" , P: V, l' 1 1I 1" tln- v.u-icd n-an [c-r ,>1 d r'1\\ ing" o r hridg,· {rom ' I I itN rl.lnd to fn glalld , " T :" ,H el l h' , :\ i, olJ.:Th," \ igh l" ,·n th ·l '{'nt ur .\ l.urop c.m r"]H lt'lt io ll oj t he (irubc-nm an n 1' I", ltl h T S. ill :
John
"';O ,H H' , ?OOI.
p. )d . , Hum ", 11\1\\ .1["(1: lrom Julius l ',W ";,l r t o
111(' Crubcnm.mn
ln-ot hc-rs: Soan c- an d th e hixtorv
,.1 \ \ C\l u!l: lI IH'idgt"", i ll : John \q ,lJl t' ,
zoo j ,
p. 19
... Bu rn ..., p. ?o 'I
'cra.k-l m an u , We rner:
I iol/h r iilkcn de l' Sc hwe LI t-in lnvvntar. Chur
1'1 '1 0 :
Kille-r, [o-cf: I ) jt ' \ Vnkv dcr Hnun c-i-tc-r ( ; r u !J,' tl lll ,HHl , 19"' ~;
vn-imuann, Lugcn: 11.1Il" Ulrich l ;rU h "Il Ill.lllll. I q1\4 ;
10
Kille-r.
19 "'+ .
p.n
The Grubenmanns ' Wooden Bridges
lost almost all of th em along with his d rawing equ ipm ent. h As well as
What Soa ne saw in Swit zerl and amazed h im : up in t he Alps, wo od en
th eir refined co nst r uc t io n , Soa ne pr aised t he pictu resqu e qu alit y of th e
br idge construct ion had mat ured to a sur pr ising deg ree in t he hand s of
Sw iss wood en bridges and log icall y, in h is lectures, exa m ined th e
th e Gr ube nman n br othe rs, without th e ben efit of a ny' aca de m ic
inte r p lay be t wee n t he str uct ure and appea ra nce of a br idge an d t he
infrastruct ure of th e sor t ex ist ing in London a nd Pari s, T he ir lack of
land scap e ." He co ns ide re d Perronet, w ho wa s of Swiss orig in , t o be a
t heoretical kn owl ed ge was mo re t ha n co mpe nsat ed lor by t heir lo ve of
goo d e ng inee r, but a bad ar chi t ect , saying t hat th e Pont de Ne u illy
e xpe r ime nt at io n and th eir st o re of ex pe r ie nce . This cause d a sensat io n.
bridge , in parti cul ar , lack ed th e "beaut y of e legance".'
\ Villiam Coxc, ano t her Eng lishm an, in hi s sket ches a/ the
;\' aC1I ra I, Poli t ical
Indeed , th e Alpi ne region wa s hom e to an out sta nd ing , co nt in ually
and Civil Stat e a/ SWitzerland (sic) , writes of t he bri dge in Sc haffha use n :
g row ing t ra d it io n of woo de n br idge co nst r uctio n , whi ch reac hed a peak
" If o ne conside rs t he size of th e plan a nd th e bold ness of th e st r uc t ure,
of ex perim enta l daring and ac cu m u lat ed expe r ience in the wo rk of Hans
on e is ast ou nde d th at t he builder was a co mmon ca r pe nte r without any
Ulr ich Grube nm ann (17° 9 - 1783) a nd Joh ann es Gr ube nma nn ( 1707 -1771).9
science, without th e slight est kn owl ed ge of mechani cs a nd wholl y
Eve n befo re t he Grube nm ann brot hers , th e ar t of build in g wood en
u nversed in t he t heory of mechani cs. Thi s ex t r ao rd inary m an is nam ed
br idges wa s ce rta in ly adva nced . The fir st han gin g t ru ss brid ge had been
Ul ri ch Gru benma nn , a co m mo n cou nt r ym an fr om Tii ffen , a sma ll
built in 146 8 oyer th e Go ldac h near St Ga lle n , wi th a span of 30 m , T his
\'illage in the ca nt o n of Appe nzell , wh o is \"Cr y tond of hi s drink . He has
t yp e of br idge spr ea d rapidly in th e isth cent u ry , w ith spa ns r angi ng
uncom m onl y g r eat natu r al skilfu lne ss and an asto ni shing apt it ude for
mostly fro m
t he prac t ica l par t of m ech ani cs; he has prog r essed so e xce pt io nally far in
Limmat at t he Land vopt cischloss in Baden, Sw it zerla nd, built in
20
to
~o
m; the lon gest , at 38 m , was the br idge oyer t he 157 2 . '0
24
Retrospective
Urnasch, Kubel, 1780
Also worthy of note ar e th e Kumma bridge of 1720 in Hittisau and th e Rosanna bridge of 1765 in Streng en . Hans Ulrich Grubenmann , in particular, became astonishingly ambitious in spanning great distances with timber structures, be cause bridges with found ations in th e water were re peatedly wash ed away by floods . Only t wo of his bridges have survived in the App cnzcll canton : the Urnasch bridge of 1778 , between Hundwil and Herisau, and th e Urnasch bridge of 1780 , between Herisau and Stein im Kubel. Both of them ar e narrow, covere d bridges with a span of around 30 m and ar e designed to carry horse -drawn traffic as well.' The structu-
re of both consist s of a hanging truss with st r uts arranged in a five-sided polygon and four pairs of susp ension posts . Above all, though, it was the aforemention ed bridges in Wettingen and Schaffhausen th at aroused fam e and admiration . Two points should be conside re d her e . The first is that although these wer e vehicular bridges, th ey might well not be perceived as such today, in view of th e remarks mad e by William Cox e when he visit ed Switzerland again aft er ten years: "The bridge stret ches and gives, as though it wer e hanging on eno r mously thi ck elastic rop es; it trembles and quakes und er th e tread of any pedestrian, and under the laden car ts that drive over it, th e swaying becomes so great that the inexperi enced fear th e collapse of th e same .'" Grubenmann first wanted the Schaffhausen bridge to span th e full "9 m from bank to bank, but his clients insisted that the middl e pier of th e pr evious bridge be used as a support . Grubenmann's impressive models (among th em on e of th e Schaffhausen bridge) can be found today in the Grubenmann Collec tion in Teufen.: The lin e between footbridge and road bridge is drawn differ ently nowadays, of course, and swaying is not tol erated. Although timb er construction in Switzerland wa s also refined by Jos ef Ritter (174-5-1809) and Blasius Baldischwiler (1752 -1831), th e baton for larg e-scale
wooden bridges passed to th e Am erican bridgebuilders. 4 Th e second point conce rn s th e aesthetic effect of the bridges . A look at th em reveals nothing about th eir constr uct ion : th ey are mostly clad, making th em appear like long timber hous es , and , as th e contem porary view of the Wettingen bridge shows, th ey wer e even painted with architectural forms . The visual int egration of this bridge as a long building into its village conte xt and the way in whi ch th e pit ched roofs over the long arches of th e bridge in Schaffhausen fit into the surrounding roofscap e both confi rm that th e contemporary understanding of beauty is to be measured in terms of th e picturesque treatment of the bridges and not
I Stade lma nn, ' 9 9 0, IV 8 and 9
2 Coxc 1786, quoted in Kill er, 19 84." . )6
J The or iginal model of the Sch affhausen Bridge is in the Allerh ciligenmu scum, in Schaffhausen , and th ere is a reproduction in the Grubenmann Co llection, in
of th eir str uct ure, which could only be seen from within - and then on ly
Teuf en .
with diffi culty in the dim light . To this day, it is precisely as footbridges
4 Afte r c. 18 0 0 , large -span timber br idges are developed
th at covered wood en bridges continue to be bu ilt in th e unicjue styles of their respe ctiv e periods (pag e 14-8 onwards).
above all in th e USA by Th eodore Bur r; as truss str uc ture s, Kurrcr,
200~,
p. 47
View lnside the urnasch bridge in Kubel; structural model (below)
25
26
Retrospective
Coalbrookdale Bridge, 1779
Such co m po ne nts can be weld ed together to create br idges w it h huge spans, wh ich th anks to th e high strengt h of steel can be m ade Significa ntly more slende r th an co ncrete bridges.
Cast Iron and Wrought Iron The firs t cast -iron bridge t o be built in Fra nce, how ever, was a foot bridge . It crossed th e Ri ver Sei ne with an o verall len gth of [66 .5 m . Lo uis Alexand re de Cessar t, Inspector Ge nera l of th e Eco le des Ponts et Cha ussees , and Jacqu es Dillon built th e Pont des Arts in 1802-04 with n in e arches, eac h spann ing 18.5 m . In [984 , it was repl aced wi t h a reco nstr uc tion in steel, whi ch had seven arches ins tead of nin e .' The Pont des Ar ts is never theless sti ll mu ch loved by Parisians on account of its functio n as a footb r idge ; it is also a pla ce t o me et, or spe nd an even ing (or even t he wh ole day) , r ath er lik e a public squa re. Site d between two sto ne bridges, Pont Ne uf and Pont du Ca rrousel , th e deli cat e structu re appea rs to sk ip gracefully an d eas ily o ver th e Seine. Alo ng w it h the Passe re lle D ebill y and t he new footbridges near Solferi no (see p. (42) an d Bercy (see p . 14 4) th e Pont des Ar ts d isplays th e his t o r ical di m en sion of th e Seine 's re lati o nship t o th e city.
Science, Economy, Experimentation The effect on th e rxth cen t u r y of im pro veme nts in iro nwo rk ing ,
It was an oth er project for a pe des t r ian bri dge th at gave Antoine
Rerny Polonceau an op po rt unity t o explore the lim it s o f feasibilit y in
early calc ulat ing m ethods and th e approaching Indu st ri al Revolution
[829: his br idge across th e Sein e near ru e de Bellechass e uses cast ir on
can not be underest im at ed . Until t he end of th e [7th centu ry, t he blast
and w rought iro n in a co m bin ation of arc hes and susp ensio n bridge, wi th
furnaces in whi ch pig ir on was smelte d wer e fire d w ith woo d . T hey
a fr ee spa n of [00 m . J
r eached a m axim um t emper ature of 1200 "C, producing iron of a qu alit y
Th e develop ment of iron pro d uc t ion was defin itel y m ot ivat ed by a
and ma lle ability th at did no t permit large com ponents to be formed .
desir e for techn ologi cal progress, co upled with t he ec onom ic pro spect s
Then , in 1709 , Abr aham D arb y (1678- 1717) had th e idea of firing t he
dep endent up on it. Perh aps surpr ising lv, t hese interest s played along
fu rnaces w ith low- sulphu r co ke, wh ich allowe d temper atures of up to
with th e arc hitect ural ex pectations of abso lut ist r ul ers up t o t he end of
1500 "C to be obtaine d. Th is produ ced r unny, m alleable iron for cas ti ng -
th e t St h ce nt ury and, in so me cases, int o th e age of Eu ro pean Resto rati o n .
a mil estone for br idgebuilding, t oo , alt ho ugh th e iron thu s m anu factured
T his pla ced th e m ain em phas is on th e picturesqu e qu ality of buildings
early on wa s brittle and co uld on ly be subjec te d to load s in co mpression.
and oth er st r uc t ures, as t heir settings in Eng lish and Ge r ma n landscap e
In 1779, a design by arc hi tect T homas Farnol Pritcha rd ([723-1777)
garde ns dem on st rate per fectl y. Before th e efficie ncy of iro n (an d lat er on ,
for a wooden bridge span n ing 30 m was built u sin g cas t -iron co m po ne nts
steel) was consis te ntly and m ethod ically improved , every kn own ty pe of
as an experi ment . This becam e th e ce lebrate d iro n b rid ge of Coalbrook-
bridge had been in corp orated int o th e ran ge of availabl e design s for foo t -
dale, erected by John Wilk in son (1728-1808) and an ir o n found r y owner,
bridges and tast efull y in st alled in th e park s and garde ns of Euro pe .
Abra ha m D arby 1II (1750- [789 ). It was t he first of a li ne of cast -iron ar ched br idges, wh ich ende d , how ever, as ea rly as [81 9 with th e co nstruction ofSo ut hwa r k Bridge in London , by John Renn ie the eld er . At 73.20 m, it st ill has th e lon gest spa ns of any cast- iro n br idge in th e wo rld.' T he t yp es of steel m anufactured nowad ays fo r m st ro ng joints wh en welded an d are available as tubes, ro lled sec tions, sheet and cast par ts.
I Pclkc, Ebe rhard , 20oS", P: 24 2 Lemoine, Bertrand, Pont des Arts, in: Lcs Pc nts de Par is,
Pari s
2000,
P:
2 11
l Paris, Archives nanonalcs. Cart es ct plans ; ilustration in : Dcswat tc, Lemoi ne, 19 97, P: 9 ~ ; the Polonceau tru ss syste m was Invented by his son, Bart he lem y Cam ille Polon ccau .
Pont des Arts, built 1802-04 wit h nine arches; reconstructed in 1984 with seven arches, each span ning 22 m
27
Retrospective
28
Avington Park, around 5 km northeast of Winchester - iron bridqe, built c. 1845, repaired in 1996
":il~ ,
$.~
Bridges as Design Features for Parks Stone and wood continued to dominate bridgebuilding into the
estate at Stourhead, in Wiltshire.t Worlitz, however, stands out for the
early 19th century. The maximum free spans that could be achieved with
sheer number of bridges and var iety of bridges in its design programme .
structures of these materials gradually became clear. Cast iron offered
Almost 5"0 bridges wer e built in the Gartenreich area as a whole, 19 of
only a moderately improved performance in respect of span lengths and
which stood in Worl tt z Park . The picturesque, scenic treatment of th e
stability. All the same, bridges such as the Coalbrookdale Bridge were of
bridges and, above all, of th eir settings may well have been influenced by
such importance as models of technical innovation that they were incor-
William Chambers . Chambers had travelled to China, where he had
porated as standard design features in parks and landscaped gardens. In
become acquainted with the Chinese approach to designing buildings and
this context , footbridges played an astonishing role, being used as models
gardens; in 1749 he had begun studying under Jacques Francois Blondel at
to illustrate everything of importance in bridgebuilding in general. They
the Ecole des Arts in Paris, later visiting Rom e to see its Classi cal and
demonstrate in miniature what distinguishes mere bridgebuilding from
Renai ssanc e architecture . Back in England, Chambers began planning
the art of bridge deSign; there is a focus on aesthetic issues , which were
Kew Gardens in 175"5. Nothing is left to chance in th ese picturesque and
unfortunately to become neglected in large-scale bridgebuilding. Today it
carefully composed gardens : visitors are led along a "beauty line" from
is still - or rather, onc e again - possible to see one of the best examples
one enchant ing view to another - and small bridges ar e an integral part
and Thomas \Vciss (eels}:
of this fashion for footbridges : the Gartenreich ar ea bet ween Dessau and
of these scenic compositions. Th e bridge programme at Worlit z also
Kult urlandsch aft , Stuttgart 1996 ;
Worlitz, the first landscaped park to be laid out in a German state.' This
include s an educational element with its roots in Enlightenment thinking.
Sperlich, Mar tin , in: Daidalos
model agricultural area and the landscaped garden at its heart were laid
Typ es of bridge from different eras and cultures with different methods
Llnendlich schon. Das Gartcnrcich Dcssau-Worlit z,
out on a grand scale by Leopold III Friedrich Franz von Anhalt- Dessau,
of construction appear like stage sets as on e walks among its many
who came of age in 175"8, and his ar chitect Friedrich Wilhelm von
wat erways . The topography of the former flood plain has been artificially
Erdmannsdorff, beginning in 1764. Prior to that, they had travelled in
varied in the park to create different landscapes in miniature, for which
England, among other countries, familiarizing th emselves with th e latest
matching footbridges have been chos en - or vice versa: th e chain bridge
ideas in places such as West Wycombe Park, belonging to Sir Francis
needs a ro ck y chasm; the miniature version of the iron bridge of
Dashwood-, Kew Gardens by William Chambers, and Henry Hoare's
Coalbrookdale is given a gradually rising emban kment; an overgrown
I
Bechtholdt, Prank -And reas.
wc ltbtld \Vorlit z. Entwurf cin cr
\7, ' 997, p. 741"·;
Berlin 100~ 2
Trauzette l, Ludwig:
Bru ck cnb aukunst , in : Llncndlich
schon , 200~, n .p. 3 Spe rlich, ' 997, p. 76
4 Burkhard t , Ber told : Das Bruckcnprogramm in W6r1itz, in : \Veltbild Worlitz, 1996 ,
pr. 2°7 - 218
Wbrlltz
Coalbrookda le Bridge in miniature, 1791
Cha in bridge, suspended between two artificial cliffs
path lead s t o th e swi ng br idge and so on . T his ri ch and var ied desig n pro g ram me has been desc ribed in deta il by Berthold Bu rckhardt , wh o was in charge of t he r e cent rep ai r an d reconst ruc tion of the Wiirl it z br id ges. 4 Landscap ed garde ns like thi s on e co uld well be th ou gh t o f as a pr e fig u ring so me of the id eas in Di sn eyland . O n th e ot he r hand , it is a lso clear t hat t he sma ll -sca le br idge wa s ga in ing a d eg re c o f autonom y, albei t p r im arily in th e sens e o f or nament a nd edu cation a nd less be cause of it s pot en ti al fo r st r uct u ra l cx pe r imc nta t io n . Regrettably, no t all o f t hc park 's m oveabl e b r idg es have su r vived , alt ho ugh the Ag ne s Bri dgc, a D u tc h sw ing br idgc , m ay st ill perhap s be r ccons t r ucted . It is also re ma rkable that alt hough , besid es Chinoiserie , it was Swi ss sce nes that were co nside re d t o be part icul arl y pictu resqu e , wo o den bridges o f the Swi ss t ype and even Alpin e -stvlc , covered, wood en bridges ar e mi ssing in W orlitz .
29
30
Retrospective
The High Bridge
White Bridge, 1773
The bridges and the land scape t yp olog y in Worlitz co mplement each other to create a co nsiste ntly at mos pheric and often m agnificent whol e. Her e, once again , th er e is an invocation of something th at is already imp lici t in th e ide a itself, less ut opi an th an unworldly: th e harm on iou s unity of natu re and technology; th e accord in th e souls of th e arti st and the te chnician ; th e simultaneity of th e ideal of beauty and fulfilm ent of fun ct ion . What footbridges can achi eve with alm ost m agical ease becom es proportionately mor e diffi cult for br idges at th e larger scales demanded by modern t ra ffic flow s. A single generation later, cri ticism was voiced of th e pictu resqu e approach t aken at Worlit z, of whi ch foo tbri dges wer e an esse nt ial part. The philosoph er Geor g Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel (1770 -1831) wrote, "Wher eas a hug e park , espec ially if rigg ed ou t with
Chinese pagodas, Turkish mo sques, Swiss chalets , bridges , hermitages, and goodness knows what other cur ios iti es , claim s our attention on its ow n accou nt ; it pr et end s to be and to mean som ething in it sel f. But our allure ment vanish es as soon as it is sati sfied , and we can hardl y look at this sor t of thing tw ice, because the se t rimm ings offer to th e eye nothing infinite , no indwell ing soul, and beside s th ey are on ly wearisom e and burden som e when we want rec reat ion and a st ro ll in conver sat ion with a Hegel , Georg Wi lhelm Pried r'ich , I, trans . TM . Knox, Ox ford, 199 8, vol. 2, I
pp. 699-7 0
fri end .'" From a histori cal po int of view, th is crit icism ignores th e holi sti c significance oflate rxth -ccntur y landscaped parks, in whi ch br idges also demonstrated struct ura l kn owl edg e .
Drawbridge at the swan pool
Sun Bridge, 1796, spann ing 8 m; the rolled iron of the springings came from England
31
32
Retrospective
Bridge in the parkof Charlottenburg Palace, Berlin, 1801
Int er est in sce n ic land scapes, whi ch should not be without br idges, revived per iod ically . In th e 19th ce nt ury , Fri edrich Ludwig von Sckell (1750-1823), Pet er Jos eph Lenne (1789-1866) and Herrmann von Piickl erMusk au (1785-1871) designed gardens that delight in eclect icism to an aston ishi ng degree, with a tend ency to give th e "natural" its due . Although footbridges no long er played th e rol e that the y had in Dessau-W orlitz. th ey wer e not negl ected as a design feature in pa rk s, as is illu strated here by Ferdinand von Tri est 's 12 m span, cast-iron bridge of 1801 in Ch arlottenburg Park, Berlin, and the Devil 's Bridge of 1852 in Kassel, t o name but tw o. In England, th e home of th e lands cap ed park , th er e ar e co untl ess examples of bridges being used as the centre piece s of sceni c compos it ions. The national ga rde n festivals held at regular interval s in d ifferent plac es, have th ei r roots in a different tradition: that of th e rxth- century botanical collec tion. They too sometimes provide opportunit ies to build high -quality footbr idges as part of urban improvem ent schemes , as is shown on page 196.
The Devil's Bridge, Wilhelmshbhe Park, Kassel, 1792-93, by Heinrich Christoph Jussow
33
34
Fa ustus Verantius, 1615
Fischer von Erlach, bridge in Sina, 1721
Winch Bridge - second version of the bridgefirst built in 1741 , sketch by Cumm ing, 1824, from Peters
Suspension Bridges - Experiments in Iron and Steel
Fisch er von Erlach to expre ss sheer aston ishm ent, when he reports on
As we m entioned earlier, from the late 18th centur y onwards, engi-
on e of "the wond erful chain bridges in China, built from th e peak of on e
neers found th emselves confronte d with new tasks as a result of develop -
mountain to another with boards on twenty iron chains near th e town of
ments in iron technology and th e ons et of industr ialization . At first , cast
Kingtung.'" The stories told by Euro pe an travellers of rop e and chain
iron had be en used structurally in th e same way as timber ; the iron was
bridges in far -off China certainly ex pre ss admiration . Fischer von Erlach 's
brittle and could not be subj ected to any ten sile load. Improving th e
source of infor ma t ion for th e Chinese ch ain hridge was a work published
tensile st rength of this material went hand in hand with the development
in 1667 by a Jesuit , Athanasius Kir cher , China Monum enti s lllustrat a - th e
of chain , wire rop e and wi re cable suspe nsion bridges . It quickly becam e
depictions are similar in every respect.
clear that th e limits of what was po ssible had not yet been reached, by any
The development of th e suspen sion bridge did not really hegin to
means. ' In connection with th e earliest chain, wire rope and wire cable
tak e off in Eu rope until the 19th cent ur y, when it became technologicall y
susp ension bridges, the footbridge acquired a rol e that earned it incr easing
and econom ically attract ive to produce iron and steel for th e manufacture
attention : that of th e exper imenta l prototype, serving in trial runs of
of chains , cable and wire rop e . Th e mo st important bridges were built in
new structures based on th eory or res earch .
ar eas of rapid industrialization , wh ere th e spirits of com me rce and
To a consider able degree, stimuli came from other cult ures . It is particularly inter esting, for example , how Johann Bernhard Fisch er von
invention came together. In the following secti ons, we will tak e a look at th e early chain susp ension hridges, then the wire cable and wire rop e
Erla ch, writing in 1721, treats bridges in th e first -ever outline of ar ch itec-
susp ension bridges. In England and Germany, it was mostly chain
tural history as such . In his second book, which conce rns th e art of build-
suspe nsion hridges that wer e built, wher eas wire rope was experimented
ing in Roman times, he mentions Augustus' bridge across th e Tib er (a
with in other count r ies.
monumental stone bridge with dimen sions suitabl e for a herd of elephants) and Hadrian 's bridge to th e Castel Sant 'Angelo, wh ich is som ewhat more modest. Fischer von Erla ch is mu ch mor e deepl y impress ed, how ever, by bridges made in other ways and by other cult u res, which he considers in I
Werner, ' 973;
\ Vagn er, Egermann , 1987; Pet er s, 198]
Chain bridges The Scholl encn ravine on th e St Gotthard pass in Swit zerland was
his third book. This is ded icat ed to th e arch itecture of th e Ar abs and
supposedl y th e site of a chain bridge built as early as the rjth century.
Turks , th e Persians , the Chinese and Japan ese. One t ype of bridge mov es
Better known , because th ey are th e old est surviving illustrations in this
Hscher von Erlach , Zwei tcs Buch
2
1] 21,
35
Winch bridge in Midd leton, 1830, repaired 1974
field, ar c th ree suspe nsio n br idge designs described in a boo k on mec ha n ics by Fau stus Vcran ti u s in 1615-17. Hi s chain br idge is more like an eye bar b r idge , hanging fro m m assive t ow ers, and in pa r ts it ant icipat es t he cha in -stayed br idge . Vcra nti us' Maclunae Novae was soo n trans late d into man y langu ages, whic h was consistent in view of Verant ius ' (155 1-1617) person a as a mult ilingu al polym ath and aut hor of dict io nar ies. Incid entall y, th e wo rd th at he used for cast iron tran slat es as " bell food" . 1 T he next oldes t bridge becam e surpris ingly well kn o wn . It was th e legen dar y ped estri an cha in suspension bridge th at spa nned 21 m across t he River Tees ncar M idd leto n , in Cu mbr ia. It was built in 1741 to shorte n th e jou rn ey fo r wo rk ers go ing to Midd leton fr om Holwi ck , o n t he ot he r side of t he rive r. 4 Th e wa lkway, wh ich co ns iste d of timber boards lyin g on chai ns , wa s apparently given a modicu m of sta bil ity by four tensi le chains anc hore d do wn in t he valley ; onl y o n o ne side wa s t here a hand r ail lor safety. T he br idge att rac te d visit ors from far and w ide, many of wh o m were greatly alar me d by th e degr ee t o whi ch it swaye d . A poet [rom Ne wcastle described it as a "da nci ng br idge".\ In 1802, t he chai ns par ted und er t he weight of ni ne people and alt ho ugh it was subsequently re pa ire d , it was replace d in 1830 by a new bridge site d a little farther up stream , whi ch aga in re qu ire d a spa n Of21 m . T his second br idge was com pletely resto re d in 1974 . T he span t hat could be achieve d with cha ins had been demon strat ed by t he Chinese muc h earl ie r, in 170 6, wit h t he han gin g Tat u bridge in Lutingch ao ; st ill stand ing today, it has ni ne eve bar chains and it spa ns aro un d 100 m . h
Meh r t en s,
19 0 0,
p. ~f.
l'c u-rs. ' 987, P: 2]
Marrcv, 19 9 0 , P: 116 [ wer t , 20 0 3, p. P
36
Retrospective
Melrose, 1828; below : collapse of the bridge in Brighton
Th e fascin ati on of suspension bridges and th e oppor t u nities th ey offered for imp ro vin g transport gave a new imp etu s to bridgebuilding , initially in th e Un ited States of Amer ica : patent s wer e sec ured and reco rd s broken . Jam es Finley (1756- 1828) bu ilt th e first chain br idge wit h a ri gid deck over St Jacob 's Cree k in 1801; it had a span of2 1m .' He had th is design o f bri dge pat ented immedi ately - un fortunately, non e of Finl ey's bridges have sur vived . The st iffeni ng of th e deck was decisive in gain ing acce pta nce of thi s type of bridge in Europe and th e USA - how ever fond peopl e may ot her wise have been of "d ancin g bridges". In th e UK , th e chain sus pe nsion bridge spread very qui ckl y and again, th e footbridge took on an expe r imenta l fun ct ion . In [8[7, a cha in bridge was built ac ross the River Tweed near Dryburgh by th e brothers John and William Smith; while in th e same year Redp ath & Brown built Kin gs Meadow Bridge , which spanned 33.5 m , also over th e Rive r Tweed near Peebl es.' Th e chain bridge at Dryburgh collapsed afte r a short tim e in 1818; th e cur rent bridge (a cable suspensio n bridge) dat es from 1872. T homas Telford ([757-1834) and Isamb ard Kingdom BruneI (180 6-59) dared stra ight away to build , on a mu ch larger scale, bridges that wer e no lon ger exclusively for ped estrian s: th e Menai St rai t Bridge (1826) ; t he chain brid ge at Co nwa y Castl e (1822 -26), and th e Clifton Suspe nsion Bridge ([864) .1A span lon ger th an th e 10 0 m had already been achieved in [820 by Sir Samue l Brown's Uni on Bri dge near Berwick , also across th e Tweed. Brow n had been expe r ime nting w it h chain bridges since [808, bravin g repeated set backs such as th e sever e dam age cause d by high winds to his chain bridge for Bright on pier in [836. 4 Altho ugh brid ge portals wer e st ill frequentl y built of stone , as at Melro se in [828 and Glasgow in 1855, th ey were increasingly be ing constr ucted as steel tru sses (es pec ially for cable suspension bridges), as at Dumfries in 1875 and Peebl es in 1905 - th e latt er ri ch ly orna m ente d (see illu st rat ion s on p. 46) . Portland Stree t Br idge in Glasgow, de sign ed by ar chitect Alexand er Kirkland and engineer Geor ge Martin with a resp ect able spa n of 126 m , is a good example of how sto ne portals help to int egrate bridges int o th e urban co ntext of th e city and pr event th em app ea ring as an all too sel f-co nta ined t echnical const r uc t. The sto ne portals seem to Ewer-t , 2003. P' S8 J Pe ter s , 19 8] . p. 17
I
1 Building work on the Clifton
Bridge was inte rrupted fo r po litical reaso ns from 1842-60 .
Pugslt·y, SirAlfred «('{I.). The \ Vo rks of Isamhard Kingdom Bruncl , an Eng ineer ing ApprC'ciation , Bristol , 1976 4
Pe ter s , 1987 . P' 95
be part of th e urban fabri c , wher eas th e steel fra me portals, such as th ose o f th e bridge in Peebl es, belon g com pletely to th e bridge as a unit . The Glasgow br idge , parts of wh ich had to be renewed in 1871, is highl y rega rded nowadays and is illuminated as a city land mark . The bridge in Melrose was rest or ed in [991, befor e which it had been limited to car ry ing no mor e th an eight peopl e at a tim e.
37
PortlandStreet Bridgein Glasgow, 1855
The fat es of these earl y cases make it quite clear that th e main structural problem for suspension bridges was oscillation . Pr act it io ners well versed in chai n bridges, suc h as James Dredge (1794 -1863) and Rol and Mason Audish certainly built co untless chain bridges, but m ost of th em collapsed aft er a fairl y short tim e .
Retrospect
38
e
Chain bridge, "Kettensteg", Nuremberg, 1824
In 1900, Georg Mehrtens (1843-1917), professor of engineer ing at th e Technische Hochschule in Dresden, r eflected so be rly that "Wholly in
in Malapane (a ce nt re of iron production) in Upper Silesia in 1825" had 75"
co nt r ast to arched bridgebuilding, the building of suspension bridges has
cat tl e herded onto it as a test of its loadbearing capacit y - hardly something
at no time r eally got going in Germany.'" In Mehrtens' opinion, only a
that would be done for a mere footbridge . s In 1828, an other chain
few early chain bridges were of importance. As far as is known today, th e
su spen sion bridge de signed for larger loads was built in Bamberg, with
old est surviving chain suspension br idg e in Germany is th e "Kettensteg", a
towers design ed by Leo von Klenze . Fourteen years later, a traffic
footbridge built across th e Pegnitz in Nuremberg by Johann Georg Kupplcr
restriction was introduced for reasons of safety and in 1891 this br idg e
in 1824-25", which spans a respectable 80 m. According to a Prussian
was demolished. One of th e bridges that has survived, ho wever, is th e
publication of 1822, th e idea of su sp ending bridges wa s first proposed by
early, sm all footbridge in the 11mpark in W eimar, dating from 1833,
Carl Immanuel Loscher in 1784; piers and trestles cou ld be dispens ed
which is suspended from three parallel ch ains on each side and spans
with if the bridge deck were to be suspended, for whi ch Loscher re com-
a mere 14 .8 m.
mended bars or chains . 2 Of th e chain bridg e in Nuremberg, th e four main suspension chains , hangers and railings remain . The suspension chains
p. 7r; Vcr han d lungc n des Vcrei ns zur
I Meh r ten s, ' 9 ° 0 , 2
Bcford crun g des Gcwcr bcfleillcs in Prcu ssen , Berlin, 1822 , p. 127
3 Petri , Kreutz, Stahlbau, }. 2004,
pp. 308 ~3 11
4 Pclkc, p. JJ
carts and coaches : a chain su sp en sion bridge spanning 31 m th at was built
The t ale of th e small pedestrian bridge spann ing 28.1 m across the upper Ruhr in the park of Laer manor in Mesched e is an interesting on e.
consist of tension rods with hooked ends and eyelets . Its original oak
It was r ediscovered towards th e end of the [990S . In 1998, a researcher
pylons were replaced in 1909 by steel truss m ast s - a change that caus ed
studying the archives of the m anor's owner found a manuscript by Johann
problems with d yn amic loads : pin joints and riv ets worked loose, not
August Robling, contain ing a detailed de scription and calculat ion s for
least because it had become a popular amusem ent to set th e deck os-
a 75" m suspension bridge across the Ruhr near Freicnohl. 6 Robling had
cillating. In [931, both secti ons of th e bridge were stabilized w ith two
placed great emphasis on stiffening his br idge adequately, in addition to
ti mber trestles each , fix ed to foundations in th e riv erbed . Sinc e th en ,
which he had proposed an alt ernative des ign with lengths of wire cabl e
private groups have repeatedly attempted to have th e Kettensteg r estored
instead of chains . The manuscript, from 1828, gives th e young Robling 's
5 Hauausfiihrungen des
to its original st at e .: Also built in 1824 was Christian Gottfried Heinrich
position as "Conducteur", roughly equivalent to a construction manager.
Berlin , 184 2, p. 67 (no te by
Bandhauer's (1790 -1837) pedestrian bridge across th e riv er Saale in Nien-
His solution was lat er adopted by a coll eague, A. Bruns, wh en designing
burg: a chain-stayed bridge on timber pylons, whi ch tragically collapsed
the much sm alle r chain su spension bridge at Laer manor, completed in
in th e following year und er th e load of a large number of townsfolk at a
1839 . It stood unnoticed on th e privately owned property for many years
public celebration . 4 In spite of the occasional bad expe r ience , German engineers were soon con structing chain bridges of larger dimensions that could also car r y
until its significance was reali zed in 1998, wh en it was giv en listed monu ment status." Th is did not prevent a tree from falling on on e of its pylons during a stor m in 2007. Although temporary m easures were immediately
Prcu ssischen Staatc s, vel .
I,
Andreas Kahlo w] 6 Schm itz, Ch risto ph, Di e Ruhrbrii ck en , Mu nster, 2004,
P: 126
7 Gr unsky, Eberhard, Von den Anfange n des Il angch riickenb aus in \Ves tfalen, in : Z ci tschrift w cstfalcn, vol. ] 6, Munich, 1998,
pp. 100-159 ;
Schm itz , 2004, p. 163f.
Altenbergsteg, Bern e, 1857
Laer, 1838-39
tak en to stabilize it and pr e\ 'ent it from collapsing, the bridge wa s a pitiful sight. Half of a pylon had to be repl aced with a tempora ry structure of st eel bea ms, while frei gh t ti c -down straps t ook th e place of broken or endanger ed han ger s. Th e old est suspe nsio n bridge in BelBilJm is thought to be a sm all footbrid ge in th e park of Wi ssck crke m anor, whi ch was built in 1824, th e same year as Nu re m berg's Ketten steg. Spanning 23 rn , it wa s design ed in th e English chain bridge t radi ti o n by Jean -Bapti st e Vilqu ai n, an eng ineer from Bru ssel s wh o had travell ed aro u nd Eng lan d . ~ T he same year saw th e foundati on of th e Gesellsclliiftfiir Kettenbriickenbau (chain bridge co ns t r uc t ion co mpa ny) in Vienna by Ign az yon Miti s, wh ich built th e city 's fir st cha in sus pe ns ion bridge fou r yea rs lat er - thi s was th e fir st br idge to have chains m ade of stee l, but unfortunately it was di smantled in 1880 to m ake way fo r a lar ger bridge . y Th e oldes t sun i\'ing chain sus pe ns io n bridge in Switzerland is probabl y t he Alt enbergst eg in Berne, built in 18p by a nat ive of t hat city, ch ief eng ineer Gu st av Gr.inic hc r (182 0 -18 79). W ith a width of 2.1m and a len gth of p m , t his foot br idge, now a list ed monument, co n nec ts the old city ce ntre (after m aking th e steep descent to th e river Aare) with th e Altenbe rg qua rt er. It is st iffene d by lat ti ce gir ders that sim u ltaneo usly fun ction as its para pe ts ; th e supe rstr uc t ure has cross -brac ing to pre yent lat er al deformati on . Th e fl at chains arc m ade up of m embers 3 m lon g, eac h of whi ch consists of four pa rallel rib s measuring 9 cm wid e and 1.7 cm thi ck . Th ese cha ins r un oyer roc king pier s and are ancho re d in th e rive r em ban kme nt at t he so ut he rn end and in th e grou nd at th e northern end.
X
de Bou w, ;\1., I. Wo ute rs .
Im-e stigat io n of t he re stor ation o f th e iro n suspens io n hr idgt'
at t he cast le of Wis sckcr kc-,in : \V ITTransactions on t he Built Envi ro nment ,
\ 0 1.
Rl, 200S
') Mehr tens , 1900 , p. 6
39
40
Retrospective
St Petersburg, Post Office Bridge across the Moyka , 1824, span 35 m
Paris, Buttes-Chaumont, 1867
In France, th e focus of int er est was mo r e on cable and wire bridges , but of course chain bridges were built as well. The country's first chain
Th e first two decades ofthe 19th century were r emarkable for an unpreced entedl y rapid transfer of knowledge and technology across
bridge was th e Drac river bridge near Gr en obl e, built by Crozet and
national and language barriers, as far as Ru ssia . When it came to solving
Jourdan in 1827 .1 In 1839 , Berdoly and Dupouy built a chain bridge across
tricky te chnical probl ems, th e court in St Pet ersburg readily calle d on
th e Agen with a span of 174 m , but tests showed that it would be un able to
th e services of French or Germ an experts . Notable names in th e field of
car ry the planned load s, so it had to be rein forced, finally being reopened
bridge bUilding include a Span iard , Augus tin Betancourt
in 1841. Even so, it failed to last long, and in 1882 th e chains wer e repla ced
Fren chman, Pierre -Dominique Bazain e (1786-1836), and two Germans,
(17~8-1824), a
by four steel cables on each side. At first , no more th an 60 people were
Wilhelm von Traitteur (1788 -18~9) and Carl Fr iedrich von Wiebeking
permitted on th e bridge at an yone time , but in 1906 thi s was reduced to
(1762-1842) - th e latter working from Munich . Traitteu r had little success
2~ ;
th en in 1936th e main susp ension cables had to be repl aced . In th e early
19~os,
high wat er levels in th e Garonne damaged th e bridge, which had
as an enginee r in his native Baden, but in 1813 he was introduced to the Tsar of Russia , who was married to a princess of Baden . In th e following
been in need of repair in any case , leading to incr easing doubts about it s
year, he began work in St Pet ersburg und er th e Spaniard Betancourt,
long-term stability. In 2001-2002, the complete bridge was reconstructed .'
taking over as super intende nt of bridges in 1821. 4 Pierre-Dom inique
The challenge of br idge building naturally app eal ed to on e particular en-
Bazaine, who had come to St Petersburg before Traitteur, expe r ime nte d
gin eer with an aptit ude for business : Gustave Eiffcl (1832 -1923). In 1867,
with cable suspension bridges as early as 1823. The bridge built in th e park
he built a 63.86 m span chain suspe nsion bridge in the park of Buttes -
of Catherine Palac e in th e sam e year was, however, a chain susp ens ion
Chaumont. However, he never favoured this typ e of bridge , preferring to
bridge, because th e production of wire was not as far advanced in Russia
exploit th e pos sibilities offered by steel truss structures. The chains of
as it was in France.s Although it was probably th e first of its type to be built
this bridge have, in th e meantime, been replaced by wi re cables.:
in Russia, chain susp ension bridges had not been unknown th er e before that : Nikolaus Fuss from Swit zerland (Euler 's succ esso r at the St Pet ers bu rg Academy of Sciences) had deSigned a susp ension bridge spanning 300 m across th e r iver Ne va many years earlie r. Traitteur worked on
Peter s, 1987, P' 68 La Passcr cllc d ' Agen. Lc sauvctage d 'un ouvrage histor ique, in: Freyssinet Magazine, Jan -April 20 0 3; Lccinq . Ben oit, and Sebastian Petit, Ren ovation of the I
2
footh rid ge over the Garo nnc in .\ gen , in: foothridge 20 0 2 ,
proceedings, Pl'. 120 - 121 3 Lcfrcsn c.Y,, La
recon stru cti on de la passerel] e sus pcnduc des Butt es Chaumont, in: Travaux , 482,
May 197), p. 50
chain bridges on a larg e and a small scale simult aneously. His three pe-
4 Fcdo rov, 20 0 0 , P'
destrian bridges have survived : th e Post Office Bridge of 1824across th e
6
5 ibid . • P' 184
ibid.• P' 197
80
Bank Bridqe, 1825-26, span 21 .5 m
Lion Bridge, 1825-26, span 23.5 m
Moyka r iver and th e Lion and Bank br idges of 182, - 26 over Catheri ne
hesit at e to atte mpt large , high -m aintenance cha in bri dges, som e of
(now Griboyedov) Canal. Fo r t he br idge across th e Moyka, t he Swiss en -
whi ch are st ill in use to day, the chain suspension bri dge was not des t ine d
gineer Henri Gu illa ume Du fou r had sent pl ans to St Peter sburg - t hese
for a glor io us fut ure . The fata l co llaps e of a chain br idge in Angers in
can no lo nger be fou nd, but it shou ld be noted that a model of h is St An -
[8, 0 , designed by th e h ighl y ex per ienced engineers Joseph Cha ley and
toin e bridge did ex ist in t he teachin g collect ion in St Petersburg.
Th eodore Bordillon , was a serious set back . Better prospects were offere d
In 1823, Trait teu r began designi ng this sm all bridg e, span ning 35 m ; in
by the developm ent of wire cab le and wire rope brid ges, in which advances
o rder to r educe osci llat ions, t he main suspensio n cha ins were to be fixed
we re made by t he Segu in broth ers and Henri Gui llaume D ufo ur in France
t o th e deck in t he middle of the bridge (sag -to -spa n ra t io
and Switz erland , an d by Bri x and (lat er) Roblin g in Ge rmany - alt hough
I : 16).
Two
cha ins consisti ng of 19 eyeba rs each sup port t he br idge via 36 hangers, t hey run over
2., m high cast -iron obelis ks an d cur ved , spo ked fr am es
dow n t o cast -iron gro un d plates. Fo r t he two ot her br idges, Tr aitteu r abandoned th e obelisks in favour of anima l fig ures , nam ely lions and g rypho ns - th e latter bei ng an heraldic beast on t he coa t of arms of Alexa nde r von Wii rttemb erg, who ran th e Russian hi gh ways aut hori t y in St Pete rsbu rg. T his design innovati on g ives t hese brid ges t heir specia l char m - animal fig ures as anchorages for chains or wire ro pes do ap pea r agai n at a lat er date o n th e Lion Bridge in Berlin (see p . 4 8) , but apa rt fro m thi s th ey d id not en joy success in engine er ing cir cles . Tr aitt eu r returned t o Germany in 1830, afte r wh ich he built lit t le . All t hree foot bri dges wer e listed as p ro tected monum ents in 19 35, since when t hey have all been renovated, gen erally overhau led or recons tructed . 6 Foo t bridge construction certain ly served as a fiel d of exper ime nt at ion in t his early phase of the new construction t ypology, albeit one in whi ch t here were in it iall y ma ny failur es. W hile t he engine ers did not
th e latter emigrated to th e U SA in 1831. The challenges faced by t he engineers of the early wire cable an d wire ro pe br idges are descr ibed br iefl y on th e following pages.
41
42
Retrospective
Suspension bridge over the Cance in Annonay, 1822
--..,.....,....._...-_M
Pont StAntoine, Geneva, 1823
Cable and Wire Rope Bridges Chains proved to be too susceptible to failure - if a link in th e chain were to snap, th is would immediately have dire consequences for the
tion methods opened up new perspe ctives for what had, until then, been
st abilit y of th e whole structure . It was therefore important to de velop an
a risky type of construction . Bruno Plagniol and Claude Henri Navier,
alt ernative, in the form of flexible and durable rope of wrought iron w ires .
both of whom wer e bridge and road engineers , be came interested in th e
This was of particular interest to th e m ining industry, whi ch needed a
idea of suspension bridges in general, and worked out a th eoretical basis
more efficient means of ext ract ion at th e pithead . The problem was
for building with wire rop es .
addressed by Wilhelm August Julius Albert, director of mines in Clausthal in Germany, who inv ented what is supposed to have be en the first ever
Verreet , Roland, Etn kur ze Gcsc hichte des Drahtscils, 20 0 2 2 Peter s, 19 87, p. 171 3 Gabriel, Knut, Hochfeste Zuggliede r, Manuskript , Uni ver sit y of Stuttgar t , 1991- 9 2;
\ Vagncr, Eger mann, 198)
4
Encouragement also came from an un expected qua rter: th e banker and industrialist Benjamin D eless ert , who was appointed pr esident of the
wire rope in [834. It had a diameter of 18mm and co ns isted of three
Banque de France in 1802at the age of 29. Shortly before that, he had set
strands of four wires each .' In the construction industry, the aerial
up a sugar factory in Passy ; it was there that he later decided to build a
spinning process patented by Roebling, who had em igrated in 1831 to the
link between his house and th e factory premises . In [824, work went
USA, m et with success where long (and thus heavy) cabl es were needed,
ahead : Delessert pragmatically chose a co m bina t ion of chains and w ire
because it allowed lightweight Single wires to be "spun in place without
cable bundles for th e 1.2 m wide footbridge, which spanned p m. The
support" into a thick cabl e of parallel wires.' By the second half of th e
main suspension elem ents we re four bundles of 100 wires each , alongside
19th cent ur y, the most important t yp es of cable or wire rope were already
two chains made up of iron bars 4 m long and 2 cm thick. They ran over th e
known and subsequent progres s wa s limited to making improvements in
top of two wooden towers, behind which t hey wer e anchored in massive
the materials, th e cross-sect ional geometry of th e wires, and th eir
masonry blocks. The hangers were attached to them at intervals of t m .!
arrangement in the strands and rope. T
In Europe , it was French engineers wh o pioneered the development of cabl e suspension bridges, with th e help of theoreticians whose calcula-
l
In th e USA, Jo siah Ha zard and Erskine White , manufacturers of
Del es sert, however, did not want to become a bridge builder and he counsell ed anyone with an interest in su spension bridges to seek advice
4 Navier, Claud e Henri, Rapport et Mcmoire sur les Pont s Suspendus, 1823; Ewer t ,
2003 .
p. )8
) Marrey, 1990, P: 121 ; Pet er s, 1987,
P: 68
wire cable , began with (yet again) a footbridge : the first-ever cable
from Navier, Seguin, Dufour, Dupin and Cordier - w ith good r eason :
6 Casciato, Mar istc lla: Le Pon t dc'I ournon , in: L'arr des
suspension bridge, built in 1816 over the Schuylkill Falls in Philadelphia .
after r ead ing an article about cabl e suspe nsio n bridges published in the
7 Marrey, 19 9 0 , P: 121; Pet er s,
Its impressiv e span of 124 m would not be exceeded for decades , alt hough
official gazette Le Moniteur in 1821, th e brothers Marc (1786-1875) and Jul es
it did coll apse shortly after being built, under the weight of a snowfall.
Seguin (1796-1868) had embarked on an audacious project to build a cable
ingenieu r s, p. ' 987.
510
p. 68 f.
8 Pet ers, 1987, 9
p. 124 r. p. 122
Marre y, 19 9 0,
Photographs taken in summer 2007
sus pe ns io n brid ge across th e River Rh on e between Tain and Tournon . h Onc« agai n , th e new t yp e o f co ns t r uc tion was fir st t r ied out o n a foot bridge: in
18 22 ,
Seguin and Navicr built a sma ll bridge across t he Cancc,
ncar Vcrnosc lcs Annonay, on a propert y belon ging to Mar c Seg uin off wh at is now th e
[) 27 0
ro ad . Over a metre wid e , th e bridge ma nag ed a
spa n of 18 m .? It was car r ied by six cable bundles of eight wires eac h , \\ ith t lu- deck resting o n four of th em and th e ot he r t wo serYing add it ion all x as hand rail s. In th e middle , it was g uye d down t o lar ge ro ck s in th e ri vcr to pr e\ ent it fro m sway ing badl y. Today th e brid ge , whi ch wax later st re ngt hen ed with t w iste d wire rop es, is a sor ry sight : it is falling apar t, as arc th e buildi ngs of th e form er paper facto r y. It is, how ever, st ill po ssible to mak e o ut th e rudim ent s of th e wire assembly. Furt he r ex per ience lor th e Tain -Tournon bridge was gained with th e co nst r uct io n of a nar r o w footb rid ge span n ing 30 m ac ro ss th e Gal au re at St Vallier, \\ hich stood until 1844 , S and a bridge acro ss th e Eyr ieux between St Fo rt unat and St Lau re nt , th e sto ne portals of whi ch sti ll exist. Another It)()tbridge with an expe r ime ntal cha rac ter was built rou ghl\ at th e sam e tim e by Bruno Plagniol. H is so n Fran coi s lat er w rote th at it had been
18
m lon g and
90
em w ide and had crosse d th e Ri ver
Pavr c ncar Chorncr ac . He o m it te d to m ention th at his fath er's bridge had been dcst ro vcd by a high wi nd soo n afte r const r uc t io n. " Doubts were ind eed voiced about th e safety of thi s ty pe of br idge . Seguin , who was a technician t hro ugh and through, as well as a m echani cal "n gine"r and tran sport organiser, did not lack practi cal proofs, whi ch he
43
Retrospective
44
Passerelle Saint Vincent, 1832, 75 m span
published in 1824 in Des ponts enfi l defer [O n iron wire bridges J. That summer , work began on the Pont de Tournon across the River Rh on e, for
second ha lf of the ce nt ury. Givin g examples here ca n only convey a sma ll
whi ch th e Seg uins bore t he full costs and ri sk . To st iffen th e deck, th ey
part of the histor y of bridgebu ildin g as we sketc h it out country by co untry .
used th e railings, designing th em as trussed gi rde rs . Complet ed in 1825,
To sta rt w ith, we focu s on Lyon, becau se th e city at th e confluence of th e
th e bridge was unfortunately demolished in 19 65 .
Rh one and Saone river s was endo wed wi th several historically signi fica nt
The fir st cable suspe nsion br idge for public use, how ever , was built in Sw itze rl and, by Seguin in coope rat ion w it h Henri Dufour. Seguin's
of 1852. Th e latter two suspe nsio n br idges were blown up by German tro-
(1787 -1875) suffic iently to awak en his int er est in th e w ire cable br idge. '
ops on 1 and 2 September 194 4 , but th ey wer e recon struct ed under th e
On I Augu st 1823, th e world 's fir st public br idge to be suppor ted on ly by
directi on of Andre Mogar ay after th e wa r.»
in Geneva . With a width of 2 m and a length of 84 rn, this foot br idge was
19 9 0 .
p. 122; Pet er s ,
Pelk c , '98 7, p. 69 3 For a co mpilatio n of th e first
articles since 1807 . sec Peters, ' 987,
p. 69
4 Pelletier, Jean, Ponts et Quais
de Lyon, Lyon, 20 02 , P'
21
f.
of Lyon w ith toda y's cit y ce nt re across th e River Saone since 25 O ct ob er 1832, and it may be accepted as being th e or iginal structure . To th e sout h
each ; it was calculate d for a load of approximately 160 peop le and was
of it are the Passer elle du Palais de Ju st ice , a cable- st ayed bridge fr om
guyed in several places to count er act deformati on .
19 83- 84 , and furth er south th e Passer elle Saint Georges , whi ch delights
th e visitor with its beaut iful proportions and its wa lled steps leading up
loads, becaus e no tradition had yet been built up : no body of knowledg e
to the colum ns on which t he steel pylons stand . T he Passer elle du College,
based on accumu lated expe rience. For thi s reason , it is impossible to
whi ch is suspended from two sto ne pylon s that st and in th e river bcd ,
u nderestim ate th e importance of th e publicati on s, above all those by
cro sses the Rho ne in the east of th e inner city. Renovated in 19 9 6 , it has
Claud e Henri Navier (1780 -1836) , that ce me nte d co n fide nce in th e new
benefit ed gre atly from vehicle ban on th e banks of th e Rhone, whi ch have
typ es of str uct u re . 2 Articles abo ut this t yp e of bridge ar e few and far
been land scap ed as a pedestrian zone .
between , but to thi s day it is st ill producin g beautiful footbridges in Marre y.
The 2.8 m wid e Passer elle Saint Vince nt has connect ed th e old part
suspe nde d from six wire cables across tw o bays of approximately 4 0 m
Ther e wer e ris ks involved in build ing larger bridges for great er
'9 87, p. 70 f. 2 L'Art de l'ingeni eur, p. p 8;
footbridges ove r a shor t period . They incl ude th e Passer elle Saint Vince nt of 1832, th e Passer elle du Co llege of 1844 , and the Passer ell e Saint Geor ges
ideas and ex pe r iences inspired and encouraged Guillaum e -H enri Dufour
wire cables, th e Pont St Antoine, was inau gurat ed by Dufour and Seguin
I
Throughou t Europ e, suspe nsion bridges spre ad very qui ck ly in th e
Lyon ho sts a world-famous festi val of light an so, as part of th e
ever- ne w var iatio ns .sJoseph Chaley, a pupil of th e Seg uins , achieved a
revitalisation programme, light ar t ists wer e co m m issioned to beautify
span of 273 m at an early dat e with h is bridge across th e Saane in Fribourg.
th e enti re ce nt ral di strict. Amo ng other th ings, th ey design ed d ram at ic
He owe d mu ch to Louis Joseph Vicat's ide a of weavin g th e suspensio n
n ight- ti me lighting schem es for the three aforeme ntione d bridges, keeping
member s from single wires in th eir final positi on on site , with th e load
in harmon y with th eir famil iar app ear ance by day. They have also man aged
di stributed equally to each of th is br idge's 1,056 wires . The importance of
brilliantly to avoid da zzlin g passer s-by, or forci ng them to inch their way
Vicat's co ntr ibut ion to th e quality of wire cable production is undisputed .
forward in th e da rk, or oth erwise disorienting th em in the slightes t .
Passerelle Saint Georges, 18 52, 8 7.5 m free span
Passerelle du College , 1844 , main span 109 m, t otal 198 m
45
46
Retrospective
Peebles, 1905
IIkley, 1934
T he reason s why so m an y of th e first cable br idges collapse d wer e (bes ides th e as yet imp erfect method s of sta tic and dynam ic analysis) th at the iron w ire produ ced at th e time developed fatig ue un der alte rnating stres s and was susce ptible to brittle frac t ure s, as well as bein g difficult to ancho r. Furthermore , the compara t ively flexibl e and light weight superstruct ures wer e susce pti ble to vibra tions . T hese problems wer e br ou ght und er co ntrol once tough and fati gu e -resist ant ste els becam e available and th e superst r uctures were suffi cien tly braced by t ru ss fra mes, heavy deck gir ders , or addit ional guy cables. For the firs t half of th e [9th cent ury, how ever, the sce pticism show n to wards th e new ty pe of str uct u re was not un jus tifi ed . T he leadin g cou ntry in the early yea rs of cable bridge co nst r uctio n, after [S22, is considered to be France : esti mates of the number built there vary fro m
300
to 500. In Ens land, ind ustr y cer tai n ly develop ed to meet a
wide range of appl ication s, even th ough engineeri ng received nothing like as mu ch support ther e as it d id in France .' The approach taken by British engineers can be describ ed as pr act ical and pr agm atic; for building bri dges, they placed the ir trust in chain systems rath er t han in novel wi re cable .
I
Amo uroux , l.cmoine, 19 81,
p. 6 ~; 2
Pet er s, ' 987, P' ' 4 4
Drewr y, Charles Stuart ,
I S ~ 2 , cite-d in Pet er s, 1987. P:
Charles St uart Drewry ([ S05 -I SS[) maintained tha t w ire was impractica l
146; Kemp, Emory L., Samuel Brown : Britain's Pionee r
for anything th at excee ded t he scale of a footbridge . 2
Suspe nsion Bridg CARLOS F ER NA ND EZ CASA DO
22 ~
227
J O H NSO N , Phil ipp
238
225
34
OTTO, F RE I
49
aV E AR U P
P AR T N ER S
&
36
140 , 16 8
247
Architects, Engineers
252
22, 15 8
PALLAD IO, A n drea P ALM , M ichael
229 2[ 7
PAUL, Marti n
2[8
PAUSE R , A lfred PAW SO N , J ohn
20
P ERRON ET, J e a n R odolphe
P O LARI S, A lfa
204
V IRLOG EUX, Michel
226
VOG EL + PARTN ER
4 2,43
42
WALTH ER, R ene
S EG U IN, Ju le s
42
WAYSS, G u stav Adolf 54
Rem v 26 &
P RI TC H AR D , Thomas F arnol
PARNT ER
26
246 20 8
PUS HAK AR KTE KTE R
246
SM EATON, J ohn
237
R EIT ZEL , Erik
R EN NI E, J ohn R ESAL, J e a n
W EISZ, H .
SOAN E, S i r J ohn
22
W ES
W I EGA N D , W erner WH ITB Y, BIRD
P AR T N ER
&
237,2 39 &
W IL KIN SON EY RE
174 , 186,2 4 2,243,2 4 5,247
224
WOLF ENSB ERG ER, Rudo l f
S USTRAN S
RI CO LAI S, R o b ert L e
76 , 94 , [36, 22 [
WSP
T AM MS, F rie d rich
76
Gr-ou e 24 4 , 245
Z EIN ING ER ARCHITE KT EN
227
Z IAN E
218
Z I ESEL , Wolfdietrich
3 LHD [ 70
88
24 4
T EL FO R D, T homas
36
153
T H E M ARK F ISHE R ST U DIO
RIT T ER , Karl Wilhelm
52, 5 6
T O DT , Fritz 59
RI TT ER, J o s ef 24
T ORROJ A, E duar do
R O EB LI N G , J ohann August R UTTI GER, M a ximili an
38, 4[ ,4 2
23 I
R U ETTI MAN N , T oni 198
224
24 3
68 68 , 16 6
TO R RO JA, J ose Anton io
210
T O RTI , F abio
40
T R AI TT EUR , W ilhelm von
32
TRI EST, F e rd i n a n d von
T R O YAN O , L e onardo F ER N AN DEZ SA U ERZAPFE, Martin SAUND ER S, Todd S CARPA, Carlo
'3 4
206
> FE R N AN DE Z TROYAN O , L e onardo U W E TIETZ E
&
74
[77
245
T EC HN IK ER
160
26
ST ORME R > J AN STORME R PA RT N ER
238 [44, 226
206
STIGLAT, K lau s 59
STRASKY, J i ri
'36, 15 6 , 24 3
110 , '36, 154, 156 , 16 3,
W IL KIN SON, J oh n
STUDIO B EDN AR SKI
16 6
[7 8
PA RTNERS
WI LH ELMSEN , T ommie
[ 24 , 221
P ART N ER P AR N T ER
&
&
225
228
PART N ER
SPE ER > ALBE RT S P EER
RI EBEN BAU ER, J ohann
RU F, S e p
&
SOBEK > W ER N ER S OB EK I N G ENI EUR E
SU ESS UNO STALLE R I N GENI E U R E
R FR RI C E FRANC IS RI CHI E
74
36, 4 7,241
229
RIIl ER A, J Os e E ugen io
74
W ENAWE SER, O tto
STROBL, Wolfgang
26
227
W EIL AND, Si lvio
36
204
R ELLI N G BAU STATIK
174
SMIT H, W i lliam
ST EFAN POLONY I
PART N ERS
&
B R OW N
&
7 2, 80 , [30
W ER N ER SOBE K I N GENI EU R E
SPIELMANN, A lai n
R AM BOLL WH ITBY BI R D
R EDPAT H
[9 0
54
STA UBLI, KU R ATH Q UADR IC I N GENI EU R E
W EBST ER, 11
36, 4 7, 24 [
SMITH, J o hn
P O LO N YI > STEFA N P O LON YI
> W H ITBY, BIR D
239 228
S EGUIN , Marc
S KM ANT HONY HU N TS
235
POLONCEA U, A ntoine
PR O GEEST
S CHONHE RR, Torbe n S CHULITZ + PARTN ER
S IV I ER O, E nzo
23 [
P ET ER U NO LO CHN ER PLAGN IOL, Bru n o
229
V I EZ EN S, L u dwig
S CK ELL , Frie drich L udwig von 32
242
232,233,234
P ED ELTA
4 9 ,71 , 9 0 , 92, [3[, [6 0
S C HLA ICH, J org
PAR N T ER
224
24 7 38
S CHLA ICH B ERGE RMANN u nd PART N ER
V ERANTIUS, FA UST US
7 8,79 ,9 0 ,9 2,108,112, [ [ 4 , [82 -[85, 189 ,
V IFQ UA IN, J e an B aptiste
222,226,2 27,228 ,229,23 0,239
V ICAT, L ou is -Jo s eph 4 2, 54
39, 4 4
2 [7
2 [8
253
Index of Places
Nordpol Bridge A(;E:--I
236
B O BLI N G E N
23 2
A .\ \S TE R D A :' \
ANG E RS
FI G EAC
I 12 , I 19
B O DMI N , C ORN W ALL
AUARRAS
B OUDR Y
24 7
231
A:--IDO A IN
223
West Park Bridge
49
AC HBE RG
AR D EZ
' 3, P
A SSE :--I S
2 )2
Holbein Footbridge
96
Iron Bridge
223
1) 0
236
F RE D R I K ST A D FR EI BUR G
Port Bridge Vegesack
FRI BOURG
224
241
BRU G ES
C A M BR ID G E
B.-\D E N -BADE N
C ASC INE
222
Port Bridge
14 6
CO M ACC H IO
174
B ED FORD
C R ETE I L
B FI . I. H ; ARD E- SUR - VA l. SE R I N E B E N SH EIM
D OL E
.tbtei Bridge 223
121
GR AZ
2 24
DRYIlUR GH DU SS ELDORF
36,241
B ERLI N K O P E NI C K
DUMFRI ES 36
40
22 4
HAMBURG
22)
184
36, 47
66
DURH AM
E DZE l. 1.
Museum Bridge 232
EGG
Pasarela Padre Arrupe 233
ESS I NG
Ponce da Ribera H BIR CHERWEID
H A N O V ER
Expo Bridqes Skywalk
72
24 1
H ERI s Au
)0
49 24
H ITTI SAU
>
241
23,51
Kumma Bridge
2 2)
ESS LING EN EX ETE R
226
226
H ENGSTE Y
16 6
19 3
134
GROS SENHA IN GR E NOBLE
BI LB AO
Campo de Volancin Bridge
189
Wiecker Bridge
)4
Katzbuckel Bridge
19 3
39
)1
DUISBURG
Expo Bridge
Lion Bridqe 4 8
2 16
Ry ck Bridge
Brid,qe in the Chatl ott enburq Pare 32 Gothenbura Footbridqe 223
36
GR EIF SWAL D
2 37
Gericke Footbridge
B E RWI CK
GIU ,\l AGLlO , M AG GI A-TAL
D OR E N-A LB ERS CHWE NDE
222
233
Pont d'en Gomez 0 de la Princesa H,
) 2
G LASG OW
D ESSAU
B ERLI N
BER N E
Iron Bridge
23 7
D EIZI SAU
2 22
LI G NO N -Lo EX
Pasarela de Sant Feliu 233
36
2 37
206
B ER G E N
>
26
2 46
CO RCA POLO
2 42
GIRO N A
CON WA Y C A ST L E
2 19
G ATW I CK
18 6
G E N EVA 44
14 0
C OI M B RA
202
B ARUTH B ASEL
10 6
24 6
)4
COA LB ROO K DALE
Las Glorias Bridge
1)2
GAT ESHEAD
22
T AVO LA
I)J
C HAZEL ET
BAR CEl. O NA
44 1S3
18 8
BAD H O .\ l B U R G VON DER H OH E 222
38
126
130
F Ro JAc H
GA ISSAU
BAMB ERG
I J2
FR AU E NF ELD
Bridge by G. Wayss H BR IST OL
AUB ERY Il.I.IERS
224
2 25
22 5
52
FRA SC O
BR EM E N
41,1 0 0
237
FR A NK FURT
BR A N D E N BURG A N D ER HAV E L
A:--INOKA Y 4 3
2I6
F ELDKIRCH
B O CHUM
M ETTI N G E N
H OR N CLIFF H O T TO N
15 9
242
218
HU NI N GU E
1]6
2 10
233
254
Ind ex of Places
46
I LKL EY
LYO N
44
24 6
PADU A
I N VERC AULD
47
Passerelle du CollCse 44
P A L EN CI A
I NVERM ARK
19 8
Passerelle Saint Georqes 44
PARI S
Passerelle Buttes- Chaumont 40
Passerell e Saint Vincent 4 4
32
K ASS E L
10 8
KEH LH EIM
28
K E\V G AR D EN S
51
L AN G EN ARG EN
49
38
L OH N E
19
10 0
20 8
P O STBRID G E ,
Bellm outh Passaq e 244 Brids e at th e Royal Victor ia Dock Bridp es to Babylon
24 3
Floatmq Brids e 244
138
R APP ER SWI L
178
I
19
RIJ EK A
170
R IP OLL
16 4
R O N G E L L EN > T R Av ER sI N A T O BE L
Temporary Bridpe.fo r A rchitekt urwoche A 1 179
R O N N EBURG
Footb ridq e over th e Mi ttle rer RinS MUR AU MURC I A
227
228
R O ST O C K
Mahlb usen Bridq e 228
216 111, 216
Nort h Brids e 7 9 R OTH
228
217
N AU D E RS
Nell' Te!ford Brids e 24 3
NESSEN TAL N ICE
Rollins Brids e
N IE N B U RG
Roy al Ballet School Brids e 154
16,
Bridoe to th e Wiesn s rounds 227
Plashet School Footbri dq e 24 4 19 0
I
17 2
239
R ENN ES
H uns eiford Bridse 244 Millennium Bridse 10 1, 16 8
56
54
SA I NTES
38
SALFO R D
38
N U RE M BE RG
245 235
SA N T C EL O N I
OB ERHAU SE N -RIPSH OR ST
St Sav iour's Dock Bridg e 24 3
O FF E N BACH
54
S CHA FFHAU SEN
OV R O NNA Z
220
S CH NAITTACH
LU C C A > V AGLI 0 1 SOTT O
OS CHAT Z
219
OXFORD
LU C ER N E
239
SA R R EGU EM I N ES
South Qyay Bridoe 24 3
234
24 0
SA IN T - M AU R IC E
200
Science Mu seum Brids e 156
LORCA
235
P U ENT E LA R EI N A
35
Bridqe in the Deutsches M useum
L O ND O N
2I
22 1
PR AGU E
MUN ICH
226
220
Dartmoor
22 8
P O T SD A M
227
MI ND EN M O Y LA N D
235
P ONTR ESI N A
120
MIDD L ET O N , C U M BR IA
50
78
P O NT EV EDRA
238
M EYL A N
74
36 , 46
P FAFFIKO N > BIR CH ERW EID
89
M ETTI N G E N
238
42
PFOR ZH EIM
36
M ELRO SE
234
L L EIDA
I
Mercha nt s Brids e 136
20
LIG N O N-L o EX L I L LE FJ O RD
P EEB L ES
Brough ton Bridse
19 2,2 26
LI N GENAU
P ASSY
Bn dqe over th e M3 0 motonvay 68
M A N NH EIM
LAVE RT EZZO
L E H AVR E
Brids e over the ,Han zanares 234
MAN CH EST ER
238
239
PAR IS - L A D EF E N SE
Glorias Catalano Footbr idq e
LA NG EN -Bu CH
L E ER
24 2
56
LAE R /M ESC H EDE
L ARR AU
Pont des Arts 26 , 27
M ADRI D
KI N G ST O N -U P O N -HU L L
14 2
Passerell e So!ferino
St ress Ribbon Bridse 7 6
18 2
144
Passerell e Simone de Beau voir
MA IDSTO N E
Lockm eadow Brids e 24 5
LADHOLZ
26, 238
Passerelle D ebil ly
K zw 24 2 KI E L
234
227 22
120
SASSN ITZ
15, 114 , 116
SC H W AN GA U S IER R E
23 229
229
98
S INGEN AM HOH ENT W IE L
229
255
Picture Credits
20 4
SOP If IEN HO L M
SR O MO WCE N IZ NE
247
24~
ST A USTE LL S T D E NI S 239
43
V A LS
Bridge orer the Sitter 17
V ENT
24
82 39
VIE NNA
Erdberger Footbridge
245
Zollamt Bridge
240
STRABOURG
Berfin : p. 103: arc h ive; pp. 106-107: Mik e Schl aic h: P: II I : Ca rlos Fernandez Ca sad o ; p. 116, r ight : Dcu t sc-hcs Museum Muni ch , ph ot ographi c se rv ice, Beato Harr er ; P: 11 8: Jiirgen Schm idt ; p. 120 left , P: 121 : Sc-h laic-h RC'rgerma nn un d Par t ner ; PI" 116 -127: Gr iff, Fircc-o : rp . 140 -14 1: Ch r ist ian Richt cr s, Mun ste r; pp . 1 ~ 4 - 1 H : Nick \Vood, Lond on ; pp . 1 ~ 6 - I P : Jam es Morri s, Lon don; p. ~8: Renderin g Zaha Hadi d ; P: 16" left; Svcn W or ner. Stuttgart ; r ight : Fret Ot to , rind ing Form, II. ; PI" 170 -171; JU ID, Zag re b ; p. 17H: Leo van del' Klcij ; 1'. 179 : Flo r ian l iol zhcrr , Muni ch ; P' IH8; Jiirg Con zett , Chur; P: ,89, ce nt re; Schlaich Bcr gcrmann lind Partner; P: 19 J, Wreck er Brid ge : Brigitt e Braun ; PI" 100 101: Philippe Ruault , Nan te s; pp. 204-105: Er ik Reit zel : PI" 206-207: Todd Sau nde rs; pp . 20 8-209 : P ushak arkit ckt cr ; PI" 116-147, Graz: HelmutTezak; Naudcrs : Vcrc in Alttinster miinz; Strengen : Mucha, Alois, Holzbruc-kcn, Wic sbadcn /Bcrlin , 1995; Vienna, Erdbcr jjcr Foothridge : Alfred Pauscr: Horton and Woluwc Saint -Pier re: [can-Luc Dcru (Daylight); Lucern e: Kantonal c Denkmalpflepc Luzcrn ; l'o ntrcsin a: O tto Kunz]r-;
Ponte Ptar r ale Roma 24 7
~o
STOCK TO N
Garc ia Gr inda , Madrid ; P: 71, left ; Ren e Walth er : P' 82, ri ght ; Leonh ard t , 1994; P: 87; Inst. F. Massivb au , TU
Palazzo Q!1erini Siampaqlia 24 7
40
S TUN 1M K UB El
22 I
V E NI C E
Ganggelibrugg 22 o STA .vIS
histori sch cn Archi te kt u r ; Pet er s, 19 8 7 ; P' )6 and P: 42 left : Pctcr s, 20 0) ; P: 4 0, St Pet er sburg: Ur su la Bau s; P' ~4, Chazc lct: Klau s St iglat, Kar lsruhe ; Offenb ach : Jo rg Rcvm endt , Darmst adt ; Du sseld orf: Stiglat, 19 96 ; Brem en , Tou louse , Sai ntcs : arch ive; P' ~ 6 : Bill, 19 , 5; P: 6,. left : Dvw idag-Rcport ; P: 6H- 69: Ch r ist ina Diaz Mo ren o , Efrcn
VALSO J /T ici no 221
23
ST PETERS BURG
Reprint, Mu ni ch , 19 6 , ; Fischer von Er lach , Entwurf cinc r
62
V AIHI N G E N
ST FOR TUNAT STGALLIN
P: 22, Old Wa lton : archi ve ; Pl': 2 ~, 2" Grub cnm ann : Maggi / Navone , 200 3; p . H, fr om le ft : Fau st o Vera ntio ,
9,60
VAG LI DI SOTTO
2I
2 18
7
f-lackinger Footbridge 2 18
STlITTGART
Bridge at iV/ax Ev t]: Lake 92
94
VRANOV
Bridge on the University o.fStuttgart 23 0 Cannstatier Footbridge 131
W AIl B lI N G E N
Footbridge in Rosenstein Park 9 0
Rems Footbridge I 23 I
Heilbronner StraJ3e Bridge 230
Rems Footbridge II 231
l.a Feru: Footbridge 23 1
W E I LA M R HE IN
l.owent or Footbridge 230
W EI M A R
Praqsau cl Footbridges I and 11 22 9
W E ST WYCO M B E
Schiller Footbridge 88
WI ESBA D E N
2 17
S ULZ
W INC H
80
S URANSU NS
23 64
34
WI N C H EST E R, AV INGTONPA RK
110
S W .-\N SEA
28
49
WE TTINGEN
24,2 17
S TRENGE N
38
W ET T E R
28
STO URH EA D
176
WI N T E R T H U R
WINTE RT HUR - Wi.iLf LlNGEN T AI N
43
WIS SEK ERK E
TA RR STE PS
TH US IS
Ex MOOR
12,2 1
2E
TERRASS A
W6R LITZ
28
124 56
39
28
W OL UW I, SA I NT -PIE RRE
218
~3
TOULO US E
Y V E R D O N - l E S- BAI N S
l'asserellc des so up i r5
~4
Passcrcllc PSG 240 To uRNo N
ZARAGOZA
Bridge overthe inter-city highway
43
T IUVERS INA TOB El ., R O N G E l L E N
Travcrsincr Footbridge I 12 2 Traversincr Footbridge II T 1U'.LO N T HI N 2 2 0
240
22 1
2I2
236
Bridge Pavilion at the Expo 15 8 , 236
Trin : Walter Bieler; Val So j: Martin Hugli;Yvcrdon.lcs-Batns: Beat Widm er: Prag: Jir i Strasky: Bad Homhurg, Hanover, Expo Bridges, Paris-La Defense : Schleich Ikrgerm ann uncl Partn er ; Baden -Baden: Ingenieur gru ppe Baucn , Karlsruh e; Berlin , Ger icke Footbridge und Gothe nbu rg Foothridge : Senator fUr Bau- und \Vohnu ngswescn tpub.). l:uf3gangcrb riicken in Berl in, Berlin , 1976; Hohlingcn : Janson + \Volfrum ; Brandenhurg an del' Havel: Llwc Tietze l.andschaftsarchitcktcn: Brem en : Torstcn Wild c-Schr ot cr; Essing, Potsdam , Ronn cbu rp: Richard J. Dietrich ; Hano ver, Skywalk: Schullt z + Part ner Architc ktcn; Lehne: Claus Bur )'; Oschatz: Mike Schlaich; Schnaitt ach : Ingenieur-Ruro Ludw ig Viczr-ns: Singen am Hohcnt wicl: Michael Palm; Backpack Bridge : Maxim ilian Riitt iger; Asserts: Cor tr ight , Br idging the World , 200 J; Andoain, Llcida,Tcrrassa: Pcdelta : Lcrca, Madr-id, Zaragoza: Car los Fernandez Casado ; Palencia. Pcnt cvcdra : Phccor Ingen iero s Co nsulto rcs; Agen: Gc rr it de Vos; Aubcr-villicr s, Belkgarde-sur -Valscrtnc, Mcylan: Jacques Mossot (www.s tr uct urac. dcu Crc tr -i l: Ger ard Mc t ro n (ww w.structurac .dc}; Do le, Sar rcgucrnincs: Alain Spielmann Architcct c; Figeac, St Den is, Saint-Maurice, Toulouse; Mimram Ingenierie ; l.arrau: hom c.pl anct .nl/ r- br uit oza : Lc Havre; Mar -rev, Lcs Pont Mod crn cs, Paris 199 5"; Rcnnc s: Marc Malinow skv.Trclon : Gro upe At-cora; Exeter; Clive Ryall; Gatwick, London , Sout h Q uay Bridge : W ilkinson Eyre Architects; Kcw: Kcw Gard ens; Kingston-upon -Hull: Mclro well + Benedetti; London, Bridges to Babylon :The Mark Fisher Studios; London, Plashct Schoo l f oo thr idge : Nicholas Cane; London , Hungerford Bridge : Ian Lamhot ; Stoc kton: Lifschutz Davidson Sand ilands; Cascinc di Tavola: Alessandro Adilardi; Com acchio : phot og raphic archives of the commune of Co mrnacchio; Padua: Lorenzo Attoli co; Tur in : Michel Dcnancc; Venice, Palazzo Qu erini Stampalia: Christian Hell: Venice, Pon te Piazzalc Roma:Tobia Zor dan; Amsterdam: Ar up; Sro mowcc Nizne: Pawcl Hawr vszko w All ot he r photograph s; Wiifri cd [)c cha u , St uttgar t \\"\\'\\'.wiIfr icd -d ech au .de
Authors: Ursula Baus, Mike Schlaich Phot ographer : Wilfr ied Dcchau et al. Layout : Moniteurs , Sibylle Schlaich; frei04 publizistik , Ur sula Baus Translatio n into English: Chr is Rieser, New York ; Rtchard Toovey, Berlin English Proofreading: Monica Buckland, Basel Library of Congress Cont rol Number 200793 1248 Bibliogra phic information published by the Ger man Natio nal Libr ar y The Ger man Natio nal Librar y lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data an.' available on the Intern et at http . v/ dnb.d-nb.de. This book is also available in a Ger man language edition ( ISBN 978 -3-76 41 -8 138-7) . This 'work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concer ned, specifically the rights of tr anslation , re print ing, re-use of illustrat ions, recitation, broadcasting, reprodu ction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in data bases. For any kind of use, permi ssion of the copyright owner mu st be obta ined .
© 2008 Birkhauscr Verlag AG Basel ' Bosto n ' Berlin
P. O. Box IB , CH-40 I0 Basel, Switzerland Par t of Springer Science
+ Business Media
ww w.birkhauscr.ch Print ed on acid-free paper from chlor ine-free pulp. T CP Lithography: Flori an Hoch , Stuttga r t Printed in Italy ISBN 978-3 -7643 -8139-4 9 87 6 ~ 4 P I
Kindl y suppor ted by Max Bogi Stahl- & Anlagenbau, Neu markt Pfeifer Setl- und Hcbetcc hn ik GmbH , Memmingen Vallourec & Mann esmann Tub es, Dusseldor f
00
View more...
Comments