Evidence Outline

EVIDENCE Atty. Demetrio C. Custodio

RULE 129 SECTIONS 1 & 2 – JUDICIAL NOTICE 1.

State Prosecutors vs. Muro – 236 S 505 2. Peop People le vs. vs. Rean Reanza zares res – 334 334 S 624 624 3. People vs. Tundag – 342 S 704 RULE 129 SECTION 4 – JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS 1.

 Aguenza  Aguenza vs. Metropolitan Metropolitan Bank Bank & Trust Trust Co. – 271 271 S 1 2. Philamgen vs. Sweet Lines, Inc. – 212 S 195 3. Alan Alano o vs. vs. CA – 283 283 S 269 269 4. Peop People le vs. vs. Solay Solayao ao – 262 262 SCR SCRA A 255 RULE 130 SECTION 1 – OBJECT EVIDENCE 1. 2. 3. 4.

Peop People le Peop People le Peop People le Peop People le

vs. vs. vs. vs. vs. vs. vs. vs.

Man Manalo alo – 219 219 S 656 656 Mal Malimi imitt – 264 264 S 167 167 Jum Jumam amoy oy – 221 221 S 333 333 Flor Flores es – 328 328 S 461 461

RULE 130 SECTION 3 – BEST EVIDENCE RULE 1.

4.

Borje vs. Sandiganbayan – 125 S 763 2. Widows and Orphans Association, Inc. vs. CA – 212 S 360 3. Peop People le vs. vs. Tan Tandoy doy – 192 192 S 28 28 Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumphs Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S 537

RULE 130 SECTION 9 – PAROL EVIDENCE RULE Inciong, Jr. vs. CA – 257 S 578 National National Irrigation Administration vs. Gamit – 215 S 436 Gurango vs. IAC – 215 S 332 1. CKH Industrial and Development Corp. vs. CA – 272 S 333 RULE 130 SECTION 20 – WITNESSES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Peop People le vs. vs. Tan Taneo eo – 218 218 S 494 494 Peop People le vs. vs. Balan Balanon on – 233 233 S 679 679 Peop People le vs. vs. Bai Baid d – 336 336 S 656 656 Peop People le vs Loli Lolito to Hon Honor or – 584 584 S 547 547 People People vs vs Solom Solomon on Dione Dioneda da – 587 S 312 312

RULE 130 SECTION 22 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF MARRIAGE

1. Ordoñ Ordoño o vs. vs. Daqu Daquig igan an – 62 S 270 270 2. Peop People le vs. vs. Casta Castañe ñeda da Jr. Jr. – 88 S 562 562 RULE 130 SECTION 23 – DEAD MAN STATUTE RULE 1. Razo Razon n vs. vs. IAC IAC – 207 207 S 234 234 RULE 130 SECTION 24 – DISQUALIFICATION BY REASON OF PRIVILEDGED COMMUNICATION 1.

US vs. Antipolo – 37 P 726 2. Lim Lim vs. vs. CA CA – 214 214 S 273 273 3. Krohn vs. CA – 233 S 146 4. Forti Fortich ch vs. CA – 268 268 S 152 152 RULE 130 SECTION 26 – ADMISSIONS OF A PARTY 1. Peop People le vs. vs. Agus Agustin tin – 240 240 S 541 541 2. Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695 3. Peop People le vs. vs. Chu Chua a Uy – 327 327 S 335 335 4. People vs. Cepeda – 324 S 290 RULE 130 SECTION 27 – OFFER OF COMPROMISE NOT ADMISSIBLE 1. Peop People le vs. vs. Las Lase e – 219 219 S 584 584 2. Trans Pacific Industrial Supplies, Inc. vs. CA – 235 S 494 3. Peop People le vs. vs. Bue Buemio mio – 265 265 S 582 582 4. People vs. Amaca – 277 S 215 RULE 130 SECTION 30 – ADMISSION BY CONSPIRATOR 1. Peop People le vs. vs. Cond Condem emen ena a – 23 S 910 910 2. Peop People le vs. vs. Prov Provo o – 37 S 19 19 3. Peop People le vs. vs. Pue Puesca sca – 87 87 S 130 130 RULE 130 SECTION 32 – ADMISSION BY SILENCE 1.

US vs. Bay – 27 P 495

RULE 130 SECTION 33 – CONFESSION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Peop People le vs. vs. Agus Agustin tin – 240 240 S 541 541 Peop People le vs. vs. Tioz Tiozon on – 198 198 S 368 368 Peop People le vs. vs. Tujo Tujon n – 215 215 S 559 559 People People vs Lada Ladao o – GR 10094 100940-41 0-41 Nove Novembe mberr 27, 2001 2001 Peop People le vs Enc Encipi ipido do – 146 146 S 478 478 People vs Janjalani – 639 S 157

RULE 130 SECTION 36 – HEARSAY RULE

2

1. Peop People le vs. vs. Val Valero ero – 112 112 S 661 661 2. Peop People le vs. vs. Dam Damas aso o - 212 212 S 547 547 3. Agca Agcaoli oli vs. vs. Moli Molina na – 249 249 S 482 482 4. Peop People le vs. vs. Brio Brioso so – 37 S 336 336 RULE 130 SECTION 37 – DYING DECLARATION 1. Peop People le vs. vs. De De Joya Joya – 203 203 S 343 343 2. People vs. Dunig – 215 S 469 3. Peop People le vs. vs. Ama Amaca ca – 277 277 S 215 215 4. US vs. Antipolo – 37 P 726 RULE 130 SECTION 42 – PART OF THE RES GESTAE 1.

People vs. Tiozon – 198 S 368 2. Peop People le vs. vs. Nar Naran anja ja – 108 108 P 781 781 3. Peop People le vs. vs. Palom Palomon ones es – 336 336 S 80 4. Peop People le vs. vs. Raq Raque uell – 265 265 S 248 248 RULE 130 SECTION 44 – ENTRIES IN OFFICIAL RECORDS 1. Peop People le vs. vs. Berna Bernalde ldez z – 294 294 S 317 317 2. Peop People le vs. vs. Divi Divina na – 221 221 S 209 209 3. People vs. Leones – 117 S 382 4. Peop People le vs. vs. Criso Crisosto stomo mo – 160 160 S 47 47 5. Feria vs. CA – 325 S 525 RULE 130 SECTION 47 – TESTIMONY OR DEPOSITION AT A FORMER PROCEEDING 1. De Leo Leon n vs. vs. Peo People ple – 210 210 S 151 151 RULE 130 SECTION 48 – OPINION RULE Lim vs. CA – 214 S 273 (supra) 2. Peop People le vs. vs. Galle Galleno no – 291 291 S 762 762 1.

RULE 130 SECTION 49 – OPINION OF EXPERT WITNESS 1.

Cebu Shipyard and Engineering Works, Inc. vs. William Lines, Inc. – 306 S 762

RULE 131 SECTION 1 – BURDEN OF PROOF 1. Jime Jimene nez z vs. vs. NLRC NLRC – 256 256 S 84 84 2. Mall Mallar arii vs. vs. CA – 265 265 S 456 456 RULE 131 SECTION 3 – DISPUTABLE PRESUMPTIONS 1. Lozano Lozano vs. vs. De De Los Los Sant Santos os – 274 S 45 45 2. LRT LRT vs. vs. Nati Nativid vidad ad – 397 397 S 75 75 3. Del San San Transp Transport ort Lines Lines vs. C&A C&A Const. Const. Inc. Inc. – 412 S 524 524 4. Peop People le vs. vs. De Guz Guzma man n – 229 229 S 795 795

3

5. 6. 7. 8.

Peop People le vs. vs. Nav Navaja aja – 220 220 S 624 624 Peop People le vs. vs. Casta Castañe ñeda da – 252 252 S 247 247 Peop People le vs. vs. Simb Simbula ulan n – 214 214 S 537 537 Peop People le vs. vs. Ballu Balluda da – 318 318 S 503 503

RULE 132 SECTION 3 – RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF A WITNESS (IN RELATION TO THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION) 1. Peop People le vs. vs. Sal Salver veron on – 228 228 S 92 92 2. People People vs. vs. Malim Malimit it – 264 264 S 167 (supra (supra)) RULE 132 SECTION 4 – ORDER IN THE EXAMINATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITNESS 1. 2.

Bachrach Motors Co. Inc. vs. CIR – 86 S 27 People vs. Padero – 226 S 810

RULE 132 SECTION 10 – LEADING AND MISLEADING QUESTIONS 1.

People vs. Caparas – 111 S 68

RULE 132 SECTION 13 – HOW WITNESS IMPEACHED BY EVIDENCE OF INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS 1. US vs. vs. Bal Baluy uyot ot – 40 P 385 385 2. People vs. Relucio – 86 S 227 3. People vs. Winston De Guzman – 288 S 346 RULE 132 SECTION 19 – CLASSES OF DOCUMENTS 1. Joso Joson n vs. vs. Balta Baltaza zarr – 194 194 S 114 114 2. Sale Sales s vs. vs. CA – 211 211 S 858 858 3. Lucente vs. Evangelista, Jr. – 396 S 627 4. Yturralde vs. Azurin – 28 S 407 RULE 132 SECTION 20 – PROOF OF PRIVATE DOCUMENT 1. Raz Raz vs. vs. IAC IAC – 184 184 S 720 720 2. Ong Ong vs. vs. Peo People ple – 342 342 S 372 372

4

RULE 132 SECTION 22 – HOW GENUINENESS OF HANDWRITING PROVED 1. Layn Layno o vs. vs. Peop People le – 213 213 S 686 686 2. Jaco Jacob b vs. vs. CA – 224 224 S 189 189 3. Security Bank and Trust Co. vs. Triumph Lumber and Construction Corp. – 301 S 537 (supra) 4. Sy vs. vs. CA CA – 330 330 S 550 550 RULE 132 SECTION 23 – PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AS EVIDENCE 1. Dupil Dupilas as vs. vs. Cabac Cabacun unga gan n – 36 P 254 254 RULE 132 SECTION 34 – OFFER OF EVIDENCE 1. Catu Catuira ira vs. CA – 236 236 S 398 398 2. Vda. de Onate vs. CA – 250 S 283 3. Sy vs. vs. CA CA – 330 330 S 550 550 (sup (supra ra)) 4. Macasiray vs. People – 291 S 154 5. Tuason vs. CA – 241 S 695 6. Candido and Rumbaua vs. CA – 253 S 78 7. Peop People le vs. vs. Bare Barella llano no – 319 319 S 567 567 8. Peop People le vs. vs. Sanc Sanche hez z – 308 308 S 264 264 RULE 133 SECTION 1 – PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE, HOW DETERMINED SECTION 2 – PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT 1. DBP Pool Pool of Accredited Accredited Insurance Insurance Companie Companies s vs Radio Radio Mindanao Mindanao Network Network GR GR 147039, Jan 27, 2006 2. Peop People le vs. vs. Mej Mejia ia – 55 S 453 453 3. Peop People le vs. vs. Matri Matrimo monio nio – 215 215 S 613 613 4. Peop People le vs. vs. Gond Gondora ora – 265 265 S 408 408 5. Peop People le vs. vs. Cab Cabile iles s – 248 248 S 207 207 6. Peop People le vs. vs. Lore Lorenz nzo o – 240 240 S 624 624 7. Peop People le vs. vs. Rig Rigod odon on – 238 238 S 27 8. Tin vs. Peop People le – 362 362 S 594 594 RULE 133 SECTION 4 – CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, WHEN SUFFICIENT 1.

People vs. Salvame – 270 S 766 2. People People vs. vs. Malim Malimit it – 264 264 S 167 (supra (supra)) 3. People vs. Ramos – 240 S 191 4. People vs. Adofina – 239 S 67 RULE 133 SECTION 5 – SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE 1. Fabe Fabella lla vs. vs. CA CA – 282 282 S 256 256 2. PAL PAL vs. vs. NLRC NLRC – 263 263 S 638 638 3. Villa Villaflo florr vs. vs. CA – 280 280 S 297 297 4.  Ang Tibay Tibay vs. CIR – 69 69 P 635

5

6