Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands | By Hilding Anderson & Rebecca Prettyman

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands Hilding Anderson

Rebecca Prettyman

Director Research & Insights, SapientNitro Arlington

Senior Associate Research & Insights, SapientNitro Chicago

Hilding is director of the SapientNitro Research Institute, which catalyzes thought leadership within the agency, and advisor to global clients on emerging digital trends and the changing consumer.

Rebecca is a consumer and industry researcher who has a particular interest in how consumers think, behave and interact, and how to best communicate with them.

Proprietary Research

Story has long been a key tenet of brand marketing. But savvy brands have discovered that consumers no longer just want to be told a story; they want to participate in it. Consequently, story must evolve into an immersive experience shared between consumer and brand. Fortunately, today’s technology provides myriad ways for brands to invite consumers into a shared story and to create a shared experience. But there is often a gap in how companies and their consumers assess the customer experience.

One recent study from Bain & Co. examined the gap between how companies and their customers assess experience. They found that while 80 percent of firms say they deliver a “superior experience” for their customers, just 8 percent of customers agreed they deliver a “superior experience.”1

detail about those dimensions). We discovered that the quality of the experience varies significantly between leaders and followers. And, we also discovered two of the dimensions – Sense and Access – are the key differentiators between high-performing experience brands and the also-rans.

To identify what makes great customer experiences great, we assessed 27 companies that are recognized as customer experience leaders.2 We used as our barometer five dimensions of experience: Sense, Control, Continuity, Fit, and Access (read on for more

Marketers who want to optimize great experiences should develop stories that create deep emotional resonance for the consumer – and build a wide set of tools that allow customers to bring the brand into their lives.

1 2

“Closing the Delivery Gap,” study of 362 firms by Bain & Co. See ‘About the Study’ for more detail. The list was sourced from Forrester Research and Fast Co. Photo credit (facing page) Luciano Mortula / Shutterstock.com

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands

Our research suggests six key imperatives for marketers: 1. The Consumer Is Never Entirely Passive Brands can no longer rely upon consumers to just sit back and absorb their messages. Today, brands must engage consumers by building worlds in which immersive experiences enable them to explore and interact with the brand. Doing so creates a wildly different outcome as compared to focusing on passive ads, which consumers tend to skip. 2. Let the Players Tell the Story The brand is the tool and world builder. But the players have significant power in determining how the story unfolds and often co-create with the brand. 3. Redefine What It Means to Be the Author Authorship is no longer about a one-way telling of story; rather, the brand’s role is evolving to provide the components for a story that is authored by customers. Components can be mobile apps, digital platforms, sensors that collect consumer data, social media, and so on. 4. Provide Immersive Experiences for All Skill Levels The design of the experience provided by the brand should be easy enough for a beginner but also challenging enough for an expert. This balance can be achieved by building a flexible “on-ramp” to the experience, whether it is a personal financial management platform (e.g., USAA) or a digitally enhanced family vacation (e.g., Disney Resorts).

NASCAR has created separate experiences for two discrete audiences – one focused on the at-the-track experience and a second one for the at-home viewer. NASCAR combines multiple devices to create the complete experience. The at-home experience, for example, includes mobile video streaming, personalized driver alerts, a tablet app, and the traditional TV broadcast.

5. Plan for a Lifetime Expect a multiyear investment. These are long-living customer platforms, delivering long-term value. They’re not campaigns. 6. To Build Powerful Experiences, Shape Stories around an Organizing Idea Our research found that experience-led brands use themes to design, develop and maintain their experience space. Unifying and resonant themes make experiences much stronger.

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands

Instrumenting Experience: About the Study In this study, we had three major research goals.

The five experience dimensions are:

1. Identify leading examples of great storytelling in the digital age.

1. Sense: The extent to which a person discerns a meaningful, emotionally relevant story. How much does the experience leave an impression or expression? How well does the brand connect to the target customers’ purpose, core, belief, lifestyle?

2. Research the constituent elements of those experiences: What are the essential elements, what work do they do for customers? 3. Research the “back story”: What are the organizational, leadership, technology, and business components which make the experience possible? To identify the 27 brands we studied, we started with the list of companies featured in Forrester Research’s Customer Experience Online Survey (from the fourth quarter of 2012). From that list, we selected only those brands that received the top customer experience score in their industry. We then added 10 fast-growing startups from Fast Company’s 2013 Most Innovative Companies. Finally, we conducted more than 15 expert reviews to determine which companies to evaluate and explore their back story. We then conducted visits across various digital and many physical touchpoints for the brands assessed, including Red Bull Arena, Walt Disney World, NASCAR’s Richmond International Raceway, and Marshalls’ Chicago store. We audited their various online, tablet, mobile, and physical properties and scored them in each of five experience dimensions. The five dimensions assess how well a particular campaign, design, interaction, or environment performs in terms of experience. Each brand received a score from zero to four in each dimension. We identified these dimensions to more effectively address a wider aperture of experience, and they build on insightful academic thinking about designing for a more complete experience.

3

2. Control: The extent to which a person is empowered to accomplish the things they want or need to do. How well does the story support user goals or tasks? How much rational or functional value does the experience provide? 3. Continuity: The extent to which one interaction or experience builds upon the next. Is it pervasive; does it exist in the right channels? Can an experience in one channel be connected to another channel? Are they linked? 4. Fit3: The extent to which a person receives the right content and functionality at the right time. 5. Access: How easily can the experience be connected to or shared with others? How easily can the consumer become part of, or affect the story?

Applying the Experience Dimensions While intended as a diagnostic, we recognize that some brands – for example a B2B manufacturer – are not going to have the same target for Sense (emotional relevance) as would consumer brands like Nike or Disney. Applying these dimensions should be done relative to a baseline target for a brand’s industry, category and competition. For this study, we ranked them collectively as a group simply to make the point that there exists a range of options for businesses in delivering a powerful experience. Not everyone can be Nike, USAA or Disney and sports gear is vastly different than insurance. The diagnostic benefits are used to quantify experience and help brands optimize that experience.

In our evaluation, this category includes Brand Consistency: Does the story demonstrate visual & brand consistency? Can the experience be joined at any point and still convey the brand message clearly? This broadens the traditional sense of “fit” typically discussed among experience professionals.

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands

Leading Experience Brands Overall

Descriptions

Rank

Retailer

Category

(out of 4.0)

1

Nike

CPG

3.90

The defining experience, particularly in the Access category. Recommending changes to my life based on my personal analytics.

2

USAA

Financial Services

3.50

Strong emotional connection, and their recent investment into brick and mortar Financial Centers packed with digital technology is impressive.

3

Disney (Orlando Parks)

Travel and Hospitality

3.40

Great brand and storytelling, but planning and execution gaps in the experience. The introduction of myDisney and mobile apps are a step in the right direction.

4

Square

Financial Services

3.30

A simple multichannel experience for small business owners, well executed. Future upside in analytics and loyalty programs.

4

Pinterest

Social Network

3.30

Social property involves users, although sensory engagement is limited to pictures.

6

Harley-Davidson

Automotive

3.20

Strong brand, and solid experience fundamentals. Opportunities exist to further connect web and mobile experiences across their digital footprint. Good access score – and more upside.

7

NASCAR

Entertainment

3.10

Strong second-screen tools, but racetrack infrastructure make it difficult to truly connect the digital and physical experiences.

7

Amazon

Retail

3.10

Extremely pervasive. Best-in-class ordering, personalization. New locker experience. Brand doesn’t connect on emotion to the same degree as our leaders.

7

Fab

Retail

3.10

Fab knows its audience, but still feels like every other e-commerce experiences beyond its core messaging and offering, with the exception of social integration.

7

Target

Retail

3.10

Consistent visuals and cutting-edge cross-channel tools, but site & stores score lower on Sense; strong wayfinding, mobile tools and very pervasive.

11

Red Bull

CPG

2.90

A rare example with low control values, but great social integration, gamification and Access elements.

11

Vanguard

Financial Services

2.90

Effective and consistent message, but very utilitarian.

13

US Cellular

Telecom

2.80

In-store experience disappoints, but on a rational level they’re providing solid value. Baseline.

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands

The Overall Score is the sum of the five equally weighted category dimensions: Sense, Control, Continuity, Fit, Access. See ‘Instrumenting Experience’ section in this article for more details on methodology. Overall

Descriptions

Rank

Retailer

Category

(out of 4.0)

13

American Express

Financial Services

2.80

Solid customer experience, small business platform tools, but doesn’t invite customers to bring American Express into their lives to the same degree as the leaders; results in a lower Access score.

15

Coca-Cola - History of Innovation (Atlanta)

CPG

2.70

Highly immersive on-site experience which doesn’t extend beyond a single visit.

15

Library of Congress

Non-Profit

2.70

Groundbreaking “passport” kiosks connect visitors once they get home, but the website design has not aged gracefully. An early Second Story project.

15

Patagonia

Retail

2.70

Worn Wear blog actively collects user stories, but overall web/mobile experience is just above baseline.

18

Nintendo (Wii, DS)

Consumer Electronics Manufacturers

2.60

Brand is relying on fans to create their own experience platform, and not providing enough support outside the console. Connected channels non-existent.

18

Uber

Travel and Hospitality

2.60

Elegant, on-demand experience, but just baseline in sharing, consistent with user needs. Fills a gap in the urban market, and helps the urban lifestyle.

18

Southwest Airlines

Airlines

2.60

The emotional connection (Sense), and mobile look and feel lags.

21

GoPro

Consumer Electronics Manufacturers

2.50

The product is about building personal stories. Strong sensory/visual site, but lack of mobile site/app hampers a strong, social brand. Simply not the same sophistication as some of the other efforts.

22

IBM

B2B/Technology Services

2.40

Effectively connects business areas to smarter planet. Due to scale, they struggle to create and sustain a consistent experience. Better than GE, but...

22

UPS

Shipping Provider

2.40

A fundamentally transaction-oriented story which misses opportunities for emotional depth (Sense), personalization despite its storied history.

24

Marshalls

Retail

2.30

Low-cost business model unfortunately shapes the depth and intensity of the experience.

24

Courtyard by Marriott

Travel and Hospitality

2.30

As part of the Marriott family, Courtyard’s brand doesn’t strongly connect on its own, nor does it offer significant participatory options. Functional. But not a connected experience.

26

GE

B2B/Technology Services

2.10

Initially pleasing, site is disjointed on the lower pages of funnel. Fragmented info. Good reviews.

27

Hertz

Rental Car Providers

1.70

Transactional site that fails to connect on emotional (Sense) level due to inconsistency of branding and significant usability issues.

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands

Top Three Experience Brands: Case Studies 1. Nike: Everyone’s an Athlete Through eight years of development, the Nike+ Runner platform has earned its number one spot by providing best-in-class Sense – building on Nike’s deep emotional connection with runners – combined with a top score in Access (one of only two brands to receive the top score) based on its sensors, digital platform, social integration and mobile apps.

Nike’s platform connects with customers on three levels: 1. Co-creation: Offers a platform to track data, preferred routes, competitors and supporters. 2. Making Sense of Data: Places the information collected in context, including personal goals and times. 3. Motivation: Helps drive additional results. Facebook taunts, local running forecasts, Nike+ missions.

These scores reflect the strength of analytics and route tracking in the platform, enabling a runner to benchmark themselves – not just against themselves, but also against others of similar age, gender and location. Extensive analytics track a runner’s route relative to his or her history and suggest new ones of similar length near their location. On the Nike site, color-coded heat maps show how the runner’s pace varies across the run. The combination of tracking and personalization is core to Nike’s platform and creates a virtuous circle, reinforcing engagement with it. On its website, Nike+ Missions encourages runners to challenge themselves and their fitness level, with motivating messages like “30 minutes to earn 200 NikeFuel points and overcome the harsh winds” while promoting the “Nike Pro Hyperwarm Dri-Fit Max Mock.” Social integration is very strong. The Nike+ Runner pulls in the “hero” runners, their competitors and their supporters. Through Facebook, competitors can taunt runners, while supporters reach out to encourage. In addition, email and messaging language is personalized to each runner’s location with weather forecasts (“This week’s forecast calls for a run”). The results are significant: Eleven million active Nike+ members and over 100 million social mentions in 2013. While comparisons are imperfect, Nike reaches close to as many viewers as a Super Bowl ad – every month. Among its core community, Nike does so with much greater frequency; these runners are engaging with Nike around their passion points, sharing personal performance data and their goals. Nike provides an immersive experience that is fueled by shared values between Nike and its consumers. We did not test all elements of the Nike+ experience. But it is also worth noting that Nike is one of the first brands to adapt its story system for multiple discrete customer segments. The Nike Golf 360° and Nike Hyperdunk+ Basketball Shoe and App deliver quantified, engaging platforms relevant to golfers and basketball players, respectively. In all, the Nike+ world, mobile app, sensors, social integration, and online tools create a robust experience for current and aspiring athletes. The set of tools allows consumers to co-create with the brand in multiple areas: music, running route, social support, and performance measurement. It’s easy to see why Nike knows “Everyone’s an Athlete.”

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands

2. USAA USAA offers an industry-defining mobile, Web and branch experience. It excels in Control, Continuity and Fit – receiving perfect scores (4.0) in all three categories based on the strength and integration of its mobile, tablet and Web platforms in this conservative industry. Unlike Nike, USAA received only a 2.0 in Access, a reflection of the reality of the financial services marketplace. Financial Services companies are considered a risk-adverse type of business and one that is fundamentally less “social.” Product reviews and an active Facebook account are highlights for USAA in this area. Here are other ways USAA excels: 1. Near-perfect consistency of the emotional and rational across all its platforms. USAA’s “We know what it means to serve” brand statement is powerfully coupled with American patriotic symbols. 2. Newly launched financial centers offer face-to-face service, video conferencing, check scanning, 24-hour ATM access, and a branded experience. 3. Class-leading mobile application includes check scanner, insurance claim filing, document access, and quick-login.

USAA offered class-leading mobile applications, which contributed to their top score in Control, Continuity and Fit.

4. Budgeting tools can be used by multiple family members and allow labeling of individual transactions and the setting of monthly budget targets. Visual tools motivate customers to hit their personal goals. USAA has taken other steps to improve the experience for its customers and encourage co-creation. As previously noted, USAA allows customers to post product reviews for credit card, checking and insurance products. USAA is a bank that delivers on all five experience dimensions used in this assessment, making it one of the leaders in customer service and expanding the definition of what it means to serve. 3. Disney Resorts The Walt Disney World Resort in Orlando, Fla., garnered a near-perfect (3.5) score in Sense, Control and Continuity and received a perfect score (4.0) in Fit. The final category – Access – held it back. Overall, the experience was particularly strong in both depth and number of characters, and the combination of sight, smell and sound that is Disney World. It was weakest in its integration of digital into the experience and lack of flexibility (particularly within individual attractions) offered to visitors.4 Three aspects of the Disney experience were particularly notable: Sorcerers of the Magic Kingdom, family booking and journey planning tools. 4

Since our visit, Disney has released RFID-based “Magicbands” ticketing, and an upgraded “MyDisneyExperience,” which may address some of the weaknesses noted.

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands

Sorcerers in-park interactive game features 18 portals throughout the park, with 70 distinct ‘spell’ cards. Sorcerers is location-based storytelling, but Disney’s tight control of the story cost it points in our study.

Disney has a strong friends and family booking tool, which allows collaborative planning and booking of activities. Pictured above is the tablet-based scheduling tool.

Sorcerers of the Magic Kingdom: One of a handful of interactive exhibits, Sorcerers of the Magic Kingdom was a high-profile addition in 2012. Sorcerers is an interactive game that allows players to collect their own spell cards, trade those cards with other visitors, and learn to “cast” spells at 18 interactive video kiosks throughout the park.

is sent directly to the hotel, and departure includes pre-printed boarding passes and baggage pickup from the hotel room. The room key was linked to all your personal information, but at the time wasn’t linked to a digital bracelet or RFID. The “MyDisneyExperience” account synced pre-booked information – including dining reservations and special needs – across tablet and mobile apps.

While entertaining, it lacks the co-creation and personal touch of Nike and USAA. For example, your path through the game is tightly controlled and scripted – after defeating a villain at a specific kiosk, the game tells players exactly which kiosk to visit next. Your personal choice is limited to which spells to cast and to trading these spell cards with other visitors on-site. There was no acknowledgement or integration with other digital platforms – either social networks or Disney’s own tools. Family Booking and Journey Planning Tools: Disney’s family booking tools were strong, allowing friends and families to see and book activities through the website and mobile apps. The Disney narrative extends to the arrival and departure phases of the journey to the park. Disney’s Magical Express bus service shuttles passengers to and from the Orlando airport and Disney hotel properties. Baggage

In-Park Tools: In-park tools received mixed reviews. Most of the park appears to be developed with no provision for sharing your experience digitally – which is increasingly critical for a generation raised with connectivity. Misses include a lack of digital tools for wayfinding, no alerts for upcoming dining reservations, transportation tools (wait times were included, but not transit times), and maps which didn’t supply the information needed. Reservation syncing across family and friends did not work as expected. There was no way to review rides. There was little real-time functionality on the mobile app. Overall, Disney is a world leader in brand and storytelling, but digital enhancements with more interactivity, cocreation and control need to be added to stay relevant to the next generation of digital natives.

Evaluating Real-World Experience: A Study of Leading Brands

Summary This research studied how 27 leading brands have built – or have failed to build – great experiences and the degree to which they are successful at making those experiences powerful across the five dimensions of experience. In our assessment, Sense and Access emerged as the two key criteria that differentiated the leaders from the followers. Consequently, marketers trying to optimize experience should develop stories that create deep emotional resonance for the consumer. Marketers should also build a wide set of tools that allow customers to bring the brand into their lives. We believe these two takeaways reaffirm much of the investment already seen in the marketplace, the extensive discussions of “storytelling” in marketing circles and the evolving idea of experience. Striving to be part of the 8 percent of companies that deliver a “superior experience,” as we noted in the introduction, is a laudable goal. We hope these experience dimensions can be a useful diagnostic tool to help you understand if you are a leader or a follower, and to provide guidance on where and how to improve.

Radu Bercan / Shutterstock.com