Effect of Failure of Counsel To Substitute Parties - Atty. Sarsaba Vs Fe Vda. de Te, G.R. No. 175910, July 30, 2009

 

Leeldt ie Eanfurl ie diubslf ti sujstntutl partnls - Atty. Tarsaja vs El Uma. Ml ]l, C.Z. Bi. 1318, Gufy 48, :88> Eadts7  A mldnsnib was rlbmlrlm jy tkl BFZD enbmnbc Tlrlbi ti kavl jllb nfflcaffy mns`nsslm abm irmlrnbc Casnbc ti pay kn` kns `ibltary dfan`s. Aetlr tkl Srnt ie Lxldutnib was rlturblm ubsatnsenlm, Fajir Arjntlr nssulm ab Afnas Srnt ie Lxldutnib mnrldtnbc Favarlz, Tklrnee NN ie tkl Batnibaf Fajir Zlfatnibs Di``nssnib (BFZD), ti satnsey tkl gumc`lbt awarm. Tlrlbi abm kns diubslf, pltntniblr Atty. Ziclfni L. Tarsaja, flvnlm a Eusi ]rudo wkndk at tkat tn`l was nb tkl pisslssnib ie Casnbc. ]kl trudo was sifm at pujfnd audtnib, wntk Tlrlbi applarnbc as tkl kncklst jnmmlr. @labwknfl, rlspibmlbt El Uma. ml ]l, rlprlslbtlm jy klr attirbly-nb-eadt, Eaustnbi Dastañlma, enflm wntk tkl Z]D a Di`pfanbt eir rldivlry ie `itir vlkndfl, ma`acls wntk praylr eir tkl mlfnvlry ie tkl trudo plbmlbtl fntl acanbst pltntniblr, Tlrlbi, Favarlz abm tkl BFZD. Zlspibmlbt Zlspibmlbt afflclm tkat Casnbc `lrlfy rlbtlm tkl trudo eri` klr abm snbdl blntklr skl bir klr kusjabm wlrl partnls ti tkl fajir dasl jltwllb Tlrlbi abm Casnbc, skl skiufm bit jl `aml ti abswlr eir tkl gumc`lbt awarm, `udk flss jl mlprnvlm ie tkl trudo as a dibslqulbdl dibslqulbdl ie tkl flvy nb lxldutnib. Xltntniblr enflm ab I`bnjus @itnib ti Mns`nss tkl Dasl ib tkl eiffiwnbc criubms7 (1) fado ie   gurnsmndtnib  gurnsmndtni b ivlr ibl ie tkl prnbdnpaf mlelbmabts? mlelbmabts? abm (:) ti mnsdkarcl rlspibmlbt's rlspibmlbt's attirbly-nbeadt eir fado ie flcaf plrsibafnty ti sul. Nt applarlm tkat tkl rlspibmlbt, El Uma. ml ]l, mnlm ib Aprnf 1:, :88